The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1149 Bernal Avenue - Staff Report. PROJECT LOCATION 1149 Bernal Avenue Item # 3 b Consent Calendar City of Burlingame Design Review Address: 1149 Bernal Avenue Item # 3b Consent Calendar Meeting Date: 03/28/OS Request: Design review for a new two-story single family dwelling and detached garage. Applicant and Architect: Poko Klein, TRG Architects APN: 026-183-020 Property Owner: Brian Cassidy Lot Area: 6000 SF General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15303, Class 3—(a) construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including (a) one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences maybe constructed or converted under this exemption. Summary: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing single-story house and detached garage (1,671 SF, 0.28 FAR) to build a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached two-car garage. The proposed house and detached garage will have a total floor area of 3,418 SF (0.57 FAR) where 3,420 SF (0.57 FAR) is the maximum allowed. The proj ect includes a detached two-car garage (427 SF) which provides two covered parking spaces for the proposed five-bedroom house. All other zoning code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following: • Design review for a new two-story single family dwelling and detached garage (CS 25.57.010). Table 1-1149 Bernal Avenue Lot Area• 6000 SF Existing I Proposed I Allowed/Required SETBACKS 1 Front (Ist flr): 25'-0" 20'-0" 19'-0" (block average) (2izd flr): none 28'-2" 20'-0" Side (left): 2'-8"' 4'-10" 4'-0" (right): 9'-0" 10'-8" 4'-0" Rear (Ist flr): 54'-6" 41'-6" 15'-0" (2nd flr): none 41'-6" 20'-0" Lot Coverage: 1671 SF 2223 SF 2400 SF 27.8% 37% 40% FAR: 1671 SF 3418 SF 3420 SF 0.28 FAR 0.57 FAR 0.57 FAR ' Existing nonconforming left side setback (2'-8" existing where 4'-0" is required). __�_ _(0.32 x 6000 SF) + 1100 SF + 400 SF = 3420 SF (0.57 FAR) Design Review Table 1-1149 Bernal Avenue Lot Area• 6000 SF 1149 Bernal Avenue Existing Proposed Allowed/Required # of bedrooms: n/a � 5 --- Parking: 2 covered 2 covered 2 covered 1 uncovered (20' x 20') (20' x 20') 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') Height: n/a 29'-7" 30'-0" DHEnvelope: n/a CS 25.28.075 b, 2 see code (window enclosure exception) • Staff Comments: See attached. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission design review study meeting on March 14, 2005, the Commission requested the applicant address several concerns and placed the proj ect on the consent calendar (March 14, 2005, PC Minutes). Below are the Commissions' concerns and a response from the applicant. 1. Commissioners asked what trim are you planning around the windows? In a letter dated March 18, 2005, the applicant notes that the typical window for this design has a raised stucco sill, which may be a contrasting texture to the wall. The sides of the window have no trim, just a stucco return, which is as close as possible to the older houses of this style. These older houses used recessed steel windows with stucco returning into the recess. Some windows will have a stained timber header, while other windows will have a column detail between the windows units as in the living room. 2. Is it possible to put hvo garage doors on ii:stead of one very large door, it would reduce the perceived mass of the garage as seen from the street; Can you find a double door that looks like two doors? Encourage the change to the garage door to two doors to make the garage more i�i scale with the house and less obtrusive from the street. • The applicant made changes to the detached garage and submitted revised plans (sheet A-5, date stamped March 16, 2005). The garage door was changed from a single, rectangular double-wide door to a single, arch-top double-wide door with two distinct sides. The applicant notes that a single, double-wide door was used instead of two, single-wide doors, because a double-wide door provides more versatility and allows a vehicle to maneuver into the middle of the garage for loading/unloading, etc. In addition, rake beams and pipe vents were added to match the design of the house. 2 Design Review 1149 Bernal Avenue Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on Apri120, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Findings: Based on the findings stated in the attached minutes of the Planning Commission's March 14, 2005, design review study meeting which noted with the revisions to the design approved that the proposed addition is a nice addition to the block, and both supports and improves the character of the house, the proj ect is found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review guidelines. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action should be by resolution and include findings made for design review. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 1, that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped February 17, 2005, sheets A-1 through A-4 and L1.0, and date stamped March 16, 2005, sheet A-5, and that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit; 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 3. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued for the new residence and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 4. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 5. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners and set the building footprint; ------ -- — 3 Design Review 1149 Bernal Avenue 6. that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 7. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; 8. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; 9. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the proj ect has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 10. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 11. that the conditions of the City Engineer's and Fire Marshal's February 11, 2005, memos, the Chief Building Official's February 10, 2005, memo, and the Recycling Specialist's and NPDES Coordinator's February 14, 2005, memos, shall be met; 12. that the proj ect shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2001 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 13. that the project is subject to the state-mandated water conservation program, and a complete Irrigation Water Management Plan must be submitted with landscape and irrigation plans at time of permit application; and 14. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance. Ruben Hurin Planner c. Poko Klein, applicant and architect 4 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes the California B ilding Code and Califo ' ire Code, 2001 The motion as seconded by C. Vist' . Acti Chair Auran called for voice vote on the motio� D�1 abstaining and C. absent). Appeal m. IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS Acting Chair Auran opened the public comment. Randy Grange, TRG Architects, 204 Park Road represented the project. Retained the existing Mediterranean style because that is what was there and it fits with the other houses on the street. Commissioners asked what trim are you planning around the windows? Stucco mold with a stucco sill into a wood header. Is it possible to put two garage doors on instead of one very large door, it would reduce the perceived mass of the garage as seen from the street? The garage is a typica120'-8" which provide just enough room for a single double door, may take a steel frame to do two separate doors? Can you find a double door that looks like two doors? There were no further comments from the floor. The Public Comment was closed. 7. 1149 BERNAL AVENUE, ZONED R-1— APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW, TWO- STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (POKO KLEIN, TRG ARCHITECTS, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; BRIAN CASSIDY, PROPERTY OWNER) (59 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN SP Brooks briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. 8. Commissioner Keighran commended the architect on this design, it is a nice addition to the block and both supports the character and improves it; would recommend a note on the plans regarding the stucco mold and would encourage the change to the garage door to two doors to make the garage more in scale with the house and less obtrusive from the street; recommend this item for the consent calendar. The motion was seconded by C. Bojues. Comment on the motion: hope that a revised drawing for the garage is included in the packet for the consent calendar. Acting chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when the garage issue has been addressed and checked by staff. The motion passed on a 6-0-1 (C. Osterling absent) voice vote. The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 8:45 p.m. l�CARMELITA A MIT FOR BASE 'ACHED G��V� �PERTY O 1 ZONED R-1- [�NT FOR NEW, ' (TRG ARCHITECTS 65 NOTICEDI PRO� March 14, 2005 edition s amended by the City of lingame. approve. The motio assed on a 5-0- (C. :s were advised. is item conclu d at 8:40 .'ATION FOR DESIGN ORY SINGLE ��1 �ANT AND AR IT ;T PLANNER: ( C:-Bojues abs med from this applicatio since he lives within 5 chambers. / �IEW AND SP ,Y DWELLING ;T; KEITH RU� / feet of the proj ect. left the dais d �� M�r 20 05 04:58p p.2 - Arcl�ilect.r M1tC�1 i 8, 2��5 Planning Commission City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Rd. Burlingame, CA 94010 Subject: l l49 Bemal Ave. RECEIVED MAR 2 1 2005 cmr o� BURurvr�e PLANNING QEPT. Dear Commissioners, We wish to clarify the window trim for this project as discussed in the study session, as well as the revisions to the garage. The typieal window on the proposed design has a raised stucco sill, which may be a contrasting texture to the wall. The sides of the windows have no trim, just a stucco return, as we are seeking to come as close to the older homes of this style as possible; those homes use steel windows that aze recessed, with the stucco returning into the recess. Some proposed feature or targeted windows also include a stained timber header, while others have a column detail between units (living room). For the garage we decided to bring in the rake beams and pipe vents used on the main house. We also switched to an arch-top door with two distinct sides. The single double door provides more versatility than two separate doors; one can pull iunto the middle of the garage for loading etc... We hope these clarifications and revisions satisfy the commission, and we look forwazd to the meeting. Sincerel y Grange AIA Project Architect 105 P:�rk RaaJ, tiuitc .�.O.i. [iurlin}�umr, C.A 9-1111U fi50.579.5762 l�ax 650.579.O115 www.trGarch.com Project Comments Date: To: From: 02/09/2005 d City Engineer ❑ Chief Building Official ❑ City Arborist ❑ City Attorney ❑ Recycling Specialist ❑ Fire Marshal ❑ NPDES Coordinator Planning Staff Subject: Request for design review for a new, two-story single family dwelling with a detached 2- car garage at 1149 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-183-020 Staff Review: 02/14/2005 1. See attached. 2. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. 3. Sheet A-5 of plans shows gutters to be constructed across property line which is not allowed. Plans shall also show foundation plans for the garage since garage is built on property line. No work shall be constructed across property lines. Reviewed by: V V ��;��j' � Date: 2/11 /2005 . { � . r .� ,_ • . PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS �� .�y;�.� Project Name: � �-�,c,_wr r,�r,�r�.,c,�.� - Project Address:_ 1/�;',�= Xi'i• The following requirements apply to the project 1 � A property boundary survey shall be preformed by a licensed land surveyor. The survey shall show all property lines, property corners, easements, topographical features and utilities. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) 2 � The site and roof drainage shall be shown on plans and should be made to drain towazds the Frontage Street. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) 3. The applicant shall submit project grading and drainage plans for approval prior to the issuance of a Building permit. 4 The project site is in a flood zone, the project shall comply with the City's flood zone requirements. 5 � A sanitary sewer lateral �! is required for the project in accordance with the City's standards. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) 6. The project plans shall show the required Bayfront BikelPedestrian trail and necessary public access improvements as required by San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. 7. Sanitary sewer analysis is required for the project. The sewer analysis shall identify the project's impact to the City's sewer system and any sewer pump stations and identify mitigation measures. 8 Submit traffic trip generation analysis for the project. 9. Submit a traffic impact study for the project. The traffic study should identify the project generated impacts and recommend mitigation measures to be adopted by the project to be approved by the City Engineer. 10. The project shall file a parcel map with the Public Works Engineering Division. The pazcel map shall show a11 existing property lines, easements, monuments, and new property and lot lines proposed by the map. - Page 1 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc . , , .. . PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 11. A latest preliminary title report of the subject parcel of land shall be submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division with the parcel map for reviews. 12 Map closure/lot closure calculations shall be submitted with the parcel map. 13 The project shall submit a condominium map to the Engineering Divisions in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. 14 � The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary , appurtenant work. 15 The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage streetscape improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutters, pazking meters and poles, trees, and streetlights in accordance with streetscape master plan. 16 By the preliminary review of plans, it appears that the project may cause adverse impacts during construction to vehicular traffic, pedestrian tr�c and public on street parking. The project sha11 identify these impacts and provide mitigation measure acceptable to the City. 17 The project shall submit hydrologic calculations from a registered civil . engineer for the proposed creek enclosure. The hydraulic calculations must show that the proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any adverse impact to both upstream and downstream properties. The hydrologic calculations shall accompany a site map showing the area of the 100-year flood and existing improvements with proposed improvements. 18 Any work within the drainage area; creek, or creek banks requires a State Department of Fish and Game Permit and Army Corps of Engineers Permits. 19 No construction debris shall be allowed into the creek. 20 � The project shall comply with the City's NPDES permit requirement to prevent storm water pollution. 21 The project does not show the dimensions of existing driveways, re- submit plans with driveway dimensions. Also clarify if the project is proposing to widen the driveway. Any widening of the driveway is subject to City Engineer's approval. ___- 22 The-plans-do notindicate the slope of the driveway, re-submit plans showing the driveway profile with elevations Page 2 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc � � PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 23 The back of the driveway/sidewalk approach shall be at least 12" above the flow line of the frontage curb in the street to prevent overflow of storm water from the street into private property. 24. For the takeout service, a garbage receptacle shall be placed in front. The � sidewalk fronting the store shall be kept clean 20' from each side of the property. 25. For commercial projects a designated garbage bin space and cleaning azea shall be located inside the building. A drain connecting the garbage area to the Sanitary Sewer System is required. Page 3 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COD�IIv1ENTS.doc Project Comments Date: 02/09/2005 To: ❑ City Engineer ❑ Chief Building Official ❑ City Arborist ❑ City Attorney From: Planning Staff ❑ Recycling Specialist d Fire Marshal ❑ NPDES Coordinator Subject: Request for design review for a new, two-story single family dwelling with a detached 2- car garage at 1149 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-183-020 Staff Review: 02/14/2005 Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence. 1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter. 2. Provide double backflow prevention. Reviewed by: r�---/� L��%� Date: fi `�'.�-6� Project Comments Date: To: From: 02/09/2005 � ❑ City Engineer X Chief Building Official ❑ City Arborist ❑ City Attorney ❑ Recycling Specialist ❑ Fire Marshal ❑ NPDES Coordinator Planning Staff Subject: Request for design review for a new, two-story single family dwelling with a detached 2- car garage at 1149 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-183-020 . StafF Review: 02/14/2005 1) All construction must comply with the 2001 California Building Codes (CBC), the Burlingame Municipal and Zoning Codes, and all other State and Federal requirements. 2) Provide fu11y dimensioned plans. 3) Obtain a survey of the property lines for any structure within one foot of the property line. 4) Roof eaves must not project within two feet of the property line. 5) Exterior bearing walls less than three feet from the property line must be constructed of one-hour fire-rated construction. 6) Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. 7) Provide guardrails at all landings. 8) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are more than two risers. 9) Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 14)The fireplace chimney must terminate at least finro feet above any roof surface within ten feet. Date: � / / � l / � o.� Project Comments Date: 02/09/2005 To: � City Engineer � Chief Building Official � City Arborist 0 City Attorney From: Planning Staff X Recycling Specialist � Fire Marshal � NPDES Coordinator Subject: Request for design review for a new, two-story single family dwelling with a detached 2- car garage at 1149 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-183-020 Staff Review: 02/14/2005 Applicant shall submit a Waste Reduction Plan and recycling deposit for this and all covered projects prior to demolition, construction or permitting. -Reviewed by: Date: 2� � �/�� 7 Project Comments Date: 02/09/2005 To: � City Engineer � Chief Building Official � City Arborist � City Attorney From: Planning Staff � Recycling Specialist � Fire Marshal ✓ NPDES Coordinator Subject: Request for design review for a new, two-story single family dwelling with a detached 2- car garage at 1149 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-183-020 Staff Review: 02/14/2005 Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City NPDES permit requirement to prevent stormwater pollution including but not limited to ensuring that all contractors implement construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) and erosion and sediment control measures during ALL phases of the construction project (including demolition). Additional stormwater requirements may be issued as conditions of approval for this project. Brochures and literatures on stormwater pollution prevention and BMPs are available for your review at the Planning and Building departments. Distribute to all project proponents. For additional assistance, contact Eva J. at 650/342-3727. Reviewed bv: �. � � Date: oL l� 4 I os" CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPARTMENT 501 PRIMROSE ROAD P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 APPLICATION TO THE PLA►NNING COMl��IISSION � �,,.r Type of application: Design Review� Conditional Use Permit Variance Special Permit Other Parcel Number:��Cv= f S3-D� � Project address• �� 7 9 � P('rl a-1 ,� c�P • APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER . � Name: �� O � P l VL Name: cZ v� Address: �� <.L f� l� ., Scu,� a �.3 Address: �/� l �c� 5�� ciry�statelz�p:�.s�,r I ; n c� Phone (w): � — � � e,ty�state/z�p: i, � �a Phone (w): ' j� �.�' �� — D SD �h�: � � 7 - a a �� lO c��: cfl-- S ?" �— D //S ARCffiTECT/DESIGNER cfl: Name:_ �� Address:� �S %)�.✓�',�i /��, s� o?�j� please indicate with an asterisk * the contact person for this projec� c�ty�s�r.�z�p: �; n�e Cva if�� o RECEIVED Phone (w): �� — �< �9 � (h): FEB - 8 2005 CITY OF BURLINGAME ( fl; PLANNING DEPT. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: /� P �J �1��1 l/�/� 9 l�l'L C`'3� / 5��2 AFFADAVIT/SIGNATIJRE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of y knowledge and belief. Applicant's signature: , Date: o? - �-' � � I know about the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. .— - Property owner's signature: � �� '� Date: �^� � S , PCAPP.FRM .� /a ?�' � .� � � a � � � i N a � � � � �' � N � � � J � -+- � RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for design review for a new, two-story single familv dwellin� and detached garage at 1149 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1, Brian Cassidy, 2121 Easton Drive, Burlin�ame, CA, 94010, property owner, APN: 026-183-020; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on March 28, 2005, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, 15303, Class 3—(a) construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including (a) one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences maybe constructed or converted under this exemption, is hereby approved. 2. Said design review is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such design review are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28`h day of March, 2005 by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for categorical exemption and design review. 1149 Bernal Avenue Effective Apri17, 2005 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped February 17, 2005, sheets A-1 through A-4 and L1.0, and date stamped March 16, 2005, sheet A-5, and that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit; 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 3. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued for the new residence and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 4. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 5. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners and set the building footprint; 6. that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 7. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; 8. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; 9. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has-been-built-according to the-approved-Planning and-Building plans; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for categorical exemption and design review. 1149 Bernal Avenue Effective Apri17, 2005 Page 2 10. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 11. that the conditions of the City Engineer's and Fire Marshal's February 11, 2005, memos, the Chief Building Official's February 10, 2005, memo, and the Recycling Specialist's and NPDES Coordinator's February 14, 2005, memos, shall be met; 12. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2001 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 13. that the project is subject to the state-mandated water conservation program, and a complete Irrigation Water Management Plan must be submitted with landscape and irrigation plans at time of permit application; and 14. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance. .� � �� cirr o� CITY OF BURLINGAME � � PLANNING DEPARTMENT � ' BURLNGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD � BURLINGAME, CA 94010 ,• TEL: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 �'b,.,m,,,.�••' www.buriingame.org Site:1149 BERNAL AVENUE _ j Application for design review for a new, two- � story single family dwelling and detached ; garage at: 1149 BERNAL AVENUE, zoned � R-1. (APN: 026-183-020). � i The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on Monday� March 28, 2005 at 7:00 P.M. � � � in the City Hall Council Chambers located at ..� � 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. � . � �. ; Mailed: March 18, 2005 . . .� w . i .� (Please refer to other side) � PUBLIC HEARING . r- � NOTICE _----_ ___ CITY OF B URLINGAME : ��'�^"� !� ,:� ��{m � A copy of the applicatto� and�ldr�s �`c�r th�� pro�ect�ay be reviewed prior to the meeting a��t��,��ann�Yr�:�Dep,�rtr�tenzE �t�5.��;�Primrose Road, Burlingame, C�I�fo� � r>� �' �,� � If you challe�i�e the�:`: raising only { 'o�°��lssi � �° �� described in ��he�nc�� at or prior to�the pul� ��.. � •. Property ow �rs ��c their tenants � bou��I (650) 558-72� 0,� '�fia �. ; �� , Margaret Monr�e,`�� City Planner �� ,µ PUB �I.0 (Please refer to other side) � � S2 �� .�. � �� : ��y� .. . � � �b��ce�,are espon��bl a �ar�'a�i�tio�al info at �� {�� .a. �`xr� � �R� � �� ."Y'v// � g ¢�'� � � � �� :� �� , �.�.�...��C�Q�TICE be limited to blic hearing, ;d to the city e or informing i , please call n A . � � -�� ; .� _�� » �, �� r ��' � �� '+� _,i �"� �� ` `°� � �' � � ,� � � , " ��: 'i: f r.. � j ' r�. i�: � . q � +, 'p `v z ,�, � � f i , ; a .., q�� y .,.� "`� �, . ,� ,� � �� 'P'� � _ . � �� }y„ i � .. a> �i' � �� w; .Y¢ ,t'pi� � '�}�� " � � "� �,� � '� � � a,: ,,,� , ►t+�%� !�. !!' I � ,q, Y ,i � � �� . � �' � �� , ,, �# � �'�"� �,� .* � ��,� � er ,+ �„ ��: ` m` r �"� �~ », :.•��' � Y. �� ,� �_"� ¢ �. -' '� , ' � . "�: s`r - ,• �. , �U �� ;! / . ��f �T'�.�?: l4r.�` &� • `*� ,y � 'g� � �E: '. � #/ f� � e, j *�� '� ��'�� . " t�� ` � �'.Yrf ��. � � � � � � �,� ,��, `.� �� ., '�� ,�g9 :��, ,,� .��,�.. ''� i � ��+I�°° " � � � � ,:�.r �� R�;�� ;;'w�� . ��°, - � )�`"".l� ''�.� • . , _ . < � � , '` � '� ,, >ti ;'� /° _ t€� �-� . �; s(�: ,} w-sr� ,'� ,,�* �<' . �' P` 1, � p . � "* . % �.,` z�� _'a.: r.�i+� � �,s�s � F i" b�n"'�,��$ . �.`�, ♦ s �"�a � �� ,�� .. ✓��e f�;� .A; �i�„d`i�t � � � i'p.,' � ��, ` � �, t �` s ; � w ` � jr . ¢ . � ', ", �� ' > � `� � �� ! �c� ` ` ' , �� .��,' "� � ��: � � d '� � z�.; . as`'r ` � *.. • � ` N w� f t � � � �^ K. � �. . x " � e �e � . ;,�y`� � a �y.^� � • `� �.��-�' ��. kYtk. �i�� P' � t��]] . � � `� �t' � �'y s � . ♦ A� �"- +� �� r� '� . �i ' , k �. �.� �� .�9R,e� y#�! � �, �` �/ � «1 . ;', # �., u�a � 4 y '.'y' �� . . . �� . �� .. � �� . ��n �� /,�� .�� - �� kG�; �,• �.,- � A •J� �+r� �* ��wf�� s"�*�'Yn, �� ,. .�.�'�;z..,`� ' �",� � � � F��O �`'�?� ' }� 4.�� ' � � .y � '� t�:.� � ""'� �` a� '� ` , S s < �� r..� �� '"'� 5 t�� , „ + . . r ':^, ��"� �� ,j� �r ' � '';°� �� i� ��''� �,+�• . "[" �:�y� „�,.�� Y � �, r''� - �° ��,, �'�;'w�y � �';. a # , � . �y 's�4� ' ��. �� . °,�" ". � .,. � "�"� + y,�� ,', �/ '�j g �"�� '� �� r �! i '�``*� y�, ,,, '� :. �'�� " . �, �! ,��, _ - ' � d'�' ; �` � � t' � � . -+ / � � .. � i .:"'k. 1��. , �'� �� f � y ,�` +rc' ,.r � �/% g'• �`, � �'f �� m �� ' �« .° .+# T �� '. � � � "� • { � • 'ki .. �"- ��f�: � � �' � " '� �t<Q�, ��` ��' s x .� �'� a-+ � ��"t+,s,�� n .+� / � ' ;.. -'M ; �r,,,f�,' na g ;'� :m��„{ r��}« .. • +�..- ,,. ,� � � �� ' , � � , a _ ' �, � ,� �: � # � ,� . : � j' � ��, � .�,.�� , �i:: � � ��rs � �`.;,�. �°'�.��,, �.� ��, � � �-� ��'~�-'` l� ,,;4 �� - �_ . �� .. � � . ,� �w s =� � `� �-. �� , . �j �- �� . �, � ., � � . � . " �� ° � �� ,��`� '��w �j/�,, `�� # �� , /�' � � s ..,.. ,a�,� ^ "� ` . A, `- . � � : � `a � s^�.' ' � 7� „ ,4 g, . � s .` }�'°�� , � .r r �. � � .� s�e , - e '�;�: . . �^�# �, �a � . .. �► s �Ca � ._ , +t �' � :� �z' �� `s#' � , �� t�� f .�+ .. . , � � a 1, .♦ �, ` �';� �� . �,"'ar! ��v„ �� ,a; � � � . „>. . �, �°/ j�� o � ;�,' � � {�� t �.�1; � �' ; ` .+; � �` . � , �,`' . f� , , � �; �s,� \� �`; ��' � ,�g� J�'� � . � "�i�' "' », � � �> �� *f .. s �� ¢P �� '� h ��` * T, �fi , � c7� '� /' "`�► r`, ,p .:'4i��'� $ � ./ .t�" � � � ; � ";°' �^�.. � "�` `+1� � � � '�'`^� � ' �� "��C7 ,. . , .p ,� � � W � � . '� Q✓ � ' � . .. �.. ,� � ,� ,� • { �•-� � "�+ �, � . `�' � �, '�°w, � � '�G � J'4. � �� M . � d ( aN �• ` �� `G� , ,. Y s . � A '/� . `� �e 5� � . �. / � t } �r �� b`��q r��. � � j� «,:� �� f�� , x ' � ` ' r �`4�'� � .,' ` `y��. �� "' �..� � �:� y3 �� ; /�� .,,� , �� A�' �� ,��, ' ° j � � ,' �`'�,`, $ n-' � •� w 9 � � � � ` `��'` � � � ; r ", s •E,,'��, � �`°"`' . � ` ` 4: � : �� , � f • ..r � +� � ♦ a. fi �` � , y _ : . � ., - � � r ' t'�+�m ��n � � � � � �" , � ° � � t' x �r , .. �. , � . �� q � � �, ' � `�" i � Y �"` } � � �,�*`"' f ° �+�� '� . � k � . , � . / , at �' �.� �F � V:� ' - ` ' �:�� r�� } . � a , , . r p � ,.. � r�R � .; � e w4"� _ . �j :, . �jt � � �� . �. � �. . � �.►? ,� � , / '�' �,+' r`;� '��Y .. s1-�' at9o- ` € ��y{' � '' �� "? n , r o � . , �� - q g' �y�¢ � • *� . 6, E ` � � , *$� �. , -, � � � '��r . / . t, � � ° �. 11 `°► sss�� . . . � +� ye �t . � �� ,. : � , �"` �� . � * "' '� �}. �. .y* .. �. . � s � �cq 4 !" ' � ,. a f Jy ' :., �^, � : _ , . �;•.. �'� � �� r �. s ; ° � . �q� .� l ' .. � ._.�„� ,� y... � M � '� ,��, :�. +a�l` `�ys,�§ �� a, , � � `�'��``g��e � r � f� � • �" , � ��;��. �T �s �:5� . r ' �� , � /y 4 �� ,»,� � � ap.,_(Jet � .,"�� 4.p�a''�Y� � - , � �� . - • w .. �� . '� � � �� ' �I � �� . • . • • �,. i' y•f� s$ t Q �J� af � �x ;% � � ,•' l ` 1 • : 1 1 r.='� ti �'��'��5��"*,"�` � � � � v "+� fb/ �: e ;k , d.. � .< � ��`.�}, *� , � J� � � e+r ,i�� a � ��'ti = a,. �' �.�. .�a�z: .� •�! �y f�' _ _ � n '� �. "^�,cis � � ir � � j w ., . lJ� ^u � '� r =�'. � �- � 4� i„� � �� .. t ` � y« � , - �: � � � � r , �° = +, .. `o� �� el �� F��- ; � � ,� ��m � . � � . � t � ,� �-� �,��„ � �� ,t . ��, �. , t #,,�Y ////�� • 4 �Y � . ,y ts G �k . �� .�� .m.d e"' t r�,•�= �� }� �� rY � .- ' v��t ��' , s 4 q,,�. '• � ,�, � .' , I �. �y.*', - . . "'"r` " � a �c 1 ' °� ` � t R`� �. a� .�'�t �� h�.g f,: � "� ,� � z� '�'^� „� . ,��* .r � .r� .� � ��;"�. �, �„.::«.;,1 . ' � � � � ,� �' ' �;,, � ��• „ 2 a y ��k . � .'% x t • '� ¢p �,� � �; � t • . ., -, � . . ,w � ; �. �� ,� y. � � "� A �,/ � !� � J; }� . Y d; : d' t" � ! � � � � � � a x� ,. � t � . . �, .�.. . - . , �;, � ,a ,o:� , f , �`, ,. � �� ,�,.,C�^.`�. ,' t�.. �` x ti � z � ` _ �" . ° �``! �� e�.. •``� 7 ,q /� �'�