HomeMy WebLinkAbout1506 Cabrillo Avenue - Staff Report�
� � �` �.� � ��: �±:� �.� ' �
� ,.
.� � r�'` . �
�ti �� `� � i
t .� � '��"' X� „; /1,
a ,, K � � �+ `;"/��
,
,' ,� � ,°� rs� $ ��.'� ��� �� '" �
;i� , �' ,
� � ''f ;�,� y� � �' �'� ; ,��
� , �� � � p, � . _ _ � ` _. `.� 1
w�A;... � , � •. � C �2�� k
e ffi � .4 k
` �`�� �_�_ � � fi , P'
�� 1 � ,t !t . � , j "`Ya�
,f . 't'' ^ d° ,� �' k
� �, _
-'�-�* .
J '�'r �,��. � :
�. � # � _ � £� .
.,��, .
. '�` ,
, :�'
4 ' . � ' 'I ^A b� �, r '�� '.ry RI: .•
' . iY Z:�i �.�Fi .
`.� S , i
.�
' , ~v'ii.� �.w� . i . �. t .
R. �
� ...:: . ' ' v. . � . .. - � . � �
4 _ ., w .`e° . . "'��
"�
,a: ;p
'�1".�.'�,� �.
� ��,
,
� �,:L.�
�_ ;_�
� :s��'='
. �`� .'"°' �
��
. F f� 1
� ,. . . I ��- ' �y,� v�
/ ♦ , ,
.�. .a4,�,. ` .
City of Burlingame
Design Review
Address: 1720 Adeline Drive
Item No.
Consent Calendar
Meeting Date: August 9, 2010
Request: Design Review for a new, two-story single-family dwelling and detached garage.
Applicant and Designer: Chu Design and Engineering APN: 026-031-050
Property Owners: Hoyman and Tram Hong Lot Area: 6,300 SF
General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1
Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15303 (a) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that
construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including one single-family residence, or a
second dwelling unit in a residential zone, is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, this
exemption may be applied to the construction or conversion of up to three (3) single-family residences as part of
a project.
Project Description: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing single-story house with an attached
garage to build a new, finro-story single family dwelling and detached garage. The proposed house and detached
garage will have a total floor area of 3,240 SF (0.51 FAR) where 3,252 SF (0.52 FAR) is the maximum allowed
(project is 12 SF below the maximum allowed FAR).
The project includes a detached garage (336 SF) which provides one code-compliant covered parking space for
the proposed four-bedroom house. There is one uncovered parking space (9' x 20') provided in the driveway.
All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following application:
■ Design Review for a new, finro-story single family dwelling and detached garage (CS 25.57.010).
1720 Adeline Drive
Lot Area: 6,300 SF Plans date stam ed: Jul 28, 2010 and Jul 6, 2010
� PROPOSED � ALLOWED/REQUIRED
'I
SETBACKS
..............................................................................................................1................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................
I
Front (1st flr): i 21'-10" 21'-10" (block average)
(2nd flr): ; 26'-4" ' ................................................2_1_�_� 0,, _�block average)
. ........................................................................................................................................................................... �
Side (/eft 1S`): � 12'-6" 7'-6"
(left 2"d): j 14'-6" j 12'-0" (average)
(right): ! 8'-6" �,_��,
_ ......................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..................................._..................._..................._...........................................................................................................................................
Rear (1st f/r): � 24'-9" 15'-0"
�
(2nd flr): � 26'-9" 20'-0"
_ ............................._. ...........__._...._..._......_._.._..._............_......._.;._................._...................................................._.._......_......_......_.._.................._...._..............................................................._........._.........................................
Lot Coverage: ' 2,005.5 SF � 2,520 SF
' 32% I 40%
1 ...............................................................................................__......................................................................................................................
FAR: � �
3,240.5 SF 3,252 SF
( 0.51 FAR j 0.52 FAR'
..............................................................................._...............................,..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
# of bedrooms: � 4 ---
.............................................._.._..............._...._...................._.........<........................................................................................................................................................................................_.........�..... _...................................................................................................................................._...........
Parking: i 1 covered 1 covered
� (10' x 20') (10' x 20')
1 uncovered j 1 uncovered
j (9' x 20') � (9' x 20')
Design Review 1720 Adeline Drive
; PROPOSED j ALLOWED/REQUIRED
Height: � 2g'-11" � 30'-0"
. ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
DH Envelope: ; complies CS 25.28.075
' (0.32 x 6,300 SF) + 900 SF + 336 SF = 3,252 SF (0.52 FAR)
Staff Comments: See attached memos from the City Engineer, Chief Building Official, Parks Supervisor, Fire
Marshal and NPDES Coordinator.
Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Design Review Study meeting on July 26, 2010,
the Commission made comments and suggestions regarding the front entry, the French doors off the dining
room, the size of the laundry room and window revisions of some windows due to neighbor privacy concerns and
voted to place the item on the Consent Calendar at the next available Planning Commission meeting (July 26,
2010 Planning Commission Minutes). The designer submitted revised floor plans, elevation drawings and a
response letter on July 28, 2010, to address the Commission's concerns.
Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the
Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows:
Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood;
2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood;
3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure;
4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and
5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components.
Findings for Design Review: Based on the findings stated by the Planning Commission in the attached minutes
of their July 26, 2010 Design Review Study meeting, that the proposed house is appropriate for the
neighborhood, and that the architectural style, mass and bulk of the house will be consistent with the existing
character of the neighborhood, the project is found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five
design review guidelines.
Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application,
and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific
findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning
Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the
following conditions should be considered:
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped
July 28, 2010, sheets A.3 through A.5; and date stamped July 6, 2010, sheets A.1, A.2, A.6, L1.0 and
Boundary Survey;
2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or
pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning
Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff);
3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would
include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit;
-2-
Design Review 1720 Adeline Drive
4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's May 20, 2010, and July 7, 2010 memos, the City
Engineer's June 2, 2010 memo, the Fire Marshal's May 20, 2010 memo, the Parks Supervisor's May 24,
2010 and July 10, 2010 memos, and the NPDES Coordinator's May 20, 2010 memo shall be met;
5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon
the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director;
6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading orearth moving on the site shall not
occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the
regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District;
7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans
shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning
Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans
throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the
conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning
Commission, or City Council on appeal;
8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination
and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be
included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued;
9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which
requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan
and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall
require a demolition permit;
10. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence,
the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm
Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff;
11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007
Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; ,
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR
TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION:
12. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners,
set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation
at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer;
13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another
architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the
architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window
locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting
framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final
framing inspection shall be scheduled;
14. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof
ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and
15. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural
details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the
approved Planning and Building plans.
-3-
Design Review
Erica Strohmeier
Associate Planner
1720 Adeline Drive
c. James Chu, Chu Design and Engineering, 55 W. 43�d Avenue, San Mateo, CA, 94403, applicant.
Attachments:'
Applicant's Response to Commission's comments, date stamped July 28, 2010
Letter from neighbor at 1508 Cabrillo Avenue, date stamped July 26, 2010
Letter from neighbor at 1718 Adeline Drive, date stamped July 26, 2010
Minutes from the July 26, 2010, Design Review Study Meeting
Application to the Planning Commission
Tree Removal Permit Application, date stamped July 15, 2010
Staff Comments
Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed)
Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed July 30, 2010
Aerial Photo
-4-
CHU DESIGN & ENGINEERING, INC.
55 West 43'�`� Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403
TeL• (650) 345-9286; Fax (650) 345-9287
July 27, 2010
City of Burlingame
Planning Commissioner
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
Re: New residence at
1720 Adeline Ave.
Burlingame, CA
Dear Planning Commissioner:
Per your recommendation/comments, we have made the following changes to the new residence
at 1720 Adeline Ave.
1. Window at walk in closet has been reduced to 2' x 2' (left elevation).
2. Simulated true divided lite, aluminum wood clad window is called out (elevations).
3. We have looked into the gable roof element over the front entry porch, but found
not only it will conflict with the trellis to the left (off the dinning room), it will
also affect the egress window above in bedroom #3. Therefore, instead of
changing the roof form, we have added a wing wall and the planter seat to bring
more interest to the front entry.
�
t..5 .� �_. - .
'JL 2 � ?_01Q
;:;! I',✓ OF B��RI_9ndGAME
�'!ANNfNG �)E"T
Sincerelv.
C/TY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMM/SS/ON — Unapproved Minutes July 26, 2010
9. 1720 ADELINE DRIVE, ZONED R-1 -APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW, TWO-STORY
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (JAMES CHU, CHU DESIGN & ENGR., INC.,
APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; AND HOYMAN AND TRAM HONG, PROPERTY OWNERS) STAFF
CONTACT: ERICA STROHMEIER
Reference staff report dated July 26, 2010, with attachments. Community Development Director Meeker
briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Terrones opened the public comment period.
James Chu, 55 West 43�d Avenue, San Mateo represented the applicant.
■ Noted that the concrete block wall will be removed.
■ Power will be redirected to Cabrillo Avenue.
■ Fence will be replaced.
■ Feel that all neighbor concerns have been addressed.
Commission comments:
■ Ensure a spirit of cooperation with the neighbor since they will be sandwiched on both sides by new
projects.
■ The existing home had a lot of charm in its day; but need to address the issue of charm in the
current design. Look at the front entry as a means of referencing the entry that existed on the
original home.
■ The landscaping is done well.
■ Be certain that simulated true divided light windows, aluminum clad, with wood trim are being
installed.
■ Consider a change at the dining room French doors that will promote more usage of the outdoor
area outside the doors. (Chu — the client prefers the French doors.)
■ Consider providing an entire laundry room rather than a closet. (Chu — current design was
requested by the client.)
Public comments:
Steve Lo, 1508 Cabrillo Avenue and Jeffrey Carter, 1085 Rollins Road; spoke:
■ Expressed a desire to make changes to the left elevation to reduce window size in the closet and
master bedroom to protect privacy. As an alternative for egress, could provide casement windows
on rear elevation.
■ Make sure that the debris box is placed on the property, not in the street.
■ Kids will be sad to see the haunted house removed.
■ Nicely done plans.
Additional applicant comments:
■ The closet window can be reduced in size.
■ One of the master bedroom windows is in the bathroom; it will contain obscured glass.
■ The other master bedroom window is for egress and appearance; may consider additional
landscaping to address the neighbor's privacy concerns.
3
CITY OF BURL/NGAME PLANNING COMMISS/ON — Unapproved Minutes July 26, 2010
There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Auran made a motion to place the ifem on the Consent Calendar when complete.
This mofion was seconded by Commissioner Yie.
Discussion of motion:
Make the revisions to fhe windows as discussed, and address the neighbor's concerns regarding
privacy.
Include a condifion requiring placement of the debris box on fhe property during construction.
Chair Terrones called for a vofe on fhe motion to place this item on the Consent Calendar when plans have
been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 5-0-2-0 (Commissioners Cauchi and Vistica
absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This ifem concluded at 10:52
p. m.
�
�
CQtilMIT11tICA77QN RECEIYEU
,ntF'TER PREPdR�lTl01�
+UF�TAFI�REPQR?
1508 Cabrillo Avenue
Burlingame, CA 94010
July 21, 2010
City of Burlingame Planning Commission
City Hall — 501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010-3997
Dear Planning Commissioners:
We are writing to you after reviewing the plans for the proposed new, two-story family dwelling and
detached garage at 1720 Adeline Drive. On behalf of our family residing at 1508 Cabrillo Avenue (next
door to 1720 Adeline Drive), we wanted to raise the following issues and potential revisions with the
plans for the new house. The following issues are related to the window size and placement of certain
windows on the Left Elevation which directly face the only window for the upstairs bedroom as well as
the two windows for the downstairs bedrooin.
� 1: .. � ' ��� -� '- �
1) Master Closet Window - Across from existing Window size can be reduced to an
Left Elevation upstairs bedroom approximately 20" x 20" window (same
window (only window type/size of window as master closet
for this bedroom room) window shown in the Rear Elevation
and two downstairs
bedroom window
2) Master Bedroom Window Same as above Reduce height of window to 20" and
— Left Elevation maintain higher placement of window.
The two windows of the master bedroom
shown on the Rear Elevation can be
revised in order to meet the building code
for an emergency escape window. Based
on our discussions with the Building
Department, this can be achieved by
using the appropriate 20" casement
window. The window in the current
lans a ears to be a 20" width window.
We have attached copies of the plans that show our bedroom windows in relation to the proposed
structure (Exhibit A) as well as indicated the windows in the plans discussed above (Exhibit B).
We believe that the proposed revisions above will preserve the privacy for our family in the upstairs and
downstairs bedrooms without impacting the aesthetics of the house or the privacy of the other
neighboring house.
Thank you for your consideration.
Respectfully,
Steve and Vanessa Lo
' H;:M l,a �. � � � �Ll'
`� ��- � � Z��Q
Cll"; OF 6URLIIVGAME.
"I 4NNIn�(a pFPT
y . _ __ _.__—_ _ _ _ _ _ _ rt. ;, #,�.,.�o.�.,
----_.,_ .__ —
_ ____ �. x�,��� r�
�
�
�
�, .�
` �, � 3
�,��
��
,�k,, � �
t� � v
v; a �,
���� ��
�� ��
��
�. �
- �,
� �:
�.i �� �
�
�' �; `�' �.
�I
., �� _
.. . .�
� �: �
�
'' .� .�
� �
a
� ��
�
u
m
��
��
�........ ,_..
�� �.
�'i.
�"���:
�,
� � �f �.�
�..., . .,...
. � w •.� � �ly'
��.
�
�
�
���
���
0
t...
it � � 1 �j f``�'�`�-. ;1,� '� �..-
• i•7Uf.aY. �, . .�. f .._. ...-L�,
•..�+,: N. J� . ...Qi�rmr�i�
.. _ ... ... . _ . __..�. .. .... .... � _ :
. ., . .,,, �.
xrv��na nutx�+�
._.._ . . .�_. _ _ .._..__ ..... .._.,....�..w .,�....
s—
w.....� , . .,.�.....,..�.._....«.,.+.;..... . � _...�,,.,,._..
........_. .... ..... . w w.r,.,
�, ��� �� ::
.� �
�� ��� ��
�� �� ��
�P�, ' ���y��" � �lQG�Y.••'
JUL. � � !O�IC�
� � ,� o€= a�r-�u�vu�,�v��
°I_A.rJNIf�!G DE��T
� �
��
����
__ _ _..�___ ,_, ____ ---- _.. . .
L... Xh��6i� �
� � L8Z6'S6L:OS9i �XV� 1e�IM��FF
� - — 987b•54f i0S9) "131 �y�
, fObb6'dl'IV�'031VW NVS � pc.pud�d�,
� j � Hf1N7AV WCb"M SS V� lu��yecpi�
i '�Nl `'2L'JN1 '8 N'JtS90 � �
����
����
L
<
a
�
� .'�
� �J N o
� NE y1
s,
i�
�
r �{ i � �
�; � �
� � &i � a �
a-.o m- .�-x
�f �� �
� � -d G � �
i dl 3 r. I��3� � � �
�.
�
i "�� ;,�°U_ _ 1( i
� � ui ,'
:, ,
..,
: y N L � . _ . `_ .%'.. _ . ..
I
� 3 ,.1.
� Q �� �� .,� �
� � �ii ' �
� �,:
i� i� � 1
. � . :�li ���; � �
i:'�'�i�; �'� . � '.���:. . �
' �� �I! � ;;
� �'•�'.',�I.;:.'.!� :.li..E -
..�.� . Ij .�� ��. �
� � .��; �, -,; .;, ;
� � ,� ;�
,,. _,•.:._. ,,::��.
� , ��: ,�. � �
� ��
' � �: �
i � � ' �� '��`,�' I {.I�)
� :,;:,;;: �
;�, :.';f,
( � i� ��
, �:
��� � ;�'`.'i
a�k i,;,: 0_...; , _._.
�� t ' f��, ;t � f �
�� ,
' -�` ';:.,�:��. Li-l-
'--�:;.,.; , -
,�� �': ��.
� '' ��iii:l;;i
d. •.:��::;:_,.!!I:i
I �r :i!::`::!'�
��
�t:;;,:1�' ;.
� �.••i�
$ � :;
3 � ���!� F. :� �, ,
o '��°l
—d
�
3 '�
� �
� ��
c$ s �
` ti �
.� � 3
� � x�
� � � �
� V -� '.�
��
���
�
h
,;��„�,�,. oso-i£a-9zo =�N�d-�
""'°""".'''°""" �'� `3I�dJI�IIT2�f1g
���.`�. �ARIQ �l�II'I�Qd aZLi
�'J�l/�i��
mrr�xv�a ��hL�IQI5�1 M3A[
ww*.o.��.!�ru
--�
3
n
�
f
+ � �
�i � i i � d
o � �� ��
i
V i
a-.a — a•.c �
� � � �� � � ; �
� � ����� �. � ---_ __.__.._ , '
� �o��� ' �
,1' �
�jI , i
\ �!;11I._ _I. �.._.,:�I.. _ �
i
�. `
� �
� 3a�
v i�5
y � �ii.j
i � �'
�
I �4
'/� I. _ �:i
Y` �{�I�S.-.
� �� .
A v ,���1��
� � x 1f
3 � � �1��;
�! �°�'i�
�!��
� ,�
z o v •; ,��1 i
� � �� : ;;��;,
�� u `,i,i:
a ap � �';
� - � � � ��� ��
a �, �p�g: :i
�
�
�
�
� ����,
�I�
� aem �
.�
���
0
H
>
a
w
�
�� �
e�
��
��
"y,�a'e"� �t',_..,,
�UL 2 �: � �,;
�:r�1' OF S�U';;4_� ..__, �,
p� , ��i,�i �, -
07.2�.10 PG ���ftnQ
v
Page 1 of 1
��er•da l�err� �$� 0.nci ��� CUMMUNICATIONRECElVED
CD/PLG-Hurin, Ruben AFTER PREPARATION
_ __ _ _ _ _ _ 4F STA�'F �P-4�T
From: Malik, Suzanne A. (SAM33) [sam33@tmw.com]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 12:48 AM
To: CD/PLG-Brooks, Maureen
Cc: CD/PLG-Hurin, Ruben; CD/PLG-Strohmeier, Erica
Subject: Planning Meeting 7-26-2010
Importance: High
Maureen Brooks-
On Friday, July 16�h, we received two notices that the homes on either side of us were going to be
reviewed. Unfortunately we left for vacation on July 18th and therefore have not been able to view the
plans at the Planning Office. We will still be away for the meeting on July 26th. For this reason, my
husband and I would like to file this e-mail for the record that we may have objections to the homes being
built on either of our home. We had an opportunity to view plans about a month ago for our neighbor at
the corner of Cortez and Adeline and did not have any objections to their plans, but we are unsure if they
have changed since we saw them.
We were only able to view the elevation posted in front of the house at the corner of Cabrillo and Adeline.
We would like to raise the following concerns and possible objections for this home (again we have not
had the opportunity to review the plans):
. The existing patio structure CMU wall at the rear of the property is currently encroaching on our
property and we would like to request that it be removed without damaging our newly built garage
(this may already be contemplated).
. That any power lines or sewer lines not run under or over our property (there is no recorded
easement to allow this).
. It is our understanding, based on our survey that the current fence separating our properties is on
our property. If the new owners wish to build a new fence on the property line, we would request to
be consulted so that we can determine how our current fence will be impacted. If they build it
entirely on their property, then we of course have no say or issue as long as it complies with
Burlingame standards.
. It appeared from the posted elevation that the house would no longer have an Adeline Drive front
door — unsure how the rear and side elevations will be viewed from the street and from our
property. We assume that there are no variances as stated on the notice. We would want to
ensure that the design of the home was in character of the neighborhood (possibly maintain the
existing Tudor character) and not simply a stucco box. Are the setbacks side and rear also
changing with the change in orientation of the property? If so, does the new home encroach more
or less toward our property line? Obviously, we have a concern if it would encroach closer that the
current home. We would assume that if the front of the home is on Cabrillo, that the back would be
facing our shared property line so there should be a minimum 15' rear setback, right? Or would it
still be maintained as a side setback at 7' minimum (57" wide lot) with a declining height
requirement? Please advise.
. Landscaping???
We respectfully submit the above to maintain our rights both now and in the future. As previously stated,
without having the opportunity to review plans, we may or may not have had all the above
concerns/objections. Please confirm receipt and next steps if any for us to be able to follow-up upon our
return.
Best Regards-
Suzanne A. Malik and John M. Schmid
1718 Adeline Drive
Burlingame, CA 94010
`� P�ease consider the environment before printing this e-mail
7/26/2010
�,.:�,
r '�i�'i
BU�:LINGFME
�
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010
p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org
APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Type of application:
C� Design Review
❑ Conditional Use Permit
❑ Variance
❑ Special Permit
PROJECT ADDRESS:
❑O Please indicate the contact person for this project
APPLICANT project contact person��/
OK to send electronic o'es of documents eIC
Name:
Address: ����.�.��
City/State/Zip:
Phone: ` "
Fax:
E-mail:
ARCHITECT/DESIGNER
OF to send eb
Name: �
Address: 1� V�:
City/State/Zip: �
Phone: ��"��� � %
Fax:
�
E-mail
project contact person
c copies of docurr�nts
❑ Parcel #: ���lO�� ����"`�
❑ Other:
--6 I`� � ii��'� � •
PROPERTY OWNER
OK
Name:
Address:
City/State/Zip�
Phone:�--��( /� �
project contact person ❑
d electronic copies of do uments�
'l ,
� �
� O O
� _ /" M'
Fax:
E-mail: � (�L/
��� �v1 V1 UV� �� �� �� i�lc% I�o d, c c,�,
,�
0
O'
�•
* Burlingame Business License #:
ECT DESCRIPTIpN
AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I ertify under
best of my knowledge an�.b'elief.
Applicant's signat
I am aware of the oposed applic tion an hereb�
Commission. ��- _..__. � '
___ i
Property owner's signature: ��
�
of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the
Date: J
authorize the above applicant to submit this _pplication to the Planning
Date:
\ � Date submitted:
u
yt Verification that the project architect/designer has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the
Finance Department at the time application fees are paid.
❑ Please mark one box above with an X to indicate the contact person for this project. S:\Handouts\PC Application 2o08-B.handout
�RO`7,EC'I�'ED 'TREE �t�MOVA]�
F'E1�MIT A�'�'L,ICA'TIOl\�
P,4RX�S & REC.IZLA "IIf�Iv DEPARTME]\r7'
8� 0 I3 URZ,INGAML A VENU�
I3U�L1_.�1TG,�ME. C� 940I0
(65Q) .5513-7330
'�`I�c unciersigned owner of �he prapei-ty �i:
.,��� ��} �
, �
.� �� �
� ���` ;
�lt�.�
� �
/`� f�7��('� �+ � r' �l. . ' . . �
!'. V�JtL:JJ. � � ..,! �. I � - - ._.
(prirlt or type)
Izereby ap��iies for a permit to remove ar pi-une more thai� 1/3 of the crawn or roots of the followi��g protected tree(s):
/� ,'�.:�_�_t;_ _:.�1_ i
�
� � . �" ' � %��
�,� ��IF � _ ��e �- � �� �� � � ���_cU��rER�r1cL � �=! `��' ,1, � ,. �
;,_ , — - ._
I�OC�TIDN Ol�T PROPEP�TY �_�� � � ��. �`� . � '� � �i. �' �, :. C� (�..1 �� �" i '= � � `-: t �:� C_C
''�r�JORK TO [3L FERFORMED i;��,' � i ,.t ,-, � _ � _ -
1�CASON WORI� IS NECESSARY � � . _ � +�� - ��C _ ` I C� ;' ; `;.�_�`-
� i:� ,,� ��l i �-' �{-"S � i-
; . ���
(Please use bcrckofforrra jor additional comrnents.) �� , � � � �- � ��'�f'�"�' `. `�-`-
_--- _
NOTE: A PHOTOGRAPI� 4F THE TREE(S) OWIVER (Print) I r1_ ,� �-� `� l. � f L�_�.�
MUST BE SUBMITTED ALONG WITH A
$75.00 CHECK TO: CITY OF BURLINGAME ADDRESS I 1 Z�'�` (�- G�! _�_ I����.�
Attach any supporting documentation you may have � �—, --
(Example: Report from an Independent Arborist). PHONE ((`, �` ) r��(" `� - u' L i�j
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FERMIT
This pernut allows the applicant to remove or prune the above listed tree(s) in accordance with the provisions of the
Urban Reforestation and Tree Protection Ordinance (Mwvcipal Code Chapter 11.06). By signing this pernut, the
applicant acknowledges receipt of a copy of Chapter 11.06, and agrees to comply with its provisions and all conditions
listed below; and that all appeals have expired or been resolved.
OWNER
CITY ARBORiST
PARKS & RECREATION DIRECTOR
_.:j �._ : ..
i,�.!L Y ':.� ZQ1��
CONDITIONS: 24 - inCh bOx size landscape tree(s) wil[ be required and may be
plai:ted anywhere on the property. If conditions are not �net withi�i
the allofted time as speeified i�z Seetion 11.06.080, payment of $400
for each tree iizto the tree replacement funrt will be required.
N� replacemerat(s) required Coiztact the Parks Divisio�a at
(650) 558-7330 when remona[(s) completed
DATE PERMIT EFFECTNE
PERMIT EXPIRES
Tlzis ivork s)zoul�l be done by qualifed tree professionals and a copy of tllis perrriit nzust be nvailable
rtt the job site at all times wlzen work is beirtg performed
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
May 19, 2010
d City Engineer
(650) 558-7230
❑ Chief Building Official
(650) 558-7260
❑ Recycling Specialist
(650) 558-7271
❑ Fire Marshal
(650) 558-7600
❑ Parks Supervisor
(650) 558-7254
Planning Staff
❑ NPDES Coordinator
(650) 342-3727
❑ City Attorney
Subject: Request for Design Review for a new single family dwelling and
detached garage at 1720 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 026-031-
050
Staff Review: May 24, 2010
1. See attached.
2. Applicant is advised to call City Arborist regarding relocation of sidewalk area
around trees in the planter strip.
3. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works —
Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information.
Reviewed by: V V
Date: 6/02/2010
/
� PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION
PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS � S+"�t'
Project Name: �y �It�✓li�-(,�
Project Address: � ���- �
The following requirements apply to the project
1 7S A properly boundary survey shall be preformed by a licensed land .
surveyor. The survey shall show all property lines, property corners,
easements, topographical features and utilities. (Required prior to the
building permit issuance.) �",iL�t�'� �'�'�� n' R'�- � �`�"'�� � � �ro
-/ p�( cfl�� 1-La%��Sr� c� ��wl:.'Y�-���uui��rt- .
2 `Y The site and roof drainage shall be shown on plans and should be made to
drain towards the Frontage Street. (Required prior to the building permit
issuance.)
3. The applicant shall submit project grading and drainage plans for
approval prior to the issuance of a Building pertnit.
4 The project site is in a flood zone, the project shall comply with the City's
flood zone requirements.
7� ��'
5 � �rsan�itary sewer lateral � is required for the project in accordance with
the City's standards. ( )
6. The project plans shall show the required Bayfront Bike/Pedestrian trail
and necessary public access improvements as required by San Francisco
Bay Conservation and Development Commission.
7. Sanitary sewer analysis is required for the project. The sewer analysis
shall identify the project's impact to the City's sewer system and any
sewer pump stations and identify mitigation measures.
8 Submit traffic trip generation analysis for the proj ect.
9. Submit a traffic impact study for the project. The traffic study should
identify the proj ect generated impacts and recommend mitigation
measures to be adopted by the project to be approved by the City
Engineer.
10. The project shall file a parcel map with the Public Works Engineering
Division. The parcel map shall show all existing property lines, easements,
monuments, and new properiy and lot lines proposed by the map.
Page 1 of 3
U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
N PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION
11. A latest preliminary title report of the subject parcel of land shall be
submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division with the parcel map
for reviews.
12 Map closure/lot closure calculations shall be submitted with the parcel
map.
13 The project shall submit a condominium map to the Engineering Divisions
in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act.
14 �_ The project sha11, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public
improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary
appurtenant work.
15 The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage streetscape
improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutters, parking meters and poles,
trees, and streetlights in accordance with streetscape master plan.
16 By the preliminary review of plans, it appears that the project may cause
adverse impacts during construction to vehicular traffic, pedestrian traffic
and public on street parking. The project shall identify these impacts and
provide mitigation measure acceptable to the City.
17 The project shall submit hydrologic calculations from a registered civil
engineer for the proposed creek enclosure. The hydraulic calculations
must show that the proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any adverse
impact to both upstream and downstream properties. The hydrologic
calculations shall accompany a site map showing the area of the 100-year
flood and existing improvements with proposed improvements.
18 Any work within the drainage area, creek, or creek banks requires a State
Department of Fish and Game Permit and Army Corps of Engineers
Permits.
19 No construction debris shall be allowed into the creek.
20 A The project shall comply with the City's NPDES permit requirement to
prevent storm water pollution.
21 The project does not show the dimensions of existing driveways, re-
submit plans with driveway dimensions. Also clarify if the project is
proposing to widen the driveway. Any widening of the driveway is subject
to City Engineer's approval.
22 The plans do not indicate the slope of the driveway, re-submit plans
showing the driveway profile with elevations
Page 2 of 3
U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
� PUBLIC WORK5 DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION
23 The back of the driveway/sidewalk approach shall be at least 12" above
the flow line of the frontage curb in the street to prevent overflow of storm
water from the street into private property.
24. For the takeout service, a garbage receptacle shall be placed in front. The
sidewalk fronting the store shall be kept clean 20' from each side of the
property.
25. For commercial projects a designated garbage bin space and cleaning area
shall be located inside the building. A drain connecting the garbage area to
the Sanitary Sewer System is required.
Page 3 of 3
U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
� Project Comments
�
Date:
Revised Plans Submitted July 6, 2010
To: ❑ City Engineer
(650) 558-7230
X Chief Building Official
(650) 558-7260
❑ Parks Supervisor
(650) 558-7254
From: Planning Staff
❑ Recycling Specialist
(650) 558-7271
❑ Fire Marshal
(650) 558-7600
❑ NPDES Coordinator
(650) 342-3727
❑ City Attorney
Subject: Request for Design Review for a new, single family dwelling and
detached garage at 1720 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 026-031-
050
Staff Review: N/A
,;,•,
�° Project Comments
�
Date:
To:
From:
Subject:
Staff Review:
May 19, 2010
❑ City Engineer
(650) 558-7230
X Chief Building Official
(650) 558-7260
❑ Parks Supervisor
(650) 558-7254
❑ Recycling Specialist
(650) 558-7279
❑ Fire Marshal
(650) 558-7600
❑ NPDES Coordinator
(650) 342-3727
❑ City Attorney
Planning Staff
Request for Design Review for a new single family dwelling and
detached garage at 1720 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 026-031-
050
May 24, 2010
�n the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2007 California Building
Codes (CBC).
�Per the City of Burlingame's adopted Resolution, applications received after
January 1, 2009 must complete a"GreenPoint Rated Checklist". The GreenPoint
Rated Checklist, and other information regarding the City's Green Building
requirements, can be found on the City website at the following URL:
http://www.burlinqame.orq/lndex.aspx?page=1219 or Contact Joe McCluskey at
650-558-7273.
3) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame
business license.
4) Provide fully dimensioned plans.
�i�ndicate on the plans that all work shall be conducted within the limits of the
City's Noise Ordinance. See City of Burlinaame Ordinance Municipal Code,
Section 13.04.100 for details.
6) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a
completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition
��ermit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project.
pecify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2008 California Ener9Y
Efficiency Standards. Note: All projects for which a building permit application is
received on or after January 1, 2010 must comply with the 2008 California
Energy Efficiency Standards. Go to
http://www.enerqy.ca.qov/title24/2008standards/ for publications and details.
8) Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed
property lines
9 Obtain a survey of the property lines.
) n the plans specify that the roof eaves on the garage will not project within two
� eet of the property line.
11 �rovide details on the plans which show that all roof projections which project
�eyond the point where fire-resistive construction would be required will be
c nstructed of one-hour fire-resistance-rated construction per CBC 704.2.
ndicate on the plans that exterior bearing walls less than five feet from the
1'3 roperty line will be built of one-hour fire-rated construction. (Table 602)
ooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or
door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the size and location of
all required egress windows on the elevation drawings.
14)Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at
any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the
Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in
height.
15)Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers.
16)Provide lighting at all exterior landings.
NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically
address items 1, 2, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, and 13 must be re-submitted before this
project can move forward for Plan ' Com 'ssion action.
. °�`�-_ -- _ �S �v . v �
Reviewed by: ` Date:
Project Comments
Date:
Revised Plans Submitted July 6, 2010
To: � City Engineer
(650) 558-7230
� Chief Building Official
(650) 558-7260
X Parks Supervisor
(650) 558-7254
From: Planning Staff
� Recycfing Specialist
(650) 558-7271
� Fire Marshal
(650) 558-7600
� NPDES Coordinator
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
Subject: Request for Design Review for a new, single family dwelling and
detached garage at 1720 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 026-031-
050
Staff Review: N/A
1. Existing tree to be removed will need Protected Tree Permit from Parks
Division. 558-7334
2. Trees labeled J and I are not on plant list.
Reviewed by: B Disco
Date: 7/10/10
Project Comments
Date: May 19, 2010
To:
� City Engineer
(650) 558-7230
0 Chief Building Official
(650) 558-7260
X Parks Supervisor
(650) 558-7254
0 Recycling Specialist
(650) 558-7279
� Fire Marshal
(650) 558-7600
� NPDES Coordinator
(650) 342-3727
0 City Attorney
From: Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review for a new single family dwelling and
detached garage at 1720 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 026-031-
050
Staff Review: May 24, 2010
1. Provide landscape plan as per requirements; note all planting material and
identify plants.
2. Note what trees are to be removed. No existing tree over 48 inches in
circumference at 54 inches from base of tree may be removed without a
Protected Tree Permit from the Parks Division (558-7330).
3. If Public Works requires sidewalk replacement, Policy for Expanding Width
of Planter Strip needs to be implemented.
4. 2 new street trees will be required to replace the 2 declining Pyrus kawakamii
(evergreen pear) in planter strip.
5. If Liquidambar tree on Cabrillo requires root pruning during sidewalk
replacement, removal will be granted through a permit with Parks Division and
a appropriate tree will need to be chosen as replacement. List of appropriate
Street Trees are available from the Parks Division (558-7330).
Project Comments
Date: May 19, 2010
To: � City Engineer � Recycling Specialist
(650) 558-7230 (650) 558-7271
� Chief Building Official Fire Marshal
(650) 558-7260 (650) 558-7600
� Parks Supervisor 0 NPDES Coordinator
(650) 558-7254 (650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
From: Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review for a new single family dwelling and
detached garage at 1720 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 026-031-
050
Staff Review: May 24, 2010
Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence.
1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter.
2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly —
Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building
Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split
between domestic and fire protection lines.
3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall
clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings
shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation.
Project Comments
Date:
��
From
May 19, 2010
� City Engineer
(650) 558-7230
� Chief Building Official
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Supervisor
(650) 558-7254
� Recycling Specialist
(650) 558-7271
� Fire Marshal
(650) 558-7600
X NPDES Coordinator
(650) 342-3727
0 City Attorney
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review for a new single family dwelling and
detached garage at 1720 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 026-031-
050
Staff Review: May 24, 2010
Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City
NPDES permit requirement to prevent stormwater pollution from construction
activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement Best
Management Practices (BMPs) during construction.
Please include a list of construction stormwater pollution prevention best
management practices (BMPs), as project notes, when submitting plans for a
building permit. Please see attached brochure for guidance. The brochure may also
be down loaded directly from "flowstobay.org." It is recommended that the
construction BMP's be placed on a separate full size plan sheet (2' x 3` or larger as
appropriate) for readability.
For additional assistance, please contact Kiley Kinnon, Stormwater Coordinator, at
(650) 342-2727.
Reviewed by: � � �
Date: Q � 1 e2,� �)C7
a
°i�;i%
5�wm,re�v
s Pollufim Pmsauw Pmp�nm
�
p�s7
/�-
��� -� -;;�
�.,,,.G , : , -
�� ._ �.'�.F
��. `` ' ; �i
General �'4~
Construction
& 5ite Supervision
A4mceyWnNd ➢mrm� pvOWm
�s�emw. ��.ww ,.a o,am� .a�aae r„ an
.�.�..r �,��,,,,,,�,.,�
�, •�� ,, o�� �. �.� �, a��
nh1�u�,
llemta ue pol�a nwa M6� m M.1�17 a(0.
�R�m�,�v�„�.R.e��.
JCm �Jufaqa nws rvqh mr�l�e
�^l wM�eml Wwe E14be� m Ssn �uer�
aeudO�eux RadottNwmva� r�wf/�elmtieb�
me�vuaunc �1pvl uwt dm� w Enm� rl�m
����e yo,n �p�vi.<..oe wbr.e.�,�a,,. at.tr
ilwe barl�se�.�l6tle �nervyoee.�nwr! w IR
me�uunon um Iofom nbcoeVx'Iw� �lwt We mx
.�. �o-�o�.w�nw�swaa
c,w aew�wms a»
!D`�id� mc wmPleelY meuineA uu fw mn
pn ��.�mebreled'u�,udrwtin.9mPam
eelLe JapmW vea �hwtl le �.eY away
M1vn i�m� mab�mEta� ukq aotl WmeA ilvuv.
ny. M�b mym n�u� eQ o�
JLesp w�enJ. avi of �Yc nu - prtreet �uavH
w� � ommcdon11mm�W�+wms. Cn ' Wcvnwv
�ICe�m po�lluteW eC ss.�roW wfac¢ 1'6ce nath �
^•s�at �v�1.. a..m1 w. ae n m�:u
Gur.
�AY �a9 D�reA v�rf �tN J�in n J�m Au¢a
vnW.ordmse�. Vp..�vexM.koinvaenvy,
wwuwu .ws wK.w���.o ".�""'.a.w
JQe�n ep lub. [�Ip� �u1 qpar �y1W wmadiamlY w
Ym�' Ju �Nnw:o�e.xl u pwmvmx v b.c
�R�M�dawfuv.lJxdry I.mqmerbed�
wLmece Wuib��. IfSamiW uoe.nv,urcjM
�rA w� m� ue� Jurn
JCorer aud m�Inwi¢ Eompn<n. C4ck B�yurnJY 5p
4vki.Yiaeed�mp�le wJaorm.a�i�luipa
wV�+������yry m ipeouu�tl�ofiW
Sm{n�u.n qetic fmcn �cw� w pn.m
waa• erui,m. n�....� w�. �pna y
EoAv61� Lom m We rmswNw Yu.
JNate rvrc pmelle w'leu m msle�aiod'a {ood
wehlos oNn bS Welmua mmp.vyuw w�.uun
mdw�1 wpmpe.y. aat mJm asa+mh ra.
kil�.
M+bu4i.ax mael�e�
JRacri.e u�urs rWusnon _ nmimlm nr .be�
rw wdo v.ie:r.. adv mr wo �w �a. s�a
rofmnYNeJe¢
�Un� exyel+Ms mum+6.FeR.e Im+l�;� Mv�
GtP�-W efmnc661e mf�viJ� mf1 n ruzrele.
iwbel�+nwee4.a.ma �w,m. evm�..e.
�0. TA4�akm1 reliW m�b�tn mlvWf
a�Au�vNel�mu6u�e.p.�n� �edXm.
In4pwe ot,G �uw uG EmaOtlw ESE�Y pmpvb.
m,a �om..�+e. �e�.a m �.,e �m x...�d
mdumnpwMsv,..a�er.Fa W t�i�,.en We puih5,
�»R�+� ml �amert. woW. aelek.aM re�eo-
v�lab ml hbri� �le� ome� De��crcxE m�H
leduo b s;pop6e hm� m Gepaed a1v
bmrdw .��k. Nevn bv� .ane munaL a loR
@am W We 16ce1 pr oar i crtsk v[ p�m bed,
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program
Pollution Preventior� — It's Part of the Plan
It is your responsibility to d� the job right!
Runoff from streets and other paved azeas is a majot source ofpollution in local creeks, SauFraucisco Bay and the Pacific Ocean.
Construction activities can directly affect the health of our w¢ters unless contractors and crews plan ahead to keep dirt, debris, and other
construction waste away from storm drains and creeks. Following these guidelines will ensLue your compliance with local stormwa ter
ordinance iequirements. Remember, ongoing monitoring and maimenance of installed controls is crucial to proper implementation.
Heavy Earth-Moving Roadwosk & Paving F resh Concrete Painting & Application
Equipment Activi�i�s & Mortar Apglication af Solvents & Adhesives
Operation
'j
0 1
• .� . � '� f �.WYwbmlvi�mtaaim�xamn�camdp�vM —
�saw.i��.a..eo.:aa,.a;�e.e.t re.M.�e,R
sim pi,..+4 me y....oe...w ..r.�.....e
� ���ta�ampla=�fm�ube6veollEccmauue-
tl�w rd1�wY ban �w�m mYam ANv idrn
6r � W e ud �quipmmi paY in �, RR�efi �� mE mm�m
�smtic md squlym-a mwcvx�.
J Mame�O�'.1elaxdLn..eqJyvmelul�fiv.
Pmhl � � rti/ lain
J�w wjam��m�ee.rcl�l�•vd.ehileaed
�opmo��u�YgeHYe
J 1f lTM se� daie ad wvbn+m�o. W ti4.wr mds�,
Na IIWN an s[w, vu NI� pay w@ap elep� n
mu mya ma ww. �uen w mm. d�a. uorc m
,eRvab mainm. m1 �nx�k.6onvP���c w
�v� �eUm,. em�m�,..-,,,�
� oe,A�n. a�.xi �w e mn�e�<o.amw�o��a
W�¢
W�
! 0.ac��4ud.did� panm��.
Q� aV 9�%�l wbm 6s� bypw
J1lembocmwn'1L9 Wemcmalmp�eble
wf rhoslpJdiyMp11e1t1�eEry-tlezupmeA
03 �.b.obm m.leiW m km*.x�N>nr).hmr.e
v�a�vro��n . ,�pm�,�ne�
Ae La Ewe.
J S�reqr W �piY�pp�'emiav4 imm�daM. Nmaa4
rmNmtiuA�nanm{ r1M�an.rc M1myt�uc
Vr a FWe a.ueru poble faduq avmal.
J Clan �.q14 wi �Wt rm by dl�iM�p ad p�vn
r�mF or�m�d „a
J R Tm+T�'Jion�9o14 m Ne Wa�W� �O�ll rt+W�e
•s�».�.ew�-r u..�.a4e�,,,y4„
W u�Eunrtb�aofemdweuucyy,bC4tllvy
ailTenou�a�Wldlnsfollwiut•l�a: �)Ui.l
91I a�wrbed ema�vry�f��ba. ])6Y
Me Goramt Y Omee o! �w{evc� Sn.}sy y/ypm�
c�c (eaol aA.� s sa p� ew.l,
t�s ��ere, �max.u.qm�m.isa,mm�iwe�wwn�e�
JBme.eei.uvy�q�wmwv.nmaEwluWlm.v. o�omW>.
� ! Paf� maj w mewmu a. rtydn, aed vuldy N squ�P
JSad rc W�oi mM0•� my Om W mwYuNm�1�4
puwefwaa�immwdno J1Yhmrcfud'v6avrLicW�ui�m�mLeimmcsmuilbe
ibWm.evcamm�amuem�Jla�dYWaioed deeaouuu.tluiwleamoplwdYwWYwlwesry
� ' 6matYmtriv'mEaNs.
JPm�mMoArys3Ymec�.ow.e.�vew�,.eEue�m JlbmimeAksdo�felubnmercelm�rquipesvm
�wuhNYWI¢�N�YdnimNn+k+.u3 Pvn
4am�wev�m�'ominGlrm. ��Y�'�uxJa0.Euwi4wsrt�SheleeaqAallet
vhmnvpu@Ic
IIbe�6ukkpmemNrcMmtirn+mmRuwvluc�w lTnlv.mplowse�6NaMamam�rmwpaarin�
�mm vd P�dA -_..
Avuj Culuucnm
Jm�aNa�NIkSvMewvilslmOw'FhfeeurtdCT+af JNmMpni6mE�alcm�iota�.v�vNa.w.'hmniv
c�.�a �rw�.-.ne.a.�wey,.��.wm.rca�w�.
lCummEwlo Sh�mEmmbdnwM1m+Vq�G
JP��mowlwaedmtiolaioaRaoiiwutlfedimeel � �°'4tlmYw+l[o5uil.a�
I1be ctrh d� 01 W. ar bnm iu �tl�xnwoQ��uM
IAWab'RW�fvMeaol'eiwboakrzGmsvtrme'd� JNeeeivvha.�ma�aiJEmuymed-�qyep�eeoo-
,eaw�d.o�v,�>.nn,,,;y �uQnwu..uawe,nmw.m�.�.o.n�,.uti.cm�
lat uA reeyel., rYqvm w Gn ua
J Cmv�qdyYv md eWv�m'vuaiw m�taiW �
CmrM6emrPven'os Vl.nicmw.AuwGmu�viufuYaodi+<vea�uuQ.iW
J9rbeJleuu�Noe.nJpadieF+vhb.h�wu6v. �Ymo6vYWle�ev�Wbmv4
i ni�amR, wm c..,..,,;a mo aw w.n��m.ew
J]aEmmla�m�w�W+in+mYfimvdel�riie fClw� �P�aMlan 'mmE'G�y'vmeWud+(tih
�xrom�wioewwmrwcww�m�ve�oemw •"iai°�'•w"u^'Fh=�asw.=a,.�,���nw-
4e0aaw�ib.wh�atit��vmpbWh'medsa� �. ouelviL
G� �iuu Nsuu. J Giku mG �scXk w�yrepris�elY �Wae eCom�
.wa..s.,..ie.�e. �
JOoedueNWulblubrin�wclunquipmrnimpu¢ IAqMmu-upplloibebym�avu[trIW6p��pprtJ.
Landscaping,
Gazdening,
and Pool Maintenance
�i� in
v�+�Nl 1'�br IYodum � .
c�d ee;� r,.am � Y�o •u Wwa w.� w=a�n ma...an r..> �
�^•v�a.m.a.m,�„�a�m..uy�w.Nmeso� '` .
JEdEa�„mYvEmEW�m�wnlvn�eSYvaY��mR I����ma�.Wwab.dp.uwld�bifl�l4u� JP�vhiuxlpJ.+udlmtr�yA.�myvia6nmmwioduJ
beOAyudWmwi�4mEam.v.�.d¢yd6om �doura�aadmNOedi�WWo(�I�hwedwt Nvb
.Y.GOaod�wv6Awmerym�46amwiul wuneoncumfieJi�rn�.e� Y��aw[�h.m�m�kr�o.o-isuWoh�u�sM1¢rinR.
�( Y^Wbralfwm�.nv
JSmmbo[eefamm[�Pa �NQ�� J5brtw>i6.fm:ba...e.aw6a.Lemi�z4'vbm��,r
ihcyveopm.Bewebk T Ina�bcdwm�a �ie.v
�ud-bH.vomn�Wndc�^YfivmlPm�.�mim PauMsgH�vep R�
A+m,n+v4kuCmmuR lNwsrclaob�m4wwriewpala�meWen�iena JSrL.dW�[�+�iW:aulu�arnWe�ny..nlv.4l��ciWc.
J�'ubNa�m�evucmwlyL atnK[+�'+enam�va.a��bam
dmpe�d •�vL-wi.m� J U.e �m�reny ebvk am wdnlv iod•en �werc..a�
m9�Yv4^lcaWevuaWOwE�armal�m� JYvruv-buWD�iWa.Pivawbrv�Loeme�um� Gu..YwJ�vim.
P^�M*a�wnditls�mvmhudmW�fAa�ealu GmWkRime�olh�m�wYasvrca¢e1wLa�x�M
ryba�e.0.'4ze.upaib4,.arydewbowbyuvpin� pnmi�whvmtM1ebelrvw�vabu �n�emy. lMmnawo�myynieku.i8yYy9gy[�.��q
W�tWomianla'cmtNammrynp��afhoullem NewrV�PimJuxvaitu emm�a do0ulobt��aa�wvan
W�o-w. Mm @�a Erutie Eihbu. w sa�w.
J Fer oiLbmd pie4 p.i, uu b�u�ho a Ue evmi ns J pew,yeneoe a u e<alleq f ef ��o�be ewwl fm
DutlnCCm�msOos bbrlrka��iOUwmcvl..�rm�m�pvpvcweiu¢ u�d�c
✓Lbe'�rviauPvuefrvFwverwuweslWeYwcill F�tamErtve�hlmenetlmNrntl.UlRmedervs
me�e.39'. tiy�iC��sCrvidwvM1m�Noa�.k la�lmD�YZ+�de
�sA�v,oaa�.k.�wim�,.wmwMevrci.m� r.�.�,mo.,� ��'�w�.�cw..erw�.i.�ia�ew.n:�.a�
bW ebYs. . ! Pale� el� �� me w�e�uer u WaYp U�py� of mn.tl
�p utl Em� 6es ew-haNm� mY �IDv[ ' n Y rn�M1.
ud.�edHulus�'bea��upmwl4 Niuvlvti
1Wleetle�IW�fb�'�xraYxndnaheamvoetlea �VAdLaCdsW+Mo[ucul JUiWmeMuweCP�xlnaOmJwvwu��.
� �uhfienwrodnaeu.eadewW�drireaOvab
ile�uanwawm�4�4i.
JPr..mi aeeRwk.v64um du�rnrlptiomuwsrieu
��cvR+vm4aW.H0.�[asp paevaOwbEln
aJ pvh iao Ein.
�/ ll+« Wy Wn wapa ambv moto4 Ep�mibpew
upwenueflaryiy�mmarucaowbef n�v�h�
Mfrbfw'NWpmQdpmpdwabtlLm�YlCmv- '�4��FmON 6e�m�uJl�m
hm�id �n�vlGvemlu(eecwEasn➢enUmtlui+�W��mcm. J0.1u1ru1�eAV^wLbe�mempirk�T.11roe�i¢e
u�ayafine� mwr,n, a�de.,...q rn rw�me�n;a,
ErmeniheRTo�WvuQudiqCvmolibed JMub.mldni�Tdepv.emmin..m.brcmowm 'Od�Opwww^i*A+
�swo.mv��w..�� �naya.um«,amm�am.u.�.�uasn.
• 14wm1ullcoNitiwJiwb..urn,ncwbr ��A°���*w��mmim.s�aa�ae�nm,�.;w
• AbmAro�dmCcl��dlub vaLYarvoeR llNqvsafvNlmiamoofcaa0ry'�mSL�.
A�bmlead.db JPamnvw � O�AlokbmvinXvw.e�umb,SEw�q odmonvwW�tru1
� 'dbaml;tl�bywwh ��YOeyaiud�wc�e/mmme
ew
�r�m.<m.nm�.m�i�y�.�eawu.sa,y irk..aw,sAwum.�aW..w.��
� �wwoa,
Storm drain polluters may be liable for fines of up to $25,000 per day!
J tlmiel Yu^t aviOiu6 �eidoa me WP ad Jm J CeYan �..�aM(+rd efqimp. p��6 V.ne. �d ua.
mm+rmcpaie�mpWLLc�Wcm�kaQo�Q�1ury1 �ninmieµllupifeaovy.utlmmpon
n bcd'qv.NefvE.oNm�.ure�
lWhmstri�qivAaeleawo�WIW�S�aicim�miblutb JewW�h�rniwai.iv�vnv�.lu�mmuutiuwiuh
ra�c�cwwr�ocmw,m�:
pmo.nwme.bbck�ivmAam�_0.iN�v¢mwr�dM �.u�efvt�wlvROA^dWOwmnubus.O..ate
�wdqWeinw�al.0yelcyeNUneioawamw� ioa4edppi�amqun�yrJwWe,
hc�vl m 6uib m �md Pa ilpaa <i ta Ycx (mop n
.�ew�d�9el�anmE�+xadURewnW cmmY JDovetble�o���beluw.�e.'mplYe�ms�
.erer.3�vupWmuf We w.vmy bemlmd buiMi 0�
w'un nulmot:+0w'vYmmdo�asMotion Poel/Fauoia/Sy� Maiolavett
! N.��eA'r!�—d _� �r_p-�1=;e �.ae` p � �em:
����P�����uP� aMn�uYau
m.�eaes�aa..„K�i.A„nN;P,�,��,.eay. �wn..
R'hm Ywy.rt Wnvrl�Yy1. �mVV 0� ae. wol 1 �L �. Thea rze,l�.avM1 •y�el�lwi�bn�l^�e h f ie
��4na��� Y R q' �^m6iP+doJlymra•
hteiv�aequYlaEfiR �9be4qwedafaW� W6wapeEsu.o�OaeWhUbmudsovmaabm
J+ia
Jwu.wa.aou"y.Rew��of.nauqm4 lc�l,,;wmo.u.�ryn�pmmn.�aw.mn.�
d�dmi.meum.H M�n..m. .�.., (u,o�..eM m. `w..,�zi�mai.nm.;n)M
�un�ie� � bz u� upLy f W[ m wwv pyn tlamnyja
ISvaYV^�bi�a���uWceectnmWeSmMum tlmi `
Cu�ny fammnrn pI Pn��M Iti.is;en rtyNilq rtry�lu�
mhv.aJov �w dl�Pd+L J Do eot �oe �pyv�.l.d JPdda Cawd JP'.iJ
M luruc a� iYar Y e�mG.n r mqa�b�M pwl e8m1�
��T��d��rv�umylR�bkmE�ienm 1m0e oLCwwue.mldMw�elV.udmvdb
pm�wedW.OewwiihOe�WaRPNiqiia"bvy- vovk4ls�oredMo.ur�C�wm�mlWme
!ak' poliry.
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for
Desiqn Review for a new, two-story sinqle-familv dwellinq and detached qaraqe at 1720
Adeline Drive, zoned R-1, Hovman and Tram Hong. 2336 Rav Drive, Burlinqame, CA, qroperty
owners. APN: 026-031-050;
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on
Auqust 9, 2010, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written
materials and testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that:
On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and
comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is
no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on
the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15303 (a),
which states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures,
including one single-family residence, or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone, is
exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, this exemption may be applied
to the construction or conversion of up to three (3) single-family residences as part of a
project.
2. Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A"
attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review are set forth in the staff report,
minutes, and recording of said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official
records of the County of San Mateo.
Chairman
I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a
regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th dav of Auqust. 2010 by the
following vote:
Secretary
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review.
1720 Adeline Drive
Effective August 19, 2010
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division
date stamped July 28, 2010, sheets A.3 through A.5; and date stamped July 6, 2010,
sheets A.1, A.2, A.6, L1.0 and Boundary Survey;
2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features,
roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to
Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined
by Planning staff);
3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or
garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an
amendment to this permit;
4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's May 20, 2010, and July 7, 2010
memos, the City Engineer's June 2, 2010 memo, the Fire Marshal's May 20, 2010
memo, the Parks Supervisor's May 24, 2010 and July 10, 2010 memos, and the NPDES
Coordinator's May 20, 2010 memo shall be met;
5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project
shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community
Development Director;
6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on
the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall
be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management
District;
7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project
construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of
approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall
remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process.
Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall
not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City
Council on appeal;
8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a
single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and
that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans
before a Building permit is issued;
9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling
Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects
to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full
demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit;
10. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the
new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as
identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review.
1720 Adeline Drive
Effective August 19, 2010
sedimentation of storm water runoff;
11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform
Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame;
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION
PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION:
12. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the
property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new
structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans;
this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer;
13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential
designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an
architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design
which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as
shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing
compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the
final framing inspection shall be scheduled;
14. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the
height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division;
and
15. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of
the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has
been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans.
. CITY OF BURLINGAME
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD �'``�a��
�` � �sutz���:�.a�;
�, BURLINGAME, CA 94010 �,� �� �, � _
'� • PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) �� - �" � _
- www.burlingame.org �.� �'._a�7' ���'�a �
� a�' +4 guj�".Y ;Y � Y,.
� .i' �
Site: 1720 ADELINE DRIVE '��m��
!)4:?',: .� �=',.'J ::.� `''�
� °�' � .�� r��
�� "'�' �
;�. .� � - -i.�j?l.;
J Sy ?'"4iy��`a���
The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the pUBLIC HEARING
following public hearing on MONDAY, AUGUST 9, 2010 NOTICE
at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501
Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA:
Application for Design Review for a new, twa-story single
family dwelling and detached garage at 1720 ADELINE
DRIVE zoned R-l. APN 426-031-050
Mailed: July 30, 2010
(Please refer to other side)
Cit,v of Burlinqame
A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to
the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose
Road, Burlingame, California. '
If you challenge the subject appfication(s) in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing,
described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or
prior to the public hearing.
Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their
tenants about this notice.
For additional information, please call (650) 558-725D. Thank you.
William Meeker
Community Development Director
PUBLIC HEARINC� NOTICE
(Please refer to other side)
''� r .
�;. �
�
��
■ f
C��
;::�°� ,;.: � � .. � , ., �. � . �
,. y . . �,"• �s��
y ��
y ' l � '` �
�,c- � •,,`�i9� �► = / r � �, i , �it'
R `' ..�h. �a�' ,i ., � � eYq �' .� y
O� ' ' �f 3s.. .�.� .
ti
��' •� � �� q��.� ' -` � � ,�
��.
� �>;'
. ''"?'�f�. � "cM1'�I,J.. , � i"�4 ^�' .�i i �..
t ���.f �:,., ���� +• -��`
! �i '• � ��
��° � '
��:v �,# x . J �
� _ .� �
�� �� x ;,. � y� �sas��. ��
��; ,.`
�� : ����*..-�� Y�
A
! A. � {' �'.!I � � ' ,i.. {C L
�C� ' } y� � ,` �. �. �,� �, p p� }"` �9tykp' 1
,;
r F.�,; X. � .. � � `.�, l� G ' 1, P d 1"= �� Y" i� /
��' �}(/ 3
�J�� �..' � � ,'„ y� �' L�F�� � .�T,v ` �jQ4y�. •�� YA'
t�s:t � �i
I' _ ���/� �� ��� i fi� k � r t � ' i x
J f
i•� � .
m � �/ •
!
,� * �, ,y a � � . , � . ar`, , � !�t!g� �,l�� ' � �"°��.;� ���"� �:' '� � �'-� � `� R �- .
� �' �A� � M � ��� �
,. �� � . .{,�l ' .� . ♦.. � ... ,{ . . . a@ /, .� `t'
�' ��' f .<.���� `T st�,{"� '� � _`I .�. V �"` + .?.�, S� L , `.;*r
'�,•. ��,a '�.''�1, �� � `. 1 ' S'1L p v�..
�
. , � , � � �� - :�
�
,.
, _�'j
r s �- :� �I,�#'� �, � �:-� w".. PY � J+� 'Y � �,: ::*� �'� . �.
� � � �`~
� � r ,�, .' : � . � •. j ,�-,� � . r . � , . � �� � � ..
.
., , _ - .
.
. ,
,�t' . . J� ,� � : � `.�.'' rMe� �� � � � .
.^ �
� ,�
.,
, � . � . .�� k:� '1g� �.
� c�� ,.�, "7 . '.� � ',-�� cq '�'r� � .� �.N. �«. .����� ��
�. � ,�.:. - P ,� .
.
`.. � � " i � ''Y�' � j A 3 � �/ . ' ♦ re✓t'r
� � � .�
.� � ti, ���,.�r �� �• � .< � �; � r, ,/x „" �r•„ `' ,. ""'- � �
� • J 'a � a '�.'!�'�. � a`.Y 't� ,� , �,� `� �,(A�N ��.
`,.�� m + � . .. , `� � . R r .� `�'� ! y . ;'& � ,s� . ..�by -+ �.� 4� §, y
� � �j ,�
� ' ✓ ' A �'�T` '"� �,�7' � ��' , �' �,�'yp'j . � �d �� ! *' .+ ��.' ; `' �,r,y , ,�b � �,�
.
.
��p' p �, . ,
�
I � .. .,�., � �� � n�d � � ��._ � �� ���� � � a � �,� <_ �, �
f T' �r' ' ♦ a ��!'�w= . �'� v;� � j` `-�y\A"'"� .,�� �'� .
.:��"i �1� ,, y � ; a_� '�'�E � �. ��`'.�:" ..r;rk'. � �. � �� �.1'� • „t .��' '�..:
.r' � ��e, ����,.�, . � 1�` ! ��� *� ^ � r�' ��� v �� • "'��, �, + t� ` �,��:
�
� � t .,,*, ~ � � ��' � �� , � $ p , r O � ." y� .,y{ � �- .y+-"„ ,� . .. '°
¢ f 1 � 1 ti . �A� �,�(.{ °.'A , ' � � r 4', ,_» ,� :.
� r � ��ai' b+ �'. �( It/
� b _ � �' � �'�� ,�. �� ���� �� ./ i a
, .
, y
� .
�
'i , • , .' . .-."• /� +�
,
a� ,_ �t � `�"� . . 4 • � �' ��l� ( � ., � ♦+� P;:. g �� +l„ ',.; .:. ,�'��'�. rJ � t t.��'�,, a ,
,. �r�,�+.• •�. r.,� , ., �� ,�, - , l "7 `:���� .� .: ♦ �.
� �� - s . , . /�,� Ai/ �� x +�'� �' .a �� . ya s �'
� , ,
✓ • • • ► / 7� � ♦ � i3. A � r<-. �� �.� �
�' �'�'� / 1 � �`�� i` �� �° �� �
� .� � �. � ,
/��" 'wy ,� � � `tm"y �,% $ � i�� 3Far_ �� s �' '' , �V� ,p `92`�
I��:.��'!.�`�f � . � ,_�-: :.s�~ .,. ,;`j,; `v :�.�Y�,�♦ '"".s faj ��y'j '?' � ��'�,:: -^T�'*' ,.w,.... `,�,,�'T- ~ � y�
e
,-,,�����,vs
�a�
:
M
\
�� � �
� .
�� � �'�3��y,
� ��, a���.� �
§'
, = 3�s P
dav�
:":,,en�� � � F
�� . �
jm �� 4 ��;. � �"�k C�,t
� ' 7h 3'S
'+v r'a
�p 2 6
*�.� �
.�v��( � j 'Q✓ �t.� �, � �'
a �,
�'� �' t, " '�. ��: ,
�J
/ s d .. �,��.'
r . , ,
�� �
� � � � �
,� ,a '
���,�«�� ���� y
� � 4 =' �/�
R
/ � � ����ry��� -��
.. �'; A ,
�3r�i 2bk •,,1 ,^� , p � �
� � � 1� ��j 6 N�
�o...i t� � h, .'�� . }.
� � �,� � �� �
, �,.
. .
� h i ^ �
. .� �. n ]y
4f �"� ' � , � � �F
.' �'�� v L W.,�''� �'"�' s � /� f:�`w a�2a'� � 4
�y , ,� ,
�- ,,� , •. ��
,� . �n �
�. R '�, * '. � , • • . 1 �
g �
�- ,
�n �yy� w �
�,j ,�� '�� � ^�� � �-: A�`� �:� �� e
�
W A` "-��`'"� ik �_� r'��s ..�J 7� !
^ � ., �
. �. �_ ' ��. � P�
f ;k „ � v* � � .+ � . S l ..� +�'�. 1!` q �u �.
# � � 'F♦ �y � n� .: �j�, � � ��� ,.� ... �� . �,.Py.{`
9 '�,``*,+"� "' ��fi���.+ Y i ��� ���� t��.n; ' '.�ti ��— � .; �'�
� � � ���n..� x ��� �.,y�� �� �a.
,P „� � �w �. ;. r `l''� ; y ,�sL � � , :� ��'� ;
^ � � # a'� .. asv d� �c' ?`.��
�
e * s� r�"�
`�4�'",� i�cs� _ �'i�,�";'�� `=��.,� :* � �
� ��� " ^ � � � .�. ..��'�-:, ... �' . '�#
9 � ,-� � . -�'� N='+'�' . ' .� �� .,
f �: � ���� � .,� .. �y � , � � , ., : ._...
�� ::�, � a �+ ....�(n' `'�''� ..,•t. ��. ' � � . � �' Y } ,/" :'w � ..
�, "`� ',} �AY�� � p . g � • � •y �, '4-if-` a
r�� +� � ��x � ' .a � �',��'�-�� ��;�:��;�..�y",��ro�.;f#'���'�.,�y ',�Y'�" ,i
1 R
� � A �y. , �
1 :,, fY� r� �� y '�" ��.'. � ,k:��'��._��i.� .€i� ?-��;'���IY ��':4�' �"�
� .� ���° '�t: - ,�.� � . - � ..� � .. '�,� � �d ""»�g �, ?n�� '�, ��� .: @s"`z. . ��{ �.�.�•�m�d"'
e � s �.k''4�` '� �.' � e �1i4 ��i�'. � : .
'P..� ���- ��r'� r ��y�'�4n f, z .. � ` r� y �
,p�.�,�' �k 4
"�t�' �'�`�gg[�'.., �>�, � � . �.,� ►� ;��Y a ^Y� � i � 1 ��
e� v � '`n e
�
-' ^'i ' . " � "' 1'� ����'. � ''�.�`�e
,
•: �
� , � � . � 4 � �� , � x 4 ..
+Y� �„.r . <. . ,�,
/
� ' .la � as ' �� : ;..- � . ;�. � ` . s � �.
�i i ,
� � . . � y «f ,.,.o � ��+e�� � � �' � � � I ...
,4 � �, t: �„_
� � ��i ii,� I
�p ��' ,,..�. , �;'� � �..� �;-` V ,% �� �,�I �I ,,
�'1 .,'�r '�_;� ,��'� � "�}� ' 4�ij��� � I a ,;
.� �.' .
� +� � .�. ; � ' �°'. '"� ' 3 .,
� : � � � ' i�ii �� �
�
�,r i . `,� n �"�
:,.-} s'SG I�. 1� 'ri�il b ., � i M'„�,
� .L �I I� � ��� »i� �. � � �
4
�� Y 1 � � � p
� � �Y �
��tX .: � 4 ..
�rl � I l. � � �t �
j � � g� �� ..tv
�
I ( '. 'G ..,' � � �`�^a�
a _ i y�� � �°Tc f� ary��,�y�� ` , ��.
t` �� � �*�" *� �J�,;; :,��mo ��k�'IP ». � � �'a �,�r r � , .
. � t.�T�^ € , � .. ; ,�- , ' �
�
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Unapproved Minutes August 9, 2010
VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEMS
3b. 1720 ADELINE DRIVE, ZONED R-1 -APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW, TWO-STORY
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (JAMES CHU, CHU DESIGN & ENGR., INC.,
APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; AND HOYMAN AND TRAM HONG, PROPERTY OWNERS) STAFF
CONTACT: ERICA STROHMEIER
Reference staff report dated August 9, 2010, with attachments. Associate Planner Strohmeier presented
the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Fifteen (15) conditions were suggested for consideration.
Chair Terrones opened the public hearing.
James Chu, 55 West 43�d Avenue, San Mateo; represented the applicant.
Noted that the neighbors to the left wished to have the bedroom window reduced in size, but it is
nearly 40-feet away from that neighbor and would not appear to be a problem.
Commission comments:
None.
Public comments:
Steve Lo, 1508 Cabrillo Avenue and Suzanne Malik, 1718 Adeline Drive; spoke:
■ The height of the master bedroom window has not been reduced on the left elevation as requested.
Landscaping would not be acceptable as a means of protecting privacy.
■ Stated that the Building Official has indicated that if the window is reduced in size, the room would
remain adequate for egress purposes.
■ The privacy of his daughter will be impacted if the window is not reduced in size as requested.
■ Want the utilities to be run over and under the subject property, not across her property. (Chu —will
ensure that utilities are run from Cabrillo Avenue.)
■ Ensure that when fences and wall on the common property line are removed, that her landscaping is
not impacted. (Chu - Will ensure that landscaping is not impacted.)
There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed.
Additional Commission comments:
■ Fully understands the neighbor's concerns; but feels this could be a slippery slope; in this instance,
the windows in question are befinreen 35-40 feet from a side property line shared with the neighbor.
Landscaping could still be used as an option to address the neighbor's concern.
■ Privacy is not regulated by the City's zoning regulations; though the Commission does attempt to
mediate between the applicant and neighbors in this type of instance.
■ The peak of the garage will potentially obscure part of the window.
■ The overhead lines and sanitary sewer both run down Cabrillo Avenue, so there is no need to
include a condition requiring connections at these locations, since this will already be required.
Commissioner Cauchi moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following conditions:
�
ti
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMMISSION — Unapproved Minutes Augusf 9, 2010
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped
July 28, 2010, sheets A.3 through A.5; and date stamped July 6, 2010, sheets A.1, A.2, A.6, L1.0
and Boundary Survey;
2. that any changes to building materials, exteriorfinishes, windows, architectural features, roof height
or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning
Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff);
3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which
would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit;
4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's May 20, 2010, and July 7, 2010 memos, the City
Engineer's June 2, 2010 memo, the Fire Marshal's May 20, 2010 memo, the Parks Supervisor's May
24, 2010 and July 10, 2010 memos, and the NPDES Coordinator's May 20, 2010 memo shall be
met;
5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed
upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director;
6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site
shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to
comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District;
7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction
plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the
Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved
plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required;
the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning
Commission, or City Council on appeal;
8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single
termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting
details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued;
9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which
requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction
plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior,
shall require a demolition permit;
10. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new
residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in
Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water
runoff;
11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes,
2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame;
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION
PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION
12. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property
5
�
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMMISSION — Unapproved Minufes
August 9, 2010
corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on
the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by
the City Engineer;
13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another
architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the
architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as
window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification
documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division
before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled;
14. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the
roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and
15. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff
architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.
according to the approved Planning and Building plans.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Terrones.
Discussion of motion:
None.
will inspect and note compliance of the
) to verify that the project has been built
Chair Vistica called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed 5-0-2-0 (Commissioners
Lindstrom and Gaul). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:45 p.m.
,:�