Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1830 Castenada Drive - Staff Report%'i ��t:� i � , P.C. 10/22/90 Item # � MEMO TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PLANNING COMMISSION PLANNER VARIANCES TO SIDE YARD SETBACK AND LOT COVERAGE FOR A DINING ROOM ADDITION AT 1$30 CA5TENADA DRIVE, ZONED R-1. Applicant/Property Owner Han-Te and Joanne Liu are requesting variances to the side yard setback and lot coverage requirements to build a first floor extension to the dining room of an existing home, located at 1830 Castenada Drive, zoned R-1. The side setback variance is requested to allow a 5�-0" setback where 7�-0" is required (CS 25.66.050). In addition, a variance to lot coverage requirements is requested to allow 42.8� where 40� is required (CS 25.62.010). Existing lot coverage is non-conforming (41.6�); the proposed structure would increase lot coverage 68 SF to 42.8� (2707 SF existing footprint, 2775 SF proposed; 2600 SF permitted). The addition and existing house will be 107 SF greater than the maximum lot coverage allowed. Staff Review City staff have further comments. Applicant's Letter reviewed this application and there are no On their application for the two variances, Mr. and Mrs. Liu note that their family has grown recently and they need additional space in the dining room to accommodate the increased family size. The side yard setback of 5'-0" is required to properly align the new addition with the existing structure, to create a uniform room without an indentation. The increased room size will be in the rear yard and hidden from public view, and will be in keeping with the character of the neighborhood. Findinas for a Variance In order to grant a variance the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d): (a) there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved that do not apply generally to praperty in the same district; (b) the granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant, and to prevent unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship; f } 2 (c) the granting of the application will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare or convenience; (d) that the use of the property will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses of properties in the general vicinity. Plannina Commission Action The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action should include findings made for the variances requested. Reasons for any action should be clearly stated. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped September 20, 1990; and 2. that the project shall meet all Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements as amended by the City. Jane Gomery Planner cc: Mr. and Mrs. Joanne Liu, Mr. Davis Ko STAFF REVIEW OF APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION I. Proiect Address: 1830 Castenada Drive II. Proiect Description and Permits RecTuested: Variances to side yard setback and lot coverage requirements to add a dining room extension at 1830 Castenada Drive, Zoned R-1. The existing dining room will extended to the rear of the building on the east side. The side yard setback variance is requested to allow 5'-0" where 7�-0" is required (CS 25.66.050). A lot coverage variance is required to allow 42.8� where 40� is required (CS 25.62.010). The proposed addition meets all other zoning code requirements. III. Property Identification: Assessor's Parcel Number(s): Lot No: 16 Block No: Subdivision: Mills Estate No. Lot Size: 6500 SF Zoning: R-1 General Plan Designation: Low 025-091-240 26 5 Density IV. Existina Site Conditions and Adiacent Land Uses: Existing single story, four bedroom and two bath residence, with a garage. Al1 adjacent land uses are single family (R- 1) residential. This use conforms to the general plan. V. VI. Proposed Percent Increase in Area: 2.5� (68 SF) CEOA Status- Categorically exempt per CEQA Code Section 15301 Class 1e (1) Additions to existing structures less than 50� of the floor area of the structures before the addition. Pro i ect Data • Proposed New Construction: 68 SF extension to the dining room. Existing Area: 2707 SF (2157 SF living area and 550 SF garage). Front 5etback: Side Yard Setback: Rear Yard Setback: Lot Coverage: Building Height: On-Site Parking Spaces: Declining Height: Required Proposed 15-0"' or Avg. NA 7�-0�� 5�-0" * 15'-0" 28'-9" 40�(41.6� Exists) 42.8� * 30'/2.5 stories 10'-0" 2 covered 2 covered NA NA PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF BURLINGAME CITY HALL - 501 PRIMROSE ROAD APPLICATION TO THE PI,ANNING COMMISSION gURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 Type of Application• Special Permit �Variance Other Project Address j� �c� �,/�-s���-,�-p�- "L (i�✓�� Assessor's Parcel Number( s ) C'�i �- '''-j �' � � ( -� �-1-�-0 APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER Name : �> ��.tn�� e ��� Name : �(tb�- 1 E �� 1�`c1 v� 6� F 1- <<-f Addres s:�� �� (,.�X Q�.�.��� 1" Addres s: l�� o �ite r�a �n� � r_ 9cE.o � o City/State/Zip �� Y�lhQ��v�e ,C..� City/State/Zip �i,,�' l,i�o{�tmC� �� jj °� �-ot b Telephone:(Work) Telephone (Work) ( Home ) �, � �k� S � � ( Home ) �Y �- �S S f r� ARCHITECT/DESIGNER �� � ~ �T .X}.i,i� L��/ G-►�t.,. Ce,�}'�u c�fc� r d� '5�2-1 �S7 Name: i '` rlease indicate with an , asterisk (*) who is the Address :�Z5 ���D� �T contact per.son for this �,+� r�r � c.�, C�-, �'. proiect. U, �7 _ � Telephone ( daytime ) :�j 511 �J��" PROJECT DESCRIPTION ,4�b I T � �, ,�( �'2 �l �-�L �i'-� � �'�� 'v �-� I�OC11iYl ��r � t/�i CJ KkG � a� -�b U S� . AFFIDAVIT/SZGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true a correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. " � �� � Ap cant�s Signature Date I know about the proposed application, and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application. � / j � t` Pro e y Owner's Signature a e --�----------------------- OFFICE USE ONLY ----------------------------- Date Filed: � � Fee ���- �(� Receipt # Z� �� � � Letter(s) to applicant advising application incomplete: ' Date application accepted as complete: P.C. study meeting (date) P.C. public hearing (date) p� z Q P.C. Action /�� -Q U/ S Appeal to Council? Yes No Council meeting date Council Action e��Rur+ca�+e � CITY OF BURLINGAME � . '"' SUPPLEMENTAL TO APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR ��� � , � . VARIANCE APPLICATIONS �' t ;,� p . I �.. In order to approve an application for a variance, the Planning � ��, Commission is required to make findings (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d). Please answer the following questions as they apply to = your property and.application request to show how the findings can be made. A letter may also be submitted if you need additional space or if you wish to provide additional information for the Planning Commission to consider in their review of your application. Please write neatly in ink or type. ' a. Describe the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to your property which do not apply to other properties in the area. We have an irregular lot and small dining room area. After the propose addition we will have a bigger dining room area to fit our family comfortablely., also the set back we need of 5' where 7' is require, I hope you can grant us this set back various so our new addition will stay the same size as the;�cisting dining room, so it won't look so awkward. � b. Explain why the application request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right and what unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship might result from the denial of the application. We need to have a bigger and expanded dining room area for our big fanily. so we don't have to all pack like a sardine in a can, set back is not affecting our neighbor nor the neighborhood. also we have plenty of room to walk to the rear yard. This variance will not be an inconvience to anyone, it will help us to have a uniform looking dining room instead of an indented dining room . c. Explain why the granting of the application will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare or convenience. all the work is in the back of the house where it won't be affecting anyone. d. Discuss how the proposed use of the property will be l � compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses of properties in the general � vicinity. The set back.will be in the rear yard where is,hidden from public view and therefore �� . won't be out of character in the neighborhood. , .� � . . � _ , ,; '� _ ,; :;. ,, ` � ,. : . . � ; �:::'� ���� � CITY OF BURLINGAME � SUPPLEMENTAL TO APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR VARIANCE APPLICATIONS ���� — :, ��-""� � �j J In order to approve an application for a variance, the Planiiing Commission is required to make findings (Code Section.25.54.020 a-d). Please answer the following questions as they apply to your property and.application request to show how the findings can be made. A letter may also be submitted if you need additional space or if you wish to provide additional information for the Planning Commission to consider in their review of your application. Please write neatly in ink or type. a. Describe the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to your property which do not apply to other properties in the area. Not obstructing any neighbor's view and this addition will have no enviromental impact. also, it's necessary for our family's expansion to have a bigger dining area of the 67 square feet propose addition. . �� b. Explain why the application request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right and what unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship might result from the denial of the application. half of my family members were living out of the country. now thier back to stay and live in the house with us. we do need the additon room. this is the only dining area we have in the house. and sometimes we can't even have room to walk behind the dining chairs. see attacted photos. c. Explain why the granting of the application will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, � safety, general welfare or convenience. We're just adding a small portion of about 67 sq.ft. of space to the existing dining room in the house, also the addition is in the back of the house so the neighbor's couldn't even see us from the front. The addition is in the back of the property where is hidden from public view, and it will blend in with existing structure. d. Discuss how the proposed use of the property will be � • compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of ,�_ existing and potential uses of properties in the general '�. vicinity. � � See above, same answer as above. �, , '� ' •� _ ti � F,� . ;, � � , • . ,.� � , - , ! .� _ , � i . , , ':T • ' . . � .. . ,��� � ' .. . . . . �� . � -1, . . . 1 ; . , . . . ' � � � , . . �. � . 1 . . . , " . . , . . { , . . . . . � i ��: ... . . . . . . . - . . � A�"`� . 4� , i j , -� ' �� ;� ,� �'y� -�;a � , , o-� �. . • „a y F� : ' e �� . > a" e �r .'+ . �' . . . V !� T� . . �p� • .. ....b t � tl .�....__- . ��� '� �` 'I, - � �s � �f . , � � � a:: _ , � � _ � � � ,,�, �� � �:�� � � �r �, 4 '� �r t a� ' � �`�.,�� � ��� � � j� a`� ," ,, � � ;,�� w't � ,� ' ''�. � �?� . I, �' � � ,b � � � �:$ ��t�. ��� . ��� . � . , ��� ��� � �� ��. , � � � , ��:" , �� ,� , � � ��� _. ��'"� � � �:; > � �, �. — �:� � r' ri. �.,: — �� . �n;,:� �� , a ' � �;� yp � ,;' ` �' .� / �� � �.�y�a � � •� � � � � � �" °� »B } � , f 4f�, a� %� � t � � � = t.e� ^' � � �� , '� � ,�. a � � �'"� 1 �,axRe�'r�'► � t�� �.�' � � :"'+, �tt� . . % d ' �� �" f, �I�i r. � R;} � _ , t � �.' +� (' �a[ ; �� , . " �`j < � %� 's.. r ''��`t a. � t � � � � � � l �'` �v , � �t. �"� �'"`' � .. x �` � Y Y�� a „�.�'F i- f- • � NP` ��$ / y � -'��, a� ! x�, �^ �''` . ,�� r. ��.,E. '�� „ , ..., . .. .� , � p� � — ���� �����o- {�� / � x� � 1 t�: % .r�i�-� A / � ��� � � %�g<8 .. r — '� �� �, _ ' YQ . . y�` �� r�A N �° � �-� � ���� � . < ,. /� H � � / � �„�ii� - ,;- , '` �, , • _ .� , . a. /.� � � ��� � �� � � � . . v . . �- . . ,. - , "�` �`" � � � �.. .� t � _ . , �;„3' . . . s Z'/ � . , .�,. `a `,� . . �`�•r� d ;�s ��� � . - � / "�. /� f' +�� `�k i� � � -"1 �d � � � y� � '#R � -A.' C � q'�� ��i. {4 P ,�' ��„�:�,rt g.,. ' Y�. . � -���� ��,; 1K�,� ,'�,J 1 � - � �. , s�:•� �, � , ,�" • "` � .� % � ' o. ,: r. �'Sy�' � f � f '�' � � '�. � / 1 � .. J ,. _ �f � ��: `"�•� �y" � � � . , ;' �'.� � / `�¢'�.� �, ,f,��.. wp �. �`�}����. �` "?'� f � �� ,�h 'L'.t';�.' � _ '° . 'A, kP "�� ' � / � � � �� � �� � � . n sy' ?� �„ �`' � i � a� � ` r� ' /; � .� � � � �� ~ � �� � \\ �. „�� f \ ,� ,�! � �� a - ? � +�•. '� `� . �' � � � � � z � � � -� �� - l �'�_ �`. ,� � � : � �� �C � � ` �� �'� ;- ' �,0 ��: • � ; �� ��`� � i H �` �� ��j f ,� ��` , � , �� � _ �� �� y , � �: v � � ' � � F �" �� �� � � p � ��� � ,� �, -a� �,7 /'` ..�� r r�� �°t> � � 'e.. .;� � � . . :,;�,< ��t�t..�'M- '�. r . , 4: � . �' r. / ����� . • f � �� �, ` O c " � ' ,{. �;... �, �h .xt?.'" � � t ✓ ��+ ��`' i ��� �� � " ¢ � ' '�: / �` / � �, � �` .� . . , , �'i �> � `L, k� .�'�' . . . � { �� � � �� 'J ���,� � er�'�r''-*::�.• j� ���#e� n T '�� . � �F � / � -io '8� ` � s F,� � � ���� / ✓� ` �\� � ;��� . . - �, ..� .. w • �, �'�►;1�� "T� ��' ' � � � . .� � ° "� ' � �� �� r , ��� . �' ��` � � �' �//, � �` �. � ' .�.��� y"��'-/ �� �� � S �y; �.. . ka �' . �1, ��n._ . '�������� �.����� �r��N � �� fjj� •� � ` . .. �tY..� ."*a.' .. �'`! � a :p� Y `� Tr /1 �� !�v' �� f rA:� .rY ' ^+R � . �' � ��� �. ��, � � � ,� � �,� ` � �.��� � , � � � � �� � ^ ^�'' � . • �+` � ._ � - , � � s ''� ''r � A�r.. * cs�, • «. � "� ` � � � ��� _d � �. \ ,r" _koxcf 1 l�H� �� �� �',w �� � � � lF . .�p � ` wr�/ �� � . _ �,� � - _ �_ .. � Y _ � �, � �^ �.. : ;�'+ � � �•�•1 � � ` � ' � I ' Q`� � � �, � �� C� ,$� s s � ! , i'' � � _ ��l} � f t; y` , � �R ' � �� � g�. , � '- ' , . � � P � � ��: � . / , —��,�.{ — �» � '� xy / / ��� ` ,,'�• �/ • � � , ���. � , �.. � � �. r. �. . �� ���� ��` �� j� .. ' � .. �'��' � 4�'�a" � ... k.'. ��� .. � p . � �%' `�. � �. .` a �,'#�� ���, � � .�� � %��``Il�' ,;�:- ,. . am ��'.*� �� �> ; � � . � , - . a�,� -' / �.,� i++�. F r:�:';,�,g ' r : .. � ./ Y � 'T � ' /) .�� *rN �r ~ � � �� ' �.. , C �-�;�'� �./ N'�1i�4� �a. a . � �i+��?�E: ^ � 4 46 "4 � �/'. '�`� r _ � . .r � A Text Consisting of: City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 (415) 342-8931 NOTICE OF HEARING The CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION announces the following public hearing on Monday, the 22nd day of October, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. A copy of the application and plans may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Planning Division at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. 1830 CASTENADA DRIVE - APN: 025- 1-101 VAR[ANCES TO SIDE SETBACK AND LOT COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS TO EXTEND THE DINING ROOM AT 1830 CASTENADA DRIVE, ZONED R-1. Note: Please ignore a previous notice for this hearing with an incorrect date. Correct date for the hearing is October 22. If you challenge the subject application(s> in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City at or prior to the public hearing. MARGARET MONROE CITY PLANNER ctober 12, 1990 was mailed to the following property owners: PAS�UINELLI VINCENZO � EDVIGE DE METRIS JOHN J LASELL DAVID & LORRAINE P MAHONEY DENNIS J& MARSHA L CAZZOLLI DIANE LEE EDWIN S JR TR BRUNI MARIA R CAPUTO TITO 8 MARIA KARLICEK BLANCHE R& MAE J MC VAY ROBERT B& MARABETH MC NEIL ROBERT A B041EN MYLES F& HARRIET M STANAWAY EDWIN J& M V BOEHNKE MANFRED & ADELE RAllINI GUIDO CHANG YI-NAN & HSIU-CHING WANG CHIH-TANG & HUE1-FEN ROEMER VIRGINIA HILL ROLLANDI CARL F& LORRAINE P SILVESTRI DANETTE WONG DAVID C& REBECCA H C/0 CINDY L WONG ATTAR REZA & MARTJE KELLEY MORRISS H& GERALDINE M 301 S ASHTON AVE 305 SO ASHTON AVE 309 S ASHTON AVE 313 S ASHTON AVE 317 S ASHTON AVE 323 ASHTON AVE S 2606 TROUSDALE DR 340 CASTENADA DR 330 CASTENADA DR 320 CASTENADA DR P 0 BOX 5153 300 CASTENADA DR 1009 LAKE ST 301 MARCELLA LJAY 311 MARCELLA WY 321 MARCELLA 331 MARCELLA 41Y 341 MARCELLA WY 320 S ASHTON AVE 316 S ASHTON AVE 312 S ASHTON AVE 308 S ASHTON AVE 304 ASHTON MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, BURLINGAME, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, 1NCLINE VILLAGE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, C. CA 94030 A.P.N. CA 94030 A.P.N. CA 94030 A.P.N. CA 94030 A.P.N. CA 94030 A.P.N. CA 94030 A.P.N. CA 94010 A.P.N. CA 94030 A.P.N. CA 94030 A.P.N. CA 94030 A.P.N. NV 89450 A.P.N. CA 94030 A.P.N. CA 94030 A.P.N. CA 94030 A.P.N. CA 94030 A.P.N. CA 94030 A.P.N. CA 94030 A.P.N. CA 94030 A.P.N. CA 94030 A.P.N. CA 94030 A.P.N. CA 94030 A.P.N. CA 94030 A.P.N. CA 94030 A.P.N. � � � ;�`v �/.,� ��r1,�J � : 025-091-010 : 025-091-020 : 025-091-030 : 025-091-040 : 025-091-050 : 025-091-060 : 025-091-290 : 025-091-300 : 025-091-310 : 025-091-320 : 025-091-330 : 025-091-340 : 025-091-350 : 025-092-010 : 025-092-020 : 025-092-030 : 025-092-040 : 025-092-050 : 025-092-160 : 025-092-170 : 025-092-180 : 025-092-190 : 025-092-200 rllL;!�� /\.,� - � r KINNEAR CARLISLE uENTWORTH TR RIVERA IGNACIO & FLORENCE FRENCH WILLIAM E& ROSEMARIE J BENNETT MARION J TR TJADER PATRICIA A FELIX FEBRONIO & GLORIA H FOREMAN HERBERT S & MARGARET PEAIRS RICHARD H & LILLIAN HARRIS HEIDI W TOTAL NUMBER OF PROPERTY ONNERS NOTICED: 32 BILLIN6 FOR THIS MAILING: $49.42 300 S ASHTON AVE 319 CASTENADA DR 329 CASTENADA DR 339 CASTANADA 349 CASTENADA DR 359 CASTENADA ST 360 LOYOLA DR 370 LOYOLA DR 350 LOYOLA DR MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, CA 94030 CA 94030 CA 94030 CA 94030 CA 94030 CA 94030 CA 94030 CA 94030 CA 94030 A.P.N. : 025-092-210 A.P.N. : 025-041-070 A.P.N. : 025-041-080 A.P.N. : 025-041-090 A.P.N. : 025-041-100 A.P.N. : 025-041-110 A.P.N. : 025-041-210 A.P.N. : 025-041-220 A.P.N. : 025-041-140 , ���r,�,���� �� � r� �� � � ,- -� a ' � . ' �� -e� �'� �? - S . � � � W� �8 / � �-�-_ . File No._ AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) � ss. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) � o� v� C� •�� e l v� od e"1 �� �. � ���� � ��;. ��T 1 �� 199� -,, �F �uF;�,�.�, ...,�,� , r�:: , being duly sworn, deposes and says: that he is a citizen of the United States , over the age of 18 years; that acting for the City of Burlingame on the �� day of OG �O �IDe�' , 19 I� , he deposited in the United States Post Office within San Mateo County, a NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses shown, to-wit: (See list attached hereto and made part hereof). that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to Notice of Hearing pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Burlingame that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses shown above. __ , -. , f ;: =-G; �-. � , ��, - I< �, � ;' i `�_ � t.; "{ �v� ri�� � �'�G� ��� ��1'�/f lif� .i ,� A Text Consisting of: City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 (415) 342-8931 NOTICE OF HEARING The CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION announces the following public hearing on Monday, the 15th da of October, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. in the City Hall Council CMa�bers located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. A copy of the application and plans may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Planning Division at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. 1830 CASTENADA DRIVE - APN: 025-09�i�101 L`! VARIANCES TO SIDE SETBACK AND LOT COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS TO EXTEND THE DINING ROOM AT 1830 CASTENADA DRIVE, ZONED R-1. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or saneone else raised at the public hearing described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City at or prior to the public hearing. MARGARET MONROE CITY PLANNER ctober 12, 1990 was mailed to the following property owners: PASQUINELLI VINCENZO & EDVIGE DE METRIS JOHN J LASELL DAVID & LORRAINE P MAHONEY DENNIS J& MARSHA L CAllOLLI D1ANE LEE EDWIN S JR TR BRUNI MARIA R CAPUTO TITO & MARIA KARLICEK BLANCHE R& MAE J MC VAY ROBERT B& MARABETH MC NEIL ROBERT A BOWEN MYLES F& HARRIET M STANAWAY EDWIN J& M V BOEHNKE MANFRED & ADELE RAllINI GUIDO CHANG YI-NAN & HSIU-CHING WANG CHIH-TANG & HUEI-FEN ROEMER VIRGINIA HILL ROLLANDI CARL F& LORRAINE P SILVESTRI DANETTE WQNG DAVID C& REBECCA H C/0 CINDY L WONG ATTAR REZA & MARTJE KELLEY MORRISS H& GERALDINE M KINNEAR CARLISLE WENTWORTH TR TOTAL NUMBER OF PROPERTY OWNERS NOTICED: 24 BILLING FOR THIS MAILING: $47.42 301 S ASHTON AVE 305 SO ASHTON AVE 309 S ASHTON AVE 313 S ASHTON AVE 317 S ASHTON AVE 323 ASHTON AVE S 2606 TROUSDALE DR 340 CASTENADA DR 330 CASTENADA DR 320 CASTENADA DR P 0 BOX 5153 300 CASTENADA DR 1009 LAKE ST 301 MARCELLA WAY 311 MARCELLA WY 321 MARCELLA 331 MARCELLA NY 341 MARCELLA NY 320 S ASHTON AVE 316 S ASHTON AVE 312 S ASHTON AVE 308 S ASHTON AVE 304 ASHTON 300 S ASHTON AVE F� � \� / �b�`��t e' \ V l�'r� I � ',, ,�' I �� j�� ��� , . � ��, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, BURLINGAME, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, 1NCLINE VILLAGE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, MILLBRAE, CA 94030 CA 94030 CA 94030 CA 94030 CA 94030 CA 94030 CA 94010 CA 94030 CA 94030 CA 94030 NV 89450 CA 94030 CA 94030 CA 94030 CA 94030 CA 94030 CA 94030 CA 94030 CA 94030 CA 94030 CA 94030 CA 94030 CA 94030 CA 94030 A.P.N. : 025-091-010 A.P.N. : 025-091-020 A.P.N. : 025-091-030 A.P.N. : 025-091-040 A.P.N. : 025-091-050 A.P.N. : 025-091-060 A.P.N. : 025-091-290 A.P.N. : 025-091-300 A.P.N. : 025-091-310 A.P.N. : 025-091-320 A.P.N. : 025-091-330 A.P.N. : 025-091-340 A.P.N. : 025-091-350 A.P.N. : 025-092-010 A.P.N. : 025-092-020 A.P.N. : 025-092-030 A.P.N. : 025-092-040 A.P.N. : 025-092-050 A.P.N. : 025-092-160 A.P.N. : 025-092-170 A.P.N. : 025-092-180 A.P.N. : 025-092-190 A.P.N. : 025-092-200 A.P.N. : 025-092-210 CITY OF BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 (415) 342-8931 NOTICE OF HEARING The CITY OF BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL announces the following public hearing on Monday, the 22nd day of October, 1990, at 7:30 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. A copy of the application and plans may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Planning Division at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. 1830 CASTENADA DRIVE APN: 025-091-010 VARIANCES TO SIDE SETBACK AND LOT COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS TO EXTEND THE DINING ROOM AT 1830 CASTENADA DRIVE, ZONED R-1. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City at or prior to the public hearing. MARGARET MONROE CITY PLANNER October 12, 1990 �E� W�S � Tp'... �o�-S, �R.S�G �' .! , T�o ��G �5 0� S�Rv �c Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Page 8 October 22, 1990 �he variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of the p��operty, the way it was designed originally was a waste of space an-d it1* was inefficient, it could not accommodate all the amenities ,u�ed tod,ay. It will not be detrimental to other properties in the_; area, then.e was a major fire on the property, now the carport wil�,�'be torn down;�. a driveway removed, the only entrance will be on �Surlingame Avenue�;,, the property will become a legitimate single n�'amily home. Roof lines will remain consistent, there is a two car'�garage, they are tryinc� to make the structure conform, it has b�en nonconforming for 48 years. He presented a petition in supp�irt signed by 22 families wi`�h 28 signatures. Applicants ha<w'e no objection to eliminating th� driveway and will tear down the�carport, landscape in front and at �'�the rear, will keep the s;C�"ucco and wood siding. Responding to a�-.,question applicant foun�� there are exceptional circumstances in tl�r-'s dwelling which is �dt functional and not usable the way it is prese�ly designed. ,�.,�'' The following members'`�-�of the au�dience spoke in support: Jane Calavano, 715 Burlingame�`'yAvenue �fi�d Niels Ploug, 218 Arundel Road. They expressed their pleasiire i�`�the plans for upgrading this house, it has been a disgrace to th neighborhood for many years. There were no further audience comm�'nts and the public hearing was closed. f C. Deal commented there i�'a 40� T�ot coverage maximum in Burlingame, its intent is to keep a�}ibuse up to �,hat point, in this case they are decreasing the amount'of lot cover�age square footage, that is commendable; since itr�'is a reduction in amount of square footage it is a valid increas �;' it is only .3� over what would be needed to allow a minor moc��fication. With these�,,statements and with the neighborhood supp�rt C. Deal found this is `�� good use of 'a variance for lot coverag� and moved for approval of`�,the variance with the following cond�tions: (1) that the project shaT�3, be built as shown on the plans su�bmitted to the Planning Departme� and date stamped September 28`, 1990, and f�ont setback and lot cov age as amended on the plans date stamped October 16, 1990; (2) that t�� unused driveway will be �removed from the sidewalk to the curb a'�d gutter (City Enginee�fs memo dated October l, 1990 ) and from the s'�' dewalk to the carport; and (3) that the project shall meet all Uniform� uilding and Fire,�ode requirements as amended by the City of Burlinga�. Mo ion was seconded by C. Galligan. Comment: pleased to s�e this h use returned to single family status. Motion approved on'�� 7-0 oll call vote. Appeal procedures were advised. "°1.,, ,. 6. VARIANCES TO SIDE YARD SETBACK AND LOT COVERAGE FOR A DINING ROOM ADDITION AT 1830 CASTENADA DRIVE, ZONED R-1 Reference staff report, 10/22/90, with attachments. CP Monroe reviewed details of the request, staff review, applicant's letter. Two conditions were suggested for consideration at the public � . Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Page 9 October 22, 1990 hearing. Responding to questions CP advised the lot is 6,500 SF, under the change to the minor modification regulations walls are allowed to extend along a side setback but the minor modification does not apply in this case because the applicant is also requesting a variance. Chm. Graham opened the public hearing. The following spoke in support. Allen Lin, 1724 Escalante Way: in favor of this request, the house does not have a formal dining room, only a small area for eating purposes; addition will improve the house and property values in the neighborhood, it is on the first floor and will not obstruct anyone�s view, it will be only 67 SF. Joanne Liu, daughter of the applicant: they have lived in this house for four years, additional family members are coming home to live and they need more dining room space. There were no further .audience comments and the public hearing was closed. With the statement this is one of the smaller lots in Mills Estate, it was over lot coverage when built, it will be a small dining room addition, will not impact any neighbors, site is on the brow of a hill, C. Jacobs moved for approval of the side yard setback and lot coverage variances with the following conditions: (1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped October 16, 1990; and (2) that the project shall meet all Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements as amended by the City of Burlingame. Motion was seconded by C. Ellis. Comment on the motion: will vote for the motion but have a minor problem, very few cities allow 40� lot coverage, this is a minor addition but wish it were designed more into the home, if possible would ask the addition be designed to incorporate the roof line into the house; side setback requirements on these lots have changed, they were originally 5'; cannot support the motion, in reviewing the plans cannot justify a finding of exceptional circumstances, understand the need for a larger dining room, they are already over lot coverage, think there is room in the existing house to reconfigure space for dining/family room purposes. Motion was approved on a 4-3 roll call vote, Cers Galligan, Graham and Mink voting no. Appeal procedures were advised. FROM THE FLOOR There were no comments from the floor. PLANNER REPORTS - Minor Modification - 1720 Broadway: no comment.