The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1431 El Camino Real - Staff ReportItem No. 8a Regular Action Calendar City of Burlingame Mitigated Negative Declaration, Design Review, Condominium Permit, Parking Variance and Tentative Condominium Map Address: 1431 El Camino Real Meeting Date: February 12, 2018 Request: Application for Mitigated Negative Declaration, Condominium Permit, Design Review and Parking Variance and Tentative Condominium Map for the use of mechanical parking lifts and Tentative Condominium Map for construction of a new 3-story, 6-unit condominium building Applicant: Levy Design Partners APN: 026-013-110 Property Owner: GGH Investment LLC Lot Area: 7,721 SF General Plan: Medium -High Density Residential Zoning: R-3 Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan (R-3 Base District) Adjacent Development: Multifamily Residential to north, south and east/Single Family residential at the rear (west) CEQA Status: The proposed project is covered by Mitigated Negative Declaration 598-P, attached. Current Use: 4-unit apartment building Proposed Use: 6-unit condominium building Allowable Use: Multifamily, duplex, and single family residential March 27, 2017 Environmental Scoping and Design Review Meeting: At the March 27, 2017, Planning Commission environmental scoping and design review meeting, the Commission had several questions and suggestions regarding this project (see attached March 27, 2017 Planning Commission Minutes) and one letter from the public was received. Please refer to the attached meeting minutes and applicant's response letter dated December 22, 2017, for detailed responses to the Commission's comments. At the March 27, 2017 meeting, the Planning Commission had the following concerns: • Is there justification for the variance for the delivery parking in front - too much is being placed on the site, could end up as a normal parking space - look at moving this and address the landscaping deficit; • Fire department shut-off needs to be shown on the plan, including screening; Will bicycle racks be provided? Not all the plants from the plant list are shown on plans; and Concerned about the noise from the lifts and metal roll -up doors. In response, the applicant revised the plans and eliminated the need for the front setback landscape variance by relocating the delivery vehicle parking to the rear. Information has been provided regarding the timing and noise anticipated from the mechanical parking lifts. The plans have been revised to be consistent with the proposed plant list, as well as to show the fire department shut-off with screening. The unit at the rear, unit #1, has been slightly reconfigured to allow for a trash enclosure at the rear of the building and to provide more common open space in the rear yard. This change resulted in unit #1 and unit #2 sharing an entry so that the outside door and stairs up to the second level are common, and they each have their own front entrance door at the top of the stairs. The applicant will be providing a sample of the Hardie shingle proposed on the exterior and has provided the addresses of two locations where Hardie shingles are used. Please refer to the applicant's response letter, dated December 22, 2017, for a full list of the changes made to the plans in response to the comments from the March 27, 2017 Environmental Scoping and Design Review Study meeting. OProject Summary: The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing 4-unit apartment building and the Project Summary: The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing 4-unit apartment building and the detached garage structure at the rear and construct a new, three-story, 6-unit residential condominium building. The subject property is zoned R-3 and has a General Plan land use designation of Medium -High Mitigated Negative Declaration, Design Review, Condominium Permit, 1431 El Camino Real Parking Variance and Tentative Condominium Map Density residential with 21-50 dwelling units per acre, which allows up to 8 units. The application is for 6 units which is a density of 35 dwelling units per acre. The proposed condominium building will have 6 units side by side and will be 3-stories. Each unit will have a ground level parking garage that will include a mechanical automobile stacker. The garage will have a 13'-3" plate height to accommodate 2 covered parking spaces; one on top of the other. There will be two living levels located above the garage. The overall proposed height is 35 feet. There will be 2 at -grade, guest parking spaces located in the right rear corner. There is also a dedicated service/delivery vehicle space located in the rear yard area. The entrance to each of the units is located on the north facing (driveway) side of the project. The project includes 6 two -bedroom, 2.5 bathroom condominium units. The average unit size proposed is 1,097 SF, with the units ranging from 1,064 SF through 1,195 SF. Condominium projects are required to provide 100 SF of common open space per unit and a minimum of 75 SF of private open space per unit. The proposed project meets these requirements with 608 SF of common open space in the rear yard and a minimum of 75 SF of private open space per unit with private balconies. The unit break down on size and open space is provided on sheet A0.3. The following applications are required for this project: ■ Design Review for construction of a new three-story, 6-unit condominium building (C.S. 25.28.020); ■ Condominium Permit (Tentative Condominium Map) required for construction of new condominium building (C.S. 26.30.020)' and ■ Parking Variance for the use of mechanical parking lifts to provide the required parking spaces (C.S. 25.70.032). General Plan and Zoning: The Burlingame General Plan designates the subject properties as Medium -High Density residential with 21-50 dwelling units per acre. The proposal of 6 units is 35 units per acre and is consistent with the General Plan land use designation. The R-3 zoning district allows multi -family residential uses by right and the development standards are summarized in the table below. The subject property itself is not identified as a historic resource however it is located along a portion of El Camino Real that contains the Howard -Ralston Eucalyptus Tree Rows, which was listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) in 2011. The Howard -Ralston Eucalyptus Tree Row is a 1.76-mile-long landscaping effort dating from 1873 to 1876 that consists of a row of trees lining each side of the historic El Camino Real in Burlingame. There are two young elm trees located in the planter strip in front of the subject property, within the Caltrans right-of-way that contribute to the Howard -Ralston Eucalyptus Tree Rows. The project proposes to relocate one tree within this historic tree row so it is not adversely affected during widening of the driveway. The project has an action plan (ESA - Environmentally Sensitive Area) to ensure that relocation of the tree does not impact this resource. Off -Street Parking/Parking Variance Request: Code Section 25.70.032 requires parking based on the number of bedrooms. Each 2 bedroom unit is required to provide 2 off-street parking spaces, 80% of which must be covered spaces. The proposed project will provide 12 on -site parking spaces that will be provided in the form of mechanical, stacked auto lifts (parking lifts). The subject property is not located within the boundaries of the plan area for the Downtown Specific Plan, where parking options, such as lifts, are allowed by right. Therefore a parking variance is required for the parking lifts; a variance application is included as part of this application. Code Section 25.30.070 (a)(2) requires 2 on -site guest parking spaces for new condominium projects with 5-15 units. The two guest parking spaces meet all dimensional standards and are located in the right rear corner of the property. In addition, Code Section 25.30.070(a)(3) requires one on -site service and/or delivery vehicle K Mitigated Negative Declaration, Design Review, Condominium Permit, 1431 El Camino Real Parking Variance and Tentative Condominium Map space, which is provided in the rear setback. All of the on -site parking will be accessed from a 12-foot wide driveway. The Municipal Code does not include specifications for parking lifts, so the City currently does not have a standard mechanism for review and approval. For properties located within the boundaries of the Downtown Specific Plan, the Plan includes language that encourages "creative approaches" to providing on -site parking including parking lifts, therefore parking variances are not required. However the subject property is not located within the boundaries of the Downtown Specific Plan and therefore a variance is required to request the required off-street parking spaces be provided in the form of mechanical parking lifts. The parking lifts could be considered a mitigation measure for the requested parking variance. The traffic study that was prepared as part of the environmental review notes that the increase from the four existing apartments to six condominiums will result in approximately eight net new daily trips, with one new trip in the AM peak hour and one new trip in the PM peak hour. Common and Private Open Space: The total common open space proposed for the condominium project is 608 SF which meets the minimum requirement of 100 SF (600 SF for the site). Of the minimum required common open space, 50% must be in soft landscaping (minimum of 300 SF of soft landscaping required); 521 SF within the common open space is proposed to be landscaped and therefore is in compliance. There is 75 SF to 80 SF in private open space per unit (75 SF/unit is the minimum required) provided in balconies. The code requires no dimension less than 3'-6" feet for private open space areas above the ground floor and all balconies comply. Landscaping: Code section 26.30.070(e)(1)) requires that 50% of the front setback be landscaped. The applicant is proposing 56.9% (586 SF) landscaping in the front yard where 50% (514 SF) is the minimum required. The project meets all other zoning code and condominium permit requirements. There are current no trees located on the subject property, just the two elms located in the planter strip in the Caltrans right-of-way. The applicant is proposing to plant two 36-inch box size Bingko biloba (Maidenhair trees), one 36-inch box size Pin Oak (Quercus palusris) along with nine 15-gallon trees. In addition the landscape plan includes various species of trees shrubs and small plantings throughout the site (see Landscape Plans, sheets L1.1. There are two young elm trees located within the planter strip in front of the subject property. As identified in the Historic Resources Compliance Report (HRCR) prepared as part of the CEQA document and required by Caltrans, while these trees are not Eucalyptus trees they do contribute to the Howard -Ralston Eucalyptus Tree Rows, which is on the National Register of Historic Places. The project proposes to relocate one tree (northern most tree/right side) adjacent to the sidewalk within the Caltrans right-of-way. Because this tree is a contributor to the NRHP-listed Howard -Ralston Eucalyptus Tree Rows it will be replanted directly south of its current location to avoid any adverse effects to the resource. This will be done under the supervision of a licensed arborist and in conjunction with the encroachment requirements set forth by Caltrans. THIS SPACE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY 3 Mitigated Negative Declaration, Design Review, Condominium Permit, Parking Variance and Tentative Condominium Map 1431 El Camino Real 1431 El Camino Real Lest Area- 7 791 SF Plans date stamped: February 14, 2017/ r1.........1. 99 9AA 7 ORIGINAL REVISED ALLOWED/REQUIRED PROPOSAL PROPOSAL 2/14/17 12/22/17 Front (1st fir): (2"d fir): (3rd fir): 20'-7" (all floors) No change 20'-7" (block average) (4tn fir): (5rn fir): ............................................................................................................................................................................. Left Side (1st fir): 5-0" No change 5'-0" (2nd fir): 6-0" 6'-011 (3.d fir): 7'-0" 7'-0" Right Side (1st fir): 13'-0" No change 5'-0" (2nd fir): 10'-0" 6'-0" (3rd fIr): 10'-01, 71_011 .............................................................................................................. Rear (1st fir): ...................................................,............................................................. 20'-0" (all floors) ......... .... .................................. :.... No change ................................................. ............ .......................... ......................................... 20 -0 (2nd fir): 20'-0" (3rd flr): 20'-0" Lot Coverage: 3,708 SF 3,758 SF 3,860 SF 48.0% 48.6% 50% ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Building Height: 35-0" .................................................... 35'-0" 55'-0" maximum/ CUP required to exceed 35'-0" .......... ......................................................................................... Off -Street Parking: ............................................................................................................................... ............:.................................................................................................. 12 condo unit spaces .. 12 condo unit spaces 6 (2-bdr units) x 2 - 1 (6 spaces + 6 spaces (6 spaces + 6 spaces Guest spaces - 2* provided in lifts) provided in lifts)' Service Vehicle - 1* 2 Guest Spaces 2 Guest Spaces Total = 15 spaces* 1 Service Vehicle Space 1 Service Vehicle Space ....................,................................................'...........11.................................................................... Driveway Width: ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12'-0" No change 12 -0 required ...................................................................................................... Front Setback 34.2%2 56.9% 50% Landscaping: 352 SF 586 SF 514 SF ranang variance Tor using mechanical parking lift to provide code required number of spaces (C.S. 25.70.032). Staff Comments: See attached comments from the Chief Building Division, Parks Division, Engineering Division, Stormwater Division and Fire Division. 4 Mitigated Negative Declaration, Design Review, Condominium Permit, 1431 El Camino Real Parking Variance and Tentative Condominium Map Public Facilities Impact Fee: The purpose of public facilities impact fee is to provide funding for necessary maintenance and improvements created by development projects. Public facilities impact fees are based on the uses, the number of dwelling units, and the amount of square footage to be located on the property after completion of the development project. New development that, through demolition or conversion, will eliminate existing development is entitled to a fee credit offset if the existing development is a lawful use under this title, including a nonconforming use. Based on a 6-unit residential condominium project and providing a credit for the existing four residential units, the estimated Public Impact Fee for this development project is: $11,074.00 (see table below). The Public Impact Fees payments are required as follows: 50% of the fee shall be submitted prior to issuance of building permit ($5,537.00) and 50% of the fee due before final framing inspection ($5,537.00). Service Area Proposed Multifamily Project Existing SFD Units 6 Units 4 Units (fee based on per dwelling (fee based on per dwelling unit) 'unit) General Facilities & Equipment $1,636 x 6 = $9,816 .........................................................................................----....................................................................... j $1,636 x 4 = $6,544 .................................................................................................................................... Libraries ...................................................... . ................. _......................................... ........ ............................... $1,415 x 6 = $8,490 ............................................................ ..................... ................ ........................................ $1,415 x 4 = $5,660 L ................................................................................ Police ............................................................................................................-.......................................................... $259 x 6 = $1,554 ..................................................................................................................................I...................................................................................................................................................................... $259 x 4 = $1,036 Parks and Recreation $350 x 6 = $2,100 .......................................................... $350 x 4 = $1,400 ................................................................................................................................... Streets and Traffic $1,105 x 6 = $6,630 $1,105 x 4 = $4,420 ........ ............................................................ Fire ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... $381 x 6 = $2,286 $381 x 4 = $1,524 .... Storm Drainage ............................ _....................... -...... $391 x 6 = $2,346 .............. ....................................................................... _..-------._...................................... $391 x 4 = $1,564 .................................................................... Subtotal $33,222.00 .............................. _--... - ..... __.............. _..._... $22,148.00 TOTAL $33,222.00 - $22,148.00 (credit for existing 4 dwelling units) $11,074.00 50% of the fee shall be submitted prior to issuance of building permit = $5,537.00 50% of the fee due before final framing inspection = $5,537.00 Planning staff would note the additional fees that apply to the project that will be required at the time of building permit issuance include sewer connection fees (determined by Public Works) as well as school fees (elementary and high school fees). Mitigated Negative Declaration: Since the project includes construction of more than four units (6 units proposed), the project is subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. The Planning Commission held an environmental scoping session for this project on March 27, 2017 in conjunction with design review study (refer to attached March 27, 2017 Planning Commission Minutes). Dudek was retained as the CEQA consultant to prepare an Initial Study. Based on the Initial Study, a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for review by the Planning Commission. As presented the Mitigated Negative Declaration identified issues that were 'less than significant with mitigation incorporation" in the areas of cultural resources and noise. Based upon the mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study, it has been determined that the proposed project can be addressed by a Mitigated Negative Declaration since the Initial Study did not identify adverse impacts which could not be reduced to acceptable levels by mitigation. 5 Mitigated Negative Declaration, Design Review, Condominium Permit, 1431 El Camino Real Parking Variance and Tentative Condominium Map The subject property has two elms trees located in the planter strip in front of the property that are part of the Howard -Ralston Tree Rows which is on the National Registrar of Historic places. Because one of the elm trees (on the right) needs to be relocated a few feet to the left (south) in order to accommodate the new driveway, as part of the CEQA process the applicant was required to have a Historic Resources Compliance Report (HRCR) prepared along with an Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) action plan and a Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties or (SOIS plan). These documents are required to be submitted to Caltrans as part of their encroachment permit review process and are attached as appendices in the CEQA document. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated for public review on December 6, 2017. The 30-day review period ended on January 4, 2018. There were two comment letters received during the review period: one from a tenant in the existing apartment building and one from Caltrans. A copy of each of these letters along with a response to each comment can be viewed in the attached Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, prepared by Dudek, dated January 2018, pages 1- 1 through 3-2. The purpose of the present review is to hold a public hearing and evaluate that this conclusion, based on the Initial Study, facts in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, public comments and testimony received at the hearing, and Planning Commission observation and experience, are consistent with the finding of no significant environmental impact. The mitigation measures in the Initial Study have been incorporated into the recommended conditions of approval (see conditions in italics). Required Findings for a Mitigated Negative Declaration: For CEQA requirements the Planning Commission must review and approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration, finding that on the basis of the Initial Study and any comments received in writing or at the public hearing that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant (negative) effect on the environment. Suggested Findings for Mitigated Negative Declaration: In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, the environmental analysis in the Initial Study was conducted to determine if there were any project -specific effects that are peculiar to the project or its site. Based on the environmental analysis, it was determined that the proposed project would have no adverse environmental impacts on the environmental in the areas of aesthetics, agriculture resources, air quality, biological resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, land use and planning, mineral resources, population and housing, public services, recreation, transportation/traffic and utilities and service systems. Although the environmental analysis did find that the project could have a significant effect in the areas of cultural resources and noise, mitigation measures were identified to reduce adverse impacts to acceptable levels. Therefore, based on the Initial Study there will be no significant environmental effects as a result of this project. Design Review: Design review is required for new construction of multi -family residential developments in the R-3 and R-4 Districts. The following considerations shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission (Code Section 25.57.010(b): (1) Compatibility with the existing character of the neighborhood; (2) Respect the mass and fine scale of adjacent buildings even when using differing architectural styles; (3) Maintain the tradition of architectural diversity, but with human scale regardless of the architectural style used; and (4) Incorporate quality materials and thoughtful design which will last into the future. Mitigated Negative Declaration, Design Review, Condominium Permit, Parking Variance and Tentative Condominium Map 1431 El Camino Real Suggested Findings for Design Review: That the proposed condominium building will be compatible with the existing character of the neighborhood with the use of a variety of quality materials including Hardie shingle siding, cement plaster, horizontal wood railings, and composite wood windows with metal trim. The new three-story building respects the mass and scale of this portion of El Camino Real which has a mix of two and three-story multifamily residential buildings with a variety of architectural styles. The building includes an articulated front fagade that provides visual interest. For these reasons the project is found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review criteria. Criteria for Permitting a Residential Condominium: The following condominium standards shall apply to all land and structures proposed as a part of a condominium project and shall be evaluated and processed pursuant to the procedural requirements set forth for conditional use permits in Title 25 of this code. No condominium project or portion thereof shall be approved or conditionally approved in whole or in part unless the planning commission, or city council upon appeal or review, has reviewed the following on the basis of their effect on: (a) Sound community planning; the economic, ecological, social and aesthetic qualities of the community; and on public health, safety and general welfare; (b) The overall impact on schools, parks, utilities, neighborhoods, streets, traffic, parking and other community facilities and resources; and (c) Conformity with the general plan and density permitted by zoning regulations. Suggested Findings for Condominium Permit: Sound community planning, the economic, ecological, social and aesthetic qualities of the community, and on public health, safety and general welfare in that the 6-unit residential condominium project is scaled to be compatible with existing multifamily buildings along El Camino Real and in the neighboring single family residential neighborhood and features ample landscaping with usable common open space; The overall impact on schools, parks, utilities, neighborhoods, streets, traffic, parking and other community facilities and resources in that with the mitigations designed into the project in the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration have found there will be no significant impacts; and Conformity with the general plan and density permitted by zoning regulations, in that the project provides two additional residential units (6 total) consistent with the applicable general plan and zoning designations. Required Findings for Variance: In order to grant a Variance the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d): (a) there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved that do not apply generally to property in the same district; (b) the granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant, and to prevent unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship; (c) the granting of the application will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare or convenience; and 7 Mitigated Negative Declaration, Design Review, Condominium Permit, 1431 El Camino Real Parking Variance and Tentative Condominium Map (d) that the use of the property will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses of properties in the general vicinity. Suggested Variance Findings (Parking Variance for the use of mechanical parking lifts to provide the required parking spaces): The project has been designed to meet the common open space requirements, service delivery space requirement as well as to provide two guest parking space therefore limiting the amount of space available to provide required parking for all of the dwelling units. The use of mechanical parking lifts reduces the square footage demands for the site and will not be visible to the public, with no impact on aesthetics. The midblock location of the property on El Camino Real provides no alternatives for overflow parking for residents or visitors for this site. The use of mechanical parking lifts guarantees that each unit can fit two vehicles on the property. The site provides the code required driveway and circulation space to allow adequate queuing and maneuverability in and out of the lifts. For these reasons, the proposed project may be found to be compatible with the Variance criteria. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action on the following items should be taken separately by resolution including the conditions representing mitigation for the Mitigated Negative Declaration (in italics below) and any conditions from the staff report and/or that the commissioners may add. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated. 1. Mitigated Negative Declaration. 2. Design Review, Condominium Permit and Parking Variance. 3. Tentative Condominium Map. Please note that the conditions below include mitigation measures taken from the mitigated negative declaration (shown in italics). If the Commission determines that these conditions do not adequately address any potential significant impacts on the environment, then an Environmental Impact Report would need to be prepared for this project. The mitigations will be placed on the building permit as well as recorded with the property and constitute the mitigation monitoring plan for this project. At the public hearing the following mitigation measures and conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped December 22, 2017, sheets A0.0 through A5.3; 2. that prior to issuance of a building permit for the project, the applicant shall pay the first half of the Public Facilities Impact fee in the amount of $5,537.00, made payable to the City of Burlingame and submitted to the Planning Department; 3. that prior to scheduling the final framing inspection for the condominium building, the applicant shall pay the second half of the Public Facilities Impact fee in the amount of $5,537.00, made payable to the City of Burlingame and submitted to the Planning Department; 4. parking lifts, three (3) Klaus 2061-190 and three (3) Klaus 2061-200, or an equivalent parking lifts, shall be installed in the garage of each residential unit, with the following conditions: a. that the interior clearance height of the garages shall be at least 13'-3"0, measured from floor to ceiling- as show on sheet A4.1 of the plans, in order to permit the parking of sport utility vehicles on the parking lifts; b. the parking lifts shall be properly illuminated to provide safety for easy loading and unloading, while not causing excessive glare. U. Mitigated Negative Declaration, Design Review, Condominium Permit, 1431 El Camino Real Parking Variance and Tentative Condominium Map C. signage shall be installed in each garage explaining the proper use of the lifts and emergency contact information for lift maintenance or problems. d. the final design of the parking lifts shall be subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director. 5. that during construction, the applicant shall provide fencing (with a fabric screen or mesh) around the project site to ensure that all construction equipment, materials and debris is kept on site; 6. that the applicant shall apply for a tentative and final condominium map with the Public Works, Engineering Division for processing in conformance with the Subdivision Map Act; 7. that the applicant shall apply for an encroachment permit from the Department of Transportation for any work proposed in the state right-of-way; 8. that the applicant shall coordinate with Caltrans and a licensed arborist to replant the existing elm tree within the Caltrans right-of-way in front of the subject property a few feet to the south (left) in order to accommodate the new driveway location in accordance with the SOIS Action Plan and the ESA Action Plan; 9. that the applicant shall implement tree protection measures for the (second) elm tree that currently exists within the planter strip in front of the subject property that will be retained as part of this project in accordance with the SOIS Action Plan and the ESA Action Plan (see appendices of the IS/MND); 10. that documentation with exhibits that show detailed project construction plans including work on the driveway, sidewalk adjacent to the two elm trees in the planter strip, and a description of any other ground -disturbing work within 100-feet of the matures trees shall be submitted to the Department of Transportation for review and approval of an encroachment permit. The documentation should describe efforts to avoid affecting the trees and if avoidance is impossible, efforts to lessen the impact on the trees must be described and shall be in accordance with the SOIS Action Plan and the ESA Action Plan (see appendices of the IS/MND); 11. that the maximum elevation at the top of the roof ridge shall not exceed elevation 49.75' as measured from the average elevation at the top of the curb along El Camino Real (14.75') for a maximum height of 35'-0", and that the top of each floor and final roof ridge shall be surveyed and approved by the City Engineer as the framing proceeds and prior to final framing and roofing inspections. The garage/first floor finished floor elevation shall be elevation 16.86'; second floor finished floor shall be elevation 29.58'; third floor finished floor shall be elevation 39.91'. Should any framing exceed the stated elevation at any point it shall be removed or adjusted so that the final height of the structure with roof shall not exceed the maximum height shown on the approved plans; 12. that any changes to the size or envelope of the building, which would include expanding the footprint or floor area of the structure, replacing or relocating windows or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 13. that the conditions of the Building Division memos dated February 27, 2017 and October 3, 2016; Parks Division memos dated October 5, 2016; the Engineering Division memos dated February 24, 2017 and October 7, 2016; the Fire Division memos dated October 12, 2016; and the Stormwater Division memos dated November 14, 2016 shall be met; 14. that storage of construction materials and equipment on the street or in the public right-of-way shall be prohibited; E Mitigated Negative Declaration, Design Review, Condominium Permit, Parking Variance and Tentative Condominium Map 1431 El Camino Real 15. that the `service vehicle stall' shall be marked on the service parking space and designated on the final map and plans, this stall shall not be assigned to any unit, but shall be owned and maintained by the condominium association, and the service vehicle stall shall always be accessible for parking and not be separately enclosed or used for resident storage; 16. that the Covenants Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) for the condominium project shall require that the service vehicle stall shall be reserved for service vehicles or guests only and shall not be used by condominium residents; 17. that the final inspection shall be completed and a certificate of occupancy issued before the close of escrow on the sale of each unit; 18. that the developer shall provide to the initial purchaser of each unit and to the board of directors of the condominium association, an owner purchaser manual which shall contain the name and address of all contractors who performed work on the project, copies of all warranties or guarantees of appliances and fixtures and the estimated life expectancy of all depreciable component parts of the property, including but not limited to the roof, painting, common area carpets, drapes and furniture; 19. that the trash receptacles, furnaces, and water heaters shall be shown in a legal compartment outside the required parking and landscaping and in conformance with zoning and California Building and Fire Code requirements before a building permit is issued; 20. that any security gate system across the driveway shall be installed a minimum 20'-0' back from the front property line; 21. that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 22. that all runoff created during construction and future discharge from the site shall be required to meet National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards; 23. that the applicant shall submit an erosion and sedimentation control plan describing BMPs (Best Management Practices) to be used to prevent soil, dirt and debris from entering the storm drain system; the plan shall include a site plan showing the property lines, existing and proposed topography and slope; areas to be disturbed, locations of cut/fill and soil storage/disposal areas; areas with existing vegetation to be protected; existing and proposed drainage patterns and structures; watercourse or sensitive areas on -site or immediately downstream of a project; and designated construction access routes, staging areas and washout areas; 24. that methods and procedures such as sediment basins or traps, silt fences, straw bale dikes, storm drain inlet protection such as soil blanket or mats, and covers for soil stock piles to stabilize denuded areas shall be installed to maintain temporary erosion controls and sediment control continuously until permanent erosion controls have been established; 25. that construction access routes shall be limited in order to prevent the tracking of dirt onto the public right-of-way, clean off -site paved areas and sidewalks using dry sweeping methods; 26. that if construction is done during the wet season (October 15 through April 15), that prior to October 15 the developer shall implement a winterization program to minimize the potential for erosion and polluted runoff by inspecting, maintaining and cleaning all soil erosion and sediment control prior to, during, and immediately after each storm even; stabilizing disturbed soils throughout temporary or permanent 10 Mitigated Negative Declaration, Design Review, Condominium Permit, Parking Variance and Tentative Condominium Map 1431 El Camino Real seeding, mulching matting, or tarping; rocking unpaved vehicle access to limit dispersion of mud onto public right-of-way; covering/tarping stored construction materials, fuels and other chemicals; 27. that common landscape areas shall be designed to reduce excess irrigation run-off, promote surface filtration and minimize the use of fertilizers, herbicides and pesticides; 28. that trash enclosures and dumpster areas shall be covered and protected from roof and surface drainage and that if water cannot be diverted from these areas, a self-contained drainage system shall be provided that discharges to an interceptor; 29. that this project shall comply with Ordinance 1845, the City of Burlingame Water Conservation in Landscaping Regulations, and complete landscape and irrigation plans shall be provided at the time of building permit application; 30. that all site catch basins and drainage inlets flowing to the bay shall be stenciled. All catch basins shall be protected during construction to prevent debris from entering; 31. that all new utility connections to serve the site, and which are affected by the development, shall be installed to meet current code standards and local capacities of the collection and distribution systems shall be increased at the developer's expense if necessary; 32. that all utilities to this site shall be installed underground. Any transformers needed for this site shall be installed underground or behind the front setback on this site; 33. that sewer laterals from the site to the public sewer main shall be checked and shall be replaced to city standards as required by the development; 34. that all abandoned utilities and hookups shall be removed; 35. that all drainage (including water from the below grade parking garage) on site shall be required to be collected and pumped to the street as determined by the Public Works Department; 36. that demolition of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 37. that the applicant shall install fire sprinklers and a fire alarm system monitored by an approved central station prior to the final inspection for building permit; 38. that all construction shall abide by the construction hours established in the Municipal Code; 39. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1645, the City of Burlingame Recycling and Waste Reduction Ordinance, and shall submit a waste reduction plan and recycling deposit for demolition and new construction, before receiving a demolition permit; 40. that this project shall comply with Ordinance No. 1477, Exterior Illumination Ordinance; and 41. that the project shall be required to comply with all the standards of the California Building and Fire Codes, in effect at time of building permit issuance, as amended by the City of Burlingame. 11 Mitigated Negative Declaration, Design Review, Condominium Permit, Parking Variance and Tentative Condominium Map 1431 El Camino Real The following four (4) conditions shall be met during the Building Inspection process prior to the inspections noted in each condition: 42. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building envelope; 43. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; 44. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; 45. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; Mitigation Measures from Initial Study Cultural Resources 46. Unanticipated Discovery of Archaeological Resources. All construction crew members shall be alerted to the potential to encounter sensitive archaeological material. In the event that archaeological resources (sites, features, or artifacts) are exposed during construction activities for the proposed project, all construction work occurring within 100 feet of the find shall immediately stop until a qualified archaeologist, meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards, can evaluate the significance of the find and determine whether additional study is warranted. Prehistoric archaeological deposits may be indicated by the presence of discolored or dark soil, fire -affected material, concentrations of fragmented or whole marine shell, burned or complete bone, non -local lithic materials, or a characteristic observed to be atypical of the surrounding area. Common prehistoric artifacts may include modified or battered lithic materials; lithic or bone tools that appeared to have been used for chopping, drilling, or grinding; projectile points; fired clay ceramics or non-functional items; and other items. Historic -age deposits are often indicated by the presence of glass bottles and shards, ceramic material, building or domestic refuse, ferrous metal, or old features such as concrete foundations or privies. Depending on the significance of the find under CEQA (14 CCR 15064.5(fl, Public Resources Code Section 21082), the archaeologist may simply record the find and allow work to continue. If the discovery proves significant under CEQA, additional work, such as preparation of an archaeological treatment plan, testing, or data recovery, may be warranted. 47. Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains. In accordance with Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, if human remains are found, the county coroner shall be immediately notified of the discovery. No further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains shall occur until the county coroner has determined, within 2 working days of notification of the discovery, the appropriate treatment and disposition of the human remains. If the county coroner determines that the remains are, or are believed to be, Native American, he or she shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) in Sacramento within 24 hours. In accordance with California Public Resources Code, Section 5097.98, the NAHC must immediately notify those persons it believes to be the most likely descendant from the deceased Native American. The most likely descendant shall complete his/her inspection within 48 hours of being granted access to the site. The designated Native American representative would then determine, in consultation with the property owner, the disposition of the human remains. 12 Mitigated Negative Declaration, Design Review, Condominium Permit, Parking Variance and Tentative Condominium Map 1431 El Camino Real 48. Unanticipated Discovery of Paleontological Resources. Paleontological resources are limited, nonrenewable resources of scientific, cultural, or educational value and are afforded protection under state laws and regulations (CEQA). Paleontological resources are explicitly afforded protection by CEQA, specifically in Section V(c) of CEQA Guidelines Appendix G, the Environmental Checklist Form, which addresses the potential for adverse impacts to "unique paleontological resource[s] or site[s] or ... unique geological feature[s]" (14 CCR 15000 et seq.). Further, CEQA provides that, generally, a resource shall be considered "historically significant' if it has yielded or may be likely to yield information important in prehistory (14 CCR 15064.5[a][3][D]). In the event that paleontological resources (silicified shell, bone, or other features) are exposed during construction activities for the proposed project, all construction work occurring within 100 feet of the find shall immediately stop until a qualified paleontologist can evaluate the significance of the find. This analysis shall comply with guidelines and significance criteria specified by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. If the discovery proves significant under CEQA, additional work, such as preparation of an archaeological treatment plan, testing, or data recovery, may be warranted. Noise 49. The project sponsor shall retain a qualified acoustical engineer to prepare an acoustical study in accordance with State Title 24 requirements. The acoustical study shall identify methods of design and construction to comply with the applicable portions of the California Building Code Title 24 to achieve an indoor noise level of 45 A -weighted decibel community noise equivalent level or less from traffic noise sources. 50. All construction equipment shall use available noise -suppression devices and properly maintained mufflers. All internal combustion engines used on the project site shall be equipped with the type of muffler recommended by the vehicle manufacturer. In addition, all equipment shall be maintained in a good mechanical condition to minimize noise created by a faulty or poorly maintained engine, drive train, or other component. 51. During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receptors and as far as possible from the boundary of sensitive receptors. 52. Pursuant to the City of Burlingame Municipal Code, the applicant shall limit construction activities to between 8 a.m. and 7 p.m. Mondays through Fridays, and Saturdays between 9 a.m. and 6 p.m. Catherine Keylon Senior Planner c. Brian Siu Yang, Levy Design Partners, applicant and architect GGH Investment LLC property owners 13 Mitigated Negative Declaration, Design Review, Condominium Permit, Parking Variance and Tentative Condominium Map 1431 El Camino Real Attachments: March 27, 2017 Planning Commission Minutes Applicant's Responses to March 27, 2017 Planning Commission Meeting, dated December 22, 2016 Application to the Planning Commission Parking Variance Application • Klaus Product Data sheets • Klaus noise information Environmental Information Form, submitted by the applicant Comment Letters Submitted on the project and CEQA document (3) Staff Comments Proposed Resolutions Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed February 2, 2018 Aerial Photo Separate Attachment: Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Appendices, dated January 2018 • Comment letter submitted on CEQA document (2) • Responses to Written Comments and Errata, dated January 2018 • Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, dated January, 2018 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration, dated December, 2017 (bound with Final IS/MND) INCLUDED IN APPEDICES Historic Resources Compliance Report (HRCR) Secretary of Interior Standards (SOIS) Action Plan Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) Action Plan 14 Cityof Burlingame BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Meeting Minutes Planning Commission Monday, March 27, 2017 7:00 PM Council Chambers d. 1431 El Camino Real , zoned R-3 - Application for Environmental Review, Condominium Permit, Design Review, Parking Variance for the use of mechanical parking lifts, and Front Landscape Variance for a new 3-story, 6-unit condominium building (Levy Design Partners, applicant and architect; GGH Investment LLC, property owner) (71 noticed) Staff Contact: Catherine Keylon All Commissioners had visited the property. There were no ex-parte communications to report. Senior Planner Hurin provided an overview of the staff report. Questions of Staff.- > Are there similar variance requests for parking (particularly parking lifts) that have been approved outside of the Downtown area? (Hurin - not outside of the Downtown area for residential projects.) > Felt that the utility pole near the driveway may make it difficult for a delivery vehicle to maneuver into the delivery space. Chair Loftis opened the public hearing. Toby Levy and Bruce Chan represented the applicant. Commission Questions/Comments: > Explain justification for flipping the driveway. (Levy - was intended to provide a greater separation between the taller buildings.) > The property survey is missing the two Elm trees at the front. The existing Eucalyptus tree is very close to the property line and the existing fence. Is concerned about getting the ten -foot wide driveway into the space shown without affecting the existing trees. Explore. > Referenced letter from Jennifer Pfaff that noted that not all of the plants from the plant list are shown on the plans. (Chan - certain plants on the list need to be deleted.) > Asked what is happening at the rear of the lot? (Chan - wasn't designed as an active open space, are providing private open space.) Encouraged planting the area as an amenity to the residents (such as vegetable planters). > Requested more information regarding the mechanical lifts. (Levy - are considering a Klaus stacker. They take about 1 minute 30 seconds to operate. It is the exchange time for coordinating car removal that makes people resistant to using them. > How noisy are the stackers? (Levy - similar to the Klaus stackers approved for other projects.) > Requested justification for the variance application. (Levy - will revisit the justification.) If the variances weren't granted, how would the project be designed? (Levy - would hope that one of the guest spaces could be used for delivery vehicles. The landscaping requirement would require removal of the rear -yard.) > If parking lifts aren't approved, how would that impact the project? (Levy - would result in perhaps a three -unit building. Wanted to build side -by -side units to appeal to families.) > How much outreach has been done to the neighbors, particularly to the neighbors on the right, with respect to the stackers. (Levy - the client attempted to meet with the neighbors - the property is totally City of Burlingame Page 1 Printed on 2/5/2018 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes March 27, 2017 closed.) Requested information regarding the noise from the stackers and potential impact upon neighbors. > Is the building to the right taller? (Levy - believes all buildings are 35-feet tall.) Be certain the rendering is accurate. > It is only 15.8% more landscaping to eliminate the variance request. Parking in front is an eyesore. Landscaping in the front is reflective of the Burlingame style and community values. Would rather consider a variance for the rear setbak. > Requested a sample of the Hardy shingle that is to be used, or better yet, a location to drive to view the installation of the material. > Feels the gas and utilities will come from the rear. May wish to look at shrinking the size of the building. > Requested more detail regarding the garage doors. (Levy - are roll -up doors due to the lifts. Can look at other options.) Public Comments: There were no public comments. Chair Loftis closed the public hearing. Commission Discussion: > The delivery parking in front is bothersome; could end up as a normal parking space - look at moving this and address the landscaping deficit. > Thinks that the fire department shut-off needs to be shown on the plan, including screening. > Will bicycle racks be provided? > Likes the design; works well in the neighborhood. > Concerned about the landscaping variance. Have approved the parking lift variance regularly within the Downtown area; is this something that should be promoted in other areas of town? > With respect to the environmental review; concerned about the noise from the metal roll -up doors. > How is "displacement" of the existing residents defined in the environmental review process, especially with respect to available units elsewhere and rents. Wants consistency in the analysis from project to project. > Feels the landscape variance is a non -starter. Too much is being placed on the site; there is no good reason for the variance request. Perhaps the number or size of units could be reduced to provide more space on the property. > Have never had a discussion of why parking lifts wouldn't be allowed in the area. Primarily concerned about noise from the litts. Not necessarily opposed to a variance for this purpose. > If noise from the lifts is not something that arises to the level of a significant impact under CEQA, then doesn't have an issue with it, but wants to see the analysis. > Noted that the Klaus lifts were not actually installed on the Floribunda project, but that an alternate that met the same noise standard was installed. > What is the issue that rises to a level of significance under CEQA relative to displacement? > What options are there for the space at the rear of the project. > Is a below market rate unit required for the project? (Meeker - the City cannot require such units, and none are proposed as part of the project.) > Feels the project fits into the neighborhood and doesn't have a problem with the parking stackers. > Agrees that the landscaping variance should be addressed and potentially eliminated. No action was required on this item as the information providing during the hearing will be considered as part of the environmental document and the project will come back as a Regular Action item when this analysis is complete. City of Burlingame Page 2 Printed on 2/5/2018 90 South Park 415 777 0561 tel San Francisco CA 94107 415 777 5117 fax I TO: Planning Commission C/O Catherine Keylon Planning Department, City of Burlingame FROM: Brian Yang Levy Design Partners PROJECT: 1431 EL CAMINO REAL APN# 026.013.110 �R C LEVY DEIPN PARTNERS �Vu ��°� k �➢ IM�'M iiAm Alpiholo DATE: 12/22/2017 ; �� „y SUBJECT: PLANNING COMMISSION: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS The following is a response to comments in the March 27, 2017 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Hearing: Commission Questions/Comments: 1. Explain justification for flipping the driveway. (Levy - was intended to provide a greater separation between the taller buildings.) LDP Response: No additional architectural comment or response required at this time. 2. The property survey is missing the two Elm trees at the front. The existing Eucalyptus tree is very close to the property line and the existing fence. Is concerned about getting the ten -foot wide driveway into the space shown without affecting the existing trees. Explore. LDP Response: Survey, plans, and renderings have been revised to reflect the (2) existing street trees that were installed after original survey was completed, 3. Referenced letter from Jennifer Pfaff that noted that not all of the plants from the plant list are shown on the plans. (Chan - certain plants on the list need to be deleted.) LDP Response: Landscape L1.1 Plant List has been updated per plans. 4. Asked what is happening at the rear of the lot? (Chan - wasn't designed as an active open space; are providing private open space.) Encouraged planting the area as an amenity to the residents (such as vegetable planters). LDP Response: Landscape L1,1 has been revised to show a seating area at rear yard. Requested more information regarding the mechanical lifts. (Levy - are considering a Klaus stacker. They take about 1 minute 30 seconds to operate. It is the exchange time for coordinating car removal that makes people resistant to using them. LDP Response: Cut sheets for proposed Klaus mechanical lifts were previously provided. 6. How noisy are the stackers? (Levy - similar to the Klaus stackers approved for other projects.) LDP Response: Noise report from Klaus has been provided; please see attached. ARC go South Park 415 777 0561 tel LEVY D E § I .P N PARTNERS San Francisco CA 94107 415 777 5117 fax TU RE 7. Requested justification for the variance application. (Levy - will revisit the justification.) If the variances weren't granted, how would the project be designed? (Levy - would hope that one of the guest spaces could be used for delivery vehicles. The landscaping requirement would require removal of the rear -yard.) LDP Response: Loading zone at front has been eliminated and relocated to rear yard. Landscaping at front yard has been revised; please see revised L1.I I. 8. If parking lifts aren't approved, how would that impact the project? (Levy - would result in perhaps a three -unit building. Wanted to build side -by -side units to appeal to families.) LDP Response: No additional architectural comment or response required at this time. 9. How much outreach has been done to the neighbors, particularly to the neighbors on the right, with respect to the stackers? (Levy - the client attempted to meet with the neighbors - the property is totally closed.) Requested information regarding the noise from the stackers and potential impact upon neighbors. LDP Response: Noise report from Klaus has been provided; please see attached. 10. Is the building to the right taller? (Levy - believes all buildings are 35-feet tall.) Be certain the rendering is accurate. LDP Response: Rendering has been revised to correct vanishing point and building height. 11. It is only 15.8% more landscaping to eliminate the variance request. Parking in front is an eyesore. LDP Response: Loading zone at front has been eliminated and relocated to rear yard. 12, Landscaping in the front is reflective of the Burlingame style and community values. Would rather consider a variance for the rear setback. LDP Response: Loading zone at front has been eliminated and relocated to rear yard. Landscaping at front yard has been revised; please see revised L1.1. 13. Requested a sample of the Hardy shingle that is to be used, or better yet, a location to drive to view the installation of the material. LDP Response: Sample has been provided (samples states Hardie Lap Siding but Hardie representative says it is the same as shingle); Two projects with Hardie Shingle can be visited: 16 10th Ave, San Mateo, CA 829 Webster, Palo Alto, CA 14. Feels the gas and utilities will come from the rear. May wish to look at shrinking the size of the building. LDP Response: Rear yard has been revised with trash area recessed into building. Utilities will be provided on Western side of yard and shielded with landscaping and fencing as needed, 12_ AR go South Park 415 777 0561 tel LEVY DE�IfN PARTNERS San Francisco CA 94107 415 777 5117 fax � i ARE 15. Requested more detail r garding the garage doors. (Levy - are roll -up doors due to the lifts. Can look at other options.) LDP Response: Garage doors to be specified during building permit application. Garage doors will be sectional residential doors that fit into the character of the surrounding area. Commission Discussion: 1. The delivery parking in front is bothersome; could end up as a normal parking space - look at moving this and address the landscaping deficit. LDP Response: Loading zone at front has been eliminated and relocated to rear yard. Landscaping at front yard has been revised; please see revised L1.1. 2. Thinks that the fire department shut-off needs to be shown on the plan, including screening. LDP Response: Fire department shut-off has been added to plans and shielded with landscaping. Please see revised A1.1. 3. Will bicycle racks be provided? LDP Response: Bicycle parking/racks have not been provided. 4. Likes the design; works well in the neighborhood. LDP Response: No additional architectural comment or response required at this time. 5. Concerned about the landscaping variance. LDP Response: Loading zone at front has been eliminated and relocated to rear yard. Landscaping at front yard has been revised; please see revised 1_1.1. 6. Have approved the parking lift variance regularly within the Downtown area; is this something that should be promoted in other areas of town? LDP Response: No additional architectural comment or response required at this time. 7. With respect to the environmental review; concerned about the noise from the metal roll -up doors. LDP Response: Garage doors will be of a residential nature instead of previously proposed industrial coiling roll -up door. Selection and submittal of garage door to be completed during building permitting. 8. How is "displacement" of the existing residents defined in the environmental review process, especially with respect to available units elsewhere and rents? Wants consistency in the analysis from project to project. LDP Response: No additional architectural comment or response required at this time. AR C 90 South Park 415 777 0561 tel LEVY DE I.P N PARTNERS San Francisco CA 94107 pis 777 5117 Fax E 1U RF 9. Feels the landscape variance is a non -starter. Too much is being placed on the site; there is no good reason for the variance request. Perhaps the number or size of units could be reduced to provide more space on the property. LDP Response: Loading zone at front has been eliminated and relocated to rear yard. Landscaping at front yard has been revised; please see revised L1.1. 10. Have never had a discussion of why parking lifts wouldn't be allowed in the area. Primarily concerned about noise from the lifts. Not necessarily opposed to a variance for this purpose. LDP Response: Noise report from Klaus has been provided; please see attached. No additional architectural comment or response required at this time. 11. If noise from the lifts is not something that arises to the level of a significant impact under CEQA, then doesn't have an issue with it, but wants to see the analysis. LDP Response: Noise report from Klaus has been provided; please see attached. No additional architectural comment or response required at this time, 12. Noted that the Klaus lifts were not actually installed on the Floribunda project, but that an alternate that met the same noise standard was installed. LDP Response: No additional architectural comment or response required at this time. 13, What is the issue that rises to a level of significance under CEQA relative to displacement? LDP Response: No additional architectural comment or response required at this time. 14. What options are there for the space at the rear of the project? LDP Response: Rear yard has been revised with trash enclosure becoming a trash room within building. Temporary delivery zone has been moved to rear yard and Landscape design has been revised to accommodate new seating area, Please see revised A2.1 and L1.1. 15. Is a below market rate unit required for the project? (Meeker - the City cannot require such units, and none are proposed as part of the project.) LDP Response: No additional architectural comment or response required at this time. 16. Feels the project fits into the neighborhood and doesn't have a problem with the parking stackers. LDP Response: No additional architectural comment or response required at this time, Thank you - If you have any questions or need any clarification please do not hesitate to call us. Sincerely, Brian Yang Levy Design Partners Inc. r BURLINGAME COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Parcel #: Oz (' . - vt 3 — Ito ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Zoning / Other: PROJECT ADDRESS: Il`A 2,''t t-�L' f'At"" xi'J'0 A4— APPLICANT Name: "f Address City/State/Zip.- Phone: E-mail: ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Name: LIENil P: Sskc Address: f/jJZ_y-_ City/State/Zip: S� Q-A Phone: + S -- _-1'7 7 - c->,� 4' 1 E-mail: i oay (d L.C-Vy Burlingame Business License #: PROPERTY OWNER Name: 6 (,,� N Ir'�,)i S T txA C-�-- LL_C. Address: i 10 (- Q0%_Le - " City/State/Zip: C-,k ` 6O 1 V Phone: E-mail: 6ztCr L1._ 161C1`'1 (� J,440o• cViA k/.t SEP 34 2016 CITY OF BURLINGAME CDD-PLANNING DIV. Authorization to Reproduce Protect Plans: I hereby grant the City of Burlingame the authority to reproduce upon request and/or post plans submitted with this application on the City's website as part of the Planning approval process and waive any claims against the City arising out of or related to such action. �-S L- (Initials of Architect/Designer) 2E-i1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 0V 2 — St-yj`-V � N1��\A2 5:.x "r t12 - sn c r►rrcMeS AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Applicant's signature: Date: C1 I I am aware of the propose plication and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. Property owner's signature: Date: (, (� `j'I ZJK•I Z_ Date submitted: S: � HA NDOUTS� PC Application. doc COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org CITY OF BURLINGAME VARIANCE APPLICATION J The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request_ Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. a. Describe the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to your property which do not apply to other properties in this area. Open space, service delivery, and setback requirements limit ground floor square footage available for parking. Variance for vehicular lifts helps project meet planning requirements while minimizing visual impact on neighborhood in comparison to other properties in area (who use exposed parking solutions). b. Explain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right and what unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship might result from the denial of the application. Variance would reduce square footage to be used to meet on -site parking requirements. Higher efficiency allows for more "softscape" landscaping improvements and reduces negative visual impact on neighborhood. C. Explain why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety, general welfare or convenience. Variance allows for better efficiency and minimum square footage used for parking. In comparison, existing adjacent buildings, use more space for parking and expose cars to street. With vehicular lifts, all residential unit parking can be provided in private garages hidden from street. Vehicular lifts would improve overall aesthetics and negative affect building has on surrounding neighborhood. d. How will the proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity? Project is similar in mass, bulk, and character to existing adjacent buildings. However, vehicular lift variance would allow for improvements in overall aesthetics as cars would use less space allowing them to be hidden from street in private, covered garages. Variance would improve overall impact of project on adjoining properties. HandoutsWanance Application.2008 Page 1 of 5 Page 1 Section Dimensions Car data Page 2 width dimesions t n Page 4 Electrical installation Technical data M SingleVario 2061 (D I C 0 }— 80 —{- 501 (54u rorvenlcte uI? to 5.zu In it long) }451 Free through Product Data SingleVario Ne L10 k • t1p to 2,5( S steM for Dimensions: W '- All space requirements are minimum finished dimensions. Tolerances for space requirements'03. Dimensions in cm. EB (single platform) = 2 vehicles 1. .1 320 160 1. 1 2061-180 1 :1 1. •1 350 190 1. 11 360 200 1. 1 370 210 '=standard type '=without car Suitable for: Standard passenger car, station wagon/Van/SUV. Height and length according to contur. 1. .1 320 150 150 1. 1 mm_ 1. :1 340 150 170 1. '1 350 150 180 1. 11 360 150 190 1. 1 370 150 200 = standard type 190 cm max. 2000/2500 kg r .. max. 500/625 kg Standard passenger car 160 - _ t 65 145 r lox10cm (for pipes). • 15 60 =-.IV • Dimensions Al, A2 and A3 must be 95 125 — coordinated with the door supplier. 114111 soo( 520) Standard station wagonon /Van/SW • Ifthe total height is greater, the max. 160— }so 4. vehicle height for the upper parking space increases accordingly. _ • Potential equalization from foundation o r grounding connection to system , �6, ra^ (provided by the customer). 100- 125 500 (520) t♦ In compliance with DIN EN 14010,10 cm Standard passenger cars are vehicles wide yellow -black markings compliant to without any sports options such as ISO 3864 must be applied by the customer t th d f th latform in the access spoilers, tow -profile tyres etc. o ee geo ep area to mark the danger zone in front of the supporting surface ofthe upper platform edge (see ))Load Plan((, Page 3) • Variable steel pillar bases in two sizes (see ))Load Plan((, Page 3). • Maximum load of 2,500 kg for extra charge. multiparking Klaus Multiparking GmbH Hermann-Krum-Strage 2 D-88319 Aitrach Phone +49-75 65- 5 08-0 Fax +49.7565.508-88 E-Mail info@multiparking.com Internet www.multiparking.com SingleVario 20611 Code number 584.69.890-0021 Version 09.2009 Page 2 of 5 P Page 2 Width dimesions Page 3 Approach Load plan Installation Page 4 Electrical installation Technical data Page 5 To be perfor- med by the customer Description Dividing walls Single Platform (EB) Double arrangement (2 x EB) Tripple arrangement (3 x EB) EB EB EB EB EB � EB 61 Bi B1 j Carriageway in accordance with usable platform width, , Bi usable platform width Bi usable platform width, , Bi local regulations 230 * 260 , 230 * 520 , 230* 780 240 270 240 540 240 830 250 280 250 560 250 840 260 290 260 580 , 260 870 270 300 270 L600 270 , 900 Single Platform (EB) Double arrangement (2 x EB) Tripple arrangement (3 x EB) �Z O A � O ER EB EB EB EB EB EB EB i EB ES EB i EB i EB , m� �a �o _ '_ B2 4 B3 4min.20 B2 4 63 Pin. 20 B2 B3 �min.20 Carriageway in accordance with usable platform width, B2 , �B3 usable platform width, B2 , , B3 usable platform width, B2 , B3 local regulations 230 * 255 250 , 230 * 515 , 510 230* 775 770 240 265 260 240 535 530 240 805 „ 800 275 , , 270 , 250 555 550 250 835 830 , 260 285 „ 280 , 260 575 570 260 865 860 , 270 „ 295 „ 290 270 „ 595 „ 590 270 „ 895 „ 890 , Single Platform (EB) EB EB B4 4 B5 4min.20 n— usable platform width, B4 , , B5 , 230 * 250 , , 240 , 240 „ 260 „ 250 , 250 270 , 260 , 260 280 270 , 270 290 280 , EB a L DF L Double arrangement (2 x EB) EB EB I EB I EB j B4 M B5 Lmin.20 usable platform width , B4 „ 5 230- 510 , 500 240 „ 530 520 250 550 540 , 260 570 „ 560 , 270 590 , 580 EB i EB L4 DF SDF P usable platform width, ,door entrance width DF L , S 230* „ 2375 „ 125 , 25 240 „ 250 125 25 250 250 15 30 260 260 15 , 30 270 270 15 30 , * = standard width (parking space width 2.30 m) Tripple arrangement (3 x EB) I EB EB I EB I EB EB I EB B4 B5 4min.20 Carriageway in accordance with usable platform width B4 ' S local regulations 230* 770 760 , 240 „ 800 790 , 250 830 „ 820 260 860 840 270 „ 890 860 A3 = seat -engaging surface (dimensions require coordination with door supplier.) EB EB EB I EB EB i EB Allround door dimensions require coordination between doorsupplierand L L L S S local agency of DF DF DF Klaus Multiparlung. Carriageway in accordance with usable platform width, door entrance width DF , L , , 5 local regulations 230 * 475 225 45 240 500 20 `40 250 520 • 20 40 260 5400 20 40 270 5600 20 40 • = no standard width for doors! AEnd parking spaces are generally more difficult to drive into. Therefore we recommended for end parking spaces our wider platforms. Parking on standard width platforms with larger vehicles may make getting into and out of the vehicle difficult. This depends on type of vehicle, approach and above all on the individual driver's skill. SingleVario 20611 Code number 584.69.890-002 1 Version 09.2009 Page 3of5 Page 1 Section Dimensions Car data Page 2 Width dimesions Page d ApproLoad Instal Page 4 Electrical installation Technical data Page 5 obeperofo mm[hbyedorenscre ipt maximum descending slope 4 ®The illustrated maximum approach angles must not be exceeded. Incorrect approach angles will cause serious maneouvring & positioning problems on the parking system for which the local agency of Klaus accepts no responsibility. Option 1: short steel pillar base platform toad F2 Fz F3 �Ft _ c F5 F6 L_____2,000 kg __, 30 1.1 7.4 , , 0.5 7.7 31 , 2,500k&__ 35 1.3 8.9 0.6 9.3 ±1 Forces in kN Option 2: long steel pillar base maximum ascending slope 14 % AThe steel pillar base can be selected optionally (short or long). Please make sure to note the corresponding forces that apply! Units are dowelled to the floor. Drilling depth: approx. 15 cm. Floor and walls are to be made of concrete (quality minimum C20/25)! Free space for longitudinal and vertical ducts (e.g. ventilation) Bt'� Bl'o 5 Bl o' 131, B2 = (see table on page 2) (265) (262.5) (262.5) 35 lOt -t35 10 _t35 10 Free space for vertical pipelines, —� ventilation branch canals •� ®Free space for horizontal ducting Approach level 20 • Size 15 cm is reduced to 5 cm for type 2061-160 Free space only applicable if vehicle is parked forwards = FRONT FIRST and driver's door on the left side. ( ) = Dimensions in brackets illustrate an example for usable platform width 230 cm. Example for ventilation branch canal and/or vertical pipelines. i B2 Tf B2 (255) a26 (515) SingleVario 20611 Code number 584.69.890-002 1 Version 09.2009 Page 4 of 5 Page 1 Section Dimensions Car data Page 2 Width dimesions Page 3 Approach 13 Conduit EN 25 Load plan (M25) Installation height: + 1.70 m 12 15 10 11 FPage 4 f i 0 Electrical installation r Conduit EN 25 (M25) Technical 8 9 height: + 1.10 m data 14\ -- - —___--- Page 5 +it To be perfor- med by the customer Description t0 the next system Generally, this parking system is not suited for short -time parkers (temporary parkers). Please do not hesitate to contact your local KLAUS agency for further assistance. Low -noise power units mounted to rubber -bonded -to metal mountings are installed. Nevertheless we recommend that parking system's garage be built separately from the dwelling. - wall recess plans - maintenance offer/contract - declaration of conformity - test sheet on airborne and slid -borne sound See separate sheet regarding corrosion protection If there are traffic routes next to or behind the installations, railings compliant to DIN EN 150 13857 must be installed by the customer. Railings must also be in place during construction. Environmental conditions for the area of multiparking systems: Temperature range -10 to +40' C. Relative humidity 50% at a maximum outside temperature of+40° C. If lifting or lowering times are specified, they refer to an environmental temperature of+101 C and with the system set up directly next to the hydraulic unit. At lower temperatures or with longer hydraulic lines, these times increase. ,No. QunatityL _ Description - J` PositioJ Frequency) 1 1 Electricity meter in the supply Lime_ 2 1 Main fuse: 3 x fuse 16A (slow) in the supply 1 per unit or circuit breaker 3 x 16 A line - (trigger characteristic Kor Q �L - 1 3 1 Supply line 5 x 2.5 mm' to main switch 1 per unit (3 PH + N + PE) with marked wire - _ and protective conductor J 4 1 Lockable main switch defined at the 1 per unit - _ plan evaluation, ! 5 1 Supply line 5 x 2.5 mm' from main 1 per unit (3 PH + N + PE) with marked wire switch to unit and protective conductor 6 every Foundation earth connector corner pit ! torn floor 7 1 Equipotential bonding in accordance 1 per with DIN EN 60204 from foundation system earth connector to the system LNo. !_ Description _ 18 lTerminalbox ___ 9_ _Control line 3x0.75mm' (PH +N+PE) 10 ; Control line 7 x 1.5 mm' with marked wire and protective conductor 11 Operating device 32 Control line 5 x 1.5 mm' with marked wire and protective conductor - J 13 Hydraulic unit 3.0 kW, three-phase current, 400 V / 50 Hz 14 Control line 5 x 1.5 mm' with marked wire and protective conductor 5 Chain control According to DIN 4109 (Sound insulation in buildings), para. 4, annotation 4, Klaus Multiparkers are part of the building services (garage systems). Normal sound insulation: DIN 4109, para. 4, Sound insulation against noises from building services. Table 4 in para. 4.1 contains the permissible sound level values emitted from building services for personal living and working areas. According to line 2 the maximum sound level in personal living and working areas must not exceed 30 dB (A). Noises created by users are not subject to the requirements (see table 4, DIN 4109). The following measures are to be taken to comply with this value: - Sound protection package according to offer/order (Klaus Multiparking GmbH) - Minimum sound insulation of building R'w = 57 dB (to be provided by customer) Increased sound insulation (special agreement): DIN 4109, Amendment 2, Information on planning and execution, proposals for increased sound insulation. Agreement: Maximum sound level in personal living and working areas 25 dB (A). Noises created by users are not subject to the requirements (see table 4, DIN 4109). The following measures are to be taken to comply with this value: - Sound protection package according to offer/order (Klaus Multiparking GmbH) - Minimum sound insulation of building R'w = 62 dB (to be provided by customer) Note: User noises are noises created by individual users in our Multiparking systems. These can be noises from accessing the platforms, slamming of vehicle doors, motor and brake noises. Single Vario 20611 Code number 584.69.890-0021 Version 09.2009 Page 5 of 5 Page 1 Section Dimensions Car data n U Page 4 Electrical installation Technical data Page 5 To be perfor- med by the customer Description Safety fences Any constraints that may be necessary according to DIN EN ISO 13857 in order to provide protection, for pathways directly in front, next to or behind the unit. This is also valid during construction. Consecutive numbering of parking spaces. Lighting, ventilation, fire extinguishing and fire alarm systems. According to DIN EN 14 010, a warning that identifies this danger area must be placed in the entrance area that conforms to ISO 3864. This must be done according to EN 92/58/EWG for systems without a pit 30 cm from the edge of the platform. Any necessary wall cuttings according to page 1. Suitable electrical supply to the main switch and the control wire line must be provided by the customer during installation. The functionality can be monitored on site by our fitters together with the electrician. If this cannot be done during installation for some reason for which the customer is responsible, the customer must commission an electrician at their own expense and risk. In accordance with DIN EN 60204 (Safety of Machinery. Electrical Equipment), grounding of the steel structure is necessary, provided by the customer (distance between grounding max. 10 m). Gerleral description Multiparking system providing dependent parking spaces for 2 cars one on top of the other each. The lowervehicle parks directly on the floor plate. The vehicle parked on the bottom must be driven out before lowering the platform. The height of the platform can be adjusted flexibly (even subsequently). Adjustment of maximum load of 2,500 kg can be made subsequently. Dimensions are in accordance with the underlying dimensions of parking pit, height and width The parking bays are accessed horinzotally (installation deviation t 1 %). Vehicles are positioned on the upper parking space using wheel stops on the right side (adjust according to operating instructions). Operation via operating device with hold -to -run -device using master keys. The operating elements are usually mounted either in front of the column or on the outside of the door frame Operating instructions are attached to each operator's stand. For garages with doors at the front of the parking system the special dimensional requirements have to be taken into account. — 2 steel pillars with bases that are mounted on the floor (short or long steel pillar bases can be selected optionally). — 2 sliding platforms (mounted to the steel pillars with sliding bearings) — 1 platform — 1 mechanic synchronization control system (to ensure synchronous operation of the hydraulic cylinders while lowering and lifting the platform) — i hydraulic cylinder — 1 automatic hydraulic safety valve (prevents accidental lowering of the platform while accessing the platform) — Dowels, screws, connecting elements, bolts, etc. — The platforms and parking spaces are end -to -end accessible for parking! Cable conduits and recesses for operating device (for double wing doors: please contact the local agency of Klaus Multiparking). Operating device exposed Operating device concealed 110 above 120 above carriageway rr level jevelageway 0 N Conduit EN 25 (M25) 191 H — Mounting of contactor and terminal box to the wall valve, complete wiring of all elements in accordance with the circuit diagram — Costs for final technical approval by an authorized body — Main switch — Control line from main switch to hydraulic unit — Platform base sections — Adjustable wheel stops — Canted access plates — Side members — Cross members — Screws, nuts, washers, distance tubes, etc. — Hydraulic cylinder — Solenoid valve — Safety valve — Hydraulic conduits — Screwed joints — High-pressure hoses — Installation material — Operating device (Emergency Stop, lock, 1 master key per parking space) — Terminal box at wall valve — Electrical locking device — Chain control — Hydraulic power unit (low -noise, installed onto a console with a rubber -bonded -to -metal mounting) — Hydraulic oil reservoir — Oilfilling — Internal geared wheel pump — Pump holder — Clutch — 3-phase-AC-motor (3.0 kW, 230/400 V, 50 Hz) — Contactor (with thermal overcurrent relay and control fuse) — Test manometer — Pressure relief valve — Hydraulic hoses (which reduce noise transmission onto the hydraulic pipe The Klaus company reserves the right in the course of technical progress to use newer or other technologies, systems, processes, procedures or standards in the fulfillment of their obligations other than those originally offered provided the customer derives no disadvantage from their so doing. KLAUS PARKING SYSTEMS, INC. LISTING OF VEHICLE MODELS BY SIZE AND WEIGHT (1) Height for Lower Cars (2) Vehicle Length (inches) Width (inches) Height (inches) Curb W1 Weight Model G61-160 Model G61-170 Model G61-180 DH (Headroom) Lower 63.0" 66.9" 70.9" laximum Lower Vehicle Hei ht 59.0" 63.0" 66.9" Cars 2007 Acura RL 194 73 57.0 4035 OK OK OK 2007 Audi A8 204 75 57.0 4505 OK OK OK 2007 BMW 3-Series 178 72 56.0 3460 OK OK OK 2007 BMW 5-Series 191 73 58.0 3650 OK OK OK 2007 BMW 6-Series 190 73 54.0 3885 OK OK OK 2007 BMW 7-Series 204 75 59.0 4505 OK OK OK 2007 Buick Lucerne 203 74 58.0 3845 OK OK OK 2007 Cadillac DTS 208 75 58.0 4130 OK OK OK 2001 Chevrolet Camaro 193 74 51.2 3545 OK OK OK 2007 Chevrolet Impala 200 73 59.0 3710 OK OK OK 2007 Chevrolet Monte Carlo 197 73 56.0 3625 OK OK OK 2007 Dodge Charger 200 75 58.0 4170 OK OK OK 2001 Dodge Intrepid 204 75 55.9 3471 OK OK OK 2007 Ford Crown Victoria 212 78 57.0 4180 OK OK OK 2007 Ford Five Hundred 201 75 62.0 3725 OK OK 2007 Ford Mustang 188 74 55.0 3585 OK OK OK 2007 Honda Accord 190 72 57.0 3455 OK OK OK 2007 Honda Civic 177 69 57.0 2810 OK OK OK 2007 Infiniti G 187 69 58.0 3515 OK OK OK 2007 Infiniti M 193 71 59.0 4095 OK OK OK 2001 Infiniti Q45 200 73 56.9 3801 OK OK OK 2007 Jaguar S-Type 192 72 56.0 3880 OK OK OK 2007 Jaguar XJ 200 73 57.0 3860 OK OK OK 2007 Jaguar XK 189 82 52.0 3890 OK OK OK 2007 Kia Amanti 196 73 59.0 4020 OK OK OK 2007 Kia Optima 186 71 58.0 3285 OK OK OK 2007 Lexus ES 191 72 57.0 3670 OK OK OK 2007 Lexus GS 190 72 57.0 3915 OK OK OK Page 1 of 4 Model G61-190 Model G61-200 74.8" 78.7" 70.9" 74.8" OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Weight Upper Car (3) Height All Model Upper Normal Wt. Special Wt. G61-210 Cars (4,400lbs) (5500lbs) 82.7" N/A 78.7" 59.0" KLAUS PARKING SYSTEMS, INC. LISTING OF VEHICLE MODELS BY SIZE AND WEIGHT (1) Height for Lower Cars (2) Height All Upper Cars Weight Upper Car (3) Vehicle Length inches (inches) Width (inches) inches Height inches (inches) Curb Weight (lbs) Model G61-160 Model G61-170 Model G61-180 Model G61-190 Model G61-200 Model G61-210 Normal Wt. (4,4001bs) Special Wt. (55001bs) DH (Headroom) Lower 63.0" 66.9" 70.9" 74.8" 78.7" 82.7" N/A aximum Lower Vehicle Hei ht 59.0" 63.0" 66.9" 70.9" 74.8" 78.7" 59.0" 2007 LexusIS 180 71 56.0 3510 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 2007 Lexus LS 198 74 58.0 4245 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 2007 Lincoln Town Car 215 78 59.0 4415 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 2007 Mazda 6 187 70 57.0 3150 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 2007 Mercedes Benz S 205 73 58.0 4465 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 2007 Mercedes Benz E 190 71 57.0 3745 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 2007 Mercury Grand Ma uls 212 78 57.0 4180 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 2007 Mercury Milan 191 72 56.0 3320 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 2007 Mercury Montego 201 75 62.0 3725 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 2001 Mercury Sable 198 73 58.0 3340 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 2007 Mitsubishi Galant 190 72 58.0 3430 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 2007 Nissan Maxima 194 72 58.0 3545 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 2003 Oldsmobile Aurora 199 73 57.0 3802 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 2007 Pontiac Grand Prix 198 72 56.0 3630 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 2007 Porshe 911 Turbo 176 71 52.0 3305 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 2007 Saab 9-3 182 68 57.0 3370 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 2007 Saab 9-5 190 71 57.0 3540 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 2007Saturn Aura 190 70 58.0 3570 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 2007 Subaru Outback 189 70 63.0 3705 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 2007 Toyota Avalon 197 73 59.0 3600 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 2007 Toyota Camry 189 72 58.0 3530 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 2007 Volkswagen Beetle 161 72 58.0 3280 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 2007 Volkswagen Jetta 179 69 58.0 3615 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 2007 Volkswagen Passat 188 72 58.0 3615 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 2007 Volvo S80 191 73 59.0 3485 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Page 2 of 4 KLAUS PARKING SYSTEMS, INC. LISTING OF VEHICLE MODELS BY SIZE AND WEIGHT (1) Height for Lower Cars (2) Weight Upper Car (3) Height All Upper Vehicle Length Width Height Curb Weight Model Model Model Model Model Model Normal Wt. Special Wt. (inches) (inches) (inches) G61-160 G61-170 G61-180 G61-190 G61-200 G61-210 Cars (4,400 Ibs) (5500 Ibs) W1 DH (Headroom) Lower 63.0" 66.9" 70.9" 74.8" 78.7" 82.7" N/A aximum Lower Vehicle Heiqht 59.0" 63.0" 66.9" 70.9" 74.8" 78.7" 59.0" SUVs_ Vans & Trucks 2007 BMW X5 191 76 70.0 4980 OK OK OK 2007 Cadillac SRX 195 73 68.0 4685 OK OK OK 2007 Chevrolet Uplander 205 72 72.0 4380 OK OK 2007 Chevrolet Traill3lazer 192 75 75.0 4830 OK 2007 Chevorolet Silverado 230 80 74.0 5280 OK OK 2007 Chevrolet Suburban 222 79 77.0 5990 OK 2007 Chevorolet Colorado 207 69 65.0 1 4270 OK OK OK OK 2007 Chrysler Aspen 202 76 74.0 5335 OK OK 2007 Chrysler Pacifica 199 79 67.0 4635 OK OK OK 2007 Chrysler Town&Count 201 79 69.0 4515 OK OK OK 2007 Dode Dakota 219 74 69.0 4790 OK OK OK 2007 Dodge Ram 228 80 77.0 5380 OK 2007 Ford Expedition 206 79 78.0 5900 OK 2007 Ford Explorer 193 74 73.0 4905 oK OK 2007 Ford Explorer Sport tra 210 74 73.0 4985 OK OK 2007 Ford F-150 Reg. Cab 224 79 76.0 5690 OK 2007 Ford Ranger 4x2 202 70 68.0 3870 OK OK OK 2007 Ford Freestar 201 77 69.0 4280 OK OK OK 2007 Honda Oddyssey 201 77 69.0 4615 OK OK OK 2007 Honda CR-V 178 72 66.0 3505 OK OK OK OK 2007 Isuzu Ascender 192 75 75.0 4830 OK 2007 Infiniti QX 207 79 79.0 1 5630 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee 186 84 69.0 4725 OK OK OK 2007 Kia Sedona 202 78 69.0 4725 OK OK OK OK 2007 Lexus RX 186 73 66.0 4200 OK OK OK OK 2007 Lincoln Navigator 208 79 79.0 6070 2007 Mazda Tribute 175 70 70.0 3575 OK OK OK 2007 Mercedes Benz M 189 75 70.0 4845 OK OK OK Page 3 of 4 KLAUS PARKING SYSTEMS, INC. LISTING OF VEHICLE MODELS BY SIZE AND WEIGHT (1) Height for Lower Cars (2) Height All Upper Cars Weight Upper Car (3) Vehicle Length (inches) Width (inches) Height (inches) Curb W eight Model G61-160 Model G61-170 Model G61-180 Model G61-190 Model G61-200 Model G61-210 Normal Wt. (4,400 Ibs) Special Wt. (5500 Ibs) DH (Headroom) Lower 63.0" 66.9" 70.9" 74.8" 78.7" 82.7" N/A aximum Lower Vehicle Hei ht 59.01, 63.0" 66.9" 70.9" 74.8" 78.7" 59.0" 2007 Mitsubishi Outlander 183 71 66.0 3670 OK OK OK OK 2007 Nissan Pathfinder 188 73 70.0 4875 OK OK OK 2007 Toyota 4Runner 189 74 72.0 4345 OK OK 2007 Toyota Land Cruiser 193 76 73.0 5435 OK OK 2007 Toyota Rav4 1 72 1 76 66.0 3750 1 OK OK oK OK 2001 Toyota Sienna 1 200 1 77 69.0 4365 1 OK OK OK Footnotes: 1) Dimensions are taken from Car and Driver Magazine and are not guaranteed. Individual cars must be tested. 2) Allowable cars shown are for lower space on grade. 3) An increased weight capacity to 2500 kg (5500 Ibs) is available on the G61 Model. 2061 - Carsize Listing G61_07.xls Page 4 of 4 This chart shows absolute sound measurements of a standard Klaus system taken 15 inches from the machine as compared to other common levels. Sound levels 20 feet from the machine are significantly lower. The average system operation duration is 30 seconds. Vacuum Cleaner 80 dB Residential Garage Door 64 dB Lower Vehicle 53 dB Open Door 41 dB Human Whisper 32 dB 150 140 120 110 100 1.0181 .n 10, 30 20 10 REGa-7iVED DEC 2 2 2017 CITY OF BURLIN GAME CM-PLANNNG DIV Hair Dryer 90 dB Human Speech 68 dB Raise Vehicle 59 dB Quiet Parking Garage 40 dB =K11LAVS multiparking City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org IYY .a. 84Jf{LIN0„E ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM kU �' (to be completed by applicant when Negative Declaration or Environmental Impact Report is required) GENERAL INFORMATION Project Address: 1431 El Camino Real Applicant Name: Levy Design Partners Address: 90 South Park City/State/Zip: San Francisco / CA / 94107 Phone: Brian Yang: 415-777-0561 Assessor's Parcel Number: 026-013-110 Property Owner Name: GGH Investment LLC Address: 110 Robler Ave City/State/Zip: Hillsborough / CA / 94010 Phone: Grace Li: 510-857-4567 Permit applications required for this project (special permit, variance, subdivision map, parcel map, condominium permit, building permit, etc.): Two variances submitted (service vehicle in landscaped front yard & vehicle lifts), boundary / topo survey, subdivision map, condo & building permit. Related permits, applications and approvals required for this project by City, Regional, State and Federal Agencies: Caltrans Encroachment Permit, Bay Area Air Quality Management District Demolition Permit SITE INFORMATION Site size: +l- 0.177 total Acres and +l- 7,722 total Square Feet Existing Zoning: R-3 Existing use(s) of property: Four Apartment Units Total Number of Existing Parking Spaces':10 (5 covered) Number of Compact Spaced: n/a Number of Existing Structures and Total Square Footage of Each: 4,102 sf Will any structures be demolished for this project? X Yes No Size and use of structures to be demolished: 4 unit residential apartment building with detached 5-car garage. Number and size of existing trees on site 2: None Will any of the existing tress be removed? Yes X No If Yes, list number, size and type of trees to be removed: n/a Are there any natural or man-made water channels which run through or adjacent to the site? Yes X No If Yes, where? n/a 1 City of Burlingame minimum standard parking space size is 9'x20'. The minimum size for compact parking spaces is 8'xl7'. Refer to City of Burlingame Zoning Ordinance C.S. 25.70 for parking requirements for particular uses. 2 Refer to the City of Burlingame's Urban Reforestation and Tree Protection Ordinance (C.S. 11.06) for tree removal permit and tree planting requirements. City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlineame.or Describe in general the existing surrounding land uses to the: North Multi -family residential _ South Multi -family residential East Multi -family residential West Multi -family residential PROPOSED PROJECT Project Description: New construction of (6) 3-story townhouse units. Each unit to be 2- bedrooms over private 2-car garage. Residential Projects: Number of Dwelling Units: six Size of Unit(s): 1,083 sf - 1,190 sf (average unit size of 1,114 sf) Household size (number of persons per utut) expected: 2.2 persons / unit Commercial/Industrial Projects: Type and square footage of each use: n/a Estimated number of employees per shift: n/a Will the project involve the use, disposal or emission of potentially hazardous materials (including petroleum products)? n/a Yes n/a No If Yes, please describe: n/a Institutional Projects (public facilities, hospitals, schools): Major function of facility: n/a Estimated number of employees per shift: n/a Estimated Occupancy: n/a For all Projects: Flood Hazard: Is this site within a special flood hazard area? Yes X No Land Use: If the project involves a conditional use permit, variance or rezoning application, please explain why the applications are required: Variance for vehicle lifts needed to provide 2 car spaces/unit. Variance for service vehicle space in landscaped front _yard needed to get all required services into site's tight constraints (common open space, (2) guest parking spaces, trash enclosure, etc.). 3 Please fill out and submit the appropriate application form 9variance special permit, etc.) City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlineame.org Building gross square footage: Existing: 4,102 sf proposed: 9,325 sf Number of floors of construction: Existing: two Proposed: three Traffic/Circulation: Standard and compact off-street parking spaces provided: Existing: Standard 5 Compact Total 5 Proposed: Standard 12 Compact Total 12 Grading: Amount of dirt/fill material being moved (check one): X 0-500 cubic yards 5,000-20,000 cubic yards 500-5,000 cubic yards Over 20,000 cubic yards(indicate amount) Note: If fill is being placed over existing bay fill, provide engineering reports which show the effect of the new fill on the underlying bay mud. Storm water runoff: Indicate area of site to be covered with impervious surfaces (parking lot paving, etc.): +/- 6,568 sf of impervious (building roof, driveway, pathways, trash enclosure) Is the area with impervious surfaces less than 200 feet away from a wetland, stream, lagoon or bay? Yes X No Noise: Describe noise sources and timing of activity generated by your project during construction: _ Vehicles. eauioment, and aeneral construction activity. All construction activity to be limited to workina hours of BMC 13.04.100. Noise sources generated during operation of facility: General loading / unloading of vehicles, movement of light construction equipment and vehicles Vibration: Will the proposal cause vibration that may affect adjacent properties? Describe any potential sources of vibration: Project should not create any more vibration than typical construction. Exterior Lighting: Please describe any proposed exterior lighting of the faciliW: Wall sconces at unit entries and possibly some soft lighting at front yard landscaping, mail area, and rear yard trash enclosure. Water: Expected amount of water usage: Domestic 792 gal/day Peak use 52 gal/min Commercial n/a gal/day Peak use n/a gal/min Expected fire flow demand TBD by fire protection gal/min consultant As per the C.3 regulations set forth by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, please respond to the following questions: 1. Would the proposed project result in an increase in pollutant discharges to receiving waters? 4 Refer to City of Burlingame Exterior Illumination Ordinance (No. 1477) regarding requirements which limit exterior illumination in both residential and commercial zones. City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlineame.org 2. Would the proposed project result in significant alteration of receiving water quality during or following construction? Water usage should be similar to current levels or a small increase due to additional 2 units over existing 4 units. 3. Would the proposed project result in increased impervious surfaces and associated increased runoff? No - current building and paving covers more area with impervious surfaces than proposed project. 4. Would the proposed project create a significant adverse environmental impact to drainage patterns due to changes in runoff flow rates volumes? No -Proposed project will provide more pervious surfaces and landscaping to improve environmental impact compared to existing site. Would the proposed project result in increased erosion in its watershed? No 6. Is the project tributary to an already impaired water body, as listed on the Clean Water Action Section 303(d) list? If so will it result in an increase in any pollutant for which the water body is already impaired? No 7. Would the proposed project have a potential significant environmental impact on surface water quality, to marine, fresh, or wetland waters? No 8. Would the proposed project have a potentially significant adverse impact on ground water quality? No 9. Will the proposed project cause or contribute to an exceedance of applicable surface or groundwater receiving water quality objectives or degradation of beneficial uses? No - Proposed project will provide more pervious surfaces and landscaping to improve environmental impact compared to existing site 10. Will the project impact aquatic, wetland, or riparian habitat? No Sewer: Expected daily sewer discharge 753 GPD Source of wastewater discharge on site (i.e. restrooms, restaurants, laboratory, material processing, etc.) City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org General: Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Provide attachment to explain nature of all items checked `yes'. Yes No Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, or hills, or substantial alteration of ground contours. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. Change in dust, ash, smoke fumes or odors in vicinity. Change in bay, lagoon, stream, channel or groundwater quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity (during construction and/or during operation). Site on filled land or on slope of 10 % or more. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable materials or explosives. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire water, sewage) Substantial increase in fossil fuel consumption (oil, natural gas, etc.). Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the statements fiunished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. _4,_ T.. %. _ Date 03/14/2017 Signature X X X X X X X X X X STATE OF CALIFORNIA—CALIFORNIA STATE TRANSPORTATION AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN Jr., Govemor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 4 OFFICE OF TRANSIT AND COMMUNITY PLANNING P.O. BOX 23660, MS- IOD OAKLAND, CA 94623-0660 PHONE (510) 286-5528 FAX (510) 286-5559 TTY 711 www.dot.ca.gov January 4, 2018 Catherine Keylon City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Making Conservation a California Way of Life SCH # 2017122013 GTS # 04-SM-2017-00144 GTS ID:8908 PM:SM — 82 — 14.89 1431 El Camino Real — Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) Dear Ms. Keylon: Thank you for including the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) in the environmental review process for the 1431 El Camino Real project. In tandem with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission's (MTC) Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS), Caltrans' mission signals a modernization of our approach to evaluate and mitigate impacts to the State Transportation Network (STN). Caltrans' Strategic Management Plan 2015-2020 aims to reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) by tripling bicycle and doubling both pedestrian and transit travel by 2020. Our comments are based on the December 6, 2017 Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). Project Understanding The 7,722 square -foot (sf) proposed project site is located at 1431 El Camino Real in the city of Burlingame. The project site is located in an R-3 zoning district and is surrounded by either R-1 or R-3 zoning districts. The proposed 1431 El Camino Real project would demolish an existing two-story four -unit apartment building with a detached five -car garage structure at the rear, and construct a 3,858 sf, three-story residential building containing six two -bedroom units. Two on - site parking spaces (for a total of 12) would be located under each unit in mechanical, stacked - vehicle lifts. Each lift would store one vehicle at ground level and one vehicle below ground. There would also be two ground -level guest parking spaces and a service/delivery vehicle parking space located on -site. The project site is adjacent to State Route (SR) 82 (El Camino Real). The project will relocate access to SR 82 from a driveway along the southeastern edge of the property, to a driveway along the northwestern edge of the property, and includes the relocation of a young elm associated with the Howard -Ralston Eucalyptus Tree Rows. "Provide a safe, sustainable, integrated and efficient transportation system to enhance California's economy and livability" Ms. Keylon, City of Burlingame January 4, 2018 Page 2 Multimodal Planning The Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) has identified the project location as a planned Priority Development Area (PDA), known as the Burlingame El Camino Real PDA, with a future place type of Transit Town Center, which emphasizes mixed -use development, transit, and pedestrian connectivity. PDA criteria includes plans for additional housing, and proximity within 'h mile of high frequency (peak headways under 20 minutes) bus or Bus Rapid Transit service, or proximity to a planned or existing rail station or ferry terminal. The project site is approximately 0.75 miles walking distance from the nearest Caltrain station (Broadway Caltrain Station), while the SamTrans Route ECR bus, which has stops within 0.25 miles of the project site provides high frequency bus service along SR 82 (El Camino Real) between Palo Alto and Daly City. Please clarify the present parking capacity at the project location: The MND indicates that a five - space parking structure will be demolished, and a total of 15 parking spaces will be included in the new project. Please consider instead of a variance to allow automatic parking lifts in order to meet parking minimum requirements, a variance to reduce the parking minimum at the site, which could include measures such as an on -site car -share point -of -departure. The project's primary and secondary effects on pedestrians, bicyclists, disabled travelers and transit users should be evaluated, including countermeasures and trade-offs resulting from mitigating VMT increases. Access for pedestrians and bicyclists to transit facilities must be maintained. These smart growth approaches are consistent with MTC's Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Community Strategies and would help meet Caltrans Strategic Management targets. Vehicle Trip Reduction From Caltrans' Smart Mobility 2010: A Call to Action for the New Decade, the project site is identified as Place Type 2b: Close -in Corridors where location efficiency factors, such as community design, are moderate and regional accessibility is strong. Caltrans applauds the construction of additional housing in this area, and due to its location, it should include a robust Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Program to reduce VMT and greenhouse gas emissions. Such measures will be critical in order to facilitate efficient transportation access to and from the site and reduce transportation impacts associated with the project. The measures listed below will promote smart mobility and reduce regional VMT. • Project design to encourage walking, bicycling and transit access; • Transit subsidies for residents on an ongoing basis; • Charging stations and designated parking spaces for electric vehicles; • Designated parking spaces for a car share program; • Subsidized access to a car share program for residents; • Unbundled parking; • Secured bicycle storage facilities; and • Fix -it bicycle repair station(s). For additional TDM options, please refer to the Federal Highway Administration's Integrating "Provide a safe, sustainable, integrated and efficient transportation system to enhance California's economy and livability" Ms. Keylon, City of Burlingame January 4, 2018 Page 3 Demand Management into the Transportation Planning Process: A Desk Reference (Chapter 8). The reference is available online at: http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop 1203 5/fhwahop 1203 5.pdf. Cultural Resources Because this project proposes the relocation of a young elm associated with the Howard -Ralston Eucalyptus Tree Rows, Noah M. Stewart, Caltrans Architectural Historian and Environmental Branch Chief has been working directly with the Lead Agency and the project applicant on the cultural resource documents needed to satisfy Caltrans requirements under PRC 5024. Please see the comments below, noting that comments provided previously by Caltrans as part of the ongoing coordination still apply. Based on Page 22, Section 2.5 within the Discussion, it appears that there is an impact to the Howard -Ralston Eucalyptus Tree Rows as one of the trees that contributes to the significance of the National Register of Historic Places -listed property will be moved. While it appears the move will not have a significant adverse change to the resource, it appears that there will be some impact; please clarify the level of change. Please also clarify if and how the trees will be protected with Environmentally Sensitive Areas, and how those areas will be delineated. Lead Agency As the Lead Agency, the City Burlingame is responsible for all project mitigation, including any needed improvements to the STN. The project's fair share contribution, financing, scheduling, implementation responsibilities and lead agency monitoring should be fully discussed for all proposed mitigation measures. Encroachment Permit Please be advised that any work or traffic control that encroaches onto the state ROW requires an encroachment permit that is issued by the Department. To apply, a completed encroachment permit application, environmental documentation, and five (5) sets of plans clearly indicating state ROW must be submitted to: Office of Permits, California DOT, District 4, P.O. Box 23660, Oakland, CA 94623-0660. Traffic -related mitigation measures should be incorporated into the construction plans during the encroachment permit process. See the website link below for more information: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/traffops/developserv/permits/. "Provide a safe, sustainable, integrated and efficient transportation system to enhance California's economy and livability" Ms. Keylon, City of Burlingame January 4, 2018 Page 4 Thank you again for including Caltrans in the environmental review process. Should you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Jake Freedman at 510-286-5518 or jake.freedman@dot.ca.gov. Sincerely, PATRICIA MAURICE District Branch Chief Local Development - Intergovernmental Review c: State Clearinghouse "Provide a safe, sustainable, integrated and efficient transportation system to enhance California's economy and livability" To Community Development Department I Rulin abufannouna, and my husband Rami Alfakhouri , My son Yousef alfakhouri (7 years old ), my son Jude alfakhouri (5 years old) and my son Kinan alfakhouri (3 months old) live in Burlingame 1433 El Camino Real apartment #a. Next year going to be our ten year living at 1433 El Camino Real apartment #a. I just want to let you know that if you approved this project we going to be on the street. We live month to month. We pearly make it. I Rulin abufannouna the wife take care of the kids and my husband Rami Alfakhouri he is only working in the family. We don't have money to move out. I really appreciate it if you take our situation in consideration before making any decision. We appreciate it if build affordable housing for people like us. Please very please help us. My phone number is 4157456665. E-mail address is rfakhouri75@gmail.com . Rulin abufannouna 12-26-17 Rami Alfakhouri 12-26-17 UDVE® JAN 2 20118 CITY OF3tJ1"iUNGA'ME CM-P ',�,NNG r11� 03.27.17 PC Meeting Item # 9d 1431 El Camino Real Page 1 of 1 From: Jennifer Pfaff [mailtoJjpf(a)pacbell.net] Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 8:46 PM To: GRP-Planning Commissioners Cc: CD/PLG-Catherine Keylon Subject: 1431 El Camino Real - Variance application for landscaping March 24, 2017 Honorable Commissioner Loftis and fellow Planning Commissioners: COMMUNICATION RECEIVED AFTER PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT RECEIVE® MAR 24 2017 CITY OF BURLINGAME CDD — PLANNING DIV. I am writing with regard to the proposal for a condo project at the above site, that is adjacent to the Howard Ralston Tree Rows, a historic resource listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Though I understand the need to accommodate home deliveries, particularly in areas where street parking doesn't exist, I think the notion of parking in what little landscaped frontage exists along the highway, sets an unfortunate precedent that needs to be very carefully considered before granting a variance. Not long ago, a development with a cantilever design at 1321 El Camino Real, just to the south of this one, was undertaken on a similarly narrow lot, with existing street trees and similar constraints. To my knowledge, the project was completed without requesting a landscape reduction variance. The result is a handsome building with a lush landscape plan that visually supports the look of the Tree Rows in the public realm, adding depth and interest. In the case of 1431, reduction in vegetation creates a sterile and flat project. The extant street tree elms, as well as the single chosen oak proposed for what little remains plantable area, will disappear for much of the year while the trees are dormant. Just one extant gum exists to the north of the property --too far away to contribute visually to the landscaping. Deliveries typically take just a few minutes, so I wonder why delivery trucks, or gardeners or other vehicles that visit for limited periods of time cannot occupy one of two guest parking spots to the rear? If this concept of a parking pad becomes the norm, the cumulative look our scenic highway will really take a hit. The goal of redeveloping these properties should be overall improvement. The introduction of parked cars on the frontage, whether it is allowed by the property owners, or not, has the potential to be a permanent blight. Finally, perhaps the applicant can consider switching out the single deciduous pin oak, for an evergreen cork oak. Many years ago, in an effort to soften the flat panels of the Safeway complex on El Camino Real at Howard, several evergreen cork oaks were used along El Camino Real, together with creeping fig on most of the stucco on the sides of the building. The effect is one that has provided visual depth, and a lush back drop for the Tree Rows in front of them. Similarly, for this property, and what appears to be an angled, albeit rather flat concrete piece on the face of the structure, some creeping fig may help create some visual interest and depth, while helping the architecture to have a sense of place in that setting. As a side note, I apologize as my abilities of reading the landscape plan may be limited, but hard as I've tried, I cannot rectify what seems to be a long list of plants, with the actual plans. On the submitted sheet L 1.1, I cannot seem to locate the following plants on the site: chinese pistache, glossy abelia, day lillies, tree mallows, red fountain grass, pleris japonica variegate, or Fraser photenia. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely yours, Jennifer Pfaff CITY Project Comments — Planning Application Project Address: 1431 El Camino Real, zoned R-3, APN: 026-013-110 Description: Request for Environmental Scoping (?), Condominium Permit, and Design Review for 6 new townhome units. From Rick Caro III Building Division Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: 1) RESIDENTIAL: Rooms that could be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Rooms that could be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. On the elevation drawings specify the location and the net clear opening height and width of all required egress windows. 2013 California Building Code (CBC) 1029.2 and 2013 California Residential Code (CRC) §R310. The response did not include what the actual dimension of the egress windows are in order to determine that the minimum 5.7 square feet would be met. Note: That if you use the minimum dimension width of 20 inches for the egress window, than you would need a minimum of a 42" net opening height. 17) Specify on the plan that all powder rooms shall comply with Section 1134A.2; Option 2, Items 8 through 12. The response to question # 17 stating that unit #7 will comply with the requirements for the accessible route to the primary entry with one powder room on the primary level does not state how the powder room will be designed to comply with 1134A.2; Option 2, Items 8 through 12. 18) Specify on the plans that all dwelling unit interior doors will comply with CBC 1132A5.2. The response that Unit #7 will comply with the requirements for the accessible route to the primary unit entry, does not address the strike edge maneuvering space at the door. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. 19) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. NOTE: A condition of this project approval is that the Demolition Permit will not be issued and, and no work can begin (including the removal of any building components), until a Building Permit has been issued for the project. The property owner is responsible for assuring that no work is authorized or performed. 20) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 21) Include with your Building Division plan check submittal a complete underground fire sprinkler plan. Contact the Burlingame Water Division at 650-558-7660 for details regarding the water system or Central County Fire for sprinkler details. 22) Sewer connection fees must be paid prior to issuing the building permit. 23) A pre -construction meeting must be conducted prior to issuing the permit. After you are notified by the Building Division that your plans have been approved call 650-558-7270 to schedule the pre -construction meeting. Reviewed By: Rick Caro III Date: February 27, 2017 (650) 558-7270 Project Comments - Planning Application Project Address: 1431 El Camino Real, zoned R-3, APN: 026-013-110 Description: Request for Environmental Scoping (?), Condominium Permit, and Design Review for 6 new townhome units. From: Rick Caro III Building Division Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: 1) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2013 California Building Code, 2013 California Residential Code (where applicable), 2013 California Mechanical Code, 2013 California Electrical Code, and 2013 California Plumbing Code, including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1889. Note: If the Planning Commission has not approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2016 then this project must comply with the 2016 California Building Codes. 2) Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2013 California Energy Efficiency Standards. 3) Place the following information on the first page of the plans: "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 8:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: No work is allowed (See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.) Construction hours in the City Public right-of-way are limited to weekdays and non -City Holidays between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Note: Construction hours for work in the public right of way must now be included on the plans. 4) On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrated on the Job Copy of the plans prior to performing the work. 5) Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of Occupancy will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued after the project has been final. No occupancy of the building is to occur until a new Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. 6) On the plans show that all openings in exterior walls, both protected and unprotected, will comply with 2013 CBC, Table 705.8. Provide a table or chart that specifies 1) the openings allowed and; 2) the size and percentage of the openings proposed. 7) RESIDENTIAL: Rooms that could be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Rooms that could be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. On the elevation drawings specify the location and the net clear opening height and width of all required egress windows. 2013 California Building Code (CBC) 1029.2 and 2013 California Residential Code (CRC) §R310. 8) Indicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 9) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 2013 CBC § 1009. 10) Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 11) Prior to applying for a Building Permit the applicant must either confirm that the address is or obtain a change of address from the Engineering Department. Note: The correct address must be referenced on all pages of the plans. 12) On the first page of the plans state the Access Regulations that you are using to gain full access compliance. There are five access regulations that may apply to a multi -family residential project in California: a. The Architectural Barriers Act of 1969 (ABA) b. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 c. The Fair Housing Act (FHA) d. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) e. The California Building Code (CBC), Chapters 11A and 11B. 13) On the first page of the plans clearly state whether ANY public money, of any kind, will or will not be used to construct this project. 14) On the first page of the plans clearly state if an application for ANY tax credits have or will be submitted for tax rebates. NOTE: See the 2015 California Code of Regulations, Title IV, § 10325 (f)7 (K). In part: "All tax credit recipient projects shall adhere to the provisions of California Building Code 11(B) regarding accessibility to privately owned housing made available for public use." 15) On the first page of the plans clearly state that all paths of travel and common use spaces will be accessible and all living units will be adaptable. 16) Provide details which show that the water closet in each unit complies with CBC 1134A.7 #1. 17) Specify on the plan that all powder rooms shall comply with Section I I34A.2; Option 2, Items 8 through 12. 18) Specify on the plans that all dwelling unit interior doors will comply with CBC I I32A5.2. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. 19) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. NOTE: A condition of this project approval is that the Demolition Permit will not be issued and, and no work can begin (including the removal of any building components), until a Building Permit has been issued for the project. The property owner is responsible for assuring that no work is authorized or performed. 20) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 21) Include with your Building Division plan check submittal a complete underground fire sprinkler plan. Contact the Burlingame Water Division at 650-558-7660 for details regarding the water system or Central County Fire for sprinkler details. 22) Sewer connection fees must be paid prior to issuing the building permit. 23) A pre -construction meeting must be conducted prior to issuing the permit. After you are notified by the Building Division that your plans have been approved call 650-558-7270 to schedule the pre -construction meeting. Reviewed By: Rick Caro III Date: October 3, 2016 (650) 558-7270 U\ i Project Address: 1431 El Camino Real, zoned R-3, APN: 026-013-110 Description: Request for Environmental Scoping (?), Condominium Permit, and Design Review for 6 new townhome units. From: Bob Disco Parks Division Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised pl7sith your resubmittal: nclude existing Accolade elm trees in planter strip on landscape plans. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. 2. Irrigation plan required for Building Permit. Include irrigation to existing street trees. Reviewed By: BD Date: 10/5/16 650.558.7333 Project Address Description: From: Project Comments - Planning Application 1431 El Camino Real, zoned R-3, APN: Request for Environmental Scoping Review for 6 new townhome units. Martin Quan Public Works Engineering 026-013-110 (?), Condominium Permit, and Design Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: 2. No comments at this time. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. Insert the 'Best Management Practices', updated June 2014, construction sheet into the plans set. A copy can be found at http://www.flowstobay.orp/sites/default/files/Countywide%2OProgram%20BMP/`20Plan/o20Sheet- June%202014%20Update.pdf#overlay-context=brochures or http://www.flowstobay.org/brochures then click "construction bmp plan sheet" 3. Based on the scope of work, this is a "Type II" project that requires a Stormwater Construction Pollution Prevention Permit. This permit is required prior to issuance of a Building Permit. An initial field inspection is required prior to the start of any construction (on private property or in the public right-of-way). Reviewed By: Martin Quan Date: 2/24/17 650-558-7245 CITY O Project Address Description: From: Project Comments - Planning Application 1431 El Camino Real, zoned R-3, APN: 026-013-110 Request for Environmental Scoping (?), Condominium Permit, and Design Review for 6 new townhome units. Martin Quan Public Works Engineering Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: 1. A remove/replace utilities encroachment permit is required to (1) replace all curb, gutter, driveway and sidewalk fronting site, (2) plug all existing sanitary sewer lateral connections and install a new 4" lateral, (3) all water line connections to city water mains for services or fire line are to be installed per city standard procedures and specification, (4) any other underground utility works within city's right-of-way. Please show on plans. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. 2. Insert the 'Best Management Practices', updated June 2014, construction sheet into the plans set. A copy can be found at http•//www flowstobay org/sites/default/files/Countywide%20Program/o20BMP/o20PIan%20Sheet- June%202014%20Update.pdf#overlay-context=brochures or http://www.flowstobay.org/brochures then click "construction bmp plan sheet" 3. Based on the scope of work, this is a "Type ll" project that requires a Stormwater Construction Pollution Prevention Permit. This permit is required prior to issuance of a Building Permit. An initial field inspection is required prior to the start of any construction (on private property or in the public right-of-way). Reviewed By: Martin Quan Date: 10/7/16 650-558-7245 I T Y Project Address Description: From: Project Comments - Planning Application 1431 El Camino Real, zoned R-3, APN: 026-013-110 Request for Environmental Scoping (?), Condominium Permit, and Design Review for 6 new townhome units. Christine Reed Fire Dept. Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal: 1. The building shall be equipped with an approved NFPA 13R sprinkler system throughout. Sprinkler drawings shall be submitted and approved by the Central County Fire Department prior to installation. The system shall be electronically monitored by an approved central receiving station, under a separate fire alarm permit. 2. The fire sprinkler system's fire department connection shall be located within 5 feet of the sidewalk and not within city right-of-way. 3. The applicant shall ensure proper drainage in accordance with the City of Burlingame Engineering Standards is available for the fire sprinkler main drain and inspector test on the building plumbing drawings. These items may drain directly to landscape or in the sewer with an air gap. 4. The fire protection underground shall be submitted and approved by the Burlingame Building Department prior to installation. The fire sprinkler system and fire standpipe system will not be approved by the Central County Fire Department until the fire protection underground has been submitted and approved by the Burlingame Building Department. 5. Electronic vehicular gate shall have a Knox key switch for emergency Fire Dept. access. The front of the building shall have a Knox key box for emergency Fire Dept. access through pedestrian gates and into other common areas of the building (if any). Reviewed By: Christine Reed Date: 10-12-16 650-558-7617 CITY O Project Address Description: From: Project Comments - Planning Application 1431 El Camino Real, zoned R-3, APN: 026-013-110 Request for Environmental Scoping (?), Condominium Permit, and Design Review for 6 new townhome units. Carolyn Critz Stormwater Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: Project proponent completed, signed and submitted the Small Projects Checklist, which shows the project is a Small Project. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. 1. Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the city's stormwater NPDES permit to prevent construction activity stormwater pollution. Project proponents shall ensure that all contractors implement appropriate and effective Best Management Practices (BMPs) during all phases of construction, including demolition. When submitting plans for a building permit, please include a list of construction BMPs as project notes, preferably, on a separate full size (2'x 3' or larger), plan sheet. A downloadable electronic file is available at: http://www.flowstobay.org/Construction 2. Label all pervious and impervious surfaces and site design measures for stormwater. For further assistance regarding stormwater, please contact Carolyn Critz, Environmental Compliance Manager, at (650) 342 3727, ext. 118, or carolyn.critzCa)_veolia.com Reviewed By: Carolyn Critz Date: November 14, 2016 (650) 342 3727, ext. 118 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME RECOMMENDING A FINDING THAT THERE IS NO SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THAT THE APPROVAL OF AN APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, CONDOMINIUM PERMIT, PARKING VARIANCE AND TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP, FOR A NEW 6-UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT AT 1431 EL CAMINO REAL WILL HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 6 OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME hereby finds as follows: Section 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration, per Mitigated Negative Declaration ND- 598-P, is hereby approved. Section 2. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12T" day of February, 2018 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Secretary RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, CONDOMINIUM PERMIT, PARKING VARIANCE AND TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP, FOR A NEW 6-UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT AT 1431 EL CAMINO REAL (ASSESSOR PARCEL NO: 026-013-110) WHEREAS, on September 30, 2016 Levy Design Partners, on behalf of GGH Investment LLC filed an application with the City of Burlingame Community Development Department — Planning Division requesting approval of the following requests: • Design Review for construction of a new three-story, 6-unit condominium building (C.S. 25.28.020); • Condominium Permit (Tentative Condominium Map) required for construction of new condominium building (C.S. 26.30.020)' and • Parking Variance for the use of mechanical parking lifts to provide the required parking spaces (C.S. 25.70.032). WHEREAS, on March 27, 2017 the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing (environmental scoping session) to review a 6-unit residential condominium project and to identify subjects to be analyzed in the project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND). At that time direction was provided to the applicant for revisions to the project design and comments were received from the Commission and public regarding issues to be addressed in the project IS/MND; and WHEREAS, on February 12, 2018 the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing (study session) to review a revised 6-unit residential condominium project to address the concerns expressed by the neighbors and Planning Commission. At that time public comments were taken and direction was provided to the applicant for revisions to the project design; and WHEREAS, an IS/MND was prepared to analyze project impacts; said IS/MND was circulated for public review and comment commencing on December 6, 2017 and concluding on January 4, 2018; there were no two public comments received on the IS/MND; and Following consideration of all information contained in the February 12, 2018 staff report to the Planning Commission regarding the project, all written correspondence, and all public comments received at the public hearing, the Commission recommends approval of the 6-unit multi -family residential condominium development based on the following findings regarding the project entitlements: 1 Design Review Findings: • That the proposed condominium building will be compatible with the existing character of the neighborhood with the use of a variety of quality materials including Hardie shingle siding, cement plaster, horizontal wood railings, and composite wood windows with metal trim. The new three- story building respects the mass and scale of this portion of El Camino Real which has a mix of two and three-story multifamily residential buildings with a variety of architectural styles. The building includes an articulated front fagade that provides visual interest. For these reasons the project is found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review criteria. Condominium Permit Findings: Sound community planning; the economic, ecological, social and aesthetic qualities of the community, and on public health, safety and general welfare in that the 6-unit residential condominium project is scaled to be compatible with existing multifamily buildings along El Camino Real and in the neighboring single family residential neighborhood and features ample landscaping with usable common open space; • The overall impact on schools, parks, utilities, neighborhoods, streets, traffic, parking and other community facilities and resources in that with the mitigations designed into the project in the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration have found there will be no significant impacts, - and • Conformity with the general plan and density permitted by zoning regulations, in that the project provides two additional residential units (6 total) consistent with the applicable general plan and zoning designations. Variance Findings: Parking Variance for the use of mechanical parking lifts to provide the required parking spaces): The project has been designed to meet the common open space requirements, service delivery space requirement as well as to provide two guest parking space therefore limiting the amount of space available to provide required parking for all of the dwelling units. The use of mechanical parking lifts reduces the square footage demands for the site and will not be visible to the public, with no impact on aesthetics. The midblock location of the property on El Camino Real provides no alternatives for overflow parking for residents or visitors for this site. The use of mechanical parking lifts guarantees that each unit can fit two vehicles on the property. The site provides the code required driveway and circulation space to allow adequate queuing and maneuverability in and out of the lifts. For these reasons, the proposed project may be found to be compatible with the Variance criteria. WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on February 12, 2018, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; 2 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND DETERMINED BY THIS PLANNING COMMISSION THAT: Section 1. Said Design Review, Condominium Permit, Parking Variance for the use of mechanical parking lifts, and Tentative Condominium Map are approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review, Condominium Permit, and Variance are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. Section 2. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of February, 2018, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Secretary 3 RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Design Review, Condominium Permit, Parking Variance and Tentative Condominium Map 1431 El Camino Real Effective February 22, 2018 Page 1 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped December 22, 2017, sheets A0.0 through A5.3; 2. that prior to issuance of a building permit for the project, the applicant shall pay the first half of the Public Facilities Impact fee in the amount of $5,537.00, made payable to the City of Burlingame and submitted to the Planning Department; 3. that prior to scheduling the final framing inspection for the condominium building, the applicant shall pay the second half of the Public Facilities Impact fee in the amount of $5,537.00, made payable to the City of Burlingame and submitted to the Planning Department; 4. parking lifts, three (3) Klaus 2061-190 and three (3) Klaus 2061-200, or an equivalent parking lifts, shall be installed in the garage of each residential unit, with the following conditions: a. that the interior clearance height of the garages shall be at least 13'-3"0, measured from floor to ceiling- as show on sheet A4.1 of the plans, in order to permit the parking of sport utility vehicles on the parking lifts; b. the parking lifts shall be properly illuminated to provide safety for easy loading and unloading, while not causing excessive glare. signage shall be installed in each garage explaining the proper use of the lifts and emergency contact information for lift maintenance or problems. d. the final design of the parking lifts shall be subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director. 5. that during construction, the applicant shall provide fencing (with a fabric screen or mesh) around the project site to ensure that all construction equipment, materials and debris is kept on site; 6. that the applicant shall apply for a tentative and final condominium map with the Public Works, Engineering Division for processing in conformance with the Subdivision Map Act; 7. that the applicant shall apply for an encroachment permit from the Department of Transportation for any work proposed in the state right-of-way; 8. that the applicant shall coordinate with Caltrans and a licensed arborist to replant the existing elm tree within the Caltrans right-of-way in front of the subject property a few feet to the south (left) in order to accommodate the new driveway location in accordance with the SOIS Action Plan and the ESA Action Plan; RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Design Review, Condominium Permit, Parking Variance and Tentative Condominium Map 1431 El Camino Real Effective February 22, 2018 Page 2 9. that the applicant shall implement tree protection measures for the (second) elm tree that currently exists within the planter strip in front of the subject property that will be retained as part of this project in accordance with the SOIS Action Plan and the ESA Action Plan (see appendices of the IS/MND); 10. that documentation with exhibits that show detailed project construction plans including work on the driveway, sidewalk adjacent to the two elm trees in the planter strip, and a description of any other ground -disturbing work within 100-feet of the matures trees shall be submitted to the Department of Transportation for review and approval of an encroachment permit. The documentation should describe efforts to avoid affecting the trees and if avoidance is impossible, efforts to lessen the impact on the trees must be described and shall be in accordance with the SOIS Action Plan and the ESA Action Plan (see appendices of the IS/MND); 11. that the maximum elevation at the top of the roof ridge shall not exceed elevation 49.75' as measured from the average elevation at the top of the curb along El Camino Real (14.75') for a maximum height of 35'-0", and that the top of each floor and final roof ridge shall be surveyed and approved by the City Engineer as the framing proceeds and prior to final framing and roofing inspections. The garage/first floor finished floor elevation shall be elevation 16.86'; second floor finished floor shall be elevation 29.58'; third floor finished floor shall be elevation 39.91'. Should any framing exceed the stated elevation at any point it shall be removed or adjusted so that the final height of the structure with roof shall not exceed the maximum height shown on the approved plans; 12. that any changes to the size or envelope of the building, which would include expanding the footprint or floor area of the structure, replacing or relocating windows or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 13. that the conditions of the Building Division memos dated February 27, 2017 and October 3, 2016; Parks Division memos dated October 5, 2016; the Engineering Division memos dated February 24, 2017 and October 7, 2016; the Fire Division memos dated October 12, 2016; and the Stormwater Division memos dated November 14, 2016 shall be met; 14. that storage of construction materials and equipment on the street or in the public right-of- way shall be prohibited; 15. that the 'service vehicle stall' shall be marked on the service parking space and designated on the final map and plans, this stall shall not be assigned to any unit, but shall be owned and maintained by the condominium association, and the service vehicle stall shall always be accessible for parking and not be separately enclosed or used for resident storage; 16. that the Covenants Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) for the condominium project shall require that the service vehicle stall shall be reserved for service vehicles or guests only and shall not be used by condominium residents; RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Design Review, Condominium Permit, Parking Variance and Tentative Condominium Map 1431 El Camino Real Effective February 22, 2018 Page 3 17. that the final inspection shall be completed and a certificate of occupancy issued before the close of escrow on the sale of each unit; 18. that the developer shall provide to the initial purchaser of each unit and to the board of directors of the condominium association, an owner purchaser manual which shall contain the name and address of all contractors who performed work on the project, copies of all warranties or guarantees of appliances and fixtures and the estimated life expectancy of all depreciable component parts of the property, including but not limited to the roof, painting, common area carpets, drapes and furniture; 19. that the trash receptacles, furnaces, and water heaters shall be shown in a legal compartment outside the required parking and landscaping and in conformance with zoning and California Building and Fire Code requirements before a building permit is issued; 20. that any security gate system across the driveway shall be installed a minimum 20'-0' back from the front property line; 21. that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 22. that all runoff created during construction and future discharge from the site shall be required to meet National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards; 23. that the applicant shall submit an erosion and sedimentation control plan describing BMPs (Best Management Practices) to be used to prevent soil, dirt and debris from entering the storm drain system; the plan shall include a site plan showing the property lines, existing and proposed topography and slope; areas to be disturbed, locations of cut/fill and soil storage/disposal areas; areas with existing vegetation to be protected; existing and proposed drainage patterns and structures; watercourse or sensitive areas on -site or immediately downstream of a project; and designated construction access routes, staging areas and washout areas; 24. that methods and procedures such as sediment basins or traps, silt fences, straw bale dikes, storm drain inlet protection such as soil blanket or mats, and covers for soil stock piles to stabilize denuded areas shall be installed to maintain temporary erosion controls and sediment control continuously until permanent erosion controls have been established; 25. that construction access routes shall be limited in order to prevent the tracking of dirt onto the public right-of-way, clean off -site paved areas and sidewalks using dry sweeping methods; 26. that if construction is done during the wet season (October 15 through April 15), that prior to October 15 the developer shall implement a winterization program to minimize the 3 RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Design Review, Condominium Permit, Parking Variance and Tentative Condominium Map 1431 El Camino Real Effective February 22, 2018 Page 4 potential for erosion and polluted runoff by inspecting, maintaining and cleaning all soil erosion and sediment control prior to, during, and immediately after each storm even; stabilizing disturbed soils throughout temporary or permanent seeding, mulching matting, or tarping; rocking unpaved vehicle access to limit dispersion of mud onto public right-of- way; covering/tarping stored construction materials, fuels and other chemicals; 27. that common landscape areas shall be designed to reduce excess irrigation run-off, promote surface filtration and minimize the use of fertilizers, herbicides and pesticides; 28. that trash enclosures and dumpster areas shall be covered and protected from roof and surface drainage and that if water cannot be diverted from these areas, a self-contained drainage system shall be provided that discharges to an interceptor; 29. that this project shall comply with Ordinance 1845, the City of Burlingame Water Conservation in Landscaping Regulations, and complete landscape and irrigation plans shall be provided at the time of building permit application; 30. that all site catch basins and drainage inlets flowing to the bay shall be stenciled. All catch basins shall be protected during construction to prevent debris from entering; 31. that all new utility connections to serve the site, and which are affected by the development, shall be installed to meet current code standards and local capacities of the collection and distribution systems shall be increased at the developer's expense if necessary; 32. that all utilities to this site shall be installed underground. Any transformers needed for this site shall be installed underground or behind the front setback on this site; 33. that sewer laterals from the site to the public sewer main shall be checked and shall be replaced to city standards as required by the development; 34. that all abandoned utilities and hookups shall be removed; 35. that all drainage (including water from the below grade parking garage) on site shall be required to be collected and pumped to the street as determined by the Public Works Department; 36. that demolition of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 37. that the applicant shall install fire sprinklers and a fire alarm system monitored by an approved central station prior to the final inspection for building permit; l:! RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Design Review, Condominium Permit, Parking Variance and Tentative Condominium Map 1431 El Camino Real Effective February 22, 2018 Page 5 38. that all construction shall abide by the construction hours established in the Municipal Code; 39. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1645, the City of Burlingame Recycling and Waste Reduction Ordinance, and shall submit a waste reduction plan and recycling deposit for demolition and new construction, before receiving a demolition permit; 40. that this project shall comply with Ordinance No. 1477, Exterior Illumination Ordinance; and 41. that the project shall be required to comply with all the standards of the California Building and Fire Codes, in effect at time of building permit issuance, as amended by the City of Burlingame. The following four (4) conditions shall be met during the Building Inspection process prior to the inspections noted in each condition: 42. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building envelope; 43. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; 44. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; 45. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; Mitigation Measures from Initial Study Cultural Resources 46. Unanticipated Discovery of Archaeological Resources. All construction crew members shall be alerted to the potential to encounter sensitive archaeological material. In the event that archaeological resources (sites, features, or artifacts) are exposed during construction activities for the proposed project, all construction work occurring within 100 feet of the find shall immediately stop until a qualified archaeologist, meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards, can evaluate the significance of the find and determine whether additional study is warranted. Prehistoric archaeological deposits may be indicated by the presence of discolored or dark soil, fire- 6� RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Design Review, Condominium Permit, Parking Variance and Tentative Condominium Map 1431 El Camino Real Effective February 22, 2018 Page 6 affected material, concentrations of fragmented or whole marine shell, burned or complete bone, non -local lithic materials, or a characteristic observed to be atypical of the surrounding area. Common prehistoric artifacts may include modified or battered lithic materials; lithic or bone tools that appeared to have been used for chopping, drilling, or grinding; projectile points; fired clay ceramics or non-functional items; and other items. Historic -age deposits are often indicated by the presence of glass bottles and shards, ceramic material, building or domestic refuse, ferrous metal, or old features such as concrete foundations or privies. Depending on the significance of the find under CEQA (14 CCR 15064.5(t]; Public Resources Code Section 21082), the archaeologist may simply record the find and allow work to continue. If the discovery proves significant under CEQA, additional work, such as preparation of an archaeological treatment plan, testing, or data recovery, may be warranted. 47. Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains. In accordance with Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, if human remains are found, the county coroner shall be immediately notified of the discovery. No further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains shall occur until the county coroner has determined, within 2 working days of notification of the discovery, the appropriate treatment and disposition of the human remains. If the county coroner determines that the remains are, or are believed to be, Native American, he or she shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) in Sacramento within 24 hours. In accordance with California Public Resources Code, Section 5097.98, the NAHC must immediately notify those persons it believes to be the most likely descendant from the deceased Native American. The most likely descendant shall complete his/her inspection within 48 hours of being granted access to the site. The designated Native American representative would then determine, in consultation with the property owner, the disposition of the human remains. 48. Unanticipated Discovery of Paleontological Resources. Paleontological resources are limited, nonrenewable resources of scientific, cultural, or educational value and are afforded protection under state laws and regulations (CEQA). Paleontological resources are explicitly afforded protection by CEQA, specifically in Section V(c) of CEQA Guidelines Appendix G, the Environmental Checklist Form, which addresses the potential for adverse impacts to "unique paleontological resource[s] or site[s] or ... unique geological feature[s]" (14 CCR 15000 et seq.). Further, CEQA provides that, generally, a resource shall be considered "historically significant" if it has yielded or may be likely to yield information important in prehistory (14 CCR 15064.5[a][3][D]). In the event that paleontological resources (silicified shell, bone, or other features) are exposed during construction activities for the proposed project, all construction work occurring within 100 feet of the find shall immediately stop until a qualified paleontologist can evaluate the significance of the find. This analysis shall comply with guidelines and significance criteria specified by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. If the discovery proves significant under CEQA, additional work, such as preparation of an archaeological treatment plan, testing, or data recovery, may be warranted. N RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Design Review, Condominium Permit, Parking Variance and Tentative Condominium Map 1431 El Camino Real Effective February 22, 2018 Page 7 Noise 49. The project sponsor shall retain a qualified acoustical engineer to prepare an acoustical study in accordance with State Title 24 requirements. The acoustical study shall identify methods of design and construction to comply with the applicable portions of the California Building Code Title 24 to achieve an indoor noise level of 45 A -weighted decibel community noise equivalent level or less from traffic noise sources. 50. All construction equipment shall use available noise -suppression devices and properly maintained mufflers. All internal combustion engines used on the project site shall be equipped with the type of muffler recommended by the vehicle manufacturer. In addition, all equipment shall be maintained in a good mechanical condition to minimize noise created by a faulty or poorly maintained engine, drive train, or other component. 51. During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receptors and as far as possible from the boundary of sensitive receptors. 52. Pursuant to the City of Burlingame Municipal Code, the applicant shall limit construction activities to between 8 a.m. and 7 p.m. Mondays through Fridays, and Saturdays between 9 a.m. and 6 p.m. 7 CITY OF BURLINGAME COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org Site: 1431 EL CAMINO REAL The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 2018 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Environmental Review, Condominium Permit, Design Review, and Parking Variance for the use of mechanical parking lifts for a new 3-story, 6-unit condominium building at 1431 EL CAMINO REAL zoned R-3. APN 026-013-110 Mailed: February 2, 2018 (Please refer to other side) PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Citv of Burin ame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to other side)