The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1199 Broadway - Resolution� � , w RECORDING REQUESTED BY: Planning Department City of Burlingame WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 2005-219945 '� 1:07am 12I16/OS R1 Fee: NO FEE Count of pages 4 Recorded in Official Records Cc�unty of San Mateo Warren Slocum Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder 'I ',�� '�I� �'� I,�I�I� i I!II I I� IIj I'; ��' I IIII I I�I I I�I �I � I' iI r,y IuI �!i� !�i I �� ;II 1 �I I � i. tlllil i � �� ':I� li.� �:� � � , � � , i �� i. I I i�I l �l �� i �� I �?��50%�9S4�AR� RESOLUTION NO. 113-2005 1199 BROADWAY; APN: 026-192-220 TITLE OF DOCUMENT I hereby certify this to be a full, true and correct copy of the document it purports to be, the original of which is on file in my office. Date: 12/12/2005 Mar aret Monroe, Cit Planner � . ' ' RESOLUTION 113-2005 RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PARHING VARIANCE RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for conditional use permit and parking variance for a real estate and travel office at _1199 Broadwav, zoned C-1, Broadway Commercial Area, Garbis and Maida Bezdjian, Trs, property owners APN: 026-192-220; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on November 28. 2005, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section: 15301 - Existing facilities, Class 1(a), interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances, is hereby approved. 2. Said conditional use permit and parking variance aze approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such conditional use permit and parking variance are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, t��'1�-e�— �2�x��, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of _ November, 2005 by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Auran, Brownrigg, Cauchi, Keighran, Osterling, Vistica NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Deal t��tc�c�i Secretary �, EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for categorical exemption, conditional use permit and parking variance. 1199 Broadway Effective Decem6er 8, 2005 1. that the real estate and travel office shall be limited to 1,419 SF at 1199 Broadway, Suite 5, with a maximum of eight desks and no conference room combined for both activities, as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped October 3 and October 31, 2005 (8%2' x 11" sheets); 2. that the real estate and travel office may not be open for business except during the hours of 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday and 10 a.m. to 3 p.m., on Saturday and Sunday, with occasional appoinhnents after business hours and on weekends; 3. that there shall be a maximum of 10 persons on site for the combined activities at any one time including the owners, employees and customers; 4. that the 1,419 SF real estate and travel office shall have a maximum of 10 employees/real estate agents/travel agents (with a maximum of 10 persons on-site at any one time); 5. that the real estate and travel office shall not expand into another tenant space within the existing building without an amendment to this use permit; 6. that the parking variance shall only apply to this 1,419 SF tenant space and the real estate and travel office use shall become void if the tenant space is ever expanded, demolished or destroyed by catastrophe or natural disaster or for replacement; 7. that any changes in operation, floor area, use, or number of employees, which exceeds the maximums as stated in these conditions shall require an amendment to this use permit; 8. that , all signage shall require a separate permit from the Planning and Building Departments; 9. that the conditions of the Recycling Specialist's October 12, 2005, memo shall be met; 10. that any improvements for the use shall meet all California Building and Fire Codes, 2001 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; and 11. that this permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission upon complaint. ,' '� � . , Date: To: From: Subject: Project Comments 10/03/2005 ❑ City Engineer ❑ Chief Buiiding Official ❑ City Arborist O City Attorney Planning Staff X Recycling Specialist ❑ Fire Marshal O NPDES Coordinator Request for conditional use permit for real estate and travel office at 1199 Broadway , zoned C-1, APN: 026-192-220 Staff Review: 10/11/2005 Applicant shall submit a Recycling and Waste Reduction Plan for approval, and pay a recycling deposit for this and all covered projects prior to construction or permitting. Reviewed by: , Date: / �z� J � City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes November 28, 2005 1D. 1199 BROADWAY, SUITE 5, ZONED C-1, BROADWAY COMMERCIAL AREA—APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PARKIl�TG VARIANCE FOR REAL ESTATE AND TRAVEL OFFICE (GARBIS BEZDJIAN, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER) (61 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIl�T Chair Auran asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the consent calendar. There were no requests. Cers. Keighran and Brownrigg abstained from voting on 1532 Columbus because they live within 500 feet of the project. C. Deal abstained on 1199 Broadway because he lives within 500 feet of the project. C. Cauchi moved approval of the consent calendar based on the facts in the staff reports, commissioners' comments and the findings in the staff reports with recommended conditions in each staff report and by resolution. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion and the Planning Commission 2006 Calendar and 1841 El Camino Real which passed on a 7-0 voice vote. The proj ect at 1532 Columbus Avenue passed on a 5-0-2 ( Cers. Keighran and Brownrigg abstaining) voice vote; and the project at 1199 Broadway passed on a 6-0-1 (C. Deal abstaining) voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:10 p.m. VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEM 2. 21 CLARENDON ROAD, ZONED R-1— APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (SCOTT KUEHNE, SUAREZ- KUEHNE ARCHITECTURE, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; AND TODD FRIEDMAN & MICHELE DOYLE FREEDMAN, PROPERTY OWNERS�(60 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN Reference staff report November 28, 2005, with attachments. ZT Strohmeier presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Ten conditions were suggested for consideration. There were no questions from the Commission. Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Todd Freidman, property owner, represented the project, stating that the entire roof and all of the existing windows will be replaced; it was hard to come up with one window style, so the front of the house was treated as a separate design element; documents were submitted to Commission to provide further explanation and illustration; does Commission want the existing Mayten tree to be taken out? Commission responded that they are not going to require an existing tree to be removed, however, applicant should be aware that it has the possibility to become invasive. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. C. Osterling moved to approve the application for design review, by resolution, with the following conditions: 1) that the proj ect shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped November 16, 2005, sheets A1-A7, and that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit; 2) that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 3) that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the �