The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1308 Castillo Avenue - Staff ReportItem No. 7a Consent Calendar PROJECT LOCATION 1308 Castillo Avenue City of Burlingame Design Review Address: 1308 Castillo Avenue Request: Design review for a new, two-story house and detached garage. Item No. 7a Consent Calendar Meeting Date: May 9, 2016 Applicant and Designer: Chu Design Associates, James Chu APN: 027-191-140 Property Owner: Brian Roche Lot Area: 6,002 SF General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15303 (a) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including one single-family residence, or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone, is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, this exemption may be applied to the construction or conversion of up to three (3) single-family residences as part of a project. Project Description: The subject property is a down sloping lot with an approximately 5-foot difference between the front and rear property line. There is a 10-foot City alley immediately adjacent on the right (south) side of the property that contains water and sewer lines. That area is not included as part of the subject property. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing single family dwelling and construct a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage. The total proposed floor area is 3,308 SF (0.55 FAR,) where 3,335 SF (0.55 FAR) is the maximum allowed. Two parking spaces are required for the proposed four-bedroom house, one of which must be covered. The new garage will provide one 14'-4"' x 20'-4" covered parking space and one uncovered space (9' x 20') will be provided in the driveway. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following application: ■ Design review for a new, two-story house (C.S. 25.57.010(a)(1)). 1308 Castillo Avenue Lot Area: 6,002 SF Plans date stamped: April 27, 2016 ORIGINAL REVISED PROPOSAL PROPOSAL ; ALLOWED/REQUIRED 2/22/16 PLANS 4/27/16 PLANS SETBACKS Front (1st flr): ; 22'-0" No change 16'-2" (block average) ; (2nd flr): 20'-0" 20'-0„ :................................................................................................. _...............................................................................................................................:. Side (left): 5 -0 No...cha.n.ge .... _ ...... 4.1.�0� (right): ; 10'-0" 4'-0" Rear (1st flr): 28'-6" No change 15'-0" : ............................................................. (2nd flr): 43'-0" 20'-0" : .................................... ; ...........................................................................................................................................:............... ' ................................................................................... : Lot Coverage: 2,378 SF No change 2 400 SF (39.6%) ` ; :...........................................................................................................................................:. ; ; ...........................................................................................................................................:............................................................................. � FAR: ' 3,308 SF No change 3,335 SF' 0.55 FAR 0.55 FAR Design Review 1308 Castillo Avenue ORIGINAL REVISED PROPOSAL PROPOSAL ' ALLOWED/REQUIRED 2/22/16 PLANS 4/27/16 PLANS # of bedrooms: 4 No change --- Parking: 1 covered No change 1 covered (14'-4" x 20'-4") (10' x 20') 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') Height: 28'-8" No change 30'-0" DH Envelope: Complies No change C.S. 25.26.035 ' (0.32 x 6,002 SF) + 1,100 SF + 315 SF = 3,335 SF (0.55 FAR) Staff Comments: See attached memos from the Chief Building Official, Fire Division, Engineering Division, and Parks Division. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission design review study meeting on April 25, 2016, the Commission had a few comments, but overall the project was well received and the Planning Commission voted to place this item on the consent calendar (see the attached April 25, 2016 Planning Commission Minutes). The applicant submitted a response letter and revised plans date stamped April 27, 2016, in response to the Planning Commission's comments. There were no changes made to the building footprint or envelope. The plans include the following revisions: • Front dormer over living room has been reduced in height (now a window seat); • Wood siding has been removed from all dormers and replaced with stucco; • Detached garage roof revised, changed from hipped roof at rear to gable end with wood vent added (at owner's request); and • Windows on the staircase turret on left elevation have been rearranged. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. InterFace of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components -2- Design Review 1308 Castillo Avenue Suggested Findings for Design Review: That the architectural style, mass and bulk of the new house is compatible with the existing character of the neighborhood; that the architectural elements of the proposed structure are interesting and provide articulation; that the curved turret on the left elevation is a unique feature which will help to soften the mass and bulk of the structure, therefore for these reasons the project is found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review criteria. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped April 27, 2016, sheets A.1 through A.6 and L1.1; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, landscape plan or amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Engineering Divisions February 25, 2016 memo, the Building Division's February 24, 2016 memo, the Parks Division's February 25, 2016 memo, the Fire Division's March 7, 2016 memo, and the Stormwater Divisions March 1, 2016 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; -3- Design Review 1308 Castillo Avenue 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 12. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 13. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 14. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 15. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 16. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plan. Catherine Keylon Senior Planner c: James Chu, Chu Design Associates, applicant and designer Attachments: Response Letter Submitted by the Applicant, date stamped April 27, 2016 April 25, 2016 Planning Commission Minutes Application to the Planning Commission Staff Comments Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed April 29, 2016 Aerial Photo -4- r111�":� ��11 ��'��IIIIl111ii"�1�/ � i j�,'nl�l �` � � • . ��;4'll '�r-+�• � Home Design u Engineering April 26, 2016 City of Burlingame Planning Commission 501 Primrose Rd Burlingame, CA 94010 Re:1308 Castillo Ave. Burlingame, CA 94010 Dear Planning Commissioner: Per your design review comments, we have made the following changes to the new proposed two story residence at 1308 Castillo Ave., Burlingame. 1. Reduced the size of front dormer over living room; plz see front elevation. 2. Removal of all wood siding at all dormers. 3. Rearranged the windows placement at staircase turret. Thank you for your time in reviewing the revised plan. Sincerely, %?c�vtsed �� James Chu Chu Design RECEIVED APR272016 CITY OF BURLINGAME CDD-PI.ANNING DIV. 55 West 43rd Avenue San Mateo, CA 94403 Phone: (650�345-9286 Fax: (650)345-9287 � CITY 0 '`�' ; :� ! 1 :,.-�.�� ,,,,� , a '~rA� y � N PaoRnr City of Burlingame Meeting Minutes Planning Commission BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Monday, April 25, 2016 7:00 PM Council Chambers b. 1308 Castillo Avenue, zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review for a new two-story single family dwelling with a detached garage (Chu Design Associates, James Chu, applicant and designer; Brian Roche, property owner) (62 noticed) Staff Contact: Catherine Keylon All Commissioners had visited the property. There were no ex-parte communications to report. Senior P/anner Hurin provided an overview of the staff report. Questions of staff.� There were no questions of staff. Chair DeMartini opened the public hearing. James Chu and Brian Roche represented fhe applicant. Commission questions/comments: > The plans show the stairway enclosure to be curved, will the windows be cuived too? Looks like there may be corners where the curve breaks. The execution of the curve is critical. Wants to make sure that it doesn't appear cheap. Doesn't want to see a lot of ridges on the roof of the curved portion . (Chu - noted that the curved wall has been done before. The windows will be flat.) > What is the thinking behind the shiplap bays and the arched roofs? (Chu - wanted to provide a bit of a difference in the materia/s.) > Fee/s that the proportion on the front dormer makes ihe second floor look a bit heavy,� revisit. > What is the wide path to the right of the driveway? (Chu - an easement that can't be used for anything. Roche - will have a fence placed there.) Public comments: There were no public comments. Chair DeMartini closed the public hearing. Commission discussion: > The rendering is helpful, but makes the home look wider than it actually is; this makes the bay on the front stand out more. Likes how the plan is represented in the e/evations. Critical to property execute the curved wall. Can come back on Consent. Commissioner Terrones made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Sargent, to place the item on the Consent Calendar when ready for consideration. Discussion of motion: > Reconsider the positioning of the front dormer. City of Burlingame Page 1 Printed on 5/3/2018 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes April 25, 2016 > Something bothersome about the design as represented in the rendering; looks suburban. > Not convinced with the explanation regarding the use of shiplap siding. The motion was approved unanimously by the following vote: Aye: 7- DeMartini, Loftis, Gum, Terrones, Gaul, Bandrapalli, and Sargent City of Burlingame Page 2 Printed on 5/3/2018 M' �a• ,_� : �. suq�.�nanm� � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: � Design Review ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Variance ❑ Special Permit PROJECT ADDRESS: 1308 CASTILLO AVE. APPLICANT Name: CHU DESIGN ASSOCIATES Address: 55 W. 43RD AVE. City/State/Zip: SAN MATEO, CA 94403 Phone: 650-345-9286 x104 E-mail: James@chudesign.com ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Name: JAMES CHU Address: 55 W. 43RD AVE. City/State/Zip: SAN MATEO, CA 94403 Phone: 650-345-9286 x104 E-mail: lames@chudesign.com ❑ Parcel #: 027-191-140 ❑ Zoning / Other: PROPERTY OWNER Name: BRIAN ROCHE Address: 1308 CASTILLO AVE. City/State/Zip: BURLINGAME, CA Phone: i650) 455-8714 E-mail: �� :� Zo I (o Burlingame Business License #: 22684 Authorization to Reproduce Project Plans: I hereby grant the City of Burlingame the authority to reproduce upon request and/or post plans submitted with this application on the City's website as part of the Planning approval process and waive any claims against the City arising out of or related to such action. �� (Initials of Architect/Designer) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NEW TWO-STORY RESIDENCE W/ DETACHED GARAGE AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATURE: I herE best of my knowledge and bel� . ApplicanYs signature: I am aware of the propo d appli Commission. Property owner's signature:= under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the � Date: Z/ 2 Z//� an hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning , � . --, �� / � -�—� ,/ -�� " � �� , , .� Date: Z2 /6 r . , Date submitted: 2� 2 2� �(p 5: � NANDOUTS� PC Application. doc Project Comments Date: To: From: February 23, 2016 X Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 0 Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a new, finro-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1308 Castillo Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 027-191-140 Staff Review: March 1, 2016 1. A remove/replace utilities encroachment permit is required to (1) replace all curb, gutter, driveway and sidewalk fronting site, (2) plug all existing sanitary sewer lateral connections and install a new 4" lateral, (3) all water line connections to city water mains for services or fire line are to be installed per city standard procedures and specification, (4) any other underground utility works within city's right-of-way. 2. No storm waters, underground waters draining from any lot, building, or paved areas shall be allowed to drain to adjacent properties nor shall these waters be connected to the city's sanitary sewer system. These waters shall all drain to either artificial or natural storm drainage facilities by gravity or pumping regardless of the slope of the property. No rain water from roofs or other rain water drainage shall discharge upon a public sidewalk (except in single family area) per Municipal code sections 18.08.010 (m) and (n). `3> Please show how the post-construction will address the additional stormoff due to new residence. Please be aware that no additional storm runoff is allowed from the post-construction project site. 4. An erosion control plan will be required during the building permit review phase. This plan shall include, but not limited to, delineation of area of work, show primary and secondary erosion control measures, protection of creek or storm drain inlets, perimeter controls, protections for construction access points, and sediment control measures. Reviewed by: M. Quan Date: 2/25/16 Project Comments Date: To: February 23, 2016 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 0 Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 0 Parks Division (650) 558-7334 From: Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1308 Castillo Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 027-191-140 Staff Review: February 24, 2016 �: 2) NOTE: A condition of this project approval is that the Demolition Permit will not be issued and, and no work can begin (including the removal of � building components), until a Building Permit has been issued for the project. The property owner is responsible for assuring that no work is authorized or performed. When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. Provide details on the plans which show that all roof projections which project beyond the point where fire-resistive construction would be required will be constructed of one- hour fire-resistance-rated construction per 2013 CBC §705.2. NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address items 1 and 2 must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for Planning Commission action. The written resnonse must include clear direction re�arding where the requested information can be found on the plans. � Reviewed by: .L(' ��.t� �� Date: FebruarX24, 2016 Rick Caro III, CBO 650-558-7270 Project Comments Date: To: February 23, 2016 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (sso) sss-72so � Fire Division (650) 55&760�0 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-72Q4 X Parks Division (650) 558-7334 From: Planning StafF Subject: Request for Design Review for a new, finro-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1308 Castillo Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 027-191-140 Staff Review: March 7, 2016 '1 � Site plan must indude all existing trees and shrubs. 4 2, Plans do not show exising City Magnolia tree in front planter strip. 3. One additional landscape tree required as per ordinance. 4. No existing tree over 48 inches in circumference at 54 inches form base of tree may be removed without a Protected Tree Removal Permit from the Parks Division. (558-7330) 5. Irrigation plan required for building permit. Reviewed by: BD Date: 2/25/16 OUTDOOR WATER USE EFFICIENCY CHECKL.IST • . - w • - • � b • • . I tertify tha e subject raject eets the specified requirements of the Water ConservaUon in landscaping Ordinance. 2-17-16 ` Sign ure Date � �" i �& ��` ^�.p�- v F � �� k � y F ; � - .,. '.. . :., . .: . . � , ., . _ i. _ . �: � T e .``yt.> L _ _ :.Y .r . ,.. . ,. i .. .. . , . . ri Singl� Family !.,l Multi-Family L] Commercia[ J Institutional J IrrEgation only J industrial :...1 Other: Applicant I�ame (printj: Contact Rhane #: Project site address: 13OH CaStlllO AVeCtU2 Agency Review Project Area (sq.ft. or acre�: 6002 Sf # of Units: � # of Meters: '� (Pass) (Faii) . Total Landscape Area (sq.ft.j: 3Op$ �,� , . U U �� :� �� Turf Irrigated Area (sq.ft.j: 67: S� , U C1 I Non-Turf Irrigated Area (sq.ft.): 233rj Sf U (_t ' Special Landscape Area (5LA) (sq.ft.j: N% /� U U ' Water Feature Surface Area (sq.ft.j: N� � .,;�� : : , ., � � �� , : - }„�.. _�� _ ��_ ew .��,.� �.v.�s� �� , , � x � ,_; - _�., , .. Turf less than 25°� af the landscape area is L}�Yes 0 '� turf U fUo, See Water Budget _ __ _._ _ _._ _.__._ _._. - -- All turf areas are > 8 feet wide � Yes U U' All turf is planted on slo�res < 25% � Yes U u Non-Turf At least 80� of non-turf area is native � Yes � U or low water use plants D fVo, See Water Budget Hydrozones Plants are grauped by Hydrozones Yes U U At leasi 2-inches of mukh on exposed Yes U' �' Mulch soil surfac�s Irrigation System E�ciency 7090 fTa (104% Eio for SLAs3 Yes U � No overspray or runoff !� Yes U u Irrigatia�s System Design Systsm efficieney � 70% U Yes � U Automatic, setf-adjusting irrigation ❑ No, not required for Tier 1 0 0 controliers �Yes _ w .. ___�_ Moisture sensor/rain sensor shutoffs � Yes � U _ _ _. . Na sprayheads in � 8-ft wide area �( Yes � 0 Irrigatian Time System Aniy operatQs kaetween S PM Yes � U and 10 AM Metering Separate irrigation rneter No, not required because < 5,000 sq.fL C3 U (J Yes 5wimming Pools / Spas Cover highly recammended U Yes U U � No, not required Water Features Recirculating U Yes � � _ _., <, . . _ . ..._. . m_ Less than 10%of landscape area U Yes ❑ U Documentation Checklist l,i(Yes � u _ � _ . ._. landscape and Irrigation Design P[an lJ Prepared by applicant u � l�Prepared by professionai __. _ . __ _ __ __ _ Water Budge[ (aptional) U Prepared by applicant C:I C.i C,.! Prepared by professional Audit Post-instalfation audit compieted lJ Completed by applicant � u U Completed by professional [Agency Name, Address, Telephone#, Fax #] Project Comments Date: To: From: February 23, 2016 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 X Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1308 Castillo Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 027-191-140 Staff Review: March 1, 2016 Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence. 1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter. (Utilization of a passive purge design system may permit a smaller meter size) 2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly — Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 3. All sprinkler drainage shall be placed into landscaping areas. 4. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Reviewed by: '�/� Date: � �� {! 1'; 4f Project Comments Date: �� From: February 23, 2016 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 0 Parks Division (650) 558- 7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 X Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1308 Castillo Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 027-191-140 Staff Review: March 1, 2016 1. Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City's stormwater NPDES permit to prevent construction activity stormwater pollution. Project proponents shall ensure that all contractors implement appropriate and effective Best Management Practices (BMPs) during all phases of construction including demolition. When submitting plans for a building permit, please include a list of construction BMPs as project notes, preferably, on a separate full size (2'x3 or larger) plan sheet. A downloadable electronic file is available at http://www.flowstobay.orq/Construction. Note: Stormwater Checklist for Small Projects attached; <2,500 ft2 rolyr�C�tz (o�iginal is signed) 3 / Date: 016 CGv , , a • ��......� .-�� SAN •iATEa COUt�TYWiDE 1Matet Pdfutlon Prevention Program Stormwater Checklist for Small Projects Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit (MRP) Order No. R2-2009-0074 ; Order No. R2-2011-0083 NPDES No.CAS612008 City of Burlingame - Office of Environmental Compliance 1103 Airport Blvd Office: (650) 342-3727 �c: (650) 342-3712 Complete this form for individual single family home projects of any size, other projects t ea ess tllarl"10, 000 square feet of impervious surface, and projects in the following categories that c�eate and/or rep a�e-t�ss-t�a�-3; 0@B'square feet of impervious surface: restaurants, �etail gasoline out/ets, auto service facilities', and parking lots (stand-alone or part of another use). A. Project Information A.� P�o�ect rvame: Roche Residence �� A.2 Pro�ectadd�ess: 1308 Castillo Avenue A.3 Project APN: 027-191-140 B. Select Appropriate Site Design Measures 6.1 Does the project create and/or replace 2,500 square feet or more of impervious surface2? ❑ Yes ■❑ No ➢ If yes, and the project will receive final discretionary approval on or after December 1, 2012, fhe project must include one of Site Design Measures a through f.3 Fact sheets regarding site design measures a through f may be downloaded at http://www.flowstobay.org/bs_new development.php#flyers. ➢ If no, or the project will receive final discretionary approval before December 1, 2012, the project is encouraged to implement site design measu�es4, which may be required at municipality discretion. Consult with municipal staff about requirements for your project. B.2 Is the site design measure included in the project plans? Plan Yes No Sheet No. ❑ A.2 b. Direct roof runoff onto vegetated areas. � d a. Direct roof runoff into cisterns or rain barrels and use rainwater for irrigation or other non-potable use. � A.2 c. Direct runoff from sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios onto vegetated areas. � A,2 d. Direct runoff from driveways and/or uncovered parking lots onto vegetated areas. e. Construct sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios with permeable surfaces. f. Construct bike lanes, driveways, and/or uncovered parking lots with permeable surfaces. g. Minimize land disturbance and impervious surFace (especially parking lots). h. Maximize permeability by clustering development and preserving open space. i. Use micro-detention, including distributed landscape-based detention. I. Self-retaining area (see Section 4.3 of the C.3 Technical Guidance) � J � � � � � � � � � � d ❑ L1.1 � � ❑ L1.1 ❑ L1.1 � ❑ m. Plant or preserve interceptor trees (Section 4.1, C.3 Technical Guidance) � See Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes here. Z Complete the C.3/C.6 Development Review Checklist if the project is not an individual single family home, and it creates and/or replaces 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surface; or if it is a restaurant, retail gasoline outlet, auto service facility, or parking lot project that creates and/or replaces 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface. 3 See MRP Provision C.3.i. 4 See MRP Provision C.3.a.i.(6). j. Protect sensitive areas, including wetland and riparian areas, and minimize changes to the natural topography. k. Self-treating area (see Section 4.2 of the C.3 Technical Guidance) 1 Approved December 4, 2012 . � Stormwater Checklist for Small Projects C. Select appropriate source controls (Encouraged for all projects; may be required at municipal discretion. Consult municipal staff.5) Are these Features that features in require source project? control measures Source control measures (Refer to Local Source Control List for detailed requirements) Is source control measure included in project plans? Plan Yes No Sheet No. �� r�� Storm Drain Floor Drains Parking garage Landscaping � � Pool/Spa/Founta ❑ Food Service Equipment (non- residential) ❑ � Refuse Areas ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Outdoor Process Activities � Outdoor EquipmenU Materials Storage Vehicle/ Equipment Cleaning Vehicle/ Equipment Repair and Maintenance Fuel Dispensing Areas Loading Docks � ❑ Fire Sprinklers ❑ @j Miscellaneous Drain or Wash Water ❑ � Architectural Copper • Mark on-site inlets with the words "No Dumping! Flows to Bay" or equivalent. • Plumb interior floor drains to sanitary sewer [or prohibit]. • Plumb interior parking garage floor drains to sanitary sewer.s • Retain existing vegetation as practicable. • Select diverse species appropriate to the site. Include plants that are pest- and/or disease-resistant, drought-tolerant, and/or attract benefcial insects. ■ Minimize use of pesticides and quick-release fertilizers. ■ Use efficient irriqation system; design to minimize runoff. _ ■ Provide connection to the sanitary sewer to facilitate draining.fi Provide sink or other area for equipment cleaning, which is: • Connected to a grease interceptor prior to sanitary sewer discharge.s • Large enough for the largest mat or piece of equipment to be cleaned. ■ Indoors or in an outdoor roofed area designed to prevent stormwater run-on and run-off and siqned to require equipment washinq in this area. • Provide a roofed and enciosed area for dumpsters, recycling containers, etc., designed to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff. • Connect any drains in or beneath dumpsters, compactors and tallow bin areas serving food service facilities to the sanitary sewer.� ■ Perform process activities either indoors or in roofed outdoor area, designed to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff, and to drain to the sanitary sewer.s • Cover the area or design to avoid pollutant contact with stormwater runoff. • Locate area only on paved and contained areas. • Roof storage areas that will contain non-hazardous liquids, drain to sanitary sewerfi and contain by berms or similar. • Roofed, pave and berm wash area to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff, plumb to the sanitary sewers, and sign as a designated wash area. � Commercial car wash facilities shall discharge to the sanitary sewer.s • Designate repair/maintenance area indoors, or an outdoors area designed to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff and provide secondary containment. Do not install drains in the secondary containment areas. • No floor drains unless pretreated prior to discharge to the sanitary sewer. 6 • Connect containers or sinks used for parts cleaning to the sanitary sewer. 6 • Fueling areas shall have impermeable surface that is a) minimally graded to prevent ponding and b) separated from the rest of the site by a grade break. • Canopy shall extend at least 10 ft in each direction from each pump and drain away from fueling area. • Cover and/or grade to minimize run-on to and runoff from the loading area. • Position downspouts to direct stormwater away from the loading area. ■ Drain water from loading dock areas to the sanitary sewer.s • Install door skirts between the trailers and the building. • Design for discharge of fire sprinkler test water to landscape or sanitary sewers • Drain condensate of air conditioning units to landscaping. Large air conditioning units may connect to the sanitary sewer.s • Roof drains shall drain to unpaved area where practicable. • Drain boiler drain lines, roof top equipment, all washwater to sanitary sewers. • Drain rinse water to landscaping, discharge to sanitary sewers, or collect and dispose properly offsite. See flyer "Requirements for Architectural Copper." �� OC n� �❑� �� 7�■ �� OC ��■ ■0�■ �� 4C �� 5 See MRP Provision C.3.a.i(7). 6 Any connection to the sanitary sewer system is subject to sanitary district approval. � Businesses that may have outdoor process activities/equipment include machine shops, auto repair, industries with pretreatment facilities. 2 Approved December 4, 2012 � Stormwater Checklist for Small Projects D. Implement construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) (Required for all projects.) D.1 Is the site a"High Priority Site"? (Municipal sfaff will make this determination; if the answer is yes, Yes ❑ No ❑■ the project will be referred to construction site inspection staff for monthly stormwater inspections during the wet season, October 1 through April 30.) ■"High Prioriry Sites" are sites that require a grading permit, are adjacent to a creek, or are otherwise high prioriry for stormwater protection during construction per MRP Provision C.6.e.ii(2). D.2 All projects require appropriate stormwater BMPs during construction, indicate which BMPs are included in the project, below. Yes No Best Management Practice (BMP) � ❑ Attach the San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program's construction BMP plan sheet to project plans and require contractor to implement the applicable BMPs on the plan sheet. � ❑ Temporary erosion controls to stabilize all denuded areas until permanent erosion controls are established. � � Delineate with field markers clearing limits, easements, setbacks, sensitive or critical areas, buffer zones, trees and drainage courses � ❑ Provide notes, specifications, or attachments describing the following: • Construction, operation and maintenance of erosion and sediment controls, include inspection frequency; ■ Methods and schedule for grading, excavation, filling, clearing of vegetation, and storage and disposal of excavated or cleared material; • Specifications for vegetative cover & mulch, include methods and schedules for planting and fertilization; • Provisions for temporary and/or permanent irrigation � ❑ Perform clearing and earth moving activities only during dry weather. � ❑ Use sediment controls or filtration to remove sediment when dewatering and obtain all necessary permits. 0 ❑ Protect all storm drain inlets in vicinity of site using sediment controls such as berms, fiber rolls, or filters. � � Trap sediment on-site, using BMPs such as sediment basins or traps, earthen dikes or berms, silt fences, check dams soil blankets or mats covers for soil stock piles etc. � ❑ Divert on-site runoff around exposed areas; divert off-site runoff around the site (e.g., swales and dikes). � ❑ Protect adjacent properties and undisturbed areas from construction impacts using vegetative buffer strips, sediment barriers or filters dikes mulching or other measures as appropriate. _ � ❑ Limit construction access routes and stabilize designated access points. � ❑ No cleaning, fueling, or maintaining vehicles on-site, except in a designated area where washwater is contained and treated. � ❑ Store, handle, and dispose of construction materials/wastes properly to prevent contact with stormwater. � ❑ Contractor shall train and provide instruction to all employees/subcontractors re: construction BMPs. 0 � Control and prevent the discharge of all potential pollutants, including pavement cutting wastes, paints, concrete, petroleum products, chemicals, washwater or sediments, rinse water from architectural copper, and non-stormwater discharges to storm drains and watercourses. Name of applicant completing the form: JAMES CHU Sig E. Comments (for municipal staff use only): F. NOTES (for municipal staff use only): Section A Notes: Section B Notes: Section C Notes: Section D Notes: Date: 2 ` Z2� �� Approved December 4, 2012 RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for Desiqn Review for a_new two-story sinqle familv dwellinq and detached qaraqe at 1308 Castillo Avenue. Zoned R-1, Brian Roche and Adele Bvford Roche, propertv owners, APN: 027-191-140; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on May 9, 2016, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Section 15303 (a), which states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, up to three single- family residences maybe constructed or converted under this exemption, is hereby approved. 2. Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th dav of Mav, 2016, by the following vote Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review 1308 Castillo Avenue Effective May 19, 2016 Page 1 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped April 27, 2016, sheets A.1 through A.6 and L1.1; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, landscape plan or amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Engineering Divisions February 25, 2016 memo, the Building Division's February 24, 2016 memo, the Parks Division's February 25, 2016 memo, the Fire Division's March 7, 2016 memo, and the Stormwater Divisions March 1, 2016 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review 1308 Castillo Avenue Effective May 19, 2016 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 12. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 13. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 14. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 15. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 16. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plan. . CITY OF BURLINGAME ,� ' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD � �` ' BURLINGAME, CA 94010 �i��'�'_',_' • PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org Site: 1308 CASTILLO AVENUE The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing MONDAY, MAY 9, 2016 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Design Review for a new two-story single family dwelling with a detached garage at 1308 CASTILLO AVENUE zoned R-l. APN 027-191-140 Mailed: April 29, 2016 (Please refer to other side) City of Burlina� PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to other side) la�1' - - �� _ ' � r . { '`.;. 1 � a �'; , fi S' �� r � 7 . 5 8. � � )' � �:�. � � �� •� ~ ,s €. �� ,� � �,i� ` ' � � 7, / ,R � . �^9��-��` I , � ' ;, . � � - � � � • / a, �! ' '4 . ,,. . ' � ., J ?�O , _ aw . , �' \ ,.. „ • � e "` ;� "a�, � , � � � x i' � � . � � A` A : Ai.: F \\� � ' YfAJ��, � � . . y � .. ��Q H. � � y�' ��. �;, �. � ✓.- b 4:.�. '` � � t� . ,� . . � '"`��. ' �'+ �� i��► s •� ' y .♦ (�{. � '�t A - �1 . � ,� +�q`.;� M�� ' 1 _.,r �t'O 1 1 / . } � . a� �(�� , � �t �.:, � " � µ' .�, " ?� � ,� ,� :: � ` b �� , � _� , � .. , .. . �� .� t .a' � � � r � � �'��' �`` n � F � .� . , ; . � d , . , r � •' ry , , � �! _s, v , ♦ R ,<„ � � . �. �,,, �^°'+: '�r /A ` � � � .j '' � ; _\ ` C ' + p .�� . y , �+. � �\ �%S< . � b1'.' 3 , .a ` / ` k�� ? , �� ,. � ;� ��c '�'' j � � �`� � � : �� ;:, \� • .��. � ? �, « .O� �' �� . � ` �4'+. - �ky'a; �� . , . �p ' - , w k ' i �. _. v , � • � - , e �:-� � � J �- � �� • . , �� . �� r �t' � �`�• +, u:' 'f � _ c `. � .�- _� �8 ��* * 1 �. � - k � � �� '♦ � �. !� '��' \ �r . ), - '� . .� ., ?� ,t �' . - , ` �.<...� �' *" 'r r � � � ?' ' r� . h '' ' `�\ / �Y � � � � w '' {f ' � ��•� �P'��, � ,�.��,�, �. w�., �► -`�,/� / �� , u '� � �iy� +� � � � y \��`� 4fio` � . ,, � �4 �`.�� ' w y i.� �r'M"' �, • \ \ � �' % •�� ` o-�,� ai � � . . '► .i � _ i �t�d' . , � _ , 2 . ` - � � ,� _. y 1 � •. • , � „ a��, . � � • i.J► a , : , � � - : :., a�i` ' �" �.-. . + e / � .�'?.\ . i ,� � �, f . � .. . �b� � � 1 `a" , �' / -. �, j� � �� t `� \� � , ,.,,. . . , � � , �ti � , ,: ; ti : - �- . • � • �a, :� , � . � � �� ,� � t � ` . �� ' ..'"� \ �F� �� '� � y., � / � � �, r�• �,• -t , f' ` .4/: . ,, , . � . r . � . . .�.. �' % � ,� -� �� IR. ��v'. 't��t� is;�;�,�t-� ��,��. , .,w �''�� !�'x' �, � . - ; •,, • •. L � .,, r � � � � N �,''� ��! ' �. 4yr ,�,� ?s � �- � V ae � ; --,- �\ �;s_ - / 1 , � , , � _ •�y '� J00 � t 5 : ._. ' �,- - � i . • _ ' 1 �