The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About114 Howard Avenue - Staff ReportItem No. 1 a Consent Calendar PROJECT LOCATION 114 Howard Avenue City of Burlingame Design Review Address: 114 Howard Avenue Item No. 1a Consent Calendar Meeting Date: November 25, 2013 Request: Application for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling with an attached garage. Applicant and Designer: Joe Sabel APN: 029-264-160 Property Owners: Julie & Leno Bellomo Lot Area: 4,944 SF General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(2), which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 SF in areas where all public services and facilities are available and the area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive. Project Description: The existing single story house with an attached one-car garage contains 1,513 SF (0.31 FAR) of floor area and has two bedrooms. The applicant is proposing to add 58.1 SF off the front of the existing first floor, which includes a new covered porch, and to build a new 991.1 SF second story. With the proposed project, there will be an increase in the floor area ratio to 2,560.4 SF (0.51 FAR) where 2,682.1 SF (0.54 FAR) is the maximum allowed. The proposed project is 121.7 SF below the maximum allowed FAR and is therefore within 5% of the maximum allowed FAR. With the proposed addition, the number of bedrooms will increase from two (2) to four (4). Two parking spaces, one of which must be covered, are required on site. The existing attached garage will be remodeled on the interior (17'-7" x 20' clear interior dimensions) and will provide one code compliant covered parking space. One uncovered space (9' x 20', as measured from the garage door to the interior edge of the sidewalk) is provided in the driveway. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following application: ■ Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling with an attached garage (CS 25.57.010, 2). 114 Howard Avenue Lot Area: 4,944 SF Plans date stam ed: November 14, 2013 & October 30, 2013 EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQUIRED SETBACKS . e ...................................................................................................................................... Front (1st flr): 17'-10'h" (to garage) : 16'-11" (to porch) 16'-11" (block average) (2nd flr): None 26'-3" 20'-0" (attached garage): 17'-10'/z"' � no change 35'-0" (for 2-car garage) , ................................................................................................................................... Side (righf): 3'-6„ z ; 6'-0" (to 2"d story) ............. ...................,. ...............................................4�_0.�................ .. (/eft): 2'-6" 3 4'-0" (to addition) 4'-0" _.. ........ ,...... . Rear (1st flr): 40'-9" (to porch) 44'-9" 15'-0" (2nd flr): none 44'-9" 20'-0" : ................................................................................................................................................................. . _.. Lot Coverage: 1,588.9 SF 1,634.7 SF 1,977.6 SF 32% 33% 40% :................................................................................................................................................................................ .... ......... .. ... . . , . ... .............................................................................................................. FAR: 1,513 SF 2,560.4 SF 2,682.1 SF 4 0.31 FAR 0.51 FAR 0.54 FAR _. ............................................................................................................................:....................................................................................................... : ...................................................................................................................................... # of bedrooms 2 4 --- Design Review 114 Howard Avenue EXISTING PROPOSED ; ALLOWED/REQUIRED Parking: 1 covered 1 covered 1 covered (13'-6" x 20') (17'-7" x 20') (10' x 20') 1 uncovered 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') (9' x 20') ; ; ...................................................................................................................................... Height: 16'-7" 27'-2" 30'-0" ,.................................................................................................................................................... DH Envelope: n�a window dormer exemption � CS 25.26.075 applied along right side of house ; ' Existing non-conforming front setback to an attached two-car garage (17'-10 %", existing and proposed, where 35'-0" is the minimum required per CS 25.26.072 b). z Existing non-conforming right side setback (3'-6" side setback existing and proposed, where 4'-0" is the minimum requirement per CS 25.26.072 c). 3 Existing non-conforming left side setback (2'-6" side setback existing and proposed, where 4'-0" is the minimum requirement 4 per CS 25.26.072 c). (0.32 x 4,944 SF) + 1,100 SF = 2,682.1 SF (0.54 FAR) Staff Comments: See attached memos from the City Engineer, Chief Building Official, Parks Supervisor, Fire Marshal and Stormwater Coordinator. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Design Review Study meeting on November 12, 2013, the Commission had several questions and comments concerning the window sill material, the second story shower window at the rear elevation, the proposed barrel tile and other details in the plans. It voted to place the item on the Consent Calendar when the plans have been revised as directed (November 12, 2013, Planning Commission Minutes). The applicant submitted revised plans and a response letter on November 14, 2013, to address the Planning Commission's questions and comments. The revised plans include clay tile vent details in the gables, a tile inset below the shower window at the rear elevation and full roll over clay tile details at all gable roofs. Please refer to the copy of the November 12, 2013, Planning Commission minutes included in the staff report for the list of Planning Commission questions and comments. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Findings for Design Review: Based on the findings stated by the Planning Commission in the attached minutes of their November 12, 2013 Design Review Study meeting, that the proposed addition is appropriate for the neighborhood, and that the architectural style, mass and bulk of the addition will be consistent with the existing house and the character of the neighborhood, the project is found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review guidelines. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific 2 Design Review 114 Howard Avenue findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped November 14, 2013, sheets A1, A3 and A4; and date stamped October 30, 2013, sheets A2, A5 and A6; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's October 21 and August 16, 2013 memos, the City Engineer's August 15, 2013 memo, the Parks Supervisor's August 23, 2013 memo, the Fire Marshal's August 12, 2013 memo, and the Stormwater Coordinator's August 14, 2013 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2010 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 12. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, 3 Design Review 114 Howard Avenue are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 13. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 14. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Erica Strohmeier Associate Planner c. Joe Sabel, 855 Jefferson Avenue #475, Redwood City, CA 94064, designer. Attachments: Applicant's response to Commission's comments, date stamped November 14, 2013 November 12, 2013 Planning Commission Design Review Study Minutes Application to the Planning Commission Spot elevations from surveyor, date stamped August 9, 2013 Photographs of streetscape Staff Comments Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed November 15, 2013 Aerial Photo 4 11.14.13 TO: Erica Strohmeier Associate Planner Planning Division City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Burlingame, CA 94010 FR: Joe Sabel AERO 11 DESIGN 855 Jefferson Ave. #475 Redwood City, CA 94064 650 255 8017 RE: Commission Response Letter 114 Howard Ave APN 029-264-160 Dear Erica, Here are the responses and plan revisions based on the feedback and review from the commissioners at the meeting on Tuesday Nov. 12. 2013 Thanks again for your review, and please give me a call if you have any questions. Thanks, Joe Sabel AERO 11 DESIGN 1. Added heavy truck operation note on sheet A1. 2. Reflected shower window inset wall and front bedroom window inset wall on sht. A3. 3. Reflected full rollover clay tile detail at all gable roof ends on sheet A4. 4. Reflected thick stone or thick painted wood sill at inset windows at front elevation on first and second floors, on sheet A4. 5. Added clay tile attic vent detail at gable ends at front and rear etevations on sht. A4. 6. Added rear shower wall window inset wall with tile detail at rear elevation on sht. A4. 7. Corrected inconsistent stone porch elevations on sheet A4. Clients felt that with the competing garage wall at roughly the same position as the new front porch entry, and with the gabled front bedroom wall on the second floor, the raised broken eave line of the front entry porch was very important in keeping a massing balance for the front fa�ade experience as a whole. Clients felt that moving the living room window over to create a more symmetrical view from the front elevation would create a tight or pinched window opening from the interior living room experience looking out. They felt that the position of the front entry porch took priority for spacing on that very short living room wall. Thanks again ! �;�� NOV 1 � 20i3 CI"�Y C;� BU'�;LINC;A�E CDU-��.�,NNlP��; DEV CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED M/NUTES City Council Chambers 501 Primrose Road - Burlingame, California November 12, 2013 - 7:00 p.m. IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS 5. 114 HOWARD AVENUE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH AN ATTACHED GARAGE (JOE SABEL, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; JULIE AND LONO BELLOMO, PROPERTY OWNERS) STAFF CONTACT: ERICA STROHMEIER All Commissioners had visited the property. Commissioner Bandrapalli met with the property owner. There were no other ex-parte communications. Reference staff report dated November 12, 2013 with attachments. Associate Planner Strohmeier briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Vice Chair Davis opened the public comment period. Joe Sabel represented the applicant: Upgrade of the existing one-story home. Has tried to work with a lot of the existing materials and the fabric of the neighborhood, as well as introduce new materials. Worked with the mass and bulk. Looked at maintaining light coming in to the side yards, and the articulation of the massing from the front. Owners spent time reaching out to the neighbors, and contacted 6-8 of those adjacent. Received positive feedback on the initial design. Commission comments: ■ It is a dramatic change. Care will need to be taken to make sure it is integrated well with the neighborhood. ■ Fascias at the gable ends — with the large base rafter at gable ends and the small-profile roof tiles, could end up looking a bit like a tract home, as opposed to a barrel tile that overlaps the fascia in the more traditional manner. (Sabel: That is the intention, to capture the "old school" look.) Could extend fascia below. • Is there a plan for the sill material, on the windows flanking the entry porch? (Sabel: Not foam. Would probably be painted wood, or stone if it fits into the budget.) Wood would be OK. ■ At the base of the entry columns it looks like there is a pedestal in the front elevation, but in the right elevation looks like it the column is not shown the same. The two drawings to not look like they are consistent. (Sabel: The intent is to introduce the stone element, as shown on the front elevation.) ■ Likes the detail with the deep-set front casement windows. ■ Detail on the upstairs deep-set window, on the plan does not show it thicker like it does on the lower walls in the Office and Living Room. Would the upstairs walls be thick as well to accommodate the deep-set windows? (Sabel: Yes, specifically in Bedroom #2 the front wall should be reflected as a deeper-set window.) ■ On the gable ends a clay attic vent detail may help. ■ Landscape plan with bigger trees at front helps. ■ During construction should be mindful that schools are nearby — school traffic in the mornings. (Sabel: Could have owners notify when heavier trucks are coming.) CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMM/SS/ON — Unapproved Minutes November 12, 2013 ■ Front window to right of front door is hidden behind the column. Maybe the window needs to shift to the right 6 inches or so. (Sabel: Initially had the fireplace unit engaged into the garage so the window was pushed back, but now pushed back to scale seating. Also it is a rare perspective moment, and will never see the house straight on.) ■ The Bedroom #3 bathroom window is not shown on the plan. (Sabel: Correct. Forgot to put it on the plan.) If didn't want to do a window could do an inset tile treatment that decorative from the outside, since there is a big window next to the bath tub right next to it. Could save money on waterproofing. If did a tile recess could make it taller, to fill more of the gable bump-out. (Sabel: Have considered a fixed window, sans frame. Inset tile aesthetic could be nice character to add.) ■ Could also allow a painted fiberglass window, for moisture. ■ Could do both — have a window in a recess. ■ Likes the fireplace at the rear with the French doors. ■ The front entry piece seems overscaled for the house. Maybe if the eave line lined up with the eave around it, it would still come up from that and be prominent from the streetfront. (Sabel: Face of the porch is lined up with the face of garage.) Public comments: 1►GTiL� There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner discussion: It is fine-tuning a handsome design. Refinements and embellishments, not fixes. Commissioner Terrones made a motion to place the item on the Consent Calendar when complete. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Yie. Discussion of motion: None. Vice Chair Davis called for a vote on fhe motion to place this item on the Consent Calendar when plans have been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0-1-0. (Commissioner Sargent absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded af 8:24 p. m. E �J+ 7 BURLINGAME ��n" COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: ��Design Review ❑ Variance Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit PROJECT ADDRESS: APPLICANT project contact person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ Name: _I /�� Address: Y/�'� � � � City/State/Zip: ��f��1�Z�� W �. ��i Phone: G�d Z�j�j �0 )� �� D rp� Fax: E-rnai�: A11Z5�-1)�'��G��6L.C6� d�1 .�✓� ARCHITECT/DESIGNER projectcontactperson`,}� OK to send electronic copies of documents �' Name: .� D�' ��0�� i �� o- _ Add ress: City/State/Zip: � �� Phone: (� �U � 77 v0 � 7'" Fax: E-mai�: �V � x�� L • G �%� * Burlingame Business License #: � �� :�UG -- 9 2013 :;!TY OF BUF3LINGAPv1E CDD-PLANNlNG DIW. � AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of mv knowledae and belief. Applicant's ❑ Parcel #: ❑ Other: � v�� PROPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ Name: .�f��a�'� Lbl�� i��'� O Address: 1 l `'�' �-i�'�'^�� rf1�� City/State/Zip: j� L�� G�N �/A�'�; G�Q • Phone: � i �� ' � � �� _ Fax: � E-mail: � �! ��ij � � O�i o l� �,' . � !� � � � � _ Date: � �• � �i � � I am aware of the proposed application and hereby authorize the above appli�ant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. Property owner's signatuf,�� — � Date: � < � , / 3 f`i1"'�-".�' � ��'� Date submitted: �� Verification that the project architecbdesigner has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the Finance Department at the time application fees are paid. S: �HANDOUTSI PC Appfication.doc PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A�17 IV EI,1 'iLr�%� �Lf.�_�T/ � ( � � ��'N �� \_/ � �� f _�� , � �' ��,-� .�y � �,�v�� . / i�� 0 � • . �.3. , . . . �, , . �,; .,• �� . � . � �< . . . . , ., �. , „ , . _ ... . , �.,. , y," �� ; . '�e«�.�� ` . , a.•� �'+*e . �G � � � �•,oi1 � � � � r �. � � � a� 1 � G S ,,.<<; cn c� C� �/! • . • , ' � y •,. � . . ' •�� , �� 1 `a �F. , � i� a �, � Y� �+-�v�� S'F � �� }.�G ��! �'� t�� c� _. ______.. --- _ _ -_ _ _ , _. . . . ..t; , . " � �•, . . , ' . , r ,.r _. . � • • � • � '. - � . - . _ ,. , , , - ti ' ','. . ` 1 i a � , ' . ' � . f " �. . , . . � , • . .. . � �? ' � . , , ,'• • � � .. . • � � , � �� ' _l+ . Y . � . .. ♦ � � ' r . � � . ♦. • .. ♦ . . 4 + �f ` . ��: � . :� � • ` , f�� '.,, \ + . • . , � � �' � ; � • . * '. � ° t.:►` :' , � : Z� . , � , • . , . . �..,, . � ,:. � , "., ,. . `�, . . � , , , , J` . �� , . , . . _ ,, � � � � �C � � �� 2 •• h • • , � �' �' SMITH, RANDLETT, FOULK & STUCK, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS - LAND SURVEYQRS P.O. BOX 970 REDWOOD CITY CA 94064-Q970 ' 1735 E. BAYSHORE RD. #6A REDWOOD CITY CA 94063 Leno Bellomo 114 Howard Ave. Burlingame, CA. 94010 Re: Evevations at the above site Dear Mr. Beliomo: TEL 650 368 1 137 FAX 650 366 9596 August 30, 2013 On August 29, 2013, our survey crew veri�ied these elevations of your site listed below (being on an assumed datum, elevations are referenced by standing in Howard Ave, and facing the property). , Left top of curb at the prod of your property line Right top of curb at the prod of your property line Left front property corner Right front property corner Right rear property corner Left rear property corner Finish Floor Sincerely, � � �--�-' George T. Stock, RCE 25079, PLS 3581 E1=1Q1.02 EI=100.63 E1=101.20 E1=100.57 Ei=�ao.�4 Ei=�ao.�7 E1=102.90 '� '�,i -�' o � t7 "� ?� Li�- #�:7�i . � �F ` �� ,_. �, � .�. , „ r.�° ,�v,� r...�..., 4 w � �-�� 9 � ., _ +�a��G -� ='��': , _;::llY OF E;;_��: _��iu��rr=: C:1En 1�2013\13018�LEVATION LET"TER ASSUMED..doc �� `��`�'��'`��'�'�`�' =1`J: g L� -P��: t. , ' 4'� r � T . . .� _.�, — _ _—:-,r � . ' � :_ �. �:: ._._,,.r-n�.,-�w- l'i_c,�,..,-..:�...�� --�s.: � i I L 1�0'�.� 1>� D �y 1 1----- -- -�1 i. I� � ,,/ � __�— .� �:�� .: . � � , � p.q. �:�s w �. ,.��t" .' R 1� �..�. . �' �� , :� � � �• � _ .�lZ)r„ " �� _ -� _ - . F:. : -.3.=• �° -.; � r�+_� i ,e� wt_�.: . . ..... �. _ ._ . _ - ..,.... ._.. .e� :� � l l� Nd��.� � � 12 laouAn'� ' I t b � ��,..r��z'p ��i�� IG - 9 2015 :;i i Y ��F BURLI�1GA1i;� � C�G-�LANNIf�i� f)IV , � � � � �Q �--� � ' . � .� � , �� -� � � Project Comments Date: To: From: August 9, 2013 X Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 0 Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling with a detached garage at 114 Howard Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 029-264-160 Staff Review: August 12, 2013 1. Storm drainage shall be designed to drain towards the street frontage or to the City storm drain system. 2. The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway and other necessary appurtenant work. 3. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. Reviewed by: V V Date: 8/15/2013 Project Comments Date: To: From: Revised Plans Submitted October 17, 2013 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 0 Parks Division (650) 558-7334 0 Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling with an attached garage at 114 Howard Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 029-264-160 Staff Review: N/A No further comments. All conditions of approval as stated in the review dated 8-16-2013 will apply to this project. Reviewed by ate: 10-21-2013 Project Comments Date: To: From: August 9, 2013 0 Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling with a detached garage at 114 Howard Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 029-264-160 Staff Review: August 12, 2013 �� On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2010 California Building Code, 2010 California Residential Code (where applicable), 2010 California Mechanical Code, 2010 California Electrical Code, and 2010 California Plumbing Code, including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1856-2010. Note: If the Planning Commission has not approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2013 then this project must comply with the 2013 California , Building Codes. � Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2008 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Go to http://www.energy.ca.qov/title24/2008standards/ for publications and details. ;�� Indicate on the plans that the tile roof will comply with Cool Roof requirements of •� the 2008 California Energy Code. 2008 CEC §151 (f) 12. The 2008 Residential and Non-Residential Compliance Manuals are available on line at __ http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/2008standards/ .-� ��Place the following information on the first page of the plans: �� "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. �- (See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.) 5) On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrated on the Job Copy of the plans prior to performing the work. 6) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. 7) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 8) Provide a fully dimensioned site plan which shows the true property boundaries, the location of all structures on the property, existing driveways, and on-site parking. 9) Provide existing and proposed elevations. 10)This project will be considered a New Building because, according to the City of Burlingame Municipal code, "when additions, alterations or repairs within any twelve-month period exceed fifty percent of the current replacement value of an existing building or structure, as determined by the building official, such building or structure shall be made in its entirety to conform with the requirements for new buildings or structures." This building must comply with the 2010 California Building Code for new structures. BMC 18.07.020 Note: Any revisions to the plans approved by the Building Division must be submitted to, and approved by, the Building Division prior to the implementation of any work not specifically shown on the p/ans. Significant delays can occur if changes made in the field, without City approval, necessitate further review by City departments or the Planning Commission. Inspections cannot be scheduled and will not be performed for work that is not shown on the Approved plans. 11)Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of Occupancy will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued after the project has been finaled. No occupancy of the building is to occur until a new Certificate of Occupancy as been issued. 2�rovide a complete demolition plan that indicates the existing walls, walls to be demolished, new walls, and a legend. NOTE: A condition of this project approval is that the Demolition Permit will not be issued and, and no work can begin (including the removal of a� building components), until a Building Permit has been issued for the project. The property owner is responsible for assuring that no work is authorized or performed. 13)Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines 14)Show the dimensions to adjacent structures. T�3 On the plans specify that the roof eaves will not project within two feet of the property line. 'y�)Provide details on the plans which show that all roof projections which project ��beyond the point where fire-resistive construction would be required will be constructed of one-hour fire-resistance-rated construction per 2010 CBC §705.2. �7�ndicate on the plans that exterior bearing walls less than five feet from the ��property line will be built of one-hour fire-rated construction. (2010 CBC, Table 602) �1�ooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the location and the net clear opening height and width of all required egress windows on the elevation drawin_qs. Note: The area labeled "office" is a room that can be used �or sleeping purposes and, as such, must comply with this requirement. ndicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 20)Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 21)Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 22)Provide lighting at all exterior landings. �he fireplace chimneys must terminate at least two feet higher than any portion of the building within ten feet or must be retrofit with a fireplace insert (not a log lighter.) 2010 CBC §2113.9 NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 23 must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for Planning Commission action. � ___- ��, Reviewed b : '� �`� '� Date: 8-16-2013 Jo , 0-558 70 Project Comments Date: To: From: August 9, 2013 0 Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 X Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling with a detached garage at 114 Howard t,�►��u�, za��t! �-�, aR�i: 0�9-26�-150 Staff Review: August 12, 2013 1. No change in landscape proposed in renovation. �. Ta�o ne�r ?4" box lan�scape trees incl�ded in !ands.�pe p!ar. as �er requirement. Reviewed by: BD Date: 8/23/13 Project Comments Date: To: From: August 9, 2013 0 Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 0 Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling with a detached garage at 114 Howard Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 029-264-160 Staff Review: August 12, 2013 Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence. 1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter. 2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly — Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 3. All sprinkler drainage shall be placed into landscaping areas. 4. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Reviewed by: �� Date: i z. ��,� /� �' Project Comments Date: To: From: August 9, 2013 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 0 Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 Planning Staff � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 X Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Subject: Request for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling with a detached garage at 114 Howard Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 029-264-160 Staff Review: August 12, 2013 1) Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City's NPDES (stormwater) permit to prevent stormwater pollution from construction activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement appropriate and effective BMPs during all phases of construction, including demolition. When submitting plans for a building permit include a list of construction BMPs as project notes on a separate full size plan sheet, preferably 2' x 3' or larger. Project proponent may use the attached Construction BMPs plan sheet to comply with this requirement. Electronic file is available for download at: http://www.flowstobay.org/documents/business/construction/Countywide_Program_B MP_Plan_Sheet Jun2012.pdf 2) Best Management Practices (BMPs) requirements apply on any projects using architectural copper. To learn what these requirements are, see attached ityer "Requirements for Architectural Copper." Electronic file is available for download at: http://www.flowstobay.org/documents/municipalities/nd/Materials/2012%20Materials/ Architectural_copper_BMPs_FI NAL.pdf For assistance please contact Stephen D. at 650-342-3727 Reviewed by: SD ��CJ .; ��`� , a ; � . : CITY OF BURLlNGAME CDD-PL4Nfvl�JG �IV. RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for Desiqn Review for a first and second story addition to an existina sinqle familv dwellinq with an attached Qaraae at 114 Howard Avenue, zoned R-1. Julie & Leno Bellomo, 114 Howard Avenue, Burlinqame, CA 94010, propertv owners, APN: 029-264-160: WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on November 25. 2013, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15301 (e)(2), which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 SF in areas where all public services and facilities are available and the area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive. 2. Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th dav of November, 2013 by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review. 114 Howard Avenue Effective December 5, 2013 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped November 14, 2013, sheets A1, A3 and A4; and date stamped October 30, 2013, sheets A2, A5 and A6; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's October 21 and August 16, 2013 memos, the City Engineer's August 15, 2013 memo, the Parks Supervisor's August 23, 2013 memo, the Fire Marshal's August 12, 2013 memo, and the Stormwater Coordinator's August 14, 2013 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2010 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review. 114 Howard Avenue Effective December 5, 2013 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 12. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 13. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 14. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. . CITY OF BURLINGAME < COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BiJRLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD ��U BURLINGAME, CA 94010 R' ; • PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650j 696-3790 - ww4v.burlingame.org - � Site: 114 HOWARD AVENUE ��-" _ ,, ; The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces PUBLIC HEARING the following puhlic hearing on MONDAY, NOTICE NOVEMBER 25, 2013 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling with an attached garage at 114 HOWARD AVENUE zonetl R-l. APN 029-264-160 Mniled: November 15, 2013 (Pl2ase refer to ofher side) Citv of Burlingame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, Califiornia. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to other side) �.:.i,, `y. ..,,.., : , `t �7 �_. k:. P `�� ' �.+ •� ` � i►.; d"�'',.� �� . .__�. �. ,,,�„ � � �,. :;ti�� , �:: . , � il,�. •�1•. . � i�. � -)ti ' t::;'r ,� ,. ;.� �� , � �.� _ = .� �- --.: = .. . � j ff:•,'� r.� . . i "; , �. �.�. , �. �,`7'� � f:Me {.� i i:i.. wr: � {• �I; . i ..._ . �,� - - __ . , � °��.> li� ...� _ .- , � -.___ �"� � ` � v . ��a�a� �`� � '�.�c�; � w � '' � '�' x, - , . . - a� . .� . � : . _ z�."`s� ,„ • � ..:� .... ... . . ..-.,.... ;.,.. .. :.a�.u'�:.'t. ;::;� �,, �c.�. •. ' , _ _ � �� .. �... ,... �. _ , .H .,..,,. �� - =mw. ��.�ai: cct� � � �`��,��s� � _ ,- � � � , . _ _ °�.� ...�.+�r. - ' , , . , _ w � =�r ry � , .: �� . ' - y T� :' �"'.�uc^4YC.YY City of Burlingame Design Review Address: 114 Howard Avenue Item No. 5 Design Review Study Meeting Date: November 12, 2013 Request: Application for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling with an attached garage. Applicant and Designer: Joe Sabel Property Owners: Julie & Leno Bellomo General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 029-264-160 Lot Area: 4,944 SF Zoning: R-1 Project Description: The existing single story house with an attached one-car garage contains 1,513 SF (0.31 FAR) of floor area and has two bedrooms. The applicant is proposing to add 58.1 SF off the front of the existing first floor, which includes a new covered porch, and to build a new 991.1 SF second story. With the proposed project, there will be an increase in the floor area ratio to 2,560.4 SF (0.51 FAR) where 2,682.1 SF (0.54 FAR) is the maximum allowed. The proposed project is 121.7 SF below the maximum allowed FAR and is therefore within 5% of the maximum allowed FAR. With the proposed addition, the number of bedrooms will increase from finro (2) to four (4). Two parking spaces, one of which must be covered, are required on site. The existing attached garage will be remodeled on the interior (17'-7" x 20' clear interior dimensions) and will provide one code compliant covered parking space. One uncovered space (9' x 20', as measured from the garage door to the interior edge of the sidewalk) is provided in the driveway. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following application: ■ Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling and a new detached garage (CS 25.57.010, 2). 114 Howard Avenue �oi Area: 4,y44 sr Plans date stam ed: October 30, 2013 EXISTING PROPOSED ` ALLOWED/REQUIRED SETBACKS j ..._ -�-- ----.......__....— ;--._...__._._..........----- Front (1st flr): 17'-10'/2" (to garage) � 16'-11" (to porch) i 16'-11" (block average) (2nd flr): None � 26'-3" 20'-0" (attached garage): 17'-10'h"' j no change ! 35'-0" (for 2-car garage) _ -..--�-- -...._.._....--�-------- ' ----------- Side (right): 3'-6" 2 ' 6'-0" (to 2"d story) � 4'-0" (left): 2'-6" 3 ; 4'-0" (to addition) � 4'-0" _ ' ""' _ '__'__ '__"'....-.._.......___'__'___.-_f'_'_"'-..._...."_"..........._. 1 11 Rear (1st flr): 40'-9" (to porch) i 44'-9" � 15 -0 (2nd flr): none i 44'-9" � 20'-0" ----. -_ --_--------;.-.--._..__.....-�--- Lof Coverage: 1,588.9 SF � 1,634.7 SF i 1 977.6 SF 32% ; 33% 40% ---... ---��--� -------._.....--'-----�.....-----------.:._....._..__........_._............_.. —__ FAR: 1,513 SF 2 560.4 SF ! 2,682.1 SF 4 0.31 FAR ; 0.51 FAR j 0.54 FAR ---- _..--�----- _._...-�-- _._......._......,._......_.._...._..--- ---- ---...---....__._...._._....._ �--.—...._ __ _ # of bedrooms: 2 i 4 -I--..__....._..........__._ --- _. --:---- -----._._..__.._..------------ -- —_...--.-.�-- Parking: 1 covered i 1 covered ' 1 covered (13'-6" x 20') � (17'-7" x 20') � (10' x 20') 1 uncovered 1 uncovered ; 1 uncovered , (9' x 20') i (9' x 20') (9' x 20') Design Review 114 Howard Avenue EXISTING � PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQUIRED � Height: 16'-7" � 27'-2" 30'-0" -- ---._._ , ._....---- ---.._...__............--- -----.......-----.—.._ DH Envelope: n/a � window dormer exemption ' applied along right side of house CS 25.26.075 ' Existing non-conforming front setback to an attached finro-car garage (17'-10'/z°, existing and proposed, where 35'-0° is the minimum required per CS 25.26.072 b). 2 Existing non-conforming right side setback (3'-6" side setback existing and proposed, where 4'-0" is the minimum requirement per CS 25.26.072 c). 3 Existing non-conforming left side setback (2'-6" side setback existing and proposed, where 4'-0" is the minimum requirement per CS 25.26.072 c). 4 (0.32 x 4,944 SF) + 1,100 SF = 2,682.1 SF (0.54 FAR) StafF Comments: See attached memos from the City Engineer, Chief Building Official, Parks Supervisor, Fire Marshal and Stormwater Coordinator. Erica Strohmeier Associate Planner c. Joe Sabel, 855 Jefferson Avenue #475, Redwood City, CA 94064, designer. Attachments: Application to the Planning Commission Spot elevations from surveyor, date stamped August 9, 2013 Photographs of streetscape Staff Comments Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed November 1, 2013 Aerial Photo � � T T' �r.. +' I ��`.. .�� .._ _:_. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 ' p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSIDN Type of appiication: �� Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit PROJECT ADDRESS: APPLICANT project contact person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ Name: � /�� Address: �5�� _1��5�� City/State/Zip: —.�� I �W G �� Phone: G �b ZS�J �� ' � � � �� Fax: E-mail: l�ln�7�i�p��G�Y�6L•G6 /� ❑ Parcel #: ❑ Other: � � � �Lv�� PROPERTY OWNER projectcontact person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ Name: ��5�� d � f � � �''� �� r � � a � Address: 1 l `'� �>�^/�� ,�� City/State/Zip: j� 7.�i� G�N L/�%�t �. G�Q < Phone: q i �� , � �� . Fax: ' E-mail: -t �! �a � � O�i p ls., �' , � l�� ARCHITECT/DESIGNER project contact Person�tl OK to send electronic copies of documents�' Name: •�,f)�' � �05�'� � � � � � �� Add ress: �N �� :a.i,;ia _ � ��i.S City/State/Zip: ��, �i/4 � ) �' � � 1 , C!"f C7F t�U=iLif'!G"11/�E f��U � �� 1 .7 Phone: �D � �'��-��r�t�;r,�G �.(V. Fax: E-mail: �V��l�/ � � � � /V�L. G�l/1� * Burlingame Business License #: � � �i L PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A�)i IV EiJ �LrG/Np �L , �/ � J� �d'N �� a�� S7ynY S��l. �, i��vay,�T� �) ,��i=�6GYl. �YJbinl� 5 � S � � �� , �� s �� tiL � L� L � �� 1 � � ►�� -�' , AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Applicant's signature: ' � •:� ` '^ � ' Date: ��. �7�. �_ I am aware of the proposed application and hereby authorize the above appli ant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. Property owner's signatu�: ,ds-- �-- �'/ Date: g= �• / 3 � ��' �` ��'� Datesubmitted: ; .� 7�_ �'.i . yt Verification that the pro�ect architect/designer has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the Finance Department at the time application fees are paid. 5: �HANDOUTS�PC Applicatron.doc SMITH, RANDLETT, FOULK & STOCK, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS - LAND SURVEYORS P.O. BOX 970 REDWOOD CITY CA 94064-Q970 ' 1735 E. BAYSHORE RD. #6A REDWOOD CITY CA 94063 Leno Bellomo 114 Howard Ave. Burlingame, CA. 94010 Re: Evevations at the abave site Dear Mr. Bellomo: TEL 650 368 1137 FAX 650 366 9596 August 30, 2013 On August 29, 2013, our survey. crew verifiied these elevations of your site listed below (being on an assumed datum, elevations are referenced by standing in Howard Ave, and facing the property). , Left top of curb at the prod of your property line Right top of curb a# the prod of your property line Left front property corner Right front property corner Right rear property corner Left rear property corner Finish Floor E1=1Q1.02 EI=10�.63 EI=101.20 E1=100.57 E1=1Q0.14 EI=100.17 Ei=102.90 �,AI�D Sincerely, l� � n�� George T. Stock, RCE 25079, PLS 3581 y �,i �' p � C� '� 7C1 ,� L�C_ #?.��i , � � _ EXP � � � .,. , s � �t�� , � .F� �.e�.: '. . ' ` ��i�l" a�� `1 / r� I i f�i'J': _ . • • �';Tl' CF 6URLil�JGAh.�1t •`-''� I��`�L:�:r':�r��i'.� t.�a.'�✓. C:1Eng112013\13018�ELEVATIONLETTERASSUMED..doc �;p�_pt;._�;=.;.,, , �� I � , � � � � ,� 1 �i �� 1� I �� . ' S's''i� r' � -F' ' t I L 1�ov ��r 1� ' I l� I�d��..� � t l 2 1aouAn'� � � 1 6 j�j D�,.,11�12 � �� au� -� zo�3 c�rY cr au��ir�G�r�� CQD-PL�,NfVI(JC DIV. Project Comments Date: �C� From: August 9, 2013 X Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling with a detached garage at 114 Howard Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 029-264-160 Staff Review: August 12, 2013 1. Storm drainage shall be designed to drain towards the street frontage or to the City storm drain system. 2. The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway and other necessary appurtenant work. 3. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. Reviewed by: V V Date: 8/15/2013 Project Comments Date: To: From: Revised Plans Submitted October 17, 2013 0 Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 0 Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 0 Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling with an attached garage at 114 Howard Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 029-264-160 Staff Review: N/A No further comments. All conditions of approval as stated in the review dated 8-16-2013 will apply to this project. Reviewed by: Date: 10-21-2013 �...N., w.�., „� � , v .. Project Comments Date: ��A From: August 9, 2013 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling with a detached garage at 114 Howard Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 029-264-160 Staff Review: August 12, 2013 ;'/1 On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2010 California Building Code, 2010 California Residential Code (where applicable), 2010 California Mechanical Code, 2010 California Electrical Code, and 2010 California Plumbing Code, including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1856-2010. Note: If the Planning Commission has not approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2013 then this project must comply with the 2013 California Building Codes. 2 Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2008 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Go to http://www.enerqv.ca.qov/title24/2008standards/ for publications and details. ; 3 Indicate on the plans that the tile roof will comply with Cool Roof requirements of the 2008 California Energy Code. 2008 CEC §151 (f) 12. The 2008 Residential and Non-Residential Compliance Manuals are available on line at http://www.enerqy.ca.qov/title24/2008sta ndards/ �Place the following information on the first page of the plans: , "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. �_- (See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.) ; 5) On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrated on the Job Copy of the plans prior to performing the work. 6) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. 7) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 8) Provide a fully dimensioned site plan which shows the true property boundaries, the location of all structures on the property, existing driveways, and on-site parking. 9) Provide existing and proposed elevations. 10)This project will be considered a New Building because, according to the City of Burlingame Municipal code, "when additions, alterations or repairs within any twelve-month period exceed fifty percent of the current replacement value of an existing building or structure, as determined by the building official, such building or structure shall be made in its entirety to conform with the requirements for new buildings or structures." This building must comply with the 2010 California Building Code for new structures. BMC 18.07.020 Note: Any revisions to the plans approved by the Building Division must be submitted to, and approved by, the Building Division prior fo the implementation of any work not specifically shown on the plans. Significant delays can occur if changes made in the field, without City approval, necessitate further review by City departments or the Planning Commission. Inspections cannot be scheduled and will not be performed for work that is not shown on the Approved plans. 11)Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of Occupancy will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued after the project has been finaled. No occupancy of the building is to occur until a new Certificate of Occupancy as been issued. 2 rovide a complete demolition plan that indicates the existing walls, walls to be demolished, new walls, and a legend. NOTE: A condition of this project approval is that the Demolition Permit will not be issued and, and no work can begin (including the removal of a� building components), until a Building Permit has been issued for the project. The property owner is responsible for assuring that no work is authorized or perFormed. 13)Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines 14)Show the dimensions to adjacent structures. �3 On the plans specify that the roof eaves will not project within two feet of the property line. 1�)Provide details on the plans which show that all roof projections which project ��beyond the point where fire-resistive construction would be required will be constructed of one-hour fire-resistance-rated construction per 2010 CBC §705.2. �7�ndicate on the plans that exterior bearing walls less than five feet from the ��property line will be built of one-hour fire-rated construction. (2010 CBC, Table 602) 18 ooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the location and the net clear opening height and width of all required egress windows on the elevation drawinqs. Note: The area labeled "office" is a room that can be used 1�or sleeping purposes and, as such, must comply with this requirement. ndicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 20)Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 21)Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 22)Provide lighting at all exterior landings. �he fireplace chimneys must terminate at least two feet higher than any portion of the building within ten feet or must be retrofit with a fireplace insert (not a log lighter.) 2010 CBC §2113.9 NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 23 must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for Planning Commission action. 1 Reviewed b: �.' � Date: 8-16-2013 Jo , 0-558 70 Project Comments Date: August 9, 2013 To: � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 55$-7260 X Parks Division (650) 558-7334 From: Planning Staff 0 Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Subject: Request for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling with a detached garage at 114 Howard Rv��u�, ��i�v�u �-i, i�►��'v': v�3-�� +-i6�r Staff Review: August 12, 2013 1. No change in landscape proposed in renovation. �, Tuvn r�Aw �d" hn� lanrlc�r�- rn,a trgac i�r:li�rieri j� Ianr,igC?�e r��a�,� ?g rn,e� requirement. Reviewed by: BD Date: 8/23/13 Project Comments Date: To: From: August 9, 2013 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 0 Parks Division (650) 558-7334 8 Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling with a detached garage at 114 Howard Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 029-264-160 Staff Review: August 12, 2013 Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence. 1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter. 2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly — Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 3. All sprinkler drainage shall be placed into landscaping areas. 4. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Reviewed by: �� Date: � z. �=4� / 3 CC—" Project Comments Date: To: From: August 9, 2013 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 0 Parks Division (650) 558-7334 Planning Staff � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 X Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Subject: Request for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling with a detached garage at 114 Howard Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 029-264-160 Staff Review: August 12, 2013 1) Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City's NPDES (stormwater) permit to prevent stormwater pollution from construction activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement appropriate and effective BMPs during all phases of construction, including demolition. When submitting plans for a building permit include a list of construction BMPs as project notes on a separate full size plan sheet, preferably 2' x 3' or larger. Project proponent may use the attached Construction BMPs plan sheet to comply with this requirement. Electronic file is available for download at: http://www.flowstobay.org/documents/business/construction/Countywide_Prog ram_B MP_Plan_Sheet_Jun2012.pdf 2) Best Management Practices (BMPs) requirements apply on any projects using architectural copper. To learn what these requirements are, see attached flyer "Requirements for Architectural Copper." Electronic file is available for download at: http://www.flowstobay.org/documents/municipalities/nd/Materials/2012%20Materials/ Architectural_copper_BMPs_FI NAL.pdf For assistance please contact Stephen D. at 650-342-3727 Reviewed by: SD �� « ,�'�_�'� � � _ = , CI i r` G� �v'�:_ii'Ju "�P�':= ,� CDii-P'u`,��1;:;?.'r =;! ��. . CITY OF BURLINGAME COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLIIVGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD ;-'��• BURLINGAME, CA 94010 ^�, , � PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 - www.burlingame.org Site: 114 HOWARD AVENUE The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2013 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling with an attached garage at 114 HOWARD AVENUE zoned R-l. APN 029-264-160 Mailed: November 1, 2013 (Please refer to other sideJ PUBLIC HEAIZING wo-ricE Ci�f Burlinaame lication and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to A copy of the app � the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. lication s in court, you may be limited to lf you challenge the subject app �) raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director pUgLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to ofher side) .� � ,� � _ � ��., ,. � ,� , - ��' � � � . '� k � ; ,,` � �' � �_ 4� s - �" �' �,. rr. ,z., ,�,r" � ,., -y� � � a�,,� � �,� � �'^ �. � �,„ � '� �i _ �� g,� �b�:�; . . . , � � � � ��. �j �` - -.''�' • � � . ,: '^� ; l� x� � 's,. �� ! +�.., " ;. !��r�; ��;� ,� ,,�.� _#�* , ,� } �er -- �, �'� � � �'"�. : . � °F .. .` rp e�+ $�.� �. °,8.� ' ,� "'� A , '`' � � .. ..s ' �� y,'� N^ . �:�;w.. :r�� . \ � �'",�j, � . .. W �� n� , �'Y�. � �,.'�.,�'4.A � � . r ..,. '-. T � � .54 ,T P +F�" - :�=i � � . � • -F" '�.�- � "• ��,� � // \� -'�r. . � . � � � �. ?� a. , ;" " z �( ��,.,'Y4 P � y, , �� , � 7 : „`r ' -. � �' `S�.a� .�. . � u� �� " � 1 ��s �,..�`.��1 f !,c`'`i � `�".�, �,•+ ,�'� . c ._-T^- �i � , � . .: � � � n � � �i . , �" "� fiw , �. , _ , , � , � � � c� , s . 5=•. ., • . �^ �' � �g �� .: ��? .��'� t >, < , ? �, r .� ��#�"� � , a� i ,�.� ��s ' � � , - � ,� k G � .. rz ��ti�r „ ' ` ; �� ' a� � �� < �.:0�. � . � . `.... '� , ,. a� . . ,,; ;, _ r �. . , �i �� . '• , :- �°,� tu� � f F� � u , � '� }, � ..�; Q � � � � , ..., � __ , a , �� , ;: a ^� l �' . -� �� P I ) � � ` �t' i I 'S } . � • .^ � , k� . �. � ii✓ ,:=� � �i..�4:; .. � �; �� `�" ,�y ,�� t°y `�, ` o ,:;+- .� �.� //'' �... • � "f �� . �3. ._,.. �� . �� n . : �. i . � �'FC � R �; _�', � '' � _; i ' � a F + > ' /` * `� , �� "a {�� Gw �'` � � � , � a�� - �:. , � , , , ,, �� ` .. , . . .. . �,.. � ^ � � .: • �* 4 � �� .♦ � ,J ' �y '� ' } , � ,` � � ;4 'V � ' ' � .'.��, 7 � �� R ��{ �r'?�+�A i"� �Ili . .: i� M . y ,. $^' �� 1 ��I �� G. I �. S?�} ..•: ; . .. t ., I .. � `, � '' ..' � I , ' � �4 ..`. ..: a�p4 w . �"� II �W . � . . , � i� . ' t ' I i. . �• k = � �Y � � �1 • � '�' :�• �a ::t: . 3 . '. .' ...�' .. : .. ' s �:r 'a w.. :r - � ; � �. ��f.. ; ., � ,. !` r 4 w ♦ `` - � C,�,: �� . , � ' ., . � � ¢ .x :;d�,� �� ` � '' f ' :t "`'�' .y� • ♦ �:�. r ��' �� . �.�'� ,. � ��,�, �, �; � ~ �. � `�° ��, � -w�„ ,,.� � �,'� � �� ,�, r �#� � ; �. ' " ,. . .�'a . �a.�� y :�.ir�� - ' � �- �. ^ � � P � � n : M � � r • r � , �� Z (� ,• � ¢ � �" �+i .'.:� . � � � �": t 'lJ �, ��' � �� : � . , � W ,� �� . �k .r .. i`:.-. .�4 a.A �� ... �, . � ".,. w.v i ► , . ' ,- ...., . S.a R .: i ` .� � .�r �, � � s ,�� .(� ,�c '�",� _ .'�'. ,.�� s,'I�� r�, �r .yv._' .� �+_ � • �/r � , � x ! ' r qr p�;44 • .,s � �= t' � � � �.. \ : � � t:;. '� ��O �� ' N-°" 6� �� $� �. .�� o� :+� .�� ` y�, � �� '�� t� :-��%� �.. � � `m ,� i',� . �+x • �,�� ', ' �� `'ia.�,� '� , s �" �� v J �'' �, �ry, ��" � ♦ � �� ,�. i � .�t�`� ^�a�' ,d�, t. _ iC�' � r. _ � _ �� . � ,� �. . . , �r =°� � , ;. _ �P�. ' , �: ; , . ,,� � �„ � ��. � . ' . , _ , �^- f £,; � ��.� � , : ,� P4: � �� . �.. ��.�,��,a ... � �. _,. . , � r _ - . . �, .. - � , - ... -_ '�i�� Y ..,.- "1�_-. .�.� �3 �N . .�. '�„m� ��, sF - F .. { � , ...A� .:.t�R.. + .. "i. � // .;� � ' f �u . rq F, . .. ��.:.. �� ,-�. y � ;�� ,...,. �� `. �" .. . '� � �<� r '':, �� ° �'� . a -e ^ 4 ' ,.� , � -9 t '�' � � i _ + �;`aS �� ; � '�/ � � � .A ��' � r` , � � � .I� � � •, � 5 � � ��°,�'\� y �' y �� ' . .. .. .. . �. �. . �'�' ��* � �� ' °'�� 1a��,� ' ai' r. �'?iS � � � y� �' � _ � �,p � «"" M: � 8. � w 4 � , �� f -�; � � e �� r O - .. � � � J` � � � ; , } ' �� , ,� � r . k �fi'� � 4$ , r� M. �. � �y,'*� !��" � � �- , , .: ., ., ,� �,�.' � , t ,�.yq ,A� t �, � �� .. ., - . . r �� . . .. . •' _ > � �";. . . �», '';_a':. ; r: S�x,, : � y ' �•' . � ,ty,�-�'.�� a , ' � � «� y y ��: � . �'�"t � " 1� :�R � � „ �:,�� s';'�"� ,� � �� L .,�� e� .� � � � � �t � ,� , ,�� r... �'rt'� A� 7 ' , Q' y4�' " '�w� � v.i y . y ' _ `lr' � � ' Iw♦ �,.�ie ,�g ��, �,. .x'�„�� s Fid. � ..r��., � ` . �F� � � � � 1 � � �.�y' . � �� n � ,. .^ � ._�' x. . � � � . � ..� iv _ �-� - .r ""`�s�� .. . � . � �+, ,u . . . - _ :.: , .R� . .s,. . - ` `,� � - � r� , ,..�:� �� ..�:. � a' �` �' _: �. !o �� - ��' . • � ' �, �� •�; .... u . — J, , �, � .9 _ .:.��I�+.� . '�_ ...:�. ' _ .:�� _ s