HomeMy WebLinkAbout177 California Drive - Staff Report (2).� r� ,� �.:�
r
ACTION ALTERNATIVES
1. City Council may vote in favor of an applicant�s request.
If the action is a variance, use permit, fence exception or
sign exception, the Council must make the findings as
required by the code. Findings must be particular to the
given property and request. Actions on use permits should
be by resolution. A majority of the Council members seated
during the public hearing must agree in order to pass an
affirmative motion.
2• City Council may deny an applicant�s request. The reasons
for denial should be clearly stated for the record.
3. City Council may deny a request without prejudice. This
action should be used when the application made to the City
Council is not the same as that heard by the Planning
Commission; when a Planning Commission action has been
justifiably, with clear direction, denied without prejudice;
or when the proposed project raises questions or issues on
which the Council would like additional information or
additional design work before acting on a project:
Direction about additional information required to be given
to staff, applicant and Planning Commission should be made
very clear,. Council should also direct whether any
subsequent hearing should be before the Council or the
Planning Commission.
SPECIAL PERMIT FINDINGS
(1) the proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be
detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the
vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, general welfare, or convenience;
(2) the proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner
in accord with the Burlingame general plan and the purposes
of this title;
(3) the planning commission may impose such reasonable
conditions or restrictions as it deems necessary to secure
the purposes of this title and to assure operation of the
use in a manner compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk
and character of existing and potential uses on adjoining
properties in the general vicinity.
(`�I�.e (1�t#� of `��rXtz��tt�t�e
CITY HALL - 501 PRIMROSE ROAD re� (415) 696-7250
PLANNING DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME. CALIFORNIA 94010-3997 Fwx (415) 342-8386
October 3, 1995
Peter I,ee
1480 Triumph Court
San 7ose, CA
Dear Mr. Lee,
At the City Council meeting of October 2, 1995 the Council called your project at
177 California Drive, Zoned C-2, Subarea D, up for review. A public hearing will
be held on Monday, October 16, 1995 at 7:30 P.M, in the Council Chambers, 501
Primrose Road.
We look forward to seeing you there to present your project. Please call me if you
have any questions.
Sincerely yours,
��'"_ C_�►V�.��_
Margaret Monroe
City Planner
MM/s
177CALIF.ccc
c. Tony Lopez
2395 S. Bascom Avenue
Campbell, CA 95008
City Clerk
A
,m�nF.V m recycK+d a�aoe' t J
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes
Commissioners noted that the hours of
ATM should be available to customers
customers when store is open; d
sign permit if signage added ou
�ration of Lucky had varied over the
hen store is open; directional signag
signage to ATM inside the store is �
September 26, 1995
�rs frocn 24 hours to present.
to ATM should be available to
subject to city regulations, need
C. Mink moved approval of t ATM, by resolution, with a modiiica ' n to condition #3, allowing ATM to be
available when store is open ith the following conditions: 1) that e ATM project shall be installed as shown
on the plans submitted to Planning Department date stamped A ust 10, 1995, Grocery Store Floor Plan (11"
X 17"), Grocery Store ot Plan (11" X 17"), Front Elevation f ATM (8'/z"X 11"), Left and Right Elevation
of ATM (81/z"X 11" , and Plan view of ATM (81h"X 11" , 2) that the requirements of the Chief Building
Inspector's memo d ted August 21, 1995 (provide disabl ccess and use of the ATM) shall be met; 3) that the
ATM shall be av ' able during the days and hours th ocery store is open and shall be located inside the store
at the front entr ce; 4) that any exterior signs fo he ATM shall require separate application for a sign permit
and possibl sign exception; and 5) that the proj t shall meet all the requirements of the Uniform Building and
Uniform re Codes as amended by the City o Burlingame.
Motio was seconded by C. Key and pass on a 7-0 voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised.
10. SPECIAL PERMIT FOR RETAIL �ALE OF SNACK FOODS AND BEVERAGES AT AN EXISTING GAS
STATION/CAR WASH AT 177 CALIFORNIA DRIVE, ZONED C-2, SUBAREA D(PETER LEE,
PROPERTY OWNER AND APPLICANT).
Reference staff report, 9/26/95, with attachments. CP Monroe discussed the request, reviewed criteria, Planning
Department comments, and noticing requirements. Five conditions were suggested for consideration.
Chm. Jacobs opened the public hearing. Mr. Lopez, 2395 So. Bascom, Campbell, was present representing the
applicant. There will be no changes other than to add the snack azea, the waiting area will remain the same.
There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed.
C. Key moved approval of this special permit application, by resolution, with an addition to condition # 2 denying
the sale of alcoholic beverages. The amended conditions are as follows: 1) that the tenant improvements for the
snack shop shall be installed as shown on the plans date stamped August 24, 1995, Site Plan and Floor Plan; 2)
that no alcoholic beverages shall be sold from the site or the snack area; 3) that the hours of operation shall be
from 7:00 AM to Midnight seven days per week and there shall be 5 full time and 2 part time employees; 4) that
the property owner shall be responsible for policing the site and adjacent sidewalks for litter and that adequate
trash receptacles shall be placed inside the building and around the site for use by the customers; and 5) that the
project shall meet all the requirements of the Uniform Building and Uniform Fire Codes as amended by the City
of Burlingame.
Motion was seconded by C. Deal and passed on a 7-0 voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised.
�
CITY OF B URLINGAME
SPECIAL PERMIT
Item# l0
Special Permit for Sale of Food and Beverages at a Gas Station
Address: 177 California Drive
Meeting Date: 9-26-95
Request: Special Permit for retails sale of snack foods and beverages at an existing gas
station/car wash at 177 California Drive, zoned C-2, Subarea D.
Applicant: Peter Lee APN: 029-232-160
Property Owner: Peter Lee
Lot Area: 14,524 SF ±
General Plan: Commercial, Service and Special Sales Zoning: C-2
Adjacent Development: Auto Row
CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section:
15301 - Existing Facilities, Class 1(a), Interior or exterior alterations involving such things as
interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances.
Summary: The applicant, Peter Lee,is requesting a special use permit to allow retail sales of
snack foods and beverages from his gas station/car wash at the corner of Howard Avenue and
California Drive. No other uses are being changed on the site. The gas pumps and the car
wash will remain in place and in service.
The applicant is proposing a tenant improvement to the interior of the existing structure.
Presently the building houses men's and women's restrooms and an office/pay booth. This
proposal is to put the snacks and beverages inside the building along with the cashier. The
snacks and beverages will include such items as candy, sodas in a fountain and in bottles, coffee,
beer and cigarettes. The snack shop will be open 7 days per week from 7:00 a. m. to Midnight,
with 5 full time employees and 2 part-time employees. The number of employees working at the
site is not change because of the proposed snack bar use.
The existing structure is 179 SF and requires 1 parking space on-site for the snack bar use.
There are two parking spaces on site designated employee parking. Two of the five full time
employees can park on site and the others iind street parking. The applicant states in his
application materials that 3 of his employees carpool to work.
PROPOSED EXISTING ALLOWED/REQ'D
Interior alterations to the existing building.
Staff Comments: The Chief Building Official commented in his August 28, 1995 memo that the
occupant load is insigniiicant and the restrooms shall meet all disabled access requirements.
Required Findings for a Special Permit:
In order to grant a Special Permit the Planning Commission must find that the following
conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.52.020 a-c):
(a) the proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to
1
SPLCIAL PERMIT
177 CALIFORNIA DR.
property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, general welfare, or convenience;
(b) the proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the
Burlingame general plan and the purposes of this title;
(c) the Planning Commission may impose such reasonable conditions or restrictions as it
deems necessary to secure the purposes of this title and to assure operation of the use in
a manner compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and
potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity.
Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing.
Affirmative action should be taken by resolution. Reasons for any action should be clearly
stated. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered:
Conditions:
1. that the tenant improvements for the snack shop shall be installed as shown on the plans
date stamped August 24, 1995, Site Plan and Floor Plan;
2. that an Alcoholic Beverage Control license shall be obtained prior to the sale of alcoholic
beverages from this location;
3. that the hours of operation shall be from 7:00 AM to Midnight seven days per week with
5 full time and 2 part time employees;
4. that the property owner shall be responsible for policing the site and adjacent sidewalks
for litter and that adequate trash receptacles shall be placed inside the building and
around the site for use by the customers; and
5. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the Uniform Building and Uniform Fire
Codes as amended by the City of Burlingame.
Leah Dreger
Planner
c: Tony Lopez, designer
2
/4r� T w CITY OF BURLINGAME
eureuNQwM¢
���APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMNIISSION
,.
�
Type of Application: t/Special Permit Variance Other
Project Address: l�l % CG.� ��e v�� i.. I� v' ��(� a av�c c n
Assessor's Parcel Number(s):
APPLICANT PROPERTY O WNER
Name: M� 6�c� fc v- �. c c... Name: _ M U- 6�.�f-e v L-c t �
Address: (`-� �3 � Ti^«.�,. d G� c_ � Address: /`f g 0 Tr.�; e.�..�. ✓I l2 c.T-
City/State/Zip: So...� 7'd s�. Ca _ City/State/Zip: Sa..s T.s c_ C,.
Phone (w): K( S- 3 y'�l -��� K Phone (w): y�j �y- 6�$ y
�): �Fa E��- y`(�- !! S�'O
fax:
ARCHITECT/DESIGNER �''
Name: �.- %r�,� v�.o tl c 7
Address: ��� S .S . I�a�S c� r� � t,
City/State/Zip: .•.�.�+ ( � �n�, ���� e g
i
Phc)*ie (W): �i0 $ -3?7-- �Pa'�C.3
(h): 4og-377�FrD9Y
fax: �{og- 377� Y33�
�): y0 �S -� yL - i i� v
fax:
Please indicate with an asterisk * the
contact person for this application.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: �.0 c a.►r� ,Oc.s.t�rlo S � : � , �ia �r�r Q r-l�-e . ��- �,, fo
C.' `G�; S � c7v� r r� � f !
� G�b-S 5`F-�.� '�� C:L J��R O►C.� ✓�C� �/' r��(Yl9 `�U TA� b'n �Q1 i rLf�t�..C� c
C.a��c� �, Snsac.kc 4pcj� L�„ hF(.� �'od ��..���..`..� Ca � .
.� c V` C.. a c.r a/5�� c
AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given
herein is true and conect to the best of my knowledge and belief.
ApplicanYs Signature Date
I know about the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this
application to the Planning Commission.
Property Owner's Signature Date
----------------------FOR OFFICE USE ONLY --
Date Filed:
Fee:
Planning Commission: Study Date: Action Date:
�r� cirr o�
BURt�NGAME `��� �u ���������� C����.� � �
'*%;'._- . y..._ � ,. ��La�O�!/'11� ���� � 0 ������LO� 0 ��U COdJ
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's ordinance
(Code Section 25.52.0201. Your answers to the following questions will assist the Planning
Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request.
Please type or write neatly in ink. Refe� to the back of this form for assistance with these
questions.
1. Exp/ain why the proposed use at the proposed /ocation wi// not be detrimenta/ or, infurious
to property or improvements in the vicinity or to pub/ic hea/th, safety, genera/ we/fare, or
convenience. -r�e �¢lc�9�.loc��N �v�apev��s o� s��``� w�`c ^�ot !e� Q�-F«f�d' bc 4aus �
t:ua �.+rc, woi' c.(�o.�..�....� �,Yl�c, 9o,r c,,. o.dd�w g c�sv y tr.d. �Fcc.. Dca.�.' � as c.c.-s Mrne.u-S ..0 �cl
� ea.s f(n� �-F�.{ oip°"twv rtY �Fo �Ou.vc(�a.s c a. s..� o.�.k.
++�e �,` �, �n.ta.( l-�.: W t c��, ivio� o..c�,c�� �o So.��{o-i,c�n) � 4I�r acw.�: {� o e.- Se�7 t►— � wa.[�cv Sc,yry��?-
c.Wc�urcr v+v�,e�►d S�'o�t- 7b�� � C_I,.e.e�c,.rco.�d � c-�� s f-�� c� co�vd� f�eNs. (..�.� ¢. �� t f!e e. �,+s�.l!-
+� iZe.ac,[,.- � cv o,..v af w a.L f� ,' N co o(tvr .
Qt�!'i << G Sai�'� = N o m.d d'ea( (,b irct o�•- �`�� •�J v�c> te �-!4•ec�1 w� c( 4 c n� e�dC.�. !�!l t�F wt,. o-�-�c..
o,d► d t� g� c�.. S N� 4 av� Fo ��n.: �•�o d.�c F.� o� o F Ff orn�to►1� (E � l�►atA�.a�oa.s e+u,.�►.(■
No a•c�tu ��`ti +�f- wo�..toC �oc `po�'.e� f: o-l!y daag«.,eea..c�
G ��� �-rs.a.. c.�,�..ac:oe.�.�.�s Iw�.o pc�.v�.(,�.ti� �{-G�c�v9a5 w►((cvo� I�a�ie. -� ��+eu,t( �"v
O�iofi,....�. /b c.n.#a�o� � �- S�a:c.l� c
Ca'�'*'vw��"'�-� - u.re w tL� �a'f' e�aC' o►�cC..ess -6c� Psvfc�,.�y %Y t�.:s s�� e�
adi ac•� se`�a
c��..�.- ��s� �� 9 cu.� �� �s � �t� (� � 9� � c� -fl�e. e+�?��u.� �� �hc pc�.�a� �c. a'ru-'.�-�'
�'� �rb-S W �'�Oc�' �0.c1 c:� -ki s e 2[s tcu �,..�.ve .
2. How wi// the pioposed use be /ocated and conducted in accordance with the Bur/ingame
G�nera/ P/an and Zoning OrdinanceT
CT���.b...( �P(� S��.�rr��c a�d Sp�cFa,1 54.(s.s ; �tJe �� �vw �Owv«k�� �Ca�,-
w a.S 1�;,,,,� � M�-oi � n.S �u �-- o c��-- c_c�. s fo �t;vs. Ig Y 9 i v c�>v � o t�-v� Cu.s f�+�c-�v-a'
-(-�c o p�p a v�w., ��.�- -k, b c�.41z -� ��.v�.o-s c- sN o-�fcs ���cC �O c.v e �-a.,q as �--
ow• f o ca-� a�v w-e. K e�.! � i u,tg �.t- i N,u �h -�c c5-��re.ti..�.l �,Dloe.� a�c6 Za�r� .
C" �, Z cs� �c. �� 9 C'a �rt �.c c� � cc... < l4 c�#o 1�C5 a� ; c�1 c. ci.v �. �v-pc s a�2�v g c�, s�.�Z.
(0�,,,�- � v ve.-E,o� � c,#- o c..�- � a Ca �e�CrN . � cav- Cu-v v�e.n� f' �.c� 6'� es�a-c� w a,e�r�6� �
-h� -l-�-c� c.( -b � ow�•� �{,� w„� � u.s t{o � uw cL�o-� c a. S�vo-c.f� . t.uc �a. ��-%� ur�cF
� IA ���'C� G G�cyWecJ �O ca}� .
3. How wi// the proposed project be compatib/e with the aesthetics, mass, bu/k and character
of the existing and potentia/ uses on adjoining properties in the genera/ vicinity)
Y�.c. 0.Z $�-Iw� : c� p cr el.o.,�.ac.�-..�r b�' �11 �,,,v.� S-ec.� S h�-(c. lo o.t�- w 2' C[ W� c-(,•o+� e.. Rl�c,i g�t.�oti :
�O�t• �-L% � O.v� O[v �� C�O�+VSi.iN �'�IJWG � tii�-eVFC1.� Z1 C� C'70OV ���l� � UJ C Q liG �(I�N�flCZ t�lt%'i
✓�G�"'aZI Scs�.¢$ O� Cs.' S�tO.Cj� IeAv �i 9p wo (-I� Otwi' C.O'�K��triCo..i Sh.��S OtC CA�Ws��
U,.ctC� �a.g $o-��t, �e. �Ot�.ec�� OC�v �c�Y��pps�$Nac.�G 6aV Wo-u�[o� �if' f/'ig�'f i¢r �tid'�_
c9c�.,� e.�f sf��� u-Se.c�9 e.. �� �cy�� g+��.� 9 eko.,+�ct�-w- e F cc,+..v lcco...froti 1S ccr�ca.r��
c�� rr�� (1w1�.: c�. LS e xac�l�r u9l.a.tocx►�- stin,�k.. �o,.�. w� c( C�c.. /Eu#� 12v..�r
,sias i s e� ccm���cv� c.a.( v��e.�{-o�.� ( cu.Ga.. Oc�,..�•• �c+.t ForFc-�vS �pua,c..�,a.ee.., �a,�s
j`r�-t� �(( l
ep.frm �,�.f� C�}'O�'sh 'L"�t��+V �G'.g CJIT' C'�4.�.' 1Q�.0--��biCi r��.. �'JrolCltFi`OL� Q C Q.+ r7�j�/
�10�-� �o e-c�.�- ���0d`� c�s � Cf. �e�.�O f�'z- ��-C c�dw� -�o� � �4 cc,"�.
c�.� w�.. w�� �O cc�,� v�e,� � � �' C.c,s �revs
c) � `"'�'� J��-Ff1cC.�. �O bc�.� Cw�t�on�c*QvS
1. Exp/ain why the proposed use at the proposed /ocation wi// not be detrimenta/ o� injurious to
property or improvements in the vicinity or to pub/ic hea/th, safety, genera/ we/fare, or
convenience.
How will the proposed structure or use within the structure affect neiphborinp properties or structures on those
properties? If neighboring properties will not be affected, state why. Think about traffic, noise, lighting, pavinp,
landscapin� sunlipht/shade, views from neighborin� properties, ease of maintenance.
Why will the structure or use within the structure not affect the public's health, safety ar general welfare7
Public health includes such things as sanitation (parba�e), air quality, discharges into sewer and stormwater systems,
water supply safety, and things which have the potential to affect public health (i.e., underground storage tanks,
storape of chemicals, situations which encourape the spread of rodents, insects or communicable diseases).
Public safetv. How will the structure or use within the structure affect police or fire protection7 WII alarm systems
or sprinklers be installed7 Could the structure or use within the structure create a nuisance or need for police services
(i.e., noise, unruly patherings, loitering, traffic) or fire services (i.e., storage or use flammable or haza�dous materials,
or potentially dangerous activities like welding, woodwork, engine removal).
General welfare is a catch-all phrase meaning community good. Is the proposal consistent with the city's policy and
goals for conservation and development7 Is there a social benefit7
Convenience. How would the proposed structure or use affect public convenience (such as access to or parkinp for
this site or adjacent sites)7 Is the proposal accessible to particular se�ments of the public such as the elderly or
handicappedl
2. How vvi// the proposed use be /ocated and conducted in accordance with the Bur/ing3rne Genera/
P/an and Zoning �rd%nance?
Ask the Planninp Department for the general plan designation and zonin� district for the proposed project site. Also
ask for an explanation of each. Once you have this information, you can compare your proposal with the stated
designated use and zoning, then explain why this proposal would "fit" accordingly.
3. Ho w wi// the proposed project be compatib/e with the aesthetics, mass, bu/k and character of the
existing neighborhood and potentia/ uses on adjoining properties in the genera/ vicinityT
How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetically with existin� neighborhood7 If it does not affect
aest�etics, state why. If chanqes to the structure are proposed, was the addition designed to match existin�
architecture, pattern of development on adjacent properties in the neighborhood? If a use will affect the way a
neighborhood or area looks, such as a long term airport parking lot, compare your proposal to other uses in the area
and explain why it "fits".
How does the proposed structure compare to neighboring structures in terms of mass or bulk7 If there is no change
to structure, say so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation etc. with other
structures in the neighborhood or area.
How will the structure or use within the structure change the character of the neighborhoodl Think of character as
the image or tone established by size, density of development and general pattern of land use. Will there be more
traffic or less parking available resulting from this use7 If you don't feel the character of the neighborhood will change,
state why.
How will the proposed project be compatible with existin� and potential uses in the peneral vicinity7 Compare your
project with existinp uses. State why you feel your project is consistent with other uses in the vicinity, and/or state
why your project would be consistent with potential uses in the vicinity.
, zres
�p.frm
,�1'� 0.1. ���(+..I" � `�
V\
� eURtJN4AMC CONIlV�RCIAL APPLICATIONS
�°• ' PLANIVING COMMISSION APPLICATION SUPPLEMENTAL FORM
•...
1. Proposed use of the site. Go. S S�c..#� i o c.� . C.c�.v- W n.s �, .�t i n�� d u�n� s c�� S,c� ac1C '�c�,�
2. Days and hours of operation. 7 e�c�us �v�� % R-tyt �f-c� � lol`F�
3. Number of trucks/service vehicles to be parked at site (by type). �lraR1S
4. Cunent and projected maximum number of employees (including owner) at this location:
Existing In 2 Years In 5 Years
Hours of AM- After AM- After AM- After
Operation PM 5:00 PM PM 5:00 PM PM 5:00 PM
Weekdays �I c.e*��p (o �,, �,,�l07�•
Full-time o u�" ��-- s`�n'� s'o.�-� �.
Part-time ►
Weekends y��Y�tr
Full-time �" �Er'`��°�{`s
o�N �✓'
Part-dme �,�,
5. Cunent and projected maximum number of visitors/customers who may come to the site:
Existing In 2 Years In 5 Years
Hours of AM- After AM- After AM- After
Operation PM 5:00 PM PM 5:00 PM PM 5:00 PM
Weekdays f S� �.� C. S �� /$1 �
Weekends p � c� ( 3 2— a.� /�f �. `f
6. What is the ma�cimum number of people expected on site at any one time (include owner,
employees and visitors/customers):
1 D n,� �(� _ �t 0.x � � ��
7. Where do/will the owner & employees park? M�efc►^ �Sf�.{�f �w(c�.�� Scar�� as arc�-c.c.S
3�,�p (vY-c-c s C�c, � c e i -ro w o., ic.
8. Where do/will customers/visitors park? 6�v S: f c C�-s S,F�f� Q�v _T.� (� ef.s
9. Present or most recent use of site. I��{�.. � �� �--o-s �c� �-c� EA_J-o-��
10. List of other tenants on property, their number of employees, hours of operation (attach
list if necessary).
iuoN�
ROUTING FORM
��,�. .� � � i .,�,r..
DATE:
�
TO: CITY ENGINEER
CHIEF BUII.DING INSPECTOR
� FIRE MARSHAL
PARKS DIRECTOR
CITY ATTORNEY
FROM: CITY PLANNER/PLANNER
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR
�'�� �: �..� �`� , #'"r` ; l'�l � ��(
AT
1
. i` i �-' � � '�"".
f a �.,
"id°
,
SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION � MEETING: � -;� ��
tr
REVIEWED BY STAFF MEETING ON MONDAY: � Z��
THANKS ,
7ane/Sheri/Leah
��
��-
(�; = Date of Comments
� � C��,��
�'
ROUTING FORM
� ,�,.
DATE:
TO: CITY ENGINEER
� CHIEF BUII.DING INSPECTOR
�_ FIRE MARSHAL
PARKS DIItECTOR
CITY ATTORNEY
I�'. � _Jru_�
SUBJECT:
CITY PLANNERIPLANNER
REQUEST FOR
�?�'1' ( �
�
AT
'� 1
- � � -
SCHEDULED PLANTTING COMMISSION � MEETING:_s �
REVIEWED BY STAFF MEETING ON MONDAY: ��� '
THANKS,
Jane/Sheri/Leah
�M
��1� U��'���'�1J t
� �
�,
�
G �G��
� !l ��s���
_�----
� � �� `' " � Date of Comments
, �. � , �;:
.E�. �� _
��
l�z� �s ��S�y� ,
z�Bss r � �
s-'�_ � ---
�iZ��-
,Q��- °s� `�' �s �- ��—
ROUTING FORM
DATE: � �
TO: '� CITY ENGINEER
CHIEF BUII.DING INSPECTOR
FIRE MARSHAL
PARKS DIRECTOR
CITY ATTORNEY
FROM: CITY PLANNER/PLANNER
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR
.!
'�,,�R.
�
.4
r,�
��
� Y�
. , --
SCHEDULED PLANTTING COMMISSION � MEETING: c ,� ��
REVIEWED BY STAFF MEETING ON MONDAY: � Z
THANKS ,
7ane/Sheri/I,eah
� vU � �� vvl wt �i+�� �
�`� ( 2 t� �`� � Date of Comments
i -��
� �
C�'-/I��
CITY OF BURLINGAME
501 PRIMR03E ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
(415) 696-7250
NOTICE OF HEARING
The CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION announces the
following public hearing on TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 1995 at 7:30
P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose
Road, Burlingame, California. A copy of the application and plans
may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Planning Division at
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California.
177 CALIFORNIA DRIVE
APN: 029-232-160
APPLICATION FOR A U3E PERMIT TO SELL FOOD AND
BEVERAGES FROM A SERVICE STATION AT 177
CALIFORNIA DRIVE, ZONED C-1, SUBAREA D.
If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may
be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised
at the public hearing described in the notice or in written
correspondence delivered to the City at or prior to the public
hearing.
The property owner who receives this notice is responsible for
informing their tenants about this notice. Please post this notice
in a public place on your property. Thank you
MARGARET MONROE
CITY PLANNER
SEPTEMBER 15, 1995
� _ . �.. �! � ! - �,,,,�.....�w � � � � �: ,....
� � -- . ,;,i� . . - /
�� - � / �
� . / �
� # ' !, ,��
- ! . � . ,-13 � ,. � / '
� T� / /
� / /
� � �r
f • ' • / �
i • �
�•. . � r" � ��.�`, � � �
� � _'" f �► �P.�� '
�► � , a'�,�R � � � � ¢ :t �
�� ,,,. �` �' �E / j ,,'"'" r a _ � . .
�' q �! • � / y ' y � � � ' .�
a�
� � �`� , ba��~ "'� �
�.. .. -.
�
s G �� � . - �,f �. � ,/ ��� S � ` A , � � ' r �
.�
�
�� / � � -'+ � Sl `Y � * '� � � ^ ". ,� � .r � . � ,.;:
� � � � ' ` � - '�
� �%'�= ' ,f .pR.•`� �' , t -
� �g . * ,�` - #� � �
�" � � � T 7� '� -,-
� i .� � � � " � � �. - .
� �' ��r; � •� - ( -
� • �' � ._ Da„�1��► �ti$ � . -
� ,,,,� _ - G A,,,�' �2� � �
o � � '!R
"- �'� ,�. � �` � '� i3� � '� r
_ �`�- T., �,��� � ` � � � � �''' '' '!S."�E
- . � � , r-
•r �,, .�,,'� ' .�`� W,� �fi � ' I- �5. , "::�. � � . �� ... ,
.. ti' T '�� .+i-, ! �1� ..��A�
„t- , .' ��' � k� _._ ,
�� �� ���
�r ��� ��� ���
�� �� ��� �� �� r
� �C. < 7� ,, ,fi �� I�.A r.l p ��`' r AJ E�lJ �'•
, ;� "' # ti°� �.' ' � .a`�" �'
�i� P'F*, �- i' �'; p • ,/- " -, �
�, , r , _`, , �, • ..- � �� � � ~ �' - , , ,
-- � � �
'� � �. ,�o? � � ,. •�
� 1 �� . . �
� �: � '- � r' _
r ;� ��
� r„ � .�. , � /" ,
�� � � - � . . �� �- � .�t. � . �. ..l �
r ,,; p D
' ; ; + � �,�_� , � r -w , �i
_;_ � � � �1 /�� r � t � . , �i , �: ` .
�As:_ -��1 � ? .. i
� 1 � , � -
tf �
�• I � ' � . . . � � - _ �' . „' �
� � � �y � � � � � . �
� ;` r � �
� . . � V.�'�..'� � . "`]f� � � ^ � �•'�� . �, �
1f0�' ? .+ � � -- � � �?' . .. '. � ,
:a.�
�� _ `� , .
►, � .. � ' �r !. ,„ > �
�d�.�i i`
t rJ X.
. . � - � Lo Rro►.� A�e►.t u �
; ��
�' " .k.'�h • ,4' x �11�';1i �
- �r,�' ;,,�.� . � �
'� � � � � �t -
����
� �.� . .�� �` .� i 1 I ii � � e � �~ � ■
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING
CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND SPECIAL PERMIT
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for a
special permit for _ sale of food and bevera eg s at a gas station at 177 California Drive APN: 029-232-
160 ;_proverty owner: Peter Lee 1480 Triumph Court San Jose, CA ; and
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on
September 26. 1995 , at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written
materials and testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that:
1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments
received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that
the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption
Section: 15301 - Exisdng Facilities, Class 1(a) , Interior or exterior alterations involving such things as
interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveniences is hereby approved.
2. Said special permit is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto. Findings for such Special Permit are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official
records of the County of San Mateo.
CHAIRMAN
I, Karen Kev , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby
certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 26th day of Se�tember , 1995 , by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
SECRETARY
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval categorical exemption and special permit
177 CALIFORNIA DRIVE
effective OCTOBER 2, 1995
1. that the tenant improvements for the snack shop shall be installed as shown on the
plans date stamped August 24, 1995, Site Plan and Floor Plan;
2. that an Alcoholic Beverage Control license shall be obtained prior to the sale of alcoholic
beverages from this location;
3. that the hours of operation shall be from 7:00 AM to Midnight seven days per week and
5 full time and 2 part time employees:
4, that the property owner shall be responsible for policing the site and adjacent sidewalks
for litter and that adequate trash receptacles shall be placed inside the building and around
the site for use by the customers; and
5. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the Uniform Building and Uniform Fire
Codes as amended by the City of Burlingame.
CITY OF BURLINGAME
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
(415) 696-7250
NOTICE OF HEARING
The CITY OF BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL announces the following
public hearing on MONDAY, OCTOBER 16, 1995 at 7:30 P.M. in the
City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road,
Burlingame, California. A copy of the application and plans may be
reviewed prior to the meeting at the Planning Division at 501
Primrose Road, Burlingame, California.
177 CALIFORNIA DRIVE
APN: 029-232-160
APPLICATION FOR A USE PERMIT TO SELL FOOD AND
BEVERAGES FROM A SERVICE STATION AT 177
CALIFORNIA DRIVE, ZONED C-1, SUBAREA D.
If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may
be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised
at the public hearing described in the notice or in written
correspondence delivered to the City at or prior to the public
hearing.
The property owner who receives this notice is responsible for
informing their tenants about this notice. Please post this notice
in a public place on your property. Thank you
JUDITH A. MALFATTI
CITY CLERK
OCTOBER 6, 1995
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING
CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND SPECIAL PERMIT
RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for a
special permit for _ sale of food and bevera eg s at a gas station at 177 California Drive. APN: 029-
232-160 ; property owner: Peter Lee, 1480 Triumph Court San 7ose, CA ; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on said application on September
26. , 1995 , at which time said application was approved;
WHEREAS, this matter was called up by City Council and a hearing thereon held on October
16, 1995 , at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and
testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Council that:
1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments
received and addressed by this council, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the
project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption
Section: 15301 - Existing Facilities, Class 1(a) , Interior or exterior alterations involving such things
as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveniences is hereby approved.
2. Said special permit is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto. Findings for such Special Permit are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records
of the County of San Mateo.
MAYOR
I, JUDITH A. MALFATTI, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the
foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 16th day
of October , 1995 , and adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY CLERK
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval categorical exemption and special permit
177 CALIFORIVIA DRIVE
effective OCTOBER 16, 1995
that the tenant improvements for the snack shop shall be installed as shown on the plans
date stamped August 24, 1995, Site Plan and Floor Plan with at least two on-site parking
stalls, one designated for employees and one designated for snack shop customers;
2. that no alcoholic beverages shall be sold from the site of the snack area;
3. that the hours of operation shall be from 7:00 AM to Midnight seven days per week and 5 full
time and 2 part time employees:
4. that the property owner shall be responsible for policing the site and adjacent sidewalks for litter
and that adequate trash receptacles shall be placed inside the building and around the site for use
by the customers; and
5. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the Uniform Building and Uniform Fire Codes
as amended by the City of Burlingame.