The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1235 Burlingame Avenue - Approval Letter�� BtJRUNGAM6 � DATE: TO FROM: CITY OF BURLINGAME Community Development Department MEMORANDUM December 21, 2010 Planning Commission Ruben Hurin, Senior Planner Director's Report Meeting Date: January 10, 2011 SUBJECT: FYI — REVIEW OF REQUIRED CHANGES TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW PROJECT AT 1235 BURLINGAME AVENUE, ZONED C-1, SUBAREA A, BURLINGAME AVENUE COMMERCIAL AREA. Summary: On December 13, 2010, the Planning Commission approved an application for Commercial Design Review for changes to the front faCade of an existing commercial storefront at 1235 Burlingame Avenue, zoned C-1, Subarea, Burlingame Avenue Commercial Area (December 10, 2010, Planning Commission Minutes). The application was approved with a condition that requires the sash, muntins and window frames (material and design) of the new windows (two windows on front fa�ade and two window facing the entry) to match the windows of the adjacent business (Peet's Coffee & Tea) and that these changes shall be brought back to the Planning Commission for review as an FYI (informational item). The applicant submitted revised plans, date stamped December 16, 2010, which shows the new windows matching the existing windows at Peet's Coffee & Tea. Other than the proposed revisions listed above and contained in the revised plans dated December 16, 2010, there are no other changes proposed to the design of the storefront. If the Commission feels there is a need for more study, this item may be placed on an action calendar for a second review and/or public hearing with direction to the applicant. Ruben Hurin Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: December 13, 2010 Planning Commission Minutes Proposed Project Plans, date stamped December 16, 2010 C/TY OF BURL/NGAME PLANNING COMM/SSION — Unapproved Minufes December 13, 2010 VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEMS 5. 1235 BURLINGAME AVENUE, ZONED C-1, SUBAREA A, BURLINGAME AVENUE COMMERCIAL AREA— APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW FOR CHANGES TO THE FA�ADE OF AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL STOREFRONT (CHRISTIAN GOEDDE, FRANCESCA'S COLLECTIONS, APPLICANT; STEVEN TURNER, MENEMSHA, DESIGNER; TYBAB PARNTERS LLC, PROPERTY OWNER STAFF CONTACT: RUBEN HURIN Reference staff report dated December 13, 2010, with attachments. Community Development Director Meeker presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Nine (9) conditions were suggested for consideration. Vice-Chair Yie opened the public hearing. Terry Horn, 405 Primrose Road; represented the applicant. Windows will be dual-paned glazing. Commission comments: ■ Is there any reason why the windows couldn't be matched with the muntins present at Peet's? (Horn — was the architect's and the business owner's suggestion.) ■ The proposed windows are a bit out of scale. ■ Will they be display windows? (Horn — yes.) ■ Consider matching the muntin pattern with a wood-frame window to that present at Peet's. ■ Perhaps match the windows along the front side to PeeYs, but use the same window sash frame on the perpendicular windows. ■ Match all of the windows to Peet's coffee. Public comments: None. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Terrones moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following amended conditions: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped November 22, 2010, sheets PC-01 through PC-05; 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of building, which would include changing or adding exterior walls or parapet walls, shall require an amendment to this permit; 3. that the proposed windows shall be of a material and design that matches the existing window design at the adjacent Peet's coffee shop to the right of the tenant space; the final design shall be submitted to the Planning Commission as an FYI prior to building permit issuance; 4. that any changes to building materials, exteriorfinishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); __.�..�_.�_��... 12 C/TY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMMISSION — Unapproved Minufes December 13, 2010 5. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 7. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial orfull demolition of a structure, interiororexterior, shall require a demolition permit; 8. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; and THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION 10. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Cauchi. Discussion of motion: None. Vice-Chair Yie called fora voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed 5-0-2 (Commissioners Vistica and Lindstrom absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:16 p.m. �� 13