Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout400 Carolan Avenue - Staff Report^�'�'�<:'!� �� �h �n � .; � � w� � �`-, --_ —_ ______�__._.. ...��_„_.r.,_..,. � t.Y.�.e V�Z�� .a� ���.4L�.���,e � CITY HALL-501 PRIMROSE ROAD PLANNING DEPARTME�NT BURLINGAME� CALIFORNIA 94010 (415) 342-8625 May 19, 1992 City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Attention: Ralph Kirkup, Director of Public Works Negative Declaration, ND-456P for Washington Park Well and Storage Tanks at 1000 Burlingame Avenue, Burlingame, California became final following the City Council meeting of May 18, 1992. The Council did not call this matter up for review and the negative declaration is considered approved by the city. A notice of determination will be filed with the county. ar aret Mon oe City Planner s/ Attachment: ND-456P Planning Commission Minutes, May 11, 1992 cc: William Roman, Stetson Engineers, Inc. Notice of Determination To: Office of Planning and Resea�h 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 County Clerk Countyof San Mateo Planning Department From: (PublicAgency) City of Burlinciame 501 Primrose Road (Address) Burlinqame, CA 94010 County Government Center Redwood City, CA 94063 � _�.,.� :� � �� . .:. ... Subjecr: Filing of Nottce of Determination (n compliance with Sect(on 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Negative Declaration for new well and storage facilities at 1000 Burlingame Ave., Washington Park, and to abandon two wells at Burlinctame Hiah School, ProjectTitle .400 Carolan Avenue � City of Burlingame, Planning Dept., Margaret Monroe (415) 342-8625 State Clearinghouse Number L,ead Agency Area Code/Telephone/Eztension (If submiaed to Clearinghouse) Contact Person 1000 Burlingame Avenue & 400 Carolan Av�nue, BurlinQame, Calif., San Mateo ProjeCt LoCatton (include county) County The City of Burlingame proposes to develop a replacement wellwith Project Descrtption: storage tanks to irrigate Washington Park and Burlingame High ��hool; and the well will provide an available supplemental water supply in the event of an emergency when the city's water supply from San Francisco Water Depar�ment could be shut down for an extended period of time. Two existing wells adjacent to Burlingame High School, currently used to irrigate the school grounds, would be abandoned with the development of the new well. This is to advise that the C i ty of Bur 1 ingame has approved the above described pmject on � I.ead Agaicy � Responsible Agency May 11, 19 9 2 and has made the following determinadons regazding the above described project (Dace) 1. The project [❑will �will not] have a significant effect on the environment 2. ❑ An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. � A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA 3. Mitigation measures [Qwere Qwere not] made a condition of the approval of the projec� 4. A statement of Ovemding Considerations [❑was �was not] adopted for this projec� 5. Findings [�were ❑were not] made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. This is to certify that the final EIR with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the General Public a� City Hall, City of Burlingame, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA 94010 Date received foc filing at OPR: Revised October 1989 STETSON ENGINEERS INC. WATER RESOURCES CONSULTANTS WIL.LIAM ROMAN ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER 2771 E. FRANCISCO BLVD. SUITE K SAN RAFAEL, CALIF. 94901 (415) 457-0701 �/�-X �c�ls) ��7-/63.�' Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Page 13 May 11, 1992 8, 1992 Exhibit and Site Plans (both 8-1/2" x 11"); (2) that the temporary tent shall be removed by May 30, 1992 and the parking spaces shall be restored to their original use; (3) that while the tent is in place the parking lot at 1338/1340 Bayshore Highway shall be available for employees, maintaining a total of 41 spaces for employee use during that time at that location; (4) that while the tent is in place, valet parking shall occur in the surface parking lot in the northeast corner of the site in front of the parking garage; (5) that the project shall meet Uniform Building and Uniform Fire Codes as amended by the City of Burlingame; (6) that the site shall be inspected for removal of the tent in June, 1992; and (7) that a site inspection shall be made of available parking on the property during use of this tent. Motion was approved on a 7-0 roll call vote. 11. SPECIAL PERMIT AND VARIANCES FOR A RECREATION ROOM AT 1524 MEADOW LANE, ZONED R-1 Continued to the meeting of May 26, 1992. 12. LOT COVERAGE AND PARKING VARIANCES FOR A FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR ADDITION AT 1645 MCDONALD WAY, ZONED R-1 Continued to the meeting of June 8, 1992. 13. NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR NEW WELL AND.STORAGE FACILITIES AT 1000 BURLINGAME AVENUE, WASHINGTON PARK, AND TO ABANDON TWO WELLS AT - BURLINGAME HIGH SCHOOL, 400 CAROLAN AVENUE, ZONED UNCLASSIFIED LAND C. Jacobs, finding that on the basis of the initial study there is no evidence that this project would have a significant effect on the environment, and in fact in the event of an emergency would benefit the community, moved to accept Negative Declaration ND-456P, seconded by C. Ellis and approved unanimously on voice vote. FROM THE FLOOR There were no comments from the floor. M .� . CITY OF•BIIRLINGAME NEGATIVE DECLARATION File No. ND - 456P for Washington Park Well and Storage Tanks at 1000 Burlingame Avenue, Burlingame, California The City of Burlingame by MARGARET MONROE on _May 4, 1992 , completed a review af the proposed project and determined that: (XX) It will not have a significant effect on the environment (XX) No Environmental Impact Report is required. Description of Project: The City of Burlingame proposes to develop a replacement well with storage tanks to irrigate Washington Park and Burlingame High School; and the well will provide an available supplemental water supply in the�event of an emergency when the City's water supply from San Francisco Water Department could be shut down for an extended period of time. Two existing wells adjacent to Burlingame High School, currently used to irrigate the school grounds, would be abandoned with the development of the new well. These two existing wells, with a total capacity of 100 gallons per minute are 50 to 70 years old and have deteriorated well screens which impede the free inflow to the pumps. Present wells are located on Burlingame High School property and the new well will be located nearby at Washington Park on City of Burlingame_property. The proposed 300 to 400 foot deep gravel packed well would yield about 150 gpm. The Washington Park irrigation system can be operated using 40 gpm of the well's 150 gpm capacity. The remaining 110 gpm capacity will be available for the high school irrigation system which requires 50 to 100 gpm. The new project would include a 400 foot test hole; electrical service and motor control center; 300-400 foot 30 inch well; well and booster pumps; emergency generator; above ground storage tanks; piping, valves and meters; and a building to secure and protect the equipment. The well water would have a high dissolved mineral cont,ent, suitable for irrigation, but would require disinfection to meet current safe drinking water standards. Disinfection for the water supplied during an emergency will be provided by a temporary chlorine feeder. The Merced Formation is the principal aquifer available for the new well. The younger Colma Formation is thought to overlie the Merced and serves as a secondary aquifer source where the water table has not declined below it. Thickness of either formational unit is uncertain in this area. The local aquifer groundwater is recharged mainly from percolation of stream runoff in outcrop areas. (Refer to report by JWA consulting engineers, A Feasibility Study of the Washington Park Well, Phase 1, City of Burlingame, September, 1991). � Reasons for Conclusion: The development of the new well to replace the abandoned wells will not have a significant impact on the environment. The environmental checklist studied the impacts on the earth, air, water, plant life, animal life, noise, light and glare, land use, natural resources, risk of upset, population, housing, transportation/circulation, public services, energy, utilities, human health, aesthetics, recreation, cultural resources, and findings of significance. Existing wells and surface irrigation systems currently use the same amount of water but from different sources. The school uses the wells to be abandoned for irrigation and the park uses the San Francisco water supply to irrigate. The use of the new wells at 150 gpm to replace existing wells and domestic water sources will only be a change in the source of the water and not a change in the amount of water used. The same amount of water will be applied on the surface to percolate into the aquifer. The new well maintenance of positive impact will provide an again improving continue to meet the new well. will improve available irrigation water for Washington Park and the high school creating a on local recreational facilities. Also the well additional water supply for community emergencies public services for the city. The city will water conservation and landscaping guidelines with The development of the wells and its facilities is consistent with the General Plan and ecology of the area, and the surrounding.park and high school uses, therefore, it should not result in any adverse environmental impacts on adjacent sites. The project is appropriate for a developed park site. If designed to meet city, state, and county requirements as approved there is no substantial evidence that the project will have significant effect on the environment. Sign tu e of Pr cessing Official � C 4 Z,., ' le at igned Unless appealed within 10 days hereof the date posted, the determination shall be final. Date posted: 7 /� � Declaration of Postina I declare under penalty of perjury that I am City Clerk of the City of Burlingame and that I posted a true copy of the above Negative Declaration at the City Hall of said City near the doors to the Council Chambers. Executed at Burlingame, California on , 1992. Appealed: ( ) Yes ( ) No ' JUDITj� A�jt�IALFATTI, CITY CLERK, �TY OF BURLINGAME �N��S�o F2 � ;� ; � �1 �. Q �� J� �C� �c J�\h�� � �� J� � �\'°,�' � `�M [�, - � �� % � '� ° �� a ��'���9� � BURLINGAME HIGH SCHOOL� r, \ _�����e,/l`�����5 /���%`.,.�..\\�i � IW�L�.�u�S�a�: , <�� � � '� �a O`~� 4�.�- �p<^�� � �` :�.%/�`�i/ WASHINGTON PARK � �`e�'/ ` ,� �; \�� �-" 0\•4 ��� �•;,, \,/,/�\ � 7 \ \` ��.ti �v � lA:.�.\7 �� � \ ^S \ �� J� � ��� � �- CITY OF BURLINGAME SAN MATEO COUNTY CALIFORNIA REVISEO: " I �' 8' ��� �' wo' aee' � ORAPNIC SC�LE . ' ��y � �r� ;,; � � ; r�,�` � -�e ,� � �. ��� � , �;. i -� "' t �. .� � „ .� � �� � �� � � a � .� � F� "�� �"�a��, � w. .. y� ,w; ::4 ih�'-� f, i R,. a�� ��r �r,h �, - , , - •'- . . _ ` n :. ,.. . , • , _, • �a�v'. �:Y..� � .,: i �..'.rC '._ r�y.�� ` 6� . . � .:.: . . �, , . � ,;� �. � "'' ,_. ._ ; ��, �"► ,Z� ���. "�'�� ��;.� Iw► ,�,�+,ir �`` ,, n* � 1 �� ,, „ . , , w �ry� ,�� . � • , , , �. 'f�,� � ,� '. � � �„ . M'y�, ,� a 'a � "#._� � . .'. 4 ,�, . d . ta' n , . � � ' � .: S� w1 ,d.,; � - ` �` ��. ... � � �-�g , . � � �� . `'�t '� . . t „,�y ;� �- a .4 . � ' . �'+�rip � . . ; . \' z y..�r " �. � , . �. ,� �.� .�.,. �:�� .; i^ „'�a ���"' � ���* �� 1�` ' � � "" a�"� � } 3 � � �. � � \ .,�,�;i' :a � ��,, '� ' �,;� '"`��, ' � •�� i�l�� 5 '+ � , . • �� . � �� � ' � a J � � � ,��,,. � ,R +..�.' � .: �6 _ . v 4: _ . . ,} � -�� ..:.a :� �� � ��+,.� �� ::� . � .: , }'�'��- 1 �,y� �`� .,,..;y.,r. �`;:i, . � ,r�..:. �.� . , , , . . , :, .. . �`�•� , , _ '�, F . 1' �a �.. n i. V , -y. � . +�+� �� ' w �4a �. . . � � .: ' ����,� �` 1 _: �- . f `�, ' � � � II. *���q, 4 _ - .. � ryJ�� ��W; � .. � .< � . . .� � � � . !. , �� " w� ',�«, sI i. � � '� ; � �.� f •a �� ���* �.,� A� � ti� � r � . � , -' � .�. „+ �i � - ' „�,,. - `� v<.` '�'�� , , . ,, . �; . .. �. � ,. , . . _ �� < . , � ��� . ,: a � � r,�r� . ..� y��� . . � ' � 'K� �� ' � � 3 ` y � .�: f + � � Y ' 1���• f� r , � � � ' �P � �� ' , � � + . � � �... ��� , k _... • ' '- ".f 2 .. '�i�. I �� � ��� 6'� � t�� . Y. ( g'" ' y� � , '. � ' F��; q ,� d.'. , � �'� n I �y,,, �` ..�` . �,.�. �- � �' . � � .. � ���..�� .�. Q� �`` �a_.���'� r ��� � .l, 1' � `, � ��,. x ��� f''�; .r• • � k ... � � , ��G � ,� � � �� "7 � � Y . r � ..- , • ' . + � . F-°r� � � � �• � �/� . � � •-_ "§�� �-�� �.. �'.�� , n v ,� � � ., -.a .. - � ..., ,�� � ' r ` .,• , ' tr / . . , � � , . 1 ;y'""R : r ,.` , k�r�' �*" . .. ,�. � � , k ;� ' • �; .... q �. .. ., " ' � �� v ., . �� , �. -. �, 1l� ' :, ���;��. �� ° �, "' ;, �,;, � k. � � . � . ..:� _'a a � ��� � Y�� J r � � � f ; �r. U.'� AF ` ���� 1 . �'+ * � v" � � A� Y� �, v� .� ;� _y� � � �sµ� �. ' S� � .t g�'�� r '4 x, � E �` ,�jly`, Y �� � ♦ � ��. � � � �. �.� 4_ • "� �, •' . �n.t�� x T"�'"�nw.��fw'r. �m W. * �� ': �w"'"""w"°`^y.'� � a ♦ . � " �"��'� � ' „�' -+*, � 'F: � ��+. � �e W'" � ' � . � �l. �. "d �'" � �, ""� w'� "�' �, � � � � � �� � �st'�.."!;,t'` �►' i�in,;��+' � ' � "� ,'a , , � � y r "�a j '�+;, i ; ♦ �y+ '� ' �+ .� µ��"��,r � ; , v,� , ,� � t w r` ,>9 � � � ax".,:y ������ #tl . dP ' ^ �{ + : .... . � � ,. � M � � . Wr • �« ', _ � , ,�� ,� ;;�' `�"'-�' . ;�` ,�� � E d � .,� � ; � � ,,� ."���. ��� .. [l t � 4 6 .. � �- .. - �'� ` FN�R.,}�i�W%�Y�.,��`;��„� � e� f � r ��'� I i � � w ,y � � P p" . . _ ����,�'��� D"� dpw '� �' , � F � , �.. .� , ,�y :� � � � � � �, ,. � � > �x . • �' .. � e "� +��� e�w, '�� , `',t�, � �... '� r w aw � ,`�P ' � t. � 4 � � ""� � � "�iY�!` � � � � ���, ,yw *4;;. E �' a i . "� � �•�`� /W'��. y �. - "M �" � ... �� �� ' �� � � �� �.i.�".'��y�.d ��Y�r'� ` � „°+rr�� � d# �� � � � �. � . ��`f► i . • � � �' �"�"�t� +y� �� , t • ,.� � �. ��., , • a � ' � � i�M1.. � - . �, n [ � -i`` � -y. �. i � p ��ak�.lp x,•> ' , '�„ ;,� • J � l,� a � " + � i' ry ����� ��� � ��t �� :,� ..���� ����. ' � .A�� � r;'�� � ��'�r' � � � " , a� � ,;����,, �� W�� . �"`�t � " • r''A� - ''> � , ,« . , a.. � � s : � w' , y'•. � � I .a � .,� � f � � '�� r"T:�,. � �� mi i .: �� �� � � �� µ . "'-a. Y:.: "� , '���. w� � • ��54 � � *r�°�i�� 3 ' .�Mg�� . �7r,��;�. . . �. y ,�'��` „� �. r £ , "� ••" � ,� �"�k � f � � ���:j ,� *d • r -�i � �'� �'��Ylr .: rr�,� � , �' • a _ h. r� ! '••�< � '� � �, �"! � .' .. _3 ' " .' �� F t 'r , � "w "�).'k. � '� � "`' F �� �l m �. �n V1ki �' ~�� `. M� ���i ��f�� .� � . . . � + � � r� �' . �� ♦ � € �' ., � ��w °' . . n' " . . + . r . �I � w .M � � �� ,�y�r �.�`�,+., � � �,�i.� "'�, J •" v � � �_� i� w yL � .� . ' ,i�, �. /� }� "� « � $, � � � � +.F �`� +�a.� �' �" �" ' ,� �`' � � � �-� �'���. . . . .���� � � ,�, •�� . �' � , - � � i� � .. � 4 4 ;:Ye. ��� ��.rt « ��r� � �� ��. � � � n � ...{.�`�w `��� 4 �� � .. .� . a '. ' , ` ... �.. < ,�' �♦ , g � . . . �. � � ,� ay ,q � � � , . � � �.ppenc�c v Environntental Impact Checklist �. �. wiu the propoeat resulc in: a. Unstable earth aondiaons or changes in geaiogic substructure9? b. Di�uptions, displaceaients, compaction or overrovering of the soil? c Qiange in topography or ground svrface re]ief features? • d The destrudion, oovaing or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any ina�ease in wind or wata erosion of soiLs, eitha on or off the site? f. Q�anges in deposition or aosion of beach sands, or changes in sltation, depasition or erosion that may modify the channel of a riva or stream or the bed of the ooean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic haTards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, ar similar hazards7 2�. Will the proposal reslilt in: a. Substantial air emissYons or detaioration of ambient air quality? b. The aeation of objedionable odors? c Altaation of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, ather locally or regionally? 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Qianges in currencs, or the cou:se or direction of water mov�aits, in atha muine or fresh waters? b. Qianges in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? c Alterations to the aourse or flow of flood waters? d�ange in the amount of s�ufaae water in any waDer body? e. DLscharge into surface waters, ar in any alteration of surfacc water quality, induding but not liauted to tempc3ature, dissolved oxygen or turbidiEy? 4. Plant L(fe. Will the proposal result in: a. �an ge in the diversity of species, or number of any spedes of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, Qops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the aumbers of any unique, rare, or endangerod sprdcs of plants? e lntrodudion of new spedes of plants into an arca, or in a barrier to the normal replenishma�t of e�asting spedes? d. Reduction in aQeage of any agriculhual aop? 5. Anlmal LJfe. Will the propo�al result in: a. (hange in the diversity of species, or numbers of spedes of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and sheU�sh, benthic orgarusms or inseas)? b. Reduction of the n�bas of any unique, rare, or endangered spedes of animals? c Introdudion of new spedes of animals into an area, Q resvlt in a barria to the migratlon or movement of animals? - 6. Hoise. Will the propa�.�al result in: a. Inaeases in existing noise levels? b. Fxposure of people to sevae noise levels? 7. L1aht and Glare. Will the proposal produoe new light or glare? 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the presa►t or planned land use of an area? 9. Natural Reaources. Will the proposal result in: a. Ina+ease in the rate of use of any nahual r�ouroes? � b. Substantial depletion of any nonraiewable natural reso�vce? 10. Hlsk of Uoset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explasion or the release of harardous substanaes including, but not limited to, oil, pesarides, chemicals or radiation) in the eveat of an acddent ac upset mnditions? b. Poasible interfaence with an �agency response plan or an emagency evacvation plan? 11. Will the gropoeal alta the location, distributlon, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area. 12. Housina. Will the proposal aEfect e�asting hotising, or aeate a d�and for additional housing? Yes Maybe No � � � � � �. � � � � . � , � � Local water supply psvject corestruction Page A-19 13. TrananortatloNClrculation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehiailar movement? b. Effecb on e�dsting parldng facilities, or d�and for new parldng? . c Substantial impact upon e�dsting transportation systems? d. Alterations to present petterns of dreulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? • f. Inaease in traffic hazards to motor vehides, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. Public �ervices. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered govanmental setv�aes m any at the followu�g azeas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protedion? c SchooLs? d Parks or otha reQeational fadlities? e. Maintenance of public fadlities, including roads? f. Other governmental savices? 15. Eneray. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Substantial inQease in demand upon e�risbng souroes of energy, or require development of new sources of energy? 16. Utllities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alteraaons to the following utilities? a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c Watcr? d Sewcr or septic t�nks? e. Storm water drainagc? f. Solid wasle and d'uposal? 17. Humen Heelth. Will the proposal result in: a. Geation of any health hazard or potential health ha7ard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposurc of people to potential health ha7ards? 18. A� ht gl(g Will the proposal result in the obshvction of any scenic vista or view opa� to the public, or will the proposai result in the aeaaon of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. Recreatlon. Will the proposal result in an impad upon the quality or quantity of existing reQeational oppornuuaes? +��T�Sj: =r • -r a. Will the proposal resvlt in the alteration of or the destnxtion of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b. Will the propor.�al result in advesse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, st:ucture or object? c Does the proposal have the potential to rause a physical change that would affect unique ethnic cvlhual values? d. Will the proposal restrict e�dsting religious ac saacd uses within the potential impact area? 21. I�endatory Flndinas of Slaniflcance. a. Does the pro�'ect have the potential to degrade the quatity of the environment, substantiall�yreduoe the habitat of a fish or wil�ife sped�, muse a fish or w�ldlife populahon to drop below self-sustaining Ieve�s, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal mmmunity, reduoe the number or restrict the ran�e of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eTiminate important exampies of the major periods of Califomia his�fory or prehistory? b. Doe9 the project have the potential to achieve short-tesm, to the disadvantage ofof long-term, a�virona►a�tal goa15? (A short-term impact on the �vironment is one that occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time, while long-term impacts will endure well into the future) c Does the project have impacts that are individuallv limited, but cumulatively aonsiderable? (A project mav impact on two or more separate resouroes whae the impact on each resouroe is relatvely small, but whe3e the eff�t of the total of thaee impacts on the aivironmett is sigiuficant. d Does the project have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effectis on human beings, either directly or jndirectly7 Yes Maybe No � � ' � � � � � � �+ � � � � � � � � � Page A-20 I�ca� water supply projert crn�struction CITY OF BIIRLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BIIRLINGAME, CA 94010 (415) 342-8931 NOTICE OF BEARING The CITY OF BIIRLINGAME PLANNING COZIIrII88ION announces the following public hearing on Monday, the iith day of May, 1992, at 7:30 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. A copy of the application and plans may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Planning Division at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. 1000 BIIRLINGAME AVENIIE APN: 029-141-030 029-141-010 NEGATIVS DECLARATION FOR A NEW WELL AT 1000 BIIRLINGAME AVENIIE� WASHINGTON PARR, ZONED IINCLA88IFIED LAND; AND ABANDON WELLS AT 400 CAROLAN AVENQE, BIIRLINGAME HIGH BCHOOL� ZONED IINCLASSIFIED LAND. If �ou challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City at or prior to the public hearing. MARGARET MONROE CITY PLANNER May 1, 1992 MEMO TO: RALPH KIRKUP FROM: Jane Gomery DATE: September 16, 1991 TOPIC: WASHINGTON PARR WELL - ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SUBJECT: There are two environmental review processes required depending on the type of well project. 1. If the well is a replacement well for an abandoned well(s) at Burlingame High School then the new well would be categorically exempt per CEQA Code Section 15302 Class 2(c) Replacement or reconstruction of existing utility systems and/or facilities involving negligible or no expansion of capacity. 2. If the well is new and includes a storage tank we suggest an Initial Study and Negative Declaration be prepared. In Municipal Code Resolution 62-89 "Adopting Environmental Review Procedures" (attached) notice shall be given to: a. all organizations who have previously requested such notice (ie. the County Health Department), b. all property owners within 300 feet, and c. posting of notice in a place accessible to the public in city hall. We would anticipate the public review period for the Negative Declaration should not be less than 10 days. The State Clearinghouse does not require an environmental review unless the project has statewide or area wide significance. Since in our determination it does not, the Negative Declaration would only be a local document and would not need to be filed with OPR. This will reduce the review period. The Planning Department would prepare the Initial Study, Negative Declaration and do the Noticing of the project. We will place the item on the Planning Commission agenda so that there is opportunity for public input during the review process. cc: Bill Roman, JWA Consulting Engineers 1 �-' Ci{q�nf f�urlingame Plan Review Process Buildi g Departm nt 696-1600 ��� PLANNING DEPARTMENT s96-�250 Plan Review Comments Job Address: �� �}�, C.I�I� Application Number:_�5 ��?�y Job Description: �l-iF� �2 c�rY W�'u-�' u�`'�f ��}'�-tL[ J Y Appl'n Date: i�� .....Check Date: 2 ..By:� [] Not Appd Resubl Date: ..Recheckl Date: ..By: [] Not Appd Resub2 Date: ..Recheck2 Date: ..By: [] Not Appd Resub3 Date: ..Recheck3 Date: ..By: [) Not Appd [✓-] Plans approved: �] Without further comment [] With conditions listed. ' By : �llJ Date : �/� 2� q a�— � .� �� / �i! _i.`�� (� , / � • � _ • • ��, / � � �� I :, fi � 2��l V'�f1�1 �_ - i�'I ��T(�.rt�� LI--� � (.�t�� = � a , � �� � I2' �1 /�.,l�Z.0 � = I�Lrn�.2.� l� r � � �� �J w �--� \ � � 1 C7 ? p � „ ,.� � � �.,,� ,-YI 1 PLNG PC ►► For each change: 'cloud' revision on original sheet & provide a revision marker at each cloud and in revision block with date.• • �r � y Plan Review Process Building Department {M 696-1600 PLANNING DEPARTMENT _ PAGE: �_ aAR..e.e��..���.. < a�u > �b Address: y � (�v�DI� ��. Application Number: �b Description: C�,� ��� - � � � ��I.L� � • I I_tA ' I� /.!I •a..,� . �I ..��. , _ ..�. ..-- , � �r�v►til^��..r.e� � "n �- - � ' " - �, , , 1/3! �L�'�Ilr � . �t� �- r� �':: a r���.. � i. ■� .. 0o I-; �nl.�� I �' . .i:. .