The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1205 Burlingame Avenue - Staff ReportCity of Burlingame Comfnercial Design Review and Sign Variance Item # � Action Calendar Address: 1205 Burlingame Avenue Meeting Date: 4/22/02 Request: Commercial design review to an existing commercial space and sign variance for number of signs at 1205 Burlingame Avenue, zoned C-1, subarea A( C.S. 25.57.010 and C.S. 22.06.110) Property Owner: Karp Family Tnist Applicant: Sephora Property Development Architect: Thomas Bond Associates, Thomas Bond APN: 029-204-060 General Plan Designation: Shopping and Service Lot Area: 5,850 SF Date Submitted: March 18, 2002 Zoning: C-1, subarea A CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15303 — Class I- the operation repair, maintenance, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipmerit, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that previously existing including but not limited to (a) interior or exterior alternations involving such things as interior partitions, pluinbing, and electrical conveyances. Previous Use: Full Service Restaurant Proposed Use: Retail beauty store specializing in fragrance, makeup, skincare, and bath and body products. Allowable Use: Retail and personal services Summary: The applicant is requesting commercial design review and a variance for number of signs for a new tenant at 1205 Burlingame Avenue. The entrance to this business would be off of the Burlingame Avenue frontage. The new tenant, Sephora, is retail beauty store that specializes in fragrance, makeup, skincare, and bath and body products. They have stores throughout Europe and the United States. This site was formerly occupied by La Pinata Restaurant, who vacated the site on March 3, 2002. The other tenant in this building is the Burlingame Hotel, which will remain with no proposed changes. The hotel's main entrance is along Lorton Avenue, where there is a 39 foot frontage. This project is subject to commercial design review since inore than 50% of the fa�ade facing a public street is being changed. The existing building has 100% lot coverage, with a first floor footprint of 5,580 SF. April 8, 2002 Study Meeting: At the April 8, 2002 Planning Commission study meeting, the Commission expressed the concerns listed below, but felt that the applicant understood the issues and voted to place t11e itein on the action calendar when revised plans were submitted. The followings revisions were requested: • Eliminate the signage variance for signage between 12' and 24' on the primary frontage, reduce the sign from 42 SF to 39 SF; • Preserve the integrity of the exterior architecture including wooden window inserts at clerestory, provide detailed infornlation on the window wall system; • Provide a profile of the mullion to be used, also in the arches; and • Clarify the presentation of the signage request by frontage. Commercial Design Review ararl Sign Va�-iance 1205 Bu��lingcame Avena�e The applicant submitted a revised sheet, SK4, date stamped April 12, 2002, in response to the Planning Commission's comments at the April 8, 2002 meeting. The revised sheet includes: • Retention of the clerestory wood windows along both the Burlingame Avenue and Lorton Avenue frontages; • Reduction of sign area of the new wall sign over 12' height along the Burlingame Avenue frontage from 32.5 SF to 29.16 SF, eliminating the need for a sign variance for height; and • Clarification of the location of the two Sephora blade signs; • Reduction of number of projecting light fixtures from 7 to 3, over Lorton Avenue wall sign; and • Scoring at the top of the plaster in-fill with dryvit finish along the Lorton Avenue frontage to mimic the round-top mullioned window above the hotel entrance. Detailed Project Summary: The applicant, Sephora, is proposing to remodel the interior and exterior of the building and would occupy 4,200 SF of the ground floor space. There would be no expansion to the building envelope. The previous tenant had direct access to the basement storage area from this tenant space. The ground floor reconfiguration by this tenant would include eliminating a direct basement connection from the Sephora space. A new exterior door for basement access would be created. The provided plans indicate that the basement will be used solely by the landlord. Sephora will not be using any of the Uasement storage area for their business, all storage will be within the ground floor tenant space. The exterior alterations include installation of a new aluminum storefront window system, with a stone base below, and new front entry doors along Burlingame Avenue. New concrete tile in alternating colors would be installed on the exiting plaster columns on each side of the front entrance on Burlingame Avenue, with a new fabric awning above the door. The Lorton Avenue entrance to this tenant space would be eliminated, along with an adjacent window, and both openings would be filled-in with plaster with a"dryvit" finish, with scoring at the top to mimic the round-top, mullioned window over the hotel entrance. The existing wood clerestory windows above the storefront window system would be retained. Primary Fronta�e Si�ns A variance for number of signs is also being sought with this application. The sign code allows 3 signs totaling 65 SF in area on the primary frontage, Burlingame Avenue. The applicant is proposing to insta115 signs totaling 59.57 SF in area along the primary frontage. The signs along the primary frontage are as follows: 1) new 29.16 SF wall sign above entry; 2) new 3.75 SF awning sign above entry; 3&4) new blade sign, (each side counted as one 6 SF sign), 12 SF total; and 5) existing 14.66 SF hotel blade sign (one side only, double sided sign, one side is counted toward each frontage). With the revised plans, the proposal is code complying in height with 38.82 SF of the total 59.57 SF of the signage between 12'-24' above existing grade, where 60% (39SF) of the total signage is allowed at this height. The 38.82 SF of sign area between 12'-24' above existing grade includes a new wall sign, 29.16 SF (reduced from 32.5 SF) and a 9.66 SF portion of the existing hotel blade sign. There is currently 5 SF of signage between 2 Cornmercial Design Review and Sign Va�-iance l205 Burlingame Avenue 24'-36' above existing grade, where 30% (19.5 SF) of the total signage is allowed at this height. The 5 SF of sign area between 24'-36' above existing grade is the remaining portion of the existing hotel blade sign. Secondary Fronta�e Si�ns Sephora is requesting 40 SF of signage (50 SF is allowed) in 6 signs (3 signs allowed). So a variance for number of signs is required. Since the hotel is a free standing business on Lorton Avenue; Lorton is the prirnary frontage for the hotel and 50 SF of signage is allowed. The existing hotel blade sign on the corner of the Burlingame and Lorton Avenues represents two signs and totals 29.32 SF (14.66 SF each side). Since this blade sign is located beyond the primary frontage one side is counted toward the primary frontage (Burlingame Avenue) and one side counted toward the secondary frontage (Lorton Avenue) for Sephora, along with the new signs proposed. The signage on the secondary frontage is as follows: 1) new 3 SF window sign, 2) new 3 SF window sign, 3) new 7.56 SF wall sign, 4&5) new blade sign, each side counted as one 6 SF sign, 12 SF total, and 6) existing 14.66 SF hotel blade sign. The applicant would have 17 SF of sign area between 12'-24' above existing grade, where 60% (30 SF) of the total signage is allowed at this heighl. The 17 SF includes a new wall sign and the remainder is a portion of the existing hotel blade sign. There is 5 SF of existing signage between 24'-36' above existing grade, where 30% (15 SF) of the total signage is allowed at this height. This 5 SF is the remaining portion of the hotel blade sign. The applicant requesting the following: • Commercial design review; and • Variance for number of signs 5 signs proposed on primary frontage where 3 are allowed; and 6 signs proposed on secondary frontage where 3 are allowed. Proposed Existing Allowed/Req'd. Use: Retail beauty Full Service Retail store Restaurant PRIMARY FRONTAGE 5' 2 3 # of signs allowed on the primary frontage (Burlingame Ave.) Total sign area 59.57 SF 29.66 SF 65 SF Sign SF 12' or less above 15.75 SF 9.66 SF 65 SF with height not greater than grade (portion of 12' above grade existing hotel blade sign) Commercial Dcsign Review and Sign SF between 12'-24' above grade Sign SF between 24'-36' above grade SECONDARY FRONTAGE # of signs allowed on the primary frontage (Burlingame Ave.) Total sign area Sign SF 12' or less above grade Vm�iance 38.82 SF 5 SF � 40 SF 18 SF Sign SF between 12'-24' 17 SF above grade 9.66 SF 5 SF � 26.66 SF 9.66 SF (portion of existing hotel blade sign) 9.66 SF 1205 Burlinganze Avenue 39 SF between 12'-24' above grade 19.5 SF between 24'-36' above grade 3 50 SF 50 SF with height not greater than 12' above grade 39 SF between 12'-24' above grade Sign SF between 24'-36' S SF 5 SF 15 SF between 24'-36' above grade above grade ' Variance for number of signs Staff Comments: See attached. Findings for a Conditional Use Permit: In order to grant a Conditional Use Permit the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.52.020 a-c): (a) the proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; (b) the proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Burlingame general plan and the purposes of this title; (c) the Planning Commission may impose such reasonable conditions or restrictions as it deems necessary to secure the purposes of this title and to assure operation of the use in a manner compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity. Required Findings for Sign Variance: I�l order to grant a sign variance relating to height ofplacement, location or number of signs the Planning Commission must apply the following circumstances (Code Section 25.06.110 b.i.-iv.): i. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property, such as size, shape, topography, street frontage, or surrounding land use, that do not apply generally to property in � Commercial Design Review and Sign Vm�iance 1205 Burlingame Avenue the same district; ii. The granting of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant, and to prevent unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship; iii. The granting of the application will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety general welfare or convenience; and iv. That the signage for which the variance is sought will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass and character of existing and potential signage of properties in the general vicinity. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirnlative action should be taken by resolution and should include findings. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: Conditions: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped March 25, 2002, site plan, floor plans and April 17, 2002, building elevations; 2. that there shall be 5 signs along the Burlingame Avenue (primary) frontage: 1) 29.16 SF wall sign above entry; 2) 3.75 SF awning sign above entry; 3&4) blade sign, (each side counted as one 6 SF sign), 12 SF total; and 5) existing 14.66 SF hotel blade sign (one side only, double sided sign, one side is counted toward eacl� fi•ontage). that there shall be 6 signs along the Lorton Avenue (secondary) frontage: 1) 3 SF window sign; 2) new 3 SF window sign; 3) new 7.56 SF wall sign; 4&5) new blade sign, each side counted as one 6 SF sign, 12 SF total; and 6) existing 14.66 SF hotel blade sign. 4. that the basement area shall not be accessible from the Sephora tenant space and shall be accessible only from an exterior door at the rear of the property, the basement area shall be used for storage for on-site businesses only; 5. that the conditions of the Recycling Specialist's memo dated March 19, 2002 and Fire Marshal's memo dated March 18, 2002 shall be met; and 6. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Unifonn Fire Codes, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. Catherine Keylon Planner Thomas Bond Associates, Thomas Bond, architect ROUTING FORM DATE: March 18, 2002 TO: _City Engineer _Chief Building Official Fire Marshal �Recycling Specialist _Sr. Landscape Inspector _City Attorney FROM: Planning Staff SUBJECT: Request for coinmercial design review and variance for sign at 1205 Burlingame Avenue, zoned C-1, Subarea A, APN: 029-204-060. ROUTING FORM � :_ y_ March 18, 2002 TO: _Ciry Engineer Chief Building Official �Fire Marshal Recycling Specialist _Sr. Landscape Inspector _Ciry Attorney FROM: Planning Staff SUBJECT: Request for commercial design review and variance for sign at 1205 Burlingame Avenue, zoned C-1, Subarea A, APN: 029-204-060. STAFF REVIEW: Monday, March 18, 2002 �. V�1 � ()�.) �`e�.�C./U�� ( Yb S C. � � V'�✓vtr�J � � y�e �J � ��i re. a,�-��. S�� , � �j�1�(l L �-1� l.� • z . � � � � s r, � �+� s << �,� � b -� � � C�IC� ��ce-� �—.� a-� ��S s-� c�.. S �—�- �� 3e.� "�l'`'� . Reviewed By: / Date of Comments: ��— vZ— City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 8, 2002 • What will be the change in water consumption and sewage generation, is there supply, distribution and collection capacity, what will need to be done as a result of the project; • Environmental effect of all three proposed houses being built to the maximum, or more, of the code allowances, particularly FAR; � All the issues identified in the neighbors' letters should be addressed in the environmental analysis; • Environmental analysis should be done then the project reviewed for design; • Tree protection should be detailed, including the driveway of the middle house; and a tree protection plan developed; • Would like environmental evaluation to include two houses, two car garages for all houses (three); • Review the heights, all lots are flat, houses are together so they become more visually prominent; � Since use (number of houses) is an environmental issue, it is too early to comment on design; • Potential for sewer system over flow needs to be addressed before design review; and • Requirements of NPDES need to be addressed. Staff was directed to prepare an environmental e� �aluation based on the oral and written comments received. CA Anderson noted that can't determine design review until see environmental data, sending the project to a design reviewer too soon could cause confusion. CP Monroe noted that when the environmental review is completed and the project is ready for design review, the city will renotice the property owners for a design review study with public comment opportunity. This item concluded at 11:35 p.m. 10. 1205 BURLINGAME AVENUE — ZONED C-1, SUBAREA A— APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW AND VARiANCE FOR NUMBER OF SIGNS AND SIGN HEIGHT (SEPHORA PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT, APPLICANT; THOMAS BOND, THOMAS BOND & ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECT; KARP FAMILY TRUST, PROPERTY OWNER) (43 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE KEYLON CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. Commissioners asked about the plans noting that the presentation of the blade signs was confusing, could this be clarified before the project returns. Could the height of the signs be clarified and how parts are measured, a clearer presentation would be helpful, for example, which parts of the signs are between 12' and 24'. Staff noted that because of the fact that the two businesses overlap primary and secondary fr�.�r�'ages for signage, this is a difficult application to present. Staff will take another look at presentation approach. Chairman Vistica opened the public comment. 1 homas Bond, 14471 Chambers Road, Tustin, represented the project. He showed a rendering of the blade signs, noting that there is a blade sign on each frontage, the awning sign is on the primary frontage; on the secondary frontage there are two plaques one in each arch. The intent of the design is to bring Saphora onto the street; the front of the store will be redone and the entire building repainted; they will close all the windows at the rear. The basement will be accessed only from the hotel space. The intent of the signage program was to provide signage to cars and pedestrians, the blades are needed by the pedestrians, the awning announces the nature of the business. Do not want the signs higher on the building elevation, but the design of the structure dictates a natural location, want the keep the clear story windows which go to 14 feet, have an open ceiling inside, so the sign band is the only place to put the signs. The lighting of the signs will be will low voltage fixtures over each letter, on the secondary frontage three fixtures will be enough to light the 7 feet of signage; the fixtures will extend 4 inches and have a 50 watt bulb. 14 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes Apri18, 2002 Commissioners asked: if the sign on the primary frontage were 15 inches smaller it would not need a sign variance for height (that's 8 percent less). Applicant noted that they would be glad to reduce by 8% to avoid a variance. Can something creative be done in the two arches on the secondary frontage. Have you considered keeping the arched windows (at clear story), they are integral to the existing building. Applicant noted that these windows are 80 years old, wooden, and require a lot of maintenance, if they are not reglazed they will leak; would prefer a cleaner look more consistent with tenant. There seem to be a lot of pigeons, would removal of these wooden arched windows reduce the number. Applicant noted that with proposed design they would remove all the bird wire which was place to discourage the pigeons. Are the blade signs lit? No. Commercial design guidelines support retaining features which are integral to the fa�ade of the building, the arched windows are integral, these features work together- see commercial design review item 5; more concerned with fitting Burlingame than Sephora. Applicant noted that he felt that retaining the arched wooden muntins was subjective and he has not seen the Commercial design guidelines; tenant not adamantly opposed to the windows, if in view of commission it is important to retain arched look would evaluate keeping them, wanted to get rid of recessed areas which the birds like. 'The arches should be tied in, can be done by matching fenestration of the existing windows. What is entry finish? Black granite at the base with lighter stone above. There were no further comments from the floor and the �;ablic comment was closed. C. Keighran moved that the applicant seems to understand the issues and he should make the revisions discussed and come back to an action meeting. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Comment on the motion: summary of the revisions needed: • Eliminate the signage variance for signage between 12' and 24' on the primary frontage, reduce the sign from 42 SF to 39 SF; • Keep the integrity of the exterior architecture including wooden window inserts at clerestory, provide detailed information on the window wall system; • Provide a profile of the mullion to be used, also in the arches; and • Clarify the presentation of the signage request by frontage. Chairman Vistica called for a voice vote on the motion to put this item on the regul� -��tion calendar when plans had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0-1 (C. Keele absent). The Planning Commission action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 12:15 p.m. X. PLANNER REPORTS Review of City Council regular meeting of April 1, 2002. CP Monroe reviewed the actions at the regular council meeting on April 1, 2002. She also reviewed, briefly, the high points of the Council's special meeting on the budget status on March 28, 2002. She noted that the loss of revenue in FY 2001-2002 would affect the capital improvements budget for FY 2002-2003 as well as the operating budget for the Planning Department for the next Fiscal Year. IS City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlin am�e.org `, CITY � �� .��E APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION ��,� Type of application: Design Review `� Conditional Use Permit Variance Special Permit Other Parcel Number: Projectaddress• �2�'S gu�LctiG�C A� APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER Name: �Et�H 612P� -� 2m P��2T'-( j��r Name: K��'�-P F�nn� t��t r�2e.l Address: 525 MA►2t�� SC'. � City/State/Zip: S • F � q '� Phone (w):� 415� -�E� � 330� (h): �� 'S� �j�7 ` 2�'g� Address: l2og �y,,,�c.��c,i,,,,,,,� ,�.�t City/State/Zip: (��-. cz ��.-, c,n..-� � c� Phone (w): 6 S� � 3-f i� ,'S� S s _ (h): (�� 6So , y�fZ , << z� ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Name: T'o n� po � -� Address: �-`i �-� t � I-h� n rSc�z. S tt-o� -t� , � � City/State/Zip: -r � s �� n� , c� Phone (w): -� ►�, G 6 9, r� � q (h): 1��, Sr��.9S7� Ge�c... (fl: �1 r � , G 6�i , �9 SIG Please indicate with an asterisk * the contact person for this project. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: !2E r�s.� �. T E N�,�.N �� M p� pvE r� � AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and corr t to the be of knowledge and belief. Applicant's signature: Date: 3'/1 • OZ I know about the proposed applicati n a d hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. ��- / R � �� n � � 1-�a.��s`i� �. � RE �'�°�'�%{ner's signature: ' Date: 3/ Z �2_--- �`-� Date submitted: 3'� 8'° Z MAR 1 8 2002 CITY OF BUF?LI'�JGH"�9E PLANfviN� DEPT. PCAPP.FRM City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlin ame.org �`, ITY � Q �,�� '�°�,.,m.,�•�'°� CITY OF BURLINGAME SIGN EXCEPTION APPLICATION . �, The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code Section 22.06.110). Please note that sign exceptions can only be granted for variances from the following regulations: height of placement; or location, or, within the allowable total square footage, the number of signs on a frontage. Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. a. Describe the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to your property that do not apply to other pr��perties in this area. 7Y�'1� R� � 5 l�- LA►R � 1'c T R61G o N T:�. �.J lE gT E� D� o F r}{-7= i�i•�. TiC..t K G'7 A--w� !� ANt . F2s�. T�.G� � T<<i7� i- w � c,c.. (1, .� oc-Ic v � g�' fs i�- �'f`f � 1� ?l+-t s� Y° I�e f'�0�- S� 6 N � ,�k-w N � n� C� �Tt. t»•-• �1.�-1�, �.J�S?'. b. Explain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial properry right and what unreasonable property loss or unHecessary hardship might result from the denial of the application. 'll'}L= �sa�c.-a.,.� ias,.—c�.� o G P+�AA � T'"� G�J 1�=— 'I�i c. /�-►a'IE-- S r 6�w s w� � � �l� � 4�. i p��n �c `�-7�i o� a G S E✓�HvR-.4- G f�-� � T�h�i f�� a�5 i��/srn� L� 1� L-- I� P-1"t-T7 C� tt l.A- 2 �- `� �i�-� w. �i)i-� �� i • c. Explain why the proposed signage at the proposed location will not be detrimental or injurious to properry or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety, geheral welfare or convenience. TF�'� 'R� �- .erA� S � 6 iu �i /�rR-E S vr, /�.. c.. c� � -F 2 � � 3 � � �. '1"A�y' f' p� 'F i... c.. L - Tl �{-e�'( ,b� R� /ud N• l L c.�. ►... � �. Isr T'eG-I� 7}f-�C4( /5rf�- G /.�Iso� �. 8 � � ?ieSZ-o+-� 1'z�� . 'T�N'� (S'1/ �tL�- �. �j i G.� larc.-� � t 5 w i T/f �.v 'i�h�. S �-L �. L� w �"►�5 . d. How witl the proposed signage be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of the existing and potential signage on adjoining properties in the general vicinity? �}f-�^ � /�R.-C Go,o f� l� i� A-T'rfi[� �J � T'w- TYl"�- 5'TvT�� R E � t� � :�� . � MAR ,1 8 200Z t� ,� T�fi R- ► 0 2.. c-61-o rt. �j �. v� ,+�..T'I� tz.i �.. c, S. -�}i-tr�( �,.� ,�,�. �� py c�l�. i< <•J/ w�!- � T'�. troC,�a � C.t"Trb�?z. I�v G� w I-f-� c Ff 1 S ��'r7Z-�-='� r� C� �( c.o� 1� l�i 1 �3 �, +� ..� t T1d�- o T1-fi�i�- '�� y`� `'� �-� '7�-''1 �Zr-•-� w� ,s.'T� tu I�` 5 CITY OF BURLINGt;i�� P L A N N I N G D E P 1 SIGNEXC.FRM City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlin ame.org a. Describe the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to your properry that do not app[y to other properties in this area. Do any conditions exist on the site that make other alternatives to the variance impracticable or impossible and are also not common to other properties in the area? For example, is there tree blocking visibility, odd lot or building shape, exceptional surrounding land uses, or unusual property frontage? How is this property different from others in the neighborhood? b. Explain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right and what unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship might result form the denial of the application. Would you be unable to erect signage similar to others in the area or neighborhood without the exception (i.e., having as many signs or visibility of signs)? Would you be unable to erect allowable signage on the site without the exception? Do the requirements of the law place an unreasonable limitation or hardship on the use of the property? c. Explain why the proposed signage at the proposed locatioH will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety, genera[ welfare or convenience. How will the proposed signage affect neighboring properties or structures on those properties? Ifneighboring properties will not be affected, state why. Think about noise, lighting, paving, sunlighdshade, views from neighboring properties, ease of maintenance. Why will the structure or use within the structure not affect the public's health, safety or general welfare? Public health includes such things as sanitation (garbage), air quality, discharges into sewer and stormwater systems, water supply safety, and things which have the potenrial to affect public health (i.e., underground storage tanks, storage of chemicals, situarions which encourage the spread of rodents, insects or communicable diseases). Public safet� How will the proposed signage affect police or fire protection? Could the proposed signage create a nuisance, create a traffic hazard or a hazard to pedestrians, or need for police services or fue services? General welfare is a catch-all phrase meaning community good. Is the proposal consistent with the city's policy and goals for conservation and development? Is there a social benefit? Convenience. How would the proposed signage affect public convenience (such as access to or parking for this site or adjacent sites)? Is the proposal accessible to particular segments of the public such as the elderly or handicapped? d. How will the proposed signage be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of the existing and potential signage on adjoining properties in the general vicinity. How does the proposed signage compare aesthetically with existing neighborhood? If it does not affect aesthetics, state why. If changes to the existing signage are proposed, was the additional signage designed to match existing signage on the site as well as signage on adjacent properties in the neighborhood? If the signage will affect the way a neighborhooc' �� area looks, compare your proposal to other signage in the area and explain why it fits. How does the proposed signage compare to neighboring signage in terms of mass or bulk? If a new sign is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation, etc. with other signage in the neighborhood or area. How will the proposed signage change the character of the neighborhood? Thnilc of character as the image or tone established by size, density of development and general pattern of land use. If you don't feel the character of the neighborhood will change, state why. How will the proposed project be compatible with existing and potential signage in the general vicinity? Compare your project with existing signage. State why you feel your project is consistent with other signage in the vicinity, and/or state why your project would be consistent with potential signage in the vicinity. SIGNEXC.FRM CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPARTMENT 501 PRIMROSE ROAD P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 Sign �Permit Application 1. APPLI�k�hon completing this form) Name_ Telephorie ��ts� .34$ -330�0 9r 7? Company and Address 525 M�f�T �• 4�'`✓F. Fax __�� ) �✓� �$q 8�, I cert� under penctlty oJperjury that the information given herein is true and correct the best of my biowledge and belief. I understand a building permit ' required bejor a si can be installed. Signature Date 3• � y' ��' 2. BURLINGAME ADDRESS OF BUSINESS/ORGANIZATION RECEIVING NEW SIGN(S) 1�d5 8�►2t,t NGp,Me- �V� Assessor's Parcel # Dt� • Zo�{ � 060 Building width: !� S� Building depth: �1 D r Lot width: 6�� Lot depth: f� �' } 3. PROP�RTY OWNER Name �'�° �M 11�`t T�I.I.ST Telephone 6 a� ►�i �8 •'ti v� S Address 1��9 $Ut¢-LIN�'rRA'vlf ��1E I know about the proposed sign(s) and authorize the a plicant to submit thu application. �1. l4 7 r t`i-Wl � ly I�2''�'b -� � r Date 3 z O z- 4. SIGN INFORMATION (photos help) # of existing signs on property: "Y proposed new signs: � # of existing signs to remain: i total # signs: 8 5. SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING WITH TffiS APPLICATION ✓site plan of property with all existing and proposed signs labeled. ✓elevations drawn to scale of all new signs and existing signs to remain. Show correct sizes and locations. Dimension ali lettering. TO BE COMPLETED BY PLANNING STAFF primary frontage: secondary frontage: maximum sign area and number of signs ,/' allowed: tL � � � f D ��- maximum allowed above first story (12' from grade): � � J� � �q 51� 6�' � Q`a� proposed with this'i�j`��.cf� application: (�v ,,,f � �q� ��F ��D�� ❑ Sign exception required � -7 , Q D� ,JlC Building permit may be approved. Approved by: Date: o Fee fo be collected by Building Dep� Remem •! A building permit must be issued before the sign can be installed. � `W Cn. l�`e-�-- � , � � c�� ' � ar�a.v��- F�2� � l � SIGNPERFRM CffY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPARTMENT 501 PRIMROSE ROAD P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 S.� n� SIGN A: L C.� A-T/ orJ _ �C New Sign Sign type: �3 wall sign ❑ � ground sign ❑ pole sign ❑ projecting sign ❑ awning sign O other _ _ Sign Specifications: Sign area 1• S sf (length �i =�." x height l o`� ) � overall height from ground ! 6�- �( �� clearance from graund to sign bottom _� single face two-sided copy �s�pFf� �a-p- Method of support P� �-� o �.�'I�.e� Illumination type �/��-- �.'� Hours b�n S K� - w. �►aN 1C,� K j 5 Pe T SIGN B: � x New Sign Existing, no change Existing, new copy Sign type: � wall sign ❑ �ground sig� ;. ❑ po[e sign � projecting sign ❑ awning sign ❑ other Sigri Specifications: G � Sign azea sf (length t-' x height 3 ' ) � overall height from ground . �! clearance from ground to sign bottom !� ' single face _�c_ two-sided Copy 'S�P�'F`I� `.J � t� t� O Method of support �J�.�:. M ewwn�l�Illumination type Nd/J � Hours SIGN C: �° _ New,�t Existing, no change Existing, new copy Sign type: Sign Specifications: ❑ wall sign Sign area sf ❑ ground sign (length I '-G " x height 't,.' - o �' ) ❑ pole sign ►, ,L � � � projecting sign overall height from ground � ❑ awnin si clearance from ground to sign bottom � other g��C.Q.G2 ti'IE— CtXA�+�+!' T`� —,� single face two-sidea Copy 5 � � � 'R�ID�- .�� t�o �� O Method of support t,JM.c- �.nM »'r�.e Illumination type N o/� � Hours SIGN D: New Sign Sign type: ❑ wall sign ❑ ground sign � pole sign � projecting sign ❑ awning sign � other Sign Specifications: sign area �•• r•,. k�• ow �-. sf (length x height ) 1 overall height from ground �- 1`'� clearance from ground to sign bottom 'F 1'�i f single face _� two-sided . _ Copy ��Tlt a-- Method of support Illumination type Hours /� b'T�fE- : T1� t S 5/ G N � 5 f-d iL Existing, no change Existing, new copy _�: Existing, no change Existing, new copy Iw � 1 F ¢�� 'T�v'� J1r•�� i^ SIGNPERFRM - -- - � --:r o,v r CI'TY OF BURLIN(GqME pLqNlNING DEPqIt'I%E�'� 501 PRIMROSE ROAD P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 � c..�V 4� a � SIGN A: _� New Sign Sign type: � wall sign ' � � _ ground sign � � pole sign � projecting sign � awning sign ❑ other _ , Existing, no change Existing, new copy . ,. Sign Specifications: • Sign area i 2�� sf (length _,7�� x height _/ '-_ 3'_� overall height &om ground 1 Co � clearance &om ground to sign bottom -� single face two-sided CoPY 5 � P .N-a� /� Method of support R� wv•, �. Illummahon type vJi.�.�. u.��-p �Pa� Hours_ D�t slt - w� e�n��G�I�.f- SIGN B: _� New SiQn . Ex' t' Sign type; � wall sign �7 'ground sig� : � pol'e sign� � � projecting sign � awning sign ❑ other is mg, no change Existing, new copy Sign Specificatio � � Sign area sf (length _ 2' x �height _ 3' ) overall height &om ground __ � � clearance from ground to sign bottom ii � single face �_ �.o-sided CoPY S'� IA i�'R- � �� C� � p Method of support oJp.�,�. �oN �.��llummation type _ No N� Hours SIGN C: _� New Sign Sign type: � wall sign � ground sign � pole sign � projecting sign � awning sign � other Existing, no change Existing, new copy Sign Specifications: Sign azea � •'7 � sf (length ►I � S" x height '' � overall height from ground _ `i �-la �� cleazance from ground to sign bottom - t o'' _,�C single face two-sided CoPY m Js.lc. H. P� s{c ��.. c.�.-rt t� •�R-aFi tt-A.N �� Method of support Illummahon type _ ND �J�; Hours SIGN D: New Sign � Existing, no change S ign type: � wall sign � ground sign � pole sign � projecting sign 0 awning sign . � other�_ CoPY 1-�{b T1t.C... Method of support IJ e "T7�., ; ?-}{., i 5 Existing, new copy Sign Specifications: Sign area �.. 4. k �. o...�,.� sf (length x height ) overall height &om ground � � 6' clearance from ground to sign bottom single, face � �o-sided ; _ - _ . ---- - '(i �. R l.1 �. �-� /!� ..,. � Illummahon type Hours S.I t� ! S �o rz ,q- l� r�FtfR. �, i 7L�� M..T' S[GNPERFRM � ' -. . ._ . --- -- - - - � �r�, cirr o� CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPARTMENT BURLINCrAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD ,�.. BURLINGAME, CA 94010 TEL: (650) 558-7250 1205 BURLINGAME AVENUE Application for commercial design review and variance for number of siqns and sign pUgLIC HEARING height at 1205 Burlingame Avenue, zoned C-1, Subarea A. (APN: 029-204-060) N OTIC E The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on Monday, April 22, 2002 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at SO1 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. Mailed April 12, 2002 (Please rEfe�- to otl�er side) CITY' OF B URLINGAME A copy of the application �u�c� plai�s for this project niay be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Pl�uluing Department at 501 Primrose Road, }3�irlingame, California. If you chalien�., �lle subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in writt�n correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hcarinb. Properry o�vnei-s wl�o receive this notice are respoilsible for informing their tenants about this notice. F��r addilional informatio►1, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank y�u. � �;�r �s � � .�r� � �� ,..,s�%1.+� Margaret Monroe , _ �`' . City Planner � PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Plc:ase refer- to other- sicle) RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, COMMERICIAL DESIGN REVIEW AND SIGN VARIANCE RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for desi review and siQn variance for number of siQns for a tenant improvement at 1205 BurlinQame Avenue, zoned C- 1 subarea A, Joseph Karp Trustee, property owner, APN: 029-204-060; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on April 22, 2002, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15303 — Class I- the operation repair, maintenance, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that previously existing including but not limited to (a) interior or exterior alternations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances. 2. Said design review and sign variance are approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such design review and sign variance are set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. CHAIRMAN I, Joseph Bojues, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of Apri1, 2002 , by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: SECRETARY EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for categorical exemption, commercial design review and sign variance. 1205 Burlingame Avenue effective May 6, 2002 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped March 25, 2002, site plan, floor plans and April 17, 2002 building elevations; 2. that there shall be 5 signs along the Burlingame Avenue (primary) frontage: 1) 29.16 SF wall sign above entry; 2) 3.75 SF awning sign above entry; 3&4) blade sign, (each side counted as one 6 SF sign), 12 SF total; and 5) existing 14.66 SF hotel blade sign (one side only, double sided sign, one side is counted toward each frontage). 3. that there shall be 6 signs along the Lorton Avenue (secondary) frontage: 1) 3 SF window sign; 2) new 3 SF window sign; 3) new 7.56 SF wall sign; 4&5) new blade sign, each side counted as one 6 SF sign, 12 SF total; and 6) existing 14.66 SF hotel blade sign. 4. that the basement area shall not be accessible from the Sephora tenant space and shall be accessible only from an exterior door at the rear of the property, the basement area shall be used for storage for on-site businesses only; 5. that the conditions of the Recycling Specialist's memo dated March 19, 2002 and Fire Marshal's memo dated March 18, 2002 shall be met; and 6. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. �� ' �' `�, '�= � � � , �� ;� �� , . � ... ; � '� �yr' �" �,1�� ' �y ', � .1 ��: r/r �jl� � fi .� }�2��. F �Y �' � � - �_ V� L ` '0�"` -'S,�'� ', x"'�x , �'t � _ � rg�pb v.�_ ` � x�� o�,, � '�� Y i=, , � . �� ,�� ,� ,�, � � � '� w � *�. r� ';,�.' �� -��. y ,.�.�;x. � �� f�� t�� e� o � � o .* �� ,� � � `�r� , ,�;., . # � ��„ �' � .� �� % � =- � � �� a �` p� � � � � s .,, _ � . �� , �t �l * . �+iw � ry � . `�"'� a !ic�� ' ,� �. �,,... � -.�� a '""� . � .a . � "' 1�' � 3 " �e ��, °'s '. , . � � '�'�"' l��s;` Y r . �� .�+' �, $�� d ��.�.�.. 8_'. ts � .1 � � �T� �'« `� �� ?�° :�' � £�� ,� � , t ' � �� r ��' �� . ,�, �s q <� :�� ,v '�I �E�;a� � .f:;�'��4 �a �" "F �%�' .s „ � ,� ,� �• .�.:�^�, s � ' �• '�w " . �', ��#� M"' � � � � � `�„ e� W :. 9 � � • L' � � �� ` � � < � ` s � t� � �` �'� � � . .. . �� . � . , ��✓ r�=? '� �\ �i a r ' 4 � «:'$��- .. .,,� �. K '. ✓,�.�' °� � f�,,.,1� .` \ ��. � ? ,r' A'^5 �'�.r�- �, �, ' ' �.'"� iy�,... . , tr ,� ` " � �'.i+� '.�.�€:� � � -�� :�� ,�' �'°t. `, ,��t � �� 1 ' fi d: ��.�ai, `✓` . � �, k P f � �� ,�s�' '' � a^ �•^': � ", � . � � ` �d� +° O'�� '� � �� „ �, *� .' ✓ , ` � . �.- r �� y ��,,. . � � b � �' �y,� �� " 'r � ,R .^. ` �"� ,� ti,'. t%�'�.� ,�p� i � .h' e �b {V „ �.'�"' �'� m � �;;•' ; � �fp,„` � - � � �� ' A�» "� _ +� � � �' � ti e, a ♦ f � � � �/4 ,. �ii �� :"�� ',� ' � � I . ,� '� _ � i � . �S � � N � iy . � °" , ',� ��, ,t �.� �, � , °':��, ^ � ��. � � A � `. aC'1.�y �, � Kt� s d �, . �3.N ;' �f , �� . �� a � � �� < ». � f � � � �' 1 � �,� �4 �' a.� .+ � 4 , �i►-. '� ,y. � �� II' � � � � `� �� . �` � ` `��j.,'� ry � k1 � 1",a ,� a �� , �. "i�':" ,;'s s�� r, . a k +� � ` �, ,� ' ,,' '' ' �gt` �. �,�, {. � y` � �«��i} � � � ` � � �' �...�.» ,�, � �r� � '€ '� �;,� �:.� ,p r " . ; � � ' d °� �? ,� Z � L `L.�"" �, i � ; a yv�� 'i� � �� '�j�� ti �' a, � �� °',' ' �� t�.L. � 1.,,'� , }I "^ �� ... � ' � �9 � `.�,��' �;,, �� _ � � �, `'"x .,. ,�� '•`� � A �` � # � ,�.. � � .) � �' �< �'�"�I�,,� �a�.� i.�-� '�'�'r ,�, ` ��`,� � �� a � .. � f e � � � � #� V �t � �� ' .� +� �� ,� , ' �► ��_� � �: � � � � . r" �✓ �j�> `� � � �y. ,� ;'$ � ,,� . �`-, "`� �� 1 �, «.� ` �� Nw, ,�"-�y�'�Yil � �k � �r � � `� , : { �L •S � ...�. . q� . /� � ��., �e> ' � � -� e I� � .a � S�� v `'t�` .. - � j�, � s .� � 1 aY� l j � '�`�.`y;,�'!��. 4 "t ..+� d , �.. °� +��' �..c,. � � ~ � �, - � ��. ��b' u � �� p �� ' . `� "� s �a .. � ° ! Y ��/�� .a `��a ".�y .�� ♦ �� s 'Y'ti'"k�� \4 � „ t��/`,' �' .�`�e'r '� `' � ... �� *�'� • � # ,`�` R ry . , , . w ��'M1, ��,�� y '% i? `,.r h; � � �� ,!� . �j°�� . _ ai � ' � � 8 ``'+; ' � .y* � � , a, � <� } � �,. �R� y ��.� Zt. , e. �[ � 'rLig�� .s � \' �� ,�+ �. ��' —=3 ,� . _�,�y r � � ;. ��y � yA �. �' j �"�IF d � d .�' c'l� � S• �,� �,. "� �.�n��.� � � ,� :^�V .. ,.f ''-� �'�'.��'�`�` � � � �`�� ,,'E. �` ��' �' � � �,' � � � � '&.s . ,p��` ,�. ; ` �fi�°: 'S+t �� itf �a^ ,� .� �'°+� �:�*�° � `.�� ,w p n+4, g31b„ � �� 1' ...�y � F �.%.: . � � � i+'' ,' 'q.'� �� _8. .F ct�� ' . . � , < � �� I � ii �'�;; ° � � �; � �� ' � � r "�F'- � � �` ��•L ,:, s 3 - . = s , „ , w '�� I � 'wy �� -' .. ° �" , y,,:., s . �. t�, �4s,' � .�+ ,. � Pr� i.�, � �. � �J � � '� !.. � �. t+' '�.- r .' � "#Z , �� rr, ` � ��. �� . � � � � � � `�� M�' . �� . ��r',, �� ,�,, . y t \i � � ',� � x � �Y � , �1► � O a � �'' : •. ' �' � .► � � � — � . �`� � �, �. � �� !. `�,, � < ��. y . � �. ` � d ,�, . .� .. � .� �•. �,. �.... .�._ ,,,. ..�. � t'�,. .... �'� � `�i . ^ �_ U� � � I /II� . II I �III� I ,I • I I 11� � � � � � � � � � � m�keup. �tlncara. h�pnnce I � i � SEPHOR� BURLINGAME, CALIFOR SIDE ELEVATIONS ENTRY ELEVATION$ xn wrrt irrr.¢ n �v+naro � [Y51MC %AStER C011l111 U °�°$f�"` � �. nac a.se �ao w�aic J CMfRf � � ROON RAS7EP ,f%L— ■/ vrtmr rw! MOICI E SEPxOAI� Ey6ryC q�S�Ep 9�4 O C ' �-Y� COIUYM$ ��rw�[n �/ Yt1.vt rJLL� Kuur4w roacraaxr 90�1E B�SE I Architect's Stamp �/�. � t• o .• MC'I NUYNIIY sau�raarn a a�ss C NEM PAMII iYPfll BI 1/iN�IOP� rzsrxc wtu s�cx ,,..., o r l � �� Thomas Bond 6 Associa 14{71 ChomDera RoaO, Suite 101 Tuelin, Caiilornio 92780 711.669.1579 Phane 711.669.4986 Foa PROJECT NUMBER : O2Z SGLE : 1/4� = 1�— ORnvnNG DATE : 03.18.2002 uv. at.tn rczrn�ow 1 T& OESGN NCY190N �,Y ] i6� NAM�IC C0IYSLOM W 4[al[ i�alr5�'u U io[�K. OE �p� YKMER.�IIo �M�tpIXIG wca`°a°o�` �sc o.�us� �;� .n�n'caK"� �or°"r°si � � .�.�,E 1xCY PCSfI11C'I�S f.RAVnNG DESCRiPnON PROPOSED ELEVATIONS DRAWING NUMBER J SK4 O O O O City of Burlingame Commercial Design Review and Sign Variances Item # � � DSR Study Calendar Address: 1205 Burlingame Avenue Meeting Date: 4/8/02 Request: Commercial design review to an existing commercial space and sign variances for number of signs and sign height at 1205 Burlingame Avenue, zoned G1, subarea A( C.S. 25.57.010 and C.S. 25.36.040) Property Owner: Karp Family Trust Applicant: Sephora Property Development Architect: Thomas Bond Associates, Thomas Bond APN: 029-204-060 General Plan Designation: Shopping and Service Lot Area: 5,850 SF Date Submitted: March 18, 2002 Zoning: G 1, subarea A Previous Use: Full Service Resta�ant Proposed Use: Retail beauty store specializing in fragrance, makeup, skincare, and bath and body products. Allowable Use: Retail ar�d personal services Summary: The applicant, Sephora, is requesting commercial design review and a variance for sign height and number of signs for a new tenant at 1205 Burlingame Avenue. The entrance to this business would be offof the Burlingame Avenue frontage. Sephora is retail beauty store that specializes in fragrance, makeup, skincare, and bath and bodyproducts. They have stores throughout Europe and the United States. This site was formerly occupied by La Pinata Restaurant, who vacated the site on March 3, 2002. The other tenant in this building is the Burlingame Hotel, which will remain with no proposed changes. The hotel's main entrance is along Lorton Avenue, where there is a 39 foot frontage. This project is subject to commercial design review since more than 50% of the fa�ade facing a public street is being changed. The existing Uuilding has 100% lot coverage, with a first floor footprint of 5,580 SF. The applicant, Sephora, is proposing to remodel the interior and exterior of the building and would occupy 4,200 SF of the ground floor space. There would be no expansion to the building envelope. The previous tenant had direct access to the basement storage area from this tenant space. The ground floor reconfiguration by this tenant would include eliminating a direct basement connection from the Sephora space. A new exterior door for basement access would be created. The provided plans indicate that the basement will be used solely by the landlord. Sephora will not be using any of the basement storage area for their business, all storage will be within the ground floor tenant space. The exterior alterations include installation of a new aluminum storefront window system, with a stone base below, and new front entry doors along Burlingame Avenue. New concrete tile in alternating colors would be installed on the exiting plaster columns on each side of the front entrance on Burlingame Avenue, with a new fabric awning above the door. The Lorton Avenue entrance to this tenant space would be eliminated and the opening would be filled-in with plaster with a "dryvit" finish. Clerestory windows would be installed above the aluminum storefront windows. Primary Fronta�e Si�ns A variance for sign height and number of signs is also being sought with this application. The sign code allows 3 signs totaling 65 SF in area on the primary frontage, Burlingame Avenue. The applicant is proposing to insta115 signs totaling 63 SF in area along the primary frontage. The signs along the primary frontage are as follows: 1) new 32.5 SF wall sign above entry; 2) new 3.75 SF awning sign above entry; 3&4) new blade sign, (each side counted as one 6 SF sign), 12 SF total; and 5) existing 14.66 SF hotel blade sign (one side only, double sided sign, one side is counted toward each frontage). Cornrnercial Design Revieti+� mad Sign variar�ces 1105 Burfngame Avenue The applicant would have a total of 42 SF of signage between 12'-24' above existing grade, where 60% (39SF) of the total signage is allowed at this height. Therefore a sign variance for height is required for signage on the primary frontage between 12'-24' above existing grade. The 42 SF of sign area between 12'-24' above existing grade includes a new wall sign, 32.5 SF and a 9.66 SF portion of the existing hotel blade sign. There is currently 5 SF of signage between 24'-36' above existing grade, where 30% (19.5 SF) of the total signage is allowed at this height. The 5 SF of sign area between 24'-36' above existing grade is the remaining portion of the existing hotel blade sign. Secondary Fronta�e Si� Sephora is requesting 40 SF of signage (50 SF is allowed) in 6 signs (3 signs allowed). So a variance for number of signs is required. Since the hotel is a free standing business on Lorton Avenue; Lorton is the primary frontage for the hotel and 50 SF of signage is allowed. The existing hotel blade sign on the corner of the Burlingame and Lorton Avenues represents two signs and totals 29.32 SF (14.66 SF each side). Since this blade sign is located beyond the primary frontage one side is counted toward the primary frontage (Burlingame Avenue) and one side counted toward the secondary frontage (Lorton Avenue) for Sephora, along with the new signs proposed. The signage on the secondary frontage is as follows: 1) new 3 SF window sign, 2) new 3 SF window sign, 3) new 7.56 SF wall sign, 4&5) new blade sign, each side counted as one 6 SF sign, 12 SF total, and 6) existing 14.66 SF hotel blade sign. The applicant would have 17 SF of sign area between 12'-24' above existing grade, where 60% (30 SF) of the total signage is allowed at this height. The 17 SF includes a new wall sign and the remainder is a portion of the existing hotel blade sign. There is 5 SF of existing signage between 24'-36' above existing grade, where 30% (15 SF) of the total signage is allowed at this height. This 5 SF is the remaining portion of the hotel blade sign. The applicant requesting the following: � Commercial design review; � Variance for number of signs - 5 signs proposed on primary frontage where 3 are allowed; - 6 signs proposed on secondary frontage where 3 are allowed; and Variance for sign height - primary frontage - 42 SF of signage between 12'-24' above grade, where 39 SF of signage is allowed (new 32.5 SF Se hora wall si n and 9.66 SF of existin hotel blade si n). Proposed Existing Allowed/Req'd. Use: Retail beauty store Full Service Retail Restaurant PRIMARY 5' 2 3 FRONTAGE # of signs allowed on the primary frontage (Burlingame Ave.) Total sign area 63 SF 29.66 SF 65 SF Commercial Design Review and Sign Varinnces I205 Burfngame Avenue Sign SF 12' or less 15.75 SF 9.66 SF 65 SF with height not greater than 12' above grade (portion of existing above grade hotel blade sign) Sign SF between 12'- 42 SFZ 9.66 SF 39 SF between 12'-24' above grade 24' above grade Sign SF between 5 SF 5 SF 19.5 SF between 24'-36' above grade 24'-36' above rade SECONDARY 6' 2 3 FRONTAGE # of signs allowed on the primary frontage (Burlingame Ave.) Total sign area 40 SF 26.66 SF 50 SF Sign SF 12' or less 18 SF 9.66 SF 50 SF with height not greater than 12' above grade (portion of existing above grade hotel blade sign) Sign SF between 12'- 17 SFZ 9.66 SF 39 SF between 12'-24' above grade 24' above grade Sign SF between 5 SF 5 SF 15 SF between 24'-36' above grade 24'-36' above rade ' Variance for number of signs Z Variance for sign height Staff Comments: See attached. Catherine Keylon Planner Thomas Bond Associates, Thomas Bond, architect / / `�� . j��?�� ;� �)2��` ,. x �� 2�a ��'`f 2� �� /� II . ��Z?� + �I a - , i � � �� , � �2�'� � I �' � i �''� ' � ,' I � , �;� � �� i� � � � �✓1 � �II � �.� �1�� , �IiIJ ,nrn I'�I _ ';��P�' III �II I �` �'�� --��'�l �� , ''� l � ' _�� - -- _ - -- - -, , �,. ; � �-- ! � ��-� ___ -- ��!�� - --,,�, -. � - - -_ � � � _ _ �� - --- -._ �_ _ � ��; � � � - - _ _ �� LL I , � _ �,. � _ ,� , � ------------ � �� ,I� � �� , _ � -' _'_ _"-... .. �r� "T� o�, CITY OF BURLINGAME BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPARTMENT 501 PRIMROSE ROAD ,,F, . BURLINGAME, CA 94010 - TEL: (650) 558-7250 1205 BURLINGAI� AVENUE Application for commercial design review and variance for number of signs and sign PUgLIC HEARING height at 1205 Burlingame Avenue, zoned C-1, Subarea A. (APN: 029-204-060) NOTICE The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on Monday, April 8, 2002 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road� Burlingame, California. Mailed March 29, 2002 (Plea�se refer to other sicle) CITY OF BURLINGAME A copy of the application and plans for t}iis project may be reviewed prior to the ineetin� at the� Planning DepartmenC at 501 Prin�rose Road, B�u�lingame, California. � If you challenge the subject application(s) in court; you may be limit�ii to raising only those issues you or sornce�i�e else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in ivritten correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public heariug. : Property o�vners who receive this nc�tice are re.sponsible for informing their tenants about tl�is notice. Por addit�ional inforination, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank yuu. � �.�:'- 4 � , � i�.� ��%% Margaret Monroe ,�� /� � ` . _. City Planner _ .. PU�LIC HEAF�ING NOTICE (Plense r-Pfer to other- sidc�) . _i DATE: 10/23/02 TO: FILE FROM: Catherine Barber, Planner RE: 1205 Broadway Tom Bond, architect for Sephora project, called to inquire about changing the blade sign on the corner of the building. Currently it is the hotel sign, each side is counted toward the frontage it faces (both Lorton and Burlingame Ave). Per Maureen, it is o.k. to remove the sign, change the copy to rear both "Hotel" and "Sephora" within the same sign frame. The sign is not considered non- conforming and will still be within the allowable square footage, therefore only a sign permit is necessary. If however the SF of the sign is increasing and is still within the maximum allowable, an addendum to the sign variance would be required. Cornmercial Design Review and Sign Variance 1205 Burlingame Avenue Proposed Existing Allowed/Req'd. Use: Retail beauty Full Service Retail store Restaurant PRIMARY FRONTAGE 5� 2 3 # of signs allowed on the primary frontage (Burlingame Ave.) Total sign area 59.57 SF 29.66 SF 65 SF Sign SF 12' or less above 15.75 SF 9.66 SF 65 SF with height not greater than grade (portion of 12' above grade existing hotel blade sign) Sign SF between 12'-24' 38.82 SF 9.66 SF 39 SF between 12'-24' above grade above grade Sign SF between 24'-36' S SF 5 SF 19.5 SF between 24'-36' above grade above grade SECONDARY 6� 2 3 FRONTAGE # of signs allowed on the primary frontage (Burlingame Ave.) Total sign area 40 SF 26.66 SF 50 SF 18 SF 9.66 SF 50 SF with height not greater than Sign SF 12' or less above (portion of 12' above grade grade existing hotel blade sign) Sign SF between 12'-24' 17 SF 9.66 SF 39 SF between 12'-24' above grade above grade Sign SF between 24'-36' S SF 5 SF 15 SF between 24'-36' above grade above rade 1 ��--'---- i'--- _ ---L___ ..['.._�._.. ♦ ai iaiia.a. av■ aiu■uiv�. v. o.b..� Staff Comments: See attached. Findings for a Conditional Use Permit: In order to grant a Conditional Use Permit the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.52.020 a-c): (a) the proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or � �r4; ciry o� CITY OF BURLINGAME BURIJNGAME PLANNING DEPARTMENT 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 �°•• TEL: (650) 558-7250 1205 BURLINGAME AVENUE Application for commercial design review and variance for number of signs and sign P U g LIC H EA RIN G height at 1205 Burlingame Avenue, zoned C-1, Subarea A. (APN: 029-204-060) N OTIC E The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on Monday, April 8, 2002 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road� Burlingame, California. Mailed March 29, 2002 (P[ease refer to other side) CITY OF B URLINGAME A copy ofi the application and plans for this project may be i-eviewed prior to the meeting at the PlanninQ De�amnent �it 501 Primrose Road, Burlingamc; i �alifornia. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court. you m�y be limit�d to raising only those issues you ��r someone else raiscd ttt the public hearing, described in the notice or in wriCten correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public heariu�. � Properry owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. "I'hank y��u. � � , � '; �.�' ��.�.��: �� Mar��aret Monroe ��` �i. �� .. _ _ _ _ _ �' � �It � C1[y P��lI1IlC1' V: . . PUBLIC HEAf�ING NOTICE (Please r�fer to c�ther sic�'e) I = M E T R O S C A N P R O P E R T Y R E P O R T = San Ma teo (CA) �***�*************��*��******�**�************�*********************************************** * Date :03/27/2002 Prepared By : * * Time :00:00:00 Prepared For:APRIL 8, 2002 PC MEETING * * Report Type :SINGLELN.TCF Company :APN: 029-204-060 * * Sort Type :PARCEL Address :1205 BURLINGAME AVENUE * * Parcels Printed :43 City/ST/Zip :BURLINGAME CA 94010 * ******************�****************************��**�*�*********************��*�**��***�******* ***�*�**�*�*�****�*********��* * Search Parameters * **��*�******************** Parcel Number...43 029 211 010 thru 029 211 O80 029 211 180 thru 029 211 260 029 204 030 thru 029 204 060 029 204 120 thru 029 204 210 029 204 230 029 204 240 thru 029 204 250 029 204 270 029 202 060 029 153 090 thru 029 153 180 029 152 OSO thru 029 152 160 029 152 270 thru 029 152 280 029 152 310 thru 029 152 330 MetroScan / San Mateo (C.A) Parcel # Owner Name 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 153 153 153 153 153 202 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 211 211 211 211 211 211 211 211 211 211 211 211 211 211 211 211 211 050 Britton Patricia Ann Tr 100 Crow Alana S 2001 Trust 110 Kirkbride Bruce C Et Al 120 Lassiter Wayne S& J L Trs 160 World Gregory F General Pa 270 Sari Henry;+ 280 City Of Burlingame 310 Nick Delis Company Inc 320 Hammer I Llc 330 Offield Archie L Jr 090 Schmidt Nathan Tr 120 Johal Avtar S;+ 150 Kao Lorenz Kao & Louisa Ze 160 Melroz Lorton Limited Part 180 Sabatini Donald F& P A Tr 060 Johal Gurdial S Tr 030 Charter Ingrid M 2001 Trus 040 Wagner Fernand J& S D Trs 050 Karp Joseph Trustee;Udt 060 Karp Joseph Trustee;Udt 120 Ichinyosha Intl Usa Inc 210 Stagi Jim L Tr 230 City Of Burlingame 240 Crisafi Dominick J& Patti 250 United States Of America 270 Kirkbride Bruce C Et A1 O10 Salma Family Limited Partn 020 City Of Burlingame 030 Porter Stephen/P Trust 040 Provost Doreen S Tr Et A1 050 Ivani Barbara M Trustee 060 Azar Basim S& Linda J 070 Casey John J& Patricia A 080 The Jewell Partners 180 Macphee Ila A 190 S L Griffiths Inc 200 Mausser Christopher C 210 Lawrence Investment Co 220 S L Griffiths Inc 230 Piazza Scott & Mary 240 Ehikian Richard G Tr 250 Ko Rosalinda W H 260 Salma Family Limited Partn Site Address 1221 Donnelly Ave Burlingam 309 Lorton Ave Burlingame 9 1200 Burlingame Ave Burling 1208 Burlingame Ave Burling 1232 Burlingame Ave Burling 1300-1304 Burlingame Ave Bu *No Site Address* 1294 Burlingame Ave Burling 1218 Burlingame Ave Burling 1210 Burlingame Ave Burling 1100 Burlingame Ave Burling 1150 Burlingame Ave Burling 303 California Dr Burlingam 306 Lorton Ave Burlingame 9 321 California Dr Burlingam 1301 Burlingame Ave Burling 1221 Burlingame Ave Burling 1213 Burlingame Ave Burling 1207 Burlingame Ave Burling 283 Lorton Ave Burlingame 9 1200 Howard Ave #203 Burlin 238 Park Rd Burlingame 9401 *No Site Address* 1220 Howard Ave Burlingame *No Site Address* 1227 Burlingame Ave Burling 1101 Burlingame Ave Burling 265 California Dr Burlingam 261 California Dr Burlingam 251 California Dr Burlingam 247 California Dr Burlingam 245 California Dr Burlingam 241 California Dr Burlingam 215 California Dr #C Burlin 218 Lorton Ave Burlingame 9 226 Lorton Ave Burlingame 9 240 Lorton Ave Burlingame 9 246 Lorton Ave Burlingame 9 254 Lorton Ave Burlingame 9 263 Hatch Ln #A Burlingame 264 Lorton Ave Burlingame 9 268 Lorton Ave Burlingame 9 1111-1113 Burlingame Ave Bu YB Owner Phone ------------------ 650-697-5741 650-341-7079 650-583-9061 650-343-4372 650-343-7970 650-344-3883 650-685-5666 650-343-7970 650-347-4641 650-588-5658 650-342-3036 650-401-6547 775-831-6026 650-347-4637 415-388-6588 650-685-8466 Infonaation compiled from vorious sources. Reol Estote Solutioru mokes rto represeutatrons or warrarities as to Ihe �ccuracy or completeness nf information cortt�ined irt this reporl. CITY OF BURLINGAME AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) Scan O'Rourke , being duly sworn, deposes and says: that he is a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years, that acting for the City of Burlingame on the 29`'' day of March , 2002, he deposited in the United States Post Office a NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the persons listed on the addresses attached hereto and made a part hereof, to wit: that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to NOTICE OF HEARING pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Burlingame that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses attached hereto. 3 2�1 b Z 1205 BUIiLINGAME AVENUE fF � � �� v $ �. o o o � � ; � i,. a3 � _ �B = O �6 ^ /5 �4 � 7 /3 � Q � /2 � �8 35 41.29' 150� IOG.S' � :1.4)' 55 3�� "1 ' O1' 41.5' Q:750' �. R'i°° A V E. � = O // ;, ((.700' i29' /200 Q�750' ,�,08' �50' 44.5' G4.S' zas. as� ss� �ia.e3 „ S � � /O � 9 0 �' 30 O I ---- 28 � �� 5- ,�,I 2 � ;� � I - _ 4 _ � 7 8 ie - � � I 5 2 _ � �- 83 3�3 � � o m 12.a' S5p 55'' � - _ - e9o.e2' 60': so.os oI ;- 3 �� 0 6 5 GS' Go' ; °' ' i50 � �6 25 � 9?.25' '15' 25' So - --HG.zT•_ � N � e � N � 2 N � � 3 si;, 4 g� Q; i� 94.98' n�^. � ,.` — — — — � �-�. - — 5G.3'�' — — -" O c 0 /9 27 3/ /6 32 � c/ 33 /c' o� V � v 58 33' 2 95 95 -/� '�`�O.t.c.z �s� �o• �o' ao� toa.se' e.� �is' zs s u e•3a �2Op Iloo � A V E. a , � �� , r�,.�z . ��,; � �.-� _ z�� -- ��o � 50.41' 49.39' 9' "•� 55' 4 x " b5' ' S0' IS' T. $. 20' 88. 93' � O �s ,,,�' �� O C� 10 O �. 60 � O s� � �. ` � �o� a� �oi a� �° � O � > + o = - � � W , �, I .. _ �' j ZT.o3' ,Iw'� 49.39, 90' _ 45' _ 50' 15 ; J ` 8 z 42' -s 55' • 45� •. � $ 2� - .52'2 �. ' Q , I50' . � 7'�5" '�I�S Q , I �. g 2� I � � � N�s � o ee �� ,v , � ,', . � � � 23 I m � � � --�-- � � � I � O w !P v � � ��` � .a c_ I 14�� m L _ 100� _ — -- — � — 135� .. f / GO' 80' _ '^ 102 33' (�V N I3S �N � " GO�� 3 (�v O l�T 155:25' w ------- -- --- oO Ido' �i - O119 3�' 2 N m O,� �� 7 N � 2/ X v�i _ . j � O �" f 29. GG' O �� — — l50' — — — O m � O = j/_�\ = /2 I 6 � ,,, - � _ � iao' �, �� N O N-. ----- 2�4 --- 2s � 2 � � O; /3 5 = � : �9 _ J55.25' ------�------- � . - � O N. .5' I S' E4SE � - I4 � 4 n = _ lB I _ • 60 c � i5a' S. . - — — 5 T B. T B. Bo' 20_GEASE = a •!40' d _ /5 3 - O � �� ^ , i50' S.T g. ~ 140' �� '^ — � G�2 �DO' �� — — — — — � 70� 70' st 7O, Q � m /6 m v _ Q - o h 2 - J 7p' o' {� 40' 4O' p Q � --- -- � � � � �- — I 00' — � O o 70 , o O � 24 � /2 0 � /5 � /4 v /3 r i �� n GS' r�C' do' 40' 2�� 140' 1 SO" BO' la5' "f5' / /200 -------- —�IdB°30' E----� 00 • A VE � � HOWARD � • m ��, CITV 0� CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPARTMENT BURLJNCrAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD „�• . BURLINGAME, CA 94010 TEL: (650) 558-7250 1205 BURLINGAME AVENUE Application for commercial desiqn review and variance for number of signs and sign pUgLIC HEARING height at 1205 Burlingame Avenue, zoned C-1, Subarea A. (APN: 029-204-060) N OTIC E The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on Monday, April 22, 2002 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. Mailed April 12, 2002 (Plense refer to other side) CITY OF BURLINGAME A copy of the a�plication and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Plantiing Departm�nt at 501 Primrose Road, �3��rlingame, Califoriiia. � If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raisccl �it the public hearing, described in the notice �r in written ec�rrespundence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearinb. Property owners who receive this notire are responsible for informin� their tenants about tllis notice. For additional information, �lease call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. Margaret Monroe �� - � � � �'� ��'�' City Pla�i��er �� . PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to ot�zc�r side) = M E T R O S C A N P R O P E R T Y R E P O R T = San Mateo (CA) *�**********�**�****************************************************************************** * Date :04/11/2002 Prepared By : * * Time :00:00:00 Prepared For:APRIL 22, 2002 PC MEETING * * Report Type :SINGLELN.TCF Company :APN: 029-204-060 * * Sort Type :PARCEL Address :1205 BURLINGAME AVENUE * * Parcels Printed :43 City/ST/Zip :BURLINGAME CA 94010 * *�*******************************�*�*********************************************************� ****�*��+��*******��*�*�***** * 5earch Parameters * ***********��*�**��************ Parcel Number...43 029 211 O10 thru 029 211 O80 029 211 180 thru 029 211 260 029 204 030 thru 029 204 060 029 204 120 thru 029 204 210 029 204 230 029 204 240 thru 029 204 250 029 204 270 029 202 060 029 153 090 thru 029 153 180 029 152 OSO thru 029 152 160 029 152 270 thru 029 152 280 029 152 310 thru 029 152 330 MetroScan / San Mateo (C.A) Parcel # Owner Name 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 029 Site Address 1221 Donnelly Ave Burlingam 309 Lorton Ave Burlingame 9 1200 Burlingame Ave Burling 1208 Burlingame Ave Burling 1232 Burlingame Ave Burling 1300-1304 Burlingame Ave Bu *No Site Address* 1294 Burlingame Ave Burling 1218 Burlingame Ave Burling 1210 Burlingame Ave Burling 1100 Burlingame Ave Burling 1150 Burlingame Ave Burling 303 California Dr Burlingam 306 Lorton Ave Burlingame 9 321 California Dr Burlingam 1301 Burlingame Ave Burling 1221 Burlingame Ave Burling 1213 Burlingame Ave Burling 1207 Burlingame Ave Burling 283 Lorton Ave Burlingame 9 1200 Howard Ave #203 Burlin 238 Park Rd Burlingame 9401 *No Site Address* 1220 Howard Ave Burlingame *No Site Address* 1227 Burlingame Ave Burling 1101 Burlingame Ave Burling 265 California Dr Burlingam 261 California Dr Burlingam 251 California Dr Burlingam 247 California Dr Burlingam 245 California Dr Burlingam 241 California Dr Burlingam 215 California Dr #C Burlin 218 Lorton Ave Burlingame 9 226 Lorton Ave Burlingame 9 240 Lorton Ave Burlingame 9 246 Lorton Ave Burlingame 9 254 Lorton Ave Burlingame 9 263 Hatch Ln #A Burlingame 264 Lorton Ave Burlingame 9 268 Lorton Ave Burlingame 9 1111-1113 Burlingame Ave Bu Injormation compiled jrom various sources. Real Esta�e Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or contpleteness of injormotion corttarned in thrs report. 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 153 153 153 153 153 202 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 211 211 211 211 211 211 211 211 211 211 211 211 211 211 211 211 211 050 100 110 120 160 270 280 310 320 330 090 120 150 160 180 060 030 040 OSO 060 120 210 230 240 250 270 O10 020 030 040 050 060 070 080 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 Britton Patricia Ann Tr Crow Alana S 2001 Trust Kirkbride Bruce C Et Al Lassiter Wayne S& J L Trs World Gregory F General Pa Sari Henry;+ City Of Burlingame Nick Delis Company Inc Hammer I Llc Offield Archie L Jr Schmidt Nathan Tr Johal Avtar S;+ Kao Lorenz Kao & Louisa Ze Melroz Lorton Limited Part Sabatini Donald F& P A Tr Johal Gurdial S Tr Charter Ingrid M 2001 Trus Wagner Fernand J& S D Trs Karp Joseph Trustee;Udt Karp Joseph Trustee;Udt Ichinyosha Intl Usa Inc Stagi Jim L Tr City Of Burlingame Crisafi Dominick J & Patti United States Of America Kirkbride Bruce C Et Al Salma Family Limited Partn City Of Burlingame Porter Stephen/P Trust Provost Doreen S Tr Et Al Ivani Barbara M Trustee Azar Basim S& Linda J Casey John J& Patricia A The Jewell Partners Macphee Ila A S L Griffiths Inc Mausser Christopher C Lawrence Investment Co S L Griffiths Inc Piazza Scott & Mary Ehikian Richard G Tr Ko Rosalinda W H Salma Family Limited Partn YB Owner Phone ------------------ 650-697-5741 650-341-7079 650-583-9061 650-343-4372 650-343-7970 650-344-3883 650-685-5666 650-343-7970 650-347-4641 650-588-5658 650-342-3036 650-401-6547 775-831-6026 650-347-4637 415-388-6588 650-685-8466 CITY OF BURLINGAME AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) Sean O'Rourke , being duly sworn, deposes and says: that he is a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years, that acting for the City of Burlingame on the 12''' day of April , 2002, he deposited in the United States Post Office a NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the persons listed on the addresses attached hereto and made a part hereof, to wit: that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to NOTICE OF HEARING pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Burlingame that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses attached hereto. l� � /2 d� 1205 BURLINGAME AVENUE