Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout601 Ansel Avenue - Staff Report (2)f_ City of Burlingame Negative Declaration Address: 601 Ansel Avenue ITEM #? Meeting Date: 12/9/96 Request: Negative Declaration for new three-story, 25-unit apartment building at 601 Ansel Avenue, zoned R-3. An on-grade parking lot located under the building provides space for the required 38 parking stalls for the 25 one-bedroom units. Applicant: N. N. Gabbay Property Owner: Con Brosnan Lot Area: 21416 SF General Plan Designation: Medium-high Density Residentia Adjacent Development: Multiple Family Residential CEQA Status: Refer to Negative Declaration 483-P APN: 029-100-180, 190 & 200 Zoning: R-3 Previous Use: Three separate lots containing a total of ten dwelling units Proposed Use: Three-story, 25-unit apartment building Summary: The applicant is proposing a new three-story building with parking on grade under two floors of living space at 601 Ansel Avenue, zoned R-3. The structure will have 25 one- bedroom apartment units including a disabled accessible living unit on the first floor. Parking to code requirements is provided for 38 parking spaces, 31 covered and 7 uncovered (SO % covered where 80 % is required). The first floor has one one-bedroom, disabled accessible unit. The second and third floor each contain twelve one-bedroom units. The one-bedroom units range in size from 710 SF to 750 SF, with patios and decks for each unit. The project has landscaped front, exterior side and rear setback areas; the interior side setback is paved and some of it is used for parking access. The second story also has a landscaped interior court above the parking garage. The site now consists of three lots with a total of ten dwelling units. The applicant intends to merge the three lots to create a 21,416 SF lot. The existing structures will have to be demolished to accommodate the new building. This project as proposed meets all zoning code requirements, and no special permits or variances are required. However, since the project consists of new construction of more than four apartment units, the project is not exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. Therefore, an initial study was prepared. A Negative Declaration has been prepared for review and action by the Planning Commission. As presented the Negative Declaration concludes that there are no significant effects on the environment as a result of this project. The purpose of the present review is to hold a public hearing and evaluate that conclusion based on the initial study, facts in the Negative Declaration, public testimony and Planning Commission observation and experience. � � NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pro�osed Front Setback (Ansel Ave.): 15'-0" Interior Side Setback: First Floor 7' -0" Second Floor 9'-0" Third Floor 9'-0" Exterior Side Setback: First Floor 7' -6" Second Floor 7'-6" Third Floor 8' -6" NOTE: Eaves projecting into side setback are exempt (C.S.25.32.080 la). Rear Setback: 601 Ansel Avenue Required 15' -0" 1 : 1 . � 7' -6" 7'-6" 8'-6" First Floor 15'-0" 15'-0" Second Floor 15'-0" 15'-0" Third Floor 20' -0" 20' -0" Lot Coverage: 59.5 % 60 % Building Height: 35' 35' NOTE: The towers proposed to provide skylights exceed the 35'-0" height limit by 6'-0", as allowed by C.S. 25.08.340 (5% of roof area may project not more than 10 feet above top of parapet). Declining Height Envelope: N/A N/A On-site Parking Spaces: 38 spaces 38 spaces Covered Spaces: 31 spaces 31 spaces This project meets all other zoning code requirements. 2 NEGATIVE DECLARATION 601 Ansel Avenue Staff Comments: The City Engineer notes (November 14, 1996 memo) that parking spaces No. 36 and 37 need to have bollards at the back next to wall. The Chief Building Inspector (November 12, 1996 memo) has no comments at this time. The Parks Director (November 20, 1996 memo) indicates that the project will require 8 new 24" box size trees in addition to those listed as "to remain", and that the project requires a Water Conservation Plan. Complete landscape and irrigation plans must be approved before building permit is issued. The Fire Marshal (November 12, 1996 memo) indicates that the building must be protected by a complete automatic sprinkler system, and a complete fire alarm system, both of which must be connected to an approved central station. Planning staff would note that in order to add mitigations or modifications to the project through the negative declaration the Planning Commission would have to find, based on specific facts, that the project would have a signiiicant (negative) effect in one of the areas of evaluation identiiied in CEQA and then note that the proposed mitigation would reduce that effect to an acceptable level. If impacts cannot be mitigated or additional information is needed by the Planning Commission in order to make a iinding of no significant impact then the applicant must prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Findings of overriding concern (accepting impacts which cannot be mitigated) can only be made in an EIR. The initial study identified the following mitigation measures to be applied as conditions of approval for this project. The project is subject to the state-mandated water conservation program. A complete Irrigation Water Management Plan must be submitted with landscape and irrigation plans at time of permit application. 2. This proposal is required to meet the Tree Protection and Reforestation Ordinance passed by the City of Burlingame in 1993 and enforced by the Parks Department. 3. All construction must abide by the construction hours established by the municipal code. 4. All new utility connections to serve the site and which aze affected by the development will be installed to meet current code standards and diameter; sewer laterals will be checked and replaced if necessary. Abandoned utilities and hookups will be removed. 5. Should any cultural resources be discovered during construction, work will be halted until they are fully investigated. 6. The project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 1995 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. cc: N.N. Gabbay, architect 3