HomeMy WebLinkAbout2747 Burlingview Drive - ResolutionRECORDING REQUESTED BY:
Planning Department
City of Burlingame
WHEN RECORDED MAIL T0:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF BURLINGAME
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
Resolution No. 79 - 2014
2747 BURLINGVIEW DRIVE
APN 027-261-040
TITLE OF DOCUMENT
I hereby certify this to be a full, true and correct copy of the
document it purports to be, the original of which is on file in my
office.
Date
William' Meeker,
October 29, 2014
�%%i;_�
ClTY
�1���.�����E
c a x� r o a x c n
',�.coqA � ";,?�i�' ',i /��0
\\�RATED .IUMF ��
�� � �-� � C���� 4
i: . 4�:'1 S: "G" i• Ri S�:F• ����, ;�'tc
C��,r? : - ?�aes z4
,=•�..c� �li- . � :'f! . �1 =. ���r,s
�i�, , . �� fo�•iic, .
,,,, ,��:�.�. �I•
;, �., ,j t F.1� -�.:r
� a:�; �
x� �� � �; ;;;! �� � � � } � �b� ,� � $ � � � :��'
� t ,
, ,.�'� r �� r 1' x �.��,, �� ,�' � V:,
^ � 'I ' , � � L ._ . •
�
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW AMENDMENT
RESOLVED, by the Pianning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for Desiqn
Review Amendment for a new, sinqle-story sinqle family dwelling with an attached at 2747 Burlinqview
Drive, Zoned R-1, Burlinqview LLC, property owner, APN: 027-261-040;
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on
September 8, 2014, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written
materials and testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that:
On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments
received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence
that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical
exemption, per CEQA Section 15303 (a), which states that construction of a limited number of
new, small facilities or structures including one single family residence or a second dwelling unit
in a residential zone is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, up to three
single-family residences maybe constructed or converted under this exemption, is hereby
approved.
2. Said Design Review Amendment is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A"
attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review Amendment are set forth in the staff report,
minutes, and recording of said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of
the County of San Mateo. M
! �,�.,� _ _t,� �,,_��� �
`�
Chairman
I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission held on the 8th dav of September, 2014, by the following vote:
2747 BURLINGVIEW DR. - RESO 79-2014
AYES: Bandrapalli, DeMartini, Gum, Loftis,
Sargent, Yie
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
RECUSED: Terrones
Secretary
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review Amendment
2747 Burlingview Drive
Effective September 18, 2014
Page 1
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date
stamped March 7, 2014, sheets A0.0, A3.1, and Boundary Survey and Topographic Map,
and date stamped March 20, 2014, sheets, A2.1, A2.3 and A5.1 through A6, and date
stamped August 11, 2014, sheets A1.1, A2.2, A4.1, A4.2, L1.1, and L1.2; and including a
synthetic turf lawn with a sand infill base in the rear yard;
2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features,
roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning
Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning
staf�;
3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which
would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit;
4. that the conditions of the Building Division's January 28, 2014 and February 6, 2014, and
November 19, 2013 memos, the Parks Division's November 25, 2013, and March 26, 2014
memos, the Engineering Division's December 4, 2013 memo, the Fire Division's December
10, 2012 memo, and the Stormwater Division's November 25, 2013 memo shall be met;
5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall
be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community
Development Director;
6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on
the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be
required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District;
7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for demolition or construction of the project, the
project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of
approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal, and the Arborist
Report date stamped March 21, 2014; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved
plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is
required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval
of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal;
8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single
termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that
these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a
Building permit is issued;
that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling
Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to
submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full
demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit;
� /:11;3�ii�_VI
Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review Amendment
2747 Burlingview Drive
Effective September 18, 2014
Page 2
9. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the
new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as
identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site
sedimentation of storm water runoff;
10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire
Codes, 2010 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame;
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION
PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION:
11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by
the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design
professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved
floor area ratio for the property;
12. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the
property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new
structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans;
this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer;
13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer,
or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural
certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be
evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved
plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design
shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be
scheduled;
14. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height
of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and
15. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the
architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been
built according to the approved Planning and Building plans.
-... : ,... ,.., r �-� - -
. _. ,: -.:, i .
Pro;ect Gomments
Date: March 24, 2014
To: � City Engineer
(65Q) 558-723f1
� Chief Building Of�cial
(65f?) 555-726U
X Parks Supervisor
(650) 558-7334
From:
Subject:
Staff Review:
Erika Lewit, Planning
� Recycling Speeialist
(S50) 558-7271
0 Fire Marshal
(650) 558-760D
Q NPDES Coordinator
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
2747 Bu�ingviewv Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-261-040 - originai
commer�ts, response fio comments, and revised pfans are in your In-
Box -
1. Include arborist report on plans_
2. Tree Protection Plan must be foliawed as specified in arborist report for 1.
Root Cufting; 2.Trenching; 3. Irrigafion
Reviewed by:B Disco Date: 3126/14
._ _ , . _ -
. I
Project Comments
Date: November 18, 2013
To: 0 Engit'teering Division
(650j 558-7230
� Builciing Divisian
�ssoj �s-72so
X Parks Divisian
(650) 558-7334
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
0 Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
From: Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review, Hiflside Area Construction Permit and
Special Permit for attached garage for a new, two-story single fami{y
dwelling with an attached garage at 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned
R-1, APN: 027-261-040
Staff Review: November 25, 2Q13
1. No e�asting tree over 48 inches in circumference at 54 inches fram base of
tree may be removed without a Protected Tree Permit from the Parks Division
(558-7330)_
2. Landscape plan is required #o meet `Water Conservation in Landscape
Regulations° (attached). trrigation Plan reqcaired for Building pe�mit. Audit due
for Final.
Reviewed by: B Disco
D�te: 1'1/25/13
- � , ., �� i
�_ ...._... _, _ .. __ � ?� �,�_.� z�.�' �.
OUTDOOR WATER USE EFFICIENCY CHECKLIST
• : - • • -. . � . • .
I cert' hat the su bjert project meets the specified requirements of the Water Conservation in Landscaping brdinance. .".:
� �/[7/��
5ignature Date
e r , : . —
t�a ; f , �
. , ..__. ....,.:. . _.� ... . ... :......�....... .. � �_.-. _ �_.._ _,._ _� _,._.,_.�,... ._ _ _.,::.. -
. . . . . , _. : . .....::: . ... _: .. _ _ , ., . :::.
j8i.Single Family Q Multi-Family ❑ Commercial ❑ Institutional ❑ Irrigetion only ❑ Industrial 0 Other:
Applicant Name {print): Contact Phone #:
Project Site Address: 27 e.t "] p�v(�V��.1 v� �,,� �R 1•1 C, AgencY �teview
Project Area (sq.ft. or acre): l O� p 6C� # of Units: # of Meters: (PaSS}; (Faii} :
:: Total LandscapeArea (sq.ft.): = � p'` C.,)
�� � ,' 2, (o�i+� �:� . -
_ . ._
7urf Irrigated Area (sq.ft.): 3 C3, -: p. ;
� ; Non-Turf Irrigated Area (sq,ft.}: � y�r,'7 ❑ . a `
;- Special Landscape Area (SLA) (sq.ft.): p, 7'
Water Feature Surface Area (sq.ft.): (o9Q
- - ' - - - - ?.�
i j, q -
Turf ' Less tha , , = _. >. .:. . -,.: .
,. . . .. , ._ .. .. <. _ . . .. . . .•.�.
n 25% of the landscape area is �Yes p; �:: <
turf ❑ No, See Water Budget
All turf areas are > 8 feet wide Yes ❑ �p ;"
All turf is planted on slopes < 2S% � Yes p 0
Non-Turf At least 80% of non-turf area is native Yes t] '. ❑:'
or low water use plants ❑ No, 5ee Water Budget
Hydrozones Plants are grouped by Hydrozones � Yes Ll ; L]
At least 2-inChes of mulch on exposed Yes � f� ,
Mutch soil surfaces
Irrigation System Efficiency 70% ETo (1Q0% ETo for SLAs) Yes , Q;' ❑;.
No overspray or runofE 0 Yes ,� f�. :,,'
Irrigation System Design System efficiency> 70% �Yes �� ' �" :
Automatic, se{f-adjusting irrigation ❑ No, not required for Tier 1 L� .: U-',
controllers I� y�
Moisture sensorJrain sensor shutaffs 1� Yes C] :� Gl '�
No sprayheads in <8-ft wide area Yes �] q,
Irrigation Time 5ystem only operates between 8 PM Yes ❑:; C}
and 1d AM
Metering Separate irrigation meter � No, not required because < 5,000 sq.ft. f3 0._:
❑ Yes
Swimming Pools / Spas Cover highly recommended Yes p`' " Li �'=.
� ❑ No, not required �-_
Water Features Recirculating ❑ Yes N Sw�v►u�►�� PooL � u,
Less than 10% of fandscape area ❑ Yes q-.�_`�
Documentation Checklist �Yes 'C1 ❑ '=
Landscape and Irrigation Design Plan 'y�Prepared by applicant C] := L3- ;"
❑ Prepared by professional
Water Budget (optional) �'repared by applicant 0 '0
❑ Prepared by professional
Audit Post-installation audit completed Completed by applicant J.: " Q'
❑ Completed by professional
0
, ,._ . _ ; _-. _
_ . , I ;:: ... . _ ;: __: i
__ , ,. .
_.-. _ : '- .._: ,.. ; _ ,__ �
OUTDOOR WATER USE EFFICIENCY CHECKLIST
��,�, � � �
� � a� s � � � a '� �_i �, .,,.� E a -� r ;.'��,,d,`,:5�
.
� m1' � 9 9 ' ' W.� 0 h o� e�C y - v ..: r r:^ tR� -Y: � '�CFry �E �, �"`Y 1h�.a���-�.
_ . _.��..5 __, ._ .� .� .� a. �'_._ " _-_ . �.. ..e.� �... .,�:if AYr', � � 1 Y:
Auditor.
Materials Received and Reviewed: ❑ Water Conservation in LandscapEng Ordinance
❑ Outdoor Water Use Efficiency Checklist ❑ Outdoor Water Use Efficiency Checklist
❑ Water Budget ❑ Water Budget Calculation Worksheets
❑ Landscape Plan ❑ Plant List
C1 Post-Instaflation Audit ❑ Other:
Date Reviewed: -
❑ Fol{ow up required (explain}: U Drip irrigation
❑ Self-adjusting Irrigation Controller
Date Resubmitted: ❑ Plant palate
Date Approved: ❑ Three (3) inches of mulch
Dedicated Irrigation Meter Required: U Soil amendment (e.g., compost)
Meter sizing: ❑ Grading
❑ Pool and/or spa cover
❑ Dedicated irrigation meter
❑ Other:
l �'
Comments:
Selected Definitions:
Tier 1 New construction and rehabilitated landscapes with irrigated landscape areas between
1,000 and 2,500 square feet requiring a building or landscape permit, plan check or
design review, or new or expanded water service.
Tier 2 New construction and rehabifitated landscapes with irrigated landscape areas greater than
2,500 square feet requiring a building ar landscape permit, plan check or design review.
ETo Reference evapotranspiration means the quantity of water evaporated from a large field of
four- to seven-inch tall, cool-season grass that is well watered. Reference evapotranspiration
is used as the basis of estimating water budgets s� that regional differences in climate
can be accommodated.
SLA Special Landscaped Area. Includes edib{e plants, areas irrigated with recycled water,
surFace water features using rec.ycled water and areas dedicated to active play such as
parks, sports fields, golf courses, and where turf provides a playing surface.
Professional Professional is a"certified professional" or "authorized professional" that is a certified irrigation
designer, a certified landscape irrigation auditor, a Eicensed landscape architect, a licensed
landscape contractor, a licensed professional engineer, or any other person authorized by the
state to design a landscape, an irrigation system, or authorized to complete a water budget,
irrigation survey or irrigation audit.
Water Feature A design element where open water performs an aesthetic ar recreational function. Water
features include ponds, lakes, waterfalls, fountains, artificial streams, spas, and swimming
pools {where water is artificially supplied).
... . -. -:.. --.., --..;.: .... .�..: ' ' :...�:. ' - ..I .. _-
. ...-. : . ..
�' � :-.'. ..�...,, '.. ... .._. .._....: '.�;._ . . .:.., ..:, . . . .. ...I _ - �._ _ _
. � i
•
Date:
Project Commen#s
February 6, 2014
To: � City Engineer
(650) 558-7230
X Chief Building Official
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Supervisor
(650} 558-7334
Fram: Erika Lewit, Planning
� Recycfing Specialist
(65Q) 558-7279
� Fire Marshal
(650) 558-7600
0 NPDES Coardinator
(850) 342-3727
� City Attorney
Subject: revised plans for 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned R-1, APN:
027-26 ���0 - original comments, response to comments, and
revised plans are in your �n- Box
Staff Review:
No #urther comments.
All conditions of approval as stated in ail previous reviews of the project will apply to this
proj ect.
Reviewed by:
Date: 2-6-2014
: .
; __ ,::: _: :- - _ -
..._ . , ..
--. � �
_. . . :. .. ., _. . � ,, :'
- - � :. ,
-
Project Commenis
Date: January 27, 2014
To: � City Engineer � Recycling Specialist
(650) 558-7230 (650) 558-7279
X Chief Building Official � Fire Marshal
(650) 558-7260 (650) 558-7600
0 Parks Supervisor � NPDES Coordinator
(650) 558-7334 (650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
From: Erika Lewit, Planning
Subject: revised plans for 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-
261-040 - original comments, response to comments, and revised
plans are in your !n- Box
Re-Check Comments:
13. RESIDENTIAL: Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one
window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the locafion and fhe net
clear opening height and widfh of a1I required egress windows on the elevafion drawinqs.
2013 California Residential Code (CRC) §R310.
Note: The area labeled "Office" is a room that can be used for sleeping purposes and, as such,
must comply with this requirement.
The note on Sheet A0.0 does not address the comment.
Specify the location and fhe nef clear openrng heighf and width of a11 required egress
windows on fhe elevation drawrngs.
NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and pfans that specifically address
item #13 be re-submitted before this project can move forward for Pianning Commission
action.
Reviewed by:
Project Comments
Date
To:
From:
November 18, 2013
� Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
X Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
Planning Staff
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
0 Stormwater Divisian
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Subject: Request for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and
Special Permit for attached garage for a new, two-story single family
dwelling with an attached garage at 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned
R-1, APN: 027-261-040
Staff Review: November 25, 2013
�jOn the plans specify that this project wifl comply with the 2013 California Building
Code, 2013 California Residential Cade (where applicable), 2013 Cafifornia
Mechanical Code, 2013 California Electrical Code, and 2013 Cafifornia Plumbing
Code, including a!1 amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1889. No#e: If the
Planning Commission has not approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on
December 31, 2013 then this project must comply with the 2013 California
Building Codes.
��pecify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2013 California Energy
Efficiency Standards.
Go fio http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24I2013standards/ for publications and
details.
� Indicate on the plans that the roof will comply with Cool Roof requirements of the
2013 California Energy Code. 2Q13 CEC §11a.8. The 2013 Residential and Non-
Residential Compliance Manuals are available on line at
http://www.energ .ca.gov/title24/2013standards/
� Place the following informatian on the first page of the plans:
"Cons#ruction Hours"
Weekdays: 7:aa a.m. — 7:00 p.m.
Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m.
Sundays and Holidays: 10:40 a.m. — 6:00 p.m.
(See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.)
5� On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that
require work to be pertormed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for
these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning
i
;
,..
_. . _.,, , .
;:. ... _-
-- . .:._ .._ -,,_. .. -
::;_ ,... -: _ , _ _: ..,. _ .: , ;.
�
i
Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must
submit a Revision to the Cify for any work not graphically illustrated on the Job
Copy of the plans prior to perFarming the work.
6) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame
business license.
7) Provide fully dimensioned plans.
8) Provide a fully dimensioned site plan which shows the true proper�y boundaries,
the location of afl structures on the property, existing driveways, and on-site
parking.
9) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a
completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition
Permit will not be issued untii a Building Permit is issued for the project.
10)Show the distances from all exteriar walls to property lines or io assumed
property lines
11)Show #he dimensions to adjacent structures.
12)Obtain a survey of the property lines.
�ESfDENTIAL: Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at
least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify
the locafion and the net clear opening helght and width of atl required
egress windows on the elevation drawinqs. 2013 California Residential Code
(CRC} §R310.
Note: The area labeled "affice" is a room that can be used for sleeping purposes
and, as such, must comply with this requirement.
�ndicate on the plans tha# a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the
Depar�ment of Public Works.
15)Provide guardrails at ali landings. NOTE: All lanc3ings more than 30" in height at
any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the
Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in
height.
16}Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 2Q13 CBC
§ 1009.
17)Provide fighting at all exterior landings.
�he firepface chimney must terminate at least two feet higher than any portion of
the building wi�hin ten feet or must be retrofit with a fireplace insert (not a log
lighter.) 2013 CRC §1003.9.
NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically
address items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 13, 14, and 18 must be re-submitted before #his
project can move #orward for P ing Commission action.
____ �
Reviewed by�l Date: 11-19-2013
Jo , Bd 6 -558-7270
;: - . � r ;: :;. - -
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
November 18, 2013
X Engineering Division
(650} 558-7230
� Building Division
(650) 55&7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
Planning Staff
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
� Stormwater Division
(650} 342-3727
0 City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Subject: Request for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and
Special Permit for attached garage for a new, two-story single family
dwelling with an attached garage at 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned
R-1, APN: 027-261-040
Staff Review: November 25, 2013
1. See attached review comments #1, 2, 5, 14 and 20.
2. Sewer backwater proteciion certification is required. Contact Public Works —
Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information_
Reviewed by: V �`
Date: 12/04/2013
� _ � - --
-:' ..! :. � � . ..�-� � �' �:J��: ..;' .,.. . .. .. . .""'--_ .. . .. :. i , . "--' . .-
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISTON
PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS t� '�l1'"v'`���' �
ProjectName: 5�+�1r� '�a�u��k�„�C1..�
Prolect Address: _�� 1�1�?d�`,fR.tl`�l�.i.d
The following requirements apply to the project
1 _� A property boundary stxrvey shall be preformed. by a licensed Iand
surveyor. 1fie survey sha11 show all property lines, property corners,
easements, topographical features a�d ntilities. (Required prior t� the
building permit issuance.) �,�� f f S �J �cc��L� �S ���9�
2 � The site and roof drainage shall be shown on plans and should be made to
drain towards the Fronta.ge Street. (Required prior to the building permit
issuance,}
3. The applicant shall submit project grading and drainage plans for
approval prior to the issuance of a Building permit.
4 The project site is in a flood zone, the project shall comply with the City's
flood zone requzrements.
5 � A sanitary sewer lateral � is required for the project in accordance with
the City's standards. )
6. The project plans shall show the required Bayfront Bike/Pedes�ian trail
and necessary public access improvements as required by San Francisca
Bay Conservation and Development Commission.
7. Sanitary sewer analysis is required for the project. The sewer analysis
shall identify the project's unpact to the City's sewer system and any
sewer pump stations and identify mi#igation measures.
8 Submit traffic trip generation analysis for the project.
9. Submit a traffic impact siudy for the project. The tzaffic study should
identify the projec# generated impacts and recommend mitigation
measures to be a.dopted by the project to be approved by the City
Engineer.
10. The project shall file a parcel map with the Public Works Engineering
Division. The parcel map shall show all existing property lines, easements,
monuments, and new property and lot Iines proposed by the map.
Page 1 of 3
U:�private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION
11. A latest preliminary titte report of the subject parcel of land shall be
submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division with the pazcel map
for reviews.
12 Map closure/lot closure calculafions shall be submitted with the parcel
map.
13 Tl�e project shall submit a condominium map to the Engineering Divisions
in accordanca with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act.
14 �_ The project slzall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public
improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary
appurtenant work.
15 The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage streetscape
improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutters, parking meters and poles,
trees, and streettights in accordance with stree�.scape master plan.
16 _ By the preliminary review of plans, it appears that the project may cause
adverse unpacts during construction to vehicular traffic, pedestrian traffic
and public on street parking. The project shall identify these impacts and
provide mitigation measure acceptable to the City.
17 The project shall submit hydrologic calculations from a registered civil
engineer for ihe proposed ereek enclosure. The hydraulic calculations
must show that the proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any adverse
impact to both upstream and downstream properties. The hydrologic
calculations shall accompany a site map showing the area of the 100-year
flood and e�sting improvements with proposed improvements.
1 S Any work witbin the drainage area, creek, or creek banks requires a State
Department of F'ish and Game Permit and Army Corps of Engineers
Pertnits.
19 No construction debris shall be allov�Ted into the creek.
20 � The project shall comply with the City's NPDES permit requirement to
prevent storm water pollution.
21 The project does not show the dimensions of exis�ting driveways, re-
submit plans with driveway dimensions. Also clarify if the project is
proposing to widen the driveway. Any widening of the driveway is subject
io City Engineer's approval.
22 Th.e plans do not indicate the slope of the driveway, re-submit plans
showing the driveway profile w�ith elevations
Page 2 of 3
U:\private development�I'LANNING REVIEVJ COI�R��NTS.doc
_ ... _ - __.
, ,, _ _- -
-- i -::
, : _,. : ,.. . ;:,: - . _ ;
PUBLIC VV4RKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION
23 The back of the driveway/sidewalk approach sha11 be at least 12" above
the flow line of the frontage curb in the street to prevent overflow of storm
water from the street into private property.
24. For the takeout service, a garbage receptacle shall be placed in front. The
sidewalk fronting the store shall be kept clean 20' from each side of the
property.
25. For commercial projects a designated garbage bin space and cleaning area
shall be located inside the building. A drain connecting the garbage area to
the Sanitary Sewer System is required.
Page 3 of 3
U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMI��NTS.doc
1 _ 1 l_ 1 --.
Project Comments
Date:
November 18, 2Q13
0 Engineering Division
{&50) 558-7230
� Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
X S#ormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
To:
From:
Subject:
Staff Review:
Planning Staff
Request for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and
Special Permit for attached garage for a new, two-story single family
dwelling with an attached garage at 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned
R-1, APN: 027-261-040
Novernber 25, 2013
1) Stormwater requirements are required to be implemented at stand-alone single
family home prajects that create and/or replace 2,500 sq.ft. or more of impervious
surface. These requirements are in addition to any City requirements. To determine if
this project is subject to those requirements complete and reiurn the attached
"Stormwater Checklist for Small Projects." For addiiional information about these
requirements please refer to the attached flyer "New Stormwater Controf
Requirements Effective 12/1/12n and by visiting the San Mateo County Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Program (SMCWPPP) website at:
http:/Jflowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section4/C3iNewRegsSm ProjSep
2012.doc
To obtain a checklist electronically, the document is available at:
http://ffowstobay. org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section4/StormChecklistSmallProj
Dec2012.doc
2) Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the Ci#y's
NPDES (stormwater) permit fio prevent stormwater poflution from construction
activities. Project proponent shail ensure all contractors implement appropriate and
effective BMPs during all phases of construction, including demolition. When
submitting plans for a building permit include a 4ist of construction BMPs as project
notes on a separate full size plan sheet, preferably 2' x 3' or larger. Project
proponent may use the attached Constructian BMPs plan sheet to comply with ihis
requirement. Electronic file is avai{able for download at:
http://flowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section5/ConstBMPPIanJun2012.
pdf
3) Best Management Practices (BMPs) requirements apply on any projects using
architectural copper. To learn what these requirements are, see attached flyer
"Requirements for Architectural Copper." Electronic file is available for download at:
http://flowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section8/Arch itecturalcopperBMPs
. pdf ,. � , �;
''�� � `�`' �� ��� ` � �
M..:� ���„ ;<
For assistance please contact Stephen D. at 650-342-3727 �
�, i ra -, - `'}. 4;: � ^ �4 �'
i'1 t!
Reviewed by: SD Date: 11/25/2013
k
� �_,�: ,,LP: .. ac,h.;ti,���
. , `h � �i.• j
^4,r^ .f�E[:.I(�-. :r. ,
M ;�}_.; �r,.
,� Construction Best Management Practices (BMPs}
SAN RIATEO CDU4TYWIOE
Water Pollution
Prevention Program
Clean Watec Heal;hy Communicy.
Construction projects are required to iinplement the storcnwater best management practices (BMP) on this page,
as th.ey apply to your project, a11 year long.
M1laterials & Waste i�Ianagement
i`,
,. r } �i
♦ I9y�.
.k'� �o,. , y 'IA�:
� T
'= '! f �.rJ .�v .'o
.i �'�'
� .��', �
`Ino-RazarJom P7Wcr1aLC
❑ Benu and em:er s�ockpil.3 ofeni� d;n or dhcr <onsm�cuon marainl
�-itl� m�ps when min k forremi or ifnoi uclirely be�ns used within
14 dara.
❑ Uac (bnt dwi't o��crose) �cclaimed wmer �Br dna m,+tml.
$xiardous M1lulcrials
❑ Iabcl JI heaudous maxrials oad lu .Wous waz� (s�eh ro
puucide� p�mes, ihimrcn. soheo�s. MI. di. nnd amifrceze) in
xcoMnnx..rth cih�. wunn. na�e a� feda�al rogWaiioiu.
❑ Stme hn�.erdoas matcriels md wmtcs in ua�or u�M1l conl�iucrs, stare
'm appmprhic acco�Wan� mn�ainmant �d emer tlkm nl tl�e �nd of
w'OIk div' p QIIfI11Q N'fI \�901hCY M n'hC� INII t3 �plKip.
O Fdlow nwuufnctwrr's applicmim�'vizuoo�ons for hverdou�
mo�eri�ls ond be carolLl not io u:e mort A�an neccooiv, Do nw
iDplv CM1Cn)iCi)S OYW00[i 1�'llql IGM Is ( OTf H'1�1i11 7A hp1(T.
❑ Nnnge fw appmpriarc disposal ofali hmz.rdom �vMcn.
Wnste 1liannqcment
p Corcr n��sie disppsol conlaincro stcmclr +rilh tsryz � thc rnd of
, . w�od A�T �md dwing ..ec w�mU�er.
❑ Check wasoe dispesol coninfncrs ir�quendy for Iea4s wd lo wnke
su.e �Aev me noc o�xrfilled, Ne.v 1qu Aonv a dumpsmr pn ihc
CA116P1Fi10� 61b.
❑ Clron or replace ponablo bi�is. eud iueped Jrom fiequentk for
�ml� M,a sntu:.
❑ Dispvsc of all �res�es a�d debris ymperiy, Reccle ma�erials and
n�stes �hx �an be mn�cbd (such as usphaiL wncreie. apgre�ie baw
wete�i�lz, wood ��p ypaid, plpq r�c.)
❑ Dispox oCliquid roiduec fiom pnlnic, lhiaa�. sol.xnls, gWes, qnd
Gra�tin�c ilnids as liunrdom �vncte.
Co �Iru[t(oo En(ranues anJ Perimeler
O EaloblisliandnminuiueRecii�e�n��etconimisendambilimell
cansmierion entrnrces evd edn m suffiaimNy cm�uol umaion nnd
scdLnrn� diuhmges Gom sia wW wclung off site.
❑ S��ecp o� iacwm uq �treel rtackinQ i.nmeGiaeery• and sceme
udimcnl soume �o pcv�rt funher axkine. Never hosc don�n .veeis
io cican up Irecking.
Equipmeut htanagement &
Spill Control
Main[enruccanAParking. � .
❑ Desiyfute oa yraa, fined rv�tl� npprqviqlo BMP; for
vefiick oM ryaipn�ent pu�tig mid nan6e.
❑ Pedom�mnjormnlnlenn�e,ropxirjat�s,anJ.chicle
md eQulpmrnt wuhine oR tile.
U Ifmluelu�gocvrlJclomaaiewkemus�bedooe
onsilc, ��•mi in � beaued erce exny ham alorm �ain�
md over a drip pm big anougli Io eolkct Ouidi.
Rn�Ge or diapnsc offluidc �s 6am.dmv w»te.
❑ IFr�hicle oreqoipioent ckaninF muM ix done ansUe.
ctwn ��itL �reieronly in e bc�mudmx thetmll ua
ollor� rinee �vercr ro nm inro gutteo suects, swm
�arthwor[c &
Contaminated
Soila
F.+..+ _�A�,».; ! � Y $ !
�� �
6 �
. • n�..ae'�3:�P�r.o.'e,-,.c.. `
EmSion Confrol
❑ Srlicdule yading md euxntion wark fat
dn� natlxr onl�.
9 Sla6ilire all daxdal mma, inmll and
�imain tempwary ttoelan conboh (nrL
ns aoeimi comvl frbric or 6ond<d 86er
mavi>-) unul vcpFmrion is esublished
❑ Seed w pWl vegeotion Ior aosion
mntrol on slopes ot ���hem ronstructiou is
natimn�lalcly planncd.
� anlns. o� eirucc ,vetm. �
PavinglA,sphalt VVork
.�r i ` � �
_ � w J�.r . . . �i
❑ A.�dd p ving ond ccol coanog iu wq
weatlier, or mheu rain is faecasi beforc
f h pyrement vrill lwee iimc �o �wc.
❑ Ca�'rr6b�m dnin inle�and nimhoics
whrn epNlying snl coai. ixk ooet, slurt�
ual, foB au�i, ac.
❑ Collee[ anA rzcyde ornvymPriately
d�SpOR O�t YCSt eilf'A6��•C g2\� Of 9011d.
Do NO'I m�eep w�vush it inw pvlers.
❑ Do not nse ��mer io �msh do�cn F L
eepLall ew�erqe pnvempu.
Concretc, Grout & b�lortar
Applicalion
Q Sro�e cone.cte, Qrour and mmar under
co�er, on polic�s uNl mrnr Rom dnmage
ups. 7Lesc marcruls nu�s1 nm<r rcacb n
`torm dnin.
� �Yosh ou[ mnc�cic cqwpmrnc'Irucl:s
offsim or in � comaiucd aca, so Jmrc
� ro disGw�}e inm U�e mWr.rlvmy yail
or oum sn.roundin� rca�, Lu concrcrc
Lerden end dispox ofu gnrb�a�c.
O CMlcu ilx wn.h �ruicr fmm �cashin�
>posreeggm�m<mocmme„a.cmorc h
for �ppropfialc dlsposal off'sile.
Dewatering
ScAimrnt Contml i�" f
O Do nd ckm .xhicic or equ(pmaH moitc �da; wnPs. :�� �
sohrnts. Aeg�epsetz. steno� clemu�b cqoipmenl. cte. ❑ Pmmcl s�wm Mui inlGf. ¢Wlers, di�dias. Sui��cuttin� & AephalJCnnucte Remoeel "
end dnin�ee rowsu �vilh �O��k � Comple�ely corn or MrticeAe sbrm
Splli Pmxmian wN Control B�iPo. e.eh n gnvol begs. fAor rolts. dnin inleq uhen se�r� cutting Use filin .�'°' �.
❑ I:eep [pill elemup me[e�inle (ragn, �Am�y��µs, c�. bams. ea. luteic. car.cli basin inlq G11ers. or gra�el
ewilablc m�tic co.of�ro�im 4m n� � timcs. � ❑ R^� sedimmf fiom mipa�mg aBdro boLK ��ecp �I�vn� out of tlia noroi dnin
byinsiallu�gandmainuiningsediment � 4'd�m. '
❑ In�pecl �ehicld mul equipmem frtawmlr for md �pi��� soch oR fi6er mlls, tiit Gnces, or ❑ Sho�nt �ho�orb. a vacu�m sm•aur -�
rtpdr Im1a prumptl�-, Use drlp pnns w eaCL IWe� spjjmal[ WyinS. sl�m end di�pwe uf aIl xasm is sopn ❑� ����elp m II funoq all�
unliWiepe'ute�InadC. �7 xc esyouarofni.hadinonclp��lianoral r��ofrp•ilLinlhesilqaMallrunoQ'thel
❑ C4aa op �pilis « ieela Immodinfdr �nd di ce of N e.ca�arcd �oil on ��e �Im x�hera i�
'P° wlli not eolier�'vn�o the eo-ro�. iha erd o(ea� �vmk doy (�.�h�cbeve disGurge� fmm We si�c. Divcn nuron
clranuP m�uria& p'opuly. soanerl). r�
O Do nd I�e dmrn sudams ntrrc lluids ha�n e illed � Tmislcr G�cavaled malerials to dumD u'ater from o� iic aubv from all Aitwrbed
P WCI:f 011 IIM Slit, OOL N IIIC ihCC[ � �'se��eut slum� enoers o cefch Waia clun areas or odien•�ise enswe wmpliorc.c.
Use dq dcmmip mclLads (absarbem materiah. cul q����� �ilo il ap'unnodialoly. ❑ t4hen drnntcrin i o�if and ob�m
ilneq a�/m r�gs). 9. � r
O Srvcep up spilkd dn' moleriais inu�roJia�Ny. Do mt ��m7 �Ihe follo��ing condilims ere appmal fian �he loal municipoliq.
vy �o md� thw m.$)' �vith wmer. orinve them. obsened. msl Fur em�aouution anA Ixf disclwr�inE �rnar ia a sveei gm�er
❑ Ckan u t 1W m drta�eos di � C rtol Boord8imal Waier Qoaliry Ilwn�h n bns'mrt'anknor ud m`enl1trov
V V bY 68�n6 up aM
p�opc��7 disposing of wnmmivatcd eo�7. ■ Unwuol soii conditions. discolwetion, m��� Lc rtqoirM.
op
❑ Reportaigni5cnu�spiWimmedin¢Ip.Yrn�aerceryimd a�r �fnaressofkno��ncd��minauon,�es�ivg
bylm��toroportaII�ignificantatenxoiofhvxde�n e�pa�dm�edwde.groimdwiks. �n'4���mdvrior�orcnteordiscl�aryeof
mareri�l; i�rcluding oil. To mpon a spill: I) Dia1911 qround�v�xec Consul� wiih Un� 6�ginecr �o
w yow bul rnw`geay �espome nuwbcr, 2) CilI tlro • �6mdoimd wells dcle.nine n�lKdier renins is requirod and
Go.emor's O�ee offine�enn� Sarioes Wae,u�g ■ Burie6 bwiels. dehru. m Rnsl�. M1o�v io in�crpre� rtml�s. Conraminaied
Ccnrr. (Bfr� 832-7550 (1�f Lonrs), growdnniv m�t bc uca�cd or houicd
off-site for p�opu Aisposol.
Storm_drain polluters may be liable for fines of up to $10,000 per day!
Paittfing R Paint 12emoval
,�
� ; ;� �
v '' _ ,�����.
����y _
\
��.�--
_��
Pafn�in� cicanup
❑ N<�y ��wn Enishcs or nnsc piim
wmoincrs imo a sUCG, guncr, stwm
d[i�n OT 111f� ce �apIC�S
❑ Far ���Icnbucd pnmLs. Pnn� om bmshcs
lo tllc t[Icfll po5sibla Rincc to Ac
sanilaq sener m�ce rou luce ga;n<d
pennission fiom J�c local ��ss�enmer
iraxmuu awhonu�. Ne��cr ponr wfm
dotm o droin.
❑ Far oil-Wsed soi�, py�nl ou1 b�ufic� �o
i6c c.nent po� iblc vid dcan ����W Uiinncr
or ml��em in apropercoxuvr�. Fiher m�d
uu �hinncn snd ml.�rnis. Dispor of
n'diM and u� .svblc ihi�.�.cr,Yohencc m
harardous waeic.
P�Iin( rtmu�'W
f] Chcmiwl paino uripping residuc an4
ch�s and dw� Gom mmu�c painm or
pimn camaining I<ad or iribuq�ltin mun
bc dicpnscd ofcs harxdous waz..
❑ Poim chips a�q dusl Itom nonfiur.vAau
dn'stripPing ond sand blaslutg mey h
+�'�p� uy M callcc4d in plaslit dNp
clodu m�d Jisposcd afas ussi�.
Landscape Nlaterials
_ ��L t ���
_ ,�l�$i. � .
'�u=;
❑ Conmin smclpilcd iandttnpin� rtuicnnls
bp sionng tlmm uttdtt (ams o�hcn ihcr n¢
1�01 iq��Cl�' bcins ItyS�.
❑ sra�: ��a;ni� i��a�u�a �,��.;,i �
pallc�s. Co�cr or �tam theec ma�criais
wMn Jmv , re nol acuveir bcing usad or
appliM.
Q Discuntinuc appiiwrion of:up� e�odible
londs�apc maunul �vi0iin 2 deps bcfom a
fomrns� runi e��ene or durin�..ci �eenJicr.
.. .. _
� ,, . < � -_;: . --
:. < _.: , _ -: -
_ ,,;.. ,.
i :; -.
�
�ap HA� utauxrrviar
war�f Pv��ucion
��verr�;on Program
��+�4/�trr- NhKhb �°+"Knhy.
Requirements for Architectura! Copper
Protect water qUafity during installatton, cleaning, freatirig, and washing±
Copper from Buiid�ngs Nlay Harm Aquatic Life
Gopper can harm aquatic lifa in San Francisco 8ay. Water fhat comes
ir--��o co;�tact with arch(tectural copper may contribute to impacts;
especialiy during installation, cieaning, treating, or washing. Patination
solutions that are used to obtain the desired shade of green or brown
typically cantain acids. After treatment, when ths copper is rinsed to
ramove these acids, the rinse water is a source of pollufants,
Municipalities prohibit discharges to the storm drain of water used fn the
in siaffation, cleaning, treating and washing of architectural copper,
U se Best Managemertt Pracfices (BMPs)
Tt-ie following Sest Management Practices (BMPs)
discharges to starm drains.
must be impfemented to prevent prohibited
During Installation
• If possrble, purchase copper materials that have been pre-patinated at the factory.
• ff pailnation is done an-site, implement one or more of t�e following BMPs:
o Discharge the rinse water to iandscaping. Ensure that the
rinse water does not flow to the street or storm drain.
8fock off storm drain in(et if needed,
o Colleci rinse wafer En a iank and pump to the sariitary
sewer. Contact your local� sanitary sewer agency before
discharging to the saniiary sewsr..
o Co(lect the rinse water in a tank and hauf off-sife for
proper disposaf.
� Gonsider coating the copper materials with an impervi�us
coating that pre�ents. further. corrosian and runoff, This will
also maintain 4he des'rred cofor for a longer time, requiring
less maintenance,
During Maintenance
fmplement fhe follow[ng BMPs during routine mainfenance acfivities, such as power washing the roof,
re-patination ar re-application of Impervious coating;
• Bfocic storm drain inlets as needed to prevent runoff from entering storm drains,
• Discharge the wash wafer to iandscaping ar to the sanifary sewer (with permission from the !ocal
sanifary sewer agency}, If thls is nof an option, haui the wash water off-sife for proper disposal.
Protecf fhe BaylOcean and yoursetf!
If you are responslble for a discharge to the storm drain of r�on-
stormwater generated by insfafling, cleaning, treating or washing
copper archlfecfural feafures, you are in viofation of the municipal
stormwater ordinance and may be subject to a flne,
Canfiact Informa�ion
The San Mateo Counfyw;de 'Water Poilution Prevention pr�gram fisfs municipal stormwater contacfs at,
www.ffowstobay.or� {cfick on "Business", then "New Deveiopment°, then "locaf permitting agency").
FINAL February 29, 2012
gutterand drainpipe.
prohibited dischsrge. The water must be
pumped and dtsposed of properly,
.. __.. .. _ ._ .. _ ._..._. _ . _ ....._.. ..
'+�
SAN �A7E0 CuUFlTYWIOf
Water Pollutian
PrevencionProgram City of Burlingame - Of�ce of
Stormwater Checklist for Small Projects Environmental Compliance
Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit (MRP} 1903 Airport Bivd
Order No. R2-2009-�074 ; Order No. R2-2011-�083
NPDES No. CAS612008 Office: (650) 342-3727
Fax: {650) 342-3712
Complefe fhis iorm for individual single family home projecfs of any size, otherprojects ihaf create ancl/or replace less than 90,000
square feet of impervious surface, and projects in the following categories that creafe and/or replace Iess than 5, 000 square feet of
impervious su�face: restauranfs, retail gasoline ouilets, auto service facififies', and paricing lofs (sfand-alone or pa�t of another
use).
A. Project Information
A.1 Project Name: New Residence, Burlingview L.L.0
A,2 Project Address: 2?47 Burlingview Drive, Budingame, CA 94010
A.3 Project APN: 027-261-040
B. Select Appropriate Site Design Measures
B.1 Does the project create andlor replace 2,500 square feet or more ofi impervious surface2? ❑ Yes ❑ No
➢!f yes, and the proJect wi!! receive frnat discrefionary approval on or after December 1, 2012, the project musf include one
of Sife Design Measures a through f.3 Fact sheefs regarding site design measur�s a through f may be downloaded at
hffp://www.f�owstobay.org/bs new developmenf.php#flyers.
➢ If no, or the project will recerve final discretionary approval befae December 1, 2012, the projecf is encouraged to
implemenf sife design measures4, which may be required af municipalify discretion. Consu(t with municipa! sfaff abouf
requirements for your project.
6.2 Is the site design measure included in the project plans?
Plan
Yes No Sheet No.
❑ 1�
� �
� �
❑ �.
a. Direct roof runoff into cisterns or rain barrels and use rainwater for irrigation or
other non-potable use.
b. Direct roof runoff onto vegetated areas.
c. Direct runoff from sidewalks, wa{kways, and/or patios onto vegetated areas.
d. Direct runoff from driveways and/or uncovered parking lots onto vegetated areas.
e. Construct sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios with permeable surfaces.
f. Construct bike lanes, driveways, and/or uncovered parking lots with permeable
S�,�a�s.
g. Minimize land disturbance and impervious surface (especially parking lots).
h. Maximize permeability by clustering development and preserving open space.
i. Use micro-detention, including distributed landscape-based detention.
❑ �
❑ ❑ I, Nlb.
❑ ❑ �I f�
� � N
❑ �
❑ ❑ �
❑ C�
❑ �.
❑ ,�.
m. Plant or preserve interceptor trees (Section 4.1, C.3 Technical Guidance}
� See Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes here.
z Complete the C.3/C.6 Development Review Checklist if the project is not an individua! single�'farrslly hntng, and tt crteates and/or replaces
10,000 square feet or more of impervious surface; or 'rf it is a restauranf, retail gasolip2 puiTet �uta sei-vice fae�itty�; o� parking lot project that
creates and/or replaces 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface. `
3 See MRP Provision C.3.i. , �
4 See MRP Provision C.3.a.i.(6). " � ` ° ' � � " 4 � �
1
_ ,.`s's;a-��proved December4, 20?2
j. Protect sensitive areas, including wetland and riparian areas, and minimize
changes to the natural topography.
k. Self-treating area (see Section 4.2 of the C.3 Technical Guidance}
I. Self-retaining area (see Secfion 4.3 of the C.3 Technical Guidance)
Stormwafer Checklist for Sma!! Projects
C. Select appropriate source controls (Encouraged for all projects; may be required at municipal discretion. Consult munrcipal staff.5)
Features that
Are these require source Source control measures Is source control
features in control (Refer to Local Source Control List for detailed requirements) measure included
project? measures in project plans?
L"i��10
��
0�
��
i� ■
�� �
��
Storm Drain
Floor Drains
Parking garage
Landscaping
in
Food Service
Equipment
(non-
residential)
❑ ❑ Refuse Areas
� � Outdoor Process
Activities
❑ ❑ Outdoor
EquipmenU
Materials
❑ ❑ Vehicle/
Equipment
Cleanin
❑ ❑ Vehic{e/
Equipment
Repair and
Maintenance
❑ ❑ Fuel
Dispensing
Areas
❑ � ❑ ) Loading Docks
❑ ❑ Fire Sprinklers
❑ ❑ Nliscellaneous
Drain or Wash
Water
❑ ❑ Architectural
Copper
■ Mark on-site inlets with the words "No Dumping! Flows to Bay" or equivalent.
■ Plumb interi�r floor drains to sanitary sewer [or prohibit].
■ Plumb interi�r parking garage floor drains to sanitary sewer.6
- Retain existing vegetation as practicable.
■ Select diverse species appropriate to fhe site. Indude plants that are pest-
and/or disease-resistant, drought-tolerant, and/or attracf beneficial insects.
■ Minimize use of pesticides and quick-release fertilizers.
• Use efficienf irrigation system; design to minimize runo#f.
• Provide connection to the sanitary sewer to facilitate draining 6
Provide sink or other area for equipment cleaning, which is:
• Connected to a grease interceptor prior to sanitary sewer discharge.fi
• Large enough for the largest mat or piece of equipment to be cleaned.
� Indoors or in an outdoor roofed area designed to prevent stormwater run-on
and run-off, and signed to require equipment washing in this area.
■ Provide a roofed and enclosed area for dumpsters, recycling containers, etc.,
designed to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff.
■ Connect any drains in or beneath dumpsters, compactors and tallow bin
areas serving food service facifities to the sanitary sewer �
• Perform process activities either indoors or in roofed outdoor area, designed
Eo prevent stormwater run-on and runoff, and to drain to the sanitary sewer.s
■ Cover the area or design to avoid pollutant contact with stormwater runoff.
■ Locate area only on paved and contained areas.
� Roof storage areas that will contain non-hazardous liquids, drain to sanitary
sewers, and contain by berms or simiiar.
• Roofed, pave and berm wash area to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff,
plumb to the sanitary sewer6, and sign as a designated wash area.
• Commercial car wash facilities shall discharge to the sanitary sewer.6
• Designate repair/maintenance area indoors, or an outdoors area designed to
prevent stormwater run-on and runoff and provide secondary containment. Do
not install drains in the secondary containment areas.
■ No floor drains unless pretreated prior to discharge to the sanitary sewer. 6
■ Connect containers or sinks used for parts cleaning to the sanitary sewer. s
- Fueling areas shall have impermeable surface that is a) minimally graded to
preveni ponding and b) separated from the rest of the site by a grade break.
• Canopy shall extend at least 10 ft in each direction from each pump and drain
away from fueling area.
■ Cover and/or grade to minimize run-on to and runoff from the loading area.
• Position downspoufs ta direct stormwater away from the loading area.
• �rain water from loading dock areas to the sanitary sewer.s
■ Install door skirts between the trailers and the buildinq.
• Design for discharge of fire sprinkler test water to landscape or sanitary sewer6
• Drain condensate of air conditioning units to landscaping. Large air
conditioning units may connect to the sanitary sewer.s
• Roof drains shall drain to unpaved area where practicable.
• Drain boiler drain lines, roof top equipment, all washwater to sanitary sewers.
• Drain rinse water to landscaping, discharge to sanitary sewer 6, or collect and
dispose properly offsite. See flyer "Requirements for Architectural Copper."
5 See MRP Provision C.3.a.i(7).
2
Pian
Yes No Sheet Nc
❑ ❑ {�/q
❑ ❑ tS A
❑ ❑ 1J (
❑ ❑
❑ ❑I
o ❑
N �
❑ ❑
� �
❑ ❑ �/�
❑ ❑
� A
❑ ❑
� �
❑ ❑
1`�IA
❑ ❑
I
� rA
❑ ❑'
N A
�. ❑
� ❑
❑ � ❑ ���
Approved December 4, 2012
... : . �.� _..:. .:
;-_
.
Stormwater Checklist for Small Projects
D. lmplement construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) (Required forall projects.)
D.1 Is the site a"High Priority Site"? (Municipa! staff wrlf make this determination; ifthe answeris yes, Yes ❑ IVo ❑
fhe projecf will be referred to construcfion srte inspecfion staff for monfhly storrnwater inspections
during the wet season, October 1 through Apri! 30.)
•"High Priority Sites" are sites that require a grading permit, are adjacent to a creek, or are
otherwise high priority for stormwater protection during construction per MRP Provision C.6.e.ii(2}.
D.2 All projects require appropriate stormwafer BMPs during construction, indicate which BMPs are included in the project, below.
Yes No Best Management Practice {BMP)
�, ❑ Attach the San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program's construction BMP plan sheet to
ra'ect kans and re uire contractor to im lement the applicable BMPs on the plan sheet.
❑ Ternporary erosion controls to stabilize all denuded areas until permanent erosion controls are established.
❑� Delineate with field markers clearing limits, easements, setbacks, sensitive or critical areas, buffer zones,
trees, and drainage courses.
�❑ Provide notes, speciftcations, or attachments describing the following:
■ Construction, operation and maintenance of erosion and sediment controls, include inspection frequency;
• Methods and schedule for grading, excavation, filling, clearing of vegetation, and storage and disposal of
excavated or cleared material;
� Specifications for vegetafive cover & mulch, include methods and schedules for planting and fertilization;
■ Provisions for temporary and/or permanent irrigation.
� ❑ Perform cfearing and earth moving activities only during dry weather.
� ❑ Use sediment controls or filtration to remove sediment when dewatering and obtain all necessary permits.
� ❑ Protect ali storm drain inlets in vicinity of site using sediment controEs such as berms, fiber rolls, or filters.
�� Trap sediment on-site, using BMPs such as sediment basins or traps, earthen dikes or berms, silt fences,
check dams, soil blankets or mats, covers for soil stock piles, etc.
�❑ Divert on-site runoff around exposed areas; divert off-site runoff around the site (e.g., swales and dikes).
�❑ Protect adjacent properties and undisturbed areas from construction impacts using vegetative buffer strips,
sediment barriers or filters, dikes, mulching, or other measures as appropriate.
i,� ❑ Limit construction access routes and stabilize designated access points.
�❑ No cleaning, fuefing, or maintaining vehicles on-site, except in a designated area where washwater is
contained and treated.
� ❑ Store, handle, and dispose of construction materials/wastes properly to prevent contact with stormwater.
'� ❑ Cantractor shall train and provide instruction to al! employees/subcontractors re: construction BMPs.
�[� Control and prevent the discharge of all potential pollutants, including pavement cutiing wastes, paints,
concrete, petroleum products, chemicals, washwater or sediments, rinse water from architectural copper, and
non-stormwater discharges to storm drains and watercourses.
�tame of applicant completing the form:_ _Richard Terrones
S�gnature: � �✓tA� Date: L 1 �_
E. Comments (for municipal staff use only):
F. NOTES (for municipal staff use only):
Section A
6 Any connection to the sanitary sewer system is subject to sanitary district approval.
� Businesses that may have outdoor process activitieslequipment include machine shops, auto repair, industries with pretreatment facilities.
3
Approved December 4, 2012
,..
::. ;, �: _ _ �
- _ : : ,.
_ ;.
: .. - ..; {
=' - -° - , . :.:::: `; , . :
Stormwater Checklisi for Smal! Projects
Secfion B N
Section C Notes:
Section D Notes:
Approved December 4, 2012
�.,._ . .r�. ..;�,.� .,�: . �.,. .i.;..: --.,. . _.., . . � - -
:._ . . .� _ , _.. .. . . . ..-�-.. i.-:: ' � . "_ � _ . .
... : -.:: "'. ' = .. . �, �.:.: -�. ... ..... �..'�. .'._ '.:.:.- �::;..� .. _�:.:. " : - �..� �' . � �:'. . ... ._.. .. . _ . .. _ '
�
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
November 18, 2013
o Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
0 Building Division
{650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
Planning Staff
OFire Division
(650) 558-7600
0 Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
{650) 558-7204
Subject: Request for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and
Special Permit for attached garage for a new, two-story single fami{y
dwelling with an attached garage at 2747 B�rlingview Drive, zoned
R-1, APN: 027-261-040
Staff Review: November 25, 2013
The house is intended to be equipped with a fire sprinkler system throughout.
1. Schematic of inrater lateral line a#ter meter shatl be shown on Building
Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split
between domestic and f�re protection lines.
2. A!1 sprinkier drainage shall be placed into landscaping areas.
3. Drawings submifited to Building Department for review and approval shall
clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings
shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation.
Reviewed by: ��C� � Date: �o ���1 �
Item fVo. 8a
Regular Action
PROJECT LOCATION
2747 Burlingview Drive
�::�
City of Burlingame Item No. 8a
Design Review Amendment Action Item
Address: 2747 Burlingview Drive
Meeting Date: September 8, 2014
Request: Application for Design Review Amendment for changes to a previously approved new, one-story single
family dwelling with an attached garage.
Applicant and Architect: Richard Terrones, Dreiling Terrones Architecture APN: 027-261-040
Property Owner: Burlingview LLC Lot Area: 10,065 SF
General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1
Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15303 (a), which states that construction of a limited number of
new, small facilities or structures including one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential
zone is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences may be
constructed or converted under this exemption.
History: An application for Design Review, Hillside Area Canstruction Permit and Speciaf Permits far attached
garage and basement ceiling height for construction of a new, one-story single family dwelling and attached garage
at 2747 Burlingview Drive was approved by the Planning Commission on April 28, 2014 (see attached April 28,
2014 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes). A building permit was issued August 1, 2014. .
The applicant submitted several proposed changes to the appraved plans as an FYI item. The Planning
Commission reviewed the FYI at the Augus# 25, 2014 regular meeting and called the project up for further review as
a Design Review Arnendment.
Proposed Revisions: The applicant is requesting an Amendment to Design Review for the following changes to
the approved project:
E{iminate the pool in the rear yard and install synthetic turF with a sand infill base;
Alter the windaw configurations at the right (west) elevation, rear (south) elevation, and left (east)
elevation; and
Shift proposed horizontal wood siding at the right (west) elevation and add horizontal wood siding at
the rear {south elevation)
The applicant has submitted a response letter and three photos of the proposed synthetic turfwith sand infill base,
date stamped September 2, 2014, as well as a sample of the turf. There are no proposed changes to the approved
building envelope.
Project Description (based on original approval): The existing single story house and attached garage on the
site are proposed to be demolished. The applicant is requesting Design Review for a new house, Hillside Area
Construction Permit, a Special Permit for an attached garage, and a Special Permit for a basement with a ceiling
height greater than 6'-6". The proposed floor area for the new house will be 4,228 SF (0.42 FAR) where 4,321
(0.43 FAR) is the maximum allowed on site (including covered porch and basement exemptions).
The proposed new house is single-story with a lower level attached garage and basement storage area. The pfate
height of the proposed house is 8'-0" at the entry area in the center of the house and increases to an 11'-�" plate
height on the right side and a 13'-0" plate height an the left side.
The applicant is requesting a Hillside Area Construction Permit for this new house and aitached garage. The
proposed highest ridge, at the left side of the house, is 22'-0" above average top of curb and matches the maximum
height of the existing single-story house on the site.
i
The applicant is requesting a Special Permit for an attached garage. The proposed 5 bedroom house requires two
covered parking spaces and a single uncovered parking space. The proposed attached lower level garage provides
two covered spaces (20' x 20') and there is a single uncovered space in the driveway in front o# the garage.
Design Review Amendmenf
SETBACKS
The applicant is requesting a Special Permit for a basement ceiling height that exceeds 6'-6". The proposed
basement storage area and hall at the right side of the house has a ceiling height of 9'-0". A total of 600 SF of
basement area and 100 SF of utility areas are exempt from floor area calculations. No part of the attached lower
level garage is exempt from floor area calculations.
The applicant is requesting the following applications:
■ Design review for a new house (C.S. 25.57.010 {a) (2)); and
■ Hillside Area Construction Permit (C.S. 25.61.020); and
■ Speciaf permit for an attached garage (C.S. 25.26.035 (a)); and
■ Special Permit for a basement height greater than 6'-6". {C.S. 25.26.035 (fl).
2747 Burlingview Drive
Lot Area: 10,065 __ Plans date stamped: March 7 and March 20. 2414
APPROVED PLANS
Fronf (9st flr): ; 25'-6"
To a#fached garage: ', 30'-2"
Side (left): ; 8'-7„
(right): ; 7'-0"
_ ...................Rear (9st flr) ..._._. _ 24'-1 �,
..... ... .... _..... _ _..__.
Lof Coverage: j 3995 SF
' 39.7%
FAR: 4242 SF
1
2
3
2747 Burlingview Drive
ALLOWEDIREQUIRED
23'-7" is the block average
25'-0"
7'-0„
7'-0„
__._ .. .. , _ _._ � _._. ...... _ . ._ __............_..._._. _ , _ .� ....... ....... .
15' 0��
.._...._ __ ..._.__.
s ._ .. _.... __. ___ .. �._ _ , _. .__._. _.... . _ _._
' 4026 S F
40%
0.42 FAR
# of bedrooms: ; 5
4321 SF'
0.43 FAR
_ _.._.__ . .... __ ._..........__.._.....__.__..
Basemerrt: � basement with 9'-0" ceiling height 2 Special Permit required per C.S.
25.26.035(fl
Parking: � 2 covered 2 covered
(2Q' x 20'}, attached 3 j (20' x 24')
i 1 uncovered ? 1 uncovered
(9' x 20') 1 i9' x 20')
Height: � 19'-11" 30'-0"
(0.32 x 10,065 SF) + 1100 SF = 4321 SF (0.43 FAR).
A special permit is required for a basement ceiling height that is greater than 6'-6" (C.S. 25.26.435 (f}).
A special permit is required for an attached garage (C.S. 25.26.03 (a)).
Staff Comments: See aftached memos from the Chief Building Official, Fire Division, Engineering Division, Parks
Division, and Stormwater Division.
2
,.. . _ , : , . ; _ ;
_. , _ _
__ , __.. . ._ - _. -.. ._.:_ .. :. . .... ... ........ .
_
_.
, _ , -:- _ ,.: _ .:. .
Design Review Amendment 2i47 Burlingview Drive
Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the
Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows:
Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood;
2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood;
3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure;
4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and
5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components.
Findings for a Special Permit: In order to grant a Special Permit, the Planning Commission must find that the
following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.51.020 a-d):
(a) The blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are
consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood;
(b) the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or
addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhaod;
(c) the proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city; and
(d} removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is
consistent with the city's reforestation requirements, and the mitigation for the rernoval that is proposed is
appropriate_
Required Findings for Hiliside Area Construction Permit: Review of a Hillside Area Construction Permit by the
Planning Commission shall be based upon obstruction by construction of the existing distant views of nearby
properties. Emphasis shall be given to the obstruction of distant views from habitable areas within a dwelling unit
{Code Sec. 25.61.060).
Ptanning Commission Action:
The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and
the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning
Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any
action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered:
thai the project shall be built as shown an the plans submitted to the Planning Division date s�amped March
7, 2014, sheets A0.0, A3.1, and Boundary 5urvey and Topographic Map, and date stamped March 20,
2014, sheets, A2.1, A2.3 and A5.1 through A6, and date stamped August 11, 2014, sheets A1.1, A2.2,
A4.1, A4.2, L1.1, and L1.2; and including a synthetic turf lawn with a sand infill base in the rear yard;
2. that any changes to building materials, exteriorfinishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch,
and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission
review {FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning s#aff};
3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding
or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit;
4. that the conditions of fhe Building Division's January 28, 2014 and February 6, 2014, and November 19,
2013 memos, the Parks Division's November 25, 2013, and March 26, 2014 memos, the Engineering
_
. ..
. - .-- .- , - - __. _ , ,.,.,. . :
Design Review Amendment
�
['�
2747 Burlingview Drive
Division's December 4, 2013 memo, the Fire Division's December 10, 2012 rnemo, and the Stormwater
Division's November 25, 2013 memo shalf be met;
that any recycling containers, debris boxes or durnpsters for the construction project shalf be placed upon
the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director;
that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not
occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shalf be required to comply with all the
regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District;
7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for demolition or construction of the project, the project
construction plans shafl be madified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the
Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal, and the Arborist Report date stamped March 21, 2014;
which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance
with a!I conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified ar changed
without the approval of the Pfanning Commission, or City Council on appeal;
8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and
installed on the portions of the roof not visible fram the street; and that these venting details shall be
included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued;
9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which
requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan
and meet recycling requirements; any partia{ or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require
a demolition permit;
10. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the
appficant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water
Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of starm water runoff;
11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2010
Edition, as amended by the City of 8urlingame;
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO
THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION:
12. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project
architect or residentiaf designer, or anofher architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates
that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property;
13. that prior to scheduling #he foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locaie the property corners, set
the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the
top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer;
14. #hat prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another
architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural
details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and
bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance
with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be
scheduled;
'f 5. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge
and provide certificatian of that height to the Building Division; and
4
_ _ , -
. _ . . ._ ._ _..... . : . .. . .. . . . � ....
Design Review Amendment 2747 Burlingview Drive I,
16, that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff wilf inspect and note compliance of the architectural
details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved
Planning and Building plans.
Erika Lewit
Senior Planner
c. Richard Terrones, applicant and architect
Attachments:
Applicant's letter of explanation for Amendment, date stamped September 2, 2014
Photos of proposed synthetic turf, date stamped September 2, 2014 (3 sheets)
August 25, 2014 FYI Memo for previously approved revisions
ApplicanYs letter of explanation for FYI, date stamped August 25, 2014
April 28, 2014 Planning Commission Minutes
Original Application to the Planning Commission
Original Special Permit form for an attached garage
Original Special Permit form for basement ceifing height
ArborisYs Report, date stamped March 21, 2014
Original Staff Comments
Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed)
Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed August 29, 2014
Aerial Photo
5
Agency Memo 02
T O :
Kevin Gardiner
2747 Burlingview Drive
cc: various — see below
, _ . _... , -. . : : ,
_ .:. � :: , : . _ _ �----..
D r e i I i n g T e r r o n e s A r c h i t e c t u r e, ' n c.
1 1 0 3 J u a n i t a A v e n � e
B u r I i n g a m e C a I i f o r n i a 9 4 0 1 0
nrchitect'sProjecttt 1412-bVl
Project: 2747 Burhngvi2w Drive
Subject: FYI Submittal Artifrc;ai turf Sarnpie
Date 10-2-'i4
C C / R e f e r e n c e C o d e s:
CC: Method Role Cortpany Name Contact Code
■ Hand Agency City of Burlingame ^ Kevin Gardiner BUR
■ File Architect Dreiling Terrones Architecture Carlos Rojas DTA
Project Memo
Item Subject Action
1. Kevin:
The enclosed submittal is a sample of the synthetic turf (EasyTurf UltimateGrass) proposed in the
FYI for the 2747 Burlingview Drive project. We apologize for the confusion generated from the
previous product submitted, as it was our intention for it to represent only the turf blade material
since it was the only product we had available.
The proposed EasyTurf product is used in residential applications and doesn't suffer from the
issue of tracking the ftll from the turf products, as in the commercial athletic products.
We have installed this product on other residential projects (see photos attached), and we are
familiar with the installation and results.
The proposed product has a sand infill at the base, with an approximately 3/4" exposed blade.
2. It is our understanding that other changes presented in the FYI {window and wall finish
modifications) were acceptable, so we are not presenting anything further on those items. Our
previous FYI description is still applicable for all changes being proposed
Please call with any questions.
Sincerely,
r----�
Carlos Rojas
Dreiling Terrones Architecture, Inc.
Y#'�,: s �` � � � � �..�,
n �, ��„� �:. �. �,<,>-'
_ d,s
, .�' #�I.��'_;\!(z'":f+,1`.-.
,
;;,lr::;_: , ,,�:r•�ir,;;:a �_;>:,::
This memorandum represents the understanding of Dreiling Terrones Architecture, Inc. Any corrections or revisions should be
submitted to our office within five (5) working days of receipt of this memo. If no revisions are received by that time, we shall
assume acceptance of the content of the above as a description of record.
END
� ' - .'� r�rY Project Memo
a...% t �' � D�2ilir-:�; , o�-,�< .... ...... ..: Ir:c. Page 1
,.�_ _�.,. . , ,. ._ . . .. , E, . ...,.,.
. �..M%A ,h,.� . . '. T'� II �" ,� �slf JE' . . .
a' �� � .�: � .:�at ,K ;� �3. � ; u ,.� �3
A � � � , `�.' � h ' tN '4m �+F4 . �Y "f� h � '^ ���\
y ...' ���y , .. �" k ^, i 2 n:il �,��" 4. ! .�S .
�..9✓R T W�:iR � � . 4� § r � ';µ i� � h
�r ` � a �
�� M, . t q y ��. � t d s. � � ..
' � "S b . � "� .3 �C " � : -.
� ��, '�
y. ^ b y� � �, ._ � � �.,
� v . �`�-� �' ' ��� S. � ,t �.y ' �
` t �`.�, Y n � �� � y � F� '� 5 � � $��8� i�._�}�`
Y� � F' � _1.k �.
Vt � ° ' �, TMY. nw� �, � �m' �`' �' � �`�'v +% 'r.s? t., t
'... � ' - k s�..' #af °, '1 +n �>r �xi� "� ' 1 '_ _.
r
r* F yr:, s'���` r w`�,a'G .,, ,� _ �C
r.^ N: i-�� ,x. a�l,'� x ��, : f p.�'', a�' �
. ,� ..4f v A.N
a t �,.� w m�a �� "k' hy�. ,: � � � �[�J�` r��+
eL 4 "a " d i � i� 1 � "S� �` '"a,.
-` � � � .; �' �
?n. W y 4� 4 � .,p � J q - ',' t( � y N P yy i
"Fp �. {'pr.,yy ''� 1 . �' y ,� � �� + _ Y 1�. ,r � S 5 � �-,�„";E
�Ayn ,� w � �u a� 5`°' e � 3 t +�' � �'*' :'s
. ..;���� �.. +� �q}� '� ,� � �:� •�. � � .. �y�'R�d�
"'�Lf �fs t- , " r �yo-'s `M �2 ,iC 7� f;� � r �'. ,p�. ._
,sr 'i �� � ' '� � �� � �' si!r ; f�.- g � �c �. ;� y�, -�,�
y „
� � ,� y, � . �� x ^.. � �' � t ; � ..
�� eik � ,y � y h ::w ' 4 * t :. .,' � r � � � �' �,1
� �,yw
,.��' � - K+a �, c ,,y� � '`^ t �v� ��, �`�.I yg �...�: n` �:}� � �v���� ' �5� �`.i
. ,]W�' 7' � y �.' �1 S , 1 � 1 ♦ '
i �, yi';�,. t`S�' : A s � .� t 9� -� :.
,� �. k Y� ,§� } � .
t . a .
� . y'0� � �, � �R "'r`� � : �' �� -�� y � > � r � :u� �
'w'° s .; e ' .Y 1 ,_
/ � �' - '�[ � I 2 .�9 t 1 'i ah 4
�.� L, �;C 7 '. { f- �f I � ��•
�,j . '�, a .+ ; •.i' r P ' `"� y .. ' �Y z � ` ��
. � ,X ,€ � * .. .
� �.. � .. f ,�� t
� t �.� . � X ``.N � ` 'u � ..v � i � K � 3"`.. � y,��
�' f . i �,���~ 1'^ J h; � '� h t5 �
t r.: � : � .tYa� +� ���.W �, 1 1 � � + � � * a � N :;� a[ , 'n
,� y'��' � � �`: .�y` y �. € � �
x .
y �• f r' 1 - 2 . rL_.�
x ^; { 4 1 r�d .,p��. Jla' .":r �� i '� K -a+ � �
�'... 1 . + � A M � � �,(9v' L
��� �,.;R .� .��' G
:' "rt 3 � Y : � +� .� � _ • �
Ca ` i
� � ' �� � . ; � ` � � . ¢ r'= 1 .
i � � � ' : � � ��_
,� �• �Y r �. W �^� ..
< ; � � � � �k° : , � � ` �` � r. d t `4
f
v i� � ,,:v v ;+ � � i : f !I�f� � f .
� i .f s ,r, �' r +��
�� r � � � :*'� � � J ' # . �
� � �' �
� Y` b +rc �e . � �,( .' '�
�, ',� � � '''
) � R
� � � :� �. � ,, U� . S .
1�� . JP�' y� :� N' `��� � f i "� � F �:
� �'' � r r'� }L q,� b 1;` ,
y �� .k � ���T���� �&6���` ��� y' 3f ' ${ Y
'Yi� � � : : �:•�. � � � jp i k �p. 3 jY I� � .
x - � w 'r '� -a : d `' � ��r r � �, �
,� � d°% , �, y ' , d' � $ .. `}
; j%j' �y^/� f)� i
1 �(1 � " / � �; �Y!/ S..t�! � 1_ � � f � � t' 1'= _
� � f `,P'� � �' �r %' f �f���l Wli� t,lSy��T�4.t�L..��� fi�Y}SI. �v. �,�Mi y� n ��� • ��S ��u� , �
� �� �� �j+ �"' `,il./� �{ '�l�:kr�.:�l'W'�,I�^ ! 3�%M At�p . � ' `
t . :, � I . � � . t :
� � . � N . ,y , , .. W .
A��y u� ,C a�� �, � i r . ,�` . � '�` X t ��'�.
Y'� ;4 - r �� ��;h�'' , .: ��' .�3
s � + � � � '� - a n %F
x Y fi'
��� .,Y y. .:' x . �, r � +y � +¢
}: ':AF � �k� .A Y` � � d � � j � ( � � y }
j.. , i. ..s�r,s,a.,.#,....... �u.'�.sl_._..�,.... . .a. ... ,z:._ .?:.� .. .,�t. �........ v �%.fc,� ....�i.e.f���i.c ....... . n_. .
�
�:. .M1.. �ti'
.-i4 ��....
�
'q'�� �
� P�,f ��`
° �
. �,. � �� } � '�. a�#
�4
> �
: is
� t.
.�•� �
v,� �� � '.
t ��y
> �
t w: � �.
�a'`'
z�
K h ::�
�� . .�
i
W" Y
�, � ��� + 4
! � Y ':
� � i%. .
f
l�.
� r
� �. �
r -
�' ✓ �M . ..0 . . ,.
:+� J
2747 Burlingview Drive: Artificial Turf Installation Example
.; ' 1�
�� � �..
-�.:�
T...;
,
_
r' ` � L�� i�i '��`
, , , .: .� �. ,o,I..l�il.fiVGAIVKE' -
� `" �';�' f �
t ` � ���`����
� ���,
: , ;y,,
�� , �i4�� �,�.,'x`rt<.,us���..d������*�'�'�.
�a . _ .,_ ..�..,1....�r.,w�. . .. . ... , w., �s:+� . .
2747 Burlingview Drive: Artificial Turf Installafion Exampfe
�� � "�NiW��'M�i�ill�Yf�'qill
aq
fi � fY l
�b 3
� !� �^� � � ' €����� �. .
k
�" :�`� � �r �� µ� N� pr;
� � � � � �,R, '�. �
E s^F x r� �''1` �'�
�#�'� �• " �.
��i;R;f�{?',n'' 4 � ( ,
� Q . �� ] S �'Y �A�Ij.� �K �
��� AE ������ ���f
R' j " ✓
��{� ��, �`� ��,'.
,`S f , �
� � � � :�' � i
, � . � , ,,� ,�>..
M. .t. ' ei f . ,��r. 'a �:
�7 ��
�� �.�._
� � � �r •
a'2 _ �.�
" ; ,�r�- a- -
�;,�.'_
'�:�,.
_":. , ,
�j� , ._h � ���li - .} �. S „d� �...w� 1F. !
�!A '9�.�� s � )� �A 4 �'�� i`i'7�
t �'. � �W^' �`� �5� �•. � �i y' '�•S��'^�
� �� �i• f
r',� ,,, y,�: x
�,� "`�
f
,, ro -S
� ��
! ,�, '.ti
,�. `
,�:�. �;
�F >'1
�No; . �
E•
,::�r.� � A:
� � £��
���. �
��� �
�,'� j:7,.o.�=k���,��`��. '! �,`" �.1� -. �����,� .� s}X: m s��.;-��Y..�; �w-_�i.7�; ��1 i� lF��a
r ,,}., � .-r r
, �� � x . � � �. , r�" � n . t � ��i/ � i � � 'F(d � } I �J'- i w* � . �
f� y3i_ � ���� � a�.i d I F�.A'�! !{� ��''y.,,���'a �,�rE ,#' b � ;i43'", � t��r� �
�� : a 'i �y" �e.� ' '�,� y,`�c `l e,a'�" ,` i�''�'�` � �' ��- p a :.;�,�'r�f�: '�' a�� . ,u h a ; ��
y x n
;.r.� ` t ..,� � ��/'�#.is�.,T.��{ 'iaN9,� . � : ��d�' � �s,;;_ -' ��'�"�L'r �
N� y� ,�,y��
�*� � dy. ..� ( � �� D_ i {. ��y� j JI � 'E �� _ 4f.,�.�'��` 7 �if r.Pk `�' %;
�1r'• � �?� �.�,}• � `{ g'� �:.w-�r .. i�. �te� �, s
3��f�,� .� {'} � P . � .�{ � y y ..
� � � � �•�z., � �,'�`�" -� �'?�. '�/ .�, '
r + � � "!_� � + t � � _ � ' r s i[�� Y {y�..�'E �
� -�
�Y"`�� r ''N�y�^�`.,`' � r 6. Y'",^��.y�f � . `�l �"' � �+,��11"^'wwx.; loi" :,
"�^' ��� *�� ��- W.l yrr,.�I.�+ `�'�'! .rf pW -�. � �`���. i` ��.� +�'�tc'.w, ._ ,d'� ^�s '� �4 �r,_A
;� � i��'?f: �1 .' �� � � i ? � �.. l�+�.k �''�� f`� �f, � � �.l, 4`Y������,'.
Il l � " �'"" s � � 1'� -a.. ;� �r�g '�t P �. ti.,._ �/♦�(' :
r / ��,�1. ..F' � � �;�y� � � . 9 ! 4 ����� � " X�.] i 6,,,�`'A '. � �`'?�� " .
"^ �"r 1 �'' � �n"' } �� � �" r � �i.- R �' .. �' `� , ,""' � �. ' Nf �
r � r� � � y a s a: Rc ,� -� � �'��x � r.,.�.� �. � . ., � � r�'
�`.sjf � . �ur � ,� `z"'.�,r" s' � � � C.*+"a"' �,� ' " �v,- � . ,.tk "�`:" �
� s � � �� ,"` } 1 �, -"`�' , �:r ♦ : . ��. ',� � ; "� . . "� ,� f ` �'
, '�y ^r,
i ��iei��t� x •J��� �� � a� � �.• �� � 6 � � e4_� � � � �4 "�i
�� . r�M1 � 4'-'� . z .rl.�� �r _ v..��1 $ � � f Y'..�� .rF �� � - p P�3r� �"� �� R 9 1
i• t � �.F „ /� + � �"'�, � : +�� .�r 'V� �.�..,�,,, � '� p �°' ..�,+ �' �, F 7� :'
r 1f /��
P �s�. r��_ � �. �..'�f`"�`��� "�. �1 �i��} .-v��� �' 1✓ � . �.'i� .R. �r't:.',1F 7�� �l�.._ti />-, _'./���.'� e��
..� f .�, ' �:.
; `.e, \ .:i,:.^��.
�
�
� . . ._'� . a'�.
�
�
F
� �w�r.�•
���.,y,��:
'-,�}�
�Y" i� . .
4�f.
�s�
`5
. :: ^��-,'�.,,.�j
�, CITY
��� 1
��� ,
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
August 25, 2014
Planning Commission
Erika Lewit, Senior Planner
Director's Report
AAeeting Date: August 25, 2014
SUBJECT: FYI — REVIEW OF REQUESTED CHANGES TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
DESIGN REVIEW PROJECT AT 2747 BURLINGVIEW DRIVE, ZONED R-1.
Summary: An application for Design Review, Hillside Area Canstruction Permit, and Special
Permits for an attached garage and for basement ceiling height for a new, single-story dwelling
at 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned R-1, was approved by the Planning Cornmission on April 28,
2014 {see attached April 28, 2014 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes). A building permit
was issued on August 1, 2014.
The applicant is requesting approval of an FYl far the following changes to the approved plans:
• Eliminate the pool in the rear yard and install synthetic turt;
• Alter windows at the right (west) elevation and rear (south) elevation; and
• Shift proposed horizontal wood siding at the right (west) elevation and add horizontal
wood siding at the rear (south elevation)
Please refer to the applicanYs letter of expianation, date stamped August 11, 2014, for a
complete description of the proposed changes.
The designer submitted plans showing the originally approved and proposed building
elevations, date stamped August 11, 2014, ta show the changes to the previously approved
design review project.
Other than the changes detailed in the applicanYs letter and revised plans, there are no other
changes praposed to the design of the house. If the Commission feels there is a need for more
study, this item may be placed on an action calendar for a second review and/or pub[ic hearing
with direction to the applicant.
Erika Lewit
Senior Planner
Attachments:
Explanation ietter submitted by applicant, date stamped August 11, 2014
April 28, 2013, Planning Commission Regular Action Calendar Minutes
February 24, 2014, Planning Commission Design Review Study Minutes
Agency Memo 07
Dreiling Terrones Architecture, Inc,
1 1 03 Jua.nita Avenue
Burlingame California 94010
TO;
Kevin Gardiner ArchitecYs Project # 1412-bvi
2747 Burlingview Drive Project: 274? Burlingview Drive
subject: FYI Submittal Artificial Turf Sampfe
cc: various — see below Date: 08-25-i4
C C / R e f e r e n c e C o d e s:
CC: Method Role Company Name Contact Code
■ Hand Agency City of Burlingame Kevin Gardiner BUR
■ File Architect Dreiling Terrones Architecture Carlos Rojas DTA
Item
1.
Memo
The enclosed submittal is a sample of the synthetic turf being proposed in the FYI for the 2747
Burlingview Drive project.
The specific brand and product have not been selected yet, but the product to be used will be of a
similar quality and composition.
Please call with any questions.
Sincerely,
��- —^
Carlos Rojas
Dreiling Terrones Architecture, Inc.
. ;,,
This memorandum represents the understanding of Dreiling Terrones Architecture, Inc. Any corrections or revisions should be
submitted to our o�ce within five (5) working days of receipt of this memo. If no revisions are received by that time, we shall
assume acceptance of the content of the above as a description of record.
ENQ
�^}-�� Project Memo
i Ci��ilu,g .,Wn�ones ��.r:.:%�,'-e�;l���rr ;ne. Page 1
��c>.,;i�.•c:1.�-,� '�. i.-;.�slr�_,=�..._ � er_�:r�nn���.en'.
CITY OF BURLlNGAME PLANN/NG COMMISSION - Approved Minutes Apri128, 2014
16
17
window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certificatio
documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Divi '
before the final framing inspection shall be schedu{ed;
that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot th eight of the
roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and
that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and te compliance of the
architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify th e project has been built
according to the approved Planning and Building plans.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Sargent.
Discussion of motion:
/►�.fTiT�
Chair Sargent called for a voice vote on the
Commrssia�er Sargent moved fo adopt e
The motion was seconded by Co issions
Discussion of motion:
None.
to approve. The motion passed 7-0-0-0.
Negative Declarafion.
Yie.
Chair Sargent !ed for a voice vote on the motion to adopt the Negative Declaration. The motion passed
7-0-0-0. Ap a! procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7;53 p.m.
� sroner Terrones indicated that he would recuse himself from participating in fhe discussions
ing Agenda ltems 6(2747 Buriingview Drrve) anaf 7(4 La Mesa Cou►t) due to a business relafionship
a quasi-business relafionship, respecfively. He Ieft the City Council Chambers.
6. 2747 BURLINGVtEW DRfVE, ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, HILLSIDE AREA
C�NSTRUCTION PERMIT AND SPECiAL PERMITS FOR AN AT7ACHED GARAGE AND BASEMENT
CEILING HEIGHT FOR A NEW SINGLE-STORY HOUSE (RICHARD TERRONES, ARCHITECT AND
APPLICANT: BURLINGVIEW LLC, PROPERTY OWNER) (34 NOTICED) STAFF CON7ACT• ERIKA LEWIT
All Commissioners had visited the property. Commissioner Yie nofed that she had a conversation with the
son of the uphill neighbor. Commissioners Sargent and DeMartini met with the neighbors at 2753
Burtingview Drive. Reference staff report dated April 28, 2014, with attachments. Community Development
Director Meeker presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Sixteen (16) conditions were
suggested for consideration.
Questions of staff:
None.
Chair Sargent opened the public hearing.
10
,. _ ,:. _
,:. .. _. _. r-:,- , . ,,: ; ,.. _
C/TY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Approved Minutes Apri128, 2094
Jacob Furlong represented the applicant.
Commission comments:
Did the applicant take the opportunity to visit the uphill neighbor, particularly the lower level
bedroom? (Furlong — recognizes that there are some impacts from that area. Have kept the home
to one story and have lowered the roof{ine while still maintaining the design.)
Have any sight-line studies been reviewed? Is it known where there would be no view impacts?
{Furlong — doesn't have an exact number regarding how much lower the roofline would need to be.)
Believes the lowered roofline looks more subtle.
Public comments:
Beth Napier, 2753 Burlingview Drive:
■ Noted that their view is gone from the master bedroom window.
■ Asked for the roof to be sloped from the other direction, would preserve more light.
■ Provide photos that show the impact upon the view from the master bedroom.
• Have discussed the impacts upon the tree. The applicant should be responsible for removal if it is
damaged and needs to be removed. The developer needs to take financial responsibility for any
damages from the tree.
■ Are selling their home. Will close on May 27, 2014. Requested that the Commission defer action
until the new owner is involved.
■ Feels that the rear extension of the home is not needed. Make it a four bedroom home.
There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed.
Additional Commission comments:
• Is the applicant amenable to the conditions expressed by the neighbor? (Furlong — doubts it.)
■ Likes the changes that have been made. The changes help to preserve the neighbor's upperfloor
view.
■ Believes that the issue of the view from the bedroom needs to be addressed. Not certain that the
code permits such a significant impact to the bedroom. Perhaps the overhang could be reduced.
■ Asked for clarification regarding the degree of view impacts that may be allowed in the hillside area.
(Meeker— indicated that view impacts must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Distant views,
particularly of the Bay, are to be preserved from living spaces. The code does not imply that there
can be no impacts upon views.}
■ Tends to look at views from common areas, not so much from bedrooms.
■ The applicant has done quite a bit ta address the view issues.
■ Doesn't feel that the view from the bedroom would be preserved by reducing the eaves. Thinks it
would require a significant redesign.
Public hearing was reopened to permit questions of the app(icant.
Further Commission comments:
Have studies of different alternatives been explored? (Furlong — have conducted some studies.
The client wanted a"butterfly roofn house.)
91
C/TY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Approved Minutes Apri! 28, 2014
� ��
Has a measurement been made to determine how much of a change would be required to preserve
the bedroom view? (Furlong — don't have a survey of the height of the bedroom on the lower level.
May be able to reduce the overhangs somewhat.)
Would have appreciated the applicant having explored how much af a design revision woufd be
necessary and whether that would ruin the design of the home.
Would be good ta have the analysis made of what would be needed to further reduce view impacts.
Public hearing closed.
More Commission comments:
• Wonders what the new buyers have seen.
■ Would like to see further analysis of the view impact and what would be needed to preserve the
lower level bedroom view.
■ Feels like the applicant has conducted considerabie analysis into view impacts.
■ The design is below the maximums allowed for the lot.
■ In most respects, the view is good or improved.
■ May be just deferring wiihout any potential for significant changes that preserve the view.
■ Feels the study should be done, but need to be prepared to make a decision at that point.
• Should the Commission place as much emphasis upon views from non-common areas versus
comrnon areas?
• Doesn't feel it is appropriate that each room should be treated equally.
■ Don't usually get held up on views from a bedroom area.
■ The bedroom is on a Iower level that is below grade.
■ The garage fits in with the neighborhood and the home design.
■ The transom windows are not a primary viewing area.
Commissioner Sargenf moved to approve the applicaiion, by resolution, with the following conditions:
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitied to the Planning Division date stamped
March 7, 2014, sheets A0.0, A2.2, A3.1, A4.1a, A4.1b, A4.2a, A4.2b, L1.1, L1.2 and Boundary
Survey and Topographic Map and date stamped March 20, 2014, sheets A1.1, A2.1, A2.3 and
A5.1 through A6, L-1 and L-2;
2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height
or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall E�e subject to Planning Division or Planning
Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�;
3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first ar second floors, or garage, which would include
adding or enlarging a dormer(s}, shall require an amendment to this permit;
4. that the conditions of the Building Division's January 28, 2014 and February 6, 2014, and November
19, 2013 memos, the Parks Division's November 25, 2013, and March 26, 2014 memos, the
Engineering Division's December 4, 2Q13 memo, the Fire Division's December 10, 2Q12 memo, and
the Stormwater Division's November 25, 2013 memo shalf be met;
5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be pEaced
upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director;
6. that demolition for removal of fhe existing structures and any grading or ea�th moving on the site
shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to
12
'.-1 .:....,,_ ..._. ....�.�. . . �. . ..-.--. .�� �..�. � -.. .. .... .. - .. � _ ' .... �
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNlNG COMMlSS10N — Approved Minutes Apri128, 2094
�
comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District;
7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for demolition or construction of the project, the project
construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing al! conditions of approval
adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal, and the Arborist Report date
stamped March 21, 2014; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the
construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of
approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City
Council on appeal;
8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single
termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting
details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued;
9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which
requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction
plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or fufl demolition of a structure, interior or exterior,
shall require a demolition permit;
10. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new
residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in
Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erasion and off-site sedimentation af storm water
runoff;
11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes,
2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame;
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUtLDING INSPECTION
PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION
12. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the
project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that
demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum appraved floor area ratio for the
property;
13. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property
corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on
the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by
the City Engineer;
14. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another
architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the
architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as
window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification
documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division
before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled;
15. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the
roof ridge and provide certificafion of that height to the Building Division; and
13
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMlSSION - Approved Minutes Apri! 28, 2014
16. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of tha
architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.} to verify that the project has been built
according to the approved Planning and Building plans.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Yie.
Discussion of motron:
" 11�OlTE.
Chair Sargent called fora voice vote on the motion to app�ove. The motion passed 4-2-0-1(Commissioners
DeMartini and Bandrapalli dissenting, Commissioner Terrones recused). Appeal procedures were advised.
This item concluded at 8:24 p.m.
Commissioner Sargent noted that he would recuse himself from the discussion regarding Agenda Item 7(4
La Mesa Court} for non-stafufory reasons. He left the City Council Chambers.
4 LA MESA COURT, ZONED R-1 - APPLICAiION FOR MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATI�N, DE N
REVIEW, HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR A NEW, TWO A ONE-
HALF STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND ATTACHED GARAGE (TIM RADUENZ, FO + ONE,
APPLiCANT AND DESIGNER; CHRISTOPHER AWOYINKA AND SUZANNE MCGOVE , PROPERTY
OWNERS 35 NOTICED STAFF CONTACT: RUBEN HUR1N
All Commissioners had visited ihe property. Commissioner Loftis indicated tha e had had a brief email
exchange with the residents of 6 La Mesa Court. Commissioner Yie noted th she met with the neighbors
on both sides of the project site. Commissioner DeMartini stated that e met with the applicant and
architect, as well as with the neighbors at 6 La Mesa Court. Referen staff report dated April 24, 2014,
with attachments. Senior Planner Hurin presented the report, revie ed criteria and stafF comments. Thirty-
eight (38) conditions were suggested for consideration.
Questions of staff:
■ Is staff comfortable with the findings of the � ht analysis? (Hurin - yes.}
• What level of detail is provided in the lig�analysis? (Hurin - the applicant will respond.}
Acting Chair Bandrapalli opened the publi earing.
Tim Raduenz represented the appl� t.
■ The visual simulation w completed with Photo Shop; it was not a scientific analysis.
■ Some of the trees w e removed from the simulation.
■ Summarized the c anges to the project.
■ Attempted to pr erve views from 2 La Mesa Court.
■ Tried to addr s all concerns expressed by the neighbors.
■ The massi g for the home is currently similar to the home at 6 La Mesa Court.
Commission omments:
■ es the redesign. Likes the materials.
■ / Is ihe glare perceived as an issue? (Raduenz - could place a film or bronze the glass. But doesn't
� believe it will be an issue.)
14
__ _ ___ . .. _ _... -.:
,.. ;. . -:. ,. . .,
._..._ _... --_ .>„ .,
�� J;
�;F`�, :
: �'��
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD � BURLINOAME, CA 9401 O
p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org
APPLICATION T4 THE PLANNING COMMISSiON
Type of application:
� Design Review ❑ Variance � Parcel #: C� 2.�1� Z.lo1 � �4-a
❑ Conditional Use Permit l� Special Permit � Other:
PRQJECTAbDRESS:_'sZ� �� �ju,r ��n.e,lrct,�! �`�
APPLICANT project contact person �
OK to send eleetronic copies of documents �
Name: �t�h%I�Y� "�F�L�1�.1�"S
Address: � D� ,,.SUAN tTA Av�
City/Staie/Zip: I�t�(x.l.tt�lCr �M�IC_� p lt�
Phone: ��`��q,(o -�, 26 6
Fax: GGSa� 3�,3 -�lra`d.s
E-mail: �"'C� S��iQiZC,1a, Cb
ARCHITECT/DESIGNER pro�eatcontactpersont3�
OK tn send electronic copies of documents @�
PROPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑
OK to send eiectronic cnpies of documenfs C9�
Name: �iUCzILWCaV1�W L�. G
Address: 27�"% �U'Rc...lt•.1GV (�'c`W �IZ.
City(State2ip: '�itj L, �.1G,A l:, O�,a
Phone: �Go�o� �(¢ � - � 3 �'%
Fax: "
E-mail: T'�- � C4MC, g, 1�'E'�'
Name: .�{� G k �-��
� � !' .�..�� 1 �,�'ru n G�� Y�'��i x. . 4 � " �°,p � _ w,r'�
�� > E U,,:.,�, �„ � �:
�3 �; fi.::�- -
Address: �i � � e ��,�tt-f�,j�f�.
CitylState/Zip: �����n_j.,,ti.� , (� � �-p�/[7
Phone: ��$�� (oJ�P - 1� 00
Fax: lC� � 3 3r�-3 � f� b S'"
E-mail: +r''k� C�.-�oah�c�. , c�►ti„
* Burlingame Business License #: �j (o� ('�Q5
;,�;; , - �''';.,
-�r ,;-;f :';t34�=,. �_
� `.,�"1.:_-+i•.....�,f�:'�,,.4 � .,. �.
PR�JECT DESCRIPTION: N'EU3 5 t l�Ch�.0 �elMl1 l.Y }�1A-i��
AFFADAVIT/SIGNA7URE: I hereb certify undsr penalty of perjury that ihe information given herein is true and correct to the
best of my knowiedge and belie .
ApplicanYs signature: Date' R� � 5 1
I am aware of the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning
Commission.
Property owner's signature: � �"�'� Date: �l '�- - 20� �
J
Date submitted:
* Verifiaation that the project architectldesigner has a valid Burlingame business Ilcense wlll be requi�ed by the
Finance Department at the time application fees are paid.
; 1
I �
I 1
I �
■
s
S: {NANDOU7S�PC Appllcation.doc
,
_ , - -
- . .
,
_ , . _ _ . _ . .. ..---- .. _ �
� .- : ; � _ � . _ ,
:. - ; „ . ...:... _ :;
. .. .
.:... .. ,. _ , . ...,. ;.. : -
.x
_. -.: - -
--. _ __.. _ . , . .. . . . . .. . . ---.., � ... . ..
City„of Burlingame Planning Department
501 Primrose Road P(6S0) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlingame ora
Ba�;�- �►'�� ��
Bvx�n�
��� f
CITY OF BUKLINGAME :
� a�=��
` SPECIA,L PERN�IT A.PPLICATION � , `, „ -. � � �'�
�. � � � � ,�,
�- ';:<;
c, 'FTf {; � .,,; ��.� «i .:- i�l�,
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Qi'��nance (Code �'s°�' `�" `
Scction 25.50), Your answers to the foltowing questzons can assist the Planning Cornmission in making
the decision as to whether the fmdings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink.
Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions.
�. ExpCain wby the blend ofmass, scale and daminantsiructural characteristics nfthe new
construction or additzon are consistent with the exis#ing structure's design ar�d with the
existin,� street and nei�hborhond
The proposed project includes an attached garage in a"basement" stary. Therefore a celling height
greater than 6-7/2 feet is needed to accommodaie automobiles. The garage for the proposed
building is being placed below grade in order to keep the building as low as possible (and lower
than adjacent buildingsj. 7he adjacent siorage room in khe basement'is necessary to minimize fhe
mass and bulk of the house, and therefore needs to be usable and grater than 6-1l2 feet in height.
Attached garages in the front part of the property are the norm on the side ot the stneet where the
project is locaied due to the topography of the area, and a common design throughout the
Burlingame Hills neighborhood.
2. Explain how the vuriety of roof line, facade, exterior f nYsh materials and elevations of
the proposed new structure or addition are consastent with the existing structure, street
and neighborhao�
The proposed project is replacing an existing building, and the style and exterior finish
materials are consistent with other modern style buiidings in the neighborhood,
The character of the nelghborhood will not be affected by the project, as there are similar
buildings throughout the Burlingame Hills that sit in a mix of different styles of buildings,
mostly da6ng farm the mid ZDth century period.
Partialfy underground "Basemenf" can be found in the adjacent properties and throughout the
neighborhood as a response to the area's topography.
3. How will the proposed project be consistent with the residential design guidelines
adopted bv ihe citv (C.S. 25.5717
1. 7he architectural style is compatible with that of the neighborhood, as the neighborhood exhibits a blend of
different styles, including modem buiidings like the proposed proJect, with aitached gareges.
2. Attached garages at the front of the property are found in most houses on the side of ihe street where ihe
project is located. The proposed basement location for the garage allows ihe proposed bullding to remain low to
the ground therefore harmonizing with the adjacent neighborhood,
3. The project is consistent with the massing and bulk of the existing strucfure to be replaced and rnatches
surrounding buildings in height and size. The exis:ing house, ihough being removed inclurles an attached garage.
4. The proposed structure doas not affect surrounding structures.
5. Pr000sed trees are seasonal, sfender and laraelv transparent io keep them from obstructinq vlews.
4. Explain how the removal of rtny trees located within the footprint of any new struc[ure or
addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements. What
mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain why this mitigation is
appropriate.
One protected tree is being proposed for removal, and will be replaced by (7) IVew trees, The
tree removal applicafion will be obtained after the planning process is compfeted.
SPECPCRM.FRM
�,i .�: � . � _ .: ..
I . I :: i' � � _
� � ;:: . .c _.. _ y _- -
_ ;,
,.. — ... . .. - . .. _ , � . ., . _ -
, ,
, . �
--� , ._ � : [. �:.
i:
I'
City of Burlin�ame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P{650) 558-7250 �{650) 696-3790
'www burline�rne ore
l. Explai�c why the blend of mass, scale and domrnant structu�al characteristics of the new
cvnstruction or addition are consistent �th the existingstructure's design and with the
e�rsting street and �eighborhood.
How wi(t the proposed structure or additian affect neighboring propertiea or structures on those properties? lf neighboring properties
will not be affected, state why, Compare the proposed addition to the ma.ss, scale and characteiisties of neighbaring properties. Think
about mass and bulk, landscaping, sunlighdshade, views from neighboring properties. Naighboring propexties and struciures include
those to the right, left, rear and across the streel
How does the proposed shuctute compan, to nei�hboring structu�s in terms of mass or bulk? If there is no change to the structare, say
so. If a new s-firticture is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation etc. with oCher structures in the neighborhood or area.
2. Explazn how the variety of roof line, facade, exter�ior finish materiats and elevations of
the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing st�ueture, street
and neighborhood.
How does the proposed structure or nse eompare aesthetically with s�uctures or uses in the existing neigl�boxhood? Tf it does not affect
aesthetics, state why. Was the addition designed to cnatch axisting architecture and/or pattem of deveiopment on adjacent properties in
the neighborhood? Explain why yoi�r pxoposal fits in the neighborhood.
FIow will the shucture or addition change the character of the neighborhood? Think of character as the image or tone established by
size, density of develop�nent and general pattern of land use. ifyou don't feel the chazacter of the neighborhood will change, state why.
3. How will the proposed pro,�ect be consistent with the residential design guidelines
adopted by the city?
Foliowing are the design criteria adopted by the City Couucil for residential desigp revie�. �Iow does your project meet these
guidelines?
1. Compadbzlity of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the nezghborhood;
2. Respect for the parking and garage pattems in tl�e neighborhood;
3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of strucbare;
4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properaes; and
5. I„andscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components.
4. Explair� how the removal o, f'any trees located withirr ihe footprint vf any new structure
or addition is neeessary and is consrstent with the city's refo�estation requirements.
[�hat mztigation is praposed for the removal of any trees? Explain why this mitigation
is appropriate.
Will any trees be removed as a result of this proposal'? If so, explain what type of trees will be removed and if any are protectad under
ciry ordinance (C, S. 11.06}, why it is ne�essary to remove the trees, and r�vhat is being proposed to replace any trees being remvved. If
no lrees are to be removed, say so.
SPECPERM,FRM
_
. . ; _..., , . ,
, .. ..
, , _ : ..
, . ,
„ ; - ,< ::. -
_ . , -.
.:
. .., ..: . ,.. , ... .. -
-� ......
, -.. : �
. .. i
.
. . : -.
. ... . .... . _. . ._ .. . . � -, ,_.
I
City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road Y{650) 558-i250 F(650) 69Cr379(? www.burlingeme.org �
�� `„'�- �z�.'�^ � ::� �� "F`�s '''r_� N ,,
i.�
.-,��, -�,� �
i����`. �'� Nr:,. l. '
��.
Tiae Planning Commission is required by la�� to rnake findings as defined by the City's Urdinance (Code
Section 25.50). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commissioh in making
the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink.
Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions.
1. Explain why the blend of mass, scale and dominant structura! �haracteristics �f the new
construction ur addition ure cor�sistent with the existdng struc�ture's design and with the
existing street unal neighborhooc�►
The proposed building is being kept as low, or lower than adjacent buildings by sinking #he
garage below the rest of the building.
Attached ga►'ages in the front part of the property are the norm an the side of the street where
the project is located due to the topography of the area, and a common design throughout
the Burlingame HiEls neighborhaod
2. Explain how the variety of roaf line, fucade, exserior finish rnitterials and elevations of
the prop�sed new sxructure ur addition are cohsdstent wrih the existing struct�re, street
arrd neighbnrhooc�
The proposed project is replacing an existing building, and the styfe and exteriorfinish
materials are consister� with other modern sryle buildings in the r�eighborhaod.
The character of the neighborhood will not be affected by the project, as there are similar
buildings throughout the Burlingame Hills that sii in a mix of different styles of buildinc�s .• ,� �.. ��� �
mostly dating form the mid 20fh century period. ;�- r
T.l �.:.r.. aN.s;�
Y. u� 4Fi�ti": ��._ �.�t.v . .� .
,y t1 j�ti �.�' } ��,.'I : ,.
1
) \ . � " �. �. ::r'
. f�ow wiCl the proposed project be consistent witia the residential design guii��l�ie�s, ``;���' ��'�_���°-'� �
� 3 ,
udonted bv the eitv (C.S. 25.57)? ���
1, The architectural style is compatible wlth that of the neighborhood, as the neighborhood sxhib�ts a blend of
different styles, including modern buildings like the praposed project, with attached garages.
2. Rttachpcf garages at the Pront af the property are found in most houses on the side of the street where the
project is locatecf.
3. The project is consistent with the massing and bulk of the existing structure to be replaced and matches
surrounding buikiings in height and size. The exisfing house, though being removed includes an attached garage.
4. The proposed structure does not affect surrounding structures.
5. Proposed trees are seasonal, slender and largely transparent to keep them from obstructing views on the
subject or adjacent properties
4. E.rplain how the retnoval ofany trees located within the footprenl afany new structure or
addition is necessury and is consistefat with the city's reforestation requirements. Whut
mitigatian is proposed for the removal of any trees? F..z�lain why this mitigation is
appropriate.
One protected tree 'ts being proposed for removal, and will be replaced by (7} New trees. The
tree removal applicatfon will be obtained after the plann'tng process is completed.
SPECPERM.FRM
,.,:-.... ..:.. , -., - ....... . . . ...... . .. . :.. . ..... ... .: . : .-:.. .,: . : . . -.. . . ....
.. ... ,,:-
� , .. ' j
,
i
City of Burlingarne Plannircg Depaztment 501 Prianrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(G50) 696-3790
www.burlineame.or�
X, Explain why the blenrl af mass, scale and dominatctstrrtctural characterrstics of the new
construction or addition are consistent with the e.xistingstructure's design and with the
existing street and neighborhood..
How will the proposed sin�cture or addition affecf neighboriag pro�xrties or structuxes on those properties? If neighbc�ring properties
will not be affectecl, state why, Compare the proposed addition to the mass, seale and charactaristics of neighboring properties. Thenic
about mass and hulk, la��d�caping, sunlight/shade, views from neighboring properties. Neighboring properiies and structures include
those to the right, teft, rear and across the sh�eet.
How does tfie proposed structure compare to neighborin� structures in terms ofmass or bulk? Tf there is no change to the structure, say
so. If a new struct�re is pmposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation etc. with other structures in the neighborhaod or area.
2. E'xplain faow ihe varietyofroofline, facade, exter�ior�nish matericxls and elevations of ; �
the proposed new structarre or addition are consistent with tlze �isting structure, street '
and neighborhoocl.
How does the proposed strucfure or use compare aes#hetical ly with stntctures or uses in the existin� neighborhood? ff it does not affect
aesthetics, state why. �`as the addition desigreed to �ttatch existing architecture and/or paiiern of development on adjacen# properties in
the neighborhood? Explain why your proposal fits in fhe neighborhood.
I3ow wil! the structure ar addition change the character of the neighborhood7 Think of character as the image or tonc established by
size, densi .ty of development and general pattern of land use. Ifyou don't feel the character ofthe neighborhood will change, state why.
3. How will the proposed project be consisient witl� the residential design guidelines
adopted by the city?
Fo}lowing are the design criteria adopted by the City Councit for residential design review. How does your project meet these
guidelines?
1. Compatibi[ity of the architecturai style with that of the existing chacacter of the neighborhood;
2_ Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighbarhood;
3. .Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure;
4. Tnterface of the proposed stracture with the structures on adjacent properties; and
5. Landscaping and its praportion to mass and bulk of siructural comp�nents.
4. Explain how the �emoval of any trees located within thefoatprint of any new structure
or addition is necessary and i.s consistent with tlze c�ty's reforestation requirements.
Whatrnitig�tion is proposed for the removaX of any trees? Explain why tlzis mitigation
is apppopriate.
W ill any trees be recnoved as a result of this proposai? lf so, explain what type of trees wi 1I be retnoved a��d if any are protected under
city ordinance (C.S. 1 l.0O, why it is necessary to remove the trces, and what is being proposed to replace any trees being removed. If
no trees are to be removed, say so.
SP�CPPRM.FRM
, .... . _ .. :. . ._.
_ ... :: :. :.. ....�- .
. . . .. .. ., . ._...,.. - : _._. . _. ... ,.
_ . _ _ . . ;
Kieity Arborist Services
Certified Arlx�rist WE#0476A
P.O. Box b187
S an Mateo, CA 94403
650-525-1464
Marchl7> 2014
Tany Construction Incarpotated
Attn: Mr. Tony Leung
1325 Cabrillo Avenue
Burlingame, CA 94010
Site: 2747 Bnrlingview Drive, Burtingaine, CA
Dear Mr. Leung,
As requested on �ziday, March 14, 2014, I vi sited the above site to inspect and comment on the
trees. A new home is planned for this site and your con.cern as to the future health and safety of
the trees as well as your neighbors trees has prompted this visit.
Method:
All inspections were made from the ground; the tree was not climbed far this inspection. The
tree in question was located on a"Not- to-Scale" map provided by me. The lree was then
measured for dianaeter at 54 inches above ground level (DBH or diarneter at breast height). The
tree was giveu a condition rating for form and vitality. The trees' condition ratzng is based on 50
percent vitality and 50 percent form, using the following scale.
1 - 29 Very Poor
30 - 49 Poor
50 - 69 Fair
70 - 89 Good
90 - 100 Excellent
The height of the tree was measured using a Nikon Forestry 550 Hypsometer. The spread was
paced off. Comments and recommendations for fnture maintenance are provided, .
f����� V ��
,
�� i�'; `� �! � �' 4 �
CETY �"Jr E�I;RLIN�APAE
C�J'L' °�hir�'�FJG L}1V.
_
-- -- - , .� . -
:. ... . _ : . :.,, .. :.: , -,
� , . �.
: .:,_ _ , , ,. , ,:_ : - -
�
�-
2747 Burlingvievv/3/17/14
t2)
Survey:
Tree# Species DBi3 CON HT/SPComments
1" Giant sequoia 40est 55 50/4a Fair vigor, good fortn, some bat cankez on
(Sequoiadendron giganteurn) stems. Located 6 feet from property line.
2* Southern magnolia 12est 60 30I35 Fair vigar, fair form, will require minor
(Magnolia grancliflora) trimming to facilitate constntctiori.
*Indicates neighbor's tree
Snmmary:
There are no protected trees on site although ttte neighbor to the sonthwest has tvvo trees that will
be affected. Tree #2 will only require some trimming to facilitate the conskruction. Tree #1 is a
giant sequoia with an abundance of surface roots. 'I'he proposed plan includes a full basement
within the dripline of the sequoia. The building of the home as planned would result in moderate
to heavy root Ioss �or the sequoia. Reducing the basement by six feet and using a mat slab type
foundation near the sequoia will reduce root loss lessen irnpacts ta this tree.
The following tree protection plans designed for this site should �e catxied out during the
buiiding of this house.
T�ee Protection Plan:
Tree pratectioz� zones should be installed and maintained throughout the entire length of khe
project. Fencing for tree protection should be 4' tall, orange plastic rnaterial supported by metal
poles or stakes pounded into the ground. The location for the protective fencing should be as
ciose to the dripline of desired trees as possible, still allowing room far construction to safely
continue.
No equipment or materials shall be stored or cleaned inside the protecrion zones. Areas outside
protection %nce, but still beneath the tree's dripiine.s, where foot traffic is expected to be heAvy,
should be mulched with 4-6" of chipper chips covered with plywood. The spreading of chips
will help to reduce compaction arad improve soil struciure.
Root Cutting
Any roots to be cut shall be nionitored and documented. Large raots (over 2" diameter) or large
masses of roots to be cut must be inspec;ted by the site arborist. The site arborist, at this time,
may recammend irrigatton or fertilization of the root zone. All roots needing to be cut should be
cut clean wzth a saw or lopper. Roots to be left exposed for a period of time should be covered
with layers of burlap and kept moist. Tk�e over dig for the foundation should be reduced a much
as possible when roots are eneountered. The site arborist vc�ill be on site for ail excavation when
within the dripline of the trees listerl above.
��������
�aii7i� c� .� i ; _
C.`: �'t � � F t3 i: �Li!�iCs.AM.'.r'_
�;�,���rr, t,t�3iuit�tu C31':�
1
�
_ :, .... ... . -...
� _,,_.. ._
_.: ,:. . .,
_ .: ... ,
.. ..
... ..: .. . �... . . ..:_ .. . .:.. . , . _, � � , . . � ,., .. , . � �
�
2747 Burlingview/3/I7/14 (3)
Trenching
Trenching for irrigation, drainage, elec�rical or any othcr reason shall be done by hand when
inside the dripline of a pmtected tree. Hand digging and the careful placement of pipes below or
besides protected roots will significanfly reduce root loss, thus reducing trauma to the tree. All
trenches shall be backfiiled with native materials and compacted to near its original level, as
soon as possible. Trenches to be left open for a period of time (24 hours), will require the
covering of all exposed roots with burlap and be kegi moist. The trenches will also need to be
covered with plywood to help protect the exposed roots.
Irrigation
The Neighbors trees will require regular irrigation. The trees should be irrigated 2 tirnes a month
using heavy irrigation with enoagh water to wet the enlire root zone. Tree #1 shall be fertiiized
using 300 gallons af 22-24-24 2 weeks prior to the start of excavation. Further irrigakion will be
recommended if nceded hy the site arborist at the time of excavation.
The information inclnded in this report is believed to be true and based on sound arboricultural
principles and practices.
Sincerely>
Kevin R. Kielty
Certified Axborist WE#0476
�"
�:.
tV� ti 1-� 3�. ?`tl 1�+
:,!'t�f ;)r EuRLINCx�tNlk
:>i�'u-t'!.-"i;1�`t�hdL l��v.
„ _ . i
., . .
:._ .. �... . .,_,. -� -
._:. . . .. _.. _ , ... ; . :,.•.: �
- - -�- - .,� .
,
_ . ...... .. _�_..._. : . .. . . . _ .. . i..',.._- . . . .
Date:
Project Comments
March 24, 2014
To; � Cit�r Engmeec
{650j 5:58-723D
0 Cirief Buikiing Official
{�o) s5s-72so
� Parks Supervisor
(65Q) 55,g-7334
From:
S u b�ect:
St.aff Review:
Erika Lewit, Planning
d Recyciing Speciatis#
(650) 558-7271
� Fire Marshal
f650� 5�8-76U0
Q NPDES Coordinator
(65U) 342-3727
Q City At#orney
2747 Bur�ingv'rew Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-261-040 - origina!
commen#s, nesponse to comments, and revised plans are in your In-
Box
�
�
:: ; : ._ :
.. , , . . - _ _
,-;�.,. :.;..:�. , ,::. _ .:> .... .. ,. -.. .. � > ,..�. _. . . .. :
,
,. , _ . , , ; ; !
� i
Date:
To. 0 Engir�ering Division
(65Qj 558-7'230
� Buil�ing Division
(650) 558-7250
X Parks Division
(sso) �a-7��
�rom: Plartning S�aff
� Fire Division
{85a) 558-%600
� Siormwater Divisian
(fi�) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650} 558-7204
Subject: Request for Design Review, H'tliside Area Consfiuction Permit and
Special P�rmit for attached garage for a new, two-story single farnily
dwelling with an afitached garage at 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned
R-1, APN; Q27-261 �-040
Staff Review: November 25, 2Q13
1. No existing tree over 48 inches in circumferencs at 54 inches fram base of
tree may be removed without � Protectsd Tree Permif from the Parks Division
(558-7330).
2. Landscape plan is required to meet `Water Conservatian in Landscape
Regulations" (attached)_ Irrigation Plan cequired for Building permit. Audit due
for Finaf.
Reviewed by; B Disco Date: 11/25/13
Project Comments
November 18, 2013
;. : ::. . , .. .. _
. .. _
...: ... , . ��.. ,
_ . �._. . _... ._.�... _. ,
._ ...
� Y .. '�, JY . �. Y .. a . �',� .�.
. . . . � u _,: ,�. .'fp` �x•r. d:n;::f �. '
OUTDOOR WATER USE EFFICIENCY CHECKLIST �
e e• a • - a e +•• . �
[ cert' hat the subject project meets the specified requirements of the Water Conservatian in Landscaping Ordi.narce, "` '
" ��I7�l�
Signature Date
Single FamEly Q Multi-Family �7 Commercial0 Institutional ❑ Irrigation only ❑ Industrial 0 Other:
�i
Applicant Name (print}: Contact Phone #:
ProjectSiteAddress: 2'7e.t'] gJ�-4��1 v� �+J t�R1J � �g���l��v��++�►_
Project t�rea (sq.ft. or acre): l t� � v6S # of Units: # of Meters ip,�Ssj !4 {F�i�}'' � I
Total Landscape Area (sq.ft.}: � ° �," , - � �,J I
�,: � �► (oq �,�,.';: �
r" '; :� ` Turf Irrigated Area (sq.ft.): 3 L7 ' i�
' ` ` ' : Non-TurP'rrigated Area (sq.ft.}: � i.� e�. 'Z ' p � � � j
, ;,. i
�; � ' Snecial Landscape Area (SLA) (sq.ft.): '• ,.� ; � �
�,� a:, ;, i Water Feature Surface Area (sq.ft.): (oa�e� I
- -- i. C � :: + �,..'Y �' ,,�,-� . '� s.t.a , _.. . � �I
'. ��� _ ' - � .,�f':'r. C.,..�. z T? �'. ;4��:�;: �. .�.s.S .... . �..,.�, . � ='i I ilyQiCwilr� �� .x i.:�re� „ r r , ' �I�
Turf Less than 25%ofthe landscape area is �Yes '� I„� '� li '
turf ❑ No, See 1Nater Budget l
All turf areas are > 8 feet wide Yes I� : q� �a �
--- -- -- - >
�':
All turf is planted on slopes < 25% � Yes O ' p �
Non-Turf At least 80% of non-turf area is native Yes ;�,7 ` p
or low water use plants ❑ No, 5ee Water Budget '
Hydrozones Plants are grouped by Nydrozones Yes �i ,_ _ �
At least 2-inches of mulch on exposed Yes L] _�'
INiulch -
soil surfaces �
Irrlgation System Efficiency 70% ETo (l0U/o Efo for SLAsj Yes ,° f 7 �]
No overspray or runoff Cl Yes � �, �,j ;
Irrigation System Uesign System efficiency> 70% �YYes ;� • f� ,;
Automatic, seff-adjusting irrigation U No, not required for Tier 1 ;; ��." s; (,� _
controllers � Yes
-- — - - ._:: . ,
Moisture sensor/rain sensor shutoffs �Yes = � . � ' "
No sprayheads in <8-ft wide area � Yes >,,,� � �
:
Irrigation Time System only operates between 8 PM Yes � I�
and 10 AM _
MQtering Separate irrigation meter � No, not required because < 5,000 sq.ft. � 1.]
❑ Yes -
Swimming Pools / Spas Cover highly recommended Yes '� q �- �
_;;;
U No, not required
Water Features Recirculating ❑ Yes t•{/A�Sw�V►t�1��� Poo,�_ � �
---„-.,r,.
Less than 10%of landscape area 0 Yes � 13
',. +`�..� .;
Documerttatan Checklist 1,5�.Ye5 � q L,'� .;
Landscape �nd Irrigation Oesign Plan �Prepared by applicant '+� � i,� �
❑ Prepared by professional
Water Budget (optionalj � i�repared by applicant f..� �> —
❑ Prepa�ed by professlonal
Audit Post-instaNation audltcompleted Completed byaQplicant � ,,,,�
0 Completed bv arofessional
.... ,_ .__ _:_, . _
-
,.,. _ , : . -. ,.... , ,-
, _ , .._
� ......, ,.;� : �
' ._.�_ .... .,. . . - � .. .. ... ., . . ._.. .. - �.-a . -' .. ... .. _ .._. - ._ . . ' _. ... I _... .... ... . . �.y �
: �
OUTDOOR WATER USE EFFICIENCY CHECKLIST
.�
o :- o • •a a �•a ;� a,
� - -
ry ,
- -- Jx
Auditor.
Materfals Reteived and Iteviewed: U Water Conservation in l.andscaping Ordinance
O Outdoor Water Use Efficiency Checklist 0 Outdoor Water Use Efficiency Che�klist
❑ Water Budget O Water Budget Calcutation Worksheets
❑ Landscape Plan U Plant List
❑ post-installati�n Audit O Other�
Date Revlewed: � j
,: .
�, ,..; >,. .. -• , . _ .. ,.. _. . . .� _.
O Foilow up required (explain): U Drip irrigation
0 Self-adjusting Irrigabon Concroller
Date Resubmitted: ❑ Plant palaYe
Date Approved: 0 Three (3} inches of mulch
Dedicated Irrigatlon Meter Required: � Soll arnendment (e.g., compost)
Meter sizing: C7 Grading
❑ Pool and/or spa cover
U Dedicated irrtgatlon meter
U Other:
Comments:
Selected Definitions:
Tier 1 New construction and rehabilitated landscapes with irrigated landscape areas between
1,000 and 2,500 square feet requiring a building or landscape permit, plan check or
deslgn review, or new or expanded water service.
Tier 2 New construction and rehabifitated landscapes with irrigated landscape areas greater than
2,5Q0 square feet requiring a building or landstape permit, plan check or des�gn review.
ETo Reference evapotransp(ration means the quantity of water evaporated from a large field of
four-to seven-inch tall, cooi-season grass that is welE watered. Reference evapotranspiratlon
is used as the basisof estimating waier oudgets so that regional differences in climate
can be accommodated.
5lA Special kandscaped Area. {ncludes edibfe plants, areas irrigated with recycled water,
surface water features using recycled waYer and areas Cedicated to active piay such as
parks, sports fields, golf courses, and where turf provides a playing surface.
Professional Professional is a"�ertified professional" or "authorized professlonal" that is a certified irrlgatlon
designer, a certified landscape irrigatian auditor, a Iicensed landscape architect, a licensed
landscape contractor, a licensed professional engineer, or any other person authorized by the
state to des(gn a landscape, an Irrigation system, ar authorized to complete a water budget,
irrigation survey or irrigation audit.
Water Feature A design elernent where open water performs an aesthetic or recreational funct(on. Water
features include ponds, lakes, waterfalls, fiountains, artificfal streams, spas, and swimming
pods {where water is artificially suppfiedj.
�
�
. ; : ,. ..
.. . _ . . _
. _. �
_ .. :.. _ _.. . .. _ -
.. _ .
.._. . _ ..-- � � .:<. . . . ...
, ...
. �: :...._. . .--. ., . .. .: , : �
--� .. .. .. .. i:- .. _
Date:
Project Comments
February 6, 2014
To; � City Engineer
{650) 558-7230
X Chief Building Officiai
(650j 558-726d
0 Parks Supervisor
(650) 558-7334
From: Erika Lewit, Planning
� Recycling Specialist
(650} 558-7279
� Fire Marshal
(650) 558-7600
0 NPDES Caordinator
(fi50) 342-3727
� Cifiy Attorney
Subject: revised plans for 2147 Burlingview Drive, zoned R-1, APN:
027-261-040 - original comments, response to comments, and
revised plans are in your In- Box
StafF Review;
No further comments.
All conditions af approval as stated in aEl previous reviews of the project will apply to this
project.
Reviewed by:
Date: 2-8-2014
__ _ _...
__
_ _, � . , ,
�. _
-. .
>, ; - = - : - -
:� _
... . _. _. i _... ._, �.., . ., _. . . . � • . ..
Project Comments
Date: January 27, 2014
To: � City �ngineer
(650) 558-7230
X Chief Building OfFicial
(65D) 558-7260
� Parks Supervisor
(650) 558-7334
From: Erika Lewit, Planning
0 Recycling Specialist
(650) 558-7279
� Fire Marshal
(650) 558-7600
0 NPDES Coordinator
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
Subject: revised �lans for 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-
261-040 - original comments, response io cnmments, and revised
plans are in your In- Box
Re-Check Comments:
13. RESIDENTIAL: Rooms that can be used for slseping purposes must have at least one
window ar door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the locafion and fhe net
clear opening height and width of alI required egress wfndows on the elevaffon drawlnps.
2013 California Residential Code (CRC) §R310.
Note: The area labeled "Office" is a room that can be used for sleeping purposes and, as such,
must comply with this requirement.
The note on 5heet A0.0 does not address the commant.
Specify the location and fhe nef clear opening haight and width of al! required egress
windows on fhe elevafion drawinps.
NOTE: A written response to the items nnted here and plans that speciflcally address
item #13 be re-submitted before this project can move forward for Planning Carnmission
actlon.
Reviewed by
_ _ ,_. -,...
�: ... _- . . -_. __ _
�
i
Project Comments
Date: November 18, 2013
To: 0 Engineering �ivision
{650) 558-7230
X Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
� F[re aivision
(650) 558-7600
� Stormwater Divisian
(�50) 342�3727
� City Aftorney
(65R} 558-i2Q4
From: Planning Staff
Subject: Request for �esign Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and
Special Permit for attached garage for � new, finro-story singie family
dwelling with an attached garage ai 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned
R-1, APN: 027-261-040
Staff Review: November 25, 2013
���},}On the plans specify that this projact wi(I compfy with the 2013 Cali#ornia Building
Code, 2a13 California Residential Cade (where applicable), 2013 Cafifornia
Mechanical Code, 2013 California Electrical Code, and 2013 California Plumbing
Code, including a[I amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1889. No#e: If fhe
Planning Commission has not approved the pro}ect prior to 5:00 p.m. on
December 31, 2013 thert fi�is project must compfy with the 2013 California
Building Codes.
��pecify on the plans that this project will comply with the 20'13 Cal9fornia Energy
EfFiciency Standards.
Go to http://www.energy,ca.govltitle24I2013standards/ for publications and
details.
� Indicate on the p[ans that the roof will comply with Cool Roof requirements of #he
2013 California Energy Cade. 2013 CEC §110.8. The 2013 ResidentiaE and Non-
Residential Compliance Manuals are available on line at
http:l/www.enerqy. ca.gov/title24/2013standards/
� f'lace the following information on ihe first page of the plans:
"Canstruction Hours"
Weekdays: 7:�0 a.m. - 7:00 p.m.
Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. - 6;00 p.m.
Sundays and Holidays: 18:OQ a.m. - 6:00 p.m.
(See City of Burtingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04,100 for detaifs:)
� Qn the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditlans that
require work to be performed beyond the scflpe of the building permit issued for
these plans may require furfher City approva(s including review by the Planning
. .. ,
:_... .. ..
-: ; , .:.._.:, ., ::
_ ... ._.. � . _ - -. . :;;; ;: _
: . . ,
...._
--- . . , , .- . , .. ' . -
, _ ; . . ; ; ,:,
i
Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must
su bmit a Revision ta the City far any work not graphically illustrated on the Job
Copy of the pians prior to performing the work.
6) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame
business license.
7) Provide fully dimensianed pians.
8) Provide a fully dimensioned site plan wi�ich shows the true property boundaries,
the location of all structures on the property, existing driveways, and on-site
parking.
9) When you submit your pfans to the Building Division for plan review provide a
compieted Supplement7l Demalition Permi# Application. NOTE: The Demolifion
Permit will nat be issuec{ until a Building Permit is issued for the project.
1 �)Show the disiances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed
property lines
� 1)Show the dimensions to adjacent structures.
12)�btain a survey of the property lines.
�ESfDENTIAL: Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at
least one window or door that cornplies with the egress requlrements. Specify
the /ocafion and the net clear opening helght and widfh of aIl required
egress wlndows on the elevaiion drawfnQs. 2013 California Residential Code
(CRC) §R310.
Note: The area labeled "office" is a room that cart be used for sieeping purposes
and, as such, must camply with this requirement.
�ndicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obt�ined fram the
Department of Pubiic Works.
15}Provide guardraiis at al) landings. NOTE: All landings more th�n 30" in height at
any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consu�t the
Planning Department for deta�ls if your pro�ect entails landings more than 34" in
height.
16}Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 2013 CBC
§ 1009.
17)Provide lighting at al1 exierior landings.
�he fireplace chimney must terminate at least two feet higher than any portion vf
ihe building within ten feet or must be retrofiit with a firep[ace insert (not a log
lighter.) 2013 CRC §1003.9.
NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically
address items 't, 2, 3, 4, 5, 13, 14, and 18 rnust be re-submitted before this
project can move #orward for P ing Commission aciion.
Reviewed b . Date: 19-19�2013
Jo , B 6 -558-7270
: . _ .. '. _ .- .. _ __ _ : .� : �. ._... . i. _. . .. . .. .
_,
,
Date:
Project Comments
November 18, 2013
To: X Engineerin� Division
(650} 558-7230
� Building Division
(650j 55&7260
0 Parks Division
(650) 55& 7334
From: Planning Staff
0 Fire Division
(650) 55&7600
� Stormwater Division
(s50) 342-3727
0 City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Subject: Request for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and
Special f'ermit for attached garage for a new, two-story single family
dwelling with an attached garage at 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned
R-1, APN: 027-261-040
�
�
�
i
.
Staff Review: November 25, 2013
.
> :< i ,. ;
,. , -
:... _..- .: . ,_
:..
._ ,.
, ,�
•. �
, „
PTJBLIC W4RT�S DEP.A,RTMENT EN�INEERiNG DIVISION
PLANNiNG REVIEW COMMENTS f� 'r�'� tf� '
Pmject �Ta�[e: 5�ei.�C'rLfi. �tc '.��+?., i
r`
Project Address:�'7¢'� �l�Lf��VI�J .
Tlae following requirements apply io the project
1 _,� A property boundary survey shall be preformed by a licensed land
sun�eyor. T'he survey shall show a11 property lines, property corners,
easemex�ts, to�ogra.phical features aa3 utilities. (Reyuired prior tv the
building penca�it issuance_) �,�.v�v f S Q��p�-��. �, �tt�p
2 ,_� The site and roof drainage sha11 be shown on plans and should be made io
drain towards the Frontage Street. (Required prior to the building pernut
issuance.}
3. The applicant sha.11 submit projec# grading and drainage plans for
approvaE prior to the is�uance of a Building pez�znit.
4 The project site is in a flood zone, the project shall comply with the City's
flood zone requiremen�,s.
5 � A sa.nifary sewer lateral � is required for ihe project in ac.cozdance with
the City's siandards. j
6. The project plans shall show the required Bayfront Bike/P�destrian trail
and necessary pui�lic access improvements as required by San Francisco
Bay Conservation aztd Development Commission.
7. Sanitary sewer analysis is required for the project. The sewer analysis
shall identify tl�e pzoject's impact to the City's sewer sqstem and auy
sewer pump stations and identify mitigation measures.
8 Subrnit tra.ffic trip generaiion analysis for the project.
9. Snbmit a traffic impact study for the proj eci. 11�e traffic study should
identify the project generated impaats and recommend mitigation
measures to be adopted by the project to be approved by the City
Engineer.
10. The project shall file a parcet map with the Public Works Engineering
Division. The parcel map shall show alI existing property lines, easements,
monuments, and new property and loi lines proposed by the map.
Page 1 of 3
U:�privata development�PLANNING REVIE�V COMM�.NTS.doc
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVIS�ON
11
12
A latest preliminary tit}e report of the subject parcei of land shall be
subrnitted to the Public Works Engineering Division with the parcel map
for reviews.
Map clasuze/lot closure ca�culations shall be submitted with the parcei
map.
13 The project shall submit a condominium map to the Engineerin� Divisions
in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act.
14 _� T}�e project shall, at its own oost, design and construct frontage public
unprovements including curb, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary
appurtenani woric.
15 'I�e project shall, at its own cost, design and construc� frontage streetscape
improvements including sidewalk, curh, gufiers, parking meters and poles,
trees, and stree�ights in accordance with ��.reetscape masier plazz.
16 By the preliminary review of plans, it appears that the project may cause
adverse impacts during construction to vehiculaz traf�"ic, pedestrian traffic
and public on street parking. The project shall identify �ese impacts and
provide mitigation measure acceptable to the City.
17 T'he project shall submit hydrologic calculations fram a registered civil
engineer for the proposed creek enclosure. The hydrauiic calc�lations
must shtiw that the propased creek enclosure doesn't cause any adverse
impact to both upstream and do�7nstream properties. The hyctrologic
calculations shall accompany a site map showing �he area. of the 100-year
flood and existing improvements with proposed improvements.
18 Any wozk within the drainage area, creek, or ereek banks zequires a State
Department of Fish and Game Pemut and Arnzy Corps of Engineers
Permits.
19 No consttuction debris shall be allowed into the creek.
20 4�� The pmject shall comply with the Ciiy's NPDES permit requirement to
prevent storm water pollution.
21 Tiie project does not show the dimensions of existing drivevvays, re-
submit plans with driveway dimensions. Also clarify if the project is
proposing to widen the driveway. Any widening of the driveway is subject
to City Engineer's approval.
22 The plans do not indicate the slape of the driveway, re-submit plans
showing the driveway pro%le witb elevafions
� Page 2 of 3
U:iprivate developmentiPL,ANMNG REVIEW CONIIVfENTS.doc
, - i -
.
� ; , _
.:_ �..
� . ,. , -
. _ . _, i ., : _ : ;_ : - �':
;
. . .:
: :
-�
„ .
.
, _ ,.. ,.:.. .
. :
' PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION
23 `I�.e back of the driveway/sidewalk approach shall be at least 12" above
the flow line of the fron�hage curb in the street to prevent overflow of starm
water from the street inio private propertq.
24. For the takeout service, a garbage receptacle shall be placed. in front. The
sidewalk ftonting the store shall be kept cleaxx 20' from each side of the
properiy.
25. For comz�nercial proJects a designated garbage bin space and eleaning area
shall be located inside the building. A drain connecting the garbage area to
the Sanitary Sewer System is required.
�
1
Page 3 of 3
U:lprivate developmentlPLANrIING REViEW CONI1vIENTS.doc
Project Comments
Date: November 18, 2013
To: 0 Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
� Building Division
(sso1 �ss-�2so
� Parks Division
(650) 55$-7334
From:
Subject:
Staff Review:
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
X Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attarney
(650) 558-7204
Planning Staf#
Request for Design Review, Hiliside Area Construction Perrnit and
Special Perrnit for attached garage far a new, two-story single family
dwelling with an attached garage at 2747 Burlingview Drive, zoned
R-1, APN: OZ7-261-040
Novernber 25, 2013
1) Stormwater requirements are required to be implemented at stand-alone single
family home projects that create andlor replace 2,500 sq.ft. o� more of imperviaus
surface. These requirements are in addition to any City requirements. To determine if
this project is subject to those requirements complete and retum the attached
"Stormwater Checklist far Small Projects." For additional information about these
requirernents please refer to the attached flyer "New Stormwater Controi
Requirements Effective 1211/1 Z" and by visiting the San Mateo County Stormwater
Po{lution Prevention Program (SMCWPPP) websi#e at:
htt}�://#lowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section4/C3iNewRegsSm ProjSep
2012.doc
Ta obtain a checklist electronically, the document is available at:
http://fiowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebklSection4lStorrnChecklistSmaAPraj
Dec2012.doc
2) Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City's
NPD�S (stormwater) permit to prevent stormwater pollution from construction
activiiies. Projec# proponent shall ensure all contractors implement appropriate and
effective BMPs during all phases of canstruction, includ�ng demolition. When
submitting plans for a building perrnit include a fist of construction BMPs as project
notes on a separate fuli size plan sheet, preferably 2' x 3' or larger. Praject
proponent may use the attached Constructian BMPs plan sheet to comply with this
requirement. Electronic file is avaifable for download at:
hitp://flowstobay.org/files/privatendlMR Psourcebk/SectionSlConstSMPPIanJun2012.
pdf
3) B�st Management Pract�ces (BMPs) requirements apply on any proj�cts using
architectural copper. To learn what these requirements are, see attached flyer
"Requirements for Architecfiuraf Copper." Electronic file is available for download at:
http:l/flowstobay.org/files/privatenci/MRPsourcebk/Section8/Arch itecturalcopperBMPs
. pdf �-
����� ��
'� `�,,�� A �»�, � . �.
For assistance please contact Stephen D. at 650-342-3727
`'14�t.s rs � , iJ�J
�'s.F: '.; �
Reviewed 6y: SD
Date: 11/25/201
�,
:�
I�
� �?�C:Lk—i;,;�..a^;t'.�h,{iv('3 Cii�f.
�
SAN MATE� COOVTYy�lOE
Water Pollution
Prevention Program
Clean W�ter. Healthy Ccmmvnity.
Constructio� Bes� Management Pract�ces (BMPs)
Constniction projects are required to impleznent the stormwater best manageznent practices (�MP) on this page,
as th.ey apply to your project, all year long.
�,
. -�� R � �{ I�
k r ISR
S� ��
1�� �,
�y R... � � �h � �J
� a �," . E� {,.
N
s �' }�
Iry; .
x�o-RKt�xUwa MyttttMt �
O Bcrn xd an.�a sbekpiks d'w�cl din or Whrr curcur-Uon maciai
n•i1L ulpe wl.m rmn I5 (wornr or ifnpi aqively boF�g �ed wvYu�
1 A iaH.
O Uac (bw dn. i o:snur) mlAi� � a�r br dnst mmml
Hu:rtlov hWter'rah
O t�bel �11 k�zardous mmials and /m ardous c:.,�es (suUt u
Fesdcid-.iPniucs, tbinime. sot�ens. 11r1. di. aM ��:Gaeze) in
xcadeiuc wrt� ci�. vxrn�, r,atc and fedrai �ee�iniac.
�1Slorehesallommecriplsad�viaciinxyurugM� ,yiws,vure
v� npprtyvuic scenudaq• eaaaiwau� md emv �rem x the u�d ot
nsn� x�ark 1ay a dnrinp ira rmtiv or.vha. �nin ia faecax.
O Follow �wnufaq�acr leppditalimi iuumtlo�s fQ 6a�nrdws
m.reride a.d be �'v! na �o ez mwe elmu n«ess,.o. po „m
opp� eficmicala ouWaocs niim rais i. foa�c nid�n L+i in
❑ A+unSr fw appo�ma2 Aiapoa.l oFa:! 6ezxdwa ��y��,
VMWfC1W�AfCM1IC111
❑ Cmr w4s�e izOmN caMancrc ucwol�• xilh �arPs xi it cw! DI
eeay a'uk dq-:ud dxriat..s� xadr�.
Q CFwk Fsne d'uw�ul antimr freE�4' Por kala ad ro roate
sere i�ey ae na arafillei, tvne� bse do�n a�anpner m �ho
coucvpdpe yyy
❑ Clcap u �eplarx pon.ible �oiie�x. atl i��ryea tldew frcyueatlp fa
Iol•c nnA �piils
P Diapu�c o( pll �vsslzf wd drlyj� p� fi�, R y�e ea�erivla uM
��ss �9ae un Ge ixyroke (s,na as a�phWt eow�ste. oF�eprc b e
�ne+,ida. maod y�p boarQ pip4 cm.)
❑ aa� or6yub �t�,a f w� yo;�.«, �n;w�e:. sd.�.�s. e�, m,a
dc nixg llwitks lt�rdoes waaie.
cmun+eiwn Ent�anucs au xnme�e.
O EseblisA a�M mo.wio eReu�w paiivcuroonquls m�d �c bil'rs atl
GORf[(IICt10A tOQ�CtbLod �X16 4 fMIS01en[b CpNpp� �ip�jpp �w`
scdimrnt dixhaPes 4om �e aod mcl.ios off srte_
❑ Sweepoe vacwm urt etmq rukiq inw�eA�.aeh•and scc�.c
udiment muroe ro pevee[ Gmhe: ncl;iey. Nc�z� Iw�e don�n frcnla
,a�,���.,�L
EquipmcuT Alanagemrnt &r
Spi3[ ContrM
Maiqtmaocc anA Parkir� ,.� . � .
❑ Aai�u�e m vq 6aed witl� npprcp�iw BMPs,fa
.eh�ek .d equpPHpit prtn�p �d aaNw.
❑ Pe4'om mtyorrvalutnm¢, fCppir�M, auG v�pyle
�d �qLLippxnlx'q6hYlg �H ei1C
Cl �rerneluilorvehkkmoin�ewrcemuabebne
muilc, nvrt m t bawad �rq aw�n� hon �Oprm �a"x.f
ad ovcr a drlp pm 6i1 rnapJ� io calimc Omdc
Rec:cle m Jispoce of9oWs u 6�rdoue�rnab.
❑ itrahickorcp�poeMckaningvuatxGm2mKe.
ckart wuL nmermlr e n hemttA am dr w�ll uet
nlbw c'sue iyattr ro nm into Quners. meats, ppm
Ea�•thwork &
Conta.minafed
SOA�IB
v ����-`��'
, �
.� � �.�,m
�r�-T^"� � - �_'�
rmslm f_entnrl
C7 S�dd< gnd g p,� e.cavouan ��vrA fu
M� nesheronly'
0 Sta6iG�e all dexuEcl �frqs, juuil ud
�mnim m�pmary <ruaion cw�va6 (src6
os uwia.� covho2 fehaic or bmdedfi6u
roa"iK) wml Vepelaien � eemb6:fied
9 Sxd w pfa.l rsgemtionfor avoou
coritrd on sip�y� wie�e py�pqjp¢ is
rrot o�mwiiskl}' p4swcd.
� ani�e, m ev�cc ��xtas. �
PavinglAsphalt Work
r:11 I ` �
_ � A /�+ a � ♦. � ,
9 A�ro'7 µ���n3 oM �col roamg iu wq
'eaUiv, arwlr� roi�i isio[tua 6sFcm
Crtrhy •ar,emwiMl�ond�na�ocure.
❑ ca�:rnom� dr�in inlca oml munhaicc
�='�•Pa�Sincsad com. rack umt,.�iom.
:d, [ s,m,L ac.
❑ f alkcc ied ia)ck arapppp`�;��
dispz of<acn �brasi�n 6re�e1 0� saM
r10 i�%i Sp'GCpCt t\'LSII lf IIIIO EWICR.
❑ 17o wt ma nater b iwsh dou'� (�
avp►a0.cenvaa pwneu.
Cuncreh, Grout & ��1orGtr
=��ptication
❑$mra ca�crc.te, puur r.d mmr undcr
cm'ef, on �ollas L�J owar frmn diana,e
ueas. ilwz mrorials mus� ncrer rtxM n
nmm 6�ao.
i7 iVodi outmna�¢ cqeipm�n�l[�cY
�'a or in � evrteioed wtn, .w LL�eet
�a��� ����, a. �.aw+,.;� �:�
�aam mrrcer�dingreet. L.acovc�e
►ardm and di�pme efes tar5age.
O Co16�ct ipc.msh n�a�cr from vasNnig
c>y� d apqfeCa< mipnc aiW .cmojs ii
6r vpproqi¢�e dlsqxalotfMe,
bewatering
O OnnpldCan�r7ri�IcOrcqniP�Mowiwupt � m[Conhul �. ` . I (
solrentt�'fRaac.aln.wcim�� s�� F
�s M�cmm�, aa Q Fm�a� aia. dmin iddi ¢unr�s d�zlws. sawc�ar:ng 3�AnvhahlCmrmt Icerore� v
wd d*ainy+�e rn.sca �vi9� WPmP+�wa O Canpk�e:y� eovef m 6ortieede staei
Bhth,e.d.a: tae
Spill Pmciuinn awt (:onm1 e�vd Msc. fiberro&. dmin InleuwLmuw cslrinC Ur_fi�v '
❑ Koep fpiR clwmD mve.vlR fra�s, ab.m�baas� c�cJ b�x mc_ fatrie, caerl Mdn sld ��erc or �a��c! _
ireil�6knefieco.shunims�cata4anxe fl Ae.eot�dimntfromasrramiya3ite tnysieke_rysbrtyva�ofdieaan�d�
❑ Iaspzt.d�ic�auteq��ymonheQonulytoxand �Y�nstuilwgnadmaw�ntngexalawu 4'+mm. �
mpntc I�S n p peM �o cach Icekc rmtrok. suh u 6ber m�Is. zil! 4zec. er ❑ 9w.e1, ahmorb. or.�acaim metr� '. n �
P� D��: Use1A Rdi�emtWshs. shm'afddi oC
until mrai,a re n�odc. W� dl ov�oe 5 raon ❑ F1[tcGVek nmivge aN n,..oa all
0 Ckm up epSNo ar leols humWiahN •ud dupom d p�`�P a�o�and eoil on Cx riic whcre it acyoa arc Lnid�d in mio bcUion or x �+tnolf w�um Oie sve anA afl ruitoQ'thu
eleee mMcria7s �nLL not wlkn voo Sk� �aa. iAc eed dexi ..rod: d� (wh�cM�c is
1M Y+�WC(I�. M9dlifsGf fronllhc sNe. Dlt��t rw.oe
O �n�w1'�edmnax{,tco�rleecBuid56a�atpilkd A7raxsF�cca�utedm�leria4toQum) mO°�I) n�alerhpmpl{tNearaqfmm�ll!¢W�bed
Ux d7 elcamp mdip�� (#ysorbep� myte`i.ia. cn �'�s on {p¢ si0c. ao[ ia ilK �pee[ O R smeout s1m7 eRtsrs e csch Weia clmn xea or oUrnes eaice compk.•.�e.
littcr, �nNar 0 Caq+rimsd Soilt ir up unnrdr ictY� ❑ KTrn dav
�)� �4, mtify �� ahhu�
Q 5i�u n O If sy ot �he Ibllm�ie«ad'itim� ac aPM*'Y fr� �c kW nunir�yd�
P 0 sP��d dn• moreriaB inonaJecaly. Do nut 7
m• w�ea� tlrsn anm� wiHi wae¢ arliu. il�nn o6rn�cd. ksf Pa oamam:iaNmm6 IxSuc diu�ar�p naiQio a s�c� yaicr
U ctnn u� spW. cr sn ama: b�- y�g[e� u� u�d cao�aa the Rogimd wMer Qodfn wnam eain. tV tradm or�li.�crsion
MW�*�7dls�osL�gofcon�ic�kded. CmndBow� � �hmneLnMsfaW�k.audimmltrap
U Rryor..�{�cmespa�lmnodie¢19.Yaiaercqi.ecd •vauemFwleoaEitio.s.diuelaxuon. ma��herzq.irc6.
or odoc 4[a aros Mlun��-n [m�mim�m_ mins
q•!a�varepmtau�n�uwntrzleoys�haudeur ■���d�*�r��; Isicqcrcaiprormrcuocordische�@cof
mqerieh, inNueng ou. To �rynn a spill: I) Dia1911 gwwGw,xcc C�vdt viO Uxw L'i�pnecr �
wYairk�xt�W�Buer.nepoota¢awbe[2)Ca�tl,e 11�6eoio�tridls de[aminc�v6e4m[citlagiSrcNkrCaM
CNvcmm�OffccoCEmer(prneySm�lwsK^u:rieg ■Hnrletp.relt,debcu.mtr�t. horvwiaerprmxmisConqmitdetl
Cenrt (B0� &5i-7550 ('24 Amus).
gouo6nvi^r m�e De rm`u1 �r hMed
off-she fa p�ova Uupoml,
Storrn drain polluters may he Iiable for fines of up to $10,Q00 per ciay!
u i��
Paintiag & Paini R�moval
�. �
,,��::.. #��, t�
�� �
r�'
PdnU•e c7exnlyl
O Nevar ciwi 6nuhos w r"vuc w�n�
wom��e.a uno n nnw, s�nar. uurm
drain.o�euR ca;yR�.
❑ Fm �ruer-bmcd perol . P�n� ax broshcs
lo tllc G MM po8ibl4 Rbist b fhC
sri�wy ttmr mce .•as hoce 6aincd
pmniuioa fiow ihe luca{ wme�.w;cr
�mancn� amlwrq:. Mc.�:r po,r pa"vx
don�n e main.
ca rvr�-w.�e oou,�. w:i �,,, c�,n� �o
Wc etani pouiWeandelma���ihthiamer
w wPreiu in a qv�cwnuew�. fi(�m ��d
rauv Wirtao vnd ml�ais. D:cpy� of
�cslN�cudux.seblcllilnev.'x+h x.c.ss
lura�do�cwarc, �
P�int rrnwrtl
:l Chemical p�r wipp� r�;duc md
tE�n an1 due f nuru.c psiwts m
pamlz cnaai�iig Icad m�ri6uq•hin nwa
bc Ecpm d alK IwVYAouS �f'�Ai.
❑ P�imclipaadd�s�Goninon-hazWous
6rc sUiPP�F and seM binlu� mry bc
�iw �W or wil¢:te7 in rtssticdmp
clulu nd dspmed al'n casi
Landscape hiatarials
; �\'":
_ ���`''�
� t,
a conm� �tpka i,wa,R�.y ��o;.i,
6)' aarie�q il�om mGtt e��p. ��Ueo ihc)• zm
�+a aafieh' bci� n:oe
❑ SW: crodiMe la.d�upe mm«:nl m
pall:ts, Co�cr or Amc thcec ma�crinls
r4en ricy� arc na am•eh� bainY vsW w
opplied.
� Discwqiaue a�pli�orn of.vr e�odiWe
MdQape ma�aid a'itlim 2 days bcfac.�
� � ��,��a��,.«���r�
�o�ii
-.; v . . _ _. : !:
. .... .
. :. ;
_. _. . . •_--. . : ..:•_ i.;• - : • , ..
_ ; ,`.., i ..
�
�aH FIA? l6C8YN1Y�Of
�ev��� Prograrn
�«.��<. �,,�y �•�;�,�.
Requi�emenis for Architecturat Copper
Pratect water quallty dur�ng fnstallation, cleaning, freat�ng, and washingl
Capper from Buildings May Harm Aquatic Lffe
Goppercan harm aquatic life !n San Francisco 6ay. Water fhat cornes
ir—�� �Qhtact with architectural copper may contribute to impacts,
especfaqy �uring instal"atian, cleanfng, treating, or washing. Patination
sc�lutrons that are used to obtain the desired shada of green or brown
typlcally canf�ih acids. After treatmer�±, w'�en the copper is rir�sed to
r�move these acids, the rinsa water is a source of pollutants.
M unicipalities prohib'r± discharges to fhe storm draln of water used in the
ir� s�alfafion, clear,ing, treating and washing of arChitectura! copper.
U se Best Management Practices (BMPs)
The foflowPhg Best Managernent Practices (BMPs)
discharges to storm drains.
must be implemertted to prevent prohibi#gd
During Inst�rlafion
� If passible, �urchass copper materiafs that have been pre-patineted at the factory.
• If paflnation is dons on�site, irrtplement one or more of the ftiltowln� BMps:
�
0
0
Dtsaharge th� rinse wafier to iandscaping. Ensure that the
rin5e water does nof fiow fo the sireat or storm drafn.
8lock off storm drafn infet if needed.
Callect rtnse water in a tar;k and pump to tf�e sanitary
seWer. Contact your lo�a1 sani�ary sewer agency before
dlscharging to the sanifaty sewer.,
Coflecf the rinse water in a tank and hau( off-sifie for
proper dispasat.
Cortsider ooafing ths copper materials w(th ar� irnpervlous
caatina that preven�s furthar. corrasian and runoff. Thts wilf
also mainEain Yhe desired coCor for a longer time, requiring
tess mafntenancs.
Durfng Mafntenance
lmplament tha follow(ng BP�fPs during roufine mainfenance acfivlffes, such as pnwsr wasi�ing the roof,
re-pattnation or re-a�plicati�n of Impervious coatrng;
• Bfock storm drain inlets as needed to prsvent runoif from enter'rng storr� drains,
• Dlscharge the wash water to iandscaping or to the sanifary sewer (with permission from the local
eanitary sewer agency). If this Is nof an optlon, haul tha wash waier off-s'rte for proper disposaf,
Pratect the Bay/Ocean anci yourself!
If you are responsibfe for a discharge to the storm drain of non-
stormwater generated by irstalfing, cleaning, treeting or washing
copper archltaciura! features, you are in violation of the mun;cipal
stormwater ordinar,ce and may pe subjecf to a fine,
Canfiact Information
The San Mateo Countywide Water Polluilon Prevention Program (ists rnunlcipal stormwaier corttacts at
�ww.flowst�bav,ora (cllck on 'Business", then "t��ew Develaprrtent°, than "Eoca! permitting agency").
FlNAL February 29, 2Q12
gutter and dr�ir�pfpe,
prohlbited a'ischerge, The water musf be
pumped and drsposed of properly.
�: , '; : : -:
, . ,. ': ; ::.; ..:
_�. . . . . .. ... , .. ,. �'�
''=� ::
SAN r�A7E0 CuUNTYWI�f
Water Polkktia�
PreventionProgram City of Burlingarrfe - Office of
Stormwater Checklist for Small Projects Environmental Compliance
Municipa! Regional Storrnwater Permit (MRP) 1103 Airport Bivd
Order No. R2-2009-0074 ; Order No. R2-2011-0083
NPDES No. CA5612008 O�ce� ($50) 342-3727
Fax: (650) 342-3712
Complete this form for individua! single family home projecfs of any size, other projects that create anc!/or repface less than 10,Q00
square feet of impervious surface, and projects in fhe foI(owing cafegories thaf creaie and/or replace less than 5, 000 square feef of
impervious surfaCe; restaurants, refai! gasoGne outleis, auto service facili6es', and parhrng lofs (sfarid-alone or part of another
use}.
A Project Informatlon
A.1. Project Name: New Residence, Burlingview L.L.0
q,2 ProjeCf Address: 2747 Burlingview Drive, Burlingame, CA 94010
q,g Project APN: 027-26]-040
B. Select Appropriate Site Design Measures
B,1 Does the project create and/or replace 2,500 square feet or more of impervious surface2'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
>!f yes, and the project wit! r�ceive frnal discretionary approva! on or after December 1, 2012, the project must inefude one
of 5ife Design Measures a through f.3 Fact sheefs regarding site design measur�s a through f may be downloaded af
hffp://www.ftowstnbay.org/bs new_developmenf.php#flyers.
➢!f no, ar tha project witl re�eive fna! discretionary approvaf befor� December 1, 2012, the projeci is encouraged fo
rmpfemenf srte desrgn measurtsa, which may be requir�d af municipality discr�tion. Consult wiih municipaJ sfa/f aboaf
requiremenfs for yaur project.
B.2 Is the site design measure included in the project plans?
Plan
Yes No I Sheet No.
❑ f�
�. O
� �
❑ -- � —
❑ -- � —
❑ ❑ N[ �.
❑ ❑ 1J A.
❑ v 0 - �--�
❑ �
❑ ❑ �
❑ 1�
❑ �
� ,�1.
a. Direct roof runoff into cisterns or rain barrels and use rainwater for irrigation or
other non-potable use.
b. Direct roof runoff onto vegeiated areas.
c. Direct runaff from sidewalks, wafkways, and/or patios onio vegetated areas.
d. Direct runoff from driveways andJor uncovered parking IoEs onto vegetated areas.
h. Maximize permeabiliiy by clustering development and preserving open space.
i. Use micro-detention, including distributed landscape-based detention.
j. Protect sensitive areas, including wetland and riparian areas, and minimize
changes to the natural topography.
k. Self-treating area (see Section 4.2 of the C.3 Technical Guidance}
t. Self-retaining area (see 5ection 4.3 of the C.3 Technical Guidance)
m_ Plant or preserve interceptor trees (Section 4.1, C.3 Technical Guidance)
! See Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes here.
� ..�... �;-.",.
Complete the C.3/C.fi Development Review Checklist if the project is not an indivi _ al $it�g�a"farwiliy,;f�n'Isn�, `��radit c�i�eatas and/or replaCes
1 D,000 square faet a more oF impervious surface; or if it is a restaurant, retail gasol��'p�t�`ek.�auta;��rVicl�faeilfty�; o`�r parking lot proJect ihat
creates and/or reolaces 5,000 square feet ar more of impervious surface. �
3 See MRP Provision C.3.i. ;;, �;.•_ : y
'� See MRP Provision C.3.a,i.{6}. 1�� �`- '" `'-`� '
1
r;;-r r �`=� <-�,.;::;;:,�;'"�:=';!'f�raved Decemberd, 2Q92
..t:;�J;.3-;'t._ :�.;�..<i'i'';:. �. .
e. Construct sidewalks, walkways, and/or patias with permeable surfaces.
f. Construct bike lanes, driveways, and/or uncovered parking lo#s wifh permeable
surfaces.
g. Minimize land disturbance and impervious surfa�e (especially pa�king I�ts}.
�
� Stormwater Checklfst for Small ProJects
C. Select appropriate source controls (Encouraged for a1I projects; may 6e requrred af munieipal discretion. Consult municipa! statf.6)
Features that
Are these require source Source control measures Is source contro!
features in control (Refer to Locai Source Control �ist for detailed requirernents) measure inc{uded
project? measures in project plans?
Yes No
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
l� ❑
� �
❑
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑ �
❑ ❑
,
�-r-i ❑
�-
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
Pian
___ _ Yes No Sheet No.
Storm Drain •�lark on-site inlets with the words "No Dumpingl Flows to Bay" or equivalent. [� ❑� � A
Floor Drains ■ Plumb interior floor drains to sanitary sewer [or prohibit]. _ ❑ ❑ ��
Parking garage ■ Plumb interior parking garage floor drains to sanitary sewer � ❑ ❑
Landscaping � Retain existing vegetation as practicable. (� ❑
■ Select diverse speciss appropriate to ihe site. Include plants that are pest-
and/or disease-resistan#, drought-tolerant, and/or attract beneficial insects.
■ Minimize use of pesticides and quick-release fertilizers.
• Use efficient irri etian s stem; desi n to minimize runatf.
�ooilSpalFountain • Provide connection to the sanitary sewer to facilitate draining 6 ❑
Food Service Provide sink or o#her area for equipmenE cleaning, which is: ❑
Equipment • Connected to a grease interceptor prior to sanitary sewer discharge.6
(non- ■ Large enough for the largest mat or piece of equipment to be cieaned.
residential) ■ Indoors or in an outdoor roofed area designed to prevent stormwater run-on
and run-off, and signed to require equipment wash'sng in this area.
Refuse Areas ■ Provide a roofed and enclosed area for dumpsters, recycling cantai�ers, etc., ❑
i designed to prevent stormwater run-o� and runoff.
� Connect any drains in ar beneath dumpsters, cornpactors and tallow bin
areas serving food service faci[ities to the sanitary sewer �
outdoor Process • perform process activities either indoors or in roofed outdoor area, designed� ❑
Adivities' to revent stormwater run-on and runoff, and to drain to the sanita sewer.s
Outdoor ■ Cover the area or design to avaid pollutant contact with stormwater runoff. ❑
EquipmenU ■ Locate area only on paved and contained areas.
Materials • Roof storage areas that will contain non-hazardous liquids, drain to sanitary
5tofage sewers, and contain b berms or similar_
Vehicle/ � Roofed, pave and berm wash area to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff, ❑
Equipment pfumb to the sanitary sewerfi, and sign as a designated wash area.
Cleanin • Commercial car wash facilities shall discha e to the sanitar sewer.s
Vehicle/ � Designate repairlmainSenance area indoors, or an �utdoors area designed toT ❑
Equipment prevent stormwater run-on and runoff and provide secondary containment. Do
Repair and not install drains in the secondary containment areas.
Maintenance ■ No ftnor drains unless preVeated prior to discharge to the sanitary sewer. 6
■ Connect containers or sinfcs used for parts cleaning to #he sanitary sewer. 6
Fuel - Fueling areas shall have impermeable surface fhat is a) minimally graded to ❑
Dispensing prevent ponding and b) separated ftom the rest of the site by a grade break.
Areas 1■ Canopy shall extend at least 10 ft in each direction from each pump and drain
awa from fuelin area.
Loading Docks ■ Cover and/or grade to minimize run-on to and runoff from the (oading area. ❑
• Position downspouts to direct stormwater away from the loading area.
• Drain water from loading dock areas to the sanitary sewer 6
• Ins#aIl door skirts beiween the trailers and the buildin .
❑
❑
!� /�
❑
� �
� t�/A
❑
A
❑ �
�
❑
N�A
❑
N�
❑
Fire Sprinklers • Design for discharge of fire sprinkler test water to landscape or sanitary sewers �, ❑
Miscellaneous • Drain oondensate of air conditioning units to landscaping. Large air �, j❑
Drain or Wash conditioning units may conneci to the sanitary sewer.6
Water • Roof drains shall drain to unpaved area where practicable. i
• Drain boiler drain lines, roof top equiprnent, all washwater to sanitary sewere.
❑ ❑ Architectural • Drain rfnse water to landseaping, d[sCharge to sanitary sewers, or collect and ❑ i ❑
Copper dispose properly offsite. See flyer "Requirements for Architectural Copper." , � ����
5 See MRP Provislort C.3.a.i(7},
2
�
Approved Decernber 4, 2012
; .. :. _ ::
i _ ...
i: ._ . ..:_ -
.�. �
.
_ .. � , .. .. .: �
Stormwafer Checklist for Smal1 Projects
D. lmploment construction Sest Management Practices (BNtPs) (Required foraJl projecfs.)
D.1 Is the site a"High Priority Site"? (Municipal staff will make this determinah'on; ifthe answeris yes, Yes ❑ IVp [J
fhe project wil! be referred to consfruction.site inspection staff for monthly stormwafer inspections
durfng the wef season, October 1 through ApriJ 30_)
•"High Priority Sites" are sftes that require a grading permit, are adjacent to a creak, or are
otherwise high priority for stormwater protection during construction per MRP Provision C.6.e.ii(2).
D.2 All projects require appropriafe stormwater BMPs during constructian, indicate which BMPs are included in the project, below.
Yes No 8est Management Practice (BMP)
�. ❑ Attach the San Mateo Gountywide Water Pdlution Pre�ention P�ogram's construction BMP plan sheet to
�roject plans and require contracfor to implement the appficable BMPs an the plan sheet.
❑ Ternporary erosion controls to stabilize all denuded areas until permanent erosion controls are established.
❑� Delineate with field markers clearing limits, easements, setbacks, sensitive ar critical areas, buffer zones,
trees, and drainagz courses.
�❑ Provide notes, Specifications, or 8ttachments describing the following:
■ Construction, operation and maintenance of erosion and sediment controls, include inspection frequency;
■ Methods and schedule for grading, excavation, filling, clearing of vegeiaUon, and storage and disposal of
excavated or cleared material;
• Spe�cations for vegetative cover & mufch, include methods and schedules for planting and fertifiza6on;
_ ■ Provisions for temporary and/or permanent irriqat:on.
-
�❑ Perform clearing and earth mov�ng activities only during dry weather.
� ❑__ Use sediment controls or ftftration to remove sediment when dewatering and obtain all necessary permits,
� ❑ Protect all storm drain inlets in vicinity ef site using sediment controis such as berms, fiber rolls, or filters.
�� Trap sediment on-site, using BMPs such as sediment basins or traps, earthen dikes or berms, silt fences,
check dams, soil blankets or mats, covers for soil stock piles, etc.
�❑ Divert on-site runoif around exposac! areas; di�ert off-site runoff around the site (e.g., swales and dikes),
� Q Protect adjacent properties and undisturbed areas from construction irnpacts us€ng vegetative buffer strips,
sediment barriers or filters, dikes, mulching or other measures as appropriate.
1,8�. � Limit consVuction ac:cess routes and stabilize designated access points.
�❑ iJo cleaning, fueling, or mainfaining vehicles on-site, except in a designated area where washwater is
contained and treated.
� ❑ T Store, handle, and dispose of construction materialsJwasies properly to prevent contact with stormwater.
'�I. ❑ Contractor shall train and provide instruction to all employeeslsubcontractors re: construction BMPs.
�[j Control and preverrt the discharge of all potential pollutants, including pavement cutting wastes, paints,
concreie, petroleum products, chemicals, washwater or sediments, rinse water from architectural copper, and
non-stormwater discharges to storm drains and watercourses.
Name of applicant completing the form: Richard Terrones
Signature: ' � Date: � 1 [
E. Comments (ior municipal staff ase only):
F. NOTES (for municipal s#aff use only):
Section A Notes:
6 Any connection fo fhe sanitary sewer systern is subject to sanitary disErict approval.
7 Businesses that rnay have outdoor process activltiesiequipment Include machine shops, auto repair, lndustnes with pretreatment iacilities.
3
Approved December4, 2D12
_ ,_
:.. ; -
. , ;.
�..�. :: ,�. .. - :. �. a �� �
;
. . . . . � . . . �.. . - -. :. :_,-. .� .: � � .
.
I `
.
,. . .. . �. - „�.�. �.��... �... _ -...: � : : �
. .. _ �., . . . . �.- � ... . :, . � � . ...
5tormwater Checklist far Smal1 Projects
Section B N
Section C N
Section D N
�
,
■
�
1
�
4
Approved December 4, 2012
_ _ i _...� - _ �
:: , _ ,, : : - -
, � , .
... •
:. , � �.. .. . ... . - -
. .. .:�� _ : ... � -�_.�:. ..�-.... :., � ��. �.:. �.�.�..� . . . . .. %c.:- - :��.,r . . .._ ... ... .. .. ,. __ . .. .,
. � � � . .-. ., . , .. . . : . ; ..
. , , . i .. , �. . .. =" ':"-•':;'
. <• �
G
Project Comments
Date: November 18, 2013
To: 0 Engineering Division
(650j 558-7230
� Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
From: Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and
Special Permit for attached garage for a new, two-story single family
dwelling with an attached garage at 2747 Burlingview �rive, zoned
R-1, APN: 827-261-040
Sta#f Review: No�ember 25, 2013
The h�use is intended to be equipped with a fire sprinkler system throughout
1. Schematic of water Iateral line after meter shall be shown on Building
Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split
between ciomestic and fire protection lines.
2. All sprinkler drainage shall be placed into landscaping areas.
3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall
clearfy indicate Fire Sprinkiers shall be installed and shop drawings
shail be approved by the I�ire Department prior to installation.
Reviewed by: ���
� �
�Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
� Stormwater Division
(65Q) 342-3727
0 City Attarney
{650) 558- �204
Date� zo i��s-�l `3
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTIQN AND DES{GN REVIEW AMENDMENT
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burfingame that:
WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for Desiqn
Review Amendment for a new, single-story sinQle family dwellina with an a#tached at 2747 BurlinQview
Drive, Zoned R-1, BurlinQview LLC, propertv owner APN: 027-261-040;
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on
September 8, 2014, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written
materials and testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that:
1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments
received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence
that the project set forth above wilf have a significant effect on #he environment, and categorical
exemption, per CEQA Section 15303 (a), which states that construction of a limited number of
new, small facilities or structures including one single family residence or a second dwelling unit
in a residential zone is exempt from environmental review. tn urbanized areas, up to three
single-family residences maybe constructed or converted under this exemption, is hereby
approved.
2. Said Design Review Amendment is approved subject to the canditions set forth in Exhibit "A"
attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review Amendment are set forth in the staff report,
minutes, and recording of said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of
the County of San Mateo.
Chairman
�, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City a# Burlingame, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission held on the 8th dav of September. 2014 by the following vote:
Secretary
, .. _
� :_ - . _ . : :--_ _ ... ;...: , ,: -- _.. _... -
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and �esign Review Amendment
2747 Burlingview Drive
EfFective September 18, 2014
Page 1
that the project shall be built as shown on the pians submitted to the Planning Division date
stamped March 7, 2014, sheets A0.0, A3.1, and Boundary Survey and Topographic Map,
and date stamped March 20, 2014, sheets, A2.1, A2.3 and A5.1 through A6, and date
stamped August 11, 2014, sheets A1.1, A2.2, A4.1, A4.2, L1.1, and L1.2; and including a
synthetic turF lawn with a sand infill base in the rear yard;
2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features,
roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning
Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning
staff};
3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which
would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit;
4. that the conditions of the Building Division's January 28, 2014 and February 6, 2014, and
November 19, 2013 memos, the Parks Division's November 25, 2013, and March 26, 2014
memos, the Engineering Division's December 4, 2013 memo, the Fire Division's December
10, 2012 memo, and the Stormwater Division's November 25, 2013 memo shall be met;
5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall
be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community
Development Director;
6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on
the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be
required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District;
7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for demolition or construction of the project, the
project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of
approval adopted by the Planning Commission; or City Council on appeal, and the Arborist
Report date stamped March 21, 2d14; which shall remain a part of al! sets of approved
plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is
required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval
of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal;
8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single
termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visibls frorn the street; and that
these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a
Building permit is issued;
that the project shali comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling
Ordinance which requires affected demolifion, new construction and alteration projects to
submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full
demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit;
; ,._
_.. _
>.;: , .:...,_. , _. . . _ _ ...
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review Amendment
2747 Burlingview Drive
Effective September 18, 2014
Page 2
9. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the
new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as
identified in Burlingame's Storm Water �rdinance, to prevent erosion and off-site
sedirnentation of storm water runoff;
10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire
Codes, 2010 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame;
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION
PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION:
11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by
the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design
professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved
floor area ratio for the property;
12. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the
property corners, set the building footprint and certi#y the first floor elevation af the new
structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the farm boards per the approveci plans;
this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer;
13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer,
or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural
certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be
evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved
plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design
shall be submitted to the Building Divisian before the final framing inspection shall be
scheduled:
14. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height
of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and
15. that prior to final inspection; Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the
architecturai details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been
built according to the approved Planning and Building plans.
,_ , --, ._ _ __ . ,,-,,. .. . _ •.::: --
. CITY OF BURLINGAME
� ° ; COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
EURLINGAME 501 PRfMF20SE ROAD
��� � BURLINGAME, CA 94010
-,�°9' ; ,� PH: (650) 553-7250 � FAX: (650) 696-3790
www.burlingame.org
Site: 2747 BURLINGVIEW DRIVE
The City of Burlingame Plnnning Commission announces PU�LiC NEARI�G
the fallawing publit hearing on MONDAY, P�Oi10E
SEPTEMBER 8, 2014 at 7:00 P.M. in the {ity Hall
tauncil Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, tA:
Applitation for Design Review Amendment for a
previously app�aved single-story house at 2747
�URUNGVIEW DRIVE zoned R-1. APN 027-261-040
Mpiled: August Z9, 2014
(Ptease reier tu other side}
Gitv of �urlir�pame
A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to
the mee#ing at the Community D2velopment Department at 501 Primrose
Road, Burlingame, Califomia.
If you challenge #he subject application(s} in couri, you may be limited to
raising only ihose issu�s you or someone else raised at the public hearing,
described in the notice or in wriiten correspondence delivered to the city at or
prior to the public hearing.
Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their
tenants about this notice.
For additional inforrnation, please call (650) 55$-7250. Thank you.
William Meeker
Gommunity Development Director
Pt��LIC HEAI�I�IG NOitCE
(Please refer to other sideJ
f� , �,�"•-^ty a;n" x -y-' T+z
. ?���'.. � w ' � -r.3`. .� �%� �� � s� � -,
� r
, � .. . , s, ��'�.� � :y��. Y 'S � .� , Y' K4y% �� !�� � 3.,y
) � 9 . y ' ��
-- '4� �� .�i � •h . ,I a
•�� �r r � • s � � # � �, �, �,a v
., '
>
.
_ l.� �yy r.. ,�¢g;'0y'�.� . �� � �� i
i • y�
( l.. ,� . .� x� y ��d _ �p 'T. Y. � i Y . . �� . — �^�il
. y �t . . .y ,� �{��a� �� (� � i ��, � �,'M '. p.���
��� ..iB . ti � "��at ��5`'� ;•� `��,,�r�'' � 'Tkr,� .�-�-f� _ k� "' ��'t: }I�.. F J'�!T .
h i � f S �a "�E • Y.n /,�: k' S�' ' }� ,' � � 9.y� '3fi � d' •. ,,,,y �'.t'.
ti � � �
'�e�:�v"o� �.. ��"� ��% . ` /..� . � � � �° tC �'�� '.
.�e -`a�� `��a . �,� �v �:y ' ' �' i a� r ';�;,. � ��3 . �� •..�� . ;`e yd
,�.: . �" � - . � _,,.�,� .
� ' �' /., �,..' 1� �`�,�V. � .:a � . v � �{ �" "� '� ��.� ,��;
'� . M� y . �3 1✓ Y.. � .^v. -�°'a? 5 a;W �
Y �. . � ld�� ;. • . . .�.� y..� l� .
arS.„;�� � .z f • � s i � �"� � .'^' ,Pn:,` . . � d � :
�. 3=4�+ d . � a Y "` �f � l}.. °�'��` � �
� � �Z� y ,� ..°�_ ^� 7r � I f� � +'' .�'� t a" : � h . �
`� � ,�'� � � .. ��� abz v'sw�i P" � 'x i�.M1 Y
�� �
t � .�., " � � � ��' P'�'y r ���� .a+�.. . ,�.,�� � .._ . .:m, „v - � '��w� �ry : p-6��'b '.��
�r �'4z � '' � t
�- �1 ,��.��'$. _ : �,, ,n.. r f- . � E
��, , 1 � � ,�M1.'b-F'- .. ' f '�:�,. �����t�'�,�=i -
r, .
?\,..pr : °x'�, . _ t+��, ' �"'�.etyJJ�y.' p� a z'..: - ' � ��i� � �
'\ �` �e m'�Yrt'"" � `'Fa,.s � : �; � �� � - f ,.
* � `5 7 k '. � - ,��ut.� ^f ��„ ' � �,�, > 2� .,.
.. 1� m _ i � ' : � `
�, .am -..;e�, e `� `$ ..:'. '; , � � � .a.,
��;p�p� '� 3:a+ '? � : , . s.., r y . �, y � � E .
ti�+.,. '9�� -�-y��.' `�y �, . . .: `. �r�QjY,r \-.
. . y � 4 { h '� � §i , - r� ~�, ��.
, . 4 . . w . �, � . _ .. ¢"Y,, . iI
`�i. c � �, tii_ . �r. . : _ r- �; ,. �y,. ��. � c, � , � �.rt� � .. � �3
y,A �i KL. �* J�� 3 . �, 5 -'. .+�},e• _ � T �� �y - F,�
�., � ,3 - 4a � .°z-v ,�, � v .-„ ' R£��h f-,s a,�A�'
'�' � �� � .' � y� ���V' .P:y b
''S . � � F, �_ . ` r . � . .. ��':. ]y
} \F�i t I . y�j � �' � i
4 "fi.
g+ �,�'$ 2 � ` -� ; ,� , . � .� y
� � _ � �� �r ¢�+� � � � :
1 a a
1 � Y � � ���� Y�.- ��. z �.
"vsc � �,��..s� �' ��'. ,-�'�i.'�,� ''�J� ��� .� ��. �,.
� T�_� f �'�"`.+Y (�'�'. (B � _ � " ,��C.
`. � - ,�rti.
. . �..� r '• �$ yY "' � .g,�." ..n.
'r�j� �".; .�,a-'` ��� �'u� . _ : �{�
' � �. t: . . , � `.. ,�e �n�x �- :�''� �,
6.:. . . e � V.�
L. ' � .�� �." � � . ��,
.�r 4y� t TM .� � : i���
�,y� .�'. : 4 � ,�.).
. T � � MF)��r x t'
( .�
�'r �
� '
��
;.
�$
' ....iC�'rw �� .�
��� .�Y �.� .. � ��{t�,� _ t .�'� -
Y� � s. ra-�.�:, r �� `;. y".`, o
�•� �� � �f, � � �� �rt�.� i � a 3
��'; ,�" ,y�{� �l� 5 „*, � `u� �',��i„�h' '. ' `,F __ � 'L
� � {y : {f •� , � .
` %,� .� (y �''^ M �'. C} "�hr, . �.
:.,rx�z �'�s` �„• Y . � � ^ ` k r. �. � ;.
, ., f,..+,� . , ' q S ..; . .. , � � '�
rir c-
., � � �R � }, ., ` . t� YJ_ �+ � � •� � �_4 �` i t:'� j � 7
'� '� �.:,;' .: k �� � +. r3• : �, � �, � � l��; �: ':f
y�A� t t� '� - � �
t ,� � ,�` . +, �s ,:. ��.. - ' �'
t �',��� � ��,
��; `� -;� M �'
� �x
�,r }` � . y'�; i � ��..�,q � i �.
�9
r -s � � � � ., .. . v��'. x� il �. .,.,�o � � ,:
x �'`� ?'
4 . ..R .. ��.' � ' d
��. ' � , p.' � � Xsb�r 1� �'-1i ,.. � � � tiz ' _
aVti �' C �� #' ��a . �
"b � 4 `x^' 'P',� � e , . � '.. ,., j � �+.. �t' ;�.
r�e: �` x• y� 3°— §. ,� � ,� "�
,r,.yC"�"� a' .. � � :: � . `�'''� . "_�{�}'y" w �.
y ' ! ,' j ��r.
.:.3%� ,��•a;�'� ! ' �'4's. p;.: . y�� _.. �i � .
„` k .. �' ,. .{` . . 6 4'; b�' �'� , ." �.
� \,_, , . �,
q 'a�`-' s �;; # �. �' '�: �� .' �d�
. ".�� a'�'.. a �X � �,�� �µr..
� � S ��� t� ,:_ � i
, h K ..4, h,� � � ; {�, }� . a
� -4 - . y � �:. .; �.✓ _ 1 f.� ^+r��,' { �$ .. y
�t*�` �"M'�� Sc � . . u
�sY^" ^ � J � � * .: * e n �.�� i. 0 �, } .� �
_ � ' ,� ' � � ' $�s 4� ,�y + t � � s�'e4..'
+� �. �y� �'~
_ �, j �, ' p . t.
' �. t � l9 'f" �i'` "�d �a.��` i . ' .i., � �,.
.1. _ ry . 'Z - �f�� .,: � _. ��. ...�. ..
:, y
: �&�,.
^X4� � ,a 4"T � �.
� ., .% r . � .L.� "
Y+
r.�ar
_.' _� ...��.
.
•'• +., � �{ma .':� . � ��� '" �e� p
.f�1` 4 � ..�y _.. .� �r� h
', p � . . _ � � � �n
� y � � � � � , ,, , ?�� " `•�
k � t�::
` � . { � x 4� �„� � ..
14 W, X !: T� y�' .�"c.���� .
� '�'^�"�' .�
�.��� • t�� r � � � � ? � � '^' w. $a �.' c . ����t �' t � .� � �� �..i ���- . =F '� �;
r r .� � . f f t �s,,r. � . t, .�: .,tZ'.:�, - .. �, + ,�C
��:' ' �� i`a� � , r'�i�� ' ` y �,'' , �� � �`•` "' � �x. ;�� t
't' ts/ k i"r k .� �,���:�r •3•� ,�� 7 +�
i i ''''''qqqjjj���,,, , aw
�.f' .� k� ��• � � IK � � {M1':+.1 2 - . . �[ � . �� �, C �� _C�} J .: Y
� �, _ TdR _ ��.. d pn ,
- , t _ i,�
.. . . , .,. . . .,y..;. .. . � 1, �. ,.. � !:, .. . .. . �.,
F"'