The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1506 Cabrillo Avenue - Staff ReportMap ID Direction Distance Elevation D25 NNW < 1/8 0.047 mi. 247 ft. Site MAP FINDINGS SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT MARRIOTT (Continued) Contact Address: Contact Address 2: City,State,Zip: NAICS: EPA ID: Create Date: NAICS Code: NAICS Description: Issued EPA ID Date: Inactive Date: Facility Name: Facility Address: Facility Address 2: Facility City: Facility County: Facility State: Facility Zip: SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT MARRIOTT 1800 BAYSHORE HWY BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Site 4 of 4 in cluster D 1800 BAYSHORE HWY Not reported BURLINGAME, CA 94010 CAL000373679 2012-04-16 09:34:15.090 99999 Not Otherwise Specified 2012-04-16 0934:15.04300 Not reported SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT MARRIOTT 1800 BAYSHORE HWY Not reported BURLINGAME Not reported CA 940101203 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S118232531 RCRA NonGen / NLR 1024833920 CAL000373679 Relative: RCRA NonGen / NLR: Higher Date Form Received by Agency: 2012-04-16 00:00:00.0 Actual: Handler Name: SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT MARRIOTT 8 ft. Handler Address: 1800 BAYSHORE HWY Handler City,State,Zip: BURLINGAME, CA 94010-1203 EPAID: CAL000373679 Contact Name: MARK BONTEMPI Contact Address: 1800 BAYSHORE HWY Contact City,State,Zip: BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Contact Telephone: 650-259-6609 Contact Fax: 650-259-6568 Contact Email: MARK.S.BONTEMPI@MARRIOTT.COM Contact Title: Not reported EPA Region: pg Land Type: Not reported Federal Waste Generator Description: Not a generator, verified Non-Notifier: Not reported Biennial Report Cycle: Not reported Accessibility: Not reported Active Site Indicator: Handler Activities State District Owner: Not reported State District: Not reported Mailing Address: 1800 BAYSHORE HWY Mailing City,State,Zip: BURLINGAME, CA 94010-1203 Owner Name: IA LODGING BURLINGAME TRS, L.L.C. Owner Type: Other Operator Name: MARK BONTEMPI Operator Type: Other Short-Term Generator Activity: No Importer Activity: No Mixed Waste Generator: No Transporter Activity: No TC6362151.2s Page 86 r ��i B11RLIf+1GAME � DATE: TO: FROM: CITY OF BURLINGAME Community Development Department MEMORANDUM November 16, 2010 Planning Commission Erica Strohmeier, Associate Planner Director's Report Meeting Date: November 22, 2010 SUBJECT: FYI — REQUESTED CHANGE TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DESIGN REVIEW PROJECT AT 1720 ADELINE DRIVE, ZONED R-1. Summary: An application for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1720 Adeline Drive was approved by the Planning Commission on August 9, 2010 (August 9, 2010 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes attached). A building permit was issued on October 18, 2010, and construction is currently underway. The applicant is now requesting an FYI for the following changes: ■ Removal of simulated true divided lite grids from all windows and doors; and ■ Change the exterior doors in the family room from two sets of French doors to a single set of sliding French doors. The applicant submitted a letter, dated October 31, 2010, and originally approved and revised building elevations, date stamped November 3, 2010, to explain the proposed changes to the previously approved design review project. There are no other changes proposed to the project. Planning staff would note that because of the minor revisions, it was determined that the project could be reviewed by the Commission as an FYI item. If the Commission feels there is a need for more study, this item may be placed on an action calendar for a second review and/or public hearing with direction to the applicant. Erica Strohmeier Associate Planner c: Hoyman Hong and Tram Nguyen, property owners James Chu, Chu Design and Engineering, designer ATTACHMENTS: Explanation letter from property owners, dated October 31, 2010 August 9, 2010, Planning Commission Minutes Originally approved and proposed building elevation drawings, date stamped November 3, 2010 October 31, 2010 City of Burlingame Planning Commission 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Re: FYI changes for 1720 Adeline Drive, Burlingame, CA 94010 Dear Planning Commissioners: We are writing to formally request FYl chan�es for the windows and French doors to the previously approved Design Review project for 1720 Adeline Drive. It was recommended during the design process and approved by your commission to include colonial g�illes for the windows and French doors. However, after careful consideration, we are requesting for the removal of the grilles in all the windows and doors for a clean look and an unobstructed view of this lovely neighborhood. We would also like to reduce the number of French doors in the family room from two pairs to a single set of sliding French doors. We feel that these simplifications in the windows and doors better reflect our personal taste yet still maintain the integrity of the beautiful design. This was our original vision for our dream home and it still holds strong. It is our hope that Commissioners will �rant these FYI changes. Thank you for your attention and assistance. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, ' / Y! � � q.�,�-� Ho an & Tram N u en � Ym � 8 Y Ovmers of 1720 Adeline Drive, Burlingame, CA cc: James Chu, Chu Design & Engineering, Inc. � ��"�'�-�� ,r,�w i;:!'W' - � 201[� ciry oF e�,s-i��c;r,E�� v;�N3�lif�:� UE�T C/TY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMM/SSION — Approved Minutes August 9, 2010 VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEMS 3b. 1720 ADELINE DRIVE, ZONED R-1 -APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW, TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (JAMES CHU, CHU DESIGN & ENGR., INC., APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; AND HOYMAN AND TRAM HONG, PROPERTY OWNERS) STAFF CONTACT: ERICA STROHMEIER Reference staff report dated August 9, 2010, with attachments. Associate Planner Strohmeier presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Fifteen (15) conditions were suggested for consideration. Chair Vistica opened the public hearing. James Chu, 55 West 43�d Avenue, San Mateo; represented the applicant. Noted that the neighbors to the left wished to have the bedroom window reduced in size, but it is nearly 40-feet away from that neighbor and would not appear to be a problem. Commission comments: None. Public comments: Steve Lo, 1508 Cabrillo Avenue and Suzanne Malik, 1718 Adeline Drive; spoke: ■ The height of the master bedroom window has not been reduced on the left elevation as requested. Landscaping would not be acceptable as a means of protecting privacy. ■ Stated that the Building Official has indicated that if the window is reduced in size, the room would remain adequate for egress purposes. • The privacy of his daughter will be impacted if the window is not reduced in size as requested. ■ Want the utilities to be run over and under the subject property, not across her property. (Chu —will ensure that utilities are run from Cabrillo Avenue.) ■ Ensure that when fences and wall on the common property line are removed, that her landscaping is not impacted. (Chu - Will ensure that landscaping is not impacted.) There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Additional Commission comments: ■ Fully understands the neighbor's concerns; but feels this could be a slippery slope; in this instance, the windows in question are befinreen 35-40 feet from a side property line shared with the neighbor. Landscaping could still be used as an option to address the neighbor's concern. ■ Privacy is not regulated by the City's zoning regulations; though the Commission does attempt to mediate between the applicant and neighbors in this type of instance. ■ The peak of the garage will potentially obscure part of the window. ■ The overhead lines and sanitary sewer both run down Cabrillo Avenue, so there is no need to include a condition requiring connections at these locations, since this will already be required. 0 C/TY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMMISSION — Approved Minufes August 9, 2010 Commissioner Cauchi moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following conditions: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped July 28, 2010, sheets A.3 through A.5; and date stamped July 6, 2010, sheets A.1, A.2, A.6, L1.0 and Boundary Survey; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's May 20, 2010, and July 7, 2010 memos, the City Engineer's June 2, 2010 memo, the Fire Marshal's May 20, 2010 memo, the Parks Supervisor's May 24, 2010 and July 10, 2010 memos, and the NPDES Coordinator's May 20, 2010 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall complywith the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial orfull demolition of a structure, interiororexterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION 5 C/TY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Approved Minutes Augusf 9, 2010 12. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 14. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 15. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc. according to the approved Planning and Building plans, The motion was seconded by Commissioner Terrones. Discussion of motion: None. will inspect and note compliance of the ) to verify that the project has been built Chair Vistica called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed 5-0-2-0 (Commissioners Lindstrom and Gaul absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:45 p.m. r�