HomeMy WebLinkAbout1506 Cabrillo Avenue - Staff ReportItA
3
All
Cityof Burlingame Item No. _
g Regular Action
Design Review Amendment
Address: 1720 Adeline Drive Meeting Date: December 13, 2010
Request: Design Review Amendment for proposed changes to a previously approved new, two story
single family dwelling and detached garage.
Applicant and Designer: Chu Design and Engineering APN: 026-031-050
Property Owners: Hoyman and Tram Hong Lot Area: 6,300 SF
General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1
Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15303 (a), which states that construction of a limited
number of new, small facilities or structures including one single family residence or a second dwelling unit
in a residential zone is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family
residences maybe constructed or converted under this exemption.
Project History: An application for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and
detached garage at 1720 Adeline Drive was approved by the Planning Commission on August 9, 2010
(August 9, 2010 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes attached). A building permit was issued on
October 18, 2010, and construction is currently underway.
On November 3, 2010, the applicant submitted an FYI to the Planning Division to remove all grids from the
windows and to change the exterior doors in the family room from two sets of French doors to a single set
of sliding French doors. The Planning Commission reviewed the FYI memo at the November 22, 2010
Planning Commission Meeting and did not approve the proposed changes to the project. The applicant
has since revised the application to include horizontal grids on the windows and submitted for a Design
Review Amendment for the proposed window and door changes on December 1, 2010.
Proposed Revisions: The applicant is now requesting an Amendment to Design Review for proposed
window and door changes to a previously approved new, two-story single family dwelling at 1720 Adeline
Drive, Zoned R-1. The applicant is requesting the following changes:
■ Removal of all vertical grids from the simulated true divided lite windows and doors; and
■ Change the exterior doors in the family room from two sets of French doors to a single set of
sliding French doors.
The applicant submitted a letter, dated December 1, 2010, explaining the reasons for the proposed
changes. Other than the changes to the window grids and to the doors off of the family room area, there
are no changes to the design of the house. The applicant is requesting the following application:
■ Design Review Amendment for proposed changes to a previously approved new, two story single
family dwelling and detached garage.
Summary of Previously Approved Project: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing single -
story house with an attached garage to build a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage.
The proposed house and detached garage will have a total floor area of 3,240 SF (0.51 FAR) where 3,252
SF (0.52 FAR) is the maximum allowed (project is 12 SF below the maximum allowed FAR).
The project includes a detached garage (336 SF) which provides one code -compliant covered parking
space for the proposed four -bedroom house. There is one uncovered parking space (9' x 20') provided in
the driveway. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the
e
Design Review Amendment
1720 Adeline Drive
following application:
■ Design Review for anew, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage (CS 25.57.010).
1720 Adeline Drive
Lot Area: 6,300 SF Plans date stam ed:.1ui zb,1ui u ana juiy b, zu-i u
PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQUIRED
SETBACKS
............................................................... _.............. ..... ..............................
Front (1st fir): j
................................................................................................................................................................i
21'-10"
...................................._...._.._...— -...
21'-10" (block average)
(2nd fir):
26'-4"
.21'-10" (block average)
........................................................................,.................. ............ .....................................................
Side (left 1"):
................. .................................................... _...............
12'-6"
_............. ........ _........................................ _......................................................................................................
7'-6"
(left 2"d): '
14'-6"
I 12'-0" (average)
(right):
8'-6"
7'-0"............._.. ..
...... ............ .......... ..........
............... ................................................................ ....................... .............
Rear (1st fir):
...... ..................................................................................................................................................
24'-9"
............_......._..................................................
15 -0 ��.........................
(2nd fir):
26'-9"
20'41
.................................................................................:.................................................................................................................................................................................._.................
Lot Coverage:
2,005.5 SF
...................... ...................................
i..._ .._..........2,520SF
I
32%
40%
FAR:
3,240.5 SF
3,252 SF
0.51 FAR
0.52 FAR'
.................... _..................................._.._............_._.......1........... _............................
# of bedrooms: ;
................................................................................................................ .... .... ........... .... ......_......... _......_..............................................
4
.. ............
---
.............................................................................._........_...._.............................................................................................................................................................................._......._
Parking: [
.........................._............................................................................................_......
1 covered
1 covered
(10' x 20')
(10' x 20')
1 uncovered (
1 uncovered
(9' x 20') ' ..............................................................................................................
(9' x 20')
... ...................................................................................:....................................._.._..............................................................................................................................................._.......;
Height:
1.._.._......_.._
29'-11 " i
30'-01'
.............................................................. .................. 1............................................................................................................................................
DH Envelope: 1
_........................................... .._.........................................
complies
.... ......... ......... ....................................
CS 25.28.075
' (0.32 x 6,300 SF) + 900 SF + 336 SF = 3,252 SF (0.52 FAR)
Staff Comments: See attached memos forthe originally approved projectfrom the Chief Building Official,
City Engineer, Parks Supervisor, Fire Marshal and NPDES Coordinator.
Design Review Criteria: The criteria for Design Review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by
the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows:
1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood;
2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood;
3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure;
4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and
5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components.
2
Design Review Amendment
1720 Adeline Drive
Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the
application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should
include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by
resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record.
At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered:
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date
stamped December 1, 2010, sheets A.4.1, A.4.2, A.5.1 and A.5.2; date stamped July 28, 2010,
sheet A.3; and date stamped July 6, 2010, sheets A.1, A.2, A.6, 1.1.0 and Boundary Survey;
2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof
height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or
Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff);
3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which
would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit;
4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's May 20, 2010, and July 7, 2010 memos, the City
Engineer's June 2, 2010 memo, the Fire Marshal's May 20, 2010 memo, the Parks Supervisor's
May 24, 2010 and July 10, 2010 memos, and the NPDES Coordinator's May 20, 2010 memo shall
be met;
5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be
placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development
Director;
6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site
shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to
comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District;
7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction
plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the
Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved
plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required;
the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning
Commission, or City Council on appeal;
8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single
termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these
venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is
issued;
9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance
which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste
Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure,
interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit;
10. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new
residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in
Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off -site sedimentation of storm water
runoff;
11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes,
2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame;
3
Design Review Amendment
1720 Adeline Drive
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS
PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION:
12. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property
corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based
on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted
by the City Engineer;
13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or
another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that
the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as
window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification
documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division
before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled;
14. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the
roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and
15. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the
architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built
according to the approved Planning and Building plans.
Erica Strohmeier
Associate Planner
c. James Chu, 55 W. 43rd Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94010, designer.
Hoyman and Tram Hong, 2336 Ray Drive, Burlingame, CA 94010, property owners.
Attachments:
Applicant's revised letter of explanation, date stamped December 1, 2010
FYI Memo from staff to the Planning Commission, dated November 16, 2010
Applicant's original letter of explanation, date stamped November 3, 2010
Minutes from the August 9, 2010 Planning Commission Regular Action Meeting
Application to the Planning Commission (from previous application)
Staff Comments (from previous application)
Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed)
Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed December 3, 2010
Aerial Photo
4
December 1, 2010
City of Burlingame
Planning Commission
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
Re: Regular Action Item: Requested changes for previously approved Design Review
project for 1720 Adeline Drive, Burlingame, CA 94010
Dear Planning Commissioners:
We are writing to formally request changes for the windows and French doors to the
previously approved Design Review project for 1720 Adeline Drive.
It was recommended during the design process and approved by your commission to
include colonial grids for the windows and French doors. We submitted a request for
FYI changes to remove the grids in all the windows and doors as well as to change the
French doors in the family room from two pairs to a single set of sliding French doors
with side lights. Unfortunately, our request for these changes were denied at the last
meeting.
Alternatively, we would like to reduce the number of windows grids as demonstrated on
the current elevation drawings. Our current request for horizontal grids represents a
compromise solution which still reflect our personal taste while maintaining the integrity
of the beautiful design.
We would like to maintain our request to reduce the number of French doors in the
family room from two pairs to a convenient single set of sliding French doors.
It is our hope that Commissioners will grant these changes.
RECEIVE
DEC -- 1 2010
1720 Adeline Drive - 1 - CITY of BURLINGAIV'L
.PLANNING DEPT
Thank you for your assistance. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any
questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
i f
J
Hoy� Y Hong & Tram Nguyen
Owners of 1720 Adeline Drive, Burlingame, CA
cc: James Chu, Chu Design & Engineering, Inc.
RECEIVED
DEC -- 1 2010
1720 Adeline Drive - 2 - CITY of BURUNGAMi
PLANNING DEPT
CITY OF BURLINGAME
B{JRLtNGAME Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
DATE: November 16, 2010 Director's Report
TO: Planning Commission Meeting Date: November 22, 2010
FROM: Erica Strohmeier, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: FYI — REQUESTED CHANGE TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DESIGN
REVIEW PROJECT AT 1720 ADELINE DRIVE, ZONED R-1.
Summary: An application for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and
detached garage at 1720 Adeline Drive was approved by the Planning Commission on August
9, 2010 (August 9, 2010 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes attached). A building permit
was issued on October 18, 2010, and construction is currently underway.
The applicant is now requesting an FYI for the following changes:
■ Removal of simulated true divided lite grids from all windows and doors; and
■ Change the exterior doors in the family room from two sets of French doors to a single
set of sliding French doors.
The applicant submitted a letter, dated October 31, 2010, and originally approved and revised
building elevations, date stamped November 3, 2010, to explain the proposed changes to the
previously approved design review project. There are no other changes proposed to the
project.
Planning staff would note that because of the minor revisions, it was determined that the project
could be reviewed by the Commission as an FYI item. If the Commission feels there is a need
for more study, this item may be placed on an action calendar for a second review and/or public
hearing with direction to the applicant.
Erica Strohmeier
Associate Planner
c: Hoyman Hong and Tram Nguyen, property owners
James Chu, Chu Design and Engineering, designer
ATTACHMENTS:
Explanation letter from property owners, dated October 31, 2010
August 9, 2010, Planning Commission Minutes
Originally approved and proposed building elevation drawings, date stamped November 3, 2010
October 31, 2010
City of Burlingame
Planning Commission
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
Re: FYI changes for 1720 Adeline Drive, Burlingame, CA 94010
Dear Planning Commissioners:
We are writing to formally request FYI changes for the windows and French doors to the
previously approved Design Review project for 1720 Adeline Drive.
It was recommended during the design process and approved by your commission to
include colonial grilles for the windows and French doors. However, after careful
consideration, we are requesting for the removal of the grilles in all the windows and
doors for a clean look and an unobstructed view of this lovely neighborhood. We would
also like to reduce the number of French doors in the family room from two pairs to a
single set of sliding French doors.
We feel that these simplifications in the windows and doors better reflect our personal
taste yet still maintain the integrity of the beautiful design. This was our original vision
for our dream home and it still holds strong. It is our hope that Commissioners will
grant these FYI changes.
Thank you for your attention and assistance. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you
have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
Ho an & Tram Nguyen
Ym g
Owners of 1720 Adeline Drive, Burlingame, CA
cc: James Chu, Chu Design & Engineering, Inc.
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Approved Minutes August 9, 2010
Vill. REGULAR ACTION ITEMS
3b. 1720 ADELINE DRIVE, ZONED R-1 -APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW, TWO-STORY
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (JAMES CHU, CHU DESIGN & ENGR., INC.,
APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; AND HOYMAN AND TRAM HONG, PROPERTY OWNERS) STAFF
CONTACT: ERICA STROHMEIER
Reference staff report dated August 9, 2010, with attachments. Associate Planner Strohmeier presented
the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Fifteen (15) conditions were suggested for consideration.
Chair Vistica opened the public hearing.
James Chu, 55 West 43rd Avenue, San Mateo; represented the applicant.
Noted that the neighbors to the left wished to have the bedroom window reduced in size, but it is
nearly 40-feet away from that neighbor and would not appear to be a problem.
Commission comments:
None.
Public comments:
Steve Lo, 1508 Cabrillo Avenue and Suzanne Malik, 1718 Adeline Drive; spoke:
• The height of the master bedroom window has not been reduced on the left elevation as requested.
Landscaping would not be acceptable as a means of protecting privacy.
■ Stated that the Building Official has indicated that if the window is reduced in size, the room would
remain adequate for egress purposes.
■ The privacy of his daughter will be impacted if the window is not reduced in size as requested.
■ Want the utilities to be run over and under the subject property, not across her property. (Chu —will
ensure that utilities are run from Cabrillo Avenue.)
■ Ensure that when fences and wall on the common property line are removed, that her landscaping is
not impacted. (Chu - Will ensure that landscaping is not impacted.)
There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed.
Additional Commission comments:
■ Fully understands the neighbor's concerns; but feels this could be a slippery slope; in this instance,
the windows in question are between 35-40 feet from a side property line shared with the neighbor.
Landscaping could still be used as an option to address the neighbor's concern.
■ Privacy is not regulated by the City's zoning regulations; though the Commission does attempt to
mediate between the applicant and neighbors in this type of instance.
■ The peak of the garage will potentially obscure part of the window.
■ The overhead lines and sanitary sewer both run down Cabrillo Avenue, so there is no need to
include a condition requiring connections at these locations, since this will already be required.
M
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Approved Minutes August 9, 2010
Commissioner Cauchi moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following conditions:
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped
July 28, 2010, sheets A.3 through A.5; and date stamped July 6, 2010, sheets A.1, A.2, A.6, 1-1.0
and Boundary Survey;
2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height
or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning
Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff);
3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which
would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit;
4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's May 20, 2010, and July 7, 2010 memos, the City
Engineer's June 2, 2010 memo, the Fire Marshal's May 20, 2010 memo, the Parks Supervisor's May
24, 2010 and July 10, 2010 memos, and the NPDES Coordinator's May 20, 2010 memo shall be
met;
5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed
upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director;
6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site
shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to
comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District;
7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction
plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the
Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved
plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required;
the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning
Commission, or City Council on appeal;
8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single
termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting
details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued;
9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which
requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction
plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior,
shall require a demolition permit;
10. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new
residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in
Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off -site sedimentation of storm water
runoff;
11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and _Uniform Fire Codes,
2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame;
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION
PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION
5
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Approved Minutes August 9, 2010
12. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property
corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on
the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by
the City Engineer;
13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another
architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the
architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as
window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification
documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division
before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled;
14. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the
roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and
15. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the
architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built
according to the approved Planning and Building plans.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Terrones.
Discussion of motion:
None.
Chair Vistica called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed 5-0-2-0 (Commissioners
Lindstrom and Gaul absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7.45 p.m.
a
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010
p: 650,558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org
APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Type of application:
2' Desi9 n Review ElVariance ❑ Parcel #: Z72 l- �
❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit
PROJECT ADDRESS: I I V".
Z Please indicate the contact person for this project
APPLICANT project contact person`/
OK to send electronic jopl'es of documents LF
Name: /
Address:y
City/State/Zip:
Phone:
Fax:
E-mail:
ARCHITECT/DESIGNER
O to send el
Name: I—�-
Address: Vim:
City/State/Zip:
Phone: C6,d
Fax: k �--
E-mail: �.
project contact person
c copies of documents
* Burlingame Business License #:
PROJECT DESCRIPTIQN
❑ Other:
—CF_,4
PROPERTY OWNER
OK
Name:
Address:
City/State/ZipE
lirl
Phone:'•
project contact person
d electronic copies of documentE
0 WE
Fax:
D:1
E-mail:
✓v1 In U✓ 1 j (� i �cr 1 �<ry c c
01
%r
AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I h, ertify under pe "of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the
best of my knowledge andbbli J
Applicant's signature: Date:
L�4L
I am aware of the proposed applic tion and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning
Commission.
Til
Property owner's signature: Date:
Date submitted:
* Verification that the project architect/designer has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the
Finance Department at the time application fees are paid.
❑ Please mark one box above with an X to indicate the contact person for this project. S:\Handouts\PC Application 2008-13.1handout
Project Comments
Date: May 19, 2010
To: Y City Engineer
(650) 558-7230
❑ Chief Building Official
(650) 558-7260
❑ Parks Supervisor
(650) 558-7254
From: Planning Staff
❑ Recycling Specialist
(650) 558-7271
❑ Fire Marshal
(650) 558-7600
❑ NPDES Coordinator
(650) 342-3727
❑ City Attorney
Subject: Request for Design Review for a new single family dwelling and
detached garage at 1720 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 026-031-
050
Staff Review: May 24, 2010
1. See attached.
2. Applicant is advised to call City Arborist regarding relocation of sidewalk area
around trees in the planter strip.
3. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works —
Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information.
Reviewed by: V V
Date: 6/02/2010
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION
PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS W/") Sys-'
Project Name: �
Project Address: hvrx-� ► z
The following requirements apply to the project
1 A A property boundary survey shall be preformed by a licensed land
surveyor. The survey shall show all property lines, property corners,
easements, topographical features and utilities. (Required prior to the
building permit issuance.) A(q t,�'n' FV Ffa- 4T"'r -01t-4PVV 9n"�a 5
- / "( qw. u4:--hi5w LAW
2 The site and roof drainage shall be shown on plans and should be made to
drain towards the Frontage Street. (Required prior to the building permit
issuance.)
3. The applicant shall submit project grading and drainage plans for
approval prior to the issuance of a Building permit.
4 The project site is in a flood zone, the project shall comply with the City's
flood zone requirements.
Ift- µ-,I-u
'�a
5tary sewer lateral is required for the project in accordance with
the City's standards. )
6. The project plans shall show the required Bayfront Bike/Pedestrian trail
and necessary public access improvements as required by San Francisco
Bay Conservation and Development Commission.
7. Sanitary sewer analysis is required for the project. The sewer analysis
shall identify the project's impact to the City's sewer system and any
sewer pump stations and identify mitigation measures.
8 Submit traffic trip generation analysis for the project.
9. Submit a traffic impact study for the project. The traffic study should
identify the project generated impacts and recommend mitigation
measures to be adopted by the project to be approved by the City
Engineer.
10. The project shall file a parcel map with the Public Works Engineering
Division. The parcel map shall show all existing property lines, easements,
monuments, and new property and lot lines proposed by the map.
Page 1 of 3
UAprivate development\PLANNING REVIEW COMIVIENTS.doe
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION
11. A latest preliminary title report of the subject parcel of land shall be
submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division with the parcel map
for reviews.
12 Map closure/lot closure calculations shall be submitted with the parcel
map.
13 The project shall submit a condominium map to the Engineering Divisions
in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act.
14 _ The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public
improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary
appurtenant work.
15 The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage streetscape
improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutters, parking meters and poles,
trees, and streetlights in accordance with streetscape master plan.
16 By the preliminary review of plans, it appears that the project may cause
adverse impacts during construction to vehicular traffic, pedestrian traffic
and public on street parking. The project shall identify these impacts and
provide mitigation measure acceptable to the City.
17 The project shall submit hydrologic calculations from a registered civil
engineer for the proposed creek enclosure. The hydraulic calculations
must show that the proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any adverse
impact to both upstream and downstream properties. The hydrologic
calculations shall accompany a site map showing the area of the 100-year
flood and existing improvements with proposed improvements.
18 Any work within the drainage area, creek, or creek banks requires a State
Department of Fish and Game Permit and Army Corps of Engineers
Permits.
19 No construction debris shall be allowed into the creek.
20 N The project shall comply with the City's NPDES permit requirement to
prevent storm water pollution.
21 The project does not show the dimensions of existing driveways, re-
submit plans with driveway dimensions. Also clarify if the project is
proposing to widen the driveway. Any widening of the driveway is subject
to City Engineer's approval.
22 The plans do not indicate the slope of the driveway, re -submit plans
showing the driveway profile with elevations
Page 2 of 3
UAprivate development\PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION
23 The back of the driveway/sidewalk approach shall be at least 12" above
the flow line of the frontage curb in the street to prevent overflow of storm
water from the street into private property.
24. For the takeout service, a garbage receptacle shall be placed in front. The
sidewalk fronting the store shall be kept clean 20' from each side of the
property.
25. For commercial projects a designated garbage bin space and cleaning area
shall be located inside the building. A drain connecting the garbage area to
the Sanitary Sewer System is required.
Page 3 of 3
UAprivate development\PLANNING REVIEW CONMENTS.doc
Project Comments
Date: Revised Plans Submitted July 6, 2010
To: ❑ City Engineer
(650) 558-7230
X Chief Building Official
(650) 558-7260
❑ Parks Supervisor
(650) 558-7254
From: Planning Staff
❑ Recycling Specialist
(650) 558-7271
❑ Fire Marshal
(650) 558-7600
❑ NPDES Coordinator
(650) 342-3727
❑ City Attorney
Subject: Request for Design Review for a new, single family dwelling and
detached garage at 1720 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 026-031-
050
Staff Review: N/A
No further comments.
All conditions of approval as stated on the review dated May 20, 2010 apply to this
project.
Reviewed by:
Date:
/` )14D
Date:
To:
From
Subject:
Staff Review:
Project Comments
May 19, 2010
❑ City Engineer
(650) 558-7230
X Chief Building Official
(650) 558-7260
❑ Parks Supervisor
(650) 558-7254
Planning Staff
❑ Recycling Specialist
(650) 558-7271
❑ Fire Marshal
(650) 558-7600
❑ NPDES Coordinator
(650) 342-3727
❑ City Attorney
Request for Design Review for a new single family dwelling and
detached garage at 1720 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 026-031-
050
May 24, 2010
/ n the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2007 California Building
( —Codes (CBC).
Per the City of Burlingame's adopted Resolution, applications received after
January 1, 2009 must complete a "GreenPoint Rated Checklist". The GreenPoint
Rated Checklist, and other information regarding the City's Green Building
requirements, can be found on the City website at the following URL:
http://www.burlingame.org/Index.aspx?page=1219 or Contact Joe McCluskey at
650-558-7273.
3) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame
business license.
4) Provide fully dimensioned plans.
�i`Indicate on the plans that all work shall be conducted within the limits of the
City's Noise Ordinance. See City of Burlingame Ordinance Municipal Code,
Section 13.04.100 for details.
6) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a
completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition
ermit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project.
7 pecify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2008 California Energy
Efficiency Standards. Note: All projects for which a building permit application is
received on or after January 1, 2010 must comply with the 2008 California
Energy Efficiency Standards. Go to
http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/2008standards/ for publications and details.
8) Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed
property lines
9 Obtain a survey of the property lines.
5
n the plans specify that the roof eaves on the garage will not project within two
,-eet of the property line.
11'Provide details on the plans which show that all roof projections which project
beyond the point where fire -resistive construction would be required will be
4(cnstructed of one -hour fire -resistance -rated construction per CBC 704.2.
ndicate on the plans that exterior bearing walls less than five feet from the
b13Iroperty line will be built of one -hour fire -rated construction. (Table 602)
)ooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or
door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the size and location of
all required egress windows on the elevation drawings.
14)Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at
any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the
Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in
height.
15)Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers.
16)Provide lighting at all exterior landings.
NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically
address items 1, 2, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, and 13 must be re -submitted before this
project can move forward for Plann" Com "ssion action.
Reviewed by: bate: o
Project Comments
Date: Revised Plans Submitted July 6, 2010
To: 0 City Engineer
(650) 558-7230
0 Chief Building Official
(650) 558-7260
X Parks Supervisor
(650) 558-7254
From: Planning Staff
0
Recycling Specialist
(650) 558-7271
0
Fire Marshal
(650) 558-7600
0
NPDES Coordinator
(650) 342-3727
0
City Attorney
Subject: Request for Design Review for a new, single family dwelling and
detached garage at 1720 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 026-031-
050
Staff Review: N/A
1. Existing tree to be removed will need Protected Tree Permit from Parks
Division. 558-7334
2. Trees labeled J and I are not on plant list.
Reviewed by: B Disco Date: 7/10/10
Project Comments
Date: May 19, 2010
To: 0 City Engineer
(650) 558-7230
0 Chief Building Official
(650) 558-7260
X Parks Supervisor
(650) 558-7254
From: Planning Staff
0
Recycling Specialist
(650) 558-7271
0
Fire Marshal
(650) 558-7600
0
NPDES Coordinator
(650) 342-3727
0
City Attorney
Subject: Request for Design Review for a new single family dwelling and
detached garage at 1720 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 026-031-
050
Staff Review: May 24, 2010
1. Provide landscape plan as per requirements; note all planting material and
identify plants.
2. Note what trees are to be removed. No existing tree over 48 inches in
circumference at 54 inches from base of tree may be removed without a
Protected Tree Permit from the Parks Division (558-7330).
3. If Public Works requires sidewalk replacement, Policy for Expanding Width
of Planter Strip needs to be implemented.
4. 2 new street trees will be required to replace the 2 declining Pyrus kawakamii
(evergreen pear) in planter strip.
5. if Liquidambar tree on Cabrillo requires root pruning during sidewalk
replacement, removal will be granted through a permit with Parks Division and
a appropriate tree will need to be chosen as replacement. List of appropriate
Street Trees are available from the Parks Division (558-7330).
Date:
I rev
From:
Subject:
Staff Review:
Project Comments
May 19, 2010
U City Engineer
(650) 558-7230
U Chief Building Official
(650) 558-7260
0 Parks Supervisor
(650) 558-7254
Planning Staff
0 Recycling Specialist
(650) 558-7271
Fire Marshal
(650) 558-7600
0 NPDES Coordinator
(650) 342-3727
0 City Attorney
Request for Design Review for a new single family dwelling and
detached garage at 1720 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 026-031-
050
May 24, 2010
Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence.
1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter.
2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly —
Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building
Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split
between domestic and fire protection lines.
3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall
clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings
shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation.
Project Comments
Date: May 19, 2010
To: U City Engineer
(650) 558-7230
U Chief Building Official
(650) 558-7260
0 Parks Supervisor
(650) 558-7254
From: . Planning Staff
0
Recycling Specialist
(650) 558-7271
0
Fire Marshal
(650) 558-7600
X
NPDES Coordinator
(650) 342-3727
U
City Attorney
Subject: Request for Design Review for a new single family dwelling and
detached garage at 1720 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 026-031-
050
Staff Review: May 24, 2010
Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City
NPDES permit requirement to prevent stormwater pollution from construction
activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement Best
Management Practices (BMPs) during construction.
Please include a list of construction stormwater pollution prevention best
management practices (BMPs), as project notes, when submitting plans for a
building permit. Please see attached brochure for guidance. The brochure may also
be down loaded directly from "flowstobay.org." It is recommended that the
construction BMP's be placed on a separate full size plan sheet (2' x 3 ` or larger as
appropriate) for readability.
For additional assistance, please contact Kiley Kinnon, Stormwater Coordinator, at
(650) 342-2727.
Reviewed by: c. ' Date:
%�i,. sln�,•Mm
�+ zPPllulionPme6tiw Plog[dm
fU,
0
a�
General
Construction
& Site Supervision
Aarm<e Pbevkd Prerevm PPUeem
JSchdule eaez,ariov ud adfe[ mMtlm far rip
wwhrs p<ddt,e,�,<e,pJ.w,b, plm„�
n.eR<vJwmpaee aan vmk+e mmnb encore
bhnLb,
JLvmn ud pmrnn Uv.w drnWm M
JrtnlA br<wmWnr Aulepwrs vv'dv pvbd<
JCmwl rha+mouer er.mvQ n<aab[Ynvr,im
I«RrauY rluaep me.,LeW br m:,p eem, er remq-
nry w pa.vmml drnnge alkAn reA-ed +uv ne+
amuml the sia Rde[e➢emmm� mmlr.elmdrs b,
�� exnpxmymnkmw abmw wnm
J Tnb ywr <mpl%as sad mh<eebaaenn. Make
dm<bra<hrrm nnlbar r. n.erywm why vwhp en [4
awnm+i te. LUarm s�<eovaw•abm[As e<w
nprmwvn mmlrwc m� ud ad r rnrmnabUltl¢
riaW dvmrtaply[ pmerkm
Jperippve m< mmMaelr maminae .,m rer am
pn4vG�.eb;eln nrnnl'vG ma rwtiv w
s the umpmmd •m,bppn� :u aw.y
6mm srmmsursmrm drab blev, avd bmm<d V vrees
mry. Mn4. nnjw •gwieR Jr..
JEvp mereUila mr of r1e nb - enrol roevQ
. nna,ema<. ce.nmlmad mam a nm �neaaamm�m;il<Mwnl.m<,nm.n a
JIk yoljuumb pH mpead mfa. ¢ Pba vh em
Jnry aww pod mrfanr ibcl Jrainm . m A.im
vxha, ordmeeb� nnmrRu.Mvdb� �,
J W�svavp 1 .b, dr. dps . vihx M r< edlse:er u
n,iArc nd em WllJma e�lrsm metlmd,
wnmk«pearola. vim mmr nr<.ma�,mJm[
Jco.<.kud male.., a un,m
lerd,. pam drm pmpners. CbeA fimumJr rm
gmrs abler soak.. m:,. ,uh mw
m ylaiic ehw14g aivd ammJ me ewtle ufrL.
Auryrv.Aplaric rmanrem .ddropn,tel
I•�k•Be of I'npb. Ne+v. Dean wr • dmap,mr b)
bmipp Ir dams m me romwrdev m<.
Jhfa}e ,me wmble rpileu ae maleraimd in peed
nxkiv6 vrdrs by ma Imbp mmq%nml rbs[wnn
anmam<n erpmp<ny. oak mum u<ymeny rm
leaks.
mafrivaa<hmd4.e
JRada wens .riot an arnlmlrs wvv nh<.
yen edv ®rvkla. DWn only r6e mmml yw m<d
JUnee.id rMJep.
uynbMe mae.:sln .M1mr.e.lnnflriv Mnntr
fwpldnrm arn«rbbk mukb meb m marsh,
aqW 14amp mein mirems, depu,m. rend <e{
daa mwe mR md. W tle wbramam w lerob
wrdmmd ol(mufram, banvin, udmm.
JDbpmc a aU worm evd dmpllUw denN pmpary.
M &nmuvs4pe mwulelsvd.mb[m be reeyded.
' �.bsva pdvx, mbldeRdn.,
bekw amlalr mlm <.v d,av0elevdve,w-
�na�erbl,m�,m b<n<n[f®
ewram am �bmub,.dya�a. ,r
huvdm• wuv. Ne�ier busy wok m.. .. m lun
@m m ILa anval yr oar a coed a[ armor bed.
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program
Pollution Prevention — It's Part of the Plan
It is your responsibility to do the job right!
Runoff from streets and other paved areas is a major source of pollution in local creeks. San Francisco Bay and the Pacific Ocean.
Construction activities can directly affect the health of our waters unless contractors and crews plan ahead to keep dirt, debris, and other
construction waste away from storm drains and creeks. Following these guidelines will ensure your compliance with local stormwater
ordinance requirements. Remember, ongoing monitoring and maintenance of installed controls is crucial to proper implementation.
Heavy Earth -Moving Roadwork & Paving Fresh Concrete Painting & Application
Equipment Activities - & Mortar Application of Solvents & Adhesives
Operation
m
JUrvUwmd apremevr markrJcdlmm•<m.wPbm rvr
wdwrY mbabmm Bib
J dehdW a v<andm �J pwGn6 nvh fa ery.rmlxe
Sfm plambL and Drmndn <eAieln milvavnvw
JUmrpax • eamplexy mnabd uv of rx rorrimrc-
'm rice v<ne+ry Rpm svmw w nwm drw idrn
fm ewa and xlulpmedgrhinL, refa6a4 and rw6m
,W Ue+d aq W pmm mumwavice.
J M+inW.vpveb:Uv W k+,. egwPmm<In+ga6<-
Rrrwayfa ad repavlub.
J Prrlwmmajo- maiwmma, vpskyeb, ud.eh'rla+d
mpmvmp vuM1krp aQYr
J Uyw nw dde>d mb<n max. eS m6nar emly¢
aP alhtlNmalro. ve Mppmsa Aw dvwb
rn<h drip and yrtb. Callw nR men, Uvlds, sme m
menaem me rtryele rbeewmpnaMly a
&spare yr Lbd• a banrdmm vss¢
J aamr wJkvl d [v brodmre a dwmWpmmr a
Pva
J Ra,elr ad+dddrbanmva.
cf®w ppma brmrdkny nhm Ih% happen
J Nma men awm-[u%-pn<mm a mmamemk
wlhm .hm< nWe, mm,q'b<d u.e ey d<r� mxe
d, l<U.wb® mm3aly d Umpmdbrnp) vbne•n
pvaSlr. If Smn n ,meJm emaph btaep
Ar Arm awv. my
J S,.r r � � uA� rm<rvls rmmeanrUy. raern+r-
UvnRdnn <+ ^ `nbM1 wa v,m nmy me¢
uP�ue ter sun evamk
J 0— w aMIL mr rbrt vem w ai[Bimw and pmpvly
di+pmbs vrm.t 4w1
J R<ym•iLniUvnraPUk m Ne grmrTpvre seen mwae
®xdrvery. Ym va.emJr 4h.ar.pm
W •1(alUmrrrab•ealhnmdem maWrb,a<hgWp
d4Tv rspenamrtr mLrheraUerleL apm<im_ Uniil
911 mvwrleW merLmryrvpemvr�mb¢ ])CaU
me epamars Dena aremnLea<T smd<a Aranmi
tines l[LL)IS]-y33URt boos}
nvbL �wawfw
J(,ymhad [qulppm MlmksedrtpW InklppepWpmav[
JAammenl,eep.rL<rw,,.wly.km,bmlaxya�.
avy.
m^wh.
J Pwkm majanilm®vw, m,drw advubiy ermWp
JSadmyfid rmpunrynpwrim ra an•len memlm
mm.n.y Gam a.mnimdw nk.
J\Vburdud'mlmvel:UUewipmem milelmrvice mw[he
abpmv ohm <vmmrcdap aem bmvlb[tlYPImmM
dew vs •Ire,dda.l<a eemplUd>_ ..-.emewry
Lvmagm drffia and medn.
lPmua Aamlw<Awvp<muna, .ve.v,•d •am
J16 pamedkdeLb bbrimr<aelem egWpmma
Aae,aib L+Ybal¢kmpov3•dnimieawal¢,Ur
rv<as bem ar rem aeb bM Ulan.
P°•¢
JRa%ck exd vU, bsrxdry ceuue,v brelm upbair. ary
,haa.mpwbk.
lU.v<Md dam ar dlrehmm AveU mpaR.mmle¢a.r
JTrile wepbws hnwbp drrwbm m+apem.vrpncdm
rh,w m mud aa,L
nJmnemo�dr m
Jce•n nalmiks mnmmnml ma wlm a«mrd aPra
padvP maid emaaLb,vwnAw,mnb.p d.
pkrd<•hw+bs
J �ml mmb bakim and maJnba whm +w�Ybe
J Preprsry mwnm avdmaaum aLLmmiwaedaN®ee[
m..el..
•d <^s<Ur°aY^vk fee uJ..rc
J kris <bal[ em¢ elwba,
m ba➢w m m.m.mnam,mW
nJem
J TaprsH reppn 6Jlom pfemiwaW vdimnl rwv<Is
reWelavl•ammwrevnrM1rmry.
INe.vnmh uays maadil 6om evgb4 rpyepr<tee-
neremslmihrpwwmaleyeruer
w<rvm Jrda Cv4
Wr<ry<k.mdmv..b dh[w
JC IadpUv W Ubameuedw mrviW wIA
mq.
Jsm+dW<�,abmmu ar.A.6wvA brdy weadw.
Pbdb emxm ram mierm mWra.am mwQ+bD
hmpamy rob aP4Ne r6eauvW bmw.
JPvbrm wYr%Ww.mrgnina.aY fimm AejoM1 sire
J dUq Lem par<r+irb drq p®a abembmmtubl
lWedb rapa,em)Ilzd rpilrsuaebiw rho sprbuev.
I ❑em vp aU rpm. ad Ivlu mblr'an• memo& f wLn
J1Yhmre6vUvpawhmvkklN<mapmmwblemre men
abvbear m<adilednp,),erdiBwudrmeaewbml-
be4wurik, vearimbs mmplewhhwcdam away
vvwlwLL
Lam wmm JrsL••
J C<Ilm ud r<mde a wPrwdabl> &[eau of®.
vhM•e
J Dn wrwv Alaml ailalvbdvram elrnqulpmmrapava
Bnada�d.
IAmM ors-aPWluLm bynrra wekaN mmtmm,l.
Landscaping,
Gardening,
and Pool Maintenance
III ill
AWN—N—SUA
�� LmL.a,S.atlw
fLdllm IIJvr M1aduw
J Cap all VNd pile[ paavca and woos awa> Uvm
w.B.n¢m.¢,d.rem dmb,.l.ipnle.mwea
_
Y -.;
J Lmbmrmxy.a•dm<memman a:e, W. ry, rmn
6a0 AvaW wad vwdala uada [arm. Nv[mad fiau
Lwe
wa¢bhrwn. d.mn, Lhlamet lWMavr
bamdmv
JPru<sv ➢a1pLu.uW bJryrLq e.vekbnmm nldmJ
rsWGU adrrmQPmm yymaa46am,rbl
wary vW man be dimvad of al a haatloua
W dir
vua roUative fieUiry(cmuaymv bul mrm.ary
rW by nabAlhm uJer brpr a,uwd plan[ ahaRn6
Jsv m, -roman rhry me vpev. ge wvbkan
Pmt•mv}
Jllm<peadcib. fvti6.n•. and nJrv.yrNd.fiJavv ur
.bd.bh.rn r®<npp.dna.ry fivm Lvvm.aarm
Pabrlv6 ekuvp
Iva •kd ar meupevLina\
draw, mm� mdr®prt
4
JNarw duo brabes yr rice plar meWem ieba
J$U,dWr
J Knrh mw
a ,v¢ Nn<s +tm draw. er aa+ael
amUULad umnrav pmj—ry rh uuWv.
m Ny Y denpmrad +vhau[ rrw
m1^mNd.wbva Aewarawm Lwvbb [opml®mr
rea .
JYry wala.bvad Piles; qim va brwhubdx eumr
Pmar w mn din.lsr mmUe hmdm aM Aipcn arm
wbewnfpwibkn<d'<lawb,d by
pmaible. Pima ra ae sulker vwavoae Sm ham paanJ
bshape. prvw:n6
ark Lm vdm far,evv Haw dryLm Awmbea mm
Pvdnim Lvm lheleminvawvmbuenm awbailry.
r <avpwrwim Juwnr Adm
o. aa.a, perm m.m. aawBe zaba. er.6.m..
fmUaL rmmmvw
J Fv eLLbamd Prima. pact wn bruA.� ry We vnem Pa.
abl<sd dau xiA Ldmvw .oleic bvpugr
JIM'l drw ewn5mbuunemm avneelAm Ywwill
ewbWa.
FLtamd mm<rHmv,ad mhnU.nWme of®a
me In. dry,
U9ni, sd mhlw v hmrdvw nm¢
JLn uP ad gvarosmill mbmmbgamhmcy plrwle
Mrbrr®pnl
drop <60a..
J Dsly, Nlpr ad dwr hew see-bmrdea dry aMp➢bg
WMadadvxwafurdrnsrny vrridmaW ewrwNea
36f
and nand blouse mry be eww[ uP a mllened k PW
AapeW, and Amesri ors 6v6.
w e•n pm,r, mnae+p A<Anrw%able
.h. auma•um A.hr.
�
J Par•nl aBmeparc rub Gem ddn...y.}.kv<ae.vu,iw emalrq ram tralna. Noe appapak v+.h ma Nn
mJ rwiekw din.
J n,a<my mla armba<mro. mvRak eowmbq a
amtrpe nw eRenyreq mma a rap w htfne'n mcLer
akmr ma ad 'k •n�•mA�
+d ➢^^d 'v°r°°dnaar 14d wy he men- am AmoN
V my ormer<<p<Jribwmeehwnerk rem Rvewamhmiw meb.a�Lmev dwnhm ba<pLpi arppdrw<m. JR'FahmWuLTParbR hp maapitkwtU,h<pimm
vd mpratdre Aed:mW warcrUmUW Covevl rlpmd: JMubrmtlni rmWq.amar, hvrmmrmvn aL redd�mttpmry'
Juvb�dprmn rma an rrr J0.
• Vrwd wR mmllJesS Jewlenden anArr J}W ebmk ePanmu[dmsmcemeb amaa wjrb aydahvLt <buep pf Mpkmrvemdtal alaeddL,
t A6mdvpvlvda6mmlladv rilebLanwQ. _
.•dn, ..eUs JPrvrra mmpy no LLUe Wemdpdpgam.mntlnp.Bbvrd Jt�mrar—11
ul6e harh. ra prmcva drymarplK Lmrr4
. pmird boars. aebaa,a vub uwam nary dwmin>m rempn bvm4
JNe.m lax Jowe roam bum vp vr4d dirt Vu by •YNa<v Lery erlW mhvrJwu vox umrsrul.
kwaP memda
Storm drain polluters may be liable for fines of up to $25,000 per day!
J Uv rmrpomY <lee4 dnw nNbly a dam mmHnrry
6vu.Wue balm.
J Perm pemdnh LJm nirhb.Ybdgbermr, dlwv wra
a vAer Ida pvx<Jaa ummmun
J Ue.ryebaer b u mJlnl term of rmrbs emwl for
r% •Ili
lvd+u➢blrU+dsv hLiermuv -
J Ux,q grdnda rd crib. I.GI dhadem. Rba mn
a+�r� um,mvwunvPmAa<Ubpan vfm d
Lr 4 rnA.
J Uimme ervma pevmkk• a hmJem wxk.
JCI<ulul P+iv<rvippbprddvevO Wq mddw
JCp6aW inwvW pudceefgrblP, wWe, pa
Gam m-'- gfeU a prWa cm Wr,bL had er m'bvryl
' he depend of v h<nriwa nn,xs.
error[ and
vi,nminµ Clap Ir rmmauy, aW avmgr<
J Whm rIU�BwcY 'o pbWWep exb<ims Mrbhiib-
Jnp m[pkccY+rdnv,rebw[ra.. lnmamimidu <•Irk
�b`deyadwa,lerv7ebdp,Imrc cLpybpard pn,
pn bkek alarm dnW.ansh nav nou•der
rm.ud iq.ds ba aU. fh, e�Hm ae bwlnwcwmmr
fen pkkw Wawm.ad bey vrmmbm Or, mks
rv,I.ed608n mmwdr rvJ nab.
Uvmmlw®airy m fidpm Vyw d mUmt (mop tt
•+<vurw) bulNyeleubp+nx+ad dfipwr b LLvneltvy
w.a�mvMwp ufine wnamyhemghal ur4r me
J pv set bM yr nke ka.e•, ea, bru the •eau.
was tre+rwrmmwhybm+kbi Hsdavipn
PvaVfmueferlP. Mafafrvmc<
lbapapMom J•Wpswpbu vameraymrbl<
J Ne<a Am,rF 3r��rri PeW a ya :•mane a •mw a
vlww Jrnu
J Ak<1ck a dkPeb efam, wpkHud wbr at a
bnwebld banrima ra•k wlleedwl:eUlry,avm vy.
JWbn erwrrbrp.pml corps, klehbrbe d..vare fa3rn
when m%uar6au•pblYJry. emp,, PaisrW
trbrr. the veyrl<win bl dnle'vrpU pradwp
p—d
bens el emvpnrylamlfiU����dbpmedpraAu.
fmdmavad m,erddnmthdlabv<d vua m�aerw
ba4•.
J Ibw lUro,v eV -band qbl. lllpm pfineea Ugdq
vr<ndrrrprhMpa.0 bawdwn.rym
J�leawrd vatrmry heb A,ebvpaJb We mdury
(Habmr<dlQ rkbcil c.nmabvrmml mvbvi0)k/
!im•LLvamdry pmeam.s apeub chaek.nmaeEUNam
yeLbLabeb,r tiryfld:nwwepigelmwJmn
emmy Pmimmnmbl Qmbenmaan mp.rdn[ m%[6.p
mbus,bm nw<dryvn4
•.
J� mane aapyv-Dud WC.Ndu CmrrolJ ,rim
J Uwpeed a®nf In'vl mryke •bk m he nnn,rvl m,be
via. Qeekwirl the kmJm repuaUelr ln'b%-
arvemmrcr mermLvwb <appv.brMpmleMml.
d. Ceppv Ir hrmrW b aama< IIF rid eavwl b
butt peUry.
mePklUy wmvvN by LLt uwaBe em®col ylm[
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW AMENDMENT
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for
Desian Review Amendment for proposed chanaes to a previously approved new, two story
single family dwelling and detached garage at 1720 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1, Hoyman and
Tram Hona. 2336 Rav Drive. Burlinaame. CA 94010. property owners, APN: 026-031-050;
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on
December 13, 2010, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other
written materials and testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that:
On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and
comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is
no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on
the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15303 (a) of
the CEQA Guidelines, which states that construction of a limited number of new, small
facilities or structures, including one single-family residence, or a second dwelling unit in
a residential zone, is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, this
exemption may be applied to the construction or conversion of up to three (3) single-
family residences as part of a project.
2. Said Design Review Amendment is approved subject to the conditions set forth in
Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review Amendment are set forth
in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official
records of the County of San Mateo.
Chairman
I, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a
regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of December, 2010 by the
following vote:
Secretary
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review Amendment.
1720 Adeline Drive
Effective December 23, 2010
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division
date stamped December 1, 2010, sheets A.4.1, A.4.2, A.5.1 and A.5.2; date stamped
July 28, 2010, sheet A.3; and date stamped July 6, 2010, sheets A.1, A.2, A.6, 1_1.0 and
Boundary Survey;
2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features,
roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to
Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined
by Planning staff);
3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or
garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an
amendment to this permit;
4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's May 20, 2010, and July 7, 2010
memos, the City Engineer's June 2, 2010 memo, the Fire Marshal's May 20, 2010
memo, the Parks Supervisor's May 24, 2010 and July 10, 2010 memos, and the NPDES
Coordinator's May 20, 2010 memo shall be met;
5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project
shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community
Development Director;
6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on
the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall
be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management
District;
7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project
construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of
approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall
remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process.
Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall
not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City
Council on appeal;
8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a
single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and
that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans
before a Building permit is issued;
9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling
Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects
to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full
demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit;
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review Amendment.
1720 Adeline Drive
Effective December 23, 2010
10. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the
new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as
identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off -site
sedimentation of storm water runoff;
11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform
Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame;
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION
PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION:
12. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the
property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new
structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans;
this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer;
13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential
designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an
architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design
which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as
shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing
compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the
final framing inspection shall be scheduled;
14. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the
height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division;
and
15. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of
the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has
been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans.
o CITY OF BURLINGAME
[ COMMUNITY" DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD - -
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
PH: (650) 558-7250 ®FP,:: (650) 696 3790,,r°--
„
www.burlingame.org
=rt Gr.i_�f
Site: 1720 ADELINE DRIVE
The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces PUBLIC HEANHO
the following public hearing on MONDAY, DECEMBER
NOTICE
13, 2010 of 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council
Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA:
Application for Amendment to Design Review for
proposed changes to a previously approved new, two-
story single family dwelling and detached garage at
1720 ADELINE DRIVE zoned R-1. APN 026-031-050
Mailed: December 3, 2010
(Please refer to other side)
CitK ®f Burlingame
A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to
the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose
Road, Burlingame,, California.
If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you maybe limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing,
described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or
prior to the public hearing.
Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their
tenants about this notice.
For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you.
William Meeker
Community Development Director
PUBLIC HEARING HOOK
(Please refer to other side)