HomeMy WebLinkAbout1199 Broadway - Staff Report.
c�''�S
P.C. 11/25/85
Item #5
NlEMO TO: PLANIVING COMMISSION
FROM; CITY PLANNER
SUBJECT; SPECIAL PERMIT FOR A TOBACCO SHOP IN A 481 SF AREA OF THE
COMMERCIAL BUILDING AT 1199 BROAD'v�IAY, ZONED C-1
Lance McDonald is representing the shop Tobacco Way in their request
for a use permit to operate in a 481 SF portion of the commercial
building at 1199 Broadway, zoned C-l. A use permit is required as a
condition of the parking variance granted to this location March 6,
1984. A permit was previously issued to this location for a men's wear
shop in May, 1985. That tenant has left the premises.
Tobacco Way proposes to have one full time and one part time employee
on site. They will be open from 7:00 A.M, to 6:00 P.M. Monday through
Friday, 9:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. Saturday, 8:00 A.M. to 2:00 P.M. Sunday.
The previous business to occupy this site had two full time employees
and was open 10:00 A.M. to 5:30 P.M. Monday through Saturday.
City Staff Review
City staff have reviewed the request. The City Engineer (October 28,
1985 memo) and the Fire Marshal (October 25, 1985 memo) had no
comments. The Chief Building Inspector (November 5, 1985 memo) notes
that there should be no more approvals for tenant use permits in this
building until the building shell has received final certification of
occupancy. Presently the bathrooms are not finished for handicapped
accessibility and the addressing is done incorrectly.
Applicant Letter
In his letter of October 15, 1985 the tenant, Lance McDonald, states
that he would like to relocate his business, Tobacco Way, from
Burlingame Avenue to the space at 1199 Broadway. He intends to sell
cigarettes, fine cigars, bulk tobacco, pipes and accessories, candy,
magazines and newspapers. He will be open seven days a week. He will
work on site with the assistance of one part time employee. His
deliveries occur once a week and take about 15 minutes.
Study Questions
At study the Commission asked a number of questions regarding the site
and completion of the building.
All problems associated with completing the shell of the building have
not been resolved. The Building Inspector reports that the required
fixtures, doors, etc. for the bathrooms to meet handicapped
accessibility requirements have not been installed. The Engineering
T�epartment reports that individual tenants have misaddressed their
locations and that no address identification has been placed on the
rear entrance to the building. Both of these problems must be
-2-
resolved before certification of occupancy can be issued on the
building shell. The Building and Engineering Departments have had some
difficulty in getting the developer and his contractor to complete
these items.
Under the UBC handicapped access is required to each of the tenant
areas in this building. Although this access could have been at the
front or the rear of the building, the developer determined in the
original design where the access ramp was to be located. He chose to
place the ramp at the front of the building. For the safety of the
public a raised curb and railing is required along the edge of the
ramp. The Chief Building Inspector allowed the tenant at the east end
of the building (United Mail Offices) to install a step and remove the
curb and railing in the area between the door to his leased area and
the east end of the building as a part of his tenant improvements
(Building Permit No. 10356, August 13, 1985). The reason why the
tenant was allowed to remove this portion of the railing was because
handicapped persons were not required to use this portion of the ramp
beyond the door to gain access to anything. As the pictures taken by
the Planning staff in November, 1985 show, the tenant removed more of
the railing and curb than he was permitted by his building permit. The
Building Department has placed a red tag which stops work on the
tenant's improvements for this location until the railing and curb
which were not authorized for removal are replaced. No other portions
of the railing can be removed because it is necessary for handicapped
persons gaining access on the existing ramp to other shops to pass by
their storefronts.
Planninq Commission Action
The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative
action should be taken by resolution. The reasons for any action
should be clearly stated. At the public hearing the following
conditions should be considered:
l. that this use permit shall not become effective and no building
permit for tenant improvements shall be issued until the Building
Department has notified the Planning Department that a certifica-
tion of occupancy on the building shell including all requirements
of the Building Department and proper address labeling on the front
and rear entrances of each business approved by the Engineering
Department has been issued; and
2. that the business in this 481 SF location shall operate seven days
a week from 7:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. and have the owner and one part
time employee on site operating the business.
� lY � 1.1N I
��-�C
Margaret Monroe
City Planner
MM/s cc: Lance McDonald
Garbis Bezdjian
David Kimmel
�
PROJECT APPLICATION ���"�" °� 1199 BROADWAY
�t CEQA ASSESSMENT BURUNc�E project address
.�
i TOBACCO WAY
�.y��.t'� pro�ect name - if any
Application received � �
( 10 15 85 )
Staff review/acceptance ( ) �
1. APPLICANT TObdCCO Way 343-0214
name telephone no.
1114 Burlingame Avenue, Burlin ame, CA 94010
applicant s address: street, city, zip code
Lance McDonald 343-0214
contact person, if different telephone no.
2. TYPE OF APPLICATION
Special Perr.iit ( X) Variance* O Ccndominium Permit O Other
*Attach letter which addresses each of the 4 findings required by Code Chapter 25.54.
3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
SPECIAL PERMIT to allow a 481 SF tobacco shop in a portion of the
new commercial buildinq on the NE corner of Laquna and Broadway
The applicant and one part time employee will operate the shop
Hours wi 11 be 7 AP1 - 6 PM (Mon-Fri ), 9 AM - 6 PM (Sat) , 8 AM - 2 PP�
(Sun). The 3/6/84 variance for this buildinq requires each new
tenant to obtain a Use Permit.
(attach letter of explanation if additional space is needed)
Ref. code section(s): ( ) (
4. PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
� 026-192-220 �� 25&26 �� 2
APN lot no. block no.
(� ���C-1 ) ( 10,841 �
zoning district land area, square feet
Garbis Bezd,iian �
land owner's name
� Easton Addition �
subdivision name
) .
40 Berrvessa Way
ad SS
�ii�l�lsborough, CA 94010
Reauired Date received city zip code
(g��s) (no) ( - ) Proof of ownershi�
(yes) (��) (10/16/85) Owner's consent to a�plication
5. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS
-- New retail commercial buildinq with 8 parking spaces in rear
Required Date received
(yes) (r� ( 10/14/85� Site plan showing: property lines; public sidewall:s and
curbs; all structures and improvements;
paved on-site parking; landscaping.
(yes) (rs� ( " ) Floor plans of all buildings showing: gross floor area
by type of us�`on each floor plan.
�) (no) ( - ) Building elevations, cross sections (if relevant).
��) (no) ( - ) Site cross section(s) (if relevant).
(otner) ( 10/15/8� 1 etter of expl anati on
*Land use classifications are: residential (show # dwelling units); office use; retail
sales; restaurant/cafe; manufacturing/repair shop; warehousing; other (to be described).
6. PROJECT PP,QPOSAL (NO NEI�1 FLOOR AREA IS BEING CREATED)
Proposed censtruction, Delov� qrade ( _ SF) Second floor ( _ SF)
gross floor area First floor ( 48 1 SF) Third floor ( _ SF)
Project Codp Project Code
Pr000sal Requirement Proposal Requirement
Front setback Lot coveraae
Side setback ►10 Ci1d P:uildine height n0 n e
Side yard Lar.dscaoed area
Rear yard �n••site pkg.spaces 8
, _ _ __. . _ _ - - ; - — — ._ ---- - - ----
6. PROJECT PROPOSAL (continued)
Full tir�e employees on site
Part tir�e emoloyees on site
Visitors/customers (weekday)
Visitors/customers (Sat.Sun.)
Residents on property
Trin ends to/from site*
Peak hour trip ends*
Trucks/service vehicles
EXISTING
after
8-5 5 PM
�0
00
11 �
1 �
1 1�
1 1�
1 1�
1 1�
IPl 2 YEARS
� after
8-5 5 PM
��
�
11 � 1
11 m
1 � 1 1
1 �/
� �
IP1 5 YEARS
after
8-5 5 PM
��
��
1 m
1 �1
1 �1
1 �1
1 �1
*Show calculations on reverse side or attach seoarate sheet.
� 7. ADJACENT BUSINESSES/LAND USES
Commercial uses to north, south and west, residences to the
east, this use cnnf�rmc tn th � eneral nlan_
Required Date received
(,�s) (no) ( _ ) Location plan of adjacent properties.
(yes) (no) ( ) Other tenants/firms on property:
no. firms ( ) no. employees ( )
floor area occupied ( SF office space)
( Sf other)
no. employee vehicles regularly on site ( )
no. comoany vehicles at this location ( )
8. FEES Special Permit, all districts $100 (X ) Other application type, fee $ ()
Variance/R-1,R-2 districts $ 40 () Project Assessment $ 25 (X )
Variance/other districts $ 75 () Neoative Declaration $ 25 (X j
Condominium Permit $ 50 () EIR/City & consultant fees $ (
TOTAL FEES $ 150 . 00 RECEI PT N0. 0693 Recei ved by A. S rague
I hereby certify under �enalty of perjury that the information given herein is
true and correct to e�bes�t �`- ,�Cnowledge and belief.
.�:%1 / % e � -,
Signature
qpp
Date 1�� I `_� � � `��
STAFF USE ONLY
NEGATIVE DECLARATION File No.
The City of Burlingame by on
completed a review of the proposed project and determined that:
( ) It will not have a significant effect on the environment.
( ) No Environmental Impact Report is required.
Reasons for a Conclusion:
19 ,
-�• -u� :- -�
•�- •� 1 ��
� C�, � � I I . s-�
Sign ture of Processino Official 'tle Daie Signed
Unless appealed within 10 days hereof the d�te posted, the deternination shall be final.
DECLARATION OF POSTIPIG Date Posted:
I declare under penalty of perjury that I am City Clerk of the City of Burlingame and that
I posted a true copy of the above Neoa.ti�re Declaration at the City Hall of said City near
the doors to th�a Council Chambers.
Executed at 6urlingame, California on
Apoealed: ( )Yes ( )P,o
19
JUDifH !� MALFATTI, CITY CLERK, CITY f!� SURLINGAME
STAFF REVI EW
1. CIRCULATION OF APPLICATION
Project proposal/plans have been circulated for review by:
date circulated reply received
City Engineer ( 10/23/85 ) (yes) (no)
Building Inspector ( " ) (yes) (no)
Fire Marshal ( �� ) (yes) (no)
Park Department ( _ ) (yes) (no)
City Attorney ( — ) (yes) (no)
2. SUMMARY OF STAFF CONCERNS/POSSIBLE MITIGATION MEASURES
memo attached
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
Concerns Mitigation Measures
Is this use compatible with Review application; make
other uses in the area? determination.
Does the proposal meet all Request comments from the
Fire and Building Code Fire Marshal and Chief Bldg.
requirements? Inspector.
3. CEQA REQUIREMEPITS
If a Negative Declaration has not been posted for this project:
Is the project subject to CEQA review? No - cateqoricallv exempt.
IF AN EIR IS REQUIRED:
Initial Study completed
Decision to prepare EIR
Notices of preparation mailed
RFP to consultants
Contract awarded
Admin. draft EIR received
Draft EIR accepted by staff
Circulation to other agencies
�
c
�
�
�
�
�
�
Study by P.C.
Review period ends
Public hearing by P.C.
Final EIR received by P.C.
Certification by Council
Decision on project
Notice of Determination
�
i
�
�
�
�
�
)
�
)
)
)
)
)
4. APPLICATION STATUS Date first received ( 10/15/8�1
Accepted as complete: no( ) letter to applicant advising info. required ( )
Yes( ) date P.C. study ( j1�12�gg
Is application ready for a public hearing? (yes) (no) Recommended date (�1�3.5/�� )
Date staff report mailed to aoplicant (►►'�0 4'�) Date Corrmission hearing (Ii�z����)
Application approved ( ) Denied ( ) Appeal to Council (yes) (no)
Date Council hearing ( ) Application aparoved ( ) Denied ( )
�p.Q II�S�`��
signed date
�
���..� ; ��.�.,-
�
��,� .,��. �* Lc�.��,�. �� i c�..�r� ^,�, n �� �=�ic�
J �� ;
� i �v� ,�1 �.h
r�v�.r� r� � o� �, �.;� _r., , �-i � �
_ P
:
'.'� =.��, � (�`r \�; � ,�►�l�t�`�� P..��;
�a������
��'�-� �v�.� �� c�� _.�r�.n� ��:� �- `� 5 -� �..g�� ��_ �:;�_
" ll
1 n�.�L�C�S�, C� �� � �9`.. �;�CS�. � i ��0� �Jr�,�,,��,y,,� � � �
_J
�% � � �`, �� G�`� � ` l Cj�G1�v e �\ . , � ��',��o�«o �� � � `=,
. ���� °`�
o. �,,���re. ' -e�c�.;�s�-�� � +���� S-��� �,.�-.�, �Jv,�L.�a�. �`�°- .
�� ,
� . � r��� c'� `r� �.e.).� L � �o, �� � 1 �� r� �. C�Sc� r-� �, ��� � � `�� �c� � ;
v
� j�Q� r G^��;5�'�4� r�0�_� ! CC�4��G�� � Y`�'�1G'�G�G��\C�SJ�� �'(��.��;:�51�C'�..�'t��'.^('�= ,
�
-�'� ��.� � � � � c�..r� �l c�cv,�:� C� �e.s�� `.
�1 r��, > �� � �.� (`�1������v� C- �'�c�c� 1 � ram - ��:�r• ���t��,ti�c���� .
,�
�-- �'t�t�'1 �-- 2- �n� �lI��CI�U� ��� �:��.�.�� (�'l� ��.,ti�"'j��� �
, \ ,�___----- , � l _
1ie.'u l � \��• J � ;,.J �� ` � Q. r�� i 10 1 �(;�� �k't�� '�,Y�^�1 �v�SZ ,
� � .
'(`�v\ ;v����.�5�%� �,.��`� L� _ c��N��,�e� w��\c� ��c��,`��-�� S
J � � `i
�.,��x� m��. 1�.� `� �-�,. �.,�� � �. �-lU.�,�.� , '�
��������
���`��1�C.�t1�..`.�. G'V�, �
��.YV� `M1.��.a2-� � � C5r15 ��r � n � (�r��
J
.:..------ `
� � c1 C51,—,fcv_U�. �
�__.r._� J _ _
,������,
,--�� �
�
�`� �_�� �'�,� � �� �� r � �
' - `C�S2�
�_���.. � �C� �� , ��._�,a
�
�t1
�
�
�
V.
�:
�
��
1'
�
: �
�1
:�
�
�
�
�
a
�s
��
Z
O
Q
1
�
�
Z��
� � c�� � � '
��1����1�
�ll �--�� G`'�J
�,
. ����� ��:�t�fl
- 5 .�G� ��'`�� �p
�
0
0
A
�
_
0
�
�
�
`�
�
��
�
�
�i
�
�_
.J
�
V \
�
\
"I
�
4
��,�
�
�
V
�
�'�•�
�
�P,S
j�
: C
�.
1� �.H'� ,m« -.�:rJ
i
— � .�.� -�_`;=f-.�� -_.�.��,� C=x
O
.,�� -,r�
5
,. �-,«
b
,.� ;n
. � zZ
E
t�3?% ' : �jN ! �i �Y �1 �� �'�
' S8- �i - �� ' .
�-�` ��-�%; �'�� � `�,�� � � � // — /a'l� �d �� � .�
' „8;2?
Z j
i
a
DATE: /� 23 S
MEMO T0: CITY ENGINEER
CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR
FIRE MARSHAL
FROM: �PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: Sp��vl �G�/+�•� ��ayr> si 7��',t�ae - J�v�v s��
��q 9 ,
An application has been received for the above project for review by the
Planning Commission. The application will be scheduled for S�iD y
at their ///�2/�S meeting. We would appreciate having
your comments by ///����
--TT
Thank you.
Helen Towber
Planner
s/
att.
� � .
73'�' �"'.�,.._.� �� _ /�d z��'�
� 1
�r�� �Li.Y %�'� Y�6
,� , �,
/�� LD�-�..�.�c�ti'�� �` �``� ��
.
y,,-��
' � ��
DATE : /4�23��,�
MEMO T0: CITY ENGINEER
CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR
FIRE MARSHAL
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: �'p�s:vl PG��s,� � � a,llair> si 7n�'.«�e - f'�p s��
��`� 9 ,
An application has been received for the above project for review by the
Planning Commission. The application will be scheduled for �P�D y
at their !//�2/�S meeting. We would appreciate having
your corrunents by // � �� �
�
Thank you.
Helen Towber
Planner
s/
att.
R��tl9��f�
OCi 2 5 i985
�dn��p��
���"� [�cz��'• ?�tS N U ��CC��"��s . -
.�� _
DATE : ���Z3���
MEMO T0: CITY ENGINEER -
CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR --
FIRE MARSHAL - �-
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: sp�,:vl %��n,�� � al�oyrl � �vG",t��e - J� •��
//99 ,
An application has been received for the above project for review by the
Planning Commission. The application will be scheduled for �Y�iD y
at their !/�/2/�S meeting. We would appreciate having
your comments by �//5���� —
` �
i�� �� -�'.�
Thank you. %�O � ��h � o•�� �� `�'�
�, A
�� �Q�/d'/�-S' LditlJ:�Ic�.�
!Pd'!n • /
T�� �u, %�,� �, �, �� �d �t w � � i��� �D�, � �� ,,�'
Hel en Towber n � l �('� S. ��� ���'�,
Planner ��r � �v�� ���nD�� s �h � �c
S� 1'�na / ph ��t' �u�6.!"'r►, cSf�t �� �fd,�' �i��'�•�J ���r —
a tt . , ��' ��' oY
�
- � i�
�� °
:��� �- ' � ^
�,-��,�� �.���
�
��, �
. .. . �.�'$ l`yZ�� .a.0 ����.�c��'Y�.e
� SAN MATEO COUNTY
CITY HALL-501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME� CALIFORNIA 94010 TEL:(415) 342-8931
March 8, 1984
Mr. Garbis S. Bezdjian
40 Berryessa Way
Hillsborough, CA 94010
Dear Mr. Bezdjian:
Since there was no appeal to or suspension by the City Council, we wish to advise the
February 27, 1984 Planning Commission approval of your Variance application became
effective March 6, 1984.
This apolication was to allow construction of a commercial building at 1I99 Broadti•ray
with eight on-site parking spaces rather than the�17 as required. The February 27,
1984 minutes of the Planning Commission state your variance was granted vrith the
following conditions:
1. that the project be built according to the plans submitted and date
stamped January 6, 1984;
2. that the project receive an encroachment permit;
3. that the final plans for the project meet all the codes and standards
of the City of Burlingame;
4. that an enclosed trash receptacle, accessible to BFI, be provided and
maintained on site;
5, that if the parking lot is to be closed off to the public use at a
given hour in the evening, the parking lot lights also be turned off
at that time to reduce the impact on the adjacent•residential use;
6. that a six foot fence or ��uall be provided on nroperty line between the
project site and the adjacent property facing on Laguna;
'/. that the final landscape plans be approved by the Parks Department; -
8. that a use permit be required from the Planning Commission for all
proposed tenants; and
9. that the conditions of the City Engineer's memo of February Z, 1984
be met.
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes
Page 7
November 12, 1985
In discussing complaints, staff stated most come from property owners
across the street; the city does not have a limit on the number of
memberships allowed for the club; one Commissioner commented that 300
or 1,200 or 8,500 memberships would make a difference.
In view of staff's confirmation that the club meets parking
requirements, C. Jacobs moved for approval of this special permit
amendment and for adoption of Commission Resolution Approving Special
Permits with the following conditions: (1) that the project as built
shall be consistent with th� plans submitted to the Planning Deoartment
and date stamped November 4, 1985; (2) that the conditions of the Fire
Marshal's October 15, 1985 memo, the Chief Building Inspector's October
22, 1985 memo and the City Engineer's October 23, 1985 memo shall be
met; and (3) that the operation and facilities shall comply with all
the conditions and city requirements as approved on July 12, 1978 as
amended by the six additional parking spaces for the pool, elimination
of one racquetball court (total 14 courts) and total on-site parking of
64 spaces. Second C. Schwalm; motion approved on a 6-0-1 roll call
vote, C. Taylor abstaining. Appeal procedures were advised.
8. SIGN EXCEPTION TO ALLOW A SECOND POLE SIGN AT 1200 BAYSHORE
HIGHWAY, ZONED C-4 (CONTINUED FROM 10/28/85)
Applicant was not present. C. Graham moved to deny this sign exception
application. Second C. Giomi; motion approved on a 7-0 roll call vote.
Appeal procedures were advised.
9. 1986 PLANi�ING COMMISSION SCHEDULE
C. Leahy moved for approval of the 1985 Commission schedule. Second C.
Schwalm; approved unanimously on voice vote.
Recess 9:20 P.M.; reconvene 9:30 P.M.
ITEMS FOR STUDY
10. SPECIAL PERMIT — SATELLITE ANTENNA DISH — 1215 VANCOUVER AVENUE
Requests: clarify driveways; who installed the antenna; justification
for the present location of the dish, are there alternative sites.
Item set for hearing November 25, 1985.
Y� 11. SPECIAL PERMIT — TOBACCO SHOP — 1199 BROADWAY
-�.-;::-,��..::.�
n
Requests: are all the problems with the project site cleared up;
criteria regarding the handicapped rail; has final inspection been
complete3 on this building. Item set for hearing November 25, 1985.
12. SPECIAL PERMIT - ORIENTAL RUGS AND ANTIQUES SHOP - 1199 BROADWAY
Item set for hearing November 25, 1985.
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes
PLANNER REPORTS
- Review of Past Permits
Page 8
Noveinber 12, 1985
The following past permits were reviewed and appr ed:
�.
- 875 Mahler Road,�Break-Away Coffee Shop
- 888 Hinckley Road�;�The Sports Therapy Cli c
- 850 Mahler Road, T� Skypak Courier
- 840 Stanton Road, Fe al's Deli
- 1633 Bayshore Highway 175, Affili ed Auto Rental
- CP Monroe reviewed Counci ions at its November 4, 1985 meeting.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
- City Counc' Staff Report, Han 'cap Parking Spaces, 10/21/85
- Processing a Minor Modification, 'ty Planner, 7/9/85
«w'
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:55 P.M. ,�
Respectfully submitted,
Robert J. Leahy, Secretary
�
5�86/ 1�0 . ' ' � ... � . [j� ;
_ � ' . ,iyMoyo� _ . . • � , � • _' . . � �1� r ;�
,, ,"�,t, � � � � ' . . � �htt�1 M� . . � : --. .� `: . �.;
. .. ��C1��413. . . .'�
� � ��'��'�tld �Nt19�X�----� . .. - . :. . �r�.r :
. N.,
. . _ :.. ,a��i - . :.� � . . ... � :;:: -:{.�_ . : . . . t . � :
, . . : � � . . �:r� :: � . - .- . . .- .. , ._�
� ,, .:+ _ .; . . . ;,�
k / / � � ` . . .- �
� ' . . � , � �� . .:: _ � . �� ��
t ! . . . / :�
� � , -. . . - - SBI�a/s . �. . � . -_ . • . � .
� � . , —d�Hs , •, • .-. '. �:` • • r " . :'. -..�
' s�loa/.8 �s/zI� �d,�s�,� s8/g�/� -� s8��/� ..::.: � � . � ., `� � `
� �, G���v��' Q��ee� O�i1r���J!/� - 0=�ilcr/ardJ! • Q3ifo�rddi�. :' • ' .. '� .
,(r�3�-v�v� �- 'o
�� � � � . . ' M!� �
• % /.. . ,• • . . : . ' . '.. ►
. - � � ' S3%� vlirr�� doy� . .
` � . d�Ns �Y/�7u�ry �','✓i1f/o�� - ��i;ay c� . :�.' _ ' _ - , "_ ' .' � . :=.�� � 3�-
� �1Jt�l .��i;�/ /voi��s1� S��>>'�o � ' � � �a . .
���5� 7/ ff(Y , Q31 /N�'I ' ' :! .
r <� � L��/ O�sodo�d . =N.1 a�od�'d - ' :.,�;ss�id • .. ' .-
:.
' n % � . � � . �►� : :�
� � �� , � �, . . . � _ � . �.
�: . � . . .�
. � � �'�
, . . � . ..
. . . � . .
� vnr�rr�a rr�l � � . �� : . . � . . _ .
� . o � . � � . .�. � . . . �: .�. . . .
' N �l���i Ci01r'i � � . •
�E ' vr'
. . � � . . : .." . . . ' . .
. �� � .
. _ . . _._._—_. . . . .—..— �4%�I . . . . ; • : • . ,
, . . - , . ( �j�� . - � -tN ��Z�'t� �i .. . . . �.. . . : � . � �r��'� %�, . . � . : . • , � . .
, . � ��dafd . , li� ��.N�d: . . . N�H �t l� .`� �l. . .. . - � . . �
� ---- --� -- . . . . . . . � . . - . , � . . _ _ I
�
0
�r;x;;.-:
� �
r
� �r" � •.
�, (
R �� �'� #���k � `���
! 1 .
� + � � i'
� � `` �,
�! �°
,. ., -r.
��.��
��, .
, ' .., i •
-- - - � ��:
�_��;��
�- � � ��
�� -
�
=.�.. w .::. _�
� �:y;
r :'� � � � � � T �
�� ^�� 1.'� _..� � �
_ �
-�`_.,,,-- _ - `_
, •
� �9i �1 e, o�e
"RA�D JVM[ �
�.hP C�it� �af �urlirt��tmr
SAN MATEO COUNTY
CITY NALL- 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME,CALIFORNIA 94010 TEI.:(al5) 342-893I
NOTICE OF HEARING
�
SPECIAL PERMIT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Monday, the 25th day of November, 1985 , at
the hour of 7:30 P.M., in the City Hall Council Chambers , 501 Primrose Road,
Burlingame, California the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame will conduct
a public hearing on the application to allow a tobacco shop in a portion of the
new commercial building at 1199 Broadway, zoned C-1.
At the time of the hearing all persons interested will be heard.
For further particulars reference is made to the Planning Department.
MARGARET MONROE
CITY PLANNER
November 15, 1985
�
�
.; ..
11/2/84
�
;
� RESOLUTIOV :10. �
i
'
RESOLUTION APPROVING SPECIAL PERPdITS
; .
� RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of
! Burlingame that;
�
iWHEREAS, application has been made for a special permit
� fo= a tobacco shop .
,,
; at 1199 Broadway c�.� 026-192-220 �,
'' and ' .
I
i WHEREAS, this Commission held a public hearing on said
' application on November 25 ,19II5 ;
�IOW THEREFOR�, it is hereby RESOLVED and DETERMINED by
this Planning Commission that said special permit is approved,
subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto.
It is further directed that a certified copy of this �
i
resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of
� San i9ateo. �
�
�
A. !4. Garcia �
Chairman
I, ROBERT J. LEAHY, Secretary of the Planning �
Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that �
the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular �
meeting of the Planninq Commission held on the 25th day of
November ,1985 , by the followinq vote:
AYES: COi•L'•1ZSSIOi1ERS:
:IOES: CO:LMISSIOt7ERS:
ABSE:IT: C0:•iMISSIO?7ERS:
�obert J. Leanv
Secretary
I
i
i
�
1
i
�