The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1220 Bernal Avenue - Staff ReportItem No. 1a Consent Calendar PROJECT LOCATION 1220 Bernal Avenue City of Burlingame Design Review and Specia/ Permit Address: 1220 Bernal Avenue Item No. 1 a Consent Calendar Meeting Date: February 10, 2014 Request: Application for Design Review for first and second story additions to an existing two-story house with a detached garage and Special Permit for Declining Height Envelope. Applicant and Designer: Chris Anderson APN: 026-172-220 Property Owners: Tom and Carrie Pendolino Lot Area: 6,000 SF General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per CEQA Article 19, Section 15301 (e)(2), which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 SF in areas where all public services and facilities are available and the area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive. Project Description: The existing house has two stories with a detached garage. The applicant is proposing additions to the first and second floors at the front of the existing house. The proposed house and garage will have a total floor area of 3,414 SF (0.569 FAR) where 3,420 SF (0.57 FAR) is the maximum allowed (including covered porch exemptions). The applicant is requesting a special permit for declining height envelope. The proposed second floor addition encroaches into the declining height envelope on the left side by 21.3 SF (2'-0" x 10'-8") at the master bathroom. The existing garage provides one covered parking space and there is one uncovered parking space in the driveway leading to the garage. The existing garage is non-conforming based on current code standards for the following reasons: it is greater than 28'-0" length without a special permit, it has glazed openings within 10'-0" of a property line without a conditional use permit, it has a separate workshop use without a conditional use permit, it is separated by less than 4'-0" from another on-site structure without a conditional use permit, and it does not comply with setback requirements. The applicant is proposing to remove the workshop space (12'-0" x 12'-6") at the rear of the accessory structure. The existing code compliant covered parking space in the garage (10' x 20') will remain. The proposed work to the accessory structure will not extend any of the existing non-conformities and the existing parking situation will not be altered. There are 4 existing bedrooms in the house and the proposed additions to the house will not increase the number of bedrooms. The covered parking space in the garage and the uncovered parking space in the driveway meet the parking requirements for a four-bedroom house. The applicant is requesting the following applications: • Design Review for a second story addition (C.S. 25.57.010,a,2); and � Special Permit for Declining Height Envelope (C.S. 25.26.035,c). Design Review and Special Permit 1220 Bernal Avenue 1220 Bernal Avenue LotArea: 6,000 SF Plans date stam ed: Janua 14 and 29, 2014 EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQUIRED (January 14 and 29, 2014 plans) SETBACKS Front (1st flr): 20'-8" No change 19'-8" is block average (2nd flr): 29'-9" 29'-9" 20'-0" Side (left): 4'-0" No change 4'-0" (right): 14'-4" No change 4'-0" Rear (1st flr): 27'-0" 31'-0" 15'-0" (2nd flr): 31'-0" No change 20'-0" Lot Coverage: 2586 SF 2380 SF 2400 SF 43%, 39.7% 40% existing,non- conforming FAR: 3012 SF 3414 SF 3420 SF' 0.50 FAR 0.569 FAR 0.57 FAR # of bedrooms: 4 No change --- Parking: 1 covered No change 1 covered (10' x 20') (10' x 20') 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') Height: 26'-9" 29'-2" 30'-0" DH Envelope: Left side Special Permit required for CS 25:26.035,c encroaches 2 encroachment of the proposed second story on the left side 3 ' (0.32 x 6000 SF) + 1100 SF + 400 = 3420 SF (0.57 FAR) Z Existing second story encroaches into the declining height envelope 114.6 SF (3'-6'/:' x 32'-2") on the left side. 3 Proposed seconds story addition encroaches into the declining height envelope 21.3 SF (2'-0" x 10'-8") on the left side. Staff Comments: See attached memos from the Chief Building Official, Fire Marshal, City Engineer, Parks Supervisor, and NPDES Coordinator. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission design review study meeting on January 27, -2- Design Review and Special Permit 1220 Bernal Avenue Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission design review study meeting on January 27, 2014, the Commission had several comments and suggestions regarding this project (January 27, 2014 Planning Commission Minutes). The designer submitted a response letter dated January 30, 2014, and revised plans, dated stamped January 29, 2014. Listed below are the Commission's comments and responses by the applicant. 1. The notes need to be updated on the front entry elevation. • Sheet A5 has been revised so that the material designations at the front entry are correct. 2. Confirm if the proposed windows are Anderson 400 series vinyl-clad windows? Approval of fhe project will require that those exact vinyl clad windows be installed. • Sheet A6 has been revised so that the window detail specifies that Anderson 400 Series Vinyl clad windows will be used. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Design Review Findings: Based on the findings stated by the Planning Commission in the attached minutes of their January 27, 2014, Design Review Study meeting, that the proposed addition and the massing of the addition help to blend the existing floors and styles of the house, and that the architectural style, mass and bulk of the house will be consistent with the existing character of the neighborhood, the project is found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review guidelines. Findings for a Special Permit: In order to grant a Special Permit, the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.51.020 a-d): (a) The blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood; (b) the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood; (c) the proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city; and (d) removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements, and the mitigation for the removal that is proposed is appropriate. Special Permit Findings: Based on the findings stated in the attached minutes of the Planning Commission's January 27, 2014, Design Review Study meeting, that the proposed encroachment into the v declining height envelope on the left side of the second floor is set back from the front of the house, that -3- Design Review and Special Permit 1220 Bernal Avenue the proposed second floor plate height is reasonable and consistent with existing plate heights, and that the proposed encroachment is necessary to work with the existing rooflines, the Planning Commission is supportive of the Special Permit request and the project is found to be compatible with the special permit criteria listed above. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped January 14, 2014, sheets C1, A1 through A-4, A7, L1, G61 and Boundary Survey, and date stamped January 29, 2014, sheets A5 and A6; 2. that any changes to building materials, exteriorfinishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the City Engineer's November 12, 2013 memo, the Chief Building Official's October 30 and December 16, 2013 memos, the Parks Supervisor's December 19, 2013 memo, the Fire Marshal's November 1, 2013 memo, and the Stormwater Coordinator's December2, 2013 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; -4- Design Review and Special Permit 1220 Bernal Avenue 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Erika Lewit Senior Planner c. Chris Anderson, applicant and designer Attachments: Applicant's Response to Commission's comments Minutes from January 27, 2014, Design Review Study Meeting Application to the Planning Commission Special Permit Application Staff Comments Photos of neighborhood, date stamped October 30, 2013 Rendering of the proposed front elevation, date stamped January 14, 2014 Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed January 31, 2014 Aerial Photo -5- Planning Commision Comments response January 30, 2014 Re: Planning Commission Review: The Pendolino Residence / Revisions Address: 1220 Bernal Ave. Design Review Commments: 1) See sheet AS for material designation correction to front entry 2) See sheet A5, Right side elevation for a new 2x12 Belly Band separating the lower story from the upper story addition to blend the the exsting structure in with the new by adding cement plaster to the lower portion as a possible suggestion by the commissioners. 3) See sheet A6 for revised window detail specifying "Andersen" 400 Series "Vinyl" clad windows. If you have any further questions, please contact Christopher Anderson at 650-996-3489 Thank you, Christopher Anderson �� I�� ,�An� 3 c 2� ,�� ^�ITY O� BURLINGAME CDD-PLANNING DIV. 1647 QUAIL COURT, LIVERMORE, CA. 94550 (650)•996�3489 � CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED M/NUTES City Council Chambers 501 Primrose Road - Burlingame, California January 27, 2014 - 7:00 p.m. 8. 1220 BERNAL AVENUE, ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE FOR A SECOND STORY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (CHRISTOPHER ANDERSON, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER, TOM AND CARRIE PENDOLINO, PROPERTY OWNERS) STAFF CONTACT: ERIKA LEWIT All Commissioners had visited the property. There were no ex-parte communications. Reference staff report dated January 27, 2013, with attachments. Planning Manager Gardiner briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Chair Sargent opened the public comment period. Tom Pendolino and Christopher Anderson represented the applicant: Existing house is odd. The former owner added onto it in 1988, and now looks like two very different houses taped together. Will improve the curb appeal. Current house already cuts into the declining height envelope so hard to do anything additional that does not also cut into the envelope. Commission questions/comments: ■ Did you look at options that would not cut into the declining height envelope? (Pendolino: Tried but would have to move master bath, then plumbing would not line up.) ■ Masterful job of blending together the styles and fixing the flaws. The area where the declining height envelope is encroached is far back, and there is an existing encroachment. (Anderson: The existing roof on the back of the house is a 10:12 pitch. Trying to maintain the new structure with a 10:12 pitch on the lower part impedes the second story addition.) ■ Fixing the non-conforming garage is an improvement. ■ Massing is handled well, and the part going into the declining height envelope is tucked in so has minimal impact. ■ Still has two different materials — look at using stucco on both parts? (Anderson: Looked at it, but they like the idea of having two different materials. Adding the secondary materials enhances the look of the house. Also a budget consideration.) Right side is the only place where the different materials look odd. ■ Is the fireplace in the Living room a wood-burning fireplace or an appliance? The chimney is not tall enough for it to work as a wood-burning fireplace. (Anderson: The fireplace does not work— only for aesthetics.) If it stays as a wood-burning fireplace the chimney will need to be taller to meet the codes. ■ Looks like the front entry has changed since the elevations; the notes need to be updated accordingly. ■ Indicates the new windows are Anderson 400 Series vinyl-clad windows. Would not want to interpret an approval of these to suggest that any type of vinyl window would be acceptable. We do not support a particular manufacturer, though these are acceptable. However that does not give a blanket approval for any vinyl-clad window. ■ Good to see that no trees on the site will be removed. CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMMISSION — Unapproved Minutes January 27, 2014 Public comments: None. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Commission comments: Important aspects in support of the declining height envelope is working within existing rooflines, not asking for an inordinate plate height on the second floor, and working with various different plate heights to articulate the roofline. Commissioner Sargent made a motion to place the item on the Consent Calendar when complete. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Bandrapalli. Discussion of motion: None. Chair Sargent called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the Consent Calendar when plans have been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0-0-0. The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 9:18 p.m. � � CITY '� ' dl ��\�l� 'a COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 9401 O p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: '� Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Parcel #: � 2 � � � � �' � �''� ❑ Conditional Use Permit �' Special Permit ❑ Other: PROJECT ADDRESS: ��. � D ��N�- �� O Please indicate the contact person for this project APPLICANT project contact person�( OK to send electronic copies of documents� Name: [��f�i4/� /�'�%D�S �'/�% Address: L�o `}'7 l�G(!�/G- � City;S�a�e;Z��: ��(%�./�%02C � ��5�� Phone: �Q S� • �'1 '�1 �O - � �S y PROPERTY OWNER project contact personP� OK to send electronic copies of documentsc�C Name: %�!✓% �' ��iL/� / �/VODGIN� Address: ld�v20 %��le/i1� �� ity; Stat�!Zip: ��/l�.lN��-n'I E �- `�1 `f'O/D Phone: �.��• ��'�-�" I. �� ? a a l S Fax: C%� .S = C''J � D � /� Z � Fax: � � °. 3 `( %. o�.o �� E-mail: �cif�'c/¢'� 6 � �l�I'1/�/L • CD/li E-mail: / /�Gi`/C6 1r"''�o �g �/��ao. Co�-j ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Pro�ect contact Person� OK to send electronic copies of documents Name: ( ' ,�i,STD r°�-/e- /-7�"�D�S /�') Address: (� ¢7 (.(��C�L (�' T. City/State/Zip: � �� 'Y10� l�/� 7 �� -.- . / � ' i �� k.� � � �"�� , � T 3 r 20'�3 Fax: � I�- � �v � � l � � �;�� ,�at�' . �,_ - ,� E-mail: �� '� � � ��'I /�7 C- • `GO �ii . * Burlingame Business License #: 2�� Z� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: N� S ��/v`D .�S/�%eGi �%��'�� i�i1�d /TTD'7'✓ /i�4 �-�CT-�l D� ��' , �D'1.JitJS��,� �(/S� ��u�- G��z Ta �Yi�� f��T� �� t� AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under enalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and bel' . Applicant's signature: Date: GD��o�� I am aware of the proposed applicati and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. � 1 p�Z3 / l3 Property owner's signature: Date: Date submitted: �lr Verification that the project architect/designer has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the Finance Department at the time application fees are paid. � Plsase mark one box above with an X to indicate the contact person for this project. s:�Halloours�PcapP�icotron zoos.hondour.doc This Space for CDD Staff Use Only � Project Description: � �� .. , - �i �i t�,^r�� r,�� r� o �.� . ,� � rt� r � 7/ � �'� ��'., .�./�'�.. a. ��::� �� pl ✓� ra � �,T,c � �, F r=,,�� • Key: Abbreviation - , Term `� CUP Conditional Use Permit DHE Declinina Heiaht Envelo DSR Design Review E Existin N New SFD Single Family Dwelli SP Special Permit City of Burlingame Planning Deparnnent 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org R�� CITY O� BURLIN4iAME �p � o0 : �� CITY OF BURLINGAME SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION �a � o ��N� �� '�i✓d � L./r►/l� /��SW/ ,f�eJ � The Planning Commission is required by law to rYske findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code Section 25.50). Your answers to the fillowing questions can assist the Aanning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be �de for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. 1. Explain why the blend of mass, scale and deiinantstructural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with tl� existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood. Currently the home combines two differnet styles of Architecture. The addition of the new second story design blends the addition done in the early 1980's with the old to create a more consistent design within the street and neighboring properties eliminating the flat roof of the early 1920's. �!['a�n= 2. Explain how the variety of roof line, facad� exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood. The steep roofline with the proposed design blends the old roof with the new roof to create a smooth transition. Gables have been added along with a blend of materials to break up the mass and to give a more architectural appeal to the home following in line with the recent remodels within the vicinity of this home. 3. How will the proposed project be consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city (C.S. 25.57)? The proposed project will be consistent with the guidelines by off setting walls reducing the mass and maintaining the height. With the constraints of the existing second story hallway and the location of the plumbing we are encroaching in the DHE by 18 s.f. because we were limited to where the addition would be along with the existing steep 10& 12 pitch of the roof. Currently the home is offset to the left side of the property with a detached a detached garage located at the rear of the property with a long driveway allowing for 3 cars to tandem park. A two story home is located on the left and s single story on the right with the mass of the addition located closer to the second story home to reduce the effects of the single story. Primarily the project is screened from the street view by (3) mature trees within the right of way and on the property reducing the overall scale of the project. 4. Explain how the removal of any trees locatedvithin the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with tle city's reforestation requirements. What mitigation is proposed for the removal of an y trees? Explain why this mitigation is appropriate. No trees will be impacted by the projects design. �,...o. � � � � ' 013 SPECPERM.FRM Project Comments � Date: To: December 16, 2013 � 0 City Engineer (650) 558-7230 X Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ' � Farks Supervisor (650) 558-7334 From: Subject: Staff Review: Erika Lewit, Planning � Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 � Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 0 NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney revised plans for 1220 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-172- 220 - original comments and revised plans are in your In- Box No further comments. All conditions of approval as stated in the review dated 10-30-2013 will apply to this project. Reviewed by: ate: 12-16-2013 � Project Comments Date: To: From: Subject: Staff Review: -1� ;''�) �) 4�1 October 30, 2013 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 0 Fire Division (650) 558-7600 0 Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Request for Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 1220 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 02� - ��--Z.- 2z ca November 4, 2013 On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2013 California Building Code, 2013 California Residential Code (where applicable), 2013 California Mechanical Code, 2013 California Electrical Code, and 2013 California Plumbing Code, including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1889. Note: If the Planning Commission has not approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2013 then this project must comply with the 2013 California Building Codes. As of January 1, 2014, SB 407 (2009) requires non-compliant plumbing fixtures to be replaced by water-conserving plumbing fixtures when a property is undergoing alterations or improvements. This law applies to all residential and commercial property built prior to January 1, 1994. Details can be found at htt�: f/www.leginfo.ca.govf�ub�Q9- 10/bill/sen/sb 0401-0450 f sb 407 bill 20091011 chaptered.html. Revise the plans to show compliance with this requirement. Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2013 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Go to http://www.enerqv.ca.qov/title24/2013standards/ for publications and details. Remove the notes regarding construction hours shown on Sheet C1 and replace with the following: "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. (See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.) ,�) fJn the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require �./work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrated on the Job Copy of the plans prior to performing the work. . � �. ,,► 6) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. 7) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 8) Provide a fully dimensioned site plan which shows the true property boundaries, the location of all structures on the property, existing driveways, and on-site parking. 9) Provide existing and proposed elevations. 10) Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of Occupancy will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued after the project has been finaled. No occupancy of the building is to occur until a new Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. 11) Provide a complete demolition plan that indicates the existing walls, walls to be demolished, new walls, and a legend. NOTE: A condition of this project approval is that the Demolition Permit will not be issued and, and no work can begin (including the removal of � building components), until a Building Permit has been issued for the project. The property owner is responsible for assuring that no work is authorized or performed. 12) Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines 13) Show the dimensions to adjacent structures. �ESIDENTIAL: Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the location and the net clear opening height and width of all required egress windows on the elevation drawin_qs. 2013 California Residential Code (CRC) §R310. Note: The areas labeled "Media Room" and "Office" are rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes and, as such, must comply with this requirement. � Indicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 16) Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 17) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 2013 CBC §1009. 18) Provide lighting at all exterior landings. NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 14, and 15 must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for Planning Commissio tion. Reviewed b . �� Date: 10-30-2013 Jo r, C -558-7270 Project Comments Date: To: From: Subject: Staff Review: October 30, 2013 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 0 Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 0 Fire Division (650) 558-7600 X Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Request for Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 1220 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: �Lo�1��LT� November 4, 2013 1) Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City's NPDES (stormwater) permit to prevent stormwater pollution from construction activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement appropriate and effective BMPs during all phases of construction, including demolition. When submitting plans for a building permit include a list of construction BMPs as project notes on a separate full size plan sheet, preferably 2' x 3' or larger. Project proponent may use the attached Construction BMPs plan sheet to comply with this requirement. Electronic file is available for download at: http://flowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section5/Const6MPPIanJun2012. pdf 2) Best Management Practices (BMPs) requirements apply on any projects using architectural copper. To learn what these requirements are, see attached flyer "Requirements for Architectural Copper." Electronic file is available for download at: http://flowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section8/ArchitecturalcopperBMPs .pdf For assistance please contact Stephen D. at 650-342-3727 Reviewed by: SD >� Date: 11 /1/2013 � Project Comments Date: To: From: Subject: Staff Review October 30, 2013 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 0 Building Division (650) 558- 7260 0 Parks Division (650) 558-7334 BFire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Request for Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 1220 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1, A P N : ��-�-4=Afi�6-- �� - � � 2 �Z-'�-O November 4, 2013 Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence. 1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter. 2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly — Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 3. All sprinkler drainage shall be placed into landscaping areas. 4. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Reviewed by: �c%�� Date: � �� Project Comments Date: � From: Subject: Staff Review: October 30, 2013 X Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 0 Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Request for Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 1220 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: OZca —t-�?r2� . November 4, 2013 1. Storm drainage shall be designed to drain towards the street frontage or to the City storm drain system. 2. The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway and other necessary appurtenant work. 3. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. Reviewed by: V V Date: 11/12/2013 Project Comments Date: To: From: Subject: Staff Review: December 16, 2013 � City Engineer (650) 55�7230 � Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 X Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7334 0 Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 � Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 0 NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney Erika Lewit, Planning revised plans for 1220 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-172- 220 - original comments and revised plans are in your In- Box 1. No further comments Reviewed by:B. Disco Date: 12/19/13 A S�COND ST�RY �DD1TlON AND �.XT�RI�R �AC��.1�T �OR: ��•� �- �.�.�1� ��C��l�� 2..2� ��.��.�. V�- ��C�� OCT 3 U Z013 CITY OF BURLWGAPJIc CDD-FL.ANNING DIV. 12Z8 ��.RNAL AVE.• � 22�' F�E.RNAL AVE.- - t 220 �ERNAL AVE.• 1216 �ERNAL AV�• 12 � 2��.RNAL AV�.• PROJECT ADDRE.55 ,�.P.Jv. - 026--172-220 - � , � • : ' �� - � , , w ,. ,:. , :. . �„�, .�` .�,,� . T� , .��" �� i �}„ ;� f �k9 k N, � Y.,. �y� +rt6nA . � � � ��+r � � �7A I�� M � dNIMAq(10� .�.•"� xnanwn+�wMww�n�nww�w+�mMunn�.,��II��NYM41afa,., . li � W'�� WMLi�I 1 r N � �I � ��'�uh� � � w �!��P, 'i:i � �m'!,",:. '� k � �. �,� M1T :. � � �^�!�.�� sn + � . � ,�, M I ' ..� �, ,li{. � \ f r.�, _ �+, � - �;�r' ^"�usW uu?^,�r,:�,�m� . '�#� rk! � � � 4� - mni a-ir�,�w�� 5u � °ain�u F �� r �"��"' t �1'f � � I! � w . , . �.� , . . �� rr + ��1 - , S' � 1 � k��ki�l . :., . v ,.. . . '; .. ,� �f�. � t � � x ��I� �af� d IF �+. �� IIWiYIi, h� � � +� �hll 7 � tl � 1 o y . � �� y�.� .,�1'k 4� �.« . , . � 7��, . �..' + w��,�,A,�. P�u ni kro � �r� � � �w�! � �� X�� -.!� r,' , .� , � �';� ��'�ti, E t �� .�x C um `�` E i j� 1 ma "�y 1�'•'�'d"� . . .. �� .p�4 � i '�'"�.. � . . . . 1� ua. I N , �., , i � � ,nF,. Hy,, � a ., ' � ' � � ,akT� '�ew °a+ "' c.�-, � ' � � ,. ��.. . . �'� . � ' kw Pw P" n. '� � � y : M • P I� . m , � . nr# . f R �� ? °� ��d ,� , ,r�..: �; � . �� tik °�„��f��'. ,� �^ .. , � , �, . .. �. # s - ,� �., A ,� r � .x �Y,�r�. . '� � '� � �'� . f w'' ,�� _ >�! _ - �. s4�.r� e�� , ' ''�•�y� 4� �1 � '4:� t,k RN � i"� $�""" j��i � ,��q:', ~N' y. �}"��r�� t �t � "a'- �p,�r� : �� t'��.�"�° " ' y��7 N a �., 1� i � ^ �,� �� ..�� ♦1�♦ y"�-! a k '+6' - R �'f'�'I��. �I� ,. •r�i: .� w+ i '� �i ,," i � � t� r ' �.Y�� '� '',��' �. � ' �.�� '� �. � � G . � � � � I .s1 1 1l � , '�.t �YJ� �; �'{�qpa •. ��, , !"1� ' , `_r j. �'�h ��. w � r;�'� , �,�i . � . . rr. �'.rq "'�^� .�!�', .%�� , , T *" .'� � : � � . ' r "w�'+�'6' �� ' - ;'i � '"u'�I IGJ�' . � �. � { "�� t _ . . ..:R��R �. i. � •'� �' t ; � 1 : ��,' r �� t� • . lx � 4 � . . y�,« ' . � P;. i ��' �,uNW5Yl4�' , . 3 � w F�' �t� . •� ♦� . . My{"� ��'rey . . �';�� ,"� . �� J., tfr . *.. ��t�+�R � . j�p��9M�� . _ �.. � . fi , .` . �. Jt �� :titi ' r 5 c � �� L� �o�,�P��'� u�"��a'� �ttinl 4� �N!. �.� � ►, • � �, �' . . ,, ,. . � �,, �4,�,� f ,,, , ��a�m �q "k� �' ..,N � ,- . �� . `( . . i,,� � . .}p� '�d�rxt ��.: 1�!fil":�S � .'t.a,+�•:1., . ,+1•y .�''•^�!'�•�ri�. �� ` y� _ � . ' . , . � �, i' 'rt , ' ",,,�";'>,y�f r,� �,�; " ��, ,, ,A • . � . ,� , d � � r, w�i NC� 1 �.qq�4'l��P.r �, � �,� �� - �t r � , . J� � , � �'�� • � lr ��[ j� '. �,q � # � A' � } ��w� �� ... � � � ' �� , fl �� r , :'.y , . �:,�,.. t�'' �'�' rt �+ l•r a� !•.v�„i�� Mtip,.11,'y�l�r'�' Ir��{� �' � .. .. ,.. .. . y } FR �.�. . . � � � �"" �w"" ._ . _ - �.a:^ , , ;.. � ; r � �,. � i ,'. ', � ' t Z � � "tii1 � � � ,k � *C i,.l u ` i ��t � � u � .su '� �i tl " t�, ti i y � 'f p � Hi� � 1 =� iu �� i ,;. ('LL"'iq?�*u'M." .. . �:.vidi. �.r ,r a � ', � ? � pav� � i u� x r� i: �h� �"r�. , .*' . � � �„ � ��. �6 ' � �,. � + � t}, t i a. .. �, : . x � � r�rxr � � �{� 5�u . . .. 4'n •� r ��.� ,. . .� .. ��4��"�.�u19�+d�.l��k4du�+�`,�il��.�4"+Y.wy�J�'��Nn,��'A��'�15�N�ir�t.� i��r3�:W�'� nrr�� .. . .. . _ , wdud�n�� ':G li `' '��'>.' . . CITY OF BURLINGAME ; � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT . BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD �o�� BURLINGAME, CA 94010 �`u"� '; +' PH: (650) 558-7250 0 FAX: (650) 696 3790 www.burlingame.org -�_� -? � _ w�'-" �3 � Yf Site: 1220 BERNAL AYENUE s� W�^� �� The City of Burlingame Planning [ommission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2014 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Design Review and Special Permit for Declining Height Envelope for a second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 1220 BERNAL AVENUE zoned R-l. APN 026-112-220 Mailed: January 31, 2014 (Please refer to other side) , ; �.-` ".. . � _ � ., �1 F r „� � .7 ! r-. •�� ;e PUBLIC HEARIMG NOTICE Cit� of Burlingame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. Ifi you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. - Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARIN�G NOTICE (Please refer to other side) RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, DESIGN REVIEW, AND SPECIAL PERMIT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for Desian Review and a Special Permit for first and second story additions to an existinq finro-story dwelling with a detached qaraqe at 1220 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1. Tom and Carrie Pendolino, propertv owners, APN: 026-172-220; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on February 10, 2014, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15301 (e)(2), which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 SF in areas where all public services and facilities are available and the area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive, is hereby approved. 2. Said design review and special permit are approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such design review and special permit are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. CHAIRMAN I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th dav of Februarv, 2014 , by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: SECRETARY EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption, Design Review, and Special Permit 1220 Bernal Avenue effective February 21, 2014 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped January 14, 2014, sheets C1, A1 through A-4, A7, L1, GB1 and Boundary Survey, and date stamped January 29, 2014, sheets A5 and A6; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the City Engineer's November 12, 2013 memo, the Chief Building Official's October 30 and December 16, 2013 memos, the Parks Supervisor's December 19, 2013 memo, the Fire Marshal's November 1, 2013 memo, and the Stormwater Coordinator's December 2, 2013 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption, Design Review, and Special Permit 1220 Bernal Avenue effective February 21, 2014 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc. according to the approved Planning and Building plans. will inspect and note compliance of the ) to verify that the project has been built 3 � � �'�J' � � ; ar � � x � � �5 qr ,•�y • �,� � a. y ' �` . ��7 �, � r �s+'i�n+� ` �' . ''_ �v i�l ' SdC � � + pr�„ . , , ,.. , , i � _ . �� . r �_ �' .... F- � ,.F�` � � .. b e. , , . r • . S .�}1. \ a . = , f . . , • � .� _r : � X .... � , ., A ,�„� _' +'� ,: " • ,. :� , �� .` � .-�i, �,,, ' S f--+ � , . � ' ' �y .•,�"' , . - ; ;� • ,� ��« { . :� r�'' ,.��' . . � .. �� S� ,r�,�i . � y ":�� , � � �� ! .�3 , � !� �. . y,, � ? .` . x n� ,: �. r I�� y� r � � � }� r �� It � ��'� � . .3t+. 5r� .. , �aF * .,�� i - � � +�r' � n� - � � �s " * a�"' .�' � �� " ;� `t , ,' 3�"� ; �.r%+i�(�s'` � r�. } �, i�. `� � �� r` �` �� .e . . . . +p� . . .. �� I" � �. �,„,,. � � , . � "�' �' . . ��'�.! A � .`� , �z• 'i` Y �T �' ��` �.1 { `i�t � � - � .t -• i (1�,, � �� ' r � � � , u. a � � ��. o . ;`�!� .�R , �, ,� j' . ''�.. � �; � � �,� `�L�, "' .a+. � . .. r 1 . _ � �� ., ;� ., L N , , . � r�+". . � �._, �`'• t: ��. �, . ; � � � � �; " : a� � s �. � ��:�, , i, �� ^, _. , , . � ._�, � i ; /, ^� � �, � � , �."�� `",� �'�� ` ' � �,�` � � . �% r'�! � , 4 i � \ . t � �` . � . � �� ' r �g�} t ., �'� '� s, '� �h �� .'r :.4 �� '`. •�' � ,,'��e. �' �' "a. ,t f:�. � � . ��'.� r�' . �:. .,,�. � _ i,' ,� , , �+� , ..,,�r _ �� . .* �, �-y�� , � ; a .. �.., � �ee 'yi � ., _ e � E�C?� 1_� �� ' v � L' � ��{�' 'i�� •.� . � u. � _ ' %� , , �. f � �� " �h x t� _a ��, �i` 9'r 4�� t � „6� .. , :t � � � ' �- u� �.' _ . �;1' . . t �,.-. �' 09 r s. �v11` <?;•, fa � , ,> ,��' x 7`� ;. � '��: �F s. . ��- v �Pi��. . �r � � d '�� Y;'>'� � � r' µ� ♦ . � .$,�,' / �' � ' � i �' � A�.�. . ) � �� +� ,p ''ti, �^ . '�:� :�,f �" �y � #i /� �� `' �Y �� „t�•�) � , ° , � � � , ,� ,� �L � " �: , - : ,. ti ; ' �. � e (� � . �; � +� 4 .� , ��..: ' � ,` `" � . '`'j'�.', `. ; . ,y� � ..: �(�_`J -; � r ";�}��% i' "` � ,� ,�� t _ , �' �'� ��V � ",�'• L � '} �� •F�; Y. `�� `�r. „P R �, . y, , �,� e�,� � � � ^�,a � . * �tr �; `�'J � , . , ' _ ' f� � , j.. "fl., . ' . . � t � �'. , • :. ,yk�� ♦ , � ' `, i' � . P`� ' .. Tr �� ' �'. ��! ��,, . L �L� �•,1, -�� _ l µ �; - � �� t.. 6¢ + , .. . ! '�+'. �y � � � ' .. i � ` • � � � �. . �r q y � �`'� � ' $ , � "`� � � t. . ,� ,1 �� ;�� ` •! � ' ?F� 1 a" 0 �?.,, . j„' �.i� � ` I ,. ^ ss� �3a' '�+ 11 + �"� � r� ' ` ' � ' � � �,> . , � � " �.w i7�� ,. �,� �# ;'+ , ,�� r � � � �"'� . � ° �- � �� ,. ^� � ; ,, ��'_ s�, � '�'� ;';; � � •'` • �. ', x . ;.i` � � �.` ` , „. ' . • � �y , . Q- . , �,� I ."�, •.,� �� . , `C � 4�L�` � � ��'I� . � �, , , �� e „ }#y. § . t .�r +�! �`� , _ � O / f� �Y A , � f.4�� ' �r' � ,T . � �� +y t Fisi, Jf,� � �.g,:yt . . ;�J Te'�� i�p � t}., . y �f�.�� . , '� V f; , � � . �c , �� ! :�� . 5 � . k `}^ l l 3 k ,,.�Ja �, . . 7 .� .y i ir . . �� ° µ . � r 9iI �p..� �, E� � � . � ,. . � � y a s � � ^ �� o�, �, r � �,� �� .. : d � !r r �:� � �y �� . �� t ,. :; � q�{Y 1 ry✓ � '�, '',� �' �j� ' � � � �� i � � �` � �' � �,�Q .�i �y� �' . . ' �t,c '" . �" �� ,,�1 ` ' ,�i/� t +tt�' �� 1 a,'�Swi''� ,#' r � �" `4 '� r � j'� � �`` k( � ��; ' p'� t� "?�� ` .1,f4� R l'#r � . ,�.iN, �'r. � i � �Su ��\,v ��t � �,-_�_ !� �y. ��,�'N : �/�R �b # � . Y 3 �.� 1 � l ~� �r - i. . , S> � ' i '�ti� � ) Y . �Y R . .w 1 � �'� _ . � . � l.�� * MT �. . f'�y ``�t �,v,�, r 1 �} � ' y � •! k �' � �� (0 •� � � w+� Y. � ''�.;�f. � .. n��: ��- .a' �, k=��"� �� s(��b�i , . r a. ' �. �V s: .. .#.',`"t w °'+� !�� V i .. �y, �• �+�V'lj, �f F{ <4`��" 4 �'� x � �"�' ^ � ' . // . +' . V - _ ' �� . . � . .. . .,, ..,F � �t �� y� /•'��,-'�r �.. �� . : � � 4 � �1' 0 . -� 'e J� ,'F "4: �[ e� � ' � t „jl';_ . t .. , , ..: *. , - im,; w ` � � s", '+� �'Y�!,'�M �'j � � � , �Yip� 1 '" ' � , ,� • � . -�' y -t �,�§s • � ,� . , � �� . 'd... } i; .. _ �q�, �y'� . rs� 'v . �c�,� � . ��.. �� i °- �'t�,' . �i��:'� ;'� � x � y 4y �t1� r , ,, �►' ,a�� ` R� ;w." - v as z � � :.�) • � �t�'_ }, �+ ''R.' .� � x ..� � t �� Y . . �'..- �} ° - i ��t,� ,rt:,'l..� .7` I� � +f �• 1 � ,� � � .��e x ' . }r,� � x �� , � � R �, � 4�% 7 ' ti. � � ,,� �, q \� �:, ?'� ' ` . ' y '� a '' , ' � ' �L . . _ : �,�„ , s . � ,a^� p � r �. �g� ;2 Ip . . ...., 4 y •. � . 4 W ' ,2 + ., , t � -, � i .- , iF "�f - .f 2% fy t J �_y. � :r '� � � ^ .'�`_ '! {�k _ h�� 'Y. 1�� '^ --`� � ,� �t . 1 �!�,� �f,'�.. #? � � "��V :� =1 � ;o '`�'- . � �� 'y" � ` "�a : r : , �. ; � � �` � � . , . �' �1 � � . . ' g � - �y�'ifr�,. �� '�� _ .�� '� _. ✓ s.'.3 � , y �ti. /` � !�?,. �r'� . ., a�. � r'f x .� �.. 4 �� +. ' ..� �. � r � t , , . / s.. . . ,., 'a 1� !k. " :. . � w� ' a�". . .. ', , `ah,:� �@ ' '"s ; I.�. �i�^ W �' ,�" �: ^'x ,, � :� • � , � -= a - , ..