HomeMy WebLinkAbout150 Anza Boulevard - Agency Approval Letter (2)Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
M81
West
1/8-1/4
0.146 mi.
770 ft.
MAP FINDINGS
Site
VIBRANT SCIENCES LLC
849 MITTEN
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
Site 1 of 63 in cluster M
Relative: San Mateo Co. BI:
Higher Name:
Actual: Address:
g ft, City,State,Zip:
Region:
Facility ID:
Prog Element Code
Record Id:
Description:
Facility Status:
Program Category:
VIBRANT SCIENCES LLC
849 MITTEN
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
SAN MATEO
FA0049671
GENERATES <27 GAL/YEAR
PR0068148
GENERATES <27 GAL/YEAR
Active, billable
HAZARDOUS WASTE PROGRAM
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
San Mateo Co. BI 5113758962
N/A
Name: VIBRANT SCIENCES LLC
Address: 849 MITTEN
City,State,Zip: BURLINGAME, CA 94010
Region: SAN MATEO
Facility ID: FA0049671
Prog Element Code: STORMWATER ANNUAL INSPECTION FEE
Record Id: PR0068151
Description: STORMWATER ANNUAL FEE - INSP FREQ EVERY 2 YRS
Facility Status: Inactive, non-billable
Program Category: STORMWATER
Name: VIBRANT SCIENCES LLC
Address: 849 MITTEN
City,State,Zip: BURLINGAME, CA 94010
Region: SAN MATEO
Facility ID: FA0049671
Prog Element Code: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879FT3
Record Id: PR0079985
Description: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879CF
Facility Status: Active, billable
Program Category: BUSINESS PLAN PROGRAM
Name:
Address:
City,State,Zip:
Region:
Facility ID:
Prog Element Code:
Record Id:
Description:
Facility Status:
Program Category:
VIBRANT SCIENCES LLC
849 MITTEN
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
SAN MATEO
FA0049671
SML QUANTITY GENERATOR(1-1991bslMo) OFF-SITE
PR0068003
SQG OFF-SITE TREATMENT (1-199 LB/MO)
Inactive, non-billable
MEDICAL WASTE
TC63621512s Page194
~ r T ` � �^ . /.i' O �
. . � � �
GFbT�1`,E DE�,'F?��',;iAP!
STATE Of CALIFORNIA ���I JR„ Gorernor
•
SAN. FRANCISCO BAY CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
30 VAN NE55 AVENUE
SAN fRANCI5CO3 CAIIFORNIA 94102 �
PHONE: 537.3686
Hometel Development Corporation
3183-G Airway Avenue
Costa Mesa, California 92626
ATTENTION: Robert Woolley
Gentlemen:
F � , 3 ., � �
�, tr' '' � 5+ ,r� _'�
r
� Y JuJG V 1���;;,5:� ���
PERMIT NO. 6-83
August 25, 1983
�d ��������� �
:;
Au � ; ' ���S:�j: `---�
JHCt �R'niYvi�)�U Clii 4U����tfZVti�{�i:
R� DEV�LC'Pltil:.',�Ii v�lip�SVfiJSi�Jii
On April 21, 1983, the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development
Commission, by a vote of 18 affirmative, 0 negative, and 1 abstention, approved
the resolution pursuant to which this permit is hereby issued:
I. Authorization
A. Subject to the conditions stated below, the permittee is granted
permission to do the following within the Bay and within the 100-foot shorelin�
band, at 150 Anza Boulevard, on Assessor's Parcel Nos. 26-342-220, 26-342-230,
and 26-342-240, immediately west of Anza Lagoon in the City of:Burlingame, San
Mateo County:
1. Within the Bay:
a. Place two, 12-inch diameter storm drain pipes;
b. Repair and remove reinforced bar from riprap
where necessary, along the 1,500 linear feet
of Bay shoreline; and
c. Construct and use a 60-foot-long, 3,400-square-
foot fishing pier.
2. Within the 100-foot Shoreline Band:
a. Construct and use a 5,000-square-foot portion
of a 56,000-square-foot hotel;
b. Construct and use a 4,353-square-foot portion
of a 9,000-square-foot combination restaurant/
public services building;
�. ,.
., ' ,, ' . � � .
�
PERMIT NO. 6-83
Hometel Development Corporation
Page Two
c. Place and use 100,260 square
vehicle circulation and 103
spaces; and
feet of paving for
of the 430 parking
d. Place and use 170,894 square feet (3.92 acres)
of landscaping for public access including 106,885
square feet (2.45 acres) for a park.
B. This authority is generally pursuant to and limited by your
application dated February 14, 1983, including all its accompanying and
subsequent exhibits, including Exhibits A and B attached, but subject to
the modifications required by conditions hereto.
C. Work authorized herein for the project must commence prior to
September l, 1983, or this permit will lapse and become null and void. Such
work must also be diligently prosecuted to completion, and must be completed
within 18 months, or by March 1, 1985, whichever is earlier, unless an extension
of time is granted by amendment of this permit prior to its expiration.
D. This project will provide approximately 3.92 acres (170,894 sguare
feet) of landscaped public access improvements within the 100-foot shoreline
band, and in addition, will provide approximately 5,600 square feet of landscaped
public access outside the 100-foot shoreline band, along 1,500 linear feet of Bay
shoreline and 1,300 linear feet of lagoon shoreline in the City of Burlingame, San
Mateo County.
II. Special Conditions
The authorization made herein shall be subject to the following special
conditions, in addition to the standard conditions in Part IV:
A. Specific Plans and Plan Review
1. Plan Review. No construction or use whatsoever
shall be made of any facility authorized herein,
until final precise site, grading, architectural,
and landscaping plans, and any other relevant
criteria, specifications, and plan information
for that portion of the work have been submitted
to, reviewed, and approved in writing by or on
behalf of the Commission.
a. Architectural Plans. Architectural plans
submitted for review shall consist of exterior
elevations with building details which indicate
the location, dimensions, exterior treatment, and
color of all structures, outside signs, and other
fixtures.
. ' � • � � -
PERMIT NO. 6-83
` Hometel Development Corporation
Paqe Three
b. Landscaping Plans. Landscaping plans shall be
prepared and signed by a licensed landscaped
architect and may be submitted as part of the
architectural plans or submitted separately.
In either case, such plans shall consist of
grading, staking, planting, and irrigation
sheets showing the location, types and dimen-
sions of all pathways, public access areas,
structures, parking spaces, benches, tables,
trash containers, lighting, and a list of the
names and quantity of all plant species to be
used.
Architectural and landscaping plans submitted for
review shall be accompanied by a letter requesting
plan approval, identifying the type of plan submitted,
the portion of the project involved, and indicating
whether the plan is final or preliminary. Approval
or disapproval shall be based upon (a) completeness
of the plan in showing the features required above,
(b) consistency of the plan's criteria and information
with the specific terms and conditions of this permit,
(c) maximizing the attractiveness of the public access
area, and (d) consistency of the plan with the recommenda-
tions of the Design Review Board. In each instance, plan
review shall be completed, by or on behalf of the Commission,
within 45 days after receipt of the plan or plans to be
reviewed, and shall consist of a letter specifically
referring to the submitted plan or plans which
indicates whether it or they have been approved or
disapproved.
2. Changes to Approved Plans. After final plans have been
approved pursuant to Special Condition II-A-1, no change
shall be made to such plans without first obtaining written
approval of the proposed change by or on behalf of the Com-
mission. Approval or disapproval shall be made within 30
days after the proposed change has been submitted for
approval and shall be based on a finding that the change
complies with this permit and would not detrimentally
affect public access, landscaping, open space, open
water, or other public benefits.
3. Conformity with Approved Plans. All leases, contract
specifications, and all structures and improvements
at the project site shall conform to the final plans
approved pursuant to this special condition. No
structures shall be placed nor any improvement
'' ' �. �: �
. PERMIT NO. 6-83
Hometel Development Corporation
Page Four
undertaken that is not clearly shown and indicated
on the approved final plans, After construction, no
noticeable changes to the exterior of any structure
shall be made, no additional structure shall be built,
nor shall park, open space, open water, landscaping,
or public access areas be altered without first obtaining
written approval by or on behalf of the Commission
pursuant to Special Condition II-A-2.
B. Public Access
1. Area. Prior to the commencement of construction authorized
herein, the permittee shall, by instrument or instruments
acceptable to counsel for BCDC, dedicate to a public agency
or otherwise guarantee rights for the public for access for
walking, sitting, viewing, fishing, picnicking and other
related purposes, to the area generally shown on Exhibit A
as public access, and prior to use or occupancy of any
facility authorized herein and until this permit is amended
such areas shall remain available to the public for such
uses.
2. Instrument. An instrument submitted to counsel for BCDC's
approval pursuant to Special Condition II-B--1 shall create
rights in favor of the public, at least to the extent of
the permittee's interest in the existing lease to the site,
for the purposes indicated and shall include a map that shows
the property lines and dimensions of such areas, and contains
a metes and bounds description of the areas. The instrument
shall be in a form suitable for recording in the county
where the property is located. Approval or disapproval of
the instrument shall occur within 30 days after submittal
for approval and shall be based upon the sufficiency of the
instrument to create the rights and duties indicated in the
special condition. Within 60 days after approval, the
permittee shall record the instrument and shall provide
evidence of recording to the Commission.
3. Improvements. Prior to the use or occupancy of any
facility authorized herein, the permittee or its assigns,
shall complete the following public access improvements,
substantially in accord with preliminary landscape plans
entitled "Landscaping Plan, Hotel Development for Granada
Royale Hometels," Sheet 2, dated January 26, 1983, pre-
pared by Blunk Associates, Architecture, Planning, Interior
Design, and Callander Associates, Landscape Architecture;
_. • ' �` �'- .
PERMIT NO, 6-83
Hometel Development Corporation
Page Five
a. Construction of a 60-foot-long, 3,400-square-foot
wooden fishing pier on the Bay shoreline as shown
on Exhibit B, attached;
b. Placement of 176,494 square feet of landscaped
public access improvements along the Bay and
Anza Lagoon shorelines, including a 2.57-acre
park on the peninsula as shown on Exhibit B,
attached;
c. Placement of a 2,800-linear-foot, 10-foot-wide
pedestrian/bicycle pathway system along the Bay
and Anza Lagoon as shown on Exhibit B, attached;
d. Placement of benches and trash receptacles within
the public access areas at locations approved
pursuant to Special Condition II-A-1;
e. Placement of five public access signs, one public
fishing sign, and approximately seven public parking
signs of a size, design, and with information approved
by or on behalf of the Commission placed at locations
approved pursuant to Special Condition II-A-1;
f. Placement of not less than 20 designated public
parking spaces at locations approved pursuant to
Special Condition II-A-l; and
g. The public restroom facilities shall be readily
identifiable from the shoreline, remain open
during daylight hours, and be free of charge.
4. Maintenance. All areas and improvements required by
Special Condition II-B including landscaping, signs and
public paths shall be permanently maintained by, and at
the expense of, the permittee, any assignees, lessees, and
sublessees. Maintenance shall include repairs to all path
surfaces, replacement of any plant material that dies or
becomes unkempt, periodic clean-up of litter and other
materials, and assuring that public access signs remain
in place and visible. Within 30 days after notification
by staff, the permittee shall correct any maintenance
deficiency noted in a staff inspection of the site.
5. Riprap. Prior to use of any facility authorized herein
the permittee shall remove all debris and any exposed
reinforcing bar from the riprap along the shoreline and
dispose of such outside of the Commission's jurisdiction.
��'
PERMIT N0. 6-83
Hometel Development Corporation
Page Six
C. Permit Recording. Prior to the commencement of construction, the
permittee shall record this permit or a notice ref�rring to this permit in
accordance with applicable provisions of Government Code Section 27291.5 with
San Mateo County and shall provide evidence of recording to the Commission.
III. Findings and Declarations
This authorization is based upon the Commission's findings and declarations
that the work authorized herein is consistent with the McAteer-Petris Act, the San
Francisco Bay Plan, the Commission's Amended Management Program for San Francisco
Bay, and the California Environmental Quality Act for the following reasons:
A. Use. San Francisco Bay Plan Map No. 9 does not designate the site
for any priority use. However, a Bay Plan note for the City of Burlingame
states: "Prepare precise plan and development program for waterfront; include
continuous public access to Bay shoreline for viewing and fishing. Some fill
may be needed." As the Bay Plan Map does not designate the site for a priority
use, the proposed project is compatible with the use requirements of the Bay
Plan.
B. Fill for Fishing Pier. The permittee has proposed a 3,400-square-
foot fishing pier along the Bay side of the project. Although the fishing pier
does not extend to deep water, the Commission finds that it will improve fishing
opportunities along this section of shoreline which is now heavily used by fisher-
men. The Commission further notes that this section of the Bay shoreline of the
Anza Airport Park Subdivision is approximately 2,000 feet long (of which about
1,500 feet are within this site) and is essentially straight. The Design Review
Board accepted the permittee's assertion that the construction of the fishing pier
would introduce some variety into this otherwise long, straight shoreline.
Although such variety could be provided by other means, such as excavating a
portion of the shoreline, the Commission finds that such an alternative would
not also serve the purpose of improving fishing. Therefore, the Commission
finds that the purposed fishing pier constitutes a water-oriented recreational
use for which some fill may be authorized and minor fill to improve shoreline
appearance and public access.
C. Public Access. The 14.5-acre site is bounded by the Bay to the
north, Anza Lagoon to the east, and existing development is located to the
west and south. The long, irregularly-shaped parcel forms a peninsula at
its eastern end. About 4.6 acres of the 19.5-acre site are in Anza Lagoon.
The project site has 1,500 linear feet of Bay shoreline and 1,300 linear
feet of Lagoon shoreline. Of the 9.9-acre dry land portion of the site,
5.4 acres are located within the 100-foot shoreline band. The site is flat
and supports no significant plant or animal life except within the Lagoon
and in the marsh vegetation along its edge.
. • ' � , �,> .
PERMIT NO. 6-83
Hometel Development Corporation
Page Seven
The permittee proposes a total of 4.12 acres of public access
improvements on the 9.9 acres of dry land at the site. Approximately 72
percent of the 100-foot shoreline band will be improved for public access
purposes and an additional 5,600 square feet outside the Commission's juris-
diction will also be improved for public access. Approximately 6,000 square
feet of the ground floor area of the restaurant structure will be used for
public services and some commercial uses. The hotel is located, at its
closest point, 60 feet from the shoreline, and the restaurant structure is
located about 50 feet from the shoreline. The minimum width of the public
access area is 35 feet, adjacent to a portion of the public parking. Public
access improvements consist of a 10-foot-wide pathway running along 2,800
linear feet of Bay and Lagoon shoreline. A 2.6-acre park is located at the
end of the peninsula and a 60-foot-long, 3,400-square-foot fishing pier is
located across from the combined restaurant/public services building. The
remainder of the shoreline is landscaped, with public access widths varying
from a minimum of 35 feet to a maximum of over 100 feet.
The Commission adopted public access guidelines for the Anza area.
The guidelines state that an important access area should be developed on the
peninsula of this site. In addition, public access widths along the Bay shore-
line should average 75 feet wide with a minimum width of 40 feet or the height
of the adjacent building. The minimum and average widths proposed are slightly
less and the public access next to the hotel is less than its height. However,
the guidelines also state: "Any exceptions to the minimum widths of public
access areas shall be allowed only if the design of the building and adjacent
public access is such that the public is encouraged to make greater use of the
shoreline and other substantial public access areas are provided to offset the
reduction in the minimum width...." An exhibit to the guidelines shows a con-
ceptual plan for the development of the site similar to that proposed in this
application with a major public access area on the peninsula which is the most
important part of the site. The 2.6-acre park area on the peninsula and the
3,400-square-foot fishing pier offset the differences in the average and minimum
widths of public access listed in the guidelines and conform to the conceptual
plan accepted by the Commission as a reasonable alternative. Furthermore,
during the Commission's review of the public access guidelines, the conceptual
project plan for the site involved a restaurant on fill. The restaurant was
perceived as an obstacle to public access, however, and the Commission stated
that no portion of the structure should be located on fill. In finalizing
the design of the project, the permittee relocated the restaurant so that not
only was no fill involved but it is now 50 feet from the Bay allowing unobstructed
access along the shoreline.
Therefore, the Commission finds that the 2.6-acre park, the public
amenities provided in the restaurant structure, and the fishing pier, with 72
percent of the shoreline band improved for public access purposes, will provide
a variety of public access amenities, will provide continuous public access to
and along the shoreline and will improve a significant fishing area along the
Bay and, therefore, is the maximum feasible public access consistent with the
proposed project.
• • �' � s.J:':
PERMIT NO. 6-83
Hometel Development Corporation
Page Eight
D. Public Trust. By this permit, the Commission determines that the
proposed project is consistent with public trust needs.
E. Traffic. Working with Commission staff, the Metropolitan Transportation
Commission (MTC) has recently completed a study relating recently proposed develop-
ments east of Highway 101 with the already strained capacity of that freeway. Highway
101 is already at capacity in several sections and the study concluded that if all
the projects proposed for development east of the freeway are completed, traffic
on Highway 101 may exceed capacity by 40 percent at peak hours. If that takes
place, there will obviously be pressure to either widen the freeway or construct
a new expressway to the east of the existing freeway. Either would require
extensive fill in the Bay.
The Commission finds that this project should not be treated as
a precedent or encouragement for the authorization of such fill beyond that
considered by the Commission in adopting the public access guidelines for
this subdivision. No policies have yet been adopted to deal with the overall
issue of traffic generation east of Bayshore and there is little evidence to
suggest that this project by itself will lead to additional fill in the Bay.
Moreover, the public access proposed is consistent with the Commission's
public access guidelines for this area. Consequently, the Commission finds
the project to be consistent with the Bay Plan and the McAteer-Petris Act.
However, the Commission also recognizes that some policies will have to be
developed in coordination with affected local, state, and regional agencies
to deal witY► the overall problem to avoid the major fills that might take
place if no other transit or planning alternatives are chosen.
F. Environmental Impact. The City of Burlingame, the lead agency,
certified the Environmental Impact Report for the proposed project on
January 3, 1983.
G. Conclusion. For all these reasons; the project provides maximum
feasible public access consistent with the proposed project. The Commission
further finds, declares, and certifies that the activities authorized herein
are consistent with the Commission's Amended Management Program for San
Francisco Bay, as approved by the Department of Commerce under the Federal
Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended.
IV. Standard Conditions
A. All required permissions from governmental bodies must be obtained
before the commencement of work; these bodies include, but are not limited to,
the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, the State Lands Commission, the Regional
Water Quality Control Board, and the city and/or county in which the work is
to be performed, whenever any of these may be required. This permit does not
relieve the permittee of any obligations imposed by State or Federal law,
either statutory or otherwise.
, ' �;�+:: �>'
PERMIT NO. 6-83
Hometel Development Corporation
Page Nine
B. The attached Notice of Commission shall be returned to the
Commission within 30 days following completion of the work.
C. Work must be performed in the precise manner and at the precise
locations indicated in your application, as such may have been modified by the
terms of the permit and any plans approved in writing by or on behalf of the
Commission.
D. Work must be performed in a manner so as to minimize muddying of
waters, and if diking is involved, dikes shall be waterproof. If any seepage
returns to the Bay, the permittee will be subject to the regulations of the
Regional Water Quality Control Board in that region.
E. The rights derived from this permit are assignable as provided
herein. An assignment shall not be effective until the assignee shall have
executed and the Commission shall have received an acknowledgment that the
assignee has read and understood the application for this permit and the permit
itself and agrees to be bound by all terms and conditions of the permit, and
the assignee is accepted by the Executive Director as being reasonably capable
of complying with the terms of the permit.
F. Unless otherwise provided in this permit, all the terms and
conditions of this permit shall remain effective for so long as the permit
remains in effect or for so long as any use or construction authorized by
this permit exists, whichever is longer.
G. Unless otherwise provided in this permit, the terms and conditions
of this permit shall bind all future owners and future possessors of any legal
interest in the land and shall run with the land.
H. Unless otherwise provided in this permit, any work authorized herein
shall be completed within the time limites specified in this permit, or, if no
time limits are specified, within three years. If the work is not completed
by the date specified in the permit, or, if no date is specified, within three
years from the date of the permit, the permit shall become null and void. If
a permit becomes null and void for a failure to comply with these time limita-
tions, any fill placed in reliance on this permit shall be removed by the
permittee or its assignee, upon receiving written notification by or on behalf
of the Commission to remove the fill.
I. Except as otherwise noted, violation of any of the terms of this
permit shall be grounds for revocation. The Commission revoke any permit
for such violation after a public hearing held on reasonable notice to the
permittee or its assignee if the permit has been effectively assigned. If
the permit is revoked, the Commission may determine, if it deems appropriate,
that all or part of any fill or structure placed pursuant to this permit shall
be removed by the permittee or its assignee if the permit has been assigned.
. • ' � �
' PERMIT N0. 6-83
Hometel Development Corporation
Page Ten
J. This permit shall not take effect unless the permittee executes the
original of this permit and returns it to the Commission within 10 days after
the date of the issuance of the permit. No work shall be done until the acknowledg-
ment is duly executed and returned to the Commission.
K. Any area subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission under either the
McAteer-Petris Act or the Suisun Marsh Preservation Act at the time the permit is
granted or thereafter shall remain subject to that jurisdiction notwithstanding the
placement of any fill or the implementation of any substantial change in use
authorized by this permit.
L. Any area not subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission that becomes,
as a result of any work. or project authorized in this permit, subject to tidal action
shall become subject to the Commission's "bay" jurisdiction up to the line of highest
tidal action.
M. Unless the Commission directs otherwise, this permit shall become null
and void, if any term, standard condition, or special condition of this permit shall
be found illegal or unenforceable through the application of statute, administrative
ruling, or court determination. If this permit becomes null and void, any fill or
structures placed in reliance on this permit shall be subject to removal by the
permittee or its assignee if the permit has been assigned to the extent that the
Commission determines that such removal is appropriate. Any uses authorized shall
be terminaled to the extent that the Commission determines that such uses should
be terminated.
Executed at San Francisco, California, on behalf of the San Francisco Bay
Conservation and Development Commission on the date first above written.
_ r
�/ �
� �
�/
MICHAEL B. WILMAR
Enc. Executive Director
MBW/LMP/mm
cc: U. S, Army Corps of Engineers, Attn: Regulatory Functions Branch
San Francisco Bay Regional water Quality Control Board, Attn: Certification Section
* * * * * * * * * *
Receipt acknowledged, contents understood
Executed at
On
By
PERMIT NO. 6-83
Hometel Development Corporation
Page Ten
J. This permit shall not take effect unless the permittee executes the
original of this permit and returns it to the Commission within 10 days after
the date of the issuance of the permit. No work shall be done until the acknowledg-
ment is duly executed and returned to the Commission.
K. Any area subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission under either the
McAteer-Petris Act or the Suisun Marsh Preservation Act at the time the permit is
granted or thereafter shall remain subject to that jurisdiction notwithstanding the
placement of any fill or the implementation of any substantial change in use
authorized by this permit.
L. Any area not subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission that becomes,
as a result of any work or project authorized in this permit, subject to tidal action
shall become subject to the Commission's "bay" jurisdiction up to the line of highest
tidal action.
M. Unless the Commission directs otherwise, this permit shall become null
and void, if any term, standard condition, or special condition of this permit shall
be found illegal or unenforceable through the application of statute, administrative
ruling, or court determination. If this permit becomes null and void, any fill or
structures placed in reliance on this permit shall be subject to removal by the
permittee or its assignee if the permit has been assigned to the extent that the
Commission determines that such removal is appropriate. Any uses authorized shall
be terminaled to the extent that the Commission determines that such uses should
be terminated.
Executed at San Francisco, California, on behalf of the San Francisco Bay
Conservation and Development Commission on the date first above writtPn_
State of California )
County of San Franci�co )
On thi� 28th da}� of April , in the year 1983 , before me
Stephanie Tucker per�onally appeared Michael B. Wilmar ,
known to me to be tt�e Executive Director of the San Franci�co
Bay Conserva�ion and Development. Commi��ion and known to me to be the per�on
w':�o executed the within in�trument on behalf of the San Franci�co Bay Conservation
and Development Commi��ion, and ackno�•:ledged to me that t�ie San Franci�co Bay
Con�ervation and Development ComT,i��ion executed the same.
E" . _ :lt7t��.:1:,.�'�rr•- ;-':t!ect��. ..:�:� ...� G --
- • ' , i. . . .. � /
. I . . . i �: , ' �—� -'/f� i ` r' � !l��L <
- � - S EPHANIE TUCI�?
:3 - _ ,_ ' ;Zotary Public
�
a�
a
.�,
�
a
�.
0
�
.�
�
v
SA N F�tA NC I SC 0 1i�1 Y
I'��hl ic ,1cc��:;:�
1�'ishin Pier
�� Restaurant/
� � F'�it�l i c :;�rrvices
I '�
Ci ���`��{ _ ' — �,�,.��T.c=� L �.
�.M � � �
� , 1
, '- y
.� . .
. G , I
�..��. � ,
., ,. �
• � ' �: � Grunada Royale ilomete ° i .•
.. . � .;` , ,�, .;, . �
, , •� ., _�.' � •
'•, ,,. :C�- '� ��d
' ;�- , •
Four Seas \ < . �� � '� • ' �
Center ' _ 1 �
. - `�
• .r �s
•" • Seabreeze Plaz �
�
� �
`'�\i 1I I ,' ..• -
,'� s r-t �' :�'
c
Anz� l;igoon
r ��
c
v
a
. �+
�
� v
ti
0
.a
�
.
�
wb
s�
�
SAN FRANCISCO BAY
� ���
. ,
Fishin Pier
Restaurant/Public
��� -�� � �
� � d �%'��r� �Q` !� � ri
�
/� �" � � Q�
• �
: ,:.: •. .., 3
� : �` -��°
•• .
a'� �i'� ,, �� ' �'C'I�:I:I�lf1ltiri��s,� ci � /�Q�•
�� � �00 � � Osads+od�e o►ee- � � �
C• �y a o eo
�.�� .e
�r R��
, � • � v ,,I
. � ,
?�" "`�'
��I�
1
1��
0
Anza Lagoon
'�ri \ ' -
. �
♦ /
04
�
.�
�
�.
�
w
�..,.
.,.a
i�=
a-e
C��'
W
r. �
W
<
�y
0
�
.�
� <
z
W `
4, ��
.�
��
�
�
J,✓ �
• • ,