HomeMy WebLinkAbout1538 Burlingame Avenue - Staff ReportItem #
Consent Calendar
PROJECT LOCATION
1538 Burlingame Avenue
City of Burlingame
Design Review, Special Permit and Variances
Item # ��
Consent Calendar
Address: 1538 Burlingame Avenue Meeting Date: 2/12/07
Request: Design review and special permit for an attached garage, and rear setback and floor area ratio
variances for a first floor addition.
Applicant/ Architect: TRG Architects APN: 028-283-090
Property Owner: Nancy Blachman Lot Area: 12,245 SF
General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1
CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15301 Class 1(e)(1) - additions to existing
structures provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the
structures before the addition.
Summary: The existing two-story house with an attached one-car garage contains 5,124 (0.42 FAR) of
floor area, has seven potential bedrooms and a 272 SF lower level utility room. The applicant is proposing
to add 213 SF on to the existing attached garage, to allow for two covered parking spaces, and add an
additional 111 SF to the first floor, including a mud room and new play room to the left and rear side of the
property. The addition will match the existing exterior building materials. The entire living room area has
a ceiling height greater than 12' and is counted twice in the FAR calculation. With the proposed first floor
addition, the floor area will increase from 5,124 SF (0.42 FAR) to 5,448 SF (0.45 FAR) where 4,818 SF
(0.39 FAR) is the maximum allowed. The existing house exceeds the maximum allowed FAR by 306 SF.
The proposed project is 630 SF above the maximum allowed FAR and therefore the applicant has, with the
addition, requested a variance to exceed the maximum allowable FAR on this lot.
With this project, the number of potential bedrooms will increase from seven to eight. Three parking
spaces, two covered (20' x 20') and one uncovered (9' x 20'), are required for the proposed eight bedroom
house. The existing attached one-car garage will be expanded to an attached two-car garage, which meets
the covered parking requirement. Because the footprint of the existing attached garage is increasing, design
review and a special permit for an attached garage are required. One uncovered space (9' x 20') is provided
in the driveway. All other zoning code requirements have been met. The following applications are
required:
• Design review for a first floor addition with an attached garage (C.S. 25.57.O10,a,4);
• Special permit for an attached garage (CS 25.28.035,a);
• Variance for rear setback to the first floor addition (14'-1" proposed where 15'-0" is the minimum
required) (CS 25.28.072, d, 1); and
• Variance for exceeding the maximum allowable FAR (5,448 SF proposed, where 4,818 SF is the
maximum allowed) (CS 25.28.070 d).
* This space was intentionally left blank *
Design Review, Special Permit and variances
Table 1 —1538 Burlingame Avenue
1538 Burlingame Avenue
Lot Area: 12,245 SF Plans date stam ed: Januar 10, 2007 & Januar 31, 2007
EXISTING PROPOSED ; ALLOWED/REQ'D
;
�
SETBACKS
� ......................................................................................................................................I..............................................................
,
�
Front (ls`ftr): 35'-0" (to garage) �: 26'-7" ' 15'-0"
; ;
to attached garage 35'-0" (to garage) 26'-7" 25'-0"
�2,:d�,r): 35'-0" ! no..change ........................... � .. .. ................ 20�-��.�..........
,.
Side (right): 20'-0" (to bay) � no change 7'-0"
(left): 23'-8" 16'-9" 7'-0"
Rear (ls` ftr): 14'-6" 14'-1" 15'-0"
(2"d flr): 14'-6" ; no change 20'-0"
:..... ... ...................................... . ... .. .............. ...................:...................................................... .... ............................................................
Lot Coverage: 2,694 SF 3,065 SF 4,898 SF
22% � 25% 40%
�....... . . .. . . ..................... .................................. ..... ....
.
FAR: 5,124 SF3 ; 5,448 SF3 4,818 SF 2
0.42 FAR j 0.45 FAR 0.39 FAR
_.... ...._ .. ; ........................................................... .. _._ ...__. .. .;....................... .. _............. .. . . ......................
# of bedrooms: 7 8 ---
Parkiizg: 1 covered 2 covered ' 2 covered
;
(12' x 21') (20' x 20') ! (20' x 20')
1 uncovered 1 uncovered � 1 uncovered
(9� X 20�� (9� X Zo�� ' �9� X 20�)
Height: 27'-3" 13'-6" (addition) ' 30'-0"
DH Envelope: n/a — no 2°d story addn. ; n/a — no 2°d story addn. ; CS 25.28.075
Variance for rear setback to the first floor addition (14'-1" proposed where 15'-0" is the minimum
required) (CS 25.28.072, d, 1);
2 (0.32 x 12,245 SF) + 900 SF = 4,818 SF (0.39 FAR)
3 Variance for exceeding the maximum allowable FAR (5,448 SF proposed, where 4,818 SF is the
maximum allowed) (CS 25.28.070 d).
Staff Comments: Staff would note that the isometric drawings attached to the original plans have not been
revised to reflect the change made to the new roof area and therefore will not be included in the conditions
of approval. See attached.
Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission design review study meeting on January 22,
2007, the Commission complimented the project and had one comment concerning the roof eave along the
left side of the house and placed this item on the consent calendar at the next available meeting (January 22,
2007, Planning Commission Minutes). The architect revised sheet A3.3 to indicate that the new roof area
over the garage and mudroom addition will match the existing rake style roof at the front entry or living
room areas (refer to half size sets of revised sheet A3.3, date stamped January 31, 2007).
Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by
the Council on Apri120, 1998 are outlined as follows:
�
Design Review, Special Permit an�l variances /538 Burlingame Avenue
1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood;
2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood;
3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure;
4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and
5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components.
Findings: Based on the revision to the plans and on the findings stated in the attached minutes of the
Planning Commission's January 22, 2007, design review study meeting, that the addition brings the on site
parking into compliance with zoning code requirements and that the proposed design is compatible with the
architectural style of the existing house as well as styles found in the neighborhood, the project is found to
be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review guidelines.
Findings for a Special Permit: In order to grant a special permit for an attached garage, the Planning
Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.51.020 a-d):
(a) The blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition
are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood;
(b) the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure
or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood;
(c) the proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city; and
(d) removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is
consistent with the city's reforestation requirements, and the mitigation for the removal that is
proposed is appropriate.
Special Permit Findings for Attached Garage: Based on the findings stated in the attached minutes of the
Planning Commission's January 22, 2007, design review study hearing, that the addition to the garage will
bring the on site parking into compliance with zoning code regulations, that the addition to the garage
complies with all setback requirements and that it is consistent with the parking pattern in the
neighborhood, the project is found to be compatible with the special permit criteria listed above.
Required Findings for a Variance: In order to grant variances for both rear setback and for floor area ratio
the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section
25.54.020 a-d):
(a) there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property
involved that do not apply generally to property in the same district;
(b) the granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial
property
right of the applicant, and to prevent unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship;
3
Design Review, Special Permit and variances 1538 Burlingame Avenue
(c) the granting of the application will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in
the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare or convenience;
(d) that the use of the property will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of
existing and potential uses of properties in the general vicinity.
Variance Findings for Rear Setback: Based on the findings in the attached minutes of the Planning
Commissions January 22, 2007, design review study hearing, that the existing rear setback is currently non-
conforming with a 14'-6" setback and only a small portion of the bay window will encroach into the
required setback, and that the proposed bay window addition is at the rear of the house and will not be
visible from the street so it will not affect the streetscape in the neighborhood, the project is found to be
compatible with the variance criteria listed above.
Variance Findings for FAR: Based on the findings in the attached minutes of the Planning Commissions
January 22, 2007, design review study hearing, that the existing house exceeds the maximum allowable
FAR by 306 SF, that because the existing living room space has a ceiling height greater than 12' it is
counted twice in the FAR which accounts for an additional 600+ SF but is an existing condition that does
not add any additional mass or bulk to the house and because most of the new floor area is being added
towards the rear of the lot and will not be visible from the street, the project is found to be compatible with
the variance criteria listed above.
Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative
action should be by resolution and include findings made for design review, special permit and variances.
The reasons for any action should be clearly stated. At the public hearing the following conditions should
be considered:
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date
stamped January 31, 2007, sheet A3.3 and date stamped January 10, 2007, sheets A1.1 through
A3.2, A3.4 and A3.5, and that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor
area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit;
2. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's November 27, 2007 memo, the City Engineer's
November 27, 2007 memo, the Fire Marshal's November 28, 2007 memo, the Recycling Specialist's
November 27, 2007 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's November 27, 2007 memo shall be met;
3. that if the structure is demolished or the envelope changed at a later date the both the rear setback
variance and FAR variance as well as any other exceptions to the code granted here will become
void;
4. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site
shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to
comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District;
5. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which
would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural
features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review;
0
Design Review, Special Permit and variances
1538 Burlingame Avenue
6. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or
another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that
the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as
window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification
documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division
before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled.
7. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the
roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department;
8. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the
architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built
according to the approved Planning and Building plans;
9. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single
termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these
venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans befare a Building permit is
issued;
10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes,
2001 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame;
11. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance
which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste
Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure,
interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; and
12. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water
Management and Discharge Control Ordinance.
Erica Strohmeier
Zoning Technician
c. TRG Architects, Architect and Applicant
5
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes
Com nt on motion: 10' pla heights on the first floor re out of place in Bu 'ng�
height the first floor and 8'- " on the second floor; co erned about the pos i
into the lo ered patio area, fenci would apply; not oppose to 9' and 8'-6" plate
max, room lay with to reduce th assing on the second r so it is not a118'-t
Craftsman loo like its sitting in a h e, go up 18", reduce pl height and will
basement; encou e debris pick-up on e; and currently no street ee in front of p:
one. This motion s seconded by C. De
C'r Brownrigg called a vote on the motio place this item on the r
had n revised as directe The motion passed a voice vote 7-0. The
adviso nd not appealable. his item concluded :45 p.m.
January 22, 2007
me; okay w h 9' plate
ity of someo falling
ights; still 152 from
• one step up ma a
re ce excavation
�pe , should provide
action calend�hen plans
in� Commissio action is
5. 1538 Burlingame Avenue, zoned R-1 — application for design review, special permit for attached garage
and variances for floor area ratio and rear setback for a first floor addition (TRG Architects, applicant and
architect; Nancy Blachman, propertv owner�(56 noticed, Project Planner: Erica Strohmeier
ZT Strohmeier briefly presented the project description. Commission commented that because the existing
living room which is not proposed to be changed has a ceiling height greater than 12', it is counted twice and
therefore adds 618 SF to the FAR calculation.
Chair Brownrigg opened the public comment. Randy Grange, architect, 205 Park Road, and David Des
Jardins, property owner, stated: because the 630 SF living room counts twice, the house already exceeds the
max FAR; the existing one story living room element that counts twice does not exceed the mass and bulk of
the neighborhood; consider Burlingame Avenue to be the front property line for this house; applicant wants
the new bay window to look out into the 15' rear yard which is more like a rear corridor; and applicant wants
to maintain and improve the historical character of the house. Commission commented:
■ Architect addressed why the bay window has to be off the rear of the house; could bay window
qualify as a minor modification?
■ Like what has been done with the garage; makes a good case for a variance;
■ Sympathize on the existing plate height in the living room;
■ It is a gorgeous home; why does the roof eave stop at the garage and not extend to the mudroom; and
■ Architect forgot to mention that the existing shed on the property will be removed.
Applicant responded: the addition contains an interesting roof element where it cannot extend out too far to
cover garage area; the intent of the roof is consistent and has the same detail everywhere; and will revise the
plans to correctly portray the proposed roof.
Public comment: Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue, this is a mansion-sized house that is on a 12,000 SF lot;
when look at a house like this and have to double the living room FAR, makes a question of how this plays
out; with the full basement exemption, can get a house the same size as this, but on a 6,000 SF lot. There
were no other comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed.
C. Osterling made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar at a time when the corrections to the
plans have been made and plan checked. This motion was seconded by C. Terrones.
Chair Brownrigg called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans had
11
Ciry of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes
6.
January 22, 2007
been corrected as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 7-0. The Planning Commission's action is
advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 10:00 p.m.
1 Los Montes Driv zoned R-1— application r design review and hillsi area construction pe it for
a fir nd second story a'tion (Tiffany and Gus Ki iris, applicants and prope owners; TRG Arch ects,
archite 47 noticed Pro t Planner: Lisa Whitma
ZT Stro ier briefly presente e proj ect description a d noted that the numbers '�the FAR calculation
provided on e chart in the staff r ort are incorrect. Com ' ission asked staff if the pro ' ded numbers in the
chart on the o rhead were also inco ect. Staff responded y and the numbers will be c ected to address
the current revi ' ns for the action me ting. There were no f her questions of staff.
Chair Brownrigg o ned the public comm t. Randy Grange, arc ' ect, 205 Park Road and Ti y and Gus
Kiniris, property ow rs, stated: problem w h the lot was to avoid e layered cake look; took long time
looking at the views i he neighborhood, do ot think that any of th house will block any vie s of the
neighbors. Commission ommented:
■ Have concerns wit the landscaping, do n see any softening; ne ds a lot more landscaping, full
landscape plan shou be submitted; this is big house in a promi nt location, the visual i act
should be mitigated b the landscaping; alwa s want to make sure 1 dscaping is installed with a
maximum sized house;
Need larger scale trees i eeping with the size the house; would li to see several evergreen
trees like bay laurels and p tosporums mixed in w deciduous trees to a d color;
■ oncerns with left elevation, 't is broad, would help there was layering u to the house; and
■ e fence along Hillside Dri is laying down, incl e in the landscape p n how this will be
res ved.
Applicant res nded: they plan to do a lot ore landscaping with ass and trees after th ouse is built;
looked into ext ding fence area along Hillsi and install Italian c ss, this is a space that eeds a lot of
attention; and th wind conditions dropped the ence down, did not w how to address the ence issue
until knew what th house would look like.
Public comment: Pet Keyes, 1505 Los Montes D e, concern is with b kyard; going to leave trees in
rear? Applicant respon yes. Report indicates that t e are six (6) potentia bedrooms, but only three (3)
edrooms and a bonus ro are shown on the plans. S ff responded that fo lanning, a room does not
n ed a closet to be counted s a bedroom. There were n ther comments fro the floor and the public
he in� was closed.
Co ' sion commented: ques n of the story pole requirem t, we typically ex ct story poles on a
hillside ea permit; have required single story house to have sto poles not that long go; think addition
has to ha story poles; and in last ee (3) years, Commission s always required ory poles in the
hillside are
C. Auran made motion to place this item n the consent calendar at a ti when the story po s have been
installed and sury ed by a licensed surveyo and a full landscape plan has b en submitted and pl checked.
This motion was s onded by C. Osterling.
Chair Brownrigg called for a vote on the motion%i place this item on the conse�alendar when the story
poles have been installed and surveyed by a licensed surveyor and a full landscape lan has been submitted
12
City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlin a�g
��`, CITY O�
BURLINGAME APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
��„m.....•'P .
Type of application: Design Review,
Special Permit
Project address: �
Conditional Use Permit Variance
Other Parcel Number:
APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER
Name: %%�(��,2Cf,/�J'�Gy' Name: /`►�� �����1fnR�
Address: � 5 jA��- ��_ Address: �5 �$ ,%�,�vflr.tiG�- ��
City/State/Zip:��i�(� �C�A�M� (�t GI'�d�bCity/Stat i Zip: B��I �.y time CA `1 �°� ��
� �j �(o z, Phone �v�: � J b- 8 f�-- �� 3 3
Phone (w): �� � .
�h�: -- (h): 6� � - 3`�8 " b'� � �1
(fl� ���6 � 5� 9• O//,5 �fl: G� b- 3�X � 85�' �-
� ARCHITECT/DESIGNER
Name: Th- c� /`f� (,!-f � TEC7� ��.���J
Address: � �� ,ff,�,� ���,
City/State/Zip:�ie���IC,AMr��. �'�} ��{���Please indicate with an asterisk *
Phone (w): � 5�1, S������� the contact person for this project.
�h�: �..
�fl� �l� � i� �, �//S.
RECEIVED
N 0 V 2 0 2006
CIN OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information
given herein is true and co the bes wledge and belief.
Applicant's signature: Date: � o
I know about the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this
application to the Planning Commission.
Property owner's signature: /�_ /�—" Date: G��Lb�� S'
Date submitted:
PCAPP.FRM
Olp��, Ca-�'1�On z>/ �5�� n �w�P.t.J
� , (� ►
A.rC1 �j-- �X�-r � on cc -�w -�-�ov✓
� �
Gt �'j IY1 l� — S�Y �o{�•l i 11rO�j
� -/
-Fv�' a '�-�c �
S�C�►a 1
aa' e� ra.- fi`c>
-�
Attachment B
SPECIAL PERMIT FOR ATTACHED GARAGE
1538 Buriingame Ave.
This is a proposal to expand an existing oversized one-car garage into a regular
two car garage. The existing garage is already attached and cannot be detached
as it is integral with the structure of the house. This proposal brings a non-
conforming parking condition into conformance with the zoning code.
The mass, scale, and dominant structural characteristics of the new
construction are consistent with the existing structure's design and with
the existing street and neighborhood. The proposed garage is in the same
location as the existing garage and the existing driveway, curb cut, and
gates will continue to work; there will be no impact to the existing street or
neighborhood.
2. The rooflines, fa�ade, materials, and elevations of the proposed garage
are similar to that of the existing and proposed house. The new roof for
the expanded garage is consistent with the rest of the house, and in fact,
ties the house together better architecturally. All materials, the elevations,
the rooflines and farade are consistent with the rest of the house.
3. 1. The architectural style is compatible with that of the existing house and
character of the neighborhood. See 1 and 2 above.
2. The attached garage being proposed is consistent with the
neighborhood since one already exists in the same location.
3. See items 1 and 2 above for comments about style, mass and bulk.
4. There will be minimal impact on neighboring properties as the garage is
similar to what is currently there, the ingress and egress for it remain
unchanged, and is a one-story element. The project improves the street by
bringing the parking up to code.
4. No trees are being proposed for removal within the proposed footprint.
RECEIV�D
JAN 1 0 2007
CITY OF EiURLINGAME
PIANNING DEPT.
Attachment A
VARIANCE APPLICATION FOR FLOOR AREA
1538 Burlingame Ave.
a. The existing house and house/lot configuration creates extraordinary
circumstances which do not apply to typical properties in the area. This
unusual and historic home includes a 618 SF living room with a 14' high
ceiling. The high ceiling counts double in floor area since it is over 12' and
puts the existing floor area over the limit. That situation, along with the fact
that this is a corner lot and the house includes an attached garage, makes
the existing FAR much tighter than one might expect.
b. The variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of
substantial property rights. The house has an unusual first floor layout in
that the dining and living rooms are quite large while the rest of the
spaces, including the garage, are tangled and small. The owner's goal is
to create a two-car garage (which will bring the property into conformance
with city parking requirements) and improve some the proportions of the
other spaces in the process. If the ceiling of the existing living room was
12' high, no variance request would be necessary, but It would create an
unnecessary hardship, and not benefit the street or neighborhood, to force
the owner to lower the living room ceiling.
c. The proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or
injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health,
safety, general welfare, or convenience. There is no change in the
proposed use at the proposed location; it remains a single family dwelling
which is consistent with the City's zoning.
d. The proposed project will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk,
and character of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in
the general vicinity. The proposed addition matches the house's
architecture. The new one-story roof element improves the mass, bulk,
and character by visually connecting the house to the site better. The
proposed one-story addition is compatible with the adjoining properties
because it is well set back does not impact them.
RECEI���
JAN 1 0 20ti7
cirr oF ��a���_�,tiU;,.�.«
P�wrc���w� �t�r.
Attachment C
VARIANCE APPLICATION REAR SETBACK
1538 Burlingame Ave.
a. The existing house and house/lot configuration creates extraordinary
circumstances which do not apply to typical properties in the area. The
Burlingame zoning code dictates that the short street frontage of a corner
lot is the front yard. Unlike most properties, where one side is measurably
longer than the other, there is just 19" difference the Burlingame Ave. side
and the Occidental side of this property. While Burlingame Ave. is
technically the longer side, the termination point of either side is subjective
due to the fact that the corner is a radius, with property line measurements
ending somewhere within it. The overall, and the average, long dimension
of the lot is actually in a direction parallel to Occidental, not Burlingame
Ave. Additionally, the existing house is sited as though Burlingame Ave. is
the front and the side opposite Occidental is the right side, not the rear
yard. The primary entry is on Burlingame Ave., and what is technically the
rear yard feels and lives like a side yard. (When a corner lot has equal
street frontages, the front yard is where the primary entry is).
b. The variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of
substantial property rights. The lot is unique enough so that strict
enforcement of the technicalities of the zoning code will not serve the
purpose for which they were created. The home owner wishes to add a
bay window to the side of the house so that one can appreciate the
garden-like setting of the side yard (technically the rear yard) from within
the house. Bay windows are allowed to project into front and side yard
setbacks, but not rear yards. Furthermore, if this area is determined to be
a side yard, then the bay window would be nowhere close to the setback.
c. The proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or
injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health,
safety, general welfare, or convenience. There is no change in the
proposed use at the proposed location; it remains a single family dwelling
which is consistent with the City's zoning.
d. The proposed project will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk,
and character of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in
the general vicinity. The proposed addition matches the house's
architecture. The proposed one-story addition is compatible with the
adjoining properties because it is well set back does not impact them.
��C�����
JAN 1 0 Z007
CITN ��'� �UFIW1lGAp�IE
Pi . ;ING DFPT.
0 5' S0' D 5' 25'
����� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
cx�ic scucs: i/is' - r-o' Ve' .+•-o"
0 t' 12' 0 1' 6' 0 9' 0 1' 3' 0 2' 0 �•
� � � � � � � � � � � � � W � i � i � � i � i � � � i � � � � � i � � � i � i � � i , � ir THrs sHcrr is Hm sn'.s.- , rt is
� 1 I I 1 � � AEOIICED PflIM - SGIE ACCOP�INCLY
��a• . r-o" �/2' . �'-o' 3/a. . r-o' r . r-a' +-+/Y . i'-o' 3' • +'-o"
A rcbitectr
-�
?As r.e1c Itoad. suioe 203
H�alingeme, Catifomis 94010
FAX 650.579.0115
650.579.5762
�Mdl: h�gatohitoah�uwLoom
ArohitecG
1.PPNDOL ,
GPPNGC
• C-Y1,Y12 f
��� AD:�O 0�
CA �
��CY",.: f'u�:'.'S':'i:.?.•'.�..5.�."'r..
w'�.��'+w'�F'.T1� r^-..�4'R�L`::�.T
L'OmBti�fBII[:
344 OCCIDENTAL AVE.
340 OCCIDENTAL AVE. 1538 (SUBJECT PROPERTY)
BURLINGAME AVE.
APAI: 028-2sa-oeo
1588 BaNingame Ave.
Builingame, CA 940f0
sheet TYfle:
MEI6NBOR PHOTOS
1538 (SUBJECT PROPERTf�) 1532 BURLINGAME AVE.
BURLINGAME AVE.
1530 BURLINGAME AVE.
Projeot Title:
Des Jardins
Remodel & Additlon
� ��
�� �
�� �
�
� ,�„�
� ���
�
NE/GHBOR PHOTOS
RECEIVED
NOV 2 0 2006
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
�
A0.1
« _ �.
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
November 27, 2006
d City Engineer
(650) 558-7230
❑ Chief Building Official
(650) 558-7260
❑ City Arborist
(650) 558- 7254
❑ Recycling Specialist
(650) 558-7271
❑ Fire Marshal
(650) 558-7600
❑ NPDES Coordinator
(650) 342-3727
❑ City Attorney
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for application for design review, special permit for attached
garage and variance for floor area ratio for a single-story addition at
1538 Burlingame Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-283-090
Staff Review: November 27, 2006
1. Storm drainage shall be designed to drain towards the street frontage or to the
City storm drain system.
2. Replace all displaced/damaged sidewalk, driveway, curb and gutter.
3. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works —
Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information.
Reviewed b : V V ��.
Y
Date: 11 /27/2006
Project Comments
Date:
To:
November 27, 2006
❑ City Engineer
(650) 558-7230
❑ Recycling Specialist
(650) 558-7271
❑ Fire Marshal
(650) 558-7600
❑ NPDES Coordinator
(650) 342-3727
❑ City Attorney
X Chief Building Official
(650) 558-7260
❑ City Arborist
(650) 558-7254
From:
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for application for design review, special permit for attached
garage and variance for floor area ratio for a single-story addition at
1538 Burlingame Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-283-090
Staff Review: November 27, 2006
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
All construction must comply with the 2001 California Building Codes (CBC),
the Burlingame Municipal and Zoning Codes, and all other State and Federal
requirements.
Provide fully dimensioned plans.
Provide a complete demolition plan that indicates the existing walls, walls to
be demolished, new walls, and a legend. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will
not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project.
Comply with the new, 2005 California Energy Efficiency Standards for low-rise
residential buildings. Go to http://www.enerqy.ca.qov/title24 for publications
and details.
Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height
at any point are considered in calculating the allowable floor area. Consult the
Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30"
in height.
Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers.
Provide lighting at all exterior landings.
Date: '/��2/0�
1 ti
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
November 27, 2006
❑ City Engineer
(650) 558-7230
❑ Chief Building Official
(650) 558-7260
❑ City Arborist
(650) 558-7254
X Recycling Specialist
(650) 558-7279
❑ Fire Marshal
(650) 558-7600
❑ NPDES Coordinator
(650) 342-3727
❑ City Attorney
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for application for design review, special permit for attached
garage and variance for floor area ratio for a single-story addition at
1538 Burlingame Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-283-090
Staff Review: November 27, 2006
Applicant shall submit a Recycling and Waste Reduction Plan for
approval, and pay a recycling deposit for this and all covered projects
prior to construction or permitting.
Reviewed by:
Date: /� �? -7 p�
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
November 27, 2006
❑ City Engineer
(650) 558-7230
❑ Chief Building Official
(650) 558-7260
❑ City Arborist
(650) 558-7254
❑ Recycling Specialist
(650) 558-7271
�( Fire Marshal
(650) 558-7600
❑ NPDES Coordinator
(650) 342-3727
❑ City Attorney
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for application for design review, special permit for attached
garage and variance for floor area ratio for a single-story addition ai
1538 Burlingame Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-283-090
Staff Review: November 27, 2006
While the project appears to not require sprinklers based upon proposed addition
and remodel, the project is close. Be advised where more than one (1) addition
and/or alteration for which building permits are required are made within a two (2)
year period and said alterations are made to the premises of the same occupant. In
such circumstances, the sum of these additions and/or alterations construction costs
during this two (2) year period shall be aggregated for the purpose of calculating the
replacement cost value formula. Final determination will be made and the plan
review phase of the project.
It is very important that you understand the threshold indicated by BMC §17.04.030.
Designer, contractor, and owner should communicate specifically the extent of
demolition and remodel. Keeping in mind any change orders and addendums
which increase the total amount of square footage added or remodeled after
plan review would be applied to the sprinkler ordinance.
Reviewed by: � /� � Date: i��y?,�� �
`
Project Comments
November 27, 2006
Date:
To:
� City Engineer
(650) 558-7230
� Chief Building Official
(650) 558-7260
� City Arborist
(650) 558-7254
Planning Staff
From:
� Recycling Specialist
(650) 558-7271
� Fire Marshal
(650) 558-7600
� NPDES Coordinator
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
Subject: Request for application for design review, special permit for attached
garage and variance for floor area ratio for a single-story addition at
1538 Burlingame Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-283-090
Staff Review: November 27, 2006
Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City
NPDES permit requirement to prevent stormwater pollution including but not limited
to ensuring that all contractors implement construction Best Management Practices
(BMPs). For guidance on what these BMPs are, please refer to the attached
brochure. Please include appropriate BMPs as plan notes.
Erosion and sediment controls must be in placed prior to the start of the rainy season
(October 15`h of each year) and maintained continuously during the construction
project.
Discharge from any construction activity is prohibited from accessing the storm drain.
The public right of way or easement is not allowed to be used as a construction
staging area and should not be used for any construction-related activity.
Brochures and literatures on stormwater pollution prevention and BMPs are available
at the Planning and Building departments. Distribute to all project proponents.
For additional assistance, contact Eva J. at 650-342-3727.
Reviewed by: � Date: 11/27/06
WHY SHOULD WE WORRY ABOUT SOIL EROSIDN?
- . • - U
Water and wind cany soil from our Bay Area Iand down into our
streams, Iakes and the Bay. This soil carries with it poflu-
tants such as oii and grease, chemicals, fertilizers, animal
wastes and bacteria, which threaten our water quality.
Such erosion also costs the home construction industry, Ioca1
government, and the fiomeowner untold mi�ions of dollars
a year. .
Nature slowly wears away Iand, but human activities such as
construction increase the rate of'erosion 200, even 2,000 times
that amount. When we remove vegetation or other objects that
hold soil in place, we expose it to the action of wind and water
and increase its chances of eroding.
The foas of soil from a construction site results in Ioss of topsoil,
minerals and nutrients, arid it causes ugly cuts and gullies in the
Iandscape. Surface runoff and the materials it carries with it cIog
our culverts, flood channe[s and streams. Sometimes it destroys
wildlife and damages recreational areas such as Iakes and re-
servoirs.
As an example, road and home building in the Oakland hilis
above Lake Ternescal filled the Iake to such an extent that it had
to be dredged in,1979 at a publlc cost of $750,000.
NEED MORE INFORMATION?
a,BAG has produced a slide/tape show on soil erosion
:alled "Money.Down the Drain." It is available for showing
:o any interested group. Ca11 ABAG Public Affairs at (415)
341-9730,
�BAG has also published a"Manual of Standards for Sur-
'ace Runoff Control Measures" which deals extensively
Nith ciesigns and practices for erosion prevention, sedi-
nent control, and control of urban runoff. The manual
addresses problerns and solutions as they apply to
California and the Bay Area. It can be purchased from
ABAG and is available on reference at many local libraries
and in city and county public works and planning depart-
ments.
USDA Soil Conservation Service personnel are wilting to
provide more inforrnation on specifc erosion problems.
This brochure is a cooperative project of the Association of
Bay Area Governments and tfie East Bay Regional Park
District. �
w A5506i�T�ON
,' } OF B�Y ARE�
.H• GOVERr+MENTS
PROrEC�ING
EAST BAY REGIONAL
PARK DISTRICT
YDUR
PROPER�Y
1�R0M
ERosioN
� � Vegetat3on-stablfized
�(�) r ` Sfope: Security
� (i (�•; ��� • soi! in place
r • minimum of
�/� erosion
����J � Fewer winter clean-
// . up problems
� • protection for
/� � house foun-
� dations
� � ���f .
/
�
� 1,, /�
��iil `
/���/�.
Bare Slope: Headaches•
and Liability
• mudslide danger
� [oss of topsoil
• clogged storm ° •' �'
drains� flooding •���k�
problems � �_:
,
� expensive
cleanup ,�� ' '
• eroded or ' •
�� .
buried hottse r%;�
foundations � '
`.�{^~,i l� � ' .t`'' .
, , � .�.r� : �.<<` .,;
i ;�� :�,, :`� ';�, � ;.
, , '�%:. .;, ::� ;+i;�.
<<::: ::.: �, �,. •_•.
p` �,..i'�,,✓ . ..•• •
� .. . ...
.
`, .;.,
'�C7j,y,:
,�' �<
�
TIPS FOR THE HOMEOWNE�
/�.1
��
,,
.,.
�.
� �
"Wiaterize" your property by mid-September, Don't
wait until spring to put in Iandscaping, You need
winter protection. Final Iandscaping can be done
Iater.
Inexpensive measures installed by fall wi11 give you
protection quickly that. wi11 Iast alI during the wet
season.
In one afternooa you can:
• Dig trenches to drain surface runoff water away
from problem areas such as steep, bare slopes.
• Prepare bare areas on slopes for seeding by raking
the surface to Ioosen and roughen soil so it wifl
hold seeds.
Seeding of bare slopes
• Hand broadcast or use a"breast seeder." A typical
yard can be done in Iess than an hour.
• Give seeds a boost with fertilizer.
• Mulch if you can, with grass clippings and Ieaves,
bark chips or straw. �
• Use netting to hold soil and seeds on steep slopes.
• Check with your Iocal nursery for advice.
� �
Winter alert �
• Check before storms to see that drains and ditches
are not clogged by Ieaves and rubble.
• Check after major storms to be sure drains are clear
and vegetation is holding on slopes. Repair as
necessary.
• Spot seed any bare areas.
BROSION CONTROL CAN�PROTECT
YOUR PROPBRTY AND PREVENT
FUTURE HEADACHES
� i� � � • � • •
J !y+ . • . • . .
�,',tj �'
�e�r �r1�, r . � . . �
� �'��It' � ' . ' •
�`�' I'�a'.'L'•
Soil erosion costs Bay Area homeowners miIlions of dol-
Iars a year. We ]ose valuable topsoil. We have to pay for
damage to roads and property. And our tax money has to
be spent on cIeaning out sediment from storm drains,
channels, lakes and the Bay.
You can protect your prop-
erty and prevent future
headaches by following
tfiese guidelines:
BEFORE AND �
DURING
CONS�RUCTION
• Plan construction activities during spring and summer,
so that erosion control measures can be in place when
the rain comes.
• Examineyour site carefully before building. Be aware of
the slope, drainage patterns and so1l types. Proper site
design wiII help you avoid expensive stabilization work.
Preserve existing vegeta-
tion as much as possible.
Limit grading and plant
remova( to the areas
under current construc-
tion. (Vegetation w111
naturally curb erosion,
improve the appearance
and the value of your
property, and reduce the
cost of Iandscaping Iater.)
• Use fencing to protect plants from fill material and traffic.
If you have to.pave neat trees, do so with perrneable'as-
phaIt or porous paving blocks.
• Preserve the naturaI contours of the Iand and disturb the
earth as Iiltle as possible. Limit the tirrie in which graded
areas areexposed.
• Minimize the Iength and
� steepness of slopes by
� benching, terracing, or
� ;.;� constructing diversion
� �`�, structures. Landscape
' ��' benched areas to stabiIize
. the sIope and irnprove its
appearance.
• As soon as possible after grading a site, plant vegetation
on all areas that are not to be paved or otherwise
covered.
• Controt dust on graded areas by sprinkling with water,
restricting traffic to certain routes, and paving or grave!-
ing access roads and driveways.
T`EMPORARY MBASURES TO
STABILIZE T'HB SOIL A b
Grasa provides the
cheapest and most ef-
fective short-terrn. ero-
sion control. It grows
quickly and covers the
ground comp(etely. To
fnd the best seed mix-
tures and plants for
your area, check with
your IocaT nursery, the
U.S. Department ofAg-
ricuIture Soil Conserva-
tion Service, or the
University of California
Cooperative Extension.
Malches hold soil moisture and provide ground�protection
from rain damage. They also provide a favorable envi-
ronment for starting and qrowing plants. Easy-to-obtain
mulches are grass clippings, Ieaves, sawdust, bark chips
and straw
Straw mulcfi is nearly 1�0%'effective when hetd inplace by
spraying with an organic glue or wood fiber (tackifiers), by
punching it into the soil with a shovet or roller, or by tack-
ing a netting over it.
Commercial applicatfons of
wood fibers combined with
various seeds and fertilizers
(hydrauIic mulching) are effec- ; „;
tive in stabiIizing sloped areas.
Hydraulic inulching with a ' �
tackifcer should - � ' '
be done in two
separate appli- . . , , � •
cations: the frst �
composed of seed fertilizer and halfthe mulch, the second
composed of the remaining mulch and tackifier. Cornmer-
cial hydraulic mulch applicators—who also provide other
erosion control services — are Iisted under "Iandscapi ng" in
tfie phone book.
__.�---- '��
,
:.,:. »;_=
;,`,<
`«�:
�:.
';
;><<��>::'�;:'<:�::::
,.: �:;...
'�` . �. .....�w .... ...... ..
�,�, t '�; ,;srs;,:ee�.�
Mats of excelsior, jute netting and plastic sheets can be ef-
fective temporary covers, but they must be in contact with
the soil and fastened secureIy to work effectively.
Roof dralnage can be collected in barrels or storage con-
tainers or routed into Iawns, planter boxes and gardens.
Be sure io cover siored water so you don't colIect mos-
quitos, too. Excessive runoff should be directed away from
your house. Too much water can damage trees and make
foundations unstable.
STRUC�URAL RUNOFF CONTROLS
Even with proper timing and planting, you may need to
protect disturbed areas from rainfall until the plants have
time to establish themselves. Or you may need permanent
ways to transport water across your property so that it
doesn't cause erosion.
To keep water from carrying soil from your site and dump-
ing it into nearby Iots, streets, streams and cha�nels, you
need ways to reduce its voIume and speed. Some exam-
ples of what you mfght use are:
jute netting
3 �
�iidplii��i�,1 vJr.�r:n
�;.
�
perimeter dike
/
straw mulch
Riprap (rock Iining)—to
protect channel banks
from erosive water fIow
• .Sedfinent trap—to
stop runoff carrying
sediment and trap the
sediment
�:: , .
�
�
_ ' ' �,. �
Storm drafa outlet
protectloa—to reduce
the speed of water tIow-
ing from a pipe onto
open ground or into a
natural channel
Dfversioa dike or perimeter dtke—to divert excess
water to places where it can be disposed of properly
',',^'cs' `�"' � --.�,�-.,..`�.,,. a �!€
f,.` "e�\��.� � '�" �
—� "k:�^`;.�1+, . . �,.ti.i,_a,k-�,� � 5
'�I�.'.:�.:. ' �'. .� �::1��4,1,n�;� a'�' � ���L .
�'�.��(��'n``��� a:l`.ilir,r" `',+�.�; � �4y i�'k�S:�i��n,,li�pr;..�i�:,'� 7 � ��
'"' �f �,•il �. '`,l'�ai��{.1�1tii�?�.,��^"�''i`u�^'-�%?,�v;,`y`���r. '� y
-� _."'S_�Cy�'i\;t4"F:t„".�"�°"��2<J,:•.`.;3;,��.+\�'.,� %�
. �_ *r'���:a�r;w"+'�;,� . ..—�
• Straw ba1¢ dfSce-to stop and detain sediment frorn
sma11 unprotected areas
(a short-term measure)
• Perfineter swale — to diveri
runoff from a disturbed area ��� ,;•:� :�<;.; ��>�
';�4� ��,����t, ar�r ��`��a. w.
; t,�� �, �a. �+.;:.>.�..�3�': �.
or to contain runoff within .<<" ��a��;.��y,.�,��' �:':�+�>: �'tr1 ��
. .8;ti'yi'�:'��\Jia�'vo+:��\�� =>i���\9�tie`a�
a disCurbed area . :;;,wi'p<,���^�` '•�'"�'�'�
• Grade atabil3zatfon structure—to carry concentrated
runoff down a slope
sediment trap
.... . . . . .��-�, .
.....0 �� 4, . . .
.. ,... � ...�
outlet protectio�
�� C��
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION,
DESIGN REVIEW, SPECIAL PERMIT AND VARIANCES
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for
desi�n review, special permit and variances for a first floor addition at 1538 Burlin�ame Avenue,
z_o_ned R-1, Nancv Blachman, 1538 Burlin�ame Avenue, Burlingame, CA, propertv owner,
APN: 028-283-090;
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on
February 12, 2007, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written
materials and testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that:
1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and
comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no
substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the
environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19. Categorically Exempt per
Section: 15301 Class 1(e)(1) - additions to existing structures provided the addition will
not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the
addition.
2. Said design review, special permit and variances are approved, subject to the conditions
set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for design review, special permit and
variances are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official
records of the County of San Mateo.
Chairman
I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby
certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission held on the 12th day of February, 2007 by the following vote:
Secretary
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for categorical exemption, design review, special permit and variances.
1538 Burlingame Avenue
Effective February 22, 2007
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department
date stamped January 31, 2007, sheet A3.3 and date stamped January 10, 2007, sheets
A1.1 through A3.2, A3.4 and A3.5, and that any changes to building materials, exterior
finishes, footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit;
2. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's November 27, 2007 memo, the City
Engineer's November 27, 2007 memo, the Fire Marshal's November 28, 2007 memo, the
Recycling Specialist's November 27, 2007 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's
November 27, 2007 memo shall be met;
3. that if the structure is demolished or the envelope changed at a later date the both the rear
setback variance and FAR variance as well as any other exceptions to the code granted
here will become void;
4. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on
the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be
required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management
District; �
5. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage,
which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and
architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning
Commission review;
6. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential
designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an
architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design
which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as
shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing
compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the
final framing inspection shall be scheduled.
7. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the
height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building
Department;
8. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance
of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project
has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans;
9. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single
termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that
these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a
Building permit is issued;
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for categorical exemption, design review, special permit and variances.
1538 Burlingame Avenue
Effective February 22, 2007
10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform
Fire Codes, 2001 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame;
11. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling
Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to
submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full
demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; and
12. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm
Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance.
�CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
�BURLINGAME, CA 94010
TEL: (650) 558-7250 • (650) 696-3790
www.burlingame.org
Site: 1538 BURLINGAME AVENUE
gr �� s
��'.,� . ���
�'��y `�� CJ
���2 '�� �� iy
�� � � a� f��!
��1 = � �
d' �74++a•�a� ��_
s ��''�d�r-�,'::'
The fity of Burlingame Planning Commission announces
the following public hearing on Monday, February
12, 2007 at 7:00 P.Mo in the (ity Hall Coun�il
(hambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA:
Application for design review, special permit for
attached garage and variances for floor area ratio and
rear setback for a first floor addition at 1538
BURLINGAME AVENUE zoned R-l. (APN 028-283-090)
Mailed: February 2, 2007
(Please refer to other side)
016H'W504325
►�� ��
Mai�ed Prom 94d10
US POSTAG�
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE
CITY OF BURLINGAME
A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed
prior to the meeting at the Planning Department at 501 Primrose Road,
Burlingame, California.
If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing,
described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city
at or prior to the public hearing.
Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for infornung
their tenants about this notice. For additio�nal information, please call
(650) 558-7250. Thank you.
Margaret Monroe - -
City Planner
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
(Please refer to other side)
.��i � ' � � � . ` �1 � � ��. �� s. � A„ti; � � � � �� 4.
'�r�,.�r'- �i"ey. � t ��d�0.„' �r � _:�:h � ....� ,� a * 3 T -,� �,�v ..X: ��., "'4���+`'�.v�'
.�. ' o
, > , �: /r y�
�yr r,
y � ^3 . Y R a,y� �S` `.�a
� w� �
.
'* 4'�.d: w' . � ,.�re,k' .. �+' ,.,y;.. . .. :.. „ +�S " � �1�;4 .. ���w fa.. y/ � � r,�.W',x .�„E..�>"� � / d , ;t,m;,. s' .�- . t*'i
,. �. . �.�, �p .: �"'�:',l��,c�.,.. �� P y . .,�;J� z'e' r$ � . �' S `+n y�y ��x .,�x +� �,r` .r`a'"" ���±::.r q
�, • . �` �
, ia ° »: " ,�+, '' �a� , Y t `�',' ,�` ' }�`
. _
. . . �
r,: _ ,_ �,.. �. 4 ,.
_
,.._ zdi� �'�.'i ..S'S.=' ;��".-� �.; ,.o ���w,�' '::µ � .,"'r � . F,tit.� ��. , � Y�,�. �; .� �, Y_ � �� . �r:
. r _ � .>; y li ..,:'� f�s�;� . r'r'� �:'r; . �7� 4 a'..e 5'i♦ ��a�+a"]ff� -"7"�.:'a'.. �..: - QE3
, , . ; . �
r ^'y.. , � . e'
. �.... � �, .. .: �.. . . , � . _ , � f y,
e .�
�,.- ��. �"a�R�.,♦ �,�f �5,. t �..� `�``.�. ;# �q �,ai ,.. �,+Rt`�.�i �:�.. ` ,�^�� �� �.:f'� :zQ i.'�"�i'tP � ,'.� *,�, . �' z �=;:'�Y iyr `:f• �°�S' .�,.e'.T4
, ,
���
,. `• �. �� . '�.+,'�� `ti�, �: .>� � ,�,�. :� o' � ,���„ r�r `� '� �.'»,�.:��i[,'�cf % � � '�i... .��,���� ��- �.�'�` � ��..c.r:� ����
` Q►'. , � . . . .. . , , r
: .;
. �. ,
,
� � � __ �., ve , . Ec, , � ��� � ;� rr � ���;, �� �. ��'� "';s� � ��'� .-ar-�''"° ° — � � ,� � �.
,.. �' .. � � .� _, y�� ,y T -r � ;.�7 ,�;^ �r � , ; ;�,,
� � t�, � u� c�y -
. =
�� ,.. . . � i�:. ' !i♦. � ." JN . ' • xi�� � '' � �,�`�!
A
r ,'
,. : ,. . , ...
_ - " `�
�r., _. �� =
.
, 5 � A- x � � ',x e � �; . � _ G �`" �'� i',
Y . "
, 'A .
'`�,r�, ;' ' ��4F �:.: ���� ���,�`t ` "j' '�' t �`S'-4 ��,�li' . �L
1�
. _ '� ' _ �-�
� :� .� � � ,, ��� � �a �� ` � ` �� `'� ���/��'� �c
. �p � � .�s�.f ;��� ',� .� � .� � � � � u.+.,�'. �.4X �'� �.t+ � � %�' �� �� � ��i�'�
.
,' . +
�! � � t- � �' + _*,� ,� � - •� "� r� i l � i° ��.,,,,1 �"' � r �'
<;
, ., _ . y� `
� . � �� �, `�, f
:
�t v . � s��� . " � _ g_�,,, � ,,�.y �q��� f �i ^� ✓ s g
�. �:
,
t
�:<a ..,.� t � r�g.y �.i
�� '' � � �� � ��� � ���� � � ��� � � � �. �• i. � f:
� _
" . ` a . � . a � . � • ��.:� . ' � ;, ..
_
,.
, . . - - -. , . � g.� � � " * � v�
�.. . . �- � � �
� � x t � � Xo �„ ` w' .
� � , w ' � • f � a = � z',_ ' p � y�, � .. �.��z� � .• �*. ' � 1 �. j :
� '� ��� %' �i� R �';� .,,� � • � � �r
�''`� � � ' ; ��� �� �.
; ,�; ,
:. . _ Ss' �"�.�` �g
. r, -,
tir.� � „
� �, , ' .< ' %' r. � � "`R"••v� , , A� .. ` q ,�.*�� �� ... � j T.2 ,��:� � : aPi� '�� d,a ''`^'$-.. ` a...
� .,_ �j `�_ � `������. g • � z .. �� ^ � �w �� , '.:�af� d . . . � +�i. .+
�. r
q � ��' � ` �.. � y3 ,� . y
�._ 3�' ct�l{.aY'�- ��� (�� ,� � "� ` � � " � A, � ':'I♦ , t�p i '�._�,. . 3'k " �, /k`�i � J � y '
„ . 1 � �s � °
's �� , V �' .. �� �
a.s \�! , � � ..r��j . . � ,� - �� .<, �. �: '' � � . . .a.t. '2 _ ..: �" �' `� '� . ��. � xv.�
!
�t ,� � , ` uy.}. � " '`� r .:� . a � � ;�
� .,�' -. �P .� � %� .� ,-,� �.ie - F � 0
�€ � ��,,,,< ,�, � •, � ��Y� . C' g''' _. , ' � t� : �' j � � �s ;� { «�'.. .. � r� , � - � r .� a
..
� , . �. . 4 �„ . .. '�s-
,�� �nx ..s � . . , . .� �, . ..t . s�� "�i' � �y� �
„. .,�� � :�>� ' i � � � � ' i' . . ��� ♦ �i . �.:-,:,. . � �'�' ,� , `�e�� i�'�
.
; �'.i"�` ` ` . '�t� -` `�i1 g
,.
: s `F �e" 4 '� ,., .�w � � ��� .�� • .� - �'' ; a ` ��2 R; ` ...
,�
�.
o :. *, � t � d, 'S" . +, +s,' . ta � � , � ��'� ''��+t':'
M, y �1 1� 4 4
„b � � r
':lf i" .: , . �_. � �. > � r�t � "' . . � ��� - �' P. Ta .�
i
'.
� � �
� , 6, . a . . , , t � �; _ �` ,�. : � i
_ �
,�. F .. .. \��- .,-As' .. `
. . µ, 4�4. r� ,,,,,j' "`. �,. ' �� .s . 'c��5
.J • ,� �, ` `� ,"� �: �� �".,. ' i � � `' �� �,
� � � " y. � ' a ` • f, r�„ �;: �, " �. T' �- ' '`.-. �t �+; i ' � +v.s�r tr � �' u
�� �.�� �'{.� ��� �,� �.:-y'w�h 4�.`y.,<-`� ,�p � �.-. �`°d ,�.P�. � ���. ��ise`. k r ��"''�.,�, .. •� ">1+ _ <+- j .l�s'�'i �i�.r�
` s.
. ,�
a
r i t
1 � ,� ,,.. X. ',� ,� � �; � � �`�,,'r ��+ -. : �x �� � ;`s �,�� E �;. s :,°.s -X� '' � , :":T
, _ .. .� � S, i , � .
. �P
3P.,
x ' �
- � • � �"'�r. � 't " � ` e"..� +}.�t�.� .:��,'� � s $�. 1'.x.� ' � k�:. A� :+'� ',� ,�+ �FR �3�:�. ¢ ��:
� , . ..z , �. . , ...
.
,<
.. ..i. +y...�
,» � , . � s,...r . . a'e�c.. � ��.'��. N� � �� � $�.� � � ri. . �� �� �'�i'�`�4 �'� �'� .w � � t � n�.! � C ^�'� t,sy>.y. ��"''`�ip�..+�� tihx+�d� � yY. ��
. •.
R. , " . k `.: r .. ` � � I � S i.
M. � � . f�tm � w�s � �,+....f �,- �.,' �',�`° x > ,�: . .�3'i � �'���'i���"�. �� ���'�4 �.7��`_.�-" � J�� � } �.,� \ �•
. �� y� .
v • „�.� �1*' *^ � '* ° :� ` �1 "�.�id `".._ . C" .., ...�_ � ;4-"k�� y�=� 1 -�` �,a �..y�,�E �� "�,•. .�^�•
.
�>'.<. .�.' . . $�° 4= . .-. .Y.� • - � . •a
�
� �s � ,'�•' � �' ��_ , • �, � � `�' • �` S �' � �i, �'�` � +,
h, a^z . ` sr � �'' �` -"� � ♦ � ✓F'- „ � � `i`�►, ,2� ,� �
. -
� . s �.. • /� .,�rN •. - ,y -� � ; f ;;�
�r < ..; ��,"' 'A� '� :� .� �e�.L' t?� `�§ �y''� ��` @�e
.
`�
� , �� �� � �,i � �� �r � � . �'�9°. �� � t � .� .
��O".�;�,� � .�� ��.,� � �b „e,. ���kr..�'„�,eo ,�� � �� rq�'�� +�`.�,�'�� � �,. .t.�'���c�� .� � � � -; � '���'} ,;�.�`.�
„ a r � �:' y�,.� " � �� *
� s � � �� ,� � ° • � ..ee`+. ,� �",*`��' ^�' .�' g~ �.1 � �'.
�T , � �� A a�. � . � i '� �a�, a ^:� .� i ' �.l
§ "�''e�.y r4t, � �:, s`t7"` .r.�� �' � .v � :j � ;a" . 'C �x �. � i s�`�, a `�,�.
�w„#� �c' . � � �s .', : �.,r
: ��
. . �
,��� ,✓ �
aw •r ; �
� �.*"` �" ,?�. � �r � «. `e�► �- ' `a� � �w-.+..�,r. '� ;. �+ �. ,`i, �� � y' '' �`^' ;
���� �('' �
� �` ,ijt'�;„i'�, *',. ���'� ,t .r�.'�. �y'�t°�...�+'�:ss ,�.�v.,.� ry�. `*, f5��.'�ti ,�r�♦ y�. .� l�.,q � �' fi. *i .�,a.�„i
� .�,��,5* . � . .�. ` �: n � �..�;.. •k4 . � ,. - „`�,agi„n ��,Y.. i � �� � y, " `r° �r—• S�. ,. ` + ,�t, ` r
��' t� � , ` � �?r� ,� ..
.
. .
1 � �
.,.<
� i�" L .,. +R" fi -' t � �" .:.r; .z � p, � �jF . � ., ,�
� s , a�, t �g �. ,r.� y �, e � f� ,
�`' ��_ y� .. � � ° . �� ,,�'«"t"r'r"�, . +; �p. 4 M. � � � �,� " i� ,s -r ,� ��f }.l . , } . x`of`i w`,(.
., •
e' .r � .. . {'.tir d . . ,�,�' 4e j. .: � � ;.1 F�""�'C '�b'..�.. _�J �� � �.<�K, t
: _
w.
t � � �
. '
.
� �
�,t: �..��d. . °` �I"• �..� tr�'3 �,, �4; � p�;.,��r )k y
r � �
:
.^'
� __ a. ' . :, .. . ... � . � ` z � � }
. i�f * ,�h
` , . .t .a �+
�� �^. ` f�
, �s.• . . .. � 3 i� � � ' � - �
s ,�
\ � �y���iss' ... � : � - , .- � >. .,�,.���'• ,�.�� � � � �E.��/ ,��a / « f� ` :r;.�� ....t.y �`t*�; i1• �.
. =
., �,;�.:- ,� � •s �. s;�:� Y" ��h � Y� ,:�'� '� '�+ t�" '+r� Ai ,�,� �r ': x " i
, .
, • .
,t
m �5'�" �3� >�
���� � � . . . _' .^i�`'. Y` � �'�'.�'� a ',�c. +t' �'� • � "'��'�y+'*. �+'` � r" . �. '+. � , f�; .m�. r r�' � � �"-ma ,e;��
.
. `,
�
-i� ► ��` w �?,;, w ,. .:�a � y' M+• � i s ^ .-r � � • �� `� � ++
�* ': . - >
� , j / �f� J,
�, a so � � ! i�` .�L..'r .4 �' ""`' ,f � R�. � f ' 1 +:. ,.�.,a_ +k� : `x. +'t '� },� a� ��
, T .� x. ~
• • � L
� ..`= a . �,v . 79 , c�t„ -i�, � `�r'-o, �,��* ��� .}y� r �r� ,� � ,� ..�,'«� � ri ��
� Y ,
� it;y ,�. �' '.a ,K�'* 'qi �ti�ij�'� +.�„ � �vu���.3 r���a a'� "�,yf,..r C
,
. ..
�� � � R,,, ' ' �, 1 . ` � �` �.�'.
,
,
a��+ � �: �a t� , `�,� • "� �` � � �*��� � @',^ ,� �y;..����` .� ���� � �
""�.�e -�^ <' � �'`•% �,� .`,��'�'' � t}��"�.�.�Y ^'�4� �� � 1� �`� ' � '�-� � � � ���� ��� j
� ,4 .. �� "q +� � 4 �``\T d . . D� t' :. .. J 1��� ry � C'a': i � r^:..- �"`'y1 �f fl� r .
' ,y
.
�
.,i.�,. � �-�v;\ ,�g �q:+'� '✓� 'i �"�`Py . "��'' '� t��� ��� �L vy.� ``�.
�_3� . ��' �f . �. Y�/ Ip.' t�cf".' a �: �..�,��. r �*t� '��; T�.: �� F � � ,< , -�' fi,��'� �4 w, 3��� �yI i
, ,,
. r > - z
_..'� Srz. , . ,,�^ �r, .� + tA'� sa�,. }5.,. �� +R� � � d�q*.� 4;.�/{ Jj' �� ��, r"� "y
4 ; t w ,�� �,.,,� .. 'v.��:�'#'. �Q' � �' �Z. ��'� �,. �+ - �.� ♦�z� � 'i�:
. ,M
.
� .�
i�' # � 4'. ' '� �� � �
y, t� ��p^'j j� (
: . g j
��:r .`" ���, i��?!' �. �t..i ��P �. ar ! �' t� t�`�^'� i`t"': � ..K,ti�} �� '..� '�1i"��il
�� �. , .. � ..,: � ' ,x, �
„, , s' t. � .., r ^'� �.�;, rt' � "��
� �. .
�' �. . � . /�`H +t � �.< ' � � f f+' �/� i. ..y�/ �� . '�� �� � � � 'P^K� �� j �; s ���
t" �,Ee �e .� i � �'�s� .k'.+,�;.. `4� i'�! .<�,.�1,,; ^� �!. � c �° ' nc" �il '.' '� ,��'R`�' r�`"(.�'�:";4�„ �� '�� -k�,..
�,� . �' � \� .' �;� � " r "�, , " �r
s. �; . t. f rrt ; w, r .� e I
,a / > . � r � � .,.�'` :. "7�' � _�� � � �.; ♦ t �� � T -•` � s "� ' � e
'� �'-��t' .�$`�r. ;�"� .� �'s� av` ^., �:�! �` �sX i�a � ��. . � 1�, t �,,.�� �., ab ��"*1 ,�'t; ,��it�.
,. . -
�.
,� ,
, .. .. „ �` r ,.
- %+ �'x ,� �fi� � `4� , �71 r�,'�:' � � ,, " } �{� .�:",�": -
� � �� f` ,v ; � E. � ,qµ, s , "�'�'„ � , � �`:� g '� � �k�,? "�% *"" C p'�' � '
. y� � � �
� � �.
'i�ll� � �� - � � a � �r. � ',. � a �, a i} �
p � � � "' � "/ � �lt�`""e'r �+i��ii�;r�'"} � ���t � t*--r � ! �°yL=� '1
��. � r. } ��' �� � �� � j � L r*:m a �a.� ��• ,�y� �' . ��� � ��
�
. '��+; . � a . �' � , �t ,7 �'' �� ♦ x i `�.+' �"c . r`�.
�' � � � �
,
1,� � � � E. t `�° � � � r, -
! � --.�7 `�w�`m �, +'+ f f 'r /��j��`� �+✓ � i {�a'�p �`'.s�''= � � �4�`: ����� �� �`" n'F } � � �?` � �f A,�`. '�%7 tl� S • h �' .
, �'1, a� `.c. �i"f .raFr � �s"" gt���#'�1<r ��'t` �� �� %� ''� ti.+ ��- � .i ,', e 7� -, +;.. �
:.� � �� � �!a`, i � . 'r �,F � `'�,�. ��'`- i,_�
. . .
�/s, r � '� -d' �..' �yf f .,� - r a � k.' `- .
K''. � ��ti'ti,..' 'x, � »:` , � '�''�1'...va`r,�`.��`.',.: �'�• .:��.r.*.�.�� n �" k`' �<„'°'44�,. �: �� .�iii ��t
Item # "J�
Design Review Study
PROJECT LOCATION
1538 Burlingame Avenue
J
City of Burlingame
Design Review, Special Permit and Yariances
Item # �
Design Review Study
Address: 1538 Burlingame Avenue
Request: Design review, special permit for an attached garage.
Applicand Architect: TRG Architects
Property Owner: Nancy Blachman
General Plan: Low Density Residential
Meeting Date: 1/22/07
APN: 028-283-090
Lot Area: 12,245 SF
Zoning: R-1
Summary: The existing two-story house with an attached one-car garage contains 5,124 (0.42 FAR) of
floor area, has seven potential bedrooms and a 272 SF lower level utility room. The applicant is proposing
to add 213 SF on to the existing attached garage, to allow for two covered parking spaces, and add an
additional 111 SF to the first floor, including a mud room and new play room to the left and rear side of the
property. The addition will match the existing exterior building materials. The entire living room area has
a ceiling height greater than 12' and is counted twice in the FAR calculation. With the proposed first floor
addition, the floor area will increase from 5,124 SF (0.42 FAR) to 5,448 SF (0.45 FAR) where 4,818 SF
(0.39 FAR) is the maximum allowed. The existing house exceeds the maximum allowed FAR by 306 SF.
The proposed project is 630 SF above the ma�cimum allowed FAR and therefore the applicant has, with the
addition, requested a variance to exceed the maximum allowable FAR on this lot.
With this project, the number of potential bedrooms will increase from seven to eight. Three parking
spaces, two covered (20' x 20') and one uncovered (9' x 20'), are required for the proposed eight bedroom
house. The existing attached one-car garage will be expanded to an attached two-car garage, which meets
the covered parking requirement. Because the footprint of the existing attached garage is increasing, design
review and a special permit for an attached garage are required. One uncovered space (9' x 20') is provided
in the driveway. All other zoning code requirements have been met. The following applications are
required:
• Design review for a first floor addition with an attached garage (C.S. 25.57.O10,a,4);
• Special pertnit for an attached garage (CS 25.28.035,a);
• Variance for rear setback to the first floor addition (14'-1" proposed where 15'-0" is the minimum
required) (CS 25.28.072, d, 1); and
• Variance for exceeding the maximum allowable FAR (5,448 SF proposed, where 4,818 SF is the
maximum allowed) (CS 25.28.070 d).
Table 1-1538 Burlingame Avenue
Lot Area: 12,245 SF Plans date stam ed: Janua 10, 2007
EXISTING PROPOSED I ALLOWED/REQ'D
SETBACKS
Froizt (IS`flr): 35'-0" (to garage) 26'-7" 15'-0"
to attacl:ed garage 35'-0" (to garage) 26'-7" 25'-0"
�2nd�IrJ: 35'-0" no change 20'-0"
Side (riglzt): 20'-0" (to bay) no change 7'-0"
(left): 23'-8" 16'-9" 7'-0"
�'
� Design Review, Special Permit and variances
EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQ'D
,
Rear (I S` flr): 14'-6" 14'-1" 15'-0"
(2"a flr): 14'-6" no change � 20'-0"
Lot Coverage: 2,694 SF 3,065 SF 4,898 SF
22% 25% 40%
5,124 SF 5,448 SF 4,818 SF 2
FAR: 0.42 FAR3 0.45 FAR3 0.39 FAR
# of bedrooms: 7 8 ---
Parking: 1 covered 2 covered 2 covered
�i2� X 2i�� (20� X 20�) (20� X Zo�)
1 uncovered 1 uncovered 1 uncovered
(9' x 20') (9' x 20') (9' x 20')
Heigl:t: 27'-3" 13'-6" (addition) 30'-0"
DHEnvelope: n/a — no 2°d story addn. n/a — no 2°d story addn. CS 25.28.075
Variance for rear setback to the first floor addition (14'-1" proposed where 15'-0" is the minimum
required) (CS 25.28.072, d, 1);
2(0.32 x 12,245 SF) + 900 SF = 4,818 SF (0.39 FAR)
3 Variance for exceeding the maximum allowable FAR (5,448 SF proposed, where 4,818 SF is the
maximum allowed) (CS 25.28.070 d).
Erica Strohmeier
Zoning Technician
c. TRG Architects, Architect and Applicant
1538 Burlingame Avenue
�
�'
��� CITY o,� CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
� . � . .. � � � gURLINGAME, CA 94010 � •�j '��f'��
�o ,"� m TEL: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696- �,�`�,y
0
"�,,.,�,,,,,,,�•• www.burlingame.org ¢�'.t�,,?��"$- �
��
��_ � �� �
--�����
-� �
Site: 1538 BURLINGAME AVENUE
The [ity of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the
following public hearing on Monday, January 22, 2007
at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, SOl
Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA:
Application for design review, special permit for attached
garage and variances for floor area rotio and rear setback
for a first floor addition at 1538 BURLINGAME AVENUE zoned
R-1. (APN 028-283-090)
Mailed: January 12, 2007
(Please refer to other side)
Q16N1650432b
� 00.240
h9ai3ed From 94010
US POSTAGE
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE
CITY OF BURLINGAME
A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed
priar to the meeting at the Planning Department at 501 Primrose Road,
Burlingame, California.
If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing,
described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city
at or prior to the public hearing.
Property owners who ` receive this ; notice are responsible; for infornung
their tenants about this ' notice. For additional information, please call
(650) 558-7250. Thank you.
Margaret Monroe
City Planner
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
(Please refer to other side)
�' -
r
, �
,t
., �.���,b. ,r w,��..�. ,�,, � ..: m� �� � � ��,.;, � esn�. m. ..��
� Design Review Checklist
Project Address: 1538 Burlingame Avenue APN: 028-283-090
Project Description: Request for application for design review, special permit for
attached garage and variance for floor area ratio for a single-story addition at 1538
Burlingame Avenue, zoned R-1.
❑ Application to the Planning Commission
❑ Supplemental Forms
, ,
❑ Project Plans Date Stamped: D ` � � � � Z:�c���- Revised: �� P� �" Is � � � '� �' � /a � I ��
❑ Staff Report for Design Review Study Meeting
❑ Copy of Public Notice
❑ Public Notice Mailing List
❑ Staff Report for Action Meeting
Was Project Referred to a Design Review Consultant? Yes No (Apply Refund)
Consultant Name:
Date to Design Reviewer:
Meeting Held:
Revised Plans Submitted:
Analysis Received:
,, _ .
. i
� ;
Project Review Staff Checkiist
Project Address: 1538 Burlingame Avenue APN: 028-283-090
Project Description: Request for application for design review, special permit for attached
garage and variance for floor area ratio for a single-story addition.
I. Project circulated for review by:
Date Circulated Date of Comments
City Engineer November 27, 2006
Building OfFicial November 27, 2006
Fire Marshal November 27, 2006
Recycling Specialist November 27, 2006
NPDES Coordinator November 27, 2006
�ity Arborist
City Attorney
11. Background Information:
III. Property Owner Confirmed? Yes
IV. Plans/Application Submitted
Plans
❑ Site Plan
❑ Floor Plans
❑ Building Elevations
❑ Roof Plans
❑ Site/Building Sections
❑ Landscape Plan
❑ Tentative Map (Condominium)
No
Applications
❑ Conditional Use Permit
❑ Special Permit
❑ Variance
❑ Commercial Application
❑ Fence Exception
❑ Condominium Permit
❑ Proposed CC&R's
ti
,
= M E T R O S C A N P R O P E R T Y P R O F I L E_
� � San Mateo (CA)
*******************************************************************************************
* *
* ______= OWNERSHIP INFORMATION =______ *
* Parcel Number :028 283 090 *
* Owner :Desjardins David L *
* CoOwner :Blachman Nancy R *
* Site Address:1538 Burlingame Ave Burlingame 94010 *
* Mail Address:1538 Burlingame Ave Burlingame Ca 94010 *
* ' Telephone :Owner: *
* *
* ______= SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION =______ *
* Transferred :05/24/2005 Loan Amount . *
* Document # :84947 Lender . *
* Sale Price :$2,810,000 Non-disc Loan Type . *
* Deed Type:Grant Deed Interest Rate . *
* % Owned :100 Vesting Type:Married Persons *
* *
* ______= ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFOFtMATION =______ *
* Land :$1,433,100 Exempt Type :Homeowners *
* Structure:$1,433,100 Exempt Amount :$7,000 *
* Other . Tax Rate Area :004001 *
* Total :$2,866,200 06-07 Taxes :$30,277.22 *
* % Improved :50 *
* *
* ______= PROPERTY DESCRIPTION =______ *
* MLS Area :460 *
* Map Grid :728 F7 *
* Census :Tract:6055.00 Block:2 *
* Zoning :R10006 *
* Land Use :O1 Res,Single Family Residence *
* Legal :LOT 19 BLOCK 2 BURLINGAME PARK NO 2 *
* :RSM B/17 *
* *
* *
* ______= PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS =______ *
* Total Rms:ll Stories . Lot Acres :.29 *
* Bedrooms :5 Bldg Sq Ft :4,210 Lot SqFt :12,500 *
* Bathrooms:4.50 Year Built :1924 Lot Dimension . *
* DiningRms:Yes Eff Yr Built: Useable Lot SF :12,500 *
* FamilyRms:Yes Bldg Cond: Carport . *
* Lvng Room:Yes Bldg Style . Garage Space:2 *
* Kitchen . Bldg Matl: Garage Type :Basement *
* BrkfastRm: Roof Matl: Garage Sq Ft: *
* Util Room: Flr Coverl . Unit Type . *
* Den . Flr Cover2 . View . *
* Attic . Foundation . Function Rtng . *
* FrmlEntry: Pool . Improve Type: *
* BsmntType: Spa . Quality Class . *
* Units . Patio . Topography . *
* AirMethod: Deck . Lot Location: *
* Heat Type:Central Dishwasher . Sewer/Septic: *
* Heat Srce: Range/Oven . Tennis Court: *
* Fireplace: Microwave: Yard Sprnklrs . *
* Bsmt SqFt:740 GrbgDisposal: Fire Sprnklrs . *
* Intercom .
* ______= EXTRA FEATURES =_____ *
* 1. 5. *
* 2. 6. *
* 3. 7. *
* 4. 8. *
* *
*******************************************************************************************
Infonnation compiled from various sources. Real Estate Salutions makes no representations
or wnrranties as to the accuracy or completeness ojinformation contained in this report.
�
PLANNING DEPARTMENT FEES RECEIPT
Subject Address: � �7 � � �`,' `^ � Q � �� �
Received for application to the Planning Department for:
ACCT.101-36630 (#63)
Date: � � �' � �'
Application to the Planning Commission
� Res. and Com. Design Review Handling Fee
_ Title 25. Zoning Code (postage add $3.00)
_ Title 22- Sign Code
_ General Plan and Specific Area Plan (postage add $6.00)
_ Specific Area Plan Only (postage add $4.00)
_ Zoning Map
_ Photocopies ($0.15 x �)
_ Environmental Handling Fee (35% of Contract)
_ Tape copies ($5 ea w/ tape provided; $8 ea w/o)
Other �
ACCT.101-22525 (#67)
� Res. and Com. Design Review Consultant Deposit
ACCT.101-36640 (#57)
'�� Engineering Fee
ACCT.101-36342 (#58)
� Parks City Arborist Review
ACCT.101-36620 (#64)
_ Second Unit Amnesty Building Inspection Deposit
ACCT.101-22590 (#83)
_ Environmental Consultant Fee
ACCT. 739-39591 (#93) ` �- � " �`'
_ Bayfront Development Fee � ? '
Lnl � � � '`
�--.—�
, p��v 2 Q <<:,'�,; I
ACCT. 739-39590 (#39) -- --- - - ----�
_ North Burlingame/Rollins Roa� �ie��tr�:� �� ��M E :
TOT�L FEES PAID:
$
$
$
$ 2.00
$ 45.00
$ 10.00
$ 1.50
$
$
$
$
$ 800.00
.----}��.
$ � �.,�,� >
$ 135.00 �
$ 400.00
$
$
�
�,,�......-_.. —c--- �
4a4j�oc� �
�7 �L`�,��c�
Effective 07/03/2006 S:�FORMS AND TEMPLATES�FEES RCPT.07.2006.FRM.doc
Design Review Exp�ns� Tracking :
,...,
�
'` City Af Bwlingame Planning Deparhnent • 501 Primrose Road • P(650) 558-7250 • F(650) 696-3790 � www.burlin ame.org
�,a�N�M� CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. FEE SCHEDULE
ADDRESS 1 � 3� �vr I �l� �� r,.�.� %�ve ,
�
Preliminary Plan Chedc- new cons
Prelimi�ary Pla� Chedc remodel
APPLICATIONS
Desi n Review — Addition
Desi n Review= New Construction
Desi n Review Consuftant De sii
� Design Review- Ha�dlinq Fee
Amendments Design Review
Design Review -f1(I subm'ittal
Condominium Permit,�4 units or
Condominium Pemiit, 5 units w
Permit
Variance
Sign Variance
Mtenna Exceptio� �
Fence Exoeption
Hillside Area Construction Permit
Minor Modifiption
Second Unit Amnesty
Building Official Inspec6ion Fee
I � Determination —
ENGINEERING
Sin le-famil
al others
charge if streetscap�
and Paridng Studies
Endosures
qe and utilities
. ..�.
�o�.w .
800.
280.00Z �
,41,0.80
150:00
980.00
. 190.00
. 355.00
. 190.00
.
920. ' '
.98Q.00
25.00
650.00
240.00
240.00
215.00
475.00
��
94.00
143.00
607.00
,
�
1 Unused portion of deposit will be refunded. �
2 Handling fee will be refunded if project does not get refemed to a design review oo�sultant
3 50% of preliminary plan check fee will be aedited toward required application fees if and whe� project is submitted as .
a complete application:
REGULAR FEES $ 2���� ��
REFUNDABLE FEES _ $ � � � o � ��' �
Preliminary Plan Chedc Fee Credit $
S:\IiAN00tlTS\FEES ]ULY 2006.FRM.doc updated July 2006