The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11 East Carol Avenue - Staff Report. i . dy6t , � ,. ; � � , '� i� �� .�'u �� a, �� , i�l i� g �� i �� . � � � i'ka �'v4 �. . � � d � � '� ; p �va� �`G',•,. . � � ��' � a� . „ ��-°''° v � :, � � -�`� � u `�"� �" � ., ;..9� � -�-a.. `^ � E '✓ ; �� ... ��"� J` � �^� re . . 5�.�;. ��' '�� r.,� �,,,; '�aw7 :. � � � �.. R, � . �. � , W � �af� ��+'`�� -� .-�"��'��+ �'�� r '�`� , �'�'� :. ♦ � �►�� r � ��.� � � �`� ` �i � � - ��N� °-� �� ° �,,g�, '�'�" � � �� `� ;� � � �, !� � ;+F��►.. �.. � `' ^±�; <� � ^�.. -. � _�,� < _ , , - �t�� ,�. .� . � � "' � :� {�' ,.f '�� , , n ��'g�a� m�_ ��i� � � � •�. ,� � � � ,• a � �'�, "'� ��i � � — �.�" �,. '�p � �"+' '� � � ,} r r � � � ^ � �� F u� � R+k,s�,�t� 5"3'1y�°� < / � �"�S". x i i t4 � �` a ; +�s f S ��w ,a . �' � _.� �sl. 4�'w:,��et � _ ��L. � ► �� . �'� `"��e��,+ i '�' '��. q r„ ��.� ' Y � � . u �r � . �r� ,�f� � �,yf � `� "'�. ..,V Y,' � �.. y�� ' t' �� ' a ". � � '� 'S' ' � � "��r" � `� " t:- 3 � „'� � � �L 5�, �'` �,�,�i`' . %" . , . t i +� ��A . L i . � � � .ri } t � r .. � F ,�� 1, . � . ;. �. �. '�,�" '� � �.�� : } ,, r �s`m � `� . '�� „� . ,° ' ;�n =,.� :► r�, � � �y' t�� ,�tt s"," � ; ,� �'�^ ", . . *'r. � �%,�� . � �,� � 1 �, � �� y�`:� i@"� �i � >�,�° ` ,� � `� � �' '* , �,m � ""� x . F y � " 9 , . d . , "'�'� � a . . ., „' � �'f • '�`y' �.M�M . - ��d 4 , � s u ;ia ' � � '., z. ",, � ,_ , . . _;,�.,: , P .,� , � . - � . w `- q ,� , 0. . p . ao ,xiq �t � � urv�`• +... � , 3, 4' ay„ . � vF M« � j . � o a ��N � �an ? l� X�" , _rie« � . .. y;� '� �'� ,, �mw � �ddr�¢a� * .� ,��: . . . ' rtT� '�'�'f' � ��n�nedi � a- �.. '' � ' e'�,'e. ' ir�^`�.. : - t�i u�� r m�„ �., . �k d�r,� = n � � � � ' � .�� rim r � , � � � � . �, , ia, �� . �� « w� � .�,�G � a, <�,,.; � , . . ,��,. , � ._ ..... .� �..... . � .. � ..::��. . -� � rtii . ,� . �.�. ,. ��kz '. . ..., � � " ��k �;o. . City of Burlingame Negative Declaration and Design Review Address: 11 East Carol Avenue Item No. 8b Regular Action Meeting Date: March 28, 2016 Request: Application for Negative Declaration and Design Review for first and second story additions to an existing single family dwelling. Applicant and Designer): Tim Raduenz, Form + One Design Property Owners: Patrick and Brittney Atiken General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 028-302-160 Lot Area: 6,000 SF Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review: The subject property is located within the Glenwood Park subdivision. Based upon documents that were submitted to the Planning Division by a Burlingame property owner in 2009, it was indicated that the entire Burlingame Park No. 2, Burlingame Park No. 3, Burlingame Heights, and Glenwood Park subdivisions may have historical characteristics that would indicate that properties within this area could be potentially eligible for listing on the National or California Register of Historical Places. Therefore, for any property located within these subdivisions, a Historic Resource Evaluation must be prepared prior to any significant development project being proposed to assess whether the existing structure(s) could be potentially eligible for listing on the National or California Register of Historical Places. A Historic Resource Evaluation was prepared for this property by Page & Turnbull, Inc., dated December 15, 2015. The results of the evaluation concluded that 11 East Carol is not eligible for individual listing on the California Register of Historical Resources under any criteria. Planning Staff prepared an Initial Study and Negative Declaration to support the findings of the Historic Resource Evaluation prior to the Planning Commission Action Hearing for this project. Because there was a potential impact on historic resources, an Initial Study was prepared for the project. Based on the analysis by Page and Turnbull, it was determined that there would be no adverse environmental impacts, and a Negative Declaration has been prepared (see attached ND-589-P). The purpose of the present review is to hold a public hearing and evaluate that this conclusion, based on the initial study, facts in the Negative Declaration, public comments and testimony received at the hearing, and Planning Commission observation and experience, are consistent with the finding of no significant environmental impact. Project Description: The subject property is an interior lot that has an existing two-story single family dwelling and a detached 2-car garage at the rear, right corner of the site. The subject property is zoned R-1 and the properties to the rear, facing EI Camino Real, are zoned R-3 and are developed with multifamily dwellings. The applicant proposes a first floor addition at the rear of the existing house and to construct a larger second story. The below-grade utility area will also be enlarged, but this area is not finished space and the ceiling height is less than 5'-11" so it is not included in FAR. The total proposed floor area is 3,390 SF (0.565 FAR), where 3,420 SF (0.57 FAR) is the maximum allowed (including lower level/utility room and covered porch exemptions). This proposed project is within 1% of the maximum allowable FAR. The existing detached garage will not be altered. There is one covered parking space (9' x 18') in the carport space at the left side and one covered parking space (9' x 18') in the garage at the right side. There is an additional uncovered parking space in the driveway leading to the garage. The existing house has 4 bedrooms and with the additions, the number of bedrooms on site will increase to 6. The 3 existing parking spaces meet the code requirement for a 6-bedroom house. The existing driveway is non-conforming in width (8'-0" existing to the front entry steps where 9'-6" required), but the proposed construction does not further impact the existing driveway dimensions. There is one protected size Redwood tree at the rear, left corner of the site. This tree is proposed to remain and construction will be 25 feet from its base. Condition of Approval #1 requires that standard tree protection Negative Declaration and Design Review 11 East Carol Avenue measures be installed and inspected by the City Arborist prior to any demolition or construction on the site. To comply with code requirements to access parking spaces, the existing tree adjacent to the rear, right side of the house will be removed and the lawn behind the carport parking space will be paved to provide access to that covered parking space. The applicant will provide two landscape trees in the front yard to meet minimum landscaping requirements and an additional landscape tree is proposed in the rear yard. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following applications: ■ Negative Declaration, a determination that there are no significant environmental effects as a result of this project; and ■ Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single-family dwelling (C.S. 25.57.010 (a) (2)). 11 East Carol Avenue Lot Area: 6,000 SF Plans date stam ed: Februa 8, 2016, Revised EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQ'D SETBACKS ; Front (1st flr): 21'-5" No change 19'-11" (block average) i2ndf/rI._.�......; ...................................................._35''��..................... _33'.'8".................. ............................: 20'-0,� , .................................................................'...........' .......................................................... Side (left): 2'-6" ' 6'-1 " 4 -0 �right)�......: ........................ 9'-6"... _No _cha_nge ..................................;.. . 4,_�„ Rear (1st flr): : 46'-6" 42'-6" 15'-0" (2nd flr,i.�. i _56''_�_�, ; _45'-0" ; 20'-0�� ; . . ................................................................................................................................ Lot Coverage: 1,973 SF 2,138 SF 2,400SF 33% 36% 40% FAR: 2,732 SF 3,390 SF 3,420 SF 2 0.46 FAR 0.565 FAR 0.57 FAR # of bedrooms: 4 6 --- ;.......... Parking: ; 2 covered No change 2 covered (18' x 18') (18' x 18') 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') Height: 23'-4" 30'-0" 30'-0" DH Envelope: complies complies CS 25.26.075 ' Existing, non-conforming left side setback. 2 (0.32 x 6,000 SF) + 1100 SF + 400 SF = 3,420 SF (0.57 FAR) Staff Comments: See attached memos from the Chief Building Official, Fire Division, Engineering Division, Parks Division, and Stormwater Division. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission design review study meeting on February 22, 2016, the Commission had several comments and suggestions regarding this project and voted to place this item on the regular action calendar when all information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Division -2- Negative Declaration and Design Review 11 East Carol Avenue (see attached February 22, 2016 Planning Commission Minutes). The applicant submitted a response letter dated March 14, 2016 and revised plans date stamped February 8, 2016, to address the Planning Commission's questions and comments. Listed below are the Commission's comments and responses by the applicant. 1. The rendering does not appear to be accurate. • New renderings showing the front and rear elevations have been submitted and were distributed to the Commission with the revised plans. 2. Was considerafion given to separating fhe plane between the first and second stories at the rear elevation? Adding an overhang in addifion fo the proposed band and brackets would help to break up fhe massing at the rear. • The rear elevation has been revised to create an 18-inch overhang at the second floor. This revision added 18 SF to the proposed overall floor area, but the project is still under the total maximum allowable floor area. 3. Will the wood trim for the new and existing windows match? � The plans have been updated to label which existing aluminum-clad windows will remain and to note that new windows will be'simulated true divided lites'; the applicant clarified at the Study hearing that all trim for existing and new windows will match. 4. Have you considered adding an eave to the dormer at the front, left side of the second floor? • After consideration, the owners prefer the originally submitted design with no eave. They feel this is a cleaner look that fits in with the overall design. 5. The windows at the front of the second floor resemble French doors but have a sill at the bottom. It mighf be more practical fo have tall windows with a transom that reaches up to the gable end. • This suggestion has been incorporated into the design. Negative Declaration: Because there was a potential impact on historic resources, the proposed project is subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. The Planning Commission held an environmental scoping session for this project on February 22, 2016. An Initial Study was prepared by the Planning Division staff. It has been determined that the proposed project can be covered by a Negative Declaration since the initial study did not identify any significant impacts from the proposed construction of the additions to the single family dwelling (please refer to the attached Negative Declaration No. 589-P). The Negative Declaration was circulated for 20 days for public review. The 20-day review period ends on March 28, 2016; as of the printing date of this staff report (March 24, 2016), no comments have been submitted on the Negative Declaration. Required Findings for a Negative Declaration: For CEQA requirements the Planning Commission must review and approve the Negative Declaration, finding that on the basis of the Initial Study and any comments received in writing or at the public hearing that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant (negative) effect on the environment. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; -3- -�- uoi�euivaaa� a�6uis e o} 'a�qissod aaaynn `pauiquao� aq ��eys san�� pue `s�uan 6uiquan�d `s}�np �ie ��e �ey� •g `�eadde uo �i�uno� /(�i� �o `uoissivawo� 6uiuue�d ay} �o �enadde ay� }noy�inn pa6uey� ao pai�ipow aq �ou ��eys �enoadde �o suoi}ipuo� ay� 'pa�inbaa si �eno.adde �o suoi�ipuo� ��e y�inn a�uei�duao� �ssa�oad uoq�na�suo� ay� �noy6noay� sue�d panoadde �o s�as ��e �o }�ed e uieuaa� ��eys y�iynn `�eadde uo �i�uno� ��i� ao `uoissivauao� 6uiuue�d ay� �(q pa�dope �enoadde �o suoi�ipuo� ��e 6ui�si� �aays �ano� e apn��ui o} pai�ipoua aq ��eys sue�d uoi}�na�suo� }�afoad ay� `}�afo�d ay} �o uog�na�suo� ao� �ivaaad 6uip�inq e�o a�uenssi o} aoiad }ey� �� °}�i�}sia �uawa6eueW �(}i�en� aiy eaay �(e8 ay� �o suoi�e�n6aa ay� ��e y�inn �(�dwo� o� paainbaa aq ��eys �{�onn a}is y�ns pue panssi uaaq sey }ivaaad 6uip�inq e �i�un an��o �ou ��eys a�is ay� uo 6uinow y�aea ao Buipea6 /(ue pue saan}�na�s 6ui�sixa ay} �o �enouaaa ao uoi�i�ouaap �ey} •g °ao��a.aid �uauado�anaa �(�iunuauao� ay� �(q pauivaaa}ap se `a�qisea� �i `�(}aadoad a�eniad ay� uodn pa�e�d aq ��eys ��afad uoi��na�suo� ay� ao� saa�sdwnp �o saxoq suqap 's�auie�uo� 6ui��(�aa �(ue �ey� �5 `�aw aq ��eys `owaw `g �pZ `� �aquaa�ad s,uoisinid �a}ennua�o�g ay� pue `owaw 5 �OZ '0 � aaquaa�ad s,uoisinid aai� ay� `souaaua g �pZ `g iGenaqa� pue 5 �pZ `p � aaqwa�aa s,uoisinia 6uiaaaui6u� ay� `souaaw g �pZ 'g � y�aew pue Z iGen�qa� `5 �0z `g � aaqwa�aa s,uoisinia s��ed ay� `sowaua g �0z '� � y�aew pue gZ �Genuef' 'S 60Z `L aaquaa�aa s,uoisinia 6uip�in8 ay� �o suoi�ipuo� ay� �ey� •� `�iwaad siy} o� �uauapuawe ue aainbaa ��eys `(s)aauaaop e 6ui6�e�ua �0 6uippe apn��ui p�nonn y�iynn `a6eaeB ao `saoo�� puo�as ao �sai� `�uauaaseq ay} �o ado�anua ao azis ay} o� sa6uey� �(ue �ey� �£ `(}}e�s 6uiuueld �(q pauivaaa�ap aq o� �uauapuauae ao �,��) nnaina� uoissiwuao� 6uiuue�d �o uoisinia 6uiuue�d o� }�afqns aq ��eys s�ei.aa�ew ade�sp�ey �o ad�(� �o �unouae pue 'y��id ao �y6iay �ooa `sa�n�ea� �ean��a�iy�ae `snnopuinn `saysiui� aoiaa�xa `s�ei�a�eua 6uip�inq o� saBuey� �(ue �ey� �Z °a�a�duao� aae }�afoad ay� ao� suoi��adsui �eui� �i�un a�e�d ui uieuaaa ��eys pue a}is ay} uo uoi��na}suo� �o uoi}i�ouaap �(ue o�.aoiad �siaoq�y �(�i� ay� �(q pa��adsui aq ��eys saanseaw asay� }ey� pue `�adoad ay��o apis }}a� `�eaa ay� �e aaa� poonnpa� ay� ao} pa��e�sui aq ��eys sa�nseaw uoq�a�oad aaa� �ey� pue °O�ZJ Pu� `O�ZB `dS `NJ `�l `6-� `0�5`d 46noay� 0' 6b's�aayg `pasina� `960Z '8 /Gen�qa� padwe}s a�ep uoisinia 6uiuue�d ay� o} pa}}iwqns sue�d ay} uo unnoys se ��inq aq ��eys ��afoad ay� �ey� pa�apisuo� aq p�noys suoi�ipuo� 6uinno��o� ay� 6uiaeay �i�qnd ay� �y nnaina� u6isad �Z uoi�eae��aa ani�e6aN � � �pa�e�s �(�aea�� aq p�noys uoi��e �(ue ao� suoseaa ayl �ppe �(eua saauoissiwwo� ay� �ey� ao�pue }aoda� }}e}s ay� uaoa� suoi}ipuo� 6uipn��ui uoi�n�osaa �(q �(�a}eaedas ua�e} aq p�noys suaa�i 6uinno��o� ay} uo uoi��e ani�ewai}}y •uoi}eae��ad ani;e6aN ay; uiy�inn pue �aoda� }}e�s ay� uiy�inn pauie�uo� sis�(�eue ay} pue �(uowi}sa� �i�qnd �apisuo� pue `uoi}e�i�dde ay� uo 6uiaeay �i�qnd e}�npuo� p�noys uoissiwwo� 6uiuue�d ayl :uoi;�y uoissivauao� Buiuueld s�uauodwo� �ean��na�s �o �{�nq pue sseua o� uoi}�odoad s�i pue 6uide�spue� •g pue `sai}�adoad �ua�efpe uo sa�n��n��s ay� y�inn aan��na�s pasodoad ay� �o a�e}�a�u� •� °aan��na�s �o ��nq pue sseua pue a�/(�s �ean��a�iy�ay �£ `pooyaoqy6iau ay� ui suaa��ed a6e�e6 pue 6ui�{aed ay� ao� ��adsa� �z anuan y lo�� 5�3 6 6 Ma�na� u6►sap pue uo►�eae��ap ani�e6aN Negative Declaration and Design Review 11 East Carol Avenue and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 12. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 13. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 14. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Erika Lewit Senior Planner c. Tim Raduenz, applicant Attachments: Response letter from the applicant, dated March 14, 2016 February 22, 2016 Design Review Study Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Application to the Planning Commission Applicant's Letter of Explanation Outreach letter to neighbors, date stamped February 12, 2016 Staff Comments Historical Resource Analysis, dated December 15, 2015 Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed March 18, 2016 Aerial Photo Separate Attachment: Negative Declaration and Initial Study (ND-589-P), dated July 8, 2016 -5- - � ]E�]E�� + ON]E 3841 24`" Street, #A San Francisco, Calif. 941 ] 4 p+ 415.819.0304 E + tim@formonedesign.com �� 12098 Highway 42 Ellison Bay, Wisco. 54210 To: Planning Commission Subject: l 1 East Carol Ave. 5470 Cross Country Way Park City, UT 84098 From: Tim Raduenz Date Sent: 3.14.20 ] 6 Number of Pages: 1 Status Letter Response: (Respondin� to plannin� comment letter dated 3/08/16) PLANNING COMMENTS: G For The Commission; 1.) We took the comment into consideration and agree we have moved the wall back on the left side to have an overhang on the rear. The wall moved 18" out. The updated sheets are A2.1, A2.2 A3.1, A3.2 & FAR. 2.) All comments in place about new windows have been updated with S.T.D.L. Details have been added to sheet A4.0 regarding the existing windows. Updated sheets A3.O,A3.1,A3.2 & A4.0 3.) We Took this comment into consideration, spoke with the homeowners, and looked at the overall design for the home and have chosen to not add a eave to the swooping dormer. We want a simple net look. 4.) We took the comment into consideration and agree we have changed the window configuration to have a transom and be more practical then the larger french door look that we had. The updated sheet is A2.0 and A3.0. 5.) we have removed the shading form the roof plan. The updated sheet is A2.2. If you have any questions please call or e-mail me. I will be available for site walk thoughts as needed. Tim Raduenz — CGi,� �� Build It [�� . MEMBER ��i1/� +'�N� • Design & Planning • 3841 24�h Street, #A • San Francisco • CA • 94114 • ais) 819.0304 • tim@formonedesign.com � GITY ��;�i � e�� f i lii:u '� o_'',r �i yo° �oaR4rF City of Burlingame Meeting Minutes Planning Commission BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Monday, February 22, 2016 7:00 PM Council Chambers b. 11 East Carol Avenue, zoned R-1 - Application for Environmental Scoping and Design Review for first and second story additions to an existing single family dwelling (Tim Raduenz, Form + One Design, applicant and designer; Patrick and Brittney Aitken, property owners) (56 noticed) Staff Contact: Erika Lewit All Commissioners had visited the property. Commissioner Gaul spoke with the property owner, and Commissioner Gum spoke to the neighbor on the right at 9 East Caro/. Senior Planner Keylon provided an overview of the staff report. There were no questions of staff. Chair DeMartini opened the public hearing. Tim Raduenz, Form + One Design, represented the applicant. > Works on existing details of the house. Kept gables, and kept eaves low. > Modernized interior layout. > Existing second story is like an attic. This will turn it into a family home. Commission questions/comments: > Rendering shows a stucco wall on the /eft side but plans show a wood fence. (Raduenz: There is a more updated rendering. �ll provide more recenf one.) > Will the wood trim be dark wood or light? (Raduenz: Darker.) > Will all the wood trim match, including windows? (Raduenz: Windows are aluminum-clad. �ll have a custom color to match.) > Was consideration given fo separation of plane on back to break up mass, similar to front? There is a band and brackets but no change in p/ane. (Raduenz: Could bump it out if needed, but c/ose to maxing out on square footage.) > Exposed wood on gable ends could attract termites and moisture. > What is fhe head height on window on far right (Bath #3)? (Raduenz: 6 feef or so.) > Windows on front resemble french doors but with sill at bottom. Consideration for set of fall windows with sill, and transoms reaching up to the gable? (Raduenz: Likes the idea.) > Why does fhe dormer on �ight have no overhang? (Raduenz: Can look at it. Wanted to de-emphasize that element.) > Clarify roof plan - hard to read with the poche. > Shared plans with the neighbors? (Raduenz: The owners sent emails to neighbors but have not heard back. There are apartments to the rear.) > Why was the lawn sign not out? (Raduenz: Will posf it for the next meeting.) Public comments: Anne Merics,1537 Carol Avenue, spoke on this item: > Concern with the size of the house compared to the smaller house next door. > Six bedrooms mean a lot of people. Neighbors have petitioned the City for 2-hour parking on the street. Street is narrow. City of BuAingame Page 1 Printed on 3/21/2018 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes February 22, 2016 Tim Raduenz spoke on this item: > There is space for a fourth car. > Lower floor bedroom is more like a playroom or office. Could adjust it so it would not be classified as a bedroom. Chair DeMartini closed the public hearing. Commission discussion: > ls there an issue if the design review sign did not go out? (Gardiner.� It is a design review sign, so is not a statutory aspect of fhe noticing. The mailed post card is the /egal notice. The item will need to return for another hearing regard/ess and the sign can be put out for that meeting.)(Keylon: An environmental notice will also be posted for at least 20 days once the environmental document is completed.) Environmenta/ Scoping: > Parking is an issue with the narrow street. The house has six bedrooms. Design Review: (no comments beyond those already stated) This item will return on the Regu/arAction Calendar once the environmental review has been completed. City of Burlingame Page 2 Printed on 3/21/2016 �� BUAL�NGAME � ��`i COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: 028 - a2 - //v0 � Design Review ❑ Variance � Parcel #: 3 ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Zoning / Other: PROJECT ADDRESS: I� �� L f'I� APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER Name: / isu /��_ i�Z � ��U/I� Name: /"/!C• � �i� s, �A?"�� HjT�ti/ Address: ��T� �f � �� /7 Address: �� . City/State/Zip: ��'j✓ ��%'►��i� �� City/State/Zip: �u��.�^�—+�'� � G� 94-b� b Phone: �l5 �/J D307 ��/� Phone: � 5 a. 7 6�. 39 3 Z E-mail: /i�c 0 ��oi✓�,D�"SIL�t/• E-mail: %�'�T�'/�. �3��TNEY � G/1'�'`f/L •C�r''I �� A?-�/GK .�/T�'�n/B Gsyt.4/G. �'`1 DESIGNER Name: / iwc �i��✓Z � I�iQiW � ��,/E Address: .��f � Z�� 57.` �� S City/State/Zip: 74y✓ ��!✓�4�-E�. � �`I�� Phone: T� �. 8�� 03 �� E-mail: /iN� � �i�?vs�E..�ESI�n/. G�t Burlingame Business License #: �� g0 � � �� a y n�. w..,�c� �� 9 � � : 1:6..,= �-C - � ?Oij .�;!?''r` tJl= BURLINGAME C;"t?s --''� ./a,�RN1PJia EJiW- Authorization to Reqroduce Proiect Plans: I hereby grant the City of Burlingame the authority to reproduce upon request and/or post plans submitted with this application on the City's website as part of the Planning approval process and waive any claims against the City arising out of or related to such action. %-,Q . (Initials of�(Designer) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Zn�� /�1� �'�1770/�/ � % � S��Y �.r,t�2o,��q�✓ 57�Y r� ri+ � . AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby c if under penal y of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Applicant's signature: Date: /� Z �.� I am aware of the proposed application a d hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this pplic tion to the Planning Commission. Property owner's signature: Date: �� I�I I� Date submitted: � Z� � l� 5 5: �HANDOUTS�PC Application.doc �:;g � ss�� . ]F��$�[ + �1�17E 3841 24`� Street, #A San Francisco, Cali£ 94114 P + ais).819.0304 �,;, 12098 Hwy. 42 Ellison Bay, Wisco. 54210 E + tim@formonedesign.com �'�E$AI�S��'� ��$� To: Planning/City of Burlingame Subject: 11 East Carol Ave. (2nd Flr. Addition) Fax: Planning Submittal Overview: r k' '� • �� 5d� � � dYB� � � 'iri ' 1 ,��5 ::'.-� Y O� BUR�lNGAME ',`;� �-,'!��PJf�IN(� 7iV. From: Tim Raduenz Date Sent: 11_25_15 Number of Pages: 1 The Owners, Mr. & Mrs. Aitken, have obtained me to design their 2"d floor addition/remodel at 11 East Carol Ave. Scope: The project entails, adding a new 2"d floor to the existing 1.5 story European/Tudor style house. We will be drawing inspiration from the existing house, as the details and forms were well designed originally. We will tie in the gable details to my new addition design, with the basic design derived from older home. Exterior Style: On the exterior we will be continuing the European/Tudor Sty(ing, we will trying to keep as much existing stucco & wood detailing on the first floor, and retain that old stucco finish, which is really hard to duplicate. On the second floor we went with high end materials (cedar) overhangs to match the existing exposed overhangs of the existing building, and with the details on the gables will really make the overall look come together with custom designed details throughout. On the addition to the left side of the home, we added scooped shed style dormer to bring the elevation down closer to the existing surface, that will help it retain that 1.5 story feel on the left side, which the neighbor has a relatively newer remodeled home. We added minimal windows on the Master Suite Side Elevation, to protect both the neighbars and the Owners privacy. To that end, we believe we have drastically updated the layout but have kept the same overall feel of the existing home and comp]eted the overall project as a whole. We also made the Aitken's house a livable solution to their growing family. Also, I do believe the overall building massing is complimenting the existing neighborhood, and will be a great addition to the street. Best, �/ Tim Raduenz — CGBP � Build It GRE�N�M MEMBER ]F��IVI +�I`dlE • Design & Planning • 3841 24`� Street, #A • San Francisco • CA � 94114 • ais) 819.0304 • tim�formonedesign.com February 12, 2016 Hello Neighbor! We wanted to reach out to you in regards to our proposed construction project. We plan on renovating our upstairs, with work also done downstairs. We wanted to take this opportunity to reach out to you to see if you had any questions or concerns about our project. We would love to discuss with you. Thanks for being a great neighbor! Brittney + Patrick Aitken 11 E Carol Ave., Burlingame Aitken.brittnev@�mail.com 650-766-3932 �' , . �� .. . 4- � l' � LO i (�P CITY' Ot _ _ , � . CpD-P� ANNI!v�:, L;'; Project Comments Date To: From: March 14, 2015 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Environmental Review and Design Review for first and second story additions to an existing single family dwelling at 11 East Carol Avenu, zoned R-1, APN: 028-302-160 March 15, 2016 Staff Review: No Comment . �� 3f�5/i� Reviewed by: � � �� Date: Rick Caro III, CBO 650-558-7270 Project Comments Date: To: From: January 26, 2016 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 0 Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Environmental Review and Design Review for first and second story additions to an existing single family dwelling at 11 East Carol Avenu, zoned R-1, APN: 028-302-160 Staff Review: Revised plans date stamped January 21, 2016 17) Provide section details that show the finished headroom lieight for each room in the basement. Per the 2013 CRC the minimum ceiling height in a baseinent is 7'0". Portions of the baseinent that do not include habitable space, hallways, batlu•ooms, toilet rooms and laundry rooms shall have a ceiling hei�ht of not less than 6"8". NOTE: Areas with a headrooin height greater than 5' 11" are considered to be floor area by the Planning Division. The response dated 1-8-16 from Tim Raduenz for building comment number 17 does not reflect the head room clearance of 6'8" as required per section 305.1.1 of the 2013 CRC on sheet A4.0 detail 1 /A4.0. NOTE: A written response to the itetns noted here and plans that specifically address items 17 must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for Planning Commission action. The written resnonse must include clear direction re�ardin� where the requested inf'ormation can be found on the nlans. %� Q� � �/��r� Reviewed by: 11(,1.�',,[ ( ./.?;20 Date: Rick Caro III, CBO 650-558-7270 Project Comments Date: To: From: December 7, 2015 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 0 Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Environmental Review & Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 11 East Carol Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-302-160 Staff Review: December 7, 2015 1) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2013 California Building Code, 2013 California Residential Code (where applicable), 2013 California Mechanical Code, 2013 California Electrical Code, and 2013 California Plumbing Code, including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1889. Note: If the Planning Commission has not approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2016 then this project must comply with the 2016 California Building Codes. 2) As of January 1, 2014, SB 407 (2009) requires non-compliant plumbing fixtures to be replaced by water-conserving plumbing fixtures when a property is undergoing alterations or improvements. This law applies to all residential and commercial property built prior to January 1, 1994. Details can be found at http:/ f www.leginfo.ca.gov�pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb 0401- 0450/sb 407 bill 20091011 chaptered.html. Revise the plans to show compliance with this requirement. 3) Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2013 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Go to http://www.energy.ca.qov/title24/2013standards/ for publications and details. 4) Provide finro completed copies of the attached Mandatory Measures with the submittal of your plans for Building Code compliance plan check. In addition, replicate this completed document on the plans. Note: On the Checklist you must provide a reference that indicates the page of the plans on which each Measure can be found. 5) Place the following information on the first page of the plans: "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. (See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.) Construction hours in the City Public right-of-way are limited to weekdays and non-City Holidays between 8:00 a.m, and 5:00 p.m. Note: Construction hours for work in the public right of way must now be included on the plans. 6) On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrated on the Job Copy of the plans prior to perForming the work. 7) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. 8) Provide a fully dimensioned site plan which shows the true property boundaries, the location of all structures on the property, existing driveways, and on-site parking. 9) Provide existing and proposed elevations. 10)This project will be considered a New Building because, according to the City of Burlingame Municipal code, "when additions, alterations or repairs within any twelve-month period exceed fifty percent of the current replacement value of an existing building or structure, as determined by the building official, such building or structure shall be made in its entirety to conform with the requirements for new buildings or structures." This building must comply with the 2013 California Building Code for new structures. BMC 18.07.020 Note: Any revisions to the plans approved by the Building Division must be submitted to, and approved by, the Building Division prior to the implementation of any work not specifically shown on the p/ans. Significant delays can occur if changes made in the field, without City approval, necessitate further review by City departments or the Planning Commission. Inspections cannot be scheduled and will not be performed for work that is not shown on the Approved plans. 11)Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of Occupancy will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued after the project has been finaled. No occupancy of the building is to occur until a new Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. 12)Provide a complete demolition plan that includes a leqend and indicates existing walls and features to remain, existing walls and features to be demolished, and new walls and features. NOTE: A condition of this project approval is that the Demolition Permit will not be issued and, and no work can begin (including the removal of � building components), until a Building Permit has been issued for the project. The property owner is responsible for assuring that no work is authorized or performed. 13)Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines 14)Show the dimensions to adjacent structures. 15)Rooms that could be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Rooms that could be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. On the e/evation drawinqs specify the /ocation and the net c/ear opening height and width of a/l required egress windows. 2013 California Residential Code (CRC) §R310. Note: The area labeled "Office" on the proposed first floor plan is a room that can be used for sleeping purposes and, as such, must comply with this requirement. 16)Indicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 17)Provide section details that show the finished headroom height for each room in the basement. Per the 2013 CRC the minimum ceiling height in a basement is 7'0". Portions of the basement that do not include habitable space, hallways, bathrooms, toilet rooms and laundry rooms shall have a ceiling height of not less than 6"8". NOTE: Areas with a headroom height greater than 5'11" are considered to be floor area by the Planning Division. In addition specify the proposed use of the area labeled as "(N) Crawl Space." 18)Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 19)Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 2013 CBC §1009. 20)Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 21)Specify on the plans whether the fireplace is a gas or solid wood-burning device. If the fireplace is a solid wood-burning device clearly state on the plans that the fireplace will meet all requirements as a U.S.EPA Phase II certified wood-burning device. 22)If the fireplace is a solid wood-burning device then specify on the plans that the fireplace chimney will terminate at least finro feet higher than any portion of the building within ten feet or will be retrofit with a fireplace insert (not a log lighter.) 2013 CRC §1003.9. NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address items 2, 5, 15, 16, 17, 21, and 22 must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for Planning Commission action. The written response must include clear direction reqardinq where the requested information can be found on the alans. Reviewed by: Date: 12-7-2015 Joe Cyr, CBO 650-558-7270 � Project Comments Date: To: From: December 7, 2015 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 0 Parks Division (650) 558-7334 Planning Staff � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 X Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Subject: Request for Environmental Review & Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 11 East Carol Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-302-160 Staff Review: December 7, 2015 1. Construction BMPs noted in plan sheet SP shall be included in construction building plans. Reviewed by: � ,� ��.� Date: I ��,�,I �� Project Comments Date: To: From: March 14A 2015 � Engineering Division (sso) 55��230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 X Parks Division (650) 558-7334 0 Fire Division �s5o� sss-�soo � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attomey (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Environmental Review and Design Review for first and seoond story additions to an existing single family dwe{ling at 11 East Carol Avenu, zoned R-1, APN: 028-302-160 Staff Review: Revised plans date stamped February 8, 2016 1. 3 new landscape trees proposed on landscape plan. 2. No protected trees proposed ior removal. �� , 3..� No further oomments �, Reviewed by: BD Date: 3/16/16 Project Comments Date: To: From: January 26, 2016 � Engineering Division (sso� ��230 0 Building Division (650) 558-7260 X Parks Division (sso) sss-7� 0 Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Environmental Review and Design Review for first and second story additions to an existing single family dwelling at 11 East Carol Avenu, zoned R-1, APN: 028-302-160 Staff Review: Revised plans date stamped January 21, 2016 1. 3 new landscape trees proposed on landscape plan. �.�2. `� InGude t►�ee list on landscape plan identifying species of new trees. p � � 3. No protected trees proposed for removal. Reviewed by: BD Date: 2/2/16 Project Comments Date: To: From: December 7, 2015 � Engineering Division (sso) �a-�23o � Building Division (650) 558-7260 X Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Environmental Review & Design Review for a first and seoond story addition to an e�asting single family dwelling at 11 East Carol Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-302-160 Staff Review: December 7, 2015 � No e�aisting tree over 48 inches in circumference at 54 inches form base of tree may be removed without a Protected Tree Removal Permit from the Parks Division. (558-7330) 2. F�dsting City Street Tree may not be cut, trimmed or removed without permit from Parks Division (558-7330) 3�. Please indicate on plans if landscape will remain or be rehabilitated. � Completed landscape must include 3 new or existing landscape trees for final inspedion. Please identify e�asting trees and note on site plan. (Fruit, nut or citrus trees do not count as landscape trees.) Reviewed by: BD Date: 12/15/15 Project Comments Date: January 26, 2016 To: X Engineering Division 0 Fire Division (650) 558-7230 (650) 558-7600 � Building Division � Stormwater Division (650) 558-7260 (650) 342-3727 0 Parks Division 0 City Attorney (650) 558-7334 (650) 558-7204 From: Planning Staff Subject: Request for Environmental Review and Design Review for first and second story additions to an existing single family dwelling at 11 East Carol Avenu, zoned R-1, APN: 028-302-160 Staff Review: Revised plans date stamped January 21, 2016 1. No comments at this time. Reviewed by: M. Quan Date: 2/8/16 Project Comments Date: To: From: December 7, 2015 X Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 0 Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 0 Fire Division (650) 558-7600 0 Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Environmental Review & Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 11 East Carol Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-302-160 Staff Review: December 7, 2015 1. Any work in the City right-of-way, such as placement of debris bin in street, work in sidewalk area, public easements, and utility easements, is required to obtain an Encroachment Permit prior to starting work. 2. Construction hours in the City Public right-of-way are limited to weekdays and non-City Holidays between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. 3. Sewer Backwater Protection Certification is required for the installation of any new sewer fixture per Ordinance No. 1710. The Sewer Backwater Protection Certificate is required prior to the issuance of Building Permit. 4. The sanitary sewer lateral (building sewer) shall be tested per ordinance code chapter 15.12. Testing information is available at the Building department counter. A Sewer Lateral Test �encroachment permit is required. ( 5. )Show the location of down spouts for the entire roof and that there is enough finish grade v elevation around the perimeter of the property to demonstrate the direction of storm water runoff for the property. If the grade is not sufficient to prevent storm water runoff onto adjacent properties, show a drainage system design. � On the proposed plan, please show the location of all proposed locations for utilities (PG&E, water, sewer, and sewer cleanout). Reviewed by: M. Quan Date: 12/10/15 Project Comments Date: To: From: December 7, 2015 0 Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 0 Parks Division (650) 558-7334 X Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Environmental Review & Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 11 East Carol Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-302-160 Staff Review: December 7, 2015 No comments at this time. Reviewed by: Christine Reed �C�� Date: 12-10-15 State of California—The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # PRIMARY RECORD T�inomial NRHP Status Code 6Z Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date or number(assigned by recorder) P1. Other ldentifier: "P2. Location: ❑Not for Publication DUnrestricted "a. County San Mateo *b. USGS 7.5' Quad San Mateo, Calif. Date 1997 *c. Address 11 East Carol Avenue City Burlinqame Zip 94010 *e. Other Locational Data: Assessor's Parcel Number 028-302-160 "P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries.) 11 East Carol Avenue is a two-story single family residence located on the north side of East Carol Avenue between Carol Avenue and Barroilhet Avenue in the Glenwood Park neighborhood. The rectangular lot measures approximately 50 feet by 120 feet. Constructed in 1921, the building has a rectangular core with projecting volumes at the primary and rear facades. The core and front projecting volume are capped with half-hipped roofs with composite shingles. Rear projecting volumes are capped with a gable roof and a shed roof, and a gabled dormer is located in the northwest corner of the roof. The overhanging eaves either feature a molded fascia or exposed rafter tails. The wood-frame building is primarily clad in stucco. Exceptions include the shed- roofed addition, clad in vertical wood siding, and the gabled dormer, clad in drop wood siding. The small front yard features a lawn and flowering bushes. A concrete driveway runs from East Carol Avenue along the south property line to a one-story detached garage and covered patio in the rear yard. The primary (south) fa�ade features a prominent half-hipped-roof projecting volume at left (west). The south face of this volume contains tall wood windows within an inset molded surround. Two 12-lite casement windows are flanked by six-lite fixed windows. Beneath the roof gable is a horizontal band of wood molding with embedded vertical timbers flush with the stucco cladding. The overhanging eave features an ornamental wood fascia. A flat-roofed entrance vestibule is located right (east) of the projecting volume. The vestibule contains one six-lite wood casement window on its south face and the building's primary entrance on its east face. Decorative wood molding and embedded timbers are featured towards the roofline. The primary entrance is accessed by a raised brick landing and is composed of a single wood door set within a four-centered arch. Right (east) of the entrance on the main plane of the primary fa�ade is one eight-over-eight double-hung wood window. (See Continuation Sheet) *P3b. Resource Attributes: (list attributes and codes) HP2: Sinqle Familv Residence *P4. Resources Present: OBuilding ❑Structure ❑Object ❑Site ❑District ❑Element of District ❑Other P5b. Photo: (view and date) View of the primary (south) and east fa�ades, December 15, 2015. *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: �historic 1921 (San Mateo County Assessor) "P7. Owner and Address: Patrick and Brittney Aitken 11 East Carol Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 *P8. Recorded by: Page & Turnbull, Inc. 417 Montgomery Street, 8th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 *P9. Date Recorded: 12/15/15 *P10. Survey Type: Intensive *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none") None *Attachments: ❑None ❑Location Map ❑Sketch Map �Continuation Sheet �Building, Structure, and Object Record ❑Archaeological Record ❑District Record ❑Linear Feature Record ❑Milling Station Record ❑Rock Art Record ❑Artifact Record ❑Photograph Record ❑ Other (list) DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information State of California — The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Primary # HRI # Trinomiai Page 2 of 17 Resource Name or #(Assigned by recorder) 11 East Carol Avenue *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date December 15, 2015 � Continuation ❑ Update *P3a. Description: (continued) The east fa�ade is composed of the main plane of the two-story half-hipped building core and the rear (north) one-story gable- roofed volume. Just above grade are several metal vents into the crawlspace. The first story features three eight-over-eight double- hung wood windows and one small wood casement window. The second story contains one eight-over-eight double-hung wood window. The overhanging eave features an ornamental wood fascia. The east fa�ade of the rear (north) gable-roofed volume is slightly recessed from the main fagade plane. Fenestration includes one small wood casement window and paired eight-over-eight double-hung wood windows. The overhanging eave features exposed rafter tails. The rear (north) fa�ade features two projecting volumes. At left (east) is the gable roof volume with an ornamental molded fascia. The north face of this volume features a crawlspace access at grade and paired eight-over-eight double-hung wood windows. The west face contains paired eight-over-eight double-hung wood windows and one small wood casement. On the main fa�ade plane, between the two projecting volumes, is one small, aluminum-frame sliding window. At right (west) is a shed-roofed addition clad in vertical wood siding. The north face of this volume contains iwo one-over-one double-hung wood windows with wide wood surrounds and a wood screen door leading to a partially glazed single wood door. Above the shed-roof addition is a gabled dormer, featuring two one-over-one double-hung wood windows in wide wood surrounds, drop wood siding, and simple fascia at the roof eave. Adjacent to the dormer are three metal chimneys. The west fa�ade faces a narrow side yard. It is composed (north to south) of the west face of the rear (north) shed-roofed addition, the main plane of building core below a half-hipped gable end, a square bay window, and the west face of the front projecting volume. The shed-roofed addition contains one one-over-one double-hung wood window with a wide wood surround. Fenestration at the main fa�ade plane includes paired wood casement windows, finro one-over-one double-hung wood windows, and one eight- over-eight double-hung wood window at the second story. Right (south) of center is a square bay window, featuring three eight-lite wood casement windows. The west face of the front volume projects from the main plane. Flanking a brick chimney are two eight- lite paired wood casement windows. The main half-hipped roofline, portions of the bay window, and the projecting volume feature ornamental molded fascia. A one-story detached garage and covered patio is located in the rear yard. The building is capped with an asymmetric gable and half-hipped portion above the garage door. The garage fa�ade echoes the embedded timber detailing of the main house, although the horizontal band is not molded and the wood members are slightly proud of the stucco finish instead of flush. The rear yard is partially landscaped with brick pavers. A mature redwood tree is located in the northwest corner of the yard. Overall, the building appears to be in good condition. DPR 523L State of California—The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomia� Page 3 of 17 Resource Name or #(Assigned by recorder) 11 East Carol Avenue `Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date December 15, 2015 � Continuation ❑ Update � Source: Page & Turnbull, December 2015. Figure 3. South face of the entrance vestibule. Source: Page & Turnbull, December 2015. DPR 523L Figure 1. Primary (south) fa�ade of 11 East Carol Avenue. Source: Page & Turnbull, December 2015. Figure 2. Decorative molding and embedded timbers, molded fascia, and half-hipped roof at primary facade. Source: Page & Turnbull, December 2015. State of California —The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomia� Page 4 of 17 Resource Name or #(Assigned by recorder) 11 East Carol Avenue 'Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date December 15, 2015 0 Continuation ❑ Update ,� r�� .�. F � �w.. Figure 5. East fagade, looking north from the paved driveways. Source: Page & Turnbull, December 2015. � �� • ' � �; � d_ ��., :., ., _ ., . . t -> � � �, y � �f�` � � _ �•5 S � e��' � ��,'. ~�� :� " �, - � ; , p � �i Y�L, Y "� *'^ �: N � '�!-�� I ._�. �� :�.. _ ,, fi � ;, �� __ � Figure 7. Rear (north) fa�ade. Source: Page & Turnbull, December 2015. Figure 6. East fagade, looking south from the paved driveway. The enclosed porch is at right. Source: Page & Turnbull, December 2015. �� ' �; r�� ,�'� f'� � 1 � ._ �,+a'ai .� y r yi'v�_,��'' _ .. � �` �.�� `��- . _ �. . °�<' "� � ,� Figure 8. Gable-roofed projecting volume at the rea Source: Page & Turnbull, December 2015. DPR 523L State of California—The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 5 of 17 Resource Name or #(Assigned by recorder) 11 East Carol Avenue 'Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date December 15, 2015 � Continuation ❑ Update �� ,_ �� 1'� � 'w. � Figure 9. Fenestration at the west face of the gable-roofed volume and main fagade plane. Source: Page & Turnbull, December 2015. r� <_� *«. § '��,��°: � !i � � Figure 11. West fagade of shed-roofed addition and transition to main fagade plane. Source: Page & Turnbull, December 2015. �_;, �i Figure 12. West fa�ade, looking south from side yard. Source: Page & Turnbull, December 2015. DPR 523L Source: Page & Turnbull, December 2015. State of California—The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomia� Page 6 of 17 Resource Name or #(Assigned by recorder) 11 East Carol Avenue *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. "`Date December 15, 2015 � Continuation ❑ Update Figure 13. Square bay window and west face of front projecting volume. Source: Page & Turnbull, December 2015. Figure 16. Mature redwood tree at rear yard, looking northwest. Source: Page & Turnbull, December 2015. DPR 523L Figure 15. Detached garage and rear yard, looking northeast. Source: Page 8� Turnbull, December 2015. Figure 14. West fagade, looking north from East Carol Avenue. Source: Page & Turnbull, December 2015. State of California — The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 7 of 17 Resource Name or #(Assigned by recorder) 11 East Carol Avenue �Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date December 15, 2015 0 Continuation ❑ Update n:� '�' �, i I�]�:Z.Y►TH� � _ ��3i�/ ��_'`�� " _� �1� �_ �i�P�;� _ . r:-: ' - �7 Figure 17. Current aerial view of 11 East Carol Avenue (outlined in red). Source: Google Maps, 2015, edited by author. State of California — The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD Page 8 of 17 *NRHP Status Code_6Z *Resource Name or # 11 East Carol Avenue 61. Historic name: 11 East Carol Avenue 62. Common name: 11 East Carol Avenue 63. Original Use: Sinqle-Familv Residence B4. Present use: Sinqle-Familv Residence *B5. Architectural Style: Tudor Revival/Enqlish Cottaqe *66. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) 1921: Original construction (permit #273); 1929: Light fixture alterations (permit #1623); 1967: Termite and rot repairs (permit #O- 400); 1968: Kitchen remodel (permit #R-429); 1975: Unspecified mechanical work (permit #I-747); 1978: Plumbing alterations ((permit #J-804), new'/2 bath at first floor (permit #Y-165); termite repairs (permit #Z-209); 1980: Interior alterations to bathrooms (permit #2103); 1987: Reroof (permit #3625); 1989: Kitchen remodel (permit #7500); termite repairs to bathroom and basement pit (permit #7934); new sewer line installed (permit #7962); 1993: Reroof (permit #9300825); 2002: Chimney retrofit (permit #2020352); new 200 amp electrical service (permit #2020363); foundation bracing in main crawlspace (permit #2021587); 2011: Demolition of existing detached garage and construction of new garage and covered patio in approximately same location (permit #B11-0148). Alterations at unknown date: Construction of shed-roofed addition, could possibly include gabled dormer at rear fa�ade; installation and removal of awning at windows on primary fa�ade. *B7. Moved? �No DYes �Unknown Date: Original Locati *B8. Related Features: One-story detached garage and covered patio B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Unknown *B10. Significance: Theme Residential Architecture Area Glenwood Park Period of Significance N/A Property Type Residential Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity) Historic Context: City of Burlinpame The lands that would become the City of Burlingame were initially part of Rancho San Mateo, a Mexican-era land grant given by Governor Pio Pico to Cayetano Arena in 1845. Over the next four decades, the lands passed through the hands of several prominent San Francisco businessmen, including William Howard (1848) and William C. Ralston (1856). In 1866, Ralston sold over 1,000 acres to Anson Burlingame, the then US Minister to China. However, following Burlingame's death in 1870, the land reverted to Ralston, and eventually to Ralston's business partner, William Sharon. Very little formal development occurred during this period, with most of the land used for dairy and stock farm operations. (See Continuation Sheet) B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) *B12. References: See Page 12 B13. Remarks: *B14. Evaluator: Siri Olson and Dan Herrick, Page & Turnbull, Inc. "Date of Evaluation: December 15, 2015 (This space reserved for official comments.) Source: San Mateo County Assessor's Office, 2015. Property outlined in red. Modified by Page & Turnbull. ,., _ I / ' �_ ,� _, i:.,,;. ,i...�.s � 4�'W --. fP 'I� / ('J . ,':;"7. % ° � �'•��' N � % � ��` .'� .� o,�� ` ,, , ��.�'�� `pe',�\� �"� , � r.,. ` � - <. ' �� , e ,� / ° a ' " •, , . � � -� � � .+ � : R � 4�r'"' � i , () %�;;,-� •,�3 +�� tt } �7, r+._ . ....% ._ �. 301 . r � �r' � ' / / .s;r�C � � �� o �., % � �� T,:: �, �:, 'b-.'-`- �F� � �� / .-�� `�i �, + c , ,,, e�" DPR 523B (1/95) "Required information State of California—The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Page 9 of 17 *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. B10. Significance (cont'd): Primary # HRI # Trinomial Resource Name or # 11 E "`Date December 15, 2015 ❑X Continuation ❑ Update In 1893, William Sharon's trustee, Francis G. Newlands, proposed the development of the Burlingame Country Club as an exclusive semi-rustic destination for wealthy San Franciscans. A railroad depot was constructed in 1894, concurrent with small- scale subdivisions in the vicinity of Burlingame Avenue. During this time, EI Camino Real acted as a de facto dividing line between large country estates to the west and the emerging small village of Burlingame to the east. The latter developed almost exclusively to serve the needs of the wealthy estate owners. Burlingame began to develop in earnest with the arrival of an electric streetcar line between San Mateo and San Francisco in 1903. However, the 1906 Earthquake had a far more dramatic impact on the area. Hundreds of San Franciscans who had lost their homes began relocating to Burlingame, which flourished after the disaster with the construction of new residences and businesses. Over the next finro years, the village's population grew from 200 to 1,000. In 1908, Burlingame incorporated as a city, and in 1910 annexed the adjacent town of Easton to the north. The following year, the Burlingame Country Club area was also annexed by the City. By 1920, Burlingame's population had increased to 4,107. Glenwood Park Neiphborhood 11 East Carol Avenue was constructed in the Glenwood Park neighborhood, one of three subdivisions (including Burlingame Park and Burlingame Heights) created from lands that were formerly part of Rancho San Mateo. These were the earliest residential subdivisions west of EI Camino Real, recorded in 1905, 1905, and 1915 respectively. Glenwood Park is a small, triangular-shaped subdivision bounded by EI Camino Real to the north, Barroilhet Avenue to the south and east, and Cypress Avenue to the west. Within these boundaries is a Y-shaped street configuration formed by Carol and East Carol avenues. This subdivision was created in 1914 by Carrie and Irving Ackerman, acting as executors of the estate of Charles Ackerman. Prior to that time, the land had been owned by P.C. Meyer & Co., a partnership of Philip C. Meyer and Charles Ackerman, who operated the Glenwood Nursery on the property. Ackerman is also notable for serving as president of The Chutes, a popular amusement park in San Francisco that featured a roller coaster, zoo, Ferris wheel, and theater. By 1921, Sanborn maps indicate that the Glenwood Park subdivision was approximately fifty percent developed. Architecturally, most houses constructed by that time were relatively modest, one-story, single-family dwellings designed with Craftsman style influences. Nearly all houses also featured a small, detached auto garage at the rear of the lot. It also appears that during this period, or shortly afterward, rows of Washingtonia palm trees were planted along the Y-shaped configuration of Carol and East Carol avenues, and these palms remain extant today. The town of Burlingame experienced a residential building boom in the early 1920s. The majority of the residences in the Glenwood Park neighborhood were constructed in the 1920s and 1930s, including the house at 11 East Carol Avenue. These somewhat later homes were almost exclusively one story in height, and largely completed in popular period revival styles, including Tudor Revival/English Cottage and the Spanish Colonial Revival style. By 1949, Sanborn maps indicate that only two empty lots remained in the subdivision. During the latter half of the 20m century, many of the original single-family homes located along EI Camino Real were replaced with multi-family residential buildings. 11 East Carol Avenue An original building permit for 11 East Carol Avenue (permit #273) indicates that construction was begun in May 1921 for an estimated $6,000. The original architect and builder are not specified; only original owner William Watson Jr.'s appears on the permit. A Burlingame Water Company water meter card indicates that construction was complete by September 1921. The house does not appear on the 1921 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map, which was produced in March, prior to the date of construction. The building does appear on the next available Sanborn map in 1949. The footprint depicted closely resembles that which exists today; however, the shed-roofed addition at the rear fa�ade and the detached garage building are not shown. Historic photographs of the subject property indicate that little has been altered on the primary fa�ade. The embedded timber detailing and molded fascia appear to have been painted a darker and more contrasting color than today, and sometime during the period of 1968 through 1995, a striped awning was installed above the windows of the front projecting volume. Other alterations include several repairs to the foundation and parts of the first story due to termite and rot damage, interior remodels to the kitchen and bathrooms, and reroofing. The shed-roofed addition at the rear facade appears to have been constructed after 1949. It is unknown if the gabled dormer is an original feature. The wood siding and window surrounds of the dormer match those found at the shed-roof addition, indicating that the dormer was potentially either altered at this time, or an addition. Architectural drawings for the new garage building, dated July 2011 and available at the Burlingame Building Division, refer to the gable-roofed volume at the rear faqade as an "enclosed porch." However, there is no other available evidence in the permit history, or physical observation, of the building that substantiates that the rear volume had been altered. Owner and Occupant History DPR 523L State of California—The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Page 10 of 17 'Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. Primary # HRI # Trinomial Resource Name or # 11 East Carol Avenue "Date December 15, 2015 O Continuation ❑ Update The original owners and occupants of 11 East Carol Avenue were William Watson Jr., his wife Jean (Fleming) Watson, and their son William T. Watson. Watson was a draughtsman and architect at a local firm established by his father, William Watson Sr. In July 1933, Watson Jr. was appointed as San Mateo County's first building inspector.' The position was created under a new governing county charter. He was responsible for issuing building permits for unincorporated San Mateo, which was experiencing a development spree, similar to Burlingame and other nearby cities. His brother, James Watson, held the position of City Building Inspector for a time.2 Little more is known about Watson Jr.'s career, except that he was officially replaced in August 1941 after a long health-related absence.3 Watson Jr. continued to live at 11 East Carol Avenue, until his death in 1944. His wife then assumed full ownership of the property.° William Jr. and Jean's son, William T. Watson, is occasionally listed in city directories from the 1930s-60s as a resident of 11 East Carol Avenue. William T. Watson married in 1945, and returned with his wife to live at 11 East Carol Avenue. with Jean until 1968.5 The next owners of 11 East Carol Avenue were Joseph and Rose Malta. Joseph worked as a U.S. Postal Service clerk in Burlingame.s No record of sale of the subject property was available at the San Mateo County Recorder's office, but the Matlas are listed in city directories through 1977. The property was next owned, for a short time, by Dave Bostrom. During the 1980s, 11 East Carol Avenue was owned by Leonard and Debra Flaherty. The Flahertys operated Baywood Associates, a real estate appraisals company, which is also listed in contemporary city directories at 11 East Carol Avenue.� In 1989, the property was sold to Keith and Abby Kutner, who lived there for the following thirteen years. The property was then sold to business entrepreneurs Mary Flynn and You Mon Tsang. In 2013, 11 East Carol Avenue was purchased by current owners, Patrick and Brittney Aitken. The following table outlines the ownership and occupancy history of 11 East Carol Avenue, compiled from Burlingame ciry directories and San Mateo County Recorder's records: Years of Ownership Name(s) Occupation 1921 — 1968 William Jr. and Jean Watson; William T. Watson [son] Architect and San Mateo County building ins ector; William T. Watson: ardener 1968 — ca. 1977-78 Jose h and Rose Malta U.S. Postal Service clerk Ca. 1977-78 — 1980 Dave Bostrom Unknown 1980 — 1989 Leonard and Debra Flaherty Baywood Associates, real estate a raisals 1989 — 2002 Keith L. and Abb H. Kutner Unknown 2002 — 2013 Ma FI nn and You Mon Tsan Entre reneurs8 2013 — Present Patrick and Brittne Aitken Advertisin software Evaluation (Sianificance): The house at 11 East Carol Avenue is not currently listed in the National Register of Historic Places (National Register) or the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register). The building does not appear in the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) as of 2012, indicating that no record of previous survey or evaluation is on file with the California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP). The City of Burlingame does not currently have a register of historic properties, and therefore the property is not listed locally. 11 East Carol Avenue does not appear to be individually eligible for listing in the National or California Registers under Criterion A/1 (Events) for its association with any events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or the United States. Constructed in 1921, the building does convey contextual significance as a single-family residence associated with the development of Glenwood Park and the surrounding suburbs. However, it is not among the earliest homes in the neighborhood, nor does it appear especially influential in the overall development of the neighborhood. It is one of many residence of similar size and style constructed during the 1920s-1930s building boom in this area and is not individually representative, nor significant, within this historic context. Therefore, the property does not appear to be individually eligible for listing under Criterion A/1. '"New Charter Government Rules County" and "By Their Fruits," San Mateo Times and Daily News Leader, July 1, 1933, page 1-2. 2"Last Tribute to Wm. Watson," San Mateo Times and Daily News Leader, January 22, 1940, page 12. ' San Mateo Times and Daily News Leader, August 19, 1941. °"Real Estate Transfers," San Mateo Times and Daily News Leader, August 21, 1944. 5 Burlingame City directories, 1921-1968. It is unconfirmed if the sale of the house occurred because of Jean Watson's death. 6 1974 San Mateo County directory. ' 1980, 1987, 1989 Burlingame city directories and San Mateo County directories. 8 Chris Ross, "Interview with Outmarket CEO You Mon Tsang," Systym Marketing Experience Design blog, http:/lsystym.co/interview-outmarket- ceo-mon, accessed online December 22, 2015. DPR 523L State of California - The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 11 of 17 Resource Name or # 11 East Carol Avenue *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date December 15, 2015 O Continuation ❑ Update 11 East Carol Avenue does not appear to be individually eligible for listing in the National or California Registers under Criterion B/2 (Persons). Research has not revealed any association with people significant in local, state or national history. The most prominent owners and occupants of the subject property were the Watson's. While William Watson Jr.'s position as San Mateo County's first building inspector is notable, there is insufficient information available to ascertain any individual impact to the county's development. Other shorter-term owners do not appear to be significant within a larger historical context. Research does not indicate that former owners have risen to a level of significance at the local, state, or national level such that the property would be individually eligible for listing under Criterion B/2. 11 East Carol Avenue does not appear to be individually eligible for listing in the National or California Registers under Criterion C/3 (Architecture) as a building that embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction. The architect and builder are currently unknown, so it cannot be said to be the work of a master at this time. It is an example of the typical scale and modest design constructed in the neighborhood in the 1920s. It reflects a Tudor Revival/English Cottage style prevalent among revival styles in the neighborhood with the half-hipped treatment at the roof and half-timbering. However, the building does not exhibit enough notable architectural details to constitute a particularly outstanding or distinctive example of the Tudor Revival/English Cottage style, and it does not appear to be an influential or noteworthy example of residential construction in the neighborhood. For these reasons, the property is not individually significant for its architectural merit and does not appear eligible for listing under Criterion C/3. Doesn't appear significant as either, nor as a combination of the two — too vernacular. This property was not assessed for its potential to yield information important in prehistory or history, per National Register and California Register Criterion D/4 (Information Potential). This Criterion is typically reserved for archeological resources. The analysis of the house at 11 East Carol Avenue for eligibility under California Register Criterion 4(Information Potential) is beyond the scope of this report. Evaluation (Inte9ritv): The house at 11 East Carol Avenue has undergone few major alterations and prominent additions have been constrained to the rear faqade. The building has undergone several interior remodels and repairs to portions of the first floor and crawlspace due to termite damage. At an unknown date, the shed-roofed volume was added to the rear fa�ade. The building still conveys its original design and character and retains integrity of design, materials, workmanship, and feeling. The house has not been moved and retains integrity of location. It continues to be used as a single-family residence within a dominantly residential neighborhood. The surrounding neighborhood of one to two-story residences has retained the design characteristics of the Glenwood Park subdivision and many houses appear to be relatively unaltered. Therefore, 11 East Carol Avenue retains integrity of setting and associati on. For these reasons, the building retains integrity. Conclusion 11 East Carol Avenue was constructed in 1921 during an early wave of the building boom of residential subdivision in and around Glenwood Park. The building has undergone some minor alterations and additions, which are mostly confined to the rear fa�ade, interior, and foundation. No significant events are associated with the property, nor is it considered to be an outstanding example of Tudor Revival/English Cottage style architecture in the area. Longtime owners, the Watsons, and later occupants do not rise to sufficient levels of individual significance. Therefore, the California Historical Resource Status Code (CHRSC) of "6Z" has been assigned to the property, meaning that it was "found ineligible for the National Register, California Register, or local designation through survey evaluation."9 This conclusion does not address whether the building would qualify as a contributor to a potential historic district. A cursory inspection of the surrounding area reveals a high concentration of early twentieth-century residences that warrant further study. Additional research and evaluation of Glenwood Park and surroundings neighborhoods as a whole would need to be done to verify the neighborhood's eligibility as a historic district. 9 California State Office of Historic Preservation Department of Parks and Recreation, Technica/ Assistance Bulletin #8: User's Guide fo the California Historica/ Resource Status Codes & Historical Resource /nventory Directory, Sacramento, November 2004. DPR 523L State of California—The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Page 12 of 17 *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. Primary # HRI # Trinomial Resource Name or # 11 East Carol Avenue "Date December 15, 2015 0 Continuation ❑ Update "B12. References: - Brechin, Gray. Imperial San Francisco. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1999. - Building Permit Records, 11 East Carol Avenue, Burlingame, CA. - Burlingame City Directories. - Burlingame Historical Society. - California State Office of Historic Preservation Department of Parks and Recreation, Technical Assistance Bul/efin #8: User's Guide to the California Historical Resource Status Codes & Historica/ Resource Inventory Directory, Sacramento, November 2004. - Carey & Company. "Draft Inventory of Historic Resources: Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan." February 19, 2008. - Condon-Wirgler, Diane. "Burlingame Park, Burlingame Heights, Glenwood Park." Burlingame, CA: Burlingame Historical Society, ca. 2004. - Evans, Beverley L., ed. Burlingame: Lively Memories- a Picforial View. Burlingame, CA: Burlingame Historical Society, 1977. - Garrison, Joanne. Burlingame: Centennial 1908-2008. Burlingame, CA: Burlingame Historical Society, 2007. - McAlester, Virginia & Lee. A Field Guide to American Houses. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2003. -"Preliminary Historic Resources Inventory: City of Burlingame." July 26, 1982. - Ross, Chris. "Interview with Outmarket CEO You Mon Tsang." Systym Marketing Experience Design blog. Accessed online December 22, 2015. http://systym.co/interview-outmarket-ceo-mon - San Mateo County Assessor Grantor-Grantee Index. - San Mateo County Directories. - San Mateo Times and Daily New Leader, available via Ancestry.com. - Sanborn Fire Insurance Company maps: 1921, 1949. - Water Meter Cards "11 East Carol Avenue", Burlingame Historical Sociery. -"Unrecorded Subdivision Book 46" County of San Mateo Public Works, Unrecorded Map Index. DPR 523L State of California—The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Page 13 of 17 *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. Historic Maps and Photographs: Primary # HRI # Trinomial Resource Name or # 11 E *Date December 15. 2015 arol Avenue 0 Continuation ❑ Update �Tr.u.�� ' � _ '___�'_�'r___'___�__"1'��_ aat'____�"" �"__'_'___1� """' __... ""'""�_"""""""_"""'.'_""""""""_"�.w OlJ�L11R1/V�IE � �� '� n r�q � '; '\ , L.._J I i. I - y� I . r ' 0 O i; � i i � • � � � � � • � ��\\� i � � �� ' ��`� �� . �.- � � ;� � _ � ` �-� ; , ` �� . ;- ,� r.:`? , � � �� , .' � ; ,� 4,y' „ � : \ '�,A� _ , , el� ' � . \ � �L, '' '' ' � � . . , . �1 , . � ;� �' r,� -.�� +° � � •�, -'" � � ;i � - , �w , , ` x � -- _ d„ ,y ,- .. , ; : � �� r 4, � � � � � — � � � r A � a � r� I 1I .. c i � a ,4 �� II- ��, . •.LT— a ypy[nf ~ N t- � j- � I� i � � _� � � �� t----� � � � , � �� a � �.. , , ; � � ' T\ .._ ;.�'�' '� i � \ � � �� : i, �. ' � i 1 ' � \ C ,—. , ' a � �� 1, .� � �i . : �� N I ' _ � �.\ r l'�� i I S�.\ \ � " � � �--_� �w I j i _ � tl � �\ � � 1 g � �'' � = tL. — � �. � . � 1 \\\\ W � � � � � •� `,��' � - 1 I 1 �. �y � T' �' � � � . � � � � � � / `,,` \ M �L �..�,_ ' � i�� :� ' \ 1 ! �. _ ,,, - � � ,. � � �-=�; - � �� e ; � I � j � Y 1, \ - � � ' � d� ; ' ' -' ' , ; � ,— -- . \ �— I ,-----,� ,:., �" 22 �-` � � � ; � � ; ; � --' ;� �� ,:., , , � , I 1 • j •� �l- �� \ � � � 1 ' \ � ; 1 � ' ' 1 �_ . I�J i� + � � �.li � ', �t � �_.--" � — \ .,—_ � � �� _r I l '�� ,f ;� �-i� �;, , , �� _S \ � �; --�� --�-� �. : __- � ---�- � �. 1921 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map of the subject area, published in March just prior to the construction of 11 East Carol Avenue (subject lot outlined in red). North is up and left. Source: San Francisco Public Library Digital Sanborn Map Collection, edited by author. DPR 523L State of California —The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomia� rage �i 4 or � i Resource Name or # 11 East Carol Avenue *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date December 15, 2015 � Continuation ❑ Update y OlL' eo.6 CypRESS .:' --- A� �J -- --_�►V•I��. � , •1 -----^-^----^--------^'��----- --- •... .. _ --- -- - --- - - -------_- - _-•-- -..[•-------- �� 7 ,.• , � � -• ' "-' - ..--- - • '• -- '�5,� .,.. -^" '"v� ac �n.r T—a"_ —�—� -- - --- - � -- (r�+uy._�v ,rc+_. .�.7�.-r .. ' . , _ � ...m � . � '"1'w 1 4\ �\ � B I •I I � ' � �" ��'i * �r}-; � � s ,. T ,L y � r� �� l � ��\ O <� s � i � L ' I ` I ' j � � I �" ..1 - . V' , h - i � � � . . ��° � � �i._� � Li-- ' .'� �'. � �' n� i o—'+ � � �.�' � � ' j.'� � • \ � � __.. � } t y �I / ' / � ' /� / , / ; 1 �\ 1 '"''t _— -- -� /p/ : � C� j.�/' y� I- � •� � � , I'' " �\( 1 � ..-} �� F�-_� J �' 1 '" N �� ' /J,• \ ' I� . n I ��• � � (``�\' Y '� , � ' �\ \ .. \ ; D . f 1.�"1 � n l ,� _'�'" ; � �g ��y /� ! V � . / , � 1 \ \ �•' • � F ' �L.I L��'Ld �_"�J �� --1� j-'�—•.I 1 , � �\ � i i � � \ ' � 1 •� �1 ` 1 \ ' � I /�¢ � f � '1 I• �� V f I 1 ` y/ ,�LI . , . -- � . .,SaT ... �rur :. ... ,r- .. ar -..i �� 11 � � 5 \ �— • es � �� .w � 1 .1 / q � �__iY�t��J..�' d a sI i HII ; i \_ � I_" � - � Y�-_ —!� ! i � . � _� � D • T.j .1"L--� �1 ', b �� r l � � �_ —___ � � � � . ( n ' � �� , �. � : . �'�� _� , �. - �� , - - --�1 � , % i- � " � �`-� ' ' � ` r _ - � �f - �� I a ! --�� _ � ; s (� � �i �� ; �—� --1I o � ,°� L�C� '` �� i � - \ c�C /�, L.'J —.� I - . __. i � �#� ��•��`�/i�7...�i ��-_�.�;�. _ �� a i j � � d � % �r• _ � ! , �v J �,_—�� " , ..J _, ,�: Y� ' ��• � � �'�` f �� - �� ! i � d � I i I I i I � E� , � r � - y ..._ 1z-r ._.._.i�` �� \ `.+� � �� •• I k J � e � � � � — -' ' � \ � - � a .. �: ;� �,��! '3� I; L•� � � , t- _ ; —� . , , � �� - - ''-� ' � �` ��'\\` .�� ..[T�' � � ': -..�, � ' ; i I� � -- W ; '',� �,\ �,,. � �� ' ; � �� K /y � ��J ,: Z \ i � •� i � i"— i � • '. r- �,• , , � ,„ � ~` � • , ''�. . � . ��.- . / •. ` ��. � :n . --- - __ , ,�/; , . , (� r . ;' i \ \J �--� --- __� i �» � J .,,_ '�� / i f � , . �-' q ,, I I� �� a � \� � � • �• I r. ' I � ♦� , 4 '.1 • rs � � - �-�,,t I � ! ; � � � �,, � � � , . , ,. , ' � : :, r � `�., t �r — ` d� \ , � � � --_� ; ° f I � ?`r r . , '� , �� " � • jr i 2 2 � � `� _ i �I --. _ � C� _ _�". � ; .-i \. I �---; � � t33 L-� .� � � � ' `"-- ��.--f- I� -- `\ �� i � ', � � �'�`� � �� ' z � �.-�'T ^` � . . �� i'� Lr' e � i S' —_.s— n-1 �J � ' � : ' � : '' j • : T C � �� C � ' a ' —_ ( ____..._—__ — I ._� , � �' � D I I JI \ \\�� \ I �� ;�.� , �� 9 ti j� �—YJ�,- ___ 1 -- --- � �,� >� S' _� . .. � I � �. ' ;�, � f'. ' � � F� __ _. . _.. �. �, • ' � l J �� ` . -- � : �� . 1. � �- - - --- � `�. A� , �, : . . . — -- -_ — ---. ---s - 7 � _. �. . __ . , � , 1949 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map of the subject area with 11 East Carol Avenue shown in red. North is up and left. Source: San Francisco Public Library Digital Sanborn Map Collection, edited by author. DPR 523L State of California—The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Page 15 of 17 "Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. /a � ��\ " �a � � \+ �\� p 4 � a M ' 9. � R 0 : t R M � � i q�L � � Primary # HRI # Trinomial Resource Name or # 11 E "`Date December 15, 2015 aroi Avenue 0 Continuation ❑ Update � q � � �.fU �� I ' \ ry ( � i ,\�� • p �r � �Q . / i Detail view of 1949 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map showing 11 East Carol Avenue (outlined in red). The shed-roofed volume at the rear fagade is not depicted on this map. The detached garage is also not shown. Source: San Francisco Public Library Digital Sanborn Map Collection, edited by author. DPR 523L State of California—The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Page 16 of 17 *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. I� r. .::.•�--�' ■"�'�� M 11 East Carol Avenue Primary # HRI # Trinomial Resource Name or # 11 East Carol Avenue *Date December 15, 2015 O Continuation ❑ Update �. .. ' -. � 4"�48,�. .. �F3 .,� ��..,... ��.�i . . ;�..,s�� :. .� � k�, .�.-- - - - - � . . -,,. ::;;��.� . �� "�� '�;,�_. , � ,:� �� riped awning has been installed above the windows at the primary fagade. Source: Burlingame Historical Society. DPR 523L �•� � -, l�� v _ � ---'--�-.r.�—.,.,_.....__. _ 71 East Carol Avenue in 1968. Source: Burlingame Historical Society. State of California—The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Page 17 of 17 *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. Primary # HRI # Trinomial Resource Name or # 11 I *Date December 15, 2015 aroi Hvenue � Continuation ❑ Update DPR 523L Source: Burlingame Historical Society. RESOLUTION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, application has been made for Desiqn Review for first and second story additions at 11 East Carol Avenue, Zoned R-1, Brittnev and Patrick Aitken, propertY owners, APN: 028-302-160; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on March 28, 2016, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 2. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th dav of March 2016, by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Design Review 11 East Carol Avenue Effective April 7, 2016 Page 1 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped February 8, 2016, Revised, Sheets A1.0 through A5.0, L-1, T1, GN, SP, B2.0, and G2.0; and that tree protection measures shall be installed for the Redwood tree at the rear, left side of the property, and that these measures shall be inspected by the City Arborist prior to any demolition or construction on the site and shall remain in place until final inspections for the project are complete; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Building Division's December 7, 2015, January 28 and March 15, 2016 memos, the Parks Division's December 15, 2015, February 2 and March 16, 2016 memos, the Engineering Division's December 10, 2015 and February 8, 2016 memos, the Fire Division's December 10, 2015 memo, and the Stormwater Division's December 7, 2015, memo, shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Design Review 11 East Carol Avenue Effective April 7, 2016 Page 2 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 12. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 13. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 14. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME FINDING THAT THERE IS NO SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THAT THE APPROVAL OF A REQUEST FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITIONS TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AT 11 EAST CAROL AVENUE WILL HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 6 OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME hereby finds as follows: Section 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and a Negative Declaration, per Negative Declaration ND-589-P, is hereby approved. Section 2. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28thdav of March, 2016 by the following vote: Secretary . CITY OF BURLINGAME " COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLIN,GAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD =�� , BURLINGAME, CA 94010 ''ai�� ,' ':'—,, PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org Site: 11 EAST CAROL AVENUE The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, MARCH 28, 2016 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Negative Declaration and Design Review for first and second story additions to an existing single family dwelling at 11 EAST CAROL AVENUE zoned R-l. APN 028-302-160 Mailed: March 18, 2016 (Please refer to other side) PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Citv of Burlingame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to other side) ,j� " IS � . qkr �:' \�" .�,. � � �s .�u i t - . rcro , � �� k�a � ,m� +"�'`�C., a - . . f 1 1�� .n,;� � � �: �, . "'�,,. � � \ �5,�i � �t �.H I, �� , ^K'� fY„ „, � . ��"t � -._ ; m� �^ l , , �% � � � � � t � � n � �� '�\�, / �` , � ��,. � � . � -- , � �, ,� � �� °;�p _ � � � �' � � r d � m , � r, 1 ; -_ , k �,3 �; � : ,., - ,.p t �' �w , ,tiy � 'f . . . •y� . � , .� . ,. � r � � �� ' �'" �i �u� . �ry�y"e i �: �s _ f2 ' � ,,.�� '� � � � ��, � � e! �� :�! � �� th `� 1 { �! y ;� rc,C � �la��'�.: �� ..Q, ` z � , ` �:.: ,� J-. '� ,+ r' ! ^ . . � - �; �� $ �, . .. . ' 1 i � a � � yf � .., m� � e. , ; , :;, -� a. � , ti � � _ ��l� . � ".. fi�,' .. e,� ' / " � � m,n r °' � ''- y n . � ' � � � `" � n r, � �°"w ' 1 ya � ��w +�� , r-, v � yy 5 � � �. � - d n,�'� �� *.,f � �� "� �� ' � g ti ° ;` � .. , -- ` -. M Aa .� +'m ��p , " "W � � � � � �` 1r i a � � ��f,�'.. ,. ' �, �: m m� � �j�� se2x_ ' � � �a u �, � .. �'' .�,� mv. � �' � � Uu' 6 (�' . .� ' +�.. . y . � � � � n��a i F �� " ^ ' i � 1 �,}� �F�S ..n, ir +rtr ro '. � � 1,-' • I . i I i \ . „� .. , xE q �'� t_ n � o � �v � � � q N � �. �� + � ' y s � ��n � , � _ � � +� , '�3�� '� � �-` : �4 �' a�� _% ° ^ �,, m � � ��s � �" ' � � � � � / , »w ' ' _� ,�'" �, .F � ` ��- � , ,a � � �( f� , �� . , � - ' � � mc � � r� '� �' u: '"� � ' . � � � , b r � � � ��" .. . �q ^,� �� °` �'� ` �_ � � ,�,,,� � , �, '°��5.. �,� � �� ` y'P ' ��, "�� r'�7" r � � y�,�,� ..`--� �, I Y , � � � �p i �, 6 � . x,m �.� t< ti(� � 7� q r r � ..0 � , .:. . . 1 r . .�«�' ,. �'"� t �z'G � `� � � <"� � � � i -�, , � �?�� . \ k ' yw . \ � � y, � � .� - „ , . � �, ,U � 'ry � � �, � � � ; � W .� �� , �� ,� , �.: , , a . �a�� m . _ � , d,8� :' _ Z � � Lqsr�.. , s , • '„ ' ,.. : « `.r- � , ,; , � +'�n� w � � � �� , � � �;� �n; � . t - � � � �; ` � � �� `�, � `�� , �� ,� � ' � � � Y ., n; � . , . � � � %�� ,� � �m, ... �. ' ' �; ,u. - .. � ..ae� ,. � ' � . , x -... ? � �:�, . "i � �� a �` � .,: . -- . � m . ...._ � i<:. � . „y � � � � � . , �� . �r e' . " � y � � i : � �. . � � � � , . . ' � �` " �.�, � J fi � � , � , w� �'a��' �+ ��>, w� t� R0 ` � � ,�Cpi - ', � � �� ,. �. „ �� , / ��, � �• � , � , - �f�� x� � / � '�� r . , � � , h � �,n � �� m ,: a� : �� ; 4 � � `L �� ,,,, � a * �Ni� � ` � �s �� °�, � �� Cq�� . �, �� ! �� 7 � _ �- .w , � � � �e,�i �?. � \�' � � �,y� �� ,� ',O� .�,3� , � , � ». "" , �.. , �, .,, ..� � , ., �� r°,,, n, r �' v "� � , 1� 3, F,Y � o..� `�a .,', ' a \�� \ ��" �. � �� • • .. „r� ''k + . ' �: � � , . �. rqk � . . , � „� aL ,., . . , ^ ....,.. � T t � .v • . � . � �.. " ��. ,. R .. � �, � �� p�. "� � �,a' # � � � �, � , � � ` < � '':•: � , i�� . s � � r � , i� �� « �' ,w. ..�a°'. e, . ' ; : ,+�, � � �� „ � m, „ ° a � ?$ �� 6 � � �'''a - �y,�k/#' �� 4�d & i � :i„� l . x„�4a1 � ... �,�� u � tv � . .. t �' '" . r i �, � � q= � �+w ��t �,� . �...... ` � �- ' :�� „� . �. � �. ,o � �� 'Q� � ^�:; t` � '�, `r„° • �!R, .� � �+ �,� ° � r � �,"� � �•' � z � •� 8 -, �. �� ,. � i ri'i�� I I� �-�� il�`� � � � � � �. � �; �°' ��1�a � � i � � } wr • � g $ "� -•,..._. ' �� E � � �w , `., ....,;; a �. , -. �