Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1315 Edgehill Drive - Staff Report� &'URLIfJGAME � DATE: TO: FROM: CITY OF BURLINGAME Community Development Department MEMORANDUM November 17, 2009 Planning Commission Ruben Hurin, Senior Planner .�.�, . � ', e..... `Y ��, a��Y 3on5 C'iid��iri r� Yi �� �� /ina Director's Report Meeting Date: November 23, 2009 SUBJECT: FYI — CHANGES TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DESIGN REVIEW PROJECT AT 1315 EDGEHILL DRIVE, ZONED R-1. Summary: On September 24, 2007, the Planning Commission approved an application for Design Review and Variances for front setbacks and lot coverage for a second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 1315 Edgehill Drive, Zoned R-1 (September 24, 2007, Planning Commission Minutes). On May 27, 2008, an FYI application for clarification of on-site landscaping was reviewed and accepted by the Planning Commission. Construction is now nearing completion. The approved plans included changing the siding of the existing single-car detached garage, from horizontal wood to cedar shingle, to match the design of the house (see originally approved building elevations of the house, dated September 10, 2007). The existing detached garage is in poor condition. Therefore, the property owner would like to renovate or rebuild the garage in the future when additional funds are available to him. Currently, the property owner is in the process of refinancing his current loan and would like to cash out in order to help pay for rebuilding the garage. However, the property owner notes in his letter dated November 16, 2009, that the refinance and cash out will be completed approximately 90 days after all City divisions approve their final inspections (bank requires that all permits be finaled prior to completing the refinance). Because it would not be sensible to re-side an existing garage that is in poor condition and which may be replaced in the near future, the property owner is requesting that the Planning Commission accept his request to retain the existing horizontal wood siding on the detached garage (see attached letter dated November 16, 2009). Other than the proposed changes described above, there are no other changes proposed to the design of the house. Planning staff would note that because of this minor revision, it was determined that the project could be reviewed by the Planning Commission as an FYI item. If the Commission feels there is a need for more study, this item may be placed on an action calendar for a second review and/or public hearing with direction to the applicant. Ruben Hurin Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Letter from Rafi Chabo, property owner, dated November 16, 2009 September 24, 2007 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Originally Approved and Existing (Proposed) Garage Elevations, dated November 17, 2009 Originally Approved Building Elevations (single family dwelling), dated September 10, 2007 �r� c�r. : Al � �.��� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: ❑ Design Review ❑ Variance ,j%) Parcel #: �Z`� - o i'� - o`�"'a ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit p Other: �1( I PROJECT ADDRESS:' �� f-�( �'/f � G� �,� ���/��,� . �'�- �fIT�',/�f o � Please indicate the contact person for this project APPLICANT project contact person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ Name: �_l�-� 1` C' C//9i3 0 Address: � �5 � � �L, �TI � � � N City/State/Zip: �✓�{,�/n��,�,� �(�/� 9Z/ o l v Phone: �'f � �6 0 ( � �- 9� Fax: E-mail: C1��-L�S �Q �.�.�.�� �-��� /►�f1- Ce�►.'� ARCHITECT/DESIGNER project contact person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ Name: Address: City/State/Zip: Phone: Fax: E-mail: �k Burlingame Business License #: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ Name: � /� �� ��(� fl Address: /����'�/,-h/�� �� R r- City/State/Zip: %��t2 /�,�� ('J9- 9�0 � o Phone: Zf j� � 60 / �9 Fax: E-maiL G��i�13�5 ��rwc( II��_�i ��d% �i� � �0--7� ;-�� � � � : „ �::=. � ,��,:;U 1 '7 Z009 �:;i';'� l;'� i�URLINGAME ��� �..,�Ni��c� n�PT. AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Applicant's signature: Date: �l � ( �� `p 9 I am aware of the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. ` Property owner's signature: Date: /l �/(� ��� Date submitted: ��� l�' G 9 * Verification that the project architect/designer has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the Finance Department at the time application fees are paid. ❑ Please mark one box above with an X to indicate the contact person for this project. s:�H,aN�ours�PcaPp�ication zoos.handoutdoc This Space for CDD Staff Use Only Project Description: Key� CUP Conditional Use Permit DHE Declinin Hei ht Envelo DSR Desi n Review E Existin N New SFD Sin le Famil Dwellin SP Special Permit Planning Department Burlingame City Hall Burlingame, CA Rafi Chabo 1315 Edgehill Drive Burlingame, CA 94010 a r .. �..�- . _ _� . .�. ,� 16 November 2009 Dear Planning Commission, `� Z009 _;�Lir�c���� . �.-���. I am writing this letter to request sign off on the final on my permit for my residence located at 1315 Edgehill Drive. This final sign off is the last one outstanding on my total home remodel that began several months ago. In order for me to begin the garage remodel, I need to complete the refinancing of my house. My intention is to remodel the garage early ne� year soon after I receive the cash out from the bank which will take approximately 90 days from the time all permits are clear. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. If there are any additional questions, please do contact me at 415-260-1429. Sincerely, Rafi Chabo City of Burlingame Planning Commission Approved Minutes September 24, 2007 VII. ACTION ITEMS Consent Calendar - Items on the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted upon simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant, a member of the public or a Commissioner prior to fhe time the Commission votes on the motion to adopt. Chair Deal asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the consent calendar. There were no requests. 1a. 412 BAYSWATER AVENUE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR FRONT SETBACK AND LOT COVERAGE VARIANCES FOR REPLACEMENT OF AN EXISTING FRONT PORCH ON A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (GEURSE CONCEPTUAL DESIGNS, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; AND BOB GLYNN, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER 1 b. 1100 HAMILTON LANE, ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR SIDE SETBACK, REAR SETBACK AND LOT COVERAGE VARIANCES FOR A FIRST FLOOR ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (LISA WINSTON AND PHIL KENNEDY, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; AND DANIEL RHOADS, YOUNG AND BORLIK ARCHITECTS INC., ARCHITECT) PROJECT PLANNER: LISA WHITMAN —�J► 1 c. 1315 EDGEHILL DRIVE, ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, FRONT SETBACK AND LOT COVERAGE VARIANCES FOR A SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (RAFI AND AIDA CHABO, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; AND FRED STRATHDEE, ARCHITECT) PROJECT PLANNER: LISA WHITMAN 1d. 50 CALIFORNIA DRIVE, ZONED C-2, SUBAREA D OF THE BURLINGAME AVENUE COMMERCIAL AREA — APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR A REMODEL OF AN EXISTING AUTO DEALERSHIP (DOUG ROBERTSON, APPLICANT; KENT PUTNAM, PROPERTY OWNER• AND PROTO INC. ARCHITECT) PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER Chair Deal indicated that he would recuse himself from voting on Item 1d due to a conflict of interest. Commissioner Vistica moved approval of the Consent Calendar Items 1 a through 1c, based on the facts in the staff reports, Commissioner's comments and the findings in the staff reports with recommended conditions in the staff reports and by resolution. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Cauchi. Chair Deal called for a voice vote on the motion and it passed 7-0. Appeal procedures were advised. Commissioner Osterling clarified that on item 1 c he had requested larger scale plant materials, rather than larger container size; revised landscape plan shall be brought back to Commission as an FYI after changes are made. Chair Deal recused himself and left the dais. Vice-Chair Cauchi assumed chairing the Commission. Commissioner Brownrigg moved approval of the Consent Calendar Item 1 d, based on the facts in the staff reports, Commissioner's comments and the findings in the staffreports with recommended conditions in the staff reports and by resolution. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Terrones. Vice-Chair Cauchi called for a voice vote on the motion and it passed 6-0-1 (Chair Deal recused). Appeal procedures were advised. Chair Deal returned to the dais. 2