The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1480 Benito Avenue - Staff ReportCity of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Apri19,2001 Chairman Luzuriaga called for a voice vote on the motion to approve the project with the added conditions. The motion passed on a 5-0-0-2 (Cers. Bojues and Osterling absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:30 p.m. 4. 1480 BENITO AVENUE — ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR HEIGHT FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (DAVE HOWELL, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; CRAIG AND DENISE FAWCETT, PROPERTY OWNERSI Reference staff report, 04.09.01, with attachments. Planner Keylon presented the report, reviewed criteria and Planning Department comments. Five conditions were suggested for consideration. Commission had no questions of staff. Chairman Luzuriaga opened the public hearing. Dave Howell , 2825 Hillside Drive, the applicant and architect, explained that he followed the Planning Commission's directions from the last meeting. He added definition and roof articulation to the design. He stepped the wall down to try to keep it as low as practical. Commission asked if the windows at the bedrooms were French casement windows? The applicant replied that yes, they were French casement windows and some were egress windows. The Commission asked that these be labeled on the plans in the future. C. Luzuriaga closed the public hearing. C. Keighran moved to approve the request for design review for a first and second story addition and the special permit for height since it enhances the architecture of the house, which will be an asset to the neighborhood. The applicant reduced the plate height, which helps reduce the bulk and mass. C. Keighran moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following conditions: 1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped March 19, 2001, sheets 1 through 9, and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall require and amendment to this permit; 2) that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, which would include changing plate heights, adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3) that the conditions of the City Engineer's February 20, 2001, memo shall be met; 4) that the project shall comply with the proposed demolition and construction recycling ordinance recently approved by the City Council; and 5) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. C. Vistica seconded the motion. Chairman Luzuriaga called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 5-0-0-2 (Cers. Bojues and Osterling absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:35 p.m. 5. 341 DWIGHT ROAD - ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE FOR A NEW TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING, AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR AN ATTACHED GARAGE (DORON KLE1N, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; NICK SOLINGER, PROPERTY OWNER) Reference staff report, 04.09.01, with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria and Planning Department comments. Five conditions were suggested for consideration. Commission had no questions of staff. 4 r � �� . �- -- ... _�- '� � + � �' `_�� `��, ' a �ir." � ' �: �a`�+ +> .,.._ _ ' �: �+ -�.+— -- � - - �+'� _ � � ' _ _ � ♦ • :I � � � . - _. - _; _ �•�. � �\ ` , � �� .� r ,--��-_ R ~ � ,� �� r`. � � �� i� .� ,� _ s' ,. y' �,. _ i =� r. ��`�� `� _- � .! y-,�- � �., ! � � . 3 _ �`� 1� . 0.� - � � � ; � -` �� .,- .�� i _ ` _ r : - .� � � - � _ _�- ��._- - _ � ` r� _+�,'^� ' i. _ ` - � - =y �' _ = �t i � �_- �_"+ °. _ -- � � _ - R� - T� �l �� _ ��'_:'�"� R - �+�' _ � � � -_ � - � . _ .�. � - _� - �.=- _ .�„y.. � �W� ! .� _ .�_ _ � -�� _ _� � .... _ a�` �, - � � �� _�_� � -- _ �!._ — �-- � Ci of Burlin ame Item # � g Regular Action Calen r Design Review for a First and Second Story Addition and a Special Permit for Height Address: 1480 Benito Avenue Meeting Date: 4/9/O1 Request: Design review for a first and second story addition and a special permit for height (C.S. 25.57.010 and 25.28.060,a,1). Applicant and Designer: Dave Howell APN: 027-172-230 Property Owner: Craig and Denise Fawcett Lot Area: 4950 SF General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15301 Class 1-(e) additions to existing structures provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition. Summary: The existing house is single-story with a detached garage. The applicant is proposing first and second story additions and a special permit for height. With the proposed additions, the floor area will be 2907 SF (0.59 FAR) where 3084 SF (0.62 FAR) is the maximum allowed. The height of the proposed structure is 30'-8", where a special permit is required for a height between 30'-0" and 36'-0". With the proposed additions, the number of bedrooms will increase from 2 to 4. A single covered parking space is required by code and a single existing, non-conforming parking space (11'-3" x 19') is provided in the detached garage. If two covered parking spaces are required in the future, existing floor area would have to be eliminated to accommodate a two-car garage or an F.A.R. variance would have to be granted. All other zoning code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following: • Design Review for first and second story addition • Special permit for height PROPOSED EXISTING ALLOWED/REQ'D SETBACKS Front (Ist flr): no change 17'-0" 15'-0" (2nd flr): 28'-9" --- 20'-0" Side (left): 4'-0" 4'-6" 4'-0" (right): no change 9'-6" 4'-0" Rear (Ist flr): 28'-0" 35'-6" 15'-0" (2nd flr): 26'-6" --- 20'-0" Lot Coverage: 1980 SF 1661 SF 1980 SF 40% 34% 40% Design Review for First and Second Story Addition and Special Permit for Height 1480 Benito Avenue PROPOSED EXISTING ALLOWED/REQ'D FAR: 2907 SF 1654 SF 3084 SF 0.59 FAR 0.33 FAR 0.62 FAR Parking: no change 1 covered 1 covered (11'-3" x 19') * (10' x 20') 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') # of bedrooms: 4 2 --- Height: 30'-8" ° 25'-6" 30'-0" DHEnvelope: complies --- see code ° Requires a special permit (30'-8" where height between 30'-0"and 36'-0" requires a special permit). * Existing structure is nonconforming in length (11'-3" x 19' where 10' x 20' is required). Staff Comments: See attached. March 12, 2001 Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission design review study meeting on March 12, 2001, the Commission commented that the height of the structure should be extended to eliminate any flat portions of roof. The Commission would support a special permit for this extended height if it benefits the architectural style and design. Commission suggested that the second story plate line be redesigned to resolve the "layer cake" look of the current proposal and to blend the second story addition into the first floor. They noted that the plate line on sections of the second story could be dropped and that some change to the perimeter walls may be required to improve the design (March 12, 2001, Planning Commission Minutes). The Commission moved to place this item on the regular action calendar with direction to the applicant that these items be addressed. The applicant submitted revised plans, dated March 19, 2001, in response the Commission's suggestions. The following changes were made to the proposed structure: • the flat portion of the roof has been removed and the height has been increased by 0'-11 ", from 29'- 9" to 30'-8"; this change requires a special permit; • the plate height for bedrooms #2 and #3, at the front (west) elevation of the second story addition, has been reduced from 8'-6" to 7'-6"; • the plate height for the bathrooms on the north and south elevations of the second story addition has been reduced from 8'-6" to 6'-6"; and • the plate height at the rear (north) elevation of the second story addition has been reduced from 8'- 6" to 8'-1" 2 Design Review for First and Second Story Addition and Special Permit for Height 1480 Benito Avenue Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on Apri120, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Findings for a Special Permit: In order to grant a special permit for height, the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.51.020 a-d): (a) The blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood; (b) the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood; (c) the proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city; and (d) removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements, and the mitigation for the removal that is proposed is appropriate. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action should be by resolution and include findings made for design review and a special permit, and the reasons for any action should be clearly stated. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped March 19, 2001, sheets 1 through 9, and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall require and amendment to this permit; 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, which would include changing plate heights, adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows 3 Design Review for First and Second Story Addition and Special Permit for Height 1480 Benito Avenue and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3. that the conditions of the City Engineer's February 20, 2001, memo shall be met; 4. that the project shall comply with the proposed demolition and construction recycling ordinance recently approved by the City Council; and 5. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. Erika Lewit Zoning Technician c: Dave Howell 4 RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR HEIGHT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for desi�n review and a special permit for hei�ht for a first and second story addition at 1480 Benito Avenue, zoned R-1, Crai� and Denise Fawcett, propertv owners, APN:027-172-230; WI�REAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on April 9, 2001, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15303, Class 3, construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures including (a) single-family residences not in conjunction with the building of two or more such units is hereby approved. 2. Said design review and special permit are approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such design review and special pernut are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. CHAIRMAN I, Ann Kei hran , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of Anril , 2001 , by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: SECRETARY EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for design review and special permit for height 1480 Benito Avenue effective April 16, 2001 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Deparhnent date stamped March 19, 2001, sheets 1 through 9, and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall require and amendment to this permit; 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, which would include changing plate heights, adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3. that the conditions of the City Engineer's February 20, 2001, memo shall be met; 4. that the project shall comply with the proposed demolition and construction recycling ordinance recently approved by the City Council; and 5. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. City ofBurlingame Planning Commission Minutes March 12, 2001 11. 1480 BENITO AVENUE — ZONED R-1— APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (DAVE HOWELL, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; CRAIG AND DENISE FAWCETT PROPERTY OWNERSI CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Chairman Luzuriaga opened the public comment. Dave Howell, 2825 Hillside Drive, project designer, was available for questions. Commissioners noted that this is good design, would comment on the flat roof, it should be eliminated, the area which would extend above height limit is only about 3%z feet wide, roof might only need to be about a foot higher to eliminate flat area, qualifies for special permit for design; from rear looks like building has flat top, nice articulation, walls step in and out, but the second story plate line and roof peaks need a little work; extending the roof would be true to the style of the architecture; need some aggressive work done with plate lines, could be less than 8'-6" on most of top floor, some at 7'-6", might mean some of the roof comes down to the first floor; it is still a layer cake look that needs to be resolved, maybe lower plate on one side of a room, not whole room; this may impact perimeter walls on plan to accommodate changes. The applicant noted that he was trying to stay within all code requirements and noted that from the street it would not be apparent that there is a flat roof. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Commissioners noted that this project will require some work but feel designer understands what needs to be done. C. Dreiling made a motion to place this item on the regular action calendar on March 26, 2001, provided that the following revisions have been made and plan checked: that the flat portion of the roof be eliminated and a special permit for height be considered to keep design in true Tudor style; need some work done on the second floor plate lines, some sections of roof could extend down to first floor; may need to change perimeter walls on plan to accommodate roof changes. This motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Chairman Luzuriaga called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the regular action calendar on March 26, 2001, if plans have been revised as directed and staff has time to plan check them. The motion passed 7-0. The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 9:45 p.m. 12. 1424 CASTILLO AVENUE — ZONED R-1— APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR AN ATTACHED GARAGE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (ALBERT SHILAIMON, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; ARIS RUIZ AND ASSOCIATES, INC., ARCHITEC � SP Brooks briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Chairman Luzuriaga opened the public comment. Aris Ruiz, 726 Baden Avenue, South San Francisco, project architect, summarized the project and was available for questions. Albert�S�hilaimon, 1424 Castillo Avenue, applicant, was also available for questions. Commission noted that this is a tough project, working with existing,�touse that now has a plain fa�ade, but the existing design does hark back to the 20's and 30's; with the addition, will become a modern tract style house; garage is attached, but there is no way to enter the house from the garage, is virtually detached anyway, why deviate from the pattern of the neighborhood. 10 �r� CIT w � BURLJNQAMi i CITY OF BURLINGAME � e�� . � APPLICATION TO Z� PLANNING CONIlVIISSION \b• •_'_%� Type of Application: Special Permit Variance Other �' • - ' � � - � i� � ! .: . ,., Assessor's Parcel Number(s): /�' ��=/7T 2^- � 3� `� APPLICANT Name: �� , �i..� � ,. '/ � Address: ��?S �7;/ll <��L��' f��. . City/State/Zip:��i� �Td.__M��i7 Phone (w):�� 3�-7�� h�; �i ��2- R�� fax: // ''� �� ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Name: _I�,� vE � f�,Fi � Address:� � �/GLs�o� f�4_ PROPERTY OWNER Name: _,p��E.eIL��l�'�� Address: ��iL�-�Fa1�T�� City/State/Zip: %�i�t'�.�,�%1�4,n.r,�,.l� . � � Phone (w): (h): — fa.x: � � � G4u_ oFF G� 1�i5b.VE TO/nl�n�e� P,�/o,�- Ta F.4x��cj Please indicate with an asterisk * the contact person for this application. City/State/Zip: /��r�,d� � .�� Phone (w): �/e�1 �¢?��/57 (h): �� ?'' l�� fax: ��¢?,�� FROJECT DESCRIPTION: �.E��.✓� � /�1 /��/ I1`' .�,i � AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Applicant's Sign ture Date I know about the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Plan��g Commission. '� � � �� Z/Ir�� Properly �wner's Sign�ture Date ' ------------------------------------- ---------FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ------------------------------------------ RE,CEIVED Date Filed: Z 12. I Fee: � 84�5 , OD � FEB 1 2 2001 Planning Commission: Study Date: Action Date: CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. Mar-29-01 03:51P David Howell aen� ny: �lir ur tlUnllryUNMt rLH1VIVlIVUj o�u oao arau� � �„• cm aF avRt.wo�ues rurnvnvo o�� ^,`�ol - ' _ ,`� �f�+ly J `Qy•�� i r �+ L��=-T,� ,�,. \ �� . . .. . .4r .. 650-342-1849 P.O1 mar•-�a-ui i:aurM� raye �Ic BBfSAD�� '��Sl8�72S0 E(650)696-]790 � . ?�;;t .c.. �/�5^ 1�if�.li':C: . . � - � � ;,.,: ::��,,,._ . - : . • ' . . . ... , ., .. ,Y< i. .. I , . �rn� Piann;ng com�aissioa� is �uiroa by iaW c� �oe�ru�n� �.� ae�,ed b�% ctu c;ey�s or�d�n�nce �caae �,� �: Sxtion 25.50). Yo� answers tb thc foilowing question9 caa assist thc Planning Commission in malarlg the decision as to whet�a d�e, fiadinga caa b� rnade for your roqnest. Pkasc �type or write neatIy in ink. `Refer to the back' of t8is form:for aasistaacc with these queations. • . 1. ExplaJ� w1�y tl�e Wiwd:of �rrars, aeaJe and do�xi�ant strtietrnwl cha�cteristics of tha new con�Ar'scm'oK or addr'�ion ane co�rsr,stant wilh the �xis�ileg str�cture's deslgn and with the txJsting street a�d neighborhood r�,� ��,�,� �•�s ��,� T�.�To� � r� �i.s�►-�� ,��., 2. Ex,�l4in Jbow tlre v�arlety of roof line, Jacadg exte�io� fi,i�h irrmerials a�ed el�vatior�s oj tAe proposed new struc�ure or additior� arr consistent wlrh :the exls�lag straclure, street and p�ighborbood �E r��,� ��-�,� �,� rs ��-��a � � �'/ ��T�� L��-�--�v�s, �. How wil! Nie pmposed project be eoresisteRt wltJ� rht residtrrtlol design guidclin�s adopred by �hs clty (C.S. 23.f7)Y . 1'�rs � /��E51a�/ �"�'0��11��s ��G �� 4j�"l�4?-�0� � �'/�,�J�,�ivi�-/�i+.1'. ,. � . . . . �.. �< : . . � . 4. Ezpiai�r how tlre rairo►�ot of any trets localed witJblA tlre fooqitin� af any naw sd�irdare or additioh �s �eessary axd is consJsteRt wi�h t1f�e city'a rieforestation �eq�eicn�ents. H'hat inil�galiox ispnoposed for the rr.w�owrl ofanY [n�sr'-�xPfatn wky rl�ts r»i�lgatron ls appropsiat� ' . . . �!�/�4 . ' . � � 6PBCP�tM.FRM � . . +: - '. ,; . .. , . . "� - ' '• ".:.�.: - �5 ...,. ..,'.:,. , �r�, ciTr o� CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPARTMENT BURLJN�AME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD � BURLWGAME, CA 94010 �• TEL: (650) 558-7250 1480 BENITO AVENUE Application for design review for a first and second story addition at 1480 Benito Avenue, P�BLIC HEARING zoned R-1. (APN: 027-172-230) The City of Burlingame Planning Commission NOTICE announces the following public hearing on Monday March 12, 2001 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. Mailed March 2, 2001 (Please refer to other sicle) CITY OF .�URLINGAIVIE A copy of the application-and plans far this project ma� be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Planninb Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California.` If you challen;e the subject application(sj in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants abo�t this �. notic�. , For � additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank yoLi � �� ' , ua� � � - �;` . A �.�;� � � � � �' �` � Margaret Monroe"; ;�� ' .�� .� -r� �� ,��d'" City Planner ` � �� , �� PUBL�C HEARiNG`NOTICE (Please refer to otl�er side) �r� cirr o� CITY OF BURLINGAME BURLINS'iAME PLANNING DEPARTMENT 501 PRIMROSE ROAD <,�+ • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 TEL: (650) 558-7250 1480 BENITO AVENUE Application for design review and special permit for height for a first and second PUBLIC HEARING story addition at 1480 Benito Avenue, zoned R-1. (APN: 027-172-230) N OTIC E The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on Mondav, April 9, 2001 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. Mailed March 30, 2001 (Plea�se r-efer to ot/ter side) CITY OF BURLINGAME A copy of the application �and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meetin� at the Planning Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlinbame, California. If yeu challen�e the subject a�plication(s} in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you ar sonleone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners wl�o receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this not'ice. For additional �information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. � �� _� ��, , ' � � , �3 MargaretMonroe ' � ` �� i '��-�` � �,�� .�` City Planner '�^�.'� ��' .. , � �� ^� ,,,�. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer- to other side) RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR HEIGHT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for desi n review and a special �ermit for hei�ht for a first and second story addition at 1480 Benito Avenue, zoned R-1, Crai� and Denise Fawcett,.�ro�ertv owners, APN:027-172-230; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on A�ril 9, 2001, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15303, Class 3, construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures including (a) single-family residences not in conjunction with the building of two or more such units is hereby approved. 2. Said design review and special permit are approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such design review and special permit are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. CHAIRMAN I, Ann Kei h,�; ran , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of ,A�ril , 2001 , by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: SECRETARY EXHIBIT "A" Co�ditions of approval for design review and special permit for height 1480 Benito Avenue effective April 16, 2001 l. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped March 19, 2001, sheets 1 through 9, and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall require and amendment to this permit; 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3. that the conditions of the City Engineer's February 20, 2001, memo shall be met; 4. that the project shall comply with the proposed demolition and construction recycling ordinance recently approved by the City Council; 5. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. . � � "�.'�-"'� ?. , • � , ' � t i �{k'=� ' �L T • )V'�• �u, •' �j` ,N/ ` j, .e '+•i� A ,t^� :,.,� r � . 6-f � f. � v .�' �d� ri� �'I'��.A'�7-�,Y�.,F��'p�� .}�lT� �Y�7?� 5 �� .�' T� i �.`._ ,:.�;. � •: ��.i��p�-..� : �,. i!-.,�9Uifi" �� ?�'d�,..o.� ��,�C� _e . j�F�' �;A�y � r+ �p _. �� .' � y[.. ` \ . l ` .0 l��if;��-k '�7� ,,t+�i�Y" � , 1 �k�" � ; (�-� ` � i�J�. � , ;�� t . � � � �{,. � / A�, " # `��y �� j� � �.: �. \ s?s k ��'�Y£ \ � `'+� � J � �. >r `�, i 3 • y � �,�' ' s � f y ''� � � �. �� - �� ' �.� � 1 ,�•r ~��,� � �(N ..r � . ,n,�r��+� _'iL' `�\tz .� ,� �` y' �'� •4:2. s' ��+��\`�� a..� � �,�,� b � P+.•� �' . f,�' �I, � .�� . �\,�5. �� / ��,,:? � � T� � yl�i��._ I , ��,. •` `�0�. �,� L �� 9� � � -,-'�''A'� `'�'� � � .� 1 � ,. ; + �:,� � v�- �.�`�J � a��• iar� �;!�' �.y'�' ,� ,., � � .��.. C, :T ��, � .� r A� . v i��° � p y. �y� ' � � _.� 'p'� ;�' S _� �. i � �. , r , �"� ;��. ' � J� � 1 �� vvl��r r.. 'r t �°. �i � "'b,�` � 4 � } .1' � �� -<'"�_'3'. `� '��-�� ^x�-r � ,e. �" - b ;r3�'� � � _:.� � A ,,�+y �.; � �.�' , ,+ ,;� � �.,,`� �� ,�'�� . , � r, � • �'� � `� � tir ,�"�, fy� � t , �.. 41:,-ir,> �h. ' ��. J`_' `. °�t�£' � . 4 .l s.• t .. � , � � �',r ,l�r� i �� r.�., r,�. t � � .,� _....,,,,' � ' r, h �A4� �� ' ..i� $ !' '.k ' •• \7;; �� • � , ! • r . � •; ��S�e� `^t;, , � y� ��+e�A. .,� �,�.. , a� ` .�' � l�� ' , .��• ��% j. a�—•- '�-a. / :;� �''0. `.-0 ` � � ,';' .�.� �" � �� i�.6/ ''r � � � �?, ' �, t . � • � \` , 4 . 'R� - '� � '�'' t�.` '� , ` ( '� :5 t�`� � �'� "'t , � � .�� Q } . j / . . � ,/ � :� � ,��•... +/. =�,y �-. j �� +' � � ��+. r t � X ��A. � y ' � '- � �� 4t�.�d ^ � � � 1 r� .�' / f,` �n . .� ,y' � �,y_ ' E ` t .r� r y . ^.� •. �1� �A t.,.s,- �V _�� n�� .,�i � '°! ♦,�• .� ��`� .S. �` 0 ,.��" `a r� i .? • J J�(� �•� : � � � � � � . .I F ..'� r." ' �R ,i �)�� \ i � �� Qr.� ��•. i . '�F,�� *� �'� �! � :{. � � �'it. � ✓ i � • � . � f �' l�/ l �� g�� ' "�� ;e, - F• � � / � f. �+%� ��, " �; 'hi'. '"4 ,..[ � � � � .. 1�1.L b. \-1 / ' �� S - i �� . �� ' "' �4 � �i'' `O'� t°� �' ;w .�'` �2 � Er ►'' . .r' ,u �y,,L, i` �,,�, � y �;; .. �� : ti > , �, ' ?� •S � t�� '!i.• �'1�,� �' � 1_'Y�-. �+w� ^n� �r;. � + _ ` .y r � � , T' � y, r , C . �. Ss:�� . ' . ti, � '' j'`� � .,� � �.. ';M. E �� . �� ? K r _. t � p t�� . •'� ra y �� _ E � ��, .:�� "�;�� r .�;.�: • y ��(((```ppp �°" �� •A� T�? .�. � %� '..,� �.�� '¢.n^ �� .. .�� • ".�. '� i �, S. y.`� _�i. c1. .;� �� ' � �� .�� '1 `�-y� i ��c � •�'f n� �t I ,tl. � �q r r�� J.. y �J ' �, � S • �� A. � '�+: + , �. =l 1► '' S . RC..� ,`r� '` � �� r ? �' M �i{ Y ,f �r�' � ��h � � � � �1 :� � i\ �� i#� r {ip + .a Y� 1, llti� �'v�4. }'w ��. \; `�. _ �.� '� ,' ' � ,�F f_� .lM1� ',.�7\'�Y 4 �}. . ; �si "� �. � , .s � � � � .-� ��. � �^'[' 3i" x, �. :� � � - �� = -:� - __ �;�- �; ,� ..� �_s. �.• ;� �� .-� � � .�"� �.z A � -' � , �! �<.; a. r,<;a • � 7 � ' �' .� .�,y i �t � . �, �:; ` �v �� i.,. - ` i i� ,.. .t,,� .. _� �'� , ` �' F' ,+� '3 �� L'ja' �'�� 1 ' � _ '� �r�:= . �' - � ` � ,� � � .: • �,,�,�' »' b � 'C� '' � "'s�'#.�+ � � � �" �f� �t � � �i ,�}� t ii . I' •, � , ��' ,: �,.� 'lii w� �� ' �' : p ' � � - ,�..h ��,�:�',ti a '4' t�i4 ( .i. � �� : � �� y Y w + ; 11 � :'�.��1 1 L i • �5 �,�y �� +j` � .�j ^� ��' �rc'� . y.. 'r � .'` � : s /: H' '''8 � � � `1�• a �. '.. � - ' :i�� ,� ' �., �� a�;: j � ti _*� � �,,�,�� - � ,�, � ,�r ..'_�,. .'.' � ��>� '"; • >;� , _ ' `.,fi,. � ,,•' . ,',\ .+ �, `, , , ,. �r'�� '�''z'"�. #: R:i� �. E:. � r � ' � i ' � : � .�� !�'(� � ` a ��,� :- .. � � "4i'a O ' � � „ ' f �. �, . � y ti:�. � , � �:, �` `' ]�'i ;�. a �' �� '� � l� '�''`:. ��. �, . : ��,� r 1 � � �� ,, `�3r ",� �,' f "�*,r , ` " y \ ` :-ti ��1 ; r-�, t �[.'f'. i �, rt `d'`;�' ' � p` A '- ,�. c �'. > ,y,,t <{r�4.i a :e '�r•• s� f.}'�� e �i,�r r :�i'. ,'f�,�T,�.A, t�. � / . ] d �,i ^�� A +r Y h, ti�� ' + tii . \'�� • S ' �/ � �Sf �Y' �• .� f 1'. ��•��1\.!'.*/ y `-.. ` �J ,�*, 9�� .:l ^ R i�A n� � �'l � � ;�. ..P*\il. i��S.�v ; j�f'��.� � �- l �. �� > ` � �d' �'� . ;, �� i�{'' � ` � '' � . s 4;: � 3� u¢.i . , ,f, ,ti,� •.:� � ,_ a :�� ;•- � \ �� , �Y i � r s s. " �. -. b , a . � �,ny * y1'�a r t t �,� ��' s� . � ,�: ( � � w ";&s. r , ., Y�' r r,� � ^ � p� � �S �- ;� :,i �> � , _ , , . ':�� t�y�'� `\ �, i . F� . _ .` � '`yf�'�J .�' r, .: ' �� ik � v � . � d� � 'Yr1 ' ��I ,1 � }h.. � (�� rj'.� � �Ri�'��I � �'�� :� �( �� . '�' � �'t �� A�:: . ♦ `• � t.,.,y .l.' � � �r � �Yt T ws� ,� N z , .. ;�^r . �� t� ... � � ��, }�' � ' ` ., .. . `� �� v t�� ,4 dk �� i 1 i..,� � .�6.� C . 1' *�''.� r ,� "��i '-� .. '� . �.�Y} �/ . 4 �. � 1. � �ti � :,S � . y ., � i:#" `.. � ��. �� R � 5 r��"� _ ,. ' yi . . . . „ . � I i �, i � � �vY� � , �' p ',. 'Q` � � f �'� 1 .•� '.�,� �v �r` �`.� .��5 r`(�, j +0 . . r �j"1��' ;�^ 1'y� e�s '"z• „q+"...r ��•. ,:t).� ,' r- 7.