The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2747 Burlingview Drive - Staff ReportItem No. 8a Regular Action PROJECT LOCATION 2747 Burlingview Drive � �� City of Burlingame Design Review Amendment Address: 2747 Burlingview Drive Item No. 8a Action Item Meeting Date: September 8, 2014 Request: Application for Design Review Amendment for changes to a previously approved new, one-story single family dwelling with an attached garage. Applicant and Architect: Richard Terrones, Dreiling Terrones Architecture Property Owner: Burlingview LLC General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 027-261-040 Lot Area: 10,065 SF Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15303 (a), which states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences may be constructed or converted under this exemption. History: An application for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permits for attached garage and basement ceiling height for construction of a new, one-story single family dwelling and attached garage at 2747 Burlingview Drive was approved by the Planning Commission on April 28, 2014 (see attached April 28, 2014 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes). A building permit was issued August 1, 2014. . The applicant submitted several proposed changes to the approved plans as an FYI item. The Planning Commission reviewed the FYI at the August 25, 2014 regular meeting and called the project up forfurther review as a Design Review Amendment. Proposed Revisions: The applicant is requesting an Amendment to Design Review for the following changes to the approved project: Eliminate the pool in the rear yard and install synthetic turf with a sand infill base; Alter the window configurations at the right (west) elevation, rear (south) elevation, and left (east) elevation; and Shift proposed horizontal wood siding at the right (west) elevation and add horizontal wood siding at the rear (south elevation) The applicant has submitted a response letter and three photos of the proposed synthetic turF with sand infill base, date stamped September 2, 2014, as well as a sample of the turf. There are no proposed changes to the approved building envelope. Project Description (based on original approval): The existing single story house and attached garage on the site are proposed to be demolished. The applicant is requesting Design Review for a new house, Hillside Area Construction Permit, a Special Permit for an attached garage, and a Special Permit for a basement with a ceiling height greater than 6'-6". The proposed floor area for the new house will be 4,228 SF (0.42 FAR) where 4,321 (0.43 FAR) is the maximum allowed on site (including covered porch and basement exemptions). The proposed new house is single-story with a lower level attached garage and basement storage area. The plate height of the proposed house is 8'-0" at the entry area in the center of the house and increases to an 11'-0" plate height on the right side and a 13'-0" plate height on the left side. The applicant is requesting a Hillside Area Construction Permit for this new house and attached garage. The proposed highest ridge, at the left side of the house, is 22'-0" above average top of curb and matches the maximum height of the existing single-story house on the site. The applicant is requesting a Special Permit for an attached garage. The proposed 5 bedroom house requires two covered parking spaces and a single uncovered parking space. The proposed attached lower level garage provides two covered spaces (20' x 20') and there is a single uncovered space in the driveway in front of the garage. Design Review Amendment 2747 Burlingview Drive The applicant is requesting a Special Permit for a basement ceiling height that exceeds 6'-6". The proposed basement storage area and hall at the right side of the house has a ceiling height of 9'-0". A total of 600 SF of basement area and 100 SF of utility areas are exempt from floor area calculations. No part of the attached lower level garage is exempt from floor area calculations. The applicant is requesting the following applications: ■ Design review for a new house (C.S. 25.57.010 (a) (2)); and ■ Hillside Area Construction Permit (C.S. 25.61.020); and ■ Special permit for an attached garage (C.S. 25.26.035 (a)); and ■ Special Permit for a basement height greater than 6'-6". (C.S. 25.26.035 (fl). 2747 Burlingview Drive Lot Area: 10,065 SETBACKS _ . __. _ : Front (1st flr): ; To attached garage: ' Side (left): ; (right): ' _. Rear (1st flr): , Lot Coverage: : FAR: ' _. # of bedrooms: _ . _ _: APPROVED PLANS __ 25'-6" 30'-2" 8'-7" 7'-0" ___. _ _...__ __ _ _ __ .................. 23'-7" is the block average 25'-0" 7'-0„ 7'-0„ 24'-1 " 3995 SF 39.7% _........ 4242 S F 0.42 FAR � Plans date stam ed: March 7 and March 20, 2014 ALLOWED/REQUIRED Basemenf: ' basement with 9'-0" ceiling height 2 Parking: ; 2 covered (20' x 20'), attached 3 1 uncovered _. _..__ (9' x 20') 15'-0" 4026 SF 40% 4321 SF' 0.43 FAR _. __ _ . Special Permit required per C.S. 25.26.035(fl _ ._ . 2 covered (20' x 20') 1 uncovered (9' x 20') __ Height: 19'-11 " 30'-0" ' (0.32 x 10,065 SF) + 1100 SF = 4321 SF (0.43 FAR). 2 A special permit is required for a basement ceiling height that is greater than 6'-6" (C.S. 25.26.035 (fl). ' A special permit is required for an attached garage (C.S. 25.26.03 (a)). Staff Comments: See attached memos from the Chief Building Official, Fire Division, Engineering Division, Parks Division, and Stormwater Division. 2 Design Review Amendment 2747 Burlingview Drive Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Findings for a Special Permit: In order to grant a Special Permit, the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.51.020 a-d): (a) The blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood; (b) the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood; (c) the proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city; and (d) removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements, and the mitigation for the removal that is proposed is appropriate. Required Findings for Hillside Area Construction Permit: Review of a Hillside Area Construction Permit by the Planning Commission shall be based upon obstruction by construction of the existing distant views of nearby properties. Emphasis shall be given to the obstruction of distant views from habitable areas within a dwelling unit (Code Sec. 25.61.060). Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped March 7, 2014, sheets A0.0, A3.1, and Boundary Survey and Topographic Map, and date stamped March 20, 2014, sheets, A2.1, A2.3 and A5.1 through A6, and date stamped August 11, 2014, sheets A1.1, A2.2, A4.1, A4.2, L1.1, and L1.2; and including a synthetic turf lawn with a sand infill base in the rear yard; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Building Division's January 28, 2014 and February 6, 2014, and November 19, 2013 memos, the Parks Division's November 25, 2013, and March 26, 2014 memos, the Engineering 3 Design Review Amendment 2747 Burlingview Drive Division's December 4, 2013 memo, the Fire Division's December 10, 2012 memo, and the Stormwater Division's November 25, 2013 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for demolition or construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal, and the Arborist Report date stamped March 21, 2014; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2010 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 12. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 13. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 14. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 15. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 4 Design Review Amendment 2747 Burlingview Drive 16. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Erika Lewit Senior Planner c. Richard Terrones, applicant and architect Attachments: Applicant's letter of explanation for Amendment, date stamped September 2, 2014 Photos of proposed synthetic turf, date stamped September 2, 2014 (3 sheets) August 25, 2014 FYI Memo for previously approved revisions ApplicanYs letter of explanation for FYI, date stamped August 25, 2014 April 28, 2014 Planning Commission Minutes Original Application to the Planning Commission Original Special Permit form for an attached garage Original Special Permit form for basement ceiling height ArborisYs Report, date stamped March 21, 2014 Original Staff Comments Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed August 29, 2014 Aerial Photo 5 Agency Memo 02 TO: Kevin Gardiner 2747 Burlingview Drive cc: various — see below C C / R e f e r e n c e C o d e s: CC: Method Role ■ Hand Agency ■ File Architect Project Memo Item Subject 1. Kevin: 2. D r e i I i n g T e r r o n e s A r c h i t e c t u r e, I n c. 1 1 0 3 J u a n i t a A v e n u e B u r I i n g a m e C a I i f o r n i a 9 4 0 1 0 Arcnitect's Pro�ect # 1412-bvi Project: 2r'47 Buriingview DrEve Subject: FYI Submit#ai Artificiai Turf Sampie Date: 10-2-14 Company Name Contact Code City of Burlingame Kevin Gardiner BUR Dreiling Terrones Architecture Carlos Rojas DTA The enclosed submittal is a sample of the synthetic turF (EasyTurf UltimateGrass) proposed in the FYI for the 2747 Burlingview Drive project. We apologize for the confusion generated from the previous product submitted, as it was our intention for it to represent only the turf blade material since it was the only product we had available. The proposed EasyTurf product is used in residential applications and doesn't suffer from the issue of tracking the fill from the turf products, as in the commercial athletic products. We have installed this product on other residential projects (see photos attached), and we are familiar with the installation and results. The proposed product has a sand infill at the base, with an approximately 3/4" exposed blade. It is our understanding that other changes presented in the FYI (window and wall finish modifications) were acceptable, so we are not presenting anything further on those items. Our previous FYI description is still applicable for all changes being proposed Please call with any questions. Sincerely, Carlos Rojas Dreiling Terrones Architecture, Inc. ��"; -�' - 2 �0'� ' ?F BURLINGAME �D-PLANNING DIV. Action This memorandum represents the understanding of Dreiling Terrones Architecture, Inc. Any corrections or revisions should be submitted to our office within five (5) working days of receipt of this memo. If no revisions are received by that time, we shall assume acceptance of the content of the above as a description of record. END Project Memo (") � �. Page 1 " _ _ _ ..�': • •, �.. . •,,, .:. . , ,_ _ _ • � - • •� . . - . - . „ . •,�.. � .� . . ' � , ' . •'• � . ' - . - y . , , ' • : r � . � • � . � ' 4 • ' . � i; k " „ � ' f• � .• , -. i,, •, ► ' ,' + 1� 1�' • , = •.�••�. ``r � � � r • � � ; . > s �•. • _�. �'. .� � � • � • � • � � * s . � . . � � . .-J.�. .. ' � t' ,* '{: - ;', �" �'-,.y.. ' . . j � . � ��. .� , � ; , ' . , . �r! '� .. . � 1 . �.. `y.� ', ` - ' .y .��, � - •'> � .• r . ' . ` t • �� 1 . ,' ' . . . �. �` -Y- � .��, � . . .. � ��,� �.� ��o�R •� .' � • ' ,'�� '. � � � . � � •• J r •�•r�� i-; , • A' � � ,»� ', ` � • �� . , • '� • � � . � • �• �.� . ' . i � ��. - ' . '�' � �r � - `, �'�� ' s = . : � R , -.: , . ' w. + , • -• , � ' . ' �, 1' .r�� +'_- 1 ,�'7 -c�� . � .• �- .+'_. •. t: i • ;� •' - . �.�. ; + . ' -. �'� . � ' � � - � '� r, �, -•. `,�.' -r.' ' � ✓ ,�... '. 1 � : t � . f+ . . �" � . . �. � ' � ! y: , , • � � / �� , .iy ' � ; ��t ' �_ . ' � . .� jh' '�,.�. _ .. ' - � l'�,�. ►.;��. . • / � . ♦ , � I '�. .7 �� - . •- : �2 . � � ��/ � 1 , i . r • . . . . ' . /. �'� .r . � . �... ,, t• . e .- r . �� • � +, • ,.'v, _ ,' � ! Y . ,{ r' � �' �� • _ , . • s' � t • �s , �� •� i s ' � � '' �1,+ `� A: . ` � • r . • .,�r. , s f '� �� ,,,.. � a .. • _� � � , • - i � � • � ` � r � ' 3�� - , �• , �� ,��'�.k� �r` i �'. � � . 3i: . � -J .:�'j' • I . ' � � +s . ' � . . : �- . •� • �.:- .� � �•�,,� i-- � - • _ • ` � `�_ ....' i • � , �� • �P .� ::� • . ' ,� r .�.` � � '. _ ' � � ' �e . � . r . ��t^ # f!- • )'••� ' � R+ � - f � .. ' , 4 �wl:� * .. j•!' � '� , �•,�'`j �- tt,:+� ,' �- *� . L . ; � � �?+'r . � - . , • • - .J` , � • , � ,' + �.� , . � r�..'`+' . ' • . . •- � '� . 'a _ a•'�. � ` • ,. ' .. �.�_:' t''� , _ • � ♦- I � � � .• M ,M'• �• •/ f .. � ��•, + ' , f.�` t�9" y�.,�+ * �S . �' . ' i ✓ ' . �`'i. 1 + . .. � . . . . , � �,':.._ ,�,�r f � ;' ��♦ �;�. f ; '�. ` � .- � .l �; � .,i ' � -/ ,• � �',.. . � � t . . , ,�'1�. `. . -I.•. I �.',L •� � • � J !� K ' :'+�N �;..'. t i ' .. ••�� . � ` '� • �,� �"��! , r � „�3��',�. -1►. '� � �j�, �.�};i.:.', .. . r' . .�.. r^ �; �,'.f4� '�'.� ,. 1� t.'; Y . �� - ��i�l�E7 �, , . . � . �. ,, � : • :':'t " �.:" � ,'r : j ,. `?�•:.'y . � 'i• � . .. ..r , , 'r: '�.� j 7�;�;..,,� -� � �, `�''_i . �. � ' ♦ . - 1 � • - � '9� ' .. ,� ' � � � � � . , - � - ;= - � �i r �'. �'� .�'4 � , . . - � `- +C-', � � � � ,-. 1 � , ; � v . � '� : .; � • � � _ �� +..:,�r �'� �`6ZY1�!=E3��LlIVGAME',;.,, �' `;.! ., , �, . ��!. �� ;<' � ' , - :��•�'f�.�71i.1�.%i(��a ?I�i � �.; ,�' .•�, • ' � � l. ., . s �i� s � r s J ' �', � .� „t� oy : � � ' � . ^'�y �► s „' � r. �� ^i �ys � �' 4 �' �. •!. � i.I� . � . � ' � �� I �' � 1 t" � � . s �� ' 1� � , , • /� , I . �. �- I . fA, i �I' ' ). t .•�.+,''��" . ' � �.•. .� �' . y �.� . . 1 3 �. ' ,�� 4 �-'� . - �� • f� `�•'' h . �j._.!,r1'._�a.fr�.''.�.�e � - . !'.•4� ��- --.I.�^ ,a7.ifr�J��.,r �_.�e"_.� ��_x` , � ..- ij ' � 1 t - _� ��E' E � , : y x • �.�� . i `�`� 2747 Burlingview Drive: Artificial Turf Installafion Example � � �., . � � � . � - : �, ep`;'' �`.�`�. �'='''F i "„' ' ��rh� �,.�„ -, '� i r:f S �.�'.l. 6�w�a,�. +�•�� c.: '�';�M+�.+ ,� � . ._�. �+�i � ' 'Z7' �,... Y.' �; �':w: �. . , ... � � � � � � . � � � � �� , �� ,�, �, . � ,. . _ :, . . , ,�. . ; . � . . . � �.� ti � � . . . �i. . . �.a � ' . � . . ' , .. . � � . � , � . ' . . ' , � � , . , ,.J,, � , . , � .. . � - � � . , � . . .. : . . . . .,. . . . . . . � .. ' . ..�. ... .,, . . ... : .. -. ;, - . .. . � �� . . � - . . � . ., .. , . . _ . . . - . �a„ . � . , . _ . � 4 i - . � . ... . �� . . � ' . J' '� �'` • „ � . . , , , " _ � .4nr. ' • � .. � . ' . .� � . .. . � � .� . . ��,�.�.' . � . . . ., i .. .. _. �_r_ , ,''s„ . ' f 3,.,. .', �",. � =.iy , . . . � . ' y� �.� r � , .T , . . . .. , ,r: a. ' Fy, 5 q � , � . dus. R_ - ;� �') ; . , ..r M1� + . � . � . , . . � . ..�.�" .r'�'4 f . . �.:i�� . � . , f ' ,`+e:- ' ,,�`. .. . . . ,. ..r. . �E�. . ., I _/. , 5 , v � . - ' . . , � , , . ' t : ..: . ' ��'. � R . � ' . " . . � � . . ��.. � . � . . ,. � f ..� �'' �'` .�. . �ti., e:. �� y v� . - .l . 'V . ��1 � ' . � t ` r . i� � .. . .. f . "L � � 5�1�.A.l. .i f '' S �:.L �! ' .�. �.'1 . w r s}. .f �� i t �' �� y . , . � ` . . . . i .: Q '7.i� 1 #`� w. . .. n I I 'A .µ� !"- � i: '��,�rk� t�. �r�, � ,.,,� �; ', . 5+ _: .�7.,yt�.�. ; u 1 � �y � L :'`�i F µ i�� _ �Y! _ . � � r _...� a , r `� :� . . .. � .r �i,. a� v m y `�` A� l� l� jn ,f. � � p - ,, l.. , i' - r 'i:.�,� �'`,� : i ��a ' t� . r . - . � . ��.�fR�� 'r,R y., . �e � e ,h' ��y �• =� _ ..7� . �- n. i �'�t �'.•�./ ' ' .� ,r,: � 7 �y .�M"k .;. . 'T l��I �y. 1 p�j J J P4 t J '�r. �!� ,R �", ' .:i' � , .�i � .� .,2 I I,l � - ^•fL..R _ ,. . ...er��4... . ...u. _a..S .j�.. . . . .i « ... _ ,... � .. .. . .... .. � ._. ��'.�;'_�.�. � ..._ .. c. _. . _ . . .iY �.� _ � >� 2747 Burlingview Drive: Artificial Turf Installation Example - 2 �Oi4 i " - Rt_fNGAME � ,•i(.' RI'./ i .. . .. M!yA, �. . �:�: �'' • 4.� - r� �� ..�_.'�� j /y � �` i'�t-,� � � �� + �r• � ��,�''J .,,�1 � .� � �, �•.r � , � � �� '�t �jg` „r� � �T • "�•,Y a ...� � • a* � . .� _ •iT.' w , lr � ,,.� . � �r�, �` �r'' _-�" ��l�' � �� i'}�� . .;.,, ,. � °`' �l l -� � � t"��3� YZ', •4 � l�. J 7 � ja � „�, � r'�. • y t� /►'r � _�.. �,L . �!. I'.`I,��} ,. . • ' � • i � J � fl,f K� �:� i�,:�. � r!� �.,�F �� ,� '� � � ��-r � •F�� z�, �r ..-� jr ,• : .i� ��r,��- t `r, � _ �, -w�� ` '� �• � " ; �7,"s � �j � "-� • •.�, ��r� �,,;�: �kyC.}� .�.�� ,� .��, ,r� r� �r�1 -�,� �'.. . �,;'I 7y�r .�'r ' '�i.� �+} �� • y �. �' �' '• -,, t' � �y. � � ry },� Y'� � �� ii ' y 7 -. � _ * M ,�� C��'�II� � h � � ` ��. �� `,�� J , .�.(_ �1a" �j., i. 'f A`. 1 i, r '�i: �1 , ��+ -�7} �. . �♦! . �. . f :.^e � � , r ` -.f ,.. ��" �� _ ji• � j � t � ��{�) r�- � -i ' . �� ?�. )'pj �% ��,.7� yj�/� % �! � �. �lr ��%�,. . ^.;'��• ,'� �~;j�j �'{,�''"' }� � ��/.:r.�'•�xCl'"7/i►��.;��ri •l�L1e'•'"'� �,�I►'�\• �'+�'; �y.y,ii'f�^ �,,��,.�,fr 4 • .%��i� �t" :. +Q, lf�'� � �atr e !, v �� . � �i"'� ,s i'r��. y,� �� ?J�� w�� .i{��Ajii��•'`, �� ,:. y�� •�i% �� ',/ ��M! ��I��1'��i �� =i ��{ ;�+`'r;:k •� �~��> �.� �' ��r .16' J.'�- t +: ! �"} 1}� ►i�' " 3 � r. � ��t ` ��3`• �ri1/1.� � . r-.�y �i '" � .� ,1!., � t%- .1� I "} y- a1► ♦ �y y a ' 7 �''Y� �� ,'�'� 1�'af `��'•" f,, ��1'�` ,�,.�• �Y ='f�.�f� , . j.r.� '�,�;�J ,Qi�,�k ��•� 1y, 3�-�- �� [� 4 � `�.F�• �-ry� ��.= � � +' .i��`'r'��• f''.y ;{�a =•.�!i:'- �f�,.►v� ;,�7 �;�'d.� ! •a� � �'�'' ��t_,�.�'�''.��';�� ,i• �r ��. ,.� 'y .�;i'� r c `�%t' • � �'�%t�� -•1"�'�� r"r � `< i . � ��1' s � as� �: � /. _.,, � , , ; , ,� • �r �, � � �. �'� 4 � f Y ��' r, .3'�.�T. '� Y: S�'��t� ='� �•�,'1r� .I,��'�� .� -. � .r'rtfi�j'L�.�' }� .i �� e r•',. �� S � / � J' !� /i Av �• ^ � {_ j�J � •� � �� .. � ,r ��:0�:» 1 . � -�: 4• �S"%. �. .'r`Y� ;c � , �x'i�r�.,��•�� -�.�: �� + �i � �t � ' .Y . _ ��/ �� . � � 4 �� - ��a. , i..{. „ -� -� :•�' �' 2 = � �. �' `� �i � �" �. '� 7 ti t � ✓' � � / � �f � ,Y�' �L..� s � .. ��`JR . i� d' C� �-f l �i y►`aG'. ��%•N '�? Z_a 7'�,�� 1. • ��t: �'�jl l- '�,..��t�r, "'� �w';��,�"�`�' '��'F��t i� �r�� f "'{' =,4� 'T i .,� 0.��J'^f�'-�� .� . � ��'��+y� • �� . . _ . � � ��!'�' . �{ �j� �'4' � � , h �, - « 7t'�. . 1�'•'� �'�' . i� � �. e �j � r r', , 1 �l �1� a �',+�''O �f-�� i � �'% r.� �;� 7t �.�,� �� . f�) pj� �il ��l � �yyrs( � � � ')f � 1 �'� s��• r��*��% ��+4�-•-;�f�i��' �T 'j`'"l�� `r_�/ y -�'��: '�/l�r,� =� ��?�� `- y �'.,��.��. �, j= �.1L.� ' l' !,� � � �� •�" �� . � '��•_ ��i, :�o{�� , � . a��i►,�,� �ry��i�.'� '�' ti�14 �': ;�,' �* .i;;�� : ��,,,,,v ��.;� ` ..`wiF,n,;; �^ �,'."'%,s"� +,.��/Ss � �, y'��,�C �4�* .�, ,r��ry� ' �►� •-�.�?-y�^ }��:.-i�_�,vY' r'�[ #"��.' d��'V ,�� ..��. :,2_ !�-Ks� S +�� ' .� �� r...�.�f �l� ;.,.,y� �Ifii/i� :r{' , •* , �• �Rr� ��n. �.r� ,��y��`4�!'I^ ��.�oF*�1 �,�;'.- ,�,��,�•:��'��'�.� :,-��..t''t .�ti,�b��.v �C I': •�O �,��j4'�'��. ,�q'i-,i�.. *�1�. S �4' ' , - �. �e. ;; * '';� � j� .f'� - �� ~�' -F fr .�: 'F` '"l I�C. ��Y --(I��v'r i�..Nt :�� ''�f�;� �� `P- �'' �`r�� +�t�h• �, �� x,� •-: lM.� ill��' �'� ` •� • � 1 � : � �.F�k;�:�►�� ',��►�t � �Y .iy,� `�'%�/�!' � .+t" �j'�� r �t�!; � • r r \Y j� ` � s � ? �l �n?4• f, i% j � � � t�j \Aw �• �. s �� ' �i,• �^i r �y, �i� .�"'} '.� � �y7 e '� R'�I ��i � '- a� �(a�`� ir . . � +�': � � .i. �� r ;oi✓ ��, �.►. T_7��i. �,- �`- ��}:�� `': � ~.! .s � � �. /�• t .. ~ ;#'-= -�,r , �� .T �ri�i ��.. il. i '�•��i �.4fV �'`!♦ .1►.�. '`" I ��, ��'r►.�i�.:�1' .�►+�' `�t`S„ `, ,lyP•l�y !� %' / � eM ^ 4 !. , � ��\•- ".�-,F.- ►� •:{ �j�`.,.s; ��►�-' -7f...�. �� ;.�— ] �1'� � )j, �.,, L' 3,.C�� '1`�,'ir��1�. ..as f �F 1�. •�,� `�f 2� . � �. `� ; • ,.r,: ..77�►�A `.fi �.�i t �:�� i,. � �w�' . c,�.1a� � 1i � i�� ' is. � '� r+ I.�'.i'?', �+;� +� �� ' S�Y ^1A��j�� T� .�' �� ' _ ��j�y ��, pt � �� L � � �/d I �'j!. �A � .+ ��A. _•y, ��-{ -�� y ��' �Ko��,(��r'",_.Y' ,1 .) ,.!�� xJ .'�. ,R�.i �'.� �' �.{ �J r i�� . i ,i/ �i'� �� , _ �� .�: ',T'.�'� ' r � '�.. - �:�t -��t / '� '��!"$r �-w ��J '� t Y/ �� Y�/� r`1r� �� ~�,�'H'.ri�'��'�,�v, —ti�j ,,�-��ja�!��;�� `-- r <i. \ w' -4 `y,C��i, % i �};�.,r_� ',� ��' `�'i.�iu �. �. -��`.•-t�La- � � "�T.'l�� .1 � �'!�M� � "s:•'t' �-. ''i9 '_ � 1� '.�� Y �y,'i�*� i ��I�� .'N�. � � � r.ir . ' . ` � .' iv• �' .` � � �j",'�/�,�• � - `. ;�l,j '.A+,' �1'�}'�i�''iYt• ,i. ► -9.V� y S � � �� -�� r� �! . r'�t ��".' ♦ , n- � t,��CtI ��, r• . �' ��+�Lr��t � r� 4 e ,(lj.. L�.� �s � �� - �•+�r-•- �P � � �� 1 � �►�v �'1 .!�" _r�� ` �vi� � � S'`• �y�� ''�. . � � � �r � � J!r. .��"' . n• �f �',T lt �� \y� �� .�� ait�: ` �� ,��.� `` I�� _ •• .' • �� 't j`�' ¢�,.�'��y�Tr'.� ��j �i�j� �i� �"E fy��+1j�,° ' �� (''�� PM'+.4.. '�e�+��'__'�if�`J!ii1��.4�" �? ��-"�.r' .�` 'i��_ �:b ��--"e'�•~�,�.e:1r1�' ,y��'. . �.i.?�',��;� fr.�/ -�� S"�j�l�'�''�s �� . ��' 1,t�~'� �' �� '�' �� -�'i;s� i%y��v� �j`�'! ,Lf'��+�c'�a�� , �:�� it�� ,+�`�-'��,`'?'�i�=`f r ,¢..,.nA j�►'� � � t.�'� 1'� ., i + J�1 F�� .'Y x �� .t •5,;� ' ��6� "�a � 6 �j3 _,.�'it��,y� ..41A ,. � ! � � ,�cr ! � { . i, 1 `_� � � : .Y s _ � -- �S�j-_�qr r. � �!"�' _ f1 � �f., � 't��' s '� ") ��t'_ <:R�''�- �'.� j i � :: :'� �j' ,v_" �jp i.,� . N�. r��%� /rf sr�:�� , � �$ Y�F �%� ��.-.1 ' z �_ �'� , i� v ��Z � �R�, - ��.,�� w , � � " ^• 'S�" . «e�. J.� , '� / t �.�.. S� � `I � �i.4 �,•y�'�� .r � +. ,• � I ' t ,� �frs`f � + � • '�q' �'7. � ' f - i. '�' �f .A , f ' ;�"! .:�',_ _. ;, .`� �-► �y-�.. ��'►4� ��, � �r sr'`� K `,��`'',_, �-..�ry.�%��{ ��,;,� _ � ,�" ,«., �,4s" .. ��, i I. ��.T �� .'��r��' .� t � ��I<1.• � li�e[�� 1 fi!�/.j. + �\� � :` � � �.!{y�,�� fl `_�-��4�,'�� ..��. ��' �`-'i7�� <,s� i ,'" � .� 1> � `��y�s �1 ��.Kf�. J� - �` ' �' �`�„��_r , � a �` ;f, ' �' ri ��- r�, ��". _� ' , i ' =� � , aw� 9 � ;= �.�'r u�.�if:. _ It '�`v�•�. t �''1 .��;'r � Qr,��'� �' �. .,,*'� ��' s" :�'G�rl�a` `w.. y�y `pb' �jG,�,s.1 •"' �,`,. . '� � +`� -e . �..., `� - �'!� �� ]1Z.� d �' � �7�- ��%_� �C y . �'.� � � �� A "'�. ,,� .,� .r�`�. � „�, � �,.� � �'� � �-� � .�',�r� ; �_ :�'��.�� . � _ �.��► ;��'�� rr"��' �� - , . , �#,� � _43 t • ,�h��l -� ��' �,��A��-� �'�¢��''+,' ' �*;r''� ';b�e�.-r�:�.'; i ) ' ,�� I� r�wJ � '� ' : `,� . �ii�� r A �S 'jf.�7'+-��} � �y ��L�'r7. � � �{jf$� � ' � �.''� � Il . � • � ' � , _ pi Y �. r f'� �� -7�' ^-=r��j� ;�'•. T "� s ' . Y/��'� rhr� ��'� •��+ 1• c_ �'�� 'ry�A, r,.J Y�S ,n�/^,lI^;'J �.1��l..��".i;. I�%.�_ t. ��t �. ` YT-'"- ; . � 3�. �fypy��i+►��.�t��tir� �j��bp' .�{ f.�''1� . / - ._ �! � ' �'��'M!'��' �Y. � l E ' � � � e/ ti R �j� + )�� Xi''{ ��. ,�� ;; 'zz�`'��'�`J�'�� ; , !: '—". �,,,,'��►', �." /"�, �.�.�.�s ,� � ,t�5,,. ��P !�'�`,: ~ .� �.�' � �', �� ,� � � �i ��r�, ��-��i',.� �.{� ��I�' � �'r•'�v�F: . ,1 I ^ �' � ��a�f`�i� �. ~.� // y_ ,yi .��/1�;� � r�.�..t . 1"Y f' �ii �� R " . � ,�`-'^� / .'�� Y �! I ' •rc' i' �7; -- - . • ` , ,� � . �, ..:�• ,�� M�i.. r � �� i.'tl�f�3' `' ` � ,� �;�•� r`�',? �• , .'�� .'3 �' �� F �� . �► ♦ /�.s% ` • ' , :�/ ,,,,, r -�,. � � ��`7' '� t'',•! � r.� t� � . �1 v !yjd Q' , Q� ,;►, , �s .� ,� .,� `• s•.'}► R,. �e : .,` � y+�, �L�y' ' �� !" � " '� `� �1�J rr �.nl�f,`, �'�, 4-_ . - .� +!. �X, �� •' � ' � , . y� �� / � �,�; �x ' . �� .� 3 i � ' , r'r 4 r�' � �- , ♦ �� • � � � � '�� . � � ,�1� � F �`"� !�:s�n . �; � .��'� _ ii'i'' . .�.. �R�►?�l� � 2747 Burlingview Drive: Artificial Turf Installation Example �� BURLINGAME DATE: TO FROM CITY OF BURLINGAME Community Development Department MEMORANDUM August 25, 2014 Planning Commission Erika Lewit, Senior Planner Director's Report Meeting Date: August 25, 2014 SUBJECT: FYI — REVIEW OF REQUESTED CHANGES TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DESIGN REVIEW PROJECT AT 2747 BURLINGVIEW DRIVE, ZONED R-1. Summary: An application for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit, and Special Permits for an attached garage and for basement ceiling height for a new, single-story dwelling at 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned R-1, was approved by the Planning Commission on April 28, 2014 (see attached April 28, 2014 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes). A building permit was issued on August 1, 2014. The applicant is requesting approval of an FYI for the following changes to the approved plans: • Eliminate the pool in the rear yard and install synthetic turf; • Alter windows at the right (west) elevation and rear (south) elevation; and • Shift proposed horizontal wood siding at the right (west) elevation and add horizontal wood siding at the rear (south elevation) Please refer to the applicant's letter of explanation, date stamped August 11, 2014, for a complete description of the proposed changes. The designer submitted elevations, date stamped design review project. plans showing the originally approved and proposed building August 11, 2014, to show the changes to the previously approved Other than the changes detailed in the applicanYs letter and revised plans, there are no other changes proposed to the design of the house. If the Commission feels there is a need for more study, this item may be placed on an action calendar for a second review and/or public hearing with direction to the applicant. Erika Lewit Senior Planner Attachments: Explanation letter submitted by applicant, date stamped August 11, 2014 April 28, 2013, Planning Commission Regular Action Calendar Minutes February 24, 2014, Planning Commission Design Review Study Minutes Agency Memo Ol T O : Kevin Gardiner 2747 Burlingview Drive cc: various — see below C C / R e f e r e n c e C o d e s: CC: Method Role ■ Hand Agency ■ File Architect Dreiling Terrones� Architecture, Inc. 1 1 0 3 J u a n i t a A v e n u e B � r I i n g a m e C a I i f o r n i a 9 4 0 1 0 Arcnitecrs Project # 1412-bvi Project: 2747 Buriingview Drive Subject: FYI Submittal Artificial Turf Sample Date: 08-25-14 Company Name Contact Code City of Burlingame Kevin Gardiner BUR Dreiling Terrones Architecture Carlos Rojas DTA Project Memo Item Subject Action 1. Kevin: The enclosed submittal is a sample of the synthetic turf being proposed in the FYI for the 2747 Burlingview Drive project. The specific brand and product have not been selected yet, but the product to be used will be of a similar quality and composition. Please call with any questions. Sincerely, �— Carlos Rojas Dreiling Terrones Architecture, Inc. y, ..�., - �,�.�; 2 � 2C!'�+ � `.- �-�,+Rt_i��rnn^E -�.��-� ..;��t��iJG uN This memorandum represents the understanding of Dreiling Terrones Architecture, Inc. Any corrections or revisions should be submitted to our office within five (5) working days of receipt of this memo. If no revisions are received by that time, we shall assume acceptance of the content of the above as a description of record. END �� Project Memo :�.� i�:.:� D�:�ilir � :.. ��..... � r�,c. Page 1 ..� _ �� . � _.. C/TY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMMISSION — Approved Minutes April 28, 2014 window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certificati documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Divi�i before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; / 16. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot th eight of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 17. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and ote compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify th e project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Sargent. Discussion of mofion: None. Chair Sargent called for a voice vote on the Commissioner Sargent moved to adopt e The motion was seconded by Co issione Discussion of motion: to approve. The motion passed 7-0-0-0. Negative Declaration. Yie. None. Chair Sargent c led for a voice vote on the motion to adopt the Negative Declaration. The motion passed 7-0-0-0. Ap al procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:53 p.m. � s�oner Terrones indicated that he would recuse himself from participating in fhe discussions ding Agenda Items 6(2747 Burlingview Drive) and 7(4 La Mesa Court) due to a business relationship a quasi-business relationship, respectively. He left the Cify Council Chambers. 6. 2747 BURLINGVIEW DRIVE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND SPECIAL PERMITS FOR AN ATTACHED GARAGE AND BASEMENT CEILING HEIGHT FOR A NEW SINGLE-STORY HOUSE (RICHARD TERRONES, ARCHITECT AND APPLICANT; BURLINGVIEW LLC. PROPERTY OWNER) (34 NOTICED) STAFF CONTACT' ERIKA LEWIT All Commissioners had visited the property. Commissioner Yie noted that she had a conversation with the son of the uphill neighbor. Commissioners Sargent and DeMartini met with the neighbors at 2753 Burlingview Drive. Reference staff report dated April 28, 2014, with attachments. Community Development Director Meeker presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Sixteen (16) conditions were suggested for consideration. Questions of staff: None. Chair Sargent opened the public hearing. 10 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NC COMM/SSION — Approved Minutes April 28, 2014 Jacob Furlong represented the applicant. Commission comments: Did the applicant take the opportunity to visit the uphill neighbor, particularly the lower level bedroom? (Furlong — recognizes that there are some impacts from that area. Have kept the home to one story and have lowered the roofline while still maintaining the design.) Have any sight-line studies been reviewed? Is it known where there would be no view impacts? (Furlong — doesn't have an exact number regarding how much lower the roofline would need to be.) Believes the lowered roofline looks more subtle. Public comments: Beth Napier, 2753 Burlingview Drive: ■ Noted that their view is gone from the master bedroom window. ■ Asked for the roof to be sloped from the other direction, would preserve more light. ■ Provide photos that show the impact upon the view from the master bedroom. ■ Have discussed the impacts upon the tree. The applicant should be responsible for removal if it is damaged and needs to be removed. The developer needs to take financial responsibility for any damages from the tree. ■ Are selling their home. Will close on May 27, 2014. Requested that the Commission defer action until the new owner is involved. ■ Feels that the rear extension of the home is not needed. Make it a four bedroom home. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Additional Commission comments: ■ Is the applicant amenable to the conditions expressed by the neighbor? (Furlong — doubts it.) ■ Likes the changes that have been made. The changes help to preserve the neighbor's upper floor view. ■ Believes that the issue of the view from the bedroom needs to be addressed. Not certain that the code permits such a significant impact to the bedroom. Perhaps the overhang could be reduced. ■ Asked for clarification regarding the degree of view impacts that may be allowed in the hillside area. (Meeker — indicated that view impacts must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Distant views, particularly of the Bay, are to be preserved from living spaces. The code does not imply that there can be no impacts upon views.) ■ Tends to look at views from common areas, not so much from bedrooms. ■ The applicant has done quite a bit to address the view issues. ■ Doesn't feel that the view from the bedroom would be preserved by reducing the eaves. Thinks it would require a significant redesign. Public hearing was reopened to permit questions of the applicant. Further Commission comments: Have studies of different alternatives been explored? (Furlong — have conducted some studies. The client wanted a"butterfly roof' house.) 11 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMM/SSION — Approved Minutes April 28, 2014 Has a measurement been made to determine how much of a change would be required to preserve the bedroom view? (Furlong — don't have a survey of the height of the bedroom on the lower level. May be able to reduce the overhangs somewhat.) Would have appreciated the applicant having explored how much of a design revision would be necessary and whether that would ruin the design of the home. Would be good to have the analysis made of what would be needed to further reduce view impacts. Public hearing closed. More Commission comments: ■ Wonders what the new buyers have seen. ■ Would like to see further analysis of the view impact and what would be needed to preserve the lower level bedroom view. ■ Feels like the applicant has conducted considerable analysis into view impacts. ■ The design is below the maximums allowed for the lot. ■ In most respects, the view is good or improved. ■ May be just deferring without any potential for significant changes that preserve the view. ■ Feels the study should be done, but need to be prepared to make a decision at that point. ■ Should the Commission place as much emphasis upon views from non-common areas versus common areas? ■ Doesn't feel it is appropriate that each room should be treated equally. ■ Don't usually get held up on views from a bedroom area. ■ The bedroom is on a lower level that is below grade. ■ The garage fits in with the neighborhood and the home design. ■ The transom windows are not a primary viewing area. Commissioner Sargent moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following conditions: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped March 7, 2014, sheets A0.0, A2.2, A3.1, A4.1 a, A4.1 b, A4.2a, A4.2b, L1.1, L1.2 and Boundary Survey and Topographic Map and date stamped March 20, 2014, sheets A1.1, A2.1, A2.3 and A5.1through A6, L-1 and L-2; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Building Division's January 28, 2014 and February 6, 2014, and November 19, 2013 memos, the Parks Division's November 25, 2013, and March 26, 2014 memos, the Engineering Division's December 4, 2013 memo, the Fire Division's December 10, 2012 memo, and the Stormwater Division's November 25, 2013 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to 12 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMMISSION — Approved Minutes April 28, 2014 comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for demolition or construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal, and the Arborist Report date stamped March 21, 2014; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION 12. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 13. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 14. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 15. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 13 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMMISS/ON — Approved Minutes April 28, 2014 16. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc. according to the approved Planning and Building plans. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Yie. Discussion of motion: None. will inspect and note compliance of the ) to verify that the project has been built Chair Sargent called fora voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed 4-2-0-1 (Commissioners DeMartini and Bandrapalli dissenting, Commissioner Terrones recused). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:24 p.m. Commissioner Sargent noted that he would recuse himself from the discussion regarding Agenda Item 7(4 La Mesa Court) for non-sfatutory reasons. He left the City Council Chambers. 7. 4 LA MESA COURT, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, DE N REVIEW, HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR A NEW, TWO A ONE- HALF STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND ATTACHED GARAGE (TIM RADUENZ, FO + ONE, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; CHRISTOPHER AWOYINKA AND SUZANNE MCGOVE , PROPERTY OWNERS 35 NOTICED STAFF CONTACT: RUBEN HURIN All Commissioners had visited the property. Commissioner Loftis indicated tha e had had a brief email exchange with the residents of 6 La Mesa Court. Commissioner Yie noted th she met with the neighbors on both sides of the project site. Commissioner DeMartini stated that e met with the applicant and architect, as well as with the neighbors at 6 La Mesa Court. Referen staff report dated April 24, 2014, with attachments. Senior Planner Hurin presented the report, revie ed criteria and staff comments. Thirty- eight (38) conditions were suggested for consideration. Questions of staff: Is staff comfortable with the findings of the � ht analysis? (Hurin — yes.) What level of detail is provided in the lig analysis? (Hurin — the applicant will respond.) Acting Chair Bandrapalli opened the publ�i�fiearing. Tim Raduenz represented the appl ■ The visual simulation w completed with Photo Shop; it was not a scientific analysis. ■ Some of the trees w e removed from the simulation. ■ Summarized the c anges to the project. ■ Attempted to pr erve views from 2 La Mesa Court. ■ Tried to addr s all concerns expressed by the neighbors. ■ The massi g for the home is currently similar to the home at 6 La Mesa Court. Commission,e�omments: Nkes the redesign. Likes the materials. Is the glare perceived as an issue? (Raduenz — could place a film or bronze the glass. But doesn't believe it will be an issue.) 14 ,. . _. . _ . _ _ .. . _.. . _ _ ._..- � ; , :.. .�`il �d....�� ; ��`� � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION T4 THE PLANNING C�MMISSI�N Type of application: � Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Parcel #: C� 2�l- Z.(ol - p4� ❑ Conditional Use Permit � Special Permit ❑ Other; PROJECT ADDRESS:_�`7 �� ur �i�e, �t�� V�e.� APPLICANT project contact person �[�/ OK Eo send electronic copies of documents [9/ Name: �tG�iA� '�E�.�-0l�-�`S Address: � 4�J �UAN ITA Av� City/State/Zip: '1,.�t�R-L1NGA�lC_GA 9�{bld Phone: �CnyO� (Q�(o -� 26 b Fax: �GSo� 3�,3 ^��dS E-mail: �C� S��/�CiG�� CbM PROPERTY OWNER projectcontact person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents � Name: �IU�RI.lNG�11�U�1 LL G Address: 27'�}-% �V'R1..11�.�G V l�W �R- City/State/Zip: '� V�L.�� AMI� . C�l. Q?�O �a Phone: �Co�O� $(F �j - � 3 �7 Fax: ^ E-mail: r�-MI� G� C6MLA�T N�T ARCHITECT/DESIGNER a�oject contact person ts� OK to send electronic copies of documents � Name: ��aoc-d- `�t�',r-� � � � � s , ,Y.; . Address: l� O � � � a.�.�t-�. �V'c-- _ _ � a ,. ; ;,; : �a'� Ciry/State/Zip: ��y Phone: �P�� (o y�o�`Ze� Fax: �� 3h3 - � � � ,_... . * Burlingame Business License #: � (p � %� , ., � � r -. , __ ., , . , , ;, + PROJECT DESCRIPTION:_1�'EUJ S 1 NC'hL.� �rlM,t LY �C AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereb certify under penalty of psrjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belie . Applicant's signature: Date: �� S 13 I am aware of the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this appiication to the Planning Commission. Property owner's signature: � �^-'� Date: �� '�- - 2ot � Date submitted: tit Verification that the project architectldeslgner has a valid Burlingame business Ilcense wlll be required by the Finance Department at the tlme appllcation fees are paid. 5: jHANDOU7S�PCApplication.doc � � ' , -: ':'. ,..= =i � � : ;; - i -- � i:,:.._ _ ' : � ,... , .. - , -;. -> : , - . .,. .. . . . ' - City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-725U F(650) 696-3790 www.burlin ame.org 1 � ' '' � ` � � � �T 0 ��x� ��'�`� CITY OF BURLINGAME SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION n �'.'�` " � �'"� � . . . ' :�� ::, �,, , . � �, ,;;_ The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Oriiinance (Code '�' rn'?�'" Section 25.50). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. 2. Explain why the 6/end of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and x�ith the existing street and nei�hborhood The proposed project includes an attached garage in a"basement" story. Therefore a ceiling height greater than 6-9/2 feet is needed to accommodate automobiles. The garage for the proposed bui(ding is being placed below grade in order to keep the building as low as possible (and lower than adjacent buildings). The adjacent storage room in the basement'is necessary to minimize the mass and bulk of #he house, and therefore needs to be usable and grater than 6-1/2 feet in height. Attached garages in the front part of the property are the norm on the side of the street where the project is located due to the topography of the area, and a common design throughout the Bu�fingame Hills neighborhood. Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations af the proposed new structure or addition ure consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhaod The proposed project is replacing an existing building, and the style and exterior finish materials are consistent with other modern style buildings in the neighborhood. The character of the neighborhood will not be affected by the project, as there are similar buildings throughout the Burlingame Hills that sit in a mix of different styles of buildings, mostly dating form the mid 20th century period. Partially underground "BasemenY' can be found in the adjacent properties and throughout the neighborhood as a response to the area's topography. 3. How will the proposed project he consisteni with the residential design guidelines adonted bv the citv (C.S. 25.57)? 1. 7he architectural style is compatible with that of the neighborhood, as the neighborhood exhlbits a blend of different styles, including modern buildings like Ehe proposed project, with attached garages. 2. Attached garages at the front of the property are found in most houses on the side of the street where the project is located. The proposed basement location for the garage allows the proposed building to remain low to the ground therefore harmonizing with the adjacent neighborhood. 3. The project is consistent with the massing and bulk of the existing structure to be replaced and matches surrounding buildings in height and size. The existing house, though being removed includes an attached garage. 4. The proposed structure does not affect surrounding structures. 5. Proposed trees are seasonal, slender and larqely transparent to keep them from obstructinp views. 4. Explain how the removal nf any trees docated within the footprint of any s�ew structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements. What mitigation as proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain why this mitigation is appropriate. One protected tree is being proposed for removal, and will be replaced by (7) New trees. The tree removal application will be obtained after the planning process is completed. SP£CP�RM.FRM ._ , � i ; ,. �: : „ i >_ � . ; �,:. ,.- - _ :: >- . ;.,. .: ; _` - � _ �-- . ... City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F{650) 646-3790 www.burlineame.o� l. Explain why the blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characte�istics of the new construction or addition are conszstent with the existing structure's design and with the e�isting street and neighborhood. How will the proposed structure or addition affect neighboring properties or structures on those properties? If neighboring properties will not be affected, state why, Compare the proposed addition to the mass, scale and characteristics of neighboring properties. Think about mass and bullc, landscaping, sunlighdshade, vicws from neighboring properties. Neighboring properties and structures include those to the right, left, rear and across the street. �Iow does the proposed structure connpare to neighhoring structures in terms of mass or bu1k7 If there is no change to the structure, say so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation etc. with other structures in the neighborhood or area. 2. Exptain how the variety of roof line, facade, exte�ior finish materials and elevations of theproposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structut�e, street and neighborhooc� How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetically with structures or uses in the existing neighborhood? If it does not affect aesthetics, state why. Was the addition designed to match existing architecture and/or pattern of development on adjacent properties in the neighborhood? Explain why your proposa] fits in the neighborhood. How will the stzucture or addition change the character of the neighhorhood? Think of character as the image or tone established by size, density of development and generai pattem of land use. If you don't feel the character of the neighborhood will change, state why. 3. How will the proposed project be consistent with the �esidential design guidelines adopted by the city? Following are the design criteria adopted by the City Council for residential design review. How does your project meet these guidelines? 1. Compatibzlity of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. 4. Explain how the removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's re. f'orestation requirements. What mitigation is proposed for the remnval of any trees? Expdain why this mitigation is appropriate. Will any trees be removed as a result of this proposal? If so, explain what type of trees will be removed and if any are protected under city ordinance (C.S. 11.06}, why it is necessary to remove the trees, and what is being proposed to replace any trees being removed. If no trees are to be removed, say so. SPECPERM.FRM , .. . ._ ._.: , , . , . ... --- . . . , .. :,_: . i..- City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Priinrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlin�ame.or� �� CITY p �� BURLINCiAME ��K The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as detined by the City s Ordinance (Code Section 25.50). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this farm for assistance with these questions. 1. Explain why the blend of mass, scale anri dominunt structurul characteristics of the new construction or addition ure consistent with the existing structure's design and with the exrsting street und neighborhood. The proposed building is being kept as low, or lower than adjacent buildings by sinking the garage below the rest of the building. Attached garages in the front part of the property are the norm on the side of the street where the project is located due to the topography of the area, and a common design throughout the Burlingame Hiils neighborhaod 2. Explain how the variety of roof line, fucade, ei7eriar finish n:aterials and e.levations of the proposed new structure or addition ure consistent with the existing structure, street anci neighborhood. The proposed project is replacing an existing building, and ihe style and e�erior finish materials are consistent with other modern style buildings in the neighborhood. The character of the neighborhood will not be affected by the project, as there are similar buildings throughout the Burlingame Hills that sit in a mix of different styles of buildings,,, mostly dating form the mid 20th century period. ,�� , .,�„ , , ;.; i �, i',. ., _ �... , . . 3. How will the proposed project be consistent witi: the residential design guirie"lines adonted bv the citv (C.S. 25.5�? � 1. The architectural style is compatible with that of the neighborhood, as the neighborhood exhibits a blend of different styles, including modern buildings like the proposed project, with attached garages. 2. Attached garages at the front of the property are found in most houses on the side of the street where the project is located. 3. The project is consistent with the massing and bulk of the existing structure to be replaced and matches surrounding buildings in height and size. The existing house, though being removed includes an attached garage. 4. The proposed structure does not affect surrounding structures. 5. Proposed trees are seasonal, slender and largefy transparent to keep them from obstructing views on the subject or adjacent properties 4. Exptain how the removal of�any trees located wrthin the footprint o��any new structure or addition is necessury and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements. What mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain wlzy tlzis mitigation is appropriate. One protected tree is being proposed for removal, and will be replaced by (7) New trees. The tree removal application will be obtained after the planning process is completed. SPECPERM.FRM '� , t�`�'., ; s� 4� a�,,� :. �a � C'` h'... City of Burlingame Planning Depariment SOl Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlineame.org l. Explain why the blend ofmass, scc�le and daminantstructural characteristics ofthe new construction or addition are cons�stent with the existingstructure's design and with the existing street and neigliborhood. How will the proposed structure or addition affect neighboring properties or structures on those properties? If neighboring properties will not be affected, state why. Compare the proposed addition to the mass, scale and characteristics of neighboring properties. Think about mass and bulk, landscaping, sunlight/shade, views from neighboring properties. Neighboring properties and structures include those to the right, lefl, rear and across the street. How does the proposed structure compare to neighboring structures in terms of mass or bulk? Tfthere is no change to the structure, say so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation etc. with other structures in the neighborhood or area. 2. E_xplain how the variety ofroofline, facacle, exterior finish ntaterials and elevations of the proposed new structrrre or addition are cansistent wzth the existing structure, street and neighborhoocl. How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetical ly with structures or uses in the existing neighborhood? ff it does not affect aesthetics, state why. Was the addition designed to match existing architecture and/or pattern of development on adjacent properties in the neighborhood'? Eaplain why your proposa] fits in the neighborhood. Now will the structure or addition change the character of the neighborhood? Think of character as the image or tone established by size, densiry of developrnent and general pattern of land use. Tfyou don't feel the character ofthe neighborhood will change, state why. 3. How will the proposed project be consistent witl: the residential design guidelines adopted by the city? Fotlowing are the design criteria adopted by the City Councii for residential design review. How does your project meet these guidelines? 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Tnterface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. 4. Explairr how the removal of any trees located within tlie footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with tl:e city's reforestation requirements. What mitigation is proposed for tlte removal of any trees? Explain why this mitigation is appropriate. W ill any trees be removed as a result of this proposal? lf so, explain what type of trees wi 11 be removed and if any are protected under city ordinance (C.S. 1] A6), why it is necessary to remove the trees, and what is being proposed to replace any trees being removed. [f no trees are to be removed, say so. SPGCPERM.FRM _. . . ... . _ _ . . . . . - , - March] 7, 2014 Kielty Arborist Services Certified Arborist WE#0476A P.O. Box b 187 San Mateo, CA 94403 650-525-1464 Tony Construction Incorporated Attn: Mr. Tony Leung 1325 Cabrillo Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 Site: 2747 Burlingview Drive, Burlingame, CA Dear Mr. Leung, As requested on Friday, March 14, 2�14, I visited the above site to inspect and comment on the trees. A new home is planned for this site and your concern as to the future health and safety of the trees as well as your neighbors trees has prornpted this visit. Method: All inspections were made from the ground; the tree was not climbed for this inspection. The tree in question was located on a"Not- to-Scale" map pravided hy me. The tree was then measured for diameter at 54 inches above ground level (DBH or diameter at breast height). The tree was given a condition rating for form and vitality. The trees' condition rating is based on 50 percent vitality and 50 pezcent form, using the following scale. 1 - 29 Very Poor 30 - 49 Poor SO - 69 Fair 70 - 89 Good 90 - 100 Excellent The height of the tree was measured using a Nikon Forestry 550 Hypsometer. The spread was paced off. Comments and recommendations for future maintenance are provided. IIM , � ��tl"�,� � 1 [0'� c�-ry �_ �uR��sv�a�r� CD[;-°l._4�iti'.Pv� DIV. ��:-. .:._, _.. , _ � . ;... �< ,,:, 2747 Burlingview/3/17/14 �2) Survey: Tree# Species DBH CON HT/SPComments 1* Giant sequoia 40est 55 50/40 Fair vigor, gooci form, some bot canker on (Sequniadendron giganteum) stems. Located 6 feet from property line. 2* Southern magnolia 12est 60 30/35 Fair vigor, fair form, will require minor (Magnolia grandiflora) trimming to facilitate construction. *Indicates neighbor's tree Summary: There are no protected trees on site although the neighbor to the southwest has two trees that will be affected. "I'ree #2 will only require some trimming to facilitate the conskruction. Tree #1 is a giant sequoia with an abundance of surface roots. The proposed plan includes a full basement within the dripline of the sequoia. The building of the home as planned would result in moderate to heavy root loss for the sequoia. Reducing the basement by six feet and using a mat slab type foundation near the sequoia will reduce root loss lessen impacls to this tree. The following tree protection plans designed for this site should be catxied out during the building of this house. Tree Protection Plan: Tree proteclion zones should be installed and maintained throughout the entire length �f the project. Fencing for tree protection should be 4' tall, orange plastic material supported by metal poles or stakes pounded into the ground. The location for the protective fencing should be as close to the dripline of desired trees as possible, still allowing room for construction to safely continue. No equipment or materials shall be stored or cleaned inside the protection zones. Areas outside protection fence, but still beneath the tree's driplines, where foot traffic is expected to be heavy, should be mulched with 4-6" of chipper chips covered with plywood. The spreading of chips will help to reduce compaction and improve soil structure. Root Cutting Any roots to be cut shall be monitored and documented. Large roots (over 2" diameter) or large masses of roots to be cut must be inspected by the site arborist. The site arborist, at this time, may recomrnend irrigation or fertilization of the root zone. All roots ne�ding to be cut should be cut clean with a saw or lopper. Roots to be left exposed for a period of time should be covered with layers of burlap and kept moist. The over dig for the foundation should be reduced a much as possible when roots are encountered. The site arborist will be on site for all excavation when within the dripline of the trees listed above. �� -A �� I��i 4', '� - . cl;7i� „ I. � �, - '�;t't�' " 'NC'.,kMw C: � �i�,,L�. L:,`��:.��,.�=.�'<IVi�`:i� i:}{';i _ ::: �.;.: .._ _..__. _ , i- -_ _ .. � --- : _. . 2747 Burlingview/3/17/14 (3) Trenching Trenching for irrigation, drainage, electrical or any other reason shall be done by hand when inside the dripline of a protected tree. Hand digging and the careful placement of pipes below or besides protectcd roots will signiiicantly reduce root loss, thus reducing trauma to the tree. All trenches shall be backfilled with native materials and compacted to near its original level, as soon as possible. Trenches to be left open for a period of time (24 hours), will require the covering of all exposed roots with burlap and be kept moist. The trenches will also need to be covered with plywood to help protect the exposed roots. Irrigation The Neighbors trees wi(1 require regular irrigation. The trees should be irrigated 2 times a month using heavy irrigation with enough water to wet the entire root zone. Tree #1 shall be fertilized using 30Q gallons of 22-24-24 2 weeks prior to the start of excavation. Further irrigation will be recommended if needed by the site arborist at the time of excavation. The information included in this report is believed to be true and based on sound arboricultural principles and practices. Sincerely, Kevin R. Kielty Certified Arborist WE#0476 '�� j:ti,�,��j; � � Z;jst �! iY C��= EiUf�LllVGAME c'�:�-��_�;�;r�,r•��: ��v. >>: _;< ,: -.: �; . - - _ _: , , _ .. :,. ... ; - ;, ; ,:�.: _ _ Project Comments Date: March 24, 2014 To: � City Engineer (65Q) 558-7230 � Chief Building Official �s�o} 5ss-�2� X Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7334 � Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 � Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 � NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney From: Erika Lewit, Planning Subject: 2747 Bur�ingview Drive, zoned R-1, APN: �27-261-040 - original comments, response to comments, and revised plans are in your In- Box Staff Review: 1. Include arborist report on plans_ 2. Tree Protection Plan must be followed as specified in arborist report for 1. Root Cutting; 2.Trenching; 3. Irrigation Reviewed by:6 Disco Date: 3/26/14 : ::: , ::_ _- - -. . :::,� , _ .;: Project Comments Date: To: From: November 18, 2013 0 Engirteering Division (650) 558-72.3U � Builtiing Division (650) 558-7260 X Parks Division (650� 558-7334 Planning Staff � Fire Division (850) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Subject: Request fior Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permit far attached garage for a new, two-story single family dwelling with an attached garage at 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-261-040 Staff Review: November 25, 2013 1. No existing tree over 48 inches in circumference at 54 inches fram base of tree may be removed without a Protected Tree Permit from the Parks Division (558-7330). 2. Landscape plan is required to meei `Water Conservation in Landscape Regulationsp (attaci�). [rrigation Plan required for Building permit. Audit due for Final. Reviewed by: B Disco Date: 11I25/13 :�_�.....'"".'.' �::._.�.�...� :': .�.�.'':.i .;:_ - :-. �:�; - I _ a . . �, °. F�•.�„�. r' ' � . , ..., .. . _. '' . ... . ,.,.. 4UTDOOR WATER USE EFFICIENCY CHECKLIST • : - • • - r • ` • r . I cert' hat the subyect project meets the specified requirements of the Water Conservation in Landscaping drdinance;'.' ^ ��i7�i� Signature Date ,{ L , ._g ...,. y� .. . , y, .. : .. . . _ _ g_:. .. , _ . . .:.. ,_:. j81.Sin le Famil � Multi-Famil ❑ Commercial ❑ Institutional ❑ Irri ation only U Industrial U Other: Applicant Name (print); Contact Phone #: Project Site Address: 21 �{ '] gv�.4 \�J v� �J (�R IJ � ABency Review Project Area (sq.ft. or acre): l O � p bs ri of Units: # of Meters: {C�ssj {Failj - Total Landscape Area (sq.ft.}: � p ❑ a /Z, 6q'i ';' Turf Irrigated Area (sq.ft.): 3 Gl ❑:. ' Non-Turf Irrigated Area (sq.ft.}; t i{ rj'� ❑ ❑' �. Special Landscape Area (SLA} (sq.ft.): 0 ` �' ` Water Feature Surface Area (sq.ft.): (va(a{ , ; - � _ _ ,. ,.. . . , : .•. , ,,...._- .,�.•.:�.•. �._: : _ Turf Less than 25% of the landscape area is �Yes �] � turf ❑ No, See Water Budget All turf areas are > 8 feet wide Yes O ❑ --- --. _ . _ . All turf is planted on slopes < 25% � Yes C] 0: Non-Turf At least SO% of non-turf area is native Yes CI ❑ or low water use plants ❑ No, See Water Budget Hydrozones Plants are grouped by Hydrozones Yes � lJ Mulch At least 2-inches of mulch on exposed Yes Q q' soil surfaces Irrigation System Efficiency 70% ETo (100% ETo for SLAs) Yes p' Ll No overspray or runoff ❑ Yes L7 i�,l Irrigation System Design System efficiency> 70% �Yes (3 U Automatic, seif-adjusting irrigation ❑ No, not required forTier 1 U L] > controllers � Yes Moisture sensor/rain sensor shutoffs � Yes C] < �3 T No sprayheads in <8-ft wide area Yes ;� � Irrigation Time System only operates between 8 PM Yes ' D_ ' q and l0 AM Metering Separate irrigation meter � No, not required because < 5,000 sq.ft. f� L] ' U Yes Swimming Poo{s / Spas Cover highly recommended Yes ^ 0 U ❑ No, not required WaterFeatures Recirculating ❑Yes N/ACsw�w�►��, POO� � � Less than 10% of iandscape area ❑ Yes C3 T�1 � Documentation Checklist �.Yes ❑ � Landscape and Irrigation Design Plan '�Prepared by applicant C] ` Ci:' ❑ Prepared by professional Water Budget (optional) � Prepared by applicant U CI ❑ Prepared by professional Audit Post-installation audit completed Completed by applicant D: 0' ❑ Completed by professional ; > -- i :=> : -- -_ - _ . � :; . _ . . . _ _ _ , ; .,, ;; �:`.:_. _ ---_. _ � !:. .. :� OUTD�OR WATER USE EFFICIENCY CHECKLIST i �" 9 0 ' 8 0 ° � o Audltor: _ ' Materials Reteived and Reviewed: ❑ Water Conservation in Landscaping Ordinance O Outdoor Water Use Efficiency Checklist ❑ Outdoor Water Use Efficiency Checklist ❑ Water eudget ❑ Water Budget Calculation Worksheets ❑ Landscape Plan ❑ Plant List ❑ Post-Instaflation Audit ❑ Other: Date Revlewed: U Follow up required (explain): U Drip irrigation '�7 Self-adjusting Irrigation Controller Date Resubmitted: � Plant palate Date Approved: 0 Three (3) inches of mulch Dedicated Irrigation Meter Required: C] Sofl amendment (e.g., compost) Meter slzing: U Grading ❑ Pool and/or spa cover ❑ Dedicated irrigation meter ❑ Other: Comments: Selected Definitions: Tier 1 New construction and rehabilitated landscapes with irrigated landscape areas between 1,000 and 2,500 square feet requiring a building or landscape permit, plan check or design review, or new or expanded water service. Tier 2 New construction and rehabilitated landscapes with irrigated landscape areas greater than 2,500 square feet requiring a building or landscape permit, p{an check or design review. ETo Reference evapotranspiration means the quantity of water evaporated from a large field of four- to seven-inch tall, cool-season grass that is well watered. Reference evapotranspiration is used as the basis of estimating water budgets so that regional differences in climate can be accommodated. SLA Special Landscaped Area. {ncludes edib{e plants, areas irrigated with recycled water, surface water features using recycled water and areas dedicated to active play such as parks, sports fields, golf courses, and where turf provides a playing surface. Professional Professional is a"certified professional" or "authorized professional" that is a certified irrigation designer, a certified landscape irrigation auditor, a licensed landscape architect, a licensed landscape contractor, a licensed professional engineer, or any other person authorized by the state to design a landscape, an irrigation system, or authorized to complete a water budget, irrigation survey or irrigation audit. Water Feature A design element where open water performs an aesthetic or recreational function. Water features include ponds, lakes, waterfalls, fountains, artificial streams, spas, and swimming pools {where water is artificially supplied). ,.. ,,, . -. - - _ . , _.. :. _. : -._.. .:: _ _ , , � . . �_ .. _ _ . ...._ . ---. , _ �. .. , . .. . __ - <: ._.,. , ,. � Project Comments Date: February 6, 2014 To: � City Engineer (650) 558-7230 X Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 � Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7334 � Recycfing Specialist (650) 558-7279 � Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 � NPDES CQordinator (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney Fram: Erika Lewit, Planning Subject: revised plans for 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-261-040 - original comments, response to comments, and revised plans are in your In- Box StafF Review: No further comments. All conditions of approval as stated in all previous reviews of the project will apply to this project. Reviewed by: : 2-6-2d14 ' > :;: � -: : ,: - - - - - . :. ; = ... . x .. ,. . , , ;, . - ;.. - __ , _.,,. _ , . ,. , � ;:' ': ,.: � i � Projec# Commenis Date: To: From: January 27, 2014 � City Engineer (650) 558-7230 X Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 � Parks Supervisor (650} 55&-7334 Erika Lewit, Planning � Recycling Speciafist {650) 558-7271 0 Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 � NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney Subject: revised plans for 2747 Burfingvisw Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027- 261-040 - originaf comments, response to comments, and revised plans are in your !n- Box Re-Check Comments: 13. RESIDENTIAL: Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the location and the net clear opening height and widfh of al! required egress windows on the elevafion drawin_qs. 2013 California Residential Code (CRC} §R310. Note: The area labeled "Office" is a room that can be used for sleeping purposes and, as such, must comply with this requirement. The note on Sheet A0.0 does not address the comment. Specify fhe locafion and the nef clear opening height and width of al! required egress windows on fhe elevation drawinps. NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and pfans that specifically address item #13 be re-submitted before this project can move forward for Planning Commission action. Reviewed by: Project Comments Date: To: From: November 18, 2013 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 0 Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permit for attached garage for a new, iwo-story single family dwelling with an attached garage at 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-261-440 Staff Review: November 25, 2013 ��On the plans specify that this praject will comply with the 2013 California Building �� Code, 2013 California Residential Cade (where applicable), 2013 California Mechanical Code, 2013 California Electrical Code, and 2013 California Plumbing Code, including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1889. Nate: If the Planning Commission has not approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2013 then this project must comply with the 2013 California Building Codes. �Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2d13 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Go to http://vwvw.energy.ca.gov/title24/2013standards/ for publications and details. � Indicate on the plans that the roof will comply with Cool Roof requirements of the 2013 California Energy Code. 2013 CEC §110.8. The 2013 Residential and Non- Residential Compliance Manuals are available on line at http:/lwww.eneray.ca.qov/title24/2013standards/ � Place the following information on the first page of the plans: "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. (See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.} � On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden condit9ons that require work to be pertormed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor mus# submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrated an the Job Copy of the plans prior to perfarming the work. 6) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. 7) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 8) Provide a fully dimensioned site plan which shows the true property boundaries, the lacation of ail structures on the property, existing driveways, and on-site parking. 9) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 10}Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or io assumed property lines 11 }Show the dimensions to adjacent strucfiures. 12}Obtain a survey of the property lines. �ESIDENTIAL: Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the Jocation and fhe net clear opening helght and width of a!! required egress windows on the elevaiion drawin_qs. 2013 California Residential Code (CRC) §R310. Note: The area labeled "officen is a room #hat can be used for sleeping purposes and, as such, must camply with this requirement. :�ndicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 15}Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 16)Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 2013 CBC §1 Q09. 17}Provide lighting at all exterior landings. �he fireplace chimney must terminate at least two feet higher than any portion of ihe building within ten feet or must be retrofit with a fireplace insert (not a log lighter.) 2013 CRC §9003.9. NOTE: A written response to the ifems noted here and plans that specifically address items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, '[3, 14, and 18 must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for P ing Commission action. Reviewed by� � Date: 11-19-2013 Jo , BC9 6 -558-7270 � . , :: ,: ;, ,. ; _. .._ .. . : : - „ _. , . _ - , ;..,_. _ ,, < ,.; ._: .. - ; . ;. ;, . .: , Project Comments Date: l� From: November 18, 2013 X Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 0 Parks Division (650) 558-7334 Planning Staff � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Subject: Request for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permit for attached garage for a new, two-story single family dwelling with an attached garage at 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned R-1, APN : 027-261-040 Staff Review: November 25, 2013 1. See attached review comments #1, 2, 5, 14 and 20. 2. Sewer backwater proteciion certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-723Q for additional information. Reviewed by: V 1►' Date: 12/Q412013 ....,_. 1 , . ; . .. . -.� . .. . .. _ , _ . ,. .. _ _ -_�_-. _.. ... .. , .. �� .. � _ ...., .�..�.,- . ._. ::_'.' _ ��:: . _ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISI4N PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS h� "i�%"`��' Project Name: 5�+� ��/ �� Project Address: Z"1¢'� �n.Lt�y�'l�,�l The following requirements apply to the project 1 _,� A property boundary survey shall be preformed by a licensed land surveyor. The survey shall show all property lines, property corners, easements, topographical features a��d utilities. (Required prior tcr the building permit issuance_} �,�� f S Q��rfp�� LLttjjF� 2 � The site and roof drainage sha11 be shown on plans and should be made to drain towards the Frontage Street. (Required prior to the building permit issuauce,} 3. The applicant shall submit project grading and drainage plans for approval prior to the issuance of a Building permit. 4 The project site is in a flood zone, the project sha11 comply with the City's flood zone requirements. 5 � A sanitary sewer lateral � is required for the project in accordance with the City's standards. ) 6. The project plans shall show the required Bayfront Bike/Pedestrian trail and necessaxy public access improvements as required by San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. 7. Sanitary sewer analysis is required for the project. The sewer analysis shall identify the project's impact to the City's sewer system and any sewer pump sta.tions and identify mitigation measures. 8 Submit traffic trip generation analysis foz the project. 9. Submit a traffic impact study far the project. The traffic study should identify the project generated impacts and zecommend mitigation measures to be adopted by the project to be approved by the City Engineer. 10. The project shall file a parcel map with the Public Works Engineering Division. The parcel map shall show a11 existing property lines, easements, monuments, and new property and lot Iines proposed by the map. Page 1 of 3 U:�private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 11. A latest preliminary title report of the subject parcel of land shall be submitteci to the Public Works Engineering Division with the parcel map for reviews. 12 Map closure/lot closure calculaiions shall be submitted with the parcel map. 13 The project shall submit a condominium map to the Engineering Divisions in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. 14 _�_ Tiie project shall, at its own c�st, design and construct frontage public improvements including curb, gatter, sidewalk and other necessary appurtenant work. 15 'I'he project shall, at its own cost, desigl and construct frontage streetscape improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutters, parking meters and poles, trees, and streetlights in accordance with sireetscape master plan. 16 By the preliminary review of plans, it appears that the project may cause adverse impacts during construction to vehicular traffic, pedestrian traffic and public on street parking. The project shall identify these irnpacts and provide mitigation measure acceptable to the City. 17 The project sha11 submit hydrologic calculations from a registered civil engineer for the proposed creek enclosure. The hydraulic calculations must show that the proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any a.dverse iinpact to hoth upstream and downstream properties. The hydrologic calculations shall accompany a site map showing the area of the 100-year flood and existing improvements with proposed improvements. 18 Any work within the drainage area, creek, or creek banks requires a State Department of Fish and Uame Pernut and Ariny Corps of Engineers Permits. 19 No construction debris shall be allowed into the creek. 20 `� The project shall comply with the City's NPDES permit requirement to prevent storm water pollution. 21 The project does not show the dimensions of existing driveways, re- submit plans with driveway dimensions. Also clarify if the project is proposing to widen tiie driveway. Any widening of the driveway is subject to City Engineer's approval. 22 The plans do not indicate the slope of the driveway, re-submit plans showing the driveway profile with elevations Page 2 of 3 U:\private developmeni�PLANMNG REVIEW COMMENTS.doc ; : ;. . ; _ ;::. ;; , ;: , __ . �:. � : ,. ,: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 23 The back of the driveway/sidewalk approach shall be at least 12" above the flow line of the frontage curb in the street to prevent overflow of storm water from the streei into private property. 24. For the takeout service, a garbage receptacle shall be placed in front. The sidewalk fronting the store shall be kept clean 20' from each side of the property. 25. For commercial projects a designated garbage bin space and cleaning area shall be located inside the building. A drain connecting the garbage area to the Sanitary Sewer System is required. Page 3 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc Project Comments Date: To: From: Subject: Staff Review: November 18, 2013 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650} 55&7600 X Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Request for Design Review, Hiilside Area Construction Permit and Special Permit for attached garage for a new, two-story single family dwelling wiih an attached garage at 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-261-040 November 25, 2013 1) Stormwater requirements are required to be implemented at stand-alone single family home projects that create and/or replace 2,500 sq.ft. or more of impervious surface. These requirements are in addition to any City requirements. To determine if this project is subject to those requirements complete and return the attached "Stormwater Checklist for Small Projects." For additional information about these requirements please refer to the attached flyer "New Stormwater Controf Requirements Effective 12/1/12n and by visiting the San Mateo County Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (SMCWPPP) website at: http://flowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section4/C3iNewRegsSm ProjSep 2012.doc To ob#ain a checklist electronically, the document is available at: http://flowstobay.org/files/privatend/M RPsourcebk/Section4lStormChecklistSmallProj Dec2012.doc 2) Any construction projec# in the City, regardless of size, sha�l comply with the City's NPDES (stormwater) permit to prevent stormwater poflution from construction activities. P�oject praponent shafl ensure all contractors implement appropriate and effective BMPs during all phases of construction, incfuding demolition. When submitting plans for a building permit include a list of construction BMPs as project notes on a separate full size plan sheet, preferably 2' x 3' or larger. Project proponent may use the attached Constructian BMPs plan sheet to comp{y with this requirement. Electronic file is available for download at: http://flowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebklSectionSlConstBMPPIanJun2Q12. pdf 3) Best Management Practices (BMPs} requirements apply on any projects using architectural copper. To learn what these requirements are, see attached flyer "Requirements for Architectural Coppe�," Electronic file is available for download at: http:l/f(owstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section8/ArchitecturalcopperBMPs . pdf � t �� :gn C ..� fi wu:t:;� �. yY � �'.,'�' � For assistance please contact Stephen D. at 650-342-3727 ... `� ,. Reviewed by: SD Date: 11/25/2013 � �� s1y�° ^ ��a; : = t �:�,-� .. �.�it..>_%%4..A1"Ji<;1,•�%n �.!i�l.: � ShN MATEO��p� Water Pollution Prevention Program Clean W�ter. Heaf:hy Ccmmunicy. Construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) Construction projects are required to implement the stormwater best management practices (BIvIP) on this page, as th.ey apply to your project, all year long. Materials & Waste i�ianagement ,` �. . .t �. �4 t oti T � � 4�S h .�1+, '�' � °:s t' � A� '�J.� gr .' k �i � . '-: NeaRazar�loua Mxfcitialr � 9+xm aod cm�er stockpiks d'mid, din m ahcr cwrsmntbn marQial mitl� mme whm min i� Fdce.i or ifay ,xfirel}' hcing �al v,ithui IJ da.y. ❑ Usc (6w don'i a�etuse) �sclaimed wu.c tur duv mmrol I11f[i�bUi !NLtIYI�IY ❑ I�bcl a116amrdws marcriats md lur,vdous wases (md� m Paa�s. Winrs,'huuicn. mhems. Ml. WI. and amifrcere) in a�a�K..��h cih. couan. stnte and fed�l xguluiw� ❑ 9ore hezardous makrialt aud .vasscs io wa� �gM cor.tniocrs, xtom �^ SGW�p1ok 3tto11da.1' ronli(Ilmen[ and L'mw IheN M I�K tnd d w'ofY di� p{�ullnE N'CL Nmf�tOt O( r'hrn i111I1 i9 �tYCGA. O Fdlow ntanufocuurr's aqilicaliw u�suuctlons far harndmis mmerials and be cuetL! not io u¢ nwre dmi oec<ewv, po � appiv chcmicals ou�daoa whd� re6e Is fortcau xiJ�in 7A Aou�s. Q N�.nge fa app.opnxr daporal o(aIl hazv�dps ��n. Wrotr Mawn;cmrnt ❑ Covcr n�s�e diepnsnl emtlaiurs xeumk �.�ith brys m ihc cnd of nm� w�od; An• nn3 G�riog na u�aM�e�. O Check wua dispwal mominvs C�eqmn�ly fw kak nod io meke SWC 1�6V CIC 110[ OYC�1�. rl[i�tt hOY dON112 �IRI}UIV M tIIL GOLSVLGIO� 5112, � ❑ CMsn or repl�ee ponayle aiktc. sud inspea ihem Bequenth� fa ��a:wu�. 0 Dispasc of oll �reslcs ud deb`is qoperFy. R�.�cfe marcriais and �ascm chx �an bc rccrcled (sinh as sspAaU. wme�c. apgc��c 6�e metr inls..�aad m P boud pipc, aac.) ❑ Dispose of?iquid �uidoec fiom peints, [d'maen_ sol.xn�s. yWea, pnd elonin� 4uids as harnrdoos.vste. Canc�ructibu Entnaues and Perf,aeter O 6mplid� and meiaan� cRecti�x pcam�acr conwh md suibilis all �°°*m'n'an rntr^+rxs �od eva ro sniSeirntty eaw�ol emnon and sedimtnt dixlurgn Gao sAe a�d wcl,vE off site. ❑ Swcp or �acwm anp vrzef mcki� immeAiamTy• and secnrt ttdimrn( swu �u nrevar FuNter vxkinY. Nc�xr hosc do��n sve�s lo ckan up Irxling. Equipmeut Aianagemcnt & Spil[ Controf Mantena¢cc auA PaYluag � � ❑ Daiyiu�e nn uaq Lned rvitli nppop�iqte BMPa. Fa ��ehick ud cquip�wnt parling and aaase. ❑ Pedortu jor �onlnkruu¢, rop¢ir jots mJ erhick md equipcirni x�ahing cff si1e. L7 If Juelm;oreduebmam¢wicemuubcdoue cns�Ic, wrnk in s bomwd erca axay ham atpm Arains aod oeer a drip pen biy airough m calkci Ouid , Ren�de or dicpnse oEfluids os hemrd«�s wbte. ❑ IF �chicle or eqYipioen� ckaniag m� 6e qone msik, clean nith aeeeronl.� in c hc.med area tl�ei mL uot nlloa� riase weter ro nen in7o gutters. mc,;fs, smny ' d�ins. a svGtt wa[as. O Do no1 clem ��Ne a equipro¢M mrsire uang wops. sol.�rn[s, elzF�eosas. sm�m efcmnig eqmpmenL cte. Sptll Pre�cmion anct Con�ml ❑ I:esp sp�LL ckmmp mueri�I� (ra�s, ahswbems, ac.) �VII�Lb�C N ihC fonylly�pQlSj�c 111 ap t111�Ly, ❑ �nspxt vehic:p and eqaip:nem GeQuca�tv for md RPm kaFs prompAy�. Use dAp pnns m cad� kekc until rzy in ere madc. ❑(7�io � spilb or kels immedialely md dispose o! clmenP ninvials pmperir. D Do nd I�e dmrn wrfues �v-Irn Ouids Aays pilled Use dq� ekmup meWade (ebsorbenl �mrerials. ai linv, a�la rags). O Sweep up splkd dn� ma{eriak imnroJFmelv- Do ml in• a��di tliem enay w-ith warcc ar bm' them. ❑ Clem op apiW m dirtams by �yging uy a�d p�opc.1J dieposing ofcwnamin.tcd tp7. ❑ RepnccaiymficmrspiWimmrdin¢k.1'a�me�equued by la�t to mport all aignificanf m2n�s of ha:armus nutaiels, including al To report a spll: I) Dial )11 wYo�alaal rnw�e.oer respome nw�bcr.2) CaD tl,e 6o.Cmo['S OmCf O(Enlefytnn� S¢vioes Whn�g Cea�u, (80[fj 832-7Ji0 (24 6onrs). CarthRork & Contaminated Soils " --�i._. � `� r �I _ ,r�� +S Piosim conKa ❑ SeLcdvk �rading a�d e:�nwtion n�ak Cor drr nailxranh�. 4 Stobiliis all da�dW arees. insW! a¢d meianin Lmpo�a�.� erwion controg (nrL uosion cpmo; {ap� a �pded 86er mnvi..? unnl xpFWeion is esublished ❑ Seed or pinnl vegotion fm wsion co�nd on s�oyes a wlcrc coomuction is na inmcdialelt planncd. SMimrnt Gnt�ol ❑ PmreG stam Mir. inlai ¢uners, diu,irea. ond dnina¢e cowscc �ri� �pruprioro BA9Pa. seh a gawl bsgs. � mLLs, bama. atc- ❑ Aeeemsedimesl[�omni�mtmjo3a[e by installirtg pnd mauu�inine xEimax cunaok. wch aR fiha mlls, silt feiw;es. or wdimnu Wsins � Kery e�ca�ared �oil on We s�e wher it � nW uot wllect'a4o We sQtM. ❑ Trai�sf'q eccawkd me�eri�ls to Cnmp hucLz o� lMe SiR. ua[ iu 13�C ara[ O Cyupmivated5oilc ❑ If any M Ihe folla��i� co�diems aie aUsenYd. ksl Fa cm�m�aGan enA moncl ihe Reg�m�l WaKr QeMiN C�nuol Boefd: � ■ tinusmi soil coeAnims. diccoloraiiun, w odor. ■ Abm�doned wdagramd t�vks. ■ ��ndo�cd weris 1&vicA benel�. d�u. or trash. Paving/Asphalt Work ,. ..1 �..�� U A�dd p ving wd renl wixiug iu Kd weatlrct ar whtu rlin is Focecas� beforc fresh pa�xment chll ha�x �ixw io oac. ❑ CacQaWrm dnin inlar mM mYnhales whrn npply ia� ml cwt. txk cosy zlcrp� seel, f s sw1. mc. ❑ Cdlec2udisq'cleor�Ppmpliately �spox ofeacess ehuive gn�sl w saM. Do NOI' m�eep w�rah it inw puefers. 0 i%O M! O52 x'�ff b tv�l dONT ff61� asph�ll CpC(GC pOvfnKnl. Sn�•cuttinY dc Ayih;Jt/C�mc�cle Runo.�nl ❑ Canyklel) eovw or lnmcade stom� drain 1Wtts w7rn s�r tuuing Usc fillc� fatric, W tclt besin mlq Ghtti Or pa�'cl baqs �a kery sAm out of tlie slao� dnia rysrcm. ❑ Sho.el, �bewrb. « ��aeuum am-cur shm� md dicpoyc ofell wssu as soon u you arc finuhed in o.c bea�ion cr n Ne eM ofer.h �vwk dey (w�hichnxr is SOOf.[t��. ❑ U n��cut slum� enters o ntch basin. cken it iry imnMiatcly. Concrete, Grout & �4a•tar Applicafion Q$twe cpntT[q pou and mmr undcr co�xr, m palle�s nad aaar Rom. d+ainage uc,s. nM� m,�r�,� ��u,� ��2, «a�a � nom� nnin. ❑ �Yasl� ouc m�c.cic cquipmrn�trucl;s offshe a iu a comaio:d um, sc dxro is m dixlwKe intu the md�rlv;py soil or oato surrounding aey� Lu cp�crcc� Uardcn and dispoac ofes g;vyx�c. O C�lkcu ilu wash �va�cr fmm i.�asNuir e. pove ayqrc�ai<concrete nne remore ii Cor opproyrinly disposal offsite. Dewatering :?�. � p V , % ', ^ ❑ EfCecli�cly maiuy all �uno� all rsnolia•i�in,he sne, aM eIl runolfOw C�ISS11Jfb'Cf (1011� We SIM. Oi�'�p (�y�y� xatcr from oflsite arn- from all disw�bcd acoe a oUrn,�iu amve complunec. q When darnknng, no�ifi �nd obum acwov.� &a� �u fow mw�uPo��. 6ef dixhv�inp n�a�crta a sv�i pmrer o� atorm dnin. Filiration c` di.-crsion lMmn�6 a basin, tav{-, a udimc�i p�p ma. be mqo;rcd. � fe arcas of kno�.�n ca�iam inauon; iesiivg u reqnircd pno! lo natx or diulurye of s,Found�vamc CoosWi u•iIh LLxc Engirccr m de�aminc mlKd�er �euing is reQuwd nnd hmr m iu�crpet resuies_ Connmm,ued grau�dna�v mus; bc um¢d w haukd aff-siic for proper disyosel. Storm drain polluters may be liable for fines of up to $10,000 per day? Pain6ng K Paint Removal _ �,„; � � � � ' - ? `y `' r -� Pafatin� ckxnup ❑ N<va clean Muhca w nnsc paint caueiners imo a suec�. Buaer, siam d�ain. or suR ce wnccrs ❑ Far �� ikr-bucd pain¢. pami om brushcs io die exlent possible Rince to nc� savibry sencr mce ,. a. hace ga�Md pcnnission hom �u bnl wx�e�.mer nc�uuu:l amlant��. Nc.cr p�u�r pni.w dmrrt o ��m. ❑ For oil-y¢ud pa�Ms, p�ivt � ytusha Io thc e.�em pmsiblc end elean n�it7� �5inncr a sd.�mi in a p'op�r couuircc Fihcr w�d muu �hinners snd soh�cn�s. Disposc of .ead�e aid m�usble ilwu�cr,Yohe�m �u lurudous�vauc. Ppi[1( RRN\:t7 U Cfrmical pain� s¢ippin6 residuc a�d cR�x artd dua fmm meru�c pai�xs or pa:.qs caxaming Icod ar itibuq•Iw nnist bc di�posed otes I�oradons �vest:. ❑ P�im chips mA duu fipm non-harxAnn d.�� snippi� and wnE blaxui� ma) �c �•cp iip a�Ist�d in p1ucK dNp clo[hs w3 disposcd ofas vuii. Landscape hlaterials rK=t ��y � '..- �f��`_t`� "P:.�_ : ❑ Conr.un stoclqkC landxiryinp ma�aiels bi- aaring tLem urtdcr ta�x �ehcn ihc�� arc �wt aai�eh� bcing nsM. O Stack cmdiAlc IandccApe �uarcrial on pallcss. Co�cr w Aa�c tficsc ma�crials w•Len �.n� xe na murde 6eu�g usW or nOP�kd. O Discontinuc npplicarian ofai� crodiblc laids��pe mren� �.•iU�in 2 d��•s bd a fo'ccnsl zpin <�r tt or dunn� w�et u�eeJK;r. __ _- .,. ,., , . _ . _. ,, .: _:- :; _ ;: - _ _: i';: - � IaH WA411tcuRtrriat �'at��PQ��uti0n ��e►t�ion Program G��W�t1f• 1�hrt+y Comy:nh�. Requ'trements for Architectura� Copper Pratect water qUality during instal(ation, cleaning, treatirig, and washing! Gopper from Buildings May Harm Aquatic Life Goppercan harm aquatic life in San Francisco Bay. Water fhat comes i�10 contact with archlfectural copper may contribute to impacts, especially during installation, cleaning, treating, or washing. Pafination solutions that are used to obtain the desired shade of green or brawn typically cantain acids. After treatment, when the copper is rinsed to r�move these acids, the rinse water is a source of pollutants. M unicipalities prohibit discharges to the sform drain af water used in the ir� stalfation, cleaning, treating and washing of architectural copper. U se Best Management Practices (BMPs) The fo(lowing Best Management Practices (BMPs) discharges to storm clrains. During Installation must be impfemented to prevent prohib;ted • If passible, purchase copper materials that have been pre-patinated at the factory. � If paffnation is done on-site, implement one or more of the following BMPs: o Discharge the rinse water to iandscaping. Ensure that the rinse water does not flow to the street or sform drain. 81ock off storm drafn in(et if aeeded, o Collecf rinse water in a tank and pump to fhe sanifary sewer. Coniact your focaf� s�niiary sewer agency before discharging to the saniiary sewer.. o Collect the rinse water in a tank and hauf off-sife for proper disposai. • Consider coating the copper maierials with an Impervious coating that prevents furfher. corrosian and runoff, This wili also maintain the desired co(or for a longer time, requiring tess maintenance, During Mafntenance fmplement fhe following BMFs during routine mainfenance acfivitiss, such as power washing the roof, re-patlnatron or re-application of Impervious coatrng: • Bfock storm drain inlets as needed to prevent runoff from enter'rng sform drains, • Discharge fhe wash wafer to fandscaping or fo the sanitary sewer (with permission frem the loca! sanitary sewer agency). If this ls not an option, haul fhe wash wa#er off-sife for proper dlsposai, Proteci fhe Bay/Ocean and yourself! Jf you are responslble for a discharge to the storm drain of non- sformwater generated by insfaffing, cleaning, treating or washing copper archltectura� features, you are in violation Qf ihe municipal stormwater ord�nance and may be subj�ct to a fne, cantact Information The San Mateo Coun#ywide Water Pollution Prevention Program fists municipal stormwater contacts a� �nrww.flaws�bav,ora (ciick on "Business", then "�1ew Deveiopment", then "local permitting agertcy"). Frrv,a�. �eb�ery 2s, zoT2 gutter and drainprpe, prohibifed clischsrge. The wafer must be pumped and drsposed of proper/y, ''� SAN �IATEO C�UNTYWI�E Water Pdlution PrevernionProgram City of Burlingame - Office of Stormwater Checklist for Small Projects Environmental Compliance Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit (MRP) 1103 Airport Blvd Order Na. R2-2009-0074 ; Order No. R2-2011-0083 NPDES No. CA5612008 Office: (650) 342-3727 Fax; (6S0) 342-3712 Complete this form for individua! single family home projects of any size, other projects that create and/or replace less than 10,000 square feet of intpervious surface, and projects in the fo!lowing cafegories thaf create and/or replace less fhan 5,000 square feef of impervious surface: restaurants, retail gasoline ouflets, auto service facilifies°, and parking lots (stand-alone or part of anofher use). A. Project Information A.1 Project Name: New Residencc, Burlingview L.L.0 A,2 Project Address: 2747 Burlingview Drive, Burlingame, CA 94010 A.3 Project APN: 027-261-040 B. Select Appropriate Site Design Measures B.1 Does the project create andlor replace 2,500 square feet or more of impervious surface2? ❑ Yes ❑ No ➢!f yes, and the project witl receive final discretionary approval on or after December 1, 2012, the project must include one of Sife Design Measures a fhrou,qh f.3 Facf sheets regarding site design measur�s a through f may be downloaded at hitp://www.flowstobay.or�/bs new development.php#flyers. Y If no, or the project wr!! receive fina! discretionary approva! before December 1, 2012, the projecf is encouraged to rmplemenf srte design measures4, which may be required at municipalify discrefion. Consult with municipal sfaff about �equirements for your project. B.2 Is the site design measure included in the project plans? Plan Yes No Sheet No. a. Direct roof runoff into cisterns or rain barrels and use rainwater for irrigation or other non-potable use. b. Direct roof runoff onto vegetated areas. d. Direct runoff from driveways and/or uncovered parking lots onto vegetated areas. e. Construct sidewalks, walkways, andlor patios with permeable surfaces. f. Construct bike lanes, driveways, and/or uncovered parking lots with permeable surfaces. ❑ � � ❑ � � ❑ �. ❑ � ❑ ❑ NJ�. ❑ ❑ � � � N ❑ � ❑ ❑ � ❑ � h. Maximize permeability by clustering development and preserving open space. i. Use micro-detention, including distributed landscape-based detention. j. Protect sensitive areas, including wetland and riparian areas, and minimize changes to the natural topography. k. Self-treating area (see Section 4.2 of the C.3 Technical Guidance} ❑ �. ❑ ,�. I. Self-retaining area (see Section 4.3 of the C.3 Technical Guidance} m. Plant or preserve interceptor trees (Section 4.1, C.3 Technical Guidance} � See Standard IndustriaV Classification (SIC) codes here. ` Complete the C.3/C.6 Development Review Checklist if the project is not an individu� Smgl�farrjity hotn&, and it cr�ates and/or replaces 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surface; or if it is a restaurant, retail gasoli�e qutlet �{�ta �ervice fachlity;'o`r parking lot project that creates and/or replaces 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface. 3 See MRP Provision C.3.i. 4 See MRP Provision C.3.a.i.(6). � � 1 �.r ` '' A�praved December4, 2092 �. w a ,. c. Direct runoff from sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios onto vegetated areas. g. Minimize land disturbance and impervious surface (especially parking lots). Stormwafer Checklist for Smal1 Projects C. Select appropriate source controls (Encouraged for a!1 projects; may be required at municipal discrefion. Consult munrcipal staff.�) Features that Are these require source Source control measures Is source control features In control (Refer to Local Source Control List for detailed requirements) measure included project? measures in project pians? �� Storm Drain Floor Drains Parking garage Landscaping ■ Mark on-site inlets with the words "No Dumpingl Flows to Bay" or equivalent. ■ Plumb interior floor drains to sanitary sewer [or prohibit]. ■ Plumb interior parking garage floor drains to sanitary sewer.6 • Retain existing vegetation as practicable. ■ Select diverse species appropriate to the site. Include plants that are pest- and/or disease-resistant, drought-tolerant, and/or attract beneficial insects. ■ Minimize use of pesticides and quick-release fertilizers. ■ Use efficient irrigation system; design to minimize runoff. ■ Provide connection to the sanitary sewer to facilitate draining s Provide sink or other area for equipment cleaning, which is: ■ C�nnected to a grease interceptor prior to sanitary sewer discharge 6 ■ Large enough for the largest mat or piece of equipment to be cleaned. • Indoors or in an outdoor roofed area designed to preven# stormwater run-on and run-off, and signed to require equipment washing in this area. ■ Provide a roofed and enclosed area for dumpsters, recycling containers, etc., designed to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff. ■ Connect any drains in or beneath dumpsters, compactors and tallow bin areas servinc�food service facilities to the sanitary sewer.� • Perform process activities either indoors or in roofed outdoor area, designed � to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff, and to drain to the sanitary sewer.fi ■ Cover the area or design to avoid pollutant contact with stormwater runoff. ■ Locate area only on paved and contained areas. • Roof storage areas that will contain non-hazardous liquids, drain to sanitary sewers, and contain by berms or simiiar. • Roofed, pave and berm wash area to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff, plumb to the sanitary sewerfi, and sign as a designated wash area. • Commercial car wash facilities shall discharge t� the sanitary sewer.5 • Designate repair/maintenance area indoors, or an outdoors area designed to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff and provide secondary containment. Do not install drains in the secondary containment areas. ■ No floor drains unless pretreated prior to discharge to the sanitary sewer. 6 � Connect containers or sinks used for parts cleaning to the sanitary sewer. 6 - Fueling areas shall have impermeable surface that is a} minimally graded to prevent ponding and b} separated from the rest of the site by a grade break. ■ Canopy shall extend at least 10 ft in each direction from each pump and drain away from fueling area. ■ Cover and/or grade to minimize run-on to and runoff from the loading area. • Position downspouts to direct stormwater away from the loading area. • Drain water from loading dock areas to the sanitary sewer.s ■ Instafl door skirts between the trailers and fhe buildinq. • Design for discharge of fire sprinkler test water to landscape or sanitary sewers ■ Drain condensate of air conditioning units to landscaping. Large air conditioning units may conned to the sanitary sewer.s • Roof drains shall drain to unpaved area where practicable. ■ Drain boiler drain lines, roof top equipment, all washwater to sanitary sewers. • Drain rinse water to landscaping, discharge to sanitary sewers, or collect and dispose properly offsite. See flyer "Requirements for Architectural Copper." Plan Yes No Sheet N� ❑ ❑ {J/A ❑ ❑ tj ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ � ❑ PoollSpalFountain ❑ ❑ Food Service Equipment (non- residential) ❑ � ❑ � Refuse Areas ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Outdoor Process Activities � Outdoor EquipmenU Materials Storage Vehicle/ Equipment Cleaning Vehicle/ Equipment Repair and Maintenance ❑ ❑ IFuel Dispensing Areas ❑ � ❑ � Loading Docks ❑ ❑ Fire Sprinklers ❑ ❑ AAiscellaneous Drain or Wash Water ❑ ❑ Architectural Copper 5 See MRP Provision C.3.a.i(7). 2 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ I� /� ❑ ❑ � � � ��1.1/A ❑ ❑ , - 1u A ❑ ❑ � � ❑ ❑ I � N/A ❑ ❑ fS ( ❑ ❑ A � � � ❑ ❑ � I � � Q� Approved December 4, 2012 : - ';: _..... .. , ;. " i ' ,,; _ - ... . - � , , _ ,_ , .. � :._ ; �... Siormwater Checklist for Small Projects D. Implement construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) (Required foral! projecfs.) D.1 Is the site a"High Priority Site"? (Municipa! staff wi11 make this determination; it fhe answer is yes, Yes ❑ No ❑ the project wi!! be referred to construction site inspection staff for monfhly stormwafer inspecfions during the wet season, October 1 through April 30.) •"High Priority Sites" are sites that require a grading permit, are adjacent to a creek, or are otherwise high priority for stormwater protection during construction per MRP Provision C.6.e.ii(2). D.2 All projects require appropriate stormwater BMPs during construction, indicate which BMPs are included in the project, below. Yes No Best Management Practice (BMP) �. ❑ Attach the San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program's construction BMP plan sheet to , projec# p{ans and require contractor to implement the applicable BMPs on the plan sheet. ❑ Temporary erosion controls to stabilize all denuded areas until permanent erosion controls are established. ❑� Delineate with field markers clearing limits, easements, setbacks, sensitive or critical areas, buffer zones, trees, and draina�e courses. �. ❑ Provide notes, specifications, or attachments describing the following: ■ Construction, operation and maintenance of erosion and sediment controls, include inspection frequency; ■ Methods and schedule for grading, excavation, filling, clearing of vegetation, and storage and disposal of excavated or cleared material; � Spec�cations for vegetative cover & mufch, include methods and schedules for planting and fertilization; ■ Provisions for temporary and/or permanent irrigation. � ❑ Perform clearing and earth moving activities only during dry weather. � ❑ Use sediment controls or filtration to remove sediment when dewatering and obtain all necessary permits ,j� ❑ Protect all storm drain inlets in vicinity of site using sediment controEs such as berms, fiber rolls, or filters. �� Trap sediment on-site, using BMPs such as sediment basins or traps, earthen dikes or berms, silt fences, check dams, soil bfankets or mats, covers for soil stock piles, etc. �❑ Divert on-site runoff around exposed areas; divert off-site runoff around the site (e.g., swales and dikes). � ❑ Protect adjacent properties and undisturbed areas from construction impacts using vegetative buffer strips, sediment barriers or filters, dikes, mulching, or other measures as appropriate. �, ❑ Limit construction access routes and stabilize designated access points. �❑ No cleaning, fuefing, or mainfaining vehicles on-site, except in a designated area where washwater is contained and treated. � ❑ Store, handle, and dispose of construction materials/wastes properly to prevent contact with stormwater. � ❑ Contractor shall train and provide instruction ta al! employees/subcontractors re: construction BMPs. �[� Control and prevent the discharge of all potential pollutants, including pavement cutting wastes, paints, concrete, petroleum products, chemicals, washwater or sediments, rinse water from architecturai copper, and non-stormwater discharges to storm drains and watercourses. Name of applicant completing the form: Richard Terrones Signature: � Date: � I E. Commenis (for municipal staff use only): F. NOTES (for municipal staff use only): Section A Notes� 6 Any connection to the sanitary sewer system is subject to sanitary district approval. � Businesses that may have outdoor process activitieslequipment include machine shops, auto repair, industries with pretreatrnent facilities. 3 Approved December 4, 2012 � _ , i ..: - , :� :: = > - � ,. =_ ' .. . :> .. : � ; . .. . . ; ;:. . I : I . Stormwater Checklisr for Small Projects Section B N Section C Notes: Section D Notes: Approved December4, 2012 • - .:< . -. , - : .. :, - - _ .. . ; �_... - - - ..; � ;.- . _ ,. _. _. , <: ,.: ; Projeci Comments Date: To: From: November 18, 2013 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (654) 558-72&0 � Parks Division (650} 558-7334 Planning Staff �Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 0 City Attarney (650) 558-7204 Subject: Request for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permit for attached garage for a new, two-story single famify dwelling with an attached garage at 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-261-040 Staff Review: November 25, 2013 The house is intended to be equipped with a fire sprinkler system fihroughout. 1. Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 2. A!I sprinkfer drainage shall be placed into landscaping areas. 3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Reviewed by: �:C� -�'' Date: Zo �� r-l3 RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW AMENDMENT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for Desiqn Review Amendment for a new, sinqle-story sinqle familv dwellinq with an attached at 2747 Burlinqview Drive, Zoned R-1, Burlinqview LLC, propertv owner, APN: 027-261-040; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on September 8, 2014, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Section 15303 (a), which states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences maybe constructed or converted under this exemption, is hereby approved. 2. Said Design Review Amendment is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review Amendment are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th dav of September, 2014, by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review Amendment 2747 Burlingview Drive Effective September 18, 2014 Page 1 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped March 7, 2014, sheets A0.0, A3.1, and Boundary Survey and Topographic Map, and date stamped March 20, 2014, sheets, A2.1, A2.3 and A5.1 through A6, and date stamped August 11, 2014, sheets A1.1, A2.2, A4.1, A4.2, L1.1, and L1.2; and including a synthetic turf lawn with a sand infill base in the rear yard; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Building Division's January 28, 2014 and February 6, 2014, and November 19, 2013 memos, the Parks Division's November 25, 2013, and March 26, 2014 memos, the Engineering Division's December 4, 2013 memo, the Fire Division's December 10, 2012 memo, and the Stormwater Division's November 25, 2013 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for demolition or construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal, and the Arborist Report date stamped March 21, 2014; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review Amendment 2747 Burlingview Drive Effective September 18, 2014 Page 2 9. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2010 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 12. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 14. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 15. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. ,�� CITY OF BURLINGAME � "°� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUi2LINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD 1, � BURLINGAME, CA 94010 �{�;� ;,,�_°-_. PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org Site: 2747 BURLINGVIEW DRIVE The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2014 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Design Review Amendment for a previously approved single-story house at 2747 BURLINGVIEW DRIVE zoned R-l. APN 027-261-040 Mailed: August 29, 2014 (Please reier to other side) City of Burlinaame PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please ref�r to other side) ^aFL . a y h� tr �'.'. � �n, , `� Item No. 6 Regular Action PROJECT LOCATION 2747 Burlingview Drive �� City of Burlingame Item No. 6 Regular Action Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit, and Special Permits Address: 2747 Burlingview Drive Meeting Date: April 28, 2014 Request: Application for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit, and Special Permits for an attached garage and for basement ceiling height for a new, single story house. Applicant and Architect: Richard Terrones APN: 027-261-040 Property Owner: Burlingview LLC Lot Area: 10,065 General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15303 (a) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including one single-family residence, or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone, is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, this exemption may be applied to the construction or conversion of up to three (3) single-family residences as part of a project. Project Description: The existing single story house and attached garage on the site are proposed to be demolished. The applicant is requesting Design Review for a new house, Hillside Area Construction Permit, a Special Permit for an attached garage, and a Special Permit for a basement with a ceiling height greater than 6'- 6". The proposed floor area for the new house will be 4,228 SF (0.42 FAR) where 4,321 (0.43 FAR) is the maximum allowed on site (including covered porch and basement exemptions). The proposed new house is single-story with a lower level attached garage and basement storage area. The plate height of the proposed house is 8'-0" at the entry area in the center of the house and increases to an 11'-0" plate height on the right side and a 13'-0" plate height on the left side. The applicant is requesting a Hillside Area Construction Permit for this new house and attached garage. The proposed highest ridge, at the left side of the house, is 22'-0" above average top of curb and matches the maximum height of the existing single-story house on the site. The applicant is requesting a Special Permit for an attached garage. The proposed 5 bedroom house requires two covered parking spaces and a single uncovered parking space. The proposed attached lower level garage provides two covered spaces (20' x 20') and there is a single uncovered space in the driveway in front of the garage. The applicant is requesting a Special Permit for a basement ceiling height that exceeds 6'-6". The proposed basement storage area and hall at the right side of the house has a ceiling height of 9'-0". A total of 600 SF of basement area and 100 SF of utility areas are exempt from floor area calculations. No part of the attached lower level garage is exempt from floor area calculations. The applicant is requesting the following applications: ■ Design review for a new house (C.S. 25.57.010,a,2); and ■ Hillside Area Construction Permit (C.S. 25.61.020); and ■ Special permit for an attached garage (C.S. 25.26.035,a); and ■ Special Permit for a basement height greater than 6'-6". (C.S. 25.26.035,fi�. Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Specia! Permits 2747 Burlingview Drive 2747 Burlingview Drive Lot Area: 10,065 Plans date stam ed: March 7 and March 20, 2014 PREVIOUS PLANS CURRENT PROPOSAL ' (February 11, 2014 ;(March 7 and 20, 2014 i ALLOWED/REQUIRED plans) plans) SETBACKS Front (1st flr): To attached garage: Side (left): (right): Rear (1st flr): _. Lot Coverage: FAR: __ _ # of bedrooms: Basement: 25'-6" 30'-2" _ ._ 8'-7" 7'-0" _ .............................................................. _._ 24'-1" _ _.... 3969 SF 39.4% _........ ..__.._ _ _ . 4228 SF 0.42 FAR 5 basement with 9'-0" ceiling height 2 Parking: 2 covered (20' x 20'), attached 3 1 uncovered (9' x 20') Height: 22'-0" 0 (0.32 x 10,065 SF) + 1100 SF = 4321 SF (0.43 FAR). No change No change No change No change _ No change 3995 SF 39.7% _...._.. ..... ..... 4242 SF 0.42 FAR No change No change No change 19'-11" 23'-7" is the block average 25'-0" __. _ .... 7'-0" 7'-0" __ _ _ _ ......................................................_..... 15' 0" _ 4026 SF 40% _ _... _ _ ... ..................... 4321 SF' 0.43 FAR _... ___ _ __..._ _ _. . _.. ........ Special Permit required per C.S. 25.26.035,f 2 covered (20' x 20') 1 uncovered (9' x 20') 30'-0" 2 A special permit is required for a basement ceiling height that is greater than 6'-6" (C.S. 25.26.035 (fl). 3 A special permit is required for an attached garage (C.S. 25.26.03 (a)). Staff Comments: See attached memos from the Chief Building Official, Fire Division, Engineering Division, Parks Division, and Stormwater Division. Staff Comments: Staff would note that the owners of 2753 Burlingview Drive, the property immediately adjacent to and uphill from the subject property, submitted a letter, date stamped April 24, 2014 (see attachments). This letter requests a delay of the noticed action hearing for this proposed project until after June 10, 2014, based on a contract for the sale of the property at 2753 Burlingview Drive. The requested delay would not necessarily result in a change to the project that the Commission will review at the April 28, 2014 hearing. The applicant for the proposed project has elected to continue with the scheduled action hearing and the information submitted by the applicant is complete. There is no legal basis for delaying the scheduled action hearing and therefore, City Staff has determined that the project should go forward to the April 28, 2014 Planning Commission hearing. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission design review study meeting on February 24, 2014, two letters regarding the proposed project were submitted from neighbors. The neighbors at 2753 Burlingview Drive, located to the right and uphill from the subject property spoke at the hearing. The y� Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permits 2747 Burlingview Drive Commission gave direction regarding the design, tree protection measures, and potential loss of view for the proposed project. It voted to place this item on the regular action calendarwhen the required revisions had been submitted and story poles had been installed. (Refer to the February 24, 2014 Planning Commission minutes for a full list of the comments). In response to the Commission's concerns, the applicant submitted revised plans, date stamped March 7 and March 20, 2014, an arborist report by Kielty Arborist Services, date stamped March 21, 2014, and a response letter dated March 25, 2014. Story poles were erected on site to reflect the revised proposed plans. Listed below are some of the revisions made in response to the Commission's comments (for a complete list of the applicant's responses and the revisions made to the plans, please refer to the applicant's response letter and the revised plans): 1. The Kielty Arborist Services report, date stamped March 21, 2014, was submitted to evaluate the impacts of the proposed construction on the two protected-size trees on the neighboring property af 2753 Burlingview Drive; in response to the arborist's findings and recommendations, the plans have been revised so that the proposed basement wall at the right side of the house has been moved an additional 6 feet away from the right side property line (basement wall is a total of 13 feei from the side property line); and 2. The uphill neighbors at 2753 Burlingview Drive have been consulted regarding view issues. Although the butterfly roof design remains part of the project, the proposed p/ate heights and the overall height of the house have been reduced so that the highest roof ridge, af the left side of the house, is 19 =11 " from average top of curb, where the previously proposed and existing highest ridges were 22 =0". Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Findings for a Special Permit: In order to grant a Special Permit, the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.51.020 a-d): (a) The blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood; (b) the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood; (c) the proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city; and (d) removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements, and the mitigation for the removal that is proposed is appropriate. Required Findings for Hillside Area Construction Permit: Review of a Hillside Area Construction Permit by -3- Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permits 2747 Burlingview Drive the Planning Commission shall be based upon obstruction by construction of the existing distant views of nearby properties. Emphasis shall be given to the obstruction of distant views from habitable areas within a dwelling unit (Code Sec. 25.61.060). Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped March 7, 2014, sheets A0.0, A2.2, A3.1, A4.1 a, A4.1 b, A4.2a, A4.2b, L1.1, L1.2 and Boundary Survey and Topographic Map and date stamped March 20, 2014, sheets A1.1, A2.1, A2.3 and A5.1 through A6, L-1 and L-2; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Building Division's January 28, 2014 and February 6, 2014, and November 19, 2013 memos, the Parks Division's November 25, 2013, and March 26, 2014 memos, the Engineering Division's December 4, 2013 memo, the Fire Division's December 10, 2012 memo, and the Stormwater Division's November 25, 2013 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for demolition or construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal, and the Arborist Report date stamped March 21, 2014; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm -4- Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permits 2747 Burlingview Drive Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2010 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 12. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 13. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 14. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 15. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 16. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Erika Lewit Senior Planner c. Richard Terrones, applicant Attachments: Applicant's Response to Commission's comments, dated March 25, 2014 Minutes from February 24, 2014Design Review Study Meeting Letter's from neighbors, date stamped February 24, 2014 (2 pages) Letter from neighbor, date stamped April 24, 2014, requesting a continuance of the April 28, 2014 hearing Arborist's Report, date stamped March 21, 2014 Application to the Planning Commission Special Permit form for an attached garage Special Permit form for basement ceiling height Photographs of Neighborhood, date stamped November 22, 2013 Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed April 14, 2014 Aerial Photo -5- � i �. � � , ._ i � _. . • �:�_ . , , ., _. �,.. 25 March 2014 To: Burlingame Planning Commission RE: 2747 Burlingview Drive — Design Review Application, Response to Comments Dear Commissioners and Staff Thank you for the opportunity to present our project. We appreciate the Commission's comments and direction at the Design Review Study session. We believe the major issue for further review of the project, is in regards to the roofline and related view corridor issues. The following is a description of our revisions, based on comments from the Commission and the neighbors. We have met again with the uphill neighbors to review the intended revisions to the Living /Dining / Kitchen roof, and agreed that we would consider revisions to the roof over the bedroom areas as well. We have reduced the height of the two major roof planes as described below, and the story poles have been revised accordingly. Our specific response to comments is as follows: Commission comments: • Likes the design. o Ok. Thank you. • Does the roof design intensify the view blockage? o We believe that the the roof design alters the existing views, but does not necessarily intensify the blockage. o Alternatives would be a flatter roof (though we have already reduced the slope to a minimal amount for drainage) or a more traditional sloped roof, which would likely block views. As a one story house with a relatively flat roof, there needs to be some overhangs, massing and material articulation that prevents the house from being a flat box. • Clarified that the siding projects out from the stucco. o No further response • Did the applicant go to the neighbor's house to the right to observe impacts? o Yes — we have visited the house on several ocaisions. • Have proposed solutions been discussed? o Yes — the neighbors most recent concerns have been in regards to the nearest roof over the bedrooms. That roof has been lowered, and the overhags reduced by 6" on both edges. o Their other concerns were in regards to the fence, and two trees. Please see responses below. • Need time to consider alternatives. o We have considered various alternatives, and we bnelieve the revisions have reduced the roof height as much as possible, with a one story house, sunken garage and no special requests other than a special permit for the attached garage (which is inherent to minimizing the massing and typical of the neighborhood.) 2747 Burlingview Drive Response to Planning Commission Comments • The massing is appropriate for the neighborhood. o We agree. • Have done a nice job of minimizing the bulk and mass of the structure. o Yes — and we have reduced the massing even further with the proposed roof height reductions. • Review the gap between the roof e/ements. o We have reduced the overhang at the bedroom side roof by 6", which increases the gap between the roof structures. Public comments: Elizabeth and Graham Napier spoke: • Impacts are significant. c We have reduced the view impacts significantly. • The view is completely obliterated. o Distant views are still visible from habotable spaces. • Though the current peak height is being maintained, the style of the roof intensifies the impact. o The edges of the roof haf been lowered, and the view impacts are primarily of near-line trees. • Noted that the neighbor at 2754 is also present. o We have discussed the project with this neighbor but have not received any comments of concern. • Noted that views are blocked from both levels of their home. o Roofs have been lowered as much as possible to minimize impacts. Drawing Revisions: Please refer to clouded portions of the Elevations and Section, for the areas revised. • The high sloping roofs over the Living Room / Dining / Kitchen and over the Bedroom areas, have both been lowered as follows: o Living Room / Dining / Kitchen Roof: The inward plate height has been lowered from 10'-0" to 9'-6", and the slope has been reduced from 1" per ft. to 5/8" per ft. This has effectively lowered this roof section 6" at the inward edge, and approximately 2'-0" at the outermost edge. o Bedroom Area Roof: The plate height on this roof has been lowered from 9'-6" to 9'-0", and the overhangs at both the outer and inner edges has been reduced by 6". • Drawing revisions: o Sheet A2.1 — The basement wall nearest to the western property line was moved east by 6' per the recommendation of the Arborist relative to the neighbors' giant sequoia tree. o Sheets A4.ia, A4.1b, A4.2a and A4.2b - The exterior elevations have all been revised to indicate the reduced roof height at all areas. o Sheet A5.1 — The building section has been revised to indicate the lower roofs at both areas, as well as the adjusted basement wall nearest the eastern property line and the adjacent sequoia tree. In regards to other concerns that the uphill neighbors have expressed to us, we respond as follows: • Site Plan Sheet A1.1: Refer to clouded notes added as follows: o Sequoia tree on neighboring property: The Contractor shall be responsible for protection of tree roots of neighboring tree per ArborisYs report, during construction. Contractor shall consult w/ Arborist during the trimming of tree roots and provide tree protection as prescribed by the Arborist. o Magnolia Tree at rear side yard of neighboring property: The Contractor shall be responsible for consulting an Arborist and trimming the neighboring magnolia tree as necessary to construct new roof. o New Retaining Wall & Fence: (N) Retaining wall and fence shall be re-built in location of the existing. (The neighbors were concerned that the new fence and retaining wall would be placed on the property line, and therefore closer to their house. 2747 Burlingview Drive Response to Planning Commission Comments In regards to the view issues in general and the concerns of the neighbors, we would note and remind the Commission of the following: • The applicant is proposing a one story house with an attached garage and basement. • The applicant has committed to burying the attached garage so as to minimize its impact. • The size of the lot would allow for a 4,321 s.f. house. • The applicant is proposing a 4,209 s.f. house, but that includes the 569 s.f. attached garage. Therefore, there is only 3,640 s.f. of living space being proposed. • Assuming the view ordinance issues could be addressed, the property could be developed with a 400 s.f. detached garage that would be exempt from the square footage area, and still allow for the construction of a house with 4,321 s.f. of living space. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, � r` Jacob Furlong, Architect CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMMISSION — Approved Minutes February 24, 2014 Chair Sargent called for a voice vote on the motion to deny. The motion passed 3-2-0-1 (Commissioners Bandrapalli and Yie dissenting and Commissioner Terrones absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 10:34 p.m. IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS 11. 2747 BURLINGVIEW DRIVE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND SPECIAL PERMITS FOR AN ATTACHED GARAGE AND BASEMENT CEILING HEIGHT FOR A NEW SINGLE-STORY HOUSE (RICHARD TERRONES, ARCHITECT AND APPLICANT; BURLINGVIEW LLC, PROPERTY OWNER) STAFF CONTACT: ERIKA LEWIT All Commissioners had visited the project site. There were no ex-parte communications to report. Reference staff report dated February 24, 2014, with attachments. Community Development Director Meeker briefly presented the project description. Questions of staff: None. Chair Sargent opened the public comment period. Jacob Furlong and Carlos Rojas represented the applicant. The downhill neighbor has raised no concerns. Have consulted with the uphill neighbor. Have installed story poles. Commission comments: • Likes the design. ■ Does the roof design intensify the view blockage? (Furlong — is possible. something that is desirable to the developer.) ■ Clarified that the siding projects out from the stucco. ■ Did the applicant go to the neighbor's house to the right to observe impacts? property and observed some impacts.) The butterfly roof is (Furlong — visited the ■ Have proposed solutions been discussed? (Furlong — haven't yet reviewed alternatives.) ■ Need time to consider alternatives. ■ The massing is appropriate for the neighborhood. ■ Have done a nice job of minimizing the bulk and mass of the structure. (Furlong — is open to further discussions with the neighbors regarding the project design.) ■ Review the gap between the roof elements. Public comments: Elizabeth and Graham Napier spoke: ■ Reviewed project today. ■ Commissioners are welcome to visit their property to observe the view impacts. ■ Impacts are significant. ■ The view is completely obliterated. ■ Though the current peak height is being maintained, the style of the roof intensifies the impact. 31 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMMISSION — Approved Minufes February 24, 2014 Noted that the neighbor at 2754 is also present. Noted that views are blocked from both levels of their home. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Additional Commission comments: View impacts need to be addressed further. The design is appropriate. Noticed that the mass of the building with the story poles appears closer. Commissioner Sargent made a motion to place the item on the Regular Action Calendar when complete. Discussion of motion: Provide contact information for neighbors Correct story po/es to ref/ect revised design. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Davis. Chair Sargent called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the RegularAction Calendar when plans have been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 5-0-0-1 (Commissioner Terrones absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 10:54 p. m. 12. 1524 LOS M6�VTES DRIVE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY DECK (MARK BUCCIARELLI, ARCHITECT AND APPLICANT; MICHAEL AND BETSY BERMAN, PROPERTY OWNERS) STAFF CONTACT: ERIKA LEWIT All Commissioners had visited the property. There were no ex-parte communications. Reference staff report dated February 24, 2014, with attachments. Planning Manager Gardiner briefly presented the project description. Questions of staff: There were no questions of staff. Chair Sargent opened the public comment period. Mark Bucciarelli represented the applicant. Commission comments: Has the architect spoken to the neighbor? (Bucciarelli — had prepared an overlay of the existing deck with the proposed deck for the neighbor. She didn't respond.) There is a good sized tree against the house, will the tree be damaged by the construction? What will happen to mitigate the loss of screening? (Bucciarelli — the tree doesn't help maintain privacy for the neighbor.) How deep is the proposed deck? (Bucciarelli — about nineteen feet:) a...�. _ w..,��...�_�.�_.._....aV.._...�,�..._ _ 32 02.24.14 PC Meeting ;: - Item #11 TF_R 2747 Burlingview Drive , : ::, : Page 1 of 1 -----origina� Message----- I� E C E I V E� From: Beth [mailto:napierelizabeth(a�qmail.com] FEB 24 2014 2:25 �nn Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 2:25 PM To: CD/PLG-Lewit, Erika Cu"rY OF BURLINGAME Cc: Graham Napier; Victoria Napier ��L� F PLANN9Nc �IV. Subject: Real Estate Developers Proposed Project at 2747 Burlingview Dr Dear Planning Commission, My name is Beth Napier and I live with my family at 2753 Burlingview Dr, next door to the proposed building. If you face 2747 Burlingview Dr my home is to the right (west). I am writing this letter to bring up several problems I can see with the proposed project now that the flags have been erected. 1)My kitchen window faces east, over the bay and the airport. I have a view of the water, the Oakland Hills shoreline, boats on the water, planes landing, the Oakland Hills beyond the bay. The developer's proposed new structure blocks the view. 2) My master bedroom windows also face east; through my windows I can see the sunrise, the bay, the Oakland Hills. The proposed new structure blocks this view completely. My master bedroom will have no view at all and will greatly reduce the light. 3) On my property in front of my home I have a very old, very large healthy Sequoia tree which is close to the property line between my home and the proposed structure. This tree is large enough that the roots will surely be damaged during construction; I believe construction will kill the tree and I am requesting that the City Arborist come look at the tree, and an Arborist report be submitted regarding this tree. 4) On my proper in the backyard I have a large magnolia tree, also close to the property line. The magnolia tree grew up and stretched east, towards the sun, and as a result most of the branches reach over the property line. I believe the trimming the builder would need to do to construct his proposed home will also kill this tree. I would like to request the City Arborist also look at this tree and an Arborist Report be submitted. 5) The flags that are up are within 36" of their fence, which runs along the property line. Even if the flags represent the eaves of the proposed roof, this distance is still too close. I received quite a surprise when I stepped out of my shower Saturday morning and opened the bathroom window to find bright orange flags just inches away. I would like the survey lines verified along the right side of the developer's proposed project. I believe the required setback is 48" for the eaves and 7 feet for the exterior wall. 6) The existing home will be completely knocked down and removed, and the property will be dug deeper than it is now. Given the amount of earth that will be removed, the existing retaining wall and the fence built on top of it will need to be redone. The plans do show a new retaining wall but do not show the fence at all. Does the builder plan to place a new retaining wall under an existing fence? We would like to see a plan which shows the new retaining wall and the fence along the west side of the house. 7) We are concerned with the above issues and any associated costs, both direct and indirect that we may incur with this developer's proposed project. My husband and I are new to this process and plan to be at the meeting tonight. The planning commission is welcome to come to our home to review the situation in person at your convenience. Kind regards, Beth and Graham Napier 02.24.14 PC Meeting .b_�.��1��:� r�Lt .�� .. Item #11 :r'F,R PREPARA7'I 2747 Burlingview Drive ,�.�,r, � A,< Page 1 of 1 RECEIVED FEB 24 2014 2:32 PM CITY OF BURLINGAME GDD — PLO�.NNING f�IV From: frog1325@comcast.net [mailto:frog1325Ca�comcast.net] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 2:32 PM To: CD/PLG-Lewit, Erika Subject: re: letter for planning commission Please give attached letter to planning commission for tonight's meeting. Thank You. Cathy Payne Catherine & Gary Payne 2754 Burlingview Drive Burlingame, CA 94010 February 24, 2014 To Burlingame Planning Commission: I am sorry but I am unable to attend the planning commission meeting tonight that discusses the building of a new home at 2742 Burlingview Drive. My husband and I are happy to see upgrades and improvements to properties in our neighborhood. However, we are not happy when the construction of a new home blocks an existing view of neighboring properties. The proposed construction at this site appears to block the view at 2753 Burlingview Drive. Please remember that we have a view ordinance in place that prohibits this. We are also concerned that the proposed design of the new home is not consistent with other homes in the neighborhood. The setback of the new home also appears to be closer to the street than the existing dwelling and that of the adjoining properties. It also seems quite close to the property line on the northwest side. I hope that the entire commission will read this letter and, if possible, read our concerns out loud to the entire audience tonight. Sincerely, Cathy & Gary Payne CD/PLG-Lewit, Erika From: Graham Napier <gnapier888@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 11:16 AM To: CD/PLG-Lewit, Erika; PLG Comm-Jeff DeMartini Cc: Graham Napier; Beth Napier; Pam Shaffer Subject: Proposed 2747 Burlingview Drive Dear Planning Council, We plan to be at the formally noticed 28th April 2014 meeting. �' � `�EIVED _ a_z n:�! �� 2 4 20 i4 'ITY O� [?URI_IrJCAME Since our last meeting we have been continuing to work with the developer's architect (Mr Richard Terrones) on the proposed 2747 Burlingview Dr project. 1) With the new flags, the kitchen view issue has been resolved 2) We have a verbal understanding that the developer will take full responsibility for rebuilding the fence on the property line 3) We have a verbal understanding that the developer will continue working with the city arborist to make all efforts to keep the Sequoia tree alive and in good health However, the proposed construction still completely takes away the view of the bay from our Master Bedroom windows and significantly blocks the sunlight. If this goes through as planned we will have our windows full of roof. We are asking for a delay in the approval of the planning permit request on 2747 Burlingview Drive until after 10th June due to a conflict of interest. The situation is that 2753 Burlingview Drive (our home) is currently under contract to sell to the same family who now intend to also buy 2747 Burlingview Dr. This information of the intended purchase of 2747 Burlingview Dr was given to us yesterday by the Contracted Buyer of our home and his family. We are scheduled to close the sale of our home on 10th June 2014. All conditions are due to be removed on Friday 25th April. If the sale of our house goes through as scheduled we are no longer upset by the proposed new home totally blocking our Master Bedroom view, since it will no longer be our Master Bedroom. However, if for any reason the sale falls apart between now and June 10, at that point we would have no recourse via any formal channels to stop the developer from completely taking our view and sunlight from the Master Bedroom. We believe a delay in approval is a small accommodation (6 weeks) on the part of the developer since he now has a buyer for the home, and we would be moving our family at our expense. Kind regards Beth and Graham Napier l Kielty Arborist Services Certified Arborist WE#0476A P.O. Box 6187 San Mateo, CA 94403 650-525-1464 March 17, 2014 Tony Construction Incorporated Attn: Mr. Tony Leung 1325 Cabrillo Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 Site: 2747 Burlingview Drive, Burlingame, CA Dear Mr. Leung, As requested on Friday, March 14, 2014, I visited the above site to inspect and comment on the trees. A new home is planned for this site and your concern as to the future health and safety of the trees as well as your neighbors trees has prompted this visit. Method: All inspections were made from the ground; the tree was not climbed for this inspection. The tree in question was located on a"Not- to-Scale" map provided by me. The tree was then measured for diameter at 54 inches above ground level (DBH or diameter at breast height). The tree was given a condition rating for focm and vitality. The trees' condition rating is based on 50 percent vitality and 50 percent form, using the following scale. 1 - 29 Very Poor 30 - 49 Yoor 50 - 69 Fair 70 - 89 Good 90 - 100 Excellent The height of the tree was measured using a Nikon Forestry 550 Hypsometer. The spread was paced off. Comments and recommendations for future maintenance are provided. RECEIVED MAR 21 20i4 CITY OF BURLINGAME CDD-PLANNING DIV. 2747 Burlingview/3/17/14 (�) Survey: Tree# Species DBH CON HT/SP Comments 1* Giant sequoia 40est 55 50/40 Fair vigor, good form, some bot canker on (Sequoiadendrnn giganteurn) stems. Located 6 feet from property line. 2* Southern magnolia 12est 60 (Magnolia grandiflorct) *Indicates neighbor's tree 30/35 Fair vigor, fair form, will require minor trimming to facilitate construction. Summary: There are no protected trees on site although the neighbor to the southwest has two trees that will be affected. Tree #2 will only require some trimming to facilitate the construction. Tree #1 is a giant sequoia with an abundance of surface roots. The proposed plan includes a full basement within the dripline of the sequoia. The building of the home as planned would result in moderate to heavy root loss for the sequoia. Reducing the basement by six feet and using a mat slab type foundation near the sequoia will reduce root loss lessen impacts to this tree. The following tree protection plans designed for this site should be carried out during the building of this house. Tree Protection Plan: Tree protection zones should be installed and maintained throughout the entire length of the project. Fencing for tree protection should be 4' tall, orange plastic material supported by metal poles or stakes pounded into the ground. The location for the protective fencing should be as close to the dripline of desired trees as possible, still allowing room for construction to safely continue. No equipment or materials shall be stored or cleaned inside the protection zones. Areas outside protection fence, but still beneath the tree's driplines, where foot traffic is expected to be heavy, should be mulched with 4-6" of chipper chips covered with plywood. The spreading of chips will help to reduce compaction and improve soil structure. Root Cutting Any roots to be cut shall be monitored and documented. Large roots (over 2" diameter) or large masses of roots to be cut must be inspected by the site arborist. The site arborist, at this time, may recommend irrigation or fertilization of the root zone. All roots needing to be cut should be cut clean with a saw or lopper. Roots to be left exposed for a period of time should be covered with layers of burlap and kept moist. The over dig for the foundation should be reduced a much as possible when roots are encountered. The site arborist will be on site for all excavation when within the dripline of the trees listed above. l��V�� f,9AR `L I i ; G1TY OF BI,�RLINGAME C;L'L-f=L�;NIvING DIV. 2747 Burlingview/3/17/14 (3) Trenching Trenching for irrigation, drainage, electrical or any other reason shall be done by hand when inside the dripline of a protected tree. Hand digging and the careful placement of pipes below or besides protected roots will significantly reduce root loss, thus reducing trauma to the tree. All trenches shall be backfilled with native materials and compacted to near its original level, as soon as possible. Trenches to be left open for a period of time (24 hours), will require the covering of all exposed roots with burlap and be kept moist. The trenches will also need to be covered with plywood to help protect the exposed roots. Irrigation The Neighbors trees will require regular irrigation. The trees should be irrigated 2 times a month using heavy irrigation with enough water to wet the entire root zone. Tree #1 shall be fertilized using 300 gallons of 22-24-24 2 weeks prior to the start of excavation. Further ic-rigation will be recommended if needed by the site arborist at the time of excavation. The information included in this report is believed to be true and based on sound arboricultural principles and practices. Sincerely, Kevin R. Kielty Certified Arborist WE#0476 ��G�li��► r�AR z 1 zoi4 CITY OF BI;RLINGAME CLD-PL4�:NING DIV. ....� BUfiLINCA � � � 7�' � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: � Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Parcel #: C� 2`�- Z.lo1 - ��-U ❑ Conditional Use Permit � Special Permit ❑ Other: PROJECT ADDRESS:�rI �� ur Iih,a�f�� r`t1K� APPLICANT project contact person �B�/ OK to send electronic copies of documents [�/ Name: �tG�1A�R0 "�'�(2-R-�t�-�"S Address: � D'�j �UAN ITA A�l� City/State/zip: 13c�Rl,1NCx A►JI�tGA �i `� O lb Phone: �fo��9Co -\ 20 6 Fax: �GSo� 3�,3'��$S PROPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents [➢� Name: �7V�Rl.ING�1l�V�i L-�. G Address: 27�% �V�R-1..11�1GV lCW ��t City/State/Zip: $116Z1.��Gr AMI� . C�i. i�� a Phone: �C�So� $(a ?j - ( 307 Fax: ^ E-mail: �'�i ��/S,�2Gt�� Cb(`� E-mail: TE-Mt� G�' CeMc.AgT. N�'[- ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Pro�ect contact Person ts� OK to send electronic copies of documents � Name: ��T� �a�-rd �.�cr-�.,�c , . _��' ��J' Address: ` O � ��v�[t-o, l��- City/State/Zip: v�r\ ; Phone: f �5�� 1� ' 17�a0 Fax: lC%�� 3�-3 - f lobs E-mail: r-�-� �"c�e.,t-c�.. c�,-,•, �k Burlingame Business License #: �(o � (�o� ME ;N. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: IV�W S i I�TCnI.C� �'dlN`1 l.`� �Pr�� AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereb certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belie . Applicant's signature: Date: �� s I 3 I am aware of the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. Property owner's signature: ��(/�""�� Date: �� `�- �- 20� � Date submitted: ,t Verification that the project architecUdesigner has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the Finance Department at the time application fees are paid. S: �HANDOUTS�PCApplication.doc This Space for CDD Staff Use Only � Project Description: 4 ' � r ` � � ��0` � , t, �,t a. , � �,� _ , � i � - � � � ��. � .� �,- � : � t , . ' �, �1, C � ;1 t c� I/'� , � � l � r � ,.- �,�� , �, i � i�.i r i;�lrr � ��r � �� . _ '�i Ke Abbreviation Term CUP Conditional Use Permit DHE Declinin Hei ht Envelo e DSR Desi n Review E Existin N New SFD Sin le Famil Dwellin SP Special Permit City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlin ame.org P a�-� C�1�� ,� c�TY o� BURLINGAME �"�....n CITY OF BURLINGAME SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION ; �' � �..J� The Planning Commission is required by law to make fndings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code Section 25.50). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. `t:�?�� !'4 y r• 1. Explain why the blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existink street and nei�hborhood. The proposed project includes an attached garage in a"basemenY' story. Therefore a ceiling height greater than 6-1/2 feet is needed to accommodate automobiles. The garage for the proposed building is being placed below grade in order to keep the building as low as possible (and lower than adjacent buildings). The adjacent storage room in the basement is necessary to minimize the mass and bulk of the house, and therefore needs to be usable and grater than 6-1/2 feet in height. Attached garages in the front part of the property are the norm on the side of the street where the project is located due to the topography of the area, and a common design throughout the Burlingame Hills neighborhood. 2. Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood. The proposed project is replacing an existing building, and the style and exterior finish materials are consistent with other modern style buildings in the neighborhood. The character of the neighborhood will not be affected by the project, as there are similar buildings throughout the Burlingame Hills that sit in a mix of different styles of buildings, mostly dating form the mid 20th century period. Partially underground "BasemenY' can be found in the adjacent properties and throughout the neighborhood as a response to the area's topography. 3. How will the proposed project be consistent with the residential design guidelines adovted bv the citv (C.S. 25.57)? 1. The architectural style is compatible with that of the neighborhood, as the neighborhood exhibits a blend of different styles, including modern buildings like the proposed project, with attached garages. 2. Attached garages at the front of the property are found in most houses on the side of the street where the project is located. The proposed basement location for the garage allows the proposed building to remain low to the ground therefore harmonizing with the adjacent neighborhood. 3. The project is consistent with the massing and bulk of the existing structure to be replaced and matches surrounding buildings in height and size. The existing house, though being removed includes an attached garage. 4. The proposed structure does not affect surrounding structures. 5. Proposed trees are seasonal, slender and larqelv transparent to keep them from obstructinq views. 4. Exp[ain how the removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements. What mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explai�: why this mitigation is uppropriate. One protected tree is being proposed for removal, and will be replaced by (7) New trees. The tree removal application will be obtained after the planning process is completed. SPECPERM.FRM City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org 1. Explain why the blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood. How will the proposed structure or addition affect neighboring properties or structures on those properties? If neighboring properties will not be affected, state why. Compare the proposed addition to the mass, scale and characteristics of neighboring properties. Think about mass and bulk, landscaping, sunlight/shade, views from neighboring properties. Neighboring properties and structures include those to the right, left, rear and across the street. How does the proposed structure compare to neighboring structures in terms of mass ar bulk? If there is no change to the structure, say so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation etc. with other structures in the neighborhood or area. 2. Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood. How does the proposed structure or use compare acsthetically with structures or uses in the existing neighborhood? If it does not affect aesthetics, state why. Was the addition designed to match existing architecture and/or pattern of development on adjacent properties in the neighborhood? Explain why your proposal fits in the neighborhood. How will the structure or addition change the character of the neighborhood? Think of character as the image or tone established by size, density of development and general pattern of land use. If you don't feel the character of the neighborhood will change, state why. 3. How will the proposed project be consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city? Following are the design criteria adopted by the City Council for residential design review. How does your project meet these guidelines? 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. 4. Explain how the removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements. What mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain why this mitigation is appropriate. Will any trees be removed as a result of this proposal? If so, explain what type of trees will be removed and if any are protected under city ordinance (C.S. 11.06), why it is necessary to remove the trees, and what is being proposed to replace any trees being removed. If no trees are to be removed, say so. SPECPERM.FRM .. . City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 �, . ; _-�; '�; i^r,'� ' �� ' •. �� CITY � < � BURLINGAME e�. www.burlin >a�e.or� CITY OF BURLINGAME SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION The Planning Commission is required by law to make tindings as detined by the City's Ordinance (Code Section 25.50). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. 1. Explain why the blend of mass, sccrle und dominunt structurul churacteristics of the new cnnstruetion or addition are consislent with the existing structcire'.s design arrd with the existing street and neinlrborhoocl. The proposed building is being kept as low, or lower than adjacent buildings by sinking the garage below the rest of the building. Attached garages in the front part of the property are the norm on the side of the street where the project is located due to the topography of the area, and a common design throughout the Burlingame Hilis neighborhood 2. E.rpluin how the vnriet�� uf roof /ine, fucade, e.rterior finis/1 muteriu/s and elevations of tlie proposed new structure nr addilion ure consistent with the existing structure, street «nd nei�hborfioocl. The proposed project is replacing an existing building, and the style and exterior finish materials are consistent with other modern style buildings in the neighborhood. The character of the neighborhood will not be affected by the project, as there are similar buildings throughout the Burlingame Hills that sit in a mix of different styles of buildings, mostly dating form the mid 20th century period. 3. How wil/ the proposed project be consistent with the residentiul design guide/ines � adonted bv the citt� (C.S. 25.57)? 1. The architectural style is compatible with that of the neighborhood, as the neighborhood exhibits a blend of different styles, including modern buildings like the proposed project, with attached garages. 2. Attached garages at the front of the property are found in most houses on the side of the street where the project is located. 3. The project is consistent with the massing and bulk of the existing structure to be replaced and matches surrounding buildings in height and size. The existing house, though being removed includes an attached garage. 4. The proposed structure does not affect surrounding structures. 5. Proposed trees are seasonal, slender and largely transparent to keep them from obstructing views on the subject or adjacent properties 4. �xpluin how the removcrl of �any trees located within the footprint of �uny new structure or uddition is necessury and is consistent with 1lre city's refores7ution requirements. What miti�;ation is proposed for tlre removnl of uny trees? Explain why this mitigation i.r u��ro�r;�,r��. One protected tree is being proposed for removal, and will be replaced by (7) New trees. The tree removal application will be obtained after the planning process is completed. SPEC'PERM FRM City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlins;ame.or� 1. E_xplain why t{ae blend of mass, scale and tlominartt structural characteristics of tlre rtew constructiorr or addition crre consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborliood. How will the proposed structure or addition affect neighboring properties or structures on those properties? If neighboring properties will not be affected, state why. Compare the proposed addition to the mass, scale and characteristics of neighhoring properties. Think about mass and bulk, landscaping, sunli�ht/shade, views from neighboring properties. Neighboring properties and structures include those to the right, left, rear and across the street. How does the proposed structure compare to neighboring structures in terms of mass or bulk? lfthere is no change to the structure, say so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation etc. with other structures in the neighborhood or area. 2. Explairt /row the vnriety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of tlre proposed new structure or addition are consistent with tlze existing structure, street and rleighbor{roocl. How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetical ly with structures or uses in the existing neighborhood? If it does not affect aesthetics, state why. Was the addition designed to match existing architecture and/or pattern ofdevelopment on adjacent properties in the neighborhood? E�plain why your proposal fits in the neighborhood. How will the structure or addition change the character of the neighborhood? Think of character as the image or tone established by size, density of development and general pattern of land use. Ifyou don't feel the character ofthe neighborhood will change, state why. 3. How wi!! tlte proposed project be consistent wit11 t/ie residential design guidelines arlopted by tlze city? Following are the design criteria adopted by the Ciry Council for residential design review. How does your project meet these guidelines? 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5, l,andscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. 4. Erplain fiow the removal of any trees located wit/zin the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with tlre city's reforestation requirements. W/zat mitigation is proposed for tlze removal of any trees? Explain why this mitigation is appropriate. W ill any trees be removed as a result of this proposal? If so, explain what type of trees will be removed and if any are protected under city ordinance (C.S. I 1.06), why it is necessary to remove the trees, and what is being proposed to replace any trees being removcd. If no trees are to be removed, say so. SPECPERM.FRM Project Comments Date: To: From: March 24, 2014 � City Engineer (650) 55�7230 0 Chief Building Official {s5o) �s-�2so X Parks Supervisor (650j 558-7334 � Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 � Fire Marshal {6501 558-7600 � NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney Erika Lewit, Planning Subject: 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-261-040 - original comments, response to comments, and revised plans are in your In- Box Staff Review: 1. Include arborist report on plans. 2. Tree Protection Plan must be followed as specified in arborist report for 1. Root Cutting; 2.Trenching; 3. Irrigation Reviewed by:B Disco Date: 3/26/14 Project Comments Date: To: From: November 18, 2013 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 X Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permit for attached garage for a new, two-story single family dwelling with an attached garage at 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-261-040 Staff Review: November 25, 2013 1. No existing tree over 48 inches in circumference at 54 inches from base of tree may be removed without a Protected Tree Permit from the Parks Division (558-7330). 2. Landscape plan is required to meet `Water Conservation in Landscape Regulations" (attached). Irrigation Plan required for Building permit. Audit due for Final. Reviewed by: B Disco Date: 11/25/13 �. -�.rx ..t,x :•� � R AI ."�r pi.,y, OUTDOOR WATER USE EFFICIENCY CHECKLIST � : - • • - • • � • • • I cert' hat the subject project meets the specified requirements of the Water Conservation in Landscaping Ordinance. " � �17�1� Signature Date �.Single Family U Multi-Family U Commercial U Institutional U Irrigation only ❑ Industrial U Other: Applicant Name (print): Contact Phone #: Project Site Address: 2-1 c� � gv f„v�� v� ��R�� Agency Review Project Area (sq.ft. or acre): l O� p b�' # of Units: # of Meters: (Pass) (Fail) Total Landscape Area (sq.ft.): 0 � �L► (o�1H Turf Irrigated Area (sq.ft.): 3 � � Non-Turf Irrigated Area (sq.ft.): t L{ rj'�' � � Special Landscape Area (SLA) (sq.ft.): �7 � Water Feature Surface Area (sq.ft.): (oa(�{ ................... ................... ................... ................... ................... ................... ................... Turf Less than 25% of the landscape area is �Yes ❑ � turf ❑ No, See Water Budget All turf areas are > 8 feet wide � Yes ❑ ❑ All turf is planted on slopes < 25% � Yes � � Non-Turf At least 80% of non-turf area is native Yes � � or low water use plants U No, See Water Budget Hydrozones Plants are grouped by Hydrozones � Yes � � At least 2-inches of mulch on exposed Yes � � Mulch soil surfaces Irrigation System Efficiency 70% ETo (100% ETo for SLAs) Yes ❑ _� No overspray or runoff ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ Irrigation System Design System efficiency> 70% ;�Yes ❑ ❑ Automatic, self-adjusting irrigation ❑ No, not required for Tier 1 ❑ ❑ controllers � Yes Moisture sensor/rain sensor shutoffs �d Yes � � No sprayheads in < 8-ft wide area � Yes � U Irrigation Time System only operates between 8 PM Yes � � and 10 AM Metering Separate irrigation meter � No, not required because < 5,000 sq.ft. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes Swimming Pools / Spas Cover highly recommended Yes � �1 U No, not required Water Features Recirculating U Yes N � ❑ 0 ------ - - - - _ tACsw,w��Nv._ Poo� Less than 10% of landscape area ❑ Yes ❑ � Documentation Checklist �l.Yes 0 � Landscape and Irrigation Design Plan �Prepared by applicant ❑ 0 ❑ Prepared by professional Water Budget (optional) ,�a Prepared by applicant ❑ �7 U Prepared by professional Audit Post-installation audit completed Completed by applicant ❑ ❑ ❑ Completed by professional OUTDOOR WATER USE EFFICIENCY CHECKLIST • : • • - • • . . Auditor: Materials Received and Reviewed: U Water Conservation in Landscaping Ordinance ❑ Outdoor Water Use Efficiency Checklist U Outdoor Water Use Efficiency Checklist ❑ Water Budget ❑ Water Budget Calculation Worksheets U Landscape Plan U Plant List ❑ Post-Installation Audit ❑ Other: Date Reviewed: ❑ Follow up required (explain): f_1 Drip irrigation U Self-adjusting Irrigation Controller Date Resubmitted: ❑ Plant palate Date Approved: ❑ Three (3) inches of mulch Dedicated Irrigation Meter Required: �-1 Soil amendment (e.g., compost) Meter sizing: Ll Grading U Pool and/or spa cover U Dedicated irrigation meter ❑ Other: Comments: Selected Definitions: Tier 1 New construction and rehabilitated landscapes with irrigated landscape areas between y 1,000 and 2,500 square feet requiring a building or landscape permit, plan check or � design review, or new or expanded water service. ; Tier 2 New construction and rehabilitated landscapes with irrigated landscape areas greater than � 2,500 square feet requiring a building or landscape permit, plan check or design review. j ETo Reference evapotranspiration means the quantity of water evaporated from a large field of � four- to seven-inch tall, cool-season grass that is well watered. Reference evapotranspiration �' is used as the basis of estimating water budgets so that regional differences in climate I can be accommodated. �� SLA Special Landscaped Area. Includes edible plants, areas irrigated with recycled water, I, surface water features using recycled water and areas dedicated to active play such as parks, sports fields, golf courses, and where turf provides a playing surface. Professional Professional is a"certified professional" or "authorized professional" that is a certified irrigation designer, a certified landscape irrigation auditor, a licensed landscape architect, a licensed landscape contractor, a licensed professional engineer, or any other person authorized by the state to design a landscape, an irrigation system, or authorized to complete a water budget, irrigation survey or irrigation audit. Water Feature A design element where open water performs an aesthetic or recreational function. Water features include ponds, lakes, waterfalls, fountains, artificial streams, spas, and swimming pools (where water is artificially supplied). � Project Comments Date February 6, 2014 To: � City Engineer (650) 558-7230 X Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 � Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7334 From: Erika Lewit, Planning � Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 � Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 � NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney Subject: revised plans for 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-261-040 - original comments, response to comments, and revised plans are in your In- Box Staff Review: No further comments. All conditions of approval as stated in all previous reviews of the project will apply to this project. Reviewed by: �"-- te: 2-6-2014 � � Project Comments Date: To: From: January 27, 2014 � City Engineer (650) 558-7230 X Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 0 Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7334 � Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 � Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 � NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney Erika Lewit, Planning Subject: revised plans for 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027- 261-040 - original comments, response to comments, and revised plans are in your In- Box Re-Check Comments: 13. RESIDENTIAL: Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the location and the net c/ear opening height and width of all required egress windows on the elevation drawinqs. 2013 California Residential Code (CRC) §R310. Note: The area labeled "Office" is a room that can be used for sleeping purposes and, as such, must comply with this requirement. The note on Sheet A0.0 does not address the comment. Specify the location and the net c/ear opening height and width of all required egress windows on fhe e/evation drawings. NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address item #13 be re-submitted before this project can move forward for Planning Commission action. Reviewed by: �. � - . -- / � ��B"ate: 1- -558-7270 �/, � �, �. Project Comments Date To: From November 18, 2013 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permit for attached garage for a new, two-story single family dwelling with an attached garage at 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-261-040 Staff Review: November 25, 2013 �On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2013 California Building � Code, 2013 California Residential Code (where applicable), 2013 California Mechanical Code, 2013 California Electrical Code, and 2013 California Plumbing Code, including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1889. Note: If the Planning Commission has not approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2013 then this project must comply with the 2013 California Building Codes. �pecify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2013 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Go to http://www.enerqv.ca.gov/title24/2013standards/ for publications and details. � Indicate on the plans that the roof will comply with Cool Roof requirements of the 2013 California Energy Code. 2013 CEC §110.8. The 2013 Residential and Non- Residential Compliance Manuals are available on line at httq://www. enerqy. ca.gov/title24/2013standards/ � Place the following information on the first page of the plans: "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. �(See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.) 5� On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning � Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrated on the Job Copy of the plans prior to perForming the work. 6) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. 7) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 8) Provide a fully dimensioned site plan which shows the true property boundaries, the location of all structures on the property, existing driveways, and on-site parking. 9) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 10)Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines 11)Show the dimensions to adjacent structures. 12)Obtain a survey of the property lines. '�RESIDENTIAL: Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the location and the net clear opening height and width of all required egress windows on fhe elevation drawin_qs. 2013 California Residential Code (CRC) §R310. Note: The area labeled "office" is a room that can be used for sleeping purposes and, as such, must comply with this requirement. �lndicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 15)Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 16)Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 2013 CBC § 1009. 17)Provide lighting at all exterior landings. ��8",The fireplace chimney must terminate at least two feet higher than any portion of the building within ten feet or must be retrofit with a fireplace insert (not a log lighter.) 2013 CRC §1003.9. NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 13, 14, and 18 must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for P�i ping Commission action. Reviewed by�� Date: 11-19-2013 Jo , �' 6 -558-7270 C 8 Project Comments Date: �� From November 18, 2013 X Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 0 Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 0 Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permit for attached garage for a new, two-story single family dwelling with an attached garage at 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned R-1, APN : 027-261-040 Staff Review: November 25, 2013 1. See attached review comments #1, 2, 5, 14 and 20. 2. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. Reviewed by: V V' Date: 12/04/2013 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS i�' 'I�v'�rt� f Project Name: `i�►.�r��E �' w,ic� ��i�.:,�— ■ Project Address:_Z"14-� �i�lZU�v(F,v— The following requirements apply to the project 1 _� A property boundary survey shall be preformed by a licensed land surveyor. The survey shall show all property lines, property corners, easements, topographical features ar�� utilities. (Required prior tu the building permit issuance.) �,�� IS k��c.�e�� i.Gtf�j 2 _� The site and roof drainage shall be shown on plans and should be made to drain towards the Frontage Street. (Required prior to the building pernut issuance.) 3. The applicant shall submit project grading and drainage plans for approval prior to the issuance of a Building permit. 4 The project site is in a flood zone, the project shall comply with the City's flood zone requirements. 5 �� A sanitary sewer lateral � is required for the project in accordance with the City's standards. ) 6. The project plans shall show the required Bayfront Bike/Pedestrian trail and necessary public access improvements as required by San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. 7. Sanitary sewer analysis is required for the project. The sewer analysis shall identify the project's impact to the City's sewer system and any sewer pump stations and identify mitigation measures. 8 Submit traffic trip generation analysis for the project. 9. Submit a traffic impact study for the project. The traffic study should identify the project generated impacts and recommend mitigation measures to be adopted by the project to be approved by the City Engineer. 10. The project shall file a parcel map with the Public Works Engineering Division. The parcel map shall show all existing property lines, easements, monuments, and new property and lot lines proposed by the map. Page 1 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 11. A latest preliminary title report of the subject parcel of land shall be submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division with the parcel map for reviews. 12 Map closure/lot closure calculations shall be submitted with the parcel map. 13 The project shall submit a condominium map to the Engineering Divisions in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. 14 ,�_ The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary appurtenant work. 15 The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage streetscape improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutters, parking meters and poles, trees, and streetlights in accordance with streetscape master plan. 16 By the preliminary review of plans, it appears that the project may cause adverse impacts during construction to vehicular traffic, pedestrian traffic and public on street parking. The project shall identify these impacts and provide mitigation measure acceptable to the City. 17 The project shall submit hydrologic calculations from a registered civil engineer for the proposed creek enclosure. The hydraulic calculations must show that the proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any adverse impact to both upstream and downstream properties. The hydrologic calculations shall accompany a site map showing the area of the 100-year flood and existing improvements with proposed improvements. 18 Any work within the drainage area, creek, or creek banks requires a State Department of Fish and Game Permit and Aimy Corps of Engineers Permits. 19 No construction debris shall be allowed into the creek. 20 _� The project shall comply with the City's NPDES permit requirement to prevent storm water pollution. 21 The project does not show the dimensions of existing driveways, re- submit plans with driveway dimensions. Also clarify if the project is proposing to widen the driveway. Any widening of the driveway is subject to City �ngineer's approval. 22 The plans do not indicate the slope of the driveway, re-submit plans showing the driveway profile with elevations Page 2 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 23 The back of the driveway/sidewalk approach shall be at least 12" above the flow line of the frontage curb in the street to prevent overflow of storm water from the street into private property. 24. For the takeout service, a garbage receptacle shall be placed in front. The sidewalk fronting the store shall be kept clean 20' from each side of the p: operty. 25. For commercial projects a designated garbage bin space and cleaning area shall be located inside the building. A drain connecting the garbage area to the Sanitary Sewer System is required. Page 3 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc Project Comments Date: To: From: Subject: Staff Review: November 18, 2013 0 Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 X Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Request for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permit for attached garage for a new, two-story single family dwelling with an attached garage at 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-261-040 November 25, 2013 1) Stormwater requirements are required to be implemented at stand-alone single family home projects that create and/or replace 2,500 sq.ft. or more of impervious surface. These requirements are in addition to any City requirements. To determine if this project is subject to those requirements complete and return the attached "Stormwater Checklist for Small Projects." For additional information about these requirements please refer to the attached flyer "New Stormwater Control Requirements Effective 12/1/12" and by visiting the San Mateo County Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (SMCWPPP) website at: http://flowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section4/C3iNewRegsSmProjSep 2012.doc To obtain a checklist electronically, the document is available at: http://flowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section4/StormChecklistSmallProj Dec2012.doc 2) Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City's NPDES (stormwater) permit to prevent stormwater pollution from construction activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement appropriate and effective BMPs during all phases of construction, including demolition. When submitting plans for a building permit include a list of construction BMPs as project notes on a separate full size plan sheet, preferably 2' x 3' or larger. Project proponent may use the attached Construction BMPs plan sheet to comply with this requirement. Electronic file is available for download at: http://flowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section5/ConstBMPPIanJun2012. pdf 3) Best Management Practices (BMPs) requirements apply on any projects using architectural copper. To learn what these requirements are, see attached flyer "Requirements for Architectural Copper." Electronic file is available for download at: http://flowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section8/ArchitecturalcopperBMPs . pdf s� For assistance please contact Stephen D. at 650-342-3727 Reviewed by: SD Date: 11 /25/2013 � C � �L SRh MAi[0 COUN7Y4YIOE Water Pollution Prevention Program Clean Water. Healchy Cemmunity. Construction Best Management Practices (BMPs ) Construction projects are required to implement the stormwater best management practices (BMP) on this page, as they apply to your project, all year long. �laterials & �'1'aste i�lanagement Nno-Hazardous Matcrials ❑ Bcnu and eovcr sla;kpiles af sand, din w oihcr wnstruaion mamrial ie�Ji urps �rMn min is forceasi ar if no� x�rvd. bcing uxd w�ithm la dars. � Usc Ibut donl u.crosc) mclaimcd n�aicr ior dus� mmml. Ha�ardous Materials ❑ Leb:l all ha�ardous ma��nals and I�a �rdons �eas�cs (such u pesticides, pnims. �6inncrs. sohems, fucl. oil, a�d antifrceec) in aceurdancc �rith <iq•, coma, smic and (edenl regWa�ionx. ❑ S�om ha<ardoia maicrials and �.astcs In a�atcr Gght contmncrs, smre in appmpriaie ueondan cmilainment, and cocer diem at �he end of c��cn� �corl: day or during �rct �rcaihcr or �chen rain is Ibrttast ❑ FoIMw manuf Iurcr's appliwlion 6iswciions for I�vnrdou� mmenals and be careCul not �o nw morc ihan necessnn�. Do not apph ehcmiwls owdoors when rain �s fomcssc wiihin '_4 Irours. ❑ Arrange for appropnatr disposal ol'oll hnzardaus w s1a. Wmte M�nagemrn� ❑ Covcr �� asce daposal wnlaincrs sccumk �rnh �erps at ihc cnd of mxn� �cork der and during �ve� weatlKr. ❑ Check wave dispesol comainen fiequcnth frn Icai-s aud to meke sw< �hcc a�e na orer511W. Nzccr hose down a dmnps�cr on tlic CA�SIiUCl1011 SIIC. ❑ Clean w replax por�iblc ioilcts. a�W iisspect ��cm Crcquenlly For IcaAs and spilfs. ❑ Dispose ofall �costcs end debris pmpedr. Recrcle ma�eri�ls and �rasics [hal can bc rec��cicd (such as aspholl. concre�c, aFBceaic Wu ma�ennls, �eood. gyP yoard pipc. cm.) ❑ Disppse of Ilquid rcsidues fmm paims, thinners. solrrnLs, glues. and clwNng fluids as hwardous �vastc. Conslruction EntrancCs and PerimHcr � Eslablish nnd moimuin clTcciirc q:mm�cr conwls aid subilvc all CORSINC(ipll <11[�YlICtS llfld C V[5 l0 SIIR1C�GnlI\' Cq�Q01 C�OSIOn .lfld udimcnt discharges from sim and vxking off sitc. O Swecp or �acuum anr strcei uacking in mediatck and scnvc sedimem somec w precem funher vacking. Never hose doen slreea to cican up tracAing. Equipment 1-tanagement & Spill Control �s ka M�intenxncc anA PnrAing � ❑ Des�gm�e an arw, Gtted �riUi appropnale BhlPs. for ceticic m�d cquipmcnt parku�g and storage. ❑ Pedomi major mnintenance. repair jobs. and cehick Md <QlllPlnnl[ 11'95fINQ O�T Silt. ❑ Ifrafnclingoreehldcmaintenancemus�bedonc o�uilc, �ro�A in o bcnned �rca a�.ac from storm drains and orcr a drip pan big cnough Io collcct Ilwds. Recccle or dispose of Buids as huardous i�aste. ❑ If echicle or equipmenl dcaning mial be done onsim, clenn �ci�i �.aeer onlp in n bem�ed arca tha� o�dl no� allon rinu ��ater io run inio guners. strcels. storm dlains, or s�vfacc wafers. ❑ Do �rol dean ��chicic or cquipm.nt o�ui�c using soaps, sokents, degreasers. seeam cleanuig equipment. etc Spill Prt�cn[ion and Control ❑ I:n.P apol claanup matcnals (rags, nbsorbcnts, ctc.) a��ailablc ai ihc conslruciion sitc at all �imcs ❑ Inspccl .chicics and cquipmcm fmqucndr fw and rtp ir IcM plomptlr Usc dnp pans ro wtcL Iwks until repairs are madc. ❑ Clcan up spilts or leal:s immediarch� wid dispose o( cleanup marerials pmpcdc. ❑ Do iw1 hose dmvn surfaces u-he¢ fluids harx spilled Usc dn� cicnnnp mcUiods (absorbcnt mstcrials. cni littcr, and/or mgs). ❑ Swccp up spillcd dn� melcrinls immcAlatcle. Do noi m- to �rash them mcnr witli water. or bury tLem. ❑ Clean up spills on din areu bc digging up nnd properb� dlsposmg of concamina�ed soil. ❑ Rcport significan� spills immcdiarcl7. You arc rcqnired b�- la�c lo report all siptificant releaus oPhazvdo��s maicnals, including oil. To mpon a spi❑�. f) Dia191I or pour local emergeocr responsc nw�bcr, 2) Czll Ihe GoremoYs OfSce oCEmergrncy Services Waming ccntec (81w) siza5io (zi hours). Earth�vork & Paving/Asphalt Work Contaminated Soils :I ( -�-.�`_' ` �, � �� v —�.....� ' Efosion Cuntrol ❑ Schcdnit Srading and c�caration ��orA for dn- xCatllV onl1. ❑ S�abilim all dcnudcd arws, ins�all m�d meinrain tcmpomry erosion convols (nwh as erosion control (abnc or bonded fiber mavi�) unnl rcgela�ion is csmblishcd. ❑ Secd or plant vegetarion for erosiai wntrol on slopec or �c6crc conshuaion is not immediatcic planncd SMimrnt Contml ❑ Protecl stortn drain inlcts. guvers, dirhes, nnd dninagc courxs vri�h approprinte BAiPs. md� ss grarcl bag. fibcr �olls. bcmis. elC. ❑ Prt�u�t sediment from migrnting ofi'si�e by insmlling oM maintsinfng sWiment romrols, such as fiber rolls, silt fences. or scdimcnibavns. ❑ Accp cscavaicd soil on Un� silc whcrc it e�ill na collec� into tlie sttect. ❑ Twis(cr ccw�elcd matcrials �o dump trucks on tlu silc, not in Wc shttt. ❑ Con�amimted Soils ❑ If any of Ihc follo��ing conAirions arc oburvcd, tcsl fw conmminarion uM conmct thc Rcgional Wmcr Qualin Control Board: ■ Unusnul soil coiMitions, discolomtion. or odor. ■ Abondo�d mdcr�round �anks. ■ Abandoncd �vclls ■ Bwicd barrtls, dcbris, or trnsh. ❑.Acoid p ving and seal ewang In �� e� meatlsr, w�� hcn raui is fweust before Cresh pacemeni �vill hare wne io eure ❑ Covcr smmi drein mlcls and manholcs whcn applping scal coal. uck woc. slum� sea1. (og seal. e¢. ❑ Collec� a�W «c�cle or appropnateh dispom of ez«ss abrasiec �acel or sand. Do NOT nccep or ��ash it imo Futmrs. ❑ Do noi uu �cntcr �o «ash doen Gecl� asplul� concrcic pavcmcm. Sne�cutting & Asphalt/Concme Rcnw��al �7 Con�plerely co.�cr or 6amcsdc slonn dr.�in mlc�s xhcn ra�� a umg Usc f hcr fabnc, w�ch basm mlci filters or gra� cl bogs co kap sl�un� om ottl�e stomi drain ns,�m ❑ Shovel, atwwrb. or ��acuum saw�-cu� shvn and d'aposc of all w�aztc as soon as you am fnishcd in onc location or ai `he end of each ��«k dap (�chichecer is SOOII[!�). ❑ I['ma'cut slum� auers a calch hasin. clean ilup immedialcl�. Concrete, Grout & 3lortar Application u: _ _ ,:� - ~� � .; y :�i � .Y,... .T'`� �� l`;l '� S� �� . �* r.;l man.ir undcr � on pallcis and a��a�� from drainage arcas Thesc mowri�ls musl ncvcr rcach a stom� drain ❑ 1Vaslioutuyierciccqwpment/wcAs olTsm a coniamcd uca, so thcre i no dis<hargc imo tlm undcrking soil or omo surrounding asu. Lei concrcic hardcn and disposc of as garbagc. ❑ Cnllcci ihc wash �.aicr fmm washing e�posW aggrcc.ve w�retc and remo�'c ii for appmpria�e disposal oRsitc. Dewatering 'ri.. f y. � � ��` 3 (��`'{� /J/`" , `+a.] P�"��f" n �' .;.f, l-�' ❑ ElTcnivcly mmugc all mnon, all runoll�n�ithin Oic siie and all runoRihni d�n,r es f, m i� �� s ic. Di.rn S a N� O�I �ea�cr fmm olTsilc awa� from all dislurbcd arws w olhencise ensure compliance ❑ N'hcn dneatcrine. nouf and obiam appro��al From ihe local munienpalii�� h.lb¢ disclu�rging waicr m a svcei guucr or swnn dain Filvation or di�crsion duough a buin. ianl:. or udimem ttap ❑ In are s of knox�n cavam ination. iesting is mqu�md pnur io rcusc or discla�c of growd�talcr. Consull u�iih ��c EnginCCr lo deiemiinc }cLeihcr �cs�ing is rcquired and ho�� o imcrprn resulu. Comammaicd gmimd«a�cr musi bc trcaicd or hunl�d oE-site for proper duposnl Storm drain polluters may be liable for fines of up to $10,000 per day! Painting $ Paint Removal - :_ f ' � : fi i `� ` ... ' .� Paintin�; clunup ❑ Never dwn bmslks or nnse pami conmmers uuo a svcci, guncr. s�orm dram orsudeccwaicrs ❑ For ��amr bazcd pnm�s, pami oui bmshcs lo �ic c.��icnl possiblc. Rinu m �hc sani�nq� snccr once � ou hncc gamcd pcmiission Gom tlu local �rastc�calcr trcmm�m autlu�rin Nc.cr pour paim do«-n a drnin. ❑ For oJ-bnscd pmn�s, pnlm ow brushcs m the e.unl possiblc and cican �cnh ihmncr or ml�cnt in a preper ro��'aincr Filler w�d � uc ihinncrc and soh�cn�s. Disposc of 251411C elld �n�iSiblC Ill��lnel;501�'C�IIS i5 lurardous uasm Paint rrmuval � Chemienl pam� smpping msiduc and chips and dnsi from mnrwc paims or pmms wmaimng Icad or tnbulcl�n musi bc disposcd ofas hmardnus ��asi. ❑ Pami cl�ips a� dus� fmm �on-haiardoi�s dn svipping and ind blanuig nie� bc wep� np ar collcaed in plas�ic drop �lod�s and disposed of as irash Landscape iYlaterials �-Gi ; L \`" : \ %,:� �'\ \ � ❑ Con�a�n stackpilcd landscaping maicnals b� storing Wcm undcr Iarps �.�hcn iho- am na acii.�cl�� bcu�g uscd. ❑ S�xk cmdi6lc landsrapc mmcrial on pallels. Co��cr or slorc 11� � malcrials �chen tl�cc arc noi activclr 0.ing uscd or op�i��a ❑ D�scontinue appl�caGon of anr crod�blc landscapc mnlcrinl n'iJiin 2 da� s bcfore a forccxsi ruin crcn� or dunng wcl ��cnthcr � 1{H NA? lOCC�MiYk10[ �'aref Po�€ution �everrt'ion Program n��Wuef. Mulrhy Ccmeunhy Requirements forArchitectural Copper Protect water quality during installation, cleaning, treating, and washing! Copper from Buildings May Harm Aquatic Life Copper can harm aquatic life in San Francisco Bay. Water that comes i�io contact with architectural copper may contribute to impacts, e specially during installation, cleaning, treating, or washing. Patination solutions that are used to obtain the desired shade of green or brown typically contain acids. After treatment, when the copper is rinsed to remove these acids, the rinse water is a source of pollutants. M unicipalities prohibit discharges to the storm drain of water used in the ir� sfallation, cleaning, treating and washing of architectural copper. U se Best Management Practices (BMPs) The following Best Management Practices (BMPs) discharges to storm drains. must be implemented to prevent prohibited During /nsta!lation • If possible, purchase copper materiafs that have been pre-patinated at the factory. • If pafination is done on-site, implement one or more of the following BMPs: o Discharge the rinse water to landscaping. Ensure fhat the rinse water does not flow to the street or storm drain. Block off storm drain inlet if needed. o Collect rinse water in a tank and pump to the sanitary sewer. Contact your local� sanitary sewer agency before discharging to the sanifary sewer. o Collecf the rinse water in a tank and haul off-siie for proper disposal. � Consider coating the copper materials with an impervious coating that prevents further. corrosion and runoff. This will also maintain the desired co[or for a longer time, requiring less maintenance, During Maintenance Implement the following BMPs during routine mainfenance acfivities, such as power washing the roof, re-patination or re-app(ication of impervious coating; • Block storm drain inlets as needed fo prevent runoff from entering storm drains. • Discharge ihe wash water to landscaping or to the sanifary sewer (with permission from the local sanitary sewer agency). ff this is not an option, haul the wash water off-site for proper disposal, Protect the Bay/Ocean and yourself! If you are responsible for a discharge to the storm drain of nor- sformwater generated by installing, cleaning, treating or washing copper architectural features, you are in violation of the municipal sformwater �rdinance and may be subject to a fine. Contact Information The San Mateo Countywide Water Poliution Prevention Program lists municipal stormwater contacts af www.flowstobay.org (click on "Business", then "New Development", then "local permrtting agency"). F/NAL February 29, 2092 (3uilding with copper flashrng, gufter and drainpipe. �to,rm drarn in.�ef rs 6locic�ci io preve,7f prohibited discharge. The water must be pumped and disposed of proper(y. ,...._� .--�i SAN �ATEO CuUNTYWibE Water Pollution Prevention Program City of Burlingame - Office of Stormwater Checklist for Small Projects Environmental Compliance Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit (MRP) 1103 Airport Blvd Order No. R2-2009-0074 ; Order No. R2-2011-0083 NPDES No. CAS612008 Office: (650) 342-3727 Fax: (650) 342-3712 Complete this form for individual single family home projects of any size, other projects that create and/or replace less than 10, 000 square feef of impervious surface, and projects in the following categories that create and/or replace /ess than 5, 000 square feet of impeivious surface: restaurants, retail gasoline outlets, auto service facilities', and parlcing lots (stand-alone or part of another use). A. Project Information A.1 ProjeCt Name: New Residence, E3urlingvicw L.L.0 q.2 Project Address: A.3 Project APN: 27d7 Burlingvie�� Drive, Burlingame, CA 94010 027-26 I -0�10 B. Select Appropriate Site Design Measures B.1 Does the project create and/or replace 2,500 square feet or more of impervious surface2? ❑ Yes ❑ No : If yes, and the project will receive final discretionary approval on or after December 1, 2012, the project must include one of Site Design Measures a through f.3 Fact sheets regarding site design measures a through f may be downloaded at http.//www.flowstobay.org/bs new development.php#flyers. : If no, or the project will receive final discretionary approval before December 1, 2012, the project is encouraged to implement site design measures', which may be required at municipality discretion. Consult with municipal staff about requirements for your project. 6.2 Is the site design measure included in the project plans? Plan Yes No Sheet No. a. Direct roof runoff into cisterns or rain barrels and use rainwater for irrigation or other non-potable use. ❑ �C1. � � � � ❑ � b. Direct roof runoff onto vegetated areas. c. Direct runoff from sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios onto vegetated areas. f. Construct bike lanes, driveways, and/or uncovered parking lots with permeable N(a, surfaces. ❑ � ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ � NIA d. Direct runoff from driveways and/or uncovered parking lots onto vegetated areas. e. Construct sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios with permeable surfaces. g. Minimize land disturbance and impervious surface (especially parking lots). h. Maximize permeability by clustering development and preserving open space. ❑ � ❑ ❑ � ❑ � j. Protect sensitive areas, including wetland and riparian areas, and minimize changes to the natural topography. k. Self-treating area (see Section 42 of the C.3 Technical Guidance) � � i. Use micro-detention, including distributed landscape-based detention. I. Self-retaining area (see Section 4.3 of the C.3 Technical Guidance) ,�. m. Plant or preserve interceptor trees (Section 4.1, C.3 Technical Guidance) � See Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes here. � Complete the C.3/C.6 Development Review Checklist if the project is not an individual single family home, and it creates and/or replaces 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surface; or if it is a restaurant, retail gasoline outlet, auto service facility, or parking Iot project that creates and/or replaces 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface. ' See MRP Provision C.3.i. � See MRP Provision C.3.a.i.(6). " - 1 , �F gL; Approved December 4, 2012 _��G-PLAN Stormwater Checklist for Small Projects C. Select appropriate source controls (Encouraged for all projects; may be required at municipal discretion. Consult municipal staff.5) Are these Features that features in require source project? control measures Yes No ❑ ❑ Storm Drain ❑ ❑ Floor Drains ❑ ❑ Parking garage � ❑ Landscaping � � Pool/Spa/Fountain ❑ ❑ Food Service Equipment (non- residential) ❑ � ❑ � Refuse Areas J� J■J �� ■ Outdoor Process Activities � Outdoor EquipmenU Materials Storage Vehicle/ Equipment Cleaning Vehicle/ Equipment Repair and Maintenance ❑ ❑ Fuel Dispensing Areas ❑ � ❑ � Loading Docks � � � ❑ Fire Sprinklers ❑ Miscellaneous Drain or Wash Water ❑ ❑ Architectural Copper � See MRP Provision C.3.a.i(7). Source control measures (Refer to Local Source Control List for detailed requirements) • Mark on-site inlets with the words "No Dumping! Flows to Bay" or equivalent. ■ Plumb interior floor drains to sanitary sewer [or prohibit]. • Plumb interior parking garage floor drains to sanitary sewer.6 ■ Retain existing vegetation as practicable. ■ Select diverse species appropriate to the site. Include plants that are pest- and/or disease-resistant, drought-tolerant, and/or attract beneficial insects. ■ Minimize use of pesticides and quick-release fertilizers. ■ Use efficient irrigation system; design to minimize runoff. ■ Provide connection to the sanitary sewer to facilitate draining.s Provide sink or other area for equipment cleaning, which is: ■ Connected to a grease interceptor prior to sanitary sewer discharge.6 ■ Large enough for the largest mat or piece of equipment to be cleaned. • Indoors or in an outdoor roofed area designed to prevent stormwater run-on and run-off, and signed to require equipment washing in this area. ■ Provide a roofed and enclosed area for dumpsters, recycling containers, etc., designed to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff. - Connect any drains in or beneath dumpsters, compactors� and tallow bin areas serving food service facilities to the sanitary sewer. • Perform process activities either indoors or in roofed outdoor area, designed to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff, and to drain to the sanitary sewer.s • Cover the area or design to avoid pollutant contact with stormwater runoff. ■ Locate area only on paved and contained areas. • Roof storage areas that will contain non-hazardous liquids, drain to sanitary sewer6, and contain by berms or similar. ■ Roofed, pave and berm wash area to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff, plumb to the sanitary sewers, and sign as a designated wash area. • Commercial car wash facilities shall discharge to the sanitary sewer.6 ■ Designate repair/maintenance area indoors, or an outdoors area designed to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff and provide secondary containment. Do not install drains in the secondary containment areas. ■ No floor drains unless pretreated prior to discharge to the sanitary sewer. 6 • Connect containers or sinks used for parts cleaning to the sanitary sewer. 6 • Fueling areas shall have impermeable surface that is a) minimally graded to preveni ponding and b) separated from the rest of the site by a grade break. ■ Canopy shall extend at least 10 ft in each direction from each pump and drain away from fueling area. ■ Cover and/or grade to minimize run-on to and runoff from the loading area. ■ Position downspouts to direct stormwater away from the loading area. ■ Drain water from loading dock areas to the sanitary sewer.6 ■ Install door skirts between the trailers and the building. ■ Design for discharge of fire sprinkler test water to landscape or sanitary sewers ■ Drain condensate of air conditioning units to landscaping. Large air conditioning units may connect to the sanitary sewer.s ■ Roof drains shall drain to unpaved area where practicable. � Drain boiler drain lines, roof top equipment, all washwater to sanitary sewer 6. � Drain rinse water to landscaping, discharge to sanitary sewer6, or collect and dispose properly offsite. See flyer "Requirements for Architectural Copper." 2 Is source control measure included in project plans? Plan Yes No Sheet No. �� ■0�■ A� ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ N /� ❑ ❑ � � ❑ ❑ ��A ❑ ❑ N A ❑ ❑ N � ❑ ❑ N/A ❑ ❑ N� ❑ ❑ N A � � � ❑ ❑ ❑ �� Approved December 4, 2012 Stormwater Checklist for Small Projects D. Implement construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) (Required forall projects.) D.1 Is the site a"High Priority Site"? (Municipal staff will make this deterrnination; if the answer is yes, Yes ❑ No ❑ the project will be referred to construction site inspection staff for monthly stormwater inspections during the wet season, October 1 through Apri130.) •"High Priority Sites" are sites that require a grading permit, are adjacent to a creek, or are otherwise high priority for stormwater protection during construction per MRP Provision C.6.e.ii(2). D.2 All projects require appropriate stormwater BMPs during construction, indicate which BMPs are included in the project, below. Yes No Best Management Practice (BMP ❑ Attach the San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program's construction BMP plan sheet to project plans and require contractor to implement the applicable BMPs on the plan sheet. � ❑ Temporary erosion controls to stabilize all denuded areas until permanent erosion controls are established. ❑� Delineate with field markers clearing limits, easements, setbacks, sensitive or critical areas, buffer zones, trees, and drainage courses. �❑ Provide notes, specifications, or attachments describing the following: ■ Construction, operation and maintenance of erosion and sediment controls, include inspection frequency; ■ Methods and schedule for grading, excavation, filling, clearing of vegetation, and storage and disposal of excavated or cleared material; ■ Specifications for vegetative cover & mulch, include methods and schedules for planting and fertilization; ■ Provisions for temporary and/or permanent irriqation. ❑ Perform clearinp and earth movina activities onlv durina dry weather. � ❑ Use sediment controls or filtration to remove sediment when dewatering and obtain all necessary permits. � ❑ Protect all storm drain inlets in vicinity of site using sediment controls such as berms, fiber rolls, or filters. ►� ■ ►� ■ ►� ■ Trap sediment on-site, using BMPs such as sediment basins or traps, earthen dikes or berms, silt fences, check dams, soil blankets or mats, covers for soil stock piles, etc. Divert on-site runoff around exposed areas; divert off-site runoff around the site (e.g., swales and dikes). Protect adjacent properties and undisturbed areas from construction impacts using vegetative buffer strips, sediment barriers or filters, dikes, mulchinq, or other measures as appropriate. �, ❑ Limit construction access routes and stabilize designated access points. �❑ No cleaning, fueling, or maintaining vehicles on-site, except in a designated area where washwater is contained and treated. � ❑ Store, handle, and dispose of construction materials/wastes properly to prevent contact with stormwater. � ❑ Contractor shall train and provide instruction to all employees/subcontractors re: construction BMPs. � � Control and prevent the discharge of all potential pollutants, including pavement cutting wastes, paints, concrete, petroleum products, chemicals, washwater or sediments, rinse water from architectural copper, and non-stormwater discharges to storm drains and watercourses. Name of applicant completing the form: Richard T Signature: � Date: � I ��_ E. Comments (for municipal staff use only): F. NOTES (for municipal staff use only): Section A Notes: �' Any connection to the sanitary sewer system is subject to sanitary district approval. � Businesses that may have outdoor process activities/equipment include machine shops, auto repair, industries with pretreatment facilities. 3 Approved December 4, 2012 Stormwater Checklist for Small Projects Section B N Section C Notes: Section D Notes: Approved December 4, 2012 Project Comments Date: To: From: November 18, 2013 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 0 Parks Division (650) 558-7334 BFire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permit for attached garage for a new, two-story single family dwelling with an attached garage at 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-261-040 Staff Review: November 25, 2013 The house is intended to be equipped with a fire sprinkler system throughout. 1. Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 2. All sprinkler drainage shall be placed into landscaping areas. 3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Reviewed by: �:C�+�-- � Date: Zo ;��r13 � � � 2735 Burlingview Drive -� — — — �� °4' '� es y�'"+- ��;"�- : ys �`s�..d. � � � � _ � �'�:N �, ; . ,�" � �-.�.. r` .�� a�a� x.; ` � „ �: .e... ,�..:.�m�wsw� �' " ^' �; �"��_„"'^ � �3�� a , ^4�� . ' � �, o � ��' vr�'�' � � „` i�� .a� Y� v � � �a} a 9q.a�' �^ .+ � � '-'�';, d � �y� y...,:. ��'��R,.��''- 2755 Summit Drive � � � ;a�-?��`• +. � � 2741 Burlingview Drive (Subject Properfy) Properties on Applicant Side of Burlingview Drive .� >�,f�"° .:o qy.�x .:. �+ �5;, �,, 4�� " "� ° � �� P � �� %'� ,� �� "s� s � �� ', °`� : _ a'j � ;�: �e I . �..,e • �,,i �r '��5, "' .� �`j. „� �� , � �� - - ' ��- w' �fi �� .,�- _ mm�� .�-� I�I�'�il� � �=-�� - �_ ��_,, ��„��` 2747 Burlingview C>rive 2753 Burlingview Drive 2759 Burling� � � 2760 Burlingview Drive 2754 Burlingview Drive Properties on Opposite Side of Burlingview Drive 1 I 1 2748 Burlingview Drive I 1 �� ; �= �� V:: C r; z O ` . ' _ . . � -- " ..: >r V J J � o •� o � o ;� o m � � o � c �� 'c — = E � •L � o ; � Q _ Z z 00 n m a Pbmng S�bminak 11; 15,�]013 Neighborhood Photos _ PH1.1 1316 or RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, DESIGN REVIEW, HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT, AND SPECIAL PERMITS RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for Desiqn Review, Hillside Area Construction Permits, and Special Permits for a new, sinqle-story sinqle familv dwellinq with an attached lower level qaraqe and a basement with a ceilinq heiqht qreater than 6'-6" at 2747 Burlingview Drive, Zoned R-1, Burlinqview LLC, propertv owner, APN: 027-261-040; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on Aqril 28, 2014, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Section 15303 (a), which states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences maybe constructed or converted under this exemption, is hereby approved. 2. Said Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit, and Special Permits are approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit, and Special Permits are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th dav of April, 2014, by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption, Design Review, HACP, and Special Permits 2747 Burlingview Drive Effective May 8, 2014 Page 1 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped March 7, 2014, sheets A0.0, A2.2, A3.1, A4.1 a, A4.1 b, A4.2a, A4.2b, L1.1, L1.2 and Boundary Survey and Topographic Map and date stamped March 20, 2014, sheets A1.1, A2.1, A2.3 and A5.1through A6, L-1 and L-2; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Building Division's January 28, 2014 and February 6, 2014, and November 19, 2013 memos, the Parks Division's November 25, 2013, and March 26, 2014 memos, the Engineering Division's December 4, 2013 memo, the Fire Division's December 10, 2012 memo, and the Stormwater Division's November 25, 2013 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for demolition or construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal, and the Arborist Report date stamped March 21, 2014; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption, Design Review, HACP, and Special Permits 2747 Burlingview Drive Effective May 8, 2014 Page 2 demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 12. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 13. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 14. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 15. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 16. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. . CITY OF BUP,LINGAtviE � COP�1tv1UNITl' DEVELOPiviENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD �� BUP.LIiJGAN1E, CA 94010 �' � � 1'� ^ PH: (650) 558-7250 o FAy:: (650) 696-3790 - ��✓wnv.burlingame.org ��` � �.� � ,• Site: 2747 BURLINGVIEW DRIVE The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, APRIL 28, 2014 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, (A: Application for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permits for an attached garage and basement ceiling height for a new single- story house at 2747 BURLINGVIEW DRIVE zoned R-l. APN 027-261-040 Mniled: April 18, 2014 (Please refer to ofher side) PUBLIC NEARING NOTICE Citv of Burlin.qame � A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to • the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to ofher side) s� , �' � � . :� � f �' �; � �a � �,�M`: � � � � " '. � . ; � _ � ,;�� , .'� �� ,' � � ,�� • •i' ' �� : � � � �. - � i - � - _ - - w�" R . '�`. +" 1 ,i � _ c � � � '� . � � � � • �. r �`.. ./ � l . . �r. �^ ` j )� �* �,.Y.�i • � P . ,- �, a . `►i .� ;, ► � � _ _ • '� '`, _ r �+► �'' � '� f` �: � .• .� \ 3�. � � �� - -'��: � ,� .=r r • � � �' � �• " R q r ,.�� , }.. � � _ � � � -_ , � r � s �� , . • .� - ' � �' . �� _ _ _ "1 ' - .� _ �3 — ^f- � • . !f � �•. ' � : = � w l, . , �� " , . � • "4 ' . �� ... . ' ; =, +. .a K � � �'' � • � ' ,F' *'+i y • . �. N�, . . � �',-) � � +. � w � •�+i .. + �` °`'i••�� I� �j� �"`�i �%! � ! . � _ , � . Y.ti .�.t/: �' � . � � I�:, . � .� ►�,�"� �� ` i � � , tt, � r, + � � ;� 'fi.� � � � ' �. - � ` .. d .►;4 �� . • \ Y R' � � �� r�� . �� ! k � � � � , wM �� < � ^ � � � �� ' r �, ...� . ��,h� f' ` � � �� R f •'i, � ' +1 Y.�*.� `¢ 1 , � y � A'� � � *.� �►„ "* - ` � � � ,. :, '�}pS ; N� � '� ,�.. ' , +'=:-' 1► �+ � � : t. Y A �'' �. � :� � � . , ` ` / � ., � Jr, �. . �. � ' � �m:�� ' . � ; '�� f" � ��` � �.: � �, _ � � . �.� - ^ -� ' ` z'�.�" r" _. < < - � i;� � � y+ - - h.. :�� '; , � � IS 1 k-•,7s( 7f �� ,` � F� � � . 'J . a` '' � Ar � � " , � �� .. .� :i � � •�y„ '�' • �� r ; � �� _ . ,�s � � _ . � ,_ � . t ., .�� i "?` .�,.{� ��; , rr � �::,- �,�" , . � � , t ,r " ,*��w, � �,/ . �t , ; �. �-` R ' ;:� _ _ " S �� ' �r� �, �� 2747 Burlingview Drive � , _ '� � � . . � _ �, . , . ,� . • � r�;:� ` � i• � _-� q ♦ .. + a. �r � � y� � ..' �. ; ' ' ' . ��I�� .� • � . . . . ' � . . _ A +f r. � "°' �� t i r' _/ > . - �.: ' • .K � .s ` . ', _ - Item No. 11 Design Review Study PROJECT LOCATION 2747 Burlingview Drive 1.� City of Burlingame Item No. 1 # Design Review Study Des�gn Rev�ew, H�lls�de Area Construction Permit, and Special Permits Address: 2747 Burlingview Drive Meeting Date: February 24, 2014 Request: Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit, and Special Permits for an attached garage and for basement ceiling height for a new, single story house. Applicant and Architect: Richard Terrones Property Owner: Burlingview LLC General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 027-261-040 Lot Area: 10,065 Zoning: R-1 Project Description: The existing single story house and attached garage on the site are proposed to be demolished. The applicant is requesting Design Review for a new house, Hillside Area Construction Permit, a Special Permit for an attached garage, and a Special Permit for a basement with a ceiling height greater than 6'- 6". The proposed floor area for the new house will be 4,228 SF (0.42 FAR) where 4,321 (0.43 FAR) is the maximum allowed on site (including covered porch and basement exemptions). The proposed new house is single-story with a lower level attached garage and basement storage area. The plate height of the proposed house is 8'-0" at the entry area in the center of the house and increases to an 11'-0" plate height on the right side and a 13'-0" plate height on the left side. The applicant is requesting an Hillside Area Construction Permit for this new house and attached garage. The proposed highest ridge, at the left side of the house, is 22'-0" above average top of curb and matches the maximum height of the existing single-story house on the site. The applicant is requesting a Special Permit for an attached garage. The proposed 5 bedroom house requires two covered parking spaces and a single uncovered parking space. The proposed attached lower level garage provides two covered spaces (20' x 20') and there is a single uncovered space in the driveway in front of the garage. The applicant is requesting a Special Permit for a basement ceiling height that exceeds 6'-6". The proposed basement storage area and hall at the right side of the house has a ceiling height of 9'-0". A total of 600 SF of basement area and 100 SF of utility areas are exempt from floor area calculations. No part of the attached lower level garage is exempt from floor area calculations. The applicant is requesting the following applications: ■ Design review for a new house (C.S. 25.57.010,a,2); and ■ Hillside Area Construction Permit (C.S. 25.61.020); and ■ Special permit for an attached garage (C.S. 25.26.035,a); and • Special Permit for a basement height greater than 6'-6". (C.S. 25.26.035, fl. Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permits 2747 Burlingview Drive Lot Area: 10,065 PROPOSED February 11, 2014 plans SETBACKS Front (1st flr): To the attached garage: _...__ .._.._......._ ..............................................._........_...._......................... Side (left): (right): _ Rear (1st f/r): _ ............. .... ..... Lot Coverage: FAR: # of bedrooms: 25'-6" 30'-2" _ _. ._........... __ ..... 8'-7" 7'-0" __ _. _......_....... . 24'-1 " _. ............ ..........._... 3969 SF 39.4% _.......... 4228 SF 0.42 FAR 5 Basemenf: ; basement with 9'-0" ceiling height 2 Parking: ; 2 covered (20' x 20'), attached 3 1 uncovered (9' x 20') Height: 22'-0" 2747 Burlingview Drive Plans date stamped: February 3, 2014 ALLOWED/REQUIRED 23'-7" is the block average 25'-0" 7'-0" 7'-0" 15'-0" _ ....... ....................... 4026 SF 40% 4321 SF' 0.43 FAR _._..........._.._ ................__._....._._ __............._._...._................. Special Permit required per C.S. 25.26.035,f _. ................... 2 covered (20' x 20') 1 uncovered (9' x 20') _ . __ __ _ ....... _. _._ ... . _. . 30'-0" _ _...._ ......................._._.............._ ' (0.32 x 10,065 SF) + 1100 SF = 4321 SF (0.43 FAR) Z The applicant is requesting a special permit for a basement ceiling height that is greater than 6'-6". ' The applicant is requesting a special permit for an attached garage. Staff Comments: See attached memos from the Chief Building Official, Fire Division, Engineering Division, Parks Division, and Stormwater Division. Erika Lewit Senior Planner c. Richard Terrones, applicant Attachments: Application to the Planning Commission Special Permit form for an attached garage Special Permit form for basement ceiling height Photographs of Neighborhood, date stamped November 22, 2013 Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed February 14, 2014 Aerial Photo -2- 6UR1.1NGAME �� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 5O7 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: L�' Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Parcel #: (� 2.�(- �.(oi - D� ❑ Conditional Use Permit C� Special Permit ❑ Other: PROJECT ADDRESS:�`�I � I �ur �i+tia,�t�� 'i1K� APPLICANT project contact person E��/ OK to send electronic copies of documents C9/ Name: �tG�A'RO "�'��.K-fl1�"S Address: � 03 �jUAN ITA AVL% City/State/zip: L3t)2L�NCxAtiIC.GA �i�}blb Phone: �Ca�o� C�q(v -� 26 b Fax: CGS�� 3�{,3 -��oBS E-mail: (Z'�'C� ��Q�2C,1�. CON� ARCHITECT/DESIGNER pro�ect contact Person � OK to send electronic copies of documents C9� PROPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents C� Name: �JUiLI.INGV l�l►�1 L�. G Address: 27�i-% �V�Rt..11JGV IGI�J �PR- City/State/Zip: '�iVIRL�1`1C�l�MI= . C�. �I�O\a Phone: �C�So� $(Q �j - (30rf Fax: ^ E-mail: T�-M� G� CeM�AsT. N�T Name: ��n�ccl-'�t�C',r„„� Address: `1 O � � l�.s,��t-a. �Y�. City/State/Zip: v�r\ � v Phone: �CQSfl� � 1 � — 17,.op � •'� ' .. E-mail: 1r''�� e.�-c� • c�.-,•, �1r Burlingame Business License #: ��pQS .1 �� , ;�.1;, , i `l. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: N'EI�f S t N�G,I,� FdlN1,l l.Y �R�-�.� AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereb certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belie . Applicant's signature: Date: �� 15 13 I am aware of the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. Property owner's signature: � (/`�""'t Date: �� `�- — 201 � Date submitted: * Verification that the project architect/designer has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the Finance Department at the time application fees are paid. 5: � HANDOUTS�PC Application. doc City_of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.ore IJ i , .' � , , �� CITY O� BIJRLJNGAME ��... CITY OF BURLINGAME SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION '� 'T" � � ;""` �., : , �,�r �l.� ; �:�:-� �� : . . -;�;�� The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code �� Section 25.50). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. 1. Explain why the blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design afzd witlz the existin,� street and neikhborhood. The proposed project includes an attached garage in a"basemenY' story. Therefore a ceiling height greater than 6-1/2 feet is needed to accommodate automobiles. The garage for the proposed building is being placed below grade in order to keep the building as low as possible (and lower than adjacent buildings). The adjacent storage room in the basement is necessary to minimize the mass and bulk of the house, and therefore needs to be usable and grater than 6-1/2 feet in height. Attached garages in the front part of the property are the norm on the side of the street where the project is located due to the topography of the area, and a common design throughout the Burlingame Hilis neighborhood. 2. Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood. The proposed project is replacing an existing building, and the style and exterior finish materials are consistent with other modern style buildings in the neighborhood. The character of the neighborhood will not be affected by the project, as there are similar buildings throughout the Burlingame Hills that sit in a mix of different styles of buildings, mostly dating form the mid 20th century period. Partially underground "BasemenY' can be found in the adjacent properties and throughout the neighborhood as a response to the area's topography. 3. How will the proposed project be consistent with the residential design guidelines adonted bv the citv (C.S. 25.57)? 1. The architectural style is compatible with that of the neighborhood, as the neighborhood exhibits a blend of different styles, including modern buildings like the proposed project, with attached garages. 2. Attached garages at the front of the property are found in most houses on the side of the street where the project is located. The proposed basement location for the garage allows the proposed building to remain low to the ground therefore harmonizing with the adjacent neighborhood. 3. The project is consistent with the massing and bulk of the existing structure to be replaced and matches surrounding buildings in height and size. The existing house, though being removed includes an attached garage. 4. The proposed structure does not affect surrounding structures. 5. Proposed trees are seasonal, slender and larqelv transparent to keep them from obstructinp views. 4. Explain how the removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements. What naitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain why this mitigation is appropriate. One protected tree is being proposed for removal, and will be replaced by (7) New trees. The tree removal application will be obtained after the planning process is completed. SPECPERM.FRM City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlin�ame.org 1. Explain why the blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood. How will the proposed structure or addition affect neighboring properties or structures on those properties? If neighboring properties will not be affected, state why. Compare the proposed addition to the mass, scale and characteristics of neighboring properties. Think about mass and bulk, landscaping, sunlight/shade, views from neighboring properties. Neighboring properties and structures include those to the right, left, rear and across the street. How does the proposed structure compare to neighboring structures in terms of mass or Uulk? If there is no change to the structure, say so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation etc. with other structures in the neighborhood or area. 2. Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, st�eet and neighborhood. How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetically with structures or uses in the existing neighborhood? If it does not affect aesthctics, state why. Was the addition designed to match existing architecture and/or pattern of development on adjacent properties in the neighborhood? Explain why your proposal fits in the neighborhood. How will the structure or addition change the character of the neighborhood? Think of character as the image or tone established by size, density of development and general pattern of land use. If you don't feel the character of the neighborhood will change, state why. 3. How will the proposed project be consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city? Following are the design criteria adopted by the City Council for residential design review. How does your project meet these guidelines? 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structurc; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. 4. Explain how the removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements. What �nitigation is p�oposed for the �emoval of any t�ees? Explain why this mitigation is appropriate. Will any trees be removed as a result of this proposal? If so, explain what type of trees will be removed and if any are protected under city ordinance (C.S. 11.06), why it is necessary to remove the trees, and what is being proposed to replace any trees being removed. If no trees are to be removed, say so. SPCCPERM.PRM City of $urlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlin�ame.org � , .. . ."4.� � • _.. _' ._ _ a� GITY � � � BURLINGAME ��. i �`°-o CITY OF BURLINGAME SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as detined by the City's Ordinance (Code Section 25.50). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. 1. Explain why t/ie blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new co�astruction or addition are co`tsistent wida Nze existing structure's design and witlt tlze existing street and �zeiglzborlioocl. The proposed building is being kept as low, or lower than adjacent buildings by sinking the garage below the rest of the building. Attached garages in the front part of the property are the norm on the side of the street where the project is located due to the topography of the area, and a common design throughout the Burlingame Hills neighborhood 2. Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior fitzish materials and elevations of t/re p,�oposed new structure or adciition are consistent witla tlze existing structr�re, street and neigfzborhoo�l The proposed project is replacing an existing building, and the style and exterior finish materials are consistent with other modern style buildings in the neighborhood. The character of the neighborhood will not be affected by the project, as there are similar buildings throughout the Burlingame Hills that sit in a mix of different styles of buildings, mostly dating form the mid 20th century period. •- �,�, �'� �,,,,,,,�' �� !, r_ � �': t 3. Hnw will the proposed project be consistent with t/ze residential design gu[deliizes ��'�' �'�`"`� adopted bv the citv (C.S. 25.57)? 1. The architectural style is compatible with that of the neighborhood, as the neighborhood exhibits a blend of different styles, including modern buildings like the proposed project, with attached garages. 2. Attached garages at the front of the property are found in most houses on the side of the street where the project is located. 3. The project is consistent with the massing and bulk of the existing structure to be replaced and matches surrounding buildings in height and size. The existing house, though being removed includes an attached garage. 4. The proposed structure does not affect surrounding structures. 5. Proposed trees are seasonal, slender and largely transparent to keep them from obstructing views on the subject or adjacent properties 4. Expluin /zow t/1e removul of any trees located within the footprint of any new struchrre or uddition is necessary cind is consistent with tlze ciry's reforestation requirements. Wltat ynitigation is proposed for t/re removal of uny trees? Explai�a w/zy this mitigution is uppropriate. One protected tree is being proposed for removal, and will be replaced by (7) New trees. The tree removal application will be obtained after the planning process is completed. SPECPIIZMFRM City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 P�imrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.or� 1. Explain wlay tlze blend of mass, scale and dominant structi�ral cliaracteristics of tlie new construction or addition aYe consistent with tlze existing structure's design and with the existing street and neiglzborlaood. How will the proposed structure or addition affect neighboring properties or structures on those properties? If neighboring properties will not be affected, state why. Compare the proposed addition to the mass, scale and characteristics of neighboring properties. Think about mass and bulk, landscaping, sunlighdshade, views from neighboring properties. Neighboring properties and structures include those to the right, left, rear and across the street. How does the proposed structure compare to neighboring structures in terms of mass or bulk? If there is no change to the structure, say so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation etc. with other structures in the neighborhood or area. 2. Explain how the variety of roof line, facnde, exterior finish materials �n�l elevations of tlze proposed new structure or addition are consistent witJt tlte existing structure, street and neighborizoorJ. How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetically with structures or uses in the existing neighborhood? If it does not affect aesthetics, state why. Was the addition designed to match existing architecture and/or pattern ofdevelopment on adjacent properties in the neighborhood? Explain why your proposal fits in the neighborhood. How will the structure or addition change the character of the neighborhood? Think of character as the image or tone established by size, density of development and general pattern of land use. If you don't feel the character ofthe neighborhood will change, state why. 3. How will tlze proposed project be co�zsistent witli tlze ��esidesitial design guiclelines adopted by the city? Following are the design criteria adopted by the City Council for residential design review. How does your project meet these guidelines? 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. 4. Explain how tlze removal of any trees loccrted witfiin t/ae footprint of a�zy new structure or additioya is necessary �rtd is consisterzt witla tlze city's reforestation reyuirements. What mitigatio�i is proposed fo� the renzoval of any t��ees? Explain wlzy tlris mitigation is �rppropriate. Will any trees be removed as a result ofthis proposal? If so, explain �vhat type of trees will be removed and if any are protected under city ordinance (C.S. 11.06), why it is necessary to remove the trees, and what is being proposed to replace any trees being removed. If no trees are to be removed, say so. SPECYERM.FRM Project Comments Date: To: From: February 6, 2014 � City Engineer (650) 558-7230 X Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 � Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7334 � Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 � Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 � NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney Erika Lewit, Planning Subject: revised plans for 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-261-040 - original comments, response to comments, and revised plans are in your In- Box Staff Review: No further comments. All conditions of approval as stated in all previous reviews of the project will apply to this project. Reviewed by: Date: 2-6-2014 �,..,,�....,._............_.,....,........,.�..�..,...,..w.....,...W_-...........,.....,.,_,......,.........�.,..,.._,,.,.,..,...,..,..;:,,....,....... _.,......,:...�..., Project Comments Date: To: From: January 27, 2014 � City Engineer (650) 558-7230 x Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 � Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7334 0 Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 � Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 0 NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney Erika Lewit, Planning Subject: revised plans for 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027- 261-040 - original comments, response to comments, and revised plans are in your In- Box Re-Check Comments: 13. RESIDENTIAL: Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify fhe /ocafion and the net clear opening heighf and width of all required egress windows on the elevation drawinqs. 2013 California Residential Code (CRC) §R310. Note: The area labeled "Office" is a room that can be used for sleeping purposes and, as such, must comply with this requirement. The note on Sheet A0.0 does not address the comment. Specify the /ocation and the net c/ear opening height and width of all required egress windows on the elevafion drawinqs. NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address item #13 be re-submitted before this project can move forward for Planning Commission action. � Reviewed by: aB'te: 1-28-2014 0 Project Comments Date: To: From: November 18, 2013 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permit for attached garage for a new, two-story single family dwelling with an attached garage at 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-261-040 Staff Review: November 25, 2013 ��On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2013 California Building Code, 2013 California Residential Code (where applicable), 2013 California Mechanical Code, 2013 California Electrical Code, and 2013 California Plumbing Code, including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1889. Note: If the Planning Commission has not approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2013 then this project must comply with the 2013 California Building Codes. �) Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2013 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Go to http://www.enerqy.ca.qov/title24/2013standards/ for publications and details. � Indicate on the plans that the roof will comply with Cool Roof requirements of the 2013 California Energy Code. 2013 CEC §110.8. The 2013 Residential and Non- Residential Compliance Manuals are available on line at http://www.energv.ca.qov/title24/2013standards/ �Place the following information on the first page of the plans: "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. (See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.) 5� On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrated on the Job Copy of the plans prior to performing the work. 6) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. 7) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 8) Provide a fully dimensioned site plan which shows the true property boundaries, the location of all structures on the property, existing driveways, and on-site parking. 9) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 10)Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines 11)Show the dimensions to adjacent structures. 12)Obtain a survey of the property lines. �ESIDENTIAL: Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the location and the net clear opening height and width of all required egress windows _o_n the elevation drawinqs. 2013 California Residential Code (CRC) §R310. Note: The area labeled "office" is a room that can be used for sleeping purposes and, as such, must comply with this requirement. ��ndicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 15)Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 16)Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 2013 CBC § 1009. 17)Provide lighting at all exterior landings. ��he fireplace chimney must terminate at least two feet higher than any portion of the building within ten feet or must be retrofit with a fireplace insert (not a log lighter.) 2013 CRC §1003.9. NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 13, 14, and 18 must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for P ing Commission action. .__ Reviewed by� Date: 11-19-2013 Jo , Bd 6 -558-7270 Project Comments Date: To: From: November 18, 2013 X Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permit for attached garage for a new, two-story single family dwelling with an attached garage at 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-261-040 Staff Review: November 25, 2013 1. See attached review comments #1, 2, 5, 14 and 20. 2. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. Reviewed by: V �' Date: 12/04/2013 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION PLAIVNING REVIEW COMMENTS 1��% "(�°'v'`If'rrQ..�' Project Name: 5��r� �' ►ur�y�'�c�;� r-- Project Address:� ��%'tLl�Vl�=� The following requirements apply to the project 1 _� A property boundary survey shall be preformed by a licensed land surveyor. The survey sha11 show a11 property lines, property corners, easements, topographical features ar.d utilities. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) ��' �S �J �G�C�� $i,Gt,i� 2 � The site and roof drainage shall be shown on plans and should be made to drain towards the Frontage Street. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) 3. The applicant shall submit project grading and drainage plans for approval prior to the issuance of a Building permit. 4 The project site is in a flood zone, the project shall comply with the City's flood zone requirements. 5 � A sanitary sewer lateral � is required for the project in accordance with the City's standards. ) 6. The project plans shall show the required Bayfront Bike/Pedestrian trail and necessary public access improvements as required by San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. 7. Satutary sewer analysis is required for the project. The sewer analysis shall identify the project's impact to the City's sewer system and any sewer pump stations and identify mitigation measures. 8 Submit traffic trip generation analysis for the project. 9. Submit a traffic impact study for the project. The traffic study should identify the project generated impacts and recommend mitigation measures to be adopted by the project to be approved by the City Engineer. 10. The project shall file a parcel map with the Public Works Engineering Division. The parcel map shall show all existing property lines, easements, monuments, and new property and lot lines proposed by the map. Page 1 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 11. A latest preliminary title report of the subject parcel of land shall be submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division with the parcel map for reviews. 12 Map closure/lot closure calculations shall be submitted with the parcel map. 13 The project shall submit a condominium map to the Engineering Divisions in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. 14 �_ The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary appurtenant work. 15 The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage streetscape improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutters, parking meters and poles, trees, and streetlights in accordance with sireetscape master plan. 16 By the preliminary review of plans, it appears that the project may cause adverse impacts during construction to vehicular traffic, pedestrian traffic and public on street parking. The project shall identify these impacts and provide mitigation measure acceptable to the City. 17 The project shall submit hydrologic calculations from a registered civil engineer for the proposed creek enclosure. The hydraulic calculations must show that the proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any adverse impact to both upstream and downstream properties. The hydrologic calculations shall accompany a site map showing the area of the 100-year flood and existing improvements with proposed improvements. 18 Any work within the drainage area, creek, or creek banks requires a State Department of Fish and Game Permit and Army Corps of Engineers Permits. 19 No construction debris shall be allowed into the creek. 20 �_ The project shall comply with the City's NPDES permit requirement to prevent storm water pollution. 21 The project does not show the dimensions of existing driveways, re- submit plans with driveway dimensions. Also clarify if the project is proposing to widen the driveway. Any widening of the driveway is subject to City Engineer's approval. 22 The plans do not indicate the slope of the driveway, re-subinit plans showing the driveway profile with elevations Page 2 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 23 The bacic of the driveway/sidewalk approach shall be at least 12" above the flow line of the frontage curb in the street to prevent overflow of storm water from the street into private property. 24. For the takeout service, a garbage receptacle shall be placed in front. The sidewalk fronting the store shall be kept clean 20' from each side of the property. 25. For commercial projects a designated garbage bin space and cleaning area shall be located inside the building. A drain connecting the garbage area to the Sanitary Sewer System is required. Page 3 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc Project Comments Date � From: Subject: Staff Review: November 18, 2013 0 Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 X Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Request for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permit for attached garage for a new, two-story single family dwelling with an attached garage at 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-261-040 November 25, 2013 1) Stormwater requirements are required to be implemented at stand-alone single family home projects that create and/or replace 2,500 sq.ft. or more of impervious surface. These requirements are in addition to any City requirements. To determine if this project is subject to those requirements complete and return the attached "Stormwater Checklist for Small Projects." For additional information about these requirements please refer to the attached flyer "New Stormwater Control Requirements Effective 12/1/12" and by visiting the San Mateo County Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (SMCWPPP) website at: http://flowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section4/C3iNewRegsSmProjSep 2012.doc To obtain a checklist electronically, the document is available at: http://flowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section4/StormChecklistSmallProj Dec2012.doc 2) Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City's NPDES (stormwater) permit to prevent stormwater pollution from construction activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement appropriate and effective BMPs during all phases of construction, including demolition. When submitting plans for a building permit include a list of construction BMPs as project notes on a separate full size plan sheet, preferably 2' x 3' or larger. Project proponent may use the attached Construction BMPs plan sheet to comply with this requirement. Electronic file is available for download at: http://flowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section5/ConstBMPPIanJun2012. pdf 3) Best Management Practices (BMPs) requirements apply on any projects using architectural copper. To learn what these requirements are, see attached flyer "Requirements for Architectural Copper." Electronic file is available for download at: http://flowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section8/ArchitecturalcopperBMPs . pdf - � + For assistance please contact Stephen D. at 650-342-3727 Reviewed by: SD Date: 11 /25/2013 �3_�,,' `,� � i�hE ; :V. j �� SAh MAiEO COUNiYWIDE Water Pollution Prevention Program Clean Water. Healthy Cemmunity. Construction Best Management Practices BMPs � ) Construction projects are required to implement the stormwater best management practices (BMP) on this page, as they apply to your project, all year long. �iaterials & �i'aste blanagement Nan-R:aardous �lalcrinls ❑ 8cmi and coccr stockpilcs of sand, din or oihcr mnnmaion marerial witl� iarps �� hcn min is Forccas� or if no� actrvciy bcinF u�-d w�ithin 1-f dar5. ❑ Usc (but don'i occrosc) mclaimcd r�amr for dus� wntrol. Ela�rrJous hiatcrials ❑ IaM;I nll hvardous matcrials and ha'rardaus «�aslcs (sucii as pcsticidcs, paims, tliinncrs. solcencs, fucl. oil, and anlifreczc) in aecurdancc �rith cin�, counn, swm mid fcdcr�l regulntions. ❑ Srore hazallous malcrials and �vastcs in ��amr Iight cowaincrs, sinrc in appmprialc sccmidan conlaimncnl, and corcr tlicm at Ihc cnd of cecq ��ork dae or during o�cl �ccalhcronrhen rain is I�vttnsi. ❑ Follo��• ina:iufnclurer's applicalwn inswclions for haiardous marerials and be carcFul not m uu morc dian necessan�. Do no� apply chemiwls omdoors when rain is forecas� H�i�hin .4 hours. ❑ Arranoe (a appmpriatz disposal of all hazardons ��asics. N'nste At�nagcmcnt ❑ Covcr..auc disposal conlaincrs sccurelc �vilh iarps at lhc cnd of cren� i�nrt dap and during ��ei weather. ❑ Chcck wastc disposal comainers Freyuen�ly (ur Ical:s yid to make 5urc IheV NC not ' o�cr511cd. Ncccrhasc �� do n a dum srer on �ic P constmc�ion sicc. ❑ Clean ur replacc ponablc loilcls. and ii�spect tlwm @cqucnUp Cor IcaF:s and spills. ❑ Disposc o; all �vustcs m�d dcbris pmpcd��. R<n�Ue maicrials and o�nsu:s thm can 6c mn�cicd (such as asphall, coMrcic. aggrcgaic basc mmcrinls, �vood. gvp board p�pc, ca.) ❑ Dispose ofliqnid residucs fmm pouns, thinicrs. sokenls, glues. and dcaiung Ouids as liaz�rdous �ros�e. Conslructiun Entr:umcs anJ Pcrimcicr ❑ Es�ablisha��dmnin�nincRcaircperimcicrwntmisy�dstabilir.call CORShLC[:OII CIIIi�fICCS 011d C\If5 10 SIIRICICIIII\' COIIPOI Cf05101� �Ild sedimenl dischorges Cmm site aiW uacking otl'site. ❑ S�vccp or vacuum an}� street vacking immcdialclr and scc�vc udinunt soume �o prevene CuNier vacking. Nn�er hose dmai suee�s to dcnn up tracking Equipmeut A�Ianagement & Spill Control �.: ' �.� 4t M1]:un[cnancc an� Parking � � • � ❑ Designatc an arca, fitted rviW appropciate BMPs, for vchicic and cquipmcnt puku�g nud storage. ❑ Pedomi major mointenance, rcpxirjobs, and eehicic and cquipmcm �rnshing off site. ❑ If afucline or vehide maima�m�ca muse be dune onsilc, �eork in a bcnnud arca ao�ay fiom stonn drains nnd a��cr a drip pan bio cnough Io collcct Ouids. Recyde or dispose o( 8uids u 6azudous �enate. ❑ It rchicle or equipmen� cleaniug must be dane onsi�e, dwn x�ith �racer onlr in a benued arca tlmt ��ill not allmv rinse �t�ater to nm inlo guttcrs. streelz. storm drains, or surFacc watcrs. ❑ Do uo1 clran vchicic or cquipm.nt o�ssi�c using swps, soh�rn�s, dcgreasers. slcnm deanuig equipment. ecc. Spill Prc��cncion and Contml ❑ Kccp spill cleanup maicrials (rags, absorbcnLs, c[c.) evailablc at �k conslncfion si�c at all �imcs. ❑ Ins�.c1 �chicics and cquipmcnt Gcqucndy for ond ¢poir Ica{-s plompUr. Usc drip pans ro u�tch Ical;s until mpairs an: madc. ❑ Clcan up spills or IcaAs immediVely wid dispose o( cicannp ma�crials propcd��. ❑ Do not h�u do�rn surfaccs ��•hnc Ouids hma spillcd. Usc drc cicannp mclhods (abwrbcnt matcnals. w1 liucr, ancVor rags). ❑ S�vccp up spillcd drr malcrinls immcdiutlr. Do no� up io �rash �hem m�ar wiW wa¢r, or b�w thcm. ❑ Clcm up spills on dirt a'cas Is digy�ing up and pmperk disposu�g of cumaminated sod. ❑ Report sig�uficane spills inunediately. 1'ou are reqnilcd b�� Im� to rcport all sip�ificant `elease{uf hararda�s maicnals, inch�dins oil. To rcpon a spill: 1) Dial 91 t r row locel emergeocy rcsponse number, 2) Call O�e Govcmor's O1Lce oC Emergcncy Scn�ees Wnming Ccnter.(800) Bi2-79j0 (2�Iwius). Garth«•ork & Paving/Asphalt W'ork Contaminated Soils ,q r i��i �� t'�'y----�-=..�,-¢,. i �1�� Rnl � � •� ^ �+?�.:i*i3��.. _ �� ;5—:- _"`� m � . ... .��,� Erusian Contral ❑ Schednlc grading and c<caraoon wark for M� a�eathvonlp. ❑ S�abilix ell dcnudcd ar,.nc, inswll and maintain Icmporan� erosion conuols (s�mh as crosion conrcol fabnc or bonded fibcr mavis) untll vcgela�ion is estnbGshcd. ❑ Seed or plan� vege�ation for erosio�i control an slopes or �vhcre conswction is notimmcdi�tcly planncd SeAimrnt Contrul ❑ Pmtecl s[orm drain inlcts. 6uucrs, dirhu. and dtaiwge rourscs �rith oppropriole BA1Ps. suG� as gravcl bags. fibcr mfls, bemis, etc. ❑ Pmrurt seduuen[ from mi�atu.g o0'sitc by insWfling and maintaining udfineuc coutrols. such as 66cr rolls, sih fenccs. or scdimcnt buvns. ❑ l:ccp ccwratcd soil on Utc silc ��hcra il �vill mt callecl inm �m s¢eet. ❑ Tra��sfcrc�cavetcdmalcriulstodump trucks on �ie sitc, not in dm streel. ❑ Contaminatcd Soils ❑ If any o(lhc follo��ins condi[ions are obsen�cd, �cs1 for comuninatlan und conlaa thc Rcgional Wotcr Qualip� Conrrol Board: ■ Unusnal wiI condilions, discofomtion, ar oAor. ■ Abandoncd nndnaround mnV;s. ■ Abandoncd wclls ■ Buricd bnncls, debris, or vash. ❑ Acaid pa��ing and ual coaGng in �.ci �ra��er, or �vhen min is forecase before Gcsh paccmcnt will ha�•c timc io cus. ❑ Coccr siom� drain inlcts and manholcs whcn epplying scal coaL racA wat, slum- seal, fog seal, etc. ❑ Collect and rmcie or appropnnleh� dispott ofcxccss abrasice �raccl or sand. Do NOT nacep or �vash it inm gwmrs. ❑ Do mt use waicr Io wash dmcn fr�sh asphah concro�c pavcmrnL San�cutting & qsphall/Concrete Rcmo�•�I ❑ Complc�ely cover or borricade sam� drain inlc6 u�hrn sau cuning. Usc filicr fabric, catch buin fnlci fihcrs. or graccl bags tn kecp sl�urq out of tl�e stomi Nain sysiem. ❑ Shocel, abosorb, or �•acuwn sa�vcuc slum u�d Aixposc of all ..�actc as soon es you arc f nishcd in onc Iocalion or nt �he e� of cach work day (u�hichecer is soonQ!). ❑ If mwcut slum� enters a calth b�sin. cltan it up immcdialclp. Concrete, Grout & �lortar 1pplication ❑ Smre concrecc y�ow and monar undcr caccr, on pallas anJ mea�� Gom drainage arcas. Thesc marerioLs musl nc�•cr rcoch a slomt d+ain. ❑ WasL ou� concrcic cquipmcnvwc4s oRsire or in a rontained arca, so thcrc is no discharge inro O�e undcrl��ing wil or m�ro surrounding arcas. Lct wncrcic hardcn and disposc of as garhagc. ❑ Collcu ihc ivash ��alcr f�om wasl�ing expowl aggrcgaa concrctc mid remorc ii for appropnatc disposal oRsilc. Dewatering ;;� ( � ; � .. F's" � ��'�j� '.?-�;;__ .. .� �,T . "1+ y�/ _ .'�lil ❑ ElTcnimlc mmwgc all run�on, all runoff �eithin �ce sit<. and all rwiolithm ILSCIWr CS (fOm I�IC i s �c. Di.cn run 6 ��atcr fmm olisilc awaa from all dis�wbcd arws or o�henviu ensure compliance. ❑ �Yhcn dnvatcring. no[ifr- and oblain appmval From the local municipnlii� b.fo�c disclurging ��aicr Io a strcci guucr or s�onn dmin. Filvation or divcrsion throug6 a basin, tanl:, or scdimenl trap i a� bc rcqnircd. ❑ In areaz of knoxn contamination, ics�ng is `cquimd pnor io rcusc or discla�e of yomd�camc Cansuh a�i�h Wc Enginttr Io de�ermu�c �vLeO�cr �csting is rcquired and �IO��' fOIfNlclPfC�lcSt��LS. CO�I�nlli�]ICd ground�.alct m st bc Ircatcd or huulyd ofi-si¢ (or pmper disposnl. Storm drain polluters may be liable for fines of up to $10,000 per day! Painting & Paint Removal �_ ; i � � " k, �.: �,;;_.. _.,� � - � .r--- Painting clunup ❑ Nerer dcan bmshes or nnse pnim comuincrs inw a svcct, guttcc, slomi dmm orsurfaccwamrs. ❑ for �cnmr bazcd paints, pom� ou� bmshcs io �ic cslcnlpossiblc. Rinsc to thc aniiep� uiccr oncc . au ho�c gaincd pcnnission from Wc local.eas�crvatcr ir.atmcnl autlwnt�. Nc��cr pour paini do�en u drnin, ❑ For oil-bewd paiu�s, poini ow brwhcs io �hc c.inn possiblc and dcan �cith ihinncr or sol��cni in a proper cai��au�cr_ Fillcr w�d rnuc ihinncrs and solrcros. Disposc of residuc aiid unus�blc thinncr/sol� ents as lu�ardous waxic. Puint rcmurnl ❑ ClKmicnl pain� smpping residuc and chips and duv from merinc polnls nr paints coruaining Icad or �ribWrlun musi bc d�cposcd oCas harardous �ras�.. ❑ Poiut cl�ips and dusl fmm non-haiardoi�s dry stripping:md snnd blasting mop bc s��cp� up or collm�ed in plas�ic drop clotlis md dispowd ofu uazh. Landscape Materials �, �t�.rti;� � ��'� C� � ;4_ � ❑ Con�mn :iockpilcd landscnping mmcnols b�' sioring tl�cm undcr Iarps �.�licn �hc�� uc not acii.�N�� bcing ��scd. ❑ Stack c�odi6le landscapc maicrial on pallcu. Covcr or slorc J�csc ma icrials �chcn ihcc are noi ac�i��clr bcing uscd ar applicd. ❑ Diswntinuc appliwtion al'ai�� zrudiblc Im�dscapc muicrinl �ciWin 2 dars befom a forecasi ruin crcm or dunng �cci �vcndicr. � �xx Na4 u�aur+Trwio[ Watef PQ��tion ��ver�t'ion Program n��W�ter. X��hl+y �°"'nunhg. Requirements for Architectural Copper Protect water quality during installation, cleaning, freating, and washing! Copper from Buildings May Harm Aquatic Life Copper can harm aquatic life in San Francisco Bay. Water that comes in�o contact with architectural copper may contribute to impacts, especially during installation, cleaning, treating, or washing. Patination Solutions that are used to obtain the desired shade of green or brown typically contain acids. After treatment, when the copper is rinsed to remove these acids, the rinse water is a source of pollutants. M unicipalities prohibit discharges to the storm drain of water used in the in sfalfation, cleaning, treating and washing of architectural copper. U se Best Management Practices (BMPs) Ti-�e following Best Management Practices (BMPs) discharges to storm drains. ttw�ding wlth coppe.rtlashing, gutter and drainpipe, must be implemented to prevent prohibited During /nsta!/ation • If possible, purchase copper materials that have been pre-patinafed at the factory. • If patination is done on-site, implement one or more of the following BMPs: o Discharge the rinse water to landscaping. Ensure fhat ihe rinse water does not f[ow to fhe street or storm drain. Block off storm drain inlet if needed. o Collect rinse water in a tank and pump fo the sariitary sewer. Contact your local sanitary sewer agency before discharging io the sanifary sewer. o Coflect the rinse wafer in a tank and hauf off-sife for proper disposaf. � Consider coafing the copper materiafs wiih an impervious coating ihat prevenfs furiher. corrosion and runoff. This will afso maintain the desired color for a longer time, requiring less marntenance. During Maintenance Implement the following BMPs during routine mainfenance activities, such as power washing the roof, re-patination or re-application of impervious coating; • Block storm drain inlets as needed to prevent runofF from entering storm drains. • Discharge fhe wash water to landscaping or to the sanitary sewer (with permission from the local sanifary sewer agency). If this is not an option, haul fhe wash wafer off-site for proper disposal, Profect the Bay/Ocean and yourself! If you are responsible for a discharge to fhe storm drain of non- sformwafer generated by installing, cleaning, freating or washing copper archifectural features, you are in violation of the municipai sformwater ordinance and may be subject fo a fine, Contact Informafion The San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program (ists municipal stormwater contacts at www.flowsfobav,ora (click on "Business", then "New Development", then "local permitting agency"). F/NAL February 29, 2012 prohibrted discharge, The water musP be pumped and disposed of properly. �..� .�.. SAN �ATEO CuUNTYWIDE Water Pollution Prevention Program Stormwater Checklist for Small Projects Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit (MRP) Order No. R2-2009-0074 ; Order No. R2-2011-0083 NPDES No. CAS612008 City of Burlingame - Office of Environmental Compliance 1103 Airport Blvd Office: (650) 342-3727 Fax: (650) 342-3712 Complete this form for individual single family home projects of any size, other projects that create and/or replace less than 10, 000 square feet of impervious surface, and projects in the following categories that create and/or replace /ess than 5, 000 square feet of impervious surface: restaurants, retail gasoline outlets, auto service facilities', and parking lots (stand-alone or part of another use). A. Project Information A.1 ProjeCt Name: New Residence, Burlingview L.I,.0 q.2 Project Address: A.3 Project APN: 2747 Burlingview Drive, Burlingame, CA 94010 B. Select Appropriate Site Design Measures B.1 Does the project create and/or replace 2,500 square feet or more of impervious surfacez? ❑ Yes ❑ No "v If yes, and fhe project will receive final discretionary approval on or after December 1, 2012, the project must include one of Site Design Measures a through f.3 Fact sheets regarding site design measures a through f may be downloaded at http://www.flowstobay.org/bs new development.php#flyers. :- If no, or the project will receive final discretionary app�oval before December 1, 2012, the project is encouraged to implement site design measures4, which may be required at municipality discretion. Consult with municipal staff about requirements for your project. B.2 Is the site design measure included in the project plans? Plan Yes No Sheet No. ❑ f ,d. 027-261-040 a. Direct roof runoff into cisterns or rain barrels and use rainwater for irrigation or other non-potable use. ❑ b. Direct roof runoff onto vegetated areas. c. Direct runoff from sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios onto vegetated areas. d. Direct runoff from driveways and/or uncovered parking lots onto vegetated areas. � � ❑ � ❑ � ❑ ❑ N1b. ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ � ❑ ❑ e. Construct sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios with permeable surfaces. f. Construct bike lanes, driveways, and/or uncovered parking lots with permeable surfaces. � � , � i. Use micro-detention, including distributed landscape-based detention. j. Protect sensitive areas, including wetland and riparian areas, and minimize changes to the natural topography. k. Self-treating area (see Section 4.2 of the C.3 Technical Guidance) g. Minimize land disturbance and impervious surface (especially parking lots). h. Maximize permeability by clustering development and preserving open space. I. Self-retaining area (see Section 4.3 of the C.3 Technical Guidance) ❑ [� ❑ � ❑ ,�. m. Plant or preserve interceptor trees (Section 4.1, C.3 Technical Guidance) � See Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes here. 2 Complete the C.3/C.6 Development Review Checklist if the project is not an individual single family home, and it creates and/or replaces 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surface; or if it is a restaurant, retail gasoline outlet, auto service facility, or parking lot project that creates and/or replaces 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface. ' See MRP Provision C.3.i. � See MRP Provision C.3.a.i.(6). 1 �;� .^-..1 ' Approved December 4, 2012 , "s'l.1�'. Stormwater Checklist for Small Projects C. Select appropriate source controls (Encouraged for all projects; may be required at municipal discretion. Consult municipal staff.5) Arethese Featuresthat features in require source project? control m eas u res �� 1►= � �� Storm Drain Floor Drains Parking garage Landscaping ool/SpalFountain Food Service Equipment (non- residential) ❑ � ❑ � Refuse Areas ■��■ �■�� L■� ��■ Outdoor Process Activities � Outdoor Equipment/ Materials Storage Vehicle/ Equipment Cleaning Vehicle/ Equipment Repair and Maintenance ❑ ❑ Fuel Dispensing Areas ❑ � ❑ � Loading Docks ❑ � ❑ � Fire Sprinklers ❑ ❑ Miscellaneous Drain or Wash Water ❑ ❑ Architectural Copper 5 See MRP Provision C.3.a.i(7). Source control measures (Refer to Local Source Control List for detailed requirements) ■ Mark on-site inlets with the words "No Dumping! Flows to Bay" or equivalent. ■ Plumb interior floor drains to sanitary sewer [or prohibit]. ■ Plumb interior parking garage floor drains to sanitary sewer.fi • Retain existing vegetation as practicable. • Select diverse species appropriate to the site. Include plants that are pest- and/or disease-resistant, drought-tolerant, and/or attract beneficial insects. ■ Minimize use of pesticides and quick-release fertilizers. � Use efficient irrigation system; design to minimize runoff. • Provide connection to the sanitary sewer to facilitate draining.6 Provide sink or other area for equipment cleaning, which is: ■ Connected to a grease interceptor prior to sanitary sewer discharge.s ■ Large enough for the largest mat or piece of equipment to be cleaned. ■ Indoors or in an outdoor roofed area designed to prevent stormwater run-on and run-off, and signed to require equipment washing in this area. ■ Provide a roofed and enclosed area for dumpsters, recycling containers, etc., designed to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff. • Connect any drains in or beneath dumpsters, compactors and tallow bin areas serving food service facilities to the sanitary sewer.� ■ Perform process activities either indoors or in roofed outdoor area, designed to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff, and to drain to the sanitary sewer.6 ■ Cover the area or design to avoid pollutant contact with stormwater runoff. ■ Locate area only on paved and contained areas. ■ Roof storage areas that will contain non-hazardous liquids, drain to sanitary sewer6, and contain by berms or similar. ■ Roofed, pave and berm wash area to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff, plumb to the sanitary sewer6, and sign as a designated wash area. ■ Commercial car wash facilities shall discharge to the sanitary sewer.s ■ Designate repair/maintenance area indoors, or an outdoors area designed to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff and provide secondary containment. Do not install drains in the secondary containment areas. ■ No floor drains unless pretreated prior to discharge to the sanitary sewer. 6 ■ Connect containers or sinks used for parts cleaning to the sanitary sewer. 6 ■ Fueling areas shall have impermeable surface that is a) minimally graded to prevent ponding and b) separated from the rest of the site by a grade break. ■ Canopy shall extend at least 10 ft in each direction from each pump and drain away from fueling area. • Cover and/or grade to minimize run-on to and runoff from the loading area. ■ Position downspouts to direct stormwater away from the loading area. ■ Drain water from loading dock areas to the sanitary sewer.6 ■ Install door skirts between the trailers and the building. ■ Design for discharge of fire sprinkler test water to landscape or sanitary sewers Is source control measure included in project plans? Plan Yes No Sheet No. ❑ ❑ �/A ❑ ❑ �j � � ,� r ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ N /� ❑ ❑ � � ❑ ❑ �/A ❑ ❑ NA ❑ ❑ N � ❑ ❑ N/A ❑ ❑ N �A ❑ ❑ N A � � ■ Drain condensate of air conditioning units to landscaping. Large air � ❑ conditioning units may connect to the sanitary sewer.6 ■ Roof drains shall drain to unpaved area where practicable. ■ Drain boiler drain lines, roof top equipment, all washwater to sanitary sewer6. • Drain rinse water to landscaping, discharge to sanitary sewer6, or collect and ❑ ❑ �� dispose properly offsite. See flyer "Requirements for Architectural Copper." 2 Approved December 4, 2012 Stormwater Checklisf for Small Projects D. Implement construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) (Required for all projects.) D.1 Is the site a"High Priority Site"? (Municipal staff will make this determination; if the answeris yes, Yes ❑ No ❑ the project will be referred to construction site inspectron staff for monthly stormwater inspections during the wet season, October 1 through April 30.) �"High Priority Sites" are sites that require a grading permit, are adjacent to a creek, or are otherwise high priority for stormwater protection during construction per MRP Provision C.6.e.ii(2). D2 All projects require appropriate stormwater BMPs during construction, indicate which BMPs are included in the project, below. Yes No Best Management Practice (BMP) ,� ❑ Attach the San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program's construction BMP plan sheet to project plans and require contractor to implement the applicable BMPs on the plan sheet. � ❑ Temporary erosion controis to stabilize all denuded areas until permanent erosion controls are established. ❑� Delineate with field markers clearing limits, easements, setbacks, sensitive or critical areas, buffer zones, trees, and drainage courses. �❑ Provide notes, specifications, or attachments describing the following: ■ Construction, operation and maintenance of erosion and sediment controls, include inspection frequency; ■ Methods and schedule for grading, excavation, filling, clearing of vegetation, and storage and disposal of excavated or cleared material; ■ Specifications for vegetative cover & mulch, include methods and schedules for planting and fertilization; ■ Provisions for temporary and/or permanent irrigation. � ❑ Perform clearing and earth moving activities only during dry weather. � ❑ Use sediment controls or filtration to remove sediment when dewatering and obtain all necessary permits. �] ❑ Protect all storm drain inlets in vicinity of site using sediment controls such as berms, fiber rolls, or filters. �� Trap sediment on-site, using BMPs such as sediment basins or traps, earthen dikes or berms, silt fences, check dams, soil blankets or mats, covers for soil stock piles, etc. j� ❑ Divert on-site runoff around exposed areas; divert off-site runoff around the site (e.g., swales and dikes). � ❑ Protect adjacent properties and undisturbed areas from construction impacts using vegetative buffer strips, sediment barriers or filters, dikes, mulching, or other measures as appropriate. �, ❑ Limit construction access routes and stabilize designated access points. � ❑ No cleaning, fueling, or maintaining vehicles on-site, except in a designated area where washwater is contained and treated. � ❑ Store, handle, and dispose of construction materials/wastes properly to prevent contact with stormwater. � ❑ Contractor shall train and provide instruction to all employees/subcontractors re: construction BMPs. � � Control and prevent the discharge of all potential pollutants, including pavement cutting wastes, paints, concrete, petroleum products, chemicals, washwater or sediments, rinse water from architectural copper, and non-stormwater discharges to storm drains and watercourses. Name of applicant completing the form: Richard Signature: � Date: � I E. Comments (for municipal staff use only): F. NOTES (for municipal staff use only): Section A Notes: � Any connection to the sanitary sewer system is subject to sanitary district approval. � Businesses that may have outdoor process activities/equipment include machine shops, auto repair, industries with pretreatment facilities. 3 Approved December 4, 2012 01�• 1�� OUTDOOR WATER USE EFFICIENCY CHECKLIST • : - • • - • • � • • • I cert' hat the subject project meets the specified requirements of the Water Conservation in Landscaping Ordinance. " � �17�1� Signature Date �1.Single Family ❑ Multi-Family ❑ Commercial ❑ Institutional ❑ Irrigation only U Industrial U Other: Applicant Name (print): Contact Phone #: Project Site Address: �-j c{, gvE„�� (�R�� Agency Review Project Area (sq.ft. or acre): l O� p(ps # of Units: # of Meters: (Pass) (Fail) Total Landscape Area (sq.ft.): � � 2 ► (oq'1 Turf Irrigated Area (sq.ft.): 3 � � Non-Turf Irrigated Area (sq.ft.): t � �j "',' � � Special Landscape Area (SLA) (sq.ft.): � � Water Feature Surface Area (sq.ft.): (o�(Q ................... ................... ................... ................... ................... ................... ................... Turf Less than 25% of the landscape area is �Yes ❑ � turf ❑ No, See Water Budget All turf areas are > 8 feet wide Yes ❑ ❑ All turf is planted on slopes < 25% � Yes ❑ � Non-Turf At least 80% of non-turf area is native Yes � � or low water use plants ❑ No, See Water Budget Hydrozones Plants are grouped by Hydrozones � Yes � � At least 2-inches of mulch on exposed � Yes ❑ � Mulch soil surfaces Irrigation System Efficiency 70% ETo (100% ETo for SLAs) J8l Yes ❑ � No overspray or runoff ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ Irrigation System Design System efficiency > 70% �Yes ❑ � Automatic, self-adjusting irrigation ❑ No, not required for Tier 1 ❑ ❑ controllers � Yes Moisture sensor/rain sensorshutoffs �Yes ❑ � No sprayheads in < S-ft wide area Yes ❑ ❑ Irrigation Time System only operates between 8 PM Yes � � and 10 AM Metering Separate irrigation meter � No, not required because < 5,000 sq.ft. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes Swimming Pools / Spas Cover highly recommended Yes ❑ � ❑ No, not required Water Features Recirculating ❑ Yes N/p��sW„u,��N� poo��__ � � Less than 10% of landscape area ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ Documentation Checklist �.Yes ❑ ❑ Landscape and Irrigation Design Plan �Prepared by applicant ❑ ❑ ❑ Prepared by professional Water Budget (optional) � �repared by applicant ❑ ❑ ❑ Prepared by professional Audit Post-installation audit completed Completed by applicant ❑ ❑ ❑ Completed by professional Project Comments Date: 1� From: November 18, 2013 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 0 Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 OFire Division (650) 558-7600 0 Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permit for attached garage for a new, two-story single family dwelling with an attached garage at 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-261-040 Staff Review: November 25, 2013 The house is intended to be equipped with a fire sprinkler system throughout. 1. Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 2. All sprinkler drainage shall be placed into landscaping areas. 3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Reviewed by: .::C� � Date: ZQ ��r-1 3 Project Comments Date: To: From: November 18, 2013 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 X Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (65Q) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permit for attached garage for a new, two-story single family dwelling with an attached garage at 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-261-040 Staff Review: November 25, 2013 1. No existing tree over 48 inches in circumference at 54 inches from base of tree may be removed without a Protected Tree Permit from the Parks Division (558-7330). 2. Landscape plan is required to meet `Water Conservation in Landscape Regulations" (attached). Irrigation Plan required for Building permit. Audit due for Final. Reviewed by: B Disco Date: 11 /25l13 Stormwater Checklist for Small Projects Section B N Section C Notes: Section D Notes: Approved December 4, 2012 OUTDOOR WATER USE EFFICIENCY CHECKLIST • : - • . - • • � . • Auditor: Materials Received and Reviewed: ❑ Water Conservation in Landscaping Ordinance ❑ Outdoor Water Use Efficiency Checklist ❑ Outdoor Water Use Efficiency Checklist ❑ Water Budget ❑ Water Budget Calculation Worksheets ❑ Landscape Plan ❑ Plant List ❑ Post-Installation Audit ❑ Other: Date Reviewed: ❑ Follow up required (explain): ❑ Drip irrigation ❑ Self-adjusting Irrigation Controller Date Resubmitted: ❑ Plant palate Date Approved: ❑ Three (3) inches of mulch Dedicated Irrigation Meter Required: ❑ Soil amendment (e.g., compost) Meter sizing: ❑ Grading ❑ Pooland/orspa cover U Dedicated irrigation meter ❑ Other: Comments: a Selected Definitions: Tier 1 New construction and rehabilitated landscapes with irrigated landscape areas between ' 1,000 and 2,500 square feet requiring a building or landscape permit, plan check or design review, or new or expanded water service. Tier 2 New construction and rehabilitated landscapes with irrigated landscape areas greater than 2,500 square feet requiring a building or landscape permit, plan check or design review. ETo Reference evapotranspiration means the quantity of water evaporated from a large field of four- to seven-inch tall, cool-season grass that is well watered. Reference evapotranspiration is used as the basis of estimating water budgets so that regional differences in climate can be accommodated. SLA Special Landscaped Area. Includes edible plants, areas irrigated with recycled water, surface water features using recycled water and areas dedicated to active play such as parks, sports fields, golf courses, and where turf provides a playing surface. Professional Professional is a"certified professional" or "authorized professional" that is a certified irrigation designer, a certified landscape irrigation auditor, a licensed landscape architect, a licensed landscape contractor, a licensed professional engineer, or any other person authorized by the state to design a landscape, an irrigation system, or authorized to complete a water budget, irrigation survey or irrigation audit. Water Feature A design element where open water performs an aesthetic or recreational function. Water features include ponds, lakes, waterfalls, fountains, artificial streams, spas, and swimming pools (where water is artificially supplied). � � 2735 Burlingview Drive 2741 Burlingview Drive 2747 Burlingview Drive (Subject Properfy) Properties on Applicant Side of Burlingview Drive � 2753 Burlingview Drive � �: = �� : �� V - wz r- � . .�a�a,�� ar T - S �. � � .�s� V . �� K.� � .-.F.- � � ' . � �� x gs.� �� . �1 �� Q a �!G -?+,_'*FR,�� i�'. .... i i. �� ,� :,�- — ��. Y � W Z e�`',. 5;+�' h o ` _ . . _ "'�,.�st�'��.."��A'�� yl �w - . . "� �— --- -- —^ -'— - �-� � . —� -- - - ; -� S � . . . , � J !—��. fwa'r —_ _--.._� .--._' 1" A'.',KyY y'�� 2759 Burlingview Drive �a+ � 2755 Summit Drive 2760 Burlingview Drive 2754 Burlingview Drive Properties on Opposite Side of Burlingview Drive ' � � I ti i"l,$i '�,' _ _ i+��3` .`- ._ - _e. �� . ; t-...<.-�" .. � � -.-:,,�+ __. .z� .__ ,.u_..aw - ..ams � 2 Hillview Court � 4_ � � t ... � .._. +;; 1 U � � � o '; o c o � ; ° o " o � � 'a U c� �� = m t� — c E �L m' � o 3 � Q _ 6 L m n m Q PlonningSuS�ninvk I1�1_'�1013 Neighborhood Photos PHI.I 1316 ot 2748 Burlingview Drive �. CITY OF BURLINGAME COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAh1E 5U1 PRIMROSE ROAD =��y�w ;11,_ BURLINGAME, CA 94010 PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 www.buriingame.org Site: 2747 BURLINGVIEW DRIVE The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 2014 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Nillside Area Construction Permit and Design Review for a new one-story house and a Special Permit for an attached garage at 2747 BURLINGVIEW DRIVE zoned R-1. APN 027-261-040 Mailed: February 14, 2014 (Please refer io other side) P�JBLl� HEARING IVOTICE �iiv of �urlin_ ame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Depariment at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, Caliiornia. ii you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only ihose issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in ihe notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public h�aring. Property o��mers who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. V1�illiam Meeker Communizy Development Director �'ilBLIG H�ARIIeI(� �I�i10E (Please reler ro other side) . a 1` ' �� - . _ _ _ _ .� . .. ;�� ,;�tr�� ,; .. � � � �. ` .�: � _ �i c..�-�. ,• ;+t .� a� t' .. �' . ` . • ► a .� •! M ,� , � " .r,y�''�� '�` �A� � i. i�'�., . , ,� . `' � �.�, ' y, xt i w' � �; �y M1, - � � �. .:_,. �`Y,� '•S j R ,� • '14' . r �P . � � 'k /„� � . .. � ..'� 3 � � °` "� � {. .. �� _ �' .� t �'*`4 y�, � " ' O _ r`' .�'' •,'�,�s,. _ '�y" �. .R , , ,��, 'J' y� . • � „�y� . I, ti.`1�� . . �� " c -' �4 � I ' �. � l i n . � . . . _ ��' �` •� x' ♦ ,y�� ; � j_ �P ' '._� `. _ �' ` _ •� ��. �}' � � ' . � ' e ' r.. t -y` , . ♦" _'� � II � i ,�' `i j.. � �� , , q _ � '; ^� � � . _ , � � . . . .' • . . .., � , � ^ . � � _ . . -. . M- -_ . . _ , _ R� 4 � , ��; .i , � ��. �' r _, �, ..,: . � . �� '�,y� _ � , t , , ��v' r +,�� ' • + i� . �`1 'i�'�q='�� _ �-�° ' '`' - - - . �- - ` ---;�I- , � � , � ',�► ' , . ' y �� ' ,; � VM t . , � ��.''w /„_ Y"! ' � � x� y_ / f � j r � . . Z !� . � i a�1' � ,. , � .- . r . �� f � K� �° '�``` ,`� � ' `�' � !/y � Y:. �. � ��"� %i �► `,,;,) • � !� �t, �! ryr, �, ' + � . +5� z!#.l� �;:,` . � . y �1� r �.: �� T y; y r �►rt �, '� . . , � _ � �.' � �` n �.. • A tl _�: � * � '�' � _ '' ` � '' � - . .� • � ._ � ._- `,, .\�� '� � �~, f - �r ..A� � � � � . ■ , y :• � ' •� ] % � ,�i f �.� P ��1 '� � �' t� ` �c� . � � � �,:.. �' . � � .� . " _'. ��. .. � � �, ti� _ ' �' �� , �. y,��' T. � . ' 1�+-�,. �. -. .�. �� a.�� ' #`�i .J� 1MM � _ �, r- � e f . , J � �.. � � �y �""�"q�' "�,'�'� C �-. �/,�yl �4�� f ��'� �. 'Y .�t'_ � , '; F :�,. r. f. � � # .� .� , •1j� •\ 4 �'. s* � '_'�_ � l ... ' � � �. � , � � �� , � �„� �4 � ;.� 1� = � ; ' ' - �-. w f.�s_. , . � � . . - I,�`� ~ � � • �,• * .�" � � : � .g � . i`'; �� ' � � .� :.�a t.. 1 ��. 1 , tc'=" ,y`i .�r . t ` . :� _�. v' .'. .:.� , . � 1 , .� � v � _ _ . �� a'�' ''"� ' � �':' � ' ,��y� _"s � i � � 'j, � ..i y�,i � I-A. ��tY'�T i�.�� ' f � j • ` A � "«� +� � � ; , � �, • � ' ;:�' _,� :; � a r ' � . �y �,.� `�;, .�•, "'� . '1 : , ,. � , � �" �-t ;• ' � t , ,,� -� � � � � . i.� • � �. - ,\ �`� " :�,� _ r . , ., � , ., . - � ► � , � -.�� '. 4� ,� �� 'S ,}Iytii � rl.� • P •� . u • �•�� . � 1i � k '%�,� � � � " I� r /Fl . F � n�! � {��. r . . � � . _ Js` —_:�._.A '' ' �� ` '�`�� 2747 Burlingview Drive ' �� rf. , i •. . � ' �,�; t. `.�. . � , j e ''�� y ��', .. �'i � . . r � . _ � �{' w rl r ;i . S:. � � h. � .. . � �r ► ��. `, � i � �r . I , �:,�: � �� ' � .� -t . � �i - � � ° ' .� ; �P . �y. r � , . : , � . ��. " � " � � . � .� . ., .. . , . , ,...,: ,�; � •i � ___- �__ . -_ ; _--_ -- -� - -