The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1117 Burlingame Avenue - Staff ReportItem No. 8f Regular Action Item PROJECT LOCATION 1117 Burlingame Avenue City of Burlingame Commercial Design Review Address: 1117 Burlingame Avenue Item No. 8f Regular Action Item Meeting Date: July 9, 2018 Request: Application for Commercial Design Review for changes to the front fa�ade of an existing commercial storefront. Applicant: Ron Stanford APN: 029-211-260 Architect: Jeffrey J. Burriss Property Owner: Olive Grove Capital LP Lot Area: 15,400 SF General Plan: Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan: Burlingame Avenue Commercial District Zoning: BAC Current Use: Vacant, previously Aida Opera Candy (retail use) Proposed Use: Tuna Kahuna (ready-to-eat food shop, considered a retail use) Allowable Use: Ready-to-eat food shop (considered a retail use) is permitted. Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 - Existing facilities, Class 1(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances are exempt from environmental review. Summary: The applicant is proposing to replace an existing vacant retail space, previously Aida Opera Candy, with a new ready-to-eat food shop, Tuna Kahuna, at 1117 Burlingame Avenue, zoned BAC. Tuna Kahuna meets the operating criteria of a ready-to-eat food shop, which is considered to be a general retail use and therefore allowed as a permitted use in the BAC District (no Conditional Use Permit required for this type of food establishment). Operating criteria include 1) sells food that is ready to eat at the time of sale, 2) does not contain a full commercial kitchen, 3) contains no more than 150 SF of seating area, and 4) contains no more than 1,000 SF of gross floor area. This application includes changes to the exterior facade of the commercial storefront along Burlingame Avenue, which measures 14'-1" in width. At the front of the building, the existing recessed angled entry, canvas awning, and frameless glass storefront system will be removed. The existing stucco and horizontal decorative bands will remain. There are no changes proposed at the rear of the building. The proposed front elevation consists of a new aluminum and glass storefront system, including a smaller recessed entry, aluminum and glass entry door, a horizontal bifold window and frosted glass below. Above the new storefront, the applicant is proposing a new wood and steel horizontal awning. Retail uses located on the first floor within the parking sector of the Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan shall be exempt from providing off-street parking (CS 25.70.090 (a)). With this application, there is no intensification of uses proposed on the ground level. Therefore, no additional off-street parking is required for the proposed retail business. The following application is required: ■ Commercial Design Review for changes to the front fa�ade of an existing commercial storefront in the BAC Zoning District (CS 25.32.045). Staff comments: None. Commercial Design Review 1117 Burlingame Avenue Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission design review study meeting on June 11, 2018, the Commission discussed the proposed project and voted to place this item on the regular action calendar when all of the required information has been submitted (see the attached June 11, 2018, Planning Commission Minutes). Please refer to the attached applicant's response letter, dated June 19, 2018, and revised plans, date stamped June 20, 2018, for a detailed summary of changes made to the project since the design review study meeting. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for Commercial Design Review as established in Ordinance No. 1652 adopted by the Council on April 16, 2001 are outlined as follows: 1. Support of the pattern of diverse architectural styles that characterize the city's commercial areas; 2. Respect and promotion of pedestrian activity by placement of buildings to maximize commercial use of the street frontage, off-street public spaces, and by locating parking so that it does not dominate street frontages; 3. On visually prominent and gateway sites, whether the design fits the site and is compatible with the surrounding development; 4. Compatibility of the architecture with the mass, bulk, scale, and existing materials of existing development and compatibility with transitions where changes in land use occur nearby; 5. Architectural design consistency by using a single architectural style on the site that is consistent among primary elements of the structure, restores or retains existing or significant original architectural features, and is compatible in mass and bulk with other structure in the immediate area; and 6. Provision of site features such as fencing, landscaping, and pedestrian circulation that enriches the existing opportunities of the commercial neighborhood. Suggested Findings for Design Review: That the new aluminum framed storefront window and door system, rectangular recessed entry, stucco siding, and wood and steel horizontal awning is consistent with the pattern of diverse architectural styles that characterize the city's commercial areas; that the proposed storefront promotes pedestrian activity by allowing views directly into the business; that the proposed storefront improvements are consistent with the architectural style and mass and bulk with other structures by using stucco siding and an aluminum and glass storefront system on the ground floor, the project may be found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review criteria. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped June 20, 2018, sheets 0.1, 0.2, A2.1 and A4.1; 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the building, which would include changing or adding exterior walls or parapet walls, shall require an amendment to this permit; 2 Commercial Design Review 1117 Burlingame Avenue 3. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materiais shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 4. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 5. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 6. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 7. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; 8. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2016 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 9. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; and 10. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Ruben Hurin, Senior Planner c. Ron Stanford, applicant Attachments: June 11, 2018 Planning Commission Minutes Applicant's Response Letter, dated June 19, 2018 Email Submitted by Jennifer Pfaff, dated June 9, 2018 Application to the Planning Commission Planning Commission Resolutions (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed June 29, 2018 Area Map 3 �, ciry �� s � �� m .tico�'�,.— 90 9aoawTa City of Burlingame Meeting Minutes Planning Commission BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Monday, June 11, 2018 7:00 PM Council Chambers c. 1117 Burlingame Avenue, zoned BAC - Application for Commercial Design Review for changes to the front facade of an existing commercial storefront (Ron Stanford, applicant; Jeffrey J. Burris, architect; Olive Group Capital, LP, property owner) (45 noticed) Staff Contact: Ruben Hurin All Commissioners had visited the subject property. There were no ex-parte communications to report. Community Development Director Meeker provided an overview of the staff report. Questions of Staff.� There were no questions of staff.. Chair Gaul opened the public hearing. Ron Stanford represented the applicant. Commission Questions/Comments: > Will the sidewalk tab/es be removable? (Meeker. would need to be removable.) > Feels like a walk-up window is being installed. If the furniture is present with the window open, could be a nice feel. > The awning that is proposed seems to fit with the proposed use, but doesn't want the design to make the space feel like a fast-foot restaurant. (Stanford: could detail the rendering better.) > Asked about the frosted g/ass on the lower portion of the facade. (Stanford: wanted to maintain an all-glass appearance, but provide frosted glass on the lower portion to maintain privacy.) Perhaps could install Ipe wood as an alternative. (Stanford: could look at this, but cost is a concern.) > Requested information regarding the Ipe materials used on the canopy; not a roof. (Stanford: is provided only for shade, not protection from rain, though this could be a good idea.) > Why is there a screen on the window? (Stanford: thought it is required by the Health Department; if can get away without it, will remove it.) > Having trouble with some of the proportions. Requested clarification of dimensions. Seems like that dimension to the bottom of the window is too short to work with tables. > The front elevation gives the impression that there are three horizontal slats. Gives a false impression. Raising the base may help with the proportions of the windows. > Having difficulty understanding the vertical wood elements on eave. Need to clarify dimensions and provide greater detailing. > Not clear how the proposed canopy relates to the adjacent awning. > Requested clarification regarding how foot is prepared. (Stanford: there is an array of foods that are available, then the customer picks the elements and builds a bowl.) Public Comments: There were no public comments. City of Burlingame Page 1 Printed on 7/3/2018 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 11, 2018 Chair Gaul closed the public hearing. Commission Discussion: > Likes the design; wouldn't want the design to address the canvas awning to the left. Would prefer removal of the screen, if possible. > Seems like there is a lot going on in such a small facade. Need to simplify a bit. > Worried that the thin slats on top of the c-channel will look cheap. the entire assembly of the canopy seems insubstantial, unresolved. Doesn't like the flourish on top of the canopy. > Agrees that there are things to like about the application; the use could be a good use to add to Burlingame Avenue. Detailing needs to be refined. Facade could be detailed better by working the Ipe wood into more of the facade detailing. Commissioner Terrones made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Kelly, to the item on the Regular Action Calendar when ready for action. Chair Gaul called for a voice vote on the motion and the motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6- Sargent, Loftis, Kelly, Gaul, Terrones, and Tse Absent: 1 - Comaroto City of Burlingame Page 2 Printed on 7/3/2018 19 JUNI-,. 2018 PI.A\"�;I'VG I)F.P.�R I MI:NT I'I.A\T�fN(; C'O'�11fIti10� I I 17 Bt RI,I'�!GAMF, ,1V1:. C(IANGGS IN R�;SPOiVSI; INITTi11. IZI��,VTI�;W COMViI��:N'l�S -Itenderin� shc�uld should he an accuratel�� scalcd represen4ition of the desi�zn intenl and ?d documei�ts. (subniitted ��ritten comment suggested a discrepane}. (unspeciiied), bct��cen tlic plan-ele��ations und the rcndering. j = fhere is no Ivn�er a sa�een in the large ��ir�do�� c�penin�. ( ft's a quirk ot Chc rendering that tl�e pixelation oi�d�at darl; arca slill rc�tds as a matrrial). � -tiide��alk table�. (under scparatc peimit). are �0'� in heigh[ an�i the sill of�thc lur��e bitiil�! ��ind��v is 34-. ahoi�e side�calk �racie. (one conunissioncr na�ed the)� seemed closer to ?4'") -�� e'��e ad�ied a ��ouden sla� r�iin-scrccn treatment to the rect�tn�ular w�indu«� beneath the large bifold ��indu�� and al5o tu its 9U dezree lo�i�er �� indu�� complcment �� ithin the cntr�� alcove. (sug��etited to mitiQale thc sen�e of a'I�ist t��o�i �valk up ��indo��c...e.g.: lhc noodlc bar in blade runncr...� -Renderin�� no�� shu��s [he [3ifii�ld �� indo�ti tulh� �ipen and u�e ha��e eleration dra��in�s shiiu�in� it hoth lull}� t�pen and lullv closed. (the une clevation dra�+�in,� in the initial presentation depicted the biful�l �ti�indo�� partiall�� i�en, a condition that ��auld not �cncrall�� obtain. [hus the dra��ing �oul�1 h�� e been misleading. fthe 1?ilold �4�indo�� «�ili cithen c� full�� open or elosed. ). -l�he I I'E �a�oocJcn slat treatment at the a��ning has been simpli�icd to jtis� a h��rizuntal series ��1�2 � 6 picces with let in glass in the 2" spacings so the assembh� a(s�� no�� sheds ��ater. (in[ended tu simplil�� o� erall. reducc lhe sensc of�'�oo man} things �oine on�). tl�� ,� � �' ��,. _ - � ti` ` ,'� ': �d;t';�.t�itv,�+l�'„- - _s�..j��!�-a [1i1� 06.11.18 Meeting COMMUNICATIONRECEIVED Item 9c AFTER PREPARATION 1117 Burlingame Ave. OF STAFF REPORT Page 1 of 1 RECEIVED JUN 11 2018 CITY OF BURLINGAME CDD — PLANNING DIV. -----Original Message----- From: Jennifer Pfaff [mailto:iipf@pacbell.net] Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2018 7:06 PM To: CD/PLG-Ruben Hurin <RHurin@burlin�ame.or�>; GRP-Planning Commissioners <PlanningCommissioners@burlin�ame.or�> Subject: 1117 Burlingame Avenue storefront facade changes Dear Planning Commissioners: 'Just a quick note to express my disappointment with the storefront design for the former Aida's chocolate space at 1117 Burlingame Avenue. It is a real jewel of a space and every inch of the front should show that off. The small mock-up rendering does not seem to match the line drawings. Even if they were one in the same, the design just isn't up to par with what is being done to date on Burlingame Avenue. Without exception, every new storefront design that you've reviewed and that which has been built for the past several years has not only followed the DSAP commercial design guidelines, but paid very close attention to correct proportions and good materials. Since the streetscape improvements were completed, things have only gotten better. This one needs work. Something about this one (at least the drawing) makes it appear like a cheap walk- up stand. Please encourage the architect to walk (and understand) this special street and to be inspired. Thanks for all you do. Sincerely, Jennifer Pfaff G�"}�� ; 6URLI�+G4ME � -__� � COMMUNITY DEVE�OPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLiNGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSIUN Type o# appiication: � Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Parcel #: �PN: Q29-211-260 C� Conditionai Use Permit ❑ Special Permit � Zoning / Other: BAC PROJECT ADDRESS: 1117 BURLINGAME AVE. APPLICANT Name: PCJKI TIME address: 1 i 17 BURLINGAN9E AVE � City/State/Zip: �`1RLINGA(�-?E CA. 94�10 Phone: `� `�.99°.5488 E-mail: ��EJ�__1NONG0�'�uYANQC�.CGP�i PROPERTY OWNER Name: Triterra Realty Group Inc� Address: i �05 Burlinyan�e ��e. � City/State/Zip: B��rlinc�ame, CA 9=?010 Phone: �S6 � 9�' -s ��d E-mail: _c?'�/7/J'�Q'�o/� Q /i-i�//�? �i'� ARCH(TECT/DESIGNER Name: �a� ��AN�ORD. STEP 3 STUDIO Address: ��'�'7 JERROLD fiVE. City/State/Zip: SAN �RANCISCO. C,� 94'124 Phone: I, ' � 5 � 9.0�98 � ;Q;��Lstep3studio ccm E-mail: Burlingame Business License #: Authorization to Reproduce Proiect Plans: I hereby grant the City of Burlingame the auth ity to reproduce upon request and/or post plans submitted with this application on the City's website as pa e lanning approval process and waive any claims against the City arising out of or related ta such action. (Initials of ArchitecUDesigner) � ena��t I�?�pro��.�emen't: (Nj siorefront win�o�•v wal� and door. (N) al�rr�ing PROJECT DESCRIPTION: &�xteriar I�ghting. nor� str��cturaE partitic�t�s. interior lic�f�tin�, caunter.. ?ixtures ar7d rinis'r�2s AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATURE: I here y certify under penalty f perjury that the information given herei is true and correct to the best of my knawledge and belie,i� ��, �`� Applicant's signature: � / � p Date: � � � � � ! am aware of the proposed application and hereb` uthorize the above applicant to submit this applicatio� to the Planning Commission. Property owner's signature.��- � 2'— Date: 3�� Date submitted: 3�27 f �" .S: ; HANDOUTS � PC AppUcation. dor This Space for CDD Staff Use Only � Project Description: Ke . Abbreviation Term CUP Conditional Use Permit DHE Declinin Hei ht Envelo DSR Desi n Review E Existin N New SFD Sin le Famil Dwellin SP Special Permit RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, an application has been made for Commercial Desiqn Review for chanqes to the front fa�ade of an existinq commercial storefront at 1117 Burlinqame Avenue, Zoned BAC, Olive Grove Capital LP P.O. Box 117309 Burlinqame Ca 94010-4105, propertv owner, APN: 029-211-260; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on July 9, 2018, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Section 15301 - Existing facilities, Class 1(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances are exempt from environmental review, is hereby approved. 2. Said Commercial Design Review was approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Commercial Design Review are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of Julv, 2018, by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Commercial Design Review 1117 Burlingame Avenue Effective July 19, 2018 Page 1 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped June 20, 2018, sheets 0.1, 0.2, A2.1 and A4.1; 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the building, which would include changing or adding exterior walls or parapet walls, shall require an amendment to this permit; 3. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 4. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 5. that prior to issuance of construction plans shall approval adopted by the remain a part of all se Compliance with all con not be modified or chang Council on appeal; a building permit for construction of the project, the project be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall ts of approved plans throughout the construction process. ditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall ed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City 6. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 7 � that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2016 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 9. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; and EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Commercial Design Review 1117 Burlingame Avenue Effective July 19, 2018 Page 2 10. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. . CITY OF BURLINGAME COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD a r, BURLINGAME, CA 94010 {i�"' _ �, X_V_ . PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org Site: 1117 BURLINGAME AVENUE The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, JULY 9, 2018 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Holl Councii Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Commercial Design Review for changes to the front fa4ade of an existing commercial storefront at 1117 BURLINGAME AVENUE zoned BAC. APN 029-211-260 Mailed: June 29, 2018 (Please refer to other side) PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE City of Burlingame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you rr�ay be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to other side) 1117 burlingame avenue 029.211.260 — 300' noticing � .,o�.,.�, :,�,, i .�� : r�.� , . � .r� ,.�,_��,.�,� . . Item No. 9c Design Review �tutiy PROJECT LOCATION 1117 Burlingame Avenue City of Buriingame Commercial Design Review Address: 1117 Burlingame Avenue Item No. 9c Design Review Study Meeting Date: June 11, 2018 Request: Application for Commercial Design Review for changes to the front fa�ade of an existing commercial storefront. Applicant: Ron Stanford APN: 029-211-260 Architect: Jeffrey J. Burriss Property Owner: Olive Grove Capital LP Lot Area: 15,400 SF General Plan: Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan: Burlingame Avenue Commercial District Zoning: BAC Current Use: Vacant, previously Aida Opera Candy (retail use) Proposed Use: Tuna Kahuna (ready-to-eat food shop, considered a retail use) Allowable Use: Ready-to-eat food shop (considered a retail use) is permitted. Summary: The applicant is proposing to replace an existing vacant retail space, previously Aida Opera Candy, with a new ready-to-eat food shop, Tuna Kahuna, at 1117 Burlingame Avenue, zoned BAC. Tuna Kahuna meets the operating criteria of a ready-to-eat food shop, which is considered to be a general retail use and therefore allowed as a permitted use in the BAC District (no Conditional Use Permit required for this type of food establishment). Operating criteria include 1) sells food that is ready to eat at the time of sale, 2) does not contain a full commercial kitchen, 3) contains no more than 150 SF of seating area, and 4) contains no more than 1,000 SF of gross floor area. This application includes changes to the exterior facade of the commercial storefront along Burlingame Avenue, which measures 14'-1" in width. At the front of the building, the existing recessed angled entry, canvas awning, and frameless glass storefront system will be removed. The existing stucco and horizontal decorative bands will remain. There are no changes proposed at the rear of the building. The proposed front elevation consists of a new aluminum and glass storefront system, including a smaller recessed entry, aluminum and glass entry door, a horizontal bifold window and frosted glass below. Above the new storefront, the applicant is proposing a new wood and steel horizontal awning. Retail uses located on the first floor within the parking sector of the Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan shall be exempt from providing off-street parking (CS 25.70.090 (a)). With this application, there is no intensification of uses proposed on the ground level. Therefore, no additional off-street parking is required for the proposed retail business. The following application is required: ■ Commercial Design Review for changes to the front fa�ade of an existing commercial storefront in the BAC Zoning District (CS 25.32.045). Staff comments: None. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for Commercial Design Review as established in Ordinance No. 1652 adopted by the Council on April 16, 2001 are outlined as follows: 1. Support of the pattern of diverse architectural styles that characterize the city's commercial areas; 2. Respect and promotion of pedestrian activity by placement of buildings to maximize commercial use of the street frontage, off-street public spaces, and by locating parking so that it does not dominate street frontages; Commercial Design Review 1117 Burlingame Avenue 3. On visually prominent and gateway sites, whether the design fits the site and is compatible with the surrounding development; 4. Compatibility of the architecture with the mass, bulk, scale, and existing materials of existing � development and compatibility with transitions where changes in land use occur nearby; 5. Architectural design consistency by using a single architectural style on the site that is consistent among primary elements of the structure, restores or retains existing or significant original architectural features, and is compatible in mass and bulk with other structure in the immediate area; and 6. Provision of site features such as fencing, landscaping, and pedestrian circulation that enriches the existing opportunities of the commercial neighborhood. Ruben Hurin Senior Planner c. Ron Stanford, applicant Attachments: Application to the Planning Commission Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed June 1, 2018 Area Map 2 ,�a��... �� OVALINGAME � '-`�/ �- -- � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNiNG COMMISSION Type of application: � Design Review O Variance ❑ Parcel #: �QN: 029-211-250 � Conditional Use Permit O Special Permit ❑ Zoning / Other. BAC PROJECT ADDRESS: 1117 BJRL!NG,�P�?E AVE. APPLICANT Name: PQKI TIP�IE 1117 BU2l.INGAME AVE �ddress: �itylState/Zip: ��RL{P�GAP{lE CA, ��+010 Phone: `�' �.999.5488 E-maii: ��UG_N/ONG02@Y�1HO�J.CrJP�1 PROPERTY OWNER Name: Trit2rra Reafty Group, I;�c. Address: � ��' BUrlin�ame Ave. CitylState/Zip: aur(ingame, CA �4010 Phone: �.��/'J.9�' .S�G'4 E-mail: �irlf7/.J��Gt'�O� � /�-i/'B//� �'ll ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Name: R�N STANt=ORD. STEP 3 STUDIO t�ddress: '667 JEP.RO! D AVE. SAN FRANClSC(J, GA �+�12� City/State/Zip: f Phone: 415.519.Q69�3 ; a^��st�p3studia corn �-maii: Burlingame Business License #: ., r. .. '. j, -,.,� � s i; - .. .. _ ru . _ Authorization to Reproduce Proiect Plans: ( hereby grant the City of Burlingame the auth ,ity to reproduce upon request and/or post plans submitted with this �pplication on the City's website as pa e lanning approval process and waive any claims against the City arising out af or related to such action. (Initiats of ArchitectJDesigner) � � �Ten�nt in��ro��ement: (Nj siOi�ICO(it V'JIR�OLj! �?ali an� C�or, (N) a�Yvning PROJECT DESCRIPTION: � ex�eri�r I�ghting, n�n st�uct:�r�( partiti�ns, i; �terior lig�iing. �,�u,^,t�r, jr�xtu, �s ��iU � ni�nes AFFIDAVITlSIGNATURE: I here y certify under penalty f perjury that the information given herei is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and beli� �C( C(, ] � / Applicant's signature: / � Date: � °2 � / � ! am av��are of the proposed applicatien and hereb uthorize .he above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. Property owner's signature. �`�— Date: � �/�� Date submitted: 3 J27 (� � �r',HA!�'DQUT� jFCA?p(i:cti�n.dec . CITY OF BURLINGAME r '� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD �,,a �, BURLINGAME, CA 94010 '�"' �: ' PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org Site: 1117 BURLINGAME AVENUE The City of Burlingame Planning (ommission announces the follawing public hearing on MONDAY, JUNE 11, 2018 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chamhers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Commercial Design Review for changes to the front fa4ade of an existing commercial storefront at 1117 BURLINGAME AVENUE zoned BAC. APN 029-211-260 Mailed: June 1, 2018 (Please refer to other side) PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Cit of Burlinqame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. if you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearin , described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250 William Meeker Community Development Director Thank you. (Pleaserzfe�toothers�dA� PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE 1117 burlingame avenue 029.211.260 — 300' noticing .; �, � � '.+., �`�� ;x n ;, .,�1�� " . I��'+t1 t,:1r�� r�o�: i � ,t� A� �:t aiY 'l::r ,. ed l ... � `: y � . CITY OF BURLINGAME � ' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD .�, . _ BURLINGAME, CA 94010 ' ti' PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org Site: 1117 BURLINGAME AVENUE The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, JUNE 11, 2018 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Applicntion for Commercial Design Review for changes to the front fa4ade of an existing commercial storefront at 1117 BURLINGAME AVENUE zoned BAC. APN 029-211-260 Mailed: June 1, 2018 (Please refer to other side) PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Citv of Burlinqame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. if you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone eise raised at the pubiic hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. William Meeker Community Development Director (Please refer to other sideJ Thank you. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE 1117 Burlingame Avenue apn prop owner info address city state zip 29204250 Burlingame Park Square Llc 1325 Howard Ave Ste 505 Burlingame CA 94010 29211180 Macphee K Bruce Tr Macphee Ila A Tr 334 Durant Wy Mill Valley CA 94941 29211170 Mendell Partners Lp 880 Longview Road Hillsborough CA 94010-0000 29204060 Jsr Karp 10 Limited Partnership P O Box 271 Burlingame CA 94011-0271 29143999 29204120 Ichinyosha International Usa Inc 1200 Howard Ave Ste 203 Burlingame CA 94010 29211230 Piazza Scott R Tr Piazza Mary Tr 930 Chiltern Rd Hillsborough CA 94010 29153160 Green Banker Llc 398 Primrose Road Burlingame CA 94010-5713 29152330 Offield Ventures Lp 1214 Burlingame Ave Burlingame CA 94010 29142020 Peninsula Corridor Jpb 1250 San Carlos Ave San Carlos CA 94070-2468 29211020 City Of Burlingame 501 Primrose Rd Burlingame CA 94010-3906 29211050 Azar Basim S Tr Azar Linda J Tr 1759 Parrot Dr San Mateo CA 94402 29211030 Hera Llc 1050 Macadamia Drive Hillsborough CA 94010 29153150 Kao Lorenz & Louisa Zee 30 Live Oak Ln Hillsborough CA 94010-6229 29211080 Dlc 225 California 999 Baker Wy Ste 300 San Mateo CA 94404 29213030 Baumelgruen Evelyn Tr Baum Trust 1647 18th Ave San Francisco CA 94122-3412 29204050 1207 1211 Burlingame Ave Llc Karp Joseph Tr P 0 Box 271 Burlingame CA 94011-0271 29152110 Tybab Partners Llc Et AI 6685 Cuttalossa Rd New Hope PA 18938 29153180 Sabatini Patricia A Tr Et AI 300 EI Portal Hillsborough CA 94010 29211070 Casey Patricia A Tr Casey Trust 2525 Poppy Dr Burlingame CA 94010-5533 29153090 Schmidt Nathan Tr Schmidt Marilyn L Tr 60 Country Club Dr Hillsborough CA 94010 29211240 Austere Leslie Tr Rubin Suzanne Tr 277 Middle Rd Montecito CA 93108 29204270 Tybab Partners Llc Et AI 4621 Garden Brook Dr Chico CA 95973 29211210 Lawrence Investment Co 1220 Lawrence Ln Gardnerville NV 89460 29204210 Stair Lauretta A Stair Lauretta A Tr 2102 Pinehurst Ct EI Cerrito CA 94530-1878 29213020 Wong Katherine Hsu Anna Kuk Sau 440 Pullman Road Hillsborough CA 94010 29211260 Olive Grove Capital Lp Po Box 117309 Burlingame CA 94010-4105 29211010 Olive Grove Capital Lp Po Box 117309 Burlingame CA 94010-4105 93362010 City & Co Of S F Water Dept 525 Golden Gate Ave 10th Flr San Francisco CA 94102 29211060 Azar Basim S Tr Azar Linda J Tr 1759 Parrott Dr San Mateo CA 94402-3608 29204040 Green Banker Llc 398 Primrose Dr Burlingame CA 94010 29204230 City Of Burlingame 501 Primrose Rd Burlingame CA 94010-3906 29211220 S L Griffiths Inc Meyerhoffer Elaine Wang Tr Po Box 117536 Burlingame CA 94011 1117 Burlingame Avenue 29152100 Tybab Partners Llc Et AI 4621 Garden Brook Dr Chico CA 95973 29211250 Ko Land L P 333 Port Royal Avenue Foster City CA 94404 29211190 S L Griffiths Inc Po Box 117536 Burlingame CA 94011-7536 29152320 Hammer I Llc 1201 Howard Ave Burlingame CA 94010 29216010 Peninsula Corridor Jpb 1250 San Carlos Ave San Carlos CA 94070-2468 29204030 Prosit Properties Llc 35 Mounds Ave San Mateo CA 94402 29152280 City Of Burlingame 501 Primrose Rd Burlingame CA 94010-3906 29211040 White Annemarie Mausser 833 N Idaho St San Mateo CA 94401 29213010 20 Hobart Llc 999 Baker Wy Ste 300 San Mateo CA 94404 29152120 Green Banker Llc 398 Primrose Road Burlingame CA 94010 29211200 Dlc Lorton 999 Baker Wy Ste 300 San Mateo CA 94404 29153120 Johal Avtar S Tr Et AI Johal Avtar S Tr 1304 Burlingame Ave Burlingame CA 94010 City of Burlingame/CDD 501 Primrose Rd Burlingame CA 94010 1117 burlingame avenue 029.211.260 — 300' noticing , .��{ ;,o � , , �ta ?.� �5 i=. .. 5 d s 0 .• CITY OF BURLINGAME AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) !y1 ,� L. �� , being duly sworn, deposes and says: that she is a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18-years, that acting for the City of Burlingame on the 1St Day of June 2018 deposited in the United States Post Office a NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING, a copy ofwhich is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the persons listed on the addresses attached hereto and made a part hereof, to wit: that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to NOTICE OF HEARING pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Burlingame that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses attached hereto. � 1117 Burlingame Avenue 47 — 300' Notices S:\NOTICINGWFFIDAVIT.doc