Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11 East Carol Avenue - Resolution<,. RECORDING REQUESTED BY: Planning Department City of Burlingame WHEN RECORDED MAIL T0: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 20� 7-021986 9:58 am 03114i17 R'� es 16 � FEE Count oi Pag Recorded ir Official Recoids Gcunty of San Mateo Mark Church Assessar-County i I Ilrl IIIeIcIlorllerlll�lll I ��!'���i�l������1�������l���i�`.�I��ii������������� * I illllll� �I � 0 2 3 b, 9 3 0 � R 0 Resolution No. 17a - 2016 11 EAST CAROL AVENUE APN 028-302-160 TITLE OF DOCUMENT I hereby certify this to be a full, true and correct copy of the document it purports to be, the original of which is on file in my office. �� Date: January 30, 2017 ����'.� William Meeker, Community Devefopment Director RESOLUTION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, appiication has been made for Desiqn Review for first and second story additions at 11 East Carol Avenue. Zoned R-1, Brittnev and Patrick Aitken, propertv owners APN: 028-302-160; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on March 28, 2016, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 2. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, �[LC�%L�.'t_ C-�, ��- , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th dav of March 2016, by the following vote: 11 EAST CAROL AVENUE - RESO 17a-2016 ,avEs: Bandrapalli, Gaul, Loftis Sargent ruoEs: None AaseNT: DeMartini, Gum, Terrones Recuseo: None � . Secreta EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Design Review 11 East Carol Avenue Effective April 7, 2016 Page 1 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped February 8, 2016, Revised, Sheets A1.0 through A5.0, L-1, T1, GN, SP, 62.0, and G2.0; and that tree protection measures shall be installed for the Redwood tree at the rear, left side of the property, and that these measures shall be inspected by the City Arborist prior to any demolition or construction on the site and shall remain in place until final inspections for the project are complete; and that Sheet A3.0 (revised) shall be submitted to the Planning Commission as an FYI to show the second story window centered under the gable ridge; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Building Division's December 7, 2015, January 28 and March 15, 2016 memos, the Parks Division's December 15, 2015, February 2 and March 16, 2016 memos, the Engineering Division's December 10, 2015 and February 8, 2016 memos, the Fire Division's December 10, 2015 memo, and the Stormwater Division's December 7, 2015, memo, shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Design Review 11 East Carol Avenue Effective April 7, 2016 demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; Page 2 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 12. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 13. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 14. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. 1�. RECQRDING REQUESTED BY: Planning Department City of Burlingame WHEN RECORDED MAIL T0: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Zo� 7-02� � sz 8:00 am 03/10/17 R1 Fee: NQ FEE Count of Pages 2 Recorded in Official Records County of San Mateo Mark Church Assessor-Cvunty Clerk-Reccrder ' Illili'!I iii IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII l!'Ii II� �! �lII! Ilili lIII llll � R 0 0 0 2 3 6 5 0 4 0* Resalution Nu. 17b - 2016 11 EAST CAROL AVENUE APN 028-302-160 TITLE OF DOCUMENT I hereby certify this to be a full, true and correct copy of the document it purports to be, the original of which is on file in my office. Date: January 30, 2017 � j��( ���� — William Meeker, Community Development Director t RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME FINDING THAT THERE IS NO SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THAT THE APPROVAL OF A REQUEST FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITIONS TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AT 11 EAST CAROL AVENUE WILL HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 6 OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME hereby finds as follows: Section 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and a Negative Declaration, per Negative Declaration ND-589-P, is hereby approved. Section 2. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. �� /^ Chairman I , f'�t t ��. c_ ��.,,..L� , the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Comn by the following vote: 11 EAST CAROLAVE. - RESO 17b-2016 ,aves: Bandrapalli, Gaul, Loftis Sargerrt Noes: None ,aesEruT: DeMartini, Gum, Terrones REcuseo: None Secretary of the Planning Commission of foregoing resolution was introduced and ission held on the 28thdav of March, 2016 r RESOLUTION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, application has been made for Desiqn Review for first and second story additions at 11 East Carol Avenue, Zoned R-1, Brittnev and Patrick Aitken, propertv owners, APN: 028-302-160; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on March 28, 2016, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 2. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th dav of March 2016, by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Design Review 11 East Carol Avenue Effective April 7, 2016 Page 1 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped February 8, 2016, Revised, Sheets A1.0 through A5.0, L-1, T1, GN, SP, B2.0, and G2.0; and that tree protection measures shall be installed for the Redwood tree at the rear, left side of the property, and that these measures shall be inspected by the City Arborist prior to any demolition or construction on the site and shall remain in place until final inspections for the project are complete; and that Sheet A3.0 (revised) shall be submitted to the Planning Commission as an FYI to show the second story window centered over the first floor entry; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 3. that any changes to the size which would include adding permit; or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this 4. that the conditions of the Building Division's December 7, 2015, January 28 and March 15, 2016 memos, the Parks Division's December 15, 2015, February 2 and March 16, 2016 memos, the Engineering Division's December 10, 2015 and February 8, 2016 memos, the Fire Division's December 10, 2015 memo, and the Stormwater Division's December 7, 2015, memo, shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full ... EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Design Review 11 East Carol Avenue Effective April 7, 2016 demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; Page 2 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 12. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 13. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 14. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans.