Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout50 California Drive - ResolutionRECORDING REQUESTED BY: Planning Department City of Burlingame WHEN RECORDED MAIL T0: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 zo� � -o29ss� 10:13 am 03'14J11 R1 Fee: NO FEE Count �f Pages 1g Recorded in qfficial Records C��unty of S;vn Mateo PAark. Church Ass,s�cr•Ccur.[ r' r � � le.k-Rer_order � � ''� '' �' '' i'I� � 0�'�!' ''' '� � � 0 ���� �� � �'!i.l;���� Iw�� Il�� l ��I ;� l;li��1�►11�1�!I ; ��l1���� � �� o � o �, � 5� ��I 5 9 6 * Resolution No. 12-2011 50 CALIFORNIA DRIVE — 029-243-020 TITLE OF DOCUMENT I hereby certify this to be a full, true and correct copy of the document it purports to be, the original of which is on file in my ,,'='�: •.�,::-;- -:��.. o�ce. ; �: : _. • r '-,�, • '"t ?? Date: February 25, 2011 ' � '�� �' � � �; ' �•��� .�.. 1, � . . ' � � William eeker, ommunity Development Director . RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW AND PARKING VARIANCE RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for Commercial Desiqn Review and Parking Variance for heiqht for interior and exterior chanqes to an existinp automobile dealership at 50 California Drive, zoned C-2, Subarea D of the Burlinqame Avenue Commercial Area, Putnam Leasinq, 3 California Drive, Burlingame, CA 94010. qroqertv owner. APN: 029-243-020: WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on February 14, 2011, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15301 - Existing facilities, Class 1(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances are exempt from environmental review. 2. Said Commercial Design Review and Parking Variance are approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Commercial Design Review and Parking Variance are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. � � , irman I, Y � `��� �;�ecretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame,� do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14`h dav of Februarv, 2011 by the following vote: 50 CALIFORfJIA DRI�lE - i�ESO 12-2011 AYES: Aur3n, ��auchi, 3aul, Lindstrom, Terrones, Vistica, Yie NOES: None ABSENT: None RECUSE: None , r ti � Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Variance. 50 California Drive Effective February 24, 2011 Categorical Exemption, Commercial Design Review and Parking that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped January 27, 2011, sheets A.001 through A.401, EO-1 and E1.0; 2. that the City Arborist shall work with the applicant to select an alternative street tree (if feasible) that will require less irrigation and permit the applicant to secure maximum LEED points for the project; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of building, which would include changing or adding exterior walls or parapet walls, shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 5. that if the structure is demolished or the envelope changed at a later date the parking Variance as well as any other exceptions to the code granted here will become void; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; � � that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2010 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; and THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION 10. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans.