HomeMy WebLinkAbout3 California Drive - Staff ReportITEM #8
City of Burlingame
Sign Exception
Address: 3 California Drive
Meeting Date: 11/22/99
Request: Sign exception for height of ground sign on the secondary frontage (Peninsula Avenue) at
3 California Drive, zoned C-2, Subarea D.
Applicant: Bill Gifford
Property Owner: Joseph and Mary Putnam, Trs
Lot Area: � 55,697 SF
General Plan: Commercial, Service and Special Sales
Adjacent Development: Auto Row, Retail Auto Dealerships
APN: 029-242-240
Zoning: C-2, Subarea D
CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15311 - Accessory Structures, Class
11, construction or placement of minor structures accessory (appurtenant to) existing commercial,
industrial, or institutional facilities, including but not limited to (a) on-premise signs.
History: In February, 1995, a sign exception was approved at this site to add a double-faced pole
sign on the primary frontage (California Drive) (February 13, 1995, P.C. Minutes). The total sign
area approved by the sign exception at the site was 4 signs, 190 SF on the primary frontage and 4
signs, 280.5 SF on the secondary frontage. A total of 8 signs, 470.5 SF of signage was approved at
this site in the previous sign exception.
Currently, there are 6 existing signs on the primary frontage and 3 signs on the secondary frontage.
On the primary frontage, there are two double-faced pole signs (4'-3" tall x 8'-5" long, 71.4 SF in
area) and (2'-10" tall x 14'-2" long, 80 SF in area); and two wa11 signs (3'-6" x 17', 59.5 SF each sign),
for a total of 6 signs, 270.4 SF in area. On the secondary frontage there is one double-faced pole sign
(4'-5" tall x 22' long, 194.2 SF in area) and one wall sign (3'-6" tall x 17' long, 59.5 SF in area), for
a total of 3 signs, 253.7 SF in area. Staffwould note that the 80 SF double-faced `Used Cars' pole
sign was never removed, as required by the sign exception approval in 1995. Please refer to
Table 1 for a description of existing signage on the site.
Recently, Volvo has incorporated a new design which requires replacement of all existing Volvo and
Mazda signs on the site with only Volvo signs. Mazda cars will no longer be sold from the site. In
September, 1999, the applicant obtained an administrative sign permit from the Planning Dept. to
remove all existing signs on the primary and secondary frontages, with the exception of the 194 SF
double-faced pole sign located at the corner of California Drive and Peninsula Avenue. To this date,
only the existing wall signs have been removed by the applicant. A total of 4 signs were approved
on the primary frontage with this sign permit. One double-faced pole sign (2'-10" tall x 6'-5" long,
3 6. 3 6 SF in area) and two wall signs (3'-1 " tall x 23'-1 " long, 71.2 SF each sign), for a total of 4
signs, 179 SF in area (4 signs, 300 SF inaximum allowed). These signs comply with current sign code
regulations and are described in Table 2. The sign permit and elevations of each approved sign are
included in the staff report for your review. There were no new signs proposed on the secondary
frontage.
Sign Exception 3 Califo�nia Drive
Requests for this project: The applicant, Bill Gifford, is requesting a sign exception for height of
ground sign on the secondary frontage (Peninsula Avenue) for Putnam Volvo at 3 California Drive,
zoned C-2, Subarea D. The applicant is requesting the following:
1) Sign exception for height of ground sign on the secondary frontage (Peninsula Avenue) (20'-0"
proposed, where 12' is allowed) (C.S. 22.38.020).
Proposed Signs on the Secondary Frontage (Peninsula Avenue):
The site contains a primary frontage (California Drive) and a secondary frontage (Peninsula Avenue).
The applicant is proposing to replace an existing double-faced pole sign (194 SF, 20' in height),
located at the corner of California Drive and Peninsula Avenue, with a double-faced ground sign on
the secondary frontage (Peninsula Avenue). The proposed ground sign (3'-7" tall x 11'-6" long, 82.4
SF in area) would read `VOLVO' and measures 20' in height from grade to the top of the structure.
The total signage proposed on the secondary frontage is two signs (double-faced ground sign)
measuring 82.4 SF in area (4 signs, 100 SF allowed). A sign exception is required for the height of
the ground sign (20' proposed where 12' is the maximum allowed).
Total Proposed Signage on the Site:
The total signage proposed on the site is 6 signs measuring 261 SF in area (9 signs, 524 SF currently
existing on the site).
TABLE 1- EXISTiNG 5IGNAGE ON SITE
Putnam Volvo/Mazda
Primary Frontage Size/Area Height Number
California Drive
VOLVO 4'-3" x 8'-5" 15'-0" 2
Pole Sign (2x) 71.4 SF
Used Cars 2'-10" x 14'-2" 16'-0" 2
Pole Sign (2x) 80 SF
MAZDA 3'-6" x 17'-0" 21'-6" 1
Wall Sign 59.5 SF
PUTNAM 3'-6" x 17'-0" 21'-6" 1
Wall Sign 59.5 SF
Primary TOTAL 270.4 SF 21'-6" 6
Zonin Code Allows 300 SF see GS. 22.20. 060 4
(cont'd)
2
Sign Excephion
TABLE 1- EXISTING SIGNAGE ON SITE
Putnam Volvo/Mazda
3 California Drive
(cont 'd)
Secondary Frontage Size/Area Height Number
Peninsula Avenue
MAZDA 4'-5" x 22' 20'-0" 2
Pole Sign (2x) 194.2 SF
MAZDA 3'-6" x 17'-0" 21'-6" 1
Wall Sign 59.5 SF
Secondary TOTAL 253.5 SF 21'-6" 3
Zonin Cocle Allows 100 SF see C.S. 22.20. 060 4
TOTAL ALL SIGNS 524 SF 21'-6" 9
TABLE 2- APPROVED AND PROPOSED SIGNAGE ON SITE
Putnam Volvo
Primary Frontage Size/Area Height Number
California Drive
VOLVO (3'-1" x 23'-1") 25'-0" 1
Wall Sign (Approved) 71.2 SF
voLvo (3�-1�� X 23�-1°� zs�-o° i
Wall Sign (Approved) 71.2 SF
VOLVO (2'-10" x 6'-5") x 2 13'-0" 2
Pole Sign (2x) (Approved) 36.36 SF
Primary TOTAL 179 SF 25'-0" 4
Zonin Code Allows 300 SF see C.S. 22.20. 060 4
Secondary Frontage Size/Area Height Number
Peninsula Avenue
VOLVO (3'-7" x 11'-6") *20'-0" 2
Ground Sign (2x) (Proposed) 82.4 SF (12' max. allowed)
Secondary TOTAL 82.4 SF 20'-0" 2
Zonin Code Allows 100 SF see C.S. 22.20. 060 2
TOTAL ALL SIGNS 261 SF 25'-0" 6
* Sign Exception for height of ground sign.
3
Sign Exception 3 California Drive
Staff Comments: The Chief Building Inspector, City Engineer and Fire Marshall reviewed the
project and had no comments.
Study Questions:
At their meeting on November 8, 1999, the Planning Commission asked several questions regarding
this application and directed this item to be placed on the November 22, 1999 consent calendar
provided all questions are answered (P.C. Minutes November 8, 1999). The existing pole sign is
20'-0" in height. The new sign is also proposed to be 20'-0" in height, as measured from the ground
to the top of the sign structure. The proposed ground sign will be internally illuminated with
fluorescent lighting.
The commission asked why the code requires a 2' opening between the base and the ground on
a monument sign. Staff would note that the 2' opening is only required on a sign which does not
have a solid pedestal of masonry or concrete, and is required to prevent deterioration of a sign
which is directly in contact with the ground and irrigation water. There is a concrete pad under
the ground sign which raises it 4" above the ground surface. Therefore, a sign exception is not
required for the spacing between the ground and bottom of ground sign. The panels covering the
poles are made of inetal and will further prevent deterioration.
Required Findings for Sign Exception: In order to grant a Sign Exception relating to height, area,
location or number of signs the Planning Commission must apply the following circumstances (Code
Section 25.06.110 a-b):
(a) any exception granted shall be subject to such conditions as will assure that the adjustment
thereby authorized shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the
limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and the district in which the subject property
is situate; and
(b) because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape,
topography, street frontage, location or surrounding land use; the size or height of the
building on which the sign is to be located; the classification of the street or highway on which
the sign is located or designed primarily to be viewed from, the strict application of zoning
regulations is found to deprive subject property of the privileges enjoyed by other properties
in the vicinity and under identical zone classification.
Findings: Based on the fact that the proposed ground sign is in proportion to the mass and scale of
the existing building on the site and is consistent with the use of this building, that the proposed
ground sign is the same height (20'-0") as the existing pole sign being replaced which is a legal height
for a pole sign, that the proposed sign area (82.4 SF total double-faced) is smaller than the existing
pole sign area (194.2 SF total double-faced), that there are other pole signs in this area of auto row
the same size and height or larger which have been granted sign exceptions, and that auto row is a
unique area in the city for commercial signage, the project is found to be compatible with the above
requirements for a sign exception.
4
Sign Exception
3 California Drive
Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative
action should be taken by resolution. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated. At the
public hearing the following conditions should be considered:
Conditions:
that the signs shall be installed as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and
date stamped September 30, 1999, Site Plan (11" x 17"), Ground Sign Elevation and Ground
Sign Specifications (8'/2" x 11 ") and that the ground sign shall not exceed 20'-0" in height as
measured from adjacent grade to the top of the sign structure;
2. that the two existing double-faced pole signs (4'-3" x 8'-5", 71.4 SF, `VOLVO' and 2'-10" x 14'-
2", 80 SF, `Used Cars') and three wall signs (3'-6" x 17', 59.5 SF each sign, `MAZDA' and
`PUTNAM') on the primary and secondary frontages shown as signs A, C, D, F, and G on the
site plan approved by the Planning Department on September 30, 1999, shall be removed prior
to issuance of a building permit for installation of the new signs approved in this sign exception
on California Drive and Peninsula Avenue;
3. that the applicant shall apply for a sign exception for any additional signs to be put on this site
prior to installation of the sign; and
4. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the municipal code and of the 1998 edition
California Building and Fire Codes as amended by the City of Burlingame.
Ruben Hurin
Planner
c. Bill Gifford, applicant
5
C,�ity oJ Liurlingame f lannin ommission Minules
Novenrber 8, 199�
questions from the ommissioners and the item was set for public,�iearing on November 22, 1999, if all of the requested
information is p vided to the staff in�`timely manner.
APPLICATI N FOR NEGATIVE �ECLARATION AND� PARKING VARIANCE;FOR DEMOLITION OF TWO
APART T BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTIOI� OF A NEW TWO-STORY OFFICE BUII.,DING AT 1411
l.1-IAATT�T �%FiT�TTTG� rII1TTLTl /t 1 (�TTT A TT A T� it�r-�r.�.r� t� . �� .__-
CP Mdnroe briefly presented the staff report and the commissioners asked: am unclear on the size of the access
ease ent, the width of the building at the front is 36'-10" and at the rear is 31'-6" remainder of site does not seem to
wo with easement dimensions, please clarify easement size; concerned about parking, how will the city benefit from
t� applicant providing the easement when the city needs to provide the ;back up area for the applicant to get any
arking; applicant doesmot know the number of employees, could they take up all of Lot B-1 and then the public would
not be able to use the,�ot; present plan removes all landscaping, want to sEe landscaping incorporated into this project;
if the city did grant this project and received the access easement, what,would happen if the city sold parking lot B-1,
would we have a-�uilding without any parking; what is the size of the office building at 1422 Chapin, what were its
parking requirements, and how were they met; clarify the effect on Lot B-1 of the encroachment permit granted to the
Garden Center* where will the display cases be situated; need additional information on the plans, show existing parking
lot configura�ion, landscaped area removed, new area becoming parking; encourage the applicant to research use of
"uni-stall" p�rking in this proposal, would it make it possible to make up missing parkin s ace and add landsca in
concerned about parking right up against the building, how prevent damage, more effi gent to provide a lands ap d�
buffer area, may need to reduce building area to achieve; can the variance for parking go with the building and not with
the land so that the parking lot is not encumbered permanently; what is the height of the adjacent buildings, especially
the Garden Center; why was glass block used on the north elevation of the building instead of regular fenestration.
Cominissioners questions continued: concerned about using city property to enhance development, mentioned policy
used for Saks project, did not favor this concept then; how big is the building description, says 8289 SF plans say 8189
S�' which is correct; Sheet A1 notes 36 parking spaces provided where 27 required, do not agree with counting the city
parking lot; Lot B-1 has 9 parking spaces now, when make perpendicular plans show 13 why staffreport say 10; can
this office space be used by real estate tenants; do;a study which shows parking and structure on-site so can see
comparison, could get parking on grade with two stories of building above, would like to see parking layout and building
square footage; this use of city parking lot allows a bigger building than if it stood alone; the parking studies referred
to in January and September 1998 were done when 1420 Burlingame Avenue was vacant and before Molly ,Stone
opened, there has been a marked decrease in available parking in this area since Molly Stone opened, applicant,�should
address; applicant should respond to the City Engineer's comments especially note that the city can mal�e the lot
perpendicular parking without the applicant's help as well as responding to numbers 2, 3, 4 in the memo; w t was the
circumstance of the dedication of 25 feet at the front of the project site for widening Chapin Ave.; nee lc�to be more
explicit about the rational for each variar}�e; concerned about the lack of landscaping; when a proj t asks for 5
variances there is often something wrong w�th the project, how can you have a successful project witho t 5 variances.
There were no further questions from the mmission and the item was set for public hearing on Nov ber 22, 1999,
providing all the information was submi�d to staff in time for preparation of the staff report.
APPLICATION FOR SIGN EXCEPTION FOR A NEW GROUND SIGN AT 3 CALIFORIVIA DRIVE, ZONED C-2,
AREA D. (BILL GIFFORD APPLIC�NT AND JOE P TNAM pROPERTY OWNERI
CP Monroe briefly presented the staff report and the commissioners asked: how tall is the pole sign in place now; is
the new sign proposed to be at the same height; how will the sign be illuminated; what is the reason for the 2 foot
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes
November 8, 1995
opening at the bottom of a ground sign. There were no further questions and the item was set on the consent calendar
at the November 22, 1999, providing all the information is provided in time for the staff report.
APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO GONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CAR RENTAL BUSINESS AT 778
BURLWAY ROAI�, ZONED C-4. (O. IyfASON HURST, II, A�LAMO RENT-A-CAR, INC., APPLICANT AND
CP Monroe briefly presented the staff report and the commissioners asked: how many cars will be brought from the
airport for n}aintenance, are they included in the 400 which will be stored on-site; what is the expected time frame for
increasing,fi'om 10 car rentals a day to 100 car rentals; is it possible to have a guaranteed monthly fee to the city based
on 100 cars rented a day. CA Anderson noted that the 1% in addition to the sale tax on the contracts written in
Burlingame was a voluntary contribution suggested by Alamo; what were the number of daily rentals before January
199�; what is the number of deliveries of new cars to the site over a given time period e.g. daily, weekly, monthly; what
is t e landscaping requirement for this site, do they currently meet it; is the storage of cars the highest and best use of
t s site; ask applicant to provide a table comparing the 1994 operation under that conditional use permit with the one
roposed now, including number of cars on-site, number of contracts written, number of cars maintained and number
of cars stored, etc. There were no further questions from the commissioners and the item was set for public hearing
on November 22, 1999, providing all the information requested is submitted to staff in a timely manner.
APPLICATION FOR SIGN EXCEP�TIO�NDFO�R �LECTRO C S GN CORPORAT ON,�PPOL CANT AND B IY
ZONED C-4. (STEVE PETERSO , .
pARK PLAZA A CIATES PROPERTY OWNER
CP Monroe briefly presented the staff report and the commissioners asked: what is the size and height of the Forbes
sign on the other building on this site; what is the size and type of face on the Forbes sign, did it require a sign exception;
does the applicant have to make this sign so large, would he put up a temporary sign which is 75% of the proposed sign
so the commission could judge the size, seeing on drawing is one thing, the reality often looks much bigger; the Forbes
building has one sign, Crossworld is requesting 2, why� not request one at a more visible location; concerned about the
height of the letters. There were no further questions from the commissioner and the item was set for public hearing
on November 22, 1999, provided the needed information is provided in time for preparation of the staff report.
ACTION ITEMS
REGULAR CALENDAR
�
APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, VARI �ACK VAR A�NCE, FOLOOR AREA RAT�IO GARIEINCE ANI
EXISTING 5 BEDROOM HOUSE, LEFT SIDE S
DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE VARIANCE FOR AN 80 SF SECOND STORY ADDITION AND 231 SF FIRS'
STORY ADDITION TO REMODEL AN EXISTING TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMII�Y RESIDENCE AND REPLAC:
ADETACHED CARPORT WITH AN ATTACHED GARAGE AT 1610 CHAPIN AVENUE, ZONED R-1. (ROBER—
AND RHONDA HOCKER, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS) - CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 2�
1999
Reference;staffreport, 11.08.99, with attachments. City Planner and Commission discussed the report, reviewed criter
and Plan�ing Department comments. Five conditions were suggested for consideration. There were no questions fro
the corr�mission.
Sep-10-99 02:29P putna�� mazda-volvo 1
� " �b�� S�gn
-� � dJRlJH4► C.� irlr�„Y �F �LTRI.,INGA11�
...�- _. f; A,PPLICATIQN TO THE PL G CONIlVIISSION
�.�-
Type of Applic�tion: Special Permit Variance Other
Project Address:_ � ���o�-�1..10. �� ., _.�, .�u�Q�.�x�'l�Z �,Ql. �
P.03
�,�y.�
Assessor's Parcel Number(s):_ � � ~ � � �, -' �� � _
APPL.ICANT
Name: � � �- �-- � � ���
Address: �-��C� E���P�t s �' V�2,
�T. ..
City/StateJZip:l-��/'t�< �t- �`���
Phone (w) : �L � — �'1 � '' Z `� �- �
PROPERTY 0 WNER
Narne: ��p h �D ,� t.c..�-h'1 . .
Acidress:_ � '
City/State/Zip: � � �
Phone (w)x[Q�� �},f'� — y- DC�
�h� � — --- -------
fax:
ARC��lITECTlDFSIGNER
Name: �� M �Nl�" }�'1 ���-- .
Address:--�5� ��y �1 �S� _
c�ty�scace�2ip: �v ��]r �X �'S�7D �
Phone (w): ��� �S�S � � �►�
(h): --•-�—
fax: U10 � ��� � `� � �
PRQJECT DFSCRIPTION
�X np��.� -�xS
(h):
fax: �...�b �'� l �-¢-� C�
Please indicate with an asterisk * the
contact person for this application.
P
0
�1
AFFIDAVIT/SiGNATURE; I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given
herein is true and correct to the best of y�owledge and belief.
.
--3d-�
Applicant's Sig re Date
I know about the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this
application to the Flanning Commission.
� -
Propert ner's Signa ure ate
_^------------------------------------------F�R OF�'ICE U5E ONLY --------------------_______--------------
� — i ��
Date Filed: °� 3° `19 Fee: 335 Q�,,; �l p� lo t 5`l
Planning Commissic�n: Study Date:_ �� 8`1 Acdon Date: 1� ZZ q�
Se -10-99 02:30P �utnam mazc-;a-volvo 1 P_04
rzt,ncrn,.�s .....� ... .�...,.. y.-..._ --u-- - ------- - -r—�---�-+•� v--
^� � j Planning Depa�tmant ( h5p ) 696-7250
'�:��� .
1. APP�ICANT (PERSQN COMPIETING THIS FORM}
Name �"``1 �-ti �- Tel��hane (a5� �`� 7 g�j
Company & Address J� �
;�) 3�f�1 1
! certify unde� penalty of per�ury tl�at the intormatron piven hereln Ts true and cariect to the best of my
knowledpe and belie�e�sland a buildin� parmit is foQuired befarc a sign Can be insta/led.
Signature
9/ip
2. BURLINGAIVI� AbbRESS OF B[JSINESS/ORGANIZAT(ON RECEIVING N�W SIGN(S}
�
building width:
3. PROP�RTY OWNER
building depth
� , �
lot width: lot depth:
Name J��Y� � {�- 1.��Mc3t.ir� T lenhone � ��
Address � ��a_�_�C�Y1r�. ".?�_ ~�,►O�n�c�.r�,r►�n �_� � � ��
I know about the proposed sign(sJ and authorize the applicant to submit tllis appliC�tion.
✓ ;� k J � 7,�,,, D a r�
4. SIGN INFORMATION (photos help)
# of existing signs on property;
# af existing $igns to remain:
�u complete the back of this sheet
proppsed new signs:
tota! # signs;
���� ,
5. SUBMIT TH� FOLLOWING W1TH THi5 APPLICATION ��� ��� �./�
��s, �
C� Site plan o# property with all existing and proposed signs labeled, J
� Elevations drawn to scale of all new signs and existing signs to remain. Show
correct sizes and locations. Dimension all lettering.
• TO BE COMptETED BY PLANNING STAFF •
Primary frontage:
Seconciary frontage:
Maximum sign area & number of
signs permitted by Title 22:
3ro'�' ��- �, J� n S
�bd `� �(- S� nS
C�'Sig� exception required.
PraposEd with this applicatir�n:
I —1 °L �� 4- S , � S
g2• `+`� Z s, .,s
❑ Building permit may be issued. Approved by: ___ Date�
Fee ta be c�llected by Building Dept: Remombarl A bui{din4 Pa«*++t nwot be iaeued bofwa the
oian can ba inctelled,
SIGN A: C��'New sign
Sign type:
❑ wall sign
�'ground sign
� pole sign
❑ projecting sign
❑ awning sign
❑ other
COPY Jo[-�O
METHOD OF SUPPORT
SIGN B: ❑ New sign
Sign type:
❑ wall sign
❑ ground sign
❑ pole sign
❑ projecting sign
❑ awning sign
❑ other
COPY
METHOD OF SUPPORT
SIGN C: ❑ New sign
Sign type:
❑ wall sign
❑ ground sign
❑ pole sign
❑ projecting sign
❑ awning sign
❑ other
COPY
METHOD OF SUPPORT
SIGN D: ❑ New sign
Sign type:
❑ wall sign
❑ ground sign
� pole sign
❑ projecting sign
❑ awning sign
❑ other_
CO PY
❑ existing. no chan�� ❑ existing, new copy
Sign Specifications: �q. �,2 a� x 2�
Sign area g2 � `� sf
(Length ���-(�" x Height 3�'��� )
overall height from ground 2b�
clearance from ground to sign bottom o'
❑ single face C�'two-sided
COPY COLOR(S) �^�'�"� � �-
ILLUMINATION TYPE HOURS
❑ existing, no change ❑ existing, new copy
Sign Specifications:
Sign area sf
(Length x Height �
overall height from ground
clearance from ground to sign bottom
❑ single face ❑ two-sided
COPY COLOR(S)
ILLUMINATION TYPE HOURS
❑ existing, no change ❑ existing, new copy
Sign Specifications:
Sign area sf
(Length x Height )
overall height from ground
clearance from ground to sign bottom
❑ single face ❑ two-sided
COPY COLOR(S)
ILLUMINATION TYPE HOURS
❑ existing, no change ❑ existing, new copy
Sign Specifications:
Sign area sf
(Length x Height )
overall height from ground
clearance from ground to sign bottom
❑ single face ❑ two-sided
COPY COLOR(S)
METHOD OF SUPPORT ILLUMINATION TYPE HOURS
'`�"'`�` j City of Burlingame Sign Perr��it Application
� evRun�c,r.s�
�Planning Department ( 650 ! 696-7250
; `, ,,�;; oi
'! . R,PPLICANT (PERSON COMPLETING THIS FORMy
Name Telephone
Company & Address Fax #
l certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief. l undeistand a building permit is required before a sign can be installed.
Signature
2. BURLINGAME ADDRESS OF BUSINESS/ORGANIZATION RECEIVING NEW SIGN(S)
Assessor's Parcel #
building width: building depth: lot width
3. PROPERTY OWNER
lot depth:
Name Telephone
Address
l know about ihe proposed sign(sl and authorize the applicant to submit this application.
✓ Date
4. SIGN INFORMATION (photos help)
# of existing signs on property:_
# of existing signs to remain:
0 complete the back of this sheet
proposed new signs:
total # signs:
5. SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING WITH THIS APPLICATION
C� Site plan of property with all existing and proposed signs labeled.
0 Elevations drawn to scale of all new signs and existing signs to remain. Show
correct sizes and locations. Dimension all lettering.
� TO BE COMPLETED BY PLANNING STAFF •
Maximum sign area & number of
signs permitted by Title 22: Proposed with this application:
Primary frontage:
Secondary frontage:
❑ Sign exception required.
❑ Building permit may be issued. Approved by: Date:
Fee to be collected by Building Dept: Remember! A building permit must be issued before the
sign can be installed.
r� , —.---•-----. ------- _ � -:__..__-_�_ . -_.._�.._.�t�_�= .�______��r���
S�p-10-99 02:30P putnam mazda-volvo 1 P.06
A� 1�
:R„HGH,,� City af Burlingama S! n Exce tlQCl
, Plannina Department {4.25� gg�_72�p � p Applicatian
``ti....��
ADqRESS QF PFiOP�RTY REC�IVING SIGN(S)
'� . Applicant {person completing this form}
Name � ��-� � � r rw�-h S��o :�t �'z-y 7`i-�
el hon
Company & Address .� ���1 L.A. .. . _ !-}. 'J n . _
I cerYify under pena/ly of perjury that
know/edg�e and belief.
Signature
Infprmation give�� herein
true and correct to the best af my
, - -
2. Has the �ppficant read Section 22,06.110 of the 8urlirt�ame Municipal Code? yes no
�• Describe the exceptional circumst�nces or conditions appl;cable to your propert
which da not generally apply to other properties in your area, and the ex#ent to which
you deserve spec;�l eonsideration ta which your neighbprs are not entit(ed.
S �..� �--rrPrc
n
5
Describ� why the exeeption is necessary now to preserve the continued use and
�njoyment Qf the property.
What hardships would result if your requested were denied?
'' r0 B� COMPLET�D�BY PLANNING $TAFF .
Planning Commission Action pate
Signed
Fec
Date
Notes:
TI� NEW CORPORATION I D SIGN IS A TWO POLE STRUCTURE WITH METAL PANELS THAT
COVER THE POLES TO MAKE A MORE PLEASANT APPEARANCE
THIS IS A NEW DESIGN THAT WII.,L REPLACE ALL OTHER VOLVO POLE SIGNS SO 'TI�Y
WILL HAVE DEALER IDENTIFICATION JUST BY Tf� DESIGN OF THE SIGN WITH OUT HAVE
TO READ TI� COPY
VOLVO WII.,L NOT ALLOW ANY SIGN TO BE INSTALLED THAT HAS BEEN ALTERED FROM
THIS DESIGN.
IF THIS LOCATION IS REQUIRED TO REPLACE THE EXISTING POLE SIGN WITH A NEW
GROUND MOUNT SIGN BECAUSE OF TI-iE POLE COVER THIS WILL CAUSE A HARD SHIP ON
PUTNAM VOLVO BECAUSE OF 'THE REQUIREMENT OF A GROUND MOUNT SIGN THIS SIGN
WOULD NOT BE VISIBLE FROM ANYWHERE.
�
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes
5. MASTER SIGN PROGRAM AND SIGN EXCEP'TI
(PUTNAM LEASING, INC., PROPERTY OWI�Ff
February 13, 1995
�
AT 50 CALIFORNIA DRNE, ZQNED G2
AND ROBERT ROGERS, BARBER SIGN
Reference staff report, 2/13/95, with attachments. CP Monroe discussed the request, reviewed criteria,
Planning Department comments, and stud.y'meeting questions. If approved six conditions were suggested.
Chm. Galligan opened the public hearing. Robert Rogers of Barber,Sign Company in Vallejo and Joe
Putnam, owner of the property, were present to answer questions. T'here was discussion of the corporate
preferences related to the proportions of signs, corporate logo, trademarks, registered copyrights and the
reasons that the dealer cannot alter the signs which aze made in the East by the corporation, The
commission discussed sign amortization and the possibility�of changing some of the rules. The applicant
indicated they would comply with the conditions and any sign not specified on the plans will be removed.
There were no other comments and the public hearing was closed.
C. Jacobs noted this project does not constitute a grant of special privilege and is in a unique area. She
then movetl approval of the this application with the following conditions; 1) that the project shall be built
as shown �on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped January 31, 1995 Sheet
1, Plan, Elevations and Photo; 2) that the conditions of the Chief Building Inspectors' December 5, 1994
memo (pole signs B1 & B2, D1 & D2 will require engineering and wind/seismic load calculations for
a building permit) and the City Engineers' December 5, 1994 memo (pole signs shall be placed within
the property at least eight feet from all driveway openings) shall be met; 3) that all the existing signs
along California Drive shall be removed except the 'Putnam" roof sign (3' X 2-' per side for a total sign
area of 120 SF); 4) that all existing secondary frontage signs (rear frontage - railroad tracks, and side
frontages - adjacent to 98 California Drive and 2 California Drive) shall be removed except the eacisting
'Putnam Toyota Burlingame' wall sign at the rear of the building�along the railroad tracks and the wooden
sign on the south fence noting "used cars" shall remain; 5) that all the temporary bunting signs on the
lighting poles along California Drive (all bunting materials and the sings) shall be removed prior to
issuance of building permit for installing the new signs; and 6) that the project shall meet Uniform
Building and Uniform Fire Codes as amende d by, the City of Burlingame.
Mo ' ns was seconded by C. Kelly and approved on a 5-2 (C. Ellis and Mink dissenting) roll call vote.
Ap�eal procedures were advised. '
=�7. SIGN EXCEPTION AT 3 CALIFO1tNIA DRIVE, 7_ONED G2, (JOE PUTNAM 7R., PROPERTY
OWNER AND ROBERT ROGERS BARBER SIGN COMPANY APPLICANT .
Reference staff report, 2/13/95, with attachments. CP Monroe discussed the request, revieweti criteria,
Planning Department comments, and study meeting questions. If approved three conditions were
suggested.
Page -3-
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes
Chm. Galligan opened the public hearing. Robert Rogers, Barber Sign Company,
was the addition of one sign and removal of one 80 SF double faced, 16' pole
another brand to the site. The manufacturer requires the new sign, he noted hi
signs, the calculation of square footage and expressed a desire to create uniformity.
comments and the public hearing was closed.
February 13, 1995
Vallejo explained this
sign in order to add
s interpretation of the
There were no other
C. Mink moved approval of the application subject to the following conditions; 1) that the signs shall be
installed as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped January 31, 1995
except that Sign A shall be built with a total of 72 SF (35.7 SF per side) of signage and as described on
the Sign permit forms dated December 19, 1994 and sign 6 shall be removed; 2) that all illegal bunting
signs shall be removed from the light poles along California Drive (all bunting materials and the signs)
prior to issuance of a building permit; and 3) that the project shall meet all Uniform Building and
Uniform Fire Code requirements as amended by the City.
Motions was secondeci by C. Deal, and was approved on a 7-0 voice vote. Appeal procedures were
advised.
8. �vIASTER SIGN PROGRAM AND SIGN EXCEPT.�ON AT 1017-1025 ROLLINS ROAD, ZONED
G2 (ALFRED MOLAKIDIS PROPERTY OWNER AND ALLEN DAVID APPLICANT)
_
� '
Reference staff report, 2/13/95, with attachments. CP Monroe discussed the request, reviewed criteria,
Planning Departine,�t commcnts, and study meeting questions. If approved four conditions were
suggested.
•.
Chm. Galligan opened the�.public hearing. Allen David, Bay A
answer the commissioners' quesiions and explain his need for this
addition of the condition stating the sign shall not be illuminated.
the public hearing was closed.
.
rea Collision Center, was present to
signage. He. is in agreement with the
There were \no other comments and
,,
C. Deal moved approval, by resolution, ofthis master sign permit and sign exception for the number of
signs, area and height finding that this does\ not grant special privilege, with the following amended
conditions: �'that the project shall be built as shov�n on the plans submitted to the Plani�ng Department
and date stamped�anuary 9, 1995 site plans and sig'r� elevations, that the sign shall have &', of clearance
below the bottom of ��he sign to the ground below and'�shall not be illuminated in any manner; �2) that the
property owner or tenant shall apply for a sign exceptib� for any additional signs to be placed on � these
parcels prior installation of the sign; 3) that the appl��ant apply for permits through the Building -
Department for the proposed sign within 30 days of action on this application, and 4) that the project shall
meet all Uniform Building �and Uniform Fire Code requirements as amended by the City.
The motion was seconded by C:�Kelly and approved on a 6-1 (C.''Galligan dissenting) roll call vote.
Appeal procedures were advised. ��
Page -4-
Q
/
�
�
��. !
� .,�
�v� ,�
�� / �i`
� �.
� �" `'.��
w , ��.�
� f �,,•
�
i
�
rj� ,,
;/
EXISTING WALL SIGN (F)
TO BE REPLACED WITH NEW
� r� �
� ��
� `;
� � �;
� �� � �.�,
EXISTING VOLVO
SALES & SERVICE
FACILITY
_.`i�-��,
EXISTING WALL SIGN (C)
TO REPLACED WITH NEW �
�� � , --
��
�
�
�� !
� � 1 � � — .--
�
EXISTING MAI?V POLE SIGN (B)
�' - TO BE REPLACED WITH NEW -
\
CALIFORNIA DRIVE
SELECT VEHICLE DISPLAY
EXISTING USED CAR SIGN (G)
TO BE REPLpCED WITH NEW
I
I
I
a
f
��r
RECEIV�%
SEP 3 0 1999
�I
/
/
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DFPT
t
voLvo
5500 Primary ID Pylon • 20
RECE�VE�
SEP 3 0 1999
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
15 3/4" 51 3/8" 71 1/2"
MODEL SIGN DIMENSIONS HT. FROM SIGN
NUMBER HEIGHT LENGTH SQ. FT. TO GRADE
5500 3' 7" 11' 7" 42.6 15' 2 1/2"
O.A.H.
OF SIGN
20'
�
Zimmerman 3ign Compan;
s���e iyo
ELECTRICAL DESIGNED
TOTAL AMPS WINDLOAD
7.6 30 PSF
,i
�
fASTEN w//10�1/Y
S.S.S.M. SLREwS TOP VIEW
aaPaox. �r c ro c „
�, . I I '- (�
nl
.i25a1 A�UN. ALIGNMENi CUP$ -.
wElO 10 Ir+S1DE OF
PANEL FACES
h�� (16) REO'D
I�• I
,125 ALUM AUGNMEN? CLIP DETAIL
SULE• N.T.S.
u 3/f
�9 S/B'
A5073t99.090
� IL SHf .090a1E-I/�.�9-5/E
PNNt SILVER
POLE COVER CAP DETAIL
SGLE: 0'-I t/2'.t•-0'
FL�
t
;� BRFNc UNES
�" Y
� G �
r +
TOP POLE PANEL FLAT LAYO T 0 TAI
SULE: 0'-I t/2'-1'-0'
19 S/6' Y
5 �-
RECEIVED �
SEP 3 0 1999 -
CITY OF BURLINGAME
TACK WELO
Ri8 & PANEL ASSEMBLED
aSOB92t7.063 aa tJ/tfi' n
IL $Hi 063•22.N-5/16 BR[AK LINE
TOP RIB DOwN
BOT704 Ri8 UP
/i KP. . ' ' ' ' ' '
PANE� R�B
BREAK UNE wELO iLUSH i0P
k BOT701A OF A5027195.090
PANElS t li $Ni .p9p.6-3/�..7t!/16
PAINT SIIKR `
PANEL PRO�itE
STANDARD RIB DETAI S
scxE: o•-i �/Y•�•-o-
_ _ g � L' --��--{f---- --2 --S/6'
1 I n5�12
� 0. SNi .06:
BREAK UNE
, � auNr savtR
3R[AK UME
aunt s�vEa
�ECTION A—A
scKc: o•-� �/r.r-v
. \ '
v
SUP CVR VOLVO a 12 @ 20' O.A.H — oP741 vn �nry
' SCAIE: N.�.S.
� S� 5/16' �
SECOND POLE�.4Nf_L FIAT LAYOUT DETAIL
sc.ae: o•-, ��r.r_or
A502B200.090
K SHt .09D�7-}�E.SO
b
�
49 I S/t G
BOTTOM PANEL & RIB DETAI
SCALE: 0''t 1/Y't'-0" -�.-n�,,.�._
�TANDARD PO f PAN F T LAYOUT D TAI
SULE: 0'-t �/Y��'-0'
$PECIFICA710NS:
C .N c17 • SUPPORT GItE•
MEA ... If.S 50. fT. PIPE 5�2E ... G SCM. 10 MPROz. 57.75 fT. tOt�L
ACTUAI 512E ... 4T.1J8-9/1T APPRO%. SVPPpRi wEiCHT ... 1000 185. TOTk
MPRO%. WEiGMT PER SiCN ... 250 L95. '
DESiCnED N1ND �OAO ... 3E PSF
fIFCiRIGt• COLOR�.
AUPS ... 1.6 TOTA� S�CN F�CE ... VOLW C1055 BLUE SOA-5988
CIRCUITS ... (1) 20 PUSH THROVGN LETfER ... wMITE ICP'Y�4) W/rmITE `�Nr� 3530-i0
vOLiS ... 120 S7CN GBINE? ... VOLVO CM,VtCOAL GRAY $OA-59865P
SUPPoRi ... Wl�'0 CHAftCOAI GRAY SOA-59E65P I
SUPPORt COVER ... VOlvO SILVER MEfKLK $OA-59E75P
RELEASED FOR MANUFACTURE 04-20-98
, Q Zimmerman Stgn Company
T�lar. inus
x:�ic�O.,:P..,r4oN,_S�GN .
a.12 DOU9�E POIE SYSTEM -��
i�
BOTrOM POLE PANEL FIAT LAYOUT DETAIL
SCAIE: 0'-I t/i'•1•-0'
�
��'
�����
nl \ '
B
r
•Y R[t. �
ACCE$$ iMRU
NOIE PiPE
0
S �
n \
b '
�I�H
b
�
3
'Y RiDCED COnOUT
Br OtHERS
�
Q:
— T � 5500 PriON S�CH
SWBOB0�.0�750 8
n i+�c �/e.i.i u-i/Y
St GVE f SCn �0 ,1�0 Ii7
Sf M1C I/�.1.1 10Y
SI /M. 1/E.I.I j0i
U.S.� Sit C�ur+NEl
}.5 ww0 �+OLE
N/ 5.7 wAtER PROOi
CU'ER h GSKET
10 Gti REwESN
COqCREiE wiRE
� Y CROVT SPACE
� GRADE
f" — T ' 1
_1_
� � � � �
_r_T_�_�
_ L _ 1 _ 1 _ J
E�EvnrioN viEw
SGLE: 0'-D �/Y-I'-0'
A BQI ]I/�I? 6M( �M
/� REB�R CAGE
5'.7'-6' $UB
5' OEEP w/
i ABOvE CRAOC
u cu. ro.
RECEIVED
SEP 3 0 1999
- F BURLINGAME
PLANNING DFFT.
SL0�05�.03950
St C�w+HR [�.5.� J9-1/Y
�� 1/i
J9 i/Y
+ / +
SECTION A—A
SC�F v.'.S
I
,�d
Sf060009.��550
Sf RP( C SLi� �0 .7C� IIS-i/Y
t�G
16' _ ]1 I/i �6 ]/�
�
EFI
sEcnoN e-e
SCkE: n.7.5.
�/�' $R. END CAP
6 5/D" Ou
BOiH EN�S
51 PUR i/�•6-5/E Du
$P19i192_020 Si060009.02038 �
si aurt �-i/�.�:�i: sr Ra e' sc� �o .�eo w-�/t I
t2' S0. I —
h I n
0
� O ��8 • HOIE rvP. —
b�
6 3/i • nO�E
O
•9/16' HO�E �OR
i/Y A-J25 BOl7
t�CK wELD Nvt iHSiCE J• •Y NOIE �OR
ELEC KCE55
�
SV106106.00d0 �
sr Purc i/z.e-s/e a.
MATCH PLATE DE7AI�
SCaE: �+ rS
s roe000s o � osa
S/'fi 9EKL $f °pC fi Sb� �0 7E0 10-1/r
� � J/i6 9CVE�
7 Ni � •
�
� 6 CUr �
�
Si060009.0�178 6 f0 6 Y�E Cvt ��a
si Avc s• sa �o ab u-�/e' CROSS PIP D TAI
SGLE: N.1.$ •
SPECIFICATIONS
�K� SUPoOPi S�ZF'
�REA .., t1.736 SO f7. PiPE SZE ... 6' SCN. �0 �PCROK. SJ 5�i
�CTU�L Si2E _.. ]'-7 S/L".��'-9' u�tCN PUt� SiIE ... 1/1-.6 5/B".Si �/�
MPROx. wEiCHi .. }�Q �BS. PER SiCn B�SE PUtE SZE ... i i/� .�2'.iI"
70P SVPPORi wE1GNf ... 500 L95 f01K
BO*TOu SUPPORf wE�CHi ... 615 �85. �Orq
F iR
�wPS ... 7.6 70Tµ SYSTEu {OLORS.
C7RCV�TS _. (�) ]0 SVPPOqt ,,. EP59B65P.SOn
Vp�TS ... i 20 viwt 5W-59E65P LP.�i
GENERAL NOTES
�. �LL CW+CREiE TO DEKIOP }Op0 P5� COMPRESSM SiREHLin A1 7Ein D�*
7. �lL REM(ORCiNG B.�RS SHML �uvE A 111NtMVM nELO S'RE�+CTH 0�
600.000 GSi. REinPORCu+G�&WS Sw0.L BE PUCED in �CCORD�wCE wiiM
iHE UTEST KRS�ON OF ME �CI }1E CODE.
]. �ll PiPE Swql MEEi fHE SiRUCTVW�1 REOViREuErv75 0� ASiN A-SJ CRnOE B
�. �Ll StEEI i�BE Sru�L BE ASTN �-500 CR�OE B.
S. All OTHER 5?EEl SiRVC1UR,u Sw�PES M+0 PUTE S��u BE �STu �-.75.
6. iMIS IS ONLT A$UCCESiEO TVPI('j,� $UPPORi $IAB �OR APPROz. J,000 7SF 5(,vl
BEMiNC lOG7i0nS, G�EASE CNECK IOL.ti CODES �OR �PROvED �OUNDAiION$.
$011 BEAAiNC AND fR0$T �INE INfORNA7iON. FiN/y DES�CN SnOUID BE �PPROvEO
er LOCnI ENG�r+EER.
RELEASED FOR MANUFACiURE 04-20-98
,� /1Q 7.unmerman Sign Company
\ t�+w, Trw
5500 PYLON SUPPORT SvST��!
10' O.e.n. p SO aS� Sva�aD
I Nf� wl�o '�-�'>-
_ ��--•.� `. i�..o. v07at2DP
I
BASE PLATE DEiAIL 10P vERTICA� PiPE DEiAi�
SCKE� M.t 5 SUtC H 1 5 ' 1 ^'""'
2' E�EG. �ttESS NOIE h
iMRV MOfiZON7I.1 GIP[
SLA9 LAYOUT
SC4E. 0'-0 �/i'-�'-0'
3 California Drive
Approved Signs - September, 1999
Se —10-99 02=30P �utnam mazda-volvo 1 .
RLNp.AME ....,.� ... .....,.. ,y....._ P . 04
;� �j Planning Department (650) 696-7250 T v T --' -'`-`-•-�-�'. .
'�,;�,/
1. APPLtCANY iPERSON COMPLETING THIS FORM)
Name
�.L_
Company & Address � �
�`f 7
�
! cerfify unde� penalty of perju�y il�at the intormation given hereJn ls true and ca�rect to tf�e best of my
knowledpe and belief,..i'p7y,derstand a buildin� parmit is �oquired beforc a sign Can ba installed.
/ /
Signature
`�//O
2. BURLINGAlV1� AbbRESS OF E3USINESS/ORGANIZAT[ON RECEIVING (V�V1/ $IGN(S)
�
:�
� , ,,
building width: building depth: lot width: 1ot depth:�_
3. PROP�RTY OWNER
Name
-- - �
Address �
+ �--
l know about the proposed sign(sl and autf>orize the applicant to submit this applrC.�tivn,
✓ :%a-� „J k� 1' - _ _ DBte
4. SIGN INFORMATION (photos help)
# of existing signs an property:� � proppSed new signs: �-
# of existing signs to remain: _.___ - 2 se�.a,�,,y� total # signs; 4-�
❑✓ complete the back of this sheet
� �
5. SUBMIT TH� FOLLOWING WITH THIS APPLICATIpN �G� �
�- N� � l � ��gh,
C� Site plan of property with all existing and proposed signs labeled. �
C� Elevations drawn to scale ofi all new signs and existing signs to remain. Show
correct sizes and locations. Dimension al! lettering.
� YO BE COMpLETED BY PLANNING STAFF •
Primary frontage:
Secondary frontage:
Maximum sign area & number of
signs permitted by Title 22:
300+#� � ¢ s; �„s
�opd� ¢ s� ns
❑ Sign exceptian required.
ProposEd with this application:
i � s `A � s�' „ s
� Building permit may be issued. Approved ay-�,,ti ,�, ' Date� Rl3o���
—�--
Fee ta be cdllected by Bui(ding Dept; ���� O� Remomborl A buildi�p parmn muot be {ssued bafwa tho
•ipn con ba inctellod,
SIGN �r. /" � j� New sign
Sign type:
�' wall sign
❑ ground sign
��'� �i ❑ pole sign
������`� ❑ projecting sign
�.o O awning sign
❑ other
f � existing, no change !-] existing, new copy
COPY vUl-_�O COPY COLOR(S) ��-u�
METHOD OF SUPPORT3�1,�� ILLUMINATION TYPE ��'�
HOURS
v�-�+I�u P���
SIGN �: C� � New sign
S� Sign type:
❑ wall sign
�p,�-� ❑ ground sign
Q�.� �,�v � pole sign
�a'�` ❑ projecting sign
�C ❑ awning sign
❑ other
❑ existing, no change ❑ existing, new copy
� C�z i t�� �� �� 4��� �u,��� ��? �L S �
COPY L'��'� � w- _- ��u= COPY COLOR(S) '��T� �
J —��TS �.�? i ND�Qe�T �f
METHOD OF SUPPOR�.�:c�z��r�: �t�u���-3��ILLUMINATION TYPE��S�HOURS
SIGN`G� ❑ New sign
Sig ype:
❑ wal ign
❑ ground ' n
❑ pole sign
❑ projecting sig
O awning sign
❑ other
❑ existing, no change ❑ existing, new copy
Sign Specifications: � 2- 13 8. SC� �
Sign area (o� � �� sf u
(Length ��'� x Height ��'��a )
� �I
overall height from ground �-�-� ±
clearance from ground to sign bottom a�L�`' �
�' single face ❑ two-sided
Sign Specifications:
Sign area 3�•aco Sf �IS.iB�`Xz�
(Length �'-5" x Height 2'-�0" )
overall height from ground
clearance from ground to sign bottom
❑ single face ❑ two-sided
Sign Specifications:
Sign area sf
(Length x Height )
overall height from ground
clearance from ground to sign bottom
❑ single face ❑ two-sided
COPY
METHOD OF SUPPORT
SIGN D: ❑ New sign
Sign type:
❑ wall sign
❑ ground sign
❑ pole sign
❑ projecting sign
❑ awning sign
❑ other
CK�Ii'J
COPY COLOR(S)
LUMINATION TYPE HOURS
❑ existing, no cha?�ge
Sign SE
Sign ar
(Leng
sf
x Height )
overall height from �und
clearance from ground to sign bottom
❑ single face ❑ two-sided
❑ existing, new copy
cations:
COPY COLOR(S)
METHOD OF SUPPORT ILLUMINATION TYPE HOURS
Fcciure F�aQaol� Po;ftions; Note suggcsted posftloa for fu;ure 1lagpules lo be lnsi�lfed at thi; sile.
. (tdnle pnssible placemen: ol up to ar rRaqy � eight per lot.�
. .. _ . . . .. '"� .
�'- •� ...:...:...: . : ..: ..:. ---, . ' ..�... �...__:-- �XI�S:.Ilr�i- ,--._.S.',..�.�._.�.��..D-,..A-._�---G--
: ....:...: . :...:...: ..: . ...... .:...:---- . - � = : _ �= . � =_�:.. : ..: :---� : � �1
= .�-��-��:�-..��, .::.._=_ _:...�._ --_..�.-�_:�-_1���-. ���b��d��--=--.�...:---:.--� ...
:...:..�,��7-�_��� ._� . .:...:......._..__ .. - --, --�...;---=--�---:...............�---: . ; .-; ..:...:...:
- -- - ----- - - --- :�'��� ��.; .--�v�.=..-�:----: . :..__. . _ . : _ _...:---=-- : --:---=---: .-: --:- -:
;- .: .l: :,:-�-_.--�; : :---; -..:. _� -.: -- _ -�... ;-- � .. �. = _ : .. =...:.�_ � _. � . :---:�--: . : _ � --: -.. �
:...: : ...:.. . _� ._,...:.--_-..,...: �����.1� � �...�...:...�_.._. .:...__ .:...:---_-_.:..-_
. ..�. . �- .._.-_.-
..: ...... : .-.: -- .�,..�. :�: : : � �.,�� .:...:. .:...:...:...:
::-::..._.-::.�:::��_-.:;:.:-:-�.�.:�=�� :. .:.�:___.:::_: _
..-...:<<l__ _ - _ �'�: _ � _�� : :�- : : : : - _ : _
: _.=>;.._�:_ -_.�. . -����.:s :..._---:---- .......:.. :. .:...:,..:._.:....
. _ .�� . ---.- .---------.. ............. . ...... . _....._ ..
.-; .-_�, ..... ..: .....:...�_...=..-�.--=--_:....:._.; .___ .;---:-..�_..:...:...:
. � _ .�- .._.. - : �..., -. -�7 �.�� _,.. : . _ : . : .-: -._... '
� - - . �:- ._. ._ - f'� -- _ .._.. , .�. : . .--=--�-�-� . .... .:........�� -
_-- : ��-_ -�: ---:..... ._ ..._ . ..;..._:�;... : --- ��: __- - ---=-- - ------=---=--� -.�- � ..:...:.._: .. _ ..
; ._:�..:...:. .: . �- � ..: . _,.-...:�...:�: - -:-..�--,�..�.�--�--.�..�.. �. .. .:. .�--: -.:...: --�. .:....
: -, : . -.:- � ..: ..,.. ._: ..�_..�__ ..:--:..--=�-=---:--.:.--= ...:... ..:.......:...:..:...,...:..=
: ��: ; - - .-: � _ _.; .. ._: .. .�:. -;-- - = . � .- .:... : .. :...:...:... . .. : ..: . : . .: .: � :---�----
:. . ....: ..: ... . �...-- � .- --� --.----�...�__ . - = : _ ��.r_.�- - - � :
� =-.-:-.--� � ..: - .. : . ..; . �-�-_ = . ..__��---�'f ��-.--..- ._.:.... _ _,.-:..� ....:............
: ..:...:._.; .: .__ .: . : -- ..�---�d----� -----..�.._. . _ . = --_ ; = = _ : �. �������"�;�� : -.
, � :.V_ ' - - � • ' . • r "+, -. .....
;-- : �-_ � _ � �_ -�--_ ..: -- ..: . _ . � : ��� �-� ...:..... .. : ..�__ : ...- _ c:��;�r���r�� p � .r•, r;7,,,:. 4; Y
i.N�. �E � ., � �
. • - � - . : • - - - . _ - , _ _ � ;`,n^�J c:r;k��' fihail h�+t A� ��ii�trtirr�fE Iir- a r �rrr.��,
_•--:- � ..... .............._..._..,:. :..._..._..'. .:..----•,� .�...�--...� _=_'rc�.a�pVr�i�f � tl{'�i.fbt��::�:�_:is
• - - . . ' . . . . : _ ; . _ - - � . _ . - . _ _ . , , � , q•�, ... . .
�_..:...� ........:...:.. �'._ _ -= - �...�---�...----:..._�...:....:---=.-�..._ ..:._.: • _, �� _ 9�3°�g1
Surveyo�"s ChecS:fPst: _ ...._......."' . . .......... ...
�r���� 2C�"�'h°�� Aif exiseng and recommended Sk�nagc �hown and cOded
8uildiag focated and proper(y �ines shaw� �� Oataiied dimensions Sho�v�
� S�: pe. of psrking and islznG's shown � Fj;ics aclfl E�tt3nces �ttown and I�belyd
� Aq rodG��a.ys label�d by n�zie/numUer � 8est visibility poiq� notcd -
� kecommendaoon of new s�gn�
9b4$ }{-gy1�:T;�dS( - �y(ef, Tx. 75705 - (80Q) E80-1327 - Fd;� (903)535-7QOT , � zuu.�xermst# $e,gn Com_pany
�Y
��.�� :.��l. P1a�1���� � �
�
; single face MAZDA sign is 3'6"by17'0" and 59.5 SF.
)LVO sign is 3'0"by23' 1" and 69.28 SF.
�e existing single face MAZDA sign is 3'6"by17'0" and �9.5 SF.
ie new VOLVO siQn is 3'0"by23'1" and 69.28 SF.
Putnam Volvo METCALF SIGNS
#3 California Ave � 5377 Eggers Dr.
San Mateo California Fremont, CA.
510-790-0372 Fax(510)790-0372
� North Elevation �
V1EW FORESHORTENED V1EW FORESHORTENED
'VIEW FORESFiORTENED SOUIil EIP.Vat1On y�EW FORESHORIENED
� � 3�" I'olt�o Logv Ziminerman Si�n Conlpa�y
- 09 i i4"- - - ---
m
� �
� r%
M
i �
i
i
S� S�ec�ficarions
Si Size
Area 69.28 ftz
AcTual Size 36" Charuiel Letters
Approximate Wei�ht V: 60, O: 58, L: 54, Total: 290 lbs.
Desi�rred 11'indloud 30 PSF
L:lectrical
Amps (10) @ 1.3 Amps, Total: 13 Amps
Circuiis (1) 20
1/olr.s 120
COIOTS
Faces Paint Blue SOA 5985 Matthews
Neon 13mm 6500 White
E3acks Clear Polv .17 %
Pfease refer to the engineering drawing for fzcrther detuils.
- - ----51 1,•'4 `. ------- �
2 ii8"'
- — - �n
277 1 /4"
- -- 51 ii4" -
� ��Y � i�'a3�i� i�d
i?i_;l:L[%�1�7�lYIC C�i�lU. ���tiil�lY��;�a!
T; is plan check shali not be construed to be a permit
fi;�, �r an approvai of, a��y vi�l :iior� of the provisit�ns
t�t j:�a �t�rlirg�me Zenin� Cotles.
'�,�'�'�iq+1,7t P�tu�iiJ� t=!�;AL F.i��-LJ �;vc.'• : � �;=
�ev'sewe� bf:� ^— ate: 1f3O19`t
---- - -- 69 1/4��
v�Lvo
,�
, � .. � :::: `,� '� � �� ;,
. ; ��. �LNG. �EP�:.�,,Y��"'-�.
, �.,�� �r�euk slEail not be eonstr4e� to Ge a p2rm;t
�_: ar� a�proval af, a�}y rio!atinn cf the pra�r�si�•;•,
'. t:�;: 3urli��p,ame Zmling �odes.
.„'i�l�Q'VPit P 'I;d' fIIAL FJELD iNSPr�;�ug
;�„vfewed by: ate: `� D
Scale: 1 " = 2
Art Drawn by ADE
Zimmerman Sign Company
Since 190t
9848 9wy. 31 East 7jler, Texas 75705
volce 80�.536.7400 � lu BO].535.7401
5000+1 Pole Sigri
"Certified Pre Owned Cars" Optior�
��
Certified Pre Owned Cars �::��:
. �,�
�
�,
4" SCN 40 STL PIPE
\ C\\
I/4' STL. PLATE
END CAP� I
d I/2' DIA. v
159-I/d
GROUT
SPACE
IS
I/2• RIGI
CONDUIT TO
POWER
SUPPLY
BT OTHERS
IUN VIEW
SCALE 0.030
BASE COvER
A10UNTED TO ST ANG.
SEE SECTION AA DFTAIL.
9 I/2" pIA�3/5` STL PLATE
5��a TACK WELD 3/&' NUT
Q 2 HOLE TO RACK Of PLATE
ELEC. ACCESS @ EACH �pLT HOLE
I/�' iTL PLATE =��
END lAP �TL FLATE
a ii2� Din O �
BOTN ENDS
156
120-3/4
2-I/8 SO
�
Q 7/ I 6 HGL E E,
FOR 3/E' BOLT
MATCH PLATE DETAI
SCALE 0.250
28-7716 ' p a-i/2
� 4" SrH a0 ST
ELEC. ACCESS �
iHRU PIPE
12
�
� � R2-I/a
I-I/4
TOP VERTICAL PIFE
SCAIE 0 063
�PAINT GRAY
R2-I/4
�
6-I/2 \
� �
,��— Gn 4 - I / 2 /
4' SCH. 40 STL FIPE
HORIZONTAL SUPPORT STUB OUTSIDE
SCALE 0.063
� ! �-PAINT GRAY
� �
� 1
� � � �
A f � A
24` DIA. PIER
a8• DEEP .a7 Cu.rD.
�� �
48 I I I p5 REBAR @ 36' LONG
(41 REO'D
I�-.. I c'... I
� I. �
43 REBAR TIE 18" DIA
c3� REO'D
SE�
SC,
�24—�'
EIEVATION
SCALE 0.030
R� �'��
.. _- .� _ � i
Ff. , . �
� ���, f� � `. � } ,' i
� r�',� � � � � � � �- � �
'� , r ����r, P.�,.g•/ � I; � �
�rs�.''_. �'�..,,,� 'D ' -�� � 1
� �„ � ��,� � � � :
�-.�:�
�� ,
� ! -�
� '�± PQ
r �^ F���
,* � R�►P'
� __.�
;- � °I� -�' �
�, � -..- �
� �""�: � .. . .�
�. _ 4
T �� � �,
� , �
$5 �
� � , �
�, .
` � ' "'!!
�� �
� � � ...�.�
R � � �
l� �
� �.
�4 �
C'2 �
- -.l
R- �
��
�
.s �
.� �
�.
��
-� �
C,J r � _ � � '
/. � .� rI
� : � ,.
�
�,� � :
_ .. � : � i:
_. , � , -
.; . ,,� I 1 ��''�'"
,� - , � � , � �,. ;_� �
� '� . • -��`�� � 1 F �
, , � 5� . --' - :''� 3 � ti FF���
�'' ,. �� _
s�► �1 A � ' ul �
��Fo� � � �:
Ga �,; +�
� � r� ��
23 s ,�,. �` � ( Q
, . _u� . � � � �
��� � .�, _ ' � + _ .
^. .. . I ��-� 1
V
� � � � �
� : �� ._ � 1 d -
�:� � 1 �
� f. � �'� • I � �,
�� � �
.,� -- io o_
' � � � ' _.. _.,..�.
� �� �
.. ���"•�
� � � i � �
� -� � �
�� � t- s1 - -
��� �'_ �. �y' �. •
� ` �'� � Q _7- I
i � � J �
�. � �„!
� , � " =:4,�.. -
r r � . �i
. � _ ��'" ( 1 _ f
-, � 'r�
� �� �
i�, �� G LANG AJ� « �
� �� . �, � � .,-. �
_ � �
. S � �
ti� J 4
� • _ � � � � �
M
s � ,. • # � ' . � r �
1 � 1 'r' ` � +'�.
. , ►
. , . �-• i �
� �r i � *a �
CITY OI; BU�L�'1�'��.�.'t��E
.-� �c�p� ��I� the ap��lic�ition �ti�ci plar.s frn- this �rc�j�i:t i�,�i� he r�� i���c��l �,i�ii�r
t�� the meetin`� :it the Pl:;tlnin� D���:u1n,,nt �ii �c)I Primru�:� Ru,i�l.
BIII'�lll��:llllZ. C:I�IrOI'lll_l.
li� ����u eh:illen«e the �ttbjeeT applici�Uor��>) in ���tn�t. ��c,�� n�:�-,, h: liinii��l ����
rai�in�� ��nl�� th���c i„uc� y��u «i- �unlcun� cl�� raiti��f ;�t tl�;: ��uh!i�� L�_�rin��.
C�c�CI'l�l«� IIl [�lt', Il�)UC� OL' 117 \\Ii[lcll �i}l'I'l',��t�tl��`{1��: l�i'�!��'!'C�! l�� [�l�' �11\
�it or �,ri��r t�, the ��ublii: hearin`�.
PfO�.�cl'[`,' O\4'llcl'� \V�ll� 1'c��l\'Z L�llti IlUl1C� �1CZ i'Z��lttiltil�i�� fi�r intc�rmin�r i�l�ll'
tenants about this iic�[ie�. F��r adiiitionu! inti�rm;itiun. pl�a�e �.ill c(�iO�
69b-7��O. Thank yc�u.
��lar�aret ��li�nri�z
Cit� Pl�u�n�r
PU�L.IG �1�A�8��� �i��'IC�
(Plecise re�fc�r to ��t/rc�r-.sre(c�1
��``-c�TY °�., 1 CITY OF QURLI��GAME
: auRiiryGa,a�s, PLANNING DEPARTMENT
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
� ; BURI_INGAME. CA 94010
��_�J "�� TEL (650) 6G6-7250
- !:t-•'LTF�-'h!(`�iH L�Fti :E_.
N�;�,; � i',1�=„-i-- ='+c'--�'�}��
!-i G�� I 1�� ct � 1 i! ri i'� n �• �. .7 �+ il E:+: r F�-�+ i[� ri T' i�}' _t Tl F' 4 J /y A,^
��f'O'_lri�_I tiiq71 c`t: � (.•cil].T'i�Y'Tiic+. JY"1`i[. -ZOfi_•� L:--`. ����'� ��/�1�'!�{,,,�
.�,,�_,;-r; �., r�o�-ic�
f'r�e CiTy of R�_ir�:(inqamE F�lanninq �ommission
a�i��nt_tT1Ca�. thF foilot�ing F�r_iblic f�earir�G o��
Monday, fVovember 2`, 1999 at 7:00 F�, M, in tt-�e
t�i�'y—�-��'=1�i1_i_.__.�oi_C"ric`i.I_...�`nam���:r,s 1ocat;ed at 5�y1
F''r�llltT'OSE �'Od�� �_t1'lli�9c'tli��� l.cclltT'r'r�ld.
Mailed Nove�ber 1�, 1995
r iEl,U.i.1)
r•I.���.(�i.
� J.��,�►.i3i'
/
�
IYlc�u.�c� rc�Jrr lu n�hc�r.�ic/c�)
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and SIGN EXCEPTION
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made
for a sign exception for hei h� t of ground si�n on the secondary frontage at 3 California Drive
zoned C-2, Subarea D. APN: 029-242-240; Josenh and Mary Putnam Trs pro�erty owners•
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of
Burlingame on November 22. 1999, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report
and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning
Commission that:
1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and
comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no
substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the
environment, and Categorical Exemption per Article 19 Section: 15311 - Accessory
Structures, Class 11, construction or placement of minor structures accessory (appurtenant to)
existing commercial, industrial, or institutional facilities, including but not limited to (a) on-
premise signs is hereby approved.
2. Said sign exception is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit
"A" attached hereto. Findings for such sign exception is as set forth in the minutes and
recording of said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the
official records of the County of San Mateo.
CHAIRMAN
1, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a
regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of November, 1999, by the
following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
SECRETARY
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval categorical exemption and sign exception
3 CALIFaRNIA DRIVE
effective December 6, 1999
that the signs shall be installed as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department
and date stamped September 30, 1999, Site Plan (11" x 17"), Ground Sign Elevation and
Ground Sign Specifications (8'h" x 11 ") and that the ground sign shall not exceed 20'-0" in
height as measured from adjacent grade to the top of the sign structure;
2. that the two existing double-faced pole signs (4'-3" x 8'-5", 71.4 SF, `VOLVO' and 2'-10" x
14'-2", 80 SF, `Used Cars') and three wall signs (3'-6" x 17', 59.5 SF each sign, `MAZDA'
and `PUTNAM') on the primary and secondary frontages shown as signs A, C, D, F, and G
on the site plan approved by the Planning Department on September 30, 1999, shall be
removed prior to issuance of a building permit for installation of the new signs approved in
this sign exception on California Drive and Peninsula Avenue;
that the applicant shall apply for a sign exception for any additional signs to be put on this site
prior to installation of the sign; and
4. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the municipal code and of the 1998 edition
California Building and Fire Codes as amended by the City of Burlingame.
Crty of Burliitgnnte Planning Co»imission Mrnutes
ACTION ITEMS
November 22, 1999
�ONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED TO BE ROUTINE. THEYARE ACTED ON
SIMULTANEOtISLY UNLESS SEPARATE DISCUSSIONAND/OR ACTION IS REQUESTED BY THE APPLICAN7; A MEMBER OF THE
P UBLIC OR A COMMISSIONER PRIOR TO THE TIME THE COMMISSION vOTES ON THE MOTION TO ADOPT.
APPLIC TION FOR DECLIN G HEIGHT ENVELOP VARIANCE AND DESI REVIEW FOR A SE ND
STORY DITION AT 924 O GROVE AVENUE, NED R-1. (SHANE IEGELMAN AND L
HAWTH R APPLI ANT PROPERTY WNER
C. Deal asked th it be noted for the r ord; he will be abstaining rom vote on 924 Oak ve Avenue due to a
business relationship ith the applicant.
LICATION FOR D LINING HEIGHT E VELOPE VARIANCE R A FIRST AND SE ND STORY
�TIONTTO A SINGLE T , Y RESIDENCE ^ 831 EDGEHII.,L DRI , ZONED R-2. (RAND GRANGE,
and
� APPLICATION FOR SIGN EXCEPTION FOR A NEW GROUND SIGN AT 3 CALIFORNIA DRIVE, ZONED G2,
UBAREA D. BILL GIFFORD APPLICANT AND JOE P TNAM, PROPERTY OWNERI
�C. Keighran moved approval of the consent calendar based on the facts in the staff report, commissioners comments and
the findings in the staff reports with recommended conditions in the staff report and by resolution. The motion was
seconded by C. Dreiling. Chair called for a voice vote on the motion; 924 Oak Grove Avenue passed 5-0-1 (C. Deal
abstaining) and 831 Edgehill Drive and 3 California Drive passed on a 6-0 voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised.
REGULAR CALENDAR
APPLICATION' R SIDE SETBACK V ANCE, HILLSIDE A CONSTRUCTIO ERMIT AND DESIG�
REVIEW FOR A ST AND SECOND��RY ADDITION AT 35 LOS ALTOS DRI ZONED R-1. (LUIS
1.f/�T !"� A 1� T T-i� (l i T!» m r� • r.r.: t � ��
Re ence staffreport, 11.2 99, with attachments. Ci Planner and Commiss' n discussed the report, viewed criteria
and P ' g Department co ents. Four conditions re suggested for consi eration. Commission ha o questions
of staff.
Chairman L zuriaga opened the pub ' hearing. Greg Mitche , 1535 Los Altos, spoke oting that he and his wi 'ust
purchased the ouse and only wanted t upgrade it. Commission asked about the clari ation of the findings for e
si setback van ce, applicant noted that i was an extension of an e ting condition which th were not removing an
they ad added re ons as requested to their oposed findings. There ere no further question and the public hearing
was cl ed.
C. eal no�that there ve been no complaints m e by the neighbors abou iew obstruction, the b' ding has some
exis ' g prob ms to correct, he design reviewer had no oblem with the propose design, commission's c n�erns were
with s 11 items so moved ap oval of the project, by r olution, with conditions i' the staff report. The otion was
seconded by C. Bojues.
5