Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1109 Bernal Avenue - Staff Report';�'.:'� Y ;` i rt� . �, � w s'. '� - ; ,�'3> - 4 ^,� Y . T:^1 � a. � ' 1 t_+ -.:. Y ::^iR.--'i�.•'�� � ',. �� 4. 1 � r. � ' . _, . �:� � ; � • + ��.c � . � � J ,� �. � C�'-�. �' . ' . y , f, , K � '���y� w , ,. , � � ��ri �',�;/ .t.:. � -- ,. - :� .* ,n _.?i�,. .i,. _�n ��.t �+ni t�i� � t?' �; , � .�,;•, ✓ P �� • ! i� 't .`s. , • � . . � 4J . . � . .� . ',nN_ :_ ' . , h�,. • ' . . '. ♦ . �ri'' . n . � .,':I•�. •.,��:`t�'' �. .►� •• �' ,..<.� �. . ` � .i: � � f':` �.,.. '_ L''�q� '}r�+,�t�,�X`i4^���y ���i?'E�4ti JY ;s`�^ >'•, ".... " �% �� : � ,� y. ;t , .' . .t , fy ,� 4 ,.... .,v . . • , < •'' . ' r • , • :f. ' City of Burlingame Design Review for First and Second Story Addition Item # 3b Consent Calendar Address: 1109 Bernal Avenue Meeting Date: 12/11/00 Request: Design review for first and second floor addition to an existing single story residence at 1109 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1 (C.S. 25.57.010). Applicant and Property Owner: Catherine Shiu Designer: JD & Associates Lot Area: 6,000 SF APN: 026-183-120 General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15303- Class 3- construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures including (a) single-family residences not in conjunction with the building of two or more such units. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences may be constructed or converted under this exemption. Summary: The applicailt is requesting design review for a first and second story addition to an existing single-story house. The proposed additions include 8 SF to the first floor and 1,070 SF for a second floor. The floor area of the proposed residence totals 3,409 SF (.57 FAR) where 3,420 SF (.57 FAR) is the maximum allowed. The number of bedrooms will increase from three to four, which requires a single-car garage. The existing garage has interior dimensions of 11'-4" x 17'-8" with a 2'-0" overhang where 10'-0" x 20'-0" is required. If a two-car garage is needed in the future, it would require the addition of 136 SF and a FAR variance. All other zoning code requirements have been met. Staff Comments: See attached. PROPOSED EXISTING ALLOWED/REQ'D SETBACKS Front (1 st flr): 22'-0" 22'-0" 15'-0" (2nd flr): 35'-0" n/a 20'-0" Side (right): 3'-0"* 3'-0"* 4'-0" (left): 13'-1 " 13'-1 " 4'-0" Rear (Ist flr): 35'-3" 35'-3" 15'-0" (2nd flr): 35'-3" n/a 20'-0" Lot Coverage: 2,398 SF 2,390 SF 2,400 SF 40% . 39.8% 40% FAR: 3,408 SF 2,391 SF 3,420 SF .57 FAR .40 FAR .57 FAR # of Bedrooms: 4 3 n/a Design Review for First and Second Story Addition 1109 Bernal Avenue PROPOSED EXISTING ALLOWED/REQ'D Parking: 1 covered 1 covered 1 covered (11'-4" x 20'-0") (11'-4" x 19'-8")* (10' x 20') 1 uncovered 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') (9' x 20') Height: 28'-3" 23-7" 30'/2 %2 stories DHEnvelope: complies n/a see code * Existing non-conforming condition Preliminary Design Review Study Meeting: On November 27, 2000, the Planning Commission reviewed this project for preliminary design review (see attached November 27, 2000, P.C. Minutes). The Planning Commission noted there are no physical conditions to justify the parking variance and asked if the six inch rise could be eliminated to make parking meet code requirements. The Commission also suggested the wood siding on the front of the house should be repeated elsewhere in the design or removed entirely and replaced with stucco. The Commission recommended that this item be placed on the consent calendar provided the issues noted were addressed. The applicant has submitted revised sheets 1 and 6, date stamped November 29, 2000, with the following changes: the 0'-6" rise in the garage will be removed in order to eliminate the parking variance the existing wood siding at the front of the house will be removed and replaced with stucco to match existing Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on Apri120, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. � Design Review for First and Second Story Addition 1109 Bernal Avenue Findings: Based on the findings stated in the attached minutes of the Planning Commission's November 27, 2000, preliminary study session for the project, the project is found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review guidelines. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action should be by resolution and include findings for design review, and the reasons for any action should be clearly stated. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped November 3, 2000, sheets 2-5 and 7, and date stamped November 29, 2000, sheets 1 and 6, showing removal of the 0'-6" rise in the garage floor, and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall require and amendment to this permit; 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3. that if at any time in the future the residential structure is further enlarged or remodeled to require two covered parking spaces, a floor area ratio variance may be required; 4. that the City Engineer's October 10, 2000, memo shall be met; and 5. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. Erika Lewit Zoning Technician c: JD & Associates, designer 3 City oJBurlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes !�I November 27, 2000 14. 1109 BERNAL AVENUE - ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR PARKING SPACE DIMENSIONS FOR A FIIZST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (CATHERINE SHIU, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; JD & ASSOCIATES, T�F �TC'TNFR 1 C. Deal noted that he had a business relationship with the applicant and would abstain from this project. He stepped down from the dais. ZT Lewit summarized the project . Commission asked staff about the 6 inch rise within the garage which resulted in the shortened depth for parking, could it be removed. Staff suggested that the applicant address this. Chairman Lurzuriaga opened the public comment. Catherine Shiu, property owner, represented the project. She was available to answer questions. Commissioners commented on the design: should explore solutions to the 6 inch rise within the parking area of the garage and eliminate exception; the wood siding on the front should be repeated on the other sides of the building or removed and replaced with all stucco. There were no further comments from the floor and the public comment was closed. ` ' Commission discussion: design is OK but want to removed parking variance, level garage floor, if can do that it could go on the consent calendar; applicant could address problem and suggest resolution, could advertise for variance so if change is not possible could still be acted on. C. Keighran moved to place this project on the consent calendar at the December 11, 2000, meeting with corrections to eliminate the parking variance. The motion was seconded by C. Vistica. Chairman Luzuriaga called for a voice vote on the motion to refer to the consent calendar without a parking variance. The motion passed 5-0-1-1 ( C. Deal abstaining, C. Dreiling absent). This action is not appealable. This item concluded at 10:20 p.m. � 5 REPORTS M OR� STIlVG ACA CEE�ORY LOIVING UNIT S IN HE R-1 ZONE AND�RECA T STAFF. This ite was moved fr m the study how to est address p eparation of a such d elling units uld be sold sep alend to Planners Reports. � �rogr and regulations. It � rate ; it seemed desirable to � units, 't would pro de better control; an properties with such uni cove age and F requirements for the -1 zone. Chairman Luzui made up of Ce . Keighran, Osterlin and Bojues to meet and p� suggested that he group meet at leas once before the end of the letter to the c' izen who was especia y concerned about this iss e CA indicate that he would do so. — FYI REVISION TO APPROVED DESIGN ZO D R-1. Commi sioners noted that the pplicant should be informed design d should have been ore aware of the CBC requ added had it been at the fron of the building because it wq�i �o 'ssion discussed th subject broadly and N noted that it did not eem appropriate that •e uire the properly o er to live in one of e t should be required o stay within curre lot aga appointed a co ittee of commiss' ners .t together a draft f r the commission. It was ear to get started. taff was directed o send a and inform him Commission's a ion. The �VIEW PROJECT AT 1515 CH �t he "botched it" ith compliance lents; would hav been concernec have been a visi le piece of the c� AVENLTE, CBC and the zt the dormer : staff should ROUTING FORM DATE: October 2, 2000 TO: CITY ENGINEER CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL �FIRE MAR5HAL SR. LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR CITY ATTORNEY FROM: CITY PLANNER/PLANNER SUBJECT: Request for design review for a first and second-story addition at 1109 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1, APN : 026-183-120. SCHEDULED PLAIVNING COMMISSION ACTION MEETING: STAFF REVIEW BY MEETING ON: Monday, October 2, 2000 THANKS, Maureen/Erika/Ruben � �—� Date of Comments J� o �M�t�+`I �' � ROUTING FORM DATE: October 2, 2000 TO: CITY ENGINEER �CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL FIRE MARSHAL SR. LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR CITY ATTORNEY FROM: CITY PLANNER/PLANNER SUBJECT: Request for design review for a first and second-story addition at 1109 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-183-120. SCHEDULED PLANI�TING COMMISSION ACTION MEETING: STAFF REVIEW BY MEETING ON: Monday, October 2, 2000 THANKS, Maureen/Erika/Ruben %�% Z�U Date of Comments �(/ 0 G' U� .t.c�/�3 �%'�'� ROUTING FORM DATE: October 2, 2000 TO: �( CITY ENGINEER _CHIEF BLTILDING OFFICIAL FIRE MARSHAL SR. LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR CITY ATTORNEY FROM: CITY PLANNER/PLANNER SUBJECT: Request for design review for a first and second-story addition at 1109 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-183-120. SCHEDULED PLANIVING COMMISSION ACTION MEETING: STAFF REVIEW BY MEETING ON: Monday, October 2, 2000 THANKS, Maureen/Erika/Ruben / � 6 �,ev�-�-n �- �O O2 adDate of Comments ed ✓1''1 ✓!'�-e� T� . / b! .._..- ��� .Qi �(/�"'"� - � G � � l w .. /.� /� -�-�-v� �- � ��� � � �� � � � �.A� %1-e� � �� � �� cir w BURUNQAMi CITY �� BURLINGAME � APPLICATION TO 1'H� PLANNING CONIlVIISSION �a� .o._f Type of Application: Special Permit Variance Other Project Address: � � �� � ����� Assessor's Parcel Number(s): � 2� —' � g d—� 2-O APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER �T�fl� �- � Name: '�� S � � Name: '� Address: � � � � ��R���-- Address: S City/State/Zip:_ �t-�-(Z���"'� �� %�-D lo Ciry/State/Zip: Phone (w): � � I � �� l i (h): 3 `�-�- �- �0� � ARCHITECT/DESIGNER � Name: �1� �: I'`�-�'S� �.A-�S' J Address:l°Z--'Z-� f'�'9'�—° �'n-/�- f�� City/State/Zip: � `ti�'� , . C-��� �10 Phone (w): -3`f 3 — �� f � (h): fax:_ 3 �-� -- 8 ��F-� �o Phone (w): (h): fax: Please indicate with an asterisk * the contact person for this application. FROJECT DESCRIPTION: �1(��T � S � �`�� ��(� ��� �L� AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the herein is true and conect to the best of wledge d belief. ''� � s2 /'�yi�%v, Applicant's Signature Date information given ri� I know about the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. � a? /'� Nd ✓, a--000 Property Owner's Signature Date ----------------------------------------------FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ----------------------------------------- Date Filed: Fee: Planning Commission: Study Date: Ackion Date: �r�, c�rr o� CITY OF BURLINGAME eurtur+�aME PLANNING DEPARTMENT 501 PRIMROSE ROAD <�. BURLINGAME, CA 94010 TEL: (650) 558-7250 . - ' 1109 BERNAL AVNEUE . . . Application for design review and parking variance for parking space dimensions for a PUBLIC HEARING �, first and second story addition at 1109 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1. (APN: 026-183-120) NOTICE The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on Mondav, November 27, 2000 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. I - Mailed November 17, 2000 (Please refer to other side) � .I CITY OF B URLINGAME A copy of the applica�t�n-an'��ans fqr tliisvpro�ect� may be reviewed prior to the meeting a��l�e�. Plann�ig Department at, ��501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, Cal oi-riia. �� � � ���� �;� ` If you chali nge the subject application(s) in court, you may�be limited to raising onl hos �ssues yau or someone else raised at the_,��blic hearing, described i t ce o�' an writ�t � �spo�denc �dsliuer�d to the city �� h �� � � � �� �.ry at or prior t �` t �� ,�� �,�a�i�g��s .v � . "��� �"' ��°h � .� � �t �_� c� � �,� s � Property o�� ers ��� o_re i� ��� otice are responsi �e��or'i �� orming their ° ' ` le e call 650 tenants ab� t thi ��noii �� ditional information� p ( ) 558-7250. � �� ank � � u. � � � �` - � ��+� ffi r � �� .��. � ��i ; � Margaret �o�� �" i3� City Planner �a�� �� , PU °�..� ` �����1�� TICE (Plec�se refer to other side) . �I � � `t i_ _ __ _ ___ __ _ _.... ___- - _ ' i �r�. ciry o� CITY OF BURLINGAME '', PLANNING DEPARTMENT � e��u~�AME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD I. � BURLINGAME, CA 94010 �' TEL: (650) 558-7250 � b,,, ..• � 7 l ; 1109 BERNAL AVNEUE ♦ k I j•Application for design review for a first and ; second story addition at 1109 Bernal Avenue, PUBLIC HEARING ' '� zoned R-l.(APN: 026-183-120) NOTICE The City of Burlingame Planning Commission ; announces the following public hearing on Mondav, December 11, 2000 at 7:00 P.M. in the ' City Hall Council Chambers located at 501� Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. I, , Mailed December 1, 2000 (Please refer to other side) ,,$ CITY OF B URLINGAME � - �?%+'�°� e } .. . _ . � A copy of the applica �'�n-�n � an °'� profe�t. ay be reviewed prior � �� to the meeting a�� Plan�ing� De,par�ment at.� Q 1 Primrose Road, Burlingame, Cal r�#ia � �`` , w � ,. , � �. �d , + � � If you chai nge t raising onl hos : described i t , at or prior t t. Property o ers tenants abo t thi � 558-7250. ank � Margaret o��� City Planner PU � A t� i F' O � limited to ic hearing, � to the city � ?� t a onsi or i orming their lformatio ple e call (650) � � � � �CE , ,.r ; . i � (Please refer to other side) 4 � . • �. �. :. „ . _ - - - — - - -_ �:..,, �.�_ _.�.�_ -- - -- . ._ ,.. �.. ._ . . . . . . . ,. ,. , : . . � ., . ...__ �� ,_... _ _. _, i . .. :. RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for desi�n review for a first and second story addition at 1109 Bernal Avenue. zoned R-1. APN• 026-183-120• Catherine Shiu,�ropertv owner; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on December 11, 2000, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and Categorical Exemption, per Article 19. 15303 - Class 3- construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures including (a) single-family residences not in conjunction with the building of two or more such units. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences may be constructed or converted under this exemption, is hereby approved. 2. Said design review is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such design review are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. CHAIRMAN I, Ann Keighran , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the l lth day of Decemeber, 2000 , by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: SECRETARY EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for categorical exemption and design review. 1109 BERNAL AVENUE effective January 2, 2001 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped November 3, 2000, sheets 2-5 and 7, and date stamped November 29, 2000, sheets 1 and 6, showing removal of the 0'-6" rise in the garage floor, and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall require and amendment to this permit; 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3. that if at any time in the future the residential structure is further enlarged or remodeled to require two covered parking spaces, a floor area ratio variance may be required; 4. that the City Engineer's October 10, 2000, memo shall be met; and 5. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. �' �����, •�' � �� /�� ' � „�,�<' �'`"�` � � '�.,� i � � � � � �` `,�` �"�" � ` `��� �' � �:�� �i ' .. . . � ..� `'ty,� � �` '°��- ' fi,:�.� ° �. �fr . « v ''li .#�, r /� � � � •.�, ��' , A.G� ?� � � ,u► �1 �'�� �,� _ r 4 <{� E �� • ? � � �� 0�' -. �++ ( -� ��� ��M � '��i��' ' f`r � r '�° � * �` , � ` � �,� - --� ,�` � � �� . � .��. �,� .�� . � � �`�° � � � � � � I, �� ; '� � �' � ,. � t Q � p s , �, ��, � . � � ,i �F O� � !\ a ��. � � b, � . ,. " ^� � . �i' L . „ \, , � . ��, .,. . . , ' � � r � � � �� . , .. /�, �4z � " . . ,d . . } s �' � � / . . � � Y _ � � ,.. . � ' , _ „ .;Y` � � { �" �,. y. !j � � ;� - . . � � :"�t � � . b, d " � � _ �� ��. � �; ��. ":� � ' � y.� ��� � � � ,� � "ti�'��,�,� �. �s; . e � ��,�` ' ' 7 ��� . �. � �. ,' . ,.� � ,. - `� , , . � �� - �l �"�'� , > ,/� � ""�' � M _ � , �., : � �Lr.�f � a w.. � . d, w v + - - �' i �� � " �a � � � � ��: ��» , �,� . � � . �r , , � �� ,� � �,. , � � I, , r ,� �° i�e�. � � � � „t� � � � �� �` � a�.� � _ ✓ ' � � ��. �., 4 ' i 4 f ra` b �s � _ N� K ! a"w� � �r..�:. ',1 � re� . �'Y� C,�, � i '�," � �t �- .d � _�',.'' . ��1 M� �..,�� , � t, �� � ;"` 4° / �. � ! '�� �? , � �� , .� �'� k,� � � � �� r � � b �'�� .�� � � 4f � y .. ,y. , , .: � �� � , . �� ._ .� '� � �" s . », � , . � " s a. ,. s ` . ' - ° � � � �. � �- •_ ,2 � � v , � 3z.t �" . �/ �' � �� ti�'*� v � �' � . �,- , i� � � a, :t r� , � �� � � . : _ .. ;, a+ � µ � � � � r _� , , . P � - � �s �. , � , � y�, � , � ,. :t ' r � `� g . � . � � _. � �'� � �:�— � 'r1c+�' /� � , .r �� . •�^ , y. � /� 'J.: ♦ .�� �' �� �11f9�. �a � ; , i � �. S �/w� w � � � � ah R � � � ' � �, 1 ��. �' .Y , `� r i . �' \ ! ...�':� . 3,n. , . —�. � `�` . bC,�EV��--Tr � .�I {�� � aN�'� ` 5 � ' `'� R .. , ,. �. �r . � , p.� �; -`� l V� � +� � '� �,� .� -,.� '� � *���� . �HOOL.,° �- � ' _ � ' �. � �� i � , , �, "` � �� . �,� : w � .� " � �`'�� ��� � ��► ."'� � � , ��� � �. � � � ° , , . : � ��� - �,.� �.'� � ��d � � ,, ..: f �. , � - � , �� : , , �� F �� � ��' � �� � �, . , w , _. � � n . r �. �-��```� ' �"' y� � �),. � *`t r ,� �' S(/ � � '� s � ;�.�` d� � A�;� q�.. � :; l � �` � � " ''e7��.� ,�� ��� � ` � 1I� � "� �y r, �'"�A�;"..�» � , y �� . �. F , v � � �� � � � � � � ♦ �� ?�• � � �. � r� ,�., , �� � ; ^ ,,� �. : �� . .�' , �- s . »�� , . . ` �`�� � ..: � ` ., _ � � � � �� rt�� � � � _ _ > �.� �., / � � � �`�`l �/ �. �r. \ r _ � � i �w f' � �� �:'� +�`�/ � � r ' � � �1 a .., , ,, � ,. � � � �• . > ' � � ,� � � ` . ,._ ..�: . �� � � � w �� = �, R=.-. , �� � q ,� ���� � V �1�, r� ,- F � J � ^ - � �� h ,,''� `-' � "�` .. � _ � , , � �., �i�' � � . , .,.•. . , ��� � �,;,� � � - ._ . . , ,., . � ,. �.� a � � � ��� � � �'� � ��'� a� �� .�'�� , � � , , . � �� � � " � ` � � � � � 9 � � � �. ,; ,� �.��,� �' � � . �m ��.�� � ` �" � � � � � s ; - _ ���� ;: ��� .� � ' k � � �_ x �a.::� s ,�; 1 ' �� . �'`s� �• � ...�..