The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1431 El Camino Real - Staff Report (2)Item No. 9d Environmental Scoping & Design Review Study City of Burlingame Environmental Scoping and Design Review Study for Proposed 6-Unit Condominium Building Address: 1431 El Camino Real Meeting Date: March 27, 2017 Request: Application for Environmental Review, Condominium Permit, Design Review, Parking Variance for the use of mechanical parking lifts and Front Landscape Variance for a new 3-story, 6-unit condominium building Applicant: Levy Design Partners APN: 026-013-110 Property Owner: GGH Investment LLC Lot Area: 7,721 SF General Plan: Medium -High Density Residential Zoning: R-3 Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan (R-3 Base District) Adjacent Development: Multifamily Residential to north, south and east/Single Family residential at the rear (west) Current Use: 4-unit apartment building Proposed Use: 6-unit condominium building Allowable Use: Multifamily, duplex, and single family residential Environmental Review: The Planning Commission should review the proposed project for areas of potential significant environmental effects. The Commission should add any additional effects of the project that they anticipate might be potentially significant. The areas of investigation for environmental evaluation as defined by CEQA are listed on the attached sheet for your reference. These potential environmental effects which will be considered in the CEQA document include: • Aesthetics • Air Quality • Biological Resources • Cultural Resources • Geology and Soils • Greenhouse Gas Emissions • Hazards and Hazardous Materials • Hydrology and Water Quality • Land Use • Noise • Transportation • Utilities and Service Systems • Energy • Cumulative Impacts The issues identified by the Commission will be incorporated into the environmental documents for the project. At this time, staff notes that based on preliminary analysis, it appears that the type of CEQA document required will be a (Mitigated) Negative Declaration. However, the type of CEQA document will be finalized during the environmental review process. The City is currently awaiting submittal of proposals from CEQA consultants for the preparation of the CEQA document. Environmental Scoping and Design Review Study 1431 El Camino Real Project Summary: The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing 4-unit apartment building and the detached garage structure at the rear and construct a new, three-story, 6-unit residential condominium building. The subject property is zoned R-3 and has a General Plan land use designation of Medium -High Density residential with 21-50 dwelling units per acre, which allows up to 8 units. The application is for 6 units which is a density of 35 dwelling units per acre. The proposed condominium building will have 6 units side by side and will be 3-stories. Each unit will have a ground level parking garage that will include a mechanical automobile stacker so that 2 parking spaces could be accommodated inside of the garage; one on top of the other. There will be two living levels located above the garage. The overall proposed height is 35 feet. There will be 2 at -grade, guest parking spaces located in the right rear corner. There is also a dedicated service vehicle space located in the front setback area. The entrance to each of the units is located on the north facing (driveway) side of the project. The project includes 6 two -bedroom, 2.5 bathroom condominium units. The average unit size proposed is 1,114 SF, with the units ranging from 1,083 SF through 1,190 SF. Condominium projects are required to provide 100 SF of common open space per unit and a minimum of 75 SF of private open space per unit. The proposed project meets these requirements with 1,000 SF of common open space in the rear yard and a minimum of 75 SF of private open space per unit with private balconies. During preliminary review Planning staff identified that the following applications will be required for this project ■ Design Review for construction of a new three-story, 6-unit condominium building (C.S. 25.28.020); ■ Condominium Permit required for construction of new condominium building (C.S. 26.30.020); • Parking Variance for the use of mechanical parking lifts to provide the required parking spaces (C.S. 25.70.032); and ■ Front setback landscape variance to have 34.2% of the front setback landscaped where 50% of the front setback is required to be landscaped. Off -Street Parking: Code Section 25.70.032 requires parking based on the number of bedrooms. Each 2 bedroom unit is required to provide 2 off-street parking spaces, 80% of which must be covered spaces. The proposed project will provide 12 on -site parking spaces that will be provided in the form of mechanical, stacked auto lifts (parking lifts). The subject property is not located within the boundaries of the plan area for the Downtown Specific Plan, where parking options, such as lifts, are allowed by right. Therefore a parking variance is required for the parking lifts. Code Section 25.30.070 (a)(2) requires 2 on -site guest parking spaces for new condominium project with 5-15 units. The two guest parking spaces meet all dimensional standards and are located in the right rear corner of the property. In addition, Code Section 25.30.070(a)(3) requires one on -site service and/or delivery vehicle space, which is provided in the front setback on grass cell porous pavers. Except for the service/delivery vehicle space, all of the on -site parking will be accessed from a 12-wide driveway. The proposal includes a request for a front setback landscaping variance because 34.2% of the front setback will be landscaped where 50% is required (C.S. 26.30.070(e)(1)). While the service/delivery vehicle space is provided on grass cell porous pavers, this area is not counted in the front setback landscaping calculation and therefore triggers the need for the landscape variance request. Given the location along El Camino Real, with Environmental Scoping and Design Review Study 1431 El Camino Real no street parking, the applicant decided to provide the service/delivery space rather than provide the required front landscaping. 1431 El Camino Real Front (1st fir): (2"d fir): (3rd fir): (4rh fir): (5rn fir): ............................................................................................ Left Side (1st fir): (2nd fir): (3rd fir): rians aate stamped: t-ebruary 14, 2017 PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQUIRED 20'-7" (all floors) i20'-7" (block average) 5'-0" I 5'-011 6'-0" 1 61-01 7'-0" 71-01 l Right Side (1st fir): 1214" 5'-0" (2nd fir): 10'-01, 6'-0" (3rd flr): 10'-01, 7'-0" Rear (Is' fir): (2nd fir): (3rd fir): 20'-0" (all floors) 20'-0" 20'-0" 20'-0" Lot Coverage: I 3,708 SF 3,860 SF 48.0% 1 50% Building Height: 35'-0" 55'-0" maximum/ CUP required to exceed 35'-0" Off -Street Parking: Driveway Width: ......................................................................................................................................................... Front Setback Landscaping: 1 12 condo unit spaces (6 spaces + 6 spaces provided in lifts)' 2 Guest Spaces 1 Service Vehicle Space ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12'-0" ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 34.2%2 352 SF 6 (2-bdr units) x 2 = 1 Guest spaces = 2* Service Vehicle = 1 * Total = 15 spaces* 12'-0" required .......................................................................... 50% 514 SF r al nll ly VaIlalluu lul uslrly Inecnarncai panung 117 to provide code required number of spaces (C.S. 25.70.032). 2 Front setback landscaping variance requested to provide 34.2% landscaping where 50% the front setback is required to be landscaped (C.S. 26.30.070(e)(1)) 3 Environmental Scoping and Design Review Study 1431 El Camino Real Staff Comments: See attached comments from the Chief Building Division, Parks Division, Engineering Division, Stormwater Division and Fire Division. Design Review: Design review is required for new construction of multi -family residential developments in the R-3 and R-4 Districts. The following considerations shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission (Code Section 25.57.010(b): (1) Compatibility with the existing character of the neighborhood; (2) Respect the mass and fine scale of adjacent buildings even when using differing architectural styles; (3) Maintain the tradition of architectural diversity, but with human scale regardless of the architectural style used; and (4) Incorporate quality materials and thoughtful design which will last into the future. Required Findings for Variance: In order to grant a Variance the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d): (a) there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved that do not apply generally to property in the same district; (b) the granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant, and to prevent unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship; (c) the granting of the application will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare or convenience; and (d) that the use of the property will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses of properties in the general vicinity. Planning Commission Action: 1. Environmental Scoping: As the first discussion item, the Planning Commission should review and take public comment on the proposed project and the areas of potential environmental effects as listed in the staff report. The Commission should add any additional effects of the project that it believes should be addressed in the CEQA document. The areas of investigation for environmental evaluation as defined by CEQA are listed in the attached Initial Study Checklist for your reference. 2. Design Review Study: As the second discussion item, the Commission should comment on the design of the project as required by Chapter 25.57 of the Zoning Ordinance, Design Review, and to the following design criteria for multi -family residential projects: a. Compatibility with the existing character of the neighborhood; b. Respect the mass and fine scale of adjacent buildings even when using differing architectural styles; c. Maintain the tradition of architectural diversity, but with human scale regardless of the architectural style used; and d. Incorporate quality materials and thoughtful design which will last into the future. Because a CEQA document is being prepared for this project, it is important that any changes to the building envelope be made early enough in the process so that any changes are reflected in the environmental review. C! Environmental Scoping and Design Review Study 1431 El Camino Real Catherine Keylon Senior Planner c. Brian Siu Yang, Levy Design Partners, applicant and architect GGH Investment LLC property owners Attachments: Application to the Planning Commission Parking Variance Application Front Setback Variance Application Environmental Information Form, submitted by the applicant Staff Comments Environmental Checklist from Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed March 17, 2017 Aerial Photo k COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - 501 PRIMROSE ROAD - BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 - www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Parcel #: OZ (/— ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Zoning / Other: PROJECT ADDRESS: 0 3� 1 e-U C "A-M )1? F— A -- APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER Name: Sir C crtc G-F D'&C_%(P*j l2 Name: (& kA 1r�JVEST Ly%-GrJ-r L. -C Address: Address: 14 R V13� A� City/State/Zip: City/State/Zip: ` 'dyo t V Phone: Phone: E-mail: E-mail: QLACt Lk— 1Cir1ci `�,4i-� 00• co ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Name: Address: ✓1-1-'i- plllr -,�L City/State/Zip: Phone: 415 --7.77 - a 14,11 fi ECEIVtU E-mail: 1 0&y C0 i-C—\ty '1>E310 • coc,l SEP 3 4 2016 Burlingame Business License #: 2-0 3 I '_1 CITY OF BURLINGAME Authorization to Reproduce Project Plans: CDD-PLANNING DIV. I hereby grant the City of Burlingame the authority to reproduce upon request and/or post plans submitted with this application on the City's website as part of the Planning approval process and waive any claims against the City arising out of or related to such action. t S �- (Initials of Architect/Designer) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 2 - 9,tV -V 1'iuk\_'piN CONSt"C C,,UP 0(= 5:-x-Ff-t Nttov+nE-�. AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Applicant's signature: Date: Z `'� 1, I am aware of the propose a plication and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. f Property owner's signature: Date: Date submitted: S: I HANDOUTS PC Application. doc COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - 501 PRIMROSE ROAD - BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 - f: 650.696.3790 - www.burlingame.org CITY OF BURLINGAME VARIANCE APPLICATION �c,vlc.lI—i E=-4-5 v The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. a. Describe the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to your property which do not apply to other properties in this area. Open space, service delivery, and setback requirements limit ground floor square footage available for parking. Variance for vehicular lifts helps project meet planning requirements while minimizing visual impact on neighborhood in comparison to other properties in area (who use exposed parking solutions). b. Explain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right and what unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship might result from the denial of the application. Variance would reduce square footage to be used to meet on -site parking requirements. Higher efficiency allows for more "softscape" landscaping improvements and reduces negative visual impact on neighborhood. C. Explain why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety, general welfare or convenience. Variance allows for better efficiency and minimum square footage used for parking. In comparison, existing adjacent buildings, use more space for parking and expose cars to street. With vehicular lifts, all residential unit parking can be provided in private garages hidden from street. Vehicular lifts would improve overall aesthetics and negative affect building has on surrounding neighborhood. d. Now will the proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity? Project is similar in mass, bulk, and character to existing adjacent buildings. However, vehicular lift variance would allow for improvements in overall aesthetics as cars would use less space allowing them to be hidden from street in private, covered garages. Variance would improve overall impact of project on adjoining properties. HandoutsWariance Application.2008 Page 1of5 SingleVario 2061 }-80---�501 } 45 { Free r— through Q) Dimensions Al, A2 and A3 must be coordinated with the door supplier. 0 If the total height is greater, the max. vehicle height for the upper parking space increases accordingly. 0 Potential equalization from foundation grounding connection to system (provided by the customer). 0 In compliance with DIN EN 14 010, 10 cm wide yellow -black markings compliant to ISO 3864 must be applied by the customer to the edge of the platform in the access area to mark the danger zone in front of the supporting surface of the upper platform edge (see »Load Plan(c, Page 3) a Variable steel pillar bases in two sizes (see »Load Plan«, Page 3). 0 Maximum load of 2,500 kg for extra charge. Product Data C E SingleVario _.SE 2061 r r Dimensions: W All space requirements are minimum finished dimensions. Tolerances for space requirements *3 Dimensions in cm. EB (single platform) = 2 vehicles t• •t 320 160 t• �f 340 180 �• •� 350 190 t. It 360 200 t t 370 210 `=standard type_ *'=without car Suitable for: Standard passenger car, station wagon/Van/SUV. Height and length according to concur. t• •r 320 150."150 1. t MINE t 340 150 170" t • • t 350 150'> 180 ` W? TFTt 360 150 190 t• t 370150 200 ' =. standard type 190 cm max. 2000/2500 kg M1, max. 500/625 kg Standard passenger car 160 —1 65 145 95 — 500 (520) T 125 Standard station wagon/Van/SUV ♦— 160 3p } P y O 1 -100-* 500 (520) —12s� Standard passenger cars are vehicles without any sports options such as spoilers, low -profile tyres etc. Klaus Multiparking GmbH Hermann-Krum-Strage 2 D-88319 Aitrach Phone +49-75 65- 5 08-0 Fax +49-75 65- 5 08-88 E-Mail infoQmultiparking.com Internet www.multiparking.com n Page 2 Width dimesions Page 3 Approach Load plan Installation Page 4 Electrical installation Technical data Page 5 To be perfor- med by the customer Description SingleVario 20611 Code number 584.69.890-0021 Version 09.2009 Page 2 of 5 Dividingivalls Single Platform (EB) EB B1 usable platform width, , 81 , 230 * 260 240 270 250 „ 280 260 290 270 „ 300 , Double arrangement (2 x EB) EB I EB i B1 usable platform width, , Bi 230 * 520 , 240 „ 540 , 250 „ 560 , 260 „ 580 , 270 600 Tripple arrangement (3 x EB) I I ES EB EB 1 Bt Carriageway in accordance with usable platform width, , Bi local regulations 230* 780 , 240 810 , 250 „ 840 260 „ 870 , 270 900 Single Platform (EB) Double arrangement (2 x EB) Tripple arrangement (3 x EB) xo xo xo E~ E~ E� 4 EB EB EB EB EB EB EB i EB i EB EB i EB i EB , >2 0 0 my E��+ I B2 11 M B3 11min.20 B2 63 min. 20 1 B2 h I �min. 20 Carriageway in accordance with usable platform width, , B2 , r 63 usable platform width, , B2 , , B3 usable platform width, , B2 , , B3 local regulations 230* 255 ,, 250 , 230* 515 ,, 510 , 230* 775 770 , 240 265 , , 260 , 240 535 , , 530 240 805 , , 800 , 250 275 270 , 250 555 550 250 835 „ 830 , 260 285 280 260 575 , , 570 , L 260 865 , , 860 , 270 „ 295 290 270 595 590 270 „ 895 890 , Single Platform (EB) Double arrangement (2 x EB) Tripple arrangement (3 x EB) EB i EB i EB EB i EB EB i EB EB i ES i EB EB i EB 134 Bs min.20 1 64 B5�i1min. 20 Ba 4 BS 4 0 Carriageway in accordance with usable platform width„ B4 BS usable platform width, B4 B5 usable platform width„ B4 B5 local regulations 230 * 250 , 240 , 230* 510 , , 500 , 230* 770 , L760 , 240 260 250 , 240 530 „ 520 240 „ 800 790 , 250 270 „ 260 250 550 „ 540 , 250 830 „ 820 260 280 , 270 260 570 „ 560 260 „ 860 „ 840 270 290 ,, 280 , 270 590 ,, 580 , 270 , 890 860 A3 = seat -engaging surface (dimensions require coordination ES EB I EB I with door supplier.) EB I EB EB I EB EB EB Allround door dimensions require o ® coordination between ra o L DF L L DF SDF S ocalagedoor nl�oFnd L DF L L DF S DF S Klaus Muttiparking. Carriageway in accordance with usable platform width„ door entrance width DF, L S usable platform width„ door entrance width DF, L S ,local regulations 230 * 2375 121 25 230 * 475 221 45 , 240 250 121 ,, 25 240 500 L20 40 250 250 15 , 30 250 j 5200 j 1 20 , 40 260 260 15 ,, 30 260 5400 20 40 , 270 270 15 30 270 5600 20 40 , * = standard width (parking space width 2.30 m) ! = no standard width for doors! End parking spaces are generally more difficult to drive into. Therefore we recommended for end parking spaces our wider platforms. Parking on standard width platforms with larger vehicles may make getting into and out of the vehicle difficult. This depends on type of vehicle, approach and above all on the individual driver's skill. SingleVario 20611 Code number 584.69.890.0021 Version 09.2009 Page 3 of 5 Page 1 Section Dimensions Car data Page 2 Width M Page 3 Approach Load plan Installation Page 4 Electrical installation Technical data Page 5 To be perfor- med by the customer Description maximum maximum descending ascending slope 4 % slope 14 % The illustrated maximum approach angles must not be exceeded. Incorrect approach angles will cause serious maneouvring & positioning problems on the parking system for which the local agency of Klaus accepts no responsibility. Option 1: short steel pillar base platform load Fi F2 F3 , 4 c Fs F6 2,000 kg 30 , , 1.1 , 7.4 , , 0.5 , , 7.7 , t1 , 2,500 kg 1 1 35 1.3 8.9 0.6 , , 9.3 tl Forces in M Option 2: long steel pillar base ® The steel pillar base can be selected optionally (short or long). Please make sure to note the corresponding forces that apply! Units are dowelled to the floor. Drilling depth: approx. 15 cm. Floor and walls are to be made of concrete (quality minimum C20/25)! 6insta[[atton` (at It M Free space for longitudinal and vertical ducts (e.g. ventilation) Bt'o B1.22.5 61.2 5 �(265) (262.5) (262.5) 35 10+ 35 1 35 10 V ME 100 B1, B2 = (see table on page 2) Free space for vertical pipelines, ventilation branch canals Free space for horizontal ducting M Size 15 cm is reduced to 5 cm for type 2061-160 Free space only applicable if vehicle is parked forwards = FRONT FIRST and driver's door on the left side. ( ) = Dimensions in brackets illustrate an example for usable platform width 230 cm. Example for ventilation branch canal and/or vertical pipelines. I B2 f 1 B2 (255) z26 (515) SingleVario 20611 Code number 584.69.890-0021 Version 09.2009 Page 4 of 5 Page 1 Section Dimensions Car data Page 2 Width dimesions Page 3 Approach Load plan Installation Page 4 Electrical installation Technical data Page 5 To be perfor- med by the customer Description Conduit EN 25 - (M25) height: + 1.70 in 10 it Conduit EN 25 (M25) height: + 1.10 m 14 to the next system Generally, this parking system is not suited for short -time parkers (temporary parkers). Please do not hesitate to contact your local KLAUS agency for further assistance. , No. Qunatlty, Description Position Frequency , 1 1 Electricity meter in the supply ,_i , line 2 1 Main fuse: 3 x fuse 16 A (slow) in the supply 1 per unit or circuit breaker 3x16A line (trigger characteristic K or Q 3 1 Supply line 5 x 2.5 mm' to main switch i perunit (3 PH + N + PE) with marked wire u and protective conductor i 4 1 Lockable main switch defined at the 1 per unit plan evaluation , 5 1 Supply line 5 x 2.5 mm' from main 1 perunit (3 PH+N+PE) with marked wire switch to unit u and protective conductor 6 every Foundation earth connector corner pit u to m Lfloor 7 1 Equipotentiai bonding in accordance 1 per with DIN EN 60204 from foundation system u earth connector to the system , No. Description 8 , Terminal box 9 „Control line 3x0.75mm'(PH +N+PE) 10 , Control line 7x 1.5 mm' with marked wire and protective conductor 11 „ Operatingdevice 12 , , Control line 5 x 1.5 mm' with marked wire and protective conductor 13 , , Hydraulic unit 3.0 kw, three-phase current, 400 V / 50 Hz 14 , Control line 5 x 1.5 mm' with marked wire and protective conductor 15 „ Chain control insulationSound According to DIN 4109 (Sound insulation in buildings), para. 4, annotation 4, Klaus Multiparkers are part of the building services (garage systems). Normal sound insulation: Low -noise power units mounted to rubber -bonded -to metal DIN 4109, para. 4, Sound insulation against noises from building mountings are installed. Nevertheless we recommend that parking services. system's garage be built separately from the dwelling. — wall recess plans — maintenance offer/contract — declaration of conformity — test sheet on airborne and slid -borne sound See separate sheet regarding corrosion protection. If there are traffic routes next to or behind the installations, railings compliant to DIN EN ISO 13857 must be installed by the customer. Railings must also be in place during construction. Environmental conditions for the area of multiparking systems: Temperature range —10 to +401 C. Relative humidity 50 % at a maximum outside temperature of+401 C. If lifting or lowering times are specified, they refer to an environmental temperature of+10° C and with the system set up directly next to the hydraulic unit. At lower temperatures or with longer hydraulic lines, these times increase. Table 4 in para. 4.1 contains the permissible sound level values emitted from building services for personal living and working areas. According to line 2 the maximum sound level in personal living and working areas must not exceed 30 dB (A). Noises created by users are not subject to the requirements (see table 4, DIN 4109). The following measures are to be taken to comply with this value: — Sound protection package according to offer/order (Klaus Multiparking GmbH) — Minimum sound insulation of building R'w = 57 dB (to be provided by customer) Increased sound insulation (special agreement): DIN 4109, Amendment 2, Information on planning and execution, proposals for increased sound insulation. Agreement: Maximum sound level in personal living and working areas 25 dB (A). Noises created by users are not subject to the requirements (see table 4, DIN 4109). The following measures are to be taken to comply with this value: — Sound protection package according to offer/order (Klaus Multiparking GmbH) — Minimum sound insulation of building R'w = 62 dB (to be provided by customer) Note: User noises are noises created by individual users in our Multiparking systems. These can be noises from accessing the platforms, slamming of vehicle doors, motor and brake noises. SingleVario 20611 Code number 584.69.890.0021 Version 09.2009 Page 5 of 5 E ns Page 2 Width M Page 3 Approach Load plan Installation Page 4 Electrical installation Technical data Page 5 , perfor- for- med u_' Safety fences Operating device Any constraints that may be necessary according to DIN EN ISO 13857 in order to provide protection, for pathways directly in front, next to or behind the unit. This is also valid during construction. Numbering of parkingspaces Consecutive numbering of parking spaces. Lighting, ventilation, fire extinguishing and fire alarm systems. According to DIN EN 14 010, a warning that identifies this danger area must be placed in the entrance area that conforms to ISO 3864. This must be done according to EN 92/58/EWG for systems without a pit 10 cm from the edge of the platform. Any necessary wall cuttings according to page 1. Suitable electrical supply to the main switch and the control wire line must be provided by the customer during installation. The functionality can be monitored on site by our fitters together with the electrician. If this cannot be done during installation for some reason forwhich the customer is responsible, the customer must commission an electrician at their own expense and risk. In accordance with DIN EN 60204 (Safety of Machinery. Electrical Equipment), grounding of the steel structure is necessary, provided by the customer (distance between grounding max.10 m). Cable conduits and recesses for operating device (fordouble wing doors: please contact the local agency of Klaus Multiparking). Operating device exposed Operating device concealed 110 above 120 above carriageway carriageway level n level 0 0 0 N rn� Conduit EN25 (M25) T—f f4 If the following are not included in the quotation, they will atso have to be provided / paid for by the customer: — Mounting of contactor and terminal box to the wall valve, complete wiring of all elements in accordance with the circuit diagram — Costs for final technical approval by an authorized body — Main switch — Control line from main switch to hydraulic unit General description Platforms consisting of: Multiparking system providing dependent parking spaces for 2 cars one on top of the other each. The lower vehicle parks directly on the floor plate. The vehicle parked on the bottom must be driven out before lowering the platform. The height of the platform can be adjusted flexibly (even subsequently). Adjustment of maximum load of 2,500 kg can be made subsequently. Dimensions are in accordance with the underlying dimensions of parking pit, height and width The parking bays are accessed horinzotally (installation deviation s 1 9/6). Vehicles are positioned on the upper parking space using wheel stops on the right side (adjust according to operating instructions). Operation via operating device with hold -to -run -device using master keys. The operating elements are usually mounted either in front of the column or on the outside of the door frame Operating instructions are attached to each operator's stand. For garages with doors at the front of the parking system the special dimensional requirements have to be taken into account. — 2 steel pillars with bases that are mounted on the floor (short or long steel pillar bases can be selected optionally). — 2 sliding platforms (mounted to the steel pillars with sliding bearings) — 1 platform — 1 mechanic synchronization control system (to ensure synchronous operation of the hydraulic cylinders while lowering and lifting the platform) — 1 hydraulic cylinder — 1 automatic hydraulic safety valve (prevents accidental lowering of the platform while accessing the platform) — Dowels, screws, connecting elements, bolts, etc. — The platforms and parking spaces are end -to -end accessible for parking! — Platform base sections — Adjustable wheel stops — Canted access plates — Side members — Cross members — Screws, nuts, washers, distance tubes, etc. — Hydraulic cylinder — Solenoid valve — Safety valve — Hydraulic conduits — Screwed joints — High-pressure hoses — Installation material — Operating device (Emergency Stop, lock, 1 master key per parking space) — Terminal box at wall valve — Electrical locking device — Chain control — Hydraulic power unit (low -noise, installed onto a console with a rubber -bonded -to -metal mounting) — Hydraulic oil reservoir — Oil filling — Internal geared wheel pump — Pump holder — Clutch — 3-phase-AC-motor (3.0 kW, 230/400 V, 50 Hz) — Contactor (with thermal overcurrent relay and control fuse) — Test manometer — Pressure reliefvalve — Hydraulic hoses (which reduce noise transmission onto the hydraulic pipe " •� !s�e�, cat!onw-„�>wtu�;:,E ,r The Klaus company reserves the right in the course of technical progress to use newer or other technologies, systems, processes, procedures or standards in the fulfillment of their obligations other than those originally offered provided the customer derives no disadvantage from their so doing. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org CITY OF BURLINGAME VARIANCE APPLICATION Lc d s c a- ,•' The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. a. Describe the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to your property which do not apply to other properties in this area. The project site's narrowness and required guest parking (located at rear yard) limits available space for temporary loading/service vehicle space. b. Explain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right and what unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship might result from the denial of the application. Locating loading/service vehicle space at other location on site would either reduce residents' ability to maneuver vehicles due to narrowness of site or limit the landscape area at rear yard. C. Explain why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety, general welfare or convenience. Loading/service vehicle space would only be used temporarily during day. Language restricting any other uses (guest parking, long-term parking, etc.) at stated hours may be introduced into permit drawings to ensure space is ONLY used for deliveries, moving, etc. d. How will the proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity? Loading/service vehicle space built with porous/permeable pavers would allow landscaping to be similar to adjoining properties by allowing plants to grow in temporary space. Variance would also reduce "hardscaped" and non -porous areas to improve stormwater treatment and aesthetics of project. HandoutsWariance Application.2008 City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.or PNO CITY G 4 4 BV1{u„fr. ME ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (to be completed by applicant when Negative Declaration or Environmental Impact Report is required) Project Address: 1431 El Camino Real Applicant Name: Levy Design Partners Address: 90 South Park City/State/Zip: San Francisco / CA / 94107 Phone: Brian Yang: 415-777-0561 Assessor's Parcel Number: 026-013-110 Property Owner Name: GGH Investment LLC Address: 110 Robler Ave City/State/Zip: Hillsborough / CA / 94010 Phone: Grace Li: 510-857-4567 Permit applications required for this project (special permit, variance, subdivision map, parcel map, condominium permit, building permit, etc.): Two variances submitted (service vehicle in landscaped front yard & vehicle lifts), boundary / topo survey, subdivision map, condo & buildinq permit. Related permits, applications and approvals required for this project by City, Regional, State and Federal Agencies: Caltrans Encroachment Permit, Bay Area Air Quality Management District Demolition Permit SITE INFORMATION Site size: +/- 0.177 total Acres and +/- 7,722 total Square Feet Existing Zoning: R-3 Existing use(s) of property: Four Apartment Units Total Number of Existing Parking Spaces1:10 (5 covered) Number of Compact Spaces': n/a Number of Existing Structures and Total Square Footage of Each: 4,102 sf Will any structures be demolished for this project? X Yes No Size and use of structures to be demolished: 4 unit residential apartment building with detached 5-car garage. Number and size of existing trees on site 2: None Will any of the existing tress be removed? Yes X No If Yes, list number, size and type of trees to be removed: n/a Are there any natural or man-made water channels which nin through or adjacent to the site? Yes X No If Yes, where? n/a 1 City of Burlingame minimum standard parking space size is 9'x20'. The minimum size for compact parking spaces is 8'xl7'. Refer to City of Burlingame Zoning Ordinance C.S. 25.70 for parking requirements for particular uses. 2 Refer to the City of Burlingame's Urban Reforestation and Tree Protection Ordinance (C.S. 11.06) for tree removal permit and tree planting requirements. ICI.\i/7.Ail'JN�I City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.or¢ Describe in general the existing surrounding land uses to the: North Multi -family residential South Multi -family residential East Multi -family residential West Multi -family residential PROPOSED PROJECT Project Description: New construction of (6) 3-story townhouse units. Each unit to be 2- bedrooms over private 2-car garage. Residential Projects: Number of Dwelling Units: six Size of Unit(s): 1,083 sf - 1,190 sf (average unit size of 1,114 sf) Household size (number of persons per unit) expected: 2.2 persons / unit Commercial/Industrial Projects: Type and square footage of each use: n/a Estimated number of employees per shift: n/a Will the project involve the use, disposal or emission of potentially hazardous materials (including petroleum products)? n/a Yes n/a No If Yes, please describe: n/a Institutional Projects (public facilities, hospitals, schools): Major function of facility: n/a Estimated number of employees per shift: n/a Estimated Occupancy: n/a For all Projects: Flood Hazard: Is this site within a special flood hazard area? Yes X No Land Use: If the project involves a conditional use permit, variance or rezoning application, please explain why the applications are required3: Variance for vehicle lifts needed to provide 2 car spaces/unit. Variance for service vehicle space in landscaped front yard needed to get all required services into site's tight constraints (common open space, (2) guest parking spaces, trash enclosure, etc.). 3 Please fill out and submit the appropriate application form 9variance special permit, etc.) City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.ore Building gross square footage: Existing: 4,102 sf Number of floors of construction: Existing: two Proposed: 9,325 sf Proposed: three Traffic/Circulation: Standard and compact off-street parking spaces provided: Existing Standard 5 Compact Total 5 Proposed: Standard 12 Compact Total 12 Grading: Amount of dirt/fill material being moved (check one): X 0-500 cubic yards 5,000-20,000 cubic yards 500-5,000 cubic yards Over 20,000 cubic yards(indicate amount) Note: If fill is being placed over existing bay fill, provide engineering reports which show the effect of the new fill on the underlying bay mud. Storm water runoff: Indicate area of site to be covered with impervious surfaces (parking lot paving, etc.): +/- 6,568 sf of impervious (building roof, driveway, pathways, trash enclosure) Is the area with impervious surfaces less than 200 feet away from a wetland, stream, lagoon or bay? Yes X No Noise: Describe noise sources and timing of activity generated by your project during construction: Vehicles,_ equipment, and general construction activity. All construction activity to be limited to working hours of BMC 13.04.100. Noise sources generated during operation of facility: General loading / unloading of vehicles, movement of light construction equipment and vehicles. Vibration: Will the proposal cause vibration that may affect adjacent properties? Describe any potential sources of vibration: _Project should not create any more vibration than typical construction. Exterior Lighting: Please describe any proposed exterior lighting of the facility4: Wall sconces at unit entries and possibly some soft lighting at front yard landscaping, mail area, and rear yard trash enclosure. Water: Expected amount of water usage: Domestic 792 gal/day Peak use 52 gal/min Commercial n/a gal/day Peak use n/a gal/min Expected fire flow demand TBD by fire protection gal/min consultant As per the C.3 regulations set forth by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, please respond to the following questions: 1. Would the proposed project result in an increase in pollutant discharges to receiving waters? 4 Refer to City of Burlingame Exterior Illumination Ordinance (No. 1477) regarding requirements which limit exterior illumination in both residential and commercial zones. City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlinitame.org 2. Would the proposed project result in significant alteration of receiving water quality during or following construction? Water usage should be similar to current levels or a small increase due to additional 2 units over existing 4 units. 3. Would the proposed project result in increased impervious surfaces and associated increased runoff? No - current building and paving covers more area with impervious surfaces than Proposed project. 4. Would the proposed project create a significant adverse environmental impact to drainage patterns due to changes in runoff flow rates volumes? No - Proposed project will provide more pervious surfaces and landscaping to improve environmental impact compared to existing site. 5. Would the proposed project result in increased erosion in its watershed? No 6. Is the project tributary to an already impaired water body, as listed on the Clean Water Action Section 303(d) list? If so will it result in an increase in any pollutant for which the water body is already impaired? No 7. Would the proposed project have a potential significant environmental impact on surface water quality, to marine, fresh, or wetland waters? No 8. Would the proposed project have a potentially significant adverse impact on ground water quality? No 9. Will the proposed project cause or contribute to an exceedance of applicable surface or groundwater receiving water quality objectives or degradation of beneficial uses? No - Proposed project will provide more pervious surfaces and landscaping to improve environmental impact compared to existing site 10. Will the project impact aquatic, wetland, or riparian habitat? No Sewer: Expected daily sewer discharge 753 GPD Source of wastewater discharge on site (i.e. restrooms, restaurants, laboratory, material processing, etc.) City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.ore General: Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Provide attachment to explain nature of all items checked `yes'. Yes No Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, or hills, or X substantial alteration of ground contours. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. X Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project. X Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. X Change in dust, ash, smoke Rimes or odors in vicinity. X Change in bay, lagoon, stream, channel or groundwater quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. X Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity (during construction and/or during operation). X Site on filled land or on slope of 10 % or more. X Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable materials or explosives. X Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fine water, sewage) Substantial increase in fossil fuel consumption (oil, natural gas, etc.). Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the statements finnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data acid information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. _.L_ Date 03/14/2017 Signature X X X Project Address Description: From: Project Comments - Planning Application 1431 El Camino Real, zoned R-3, APN: 026-013-110 Request for Environmental Scoping (?), Condominium Permit, and Design Review for 6 new townhome units. Rick Caro III Building Division Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: 1) RESIDENTIAL: Rooms that could be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Rooms that could be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. On the elevation drawings specify the location and the net clear opening height and width of all required egress windows. 2013 California Building Code (CBC) 1029.2 and 2013 California Residential Code (CRC) §R310. The response did not include what the actual dimension of the egress windows are in order to determine that the minimum 5.7 square feet would be met. Note: That if you use the minimum dimension width of 20 inches for the egress window, than you would need a minimum of a 42" net opening height. 17) Specify on the plan that all powder rooms shall comply with Section 1134A.2; Option 2, Items 8 through 12. The response to question # 17 stating that unit #7 will comply with the requirements for the accessible route to the primary entry with one powder room on the primary level does not state how the powder room will be designed to comply with 1134A.2; Option 2, Items 8 through 12. 18) Specify on the plans that all dwelling unit interior doors will comply with CBC 1132A5.2. The response that Unit #7 will comply with the requirements for the accessible route to the primary unit entry, does not address the strike edge maneuvering space at the door. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. 19) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. NOTE: A condition of this project approval is that the Demolition Permit will not be issued and, and no work can begin (including the removal of any building components), until a Building Permit has been issued for the project. The property owner is responsible for assuring that no work is authorized or performed. 20) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 21) Include with your Building Division plan check submittal a complete underground fire sprinkler plan. Contact the Burlingame Water Division at 650-558-7660 for details regarding the water system or Central County Fire for sprinkler details. 22) Sewer connection fees must be paid prior to issuing the building permit. 23) A pre -construction meeting must be conducted prior to issuing the permit. After you are notified by the Building Division that your plans have been approved call 650-558-7270 to schedule the pre -construction meeting. Reviewed By: Rick Caro 111 Date: February 27, 2017 (650) 558-7270 Project Address Description: From Project Comments — Planning Application 1431 El Camino Real, zoned R-3, APN: 026-013-110 Request for Environmental Scoping (?), Condominium Permit, and Design Review for 6 new townhome units. Rick Caro III Building Division Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: 1) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2013 California Building Code, 2013 California Residential Code (where applicable), 2013 California Mechanical Code, 2013 California Electrical Code, and 2013 California Plumbing Code, including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1889. Note: If the Planning Commission has not approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2016 then this project must comply with the 2016 California Building Codes. 2) Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2013 California Energy Efficiency Standards. 3) Place the following information on the first page of the plans: "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 8:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: No work is allowed (See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.) Construction hours in the City Public right-of-way are limited to weekdays and non -City Holidays between 8:00 a.m. and 5: 00 p.m. Note: Construction hours for work in the public right of way must now be included on the plans. 4) On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrated on the Job Copy of the plans prior to performing the work. 5) Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of Occupancy will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued after the project has been final. No occupancy of the building is to occur until a new Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. 6) On the plans show that all openings in exterior walls, both protected and unprotected, will comply with 2013 CBC, Table 705.8. Provide a table or chart that specifies 1) the openings allowed and; 2) the size and percentage of the openings proposed. 7) RESIDENTIAL: Rooms that could be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Rooms that could be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. On the elevation drawings specify the location and the net clear opening height and width of all required egress windows. 2013 California Building Code (CBC) 1029.2 and 2013 California Residential Code (CRC) §R310. 8) Indicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 9) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 2013 CBC § 1009. 10) Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 11) Prior to applying for a Building Permit the applicant must either confirm that the address is or obtain a change of address from the Engineering Department. Note: The correct address must be referenced on all pages of the plans. 12) On the first page of the plans state the Access Regulations that you are using to gain full access compliance. There are five access regulations that may apply to a multi -family residential project in California: a. The Architectural Barriers Act of 1969 (ABA) b. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 c. The Fair Housing Act (FHA) d. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) e. The California Building Code (CBC), Chapters I IA and 1113. 13) On the first page of the plans clearly state whether ANY public money, of any kind, will or will not be used to construct this project. 14) On the first page of the plans clearly state if an application for ANY tax credits have or will be submitted for tax rebates. NOTE: See the 2015 California Code of Regulations, Title IV, § 10325 (f)7 (K). In part: "All tax credit recipient projects shall adhere to the provisions of California Building Code I I (B) regarding accessibility to privately owned housing made available for public use." t 5) On the first page of the plans clearly state that all paths of travel and common use spaces will be accessible and all living units will be adaptable. 16) Provide details which show that the water closet in each unit complies with CBC 1134A.7 41. 17) Specify on the plan that all powder rooms shall comply with Section 1134A.2; Option 2, Items 8 through 12. 18) Specify on the plans that all dwelling unit interior doors will comply with CBC 1132A5.2. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. 19) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. NOTE: A condition of this project approval is that the Demolition Permit will not be issued and, and no work can begin (including the removal of any building components), until a Building Permit has been issued for the project. The property owner is responsible for assuring that no work is authorized or performed. 20) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 21) Include with your Building Division plan check submittal a complete underground fire sprinkler plan. Contact the Burlingame Water Division at 650-558-7660 for details regarding the water system or Central County Fire for sprinkler details. 22) Sewer connection fees must be paid prior to issuing the building permit. 23) A pre -construction meeting must be conducted prior to issuing the permit. After you are notified by the Building Division that your plans have been approved call 650-558-7270 to schedule the pre -construction meeting. Reviewed By: Rick Caro III Date: October 3, 2016 (650) 558-7270 BURLINGAME Project Address: 1431 El Camino Real, zoned R-3, APN: 026-013-110 Description: Request for Environmental Scoping (?), Condominium Permit, and Design Review for 6 new townhome units. From: Bob Disco Parks Division Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised pl7sith your resubmittal: .nclude existing Accolade elm trees in planter strip on landscape plans. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. 2. Irrigation plan required for Building Permit. Include irrigation to existing street trees. Reviewed By: BD Date: 10/5/16 650.558.7333 Project Address Description: From: Project Comments - Planning Application 1431 El Camino Real, zoned R-3, APN: 026-013-110 Request for Environmental Scoping (?), Condominium Permit, and Design Review for 6 new townhome units. Martin Quan Public Works Engineering Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: Mawr. V- • 2. No comments at this time. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. 2. Insert the 'Best Management Practices', updated June 2014, construction sheet into the plans set. A copy can be found at httD://www.flowstobay.orR/sites/default/files/Countvwide%20Program%20BMP%20PIan%20Sheet- June%202014%20Update.pdf#overlay-context=brochures or http://www.flowstobay.org/brochures then click "construction bmp plan sheet" 3. Based on the scope of work, this is a "Type II" project that requires a Stormwater Construction Pollution Prevention Permit. This permit is required prior to issuance of a Building Permit. An initial field inspection is required prior to the start of any construction (on private property or in the public right-of-way). Reviewed By: Martin Quan Date: 2/24/17 650-558-7245 Project Address Description: From Project Comments - Planning Application 1431 El Camino Real, zoned R-3, APN: 026-013-110 Request for Environmental Scoping (?), Condominium Permit, and Design Review for 6 new townhome units. Martin Quan Public Works Engineering Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: 1. A remove/replace utilities encroachment permit is required to (1) replace all curb, gutter, driveway and sidewalk fronting site, (2) plug all existing sanitary sewer lateral connections and install a new 4" lateral, (3) all water line connections to city water mains for services or fire line are to be installed per city standard procedures and specification, (4) any other underground utility works within city's right-of-way. Please show on plans. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. 2. Insert the 'Best Management Practices', updated June 2014, construction sheet into the plans set. A copy can be found at http://www.flowstobay.org/sites/default/files/Countywide%20Program%20BMP/o20PIan%20Sheet- June%202014/o20Update.pdf#overlay-context=brochures or htttp://www.flowstobay.org/brochures then click "construction bmp plan sheet" 3. Based on the scope of work, this is a "Type II" project that requires a Stormwater Construction Pollution Prevention Permit. This permit is required prior to issuance of a Building Permit. An initial field inspection is required prior to the start of any construction (on private property or in the public right-of-way). Reviewed By: Martin Quan Date: 10/7/16 650-558-7245 CITY i Project Comments - Planning Application Project Address: 1431 El Camino Real, zoned R-3, APN: 026-013-110 Description: Request for Environmental Scoping (?), Condominium Permit, and Design Review for 6 new townhome units. From: Christine Reed Fire Dept. Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal: 1. The building shall be equipped with an approved NFPA 13R sprinkler system throughout. Sprinkler drawings shall be submitted and approved by the Central County Fire Department prior to installation. The system shall be electronically monitored by an approved central receiving station, under a separate fire alarm permit. 2. The fire sprinkler system's fire department connection shall be located within 5 feet of the sidewalk and not within city right-of-way. 3. The applicant shall ensure proper drainage in accordance with the City of Burlingame Engineering Standards is available for the fire sprinkler main drain and inspector test on the building plumbing drawings. These items may drain directly to landscape or in the sewer with an air gap. 4. The fire protection underground shall be submitted and approved by the Burlingame Building Department prior to installation. The fire sprinkler system and fire standpipe system will not be approved by the Central County Fire Department until the fire protection underground has been submitted and approved by the Burlingame Building Department. 5. Electronic vehicular gate shall have a Knox key switch for emergency Fire Dept. access. The front of the building shall have a Knox key box for emergency Fire Dept. access through pedestrian gates and into other common areas of the building (if any). Reviewed By: Christine Reed Date: 10-12-16 650-558-7617 Project Address Description: From: Project Comments - Planning Application 1431 El Camino Real, zoned R-3, APN: 026-013-110 Request for Environmental Scoping (?), Condominium Permit, and Design Review for 6 new townhome units. Carolyn Critz Stormwater Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: Project proponent completed, signed and submitted the Small Projects Checklist, which shows the project is a Small Project. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. 1. Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the city's stormwater NPDES permit to prevent construction activity stormwater pollution. Project proponents shall ensure that all contractors implement appropriate and effective Best Management Practices (BMPs) during all phases of construction, including demolition. When submitting plans for a building permit, please include a list of construction BMPs as project notes, preferably, on a separate full size (2'x 3' or larger), plan sheet. A downloadable electronic file is available at: http://www.flowstobay.org/Construction 2. Label all pervious and impervious surfaces and site design measures for stormwater. For further assistance regarding stormwater, please contact Carolyn Critz, Environmental Compliance Manager, at (650) 342 3727, ext. 118, or carolyn.critz(a�.veolia.com Reviewed By: Carolyn Critz Date: November 14, 2016 (650) 342 3727, ext. 118 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FROM APPENDIX G OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES AESTHETICS. Would the project: ❑ Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ❑ Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? ❑ Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? ❑ Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: o Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? ❑ Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? ❑ Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: ❑ Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? ❑ Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? ❑ Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? ❑ Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? ❑ Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: ❑ Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? ❑ Have a substantial or adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? ❑ Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? ❑ Interfere substantially with the movement of any native or resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? ❑ Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? ❑ Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: ❑ Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource as defined in '15064.5? ❑ Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to ' 15064.5? ❑ Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geological feature? o Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Environmental Checklist from Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: ❑ Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: a) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. b) Strong seismic ground shaking? c) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? d) Landslides? ❑ Result in substantial soil erosion or loss of topsoil? ❑ Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? ❑ Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (2001), creating substantial risks to life or property? ❑ Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ❑ Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? ❑ Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: ❑ Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? ❑ Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? ❑ Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? ❑ Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? ❑ For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? ❑ For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? ❑ Impair implementation of, or physically interfere with, an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ❑ Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: ❑ Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? ❑ Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? o Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? -2- Environmental Checklist from Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines ❑ Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? ❑ Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? ❑ Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ❑ Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? ❑ Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? ❑ Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? ❑ Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: ❑ Physically divide an established community? ❑ Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? ❑ Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: ❑ Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? ❑ 2b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? NOISE. Would the project result in: ❑ Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? ❑ Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? ❑ A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? ❑ A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? ❑ For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? o For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: ❑ Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? o Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? ❑ Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? -3- Environmental Checklist from Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project: ❑ Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? c) Schools? d) Parks? e) Other public facilities? RECREATION. ❑ Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? ❑ Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: ❑ Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? ❑ Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? ❑ Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? ❑ Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? ❑ Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ Result in inadequate parking capacity? ❑ Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: ❑ Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? ❑ Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? ❑ Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? ❑ Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? ❑ Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? ❑ Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? ❑ Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. ❑ Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? -4- Environmental Checklist from Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines ❑ Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? ❑ Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? -5- CITY OF BURLINGAME COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org Site: 1431 EL CAMINO REAL PUBLIC HEARING The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the NOTICE following public hearing on MONDAY, MARCH 27, 2017 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA:` Application for Environmental Review, Condominium Permit, Design Review, Parking Variance for the use of mechanical parking lifts, and Front Landscape Variance for a new 3-story, 6- unit condominium building at 1431 EL CAMINO REAL zoned R-3. APN 026-013-110 Mailed: March 17, 2017 (Please refer to other side) Citv of Burlin_aame A copy of the application` and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to other side) T) Cb 9�0 G6 RO 79S tl T 700 T? T `u Ol ^ •P h�'L "' ► GP P 3 3 . vo 7 05d„ O T'r v 16,o rp ov h i`M1 w4b� o� ti ^ � ,y , h"I N to, or 03 7,1 40 A- �9A� ^ T� '� ^s .° °� e T T s r �tK � h Sf a lb, Yroo n �(l ^DL ¢E ��0 �! T ¢ z ti OFFICE OF ASSESSOR -COUNTY CLERK - RECORDER & ELECTIONS COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Date: May 21 2018 To: City of Burlingame Community Development Dept - Planning Division 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 MARK CHURCH ASSESSOR -COUNTY CLERK- RF,CORDF,R & CHIEF SUCTIONS OFFICER Final Posting Confirmation for Environmental Impact Reports Subject: Return of Environmental Documents Filed and Posted for 30 days. Public Resources Code Section 21092.3 By: The attached document(s), File Number 127089 was received, filed and a copy posted with the County Clerk on Feb 16 2018 and remained posted for thirty calendar days. Besz De La Vega Deputy Clerk on behalf of Mark Church SS-12 Posting Confirmation Letter for Environmental Impact Reports 555 County Center, Redwood City, CA 94063 P 650.363.4500 F 650.599.7458 email countyclerk@smcacre.org web www.smcacre.org State of California - Department of Fish and Wildlife 2018 ENVIRONMENTAL FILING FEE CASH RECEIPT DFW 753.5a (Rev. 01/03/18) Previously DFG 753.5a Print SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE. TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY. I Finalize&Email i I RECEIPT NUMBER: 02162018 —' ATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER (If applicable) LEAD AGENCY LEADAGENCY EMAIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME 02162018 COUNTY/STATE AGENCY OF FILING DOCUMENT NUMBER CDFW 1 2--t'01?19 PROJECT TITLE 1431 EL CAMINO REAL - NEW THREE STORY, SIX UNIT CONDOMINIUM BUILDING PROJECT APPLICANT NAME PROJECT APPLICANT EMAIL PHONE NUMBER WILIAM MEEKER ) PROJECT APPLICANT ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE PROJECT APPLICANT (Check appropriate box) 0 Local Public Agency School District Other Special District State Agency Private Entity CHECK APPLICABLE FEES: ❑ Environmental Impact Report (EIR) El Mitigated/Negative Declaration (MND)(ND) ❑ Certified Regulatory Program document (CRP) ❑ Exempt from fee ❑ Notice of Exemption (attach) ❑ CDFW No Effect Determination (attach) ❑ Fee previously paid (attach previously issued cash receipt copy) $3,168.00 $ 0.00 $2,280.75 $ 2,280.75 $1,077.00 $ 0.00 ElWater Right Application or Petition Fee (State Water Resources Control Board only) $850.00 $ 0.00 0 County documentary handling fee $ 50.00 ❑ Other $ PAYMENT METHOD: ❑ Cash ❑ Credit El Check ❑ Other TOTAL RECEIVED $ 2,330.75 SIGNATURE AGENCY OF FILING PRINTED NAME AND TITLE X - DIANA SIRON/COUNTY CLERK ORIGINAL - PROJECT APPLICANT COPY - CDFW/ASB COPY - LEAD AGENCY COPY - COUNTY CLERK DFW 753.5a (Rev. 20151215) NOTICE OF DETERMINATION TO: ® Office of Planning and Research FROM: City of Burlingame P.O Box 3044 Community Development Dept. Sacramento, California 95812-3044 Planning Division 501 Primrose.,Rgad-—, Burlingame, A194 0 fir, ® County Clerk's Office a"` r� (";��' j °� County of San Mateo SA j �j rVi�� 555 County Center Road, First Floor FEB 16 Z018 Redwood City, California 94063-0977 F. IUTARI( ; � '• SUBJECT. Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21152 of the A66ikekesources Code. 1431 El Camino Real - New Three -Story, Six Unit Condominium Building Project Title 2017122013 William Meeker (650) 558-7250 State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Area Code/Telephone (If submitted to Clearinghouse) 1431 El Camino Real, City of Burlingame, San Mateo County Project Location (include County) Project Description: The proposed 1431 El Camino Real project would include demolition of an existing two-story apartment building with a detached five -car garage structure at the rear, and construction of a 3,858-square-foot, six -unit, three-story (35 feet tall) residential building in its place. Each unit would be two bedrooms and 2.5 bathrooms, ranging in size from 1,004 square feet to 1,195 square feet. All entrances to the units would be located on the north -facing (driveway) side of the project site. The application includes a request for a Condominium Permit, Design Review, and Parking Variance for the use of mechanical parking lifts. This is to advise that the City of Burlingame, the Lead Agency, has approved the above -described project on February 12, 2018 and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1. The project [❑will ® will not] have a significant effect on the environment. 2. ❑ An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. ® A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. The EIR or Negative Declaration and record of project approval may be examined at: City of Burlingame, Planning Division, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame CA 94010. 3. Mitigation measures [®were [J were not] made a condition of approval of the project. 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations [❑was ®was not] adopted for this project. 5. Findings (® were ❑ were not) made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. This is to certify that the Negative Declaration with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the General Public at: City of Burlingame, Planning Division, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA 94010. %Z�— February 15, 2018 William Meeker, Community Development Director Date County of San Mateo Assessor -County Clerk -Recorder Mark Church 555 County Center Redwood City, CA, 94063 Finalization 2018009097 2/16/18 2:34 pm 018 96 Item Title 1 Fish & Game: Mitigated Negative Declaration Document ID Amount DOC# 2018-000036 2330.75 Total 2330.75 Payment Type Amount Check tendered 2280.75 # 272 Check tendered 50.00 # 273 Amount Due 0.00 THANK YOU PLEASE RETAIN THIS RECEIPT FOR YOUR RECORDS