The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1249 Bernal Avenue - Staff ReportItem No. 3 a . Consent Calendar City of Burlingame Lot Coverage and Side and Rear Setback Variances for a Single Story Addition Address: 1249 Bernal Avenue Meeting Date: 5/10/04 Request: Lot coverage, side and rear setback variances for a single story addition at 1249 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1 (C.S. 25.28.065, C.S. 25.28.072 (c)(d)) Applicant/Property Owner: Linda Frye APN: 026-173-020 Designer: Mark Robertson Lot Area: 9,500 SF General Plan: Low density residential Zoning: R-1 CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15301 Class 1-(e) additions to existing structures provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition. Summary: The applicant is requesting lot coverage, side and rear setback variances for a 61 SF single story addition at 1249 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1. Easton Creek runs through the subject property, which is almost square, 100 feet wide and 95 feet deep. The garage is built on the left side of the creek and the existing single story house is built on the right side of the creek. There is a covered deck constructed over the creek that connects the house and the garage. Portions of the deck that are over 30" above grade and/or are covered are counted toward lot coverage. The proposed single story addition is 61.25 SF of the master bathroom along the right rear sicie of the house. Because of bridging the creek the existing site is already over on lot coverage at 41.3% (3,930 SF) where 40% (3,800 SF) is the maximum lot coverage allowed. With the proposed addition the lot coverage will increase to 42.0% (3,991 SF), which requires a lot coverage variance. The floor area will increase to 3,344 SF (0.35 FAR) where 4,140 SF (0.43 FAR) is the maximum floor area allowed. The areas below the deck (272 SF) over Easton Creek that are more than 6 feet in height, measured from grade to the underside of the deck, are counted in floor area, as well as areas under the covered portion of the deck (485 SF). The existing right side and rear setbacks are non-conforming, with the right side setback at 3' 1" where 7' is required, and the rear setback at 2' where 15' is required. The proposed single story addition will have a 4'8" right side setback and an 11' rear setback, requiring both side and rear setback variances. The proposed addition requires: • Lot coverage variance, 42% (3,991 SF) proposed where 40% (3,800 SF) is the maximum lot coverage allowed; • Side setback variance for a 4'8" right side setback where 7' is required, and 3' 1" for the existing right side setback where 7' is required; and • Rear setback variance for an 11' rear setback where 15' is required, and 2' for the existing rear setback where 15' is required. PROPOSED EXISTING ALLOWED/REQ'D SETBACKS Front: No change 12' 15' or block average Side (left) No change 2' * 7' -1- Lot coverage, sicle and rear setback variances 1249 Bernal Avenue PROPOSED EXISTING ALLOWED/REQ'D Side (right): 4'8"' 3'1" * 7' Rear: l l,z 2,* 15' LOT COVERAGE: 42% 41.3%* 40% (3,991 SF) (3,930 SF) (3,800 SF) FAR: 3,344 SF/ 3,282 SF/ 4,140 SF/ 0.35 FAR 0.34 FAR 0.43 FAR PARKING: No change 1 covered in garage 2 covered in garage (19' x 23')* (20' x 20') + 1 unc. in driveway + 1 unc. in driveway HEIGHT: 10'6" 11'6" 30' or 2'/z stories * Existing non-conforniing 1 Side setback variance for a 4'8" side setback where a 7' side setback is required; 2 Rear setback variance for 11' rear setback where 15' rear setback is required; and 3 Lot coverage variance for 42% lot coverage where 40% is the maximum allowed. Staff Comments: See attached. Planning staff would note that this application includes variances for two non-conforming setback requirements with the condition that should this property ever be re-used/constructed or a major remodel occur that all applicable regulations required in the code at that time shall be met on the site. The reason is that under current code if a house with non-conforming setbacks is demolished in a disaster or by fire it can be replaced as it was originally on the lot. Given the extent of the current exceptions to the code and since the property owner is requesting to make an addition which still does not conform to present setbacks and increases the lot coverage, which also extends the life of the substantial existing nonconformity it seems appropriate to have this property become compliant with the code should it ever need to be replaced. The applicant notes that all access to construction will be done through the right side yard and the house. There will be no construction staging on the creek side of the house. April 26, 2004 Study Meeting: On April 26, 2004, the Planning Commission reviewed the lot coverage and side and rear setback variances for a 61 SF single story addition at 1249 Bernal Avenue. The Planning Commission had no questions and voted to place this item on the consent calendar for the next meeting. No changes were requested for this proposal. Required Findings for Variance: In order to grant a variance the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d): a) there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved that do not apply generally to property in the same district; b) the granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant, and to prevent unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship; �►� Lot coverage, sirle and rear setback variances 1249 Bernal Avenue c) the granting of the application will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare or convenience; and d) that the use of the property will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses of properties in the general vicinity. Varianee Findings: The single-story extension, as proposed, will be compatible with the existing architecture and style of the house. Moreover, the single story addition is only 61 SF and is located at the rear of the property, not visible from the street. The existing right side setback is already non-conforming at 3' 1", and the proposed addition will have a side setback of 4'8", a greater side setback than the existing right side setback. The complicated design of the house does not allow for simple expansion or modification. In order to meet lot coverage requirements changes would be need to be made to the existing design of the house that would be detrimental to the architectural character of the house. Based on these findings, the project is found to be compatible with the variance criteria listed above. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action should be by resolution and include findings made for lot coverage and side and rear setback variances, and the reasons for any action should be clearly stated. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: Conditions: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped April 7, 2004, sheets 1 through 3, site plan, floor plans and elevations; 2. that there shall be no staging, or storage of construction equipment or materials along the creek side portion of the house or around the trees on the lot, all construction access shall be along the right side yard or through the house; 3. that should the existing structure, as remodeled under this permit, ever be willfully demolished or removed from the site, the lot coverage variance and side and rear setback variances shall become null and void and the site shall be developed within the lot coverage and setback regulations in effect at the time of reuse; 4. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first floor, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), converting attic space to habitable living space, moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 5. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 6. that the conditions of the City Engineer's memo dated March 22, 2004 shall be met; �c� Lot coverage, side and rear setback variunces 1249 Bernal Avenue 7. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction Plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; and 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. Catherine Barber Planner c: Mark Robertson, designer -4- Project Comments Date: 03/15/2004 To: �City Engineer ❑ Chief Building Official ❑ Fire Marshal ❑ Recycling Specialist ❑ City Arborist ❑ City Attorney From: Planning Staff Subject: Request for lot coverage, and side and rear setback variances for a first floor addition at 1249 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1, APN:026- 173-020 Staff Review: 03/22/2004 ( � A't�� w'7l:S �� ,�'s�.u� l:a��s n��rs�.✓4tia� 5��.� � �1tg C�'1�1 �t cw.l.i�YL /.--,l `�'/ `��Li/LLtit �t.i.f � �` CYs��cs�� —tD (fy✓L��,..i ��y�_ �"� �1'12ti'L�� {.� T �+i �L�� :I.:�i �iL�"l �a.�_ �. � / I i:� . �. � /��• .�/ �L� �i1.��.=��. � � �....ii __ :� � M s.(i�/a ��r..I -lvLG1S7�t�Cf74�'L �1�-�f��- Reviewed by: V, V . Date: �'�i2�� CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA April 26, 2004 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Chair Bojues called the April 26, 2004, regular meeting of the Planning Commission to order at 7:05 p.m. Present: Commissioners Auran, Bojues, Keighran, Keele, Osterling and Vistica Absent: Commissioners: Brownrigg Staff Present: City Planner, Margaret Monroe; Planner, Ruben Hurin; City Attorney, Larry Anderson; Senior Engineers, Phil Monaghan and Doug Bell III. MINUTES Commission reviewed the minutes of the April 12, 2004 regular meeting. C. Auran noted that he had abstained from the vote on item 2d, 1080 Howard Avenue. The Planning Commission were approved the minutes for the meeting as amended. IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA There were no changes to the agenda. V. FROM THE FLOOR VI. STUDY ITEMS There were no public comments. 1. 1249 BERNAL AVENUE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR LOT COVERAGE VARIANCE AND SIDE AND REAR SETBACK VARIANCES FOR A FIRST FLOOR ADDITION (LINDA FRYE, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; MARK ROBERTSON, DESIGNER) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER CP Monroe presented a summary of the staff report. The Planning Commission had no questions. This item was set for the consent calendar at the next available agenda. This item concluded at 7:08 p.m. 2. 508 PENINSULA AVENUE, ZONED R-3 — APPLICATION FOR CONDOMINIUM PERMIT AND VARIANCE FOR DELIVERY VEHICLE PARKING FOR A NEW THREE-UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM (DINO ROPALIDIS, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; JAIME RAPADAS, A/R DESIGN GROUP) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN Plr. Hurin presented a summary of the staff report. Commissioners asked: Is the shingle siding (half round siding) shown sheet A-3 drawn to scale; they appear proportionately large, please make sure they are drawn to scale; Concerned with variance request for not providing a delivery vehicle space on-site, there may be enough room at the front of the lot to provide one, 66% front landscaping now proposed when only 50% is required, the area at the front is flat, feel that both landscaping and a delivery vehicle space can be provided; City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org �`, CIT7 0 � ��E APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION �"�,,.m .,� •�'" Type of application: Design Review Conditional Use Permit Variance Special Permit Other Parcel Number: Project address: � Z �.. � � ��i /� (_ I�� % � APPLICANT Name:___LINDR I—RY�. PROPERTY OWNER Name: Address:� °� �j�RN►� �. �1Vi. , Address: City/State/Zip: 8itif21�h16i If�,rvl � . C�} . �,(r�l� City/State/Zip: �i:E �UGl9,t�1 % Phone (w): �55 — 7°% �. `'J Phone (w): � (n�: 3�c - — �'qU� (t�: 3c�- 3— v 3�7 3 (�� ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Name: �'1'1t4�'•�,L �jp��,t; -��IS— Address: `' �� L � �f�41�3g' �'i.�}(,c City/State/Zip:��fi�? I��'F�%, C1�, `�,�'Z Phone (w): �65U �J%l -1/Z�� n�:_(65a �7/ -- I �25 (fl: (�s�� 571 � I 3 �I � Please indicate with an asterisk * the contact person for this project. RECEIVED MAR 1 5 2004 AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. y' I�` Applicant's signature: :< � 1� Date: � 15 I�� I know about the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. �' Property owner's signature: Date: � � Date submitted: �� S/D�f- PCAPP.FRM �-�"� Go�� Si o�.� A�d rtar S-�-i�%�,,�� CITY OF BURLINGAME VC«(An �R S�� 'Fi� 5� t�vz>�- ac��I ��"h�c-�,�, PLANNING DEPT. City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlin�ame.org I�� I.�- I �f `� ��Y�i � I—. � L� � i°1 G I L. 1`?` � 1% E`� IVED �� .,�� ,,,�,.,. •�; � CITY OF BURLINGAME 'VARIANCE APPLICATION MAR 1 5 2004 � � CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. a. Describe the exceptional or �xtraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to your property which do not apply to other properties in this area. A C; �EEi< I`VN S TNR�vL �-r N `�H� ��v P£�€z.'�Y 11Nt� TNE (E� NOVSE boE�S nlv7 Gom�'L.y Y� S7l9NDWRJ ��T�j3r1G� i'�Ec�S, (�,% �ZC�R �'��D SGi �1c'-K = Z 1=T, ��i SIDC yARi� SC-i-�19CK = 3 FT, b. Explain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right a�d what unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship might result form the denial of the application. �'fffE (E� M ASiC-R F�i4TH Ucs w ITH�N CGi 5 r D, 5� i Bf9cl�S -� NC A�7�ii10l�1 W��tiLD l�i POSSI.C3LE WI`�'Hr�G� rq Vfar2li4NG� • c. Explain why the proposed use at the proposed [ocation will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety, general welfare or convenience. �71t� PKC1 P�cD (�I�n l�/ Oh( � 5 ► V GK.�7 I IV70 (J Gv►2N E2 �T �11E Rc�►fZ OF l'HC IiOt� c. �►N.D w i ��- dV oT ��'T�r�ZFF�L�. WI�'li t'��y7H�rJ� . d. How will the proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of the existing and potential uses on adjoiniHg properties in the general viciniry? "fli� i��Cl�'� �S� (�17D(1TI ON 1`i �l N 6t LE �avl�`i �f i F� �OOF 1'� f� ►�r'C Jf 1ri�f ��X f ST I I'� G� . FIOGS,SL ��1 . i!f� l��D rTr�r� w� �..[� r4P�cr�f� ��w► �� S , VAR.FRM City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlin�ame.orQ a. Describe the exceptional or e.ztraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to your properry which do not apply to other properties in this area. Do any condirions exist on the site which make other altematives to the variance impracricable or impossible and are also not common to other properties in the area? For example, is there a creek cutting through the property, an exceprional tree specimen, steep terrain, odd lot shape or unusual placement of existing structures? How is this property different from others in the neighborhood? b. Explain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial properry right and what unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship might result form the denial of the application. Would you be unable to build a project similar to others in the area or neighborhood without the exception? (i.e., having as much on-site parking or bedrooms?) Would you be unable to develop the site for the uses allowed without the exception? Do the requirements of the law place an unreasonable limitation or hardship on the development of the property? c. Explai� why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improveme�zts in the vicinity or to public health, safety, general welfare or convenience. How will the proposed structure or use within the structure affect neighboring properties or structures on those properties? If neighboring properties will not be affected, state why. Think about traffic, noise, lighting, paving, landscaping sunlight/shade, views from neighboring properties, ease of maintenance. Why will the structure or use within the structure not affect the public's health, safety or general welfare? Public health includes such things as sanitation (garbage), air quality, discharges into sewer and stormwater systems, water supply safety, and things which have the potential to affect public health (i.e., underground storage tanks, storage of chemicals, situarions which encourage the spread of rodents, insects or communicable diseases). Public safety. How will the structure or use within the shucture affect police or fire protection? Will alarm systems or sprinklers be installed? Could the structure or use within the structure create a nuisance or need for police services (i.e., noise, unruly gatherings, loitering, traffic) or fire services (i.e., storage or use of flammable or hazardous materials, or potenrially dangerous activities like welding, woodwork, engine removal). General welfare is a catch-all phrase meaning community good. Is the proposal consistent with the city's policy and goals for conservation and development? Is there a social benefit? Convenience. How would the proposed structure or use affect public convenience (such as access to or parking for this site or adjacent sites)? Is the proposal accessible to particular segments of the public such as the elderly or handicapped? c� How will the proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of the existing and poteHtial uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity. How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetically with existing neighborhood? If it does not affect aesthetics, state. why. If changes to the structure are proposed, was the addirion designed to match existing architecture, pattern of development on adjacent properties in the neighborhood? If a use will affect the way a neighborhood or area looks, such as a long term airport parking lot, compare your proposal to other uses in the area and explain why it fits. How does the proposed siructure compare to neighboring struchues in terms of mass or bulk? If there is no change to the structure, say so. If a new shucture is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation, etc. with other structures in the neighborhood or area. How will the structure or use within the struchue change the character of the neighborhood? Think of character as the image or tone established by size, density of development and general pattern of land use. Will there be more traffic or less parking available resulting from this use? If you don't feel the character of the neighborhood will change, state why. How will the proposed project be compatible with existing and potential uses in the general vicinity? Compaze your project with existing uses. State why you feel your project is consistent with other uses in the vicinity, and/or state why your project would be consistent with potential uses in the vicinity. VAR.FRM City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 555-7250 F(650) 696-3790 ww��.burliiies�ne.or4=_ i� I+cl �C�v ��. �i C�V F�,,-'�C�, E. (��5U�5 �� CITY � � � BURLNGAME `�`�.. , CITY;OF��iJRLINGAIViE ,:� .: � : � VA.RIANCE APPLTCATION , j:��' ;� ..b ��5.� �� . RECEIVED MAR 1 5 2004 CITY OF BURLINGAME The Planning Commission is required by law to make tiridings as defined by the City's OrdinLai N N I N G D E PT. (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Plannirl� Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your reyuest. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these c�uestions. a. Describe tlie exceptio�zal or extraordinary circuinsta�rces or conditio�is applicable to3�oi�r propert,y� ►v/tich do �iot apply to otlier properties in t/iis area. � cr�EK i�VNS TfiRUGt�-iH "T'HE� �av�Ty B�sE�� ,rvc� n�� v-r iN �v rwo. 'THE ��,4c-;E w�s �1,�►c�D o,v orv� rfia,vic ANi� i HE I-10V5� W�°t5 t�u4�:�D DN '7HE OTHEf'� 4 C;ONNEc�ll�3�'j I}'fE I-fOL�(,SE � Elf`�'%i(�E /S A Lr4FZCi� �2 � 5a 1=, L7cGIL ., I It�S � DEG� i'Vl"f'S �TFt� AU�'I4v l.1JT G�l�i . OF �HC L(=i Si`RVC7(l� WELL. OYL�f` I,-�%/ b. Explain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and e�ijoyment of cr substantial property right and what unreasonab[e property loss or unnecessar}� hardship mig/it result forni the deitial of tlie applicatioit. N4 ADS%I�T�Ut�I '7�� %TU�2E �55i8i.C— iN/, G6LRi"�N'T' LCT� <:VEi. CE� i'i'1 v'iP., .� 1 I'} IS �70CI 5rV1A L.l_. � GWn�d" G X PAND (►U � Ci 110175 (r t�uc� To it►�u., wA�S. NO �r�PROU�v►EN'S' ��.rsl�S�E Wi�HOl1�i p 5�n a� �vw�P - v c,�-T. _, `.: v r� � a c� c:E. ��iv►� Es N�c;�—�5�9 �'. c. Explain rt�l�}� tlie proposed use at t/�e proposell �OCllllOil will itot be detri�neiita/ ur i�ijurious to property or irrip�•oveme�zts in the viciiiih� or to piiGlic health, safety, gen��rrr! welfare or convenience. rFt� P� �vS �� .i� t�r, r�,'�s � S 7vl,c%��D i ru5r� A c�r�n;e,� I�' � r{�C- RGw sZ. aF tJ�! � f-1�vt5 �E � w> u_ �o`T r�c�2.r=� W i'�-� �cvY i Fti N�i o cl. flow will the p►�oposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, n:uss, bulk aitd character of the existi�ig aiid potential uses oia adjoining properties iii the generul viciniry,? � ► H c '��.7t��s �� +DD�Q"i�,n] , � A �lr�� r..� ��7' w/� r9 ;-tt4 i �� "ro Wlr4`"Crol 'i"i�E� [�►Sh'/Nr� ►�Ol�t�c �i�h') , T�tc �1�� N W i t.t_ f4��?G4�. ��cA � �Ess , � ni: rizn� �r`, ciTr o� CITY OF BURLINGAME eu�euH w�E PLANNING DEPARTMENT rtu, o�, ,, 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 �b,..�„ ��•�'� TEL: (650) 558-7250 Site: 1249 BERNAL AVENUE Application for lot coverage variance and side and rear setback variances for a first floor pV BLIC H EARING addition at: 1249 BERNAL AVENUE, zoned NOTICE R-1. (APN: 026-173-020). The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on Monday, May 10, 2004 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. Mailed: April 30, 2004 (Please refer to other side) CITY OF B URLINGAME A copy of the a to the meeting Burlingame, Cal be reviewed prior Primrose Road, If you cha raising on described at or prior Property c tenants at 558-7250. Margaret Nl� City Planner be limited to iblic hearing, ;d to the city ming their call (650) (Please refer to other side) RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, LOT COVERAGE AND REAR AND SIDE S ETBACK VARAINCES RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for a lot coverage and rear and side setback variances for a sin le story addition at 1249 Bernal Avenue, zoned R- 1, Linda D. Frve propertv owner, APN: 026-173-020; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on Mav 10, 2004, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19. Section: 15301 Class 1-(e) additions to existing structures provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the stnzctures before the addition. 2. Said lot coverage, rear and side setback variance are approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such variances are set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10`h day of May 2004, by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for categorical exemption, lot coverage and rear and side setback variances. 1249 Bernal Avenue effective May 20, 2004 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped Apri17, 2004, sheets 1 through 3, site plan, floor plans and elevations; 2. that there shall be no staging, or storage of construction equipment or materials along the creek side portion of the house or around the trees on the lot, all construction access shall be along the right side yard or through the house; 3. that should the existing structure, as remodeled under this permit, ever be willfully demolished or removed from the site, the lot coverage variance and side and rear setback variances shall become null and void and the site shall be developed within the lot coverage and setback regulations in effect at the time of reuse; 4. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first floor, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), converting attic space to habitable living space, moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 5. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 6. that the conditions of the City Engineer's memo dated March 22, 2004 shall be met; 7. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction Plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 8. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; and 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. . _ �'•�,� � f`:,r`:��.74 t � ; �,� ;.� -- ,y�� : _. ti;.�. ✓- - / .� j , •+.� �r - .,� �-3+�� t' 4 > �, . . . '.�3.��' � r�-� ,'� .' ��(-,"�, y � . �' ` - �i,pa� }a � �� fi� - `�� ti� .,� s� � � i;y „� � �� ' ' �� ' ' : .a; _. ..F:�".1 ,< : � ,� . , . + .� �� "�►�y�.��t� ��?� .. �`'� �� t�l �, �yT lS.� i t w6a * �� '.� • f'`''"z' i'+�.a . `�. ��..�� , s..'?'• {s� � � . t3 � _ � . ., ' _-t -� . j �~" A � �� `K.'` � h ~�_ S�C. `i� i� �� • �� ' ...+� �j �� ,� � i, ' .r►� �� r r * �11 . s" s� ' t�,� I (�1,�, � �' � �� ! .'r4 _ f� N -4 � . .�� ^ , .. �\ i�y`� . . . . � 1 \ . .�_}t +� w.�t .. r. T � .. �� -'_ , f �� :�i' `� � � 4� . y��^ �t I� y �f7._,.�. �{'�-. < „� �4i Y ,�� .� +'� ' \ � i ,� :i7 .h'� . : \ ;��+ �� . . ? ✓'-o'_ � �.. ... �`� . ' +��: � " ,i��o'�".r'�' ,. .f , _ .\, r�X?i;�",, ,�� ` � � � � .�••' �� .; �"' ' �i , _ ,�. � . , f�, , \ ' � ,.rw �� n . � i�. . � L� c'' 1� , J �.l .:. .M.: . , ' }�+' � t'2 Lr � -i • �� i J � % - r . .. .ar �• ��` . . � . � � �l � � �� ,�r'' . � . _ 'r• . -- � . � � �+� �' � --' � _ , �. � . � ` R ' s : _!'► � d � -a � � � K y � ° g�! . �.. � _ ' � ,:. _ °e', :� � �•`_h '��"'°'� �•��t � � - � �,� ' i �; �7 . , � . %,�. � 'z `� �. � �j �Y s¢_Y . �_4 . . :�.�" ,, � � � :�� . �±.. � u�e '��I�� ' .• - -y _ Y � ,t '�' •S � ` 4 z �? M�y,. r,.r., 5.. �,�iie . � .. �t , ' �� . . 1y, - w '=s �+ . _ , ; � .�: a' . � • ��• � � �-. �. � . ��f . , % __-? � P �S L � �l � J ' . �r-�' ,t .. � .., i F i � r 4 . �l r � "' � i ' � � � , 4' - �js tl` Q � � � � � � r ` �� . . !, � t ,V� � 4 !�',�� .�"�� Y X�}�-V { �..r.�P .. �` � • �'� � t J� � �: '+: �' - IC �:Ki "�i 1 .�; �� ` � .... '� �R. /. � � • . � � • � , � /�� ' . f- �,.�, x ii ;fr fi a �,1 � ��' �. � +'� ! .. � ... J�� '',� �s :-.� i$�qk : }�, '� . 'i�! t � Ut + �' y�� f, � : :j ny'� ,� �ri . .S i : � > ��7 � �� . f �' ar �'� � vt��.� � •7 i � �'� i � f,'+ ."� tt �,�� ,�� i � . "g.'� � ,6{4 t�- , � � s• J �� „ ` _ -, ' z'}I A � '� ` ��'•� r/ � � 9 (� ��`6�Ye h �.♦ �� t. 1( — � 'f�, � �� '�� , � a� `�` ./� � � � • 'r a � � a '� •- �" • "�? , � � T?� ;h�� }�r'K - . . . ` "r; .. , ti� , . ; l'' � _ �� '�`r,x �� j !' + T 3� � g �� , Y j,,�.1 •r� "+.�� ' .ra P� I }F�.� � ��. � �. ..;� .. '.wi � �{ � i � - ` � '+ . , . � L � �- �t�.4 ,�. ,.�r. .� `� ,r.- � ` � . - � ��►� , • �' : �'AO°`i� f"+ ,�ri � �' , `� � ' �►�` ,, �;-� �,n ;�� . ,� �.. : '` y� �_� / � " - :�,. , , � � r'� '� �� , � � � � • . - #a � �� T r <-� a;;�: . ,��t ;f, � � �'«; '�, � ;.� � � � .. _ pr J ` 4• �� - �� j .rM `C , , .,. , . . . . . - 7 ,• . . . � � � �a �: '�? .� � _/' � - _ ♦ .. � � y � �"�'�� . �:,. ` � �.. � �. rV �• ' � �� y w . .. �� j. . ' t'�� ` �� l . .� T � v � � .�P� � '�, r . . , .; r . . . . �• . s , . . g v � , � � �Y� �� y .. � � r � / �:' ` � l � , �r tf • ��j('�� !� " �� . • . � r.. � _ � : e� , r .. � . . _ , , •/ � r �" � •. . i. ; , ,y. �`` � � �s d► ' ,� �'+,yt, i.""".' `: � _ • e,Ar �J •4 fF � � �� Cfi�'t��'� , h`. + , � .{�' �. ,��i% � � ��i. �'� . ; ... . � �•.. ✓ � � � . � ... < � , . . � ' � -�/Y �1.� � � , • ry,` , r� «.J - _�.» � . i 't�1> . .=�� f �"� '"� � "'; . � a � . � ti ° '. �� ; 1 .. .: "Y'� X � • w . �. d � _ -��., " �• ,. .r•- ' . 7 �,� � �' .3.� � .� ; r . y � t ra . . �. . ..�, . � / . • ��+- � � j��,\ � �'.' � � � . � �"i 4/'�� ^� ..� �� ,��`#'� ' • � ', ` } �•' , l. '�.., • > �} "rp� � \ ' �� i + � _.. / i. . � .} ��' �i„�.+ � �FN'r_ � ' .i� ��t''� � , . � " . . � . �'k ��.!� � �. '��+� � '� :. � .,.,4y�i. : ' C,;i�t�t \ � �`1 '�� +��rrVR � � • r :'' :, �,'�� 2 , � r' I�y+ % � ��•' ' � , � . - . ' � � ',. r gr � : r � N � •=. � ..�, x ., ,�` �'.��: f #.. �.. ,• ,��w �i � �� ``• •"'. � � >, � .� f' :r_. - i' � �.�� a� -'4. �; ... � , . ,' . / � �' t �, i � � � � � •. y ��* - t � �t •' ! ^ �� ' ,' • �t �' ' �' ,'� � � � � � �A. �� "-�'''�, � '� J�. 1 � � - �� "- ��ts • � .. � �� _ � ��, _ . N �� '� � � �� .�`� =5� i -k-� s. i` i � �; L'� �y �4 1 .4?, ,S, t�, Y{ i . -,, •_ .., , � � ,�`�^ . � ; �.c . �� `� . � . . . x„� ..,. q . �r � z � �� ,, +�:,M� ` k � • �� Y {p. � d�Mr , ��. �• :+�` 1� � t � � , �'�l ''�' , ,� '-� .`-. + `i-. , % �� .. � � Y'T't . . a. 8:': � • 1 . �i �y�.� �.+� Y� �. � ''. '+�',' 4} �.` r r � �'7 ✓ ,.� 1`� �� `�$w4- �"` t x r � tii� i'T \7 �� .�. ,�+ ` �yS,.-�� . � � \ �ti f"� ,T!`w. � r. ` _-i w, .y . � JrtYy�♦ - ,� - n �. %� ' ` �"C m ' ' + . . � Y. , r " . +� .' � ;�!i��' �J�"' d'W. \ S '�t �� . a; l � . :. ar , n�, , F �; y i � ::.,r � , s''� ��• r ^� � z y. � !•� . � � >� i �',� � � '. �•. . . �+ .' ..'� � �� r' ��' ��' • �� . �il� . ti! °�. .�` x:� 4 6 �.• . - , ' • , � C � , }''. _ , , _ " ..x f� :€ "% , � � vx�'b� . T �r.: � C / jTj ;� ` '�',"`�� , tii r F+ . � � �'�_ � �N�"..� � �� p, � r ± r _ . , - .._ _ , _ . �.. 4 _ �'i'-- � +r ��:, � � y'�. \' �� vx v"S`{ � . ��`� �, � y� . � . . . m . , � �. .. � .., . . , . , " � ,� 1A, y�, , � • �� • � - � ' '- "� � , �` - �� '' - • - . ti- .. �.. , . •. *r 'q,k t , "'� y .,. �' � L �'+�.. �' �% . �s_. rs r _ �i�".. . .. � �..+ j�. ,'�MO��