The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About113 Anita Road - Approval Letter. � �' . � _. C�.C�.e l'�.z�� .a.0 ��.Cz'.L�rC.c�c�x�.e CITY HALL-501 PRIMROSE ROAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME� CALIFORNIA 94010 (415) 342-8625 April 19, 1988 Mr. Vincent Lee 170 Port Royal Foster City, CA 94404 Dear Mr. Lee: Since there was no appeal to or suspension by the City Council, the April 11, 1988 Planning Commission approval of your application for a condominium permit and side setback variance became effective April 19, 1988. This application was to allow a six unit residential condominium project at 113 Anita Road. The April 11, 1988 minutes of the Planning Commission state the condominium permit and variance were granted with the following conditions: l. that the conditions of the Planning Commission�s action on this project on January 13, 1986 shall be met; 2. that the conditions of the Fire Marshal�s March 8, 1988 memo and the City Engineer�s March 10, 1988 memo shall be met; 3. that the project shall not include a remote controlled sliding security gate across the driveway or intercom system from the outside of the gate to individual units; 4. that one parking space at the end shall be designated for guest parking with no garage door and be marked accordingly; 5. that no property line fence or wall and fence combination shall exceed the height of 6' from grade; and 6. that this permit and variance approval shall be valid for one year or until a building permit is issued and the project executed. Mr. Vincent Lee -2- April 19, 1988 This approval is valid for one year during which time a building permit must be issued. One extension of up to one year may be considered by the Planning Commission if application is made before the end of the first year. Sincerely yours, J�� " ►� Margaret Monroe City Planner MM/s att. cc: Vincent & Susan Lee (prop.owners) Chief Bldg. Inspector (w/att.) Assessor�s Office (Lot 3 and Ptn. Lot 4, Block 20, Lyon & Hoag; APN 029-235-130) . ` CITY iRLINGAME January 21, 1986 Mr. v�illiam [�agle Triangle Enterprises Post Office BoX 1513 Burlingamz, CA 94011 Dear Mr. Nagle: C�':�j�� z.�� iri �l� Ltx'lzxr.��t�t.�� SAN MATEO COUNTY CITY NALL-501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CAIIFORNIA 94010 l�_..__.__ TEL:{4i5) 3a2-893t Since th2r� was no appeal to or suspension by the City Council, the January 13, 1985 Planning Commission approval of your condominium per�it and variance application became effective January 21, 1986. This application was to allow construction of a 6-unit resi3ential condominium and to allow a third Floor e:cit balcony to extend 2'-5" into th� requira3 side yard area at lI3 Anita Road. The January 13, 1986 minutes of the Planning Commission state your ao�lication was a�ooroved with the followinq conditions: 1. that the conditions ot the rire Marshal's August 13, 1985 �nemo, the Chief i�uilding Inspector's September 3, 1985 memo and the City Engin�er's November ��, 1985 ;nemo shall be met; 2. that the �roject as built shall be consistent with the plans submitted to the Planninq Department and 3ate stamped July 25, 1985; 3. that the quest parkinq space designated on the plans shall be permanently set aside for guests an3 shatl be i3entified as available for guests only; and 4. that a rollinq security qate be placed at least 8' behind the property lin� with intercom system on the �utside which connects to each unit to assur� guest oarkinq is a�c�ssible. All si�e improvements and construction work will require se:�arate a[�plic.�tion to th� Bu.il:�inq D�c�artm�nt. Sincerely yours, � � ' ! � 'i � � ,��. , l(,� `�( l,�..-� �'� l,�y �' �� arga`r�t ��Ionro� City Planner til�vl / S att. �._. : ��ieF �;ui1 :i.^.� Ins�,�ctar (w,%3tt. ) cc: Assessor's Offic�, Redwoo: �.ity !I�ot 3 & Ptn. Lot 4, 31oc;: 20, Lyo:� & ,��3q �ub. ; APN J29-?_35-i30) `�, DATE : 9�� ,r MEMO T0: CITY ENGINEEP, CHIEF BUILDING I^' EC;�R FIRE MARSHAL DIRECTOR OF P RKS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: An apRlication has been received �or the above project for review by the Planning Commission. The appiic�;.ion will be scheduled for S� O at tf�eir f�J�� meeting. We wouid G�DD;�GCiate having your con-�ren �s by /%7� �,y�1y�� Thank you. �� pr,�N► �,` _ �.-, �. . ,. . � 8�,�o,-�c. 7� l-f�-✓r ,�✓ !i !� �a S p c o �z►,�1 cf�t t�J �� }� S ysXh C'E�lti4L STQ-n ��J . ILIG�J / Tl�./1�A l�y � A�P� � � MEMO TO: PLANNING FROM: ENGINEERING DATE: MARCH 10, 1988 RE: TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP AND CONDOMINIUM PERMIT PLANS - 6-UNIT DEVELOPMENT - 113 ANITA ROAD - P.M. 85-7 Attached is a copy of my November 4, 1985 memo regarding this map and permit. All conditions still apply and should be attached to permit approvals. In review of the final Building plans, it is apparent that the detailed information requested has not yet been provided and unless provided, will not allow issuance of the Building Permit. - ,� / � Frank C. Erbacher dj Attachment '�� :%` � � � ��i �i i� �� hiuV � - i985 MEMO T0: FROM ��{,�kI�N(i � ,, Planning Department Department of Public Works - Engr. Div. November �l, 1985 Re: Tentative Condominium Map and Condominium Permit Plans - 6-Unit Development 113 Anita Road - P. M. 85-7 1. Drainage patterns of adjacent properties need be determined. Ex- isting drainage patterns cannot be blocked. How are all roof and paving drainage to get to street? 2. Site plan grades on Burlingame datum must be shown. Show adjacernt site elevaticns on site plans and show complete prcposed final site elevaiiens. 3. New curb, gutter and sidewalk, designed by applicant's Engineer, to be installed by the applicant, complete wit� any required paving. Applicant's Civil Engineer to design curb, gutter and sidewalk grades based on survey inf�rmation at least 100 feet past property line. 4. Indicate where a trash enclosure may be installed behind the front setbacks. 5. Show locations of adjacent property's driveways. 6. All utilities shall be installed underground, including any trans- formers proposed on-site. 7. Indicate lot lines on parking layout. Appears that proposed fencing restricts parking back out distance by probably four inches or so. 8. A detailed survey plat., to the detail of a re�ord map,is required showing the basis or all corner sets. City Engineer review and approval is required. -�l � �; / � f , � _ --;� -<, ��/ �� -f- �runk C. Erhacher City Engineer I have the following comments on this study item: mg