The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1207 Burlingame Avenue - Staff ReportPROJECT LOCATION 1207 and 1203 Burlingame Aven�e Item No. 6 Action Item City of Burlingame Commercial Design Review Address: 1207 and 1209 Burlingame Avenue Item No. 6 Action Item Meeting Date: June 24, 2013 Request: Application for Commercial Design Review for changes to the fa�ades of an existing commercial building. Applicant: Karen Hess, Kate Spade Architect: Joseph Park, TPG Architecture Property Owner: 1207 1211 Burlingame Avenue LLC APN: 029-204-050 Lot Area: 4,500 SF Zoning: BAC General Plan: Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan: Burlingame Avenue Commercial District Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 - Existing facilities, Class 1(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances are exempt from environmental review. Project Description: This application is for proposed changes to the fa�ade of an existing commercial building located at 1207 and 1209 Burlingame Avenue, zoned BAC (Burlingame Avenue Commercial). The tenant space at 1207 Burlingame Avenue was most recently occupied by Round Table Pizza and is currently vacant. Kate Spade, a retail business which sells women's clothing and accessories, will be occupying the space. The proposed retail business is a permitted use in the BAC zoning district. The fa�ade along 1209 Burlingame Avenue is an entry to existing office space on the second floor of the building. With this application, changes are proposed to the fa�ades of the existing tenant spaces along 1207 and 1209 Burlingame Avenue. This project is subject to Commercial Design Review because it includes changes to the front fa�ade of a storefront located in the BAC zoning district. The existing tenant frontage contains tile, brick and a horizontal stucco band above a glazed aluminum storefront system. A wall sign and fabric awning are located above the storefront windows and recessed entry door. For 1207 Burlingame Avenue, the applicant is proposing to replace the existing storefront window/door system, tile under the storefront windows, awning and wall sign with a new storefront design. The new storefront design includes a ceramic stone finish base and an aluminum framed glass storefront system with a new mirror finish polished brass cabinet above the double swing glass entry doors. As noted on sheet A-3, the glass storefront system angles inward to the recessed entry doors. A new canvas awning is proposed above the glass storefront. The existing tile and brick cladding surrounding the new storefront will remain and be repaired as necessary. For 1209 Burlingame Avenue, the existing aluminum framed entry door, sidelight and clerestory window above the door (below the existing horizontal stucco band) will be replaced with a taller aluminum framed door and sidelight to match the height of the new doors proposed at 1207 Burlingame Avenue. Personal and retail services on the first floor in the BAC zoning district are exempt from vehicle parking requirements as set forth in code section 25.70.090 (a). Therefore, no additional off-street parking is required for the proposed retail use. The following application is required: ■ Commercial Design Review for changes to the fa�ades of existing commercial storefronts in the BAC Zoning District (CS 25.32.045). Commercial Design Review 1207 and 1209 Burlingame Avenue Staff comments: See attached memos from the Chief Building Official, Fire Marshal, City Engineer, Parks Supervisor and Stormwater Coordinator. Planning staff would note that the proposed retail use is replacing a portion of the tenant space previously occupied by Round Table Piva, an existing food establishment classified as a specialty shop food establishment. A condition of approval for the conditional use permit granted to Round Table Pizza in 2000 notes "that if this site is changed from any food establishment use to any retail or other use, a food establishment shall not be replaced on this site and this conditional use permit shall become void." Therefore, with this application, the conditional use permit granted for a specialty shop food establishment will become void, unless an application for a conditional use permit amendment is submitted within six months of Kate Spade occupying the space. Staff would also note that under current zoning regulations for the BAC zoning district, a conditional use permit application could be considered for a full service food establishment in the future. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission design review study meeting on June 10, 2013, the Commission had several comments and questions regarding this application (see attached June 10, 2013 Planning Commission Minutes). The applicant submitted a response letter dated June 12, 2013 and revised plans date stamped June 14, 2013 to address the Commission's concerns (see attached). Planning staff would note that since the design review study meeting, the application has been revised to include changes to the entry at 1209 Burlingame Avenue (see description on page 1). Attached to the staff report you will find Section 5.2.3 - Architectural Design Consistency of the Design & Character chapter in the Downtown Specific Plan, which provides guidance for fa�ade designs, windows, awning and materials for buildings located within the Downtown Specific Plan. In response to the property owner's question regarding the Certificate of Occupancy being rescinded during construction, the Chief Building Official clarified that it would only be rescinded for this tenant space; the remainder of the spaces within the building may be occupied during construction. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for Commercial Design Review as established in Ordinance No. 1652 adopted by the Council on April 16, 2001 are outlined as follows: 1. Support of the pattern of diverse architectural styles that characterize the city's commercial areas; 2. Respect and promotion of pedestrian activity by placement of buildings to maximize commercial use of the street frontage, off-street public spaces, and by locating parking so that it does not dominate street frontages; 3. On visually prominent and gateway sites, whether the design fits the site and is compatible with the surrounding development; 4. Compatibility of the architecture with the mass, bulk, scale, and existing materials of existing development and compatibility with transitions where changes in land use occur nearby; 5. Architectural design consistency by using a single architectural style on the site that is consistent among primary elements of the structure, restores or retains existing or significant original architectural features, and is compatible in mass and bulk with other structure in the immediate area; and 6. Provision of site features such as fencing, landscaping, and pedestrian circulation that enriches the existing opportunities of the commercial neighborhood. E Commercial Design Review Planning Commission Action: 1207 and 1209 Burlingame Avenue The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped June 14, 2013, sheets T-0, A-D, A-E and A-1 through A-6; 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of building, which would include changing or adding exterior walls or parapet walls, shall require an amendment to this permit; 3. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's May 30, May 16 and April 12, 2013 memos, the City Engineer's May 23 and April 22, 2013 memos, the Fire Marshal's April 15, 2013 memo, and the Stormwater Coordinator's April 18, 2013 memo shall be met; 5. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 7. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 8. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2010 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; and 3 Commercial Design Review 1207 and 1209 Burlingame Avenue 11. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Ruben Hurin Senior Planner c. Karen Hess, Kate Spade, applicant Joseph Park, TPG Architecture, architect Attachments: Section 5.2.3 - Architectural Design Consistency of the Design & Character chapter - Downtown Specific Plan Applicant's Response to Commission's comments, dated June 12, 2013 June 10, 2013 Planning Commission Design Review Study Meeting Minutes Application to the Planning Commission Applicant's Letter of Explanation, dated February 26, 2013 Photographs of Neighborhood with Proposed Storefront Design Staff Comments Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed June 14, 2013 Aerial Photo 4 5.0 Design & Character .�-'' �.-f"'"�' ,ir �� € i� �j� �_�-,. , "��;:'-k:. _ Inre�csting Rooftine oc Profilc " > 1 �� ,� � Comice and Ornamenquon r ,.��. w� ;.'"",'`'�` �-�" Recessed CG"indo�vs Create Shade and Shado�v : � � � i� Building Omament '""rt~`�� T � t� � Recesses in Facade Cceate Inrecest and Depch Transom Windows �r � High Q�ality Srorefront Glazing Awnings �Y'ithin Building Bays � . �� Street T'ntiance Doors Every 50 Feet Masimum, 15-25 Feet Preferrea Signage to be Incegzal with Building Design Ornamental Base, 18" to 30" Height . Compositional Change in Facade Every 1 � to 50 Feet 5.2.3 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CONSISTENCY 5.2.3.1 Facade Design To maintain the present scale and character of buildings in Downtown, large unintexrupted expanses of horizontal and vertical wall surface should be avoided. Building fa�ades should respond to the relatively narrow increments of development (15 to 50 feet) with variarion in fenestrarion, building materials and/or building planes. Facades should have genetous reveals such as inset doorways and windows. Doors, windows, and details should be in keeping with pedestrian scale, as opposed to a monumental scale that is out of pxopoxtion to the surrounding context. Design details should be authenuc and have purpose, rathex than being applied or stricdy decorative. Facades should have a variation of both positive space (massing) and negative space (plazas, inset doorway�s and windows). FIGURE 5-12: Facades on both new and rehabilitated buildings should include the elements that make up a complete storefront including doors, display windows, bulkheads, signage areas and awnings. Facades on both new and xehabilitated buildings should include the elements that make up a complete storefront including doors, display windows, bulkheads, signage areas and awnings. New buildings need not iniinic an "historic" axchitectural style (and in fact should avoid imitation that results in caricatuxes) but should include a level of axchi- tectural detailing and quality of materials that complements e�cisting buildings. Where older e�ting buildings are renovated, preservation oE existing architectural details and materials is encouraged. Even if separate businesses Eunction within the same btulding, the overall design of the fa�ade should be consistent. Individual businesses should not break the basic lines, matexial and concept of the fa�ade. Storefronts can be demarcated from each othex within the same build- ing by subde variations in the color or pattexn of surfaces of doors, tiling, signage or entries. Corner parcels are encouxaged to incorporate features such as rounded or cut corners, corner entrances, display win- dows, corner roof features, wxap-around awnings/overhangs, blade signs, etc. ti_� FIGURE 5-13: Even if separate businesses function within the same building, the overall design of the fa�ade should be consistent. Individual businesses should not break the basic lines, material and concept of the facade. 5.2.3.2 Windows General Windows are ixnportant for providing "eyes on the street" and enliven- ing stxeetscapes. Building walls should be punctuated by well-propor- tioned openings that pxovide relief, detail and variation on the facade. Windows should be inset from the building wall to create shade and shadow detail. The use of high-qualiry window products that contrib- ute to the richness and detail of the fa�ade is encouxaged. Reflective glass is considered an undesirable matexial because of its tendency to create uncomfortable glare conditions and a forbidding appearance. The use of materials that are reflected in the historic axchitecture pxes- ent in the Downtown axea is encouxaged. Di.r�lay Windo�v.r Display windows should be designed to enliven the street and provide pedestrian views into the interior of the storefront. Size, division and shape of display windows should maintain the established xhythm of the streetscape. Glass used in the display windows should be cleax so it is possible to see inside, and display cases that block views into stores are strongly discoutaged. Noticably tinted glazing is discouraged and mirrored/reflective glass is not permitted. 5.2.3.3 Awnings Awnings should be designed to be decorative, complimentary to the overall facade design, and pxovide effective weather and sun protec- tion. The placement of awnings should xelate to the major architec- tural elements of the facade, avoiding covering any transom windows or axchitectural elements such as belt courses, decoxative trim and simi- lar features. The position of awxungs should also relate to the pedes- trian and provide a sense of shelter, with awnings situated to corre- spond to the tops of doorways and scale of pedestrians rather than high up on the facade with a monumental scale. Separate awnings should be used over individual storefxont bays as defined by the col- umns or pilasters rather than placing a continuous awning acxoss the FIGURE 5-15: Awnings should be designed to be decorative, complimentary to the overall facade design, and provide effective weather and sun protection. �-� FIGURE 5-14: Size, division and shape of display windows should maintain the established rhythm of the streetscape S.0 Design & Character building frontage. Backlit awnings that visually appeax as large light souxces will not be permitted. 5.2.3.3 Materials FIGURE 5-17: Service facilities such as trash enclosures and mechanical equipment should be screened with enclosures and devices consistent with the building architecture in form, material and detail. Building materials should be richly detailed to pxovide visual intexest; reference should be made to materials used in notable examples of his- toric Downtown architecture. Metal siding and laxge expanses of stuc- co or wood siding are also to be avoided, except in the Myrde Mi7ced Use area. Roofing materials and accenting features such as canopies, cornices, and tile accents should also offer color variation. Charactet and richness in Downtown can be enhanced from the incor- poxation of details and ornamentation into the design of the buildings. These elements can include elements that have been traditionally used such as cornices, brackets or moldings. 5.2.3.4 Rear and Side Facades Because the side streets and alleys in Downtown are highly visible and are used for both pedestrian access and vehicular access, rear and side fa�ades that are visible fxom the public realm should exhibit sophisti- cated levels of design and materials. Rear and side fa�ades of e�sting buildings should be improved with design features and quality materi- als where possible. Buildings should have windows and doors oriented to the alleys and side streets. Entry dooxs, garage dooxs and windows should be attractive and durable. Where buildings abut public paxking lots, they are strongly encouraged to have rear entrances in addition to their pxincipal street entrances. Rear facades may look like the back of a building, but still be pleasant and inviting. Service facilities such as trash enclosures and mechanical equipment should be screened with enclosures and devices consistent with the building architecture in form, material and detail. Roofs and trellises are recommended for screening views fxom above. Whenever possible, trash and recycling enclosures should be consolidated and designed to serve several adjacent businesses provided they do not become over- FIGURE 5-16: Rear and side facades that are visible from the public realm should exhibit sophisticated levels of design and materials of a quality similar to front facades. Buildings facing public parking lots are strongly encouraged to have rear entrances in addirion to theu principal street entrances. sized or too ungainly. Care should be taken to ensure xefuse areas do not become noxious or smelly. Where security devices are desired or warranted, designs should be axt- ful with decorative grillwork that enhances the overall building design. Alley areas should be well lit but should be designed so they are attrac- tive and do not adversely impact adjacent pxoperties and detract fxom the ambiance of Downtown. 5.2.4 SITE DESIGN AND AMENITIES 5.2.4.1 Building Coverage In order to create well-defined street spaces consistent with the scale of Downtown Burlingame, side yards are genexally discouraged in favor of contiguous building fa�ades along the street. However, narrow mid-block pedestrian passages that encouxage through- block pedestrian circulation and/or arcaded spaces that create widex sidewalk areas for cafes, etc. are enco�aged. 5.2.4.2 Open Space Private open space within Downtown is not intended to provide recreational or large landscaped areas, since this is a mare urban environment. However, open space is an important element and should be used to articulate building forms, promote access to light and fxesh air, and maintain privacy foz Downtown xesidents. In residential mixed-use developments, most open space should be used to provide attractive amenities far xesidents, including interior courtyards and perimeter landscaping. Balconies and rooftop texraces are encouraged. Commexcial development should typically have less open space in arder to maintain a dixect pedestrian relationship and continuous storefront streetscape. Entry alcoves, courtyards, and employee open space are examples. Open space for nonresidential projects should provide a visual amenity for the development and an attractive buffer to adjacent residential uses where applicable. FIGURE 5-18: Open spaces such as retail plazas and outdoor seating areas should be located at building entries, or along or near well- traveled pedestrian routes to encourage frequent and spontaneous use. FIGURE 5-19: In residential mixed-use developments, most open space should be used to provide attractive amenities for residents, including interior courtyards and perimeter landscaping. TPG Architecture, LLP June 12, 2013 City of Burlingame Planning Commission-Commercial Design Review 501 Primrose Road, 2"d Floor Burlingame, CA 94010 ITIPIGI A M C' 11 1 T!: C T V R V Rp. G Kate Spade-Commercial Design Review 1207 Burlingame Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010. APN: 029-204-050 Dear Planning Commission staff; ,�tY'•p. � � ,.�( � �� I _, pza JUN � 2 ZO��_� ��,a ,., -. � ;,(rc i�;..�-d ', , ;iL ._. : _. . :,, r , �,��'•��-, _: _,.`��:: Please read below for the storefront design revision narrative for the staff review on June 24 for APN: 029-204-050 for storefront design approval: As the Board Meeting requested the revision of heights of the storefront regarding the awning, doors, and display windows, our design team studied the entire storefront to achieve a better dialogue with both the adjacent tenants and the neighborhood in general. The proportions of the show windows were revised as to create a better relationship in human scale by adding a mullion at 9'-0" that follows the existing stucco band, aligned as well with a revised maximum door height of 9'-0" for an orderly proportioned facade. The bottom of the awning was revised to a maximum height of 11'-9" and the door handles were also revisited to a smaller scale adding a touch of better proportions. As discussed during the previous board meeting, the existing tile cladding at both sides of the storefront will be repaired to as-new conditions for a more presentable fa�ade. We believe this design with along with the awning, and the slanted configuration of the window displays, will have an inviting effect, for an improved bond between the surrounding area and our store. Thank you for your collaboration Regards Camilo Espitia TPG Architecture, LLP 360 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10010 (212) 536-5169 direct (212) 768-1597 fax 360 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10010 212 768 0800 212 768 1597 fax www. toq a rch itectu re. com G:\13\1513060-OO�Arch\Data\PLANNING COMMISSION DESIGN REVIEVV�06.12.2013 REDESIGN\KS BURLINGAME DESIGN NARATIVE.docx 6/12/20'13 . . .;z . F _ ",1':!3; � , � �' � r 4 ~ ,. -' � -< � y�� . . Y' w N / . . . - -' .� ' \ .I� +�I � .r ' .�7 � . r� • , , . i ,�� ' � �` . b �'n. . y 1�1� �V.fi� ,. . ` .'` ..,, .y.., i ' S _ � `�„_'��4'1 �, l jV �� ` , � �� u � �� . .. \�+ ' � � - ��r .� i � � � � t �- p / ,. ,_ _.....-,.ic' �::•�-,f�' . � � � � . w ' . ..,'�!._}«n.c•� d` bzk.� �Y.+ P'� �► ' r. I. ; I I ' f . 3, i�I �� . � � d � v . -�::� �r �'' ,,�.* �j 1'' •� � t� ' i 4' 0�}y: � _ _ • �' �. � � _ � �'t -. �� I R� q e� : �q I � �- � �� ,� � CQ� l�t r�—q� _' `�. ii�a . "� p�- _ - _,t.'^_ F f ' r.t'y fi q�, � - � �._ � �- `r'1 , ' �- �w i � - �1 b4f�� -�„ s� � a � :� � - _ _ - =; r. y �` � .� � , �' - �:� � � , �. ",� � - -.. _ � a�L '" . Sr_ .. : �� r .� � � �' ; �� .:; - `� � T7 + �.Fr�ktx � vrX � - - s � ,. ,y�=:. . � a � 6 £ E .�i �'� �'w^�"a �'. _ � ,r+�� x. ��.�t�'° '�� '�;r � � ;._� ' '�r:A,a,,. - ,��-'s-� ;.r � . �_ h .�> � - -k� � � sh " .. r, s� -� .� n i - ':-` xr � �s4�r,,$'�f.3, z _ � r'� ,�: ,�` �: � - 3 �` � � .� �Q � � �„�'� � � � �,: q a�,� �.. � � � !.� ,{,§ � 2 �. +L`"_`:� t=�� J 't a� Y '�3;;{t.-�`£.n"+uF+ , � o- � .;��yt,� v ��..�o-Z. 4' '4 �k , ,,�- p ..` 1 h� �'� '��{-.� � fu,. � � . i`�, ' i+ _ ' ;li # J � . ..n, v�_.. j �'� '<✓ Y� �� ,�1��$ - � ; a � 'T'4� «� � E, �` � ry��x��,. ,, .�'L s��.+� t s ._ r . : ��.. �y� � �: 'y�'�"`J�. � � � ' Y'y�{ � �~ �3`��. e��'•' 'k``�a'.�.�iyfn �� 1 � . , .k':�' ls 1� �. ��'"'fM'j�' �' `T�'' Y^ r . -"�.'�t rn�..,. +:' e^ . q,� � _ ,-:�, �e,ql 4� �a�-� a�� * :C.. � a y� +�.�.�� '. ,- '�» �S'�-t�'1�`,y,�- �.�xT�„�.,�'�.` '��,��'^ ,y'7�'^'' '��:.`a,_��'�' �=.n+ �'i,.9' ds 1207 Burlingame Avenue �� ' ��'� JUN 1 ,'�� :� CITY CF BURL[i�lG'�P�E CDD-PLAPJNiivG DIV. CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED M/NUTES City Council Chambers 501 Primrose Road - Burlingame, California June 10, 2013 - 7:00 p.m. 7. 1207 BURLINGAME AVENUE, ZONED BAC — APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW FOR CHANGES TO THE FAC�ADE OF AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING (KAREN HESS, KATE SPADE, APPLICANT; TPG ARCHITECTURE, ARCHITECT; RONALD KARP, PROPERTY OWNER STAFF CONTACT: RUBEN HURIN Reference staff report dated June 10, 2013, with attachments. Senior Planner Hurin briefly presented the project description. No ex parte communications were reported and all Commissioners had visited the subject property. There were no questions of staff. Chair Sargent opened the public comment period. Karen Hess represented the applicant. Brought photos from a store that was just completed at Santa Monica Place, for reference. It opened about three weeks ago. Also photos of an interior mall store that was recently completed. Commission questions and comments: ■ Storage areas in the back, will those not be a part of the project? (Hess: We are not taking that space, it is not part of our leasable area. We will be putting a demising wall in.) ■ Describe the brass cabinet? (Hess: It is a brass panel. Our Iogo and signage are routed out of that panel and backed up with a piece of plexiglass and then it's lit from the interior. It is a light cabinet but people would only see the brass panel.) ■ Concerned about the scale of the storefront. Sephora is great, it's bright, but it's tall. Similarly, the Pottery Barn/Banana Republic stores across the street the storefronts are tall, the scale is massive. As you work your way up from this store, at the jewelers and Mingalaba the awnings are down at a nice scale, but here the storefront is pushed really tall. Understandable to want to have presence and light, but in the rendering it looks like the doors are going to be between 9 and 10 feet tall. How tall will they be? (Hess: 12 feet to the underside of the awning. Typically we'd want a minimum of 30 inches for signage, so doors would be about 10'h feet.) ■ The doors to the office (next door to the right) and the jewelers have nice scale, with the transoms above. Then there are awnings as you work your way up the street. ■ Could bring the awning lower and have windows up high to let light into the deep recesses of the store — a typical storefront design. Or possibly introduce a secondary awning at an 8-foot height and still have the glass doors — it could be a relatively thin horizontal band. ■ It feels massive. We have made that mistake and let that happen on other storefronts, and we need to stop making that mistake. We need to look at this relative to the other storefronts in the neighborhood. ■ Likes idea of bringing the awning down. The awning line of the jeweler and Mingalaba are consistent — this would bring it down to a more pedestrian level. ■ Understand the need to have the brand and presence. Not looking for a canvas-type awning, it could be sleek and contemporary and modern. If the awning was down at the proper scale it would really help with the storefront feel along that street. (Hess: The door to the office next door is a very small door. Would not want to hold it to that height). CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMMISSION — Unapproved Minutes June 10, 2013 Just looking for a bit of better scale. Could still have nice 8-foot doors. Does not need to be down at 6'-8", does not even need to be down at 7 feet. Just looking for better scale to represent the building, right now it looks like a tall rectangle into the space and looks stark. Ron Karp, Burlingame, represented the property owner: ■ Door of office building next door will be modified to match Kate Spade. It is consistent with the store across the street, which is rectangular and glass as well. ■ With all the work being done with the streetscape, trying to bring in some higher quality and better retailers to Burlingame Avenue. This is the first major corporate tenant we've had on Burlingame Avenue since Banana Republic. ■ Not yet sure what will be in the back area. Might be storage for the present jeweler or something else, but this is not what is being addressed tonight. ■ Requests to preserve the right to keep the food service use for the property (per the Ordinance) to possibly use for the back area and/or the jeweler. Precedent from retaining restaurant use from La Pinata (now Sephora) to later allow Cherimoya on Lorton Avenue. ■ One possibility is the back area may continue to be a specialty restaurant configured with the current jewelry store. Not planned yet, just a possibility. ■ Building Official comment #8 needs to be clarified that is only applies to the subject tenant space, not the entire building. (Hurin: Will clarify. It is only meant for the subject tenant space.) Commission questions and comments: ■ Wants to make sure the area in the back would not be a storage space that could be rented out separately. A sandwich outlet in the back could be interesting. As we develop the downtown would like to see some businesses on the back sides of those buildings. (Karp: There are people who are interested in using the space for that, will come back for that at a later date. Will not be for rent as a contractor's workshop to store things.) (Hurin: Could be storage as an expansion of another adjacent business, but would not be allowed to be a separate stand-alone storage use.) ■ No problem with grandeur, or juxtaposition of the contemporary storefront with the rest of the building. Just thinks there are ways to get a better scale and still get all of the grandeur and details being talked about. Could be achieved with a little bit of revisiting. ■ Understands wanting to match scale of other storefronts, but example of Plant restaurant replaced awnings of adjacent businesses to match. If came back with proposal to replace consistent canopies on the whole building that were higher, would not have a problem with that. Thinks 10 feet is fine if it is consistent across the building. (Karp: Intends to have adjacent office door match the Kate Spade design. Planning to see what is approved for Kate Spade, then will make the office door consistent. Jeweler will be changed to once the streetscape is completed, to be consistent with Kate Spade as the landmark tenant. The jeweler will not be replacing the door but will be replacing awnings.) (Hurin: Changes will come back as a Minor Design Review or Commercial Design Review. Would encourage showing all changes in one application.) ■ (Karp: Could make approval of Kate Spade conditioned that door of 1209 (office door) be at the same height and that the awning be at the same height, and that the awning of the jewelry store be at the same elevation.)(Hurin: Those tenant spaces are not part of this application, unless they come back and include that in the application.) ■ Doesn't think the door and canopy scale needs to be brought down just because the adjacent spaces are lower. ■ Point is not the adjacent spaces, it is the scale of the street as a whole and human scale. In the design guidelines for the downtown human scale is the emphasis. Not awnings twelve feet up in the air, iYs awnings down at a human scale. ■ Functionally would not want awnings of Mingalaba and the jewelry store up high because there is a functional purpose for the awnings. If it's raining people can stand under the awnings for some 2 C/TY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMMISSION — Unapproved Minutes June 10, 2013 protection — if they are up high it does not accomplish anything. Would not want to raise everything up to the Kate Spade level. There are ways to add secondary awnings or secondary pieces that add human scale and still get the grandeur. It's the human scale of the whole downtown. Public comments: None. There were no comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Chair Sargent opened the public hearing for additional Commission questions of the applicant: Is there variety between stores, or is there a signature look in every store? (Hess: The Santa Monica store had a bulkhead that was part of the space and the materials were applied to it. On the other example the opening of the store is much wider but the height is similar. Our preferred design is to have the sign right over the doors. The other example shown is in Huntington, NY on Long Island and is more similar to what is being proposed here.) There were no further comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Commission comments: ■ Not sure if canopy needs to come down. Thinking of Union Square and other more urban places, it's exciting. It's not just a mall storefront, it feels more like a city. ■ Part of commercial design review is making sure it ties into neighboring buildings. ■ Anthropologie is a good example: is tall but has elements to give it a human scale. When it was reviewed the Commission looked at the issue of the scale. They introduced a secondary line at about 8 feet. Still had a tall storefront but the doors were at a more human scale. ■ Not looking for cookie-cutter 8-foot awnings, but based on the design guidelines are asking for elements that are more at a human scale. On a storefront like this with a simple palate of items, it is a bit more difficult to get that scale. Maybe an introduction of another element, just an introduction of something to give a bit more scale but still get the grandeur and contemporary feel that they are going for. Commissioner Yie made a motion fo place the item on the Regular Action Calendar when complete. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Gaul. Discussion of motion: Bringing it back for Regular Action will allow Commissioners to go out and look at this again. Can look at the sca/e not just of the adjacenf buildings, but the who% block. Review with the downtown design guidelines, which look af fhe downtown as a whole rather than individual pieces. Chair Sargent called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the RegularAction Calendar when plans have been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 7-0-0-0. The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded af 8:46 p.m. 3 < ,-, .: ��, � � :�,�'' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 5O1 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: � Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit PROJECT ADDRESS: I ZO� 0 Please indicate the contact person for this project — APPLICANT pro)ect contact person�t OK to send electronic copies of documents � Name: I�A�'C S A�"h�� Ir' Y1 I`TCSS Address: 2 �ark �ve , �+h �� City/State/Zip: N(� �/l� /�Y�T_� �w �(D Phone: C�� %�I'��'J�2 /�q�� 5 �'3gq� Fax: �/�t E-mail: I �GSS l." ' . ARCHITECT/DESIGNER project contact person o OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ _�_ . . .. . �, �, .� ❑ Parcel #: O2-°�— 2-04 - 05--0 ❑ Other: �v� ��rl inaam� . C� �'4�0►0 PROPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ Name: ��nald I�QrI� Address: 2 r ( Yt/ � City/State/Zip: ^ V r I � V1A A Wi e;� q 4010 Phone: l�dCO� 3�$• 3055 Fax: N�A E-mail: 1r � � � Q 0 • �I,' � � Jose�oh Address: ..�f�� Q r I� /`t V C�� c�lJ U� City/State/Zip: NeW ��r� � �Y � �d� V Phone: l 2� 2� �7�0 �� Fax E-ma * Bu PROJECT DESCRIPTI N: 4CppIiC�'h'On r � �� AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I he best of my knowledge and belief. Applicant's signature: � I am aware of the proposed appli Commission. ! Property owner's ify under p�alty of perjury that the information given h ;: «:� 1.�a � � w� ..�.�r � �n C VP� �in is true and correct to the Date: 2�2'5��3 ion and hefeby a rize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Date: � � � Date submitted: �' � � � � � * Verification that the project architect/designer has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the Finance Department at the time application fees are paid. ❑ Please mark one box above with an X to indicate the contact person for this project. S:�Handouts�PC Application 20o8-B.handout �/ V kate s ade p NE'4ti' YORK February 26, 2013 Planning Commission City of Burlingame Re: New Kate Spade Store — storefront design 1207 Burlingame Ave. Burlingame, CA 94010 `��@�J�:� j Y� ��PR � !� 10i3 ,:::,_`,, �?!_ �:�RLfNGA1t�E f,._ .i-i:;i /:;�c'�S':i�!+r; l-1i�!. The proposed storefront for the new Kate Spade on Burlingame Avenue is a reflection of Kate Spade New York's signature bow print that permeates our product and stores. The "bow" and the aqua color have become an integral part of Kate Spade as a brand. It's transformation into a grand scale bow strengthens our brand presence. The bow storefront is intended to break up the monotony of a standard retail storefront. The recessed entrance draws customers into the store and creates a pausing point for window shopping. We hope that you will consider our storefront a welcome addition to the Burlingame Avenue streetscape. Regards, karen hess design manager • store design kate spade new york 2 Park Avenue, 8th floor, New York NY 10016 2 park ave. 8th floor new york, ny 10016 1 � IIMAGES SCALE : 1/2" =1,-0" Project No.: 1513060 �rawing No.: A-3 Date : 02/�2/13 Scale: AS_NOTED kate spade 1207 BURLINGAME AVE. PROPOSED STREETSCAPE RENDERING �_��i.` : .'i, C:;! � Y GF E?UR�Ii�G�P.�� .::�r�-!��.8:°��E:��. aiv. , , _' �� h ,Y��;- KATE SPADE, BURLINGAME, CA- ARCHITECTURE REVIEW BOARD -� �'�" ��"` '" L�� 80 �u�u�ucaN�E �v�__ (;a�i;ox) 1207 BU�LIi�1GAPv1� �,�;'��.. PRO;�OSED P,ENDEBiNG 1192 BUr�LiNGAP�IE AVE. (APROX) 1216 BUR�INGAME AVE. (APROX) Project Comments Date: May 29, 2013 To: � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 From: Planning Staff � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Subject: Request for Commercial Design Review for changes to the front fa�ade of an existing commercial building at 1207 Burlingame Avenue, zoned BAC, APN: 029-204-050 Staff Review: All conditions of approval as stated in the review dated 5-16-2013 will apply to this project. In addition, the following information must be provided on the plans submitted for Building Code compliance plan check: 1. Provide fully dimensioned plans. 2. The net interior floor area of 1,645 square feet is to be provided on Page T-0. 3. The landing at the front door must have a maximum 2% slope and cross slope for a distance of 4'0" perpendicular to the door on the push side of the door and a distance of 5'0" on the pull side of the door. 4. Remove all references to "ADA" and replace with the "2010 California Building Code, Accessibility Standards." 5. The front door must not encroach into the public right of way when in its fully open position. 6. Note: Architects are advised to specify construction dimensions for accessible features that are below the maximum and above the minimum dimension required as construction tolerances generally do not apply to accessible features. See the California Access Compliance Manu� Interpretive Regulation 118-8. Reviewed � Project Comments Date: To: From: May 16, 2013 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Commercial Design Review for changes to the front faCade of an existing commercial building at 1207 Burlingame Avenue, zoned BAC, APN: 029-204-050 Staff Review: Follow-up comments: 6) Provide fully dimensioned plans. The response was incomplete. P/ease fully dimension the floor plan. 13) On your plans provide a table that includes the following: c. Allowable area Provide the allowable area for this occupancy group and type based on Table 503. d. Proposed area Provide the total calculated floor area for this tenant space. 15) Illustrate compliance with the minimum plumbing fixture requirements described in the 2010 California Plumbing Code, Chapter 4, Table 4-1 Minimum Plumbing Facilities and Table A- Occupant Load Factor. The 2010 California Plumbing Code requires separate toilet facilities for each sex when the "total floor area" is more than 1500 square feef. The tota/ floor area of this proposed tenant space is approximately 1675 square feet, not 1275 as stated. On the plans indicate that a separate bathroom will be provided for each sex. 16) Separate toilet facilities are required for each sex, except: a. Residential occupancies b. Occupancies serving ten or fewer people may have a toilet facility for use by more than one person at a time, shall be permitted for use by both sexes. c. Business and Mercantile occupancies with 1500 square feet or less may have a toilet facility for use by no more than one person at a time, shall be permitted for use by both sexes. 2010 CPC §412.3 This project does not qualify for exception a, b, or c. On the plans indicate that a separate bathroom will be provided for each sex. 17) Show compliance with all accessibility regulations found in the 2010 CBC for existing buildings including: a. Specify a level landing, slope, and cross slope on each side of the door at all required entrances and exits. No response found to this comment. c. Accessible bathrooms Because a bathroom is required for each sex, provide dimensioned details on the plans which show that both bathrooms will be fully accessible. NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address items 6, 13, 15, 16, and 17 must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for Planning CommissiQrr� action. Reviewed b� �----�l�! k�: G`� / _Date: 5-16-2013 ., Project Comments Date: To: From April 11, 2013 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 0 Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Commercial Design Review for changes to the front fa�ade of an existing commercial building at 1207 Burlingame Avenue, zoned BAC, APN: 029-204-050 Staff Review: April 15, 2013 The plans submitted were incomplete. A full plan check will be performed when the plans are resubmitted and that plan check will be considered the first plan check for this proiect. "� On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2010 California Building Code, 2010 California Residential Code (where applicable), 2010 California Mechanical Code, 2010 California Electrical Code, and 2010 California Plumbing Code, including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1856-2010. Note: If the Planning Commission has approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2010 then the building permit application for that project may use the provisions found in the 2007 California Building Codes including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1813. :� Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2008 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Go to http://www.energ .y ca._gov/title24/2008standards/ for publications and details. ,�Place the following information on the first page of the plans: "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. (See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.) �On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrated on the Job Copy of the plans prior to performing the work. 5) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. �Provide fully dimensioned plans. �Provide existing and proposed elevations for the front facade 8) Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of Occupancy will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued after the project has been finaled. No occupancy of the building is to occur until a new Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. �Provide a complete demolition plan that indicates the existing walls, walls to be demolished, new walls, and a legend. NOTE: A condition of this project approval is that the Demolition Permit will not be issued and, and no work can begin (including the removal of � building components), until a Building Permit has been issued for the project. The property owner is responsible for assuring that no work is authorized or perFormed. 10)Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 11 Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. ��rovide a title block on the plans that includes the name of the owner(s) and the �ame, address, and phone number of the project designer. n your plans provide a table that includes the following: a. Occupancy group for each area of the building b. Type of construction c. Allowable area d. Proposed area e. Allowable height f. Proposed height g. Proposed fire separation distances h. Exterior wall and opening protection i. Allowable ii. Proposed i. Indicate sprinklered or non-sprinklered �Acknowledge that, when plans are submitted for building code plan check, they will include a complete underground plumbing plan including complete details for the location of all required grease traps and city-required backwater prevention devices. '�Ilustrate compliance with the minimum plumbing fixture requirements described in the 2010 California Plumbing Code, Chapter 4, Table 4-1 Minimum Plumbing acilities and Table A- Occupant Load Factor. �1�,�"eparate toilet facilities are required for each sex, except: a. Residential occupancies b. Occupancies serving ten or fewer people may have a toilet facility for use by more than one person at a time, shall be permitted for use by both sexes. c. Business and Mercantile occupancies with 1500 square feet or less may have a toilet facility for use by no more than one person at a time, shall be permitted for use by both sexes. 2010 CPC §412.3 ��how compliance with all accessibility regulations found in the 2010 CBC for existing buildings including: a. Specify a level landing, slope, and cross slope on each side of the door at all required entrances and exits. b. Accessible countertops c. Accessible bathrooms 18)Please Note: Architects are advised to specify construction dimensions for accessible features that are below the maximum and above the minimum dimension required as construction tolerances generally do not apply to accessible features. See the California Access Compliance Manual — Interpretive Regulation 118-8. �In the tenant space indicate the location of the "Office" or area where bookkeeping and financial reconciliation will take place. ;��Provide an exit plan showing the paths of travel 2�Doors and/or windows cannot project into the public right of way 2010 CBC §3202.2. Amend the plans to show that doors and windows in their fully open position do not encroach into the public right of way. NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address items 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, and 21 must be re- submitted before this project can move forward for Planning Commission action. __.�.., Reviewed b�� ^ � ' �Date: 4-12-2013 Project Comments Date: To: From: May 16, 2013 X Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Commercial Design Review for changes to the front fa�ade of an existing commercial building at 1207 Burlingame Avenue, zoned BAC, APN: 029-204-050 Staff Review: Response to previous comment #1 is acceptable. Reviewed by: V V Date: 5/23/2013 Project Comments Date: To: From: April 11, 2013 X Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Commercial Design Review for changes to the front fa�ade of an existing commercial building at 1207 Burlingame Avenue, zoned BAC, APN: 029-204-050 Staff Review: April 15, 2013 1. he proposed new doors appear to encroach into the public right-of-way which is prohibited. Plans need to be revised to eliminate this encroachment. 2. Replace all displaced/damaged sidewalk, curb and gutter. 3. An encroachment for pedestrian protection is required for the proposed frontage improvements. Reviewed by: V V Date: 4/22/2013 Project Comments Date: To: From: April 11, 2013 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 �Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Commercial Design Review for changes to the front fa�ade of an existing commercial building at 1207 Burlingame Avenue, zoned BAC, APN: 029-204-050 Staff Review: April 15, 2013 Based upon demolition and demolition permit previously approved: 1. The building shall be equipped with an approved NFPA 13 Sprinkler System throughout. Sprinkler drawings shall be submitted and approved by the Central County Fire Department prior to installation. The system shall be electronically monitored by an approved central receiving station under separate permit through the Central County Fire Department. 2. The applicant shall ensure proper drainage in accordance with the City of Burlingame Engineering Standards is available for the fire sprinkler main drain and inspector test on the building plumbing drawings. These items may drain directly to landscape or in the sewer with an air gap. 3. The fire protection underground shall be submitted and approved by the Burlingame Building Department prior to installation. 4. The fire sprinkler system will not be approved by the Central County Fire Department until the fire protection underground has been submitted and approved by the Burlingame Building Department. Reviewed by: �/� Date: /S� �3 Project Comments Date: To: From: April 11, 2013 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 X Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Commercial Design Review for changes to the front fa�ade of an existing commercial building at 1207 Burlingame Avenue, zoned BAC, APN: 029-204-050 Staff Review: April 15, 2013 1) Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City's NPDES (stormwater) permit to prevent stormwater pollution from construction activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement appropriate and effective BMPs during all phases of construction, including demolition. When submitting plans for a building permit include a list of construction BMPs as project notes on a separate full size plan sheet, preferably 2' x 3' or larger or attach the attached document to plans. Project proponent may use the attached Construction BMPs plan sheet to comply with this requirement. Electronic file is available for download at: http://www.flowstobay.orq/documents/business/construction/Countywide Program B MP Plan Sheet Jun2012.pdf 2) Best Management Practices (BMPs) requirements apply on any projects using architectural copper. To learn what these requirements are, see attached flyer "Requirements for Architectural Copper." Electronic file is available for download at: http://www.flowstobay.orp/documents/municipalities/nd/Materials/2012%20Materials/ Architectural copper BMPs FINAL.pdf For assistance please contact Stephen D. at 650-342-3727 Reviewed by: SD � iJ Date: 4/18/2013 � i"1r/ 5.0.'N MAiE9 CaL"NPWVYk[i4 Wacer Poilutian Pre►rention Program Gcan Watec HuaM6y Commar.i�.� Requirements for Architectural Copper Protect water quality during installation, cleaning, treating, and washing! Copper from Buildings May Harm Aquatic Life Copper can harm aquatic life in San Francisco Bay. Water that comes into contact with architectural copper may contribute to impacts, especially during installation, cleaning, treating, or washing. Patination solutions that are used to obtain the desired shade of green or brown typically contain acids. After treatment, when the copper is rinsed to remove these acids, the rinse water is a source of pollutants. Municipalities prohibit discharges to the storm drain of water used in the installation, cleaning, treating and washing of architectural copper. Use Best Management Practices (BMPs) The following Best Management Practices (BMPs) must be implemented to prevent prohibited discharges to storm drains. During Installation • If possible, purchase copper materials that have been pre-patinated at the factory. • If patination is done on-site, implement one or more of the following BMPs: o Discharge the rinse water to landscaping. Ensure that the rinse water does not flow to the street or storm drain. Block off storm drain inlet if needed. o Collect rinse water in a tank and pump to the sanitary sewer. Contact your local sanitary sewer agency before discharging to the sanitary sewer. o Collect the rinse water in a tank and haul off-site for proper disposal. • Consider coating the copper materials with an impervious coating that prevents further corrosion and runoff. This will also maintain the desired color for a longer time, requiring less maintenance. During Maintenance Implement the following BMPs during routine maintenance activities, such as power washing the roof, re-patination or re-application of impervious coating: • Block storm drain inlets as needed to prevent runoff from entering storm drains. • Discharge the wash water to landscaping or to the sanitary sewer (with permission from the local sanitary sewer agency). If this is not an option, haul the wash water off-site for proper disposal. Protect the Bay/Ocean and yourself! If you are responsible for a discharge to the storm drain of non- stormwater generated by installing, cleaning, treating or washing copper architectural features, you are in violation of the municipal stormwater ordinance and may be subject to a fine. Contact Information The San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program lists municipal stormwater contacts at www.flowstobay.orq (click on "Business", then "New Development", then "local permitting agency"). FINAL February 29, 2012 Building with copper flashing, gutter and drainpipe. Storm drain inlet is blocked to prevent prohibited discharge. The water must be pumped and disposed of properly. Project Comments Date: To: From: April 11, 2013 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 X Parks Division (650) 558-7334 0 Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Commercial Design Review for changes to the front fa�ade of an existing commercial building at 1207 Burlingame Avenue, zoned BAC, APN: 029-204-050 Staff Review: April 15, 2013 1. No Comments Reviewed by: B Disco Date: 4/17/13 RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for Commercial Desiqn Review for chanqes to the fa�ades of an existinq commercial buildinq at 1207-1209 Burlinqame Avenue, zoned BAC, 1207 1211 Burlinaame Ave LLC, P.O. Box 271, Burlinqame, CA, 94011, propertv owner, APN: 029-204-050; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on June 24, 2013, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15301 - Existing facilities, Class 1(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances are exempt from environmental review, is hereby approved. 2. Said Commercial Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Commercial Design Review are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th dav of June, 2013 by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption and Commercial Design Review. 1207-1209 Burlingame Avenue Effective July 5, 2013 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped June 14, 2013, sheets T-0, A-D, A-E and A-1 through A-6; 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of building, which would include changing or adding exterior walls or parapet walls, shall require an amendment to this permit; 3. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's May 30, May 16 and April 12, 2013 memos, the City Engineer's May 23 and April 22, 2013 memos, the Fire Marshal's April 15, 2013 memo, and the Stormwater Coordinator's April 18, 2013 memo shall be met; 5. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 7. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 8. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2010 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; and EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption and Commercial Design Review. 1207-1209 Burlingame Avenue Effective July 5, 2013 Page 2 11. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. . CITY OF BURLINGAME , COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD U BURLINGAME, CA 94010 � ��" `' PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org Site: 1207 and 1209 BURIINGAME AVENUE The City of Burlingame Planning (ommission announces the following pu6lic hearing on MONDAY, JUNE 24, 2013 at 7:00 P.M. in the [ity Hall Council (hambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for [ommercial Design Review for changes to the fa�ades of an existing commercial building at 1207 and 1209 BURLINGAME AVENUE zoned BAC. APN 029-204-050 Mailed: June 14, 2013 (Please refer to other side) pUgLIC HEARING NOTICE Citv of Burlinaame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written corresp�ndence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to ofher side) '�"t + "� • �"' �� x_• � �"' �, � I �!1 b J � � �r � I �A'` � _ �ir: �M� ! �'T y "� I i � a' + � E r- , •��, l,�.�� '�, , � �� '!.*� ; � � t� .� f ��'{�+�'�y//_/��, � � � C. • � ' � F �'•�f�/�*1y • ��;'*�j!'" ' 3 = , �_ F � s' �, � t r ! i ' `�lr� ' e � , M .,.� �. ., j, �� R ,s� _� �M �,,._� 1 � e-w" i V . _ . _ .. . q ` _ � . i . �� •��. ��%��... � .. • � � . , .. � •. � ' !} - , � �- � � '�l� i j y � �� w� A-�- /w � �''� s' ` ',,�:t � i '� � � ': ,sr. - a ..�' "a 'y ;.'.i- '�i.? :�� .. " _ - • � , ,� •�' � � � t�. t �. .'��' . • .. �.w'�� ` 1. r $ ' . 3 �,a,. R . � .� , � � � xa �,r��l � � R�► - � iab�� . �� r, � ` _ �� i, ......�, � � c �i � ;�;� � '' �g � ,�u� , �.�- } s��g �- . - 7 � �y, - 3 c _ ' _ �•-.-.i'�._.,.�I � et t� ,. � ` s�� _ - � b="�� , „-. {� rt . .'�.,. . �� _,��F.� 3'�.-�m � �.. � d.$ .a.___ � .. � , �� , 1� a x Yl..� „T '4 a � -� � a � �.. ..:. ' � �r„� . � "i� � `�. .:-> �r .� f �� `�.�_ _ �'' �� ;�#: _ , �E: _,_ �:�,�r, � �� µJ ... =019Ceogk InzgeLote.:pr1�N1 •- . . . . ' . . ��4� a, ¢� �-� �� i��° ^ �V�'�9Yr.�tYy ` . }is �BQ+ �'' �,?. 4�. � - - ,, , _.. � �,: � L � .� . ...; � ".. ;,i; :; we.�.._y;... �,^A-.e,�, � ` City of Burlingame Commercial Design Review Address: 1207 Burlingame Avenue Item No. 7 Design Review Study Meeting Date: June 10, 2013 Request: Application for Commercial Design Review for changes to the fa�ade of an existing commercial building. Applicant: Karen Hess, Kate Spade APN: 029-204-050 Architect: Joseph Park, TPG Architecture Lot Area: 4,500 SF Property Owner: 1207 1211 Burlingame Avenue LLC Zoning: BAC General Plan: Burlingame Downtown SpeciTic Plan: Burlingame Avenue Commercial District Project Description: This application is for proposed changes to the fa�ade of an existing commercial building located at 1207 Burlingame Avenue, zoned BAC (Burlingame Avenue Commercial). The tenant space was most recently occupied by Round Table Pizza and is currently vacant. Kate Spade, a retail business which sells women's clothing and accessories, will be occupying the space. The propose�' retail business is a permitted use in the BAC zoning district. With this application, changes are proposed to the fa�ade of the existing building along Burlingame Avenue. This project is subject to Commercial Design Review because it includes changes to the front fa�ade of a storefront located in the BAC zoning district. The existing tenant frontage contains tile, brick and a horizontal stucco band above a glazed aluminum storefront system. A wall sign and fabric awning are located above the storefront windows and recessed entry door. The applicant is proposing to replace the existing storefront window/door system, tile under the storefront windows, awning and wall sign with a new storefront design. The new storefront design includes a ceramic stone finish base and an aluminum framed glass storefront system with a new mirror finish polished brass cabinet above the double swing glass entry doors. As noted on sheet A-3, the glass storefront system angles inward to the recessed entry doors. A new canvas awning is proposed above the glass storefront. The existing tile and brick cladding surrounding the new storefront will remain and be repaired as necessary. Personal and retail services on the first floor in the BAC zoning district are exempt from vehicle parking requirements as set forth in code section 25.70.090 (a). Therefore, no additional off-street parking is required for the proposed retail use. The following application is required: ■ Commercial Design Review for changes to the fa�ade of an existing commercial storefront in the BAC Zoning District (CS 25.32.045). Staff comments: See attached memos from the Chief Building Official, Fire Marshal, City Engineer, Parks Supervisor and Stormwater Coordinator. Planning staff would note that the proposed retail use is replacing Round Table Pizza, an existing food establishment classified as a specialty shop food establishment. A condition of approval for the conditional use permit granted to Round Table Pizza in 2000 notes "that if this site is changed from any food establishment use to any retail or other use, a food establishment shall nAt be replaced on this site and this conditional use permit shall become void." Therefore, with this application, the conditional use permit granted for a specialty shop food establishment will become void. However, staff would note that under current zoning regulations for the BAC zoning district, a conditional use permit application could be considered for a full service food establishment in the future, but no other type of food establishment would be allowed. Commercial Design Review Ruben Hurin Senior Planner c. Karen Hess, Kate Spade, applicant Joseph Park, TPG Architecture, architect Attachments: Application to the Planning Commission Applicant's Letter of Explanation, dated February 26, 2013 Photographs of Neighborhood with Proposed Storefront Design Staff Comments Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed May 31, 2013 Aerial Photo 1207 Burlingame Avenue � lUI�LINr.l1MC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD � BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: ,� Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit PROJECT ADDRESS: � ZO 1 gVrl ❑ Parcel #: DL°�- ZD4- - oSq ❑ Other: ,�v� _ ��rl �nqamc . C,� �'4�0►0 O Please indicate the contact person for this project � APP_�ICANT project contact person� OK to send electronic copies of documents � ►vame: I�GI�� S A�"11 • Ir !�1 �CSS q�de kA C Address: 2 �a� K Ve ,T �ih �WlJir City/State/Zip: N�OrI'!1_T� �W � (D Phone: 4��J7a�1'��J�Z /C�� r7 �'3S-I� Fax: n%/�t I �G�JSI: � E-mail: • ARCHITECT/DESIGNER pro�ectcontactperson❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ Name: T r� �I�� C�i�1� a� PROPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ Name: ��nald I�Qi�I� Address: 2 r ( � Y�/ City/State/Zip: U r I I�na a w� e, �� 0 � Phone: ��oCjO� 3��• 3055 � Fax: N�A E-mail: r �� Q � � w� � OSPpI� Add�ess: �0 Pa r I� �4-vc n v�e � v� City/State/Zip: N eW I D r 1`� ,�Y I�d� V Phone: �Z� 2� �36 � S � � Fax: �21�► E-mail rGhi tC 1 (' T ( IT i,C f I r'.j�! jnt.,i'. * Burlingame Business License #: �� J o�� l. ��'�''•�-�s ' �c,�uy' . _ ,. � .� PROJECT DESCRIPTI N: �.ppl iC�tt�On r AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I he best of my knowledge and belief. Applicant's signature: � I am aware of the proposed appli Commission. ! Property owner's signatu - I Sq C under pqQalty of perjury that the information given -� �--.. �'� � �f-`�� - � - �,. � :�.. i �` � �' - , � E� ;', r i<, ,_ _ , � �n is true and correct to the Date: 2/ZS� 3 on and he"reby a rize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning �`� � Date: `� � � Date submitted: �' � �' � 3 ,k Verification that the project architect/designer has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the Finance Department at the time application fees are paid. ❑ Please mark one box above with an X to indicate the contact person for this project. S:�Handouts\PC Application 20o8-B.handout � ��.�� .C�.� � � lY L��7 S � i� i� February 26, 2013 Planning Commission City of Burlingame Re: New Kate Spade Store — storefront design 1207 Burlingame Ave. Burlingame, CA 94010 .f � � � ► �.-� �� 4�� w�.� � �,.,� F1 !� � � f.f �.. . : �_ - - -.. .-. .,r,�., .`��= The proposed storefront for the new Kate Spade on Burlingame Avenue is a reflection of Kate Spade New York's signature bow print that permeates our product and stores. The "bow" and the aqua color have become an integral part of Kate Spade as a brand. It's transformation into a grand scale bow strengthens our brand presence. The bow storefront is intended to break up the monotony of a standard retail storefront. The recessed entrance draws customers into the store and creates a pausing point for window shopping. We hope that you will consider our storefront a welcome addition to the Burlingame Avenue streetscape. Regards, karen hess design manager • store design kate spade new york 2 Park Avenue, 8th floor, New York NY 10016 2 park ave. 8th floor new york, ny 10016 � - . ;. ...�- � � Lt , i �L � � � w; � � � � i" ,,�:� �a � �� i i � � � , , , :�'� � � � . ,�.,,�..: � �,• � �m;��. � � ' ,'. - �� '.� �, � � . ; i� / � �', � � � �� Y �1 4\i�f`,,.� S �� 4 1 i � �, '� � � ` ��• � � a, . � , , s i b�eip � � .� � � �� y i a �+� i I �/s�:�; � �s :�� _ ��'`�� .. i � .. �'� � ..,��..� t � � � 9.. �'� ^-- . �._�:la'er ca ,�n b.x � �g.a j ' a; .:r,a � �. �� •..1 � r � .-. . . '� .� . � ,. . _ . . ... ia 1207 BURLINGAME AVE. PROPOSED STREETSCAPE RENDERING �1 ' l � �.+ 'r` ,'p��F75'�"��. 4 � '�-' ' �� 4b�t,�"�. j'.r� �+° . '�*,'i�� .+��+�� .,��,�r� �+9,��-r r�r .? : '4Y7 i_ � t'-� . 1207 BURLINGAME AVE. PROPOSED RENDERING iD � �, . — 'fx- - .ae :. -.. - -�-'�� ..... ✓. � T�`:.t is' j i d :.� , .--�� ., �; � � y� _� '�, _—._— �r 9siw,,:�'... . . �,�w �� ` �. , a _ =� ;� �� ..�.,a � �„ a _._—.r, _�: ---y. r �:: -�_ �� r— � � �' — >'� � : F�w.t� —_ � I��l�i� '`� `� '''�:. � �:,. �i�: "�� _ � �,; , .-� r�'.E 1180 BUR�I��IGAP�I� AVE. (APROX) � IIMAGES SCALE : 1/2" = 1'-0" Project No.: 1513060 Drawing No.: q-3 Date : 0?J12113 Scale:AS NOTED kate spade KATE SPADE, BURLINGAME, CA- ARCHITECTURE REVIEW BOARD � �i ! . � .. . :+ ! ii . .. ,.�;r,,r ac a��i�vcann� ��L+�-�i P.iv`�:i�i �i�! =,;r:j �..�..!:m.;;;w��.�,rtn�se��ii "1�� a� �� 1192 BU�Lii�GANi� AV�. (APr�OX) 1216 BURLINGAME AV�. (APROX) �� Project Comm'ents Date: May 29, 2013 To: � Engineering Division � Fire Division (650) 558-7230 (650) 558-7600 X Building Division � Stormwater Division (650) 558-7260 (650) 342-3727 � Parks Division � City Attorney (650) 558-7334 (650) 558-7204 From: Planning Staff Subject: Request for Commercial Design Review for changes to the front fa�ade of an existing commercial building at 1207 Burlingame Avenue, zoned BAC, APN: 029-204-050 Staff Review: All conditions of approval as stated in the review dated 5-16-2013 will apply to this project. In addition, the following information must be provided on the plans submitted for Building Code compliance plan check: 1. Provide fully dimensioned plans. 2. The net interior floor area of 1,645 square feet is to be provided on Page T-0. 3. The landing at the front door must have a maximum 2% slope and cross slope for a distance of 4'0" perpendicular to the door on the push side of the door and a distance of 5'0" on the pull side of the door. 4. Remove all references to "ADA" and replace with the "2010 California Building Code, Accessibility Standards." 5. The front door must not encroach into the public right of way when in its fully open position. 6. Note: Architects are advised to specify construction dimensions for accessible features that are below the maximum and above the minimum dimension required as construction tolerances generally do not apply to accessible features. See the California Access Compliance Manu� Interpretive Regulation 118-8. Reviewed �' ��i ��!-_ �/l _ / Date: 5-30-2013 � .,.� ,..,,...a ..�,��a. �, . ,�,�, � �a � _ n. �.n �, n,.:F��,.��, ��,..�,�. �v< � Pro ect Comments � � Date: To: From: May 16, 2013 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 0 Fire Division (650) 558-7600 0 Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Commercial Design Review for changes to the front fa�ade of an existing commercial building at 1207 Burlingame Avenue, zoned BAC, APN: 029-204-050 Staff Review: Follow-up comments: 6) Provide fully dimensioned plans. The response was incomplete. Please fully dimension the floor p/an. 13) On your plans provide a table that includes the following: c. Allowable area Provide the allowable area for this occupancy group and type based on Table 503. d. Proposed area Provide the tofal calculafed f/oor area for this tenant space. 15) Illustrate compliance with the minimum plumbing fixture requirements described in the 2010 California Plumbing Code, Chapter 4, Table 4-1 Minimum Plumbing Facilities and Table A- Occupant Load Factor. The 2010 California Plumbing Code requires separafe toilet facilities for each sex when the "fotal f/oor area" is more than 1500 square feet. The fota/ floor area of this proposed tenant space is approximately 1675 square feet, not 1275 as stated. On the plans indicate that a separate bathroom will be provided for each sex. 16) Separate toilet facilities are required for each sex, except: a. Residential occupancies b. Occupancies serving ten or fewer people may have a toilet facility for use by more than one person at a time, shall be permitted for use by both sexes. c. Business and Mercantile occupancies with 1500 square feet or less may have a toilet facility for use by no more than one person at a time, shall be permitted for use by both sexes. 2010 CPC §412.3 This projecf does not qualify for exception a, b, or c. On the plans indicate that a separate bathroom will be provided for each sex. 17) Show compliance with all accessibility regulations found in the 2010 CBC for existing buildings including: a. Specify a level landing, slope, and cross slope on each side of the door at all required entrances and exits. No response found to this comment. c. Accessible bathrooms Because a bathroom is required for each sex, provide dimensioned details on the plans which show that both bathrooms will be fully accessible. NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address items 6, 13, 15, 16, and 17 must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for Planning Commissip�rr� action. Reviewed by:�� ----`"� ---�` � iJ1� ��' / Date: 5-16-2013 ��.�.,n �... ��,�, � ,�,.,�..�_�w �y.,_. ..�� W ,. ,,,. ,� s ��.. , �..,...,�,.._ �; Project Comments Date: To: From: April 11, 2013 0 Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 0 Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Commercial Design Review for changes to the front fa�ade of an existing commercial building at 1207 Burlingame Avenue, zoned BAC, APN: 029-204-050 Staff Review: April 15, 2013 The plans submitted were incomplete. A full plan check will be performed when the plans are resulbmitted and that plan check will be considered the first plan check for this project. '�"1 On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2010 California Building Code, 2010 California Residential Code (where applicable), 2010 California Mechanical Code, 2010 California Electrical Code, and 2010 California Plumbing Code, including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1856-2010. Note: If the Planning Commission has approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2010 then the building permit application for that project may use the provisions found in the 2007 California Building Codes including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1813. � Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2008 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Go to http://www.enerqv.ca.pov/title24/2008standards/ for publications and details. �Place the following information on the first page of the plans: "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. (See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.) �On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrated on the Job Copy of the plans prior to performing the work. 5) Anyone �rho is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. ��Provide fully dimensioned plans. �Provide existing and proposed elevations for the front facade _ 8) Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of Occupancy will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy wili be issued after the project has been finaled. No -�ccupancy of the building is to occur until a new Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. �Provide a complete demolition plan that indicates the existing walls, walls to be demolished, new walls, and a legend. NOTE: A condition of this project approval is that the Demolition Permit will not be issued and, and no work can begin (including the removal of a� building components), until a Building Permit has been issued for the project. The property owner is responsible for assuring that no work is authorized or performed. 10)Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 1�11 Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. ' rovide a title block on the plans that includes the name of the owner(s) and the c��ame, address, and phone number of the project designer. n your plans provide a table that includes the following: a. Occupancy group for each area of the building b. Type of construction c. Allowable area d. Proposed area e. Allowable height f. Proposed height g. Proposed fire separation distances h. Exterior wall and opening protection i. Allowable ii. Proposed i. Indicate sprinklered or non-sprinklered �Acknowledge that, when plans are submitted for building code plan check, they will include a complete underground plumbing plan including complete details for the location of all required grease traps and city-required backwater prevention devices. �Ilustrate compliance with the minimum plumbing fixture requirements described in the 2010 California Plumbing Code, Chapter 4, Table 4-1 Minimum Plumbing ,�acilities and Table A- Occupant Load Factor. C��Separate toilet facilities are required for each sex, except: a. Residential occupancies b. Occupancies serving ten or fewer people may have a toilet facility for use by more than one person at a time, shall be permitted for use by both sexes. c. Business and Mercantile occupancies with 1500 square feet or less may have a toilet facility for use by no more than one person at a time, shall be permitted for use by both sexes. 2010 CPC §412.3 �how compliance with all accessibility regulations found in the 2010 CBC for existing buildings including: a. Specify a level landing, slope, and cross slope on each side of the door at all required entrances and exits. b. Accessible countertops c. Accessible bathrooms 18)Please Note: Architects are advised to specify construction dimensions for accessible features that are below the maximum and above the minimum dimension required as construction tolerances generally do not apply to accessible features. See the California Access Compliance Manual — Interpretive Regulation 118-8. ��In the tenant space indicate the location of the "Office" or area where bookkeeping and financial reconciliation will take place. r� rovide an exit plan showing the paths of travel 'f' Doors and/or windows cannot project into the public right of way 2010 CBC §3202.2. Amend the plans to show that doors and windows in their fully open position do not encroach into the public right of way. NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address items 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, and 21 must be re- submitted before this project can move forward for Planning Commission action. ,.. ._�...._._.....__ Reviewed b : ^ , ' `� Date: 4-12-2013 i C/ 0 Project Comments Date: May 16, 2013 To: X Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 0 Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 From: Planning Staff � Fire C��vision (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Subject: Request for Commercial Design Review for changes to the front fa�ade of an existing commercial building at 1207 Burlingame Avenue, zoned BAC, APN: 029-204-050 Staff Review: Response to previous comment #1 is acceptable. Reviewed by: V V Date: 5/23/2013 Project Comments Date: To: From: April 11, 2013 X Engineering Division (65C) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Commercial Design Review for changes to the front fa�ade of an existing commercial building at 1207 Burlingame Avenue, zoned BAC, APN: 029-204-050 Staff Review: April 15, 2013 1. he proposed new doors appear to encroach into the public right-of-way which is prohibited. Plans need to be revised to eliminate this encroachment. 2. Replace all displaced/damaged sidewalk, curb and gutter. 3. An encroachment for pedestrian protection is required for the proposed frontage improvements. Reviewed by: V V Date: 4/22/2013 Project Comments Date: 1� From: April 11, 2013 � Engineering Division (650) 558- 7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 BFire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Commercial Design Review for changes to the front fa�ade of an existing commercial building at 1207 Burlingame Avenue, zoned BAC, APN: 029-204-050 Staff Review: April 15, 2013 Based upon demolition and demolition permit previously approved: 1. The building shall be equipped with an approved NFPA 13 Sprinkler System throughout. Sprinkler drawings shall be submitted and approved by the Central County Fire Department prior to installation. The system shall be electronically monitored by an approved central receiving station under separate permit through the Central County Fire Department. 2. The applicant shall ensure proper drainage in accordance with the City of Burlingame Engineering Standards is available for the fire sprinkler main drain and inspector test on the building plumbing drawings. These items may drain directly to landscape or in the sewer with an air gap. 3. The fire protection underground shall be submitted and approved by the Burlingame Building Department prior to installation. 4. The fire sprinkler system will not be approved by the Central County Fire Department until the fire protection underground has been submitted and approved by the Burlingame Building Department. Reviewed by: e�/� Date: �S� �3 Project Comments Date: To: From: April 11, 2013 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 l� Fire Division (650) 558-7600 X Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � C:+y Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Commercial Design Review for changes to the front fa�ade of an existing commercial building at 1207 Burlingame Avenue, zoned BAC, APN: 029-204-050 Staff Review: April 15, 2013 1) Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City's NPDES (stormwater) permit to prevent stormwater pollution from construction activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement appropriate and effective BMPs during all phases of construction, including demolition. When submitting plans for a building permit include a list of construction BMPs as project notes on a separate full size plan sheet, preferably 2' x 3' or larger or attach the attached document to plans. Project proponent may use the attached Construction BMPs plan sheet to comply with this requirement. Electronic file is available for download at: http://www.flowstobay.orq/documents/business/construction/Countvwide Proqram B MP Plan Sheet Jun2012.pdf 2) Best Management Practices (BMPs) requirements apply on any projects using architectural copper. To learn what these requirements are, see attached flyer "Requirements for Architectural Copper." Electronic file is available for download at: ht�://www.flowstobay.orq/documents/municipalities/nd/Materials/2012%20Materials/ Architectural copper BMPs FINAL.pdf For assistance please contact Stephen D. at 650-342-3727 Reviewed by: SD �'� l� Date: 4/18/2013 � 4�5N HATE9 CQUaTY1Vf�E Water Pol�ution Prevention Program Gean Wa[et Hsatt6y Lammenny. Requirements for Architectural Copper Protect water quality during installation, cleaning, treating, and washing! Copper from Buildings May Harm Aquatic Life Copper can harm aquatic life in San Francisco Bay. Water that comes into contact with architectural copper may contribute to impacts, especially during installation, cleaning, treating, or washing. Patination solutions that are used to obtain the desired shade of green or brown typically contain acids. After treatment, when the copper is rinsed to remove these acids, the rinse water is a source of pollutants. Municipalities prohibit discharges to the storm drain of water used in the installation, cleaning, treating and washing of architectural copper. Use Best Management Practices (BMPs) The following Best Management Practices (BMPs) must be implemented to prevent prohibited discharges to storm drains. During Installation • If possible, purchase copper materials that have been pre-patinated at the factory. • If patination is done on-site, implement one or more of the following BMPs: o Discharge the rinse water to landscaping. Ensure that the rinse water does not flow to the street or storm drain. Block off storm drain inlet if needed. o Collect rinse water in a tank and pump to the sanitary sewer. Contact your local sanitary sewer agency before discharging to the sanitary sewer. o Collect the rinse water in a tank and haul off-site for proper disposal. • Consider coating the copper materials with an impervious coating that prevents further corrosion and runoff. This will also maintain the desired color for a longer time, requiring less maintenance. During Maintenance Implement the following BMPs during routine maintenance activities, such as power washing the roof, re-patination or re-application of impervious coating: • Block storm drain inlets as needed to prevent runoff from entering storm drains. • Discharge the wash water to landscaping or to the sanitary sewer (with permission from the local sanitary sewer agency). If this is not an option, haul the wash water off-site for proper disposal. I �'�}� 6 a+��L4�.i"` ��'� �-' Protect the Bay/Ocean and yourself. �' ` °:�� If you are responsible for a discharge to the storm drain of non- stormwater generated by installing, cleaning, treating or washing - �-�_ copper architectural features, you are in violation of the municipal �� , �� stormwater ordinance and may be subject to a fine. � Phofo credit Don Edwards National Wildli(e Sanctuary Contact Information The San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program lists municipal stormwater contacts at www.flowstobay.orp (click on "Business", then "New Development", then "local permitting agency"). FINAL February 29, 2012 Building with copper flashing, gutter and drainpipe. Storm drain inlet is blocked to prevent prohibited discharge. The water must be pumped and disposed of properly. Project Comments Date: April 11, 2013 To: � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 X Parks Division (650} 558-7334 From: Planning Staff Subject: Request for Commercial Design Review for changes to the front fa�ade of an existing commercial building at 1207 Burlingame Avenue, zoned BAC, APN: 029-204-050 Staff Review: April 15, 2013 1. No Comments Reviewed by: B Disco � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Date: 4/17/13 . CITY OF BURLINGAME � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD _`, ;,� � BURLINGAME, CA 94010 ,��; PH: (650) 558-7250 e FAX: (650) 696-3790 - - www.burlingame.org Site: 1207 BURLINGAME AVENUE The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, JUNE 10, 2013 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, B��!ingame, CA: Application for Commercial Design Review for changes to the fa4ade of an existing commercial building at 1207 BURLINGAME AVENUE zoned BAC. APN 019-204-050 Mailed: May 31, 2013 (Please refer to ofher side) PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Citv of Burlin ame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Develo�ment Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to other side)