The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11 East Carol Avenue - Staff Reporti��. "�� _, �. .�. �;,. �; � ' �r�;:; `:�..�....: CITY OF BURLINGAME Community Development Department MEMORANDUM DATE: July 25, 2016 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Erika Lewit, Senior Planner Director's Report Meeting Date: July 25, 2016 SUBJECT: FYI — REVIEW OF THE COMMISSION'S REQUESTED CHANGE TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DESIGN REVIEW PROJECT AT 11 E. CAROL AVENUE, ZONED R-1. Summary: An application for a Negative Declaration and Design Review for first and second story additions to an existing single family dwelling at 11 E. Carol Avenue, zoned R-1, was approved by the Planning Commission on March 28, 2016 (see attached March 28, 2016, Regular Action Planning Commission Meeting Minutes). A building permit has not yet been issued. At the action hearing, the Planning Commission voted to approve the project with the following amended condition: 1. that Sheet A3.0 (revised) shall be submitted to the Planning Commission as an FYI to show the second story window centered under the gable ridge; The architect submitted a revised front elevation and a letter of explanation, date stamped July 13, 2016, to show the requested revision. ` Other than the change requested by the Commission, there are. no other changes proposed to the design of the house. If the Commission feels there is a need for more study, this item may be placed on an action calendar for a second review and/or public hearing with direction to the applicant. Erika Lewit Senior Planner Attachments: Explanation letter submitted by the designer, dated July 13, 2016 March 28, 2016 Planning Commission Minutes Originally approved and revised sheet A3.0 �� IF��M[ + �1�T]E 3841 24`h Street, #A 12098 Hwy. 42 San Francisco, Calif. 94114 Ellison Bay, Wisco. 54210 P + a�s).819.0304 E + tim@formonedesign.com '�'�$AI�1��'�'f��. �'O'�M[ To: Planning City of Burlingame Subject: 11 East Carol Ave. FYI From: Tim Raduenz Date Sent: 07_12 16 Number of Pages 1 Planninq Review RFI: We have made the corrections to get the bedroom windows to match up on the new roof ridge line. To that end we believe we have addressed the items of the board and presented an approvable set of drawings for the Commission, thank you for your time and consideration moving forward. RECE11iF� JUL 1 3 2016 CITY OF BURLINGAME CDD-PtANNlNG DIV. Best, Tim Raduenz — CGBP � Build It GREEN�M MEMBER ��M +�N� • Design & Planning • 3841 24th Street, #A • San Francisco • CA • 94114 • ais) 819.0304 • tim@formonedesign.com Planning Commission Meeting Minutes March 28, 2016 Vice-Chair Loftis opened the public hearing. Anthony Ho represented the applicant. Commission questions: > What are the intentions with the landscaping on the affe side of the home? (Ho - there will be a fence along fhis side of the site.) Public Comments: There were no public comments. Vice-Chair Loftis closed the p ic hearing. Commission discus � n: > Fee/s e fireplace venting will be mitigated well. Co issioner Gaul made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Bandrapalli, to approve the application. The motion carried by the following vote: b. 11 East Carol Avenue, zoned R-1 - Application for a Negative Declaration and Design Review for first and second story additions to an existing single family dwelling (Tim Raduenz, Form + One Design, applicant and designer; Patrick and Brittney Aitken, property owners) (56 noticed) Staff Contact: Erika Lewit All Commissioners had visited the property. Commissioner Bandrapalli met with the neighbor at 19 Carol Avenue. Community Development Director Meeker presented an overview of the staff report. Vice-Chair Loftis indicated that he had reviewed the recording from the design review study meeting on February 22, 2016, though he wasn't presenf af that meeting. Questions of staff.� There were no questions of staff. Vice-Chair Loftis opened the public hearing. Tim Raduenz represented the applicant. Commission questions: > Suggested centering the front window on the ridge rather than on the front door e/ement. The current placemenf appears awkward, but not a deal breaker. (Raduenz - would be open to coming back to the Commission with an FYI if the Commission directed restoring the original window design.) Public commenfs: There were no public comments. Vice-Chair Loftis closed the public hearing. Commission discussion: City of Burlingame Page 2 Piinted on 7/14/2018 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes March 28, 2016 > Project has improved since last review. Likes the windows better now. > The changes that have been made look good. > Would like to see an FYI submitted wifh the window centered. Commissioner Sargent made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Bandrapalli, to approve the application and adopt the negative declaration with the added condition that the placement of the front window, centering it with the ridge, be submitted as an FYI. Vice-Chair Loftis asked for a voice vote, and the motion carried by the following vote: c. 1709 Ray Drive, zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review Amendment for changes to a previously approved new, two-story single family dwelling (Grace Sun, applicant and property owner; Chu Design Associates Inc.) (61 noticed) Staff Contact: Ru n Hurin All Commissioners had visited the property. Commissioner Sargent met with the applicant d general contractor. Community Development Director Meeker presented an overview of the staff report. Questions of staff.� There were no questions of staff. Vice-Chair Loftis opened the public hearing. Grace Sun represented the applicant. Commission questions: > Why was the post design changed? Thought that fo r, four-by-four posts were fhe original post design. (Sun - the wood design color would not match the stucco; wanted the co/ors to match so stucco was se/ected.) > Has a real problem with all of the changes particularly since fhey were all made without approaching fhe Commission first. Doesn't be ' ve the project would have been approved as constructed. The Commission's approval has no alue if projects are not built according to the approved plans. Maintain high quality design with use o quality materials. Is disappointed with the results in this case. > Doesn't believe that the window grid design would have been approved; a lof of windows were installed that were not as approved. M ntins are flat against the glass. (Sun - approached the Planning Division with the change and was uggested a trial applying the muntin bars. The current window design was presented when orde ng the windows. Didn't know the difference.) Wasn't the original designer involved in the decision? un - no.) > Has a real problem sup orting the changes that have been made; has a tendency to not approve the changes and require the roject to be built as approved. > The front porch col ns are not as approved; who had control of the project? (Sun - is the property owner, but doesn't un rstand much about the construction.) > Does the app � ant intend to live in the home? (Sun - originally had planned to live there, but the family circumsta es have changed.) > Referenc letter from neighbor. Noted the comments regarding two sets of security floodlights . The Munic� al Code does not permit light to shine off of the property. (Kane - verified that the lights could be ubject to code enforcement.) Pub � comments: here were no public comments. City of Burlingame Page 3 Printed on 7H4/2018 i i i �o�.o� D� � .zb.� �ia•_ , O 3-0�-_F 9 E,___� �_B 6' �go � o� ��3-{'—_i_ � t � 0 8 �� a fi�� ; Q 1� �° � g I I R�> I �yRm� g � o� _ -�� — -- - —��—�a. �— a i �� ,� � �--- rt /,; i —� - m -- - -`� ik -- � �- I� < i � _ �� L.. ° �_ -.-... '------ ��- � � �� ' , "� � I �� { s ' �r= _�V � h � � � III � I� � I 3 ba��l!�� _ , � � � ' � �� I � IY _ _� ,, � `� � �II � !� � � � `\ � � �� !� �� i � ' I � � II — � i� — �� — f � �0 — — , _. � , , __ _-- � � � � �s , o, - , � I'' ,f III II�I � '� `;'N � � i � �1 � � � I� ��°� � �� I '"'"'" � FEYE '3 L b �- apu� x - E£ o8m �� ______�- � ss2 C 4' / �4i k�' of � °5a� ` � 6fi�5 y ��i �i��€. =3�� 7=� 90 6 �m ' � ,F, /(a � 4 I - . I � ; N. r t _____ __ ._�.-- % ' —<_-0• __-_--_� � _ - _ to W � /� l . ___ __ . ._-_ _.- . _�0.0' - --_ �- .._ _� 1 +16L1�8� __- _ I_ ' � �''��r -8 6• —i_ II � fi � fifi fi � � � ;^ ae � � � �� ', A I- I--_„.o• _� � � �� Q '3� E =EFb I � �3 `oE � �ae o � ~os= '� �� s rn s�s m � ;� �; ; e �� n � � � � � � e �� I I \\\`- ^ � -�---- � II II ,�—'• 6�1 -__-__ II - � � ��_�_ �� I �d I � I \ ' II I � � �� "' � � � � ` I �� i fl i� ii i� I ul � i. 'I,:, I � � dI - -� I �Ii�l I =�ii�� I� �yil� -(-- j i ° I�� I��, I�I ,. �� I�'- � «-��ril r , __,� � � � �� III '` � J � � > � I� �-_ � I II�, I � { �� I��'�= - � a,R r �] �� I 31 I I I`., I__1._'� IIII� ti� W.fL . � ; 4 i,� ��pjt�i _ � I;:�I I � ; �, 'Ilil l' �_� i� � I �__ ,'I I f"� , �� , � �� , i � i� d` ��i `ii�-�� 41� �� e � � _�_ �� „—,� F� �� `'------ �s�l�. -_�— ? �— � ` : � � � -��' � � � -- --� . r ,—,.-0� _��----� � i�� ASBuilt+proposedElevanons ,r� q a- L W ' M:r. * Mrs. Patrick AitKen �� ., ' 11 East Cazol Avc. p , ��•�•.��. E O �urlingame, CA 9401C i� R'; �' �� L „�.��.... , I��,,,.,.,..n,,...1��... o...-�. ��.-._. _-.__-�� r APN rf: 0?8-302-]60 _ 3o-a•_� _ _ r � --- - - -- --- — .z� b,�a �I D �o� o�� ,_ � I W � vl{ F B I'I` 6 3 � fi I�, > R II a p I 5- g I I F IP Ip ' I T p m ; _ — �`�° � � �� n � � I�-_Ig -. .-T�- -�-� rn � ��-- � I � --� --- � � �i i o _ i , �; � ' il _ rt ' �' �t_ � :I� � Ip�—� n I' j!'� � = � � � 'a_ _ II �� -4 - � � ', � � li- - �. � Ii 'i , � k i�—'� -_�� li , � _ „ ,} - - I�', i��-= � -� ` -� `l i r ( I' " f f �� + � �� , �� I �'' p� r�' ��. I � , � �, _ � ;, � ,�� E =, �� a �� t��1 i� #�� i � ._ — ��+ _� ,��. � ,�� j�_�� _ �� - � � ,� F�f � � �� F_F ��_ �� _- � , r - II I � �- - ,_, _ � _Fi- �f " � � �� / �� _% ,: � i � , �,� � -- ��Q�� =o / I � f"o i o��p� �� / `� s �� J\ _ — _. _--J=I—' � �_'—' �o�� _I4'.0" � � _.—___ �0'-0'_ _. .. _._.. . '. __.- _- . r D ---_�3� -- --- i -- In � 1�_ 9 0' ]' 1 I ! W rr 4:? _ —r � t � 1�--- -� fi �g � � � � i i i i� i� '� ; � Q I_l_ __„_.o- -- I�-r- �� ' i rn -- £ m--��--- i�-� N o � ° � 4, ° ,o<<�.� < 3� � � \ fl � � o' �I, 'I � � , , \ pI� i � I �� , � _ __ ___ _ � I ' " }�� - I� � I, r�� r E I i I � �� \� '�I r rF� c I� li r. i i �i � - �t- I � r I — � �1�s I E t' � � ��-_ � � '� � - �--- � �� '� � � � � � � 1� � I��t � ��r� I I'' I I'I'j> j �� I��I �I �%- ��I � _ -- }�T � I I � �Lr j - — ._ _ I � �-1 � �� r / -,-�� ---- - . �, 1 -____ __�` ;l � / ;N. — - ��.-0_—= L -I— - — - ,a—� PLANFING SET �� °��— � _ �K�� , T , _� 00 � I� I� � � � � ��,_ � _ �/ ,. .� - �.;, � � � I� � ' � ,� > .,,,� � - �_ _ - w � �E � � ; � _�W.E _ � ,�=�ff� e ,. � „�.� - � - - � - � �� Aru,` , � , � _ •:T — i_ �. yr��T � ❑ �n o �'�; . ,% o " n '__________'________________________________________ _______ ___ __ " _ _ " _ _ _ ' _ �' � � n _ __________________� _ _ n�a , � � � ' �roc ____ __'""______ _ ____________ '_____ � — ' ' � ��- � , � w�a- � �_ """____________________________�_________.____.__t__________ _T__ "______"__""_ ____ "__.." ecKs wutur �"_.____ ______________"__ __` _�"__ ____ _ ______"_"_"___________ ___ _' . .] '- I I \ S�ucwfn. cvnwi5r�a T___________ �_ ____ i_ H - I "`Kx °�°"` I I m I I I I I M[a.voo. � 1 I I � I I .' L_______________J L_______________J As Built Front Elevation � As Built Rear Elevation � . - s�ei.�: �.a'-r.o.. .a3o _ s<.i��. �ia�-r-�• .n3.o = oomm.c�ecx,uw� ________'___' ' ��xv.so '—___ pp ' � i�� .eu�,o„�.��in T ��'.s�—"'_ ______ � a , 3' 8 m�.Kr.�:,.u� I� �M's°oo`r:.,,a.�,c�lEp er �—�=�---�� ,aw. � $,�.A"— , w � , .> � ��° ��o��n�, E,�, . ,,� M..�E i E�,�� , �� . ,..� , , � o �� ' ' �- � � � - �:^r°�.�o�o ` , � � � \ �5, F � � � � e5"�- - 93• � t` �o.�wicNe \' � aJ. �3 � 3-] �•./ form+one ' u : m _n � N m �� N � \ T l � _ _ .. \\ � %C' "_ _ . , . � - i � O � � - — I'' t_'_' � _ ' i . � - b I F� �. � - — � ' _ Id " - al w000 000v - I ' ^� � � / s.i�G �� I _ � . Wo Feucoows � � � LJ - �' Q . 0 3 1 I - I f � . I q y > m 4'lll ° ~ 4 u _ �ei.aoo ', � � c' � i / ° �'°'`n ` `-- . $-�` � - a u E T — i : o ` ifl.Pa E PT / - IEI oarv[.vnr - — ' n _`_"""- _ __ _ _____'_________________ __________'_ _______ __ _ _ _______ ______ _ : �ioc � - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 0 � � � . , n �r¢ � � �. � H �e � ' ' $. e1r _ ` � . . `_ ._ _ __ _ _- ___'_- - ____'_-_"_- ___ - __ _ "_._ i_ _ _ . � . t� y +� '. - ___ _� __"_'_"______________� _� r E �a .� � . ' IneocRwuxw _ ____ _________"___""__ �_ __ - '_ `_ _____- _�- _- ________ __ _- _'_'________�__� £ m ' INI cnnw �saF I I I i 000r[ra . ,� , I�ce�wvnaven �oru*w�lfl V� j �� ' I I I � - I . L_-____-___LI_M[d_�--__-___-_-J EIUSiING ADOIiION Proposed Front Elevation � Proposed Rear Elevation �"� ��1 C'\, �� , A3.� - s�,ie: va,=,.-0.. .+30 _ �� in nvo snNe�. calc: �L,Oclails `` � JUL 1 3 2016 ��-=� i r � s�� , � a �� ` ,, .., � �`e ii , v-�� .� C sr CITY OF BURLINGAME CDD-PI�,NNING DIV.