HomeMy WebLinkAbout111 Anza Boulevard - Environmental Document (3)EXHIi3IT A- NOTICE OF DET�RMIrIATION 35 BAYVIEW PLACE
<, cii-Y
� Tentative Procedure Pro�ect Address or Location
�c�:;:'�''';:��'�,>�'� ' S/1/74, Subject to Revision �
�� _ .�
6URl_ItS�AME � •
--,��,���7a � T0: COUNTY CL�RK .
��'�,. County of San Mateo
� �;��:, -: o
'R�,��,�o�„„�e Redwood City, CA. 94063 File No. ND-195P
CC: Secretary for Resources, Sacramento, CA.
Project Title: SEA6REEZE PLAZA
Applicant's Name: Raiser Architectural Group/San P1a�teo Sauare Investors
Address: 800 South Claremont Street City: San Mateo, CR. ZiP� 94402
County: San Mateo_ �
Contact Person : John Ra i ser Area Ccde 415 Phone : 342-9061 Ext ._
PROJECT DESCRIPTION; LOCATION:
The site consists of 120,000 SF of barren, low-lying land.fill at the end of Bayview Place,
adjacent to the Anza area's "outer lagoon". The project is a 4 story office building with
approxima e y , pf floor rea and 35� on-site parkin s c Th e b ild�n�hend
adiacent barkin4 deck will cover 6�% of the site; approXima�e�v �� ��b SF (Z�+% o
i e an scape . is an icipa ec��hat there w�ll be 4�� permanent empioyees
. � ..�..,,.�.��-�.�.,� .-���Y.> >.-.rl nnff'.�n cb.nn �.�ill {�n nv�n�rir-lorl
The City of Burlingame, by JOHN R. YOST on FEBRUARY 13
l� 79 , ccmpleted a review of the proposed project and determined tnzi.:
1. The project is exempt from () ONGOING PROJECT
CEQA requirements as : () FEASIBILITY F.�?D PLANNIDIG STUDY
( ) CATEGORICAL EXEI�IPTIO:�I
( ) EMERGENCY PRO�T�CT
'- . ( ) MINISTERIAL PROJFCT
2. It ���.xX�Dt��X�(����(X�>J((will not) have a significant effect on
the environment.
3 . It is (approved )��(X�X���'�A�1(�(���
e�aiTec�project study was filed bv the applicant which
Reasons for Conclusion: after re ' Gv nd p�parat
vere circu a�te ��o �ie �State��Clearin �io°use fo�rcommen�tY
a rove7—C— ii�e—Cfi�'s anninc on�gssi on iarc�Zb��
� -Pp -�-- ----x �- �----_,� �,--- __.___.� �....,..... ..�
� Go i s o� tnese e cumenz�
ecia� �ermit was su se iqien 1
con � -ians; in �i�--
An Environmental Impact Report �(D4�(,X(has not) been prepared pursuant to
the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as
am�nded.
APRIL 9, 1979 V � •"i�� -
Date Signed . - Signatur f Processing Official
Date Posted: APRIL 9, 1979
ASSISTANT CITY PLANNER
Title
ATTEST:
, , .
�a : t ��.��, ��✓ �,�� �- ��
EUELYN fl . 111 LL , Ci ty C1 erk ,
City of IIurlingame
e
� • � EXHIBIT B - NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Tentative Procedure
5/10/73, Subject to Revision 35 BAYVIEW PLACE
���,CITV o� Project Address or Location
BURLINGAME T0: STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
-?•...�, � 1400 - lOth Street
'�,��"" t .�' Sacramento, CA. 95814
��•���•�•• File No. ND-195P
Project Title: SEABREEZE PLAZA
Type of Permit: Special Permit to construct an office building in the C-4 District
Legal Description: Site "W", 2.76 acres MOL adjacent to NLY line of Anza Airport
Park Unit No. 5. APN 026-342-090
Zone: C-4
"Waterfront Commercial"
Property Owner:
Name: San Mateo Square Investors
Address: 800 South Claremont Street
San Mateo, CA. 94402
Applicant:
Name: Raiser Architectural Group
Add,ress: 800 South Claremont Street
San Mateo. CA. 94402
Contact Person: John Raiser
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Area Code: (415) Phone: 342-9061
The site consists of 120,000 SF of barren, low-lying land fill at the end of
Bayview Place, a public street off Airport Boulevard. The project is a four
story office building with approximately 106,000 SF of floor area. There will
be 256 parking spaces 5' below grade and an additional 103 spaces at the lobby
level 4' above grade, immediately west and east of the b.uilding. The office
building has two wings separated by a lobby area; the exterior is a reflective
glass curtain wall. It is anticipated that there will be 425 permanent employees
on site; a gymnasium, sauna, and coffee shop will be provided.
The office building and adjacent decks will cover 62% of the site. Approximately
28,500 SF (24� of the site) will be landscaped. The northern boundary of the
site will be developed to include a sidewalk and a private road leading to the
shore of the Anza area's "outer lagoon". Along the edge of this lagoon adjacent
to the project the applicant proposes to provide for public use a landscaped
recreation area and bicycle path. Separate permits for these improvements
will be required.
The City of Burlingame by John R. Yost on February 13
1979 , completed a review of the proposed project and determined that:
( X) It will not have a significant effect on the environment.
( ) No Environmental Impact Report is required.
/ �e
Q�a
a �
J�e
ea�/
�
5an Francisco Bay
�i�;ii �; ,t�f� ( � + � i;�;
'��!' i Ii1 �'� �� I ��i
I I j�l; i�� f
'i��l�ft � =!t
Exl�ting Otfice/
Warehouse Use
/ '� i
\ . ��I
Pr posed Oftice/ I I �
Restaurant Use I
\ ��/
_� �
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
� , � Proposed Road
( �
I
�
I
i
---__ .
SeaBreeze Plaza
Proposed Otfice Use
�
�g yttice�
�
Lagoon
t
Parking 6
Ai►port Boulevard
Facitities
�
—_..
_.... _ . -----. _. __
___��_ _
__. -- -_
, ,,--�_= �-� : _'--. =.��--�
Lagoon -_ .�---�,..:�.�"y---�--- _�..
---`'_'-----
�� Site Location
North �
-z-
REASONS FOR CONCLUSION:
An Initial Study was prepared for this project, and it determined that the project,
as modified, will not cause any of the following effects:
1. Conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community
where it is located;
2. Have a substantial, demonstrable negative aesthetic effect;
3. Substantially affect a rare or endangered species of animal or plant or
the habitat of the species;
4. Interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory
fish or wildlife species;
5. Breach published national, state, or local standards relating to solid waste
or litter control;
6. Substantially degrade water quality;
7. Contaminate a public water supply;
8. Substantially degrade or deplete ground water resources;
9. Interfere substantially with ground water recharge;
10. Disrupt or alter an archaeological site over 200 years old, an historic
site or a paleontological site except as part of a scientific study of
the site;
11. Induce substantial growth or concentration of population;
12. Cause an increase in traffic �vhich is substantial in relation to the
existing traffic load and capacity of the street system;
13. Displace a large number of people;
14. Encourage activities which result in the use of large amounts of fuel
or energy;
15. Use fuel or energy in a wasteful manner;
16. Increase substantially the ambient noise levels for adjoining areas;
17. Cause substantial flooding, erosion or siltation;
18. Expose people or structures to major geologic hazards;
19. Extend a sewer trunk line with capacity to serve new development;
20. Substantially diminish habitat for fish, wildlife or plants;
21. Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community;
22. Create a public health hazard or a potential public health hazard;
23. Conflict with established recreational, educational, religious or scientific
uses of the area;
24. Violate any ambient air quality standard, contribute substantially to an
existing or projected air quality violation, or expose sensitive receptors
to substantial pollutant concentrations.
February 13, 1979 �� �' ��
. Date Signed Signature Processing Official
Assistant City Planner (Tit1e)
Unless appealed within 10 days hereof the date posted, the determination shall be final.
Date Posted: MARCH 13, 1979.
DECLARATION OF POSTING
I declare under penalty of perjury that I am City Clerk of the City of Burlingame and that
I posted a true copy of the above Negative Declaration at the City Hall of said City near
the doors to the Council Chambers. .
Executed at Burlingame, California on �'y/ /��,� /.� , 197�.
Appealed: ( )Yes ( )No
� n.-/ _.Ci r/�'�i / V . / I! [ -C � �C -
EVE N H. HILL, CITY CLERK
CITY OF BURLINGAME
EXNIBIT C - INITIAL STUDY
Tentative Procedure
� ciTv 5/10/73, Subject to Revision
�,�. . .. �: � o.�
��"yir.� d7�'
zza
BURLINGAME T0: STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
�� ' 1400 - lOth Street
"�9�"'�� �� � 'q°� Sacramento, CA. 95814
�Mwico Nc�
35 BAYVIEW PLACE
Project Address or Location
File No. ND-195P
Project Title: SEABREEZE PLAZA
Type of Permit: Special Permit to construct an office building in the C-4 District
Legal Description: Site "W", 2.76 acres MOL adjacent to NLY line of Anza Airport
Park Unit No. 5. APN 026-342-090
Zone: C-4
"Waterfront Commercial"
Property Owner:
Applicant:
Name: San Mateo Square Investors Name: Raiser Architectural Group
Address: 800 South Claremont Street Address: 800 South Claremont Streei:
San Mateo, CA. 94402 San Mateo, CA. 94402
Contact Person: John Raiser Area Code: (415 Phone: 342-9061
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The site consists of 120,000 SF of barren, low-lying land fill at the end of
Bayview Place, a public street off Airport Boulevard. The project is a four
story office building with approximately 106,000 SF of floor area. There will
be 256 parking spaces 5' below grade and an additional 103 spaces at the lobby
level 4' above grade, immediately west and east of the building. The office
building has two wings separated by a lobby area; the exterior is a reflective
glass curtain wall. It is anticipated that there will be 425 permanent employees
on site; a gymnasium, sauna, and coffee shop will be provided.
The office building and adjacent decks will cover 62q of the site. Approx�mately
28,500 SF (24% of the site) will be landscaped. The northern boundary of the
site will be developed to include a sidewalk and a private road leading to the
shore of the Anza area's "outer lagoon". Along the edge of this lagoon adjacent
to the project the applicant proposes to provide for public use a landscaped
recreation area and bicycle path. Separate permits for these improvements will
be required.
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING:
The proposed project will be located in the Anza Airport Park Subdivision, adjacent
to San Francisco Bay in Burlingame. Until the early 1960's the area was tide and marsh
lands. In 1962 and 1963 permits were obtained to fill this property; street patterns
and utility systems were laid out with City approval, and work largely completed by
1970. In 1972 the zoning of the area was changed from light industrial to "waterfront
comnercial" (offices being a permitted use in this district at that time; they now
require a Special Permit).
The project site is in an area of high seismic activity, although removed from both
the San Andreas Fault and the Serra Fault. The natural soils immediately beneath the
recent fill consist of highly compressible soft clays with a thickness of about four
to five feet. Being close to San Francisco International Airport, the site is subject
to 65 CNEL sound levels; this is acceptable for new commercial projects with modest
exterior sound attenuation. Air quality in the vicinity is generally good; the site
falls within an area which has approximately 15-20 days per year with high oxidant
levels (0.10 ppm). Because the site consists of recently compacted fill, none of the
animals on the Department of the Interior's "Rare" or "Endangered" species list make
use of the property.
-2-
Present traffic levels on Airport Boulevard (adjacent to the site) are very low
at non-peak hours. During peak hours this four lane, central median street still
maintains free flow conditions. All the utility systems in the project area are new ,
and have substantial surplus capacity.
COORDINATIO�J WITH OTHER AGENCIES:
The proposed project complies with the terms of the Boundary Settlement and
Agreement between the State Lands Commission and Anza Pacific Corporation; this agreement
requires that this land be developed in accordance with the City's "waterfront commercial"
district zoning.
A shoreline permit will be required from the Bay Conservation and Development
Cor�nission for landscaping and paving within the 100' shoreline band. The proposed four
story building will be set back beyond this 100' band, with the bulk of the building
generally at right angles to the "inner lagoon" to further reduce the visual impact
from the project.
ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF PROJECT:
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided at the conclusion of this
section.)
Yes Maybe No
1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes
in geologic substructures? X
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcovering of the soil? X
c. Change in to�ography or ground surface
relief features? X
d. The destruction, covering or modification
of any unique geologic or physical features? X
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of .
soils, either on or off the site? X
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition
or erosion which may modify the channel of
a river or stream or the bed of the ocean
or any bay, inlet or lake? X
g. Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides,
' mudslides, ground failure, or similar
hazards? X
2. AIR. Will the proposal result in:
a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors?
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or
temperature, or any change in climate,
either locally or regionally?
X
X
X
3. WATER. Will the proposal result in:
a. Changes in currents, or the course or
direction of water movements, in either
marine or fresh waters? X
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns
or i;he rate and amount of surface water runoff? X
c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood
� waters? X
d. Change in the amount of surface water in any
water body? X
-3-
Yes, Maybe No
e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any
alteration of surface water quality,
including but not limited to temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
f. Alteration of the direction or rate of
flow of ground waters?
g. Change in the quantity of ground waters,
either through direct additions or
withdrawals, or through interception
of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
h. Substantial reduction in the amount of
water otherwise available for public
water supplies?
i. Exposure of people or property to water
related hazards such as flooding or tidal
waves?
X
X
X
X
X
4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in:
- a. Change in the diversity of species, or number
of any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs, g►~ass, crops, and aquatic plants)? X- Favorable
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of plants? X
c. Introduction of new species of plants into
an area, or in a barrier to the normal
• replenishment of existing species? X
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural
crop? X
5. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or
numbers of any species of animals (birds,
land animals including reptiles, fish and
shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? X
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of animals? X
c. Introduction of new species of animals into
• an area, or result in a barrier to the
migration or movement of animals? X
d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat? X
6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
X
X
7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce new
light or glare? X
8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or
planned use of an area? X
9. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources? X
b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource? X
-4-
Yes Maybe No
10. RISK OF UPSET. Does the proposal involve a risk .
of an explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited to, oil, -
pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the
event of an accident or upset conditions? X
11. POPULATION. Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate of the
human population of an area? X
12. HOUSING. 4Ji11 the proposal affect existing
housing, or create a demand for additional
housing?
�
13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement? x
b. Effects on existing parking facilities,
or demand for new parking? X
c. Substantial impact upon existing
� transportation systems? X
d. Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods? X
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic? X
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X
14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an
effect upon, or result in a need for new or
altered governmental services in any of the �
following areas:
a. Fire protection? X
b. Police protection? X
c. Schools? X
d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X
e. Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads? X
f. Qther governmental services? X
15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or
energy? X
b. Substantial increase in demand upon
existing sources of energy, or require the
development of new sources of energy? X
16. UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need
for nea� systems, or substantial alterations
to the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas? x
b. Communications systems? � X
c. 4Jater? X
d. Sewer or septic tanks? x
� e. Storm water drainage? X
f. Solid waste and disposal? X
- 5-
Yes Maybe No
17. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in:
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
b. Exposure of people to potential health
hazards?
X
X
18. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the
obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result in the
creation of an aesthetically offensive site open
to public view? X
19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an
impact upon the quality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunities? X
20. ARCHEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL. Will the proposal
result in an alteration of a significant
archeological or historical site, structure,
object or building?
21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
X
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten
to eliminate a olant or animal comnunity,
reduce the number or restrict the range of
a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the major _
periods of California history or prehistory? X •
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve ,�
short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, '
environmental goals? (A short-term impact
on the environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of time
while long-term impacts will endure well into
the future.) X
c. Does the project have impacts which are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (A project may impact on two
or more separate resources where the impact
on each resource is relatively small, but
where the effect of the total of those
impacts on the environment is significant.) X
d. Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X
RESPONSES TO IDENTIFIED ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS:
ITEM l.b. The existing grade for Lot W is approximately 5' below the adjacent
land. The proposed project will use this natural depression for parking.
Consequently, the first floor of offices is approximately 4' above grade
at the lot lines. The office building and adjacent parking decks will
cover 62q of the site.
ITEM 3.b. The site consists of 1.74 acres. Assuming a rainfall intensity of 32
inches per hour for a five minute peak or 2 inches per hour for a sixty
minute period, a design steady maximum flow of 7.50 cubic feet per secand
has been used for the project. This indicates that the site will utilize
roughly 6q of the available storm sewer capacity in this area, based upon
The Talbot Formula.
-6-
ITEM 4.a. It is proposed that 23.8� of the site area shall be developed with
landscaping. This shall have a very positive effect on what is
presently a barren, compacted earth parking area which is sporadically
maintained.
ITE�� 8. The site consists of 120,000 square feet of barren, low-lying land fill.
It is proposed to construct a four-story executive office building with
106,000 SF of floor area.
ITEM 11. It is expected that 425 permanent employees will use this building.
ITEM 13.a. There will be some 700 trips per day as a result of this project.
Research data indicates that 24.0% of the average weekday traffic is
concentrated at peak hours resulting in 168 cars involved at maximum
loading. The total acreage served by Bayview Place is sufficient to
generate approximately 350 trips during peak evening rush hour. This is
based upon full development of restaurants upon the State parcels, which
would be the most traffic-intensive use, plus office space as proposed
on Site W, plus a share of the traffic from the Purdy and Lo buildings
which front upon Airport Boulevard, but have access to Bayview. This
is a very minor traffic flow and signalization would not be justified
by this volume. This figure also assumes that restaurant and office
usage would peak simultaneously, which is an unlikely contingency.
SeaBreeze Plaza would contribute approximately 40q of this peak volume,
which is, in turn, anproximately 15% of the capacity of the roadway and
approximately 18% of the capacity of the intersection. It thus appears
that the impact of this project, while mensurable, is far below any
critical level.
ITEM 13.b. A total of 359 parking spaces will be provided on site. Of this number
256 will be in the depressed part of the site.
ITEM 13.d. See response to Item 13.a.
ITEM 14.a. The existing water system is equipped with Burlingame standard Greenberg
'76' fire hydrants which are approximately 280 feet apart and within
the street rights-of-way. The proposed project will be equipped with
an automatic sprinkler system. The area is also served by an underground
fire alarm system with Fire Alarm boxes and building connections per
Burlingame Fire Department requirements.
ITEM 14.f. The electrical power and natural gas systems for the project are supplied
by the Pacific Gas & Electric Company, while the telephone system is
provided by the Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Company. With the exception
of the existing three wire, overhead, streamline type of electric.
distribution systems down the center planter islands of Airport Boulevard
all of the electric power, telephone, fire alarm and street lighting conduit
systems and services are underground.
ITEM 15.a. The mechanical system that is being designed for SeaBreeze Plaza is one
that involves the use of a central variable volume cooling system
operating in conjunction with a constant velocity "skin" heating and cooling
system. This system has found favor among both aovernmental authorities
and owners because of its low energy operating costs.
Energy sources for the building have been limited to electrical means
of driving the open reciprocating refrigeration comoressors and fans,
and low pressure natural gas for the boiler.
Operational cycles that have been recomnended as part of the State of
California comprehensive energy plan have been included in this system.
The field erected main fan room will be fitted with an economizer cycle
designed to introduce cool outside air in lieu of inechanically refrigerated
supply air. For the location in Burlingame, it is estimated that this
feature will save approximately 40% of the annual operating hours of the
-7-
two 100 HP compressors. During the unoccupied night cycle, all
refrigeration is locked out and the building is permitted to lose heat
until a pre-set lower temperature is achieved. This setback provides .
savings in heat expended at night and provides cool thermal storage for
air conditioning credit when morning start-up occurs.
DETERMINATION:
On the basis of this initial evaluation: •
( ) I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
( X) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on
the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because
of the mitigation measures which have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
( ) I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment,
and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
Date Februar 13, 1979 � � ~' ��
Signa ure
For CITY OF BURLINGAME
•
Front setback
Side setback
Side yard
Rear yard
Lot coverage ���
Building height
Landscaped area
On-site p!cg.spaces
Project
Proposal
3 8—� :;
n.a.
40'
60'
o SF(62�)
9 �_9��
16�
359
Code
Requirement
_--30 �
10'
25'
none
.P.over 50
15 °6
354
after
8-5 5 PM
Full time employees on site 425 i p
Part time employees on site 0 � 0 �
i
Vi si tors/custor�ers (weekday) � 35 ' 0
� _�. _ --- --
Visitors/customers (Sat.Sun.); 0 I 0
i i
Residents on property � 0 0
i
Trip ends to/from site � 700 � 0
Peak hour trip ends ! 168 i 0
�
Trucks/service vehicles 2 � 0
�38 feet measure� from the ortherly property line which will a join a new
--_ _. _ __ __
road to be cons ructed for access to tate owned land adjacent to the Bay
----.._ � _
and the lagoon_ The propo ed buildin is 210' from the end of the ne rest
- ------- - --- --- -
existing public street.
* Land use classifications are: residential (# dwelling un�ts); office use; retail sales;
restaurant/cafe; manufacturing/repair shop; warehousing; other (to be described).
p�30JECT ��SESSM�R�T ,�?�A"� �°� 1, -7�
� �' �- �'f-� ' 35 BAYV I EW PLAC E I
BUF`cl_If4GAME `
�' /3/�g ' ��i�� j�, ' project address
" �� °�� �"""` e SEABREEZE PLAZA ~�
date date � �����==� �! _ _ m
prepared revised °p.•t����E°� project name - if any
1. APPLICANT Raiser Architectural Group 342-go61
. name telephone no.
800 South Claremont Street, San Mateo, CA. 94402
applicant s address: street, city, zip code ---
2
3.
4
Joseph Kent, Director of Architecture 342-9061
contact person, if different telephone no.
TYPE OF APPLICATION AND Special Permit to construct a 4 story office building
PROJECT DESCRIPTION with apnroximately 106,000 SF of floor area. There
will be 256 parking spaces 5' below grade, and an
additional 103 spaces on decks at the lobby level 4' above qrade,
immediately west and east of the building. It is anticipated that there
will be 425 �ermanent em lo ees on site; a qymnasium, s.auna locker and
s ov� e c'�f i t i e n o ee s p w i T o i�e .c.T�— e es r an r�
will I�ea� �rom t�i� �uil�dinq to t�ie ad�acent I�ac!oon, a po�tion o� which
Ref. code section(s): (25.41 .025 ) ( � wi 11 be landscaped by
the appl i cant for pub 1 i c
use.
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION 2, �6 acr s MOL adjacent to NLY 1 i n� of Anza Ai rport
( 026-342-090 ) ( "W"� ) ( 3 ) ( Park Unit 5 )
APN lot no. block no. subdivision name
(yes) X (no)_
owners consent to
application filed
(yes) - Frto-)- ( 10/2 /78 ) Site plan showing: property lines; public sidewalks and
curbs; all structures and improvement�;
paved on-site parking; landscaping.
(yes) -(7t�� (10/2/78 ) Floor plans of all buildings showing: gross floor area
by type of use* on each floor plan.
(yes) -F►t�)- ( 10/2/78 ) Building elevations, cross sections (if relevant).
(yes) -Fr+a�- ( �p/2/�g ) Site cross section(s) (if relevant).
(other) (10/18/78 ) ''Initial Study" consistent with CEQA requirements.
( C-4 ) ( 120,000 SF )
zoning district land area, square feet
San Mateo Square Investors (yes) (no) X
���O��or��Lla�&mon��S�t�eet Proof of ownership
an Mateo, 0 ' filed
PROPERTY: PHYSICAL CONDITIONS
Required Date received
5. PROJECT PROPOSAL
0
_ f�y��_ � no � � _ _ �
Proper�ty is undeveloped
at present.
Location plan of adjacent properties/written description
of adjacent land uses.
Other tenants/finns on property:
no. firms ( ) no. employees ( )
1floor area occupied ( SF office space)
( SF other)
no. employee vehicles regularly on site ( )
no. company vehicles at this location ( )
7. STAFF REVIEW
Project proposal/plans have been circulated for review by:
date circulated reply recei.ved
City Engineer ( 10/2/78 ) �y�25j' (no)
Building Inspector ( 10/2/78 ) -(yEsj- (no)
Fire Inspector ( 10/2/78 ) �yes} (no)
Police Department ( 9 /20/78 ) (yes) �nQ� '
City Attorney ( 11/3/78 ) -(y�s� (no)
memo attached
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
�5'�S1' (no)
(yes) (no)
8. CEQA REQUIREMENTS
Is project subject to CEQA review? (yes) -�no�
Has a hlenative Declaration been prepared and signed?- Fy�)- (no) File No. ND- P.
%'��lot yet determined. date signed ( )
� Is an EIR required? (yes) (no) When will the RFP be circulated? ( )
`An "Initial Study" has been repared and is now being revised by the app licant. It may be
9. SUMMARY OF �TAFF CONCERNS/POSSIBLE MITIGATION MEASURES possible,to post a Negative
Declaration if there are no
Concerns Mitigation Measures other �"responsible
- ���requiremen�s t
Designation of "Site lJ" in both
Anza Master Plan and Blayney
Report 3 4laterfront Element as
"hotel use".
Peak hour traffic generated by
this 106,000 SF office building
Policy decision on Waterfront Element
and future zoning for the Anza area.
Review Bayview Place/Airport Blvd.
intersection; consider need/timing/cost
of traffic signal.
Review the % added by this project to
the ultimate capacities of Peninsula
Ave. interchange and Airport Blvd./
Bayshore Hwy. intersection; consider
improvements required/associated costs/
Bayfront Development Charge policy.
Lack of street frontage for projec�. Require Bayvi�w Place be extended at
applicant's e�epense to City standards.
Public access to lagoon. Require landscape plan with pedestrian
pa'� arfd-fiagoar� ;
landscape lapoon banks for public use.
0
• 6. ADJACENT BUSINESSES/LAND USES
Required Date received
�Yes) - frro-}' ( 10/18/78 )
10.
Date first received (9 /18/7$ ) Accepted as complete ( '-- ) P.C. study (--- )
Is application ready for a public hearing? (yes) (no) Recommended date ( )
Date staff report mailed to applicant ( ) Date Commission hearing ( )
Application approved ( ) Uenied ( ) Appeal to Council (yes) (no)
Date Council hearing ( ) Apalication a roved ( ) Denied ( )
. � 11/3/78
signed date
�l