The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1080 Carolan Avenue - Application�--� Y � � � � I V � � Dat� fil.ed .._.-..... Study mezting .. APPLTCATION TO TFiE PL.�7NING C�MM?'S5iON Public hearing ....___._.,_„_,.,._.....,... AND CITY COUi�TCiL OFTHE CITY OF BURLINGAME. Applicant Iv'ame �... Address Property Address D3te April o, 1971 Wheatley-Oliver , . Telephone .......326-..7.3�0... 220 California Avenue, Palo Alto Burlin�ame Shore Land .at_Carolan.....Ave.,...,.,and_.,C.�..d.i.a,.l�,.�,....��,y Lot B1ock Subdivision Zone Improvements existing Stora�e.._�uildin.�_ .. .O.�x_.,1, 0 .._.._.....__.._....,.... ......... . Z.._._._.._._.._.._---__........_......__ ................._....__._......._..__..........._._..........._........__..__.. Variance applied for � � To permit �en (,10�_ apartment._.buildin.�s....,on....a„s.in.�le.,...prope_�ty � -..._.....__�...._..... To permit a netiv map to be submitted at a later time separa�ing • . . ...... . .. .... . ..... - . _. . . . . ._ .... ..................._......_...._................_......_.....5--3:.. .. ........�........:......._......__.._._............_...�._............... _.. _._. n �� a��O,b�O�� sq��, ft. resturan�,� ad�acent to Union station) lrom tl�e , !� Exh� its see in'structions) Letter o� j�1stification N�ap or diagrz.ms _,_ Other supporting data Fee:. Forty Dollars ($40.00), payable to �ity of Burlingame. � AUplication: I, the undersigned owner �or agent of the owner) of t;ne property described herein, do hereby make ��plicati�n for a Variance of the r_ature set forth �.bove, in accc-�rd-- ance with the provisions of the ordina.nces of th� Citv of Burling :me, and I,hereby, certi.fy that the infoi-�r.a-� tion given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief,� !l \Respectful�y sui:•:r�t:;tt�u, ..: � D�t� � �� —�� ._....__...A nr i 1.__� �.._. l� 71 _..._...._ 220 California Avenue, Suite 210 • Palo Alto, California 94306 •?dephone (415) 32(r7350 LEON M. WHEAIT.EY RIGHARD B. OLIVER March 10, 1971 City Council City of Burlingame Re: Burlingame Shore Land Gentlemen: In.preparation of our hearin� this Monday n�,ght I enclose herewith for your reviet•v a revised plot plan of the 510-unit apartment complex. The basic chan e is the sli ht movin of buildin� � to permit the savin o he ex s ln mason r uild- n� a the rear o the existin� service station. This build- in� would be refurbished and would be used for storage, main- tenance facilities and Possibl.y mana�ement offices for the pro,iect . We have met with the President of the Velvet Turtle Rest- aurant and we would request the use of the �0,000 sq. ft. par- cel for that use. I have just now received one copy of the plot plan, elevation and layout plus a color renderin� which I will present at the meeting. I was unable to obtain copies of these documents; however, I have outlined in red on tr.e revised plot plan of the apartment project the location of the restaurant. In the event the economics of the restaurant do not work out we would request lee-way to resubmit a proposal for a two-story office building for our own use and for other tenants for that �0,000 sq, ft. site. Other data has been submitted to you and I will be at the meeting with our arc'riitect to answer any questions. Very truly yours, ��.�,,�,C� � 111� Richard B. Oliver RBO:np , � < ,�,,�. i , � ;�,,,,� �,, �..�. { � ��.�''' ,:�.�� ,.". J S�r7�7( reported that the agreement relates solely to t�ie apartment project, except thet there is provision for the property �o be divided into two parcels--one the site of the apartment complex, the other to be the subject__of._a_.separate_ a�reement between the.city and the present owner for restaurant or other improvement. Councilman Martin commented that in place of a single development Council will be confronted �eith two separate proposals by different owners. At r7ayor Amstrup's request, the City Attorney read the draft of agree- ment in its entirety. . During the ensuing discussion, there appeared to be some differences of opinion as to inclusion of the restaurant parcel in the agreement. Following comments from Council, Mr. Oliver stated it was his under- standing from prior discussions that the parcel was to be excluded, because arrangements had not been made with a specific tenant, and that the present owner was to assume responsibility for improvement of the site and bring his proposal to Council separately. The City Planner reported that, based on his interpretation of the discussions before Council, he advised the Planning Commission, at the time the zoning variances were considered, to disregard the restaurant site. � Counci�lman i�iartin stated that the agreernent need not specify a particular restaurant but should at least attach the use classifi- cation to Parcel B, thereby eliminating the possibility of proposals that would be totally unacceptable. Mr. Oliver informed Council that the attorney for Burlingame Shore Land Company was present and willing to accept the qualification suggested by Councilman Martin. In response to Councilman Johnson, the City Planner and Fire Chief reported they suggested some changes in the agreement in areas of concern to their departments; the City Engineer stated that he was satisfied with provisions for completion of public works and related matters. The City Attorney, in response to PRayor �lmstrup, stated that, Council willing, the agreement will be rewritten to incorporate amenclments requested by Council, as follo�as: 1.Strike reference to "restaurant site," paragraph 1"RECITALS," 2.Limit Parcel B to restaurant use, any other use to be at Council's discretion; preliminary and working drawings for improve- ment of the site to be subject to Council approval; 3.Working drawings for remainder of the project subject to Council approval; 4.Strike reference to parcel map, (paragraph 9, sub-paragraph (1); S.Add "and/or off site" in connection with installations of fire hydrants, etc., su}�-paragraph (6); - 6.Provide for amending Fire Zone i�iaps applicable to Parcel B, at Council's discretion. -11- � RESOLUTIOi1 N0. 29-71 (oral, to be reduced to writing) "Authorizing execution of agreement with Burlingame Shore Land Company, :�Theatley/ Oliver, et al., for improvement of acreage bounded generally by Bayshore F3oulevard, Cadillac Way and Carolan Avenue"„ was introduced by Councilman Johnson, who moved its adoption, seconded by Councilman Crosby and declared carried on the following roll call: AYES: COUNCILrQEN: Amstrup, Crosby, Johnson, Mangini NOES: COUNCILMLN: Martin ABSENT COUNCILP�EN : None COt�IMUNICATIONS (continued) 2. SIDEI��ALK R�PAIR PROGRI�M A comnunication dated riay 12, 1971, from the Director of Public VJorks reported that Venturini Trucking and Grading Company has satisfactorily completed the annual work of sidewalk, curb and gutter repairs in accor�lance with the contract and recommended acceptance of the project. An addendum to the communication from the City I�lanager dated t�7ay 13, I971, concurred in the recorunendation. RESOLUTION NO. 30-71 "Accepting City Sidewalk Repair Program, 1970- 1971, Joi� No. 70-8" was introduced for passage on motion of Councilman Crosby, seconded by Councilman P�angini, and unanimously carried on roll call. 3. ADDITIONS TO FIRE STATION NO. 3 A letter dated April 26, 1971, from Albert W. Kahl, project architect, reported that the work of remodeling Fire Station No. 3 has been completed in accordance with the contract and r2commended acceptance and filing of notice of completion. An addendum to the letter from the City P�2anager under date of May 13, 1971, concurred in the recom- mendation. RESOLUTION NO. 31-71 "Accepting Construction Of Additions To Fire Station No. 3" was introduced for passage on motion of Councilman Mangini, seconded by Councilman Crosby and unanimously carried on roll call. RESOLUTIONS 1. RE:SOLUTION NO. 32-71 "Requesting Allocation Of Funds From The California State Iiighway Cor,unission For Improvement Of A Portion Of Hocvard Avenue, California Drive And Bayshore Highway As A'Topics Project "' was introduced for passage on motion of Councilman Johnson, seconded by Cotincilman Crosby and carried unanimously on roll call. ORDINANCES l. ORDINANCE NO. 934 "An Ordinance Ariending Tne Municipal Code Of The City Oi Burlingame By Adding Chapter 18.20 To Title 18 Grading, Excavation And Fills, was given its second reading and on motion �� of Councilman Martin, seconded by Councilman Johnson, said Ordinance -12- / August 25, 1971 MEMORANDUM TO CITY CLERK Department of Public Works } r.�lanning Consultant ) for intormation FROM: City Attorney SUBJECT: Burlingame Shore Land Co., Inc., Wheatley-Oliver, Inc., development. The following documents are attached for the permanent file in the office of the City Clerk: l. Notice of Termination of Agreement dated August 5, 1971, by and between BURLINGAME SHORE LAND CO., INC., and the city of Burlingame; and Agreement dated August 5, 1971, by and between Burlingame Shore Land Co., �nc., and others, and the city of Burlingame. The two documents were recorded in the Office of the County Recorder, San Mateo County, on August 11, 1971, serial numbers 35217AE and 35218AE, respectively. �,� ��-� �� ° City Attorney BK:dw encl