The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1500 Burlingame Avenue - Resolution� , CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 2- 78 RECOMPIENDIPJG ADOPTION OF AN. ORDI�JANCE RECLASSIFYING A PORTION OF 1500 BURLI��GAP4E AVE�JUE FROM R-1 TO R-3 DISTRICT blHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 25.16 or' the Municipal Code an application YJdS filed b,y JOSEPH KARP for reclassification of Lot 3, Block 2, Burlingame Park No. 2(portion of APPJ 028-283-010) from the R-1 District to the R-3 District; and 4JHEREAS, the Planning Commission fixed Monday, March 27, 197R, at 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of the 6urli.ngaine City Flall, 501 Promrose Road, Burlingame, California, as the time and place for hearing upon said application; and 4JHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the notice of time and place of said hearing has been given by publication as required by Section 65854 of the Government Code, and Section 25.16.020 of the Burlingame Municipal Code, and by mailed notices to all affected property owners, and no other notice is necessary; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby RESOLVED that: l. The Planning Commission finds that the proposed zoning change will be consistent with the Qurlingame General Plan. 2. The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council the reclassification of Lot 3,Block 2, Burlingame Park No. 2, a portion of Assessor's Parcel No. 028-283-010 from R-1, Single Family Dwelling District, to R-3, Multiple Fainily Dwelling District. 3. The Secretary of the Planning Commission be, and i�e is hereby, ordered to transmit to the City Council a copy of the minutes of said public 4/4/78 -1- � :; , . hearing as and for a summary of hearing provided for by law. 4. The Secretary of the Planning Commission be, and he is hereby, ordered to transmit to the City Council a certified copy of this resolution. --� �� -t-t� �.- . �, � �� .�_� RUTH E. JA �3S Vice Chairman, Planninq Commission City of Burlinqame THUMAS C. TAYLOR Chairman, Planning Commission City of Burlingame I, THOMAS 4J. SIPdE, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby cerify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting e` the Planning Commission on the lOth day of April, 1978. by the follou�ing vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CISTULLI, FRANCARD, JACOBS, KINDIG, SINE NAYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOPJE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TAYLOR AE3STAIN: COMMISSIONERS: MINK �,� j � ; _-= �� : ,-�� ' �-=�.-`_J I�OMAS W. SINE Secretary -2- � ` ' • � , �SOLUTZON N0. 24-75 � , At�IEt�DI?3G PART III GENERAL PLAN TO RESTRICT RESIDE't1TIAL DENSITIES IN R-1 AND R-2 DISTRICTS TO THGSE PERi��ITTED BY TF1E PRESi;IvT Z0�1II�G CODE �iEREAS, t�e City C��sncil of t;�e City of Burlingame adopted � Ordinance No. 539 entitled "An Ordinance Repealing Part �, Article 50 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Burlingame and Adopting a New Part X, Article 50 providing for the-Establishment of Districts within the City: Regulating the Use of Said D�.stricts as Indicated on the Zoning Maps of the Gity of Burlingame; Repealing Al1 Ordinances in Conflict Therewitr" on January 15, 1954; and ' .� VlHEREAS, said Ordinance No. 539 is the zoning ordinance of the City of Burla.nr,aMe, and, as amended from tiine to time, is now set fcy �h in the I�iunicipal Code zn Title 25 (ZONING); and . YdHEREAS, the current otficial zoning map of_ the C� ty o� Eurlingame t•ras repubyished per Resolut�on No. 13-73 adopted by thn City Council on the 2Ctr. day of February, 1973; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of BurlingamP adopted a genera)_ plan entitled "GE�ERAL PLAN FOR BURLINGA�tiiE" by its Resolution ho. 87--G9 entitl�d "Adopting General Plan," on October 20, 1969; an3 WiiEREAS, a Negative Declaration, ND-51P, was prepared for , Revisions to Part III General Plan ar_d posted January 17, 1975; and t�THEREAS, the Burlinga:ne Planning Com�nission has noticed and held two public hearings, on November 25, 1974 and on January 27, 197 5, for tlie purpose of considering revi�ions of Part III of the General P3an; and�. e WHEF'.EAS, i:he Planning Commission has studied� General Plan modifications that c��ould ma�� it more nearly coincide with the zoning map, favored retainizlg existing :-1 zoning, and reconunended that methods , be es�ablished to deal with iegal non-confor.ming uses and� illegal uses; and , . . . . . , .. . .. . . . :� , . ' • WHEREAS, the C;ity Council has noticed ana held a public hearing on Apri1 21, 1975 for the purpose of considering an amendment of Par t III of the General Plan for Burlingame, as shown in the General Plan S tud ies Map, so tYiat Part III will be made identical with the present zoning code in those R-1 and R-2 Districts where Part III of the General Plan now proj�cts a higher density than that allowed by the present zoning code; NOW, THE:tEFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AND DETERi�IINED TH.AT : •1. With the exception of Area A(Reference Exhibit H of Part III General Plan, Staff Review dated November 25, 1974) which is the Pr ingle Apartment compler, located at the corner of Trousdale and Skyline Eoulevard and that portion of Psea F which fronts on Capuchirio bet�oeen Carmelita and Broadway,��art III of the General Plan shall be amended so that the General Plan �iap will be made identical with the present zoning code in those R-1 ar.d R-2 Districts where Part III of the General Plan now projects a higher density or a different use than that allowed by the present zbning code.� � � � 2. The various land uses authorized by the zoning ordinance (Burlingame �iunicipal Code, Title.25, ZONING) are compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specif ied in the General Plan. 3: The Burlingame Zoning Ordinance and the Burlingame General Plan are consister_t ti�ithin the meaning of Government Code �65860. J�.1�1n.. . � MAYOR I, HERBERT h. WHITE, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was irltroduced at a reyular meeting of the City Council held on the 21st day of April , 1975, and adopted therearter by the following vcte: AYES: COUNCII�IEN: Amstrup-Crosby-Cusick-Harrison-Mangini NOES: COUNCILi•IEN: None . . ABSENT: COU�CILrIEN: None �' � . ' • • " TY LLRIC a ' � �' I DO HEREBY CERTIFY TNAT THE FOREGOING IS A FULL, TRUE AP�D CORRcCT COPY UF RESOLUTIO�� N0. 24-75 QULY Af�D REGULtIRLY ADOPTED AT A�1EETItdG OF TfiE CITY COUf�CIL OF THE. CITY OF BURLI�dGAt�1E HELD OPd APRIL 21 , 1975. EVELYid H. fiILL, CITY CLERK ` � . - ,� . , - � i - // ( 0 :;" __; S�/ z, ,5 _� ��,�c_�� L, �� ! , PLANc�ING COt�IMISSZON - CITX OI' BliRLIIdGI�ME RFSOLUTICN NO. 2-75 MAY.ING ENVIRCNI�SEVTAL IMPFICT REPORT, EIR-32P RECLASSIP'ICATION OF 10 LOTS FRON R-1 TO R-3; LOTS 3 AND 6, BLOCI 2; LOTS 5 AND 6, BLOCI: 3; AND LOTS 3, 9 AND 5, BLGCK 4, ALL OF BUP.LING�u�1E PAR,'C NO. 2; AND LOTS 11L', 21A AND 22, BLOCP 22, TO��N OP EUP_LINGe'll�fr WHEFtEF�5, the City Council of the City of Bvslingame � adopted Resolution No. 26-73 at a regularly adjourned meeting on i ; April 4, 1973; said resolution established rules ana regul.ations f_or the maY.ing of Environmental Impact Reports; ard WHEREAS, Puragraph 9.1A specified that any app].icat�.c.-: for amendment of zoning ordinances shall be accompanied by an �'I�: prepared purs�ant to the provisions of Ar.ticle 7; and WHEREAS, members of tne public and other concerned pa.rties must be given an opportunity to provide input both ir. the ma'r.ing of the report and the ultimate decis�on upon the private application L-ased in part upon thaL report� �:71d F1HEP.EAS, an Environmer,tal Impact Report enti�led and numbered a� set forth above has been prepared and filed in the Office of the City Clerk of this City and set for liearing before the Planning Commission of the City of i3urlingame; and WHERLAS, a copy of said Environmental Impact Report was posted at the place, and a notice of hearing was mailed to each owner of property which lies within a raclius of iive hundred feet fr.om the pr.operty and project location in the forrn and manner, and at the times heretofore p.rovided by tre Ordinance Code; and i ��.�.�.��'��c� , � i i i � �4IiL�t�nS, on L-he 2�:th day of Februar}�, 1�75, a� ti�e hour of 7:30 P.M., in the Council Cnanbers in the City r:all cf the City of Burlingarne, Caunty of San Mateo, State of Ca].iforii�_a, said time and pJ.ace bein; the day, hour and place fi�;ed by the CiL-y Clexk for hearin7 upun Lnvironmental Impact Repori�, �IR-•32P, tlie City Plannir�g co�l,isrion a�a Yica.r �ind pass upon said i i i I t _1_ � I i i EmTironmeni:al Impact Report, at wl�ich hearing all persens desiring to be heard were heard and evidence, both oral and documentary, was received from all persons desiring to introduce evidence; � i NOW, THEFtT'FORE, IT IS HFREB�' ORUERED THAT: � 1. The Environmental Impact Report designated above, i ia copy of which is attached, marked Exhibit A, be, and the same �is hereby declared to be, the Draft Environmental Impact Report imade by this Planning Commission for and on behalf of the City {of Burlingame. � � � � 2. Said Draft �nvironmental Impact Report is accepted � I and recont*nended to the City Council for consideration ar_d I �certification. . , i3. Said Draft En�,*ironmental Impact Report is for�aarded ifor public hearir.g before the City Council and is subject to j modification. . Charles W. N,ink, ChairMan Planning Cor.unission City of Burlingame I, RUTH �. JACOBS, Sec.retary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foreqoing ResolL:tion was int�oduced at the regular meeting held on the lOth day of Marcli , 1975, and adopted thereafter by ' the fallowing vote: . I?YFS : . CQrTI�1ISSI0P�ERS : I�'OES: COAl2�lISSIONERS: ► Ai3SET�T: COt�'ti�1ISSIONERS: Secretary � � _�_ i ' Y EXIIIBIT A FINDINGS i 1. The third residential (multi-family dwellings) R-3 District Regulations were established by Ordinance 539 adoptea January 9, 1954. � � 2. All the land proposed for reclassification is zoned first residential (R-1) district. The R-3 district permits apartrlent houses and multi-family dwellings and all uses permitted in R-1 and R-2 distra.cts, subject to the same restrictions, regulations, and limitatioiis that apply to those uses in their respective districts. 3. The first 150 feet southwesterly of E1 Camino Real and the southwesterly ha]_f of BlocY 22 containing the three lots in East Burlingame are preser.tly designat.ed medium high residential use in the General Plan adopted by Council Octobei 20, 1969. . � 4. A consensus of reclassification was reached bet�aeen the City Council and the Planning Commission at a joint study session January 15, 1975. ; 5. Information contained in Environmental 1'mpact Report, EIR�32P, is incorporated in these findings by reference. i I i � -3- ,�-��.-� �� d�� -i ( _ �.�� PLANNING COiKMISSION - CITY OF f3URLII1G11M� R�SOLUTZON NO. 3-i5 i RECOMhSENDING THE ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE RECLI-�SSIFYING ' SEVEN LOTS IN BURLI:�IGAA:r PARK r^FOM R-1 (FIRST � RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT TO R-3 (t�IULTI-FAP4ILY DWFLLINGS) DISTRICT WHEREAS, on or about February 10, 1975, pursuant to � the provisions of Chapter 25.16 of the Municipal Code, on the initiation of the City of Burlingame Planniny Commission, an application was filed for reclassifica.tion of Lots 3 and 6 of Block 2; Lots 5 and 6 of Block 3; and Lots 3, 4 and 5 of B1ocY 9, Burlingame Park No. 2, from R-1 (First Residential) Di_strict to R-3 (t•�ulti-iamily D�•�ellings) District, in the office �f the CiL1> Clerk; and h'HEREAS, on said date the Planning Conunission fi.xed P4onday, February 24, 19i5 at 7:30 P.M., in the Council Chambers of the Burlingame City Hall at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California, as the time and place of consolidated hearing upon said application and said matter initiated upon its own motion; anz WHT'REAS, the Planning Commission finds that the notice of ti;ne and place of said consolidated hearing has been aiven by publication required by Section 65500 of tr:e Government Code and Section 26.16.090 of the �urlingame Municipal Code and by mailed notices to all affected property owners aiid no other i notice is necessary; ; i • NOW, THEREFORF, IT IS I3FTEB' RESOLVED TIi�1T: I 1. The Planning Corrunission hereby makes the iindings set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto, incorporated herein, aiid made a part of tliis resolution by refer_ence, and adapted by said Planning Commission as its statemerit of reasons for i.he recemmendations hereinafi:er made. j 2. The Planning Com-nission recommends to the City � ; Council the z�eclassifica.tion of Lots 3 and G of B].ock 2; Lots ! I 5 and G of B].ock 3; ana Lot:; 3, 4 and 5 of Blocl: 4, Eurli.riyar�e { � -� - �I ' �I t i � r ; Park No. 2 from R-1 (First Residential) District to R-3 (Multi- family Dwellings) District. � 3. The Secretary of the Planning Commission be, and � she is hereby, ordered to tran�:*iit to t.he City Council a capy � of her minutes of said public hearing, as and for the summary of hearing provided for by law. � 4. The Secretary of the Planning Commission be, and she is hereby, ordered to transmit to the City Council a certified copy oi' this Resolution together with its attachment. Charles 4�. DZink, Chairme.n Planr.ir_g Consnission City of Burlingame I, RUTH E. JACOBS, Secretar.y of the Planning Commission of the City oi Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoin,� resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular_ meeting of ' the Planning Cor.u:�ission on March 10, 1975, by the following vote: ' i AY�S: COMN!ISSIONERS: ' � I NOES: COMMISSIO'.VEP.S: f I ABSENT: CONIt4ISSIONERS: 1 I Secretary . . ; i I, � , I `. 2 � G ii EXHII3IT B FINDiNGS s _ �: 1. Iniormation contained in Environmental Impact Report, EIR-32P, is incorporated in these findings by reference. 2. Only one parcel is likely to change, the property at ]_500 Ho�,�ard Avenue, now partly in R-1 and partly in R-3. The oFrners favor the reclassification sir.ce it presents an opportunity to develop the site satisiactorily. : .3. The R-1 property owners in I3urlingamc Park wish to retain the residential characteristics of this neighborhoc�d.� 4. The Council on Intergovernmental Relations aaop�ed Guidelines for Local General Plans on September 20, 1973. 5. Th� General Plan is in'�erided to provide a broad base of policy for guiding decisions, while th� zoning ordinance is a set of specific legal re�ulatio.�s. 6. Government Code Section 658G0 requires that county or city zoning ordin�nc2s shall be consistent with the general plan of the cour.ty or city. A zoning ordinarice shall be , consistent wit}i a general plan only if the jurisdiction has officially adoptec'. such a plan and if the various land uses authori2ed b1� the ordinance are compatible with the oLjectives, I policies, general land uses and programs specified in such a , � plan. , 7. An R-3 District 150 feet wide �,-est of �1 Camirio Real will �nable the City of 13url.ingame to gain greate.r consistency between the zoning map and the General Plan. i 'r[t� ',�-�'". � � �I �L �d6��,�� .� — / ��-Gb� i (� � �1'``��f i PLANNING COr�1ISSI0N - CITY OF BURLINGADI� I I RESOLUTION NO. 4-75 R�COh1�'�IENDING TI�E ADOPTION OF AN QRDIPIT�\CE RECLASSII'YIP]G TIiRE� LOTS IN EAST �LIRLINGAAI� FROM R-1 (FIP.ST RESIDL;2dTIAL) DISTRICT TO R-3 (PdULTI-��1I�1ILY D�r'ELLIPdGS) DISTRICT WHEREAS, on or about February 10, 1975, pursuaiit to tkie pro��isions of Chapter 25.16 of the Pdunicipal Code, on tiie initiation of the City of Burl�ngame Planning Commission, an application was filed fer reclassification of Lots 11B, 21A and 22, Block 22, To�ln of Burlingame, in the office of the Cii:y Clerk; and WHEREAS, on said date the Planning Commission fi�ed Monday, February 24, 1975 at 7:30 �.M., in the Co�ncil Glambe�rs of the �urlingame City Hall at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California, as the time and place of consolidated hearing upon said application and said matter initiated upon its o�on mot�ion; and �Vi3ER�AS, the Planning Coi�unission finds that the notice of time and place of said consolidated hearing has been ��iven by publication required by Section 65500 of i�he GoverrL�l�nt Code and Section 26.16.090 of the Burlingar,e Municipal Code and by mailed notices to all affected property owners and no other notice is necessary; NUV7, THEI:�FORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED THAT: 1. The Planning Comr,iission hereby makes the findirgs set fortii in Exhibit C attached hereto, incorporated herei.�, and made a part of ihis resolution by reference, and adopted by saici Planning Ccrmnission as its si;atement of reasons for th�� recommendatii�ns li�reinafter made. �2. The Planr.ing Conunission reco:nmends to the City Cour�c�l th� reclassificai:ion uf Lots 118, 21A and 22, Block 22, 'I To�an of Lturlingame irom R-1 (First Residential) District to fi-•3 I ��- i (Muli;i--famil.y Dwellings) District. f) -1- i� ' 0 I ; , � ! '� ' i 3. The Secretary of the Planning Commission be, an� � she is hereby, ordered to transmit to the City Council a copy � of her minutes of said public hearing, as and for the summary I of hearing provided for by law. • ! 4. The Secretary of the Planning Commission be, and � she is hereby, ordered to transmit to the City Council a certified copy of this Resolution together with its attachment. . . i i . Charles W, riink, Chairman ' Planning Commissio� City of Burlingarie I, RUTH E. JACOEsS, Secretary of the Planning Cor.imission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on March 10, 1975, by �he follov:ing ' vote: ill 1 _ I AYES: COrMISSIONERS: i I NOES: COMMISSIONERS: y I ABSEiVT: CONIMISSIONERS: � Secretary i � i , � j - 2- 0 f EXIiIBIT C FINDINGS I l. Information contained in Environmental Impact ( Report, EIR-32P, is incorporated in these findings by reference. 2. Only one parcel is likel_y to change, the property aL- 811 Burlingame Avenue. It is 75' x 200' and contains � 15,000 square feet of land area. i � 3. An alternative as a parking lot would be beneficial I � to the recreation center whicii is located directly across f Burlingame Avenue from said property. � � 4. The t�•�o single f:_mily dwellings at 816 and 812 I ! Howard Avenue are in good condii:ion. i 5. The General Plan is intended to provide a broad , base of policy for guiding decisior.s, while the zoni:�g ordinance i f is a set of specific legal regulations. � 6. Goverrunent Code Section 65860 requires that cou:�ty I Ior city zoning ordinances shall be consistent �aith the genPral i Iplan of the county or city. A zoning ordinance shall be Iconsistent with a general plan only if �he jurisdiction has I i officially adopted such a plan and ii the various land uses � authorized by the ordinance.are compatible with the objectives, I policies, general land uses and programs specified in such a � � plan. � 7. An R-3 District boundary through the middle of the block bounded by Anita and Ar_undel Roads, T3urlingame and Howard Avenues will enable the City of Burlinc,ame to gain qreater consistency between the zoning map and the General Plan. -3- 0