The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About312 Howard Avenue - Resolution, , � , RECORDING REQUESTED BY: Planning Department City of Burlingame WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE BURLINGAME, CA 94010 �){�f:�� _n,�?�� , - ;q,. , ...��: : ,-: � ; ee�� I�lU FEE r.. ' i �n.7 � � : F2� �.ords , . , '.:�t�o t, , c�,,..prrl�.r '' { ? �� s' � �� tli ` _ ; R � Resolution No. 027-2004 312 HOWARD AVENLTE; APN: 029-262-150 TITLE OF DOCUMENT RECEIVED MAY 2 � 2004 CI pLA�NNgNGLDEPTME I hereby certify this to be a full, true and correct copy of the document it purports to be, the original of which is on file in my office. Date: 04/23/2004 Mar aret onroe, Ci Planner � �� l, i RESOLUTION 027-2004 RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for desiQn review for a second story addition at 312 Howard Avenue, zoned R-1, Thomas and Trish Nichol, property owners, APN: 029-262-150; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on April 12, 2004, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15301 Class 1(e)(1) - additions to existing structures provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition, is hereby approved. 2. Said design review is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such design review are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the Official records of the County of San Mateo. � � � I, �'11rh I�tNA.r1 , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of April, 2004 by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Auran, Bojues, Keele, Keighran, Osterling, NONE Brownrigg, Vistica ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ecretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for categorical exemption and design review. 312 Howard Avenue Effective Apri122, 2004 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped March 11, 2004, sheets A1 — A3; and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall require and amendment to this permit; 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors or basement, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury; certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; 4. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; all new windows shall be true divided light wood windows and shall contain a wood stucco-mould trim to match the existing trim as close as possible; 5. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 6. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; 7. that the conditions of the City Engineer's February 17, 2004, memo, the Fire Marshal's February 19, 2004, memo and the Recycling Specialist's February 11, 2004, memo shall be met; 8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction Plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 9. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; and EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for categorical exemption and design review. 312 Howard Avenue Effective Apri122, 2004 Page 2 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. .. --,� .� : ... t, , ��, �� Project Comments Date: �� From: Subject: Staff Review: 02/11 /2004 �City Engineer ❑ Chief Building Official ❑ Fire Marshal ❑ Recycling Specialist ❑ City Arborist ❑ City Attorney Planning Staff Request for design review for a first and second story addition at 312 Howard Avenue, zoned R-1 , APN:029-262-150 02/17/2004 V =� � �� r � �,��_. fi • .. __.� ��.....<< . ..�.f _., ,'sa ' � �a,w.�� g��_�� V LL s!_�I..L= ,.r .-:q . a. � :� ,i , . ,. r. _ .s•. .!. 1. " ' ' "`"� l�`�wb'11Y� 1� Lti� :t�. _/ .,� Lc�� ...i _t. -- - [�' L1<�.... � �1-_ i .-�....L Ga: ,ic.�,�._. �r� . ... c. � �rn. ' _ -a ' � � ��i Reviewed by: 1�.� • Date: ��,��`� Date: To: From: Subject: Staff Review: _ _,.�,y Project Comments 02/11 /2004 ❑ City Engineer ❑ Chief Building Official �Fire Marshal ❑ Recycling Specialist ❑ City Arborist ❑ City Attorney Planning Staff Request for design review for a first and second story addition at 312 Howard Avenue, zoned R-1 , APN:029-262-150 02/17/2004 �.__._, � � � 1 �� . a j ��e- ls-�\� '`�� C'� [�� S"ta��[,�� C.:.�."i V � c�_ � �^S. �.� ._ \ � � :_S �. "� .y e—� ,��C�.c3 ` �.�— ��-�S.'�� Reviewed by: � i" �/ }� � ��t�� Date: �� Date: ,�.., , �... . �.,� Project Comments 02/11 /2004 To: ❑ City Engineer ❑ Chief Building Official ❑ Fire Marshal �j Recycling Specialist ❑ City Arborist ❑ City Attorney From: Subject: Staff Review: Planning Staff Request for design review for a first and second story addition at 312 � Howard Avenue, zoned R-1 , APN:029-262-150 02/17/2004 Applicant shall submit a Waste Reduction Plan and Recycling Deposit for this and all covered projects and sections of projects prior to any demolition, construction or permitting. by: 0 Date: �� CITY O� BURLINGAME q, e bQ� 90 NwTm .wwc �• The City of Burlingame CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD TEL: (650) 558-7250 PLANNING DEPART'MENT BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010-3997 FAX: (650) 696-3790 Apri123, 2004 Robert Medan 1936 Los Altos Drive San Mateo, CA 94402 Dear Mr. Medan, Since there was no appeal to or suspension by the City Council, the April 12, 2004 Planning Commission approval of your application for design review became effective Apri122, 2004. This application was to allow for construction of a second story addition at 312 Howard Avenue, zoned R-1. The Apri112, 2004 minutes of the Planning Commission state your application was approved with the following conditions: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Deparhnent date stamped March 11, 2004, sheets A1 — A3; and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall require and amendment to this permit; 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors or basement, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury; certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; 4. that prior to final inspection, Planning Deparhnent staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; all new windows shall be true divided light wood windc�ws and shall contain a wood stucco-mould trim to match the existing trim as close as possible; 5. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single ternunation and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; , 6. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; Apri123, 2004 312 Howard Avenue page 2 7. that the conditions of the City Engineer's February 17, 2004, memo, the Fire Marshal's February 19, 2004, memo and the Recycling Specialist's February 11, 2004, memo shall be met; 8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction Plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 9. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; and 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. Reimbursement of your design review deposit has been processed and will be mailed to the property owner under separate cover. All site improvements and construction work will require separate application to the Building Department. This approval is valid for one year during which time a building permit must be issued. One extension of up to one year may be considered by the Planning Commission if application is made before the end of the first year. The decision of the Council is a final administrative decision pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. If you wish to challenge the decision in a court of competent jurisdiction, you must do so within 90 days of the date of the decision unless a shorter time is required pursuant to state or federal law. S'ncerely yours, ��, M garet Monroe City Planner 312howard.cca c. Thomas and Trish Nichol, property owners 312 Howard Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 Chief Building Inspector Chief Deputy Valuation, Assessor's Office (LOT 16 BLOCK 39 LYON & HOAG SUB TOWN OF BURLINGAME RSM B/20 CITY OF BURLINGAME; APN: 029-262-150) Project Comments Date: To: From: Subject: Staff Review: 02/11 /2004 �City Engineer ❑ Chief Building Official ❑ Fire Marshal ❑ Recycling Specialist ❑ City Arborist ❑ City Attorney Planning Staff Request for design review for a first and second story addition at 312 Howard Avenue, zoned R-1 , APN:029-262-150 02/17/2004 � � � ��.�� .1� ii � .._ _.� . -�.. �� .�.� �� ;e � •' �... wL. l/ il I i" 1 ��_. -�Li-1 � L�i �sl�G.�i� ".�.t:' rL e _-.q � .. L.� i rr •./ . \�.. .i.i /a �/. �) �'�i �Kn.,e�a�� . �► L:� '.�. _i _,� G_� .... _... <<' 1��._ , � - Il=� i4.�a�� _ �!-� i� �L�:.L (a� ,.lc � _�,. �ar� : c.�/nu ' �-.-s '� _ ��i Reviewed by: 1%� - Date: �� Project Comments Date: 02/11 /2004 To: O City Engineer ❑ Chief Building Official �Fire Marshal � Recycling Specialist ❑ City Arborist O City Attorney From: Subject: Flanning Staff Request for design review for a first and second story addition at 312 Howard Avenue, zoned R-1 , APN:029-262-150 3taff Review: 02/17/2004 I �> �� 6� � �s �,..��-.=�, ��.� b es��=-�`�',�,� c:.�.� � �C.'l.� �1. � �-� yc�� .. � � :.��. -"� .� x—� _«L,eln Reviewed by: �` i� � Date: f � �.�¢.�-.a � Dafe: To: O City Engineer O Chief Building Official O Fire Marsha! � Recycling Specialist ❑ City Arborist ❑ City Attomey From: Subject: Staff Review: Project Comments 02/11 /2004 Planning Staff Request for design review for a first and second story addition at 312 Howard Avenue, zoned R-1 , APN:029-262-150 02/17/2004 � __ _ _ .__ _ _ i � Applicant shall submit a Waste Reduction Plan and Recycling , Deposit for this and all covered projects and sections of projects —i prior to any demolition, construction or permitting. �