The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1115 Burlingame Avenue - Staff ReportCity of Burlingame Commercial Design Review Address: 1115 Burlingame Avenue Item No. 9e Design Review Study Meeting Date: March 22, 2021 Request: Application for Commercial Design Review for changes to the front faCade of an existing commercial storefront. Applicant and Business Owner: Lijun He APN: 029-211-260 Architect: Ren Huang, Ren Plus Architects Property Owner: Olive Grove Capital, LP Lot Area: 15,400 SF General Plan: Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan: Burlingame Avenue Commercial District Zoning: BAC Previous Use: Crepe Island (ready-to-eat food shop, considered a retail use) Proposed Use: Tiny Tea (ready-to-eat food shop, considered a retail use) Allowable Use: Ready-to-eat food shop (considered a retail use) is permitted. Summary: The applicant is proposing to replace an existing vacant space, previously Crepe Island, with a new ready-to-eat food shop, Tiny Tea, at 1115 Burlingame Avenue, zoned BAC. Tiny Tea meets the operating criteria of a ready-to-eat food shop, which is considered to be a general retail use and therefore allowed as a permitted use in the BAC District (no Conditional Use Permit required for this type of food establishment). Operating criteria include 1) sells food that is ready to eat at the time of sale, 2) does not contain a full commercial kitchen, 3) contains no more than 150 SF of seating area, and 4) contains no more than 1,000 SF of gross floor area. This application includes changes to the exterior facade of the commercial storefront along Burlingame Avenue, which measures 13'-6" in width. At the front of the building, the existing recessed angled entry, and frameless glass storefront system will be removed. The existing stucco and horizontal decorative bands will remain. There are no changes proposed at the rear of the building. The proposed front elevation consists of a new aluminum and glass storefront system, including a smaller recessed entry, aluminum and glass entry door, bifold window and solid oak window sill. Retail uses located on the first floor within the parking sector of the Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan are exempt from providing off-street parking (CS 25.70.090 (a)). With this application, there is no intensification or change of uses proposed on the ground level. Therefore, no additional off-street parking is required for the proposed retail business. The following application is required: ■ Commercial Design Review for changes to the front faCade of an existing commercial storefront in the BAC Zoning District (CS 25.32.045). Staff comments: None. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for Commercial Design Review as established in Ordinance No. 1652 adopted by the Council on April 16, 2001 are outlined as follows: 1. Support of the pattern of diverse architectural styles that characterize the city's commercial areas; 2. Respect and promotion of pedestrian activity by placement of buildings to maximize commerciat use of the street frontage, off-street public spaces, and by locating parking so that it does not dominate street frontages; Commercial Design Review 1115 Burlingame Avenue 3. On visually prominent and gateway sites, whether the design fits the site and is compatible with the surrounding development; 4. Compatibility of the architecture with the mass, bulk, scale, and existing materials of existing development and compatibility with transitions where changes in land use occur nearby; 5. Architectural design consistency by using a single architectural style on the site that is consistent among primary elements of the structure, restores or retains existing or significant original architectural features, and is compatible in mass and bulk with other structure in the immediate area; and 6. Provision of site features such as fencing, landscaping, and pedestrian circulation that enriches the existing opportunities of the commercial neighborhood. `Amelia Kolokihakaufisi, Associate Planner c. Lijun He, applicant Attachments: Application to the Planning Commission Letter of Explanation from the property owner, dated January 27, 2021 Commercial Application Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed March 12, 2021 Area Map 2 CITY OF BURUNGAME � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD — BURLINGAME, CA 94010 PH: (650} 558-7250 www.burlingame.org Projett Site: 1115 Burlingame Avenue, zoned BAC The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following virtuai public hearing via Zoom on Monday, Mnrch 22, 2021 at 7:00 P.M. You may access the meeting online at www.ioom.us/ioin or by phone at (669) 900-9128: Meeting ID: 944 4756 8587 Passcode: 047005 Description: Application for Commercial Design Review for facade changes to an existing �ommercial huilding. Members of the public may provide written comments by email to: publiccomment d�burlingame.ora. Mailed: March 12, 2021 (Please refer to other side) PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE City of Burlinaame - Public Hearing Notice If you have any questions about this application or woufd like to schedule an appointment to view a hard copy of the application and plans, please send an email to plannin�deptC«�burlingame.ors or call (650j 558-7250. Individuals who require special assistance or a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, or who have a disability and wish to request an alternative format for the agenda, meeting notice, agenda packet or other writings that may be distributed, should contact the Planning Divisian at nlannin�de�t(�burlin�ame.or� or (650) 558-7250 by 10 am on the day of the meeting. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. Kevin Gardiner, AICP Community Development Director �Please refer to other side) 1115 Burlingame Avenue 300' noticing APN #: 029-211-260 ,,� c=� �?0 � 1�9�� :� �� C��35,,y �.�,�� c�� P. `'./� �� : .�� .�� '', „ f7,��. f% •,-�r°� �' :��;� l ��f � �, v;t� C � � ��} �� ' � � � � ,�� c�`� '•� �� 1!� � � �;� �.� �� +4� r �y � i . 1 r �� ) t1'�+`c s�« ",``� � ,i; la' ('� t�( �, � ��" r � r "�` (�_(1 C% �"�` .��, �' i{ `49�4� �y �r � Gf�: � 1 e'+.��y/.^ . �+,, 3 < .� , a.x "�,,. � 6' � Y: � �� ' � ' ,;�.c� . ,,. �r� �f i 4� . � �y ��1 it�i�F :, . . LJ � �� i•.`.: � �� - 4>, a: Rbt `t, ` Y+j .'r'i "� r�`. �� : �. �� / �� `. � �', �� a � � � � �y�� J V .� �' � r �-�., t� � �� ^ 1,1 rl i C% ��,� W V7'V� � �� ; � �f �: "� � 7 �� ;��, �`�' h `'�"�, � �. ��Y�. :;.' City of Burlingame Commercial Design Review Address: 1115 Burlingame Avenue Item No. 8c RegularA�ction Item Meeting Date: April 12, 2021 Request: Application for Commercial Design Review for changes to the front farade of an existing commercial storefront. Applicant and Business Owner: Lijun He APN: 029-211-260 Architect: Ren Huang, Ren Plus Architects Property Owner: Olive Grove Capital, LP Lot Area: 15,400 SF General Plan: Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan: Burlingame Avenue Commercial District Zoning: BAC Previous Use: Crepe Island (ready-to-eat food shop, considered a retail use) Proposed Use: Tiny Tea (ready-to-eat food shop, considered a retail use) Allowable Use: Ready-to-eat food shop (considered a retail use) is permitted. Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 - Existing facilities, Class 1(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances are exempt from environmental review. Sumir�ary: The applicant is proposing to replace an existing vacant space, previously occupied by Crepe Island, with a new ready-to-eat food shop, Tiny Tea, at 1115 Burlingame Avenue, zoned BAC. Tiny Tea meets the operating criteria of a ready-to-eat food shop, which is considered to be a general retail use and therefore allowed as a permitted use in the BAC District (no Conditional Use Permit required for this type of food establishment). Operating criteria include 1) sells food that is ready to eat at the time of sale, 2) does not contain a full commercial kitchen, 3) contains no more than 150 SF of seating area, and 4) contains no more than 1,000 SF of gross floor area. This application includes changes to the exterior facade of the commercial storefront along Burlingame Avenue, which measures 13'-6" in width. At the front of the building, the existing recessed angled entry, and frametess glass storefront system will be removed. The existing stucco and horizontal decorative bands will remain. There are no changes proposed at the rear of the building. The proposed front elevation consists of a new aluminum and glass storefront system, including a smaller recessed entry, aluminum and glass entry door, bifold window and solid oak window sill. Retail uses located on the first floor within the parking sector of the Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan are exempt from providing off-street parking (CS 25.70.090 (a)). With this application, there is no intensification or change of uses proposed on the ground level. Therefore, no additional off-street parking is required for the proposed retail business. The following application is required: ■ Commercial Design Review for changes to the front fa�ade of an existing commercial storefront in the BAC Zoning District (CS 25.32.045). Staff Comments: None. This space intentionally left blank. Commercial Design Review 1115 Burlingame Avenue Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Design Review Study meeting on March 22, 2021, the Commission discussed the proposed project and voted to place this item on the Regular Action calendar when all of the required information has been submitted (see attached March 22, 2021 Planning Commission Ninutes). The following is a summary of the Commission's comments (please refer to the attached March 22, 2021 meeting minutes for additional details): • Like the design but the bifold window and arch window above fills up the stucco space; • Cross piece befinreen arch and bifold window is very thin, would be better if was a muntin or part of the window frame; • Connect the arch and bifold window; and • In support of the project. The applicant implemented the Commission's recommendations and submitted revised plans, dated NYarch 31, 2021 to reflect those changes. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for Commercial Design Review as established in Ordinance No. 1652 adopted by the Council on April 16, 2001 are outlined as follows: 1. Support of the pattern of diverse architectural styles that characterize the city's commercial areas; 2. Respect and promotion of pedestrian activity by placement of buildings to maximize commercial use of the street frontage, off-street public spaces, and by locating parking so that it does not dominate street frontages; 3. On visually prominent and gateway sites, whether the design fits the site and is compatible with the surrounding development; 4. Compatibiliry of the architecture with the mass, bulk, scale, and existing materials of existing development and compatibility with transitions where changes in land use occur nearby; 5. Architectural design consistency by using a single architectural style on the site that is consistent among primary elements of the structure, restores or retains existing or significant original architectural features, and is compatible in mass and bulk with other structure in the immediate area; and 6. Provision of site features such as fencing, landscaping, and pedestrian circulation that enriches the existing opportunities of the commercial neighborhood. Suggested Findings for Design Review: That the aluminum and glass recessed storefront system, stucco siding, and wood detail is consistent with the pattern of diverse architectural styles that characterize the city's commercial areas; that the proposed storefront promotes pedestrian activity by allowing views directly into the business; and that the proposed storefront improvements are consistent with the architectural style and mass and bulk with other structures. For these reasons, the project may be found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review criteria. This space intentionally left blank. �a Commercia/ Design Review 1115 Burlingame Avenue Planning Commission A�ction: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped March 31, 2021, sheets A0.0 through A6.0; 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the building, which would include changing or adding exterior walls or parapet walls, shall require an amendment to this permit; 3. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 4. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Qualiry Management District; 5. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 6. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 7. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; 8. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, in effect at the time of building permit submittal, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOVIANG CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 9. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; and 10. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. 3 Comm ercial Design Re vie w `Amelia Kolokihakaufisi Associate Planner c. Lijun He, applicant Attachments: March 22, 2021 Planning Commission N6nutes Application to the Planning Commission Letter of Explanation from the property owner, dated January 27, 2021 Commercial Application Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed April 2, 2021 Area Map 1115 Burlingame Avenue 4 F, ciTv '`� � ,� I �l �� 1.cQ�� . .:,;1�� e 4rownrEo � City of Burlingame Meeting Minutes Planning Commission BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Monday, March 22, 2021 7:00 PM Online e. 1115 Burlingame Avenue, zoned BAC - Application for Commercial Design Review for facade changes to an existing commercial building. (Lijun He, applicant; Ren Huang, Ren Plus Architects, architect; Olive Grove Capital, LP, property owner) (77 noticed) Staff Contact: 'Amelia Kolokihakaufisi All Commissioners have visited the project site. There were no ex-parte communications to report. Associate Planner Markiewicz provided an overview of the staff report. Quesfions of sfaff.� > There were no questions of staff. Chair Tse opened fhe public hearing. Rena Huang, Ren Plus Architects, represented the applicant wifh property owner Lijun He. Commission Questions/Comments: > I like the bifold window. / see a frame around that opening, but not around the arched opening above . IYs as fhough the glass looks like iYs just running into the stucco. What brought my attention to it is, it looks like the top of the bifold window is framed by something that is stucco. If /ooks like a four-and-a-half inch piece of sfucco across the head of fhe window and no frame in the radius opening in the archway. Is that the case? Can you wa/k us through that? (Huang: So, fhe idea is to use a frame for the bifold window and another frame for the arched window on top. lf you look at the divider between the arch and bifold window, inside fhere is a tube steel in that area. That defines it.) Public Commenfs: > Riyad Salma: l represent the owner of the property. I wanted to voice the support that I have expressed in the letter that I believe most of you should have received. We worked back and forth quite a lot with the applicant over a number of months as they massaged this design. I think they really did a fantastic job. lYs traditional, contemporary and elegant without being overstated and l think it will be a welcoming addition fo the block. We're happy to see the design they came up with and we're looking forward to them opening on the street. Thank you for your consideration. Chair Tse c/osed the public hearing. Commission Discussion/Direction: > As the owner of the building said, I like the understated character of the project. I like the arches . However, there are some architectonics that I'm concerned with. One has to do with the horizontal element between the bifold window and the arched window above. The stucco on the vertical sides of the bifold doesn't bother me too much. Howeve� the four-and-a-half inch piece of stucco is purporting to be something that doesn't make a lot of sense. Stucco is a cementitious material and it has weight. It City of Burlingame page � Printed on 4/2/2021 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 appears that there's a figural image in the background which is the stucco itself. That cross piece behveen the arch and the bifold window is rendered in this architecfonics as a cementitious material that is 4-1/2" wide. It would feel better if that were part of the frame. If there was a frame that filled the entire opening, the bifold and the archway, and that was a muntin or cross piece in the window frame. lYs not paying attention to what stuff ineans in architecture. Other than that, I like its understated nature. But 1 really find that questionable. > I would agree. The header piece, if covered in stucco, is going to crack on either end immediate/y. It needs to set back and you should think about the full arch top to bottom, much like fhe door is rendered. You don't have a cross piece in the door, so they would go together nicely. IYs an opportunity for a little bif of a material to show up like the frame of the bifold, but also show up in the window, because otherwise it can look flat. There are a lot of nice things to say about this project and I would love to see it go forward. > From my experience in insfalling bifold doors, they hang typically from the header. I would encourage the applicant fo check with the engineer and the manufacturer to make sure thaf whatever that header is above the door, it doesn't need to be fhicker because if iYs only 4-1/2", iYs going fo be a piece of 4x4 if it's wood and the door is going fo make that sag. Just a point to be aware of because that may change the whole design. > 1 like the project. I agree with the detail issues that my fellow Commissioners have broughf up. I like the sort of lemon yellow thaYs been identified for the bifold door and fhe frame. The soft yellow color sitting there wil! be really pretty in that facade. It wou/d really hang together nice/y if it were all one uniform piece. Even that cross piece can be the same yellow color with a cap piece over if. They've identified a three-and-a-half by iwo-and-a-half stee/ tube as fhe header that my fellow Commissioner was ta/king about. It tells me that they are trying to get the stucco attached to fhat, you're just trying to glue stucco on like it is clay. By the time you get screens or something you're attaching to, if really wants to be a part of that frame and part of that window system. Wth all that said, iYs a nice project and a good locafion for it. It will be nice to see something come back to that location. IYs a nice little storefront fhe way it humbly sits into what we have now. The project should move fonvard. > It's a great little project for that part of the street, so I could support the project. Vice-Chair Terrones made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Comaroto, to place the item on the Regular Action Calendar when the application has been revised as directed. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 7- Sargent, Comaroto, Terrones, Tse, Gaul, Loftis, and Schmid City of Bur�ingame paye y Printed on 4/2/2021 PLANNlNG APPLICATION '�"��u, �!"'�� C4MMi�IVIiY DEVEL�3PA�ENT DEPARTMENT—PLANNING t31VI�ICiN 5D1 PRIMROSE ROAD, 2ND FLOOR, BURLINGAME, CA 94010-3997 TEL: 650.558.7250 � FAX: 650.696.3790 � E-MAIL: PLANNINGDEPT(�a,BURLiNGAME.ORG Z O F= Q � � a � F- � w � 0 � n. 1115 Burlingame Ave Buriingame, CA, 94010 PROJECT ADDRESS PROJECT DESCRIPTION 029-211-260 ___ �__ __,_ __ __ .. _._.__._.�_.__. �. �. Commercial� _.__._._ ..................�.._.�.. _......._.........._�� ...................._.........._.... A5SESSOR'S PARCEL # (APN► ZONING The _proposed project,,wou;id,,,,replace,the current_storefrontglass,window,_re.p.lace,._the,,,logo._on.__th_e,,,,,,,., signage band, touch up the white paint on the fa�ade, and renovate 651 SF of the 974 SF interior , , P pa , yar . Lijun He 1999 Beach Park Bivd, Unit 19, Foster City, CA, 94404 __._. _... _ ............._........ _ _....__._............ _ ._. ...._... _..._...._..._.._.......................................... ...... PROPERTY OWNER NAME Q APPLICANT? ADDRESS 213-44&-8288 phillip.he@haulicedv.com PHONE E•MAIL ----��--�---^— �—� Ren Huang 4T1 26th st apt.Z09 Oakiand,CA 94612 ARCHITECTIDESIGNER APPLICANT? ADDRESS 510-590-2135 rhuang@renplus.com PHONE E-MAIL BURL(NGAME BUStNESS LICENSE # ,. ,.__. .._., _ ......., «_�...,.._._.. ..,..e ........... , _., _ _...._ _. �._.._ _.... "FOR PROJECT REFUNDS* - Piease provide an address to which to aU refund checks wiil be mailed to: � O N 4 .� C� O �i z N z a � J a a Q AJ Food Holdings, Inc. NAME 1999 Beach Park Blvd, Unit 19, Foster Ciry, CA, 94404 ADQRESS � Z � � ua z � O � Q f- > 4 � � LL Q I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE INFORMAT�ON GIVEN HEREIN IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BEIIEF. � 1 /23l2021 APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE (IF DIFFERENT FROM PROPERTY OWNER) DATE I AM AWARE OF THE PROPOSED APPLICATtON AND HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE ABOVE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT THIS APPLICATION TO THE PLANNIN COMMIS /DIVISIdN. 1 /25/21 PRO OWNER'S SIGNRTURE DATE �,H,.� _.... . ,....._ — _ _._ . ..�� <�,,,,, ,� ... ............__ .�,�,�—,�„ ,»� ,�,,�� ' AUTHORIZATIC}N TO REPRODUCE PLANS �p.m,�p�� ', I HEREBY GRANT THE CITY OF BURUNGAME THE AUTHORITY TO REPRODUCE UPON REQUEST ANO/OR PQST PLANS SUBMITTED WITH THIS ', APPLICATION ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE AS PART OF THE PLANNING APPROVAL PROCESS AND WAIVE ANY CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY ARISING ', OUT OF OR RELATED TO SUCH ACTION zfh (INITIALS OF ARCHITECTIDESIGNER► � Z O w � � LL � � � APPLICATION TYPE ❑ ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU) ❑ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) �DESIGN REVIEW (DSR) ❑ HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT ❑ MINOR MODIFICATION ❑ SPECIAL PERMIT fSP) ❑ VARIANCE (VAR) ❑ WIRELESS ❑ FENCE EXCEPTION ❑ OTHER:____________ DATE RECEIVED: ___...__� � �_m,___,..__,.�__,._,,.� _.,, ��,�� !�";l`� � � C�Li �;:�i��Y C3� �;�Rl_!N�'�!`.�11�=� ;;,�,`�,,;,��;ri �„',L � ��;y�.p>_, . � � A � -n C Cn rn O � r � January 27, 2021 Burlingame Planning Commission 501 Primrose Ave Burlingame, CA 94010 Re: 1115 Burlingame Avenue Tiny Tea - Fa�ade improvements Dear Commissinners, i am writing to share the (andlord's support of the applicant's propased project at 1115 Burlingame Avenue. Until about 2005, 1115 and 1117 Burlingame were a single combined space. Some of you may remember "lona", which was the fast business to operate in that corrrbined lacation. Following the departure of lona, the space was split in half to be shared by two retailers, a shoe store and a women's boutique. The fa�ade of 1115 Burlingame Avenue, the subject of the application currently under consideration, was designed to suit the unique needs of that specific retailer, a shoe store tf�at displayed shoes in those narrow window recesses. What worked we(I for that bygone use is now simply an awkward inefficiency that today's businesses cannot afford to maintain. This is particularly true for this camparatively narrow fa�ade which is only about eleven feet wide. A variety of factars were important to the Eandlord when reviewing this submittal. The new design must be modern yet acknowledge and enhance the charm of the building and Avenue. It must complement but not compete with its immediate neighbors. Lastly, it must incorporate some of the difficult lessons we have learned over the past twelve months in regard to the impact of architecture on the health of a building's occupants and a business's economics. The Tiny Tea team exceeded our expectatians. Their modern design incorporates traditional elements that will showcase the business's offerings while enhancing the building's overall appearance. The operabie windows attract attention from passersby, improve ventilation and, should the need arise, offer operationai opportunities for processing take-out orders. We hope you will agree that the Tiny Tea design is an attractive and functional improvement for the Avenue and that you will approve their application without delay. Sincerely, �'—�� Riyad Salma On behalf of Olive Grove Capital, LP. Community Development Dept. ■ 501 Primrose Road • Burlingame, CA 94010 • P:650.558.7250 • F:650.696.3790 • www.burlinqame.orq eunt r�sar�c COMMERCIAL APPLICATION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION SUPPLEMENTAL FORM 1. Proposed use of the site boba tea shop 2. Days and hours of operation � days a week; 12pm-8:30pm 3. Number of trucks/service vehicles to be parked at site (by type) 4. Current and projected maximum number of employees (including owner) at this location: ,r r� i� �i�iey � /i � 9�"�Ci�y/'�/'��ii��iii?(i��-..�4i/�ii � ' r �Gi /� : !�' ,� /'� i � y y / // l i�/// ��,�'�� °Hr 9i� r rr� � i" /a i� 9 �: �u f yi/i� ,'�d . ,, �/�// � �/sU//i�,r�i/'��/��'��% %�� ,. �� i�/%��.v �////7�19y��i//��!��'�v%�i, ; /i . . �� ' G / ', y � ' / / � �` � �/�� ,/ ii., % � .,v„` .r d,,: / ii. ,�. //. .,/. � i�//6 i��/%!%��j r% .. .. /i�. . .._ '/„�.��H .. .%y � ....: .f/// G.�� — __. — :�— . <i/..,.,... .. , iiig,. .. • � •__ _—'_-- _ • "_ - • _ II ��' � � � • � � • � � � � �•� � � � � �•� i � ' ,� . I - I � • I I • • I I � - � I �—_______ —_— --� 5. Current and projected maximum number of visitors/customers who may come to the site: 6. What is the maximum number of people expected on site at any one time (include owner, employees and visitors/customers): 30 7. Where do/will the owner and employees park� Street parking 8. Where do/will the customers/visitors park? Street Parking 9. Present or most recent use of site Cafe 10. List other tenants on property, their number of employees, hours of operation (attach a list if more room is needed) Commercial Application.doc RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for Commercial Desiqn Review for changes to the front fa�ade of an existinq commercial buildina at 1115 Burlinqame Avenue, Zoned BAC, Olive Grove Capital, LP, propertv owner, APN: 029-211-260; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on Aprii 12, 2021, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Section 15301 - Existing facilities, Class 1(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances are exempt from environmenta� review, is hereby approved. 2. Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review is set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of April, 2021 by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review 1115 Burlingame Avenue Effective April 22, 2021 Page 1 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped March 31, 2021, sheets A0.0 through A6.0; 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the building, which would include changing or adding exterior walls or parapet walls, shall require an amendment to this permit; that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 4. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Councit on appeal; that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, in effect at the time of building permit submittal, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 9. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; and 10. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. CITY OP BURLINGAME GOMMUNITI� DEVELOPMENT D�PARTMEN7 BU�i,.(I+�CAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAQ �- BURLINGAME, CA 94010= ` PN:(650�558-7250 www.burlingame.org Project Site: 1115 Burlingome Avenue, zoned BAC The City of Burlingame Planning 'Commission onnounces the following virtual pu6lie hearing via Zoom on Monday, April 12, 2021 at 7:00 P.M. You may access the meeting PUBLIC HEARI'NG online at www.zuam.us/ipin or by phone at (6b9) 900-912& NCiTICE ' Meeting ID: 971649U 1121 Passcode: 412262 Description: Applicatiun for Commercial Design Review for ' ; ; facade changes to an ezisting commerqal buildi�g. Members af the pu6lic may provide written comments by ema'rl ' to: publiaomment(c�burlin,game org; �tailed: April 2, 2021 ° ' (Please refer to other side) 'If you have any Rianningdep� lndividuals wh accommadatioi request an alte writings that eity af Burlin�crr»e - P , questians �bout this a' wr� €tard ��p��r �af tl�e �{��r in�*a�e:or� ur C��i��r5{�� ; If you challenge ih� �ubject app(icatian those issues you or so�rreone else raise+ or in written correspc��d��ice deliveretl Property owners who re�etve this notii about this nntice. K ' � d' `ic Hearin�Notice . , ��it�r' �tt' woul�! like to schedule - an tic�rt�a�#� plans, pl��se send an email to n 71"�0. � �' �. � � d�s�bt[ity-relat�d modificatian or or who have � disability and wish to . �leetin� r�ati,ce, a�enda packet or other contact fhe Planning Diuision at >A-�� 10 am on the..d�r c�f the rneeting. city at or p evm ar iner, AICP Gommunity Develapmant Director nay be lirnitetl to raising anly �ring, de��ribed in #he notice �ir�r to the"pi�iilic hearing. � for inft�rmin� their tenants rPlease refer to other sirleJ 1115 Burlingame Avenue 300' noticing APN #: 029-211-260 _ ,� � ��?C � � � g ,�,. � t?:�i ��'�� '�� ' !��-' � • ��3 �'� ��;'"" ;� �� `�{� ��P� � ��:; i% � � �.. �'� �;�� '�r: f%„•y�- � �'.a v�' ,r•;,5 . ��. �i c�'�'r .:. '� C :;�,�� , � t:_,; � ��_. �'� ��, � � � "a�, , � �. �� " ��.° t;''� �� ti ��v ��^�,,� � ,s? �'��' / � ^ �, �� F ` �1:� �{�}l�� k_�� `7.'1� � i . . I� � �°�� L! � (./ � Q � �i.�� , f�� .� ,�. .�?,� � r � ,� "�,� C•C��' F�.,�,5.,�.; �� + , �' �`� � �� :�.. �� . ,i � f � G ;V �� `"� � ` �� ., .�. ��. _, ;� ,� \ � ``_ ." . "r :�, `~f / '� �'`., ��. � . r;, r, �� a- ► L,f j � tF� : � �''� � � i �� 7 �� '�, �� -�,, � . a �,� �7 � t`:�� L( �� - a