The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1199 Broadway - Staff Report—v e ^• a } � �� • \ �'/ ,, �7! P.C. 6/13/88 Item #8 MEMO TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PLANNING COMMISSION PLANNER MASTER SIGNAGE PROGRAM FOR THE COMMERCIAL BUILDING AT 1199 BROADWAY, ZONED C-1 David Kimmel, leasing agent representing Garbis Bezdjian, property owner, is requesting a sign exception for a uniform master signage program for the commercial building at 1199 Broadway, zoned C-1. All master sign permits require Planning Commission approval (Code Sec. 22.06.070). Under the proposed master signage program each tenant space would be allowed one identification sign totaling 9 SF except the corner shop which would have two signs, one on the Broadway frontage and one on the Laguna frontage. A 24 SF building identification sign would be placed on the building at the corner of Broadway and Laguna Avenue. None of the proposed signs would be lit. A total of seven signs are proposed for the Broadway frontage (six tenant signs plus one building identification sign) totaling 7$ SF, and one 9 SF tenant sign for the Laguna frontage. Under the present code, as a one tenant space the building would be allowed 165 SF of signage in three signs on Broadway and 50 SF of signage in three signs on Laguna, compared to the 78 SF in seven signs on Broadway and the 9 SF in one sign on Laguna proposed in the master signage program. The Broadway frontage with six tenants as at present could have as many as 18 signs totaling 300 SF, with an additional three signs totaling 50 SF on the secondary frontage of Laguna Avenue. Thus the program as proposed is within the allowed signage limits of the present code. Existing signage on the site has evolved over the years without the benefit of sign permits and has been the issue of numerous code enforcement attempts. The proposed master signage program is intended to achieve a uniform and cohesive signage program for this site. Staff Review City staff have reviewed the proposal. The Fire Marshal (May 4, 1988 memo), the City Engineer (May 2, 1988 memo) and the Chief Building znspector (May 6, 1988 memo) had no comments. Planning staff would note that included in your packet is a letter from The Kimmel Company to the tenants of 1199 Broadway (March 24, 1988) which asks the tenants to choose between having a master signage program or window signs. On April 7, 1988 the tenants responded by choosing the master signage program for tenant identification signs and no window signage. On April 18, 1988 the ' y •1 � 2 tenants sent a subsequent letter to The Kimmel Company outlining their requirements for signage which included approval by the city of a master signage program as well as window signage. Window signs are permitted as a part of permitted signage in the sign code as long as they don't cover more than 50� of a window area or exceed the permitted signage square footage for a site. Property owner consent is required for any sign permit application. Since the property owner is choosing not to include any window signs as a part of the master signage program, window signs are not included in this proposed master signage program. The only way permanent window signs could be permitted in the future would be through an amendment to the proposed master signage program. Apvlicant's Comments In the sign exception the applicant notes that 1199 Broadway is a single building with a number of tenants and the sign code does not adequately address signage for such a building. Study Ouestions At study on May 23, 1988 the Planning Commission asked a number of questions (Planning Commission Minutes, May 23, 1988). Review of the previous requests for signage on this site was primary among the Commission�s questions. An application for a master signage program for 1199 Broadway was originally filed on August 15, 1986. The signage proposed at that time was the same as currently being reviewed. This application was withdrawn at the request of Mr. Kimmel, the leasing agent, in order for him to come to agreement with the property owner regarding appropriate signage for the site. On September 17, 1987 a new application was filed which, in addition to the tenant identification and building identification signs, also proposed between 20 SF and 34 SF of window signage for each tenant space. This application was withdrawn by the property owner who did not approve of the proposed window signage. On April 20, 1988 a letter was received from the leasing agent�s office requesting that the September 17, 1987 master signage application be reactivated. Property owner consent was obtained for this application with the specification that no window signage be added without the property owner�s consent (Garbis Bezdjian response dated April 18, 1988 to Terry Thornhill�s letter dated April 14, 1988). The application being processed, if approved, would allow no window signs without amendment to the master signage permit. Tenants will be allowed only that signage specified by the master sign program. The property owner and his authorized representatives will be required tv inform tenants of the permitted signage. They will be ultimately responsible for implementation and adherence to the adopted signage requirements. Because sign •- --- � �' , - , . 3 code enforcement has been a problem on this site over the past several years it should be required that the leasing agent and property owner see that all existing signage is removed from the site and signage consistent with the master signage program installed within a fixed period of time. The proposed tenant signs will be made of plywood and painted with enamel. The signs will hang from two metal extension pipes which will be bolted to the metal trim around the building. Findincrs for a Sian Exception . In order to grant a sign exception the Commission must find that the following circumstances apply to the property (Code Sec. 22.06.110): (a) any exception granted shall be subject to such conditions as will assure that the adjustment thereby authorized shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and district in which the subject property is situate; and (b) because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, topography, street frontage, location or surrounding land use; the size or height of the building on which the sign is to be located; the classification of the street or highway on which the sign is loca�ed or designed primarily to be viewed from, the strict application of zoning regulations is found to deprive subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. Planning Commission Action The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action should be taken by resolution. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 1. that the signs shall be installed as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped April 15, 1987 and as individually described in the sign permit application dated September 17, 1987 and that no window signs shall be allowed; 2. that the property owner and his authorized representatives shall be responsible for informing the tenants of the permitted signage under the master signage program and ensuring that the sign program is implemented within 30 days of receiving a master signage permit; 4 3. that any changes to window signs, shall program; and the signage, including the addition of require amendment to the master signage 4. that the signage requirements of this master signage program shall be amended to each tenant�s lease agreement and shall be enforced by the landowner as a part of the tenant�s lease. V Margar Monroe City Planner ��'YI�G'L �t2��L�C9',�= , Adriana Garefalos ^ Planner AG/MM/s CC: David Kimmel, The Kimmel Company Garbis Bezdjian (property owner) _ � `� . ��g ��:� ��P �. "� 19� r C1Tv f�F f?uyt_�r;r;n.+,F,: ,-. 'n".,.::� r�,•� •. SIGN PERMIT Datefiled q—a7—�7 Application to the City Planner Received by /r�j Form S-2 Rev. 4/1/77 1. PERSON/COMPANY COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION Name DAVID KIMMEL TelePhone 415-348-2311 Firm THF KTMMFI f.�MPANY Firm's Address 1209 DONNELLY AVE. , SUITE 102, BURLINGAME, CA 94010 I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signature Date 2.: BURLINGAME BUSINESS/ORGANIZATION REQUESTING NEW SIGNAGE . Name of business establishment/organization THE KIMMEL COMPANY Nature of business PROPERTY INVESTMENT & MANAGEMENT Name of business owner DAVID KIMMEL Telephone 348-2311 ,address 1209 Donnelly Ave., #102, B li^1 ina��Zoning district 3. OWNER OF BUILDING, STRUCTURE OR LAND Name GARBIS BEZDJIAN Address 40 Berryessa Way, Hillsborough, California 94010 I know about the proposed sign, or signs, and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application. L% Signature _� � l �. -;� � �c�«�i ��t Date � � - ,�� ` - �� f - , , 4. PROPERTY INFORMATION Building Lot width 115' Building width 115' height 22' Lot depth � �� Bui ldi ng depth 88 � Setback 5. SIGNAGE INFORMATION . Number of existing signs on property Number of existing signs to remain Attach photo(s) Number of proposed new signs 7' fthct� �v��?$, f f,31�� ,�'qlEi�fi��r'Cq�iC7�� Sign construction details (SEE PAGE 2; pl se complete all parts) 6. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION :C Site plan showing size of property and location of all signs. � Elevations drawn to scale of not less than 1/2" = 1'-0" for all signs. �_ Show sign positions on building elevations if relevant. Color rendering or perspective of all signs. 7. TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY PLANNER Maximum signage permitted by Title 22: Primary frontage 16 5 Sf Secondary 5 � Sf Total signage proposed by this application: Primary frontage � Sf Secondary ��F This application is consistent with all Title 22 reauiremen , and a Building Permit may be issued. (yes) X (no) , � Si gned CL�� eGlSid'�' SIGdt� G'GE'G7G.�f'/� q---�— _-------�---..------ ---�-_-- ct��`QU/�:'ES •/�'��?�f'Ov/�L D� Date /- 2�_. '��._._�__.__._.__.__ /r��.9iv/Y.i�YC� f'G��'l✓�7/�SS/P�YJ SIGN PERMIT FEE to be collected by Building Department: $ "� . . �'" r �P�"�A�U'T � /6 �� SIGN A: ()Existing, no change ()Existing, new copy (�New sign Sign type: ground sign wall sign INCLUDES ALL SUITES pole siyn other (please specify):_�q_t�►Nq S�q� projecting sign �—�' IDENTICAL SIGNS (�6�� Overall height g�6�� Width of sign face 51 Height of sign face ��8�� Ar ��Cr7/Q 6��y�5 �' J�/J �'1 � ��' Area of sign�_ spft Background color grey Copy color burqundv � S,y,� �,� ,��v�dar� /rc��-�� Copy individual store names: see layout Type of illumination none Hours to be illuminated none Sign material: letters pn�mPl body or sign surface Yz". crezon w/black Methnd of support ____ _^_ single/double faced sinalE � me d Permit to: erect XX alter paint move BUILDING SI6N B: ()Existing, no change ()Existing, new copy (�;New sign IDENTIFICATION SIGN sign type: ground sign wall signX �i�i�hc� � Q�� b� z�'""�'��S pole sign other (please specify): � projecting sign Overall height ±�8� Width of sign face 8�� Height of sign face 3� Area of sign 2 4 � St gackground color Cony color copy - 1199 Broadwa.y Plaza Type of illumination none Hours to be illurr�inated none Sign material: letters enamel body or siqn surfaceiSdm2 dbOV2 Method of support single/double faced Permit to: erect X X alter paint move SIGN C: ()Existing, no change ()Existing, new copy ��New sign Sign type: ground sign wall sign pole sign other (please specify)- projecting sign Overall height Area of sign _ _ Copy Type of illumination_ Sign material: letters Method of support Permit to: erect Width of sign face Height of sign face dackground color Copy color Hours to be illuminated body or sign surface single/double faced alter paint move SIGN D: ()Existing, no change ()Existing, new copy ()New sign Sign type: ground sign wall sign pole sign other (please specify): projecting sign Overall height Width of sign face Height of sign face Area of sign Background color Copy color Copy Type of illumination Hours to be illuminated Sign material: letters body or sign surface Method of support single/double faced Permit to: erect alter paint move -2- . . � . � �1'�'tiA�'T �S 16 �/% � � . SIGN A: ()Existing, no change ()Existing new copy Q� New sign INCLUDES ALL SUITES IDENTICAL SIGNS (•8') i 6 s;4�5 �7 �,,;�a y ��o��e / Si 97 o�J -��codan� Fro��e Sign type: ground sign wall sign_ _ pole sign other (please specify):,�i'tG�►�� projecting sign • 9'6" 5' ' Overall height Width of sign face Height of sign face �r� Area of sign sqft Background color qrey Copy color burQundv copy individual store names: see layout Type of illumination none Hours to be illuminated none Sign material: letters Pnamel body or sign surface'/z". crezon w/black' Method of support single/double faced single me d Permit to: erect XX alter paint move B U I L D I N G SIGN B: ()Existing, no change ()Existing, new copy (�;New sign IDENTIFICATION SIGN si9n type: yround sign wall siyn,' l��ki�he.c� fo 61dg b� Z�r'� pole sign other (please specify): • projecting sign Overall height ±�8� Width of sign face 8�� Height of sign face 3� Area of sign 24 �^� Background color Copy color � copy� • - 1199 Broadway Plaza Type of illumination none Hours to be illuminated none Sign material: �ette,-s enamel body or siqn surfaceiSdm2 above P4ethod of support single/double faced Permit to: erect X X alter paint move SIGN C: ()Existing, no change ()Existing, new copy t,New sign Sign type: ground sign wall sign pole sign other (please specify): . projecting sign •• Overa'Il height Width of sign face Height of sign face Area of sign dackground color Copy color Copy T��e of illumination Hours to be illuminated Sign material: letters body or sign surface � Method of support single/double faced Permit to: erect alter paint move SIGN D: ()Existing, no change ()Existing, new copy ()New sign Sign type: ground sign wall sign pole sign other (please specify): projecting sign Overall height Width of sign face Height of sign face Area of sign Background color Copy color Copy Type of illumination Hours to be illuminated Sign material: letters body or sign surface Method of support single/double faced Permit to: erect alter paint move -2- �:��i�l� EXCEPT IQN Date filed d'/�.r/�� r $75 Fee recei ved by ��lr-� Application to the Planning Commission ' �" `''' � - � � `` Receipt No. )� S`� � �U�' 1 � 19t�ublic hearing scheduled CI �NNIN��DEPTME 1. rERS�iV/COMPANY COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION Name DAVIU KIMMEL Teleph�ne j4ti-2311 Firm THE KI�IEL COMPANY Firm's Address 1209 DONNELLY, SUITE 10� , BURLINGAME, CA. 94010 ATTACH DENIED SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION � 2. Has applicant read Section 22.06.110 of the City Ordinance Code? Yes X No 3. ��scr i�e t�;2 �� c„ .' �;�cu�^s �ar�cs o� �on� i t� ons a�:�; ; i cab 1 e to y�ur� prc�p�riy wnich ao ��ot generaiiy apply to oiher �roperties in your area, and the extent to which you may deserve special consideration to which your neighbors are not entitled. .1199 BROADWAY IS A BUILDING WITH A NUMBER OF COMMERCIAL TENANTS AND THE PRESENT SIGN CODE DOES NOT ACCOMODATE OUR FRONTAGE. WHILE THE SIGN CODE ALLOWS FOR 3 SIGNS ON A BUILDING OF THIS SORT, OUR SIX TENANTS NECESSITATE A NEED FOR SIX SIGNS. 4. Describe why the exception is necessary now to preserve the continued use and enjoyment of the property. N�- A LIMIT OF THREE SIGNS ON A SIX TENANT BUILDING WOULD^PROVIDE THOSE TENANTS WITH ADEQUATE EXPOSURE, THUS RESULTING IN A LOSS OF BUSINESS. CURRENTLY, THE TENANTS � ARE PROVIDING THEIR OWN INTERIOR SIGNAGE WHICH WILL BE REMOVED UPON APPROVAL OF THIS EXT-, ERIOR UNIFORM SIGNAGE PLAN. 5. What hardships would result if your request were denied? INADEQUATE EXPOSURE FOR THE EXISTING BUSINESSES, THUS RESULTING IN A LOSS OF BUSINESS. 6. EVALUATION BY CITY PLANNER Code section(s) relevant to this application �'�'r (�� . G-�'�� An exception has been requested because ... /�%/,�5T1-�/� :S'�G✓Y �r�'G��f'/,i�'�% vF'c�G�Ui.�'G-S /�'J'e�.jt�GJ`�9� � G'� �'`�.rysY� �a'c' C'C��t->�i' �SS/0�1./.. � � THE KIl`�IMEL C OMPAN�' ��c�iv�� APR 151988 April 14, 1988 C�p oF�°Uc�nE�AM� City of Burlingame Attn: Adriana Garefalos, Zoning Aide City Hall-501 Primrose Road Burlingame, California 94010 RE: 1199 Broadway, Burlingame Dear Adriana, Pursuant to our conversation of today, we would like to re-activate the master sign program for the above noted property. The program being one individual sign for each tenant and the building sign. I have enclosed the approval from the tenants that there will be no temporary signage. Please contact me if you should need any additional information than you now have on record. Sincerely, � � . � �.Q�-,, � . Ms. Terrie Thornhill Project Manager cc: Garbis Bezdjian 40 Berryessa Way Hillsborough, California 94010 (for approval) 7 209 DONNELLY AVE., SUITE 102 • BURLINGAME, CA 9401 O•(415) 348-231 1 � , -� " � THE KIMMEL COMPANY April 14, 1988 City of Burlingame Attn: Adriana Garefalos, Zoning Aide City HaII-501 Primrose Road Burlingame, California 94010 REC�IVED APR 2 01988 CITY OF f3URLiNGAM� P;�n•.�tdlrlG DEPT. RE: 1199 Broadway, Burlingame Dear Adriana, Pursuant to our conversation of today, we would like to re-activate the master sign program for the above noted property. The.program being one individual sign for each tenant and the building sign. I have enclosed the approval from the tenants that there will be no temporary signage. Please contact me if you should need any additional information than you now have on record. . Sincerely, 0 Ms. Terrie Thornhill Project Manager ; .- v�J� �-5-t.,�,�--_� �[iT.YC�'� � �.s �;, L•.C� ,>�� -�.c c^�iY i�i ,ac � , � t w � , 'S,'C;niS ! C' ' �/: �t/c cc%�i ;�is� �3�c�E , h�.,✓rs c�.� r v-�.�s� y � ��3 �r„ .-��. iF r�2.�'rn•T iS 7� i3� �>�'�r:r�.J %=c�,' c�';n/,�t::iJ �:�'.dS r�.cE'�Js'� il��s� .'.i5 %`3 .:%�!'.C' L' / 5 S u �.v .: �1 n! � ,��r /'ir� , ,—. cc: Garbis Bezdjian 40 Berryessa Way Hillsborough, California 94010 (for approval) 0 0 _ - ;.�� l �� l� ��/'�. ' ' �ated : -�'ia'- ��' �Mr. Garbis Bezdjian � 0 0 ❑ 1209 DONNELLY AVE., SUITE 1 OZ • BURLINGAME, CA 9401 O•(415) 348-231 1 � � THE KIMMEL C OMPANY April 14, 1988 City of Burlingame Attn: Adriana Garefalos, Zoning Aide. City Hall-501 Primrose Road � Burlingame, California 94010 ��c�iv�u APR 2 01988 - CITY OF QURLINGAMc P�_��'•�F�ING DEPT. RE: 1199 Boardway, Burlingame Dear Adriana, Enclosed is the notice of approval from Mr. Bezdjian for the master sign program. As you will see, he is insistant on not allowing any temporary signage f ,the tenants. Sincerel , �:' i,' f ` �-.l�� (5� Ms. Terrie Thornhill Project Manager 1209 DONNELLY AVE., SUITE 102 • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 •(415) 348-231 1 . � , THE KIMHEL COMP�NY 1209 Danr:glly Avenue, Snite 102 Bur2ingame, Ca.tifornia 94010 415-348-231i MarcA 24, 1988 F].oeting Fentesies - 1199 Braedwey, Suite 2 Burlinga�, Celiiarnia 94010 RS: Master Sign-Pragre� D�er Tenant, hs yan ell e�re avare�� ve� h�ve� bee�n trying to iraple�ment � �aste�r sign progrem far the Duiiding in vhich yoc� leas�, We Aave� been stel2ed e numtyer of tia►es, and vavid lik� tAis raatter completed as much es yon vould. TAereiare witA this in mind, re ere plecing tAe solutfon to the prob3esa in yaur Aend� and wou3d like th� decision of complience ta be yours. As th� master le�ssar, we� iuust try ta setisfy Doth yau� _ as our tenaats, and tAe ovner of t?�e building. � Mle presently have F�pproval fram thg ovner far LAe p�lscearent ai sigiRs ior e�ach unft end one building sign. 1dAat ve have been trying ta gat is appravel for the� temparary signs xhicA presently are in each af your vindaws. If you xon2d prefer riot to pisrx any signs in tAe vindows, �uch es "se.Ie� signs, latto signs, 2aga signs, etc", and leave th� gless Dare of ar�y markirigs, then ve can proceed Mith tAe nraster program ai on� sign ior e�sch. According to the� City ai Burlingawr�, you ere a1loMec! by code so much squere► foatege for tAese� type�s af temparsry signs, Me can not get 'th� arner tc epprove af the�se sigrYs. Therefare, ve� ere in tAe� �nniddle� of kh�► city, tenants and avner. P2�as$ respond ss soon as possib2e with your recoman�rsdat�o� #cr thi� aituation. W� are villing to proc�e�d wiLh the faaster program, but you wvst decide on tihett�er the temporary sign� or �aater signs are more beneficial. � i rs c�r el y, ---.-_..___,�..� .�-- � Mr. David liimmel �� : �S P � 0 �: � � ' �� , , �i � � , .��►�. , � � ' � Apri�l 9$, 1988 The Kimmel Company 1209 Donnelly Ave. #102 Burlingame, Calif. RE: Marquee signs Dear Mr. Kimmel: RECEIVED APR 191988 CITY OF BURLINC3AME Pt A'��ING DEPT. The "Master Sign Program" does not seem to have had much success. After two years there are still no signs identifying the businesses at 1199 Broadway. Original front elevation plans show the cartouche signs of strip mall design along the bottom rail of the double convex canopy in �ront of each business. They were never completed; t.hese are the marquee signs we have been waiting for over two years to see below the cano�y to identify our businesses to the public under the "Master Sign Program." A cause of the failure of the "Master Sign Program" seems to be the omission of the obvious need for window signage. We can find no rational motivert��r.can the Planning Department,for the lanc owner's disavowel of window signs. They should not exclude the equally necessary marquee signs. All together the signage would be under 50 square feet, and since the signs identifying our businesses and services will be extant over fourteen days, we require the �`written permission" of the land owner, who for svhat ever reason, inconsiderately omitted window signage from t�e fiiino of his 22.04.240, and has delayed thereby the implementation of the marquee signs. In his letter of August 8, 1987 he claims to give approval for the signs. Understanding his attitude about windows, this must refer to the marquee signs, which he enjoins you td"have the contractor work on as soon as posible." This direction or subterfuge follows a letter requesting the marquee sign�, sent to you January 15, 1987, signed by the tenants. Your Addendum to Lease #7 stipulates that you shall maintain signs, and #15, that you shall comply with City regulations including signs. Yet, you asked for the tenants suggestion and decision on the matter of window signs or marGuee signs. We chose the latte�,-�nc o.nly prcvision in the land own��sr'.s.;��1Sf�-f,or..signs, and allowed you one week for Gity approval with c�n�if^mation t0 the tenants, by 4/14/�4$, hopefully with confirmation from the sign contractor as well, so we can have our marquee business signs. For ihis necessity we request at this time, within ten days of receipt of this l.etter, after waiting over two years for the "Master Sign Program" to ��rform,�all �Ghe following requirements: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Letter of approval of window signage from the Addition to the "Master Sign Program" of this City Planning Department approval of addition Deletion of the unnecessary "Broadway Plaza" Confirmation of City approval a� m�rq�ee and Confirmation of sign contractor to impier�ent c.c. Garbis Bezdjian, land owner Margaret Monroe, City P�lanner land owner. owner approval. to ihe 22.04.240. sign for the roof. window signage. t�arquee signs. / :' _ . ., , '. . r � � _ ' / 2 / q�� DATE A;. .;, . F r � i . � . � , � � � . � . ' ,', •MEMO�.TO: • CITY ENGINEER �'Y CHIEF BUILDING IN CTOR ' FIRE MARSHAL � �� t :: DIRECTOR OF .PARKS ; , �; FROM �� PLANNING DEPAR�-M�NT, , }; ;. ,; , � � . r`"' SUBJECT: %% �Y'� (,(i — . , - a ;, �,`� ,r� �,, : An.ap�li�cation has been received for the above , .�� , projec� for review by the �� P1ann�ng Commission. The application will be scheduled for S ,�r (� !, , � . . . ;- ' at `ti�ei r: 2,3�q�� meeti n We woul d a , 4:z� _ 9• ppreciate Na g �'� your comments by /�'J � /� ., Thank `you . � . 7F � = x l. a � �,�lN� �� L ��/�/` r� �i , � • l � �� J �� ;J ( c �'Y��i � � I '.\ "_ \ � - y-�� O �� -,� �� ..S � !• �. ? ' ; 4 ... 1 : L' � t t � _N- . � ' ' , • �. ' . . %�� J' ( m 'r . 'r '�.'- � . ` : DATE 2 � �� 1 . ��.. .��_, : , 'n'. / 3 'j • ' MEMO TO�:;�:.CITY ENGINEER � , ,; ;r � CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR , � `' EIRE MARSHAL � -x F + ` ' : DIRECTOR OF PARKS , _; FROM PLANNING DEPARI�MENT, z` ' �� SUBJECT:` � fI i'� � �Y'Q (�j — , . � ' �_� _ a �'�____ �.. �, ;,, :_ : :; : An apRlication has been received ror the above �° ; � projec� for review by the � Planning Commission. The application will be scheduled for S O , t , , �1 f . � ;'at the�r. G 2� �q�� meetin We would a , ;r4_ 9• ppreciate h�a g ;c your comments by /%% q /� �, ti I - Thank;you. � . t . � ` /v%�� _ �- / i �� , ��Y/� - • r ;� • r '� � .� i r �..,�. � . . � � �{/1 = !t A \ �tJ � ` �w �/ ��J _ " ..�,�... / V' �"/ / /'� .r_ .� � � � o �, C 7 :`;�a � •.y-" :,', t , 1 ' r � � � .. .. , �� .:8� Y� _ . . . . . . . . . . �,. � r�a �� _.. , . � V DATE � I / �� - ;� MEMO T0:`• .CI7Y ENGINEER �'� CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR `� FIRE MARSHAL � '�£ � DIRECTOR OF PARKS �,; FROM : PLANNING DEPARTM�hT � , ��: . ��,,.. . � � �� SUB�J ECT �� ' /I � '• � �f'Yj (�(% — _ ��aS'�� ' '. i T � f: � , , n'�` , i� �`r ^ An appli_cation has been received for the above project for review by the , �; ,r•, ' .� ; Plann�ng'Commission. The application will be scheduled for ,S >r { � ' ,:• ;` ' at "thei r: 2,3 �`�'�� meeti n We woul d a � � ,;;t� . , : =., g• PPreciate h�a g r.` y0:�r cori�nents by � q /� � , :�. �" � � ' � , . t : '•. Tha�nk �you . � ` ` , %�a , �� f� ��L /�� %� ,- � /' � ` �/�0 jsa �� GL i /cf � h-� '�� ` � � . /��'J C�D � rn �'K T' f� ;F� . � � r � � � � ' , ,t... .. ,i", c—�. i.'i ' � .�.i�� . � � J �•� . l7 _ p ir ' , �''>4. , )' �t t '} t ! � .. � � •' _ � . ' . • '. CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 23, 1988 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Planning Commission, City of Burlingame was called to order by Chairman Jacobs on Monday, May 23, 1988 at 7:32 P.M. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Ellis, Garcia, H. Graham, Harrison, Jacobs Absent: Commissioners Giomi,,S. Graham Staff Present: Margaret Monroe, City Planner; Jerome Coleman, City Attorney; Frank Erbacher, City Engineer; Bill Reilly, Fire Marshal MINUTES - The minutes of the May 9, 1988 meeting were unanimously approved. AGENDA - Order of the agenda approved. The Chair introduced County Supervisor Bill Schumacher who was in the audience. Mr. Schumacher acknowledged the introduction and commented on the importance of a Planning Commission to the governmental process, to a city and to its citizens. ITEMS FOR STUDY 1. SPECIAL PERMIT - SATELLITE DISH - 3 CALIFORNIA DRIVE Requests: when was this dish installed, why was no permit required at that time; discuss FCC preemption referred to in applicant�s letter; will the dish be screened; method of fastening dish to the roof; where can it be seen from. Item set for public hearing June 13, 1988. 2. SIGN EXCEPTION - MASTER SIGN PROGRAM - 1199 BROADWAY Requests: effects of the building owner�s refusal to allow window signs; history of the application since September, 1987 when it was first received; detail on how the signs will be attached; has the application changed since the conceptual proposal in September, 1987. Item set for public hearing June 13, 1988. 3. SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT - 1730 ROLLINS ROAD Requests: location of the new parking space; indicate on diagram existing on-site parking, are all these spaces marked; comment from Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Page � May 23, 1988 Fire and Building Departments regarding loss of a s:�.�ir�vay in the mid portion of the building; discuss parking requirements with the relocation of office space. Item set for public hearing June 13, 1988. ITEMS FOR ACTION 4. TWO 5PECIAL PERMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW GARAGE AT 728 CROSSWAY ROAD, ZONED R-1 Reference staff report, 5/23/88, with attachments. CP Monroe reviewed details of the request, staff review, applicants� letter, study meeting questions. Two conditions were suggested for consideration at the public hearing. During discussion it was noted no trees are marked on the plans, will this construction affect the large tree on the neighbor�s property; staff advised the proposed garage is too large to be considered under the Minor Modification procedure; total garage and storage area requested is 660 SF, storage area exceeds 10� of the floor area of the house, when a second story is added to the house within the next two years storage area in the garage will not exceed 10� of the floor area of the house. Chm. Jacobs opened the public hearing. Michael McCallion, applicant, was present. He advised they plan to remove all trees except the redwood tree on the side, they will put redwood siding on the rear of the garage for the benefit of the neighbor and will plant some trees behind the garage for privacy, any trees which are removed will be replaced; they had not considered the effect of construction on the redwood tree next door on the fence line but had talked to the neighbor who had no objections to the garage, they did not discuss the redwood tree; they plan to add to the house in the near future and storage area in the garage will be used to store supplies for this project; applicant confirmed he was a contractor. A petition in favor (included in the packet) signed by 16 people in the area was noted. There were no audience comments and the public hearing was closed. Staff explained the storage area is partitioned off from the garage space, therefore the second special permit is required. C. H.Graham moved for approval of the two special permits and for adoption of Commission Resolution Approving Special Permits with the following conditions: (1) that the garage as built shall conform to the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped April 21 and 22, 1988; and (2) that no part of the garage shall ever be used for residential purposes nor shall any other utility except electricity be extended to the garage. � , � ` `/ � . ,�• R . � .. �� , -� � ~ •:. h ` �Y�� . • �' - ��` � ^ :� . ' � . .yy��/; w r�� • a. . P * � , � � ..m �;: , � ��'�. �+�� .�d ' � -; , � , '9 ��, , . � �'�� e'� �,.. ��i � �z �°'� � r �� , , . �� `� �,� , � , � � � � .''� � ��, ,�`4.,y � � �:�; e.. . _ ,� � " �� , ' � � � �'� � � . �� 3'� � �� .�- `' � ,\i /� .y,y�' '�r`' t �:' 4 k' . �e ' �� r,\ '�' ��.' t .,, �= •j"' , �� . - . , ,: . �� . , r o , . � . r , � Z � � � , ,�` �Y 'a� � ,,� �'`�� s. , � �� , ti; - . � , .� � , � , _ ; �, ., � �1 � °�.,-,a, �, , � � .,, . ,, . - " -� �- ' ` �-'" ,�= � � ` � , � � , � . .. � . �' a �. P '� _ � j' � � f ��- +l. �. t �' , � � � °��" . `"`� - �. � . � � . , � P . �" y ¢'� i �'`�� :.,� �,,; ,.` � �,��' y, . f w � �`� ..< < ^, �:� '► . t�r4 < � �( s _x � f .tij;` ��"�;' -� , . �� . „z `k �� . � � � � m' � �� c . � �:?� � ' � � � . ` �. � � � � �� , � . \ ; �_ � � , , � � �� . .,� . �� E ��v.._ � � ^�;_ .- �� . �,. �: � , , .�.: � � � . � ��P � � � � � , � �, � ,� .: Y� 1 �' ,, � � , � � � �. � � �' � � � � � ,�' __, b �� f � � �: - �� - � � �� . � �., G �� . . . ��t4• � �} � �;�� y' �� , � � �• �`` � < � ''�` � t:,,�' ',9�� P: �� . : .� n_ , , , . , � � _ '. / .�� . � _ �� % . % � ' ' � � � �. �� "°�..,,�''' .� � � �. r �r' �� . � • , , �e , , 4, �� h� : �. • a . �` � _ b � �. � r j6� 4 . � � ��i 7 I . . � e . �r ,. • � : ... � . . x � r �' � A`C � � �� F / �j r' � �� `�• �n � � �'" S �n' �y .. . . � . � , . . J' i� :_: , .:. s � .s:�.. . � � ` , -. � . N L_ � j , '� , ' . J , r. ' " -p� �. . �r�^ ~�i. ��f: � �� v � ' � � . �� + i � L ; n > r— � �,:. r f .., ' _ _r. . .� �. � t� �� ,� , •.., � �:.� � �', � �� . � � � � � , • � �� e�� . _ � �4 � a �f �� _ , � � � � �' ° , }� ,,, � _ . : � .,.�� ,� �e , � � � �- ••.., •••z .. �.� , , _ - �� % ��.� � .�: �� ,� ... . . . . . � f � . '� :� �� '''° , � �' �., .� ' �',�� , . .. . ��- � t � � �:o � .,,� �i�� .r�� '�., , , , � .: : , � '�f� .,, , � ,�. e , .; � '' y `'-��° �; . . �� - .. , �� :� �� . ,�� ,, - � � ' °� � � � ��''` .;\� `, \ , � � � �" �•� � ' _ . � % �, ti = . . � . � �a� - � ">.� -�'� , . . _, . . ,�� , . ,, ,y . % xa � r � ' �" � � .j �+ " : , va -. _ � � �� w / .� � �. f , �e � . � . � / � �. ��' . � . .,�„ ^ ,:- � � � . .. � � ,y , � - .. � � . �. � . � : � ; ��.. , , , � � / �4 , , . , , • � �"e+ , } . ' ' ' ' � ' � `�?t � �a �° � � �� r� � �- a. � . `� '� �� l '� '\ �;:; , ��. �� '�� . ' �,� �� . , _. � . _ KK � r , , � �� , � , � , , '� �� : �� ,� �� v� ,� a _ � � � � �� A - ��,� � �� . 4 . . , ` ,� ` . ; � ' . � F.. _, _ - ; ,. , - s � , .; ` �" � � ��` �� ` �� . � �� . .,. 4�. ' - 1 � � � � ,e � �. , . j � � 4 ' ��14 t � F, �. �- � - _ � � �� - : �,,,-� �� . , �t � � � r c . � `�. � ,�� .�, �� . ,�.r . d�. , _ . . �: : ° . � ` �. . � �: � �� , , � , - � �� . � � �� i �. �. � " ° � � ` • � r` , �� _: �� •�� , '� , � _� _ �'� , �. �._ ,�� w�� n� ``.,� ,,. �, t, . . . .t � , � �� , ; a�'�: � �.: ,� � ��, �� e,� �� . \ � �� i�: . �. � e ; ; X � -. � � � ,_ .� � � . � � � " �,,''� �� .�.,� � �.,, � � � � � �,. � � � � � � �, - ,v , _ . � , , �.� �, � �. ; '' � �s _ _ �< - ,, � � � � �. � e � .. � � , �" � ; � �a "�; ��• � � �,� � � � . �C � a � � �t� � . .. '�', . �.: �hQ C�i�� f �u��irtg�txrt.e SAN MATEO COUNTY CITY HALL- 501 PRIMROSE ROAD � � BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 TEL:(415) 342-893I NOTICE OF HEARING Sign Exception NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Monday, the 13th day of June 1988 , at the hour of 7:30 P.M., in the City Hall Council Chambers , 501 Primrose Road,. Burlingame, California the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame will conduct a publiC hearing 011 the application for a Master Sign Program at 1199 Broadway, Zoned C-1 � At the time of the hearing all persons interested will be heard. For further particulars reference is made to the Planning Department. MARGARET MONROE CITY PLAN��ER June 3, 1988 _. . , ,; f � • ' ' ' , RESOLUTION NO . RESOLUTION APPROVING MASTER SIGNAGE PROGRAM RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: - , WHEREAS, application has been made for a sign exception for a master siQnacte provram at 1199 Broadwav , (APN 026-192-220 �, and WHEREAS, this Commission held a public hearing on said applicatiorr on June 13 , 1988, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; . NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that said application is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. RUTH E. JACOBS CHAIRMAN I, MIKE ELLIS, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of June , 1988 by the.following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: � ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MIKE ELLIS SECRETARY r � 1 t i �� - �,� ;�.:� � a_!' � �' 5 E�' 1�� 1:� �� i` C1�`tc� 3u�(!r:r,�,�r- ,. r , . .. r, - Coxvr��r P��ScS�U o C� L � F�{ r F D 6�,.� � , � +I 1i� �' \ � � / �� ' �►' S I G N P E R M I T Date fi 1ed 9- ��'- �7 Application to the City Planner Received by %,��j Form S-2 Rev. 4/1/77 1. PERSON/COMPANY COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION Name DAVID KIMMEL Telephone 415-348-2311 Firm THF KTMMFI (:(1MPANY Firm's Address 1209 DONNELLY AVE., SUITE 102, BURLINGAME, CA 94010 I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signature r �---- Date �� ry_ S O S O 2. 1 BURLINGAME BUSINESS/ORGANIZATION REQUESTING NEW SIGNAGE � , Name of business establishment/organization THE KIMMEL COMPANY �• ' - ►vature of business PROPERTY INVESTMENT & MANAGEMENT t ` l('�L�� Name of business owner DAVID KIMMEL Telephone 348-2311 addr-ess 1209 Donnel 1y_gy�,_� #�Q� B 11^1 i��ame Zoning district Gin�t. w r� 3. OWNER OF BUILDING, STRUCTURE OR LAND " Name GARBIS BEZDJIAN �(��Q�Yi- GVp��N� Address 40 Berryessa Way, Hillsborough, California 94010 ame�e�k. cu� � �u,+r�r nb�' $tive� �n cen-�---� �,G�. �� G�` s�l.i�n�^ _ 5. �G►�--Un . � �Lry�j �� S — -�Cp ��-� ��, � � . ��i� (/l%.L � -��.Q�' 6 . b��-- � 5�� . �/) �' I��i� UUu ,Q�i � � ��5a1 . I know about the proposed sign, or signs, and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application. � ;, , Signature�: i�t. l� . ,� ,;� ,f,f ��=1 �i c� Date _ ,� PROPERTY INFORMATION / Building Lot width 115 � Building width 115 � height 22 � Lot depth � �� Bui ldi ng depth 88 � Setback SIGNAGE INFORMATION Number of existing signs on property Number of existing signs to remain Attach photo(s) Number of proposed new signs 7 fPnarn� S•`Q+7S; � l�l�� j'c��F)��q�C1�i f� Sign construction details (SEE PAGE 2; pl ase complete all parts) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION X Site plan showing size of property and location of all signs. �_ Elevations drawn to scale of not less than 1/2" = 1'-0" for all signs. �_ Show sign positions on building elevations if relevant. Color rendering or perspective of all signs. 7. TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY PLANNER Maximum signage permitted by Title 22: Primary frontage 16 5 Sf Secondary 5 � Sf Total signage proposed by this application: Primary frontage 87•5sf Secondary � This application is consistent with all Title 22 reauiremen , and a Building Permit may be issued. (yes) X (no) LL �, � � � Signed^�' CB�� (/1� �s � � .e SiCrL ✓ � �'G� fi'/� q--.- __._ ----- _ _ --- -- ----- �'f`Qc/i✓: LCJ /��:��C'vs3L �.0 Date— / �/__ ._`��_--.. _ _. _ j�(/.�iv�Y.�.s1'( �'C�./�7✓�7i SS%O✓Y) SIGfJ PERMIT FEE to be collected by Building Department: � "'—" • Date fi led � /J' �� I�G� EXCEPT ION i�� Application to the Planning Commission '' `� �� . � s��5 'Fee received by �� -� , Receipt No. )� S'% � . ��G 1 � 19t�ublic hearing scheduled C�TY OF BURLINGAME � /� 1. PERSUfV/COMPANY COMPLETING THIS APPLICATIpNN�Nc°FPr, � Name DAVID KIMMEL Telephone j4$-2311 � F11"tl1 TEIE KIMMEL COMPANY � Firm's Address 1209 DONNELLY, SUITE 10� , BURLINGAME, CA. 94010 ATTACH DENIED SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION 2. Has applicant read Section 22.06.110 of the City Ordinance Code? Yes X No 3. ��scriEe t�e ex�e�t:�nal ci�currstar�cs or con�it�ons a�:F3icable to y��r proper�y which do r�ot generaiiy apply to oiher properties in your area, and the extent to which you may deserve special consideration to which your neighbors are not entitled. 1199 BROADWAY IS A BUILDING WITH A NUMBER OF COMMERCIAL TENANTS AND TIiE PRESENT SIGN CODE DOES NOT ACCOMODATE OUR FRONTAGE. WHILE THE SIGN CODE ALLOWS FOR 3 SIGNS ON A BUILDING OF THIS SORT, OUR SIX TENANTS NECESSITATE A NEED FOR SIX SIGNS. 4. Describe why the exception is necessary now to preserve the continued use and enjoyment of the property. N�- A LIMIT OF THREE SIGNS ON A SIX TENANT BUILDING WOULD^PROVIDE THOSE TENANTS WITH ADEQUATE EXPOSURE, THUS RESULTING IN A LOSS OF BUSINESS. CURRENTLY, THE TENANTS ARE PROVIDING THEIR OWN INTERIOR SIGNAGE WHICH WILL BE REMOVED UPON APPROVAL OF THIS EXT ERIOR UNIFORM SIGh'AGE PLAN. 5. What hardships would result if your request were denied? INADEQUATE EXPOSURE FOR THE EXISTING BUSINESSES, THUS RESULTING IN A LOSS OF BUSINESS. 6. EVALUATION BY CITY PLANNER Code section(s) relevant to this application �c''.C7� . C��Q An exception has been requested because ... /f%i?S Tl_= � :5�1 C�✓Y .i'�.�!' G�/,�f?? .�faE'G'r/ i i�L- S /�./��h'D>��-%L Cr= ✓�.ira.n-sy: ✓f�'c' c� O�j»�i S�'l O/_. u ' 1199 BROADWAY - PROPOSED MASTER SIGN PROGRAM SF OF TOTAL STORE SF % OF IDENTIF. NUMBER STORE FRONTAGE WIPJDOW SIGNS WINDOW AREA SIGNAGE SIGNS A 20' 26.55 SF 15% 10 SF 3 B 25' 33.75 SF 15% 10 SF 3 C 12' 20 SF 22% 10 SF 3 D 15'-2" 20 SF 15% 10 SF 3 E 25' 33.30 SF 15% 10 SF 3 F1 20'-6" 27.45 SF 15% 10 SF 3 F2 24'-9" 33.45 SF 15% �_ 10 SF 3 TOTAL SIGN AREA 36.55 SF 43.75 30.00 30.00 43.30 37.45 43.45 A. Garefalos/ 10-20-87 i r � � l0�/3% g �' DATE: MEMO T0: CITY ENGINEER �CHIEF BUILDING INSP�CTOR FIRE MARSHAL ,,,�;'� DIRECTOR OF PARKS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: U19•1 ��`�'�C;��G"�� // �-- ,f lea s e � o ye. �''�� 5�.� U�� a n S cS��zvi ��7 c �'./� a�'� .l' �%�! ...� , �--. . Gl/;�1 c�G�� , 9n �`� e . . i'�Jt1.S �C� �i GV �1��/!.</Aa "7' r / %) ��ra r � An application has been received for the above project for review by the Planning Commission.2�he application will be scheduled for u�'C� at their_ �� f� � � f�c � meeting. We would appreciate having your comments by ;�-�~-r.—�==�� L��C�- �� ia' �' Thank you. -``��Z� l�l (k�SI��L t.�� S ivp CG�tttti�Elt;`1 � (C v� RECEIVED 'O�T � 31987 CITY OF BURIIN(�►NE P'-.�!.':NIN(i OEpT, i.�. . . � lt�//3/ g �' DATE : ��`�-- . MEMO T0: CITY ENGINEER ✓ CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR FIRE MARSHAL DIRECTOR OF PARKS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT �� a�s l/'./� O�� .� �%�l ��9��e. _ �� .:' �%�ea .S e �� s�.c� s��y G�/�'� c�� SUBJECT: V 1 � ��'� �"',�/�C`�t' /, trS�/t� ,%, �c�' �cfa�j' . � c,�'rQ � � An application has been received for the above project for review by the � Planning Commission.�6The application will be scheduled for S�,'C.�� at their V�f- �� `;r 'y meetin We would a � f% 1 / g. ppreciate having your comments b t---r�"�� L'l<.'�- �`�J I`�18 � �' ~^"• „� D Y .-�--`-t--r—,'_ . ; acr ,z 3 �51�7 Thank you. ��Tru��R��N�,a� p�.�wirvao�t, � '�v ', � l G �n v,� r►,� �,p (d� �� vre � 1r I � . �� C,oV,.�•v�•.a��, a�.. -%G.��a � r►�.�{- �o�t3 g� �a.,,.�, C � l'� � �N'g� I • ' 0 � l0�/3/ � �' DATE : ��-/ / =�_`�--- � �/ea S C' %t''��i� Sz°-C, MEMO T0: CITY ENGINEER �^hGaL/�j� - CHIEF BUILDLNG INSPECTOR FI RE MARSHAL /G,�•� C�L�--��/ DIRECTOR OF PARKS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: v�9� �X��,,�j/�C° �� l�� t S �� l� . �o�� v°�a�s ��.�� av�� f ��.� �.s;� 9�� e . ._ . i ��r�t vyJ � An application has been received for the above project for review by the Planning Commission.2�he application will be scheduled for S%l�'C� at their OC�'- �'T �,I ��`'� meeting. We would appreciate having ' , your comments b --�-- �` �%��'�- � q � �1 � � Y �- � • --�-=f 7 �� ) Thark you. � , �[ �� ^ ��'� � � l /_ / � , � �! ja ✓i � ►� ,�r' ,/'" . � � �!�' � � ,-�� l %�J `' f <S � a � �, ��' 'f'c � r�v `` � � / - , . � . �� 1� l�.t G'•� � _ � ��+ `' �yt/`"' 1 � , T0: File FROM: Planner - A. Garefalos SUB�TECT: 1199 Broadway Avenue DATE: October 8, 1987 A complaint was received regarding flags at 1199 Broadway. A site inspection today revealed that Galleria De Farsh ha.s six flags being displayed above their doorway. Per Code Section 22.34.110� only one flag of any particular type, may be permitted per parcel; all other flags require Planning C�nission review. A letter has been sent to this business, informurig them of the limitations which apply to tYie display of flags. The picture belaw displays the existing conditions at this location. �. �;.�w� . \L �m _-- � - �-.. --,�:,s�: . �.. �.�ti'+:Ybll �97 ��` ?� /O-- /9- �' �' P� �S�'fe i�s��o�o �''ac� ,�/�S �a.r�� jPE'� /"'�/�?r11JC'Cj� � G�J �• ,t' -� � ...• , � �/, ` r 1 '� ' e: ��:; � �` � � ,�y ` i � ' _ `J� -' .` r ' �� i � \ . � � / �. �\ ` ` i • � �•"'. 1��1:: ,� <' 'Q�� . ' �' '�Y •` • �'7 �� ,. ��:�,� . , �'''� -. ��; � yI � � ,�.� • �- �_, ' J � ~ i / k�i � � . . � . . �r.:� \` ;.. � = �,V \ ;��. �'\ �% - C '"�-, r 'F �� ` j, ( �� Q� ,' � / �„ , . ',. ��' :� ` ` .�� ' � � , � ;� . i�, �l . - �5 A ' � •�� `! ,� �_ � �T. ` �, � _ :{�`.\ � �. � � � w /��i�}�,��.?. .../�'�r '� < /�.'. • ' t •• � �. � .�.-; 'i ,} � � . . �� 3 1 �. �'• *'�� . . �� Y' 1�I , q, . � �r�� ' +!, �if �` •,�"'! + � l a 4, ,� � ` t�:' F: � r�r r/ ` � i �` ,�.�` � �,: � � , _Y �� `� � �� f. '� « . � �L t� � . � � �,�- � V i 1 �?��' : • . 1�.� �K��. GA R�'Y/` . I 1 .. ^1. �� -.\�`�. •g..�: , � I .{ /�� • �, �� I� . :,'; � 1 }. ��t � �� , � �� .,�..,,{` ' I � 1 ` / � j\ �' �� ,��' I .� . t 3'� �,� �;'`:,; ; L� ' � �r � ' .. � .i �' C` �'+ �� ,�.�.�+�,;� ` . � , �f. �.'�'� � � � .<" :�� Iv� �� '�� • ;� . t?� "� {+: /� "� ,+,• '0••, ' r•. ' . - :4 7 + � � � �^ \ �� 6� ��' r �``\\ f I� r ��.. � ' /�•• ''•..r� '\ _ �' ��' }� , � ' S� �c .�� . ", . . . ;;' •:. � `�;��r �I�J ; j�', - � �.,, •, � . �. � ,.� .� +�j:;':�'�,: ,�` �� <' J� � !� i ..-�. ' �� ,y, � -L� . . ' • � � `� } � - f� � : �`� .., . ).../ 1 ` + \ �� ' `� ^.�tl , • , " ` � �,�� ' � � , ' � �y�' . .�y� +`, /� � �' .\. �� • . `\ F `��r R /+ ��t��. �`� ♦.`4. !7 `�^'� s�' '\-. ` � \yi� , w � � / `. �,. r•. �' , "►��/'Z � �'+t�� % ��.tv-�� ' �r. . - �. „ � � `�,� ' �' ,� -,�„� 'v . �. . i � / � \ � � . < . �, � ` . � 1 <` , ,� '' .��. • ` . . - Cr � � � I ��\ }; t .�, � ` � �� .� .�, �., � � `� i �+ �' . ., `�, � �� ;, � �,� . / ` \ �, f r� ` . `. �, �'� `�� " �, i;� �, .'`! r �� :� }` . � ( `t•��. �/ �,'f , r �' ` \ . � y r- � � �� \V,�� , .. . •� ;. 1 �� . �`� i/ � \�. � �� / ` ��, �. r / �, .� .� CITY HALL - Spl F'RIMRO �C fiOhD FlL1RI.INGAME, Cl�IJFnRNIA QAf>10 October 13, 198? C�C�r (�'rt� n�F ��ir��l'r�r��?r��r�� t'L./�NNING DEf'hRTMCNT (415) 34: -AC3?S Mr. Garbis Bezdjian 40 Berryessa Way Hillsborough, CA 94010 RE: 1199 Braadway Signage DP�r. Mr. Bezd�i�n: t>lrra:�r: l:i.r�ci rr�cln�cci c� c:c��y c�l thc� pltit�a� :;utxnl_L•l•ccl 1'or win�iow �ignt�gc to be included in the master sign program for 1199 Broadway. Since these plans were sukx�titted after the sign exception application was filed, we wanted to be sure you were aware of the proposed signage and had no objections. Please review the plans and, if you have any objections to the proposal, please let us knaw by October 19, 1987. Otherwise we will ass�ne you are aware of the proposed signage and have no objections. Feel free to give m� a call at 342-8625 if you have any questions. Sincerely, </lL,�1� G�� !�� ___. Adriana Garefalos Planner �closure � y Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 September 8, 1986 plans submitted and date stamped August 26, 1986; (2) that the conditions of the Chief Building Inspector's memo of August 21, 1986 and the original use permit (June 16, 1986) shall be met; and (3) that the applicant shall submit to the city a copy of the BCDC plan approval letter prior to receiving a building permit. Second C. Graham. Motion approved on a 6-0 roll call vote. Appeal procedures were advised. 6. SPECIAL PERMIT - AUTO DETAILING SERVICE OFFERED TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC - 1362 NORTH CAROLAN AVENUE It was determined the applicant was not present. C. Graham moved to continue this item to the meeting of September 22, 1986; second C. Schwalm. Motion approved unanimously on voice vote. 7. PARKING VARIANCE - 1320-50 HOWARD AVENUE Item continued to the meeting of September 22, 1986. 8. MASTER SIGN PROGRAM - 1199 BROADWAY Item continued until further notice at the request of the applicant. CONSENT ITEM 9. TWO MINOR MODIFICATIONS - SECOND FLOOR BEDROOM/BATH ADDITION - 2018 RAY DRIVE Item was not called up for review. PLANNER REPORTS - SPECIFIC PLANNING CONCERNS FOR FUTURE ACTION Reference CP's memo of 7/31/86. Commission requested additional items for study: parking requirements for condominiums and apartments; concern about regulations for abandoned progerties and nonconforming parking, alternatives otaer than a variance or buying another lot for parking; possibility of making it easier to build an oversized garage, thus getting more cars off the street. CE's suggestions were also noted: paved access to required parking; single family residential driveway width; regulations to keep required parking open to the users � of a building and not leasing it out to others; hotel valet parking. Staff noted the need to prioritize these items in view of available staff time. CP will take this amended list of concerns to City Council and request consideration be given to a joint meeting with the Planning Commission. / j Page 5 Burlingame Planning Commis'sion Minutes September 8, 1986 would set a orecedent. Commission and staff discussed the fact that the accessory structure had been there for many years, it is not a habitable structure with reference to UBC regulations; the bathroom was added without a building permit and attached to the accessory structure within 3' of property line, if the special permit is not granted the applicant will have to remove it; the accessory structure could be used for storage. With the statement that the city has codes which are basically laws, this addition is not an asset to the community, it will affect the neighborhood, the house seems large enough for this family, C. Jacobs moved for denial of the special permit and for adoption of Commission Resolution Denying Special Permit with the following conditions: (1) that the illegal bathroom attached to the detached accessory structure shall be removed within 30 days (October, 1986) and the structure returned to the use for which it was originally designed, storage; and (2) that neither of the two detached accessory structures on site shall be used for residential purposes. Second C. Graham. Comment on the motion: in favor of the motion, approval would be precedent setting, there are regulations which have been developed as a guideline for the city, this is a large lot and there are other alternatives to gaining additional square footage such as an addition to the house. Motion to deny approved on a 6-0 roll call vote. Appeal procedures were advised. Recess 8:37 P.M.; reconvene 8:45 P.M. 4. SPECIAL PERMIT - TAKE-OUT FOOD SERVICE AND CATERING OPERATION - 1109 BURLINGAME AVENUE Item withdrawn by the applicant. 5. SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW RELOCATION OF A SATELLITE DISH ANTENNA AT THE MARRIOTT HOTEL, 1800 BAYSHORE HIGHWAY Reference staff report, 9/8/86, with attachments. CP Monroe reviewed details of the request, staff review, Planning staff comment, applicant's letter, need for BCDC approval. Three conditions were suggested for consideration at the public hearing. Comment: landscape screening of the installation will still be required. Chm. Giomi opened the public hearing. Applicant was present. There were no audience comments and the public hearing was closed. With the statement this is merely an amendment to the placement of the dish, a slight move, if BCDC approved it view corridors will be maintained and with the understanding the original landscaping requirements will be met, C. Jacobs moved for approval of this special permit amendment and for adoption of Commission Resolution Approving Special Permits with the following conditions: (1) that the dish antenna and fence shall be installed at the location shown on the