The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1462 Burlingame Avenue - Staff Report: � �. � ! nr . �. ciTv �1, o,► BURLINGAME S T A F F R E P O R T �.... To: HONORABLE MAYOR AfJD CITY COUNCIL suE BY aATE: FEBRUARY 13, 1985 FROM: CITY PLANNER A P 8Y �- . �� -� AGENDA L� J ITEM n MTG. ^/�^�� DATE � � ,,,B,E�T: REVIEW OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ON SPECIAL PERMIT FOR A ROOFTOP DISH ANTENNA AT 1450 BURLINGAME AVENUE TO SERVE 1462 BURLINGAP�E AVENUE RECOMMENDATION: Council hold a public hearing, review special permit request and take action. Conditions proposed for the use permit as approved by the Planning Commission: 1. that the conditions of the Chief Building Inspector's memo of December 17, 1984 and the City Engineer's memo of January 9, 1985 be met; 2. that the city receive written permission from the property owner, Mr. Wurlitzer, for the location of the antenna on the roof of 1460 Burlingame Avenue to serve the property at 1462 Burlingame Avenue; 3. that a building permit be issued for installation, this permit to be applied for and granted within 30 days following the effective date of the special permit; 4. that all parts of the dish to serve 1462 Burlingame Avenue be wholly located on the property owned by P1r. Wurlitzer at 1460 Burlingame Avenue or permission be gained from all property owners affected; and 5. that this antenna shall be removed when the retail video use is terminated at 1462 Burlingame Avenue. Action Alternatives: 1. uphold the Planning Commission's action approving the special permit as conditioned. This action should be taken by resolution recorded with all affected properties. 2. reverse the Planning Commission's approval. BACKGROUND: As a part of a code enforcement action, Gary Andrieni representing Burlingame Home Video made application for a rooftop dish antenna to serve his business at 1462 Burlingame Avenue. Because of existing buildings interfering with transmission signals, the antenna was placed on the property line wall of 1460 Burlingame Avenue. The antenna was placed without a building permit and violates four of the criteria established in the municipal code (Code Sec. 18.18.060-1,3a,b,e) for review of antenna: needs a building permit, exceeds 7 SF in area (antenna is 113 SF in area), installed more than 5' above grade (the top of the antenna is 34' above grade) and visible from the street (antenna can be seen from Burlingame Avenue and E1 Camino Real). -2- At their meeting of January 28, 1985 the Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed the request for three special permits for this antenna (Planning Commission minutes, January 28, 1985). The Commission voted 5-2 (Commissioners Jacobs and Leahy dissenting) to approve the special permits for the antenna with the conditions cited above. Only the applicant's representative testified at the hearing. In their discussion the Planning Commissioners expressed concern about the quality of the information about the antenna's location and installation provided by the applicant, that the building permit must meet the conditions of the City Engineer's memo, the view of the antenna from the west side of E1 Camino Real, the size of this antenna is consistent with present technology. The applicant has not sold any antennas in Burlingame, but has sold several in Hillsborough where he complied with that town's regulation on installation; since the City Engineer will require removal for inspection the antenna could be moved to another location on the roof. EXHIBITS: - Monroe letter to Andrieni, February 7, 1985 - Planning Commission Minutes, January 28, 1985 - Planning Commission Resolution regarding - Planning Commission Staff Report, January - Notice of Public Hearing by City Council, - City Council Resolution Approving Special MM/s special permit for dish antenna 28, 1985 (w/attachments) mailed February 8, 1985 Permit cc: Gary Andrieni Raimund Wurlitzer �) C��.e C�z.�� .a.� ��x�Zix�.��xn�r.e SAN MATEO COUNTY GITY HALL-501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME� CALIFORNIA 94010 TEL:(415) 342-8931 February 7, 1985 Mr. Gary Andrieni Burlingame Home Video 1462 Burlingame Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 Dear Mr. Andrieni: At the City Council meeting of February 4, 1.985 the Council called up for review your special permit application for a rooftop dish antenna located at 1460 Burlingame Avenue to serve 1462 Burlingame Avenue. A public hearing will be held on Tuesday, February 19, 1985 at 8:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame. We look forward to seeing you there. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely yours, �.C�.�-�.-�t-E �l1°,,`��/s � r Margaret Monroe City Planner MM/s cc: Raimund Wurlitzer (property owner) City Clerk Paqe 2 Burlingame Planning Commission Minut�s January 28, 1985 (1) that the carport addition shall be limited to a 10' x 20' covering over~f't�--e.x,�isting slab built according to the standards of the Uniform Buil3ing Code;��and--d-2�.��that the cl�se�t edqe of the slab for the carport be no closer to. the �'p�c�pe��M_1,�ne on the driveway side of the lot than 20'. Second C. Leahy; motion approve�l�or�.a.6-1 roll call vote.,- �:- J"acobs dissenting. Appeal procedures were advised. 2/3/4. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMEN'r, REZONE A,.VD TWO SPECIAL PERMITS - SENIOR RESIDENTIAL FACILITY - 1221 BAYSWATER AVENUE Items continued to action on February 11, 1985. 5. SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW A ROOFTOP DISH ANTENNA LOCATED AT 1460 BURLINGAME AVENUE TO SERVE 1462 BURLIi�TGAME AVENUE, ZONED C-1, BY GARY ANDRIENI WITH RAIMUND WURLITZER CP Monroe revi�wed this request to allow an existing satellite dish antenna located on th� roof of 1460 Burlingame Avenue. Reference staff report, 1/28/85; Project Application & CEQA Assessment received 11/29/84; copy of Municipal Code Chap. 18.18 Radio and Television Antennas; Gary Andrieni letter, November 15, 1984 with drawings detailing placement and dimensions of the antenna installation; photographs of the site; Continental Satellite Systems brochure; staff review: Fire Chief (12/12/84), Chief Building Inspector (12/17/84), City Engineer (1/9/85); Towber letters to Andrieni, 12/14/84 and 1/4/ 85; block map; study meeting minutes, 1/14/85; aerial photograph; notice of hearing mailed 1/18/85; Resolution 4-85 Approving Special Permit. CP noted letter confirming property owner's consent to the application received in the Planning Department today and discussed details of the request, applicant's lettsr, code requirements for antennas, location of this installation. Five conditions wer� suggested for consideration at the public hearing. Discussion: the fact that this is a code enforcement item, antenna was installed without a use permit or a building permit, it must be removed if Commission does not approve the special *�ermit; if any part of the antenna is found to extend over a property line written consent of all property owners involved will be necessary prior to issuance of a building permit; concern that much of the information requested at the study meeting had not been received. Chm. Graham opened the public hearing. The applicant, Gary Andrieni was present. Mr. Gilmore, his representative, told Commission that manufacturer's technical data had been furnished, he felt the same wind effect would apply on the ground or on the roof. There were no audience comments and the public hearing was closed. Commission discussion: how can we grant this use permit without all pertinent information; the applicant has not abided by the city ordinances, what is he advising his clients; suggest building permit be clearly conditioned to meet city engineering standards; concern about the size of this antenna when viewed from the west side of � CITY OF BURLIivGAME P.LANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 28, 1985 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Planning Commission, City of Burlingame was called to order by Chairman Graham on Monday, January 28, 1985 at 7:30 P.M. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Garcia, Giomi, Graham, Jacobs, Leahy, Schwalm, Taylor Absent: None Staff Present: City Planner Margaret Monroe; City Attorney Jerome Coleman; City Engineer Frank C. Erbacher MINUTES - The minutes of the January 14,�1985 meeting were unanimously approved. nr .. AGENDA - Items #2, #3 and #4 continued to the meeting of February 11, 1985; order of the agenda approved. I'rEiKS FOR ACTION l. SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW A 200 SF ADDITION TO A 400 SF CARPORT AT 760 WALNU•I' AVENUE, BY J."D. MC CARTHY FOR JAMES POPIN CP Monroe revi�wed this request� for an addition to a carport which will cause total area to`exc?ed 'S00 SF. Reference staff report, 1/28/85; Project Application & CEQA Assessment received 12/13/84; J. D. McCarthy letter��December 11', 1984; staff review: Chief Building Inspector (12/17/84>,''Fire Chief (12/14/84), City Engineer (1/9/85); study meeting minutes, 1/14/85; aerial photograph; notice of hearing mailed 1/18/85; Resolution SP/3-85 Approving Special Permit; plans date stamped December 13, 1984. CP discussed details of the request, code requirements, staff review, Planning staff comments on recent subdivision of this site. `I'wo conditions were suggested for consideration at the public hearing. Discussion: existing slab and backup area of 20'. Chm. Graham opened the public hearing. James Popin, property owner and his representative, J. D. McCarthy were present. The,re were no audience comments and the public hearing was closed. Commissa�on comment: this site abuts the R-3 zone at the rear; addition is in �he backyard, would have little impact on the neighbors and canno,�� be seen fro� the street. C.��iomi moved for approval of this special permit and for adoption of Planning Commission Resolution SP/3-85 with the following conditions: Page 3 Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes January 28, 1985 E1 Camino Real; if satellite antennas are to be allowed this is the size the city will be considering with present technology; applicant advised he sells video equipment; the dish does not replace an antenna, it brings in signals directly from a satellite and increases the number of channels; he has not sold any in Burlingame but has put up several in Hillsborough conforming to tha�t town's criteria; he does his own invoicing, has installed some himself, some on contract. Furth��r comment: this application violat�s three of the code criteria for antennas, do not find this acceptable; have no problem with the size, appears to be no worse than most antennas on homes in Burlingame; since City Engineer will require removal and reinstallation, location of the dish could be moved at that time. C. Schwalm moved for approval of this special permit and for adoption of Planning Commission Resolution SP/4-85 with the following conditions: (1) that the conditions of the Chief Building Inspector's memo of December 17, 1984 and the City Engineer's memo of January 9, 1985 be met; (2) that the city receive written permission from the prooerty owner, Mr. Wurlitzer, for the location of the antenna on the roof of 1460 Burlingame Avenue to serve the property at 1452 Burlingam� Avenue; (3) that a building permit be issued for installation, this permit to be applied for and granted within 30 days following the effective date of the special permit; (4) that all parts of the dish to serve 1462 Burlingame Avenue be wholly located on the prooerty owned by Mr. Wurlitzer at 1450 Burlingame Avenue or permission be gained from all property owners affected; and (5> that this antenna shall be removed when the retail video use is terminated at 1462 Burlingame Avenue. Second C. Taylor; motion approved on a 5-2 roll call vote, Cers Jacobs and Leahy 3issenting. Appeal procedurzs werz advise3. 5. SPECIAL PER.�IIT TO ALLOW AN Or,FICE EXPANSION AND A ��R'iANCE TO � LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS AT 1660 ROLLINS ROAD, D M-1, BY `�� J. WINTSCH (APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNF;��- CP 1�Ionro�.,�eviewed this re uest for 3 ��` q �.�20 SF office space addition to a wareho��.e building and for a v ance to reduce landscaping. Reference staf�f report, 1/28/85;_..Project Application & CEQA Assessment received 12/12/84 with attached'"detail 3ate stamped 12/12/84; plans date stamped 12/12/84; stat� review: Fire Chief (12/19/84), Chief Building Inspector (12/l�%84), City Engineer (1/9/85); study meeting minutes, 1/14/85; Towb�r me�no�-�o Monroe, 1/18/85; floor plans cooied from Building Dep��tment file; aeri�,l photograph; notice of hearing mailed 1/18/85,,,Commission Resolution �g_�roving Special Permit. CP discussed d��ails of the r�quest, code reqtx�ir�ments, staff review, applican�.'s letter, study meetinq questions. Two conditions were sugge��ed for consideration at the public hearing. � % Letter in supoort (January 21, 1985) from Arthur Zanello, owner of 1718 Rollins Road was noted by staff. Discussion: parking requirement if this structure were entirely warehouse; height limit in the M-1 zone. Page 4 Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes January 28, 1985 Chm. Graham opened the public hearing. Applicant was present. There were no audience comments and the public hearing was closed. Commission discussion: of the 21 present employees, only 14 are on site at one time; there are 12 on-site parking spaces; City Council's desi e to retain warehouse facilities in the M-1 area and reluctance to a ow more intense office use, this request is inconsistent with plann ng objectives of the city, can find no compelling reason to approv , it would be a significant change from warehouse to office. Applica t advised existing parking spaces are marked and employees do use them� they have explored other possibilities for the addition but none wer feasible. Commission expressed concern about further loss of landsc�ping; should stay with the 10� requir�ment to make the area more attra�,tive; would not want to set a precedent by allowing the variance to�`,landscape requirements; feel the 20$ office space restriction �n the code was to prevent conversion of warehouses into office, in this case will not be losing any warehouse space but will be a3ding offi�e and losing landscaping. C. Giomi moved f�r denial of the special permit. Second C. Taylor; motion approved o� a 7-0 roll call vote. C. Jacobs moved to deny the variance. Second Giomi; motion app�oved on a 7-0 roll call vote. Appeal procedures cvr_ e advised. 7. SPECIAL PERMIT AND'• OPERATION AT 'rHE � BY CALIFORNIA COMPAC ARKING VAR�*7�NCE TO ALLOW A CAR REN'I'AL $DA INN, ]� 50 BAYSHORE HIGHWAY, ZONED C-4, T5� RENT $,�CAR WITH RAMADA INNS, INC. CP Monroe reviewed this requ s��to locate a car rental business at the Ramada Inn. �eference staff � port, 1/28/85; Project Application & CEQA Ass`ssment received 12/�2 4; Negative Declaration ND-373P posted January 7, 1985; Rent-A-Car�-;Quest�'onnaire 3ated 12/10/84; applicant's letter, 12/15/84; site dr�aing dat�,,stamped 1/21/85; Ramada Inn's letter of consent to the�pplication�. 12/12/84; staff review: Chief Building Inspector (12/1.� /84) , Fire Ct%' ef (12/14/84) , City Engineer (1/9/85); stu3y meetinc�lminutes, 1/14/85,,; applicant's letter, 1/18/ 85 with attachments; Commission minutes,�Q�24/75; aerial photograph; notice of hearing mai`led 1/18/85; Commissi�i Resolution Approving Special Permit. CP:�'discussed details of the`'�r�quest, code require- ments, staff review, applicant's letters, Plai�czing staff comments. Six conditions were suggested for consideration'��,at the public hearing. `�, � Chm. Graham opened the public hearing. Betty Jenki�s, r�presenting the applicant, was present. There were no audience cacnments and the hearing was closed. Commission discussion: no fixed signage is proposed, applicant wants to use portable signs on the side or roof of their courtesy vehicle. Appli�cant's representative a3vised they are looking for a larger site to handle a complete operation, the present site would help them qet started at a San Francisco International Airport location, they serve ,� RESOLUTIO:�] .10. RESOLUTION APPROVING SPECIAL PERhSITS 11/2/84 � WHEREAS, this Commission held a public hearing on said application on January 28 19p 5 P70W THEREFORE, it is hereby RESOLVED and DETERP4INED by this Planning Commission that said special permit is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. , I � RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that; � WHEREAS, application has been made for a special permit . I for a satellite dish which exceeds the limits of : P9unicipal Code Sec. 18.18.060 � �, at 1460/1462 Qurlingame Avenue (APN 029-122-270/280,),� , , � and i It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San t4ateo. � ^ , > � L � � � Harry S. Graham � ' /�hairman I, NANNETTE M. GIOMI, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the fore9oing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 2$th day of January .198 5. by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: " � � � I \ -. ' � i 1 //f '� / ,� �� <:+ �C� / C ( �.l-tt�' Z��l Nannette M. iomi Secretary P.C. 1/28/85 Item #5 MEMO T0: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM; CITY PLANNER SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMI'r FOR A ROOFTOP DISH ANT�;NNA LOCA'rED AT 1460 BURLINGAME AVENUE TO SERVE 1462 BURLINGAME AVENUE Gary Andrieni r�presenting Burlingame Home Video is requesting a special permit for a satellite dish antenna located on the roof of 1460 Burlingame Avenue which serves his retail video sales business at 1462 Burlingame Avenue. This dish was placed without a permit. In its present location the antenna requires a special permit for exceeaing � SF in area (antenna has an area of 113 SF), for being installed more than 5' above grade (the top of antenna is 34' above grade) and for being visible from the street. The antenna was also installed without a building permit (Code Sec. 18.18.060-1, 3a,b,e). City staff have reviwed this request. 'I'he Fire Chief (December 12, 1984 memo) had no comments. The Chief Building Inspector (December 17, 1984 memo> notes that the plans seem to indicate that the antenna structure crosses property lines, that engineering plans and calcula- tions are required before a building permit (which is also required) can be issued. The City Engineer (January 9, 1985 memo) comments plans seem to indicate antenna may be mounted across a property line, building permit is needed including removal and reinstallation to inspect the structural attachment, and there m3y be further comments based on submittal to the Building Department. In his letter of [�ovember 15, 1984 the applicant, Gary An3rieni, notes that his landlord, Mr. Wurlitzer, gave him verbal permission to install the antenna. The purpose of the antenna is to demonstrate to potential customers the a3vantage of having their own satellite antenna (a part of this business is antenna sales). He points out that the placement of the antenna was determined by the location of the Pacific Bell building (the antenna is located on property line wall of 1460, 25' from property line). If the Pacific Bell buil3ing had been lower, then the antenna could be placed further back from the front property line. Planning staff wrote two letters to the applicant (Towber, December 14, 1984 and January 4, 1985) relating to submittals and additional information needed for the application. Some of these items were provided. However, direct written consent by the property owner, whether the cup of the antenna extends over property line, engineering and wind load calculations for the precise location and type of attachment and clarification of where the property line runs through the wall on which the antenna is attached were not provided. Because this installation was done in violation of the buil3ing code and antenna ordinance, staff notes that the application will continue to be reviewed by the Planning Commission whether the a3ditional information required is submitted or not. Staff hopes that the applicant will be able to answer some of these questions at the �� hearing. If will not be tion of the completed. granted a use permit for the antenna, a building permit issued until the engineering calculations and investiga- placement relative to the property line have been Because this application is the first under the antenna ordinance (Code Chapter 18.18> since it was revised in November, 1983 staff has included a copy of the ordinance in the packet. The criteria for reviewing satellite dish antenna are clearly outlined in Co3e Sec. 18.18.060. The criteria in the ordinance clearly direct consideration of the size, height and visibility from the street of the proposed antenna. In this application it should be noted that for proper reception the antenna is not placed on the roof of the site requesting the special permit; the antenna is off-premise on the roof of the adjacent tenant. Both retail sites are owned by the same property owner, Mr. Wurlitzer. Thus a use permit should note that the antenna is to serve 1462 Burlingame Avenue and to be located on the roof of 1460 Burlingame Avenue and, if granted, the permit should be recorded with both properties. The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. If affirmative action is to be considered that action should be taken by resolution identifying both properties, 1462 and 1460 Burlingame Avenue. At the public hearing the following conditions shall be considered: 1. that the conditions of the Chief Building Inspector's memo of December 17, 1984 and the City Engineer's memo of January 9, 1985 be met; 2. that the city receive written permission from the property owner, Mr. Wurlitzer, for the location of the antenna on the roof of 1460 Burlingame Avenue to serve the property at 1462 Burlingame Avenue; 3. that a building permit be issued for installation; 4. that all parts of the dish to serve 1462 Burlingame Avenue be wholly located on the property owned by Mr. Wurlitzer at 1460 Burlingame Avenue; and 5. that this antenna shall be removed when the retail video use is terminated at 1462 Burlingame Avenue. ��G��r �'I� Margaret Monroe City Planner cc: Gary Andrieni Raimund Wurlitzer MM/s 1460/ PROJECT APPLICATION ��'��ry °� 1462 BURLINGAME AUE��UE fr C E QA ASS ESS M E NT BURLJNGAME project address BURLINGAP1E HOME VIDEO ��.�o'��,'° project name - if any Application received (11/29/84 ) Staff review/acceptance ( ) i. aPP�tcaNT_ Gary Andri�ni, Burlinqame Home Video 342-8575 name telephone no. 1462 Burlingame Avenue, Burlin ame, CA 94010 applicant s address: street, city, zip code Same Same contact person, if different telephone no. 2. TYPE OF APPLICATION Speci�.l Perr�it (X ) Variance* O Ccnc�ominium Pereit O Other *Attach letter which addresses each of the 4 findings required by Code Chapter 25.54. 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION SPECIAL PERMIT to allow a satellite dish which exceeds the limits of Municipal Code Sec. 18.18.060 to remain on the roof of a commercial building. The dish antenna has a 12' diameter (113 SF) and the overall heic�ht from rade is 34'. The code requires a Special Permit if the dish exceeds 7 SF in area or is installed more than 5' above grade and if it is also visible from the street. (attach letter of explanation if additional space is needed) Ref. code section(s): ( 18.18.060 ) ( ) Raimund B. w'urlitzer 30 Genevra Road land owner's name �il�sborough, CA 94010 Renuired �ate received city zip code (�) (no) ( — ) Proof of ownershin (yes) �� ( PIISSING ) Owner's consent to a�plication 5. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS Existinq commercial building 4. PROPERTY IDEPITIFICATION ( 029-122-280/27�)( 5 )( 11 )( Burlingame Land Co. Map APN lot no. block no. subdivision name ��0.2 � ( C-1 ) ( 14,665 ) zoning district land area, square feet Re�uired Date received (yes) (�) ( 11/29/84 (-�s) ino) ( ' ) (yes) �i� (11/29/Q4 ) (other)�� ( " ) Site plan showing: property lines; public sidewall:s and c�rbs; all struc�ures and improvements; paved on-site parkino; landscaping. Floor plans of all buildings showing: gross floor area by tyoe of us� on each floor plan. Building elevations, cross sections (if relevant). Site cross section(s) (if relevant). letter of explanation *Land use classifications are: residential (show # dwelling units); office use; retail sales; restaurant/cafe; manufacturing/repair shop; warehousing; other (to be described). 6. PROJECT PR�IPOSAL Proposed censi:ruction, Qelow orade (� Second floor ( gross floor area First floor L SF) Third floor ( SF) Pro.ject Code Project Code Pr000sal Re4uirement Proposal Requirement Front setback l^Ox.19' 0' �ot coveraae 00% 100% Side setback n�a - P,uildino hei9ht 2$' SP over �5 � Side yard _ _ Landscaoed area n/ a -• Rear yard _ - Qn�site pk�.spaces Q - � 6. PROJECT PROPOSAL (continued) Full tir�e emnloyees on site Part tir�e emoloyees on site Visitors/customers (weekday) Visitors/customers (Sat.Sun. Residents on property Trin ends to/from site* Peak hour trip ends* Trucks/service vehicles EXISTING IPl 2 YEARS IP! 5 YEARS after � after after 8-5 5 PM 8-5 5 PM 8-5 5 PM *Show calculations on reverse side or attach separate sheet. 7. ADJACENT BUSINESSES/LAND USES Retail and service uses to the north, east and south; public utility to the west; this use conforms to the General Plan. Required Date received (�c� (no) ( - ) Location plan of adjacent properties. (�� (no) ( - ) Other tenants/firms on property: no. firms ( ) no. employees ( ) floor area occupied ( SF office space) ( SF other) no. employee vehicles regularly on site ( ) no. comoany vehicles at this location ( ) � � 8. FEES Special Permit, all districts $100 ( X) Other application type, fee $ () Variance/R-1,R-2 districts $ 40 () Project Assessment $ 25 (X ) Variance/other districts $ 75 () Neoative Declaration $ 25 (X ) Condominium Permit $ 50 () EIR/City & consultant fees $ () TOTAL FEES $ 15� . �� RECEIPT N0. 55H% Recei ved by M. Monroe I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signature � � �' Date ,'�` , /�� i� C-F • 6,T, pplicant ,� " �� t 7�_ /// ! c L� ; STFFF USE ONLY NEGATIVE DECLARATION File No. The City of Burlingame by on , 19_, completed a review of the proposed project and determined that: ( ) It will not have a significant effect on the environment. ( ) No Environmental Impact Report is required. Reasons for a Conclusion: Categorically exempt: Reference Code Sec. 15301 - Existinq Facilities. _� ci l��•� ig ure of Processing fficial T tle Da�e Signed Unless appealed within 10 days hereof the d�te posted, the deternination shall be final. DECLARATION OF POSTI��G Date Posted: I declare under penalty of per.jury that I ar� City Clerk oF the City of Burlingame and that I oosted a true copy of the above Nega.ti��e Declaration at the City Hall of said City near the doors to th•a Council Chambers. Executed at Qurlingame, California on Apoealed: ( )Yes ( )P;o �� 19 JUD�. MALF�TTI, CITY CLERK, CITY ('� oURLINGAPIE I �� STAFF REVIEW 1. CIRCULATION OF APPLICATION Project proposal/plans have been circulated for review by: date circulated reply received City Engineer ( 12/11/84 ) (yes) (no) Building Inspector ( " ) (yes) (no) Fire Marshal ( !� ) (yes) (no) Park Department ( — ) (yes) (no) City Attorney ( _ ) (yes) (no) 2. SUMMARY Of STAFF CONCERNS/POSSIBLE MITIGATIOP! MEASUP.ES Con cern s Will this proposal Fire and Building ments? meet all Code require- Will the antenna have any negative effects on the environment or other sites? 3. CEQA REQUIREMEPlTS memo attached (yes) (no) (yes) (no) (yes) (no) (yes) (no) (yes) (no) Mitigation Measures Request comments from the Fire Marshal and Chief Building Inspector. Review application; make determination. If a Negative Declaration has not been posted for this project: Is the project subject to CEQA review? No--cateqorically exempt. IF AN EIR IS REQUIRED: Initial Study comoleted Decision to prepare EIR Notices of preparation mailed RFP to consultants Contract awarded Admin. draft EIR received Draft EIR accepted by staff Circulation to other agencies � � � i � � � � ) ) ) � ) ) ) ) Study by P.C. Review period ends Public hearing by P.C. Final EIR received by P.C. Certification by Council Decision on project Notice of Determination � � � � � � � 4. APPLICATIOPJ STATUS Date first received �ll/29/84 ) Accepted as complete: no( ) letter to aoplicant advising info. required ( ) Yes( ) date P.C. study (�'�/�f�� ) Is application ready for a public hearing? (yes) no) Recommended date (i� � 5S �3� ) Date staff report mailed aoplicant (/'� �� ) Date Comni�s i f hearing (l��ljs� ) Application approved (✓ ) Denied ( ) ��;ti L/� �� COfncil (yes) ; (no) Date Council hearing ( %ij1`� � � 5 ) Apolication aporoved ( ) Denied ( ) ! , �l �,�� signed date � � � RADIO AND TELEVISION ANTENNAS 18.18.010-18.18.050 Chapter 18.18 RADIO AND TELEVISION ANTENNAS Sections: 18.18.010 18.18.020 18.18.030 18.18.040 18.18.050 Definition. Permit required for installation. Exempt devices. Engineering report required. Height limitations. 18.18.010 Definition. An "antenna" is any composition of wood, metal or wire, which together with its necessary supports is constructed for the purpose of receiving or transmitting electronic signals. (Ord. 948 § 1(part); December 20, 1971, as amended by Ord. 1258 § 1(part); October 3, 1983). 18.18.020 Permit required for installation. No antenna, except those deiined as exempt in Section 18.18.030, shall be built, installed, placed or maintained upon any location within the city without obtaining a building permit. For the purposes of this code, such antennas are considered struc- tures. (Ord. 948 § 1(part); December 20, 1971, as amended by Ord. 1258 § 1 (part); October 3, 1983). 18.18.030 Exempt devices. Devices of inetal and wire for the reception of radio or televised signals which are placed or attached to a building and of a height not in excess of fifteen feet above the roof of a building are exempt from the requirements of this chapter for a building permit or engineering report. (Ord. 948 § 1(part); Decernber 20, 1971, as amended by Ord. 1258 § 1 (part); October 3, 1983). 18.18.040 Engineering report required. Prior to the issuance of a permit for the construction of any antenna where the gross weight of all of its included parts exceeds five hundred pounds or where the gross height above the ground, when built upon the ground, exceeds thirty-five feet above ground level, or where the gross height above the roof, when built upon a building, exceeds fifteen feet above a roof, the building offcial shall require that a plan and engineering calculations for wind load, bracing and founda- tion be prepared by a licensed civil or structural engineer. Such plans and specifications shall be prepared to meet or exceed the applicable require- ments for such construction as set forth in the Chapter 18.08 of this code as adopted or as it may subsequently be amended. (Ord. 948 § 1(part); Decem- ber 20, 1971, as amended by Ord. 1258 § 1(part); October 3, 1983). ` 18.18.050 Height limitations. (a) The height of any antenna shall be r� measured from the ground level of the site upon which it is placed or con- structed to the topmost extension of the device. On any site which has a slope which results in a difference in elevation between the front property 222-123 (Burlingame 12-83) ` - •+.... : � 18.18.050 BUILDING CONSTRUCTION line and the rear property line of more than fve percent, the assumed ground level shall be the average of the two elevations. (b) The permitted height shall be limited to that applicable to a struc- ture within the zoning classification of the site. (c) Antenna may exceed the height set forth in subsection (b) of this section with a special permit pursuant to Chapter 25.16 of this code. (d) Nothing in this title shall be construed to permit the erection, in- stallation, building or maintenance of any antenna which exceeds in height the limits prescribed by any federal statute or by any law of the state of California, or by any order, rule or regulation of the Federal Aviation Agency, or other federal or state regulatory agency empowered to make such order, rule or regulation. (Ord. 948 § 1(part); December 20, 1971, as amended by Ord. 1258 § 1(part); October 3, 1983). � "18.18.060. Dish or satellite antennaes. i ;' 1. A dish or satellite antenna shall not be installed or maintained �� Ilwithout obtaining a building permit. � I �I Z. Section 18.18.040 shall apply to all such antennaes. i �i ; ii 3. Such an antenna shall not be installed without a special � ��permit pursuant to Chapter 25.16 of this code if any one of the following exist:' a.) it is more than seven square feet in area; b.) it is installed more than five (5) feet above ground level; i c.) itslocation exceeds any height, setback, lot coverage, or ,t ,other limitation on structures; I I� d.) its location is in required parking, landscaping or open lspace; or I� e.) its location is in a yard or other area adjacent to a street ,and visible therefrom." I �QQ �Z�o� ti�� , � �83 (Burlingame 12-83) �� 222-12b �� . \ '`1 C r� � R�CEIVi�1� N OV 2 9 1984 GTY� O�FNa"U�RL��AAE duri�nydriie Satellite T.V. Systems The Manager City Planning Department Burlingame City Burlingame, Ca 94010 Dear Sir, 1462 ev�tlnp�m� Ave. Buttlnp�rt►�, Ca, fla010 (415) 3�2d575 November 15,1984 I refer to my application for a permit for the installation of the Satellite antenna above my business premises at 1462 Burlingame Ave., Burlingame. May landlord Mr. Worlitzer has given me verbal consent to have the installation done. This antenna is used for demonstrating home Satellite systems and the vast amaunt of programne entertainment. The placement of this antenna was inf luenced by the extreme height of the Pacific Bell (AT+T) building next door. To explain the technical ramifications I refer yau to the illustration, Fig. 1 of the Satellite placement situation servicinq Nor.th America. L�,�e to geographical location of 1462 Burlingame Ave. in respect to the above technical data, it was necessary to place the antenna within 25ft of the Burlingame Ave. frontage. This affords aur antenna system a full sauth easterly to saurth westerly traverse at an angle of 43 . Had the Pacific Bell building not been so high the placement of the antenna cauld have been further back from the Burlingame Ave. frontage. I appreciate the cities emphasis on the esthetics and will endevaur to balance the ordinance and the satisfactary function of the equipment to mutual interest. Sincerely yaurs, Enclosure GA/mdt . _ . . �y, . ,a-� -a-a � �,-« -a_�_ �:, ,. �.,y� ['� An�k Ai��h � �j � �� ~ O Comsiar Wes�ar A`�" 8 : d ;1 S.,icom West�, �� ` �� l.l� Wr>I��r 1 6 2 4 � 0� 5; �y � 09� W i 14" W t g= yy g Co ;Sla� Satcom Cumctar 99` W' t23` W Sattom 3 95°W �:"'W 3R Satcom Westar d � 9�°1M1' 131°w � � a 2 9�•• w a��w i�s° �v 79° W . � � �ov.vr�ti6 �s o.�s r/1,�- Tf�� s.�r,��,r,� tii'��EG7'r{ u� / �- 60 ��m� - �4z'�=�� T'o ��-v so ore9 f� E�VT _ PIACE N/giVi _Of /(NT �'o lGl6- Tf%QE� FoR 9FT'°•'C SATEII/TE /�/T�.t..NA • I \ i � t �" �T� .OoTh� /J�.clOr�+cs ;� /��/�qftaP �r f��-�+�sf �i4�i0 IftF o �i r.�A •.'��i.��.-i . �M�dQ �/ ,� ��.6 0� !3 �r c co.�c.Cs i�v Qe t.Q-rra�►v T-o � �/�R�� N 6 TE' �. �7 `�/ �!i� ' ��if��;i 13u�LD�tic';�i� ;� ;j�s��f;'' ..�--`.. ; ' , � • � , � I � : � , . r3 u r� O�NC l,��i��l �' � i l; � L i � !��/Q�JC g0�� T�� , , . ' �; � � � �— �'3 ��` ' ` �— f �� . � �i�, i�i..: ; ,...;i��ii��ij� , f � � f � i ! �� , . ' } � ' , � , � � i ; . : � � - �- �- J � � . � � ' � ; ' � � , � ' ; ! l i- �-- ; ; � t , � � . , ' ' t :, . I ! i � i � � I ; . , ; 1 � i � f i ' ; . -i -t � , , i - , . . •: �;;;,: ,� : �� ' n�ou�r�',0 o� ��- _ .1_ L �� _ � $ f r �.,, 1 � �%f F (� � � �4�� c�' � � U� G / �/G��?E �o�,� I��TI,��'Sfr�� V T � �o , r � � � .? 8j�f To rop o{ �3 U�11 CN . PA�A,oET• : . .1 �� , 8 . �� . . ;, 1 � i�; 7 i � � ► � � � f f n i � �- C��E ��/f �'p ,� �v� tiv� ; ,��F ToP -; � . ; : . . ; C F� oN T�'�G��: .. : : � 4S'c�t� � /� �iu�vr�� k,� t3FrwEt �cJ = > dv iG o��/GS `' �a�-� F� � L� f� D F RN TEN NE� � �3 • 0 3.� �.s`Q ,r?'• �.?,!r v��,F TFQ ��vrc- �T PR ap� _r-T � ��-� T _ 1 � ; ��r � �f r � 3 � � � Cl/Z L / NC' B '�''�� '' g v�n� v�' �� V D � /� �� / �� < W �/VV �d�� Tf��E �NT�N/1�R HA � T'O /l�D�.1N7"E� ON Tft� T�/U/fl�NG w�� t3 E CAvSE' D/=� �X T•�I�' /yJ,E ��-/cf��' O C Tf%E' � T�T �j (jCL �i�/G ��x T" l� �r�t Ta /�62 /3 f� •— Tf�E ss�T�Lc irL�' TQ.A-c�-� �r c rP!?� v��s i� T �.v� o��v �Sl� !/'�s i ti �E �-r J�-ti �N��E' pf.^ l,�c � a r'�tz cr�r7 J'o cr7�5= Ei�ST � S v�-�'ff lu�ST' ' �,�' Cr� • � � � 5 �� 7� p v�i`,�' 1 �� s�- ��''��,�c tc��-� �/� 6 6 3� � o � . �-J9..�, c _ — -- i. r � � ( � � � ,- 6a I I � lNq L L i�ocJ•�r�,�C v To •�� .� . ___-_ I I ( - /� " p,uc/E- �i.�°tiv ( 7'v[3/NG . Go" � I S'6C'v�12 L�p 37 ' ( s� �ocrs" � � � • �7iv�'/�' �'.a o-�v �s I GJ � L aG� D To .� D D T�� L�III� �Sup/�o�Tiiu6 �T�+ys �/� 0 ' � � 3 6" 1 � � �� ,a-� • w f�� c �/ �/v/ O/��J� �Nr'�N'c�I� !'►'�vtr�'�i��6' /S �jol7`ED �o � �o r � s��E � � / ,�— `, ...- - - _ _- /$ ��-�— � ^ _ ,. -3v" ._. ____ —�—� I�IEs? f�2e�'r� yB��+'/4os�E C'o•¢Nc�I. �' � (',c�,-i, i•vo .��s.a G E�c.�O L oo ir��c.0 ,�'�ss7" ljout.ts �c�QCiNC.H�4Q �i c.�' op�orirE s'�,o,�.� o� !"daa,t.�.�c�..,�� ,q�- l oo �..v c ko.a T`.�. /?Cfe �TBP �4c5,�4-iivc re��...�awr �� l. /i'yY/ //t/O Q�'G r — r � %� cl� / ,�il� Ul✓•o� �v G' / �v �� 1 � � � � � 11 � :�...��i� ., j . . � �� J � � ti�� ' • 1� . � .y �'i� ,� - 'r.-� , .. `'\ ' ��' � �.�.:J��'��'I�� E�� !� �'� ,� i ` . '' • � : _ �1��'��'� , _ -. . �7 ,,•��`�'.�...a�. -�- �� . \ fl )f; �� ..`:it - ti ��' z'� `' i. S� ",,,�•,g.•-.. '�r= ` �_- - s <. a:r� .r y �� ' , i�i - Y,�i. �'a,: �: ��s� M�� g . w+� � � , .. :�. . �.. ' ._.� =�-�� . , • , � , ,,, •� �•�--� "-- 1 3 L `�" � �-� ,� � tC X.� y. ^C�.. ,�,:.,' ''+ Z 'i. t�• c�:q:�`� •.�::- ✓,��.��.f`.., . .. � ti .. 'i�'�1 , „ �r • � ` ., - , Continental Sa�e�lite S�stems Cl�ckamas, Oregon 97015 503-656-2774 raftman's pride and company spirit are producing a quality line of expanded mesh aluminum antennas at Continental Satelllte System's newly enlarged facility fn Clackamas, Oregon. Our alurNnum productlon Ilne and steel fabrication department operate around the clock to satisfy world demand for Ilghtweight, durable, easlly shipped antennas. All welding, Silver Edition 8 ft., 2.4 meter Weight ................... 88 Ibs. Shipping Weight ......... 100 Ibs. Focal Distance .......... 4 ri� 38" Mount .....................Polar Ground Post ... .... . 3"' sch 40x5' Feed Horn Mount ......... Quad Hardware ......... Stainless Steel Silver Star 10 ft., 3 mete� Weight .................. 100 Ibs. Shipping Weight ......... 108 ibs. Focal Distance ....... 375 l� 45"' Mount . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Polar Ground Post . . . . . . . . . 3 sch 40xG" Feed Horn Mount ..... . ... Quad Hardware ......... Stainless Steel cutting and fabrication Is done at our manu- SllVe� FEs7the� facturing plant to insure "hands on" 12 ft., 3.y meter quality control. Customer service Is the Weight ... .. .. ..... ..... . 223 Ibs. banner under which Continental oper- shipping Weignt ......... z3o ibs. ates. From their sales staff, prepared Focal Distance .... ... 375 Ca 54" to Hsten and advise, to their office Mount . .. . ... . . ... . ... ... . . Polar Ground Post ...... 3" sch 40x6.5' staff, with a ready ear for customers, Feed Horn Mount .. Quad or Pinhook thepeople at Continental care. Hardware ......... scairness sceei The shipping department, a vital Iink in the process, quickly dfspatches orders via the best possible transport. Once at Its destinatlon, the antenna fs easily assembled and Installed, to provide years of trouble free Siiver Max enJoyment. 16 ft., 4.9 meter *Silver Medallion 20 ft., 6.1 meter Weight ... ............... 462 Ibs. Shipping Weight ......... 482 Ibs. Focal Distance ...........45 (a 9' Mount .....................Polar Feed Horn Mount . . .. . . . Pinhook Hardware ......... Stainless Steel *Silver Command 24 ft., 7.3 meter Weight .................. 608 Ibs. Shipping Weight ......... 630 Ibs. Focal Distance ..... ... 375 �.� 9" Mount .....................Polar Feed Horn Mount . . . .. . . Pinhook Hardware ......... Stainless Steel ` Requires trained technician or fac[ory rep for installavon Weight ...... .... . .... ... 320 Ibs. Shipping Weight ........ . 365 Ibs. Focal Distance ........ 4 �) 76.8" Mount .....................Polar Ground Post ....... 3" sch SOx 10' Feed Horn Mount .. Quad or Pinhook Hardware ......... Stainless Steel Recognizing the double criteria of quality and afforda- bility, Continental's Silverline meeu the demand of today's value conscious customer. Their rugged, light- weight, state of the art antennas are satisfying custom- ers from Alaska to Abu Dhabi, and from Wyoming to �e West Indies. End your search for quality, afforda- bility and service at Continental Satellite Systems. Remember ti�e or the Flnest Antennas Telex # Avallable 294858 CSAT UR 0�� Uiewirg of satellitr N channeis requlrn the curtomer [o oDtain permission hom and may require payments to the program supplier. 7he cus[omer is responvbk fw compliance with all local, state arW federal govemment laws antl regulatlons in[hding Dut not limired ro corumxvon, placement an0 use. Continenta� Sa�e111te S�stems Clackamas, Oregon 9701 S 503-656-2774 raftman's pride and company spirit are producing a quality line of expanded mesh aluminum antennas at Continental Satellite System's newly enlarged facility in Clackamas, Oregon. Our aluminum production Ilne and steel fabrication department operate around the clock to satisfy world demand for lightweight, durable, easilyshipped antennas. All welding, Silver Edition 8 ft., 2.4 meter Weight . .... . .. . ... . .... .. 88 Ibs. Shipping Weight .. . ... . . . 100 Ibs. Focal Distance .......... 4 (a 38" Mount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Polar Ground Post . . . . . . . . 3"" sch 40x5" Feed Horn Mount ..... .. .. Quad Hardware ......... Stainless Steel Silver Star 10 ft., 3 meter Weight .................. 100 Ibs. Shipping Weight ... ... ... 108 Ibs. Focal Distance ....... 375 (cr 45"" Mount .....................Polar Ground Post......... 3 sch 40x6" Feed Horn Mount ... . .. Quad ... Hardware ......... Stainless Steei cutiing and fabricatfon is done at our manu- SIIVEI' Fee'1the� facturing plant to insure "hands on" � Z�„ 3.7 mete� quality control. Customer service Is the Weight ... .. ... ...... .... 223 Ibs. banner under which Continental oper- snipping vveighc ......... z3o ibs. ates. From their sales staff, prepared Focal Distance ....... .375 (q 54"" to listen and advise, to their office Mount ................ .. ... Polar staff, with a ready ear for customers, Ground Posc ...... 3" scn 4ox6.5' Feed Horn Mount.. Quad or Pinhook the people at Continental care. Hardware .. ..... .. scainiess sceei The shipping department, a vital Ilnk in the process, quickly dispatches orders via the best poulble transport. Once at Its destinatlon, the antenna is easily assembled and Installed, to provide years of trouble free Silver Max enJoyment. 16 ft., 4.9 mete� *Silver Medallion 20 ft., 6.1 meter Weight .......... .. . .... . 462 Ibs. Shipping Weight ... ... . .. 482 Ibs. Focal Distance ..... .. ... .45 �o� 9' Mount ..................... Polar Feed Horn Mount . . . . . . . Pinhook Hardware ......... Stainless Steel *Silver Command 24 ft., 7.3 mete� Weight .................. 608 Ibs. Shipping Weight ... ...... 630 Ibs. Focal Distance ... ..... 375 @ 9' Mount . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . Polar Feed Horn Mount . . . . . . . Pinhook Hardware ......... Stainless Steel ' Requires [rained technician or fattory rep for installavon Weight ...... ........ .. .. 320 Ibs. Shipping Weight .... . .. . . 365 Ibs. Focal Dista�ce .... .... 4 C�� 76.8" Mount ..................... Polar Ground Post ....... 3" sch SOx 10' Feed Hom Mount .. Quad or Pinhook Hardware ......... Stainless Steel Recognizing the double criteria of qualiry and afforda- bility, Continental's Silverline meets the demand of today's value conscious customer. Their rugged, light- weight, state of the art antennas are satisfying custom- ers from Alaska to Abu Dhabi, and from Wyoming to the West Indies. End your search for quality, afforda- bility and service at Continental Satellite Systems. Remember ti�e or the Flnest Mtennas Telex # Avallabl� 294858 CSAT UR cO�ssa Vie�nng o( satelli[e N channels requ�res the ru5tomer [o ohtair�;�err�u,�.i; -�. tr�:,r.. a,r�� r; ay reqiiwe paymen[s to [he program wpplier. 7he cus[wner is responslbk fw compliance with all local, sta[e and tetleral gOvenm�Yt[ IaWi aM reyula[ions iIxlUOing bUt not Iimited [o cautrtxtiOn, placertlent an0 uu. �� p� � �,�- ° 6 �... K , �1� :'s � -,�� l }� � < .r_3'.��- _ .Ai tNi> �.'.� ,, .�x ...:xa::. ..��: - , ,� �^R :i G , � �.`� n. � � ��i� �.� �, 1 �. �� , �.��. ♦ ` �, ._�` `-� ` �� , ♦ . * Colors available (*stock colors�. :� � q' 3 r. �,..y� � ,�'N � 3:i _: � �,� , � I� � �, �• .� � � �•. � ♦�.� S I �/r; ��• . ��,. .� �+�� _ `.. _ . ' �i�,►. ,� �`.,� � \ �� ,, �. ' � � ! 1�.� �� y�'. .a fi.4,- � � 111 DATE :_/Z�//�� MEMO T0: CITY ENGINEER CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR ,��RE MARSHAL FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT S U B J E C T: ��j;r.l �(�st+� � -�v �G G�iJ`i l''�.�j,�Grt,s� Or� y�tl a� �� z��, C� i� An application has been received for the above project for review by the Planning Commission. The application will be scheduled for �2f0�/ at their /�/��.� meeting. We would appreciate having -7 , your comments by /�Z��f� Thank you. Helen Towber Planner s/ att. I Z I I Z -- � 1-� S��1n �(1(�SZ,1� �-�(JS (�i 0 Y'�Qv►rc.. �s C�� i � S ��'�=� e� ( = �(1(l . 1c�v�avS �� .�. � DATE : /Z�//�� MEMO T0: CITY ENGINEER ;�2�IEF BUILDING INSPECTOR FIRE MARSHAL FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: S,dG�f;c� YG�su� �zf ��Z ��i� � 0 An application has been received for the above project for review by the Planning Commission. The application will be scheduled for 1/LfO�/ at their /�/�� meeting. We would appreciate having —�--� your comments by /�L�� Thank you. Tp �� r�n ��,� j! � /C ` �3 �/� .J,�1 . . / /1 GJ� � K/ /r+ y �L//!%�'S/01� / Helen Towber Planner , ��l -/i�- �/ /! E., /��I.r�"dn d �/�S %1 /5 dd/' %L10u�1 E'•i/' � s� �, � /�JC.� S � - att. r f y�- / ' / /� ��/�l,rL / Cr•�L �i�'i Gcr �S /c� d t C/�O :S-S i r!� �'�o r1l.�fy ✓� i r GS � �/ / �. �n �n C'c'��e/ny ��rS �n.�" �d/r��c�S l.��OL �y'uiR1�! / / .�- �u� /,�� j ,�,�M. �� f�� „�f.� .�� / - . � � �� l� DATE :_�Z�//�� MEMO T0: ;�'�TY ENGINEER CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR FIRE MARSHAL FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT S U BJ EC T: S,G�r�;c,� YGIx� ��fl Z /��C�ii�s .��.�� - i�,� An application has been received for the above project for review by the Planning Commission. The application will be scheduled for J"!LlD�/ at their /�/��'� meeting. We would appreciate having �� your comments by /�Z�d� Thank you. RECEIV�� JAN 9 • i985 .�..; .:-: _. Helen Towber Planner s/ att. . �' /�/�� , �'�. ' �/1y/��ri�� / / �"' /.� -� /��'� � / � . � ','' / , � - � / /� / / / � / / / i / . / % � / � � i � /� � � /� �� - , /i � � � � �y- _ � ' d � i, , �� , � , , / i / �� - - . �( � �(��'l�/' ��7"�i� �� ,� �.�$ lnZ.�� a.0 ��Cx,LZxC.�CC�1'C$ SAN MATEO COUNTY CITY HALL-501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME� CALIFORNIA 94010 TEL:(415) 342-8931 December 14, 1984 Mr. Gary Andrieni c/o Burlingame Home Video 1462 Burlingame Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 Dear Mr. Andrieni: In the review of your special permit application to allow the disch antenna on top of the building at 1460 Burlingame Avenue to remain the following questions have come up: 1. Your roof plan seems to show that the antenna is mounted very close to the property line between 1454 and 1460 Burlingame Avenue and perhaps even on the roof of the structure at 1454 Burlingame Avenue. Please clarify the exact location of the satellite dish with respect to property lines. Does the dish, in fact, extend over property line? 2. The property owner's consent to the application is still missing. Verbal consent is not adequate. 3. More detailed information on the antenna itself would be helpful in order to understand the bulk, shape, color, type of mount and appearance of the antenna. Perhaps photographs could also be provided. 4. Please show the antenna on the elevation drawing of Home Video and Coiffeur Ambassador. Please provide this information by 5:00 P.M., December 20, 1985 in order to include it in the next Planning Commission packet. Thank you. Sincerely, ��, '�iu�-L�— Helen Towber Planner HT/s z�-� �-•c.� RLINGAME �uNe V�.L I.L V�.l�� .V ��.l�l��.LL.i LM�.� a L.G � �✓ SAN MATEO COUNTY CITY HALL-501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME� CALIFORNIA 94010 TEL:(415) 342-8931 January 4, 1985 Mr. Gary Andrieni c/o Burlingame Home Video 1462 Burlingame AvPnue Burlingame, CA 9401� Dear Mr. Andrieni: 0 On December 14, 1984 we sent you a letter requesting additional information to clarify the lor_ation and description of your proposed roo-f-top dish antenna. As of this time v�te have not heard from you; therefore, your application will be forw�rded to trie members of the Planning Commission "as is" for study. We suggest that you definitely plan cn a�ttending the st�dy session for your project on January 14, 19�5 at 7:30 P.M. since the Commission may request . additional information beyond what staff has req��ested. You will have only one week following the study session to submit the requested information before the next packet goes out to Commission members for review prior to the public hearing, as is the normal procedure for a Special Permit application. A copy of our last letter to you listing the specific information requested is enclosed for your convenience. Please call us at 342-8931 if you have any questions. Sincerely, �� Helen Towber Planner HT/s enc. �-,p; /) -,�,� ,"''�'�!►.�rnfl . - a �fi � s�; w��f'�) ��l�l 70 '- e-o�A l �J•�� w� �a�rnssv��n,.1� — 0'1fi�1 �1� iy 3,/1�1 3Wb�r1'1�11� 9�-ZE�I i►�-Pii1 '�5-��►hl o�1h1 2°►�h1 ' � � � � Q O ��. J � � � � o b-�►� Z � � : � � , � , . � I � . _ � ,� � � 1 - �. , � 1 � - y ._..� � � ��,_,_,r- —_ -y ___, +ai �. � +°1 i � �J� �_i �_ ._ . .� _ � , �4 � ogfil � v� N�n�r N�a�r�i� Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Page 9 January 14, 1985 Staff/Commission discussion: if this ordinance is not adopted, existing nonconforming uses could remain if the use is continuous; Fire Chief has stated he had few concerns if nonflammable solvent were used; Fire Department makes an inspection each year of all industrial businesses. Chm. Graham opened the public hearing. James Jackson, attorney representing Marmora Terrell and Nancy Kurkjian, property owners of the Adeline Market site, spoke in favor: their request for a code amendment had been made to City Council and Council referred it to the Planning Commission; felt a dry cleaning establishment would be a good addition to the Adeline Market area and found that the One Hour Martinizing people do processing on site; understand flammable liquid usage is outlawed in California; would suggest the ordinance be amended to allow dry cleaning plants in C-1 but only with a special use permit, in that manner Commission could review each operation on its own merits and consi3er individual neighborhood concerns; it appears the city has six plants in the C-1 zone at present; would like the opportunity to come back to Commission for this use in the C-1 zone. There were no further audience comments and the public hearing was closed. Commission comment: this is heavier type of use than other uses in C-1, feel it should stay in C-2 unless the city revi�ws other C-2 uses also, am not aware there is a public demand for this use in C-l. C. Taylor moved that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council no change in the C-1 district ordinance. Second C. Schwalm. Comment on the motion: have seen no comoelling information to suggest the ordinance should be changed; amendment appears to be 3esigned for the benefit of one property owner; such a significant change should be supported by more interest and a public need demonstrated. The difference between C-1 and C-2 was discussed; C-1 is retail/service, the service given directly; C-2 involves making the product and providing the service; major difference between the two seems to be number of employees, a C-2 use in C-1 would have greatzr parking impact on the retail area. Motion approved 5-2 on roll call vote, Cers Giomi and Leahy dissenting. Staff will forward Commission's recommendation to Council. 8. REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE JA�VUARY 23� 1984 SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW A SWIMMING POOL ADDITION 'I'O THE BURLINGAME ATHLETIC CLUB AT 888 HINCKLEY ROAD; BY KENN EDWARDS CP L�lonroe reviewed the item; request for extension has been made because the applicant has not yet received financing for the project. Ref. staff report, 1/14/84; applicant's letter, 12/19/84; Commission minutes, 1/23/84; Monroe letter of action, 2/8/84. C. Jacobs moved to grant the extension. Second C. Garcia; motion approved unanimously on roll call vote. Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes ITEMS FOR STUDY Page 10 January 14, 1985 9. SPECIAL PERMIT - ADDITION TO CARPORT - 760 WALNUT AVENUE Requests: how will the slabs be joined; address impact on adjacent property. Set for hearing January 28, 1985. 10. CONDOMINIUM PERMIT - 141 EL CAMINO REAL 11. TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP - 141 EL CAMI1�0 REAL Items continued to January 28, 198� for study. 12. SPECIAL PERMIT - BURLIiVGAME HOME VIDEO - 1462 BURLINGAME AVENUE Requests: copy of ordinance regulating dish antennas; clarification of property line. Set for hearing January 28, 1985. 13. SPECIAL PERMIT AND VARIANCE - OFFICE EXPANSION - 1660 ROLLINS ROAD Requests: amount of existing landscaped area; double check parking provided. Set for hearing January 28, 1985. 14. SPECIAL PERMIT AND VARIANCE - CAR RENTAL OPERATION AT RAMADA INN, 1250 BAYSHORE HIGHWAY Requests: how many of the l� car fleet will be on site at one time; parking use count at the Ra,-nada Inn; where will spaces For the car rental operation be located; how does applicant intend to pick up people from the airport, is this vehicle included in the fleet vehicle count and parking spaces requeste3; statement from the applicant on expected growth and any signage proposed; number of employees. Set for hearing January 28, 1985. PLANNER REPORTS CP reviewed Council actions at its January 7, 1985 regular meeting and January 9, 1985 stu3y meeting. ACKNOWLEDGMENT - December 17, 1984 letter from Irwin and Sonia :�arcus, 1712 Quesada Way regarding sign placed at Burlingame Intermediate School. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 11:20 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Nannette M. Giomi Secretary � . ' � � �,�.1 , ��c _ �f� . .� .�,�+� ' � r .` , . � .� � _'- � - �'c, ' : ; r ' �� '� , . � .�. .• � , , .•� t , + -' ,�► .�. ,� ,_'`� . ` ,. � � � . t�, � � .- + / �"� e , T � a � ��' �'E,. '� , ./ � '� 4�'. i �~�� y � ` �,�' �� y, t .. � � � • . !'• (' . r � . . ?7 � • �`. � _, * i 1� ` � ��' . +��, r * r ! T r �i 1f. I ; ` „ ��Yt � �ii � ;' ,�� r F � : r 4 .�, .- � ; ��+, �.r �� ` � � � -�- _r � I- r• � �` � � . . � , � ? fi�S�r/ . _ � ' ,.' � • ' �r _.�1 ., � R �1 - _ / ., • , ♦ [ . � `ti.+� P�6� ,, r� .' ` f � - � �f � � RF � � ��s �'� �` • ^ • ' .� �a .. ti .-� vr s 1.. y • , � •♦ F F Q r �L �� , ' �'' ., r. , , . � � � - � ��► � _ ,,,�� ,,, �y� 1, � . _ . . �- ' � �i "� �T , r � � ' . , , � � ' ' ..r r . /. � �-- TT � � � �• � ' ', `• i � _ iT , '�� i �_ • , z /. r � � � r,r, F f/,�F� ,. : � �', � R / r � ��- �� tTC� a.... f � � � . I'�� i ,� � � � � � , �� : , � �'� � , �-qr �'�;,, __��,�, . ;�� a rr r— � ,/" . �.,� �,', ..r � • _ Ti (� � .� � � `� v� ' � R�1 � f .�. � L . �` . . � r � �� v' � � �"� �' � ' J � '� ' � ♦ ��y � � VQ� � 1 _ .. �F ' t ' � �` J�V� t�t "'� � ,� = ' ` �+- / � �' . �. b�i. �� : '` �, � � �� ,�, F� � � 4�,�. � �� a� r �� • . ., � � � r �d` � � �� l r... . � .- ' , ��, �� __ p - /� r— ' , .. / � : �\ / � I�-- � t ►' � : , .�f � • i � ' �' - . i . � • ^ s` � K {' , � � ,� ,' +� ' ' � � , 'i / � ' ' . . � � ,� _ ,. - t, ti„ `4' `�' f , ,�C . ,,� •:� •�.. ,- , , /' �'' ••� � F ' , ' �- ' , 1 � �- ; � , .. E'� �, � : � . • � . ;,�.r„ � , �` ��i,vo � ., `� '.� ��'� � � 'P�q �' -.a � - � P �� F � � � _ ., „ , I . ��=,� . { � �� t • •. : . , / F ° �+. , �' �•. � _ , d� • � _ i � � �� ro � . # � � � a �.s�.. : ' � � �� • � .� � .� - '� . - .s :� / �� i � �,rt�r� 1 _:� a i � � 1 1 i�Vk _ i � �hr C�t�� IIf �urlt�t��xm� SAN MATEO COUNTY CITY MALL- SOI PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 TEL�(415) 342-6931 NOTICE OF HEARING SPECIAL PERMIT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Monday, the 28th dav of January, 1985 , at the hour of 7:30 P.M., in the City Hall Council Chambers , 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame will conduct a public hearing on the application to a11ow Burlinaame Home Video at 1462 Bur�ingame Avenue (zoned C-1) to have a rooftop dish antenna which exceeds code limits; by Gary Andrieni (applicant) with Raimund Wurlitzer (propertyo uwner) . At the time of the hearing all persons interested will be heard. For further particulars reference is made to the Planning Department. MARGARET MONROE CITY PLANNER January 18, 1985 �hF C�tt� IIf �uxlt�z��mP SAN MATEO COUNTY CITY HALL- 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME,CALIFORNIA 94010 �dOTICE OF HEARING SPECIAL PER�1IT TEL: (415) 342-8931 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Tuesday, the 19th day of February, 1985 , at the hour of 8:00 P.M., in the City Hall Council Chambers , 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California the City Council of the City of Burlingame will conduct a public hearing on an application to allow Burlingame Home Video at 1462 Burlinqame Avenue (zoned C-1) to have a rooftop dish antenna which exceeds code limits; bv Gary Andrieni (applicant) with Raimund Wurlitzer (property owner). At the time of the hearing all persons interested will be heard. For further particulars reference is made to the Planning Department. MARGARET MONROE CITY PLANNER February 8, 1985 r= RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING SPECIAL PERf4IT 1' RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame 0 � that; r� i WHEREAS, application has been made for a special permit �for a satellite dish which exceeds the limits of Municipal Code Sec. 18.18.060 lat 1460/1462 Burlingame Avenue �Ap;� 029-122-270/280 � and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on said application on January 2$ ,198 5, at which time said application was approved; WHEREAS, this matter was called up for review and a hearing thereon held on �ebruary 19 ,1985 NOw, THEREFORE, it is hereby RESOLVED and DETERI�IINED by this Council that said special permit is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. It is further directed that a certifed copy of this �esolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. �Kayor � I I, JUDITH A. MALFATTI, City Clerk of the City of � �Burlingame do hereby certify ttiat the foregoing resolution �vas � �introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the i l9th day of February ,198 5, and adogted thereafter by � ithe following vote: I iAYES: COUNCILt1EN: i NOES: COUNCILIfEN: I `ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: I• -.::,i�,' � _.j . f; .::�:�. ��.��,�,:. ;-�:uo� r:��: i