HomeMy WebLinkAbout1350 Bayshore Highway - ApplicationBURLINC�AME
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • SO1 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010
p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org
APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Type of application:
❑ Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Parcel #: DZ �' I �3 - So(�
❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit � Other:,¢om��� srn-µr: �r �E�'-Pw
PROJECT ADDRESS: /.3SU �.aLjlSf,i�.�� l�sq/7,,�,,..y�.� ,t��� L�ti�.�,n e C_� D� -it �-so�
O Please indicate the contact person for this project
APPLICANT project contact persony� PROPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑
OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑
<��.qy�e ,�l..�rifr%.�cia"�J To�IJ I/�ri� 7'�t�iP </
Name: ��,��s�Y ��� r�,�ti- �o��,Ts Name: ��--o.�.�e r�,���,az� ���-,��.�.r�,��
�
Address: /l6 �' L�-��i� /,��
City/State/Zip: ���.4;, ��- 9�5�-�
-Tsv,�c�� - ��7-37�-�y4f:
Phone: L?G��1s r� - y�., _�, �- z, Z�
Fax:
E-mail
'�P.,y-i��c' � -'7/fE C/.i2 E'�vf'_ � M
ARCHITECT/DESIGNER project contact person ❑
OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑
Address: i3� B-�/���`da� �%i��'�`/
City/State/Zip: 6���� ����-� � , �✓f
Phone: �! r'., I� <��`,3v ��
Fax:
E-mail: Tti'/3t7k T�=�G C I�"i�r ` r�'s � Cow
Name: Dr�N� c'7Ps��..� �.Cr��i° 7.� e. �,Au�,c� �0 �l..o,ec�:r E�c_
Address: ��� � T��'� ��'�� ����
City/State/Zip: -�4fr1 �-e��s �q,s���; c�a ;�y�;
Phone: �'d s - .s�l�- 9 �t � � � � � � " a � �
�. ,
Fax:
E-mail: S/Yiciv�rz o.��s,c,v � �o�
�k Burlingame Business License #: � 79� �
�\UG �4�` "l_Oic
CITY ��__ ��.'f��_�NGAiVIE
CGi�-P�i�!iv;(�;U DiU
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:ie��:,� � C3 ) �� " �71�Pe�`���'-�/w��'"c- /ati�G''NNA- �-�uJ 2E ' ���,�z �e���o.��,a,�
iE��cr.i„�*=� i9n-y'.�.�.�,�d
AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I her ¢ertify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the
best of my knowledge and belie .
ApplicanYs signature: c��i-�-�-- Date: d'' `�-� �-
I am aware of the pro s�pplication and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning
Commission.
Property owner's signature: �' � �'�
Date: � �' -�z-
Date submitted: U��' � 2"
yt Verification that the project architect/designer has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the
Finance Department at the time application fees are paid.
❑ Please mark one box above with an X to indicate the contact person for this project. S:�Handouts�PC Application 2oo8-B.handout
e{1RLI+�pI�1+1[
COIi8111UNITY DEVELQPMENT DEPARTNEt�ET' + 501 PRIMROSE ROAD � Bt1RLINGAME, CA 94Q18
p: 650.558.7250 • f: 550.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org
APPLICATION TCf THE PLANNING C4MMISSION
Type of appllcation:
O Design Rev�ew C7 Variance ❑ Parcel #:
❑ Conditionai Use Permit ❑ Specia! Perrnit � Uther. ,¢rim�.-� � n��: � z„,�'h, F�. t•--� ___
PROJEC7 ADDRESS: /�SG� �.��I.Sr�c:�c6 .�s q/� u,.,g�1 �,t3 •� L..� l.es,� e C_a c�.� - i� .�-sa �, .,
C� Please indfcate the cantact person for this projed
APPL.ICANT proJaet contact per8on� PROPERTY OWMER
project wntact psrson p
WC to send electronlc coples of documentt� ❑ OK to send electronic capies af docamenb O
<�e4r--� :/-l..t�e:l��.:���: TC.(JJ_I i1s�ri- �esc7'Pe/
Name: C��sry ;r�c� rK°.��: �c,��� _ Name: �:.�--c�,va. r,�y�.���� �?.,�;�.��sN,.�
Address: /! d b' L.��r� w�sy
CitylState/Zip: �%��?�9-� �'� 9ys��� ��
-�e�r - 7�7-�T�-�Y��a.
Phone: Cl�,�'is T� - y,,r-�c �-a � z 3
Fax: '
-r1�.-7-.-� �� ��ic. t�'/�� C'�:��. �....ar�
E-mail:
ARCHITECT1DESiGNER projsct coMact person ❑
OK to send eleclronic copies ai documents O
Address: �3s� Z��s��b,C.� f1„�d��f
City/State2ip: 1�',,e �- -�g.�•k f , �•� -- -
Phane: �/S- - �c ���-_3c J�c.
Fax:
E-mal I: �"'�' �3 c�k i rL � 5'+tiPr F:,�s ,��,�
Name: d��� �es. .�.. ��c���° >� c. a��,v A�z.a,er� E-c�
Address: �'�' y i�+ti� .r.;���x ;.�4,�,�
CiiylState/Zip: �i- �t,a.s �.�.S�J� c�a �';r�� _
Phone: �� 5`�._ 3��- 9`�r.� �,
Fax:
E-ma91: S�C���� �� ���=s.�� , P�� �
* Burfingame Business License #: � �9� 7
� � ����� � ��
�'�UG - 9 2��:T_
i;f-� '�' �+� BUFiIJNGAME
�;;��j_�-�; q��;�s�iG UIV,
PROJECT DESCRIPTlON:�X1ii..� �r ��} : � •• U����7`ie..:.a.1k,,.t�c- /,+.�.. tc�.v�.v. Y�tl1 �E •, /j�.� �e �`.o.v�a/
lZlr��:u�,.r�-t- �j �`.a,el.e%�FJ
AFFADAViTlSIGNATURE: I her� �ertiiy under penaity of perjury thaf the information given herein is #rue and correct to the
hest of my knowledge and belie�! / "�
Applicar�'ssignature: G�z�-�--- Date: �'-`��� �-
I am aware af the pro , se�application and hereby authorize the abo�e applicant to s�bmit this application to the Planning
Commission. --
Prvperty owner's signature: ^�� r" '4'� Date: ��' -��
Da#e sabmitked:
�t Verification that the project arci�itectldesigner has a valid Burltngame busin�ss license will be required by the
Finance DepartmeM at the time application fees are paid.
[] Please mark one hox abave with an X to indicate tt�e contact persoo for this project S:�HandoutslPC Application 2008-B.handout
Letter of Authorization
To: City of Burlingame
50] Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
Re: Application for Permit
CA-ONE BAY PLAZA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Delaware limited partnership
("Owner") is the owner of the property located at 1350 Bayshore Highway, Burlingame,
California (the "Property"). GTP Towers I, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
("GTP") has entered into a Master Lease Agreement with Owner dated April 28, 2008 (a
"Master Lease AgreemenY'), pursuant to which GTP has the right to license certain
portions of the Property to third parties for the purpose of installing and operating
telecommunications equipment. MetroPCS California, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company ("Prospective Licensee"), is investigating the possibility of entering into an
agreement with GTP (a "License Agreement") pursuant to which Prospective Licensee
would so license from GTP certain portions of the Property for such purpose. Owner
acknowledges that, prior to installing and/or using such telecommunications facility at the
Property, applicable law may require that Prospective Licensee apply for and obtain a
permit or other governmental agency approval. As of the date hereof, Owner does not
object to Prospective Licensee pursuing such permit and/or other approvals from the City
of Burlingame; provided, however, that, (1) Prospective Licensee shall not be permitted
to construct and/or use any such telecommunications facility on the Property unless a
License Agreement is entered into pursuant to the Master Lease Agreement and any such
facility is constructed and used in accordance with the Master Lease Agreement and (2)
Prospective Licensee is not authorized to act as Owner's agent or otherwise impose legal
obligations upon Owner, Owner's interest in the Property or the Property.
Signature of Owner:
CA-ONE BAY PLAZA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Delaware limited partnership
By: EOP Owner GP I"�L.C.y'�Delaw,A�e limited liability company, its general partner
gY. � �, i -�-._
Name:
Title: arou agopian
�a,s� ,�...: �'�.'�,, r. -
Date: ��,����'����
AUG - 9 20iZ
CITY C)F �! IRI_lRIGAME
'":::�,_ , _ti,i,,�na��..ir� 3J�V
('A-0298 One Bay Plaza - MetroPCS California
8� ��� �1S ����� ���
� ��
i;', i:,� ,f ,; u 1:�
TOWER / STRUCTURE / EQUIPMENT g ;- ;.:.;:^' ;-;.,.
".ia F '-..��" � .,i� i.�.n��� �6:�Yii:��
REMOVAL BOND
Location of tower/structure/equipment:
Site Name & Address:
1350 Bayshore Highway
Burlingame, CA
Site#: SF0070
Bond Number: 022041229
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
THAT MetroPCS Wireless, Inc., as Principal, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a
corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Massachu�etts as Surety, are held and firmly
bound unto City of Burlingame, California, as Obligee, the penal sum of
---Six Thousand 8� 00/100---Dollars ($6,000.00) for the payment of which, well and truly to be made, we
bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly
by these presents, the liability of the surety being limited to the penal sum of this bond regardless of the
number of years the bond is in effect.
WHEREAS, the Principal has entered into a written agreement with the property owner for the
placement of a tower, structure or equipment furnishing telephone, television or other electronic media
service, which agreement sets forth the terms and conditions which govern the use of such towers,
structures or equipment and which agreement is hereby specifically referred to and made part hereof, and
WHEREAS, City of Burlingame, CA (city/county ordinance and/or property owner), requires the
submission of a bond guaranteeing the maintenance, replacement, removal or relocation of said tower,
NOW THEREFORE, the condition of this obligation is such, that if the above bounden Principal
shall perform in accordance with the aforesaid ordinance and/or agreement, and indemnify the Obligee
against all loss caused by Principal's breach of any ordinance or agreement relating to the maintenance,
replacement, removal or relocation of a tower, structure or equipment, then this obligation to be void,
otherwise to remain in full force and effect unless cancelled as set forth below.
THIS BOND may be cancelled by Surety by giving thirty (30) days written notice to the Obligee by
registered mail. Such cancellation shall not affect any liability the surety has incurred under this bond
prior to the effective date of the termination,
PROVIDED that no action, suit or proceeding shall be maintained against the Surety on this bond
unless the action is brought within twelve (12) months of the cancellation date of this bond.
SIGNED this 6th day of December, 2012 and to be effective December 6, 2012.
Principal: MetroPCS Wireless, Inc.
Surety: Lib utuallns anc Comp y
By:
Davi Ward, orney-in-Fac
THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY IS NOT VALID UNLESS IT IS PRINTED ON RED BACKGROUND. SO 141 SS
, This Power of Attorney limits the acts of those named herein, and they have no authority to bind the Company except in the manner and to the
• exteR:�herein stated.
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
BOSTON,MASSACHUSETTS
POWER OF ATTORNEY
Bond No. 022041229
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (the "Company"), a Massachusetts stock insurance company,
pursuant to and by authority of the By-law and Authorization hereinafter set forth, does hereby name, constitute and appoint DAVID B. WARD,
SHARYL A. MARKOVITS, ALL OF THE CITY OF FRISCO, STATE OF TEXAS .................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................
, each individually if there be more than one named, its true and lawful attorney-in-fact to make, execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver, for and on its
behalf as surety and as its act and deed, any and ail undertakings, bonds, recognizances and other surety obligations in the penal sum not exceeding
ONE HUNDRED MILLION AND 00/100"'*"**"'""""•**'«"'""`""""'*""""'""�""""""""""'+"" DOLLARS ($ 100,000,000.00"""'*"""""""""" ) each, and the
execution of such undertakings, bonds, recognizances and other surety obligations, in pursuance of these presents, shall be as binding upon the Company
as if they had been duly signed by the president and attested by the secretary of the Company in their own proper persons.
That this power is made and executed pursuant to and by authority of the following By-law and Authorization:
Y N
d
a�
�o
�.i L
� �
� �
� �
v �
o�
� �
d
� �
— �
�
� �N
O �
d O
��
c`
ai .r
� �
�1 �
C +�
EY
O L
a�
> N
� L
Z :.i
ARTICLE XIII - Execution of Contracts: Section 5. Surety Bonds and Undertakings. �
Any officer of the Company authorized for that purpose in writing by the chairman or the president, and subject to such limitations as the
chairman or the president may prescribe, shall appoint such attorneys-in-fact, as may be necessary to act in behalf of the Company to make, N
execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver as surety any and all undertakings, bonds, recognizances and other surety obligations. Such attorneys- _
in-fact, subject to the limitations set forth in their respective powers of attorney, shall have full power to bind the Company by their signature and
execution of any such instruments and to attach thereto the seal of the Company. When so executed such instruments shall be as binding as if �
signed by the president and attested by the secretary. �
By the following instrument the chairman or the president has authorized the officer or other official named therein to appoint attorneys-in-fact:
Pursuant to Article XI I I, Section 5 of the By-Laws, David M. Carey, Assistant Secretary of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, is hereby authorized
to appoint such attorneys-in-fact as may be necessary to act in behalf of the Company to make, execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver as surety
any and all undertakings, bonds, recognizances and other surety obligations.
That the By-law and the Authorization set forth above are true copies thereof and are now in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Power of Attorney has been subscribed by an authorized officer or official of the Company and the corporate seal of Liberty
Mutual Insurance Company has been affixed thereto in Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania this day of isth day of November ,
2011
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
By � , l
David M. Carey, Assistant Secretary
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ss
COUNTY OFMONTGOMERY
On this �sth day of November 2011 , before me, a Notary Public, personally came David M. Carev, to me known, and
acknowledged that he is an Assistant Secretary of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company; that he knows the seal of said corporation; and that he executed
the above Power of Attorney and affixed the corporate seal of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company thereto with the authority and at the direction of said
corporation.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed my notarial seal at Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania, on the day and year
first above written.
- BY
�/�.�� ��2^��
' � � —� Teresa Pastella, Notary Public
CERTIFICATE
I, the undersigned, Assistant Secretary of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, do hereby certify that the original power of attorney of which the foregoing is
a full, true and correct copy, is in full.force and effect on the date of this certificate; and I do further certify that the officer or official who executed the said
power of attorney is an Assistant Secretary specially authorized by the chairman or the president to appoint attorneys-in-fact as provided in Article XIII,
Section 5 of the By-laws of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company.
This certificate and the above power of attorney may be signed by facsimile or mechanically reproduced signatures under and by authority of the following
vote of the board of directors of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company at a meeting duly called and held on the 12th day of March, 1980.
VOTED that the facsimile or mechanically reproduced signature of any assistant secretary of the company, wherever appearing upon a certified
copy of any power of attorney issued by the company in connection with surety bonds, shall be valid and binding upon the company with the
same force and effect as though manually affixed.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the corporate seal of the said company, this 6� day of
December , 2012.
Gregory W�Davenport, Assistant Secretary
C
� O
vy
�'W
a�
c
`oa
r
Q M
O�
C`� C
3 �°
O �
a�
No
ro
w�
O C
� �
�v 3
'� d
>�
y o
�
��
� N
� �
C �i
vo
��
�
September 24, 2012
Mr. Ruben Hurin
Senior Planner
City of Burlingame
Burlingame, C
�_.:.... i. .,. . .,.. . _ ... ..., � ✓ -: - t ; t .
� . � 6�
RE: Proposed Metro PCS Application at 1350 Bayshore Highway, Burlingame (Metro Site SF0070)
Dear Mr. Hurin:
This letter serves to address the attached letter requesting that application include additional items. Each item
is addressed below in order for Burlingame to deem the proposed project application complete:
1. On 8Y� x 11 paper, provide the name, address, phone number, email address of:
a. The owner of the proposed facility;
Property Owner: CA-One Bay Plaza Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited
partnership, as successor to the original Licensor, EOP-One Bay Plaza Limited
Partnership,
Property Manager: CA-One Bay Plaza Limited Partnership, c/o Equity Office, 2655
Campus Drive, Suite 100, San Mateo, CA 94403, Attn: Natalia Morales, Senior Property
Manager , Email: Natalia Morales@equityoffice.com or 1-877-367-0006.
b. The applicant if different than owner;
Christy Beltran Roberts, The CBR Group, 1168 Larkin Way, Napa, CA 94558, authorized
agent representing Metro PCS, (TenanfiJ, on behalf of the proposed project
installation. Christy@TheCBRGroup.com or 415-806-2323
c. Any proposed service provider tenant.
Metro PCS (TenantJ
2. Provide a clear written description of the proposed Facility that includes the number of antennas, the
location and length of fiber/cable, the location and dimensions of all related equipment (cabinets,
generators, batteries, cooling, transmitters, hubs etc.); such written description shall provide how this
Facility relates to the overall wireless network for the carrier(s) it is servicing as well as how this Facility
relates to other wireless Facility projects in process of being constructed and/or planned in or near the
City of Burlingame.
Proposed project entails installing seven (7J microwave dish antenna on existing rooftop penthouse
and adding eight (8) 3/8" fiber line, each ranging between 70' to 85', running from proposed
microwave dish location to fihe existing equipment located building, through existing conduit. The
antenna will be painted to match. Please see attached drawings and photo simvlations that depict
,:�,,. � � . ., : , ,. . : . . � K_ r
� .. 1. � -
Christy@TheCBRGroup.com . ` ° 41 . 6.�� 3 "- ." �, , ., � " ` . ;, , 'uninryw: "e dC�p.COAY '" ` �
, �} �"'
� Fra�'I'�+,�_ �I.,` .. . .
n
. . ..: ^Y c �:•,�{sri� �.'e�„�:l.�:U 3._..-�, .,, e � .,,.' .su:"-1` � .� .. .,�- ::..i_..�'l.� , t.....1: . r� .u_.w..... . . � . .. � . ..
the location of proposed MW dish on the existing building. The proposed Directional antennas on
this site will link this site to the sites listed below. This Each Directional antenna network will increase
bandwidth and increase data transmission speeds for all of the following linked sites:
• SF0901 - 1 101 Helen Drive, Millbrae.
• SF0520 - 1699 EI Camino Real, Millbrae
• SF0069 - 1341 Skyview Drive, Burlingame
• SF0076 - 400 S. EI Camino Real, San Mateo
• SF0068 - 400 Hillcrest Drive, Millbrae
• SF0902 - 1801 Murchison Drive, Burlingame
• SF0081 - 2929 Campus Drive, San Mateo.
3. Provide a map identifying the applicant's existing and planned Wireless Communications Facilities
within city limits. The map shall include an illustration of the estimated coverage area (search area) for
all existing and proposed Wireless Communication Facility sites for the applicant and/or service provider
and shall include an explanation of how the proposed Wireless Communication Facility fits into the
individual service provider's network of existing and proposed Wireless Communication Facility sites
within a tentative 2-year plan.
Forfhcoming....
4. Provide an explanation of the Wireless Communication Facility site selection process including
information about other sites, which were considered, the reasons for the rejection of other sites, the
reason that this particular facility is required to cover a gap in service, and the reason why the gap in
service cannot be covered with another location or another technology.
The microwave upgrade will provide an alternative data connection for the new Metro PCS LTE
network (as opposed to using AT�T fiber network, a competitor in wireless services). Microwave
dish installations are point to point (meaning one dish talks to another dish, at another IocationJ,
providing a wireless data link from one cell site to the next. At a hub site (multiple dishes
insfialledJ, the end link of the microwave connects to the Internet, by way of Ethernet
connection (Ethernet connection is what the microwave link ultimately providers to the cell site).
The microwave system does not communicate with cell phones. It does not add, reduce,
change, or alter the coverage or emissions from the cellular antennas. Therefore, any coverage
maps, alternative siting analysis, radius maps will not change from before the upgrade to
after. As for alternative a siting, the purpose of the microwave install is to provide the Ethernet
connection to the existing cell site, to supporf future data services. It simply needs to be located
where the existing site is today, as an accessory to the existing site.
This microwave antenna installation is parf of Metro PCS's upgrade to the greater San Mateo
county service area and is interconnected, site to site, to many ofiher locations (cell sitesJ.
5. BMC.25.77.090 requires that wall- mounted facilities be flush mounted, i.e. not extending from the face
of the building more than twenty four (24) inches. Several of the proposed Microwave antennas extend
� �� � . i�
,i; �i.c w'c�'�...;� 'a _ � .. . . , �
. . . .. ..a>.=;.. , .f; . ,. .:.. � .
. . . � -. . , . .<-. - -. � � . - ..:-. � , u. �aa: �. � .. :....� .. ..... . . . . . . .: .
more than 24 inches from the face of the wall. Please redesign to comply or submit a detailed
explanations why it is not reasonable feasible to comply with the criteria.
All proposed Directional antennas will be mounted as close to the face of the wall as is
possible. However, in some cases due to the azimuth angle in relation the walls, it will not be
possible to comply with the 24" requirement. Plans have been revised to show dimensions that
the directional antennas protrude out from the face of the walls. Antenna placements were
based on Line-of-sight surveys to the connecting sites, and availability of clear space around the
existing antennas.
Please call or email me if you have questions, comments or require more information. I may be reached at
415-806-2323.
Sincerely,
Christy Beltran Roberts
The CBR Group
Authorized Agent Representing MetroPCS
M1etf0 PCS If1C Caverage Legn�d
4G Cov�rage in Burligname for ■��� y�
ngineering c�+e� c�nn�n �.,.� ccnon�
a���;�:t
r
n
Radio Frequency — Electromagnetic Energy (RF-EME)
Compliance Report
Prepared for:
MetroPCS
1080 Marina Village Parkway
4th Floor
Alameda, CA 94501
Site No. SF0070
Equity Bay Plaza
Burlingame, California 94010
San Mateo County
37.594700; - I 22.364000 NAD83
rooftop
EBI Project No. 62122844
July 23, 2012
.a.. ....._
MGO i0
AC! N� .R
�/�pptC �TII ,YJ�
N v
U
C O N� U l_ 'I' I N G
Creating Volue for Yotrr Business
�EBI 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346
� ,��i�%��
�aUG - 9 2012
;I"�' �� pi,;��_���t�,:r:�F
. ,_ _ -. _ _ ;,'; i
RF-EME Compliance Report
EBI Project No. 62122844
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Purpose of Report
Site No. SF0070
1350 Bayshore Hwy, Burlingame, California
EnviroBusiness Inc. (dba EBI Consulting) has been contracted by MetroPCS to conduct radio frequency
electromagnetic (RF-EME) modeling for MetroPCS Site SF0070 located at 1350 Bayshore Hwy in
Burlingame, California to determine RF-EME exposure levels from existing and proposed MetroPCS
wireless communications equipment at this site. As described in greater detail in Section I I.0 of this
report, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has developed Maximum Permissible Exposure
(MPE) Limits for general public exposures and occupational exposures. This report summarizes the
results of RF-EME modeling in relation to relevant FCC RF-EME compliance standards for limiting
human exposure to RF-EME fields.
This report contains a detailed summary of the RF EME analysis for the site.
This document addresses the compliance of MetroPCS's proposed transmitting facilities independently
and in relation to all collocated facilities at the site.
r , , � ,.x� {
�ti �. i s ��a
, '���� � ��
�EBI 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346
�,UG - 9 2Ci2
i�! : Y �i= BUR�_INGAME
CGu-I�lANNIIVG DIV.
RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. SF0070
EBI Project No. 62122844 1350 Bayshore Hwy, Burlingame, California
I.O LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING ANTENNAS AND FACILITIES AND EXISTING RF LEVELS
This project involves the installation of seven (7) MetroPCS microwave dishes on a rooftop located at
1350 Bayshore Hwy in Burlingame, California. There are also six (6) MetroPCS wireless
telecommunication panel antennas on the rooftop. There are three Sectors (A, B, and C) of panel
antennas existing at the site, with two (2) antennas that are installed per sector.
Based on the drawings and aerial photography review there is one other collocated carrier on the
rooftop.
2.0 LOCATION OR ALL APPROVED �BUT NOT INSTALLED� ANTENNAS AND FACILITIES AND
EXPECTED RF LEVELS FROM THE APPROVED FACILITIES
There are no antennas or facilities that are approved and not installed based on information provided to
EBI and MetroPCS at the time of this report.
3.0 NUMBER AND TYPES OF WTS WITHIN I 00 FEET OF THE PROPOSED SITE AND
ESTIMATES OF CUMULATIVE EMR EMISSIONS AT THE PROPOSED SITE
With the exception of the antennas mentioned in Section I.O, there are no other Wireless
Telecommunication Service (WTS) sites observed within 100 feet of the proposed site.
4.0 LOCATION AND NUMBER OF THE METROPCS ANTENNAS AND BACK-UP FACILITIES PER
BUILDING AND NUMBER AND LOCATION OF OTHER TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES
ON THE PROPERTY
This project involves the installation of seven (7) MetroPCS microwave dishes on a rookop located at
1350 Bayshore Hwy in Burlingame, California. There is proposed to be two microwave dishes
transmitting in the 38,000 MHz frequency range and four microwave dishes transmitting in the 28,000
MHz frequency range and one microwave dish transmitting in the 18,000 MHz frequency range. The
bottoms of the microwaves will be 140 feet above the ground level. The microwaves will be oriented
278.85� from true north, 299.99° from true north, 224.27° from true north, 136.66° from true north,
263.35° from true north, 266.71 ° from true north and I 53.5° from true north.
There are also six (6) MetroPCS wireless telecommunication panel antennas on the rooftop. There are
three Sectors (A, B, and C) of panel antennas existing at the site, with two (2) antennas that are
installed per sector. The MetroPCS antennas will be transmitting in the 1975-1985 MHz and 2135-2140
MHz frequency ranges. To be conservative for modeling purposes it was assumed that the MetroPCS
antenans will be transmitting at 1975 MHZ and 2135 MHz. The Sector A antennas are oriented 120°
from true north. The Sector B antennas are oriented 240° from true north. The Sector C antennas are
oriented 330° from true north. The bottoms of the Sector A, B and C antennas are 8.86 feet above the
main roof level.
Based on the drawings and aerial photography review there is one other collocated carrier on the
rooftop.
f�
.
�- �.<b� p i ��,i a
v ��
�EBI 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346 1
auca _ a; � ,. _
t;i ; ;' O� BURL�(VGA�1E
CDD-PLFlNNiNG DlV,
RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. SF0070
EBI Project No. 62122844 1350 Bayshore Hwy, Burlingame, California
5.0 POWER RATING FOR ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED BACKUP EQUIPMENT SUBJECT TO
THE APPLICATION
The operating power for modeling purposes was assumed to be 20 Watts per transmitter for the 1975
MHz panel antenna and there will be four (4) transmitters operating at this frequency per sector. The
operating power for modeling purposes was assumed to be 60 Watts per transmitter for the 2135 MHz
panel antenna and there will be two (2) transmitter operating at this frequency per sector.
6.O TOTAL NUMBER OF WATTS PER INSTALLATION AND THE TOTAL NUMBER OF WATTS
FOR ALL INSTALLATIONS ON THE BUILDING
The effective radiated power (ERP) for the 1975 MHz transmitters combined on site is 2,946 Watts.
The effective radiated power (ERP) for the 2135 MHz transmitters combined on site is 4,626 Watts.
The ERP for the microwaves transmitting in the 38,000 MHz on site are 2,630.27 and 870.96 Watts.
The ERP for the microwaves transmitting in the 28,000 MHz on site are 1,023.29, 794.33, 1,445.44 and
794.33 Watts. The ERP for the microwave transmitting in the 18,000 MHz on site is 1,548.82. The ERP
for the unknown carrier one combined on this site was assumed to be 1,449 Watts.
7.O PREFERRED METHOD OF ATTACHMENT OF PROPOSED ANTENNA WITH PLOT OR ROOF
PLAN INCLUDING: DIRECTIONALITY OF ANTENNAS, HEIGHT OF ANTENNAS ABOVE
NEAREST WALKING SURFACE, DISCU55 NEARBY INHABITED BUILDINGS
Based on the information provided to EBI, the information indicates that the proposed microwaves are
to be pipe mounted to the rooftop penthouse. Operating in the directions, frequencies, and heights
mentioned in section 4.0 above. The site building is located in a commercial area right next to the shore
line with a lot of open space.
8.0 ESTIMATED AMBIENT RADIO FREQUENCY FIELDS FOR THE PROPOSED SITE
Based on worst-case predictive modeling, there are no predicted areas on any accessible rooftop or
ground-level walking/working surface related to the proposed MetroPCS microwave dishes and existing
panel antennas that exceed the FCC's occupational or general public exposure limits at this site. At the
nearest walking/working surfaces to the proposed MetroPCS antennas, the maximum power density is
62.81 percent of the FCC's general public limit ( I 2.56 percent of the FCC's occupational limit). The
composite exposure level from modeling all other carriers existing on this site combined with
MetroPCS's proposed microwaves and existing panel antennas is 62.91 percent of the FCC's general
public limit (12.58 percent of the FCC's occupational limit) at the nearest walking/working surface to
each antenna. Based on worst-case predictive modeling, there are no areas at ground level related to
the proposed MetroPCS microwave dishes and existing panel antennas that exceed the FCC's
occupational or general public exposure limits at this site. At ground level, the maximum power density
generated by the MetroPCS microwave dishes and the existing panel antennas combined with the
modeling of the existing other carriers antennas on site is 5.1 I percent of the FCC's general public limit
( I.02 percent of the FCC's occupational limit). The inputs used in the modeling are summarized in the
RoofViewOO export file presented in Appendix B. RoofviewOO was used for modeling the panel antennas
however RoofViewO is not suitable for modeling microwave dishes. Therefore formulas from OET
Bulletin 65 were used to calculate a worst-case prediction of the maximum power density (MPE) at
ground level and nearest walking surface for the microwave dishes. Power density estimates used for the
microwave dishes proposed for installation at this site are included in Appendix C.
9.0 SIGNAGE AT THE FACILITY IDENTIFYING ALL WTS EQUIPMENT AND SAFETY
PRECAUTIONS FOR PEOPLE NEARING THE EQUIPMENT AS MAY BE REQUIRED;
�EBI
i ngton,
8��,,TF�1�--, .;-
. -�
,, 1
,:.� �,
�,���:� �����
-, �.1 �' a �_ '_, � L
i;i"i �' G't= BURi_iNGAME
CDt�-F! ANNIivG DiV.
RF-EME Compliance Report
EBI Project No. 62122844
Site No. SF0070
1350 Bayshore Hwy, Burlingame, California
APPLICABLE FCC ADOPTED STANDARDS �DISCUSS SIGNAGE FOR THOSE WHO SPEAK
LANGUAGES OTHER THAN ENGLISH�
Signs are the primary means for control of access to areas where RF exposure levels may potentially
exceed the MPE. It is recommended that additional signage be installed for the new antennas making
people aware of the antennas locations. Also workers elevated above the roof or ground level should be
made aware of the antennas locations. There are no fields in front of the proposed antennas and
therefore barriers are not recommended.
Additionally, there are areas where workers elevated above the rooftop may be exposed to power
densities greater than the general population and occupational limits. Workers and the general public
should be informed about the presence and locations of antennas and their associated fields.
Additionally, access to this site is unknown and as such, the general public is assumed to be able to
access the rooftop.
I O.O STATEMENT ON WHO PRODUCED THIS REPORT AND QUALIFICATIONS
Please see the certifications attached in Appendix A below.
I I.O FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC� REQUIREMENTS
The FCC has established Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits for human exposure to
Radiofrequency Electromagnetic (RF-EME) energy fields, based on exposure limits recommended by the
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) and, over a wide range of
frequencies, the exposure limits developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
(IEEE) and adopted by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) to replace the 1982 ANSI
guidelines. Limits for localized absorption are based on recommendations of both ANSI/IEEE and
NCRP.
The FCC guidelines incorporate two separate tiers of exposure limits that are based upon
occupational/controlled exposure limits (for workers) and general public/uncontrolled exposure limits
for members of the general public.
Occupational/controlled exposure limits apply to situations in which persons are exposed as a
consequence of their employment and in which those persons who are exposed have been made fully
aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Occupational/
controlled exposure limits also apply where exposure is of a transient nature as a result of incidental
passage through a location where exposure levels may be above general public/uncontrolled limits (see
below), as long as the exposed person has been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can
exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate means.
General public/uncontrolled ex�posure limits apply to situations in which the general public may be
exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made
fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Therefore,
members of the general public would always be considered under this category when exposure is not
employment-related, for example, in the case of a telecommunications tower that exposes persons in a
nearby residential area.
Table I and Figure I(below), which are included within the FCC's OET Bulletin 65, summarize the MPE
limits for RF emissions. These limits are designed to provide a substantial margin of safety. They vary
Y--
by frequency to take into account the different types of equipment that may be ��' �';;,. ��
�EBI 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346
;UG - � ���z
CITY OF BURI_�f�GAME
CDD-PLANNIi�JG DiV.
RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. SF0070
EBI Project No. 62122844 1350 Bayshore Hwy, Burlingame, California
particular faciliry and are "time-averaged" limits to reflect different durations resulting from controlled
and uncontrolled exposures.
The FCC's MPEs are measured in terms of power (mW) over a unit surface area (cmz). Known as the
power density, the FCC has established an occupational MPE of 5 milliwatts per square centimeter
(mW/cmZ) and an uncontrolled MPE of I mW/cm2 for equipment operating in the 1975 MHz — 38000
MHz frequency ranges, These limits are considered protective of these populations.
Table I: Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE)
(A) Limits for Occupational/Controiled Exposure
Frequency Range Electric Field Magnetic Field Averaging Time
(MHz) Strength (E) Strength (H) Power Density (S) �E]2, [H]2, or S
(V/m) (A/m) (mW/cm ) �minutes)
0.3-3.0 6 I 4 I.63 ( I 00)* 6
3.0-30 1842/f 4.89/f (900/ )* 6
30-300 6 I.4 0. I 63 I.0 6
300-1,500 -- -- f/300 6
I,500- I 00,000 -- -- 5 6
(B) Limits for General Public/Uncontrolled Exposure
Frequency Range Electric Field Magnetic Field Averaging Time
(MHz) Strength (E) Strength (H) POWer Density (S) �E]2� [H]2, or S
N�m� �am� (mW/cm ) (minutes)
0.3- I.34 6 I 4 I.63 ( I 00)* 30
I.34-30 824/f 2. I 9/f ( I 80/ )* 30
30-300 27.5 0.073 0.2 30
300-1,500 -- -- f/ I ,500 30
I,500- I 00,000 -- -- I.0 30
f = Frequency in (MHz)
* Plane-wave equivalent power density
Fioure 1. FCC Limits /or Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE)
Plane-wave Equivr�len[ Powe� Densiry
N
�
>U
>
T
.�
C
N
�
N
�
O
d
aiL
0.03
� OccupationaUConhalied Exposure
��. ---- Generdl PopulafioniUncontrolled Exposure
�
�
\\�
�
�
�
� - - - - - - - - - -
\ i
i
``-----'
1 3 30 300 � 3,000 30,000 �j 300,000
�
1.3d 1.500 700.0�0
Frequency (MHz)
Based on the above, the most restrictive thresholds for exposures of unlimited duration to RF energy
for several personal wireless services are summarized below:
$. - - _
�EBI 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346 '
�'`� ��
,�UG - � ;�� �2
ci�v oF au��_,�,��;1PllE
CDD-PLANNI�aG DIV.
RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. SF0070
EBI Project No. 62122844 1350 Bayshore Hwy, Burlingame, California
Personal Wireless Service Approximate Occupational public MPE
Frequency MPE
Personal Communication (PCS) 1,950 MHz 5.00 mW/cm I.00 mW/cm
Cellular Telephone 870 MHz 2.90 mW/cm 0.58 mW/cm
Specialized Mobile Radio 855 MHz 2.85 mW/cm 0.57 mW/cm
Most Restrictive Freq, Range 30-300 MHz I.00 mW/cm 0.20 mW/cm
MPE limits are designed to provide a substantial margin of safery. These limits apply for continuous
exposures and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age,
gender, size, or health.
Personal Communication (PCS) facilities used by MetroPCS in this area operate within a frequency
range of I 975-2140 MHz. Facilities typically consist of: I) electronic transceivers (the radios or
cabinets) connected to wired telephone lines; and 2) antennas that send the wireless signals created by
the transceivers to be received by individual subscriber units (PCS telephones). Transceivers are
typically connected to antennas by coaxial cables.
Because of the short wavelength of PCS services, the antennas require line-of-site paths for good
propagation, and are typically installed above ground level. Antennas are constructed to concentrate
energy towards the horizon, with as little energy as possible scattered towards the ground or the sky.
This design, combined with the low power of PCS facilities, generally results in no possibility for
exposure to approach Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) levels, with the exception of areas directly
in front of the antennas.
Statement of Compliance
A site is considered out of compliance with FCC regulations if there are areas that exceed the FCC
exposure limits and there are no RF hazard mitigation measures in place. Any carrier which has an
installation that contributes more than 5% of the applicable MPE must participate in mitigating these RF
hazards. �
12.0 LIMITATIONS
This report was prepared for the use of MetroPCS. It was performed in accordance with generally
accepted practices of other consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the same
locale under like circumstances. The conclusions provided by EBI are based solely on the information
provided by the client. The observations in this report are valid on the date of the investigation. Any
additional information that becomes available concerning the site should be provided to EBI so that our
conclusions may be revised and modified, if necessary. This report has been prepared in accordance
with Standard Conditions for Engagement and authorized proposal, both of which are integral parts of
this report. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made
I 3.O SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
EBI has prepared this Radiofrequency Emissions Compliance Report for the proposed MetroPCS
telecommunications equipment at the site located at I 350 Bayshore Hwy in Burlingame, California.
EBI has conducted theoretical modeling to estimate the worst-case power density from MetroPCS
antennas and the other carriers' existing antennas to document potential MPE levels at this location and
ensure that site control measures are adequate to meet FCC and OSHA requirements. As presented in
the preceding sections, based on worst-case predictive modeling, there are no modele�d �xpasures Qn
any accessible rooftop or ground-level walking/working surface related to proposed e�qu�pment in the '�_ �
�EBI 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • I.800.786.2346 ,
, (.� ,
.�1���.i��_� � cl LUIi_
�CI <`Y' C� BURLI�GA�E
CQD-PLAR1f�iItiG DIV.
RF-EME Compliance Report
EBI Project No. 62122844
Site No. SF0070
1350 Bayshore Hwy, Burlingame, California
area that exceed the FCC's occupational and general public exposure limits at this site. As such, the
proposed MetroPCS project is in compliance with FCC rules and regulations.
Signage is recommended at the site as presented in Section 9.0. Posting of the signage brings the site
into compliance with FCC rules and regulations.
,
, .. � __.� 'z,.� � H ',4 wfs,.. �
��EBI 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • I.800.786.2346
�, iJ G-- :� � � � 2
i,;;�3 ��' OF BURLI�lGAME
CU1�-PLANNI� iG QlV.
RF-EME Compliance Report
EBI Project No. 62122844
Appendix A
Certifications
Site No. SF0070
1350 Bayshore Hwy, Burlingame, California
� _ - - �� v�. �
,; i�:, .. ;, � ,��,�,
�EBI 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • I.800.786.2346
; . �;=
��
+`;Uv-Pv=',�yf�yi, a;a L.?i'J.
RF-EME Compliance Report
EBI Project No. 62122844
Preparer Certification
I, Preparer, state that:
Site No. SF0070
1350 Bayshore Hwy, Burlingame, California
■ I am an employee of EnviroBusiness Inc. (d/b/a EBI Consulting), which provides RF-EME safety
and compliance services to the wireless communications industry.
■ I have successfully completed RF-EME safety training, and I am aware of the potential hazards
from RF-EME and would be classified "occupational" under the FCC regulations.
■ I am familiar with the FCC rules and regulations as well as OSHA regulations both in general and
as they apply to RF-EME exposure.
■ I have reviewed the data provided by the client and incorporated it into this Site Compliance
Report such that the information contained in this report is true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge.
� � �� 1 '[ ' -.� '� 1`, � `�i ������,;.a
�'�` � 1�'w= s, �r '� . �
?,' ;r• ,. �� . ,x
1!! �
�EBI 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800J86.2346 � '
;_;'� ; •; OF [;URLIRGAME
.`y, -_i�i �^,;,;,i:,!; :(:i i.-JI�,�.
�
RF-EME Compliance Report
EBI Project No. 62122844
Site No. SF0070
1350 Bayshore Hwy, Burlingame, California
Appendix B
Roofview0 Export File
.�.:.� � r.�.�,"
������''�'�:
��, U ;; — �� L � i �
�EBI 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346
��s-� ; �?:= r���;;��ca�r,�E
�GD-FLANNIiVG DfV.
,
Map, Settings, Antenna, and Symbol Data Table .. Exported from workbook -> RootView 4.15_NEW.xlsm
Done on 7/18/2012 at 11:19:34 PM.
Use this format to prepare other daW sets for the RoofView workbook file.
You may use as many rows in this TOP header as you wish.
The critical polnt are the cells in COLUMN ONE that read'Start...' (eg. StartMapDefinition)
If used, these (4) headers are required to be spelled exactly, as one ward (eg. StartMapDefinitlon)
The very nezt row will be considered the start of that daW block.
The f rst row of the daW block can be a header (as shown below), but this is optional.
W hen building a text file for import, Add the Map info first, then the Antenna data, foliowed by the symbol data.
All rows above the first marker line 'Start...' will be ignored, no matter how many there are.
7his area is for you use for documentation.
End of help comments.
You can place as much teM here as you wish as long as you don't place it below
the Start Map Definition row below the blue line.
You may insert more rows using the Insert menu.
Should you need additional lines to document your project, simply insert additional rows
by highlighting the row number adjacent to the blue line below and then clicking on the Insert menu
and selecting rows.
StartMapDefinition
Roof Max � Roof Max X Map Max Y Map Maz XV Offset X Offset Number of envelope
i3o i�o iso zoo io io 1 SUS8I:SGF$US$1:SGH$210
Sta(LSettings0ata
Standard Method Uptime Scale Facto Low Thr Low Color Mid Thr Mid Color Hi Thr
4 2 3 1 20 1 50 2 S00
SURMtennaData It is advisable to provide an ID (ant 1) for all antennas
(MHz) Trans Trens Coaz Coax Other Input
ID Name Freq Power Count Len Type Loss Power
MET A1 Metro PCS 1975 20 2 140 1-5/8 LDF 1.52
MEf A1 Metro PCS 2135 60 1 140 1-5/8 LDF 1.52
MET A2 Metro PCS 1975 20 2 140 1-5/8 LDF 1.52
MEf A2 Metro PCS 2135 60 1 140 1-5/8 LDF 1.52
MET Bl Metro PCS 1975 20 2 140 1-5/8 LDF 1.52
MEf Bi Metro PCS 2135 60 1 140 1-5/8 LDF 1.52
MET B2 Metro PCS 1975 20 2 140 1-5/8 LDF 1.52
MET B2 Metro PGS 2135 60 1 140 1-5/8 LDF 1.52
MEi Cl Metro PCS 1975 20 2 140 1-5/8 LDF 1.52
MEf C3 Metro PCS 2135 60 1 140 1-5/8 LDF 1.52
MET Q Metro PCS 1975 20 2 140 1-5/8 LDF 1.52
MET Q Metro PCS 2135 60 1 140 1-5/8 LDF 1.52
UNKl A1 UNK 1 850 33.3 1 3
UNKl A2 UNK 1 850 33.3 1 3
UNKl A3 UNK 1 850 333 1 3
UNKl Bl UNK 1 850 333 1 3
UNKl B2 UNK 1 850 33.3 1 3
UNKl B3 UNK 1 850 333 1 3
UNKl Cl UNK 1 850 333 1 3
UNKl C2 UNK 1 850 333 1 3
UNK2 C3 UNK 2 850 33.3 1 3
StarKymbolDaW
Sym Map Marker Roof X Roof Y Map label Description ( notes for this table only )
Sym 5 35 AC Unit Sample symbols
Sym 14 5 Roof Access
Sym 45 5 AC Unit
Sym 45 20 Ladder
Hi Color Over Color Ap H[ Mult Ap Ht Method
2 3 1.5 1
Calc
Power Mfg
21.43187 Kathrein
32.1478 Kathrein
21.43187 Kathrein
32.1478 Kathrein
21.43187 Kathrein
32.1478 Kathrein
21.43187 Kathrein
32.1478 Kathrein
21.43187 Kathrein
32.1478 Kathrein
21.43187 Kathrein
32.1478 Kathrein
16.68953
16.68953
16.68953
16.68953
16.68953
16.68953
16.68953
16.68953
16.68953
(ft) (ft)
Model X Y
742-445 106.6667 13.62963
742-445 106.6667 13.62963
742-445 106.0741 11.06173
742-445 106.0741 11.06173
742-445 100.5432 9.283951
742-445 100.5432 9.283951
742-445 97.77778 9.876543
742-445 97.77778 9.876543
742-445 47.60494 75.45679
742-445 47.60494 75.45679
742-445 48.79012 77.82716
742-445 48.79012 77.82716
35.16049 29.4321
32.39506 27.65432
29.62963 26.2716
28.24691 28.24691
29.62963 31.80247
32 37.53086
37.53086 51.35802
3930864 55.11111
40.49383 58.46914
(ft)
2
8.8625
8.8625
8.8625
8.8625
8.8625
8.8625
8.8625
8.8625
8.8625
8.8625
8.8625
8.8625
9.25
9Z5
9.25
9.25
9.25
9.25
9.25
9.25
915
Type
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
(ft)
Aper
4.275
4175
4.275
4175
4.275
4175
4175
4.275
4.275
4.275
4175
4175
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
dBd
Gain
15.75
15.95
15.75
15.95
15.75
15.95
15.75
15.95
15.75
15.95
15.75
15.95
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
BWdth
Pt Dir
65;120
63;120
65;120
63;120
65;240
63;240
65;240
63;240
65330
63;330
65;330
63;330
63;120
63;120
63;120
63;220
63;220
63;220
63;260
63;260
63;260
List Of Arez
Su5si:5eH
Uptime
Profile
ON
flag
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
.. �' r� yg'� �:a
. . ::_� � 9 �ar
; - 9 20i2
�''{ �� B'JRL;NGAh9E
,_ ��-?t.fiNNING DIV.
�
..
RF-EME Compliance Report
EBI Project No. 62122844
Site No. SF0070
1350 Bayshore Hwy, Burlingame, California
Appendix C
Microwave Modeling
�� �. � � � '� � �..7'
AUG - � ; �
CI?Y C`F� i?� i€=1�_'^,��;p,P;i#�-
�_;� _ � .
�EBI 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • I.800.786.2346
Estimation of Power Density from Microwave Dishes
Site Number: SFoO�o
Total Number of
7 #N!A
Roof Are the anlennas installed on a roof or a loweR
Varies Nearest Walking Surtace
ModaUM�erlptlon Frequ�ncy A6LlARL ERP
, ;� _,_
p n����� ��(��
AUG - � 2G12
unconvoNa comroneu
Powsr Danstty Power Density Oubid� Oubide Mln Dlst from
: Gak� ' DIamN�r Inaide Column Ground Gan Pop Llmk Oec Limit Column Coluan Atanm
d mW/an2 mW/an2 mWkm2 mWhm2 %MPE %MPE ft
45.2 2 0.178535 0.007785 1.000000 5.000000 0.17854% 0.036% 2
42.6 2 0-126393 0.001264 7.000000 5.000000 0.12639 % 0.025 % 2
38 1 1.131840 0.071318 1.000000 5.000000 1.13184 % 0226 % 2
42.6 2 0.178535 0.001785 1.000000 5.000000 0.17854 % 0.036 % 2
38 1 1.131840 0.011318 7.000000 5.000000 1.13184 % 0.226 % 2
40.4 1 0.714138 0.007147 7.000000 5.000000 0.71414 % 0.143 % 2
38.9 2 0.448461 0.004485 1.000000 5.000000 0.44846 % 0.090 % 2
0.07•4•P
O-----'-�-�-'-'-'-'-'--�------------------�--- A
outside of transmitting column, power ia - 1% of that inaide column
"Summary o/Nearfield Power Density Calculations Por EBI Consulting", July 21, 2006
E
�I �' �� BURLINGAI�E
{���-��,�NtVItiG DIV,