The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1234 Burlingame Avenue - Staff ReportItem No. 8b Regular Action Items PROJECT LOCATION 1232 Burlingame Avenue City of Burlingame Commercial Design Review Address: 1232 Burlingame Avenue Item No. 8b Regular Action Item Meeting Date: September 9, 2019 Request: Application for Commercial Design Review for changes to the front fa�ade of an existing commercial storefront. Applicant and Property Owner: Keil Sonoma Corporation Architect: Thomas A. Pirtle III, DTMArchitect General Plan: Downtown Specific Plan: Burlingame Avenue Commercial District Current Use: Vacant, previously J. Crew (retail use) Proposed Use: Madewell (retail use) Allowable Use: Retail use is permitted. APN: 029-152-160 Lot Area: 9,572 SF Zoning: BAC Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 - Existing facilities, Class 1(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances are exempt from environmental review. Summary: The applicant is proposing to replace an existing vacant retail space with a new retail use, Madewell (clothing store), at 1232 Burlingame Avenue, zoned BAC. The existing building contains two tenant spaces; Madewell will occupy the tenant space at the left half of the building. The tenant space at the right half of the building is currently vacant. Previously, both tenant spaces were merged and utilized as one tenant space for J. Crew (clothing store). This application includes changes to the exterior facade of the commercial storefront along Burlingame Avenue, which measures 27'-8" in width. At the front of the building, the existing glass storefront system and a portion of the fa�ade on the right side will be removed. The wood trim above the existing storefront will also be removed. There are no changes proposed at the rear of the building. The proposed front facade consists of stucco siding, a new aluminum and glass storefront system, a recessed entry, and aluminum and glass entry doors with stainless steel kick plates. Above the new storefront windows on either side of the recessed entry, the applicant is proposing fluted glass bands with aluminum trim to match the storefront system below. The proposed storefront will also incorporate a new fabric awning. Retail uses located on the first floor within the parking sector of the Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan shall be exempt from providing off-street parking (CS 25.70.090 (a)). With this application, there is no intensification of uses proposed on the ground level. Therefore, no additional off-street parking is required for the proposed retail business. The following application is required: ■ Commercial Design Review for changes to the front fa�ade of an existing commercial storefront in the BAC Zoning District (CS 25.32.045). Staff comments: Planning staff would note that because of the nature of the request and that the improvements are for a building which has been vacant for some time, it was determined that this request could be brought forward directly as a Regular Action Item. However, if the Commission feels there is a need for more discussion, this item may be placed on a future action calendar for a second review and/or public hearing with direction to the applicant. Commercial Design Review 1232 Burlingame Avenue Design Review Criteria: The criteria for Commercial Design Review as established in Ordinance No. 1652 adopted by the Council on April 16, 2001 are outlined as follows: 1. Support of the pattern of diverse architectural styles that characterize the city's commercial areas; 2. Respect and promotion of pedestrian activity by placement of buildings to maximize commercial use of the street frontage, off-street public spaces, and by locating parking so that it does not dominate street frontages; 3. On visually prominent and gateway sites, whether the design fits the site and is compatible with the surrounding development; 4. Compatibility of the architecture with the mass, bulk, scale, and existing materials of existing development and compatibility with transitions where changes in land use occur nearby; 5. Architectural design consistency by using a single architectural style on the site that is consistent among primary elements of the structure, restores or retains existing or significant original architectural features, and is compatible in mass and bulk with other structure in the immediate area; and 6. Provision of site features such as fencing, landscaping, and pedestrian circulation that enriches the existing opportunities of the commercial neighborhood. Suggested Findings for Design Review: That the new aluminum framed storefront window and door system, fluted glass above the storefront, rectangular recessed entry, stucco siding, and fabric awning is consistent with the pattern of diverse architectural styles that characterize the city's commercial areas; that the proposed storefront promotes pedestrian activity by allowing views directly into the business; that the proposed storefront improvements are consistent with the architectural style and mass and bulk with other structures by using stucco siding and an aluminum and glass storefront system on the ground floor, the project may be found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review criteria. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped August 26, 2019, sheets T-1.0, T-1.1, D-1.0, A-1.0 through A-3.1; 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the building, which would include changing or adding exterior walls or parapet walls, shall require an amendment to this permit; 3. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 4. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 5. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the E Commercial Design Review 1232 Burlingame Avenue Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 6. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 7. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; 8. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, in effect at the time of building permit submittal, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 9. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; and 10. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. `Amelia Kolokihakaufisi Associate Planner c. Keil Sonoma Corporation, applicant and property owner Attachments: Application to the Planning Commission Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed August 30, 2019 Area Map 3 , _ � ' � Pl.��►NIMING i�PPLl�:��'i�'1N �uR"-!^!��""•�� GQ1RI�UtJ17'Y �E'UE�fst�Pd��P�'i' GE:��K i MENT--F'LAN�il3vt, D6VISi0N 501 F'RIMROSE ROAD, 2ND FL"JOR, BURt_INGAF,�E, CA 94U10-3997 TEL: 650.558.7250 � FAX: 650.696.3790 � E-MAIL: PLANNINGDEPT�a�BURLII�GAME.ORG ;�:: ; 1234 BURLINGAME AVE BIIRLINGAME CA 9a�Ui �� Q,Z ��j� - I io0„TM� ��M BAC� � ----1--- -'--- - �----- Cr`. PROJECT ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PAkCEL �(APN) ZONING ,:... � s-`� PROJECT DESCRIPTION � �; _--- —� �:� ; TENANTiMPROVEMEMT OF EXISTING DEMISEa SF'ACE W; NEW STOREFRONT AND REFINISHED FACADE FOR COMMERCIAL USE. s�. � --------------- - ----_—_ _ — � �� NO C�-IAMGE OF OCCUPANCY USE. , �... , �----�-----__..�._--..�..___---`_.,_..._.._.__..______ t: . � _ _____ _ �_, u�� ',� _..-------___--.__.__-----------.�_______._.... --� — -- n:' c�..'` ...a..�...., ...�.:.._...:..:,,w,.,::.�._ . __ _ . _ .. _ _ . - -- - - - __ _ _�------„-;..�..a � . ..;:> �_ .., . a : .., �, .::..:. n �..:.�..:._..... -..rw:�:�....:�.::�:: ._ . ::_.......w:..::.�,,:_.:,...:�;:�,.::___.:: .�._:....:w.��:.�_. .._._.M..:......�:�.....::..,.�.::.....�:: _..:_.:::,:� ' �-�!'FtL �„GIL S pMp�� i'�. 244 KEARNY STREET, 3RD FLOOR. SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94108 ( PROPERTY OWNER NAME APPLICANT? ADDRESS �' i:. ��;; : ;.;� u:; .i �, { � : 'i �a: r� :i �,, ; Ez , �; 415-?61-5546 PHONE'-•-__�------__-----� _.�__�_... TNG�4AS A. PIRTLE III ARCHITECT�DESIGNER � APPLICANT7 �� 817-265-2415 PHONE ^~� � RKEIL@KEILCOMPANIES.COM E-MAIL ---_____�_.- 603 I-20 WEST. SUITE 260. AR�►N�CTON TX 76017 ADDRESS OFF I CEREPLY@DTMARCH ITE CT.COM E_MAIL _...._._..__...--•-�------------�----------- _ ---- BURLINGAME BUSINESS LICENSE # .. ... ... _ __. . _ . ..... .. ......... ....... *FOR PRC�JECT REFUNqS' - Please provi�e an addmss to which to all refund checks will be ma+l�d Io: NAME ADDRESS �%•• I FtEREt Y CERTIFY ( INUER PENALTY OF PERJURY � hlkT THE INFORMATION GIVEN HER�.IN 13 TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY r:��,�, , KiJO'.1'LEG'.iE AND BELI �F. G', I.I.t �: �� APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE IIF DIFFERENT FROM PROPERTY OWNERI DAT� u.. : �' �' I AA4 AM!�RE OF THE PROPOSED APPLICATIi�N AMC NEREBY AUTHORIZE THE ABbVE AFPLICANT f0 SUBMIT THIS APPLICATION TO THE i �� : ;�;! , PLANhIIPlG !�0 MISSI I ISION. �/ „,r � � � �� , • i', �.� ; . �,�.Yl, � P' �y ' 1 � 7.-� � �-- q� 's PROPERT_W R'S,SIGNATURE � DATE .n,..:..,,w W..::., .�,;.:.,,..,...,,w:M<�»....�...y�. W..,.;....,...,:.,.,:.,.,_.,�,,;�;..,.;.�,.��;:;:...::...:;:...__.:,,.:: ...v.............w�>,_,._..�.....�:.....� ...� _ _. . ..... .. _. ._. ......_ r ` hlJTHC1RIZATION T� REPRODUCE PLP.NS ---- -- -- i I HEREBY �3Ri;PJT THE �ITY OF BURLINGAME THE AU7NORIT" ?0 REPRODUCE UPOPJ kEUuEST ANDIOR POST PLANS SUBMITTED WITH THIS i ; k�PLlCf�TION ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE AS PANT �i- ';1-� PLAN�`RJG APPROV.4L P�OGESS ANU YJAIVE ANY CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY ARISING � � OUT OF Ok RELATED TC) SUCH ACTIUPJ � LNfTIALS Qf ARCHff'cCi1DESIGNEJ � , .:;::a._,...,�� .�,;......::.e.<::;:...:_�. �...:.:.....:,:: .,,.., .< ;. ,. ..,;,.,...;:,:.., . ..�;;: ..:.,..._....:., .�w..:..,......,...�,.,�.�:�...a��:w��,:.:�...�: ,_�.�;� � APPLICATION TYPE -°' : ❑ ACCESSORI' DUJELLI�IG UNIT ;,4DU) ❑ 'J.��iiAt:i.� ;dNR) '�,: , L� � ❑ CONDI710NAL USE PERMIT (CUP) ❑ ��iRr_�ESr: u.� ;. d'; f DESIGN REVIEW (DSR) ❑ FENCE ";CFP?;CN _.� '; � i HILLSIDE AREA CONS7RUC710N PERNiIT � 0 (HER: . ._ __ __ __ e,, ; �� ❑ MWOR A�IODIFICATi�'h v,� � ;, ❑ SPEC:IAL PERMIT (SPi ��'��: �!)I j, 35 !i``� ii�( ` . `; ". DA7E RECEtYED: � � -�-I D � � c N m O 2 � RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for Commercial Design Review for changes to the front faGade of an existinq commercial storefront at 1232 Burlingame Avenue Zoned BAC Keil Sonoma Corporation property owner, APN: 029-152-160; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on September 9 2019, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Section 15301 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances are exempt from environmental review, is hereby approved. 2. Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairperson I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th da�of September, 2019, by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption & Design Review 1232 Burlingame Avenue Effective September 19, 2019 Page 1 l. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped August 26, 2019, sheets T-1.0, T-1.1, D-1.0, A-1.0 through A-3.1; 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the building, which would include changing or adding exterior walls or parapet walls, shall require an amendment to this permit; that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 4. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; 8. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, in effect at the time of building permit submittal, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 9. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; and 10. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. . GITY tJF BURLINGAME + ' CC}MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DERARi"MENT BURl�IN,GAME 501 PRlMRUSE RC1AD �' BURLiPlGAME, GA 940°I O � ~ + PH: (650) 558-7250 � FqX: (660j 696-3790 www.burlrngame.org Site: 1232 BURLINGAME AVENUE PUBLIC H�ARINi�`.�r The City of Burlingume Pfanning Commission annountes the fiollowing �Q'�'�(,,`,E public heoring on MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2019 at T:OQ p.M. in the City Nall ('ouncilfhambers, 501` Primrose Road, Bur�ingame; tA: Appiication for Cammercial Design;Review fur changes to the frant fa�ade of an existing cammercial storefront at 1232 BURLINGAME AVENUE zoned BAC. APN 029J 52.160 Mailed: August 30. 2019 (Please'refer to other side) ` �l�,�j �� Cll'�ll� �t��l'�?L ' ` A copy of the application and plar�s f�r this prc�ject rrtay be reviewed prior'tc� the meetir�g' at the C�rn�un�ty ��l�aprn�r�t ��tme�� at �0� Primrc�se : RcradF Burlingame, C�Pifarni�. , If yau.cha(lenge th� subject ��a�a��catfcsn�s� in cc�urt, you may be limited to raising only thase issues you or someone else raised at ti�e pubi€c hearing, ��described� in the not�c� �� in written corr�spandence delivered� to the city at or � prior fio� the public hearing. Praperky owners wh�a receiv� this rrc�tice are responsibfe €rar ir�farming th�ir ienants about fihis t�catice. �'or additional informati�n, please cait (65E�} 558-72�(}. �"h�nit'yac�. ` Kevin`Gardiner, AiCP � Cc�mmunityr Qevelopme�t II�r��te�r ' PUBLIC HEAR1NGi NtlTICE (Ptease refer to ather side} ; . .. �� , � a ��, �lQ �C!" , � . �sQ� ��a �Q�� ❑q ., ��. , ` `�T C�t` �;s. 4� Q " 4� i� ` 13� �� :�w �flC� t ' ;:a _ � � . t7 ' � � `� � .rv� �� ' Q£5�36 _ _ � �� _ _ � '�t� ' _ ��`' , �� . p � �j q aG�' �; Q� �' a�'c� �� a�� a� � t � � ._� �,� �Q , Q �� r�� r , � � �� , '�'s. ;�� ' .: �,� . s , d ., � � �. � � _ � ,t � �� a � c� � � . . � :�? � �� . .� r a =, �� ^ � � �,�a . � " � �. �, �� `< �{.�� ; - �a� ..., . . � :� � � � � � � `� n � � O c� "'� f 1 0 f� � , „> � C'� � �. >�� ... ��,�� ^'�� -� �� 3 � �' - '� �>� p+� �� " �,,a�' � � -;, B ��G' �� ' � �Gs G' �� {` �� - ^�`� � s r3 �� "� �� , ` �� c� � R✓4� _�' �'�; q,`�� +� '� 1��i,�� . y�- � � Y ^ . .{� �,r �� t � � ��-`� � ° � �� '' ��,9'" - � �� ' f'�� '"c°�" . � . ,i7r a. �,.. ' e, � .. �3� , � . ('s� �. , �. .�� r�� .. � `'` �: -�" �, �, � ��. �� , �� . , i P'o' �'��` p � � � �'�� a�� a c ' �,�a Q �� d 4� � L� Q c�o Qp ��a �� i341rJ � N fl 3��'s � � C = N � r�j� � 'L �v o �,Q a�' � , m ° � °a C � � N O �- �LiQ�y�Cs�, --re r M Q `� � �� a �� ,� q� _ �� i �� E �a°� - � �Q� �� s.. .. �,�� w � a �� - � � n � l �'" � > .� _��" � �U� _ t� �, - � A...,� �, �Q P' ,�O � c �' q�' _ � a � , : *� a � �a �� c��, ��' 4 ...� � �� Q � � � � � � � �r�� , �� - °� _ �� ,� , � _ �� ;� Q� �, . , ." a � c�� '; w� q ��, � ' q�. � Q� Aa � �'v_ '. Ca�' <. 4 � Q �� , r�b� 4U C� Q� G' �23 ��,� _ � �40 Q� � ��l3� a� a � �� .. � � �'�' i3 � �, ; �. � s naa ..4� �� ... �� ciTr o� �`i ; J i tl -�`1x'� ,, , � � �-='m COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING FEES RECEIPT Subject Address: �Z�� f<< Y'-K c��_ ACCT.101-36630 (#63) � Application to the Planning Commission Residential & Commercial Design Review Handling Fee Title 25 Zoning Code (postage add $3.00) Title 22 Sign Code General Plan (not including postage) Specific Plan (not including postage) Neighborhood Design Guidebook Commercial Design Guidebook Bayfront Specific Plan Zoning Map Photocopies ($0.25 x ) Environmental Handling Fee (20% of Contract) ACC�T.101-22525 (#67) �� Residential & Commercial Design Review Consultant Deposit ACCT.101-36640 (#57) Engineering Fee ACCT.101-36342 (#58) Parks City Arborist Review ACCT.101-36620 (#64) Second Unit Amnesty Building Inspection Deposit ACCT.101-22590 (#83) Environmental Consultant Fee ACCT. 235-36651 Commercial Development Impact Fee ACCT. 235-36652 Residential Development Impact Fee ACCT.739-39590 (#92) North Burlingame/Rollins Road Development Fee ACGT.739-39591 (#93) Bayfront Development Fee ACCT. 739-39597 Parking In-lieu Fee — Downtown Burlingame ACCTS. 739-36660-000-6080 to -6086 Public Facilities Impact Fees (see reverse sideJ TOTAL FEES PAID: Date: � � 2� I � I $ �,�� $ 548.00 $ 34.00 $ 10.00 $ 83.00 $ 34.00 $ 12.00 $ 10.00 $ 12.00 $ 5.00 $ $ $ 1408.00 $ $ 246.00 $ 517.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ a , r E�i� �.�- � Public Facilities Impact Fees ACCT. 739-36650-000-6080 General Facilities & Equipment ACCT. 739-36650-000-6081 Libraries ACCT. 739-36650-000-6082 Police ACCT. 739-36650-000-6083 Parks & Recreation ACCT. 739-36650-000-6084 Streets & Traffic ACCT. 739-36650-000-6085 Fire ACCT. 739-36650-000-6086 Storm Drainage 7 i?� `�� sr� �°'/ 7 ��9°,� a � ��-q-9`� L� .� `�� C',,,�'� a� O� Design Review Expense Tracking $ $ �� s $ Date Description of Transaction C Debit (-) Credit (+) Balance _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Effective 07.05.2019 S:\HANDOUTS\Fee Schedule Receipt and Forms\FEES RECEIPT.07.05.2019 City of Buriingame • Community Development Department • 501 Primrose Road • P(650) 558-7250 • F(650i 696-3790 • www.burlineame.ors �� BURUNGAME ;. APPLICATIONS Design Review - Additions $1,249.00 - Amendment 1,078.00 - As Buiit Change 1,534.00 - FYI 416.00 - New Single Family 1,248.00 - New Multifamily: 25 units or fewer 1,872.00 - New Multifamily: 26 units or greater 2 496. �- New Commercial: 5,000 5F or less 2 - New Commercial: 5,001 to 10,000 SF 1,872.00 - New Commercial: 10,001 SF or more Design Review Deposit 1,40 1 Design Review Handling Fee 548.00 z Accessory Dwelling Unit 710.00 Appeal to Planning Commission/City Council 942.00 Conditional Use Permit 1,949.00 Condominium Permit - 10 units or less 3,469.00 - 11-25 units 4,075.00 - 26-50 units 4,783.00 - 51-100 units 5,616.00 - 101 or more units 6,594.00 Determination — Planning Commission 1,470.00 Extensions/Amendments to permits 792.00 Fence Exception 1,097.00 Hillside Area Construction Permit 2,298.00 Legal Review for Develo ment Projects 193.00/hour Minor Modification 1,397.00 Reasonable Accommodation 448.00 Rezoning/General Plan Amendment 7,473.00 Second Unit Amnesty — Inspection Fee 517.00 Sign Variance 3,135.00 Special Permit 4,264.00 Variance 4,458.00 Wireless Administrative Use Permit 1,981.00 Zoning Verification/Property Profile Letter 103.00 PROIECT PLAN CHECKS Preliminary Plan Check (New Construc[ionJ $880.00 3 Preliminary Plan Check (Addition) 440.00 3 Plan Recheck Fee — more than 2 revisions 723.00 Plan Recheck Fee — major redesign of plons 870.00 ' Unused portion of deposit wiil be refunded. � Handling fee will be refunded if project does not get referred to a design review consultant. 3 50% of preliminary plan check fee wlll be credited toward required application fees if and when project is submitted as a complete application. Please see other side for development fees. Updated July 5, 2019 CITY OF BURLINGAME: 2019-2020 PLANNING FEE SCHEDULE PROJECT ADDRESS PARKS REVIEW Arborist Review $246.00 NOTICING ENVIRONMENTAI REVIEW Categoricai Exemption 121. Environmental Document (prepared by staff) 6,281.00 Mitigated Declaration and/or with consultant a Responsible Agency cost + 10% of contract Environmental Impact Report consultant (deposit determined by CD Director) cost + 20% of contract Environmental Posting Fee - Neg Dec & EIR 859.00 Neg Dec. Fish & Wildlife Fee 2,354.75 (make check payable to San Mateo CountyJ EIR Fish and Wildlife Fee 3,271.00 (make check payoble to San Mateo County) County Handling Fee 50.0o PARKING IN LIEU FEE All uses within Downtown Burlingame $56,258.68/space Application Fees $ 2'�'��' Design Review Deposit $ � a 5(o • O� TOTAL FEES $ � 2'� �' � �� e m ENGINEERING REVIEW CITY 0� BURL�NGAME BLD 501 P�IMROSE RD 6URLINGAME, CA 9�010390 09'5�;�� 01!26�2019 TID: XXXXX�469 MID', ��XXXXXXXXXXX31Z CREQIi CARD AMEX SALE Card # Chlp Card; AID', ATC', TC, SEQ #; gat�h #; INVOICE Approval Code: Enh'y Met�od: Mode; SALE AMOUNT �(�1(XXXyJI�#�68 Af 1ERICAN EXPRE5S A000000025010801 0006 82D62AAE9A631F96 1 1225 1 &�2691 Chip Read Issuer $4246,00 I agree to pay above tota� amount �ctording to card issuer agreement. (Merchant agreemEnt if Credit Voucher� � X....._ ___ .. �-.. _.___ __.___.._._. pANIEI CROWLEY MERCHANT COPY Item No. 8b Regular Action Items PROJECT LOCATION 1232 Burlingame Avenue City of Burlingame Commercial Design Review Address: 1232 Burlingame Avenue Item No. 8b Regular Action Item Meeting Date: September 9, 2019 Request: Application for Commercial Design Review for changes to the front fa�ade of an existing commercial storefront. Applicant and Property Owner: Keil Sonoma Corporation Architect: Thomas A. Pirtle III, DTMArchitect General Plan: Downtown Specific Plan: Burlingame Avenue Commercial District Current Use: Vacant, previously J. Crew (retail use) Proposed Use: Madewell (retail use) Allowable Use: Retail use is permitted. APN: 029-152-160 Lot Area: 9,572 SF Zoning: BAC Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 - Existing facilities, Class 1(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances are exempt from environmental review. Summary: The applicant is proposing to replace an existing vacant retail space with a new retail use, Madewell (clothing store), at 1232 Burlingame Avenue, zoned BAC. The existing building contains two tenant spaces; Madewell will occupy the tenant space at the left half of the building. The tenant space at the right half of the building is currently vacant. Previously, both tenant spaces were merged and utilized as one tenant space for J. Crew (clothing store). This application includes changes to the exterior facade of the commercial storefront along Burlingame Avenue, which measures 27'-8" in width. At the front of the building, the existing glass storefront system and a portion of the fa�ade on the right side will be removed. The wood trim above the existing storefront will also be removed. There are no changes proposed at the rear of the building. The proposed front facade consists of stucco siding, a new aluminum and glass storefront system, a recessed entry, and aluminum and glass entry doors with stainless steel kick plates. Above the new storefront windows on either side of the recessed entry, the applicant is proposing fluted glass bands with aluminum trim to match the storefront system below. The proposed storefront will also incorporate a new fabric awning. Retail uses located on the first floor within the parking sector of the Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan shall be exempt from providing off-street parking (CS 25.70.090 (a)). With this application, there is no intensification of uses proposed on the ground level. Therefore, no additional off-street parking is required for the proposed retail business. The following application is required: ■ Commercial Design Review for changes to the front fa�ade of an existing commercial storefront in the BAC Zoning District (CS 25.32.045). Staff comments: Planning staff would note that because of the nature of the request and that the improvements are for a building which has been vacant for some time, it was determined that this request could be brought forward directly as a Regular Action Item. However, if the Commission feels there is a need for more discussion, this item may be placed on a future action calendar for a second review and/or public hearing with direction to the applicant. Commercial Design Review 1232 Burlingame Avenue Design Review Criteria: The criteria for Commercial Design Review as established in Ordinance No. 1652 adopted by the Council on April 16, 2001 are outlined as follows: Support of the pattern of diverse architectural styles that characterize the city's commercial areas; 2. Respect and promotion of pedestrian activity by placement of buildings to maximize commercial use of the street frontage, off-street public spaces, and by locating parking so that it does not dominate street frontages; 3. On visually prominent and gateway sites, whether the design fits the site and is compatible with the surrounding development; 4. Compatibility of the architecture with the mass, bulk, scale, and existing materials of existing development and compatibility with transitions where changes in land use occur nearby; 5. Architectural design consistency by using a single architectural style on the site that is consistent among primary elements of the structure, restores or retains existing or significant original architectural features, and is compatible in mass and bulk with other structure in the immediate area; and 6. Provision of site features such as fencing, landscaping, and pedestrian circulation that enriches the existing opportunities of the commercial neighborhood. Suggested Findings for Design Review: That the new aluminum framed storefront window and door system, fluted glass above the storefront, rectangular recessed entry, stucco siding, and fabric awning is consistent with the pattern of diverse architectural styles that characterize the city's commercial areas; that the proposed storefront promotes pedestrian activity by allowing views directly into the business; that the proposed storefront improvements are consistent with the architectural style and mass and bulk with other structures by using stucco siding and an aluminum and glass storefront system on the ground floor, the project may be found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review criteria. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped August 26, 2019, sheets T-1.0, T-1.1, D-1.0, A-1.0 through A-3.1; 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the building, which would include changing or adding exterior walls or parapet walls, shall require an amendment to this permit; 3. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 4. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 5. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the 2 Commercial Design Review 9232 Burlingame Avenue Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 6. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 7. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; 8. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, in effect at the time of building permit submittal, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 9. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; and 10. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. `Amelia Kolokihakaufisi Associate Planner c. Keil Sonoma Corporation, applicant and property owner Attachments: Application to the Planning Commission Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed August 30, 2019 Area Map 3 �1 PL�N�JING I�PPLl�:�,T'iP,�N BURI.INCEIME G��IMUNIT'Y DEVE��t�F�!�hd'f DE:�Q,F� i MENT--PLA�ihiliv�� QlVfS101V � 501 PRIMROSE ROAD, 2ND FLJOR, B�R�_INGAP�fE, CA 94U10-3997 '"�" TEL: 650.558.7250 � FAX: 650.696.3790 � E-MAIL: PLANNINGDEPT(�BURLI�tGAME.ORG .�._.... �..�.._.....___—_�---------- ---- -_---: �� ;; 1234 BURLINGAME AVE BURLINGAME, CA 9�4�U j C' ` PROJECTADDRESS A� SSOR'S ARCELi�� N) ZONNG �:. � I PROJECT DESCRIPTION ' fl. . C:� ' TENANT iMPROVEMENT OF EXISTING DEMISED SFACE Wl NEW STOREFRONT AND REFINISHEL' FACADE FOR COAIMERCIAL USE. � ;� ----- ---- �... 1_ NO C4AMGE OF OCCUP�NCY USE. �; . --•—._��. ---.. _ _...----�---- — ws �:� --- ---- ----•-- �.. {'• ,.�_..., .....:.... .,,:..._............,..,. ,.,_.,,,.•� _.�. ,_,.. ._ _..._..._.�,,..,..��... ---- -..,..-- ----- ---- _. ..,_. _. - - --- _. _..._, ...._....,,_..,P� -----'�---_s--�- k �. ._ ... . ;..:..,� ,. _:�_.�:...:,.�:.:::: _..:.::_:. . . :: ,.. _ .. _ . _ ... .. ..� ._.._ - -- __.,..... __.�.�.�_..._�_- ... :��:._,._.. _.�::_� ! �*_*L �G1�. S O�Up�� Ce1r . 244 KEARNY STREET, 3RD FLOOR. SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94108 ; PROPERTY OWNER NAME APPLICANT? � ADDRESS 415-?81-5�6 PHONE �—�---•----•— - THGA4AS A. PIRTLE III ARCHITECTI6ESIGNER � APPLICANT? � 817-255-2415 PHONE RKE IL@KEILCOMPANIES.COM E-MAIL 603 I-20 WEST. SUITE 260. ARL I�J�CTON TX 76017 ADDRESS OFFICEREPLY@DTMARCH ITECT.COM E•MAIL B�JRLINGAME BUSINESS LICENSE # ^ ..._. ... ... .. ...__. . .. . ..... .. .. .. . .._ . . . . . . . *FOR PROJECT REFUNDS'- Please proviae an addrr:ss to a�hich to all refund checks will be ma�led to: � NAME ----------- —!. AUDRESS -- --- G�• I FtEREEY CERTiFY �JNUER PENALTY OF PEP.JIJRY THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN HER�IN IS TR�JE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY �' � K�JO'�1'LEC�E AND BELI=F. r�:� . G' : LI.ti i � :� �� APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE (IF DIFFERENT FROM PROPERTY OWNERI DAT� C) i u.. ? �' � I AM Al�!�RE OF THE PROPOSED APPLICATii)�� APdC HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE ABC)VE AFPLICAhT 70 SUBMIT THIS APPLICAT�ON TO THE I' ��• � ,`f , PLANPIIP:G CO MISSI DI ISION. � Q.I S O��+Ri ��0�' , �, _ t „�..K� � . by . �; i � a. J, � 7.i� �{' ; PROPER R'S SIGNATURE �� DATF �� . . .....,,..___..:_.,..___.._ .._ ,._.__.� _..,...,..,_�_._._..__._._...._..._.__... . . _....�.._...._,r.._._._._:... _. .. .__ _ `...__ . ._ _.. . _.. _._..._.. � hUTHORIZATION TO REPRODUCE PLQ.NS I HEREBY �3�;PJT THE �ITY OF BURLINGAME THE AUTNORIT' ?0 RE°RODUCE UPOP1 kECluEST ANDIOR POST PLANS SUBMITTED WITH THIS ' � A?PLlCf�TION ON THE �: ITY'S WEBSITE AS PAF.T �J� '; r� PLA,NiVI�IG APPROVAL PI;OCESS .4�JU YJAIVE ANY CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY ARISING � i OUT OF Ok RELATED TO SUCH Ar71UP� ((NITWLS QF ARCHff'cCTlDESIuNEJ ..._..�—,.. ., �„., _.. ,--.,..,.,�. _ ....__ �. . .a,� _ --.,. ...,. , � .,,..k, �. ,._r.,_ �..�.. ... ., ,-,,. ...�. . _.�... _ . _.; .- .,, ,. _ _ . .. _ _ _ ... _ _. __ _..._ _ _ _ ......_,_.T..,—�____ �. �;...:��:.,.-�.�b�:. :.......a::;.::.._... .�.:.,_.,__ :. .,,.... _ � APPLICATION TYPE —� : ❑ ACCESSORY DVdEIU�IG UNIT ;,4DU) �. L' : ❑ COPlDITUJNNL USE PERMIT (CUP) u�; �"; � `��7' DESIGN REVIEW (DSR) �_ � p HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PER�11T �! ' �- ❑ MIN�R �\•I�DIFICATICN �. � ❑ V,QIZiAt7l.F ; �'N�� ❑ �rr:Rr_�ES�: ❑ FEFJGF ":::FPT,or� p orHt,:. ------ ��: JiJI_ .�, �; ''i;� C1T`�' �I= - _ . ,__;id�p,i��ic. ;;; _ -, ,. �11,� �IAf.,` ..��{J.. � ❑ SPEC•IAL PERMIT (SPj � cn a T � c � m O Z � RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for Commercial Design Review for changes to the front farade of an existing commercial storefront at 1232 Burlinqame Avenue, Zoned BAC. Keil Sonoma Coporation, property owner. APN: 029-152-160; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on September 9 2019, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Section 15301 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances are exempt from environmental review, is hereby approved. 2. Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairperson I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of September, 2019, by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption & Design Review 1232 Burlingame Avenue Effective September 19, 2019 Page 1 l. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped August 26, 2019, sheets T-1.0, T-1.1, D-1.0, A-1.0 through A-3.1; 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the building, which would include changing or adding exterior walls or parapet walls, shall require an amendment to this permit; that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 4. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 6. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 7. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, in effect at the time of building permit submittal, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalry of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; and 10. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. `��. CITY OF BURLlNGAME COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGA,ME �p� p��ROSE:ROAd : ` ''��?`� � BURUNGAME, CA 94d10 PH: (650) 558-7250 � F/�X;,(650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org - Site: 1232 BURLINGAME AVENUE PUBLIC HEQRING ' ihe Lity of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following (y(�"��CE > public hearing on MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 2019 at 7:00 P.,IVI, in the [ify Hall Council (hambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, [A: Application for Cammercial Dasign Review for changes to the front fa4ade of an existing commercial storefrant at 1232 BURLINGAME AYENUE zoned Bkf. APN 024.152.160 1Nailed: August 30, ZOl9 (Please refer to other srdef City of Burlinqame A copy of the appiication'and plans for #his praj�ci may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Cammunity [3evetapment Depa�trrier�t>at 501 Primrase Road, Burlingame, Ca�ifornia. (f you challenge the subject ap�fication(s� in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised af ihe public hearing, described in the notice ar in written correspondence delivered :ta the city at or prior to the public hearing. '` Property owners who receive this notice are `responsible for infarming their tenants about this notice. For additional infarrnation, please call (�50) `558-725Q, Thank you. Kevin Gardiner, AICP Community bevelopment Director � PUB�.IC HEARING NOTICE (Please refar b other side) 1232 Burlingame Avenue 300' noticing APN #: 029.152.160 Q�� YU � - �Y�� ViSL'J . ��Q�� ` - q9� �.' p iJ�40 c��``' a �� 4a� , d � a�7� Q. 1.- f�Q� ; `p : �,� ��9 .,'t�� `f � a�'y .�. . �� . �� a �. . � i . Y .. . � .. � 7, .�� `�"M� �� i�J ; �„ 3 � � �� 4, ' ,: i r �_ , a ' �`�, �'? -u� �' � rk � Q0� �'�' �� ,� �� '; `� �� :f��r -�� rq� c f � . I�`I�' �� [f V�Cy' 4 y5� . � 4l� '�" �! � �� a �'p p�p�'��Ri �,U� F^ �� T X� �, 2" � ' y a � �y4�, . 9c�� " �,� `�' , � .�$ ' � n,�zti� ��p , ' - �� . �' �� sF • 4fl �r.,� �� ,,f �� F , �� p � . . C7p� � , Q x , �� %.;��nc ` �� +„�_ �+� Q a� ., ,,�• � �r�� 9 � � � � �. ,. �� a ,`. -�` p � �� .r � 9 ,- �� , ` � �d'r � � a� ' � , ,: � �J� e7 >' p� D� �` ;' c��t3 �Q ,. C? F?� � q� : '` p � 41 . `� �c�, % � 4 �c��a � ,�' - ;n OO ta� : t%, `,� ". � � . . �� flp t , ir ` p D� �� .� :4��%'� � f% .'�� ,.'' � IE%�i r, s ,;.1' , i�., v fnua,� �. . � uV] �`i<�ry . �,•� �� '� , ..;<. �, . �� /� t� � �r � �:�lffm i , �,y'� U5 �1tnk �� . , ; �'oo , ,.,, p� � . .. h _c.., � •:��. �� l_, �,� " - � � ,, � � ��p � ��'�f:a,y,k,,� `` • R ' � , J�Bf�s� i! � f^�n d�1 ��. �1�� .. . { .. � .. _ . v ' � �� , 9 � . �.., . . � �,i L"alt�ai�i�� . � b� b 9f%�� eurlingarrb :r � , c ,� s , „�� 1� ' p c4'`l �}� : �a0 � . g"C}�} �7p(3r'';' Q��r �, ��' � � ,' `- �, j �(3�3 ,,. � " � �' � � �4 /' a4 , ;n.-'�` -. d 2. ,�Y4, . 3 ��.�,� �"��w , � �. ' 41q � 4 �y� ; �' �u r� s � � �4rfi� idhv sr a� : � �,(M�l��p' .. $S 't, � � {'y�'r ,(�� % � �,:' x"�tT r�� yy° U' � 6 �;,'� r+3 � ,. r �''�� 'a4`d^�r4 �-�. a° � ,C p�S � ry r,F �n ear, . 1,,. � _' �r's �i� � h 1dk iCb' . ... r �l : ,��ca"� �,'� � '�,r `« �" � � �,�'"�`� �� ,p_e f�,; .'• . ,�f( , - �r.1� : � f~�, -c�, k �T�.'1f� �� Y'%� � � � ��M.* �`` �� r�y ._' �4� �� a�.,, �*� �` � ° �a°° � �,�� _ �� Q : - � , „ �j �",�'` �� Q� . '''�' ".,.'"'� � �CU � .�` � ,y `� ,� v � �� \,, ' � ;:p b '�' �t�}(�a � d �O , �.:; p�r 't?' � v'� ^Gy � � �-+� l. ,,;�Q�,.^'°� S � � , O �'� .�. p, � ' 4 � ^' Q i �� v��, 't1�p Au�rn .� p� , r F,7 i� . . . M1�e JwAr�. , �� . f% .� Q .�1 �"j - � � �� ao � � �� P 4 ;;,,'�o � o E'' f , �' p� .� �� y:`AII��1nIVrySI�4. . �, /1 . . f� i� ii . a" °F �'►' °�� San Mateo County - Property Assessment �i<rroR�� Summary of Property Details Property Use Details APN: 029152160 STORE (11) Owner 1: Keil Sonoma Corp Owner 2: Care Of: Owner 244 Kearny St Address: San Francisco CA, 94108-4507 Situs 1232 Burlingame Ave Address: Burlingame District: 5 Legal 60 FT X 138.31 FT ON NWLY LN OF Description: BLGME AVE COM 254.58 DONNELLY AVE ACREAGE CITY OF BURLINGAME FT FR SWLY LN OF LORTON AVE WITH 10 FT FRONTAGE ON Neighborhood: 004 Current Jurisdictions Supervisorial: 1 Congressional: 14 Assembly: 22 Senatorial: 13 Election Precinct: 1008 City Name: BURLINGAME (Incorporated Area) Zip Code: 94010 Mitigation Fee Area: None Assigned Planning Zone: NO DATA ASSIGNED Property Assessment Report generated 26-Ju1-2019 Page 1 of 3 Secured Assessment Roll: 2018-1 Assessment Details Owner 1: KEIL SONOMA CORP Owner 2: Care Of: Owner Address: 244 KEARNY ST SAN FRANCISCO CA, 94108-4507 Document Number: AB028600 Assessment Type: Annual Temp Code: Notice Date: / Change Number: TRA: 004001 PUC: 11 PUC Description: Store Assessment Values Land: $344,752 Temp Land: N/A Root: N/A Min/Mineral: N/A Improvements (Structure): $86,163 Temp Improvements (structure): N/A Fixtures: N/A Total Gross: $430,915 Total Temp: N/A Exemption - Home Owner: N/A Exemption - Other: N/A Net Assessed: $430,915 Assessment Type Amount: Sales History Sale Code Document Number Sale Date Amount Property Assessment Report generated 26-Ju1-2019 Page 2 of 3 Tax Rate Area# 004001 BAY AREA AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT BURLINGAME 2015 REF (REF SER 2004) BURLINGAME DEBT SERVICES BURLINGAME EL BD 97 BURLINGAME EL BD REFUND SER BURLINGAME EL BOND 2010 SER B BURLINGAME EL BOND ELEC 07 SER C BURLINGAME EL BOND ELEC 07 SER C SINKING BURLINGAME ELEM BOND SER 2008 A BURLINGAME ELEM GENRL PURPOSE BURLINGAME ELM BOND SER 93A BURLINGAME ELM BOND SER 93B BURLINGAME ELM BOND SER 93C BURLINGAME ESD 2016 ELECT BURLINGAME ESD 2016 REF BOND BURLINGAME GO 2012 ELEC BURLINGAME GO 2012 ELECT CITY BURLINGAME TAX REDUCTION CITY OF BURLINGAME COUNTY DEBT SERVICES COUNTY EDUCATION TAX COUNTY HARBOR DISTRICT GENERAL COUNTY TAX GENERAL TAX RATE PENINSULA HEALTH CARE DISTRICT PENINSULA HOSPITAL DIST. TAX REDUCTION SAN MATEO COMM COLL 2005 SER B SAN MATEO HIGH 2O12 GO REF SAN MATEO HIGH 2O14 GO REFUNDING SAN MATEO HIGH 2O16 GO REF SER B SAN MATEO HIGH 2O16 GO REFUNDING SAN MATEO HIGH 2O17 GO REFUNDING SAN MATEO HIGH BD SER 2000 A SAN MATEO HIGH BD SER 2002 B SAN MATEO HIGH ELEC O6 SAN MATEO HIGH ELEC 06 SER 2011A SAN MATEO HIGH ELEC 06 SER 2011A-1 SAN MATEO HIGH ELEC 06 SER 2012A SAN MATEO HIGH ELEC 2010 SAN MATEO HIGH ELEC 2010 SAN MATEO HIGH ELEC 2010 SER 2011A SAN MATEO HIGH GENRL PURPOSE SAN MATEO HIGH GO REF SAN MATEO HIGH RFND.SER 2004 SAN MATEO UN HIGH BND SER. 2000C SAN MATEO UNION HI SER 2008 A SAN MATEO UNION HI SER 2010 SAN MATEO UNION HI SER 2010 B SM JR COLL BOND 2001 SER C SM JR COLL BOND 2006 SER A SM JR COLL BOND 2014 REFUNDING SM JR COLL BOND 2015 SM JR COLL BOND REF 2012 SM JR COLL BOND SER 2005 B SM JR COLLEGE BD 2002 SM JR COLLEGE GEN PUR SMC MOSQUITO & VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT Property Assessment Report generated 26-Ju1-2019 Page 3 of 3 City of Burlingame Planning Division (650) 558-7250 • (650) 696-3790 (fax) Plan Review Comments Project Address: 1232 (1234) Burlingame Avenue Description: Application for Commercial Design Review for changes to the exterior fa�ade of an existing commercial building. Date of Plans: July 26, 2019 Lot Area: approximately 9,572 SF Zoning: BAC (Burlingame Avenue Commercial) 1. Commercial Design Review (Code Section 25.57.010 (d)) • The proposed changes to the exterior fa�ade of the tenant space are subject to Commercial Design Review. An application for Commercial Design Review was submitted on July 26, 2019. No response required. 2. Use (Code Section 25.32.030) ■ The proposed retail clothing store (Madewell) is a permitted use. No response required. 3. Off-Street Parking (Code Section 25.70.030) ■ The subject property is located within the parking sector of the Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan. Retail, personal service and food establishment uses located on the first floor within the parking sector shall be exempt from providing off-street parking. Therefore, no additional off-street parking is required. No response required. 1