The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1451 Burlingame Avenue - Approval Letter��b, CITY O� BURLNOAME 4� os �� ' CITY OF BURLINGAME Planning Deparunent City Hall - 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, California 94010-3997 Tel. (650) 558-7200 February 29, 2000 Thomas W. and Diane L. Ayoob Trs 50 Mounds Road #315 San Mateo, CA 94402 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Ayoob, Since there was no appeal to or suspension by the City Council, the February 14, 2000 Planning Commission approval of your conditional use permit application became effective February 23, 2000. This application was for an existing food establishment classified as a Full Service Food Establishment in the Burlingame Avenue commercial area at 1451 Burlingame Avenue, zoned C-1, Subarea A, Burlingame Avenue Commercial Area. The February 14, 2000 minutes of the Planning Commission state your application was approved with the following conditions: l. that this business location presently occupied by a full service food establishment, with 934 SF of on-site seating may change its food establishment classification only to a limited food service or bar upon approval of a conditional use permit for the establishment change; the criteria for the new classification shall be met in order for a change to be approved; 2. that the 934 SF area of on-site seating of the full service food establishment shall be enlarged or extended to any other areas within the tenant space only by an amendment to this conditional use permit; 3. that this food establishment shall provide trash receptacles as approved by the city consistent with the streetscape improvements and maintain all trash receptacles at the entrances to the building and at any additional locations approved by the City Engineer and Fire Department; 4. that the applicant shall provide daily litter control along all frontages of the business and within fifty (50) feet of all frontages of the business; 5. that an amendment to this conditional use permit shall be required for delivery of prepared food from this premise; 6. that there shall be no food sales allowed at this location from a window or from any opening within 10' of the property line; rebruary 29, 2000 1451 Burlingame Avenue page -2- 7. that if this site is changed from any food establishment use to any retail or other use; a food establishment shall not be replaced on this site and this conditional use permit shall become void; 8. that this full service food establishment may be open seven days a week from 11:30 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., with a maximum of 12 employees on site at any one time; and 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the Uniform Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 1998 Edition, and as amended by the City of Burlingame. The decision of the Council is a iuial administrative decision pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. If you wish to challenge the decision in a court of competent jurisdiction, you must do so within 90 days of the date of the decision unless a shorter time is required pursuant to state or federal law. 'ncerely yours, l�-� � arg�Monro ' City Planner RH\s 1451 I3U RL. cca c. Isobune Sushi of Burlingame, applicant 1451 Burlingame Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 Chief Building Inspector Chief Deputy Valuation, Assessor's Office (0.07 AC MOL ELY 25 FT X 125 FT PTN LOT 9 BLK 1 TOWN OF BURLINGAME SUPP MAP NO 1 RSM 3/71; APN: 029-201-380 �iry nfBit�linganse Plnn�ii�tg Contmission Mii�i<tes February 14, 2000 B. 1121 BURLINGAME AVENUE -(SWEET TREATS, APPLICANT AND FISHER SANDRA TRUST, PROPERTY OWNER) C. 1205 BURLINGAME AVENUE -(LA PINATA, APPLICANT AND JOSEPH & SANDRA KARP TRS, PROPERTY OWNERS) D. 1207 BURLINGAME AVENUE -(ROLJND TABLE PIZZA, APPLICANT AND JOSEPH KARP TR, PROPERTY OWNER) E. 1213 BURLINGAME AVENUE -(KING YUAN RESTAURANT, APPLICANT AND FERNAND J. & S.D. WAGNER TRS, PROPERTY OWNERS) F. 1401 BURLINGAME AVENUE -(TOWLES' CAFE, APPLICANT AND CAROL ETIENNE PEARSON TR, PROPERTY OWNER) G. 1407 BURLINGAME AVENUE -(HOUSE OF COFFEE, APPLICANT AND WELLS FARGO BANK, PROPERTY OWNER) H. 1408 BURLINGAME AVENUE -(ALANA'S, APPLICANT AND EDWARD G. ZUKAUSKAS, PROPERTY OWNER) I. 1409 BURLINGAME AVENUE -(BASKIN-ROBBINS, APPLICANT AND WELLS FARGO BANK, PROPERTY OWNER) J. 1420C BURLINGAME AVENUE -(SAKS/COMPANY, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER) K. 1425 BURLINGAME AVENUE -(GAU POANG CHINESE RESTAURANT, APPLICANT AND JAMES R. TORMEY ET AL, PROPERTY OWNER) L. 1447 BURLINGAME AVENUE -(GARDEN CAFE, APPLICANT AND BANK OF AMERICA NT SA ET AL, PROPERTY OWNER) M. 1448 BURLINGAME AVENUE -(PARAGON RESTAURANT & BAR, APPLICANT AND JAMES P. & RUTH MODISETTE, PROPERTY OWNERS) CONTINUE TO FEBRUARY 28, 2000. N. 1451 BURLINGAME AVENUE -(ISOBUNE SUSHI OF BURLINGAME, APPLICANT AND THOMAS W. & DIANE L. AYOOB, PROPERTY OWNERS) O. 1453 BURLINGAME AVENUE -(BURGER KING, APPLICANT AND THOMAS W. & DIANE L. AYOOB TRS, PROPERTY OWNERS) P. 297 CALIFORNIA DRIVE -(SAM'S ITALIAN SANDWICHES, APPLICANT AND FISHER SANDRA TRUST, PROPERTY OWNER) Q. 220 LORTON AVENUE -(THE ALIBI, APPLICANT AND ILA A. MACPHEE, PROPERTY OWNER) R. 246 LORTON AVENUE -(PADDY FLYNN'S, APPLICANT AND LAWRENCE INVESTMENT CO., PROPERTY OWNER) S. 250 LORTON AVENUE -(MANDARIN CUISINE, APPLICANT AND LAWRENCE INVESTMENT CO., PROPERTY OWNER) T. 260 LORTON AVENUE -(HOUSE OF BAGELS, APPLICANT AND RICHARD G. & DOROTHY EHIKIAN TR, PROPERTY OWNERS) U. 266 LORTON AVENUE -(NORTH CHINA INN, APPLICANT AND ROSALINDA W.H. KO, PROPERTY OWNER) V. 221 PARK ROAD -(DICEY RILEY' S IRISH BAR, APPLICANT AND LAWRENCE J. AND GLORIA A. HORN TRUSTEES, PROPERTY OWNERS) W. 231 PARK ROAD -(NARIl�T THAI CLJISINE, APPLICANT AND LAWRENCE J. AND GLORIA A HORN TRUSTEES, PROPERTY OWNERS) X. 240 PARK ROAD -(SAKAE SUSHI, APPLICANT AND BRUCE C. KIRKBRIDE ET AL, PROPERTY OWNER) Z. 321 PRIlVIItOSE ROAD -(PIAZZA ITALIA CAFE, APPLICANT AND DSM PRIlVIROSE LP, PROPERTY OWNER) „it� ofBu; li�igame Pla�n:ing Commission t1�fi»utes Febnrory 14, 2000 1108 BURLINGAME AVENUE, ZONED G1, SUBAREA A, BURLINGAME AVENUE COMI��RCIAL AREA - AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN EXISTING FOOD ESTABLIS�IMENT IN THE BURLINGAME AVENUE COMIVIERCIAL AREA (FANNY & ALEXANDER, APPLICANT AND LORENZ KAO AND LOUISA ZEE KAO, PROPERTY OWNERS) - 1123 BURLINGAME AVENUE, ZONED C-1, SUBAREA A, BURLINGAIV� AVENUE COMI��RCIAL AREA - AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN EXISTING FOOD ESTABLISf-�VIENT 1N THE BURLINGAME AVENUE COMIVIERCIAL AREA (NELSON'S COFFEE SHOP, APPLICANT AND SANDRA FISHER PROPERTY OWNERI 1420A BURLINGAME AVENUE, ZONED C-1, SUBAREA A, BURLINGAME AVENUE COMMERCIAL AREA - AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN EXISTING FOOD ESTABLIS�IlVIENT IN THE BURLINGAME AVENUE CONIlV�RCIAL AREA (SAKS/COMPANY, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER) C. Keighran moved approval of the consent calendar based on the facts in the staff reports, commissioners comments and the findings in the staff reports with recommended conditions in the staff reports as amended by staff tonight, by resolution. The motion was seconded by C. Dreiling. Chair called for a voice vote on the motion and it passed 7-0. Appeal procedures were advised. The Commission began consideration of the consent calendar at 8:10 p.m. and concluded their action at 8:15 p.m. Chairman Luzuriaga called for a 10 minute break at 8:15 p.m. and reconvened at 8:25 p.m. REGULAR CALENDAR 1541 LA MESA DR1VE, ZONED R-1- APPLICATION FOR HII,LSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION. (KEITH BORRAL, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER) Reference staff report, 2.14.00, with attachments. City Planner and Commission discussed the report, reviewed criteria and Planning Department comments. Three conditions were suggested for consideration. Commissioner noted that there was no landscape plan included and in this case the height of the trees should be shown, in hilIside areas there should be a tree height limitation because of view impacts. There were no further questions or comments for staff from the commission. Chairman Luzuriaga opened the public hearing. Keith Bonall, property owner, spoke tried to put up story poIes, the weather was bad and it was too dangerous, took pictures from the house where the people had expressed concern about their view being blocked, they will be most affected by the Cyprus trees in the yard, would be glad to remove them if they would assist with the cost; would be willing to put up story poles again but not sure that it will help people understand the addition. Commission asked, looked at the plans and the second story seems well integrated but the porch is small, could you expand the roof eave to cover it. Applicant's architect Noemi Avram, Gumbinger Associates, 60 W. Third Street, San Mateo, responded, the reviewer suggested adding the porch to emphasize the entry and break the long facade, she felt the change was an improvement. Commission noted that the entry is not resolved on the right side, could have a softer line. Architect noted proud of the way the entry was resolved, difficult problem because now all one sees is the driveway, wanted to do without a massive staircase. Commission asked applicant if he wanted a porch; originally wanted a sun room; Commission suggested that could hip the roof over the stairwell and get a vertical element. The applicant had no further comments. ��