HomeMy WebLinkAbout720 Burlingame Avenue - Staff Reporty��.vy �e.�'�}�Vy �'� *e,� a � ,� �
}y�f� »'+ � � t � � ,� ' ? ����� �w1 � , t
� ���_�� jiA/t�y4 `�f �-�'. y}D`x.�.
-f'7Ftv 1�. � �}�'Aq�„�
.�° ��k �Y� 'w ' 4 � +� � � � M
bq . n+fl i eYM .+py 1� , y� ��F R.�'. �.
y , �
, n ...a��L ; .` ��t, `ry 91 r ��;,��..�: v,
' `.� r .., �'�.�r�j
ls�� `,� % � : J . r � � ; .
�� • ¢ i. �bk '� {,7 } � �. ' ax t � 1 . . ' �
f�,� YL � ' a" r. ., � r ., ,�\� � . .
• 3 c r r� d.. l ��' �, � r�' a'��"i
y. �
� � TS � �. 1 ! � � � �. � ,� °'� � .: I i
��''at�� � ��l�i �,i ,t, t , � , �g � . � ,
t �`. ` ' '" rr � .t�i� � .�s . : .;
� �b; � ��.������.,.��; t�1�;'1-r��y�.���..sN� �,y��•.':'�� ....
..� f r`�.« ,���"W t .,;;r tiY�t''` ,l:ia.�-
�; � � � , �''.y .��
.y M
'� � �:, i IhK. •
� . � �`"� .` :.
�-:�
� '�= � _ ;�:
! �.n.
�� �,�eef4 .t ' � •�� `' t � r
� � �Y
� � . ,
,.,�.
�Yf���� IL`�'l�ry ��, ��:.
��s� ' L ..�i Y j'�'.
�,.� ,✓
� '� i
, �
� p ii
r . 1 ..... �i�.. .
����� g;•�*�•'
i ry;,
�
i
_,�Y R
X..'.e,�.�� . �
'' r ;. "`,�t,� � .`. .i,
A r[ �'�aiK �y�" ���
. � AY4yY q� `,�^�� � pY, � r
� rM
v. s
.. � yp�. ; � f �;�}Ai�A'.
Ig+,�„t�+�..5.t. ,.."
� A � t
.! '�t�
}" -�
�'� � � ^ ... r'�.,�t �.JV`' h "'i � ' a �:�
,'i � r �.�, ��. �� , Y ^w r.Lr x''�� ' Y ��r jj� � ''"se7 �',. r �r'�
�"^�1'� �* ;'fNp «, �'�,�.r�s�.}�sn ' y}�L, "'�Vd' � �l�,o''�� v Y � 5� . �� i ..`f��
} ...'ar �� t �a} �'j � ' .
'"& �wi.'.�r`3 4 e _ . . _ ..._ ' � .
City of Burlingame
Design Review
Address: 800 Burlingame Avenue
Request: Design review for a first and second story addition.
Item # � q�
Consent Calendar
Meeting Date: 06/13/OS
Applicant/Designer: Mark Robertson APN: 029-173-160
Property Owner: Marie Benedetti Lot Area: 5,000 SF
General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1
CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15301 Class 1(e)(2) - additions to
existing structures provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 SF in areas
where all public services and facilities are available and the area in which the project is located is not
environmentally sensitive.
Summary: The existing single-story house, with an attached garage (11' x 16' clear interior
dimensions), contains 1,505 SF (0.30 FAR) of floor area and has two bedrooms. The applicant is
proposing to add onto the first floor and build a new second story. The first floor addition will include
a new stairwell, family room and a covered patio area. The new second story will include a new master
bedroom with a bathroom and walk-in closet, a new laundry area and a study on the stair landing. The
proposed new second floor would total 856 SF. With the proposed first and second story addition, the
floor area will increase from 1,505 SF (0.30 FAR) to 2,409 SF (0.48 FAR) where 2,700 SF (0.54 FAR)
is the maximum allowed. The proposed project is 291 SF below the maximum allowed FAR.
With this project, the number of potential bedrooms will not increase (two existing). Two parking
spaces, one covered (10' x 20') and one uncovered (9' x 20'), are required for the two bedroom house.
The existing attached one-car garage (11' x 16', clear interior dimensions) meets the covered parking
requirement and may remain as non-conforming in length because there is no increase in the number of
potential bedrooms. The existing uncovered 9' x 18' space provided in the driveway may also remain
as non-conforming in length because there is no increase in the number of potential bedrooms. All
other zoning code requirements have been met. The following application is required:
• Design review for a first and second story addition (C.S. 25.57.010, 5).
Table 1— 800 Burlingame Avenue
Lot Area: 5,000 SF
�
EXISTING � PROPOSED � ALLOWED/REQ'D
�
, ;
SETBACKS ; i
; .......... .
Front (1 S` flr): 15'-6" no change j 15'-0"
2 r none 32'-0" ; 20'-0"
� „d�, 1 � ,
/; ...........................................................................................................................................
................................. ............................................................................................................................ .
i
Side (right): 5'-0" i 5'-0"
' 4'-0"
(le t 8'-3" 8'-3" � 4'-0��
.%) � _ ... . ...................._.................................... ........
_........_ ...................................................................... ................. ................. ........... .. .................. .............. .............................................................i....... ;.
,
Rear(IS` flr): 38'-0" 38'-0" I 15'-0"
' ' 20'-0"
�2,:a fl,r): none 34'-4" �
_ ..................... .............................................................................................................................:........................................................................._........................ . ,
Lot Coverage: 1,505 SF ; 1,602 SF j 2,000 SF
30% � 32% ' 40%
Design Review
Table 1— 800 Burlingame Avenue (cont.)
800 Burlingame Avenue
Lot Area: 5,000 SF
;
EXISTING ± PROPOSED ; ALLOWED/REQ'D
1,505 SF � 2,409 SF ; 2,700 SF�
FAR: 0.30 FAR i 0.48 FAR � 0.54 FAR
; ......................................................... ; .............. .... ........... ............................................... .
,
# of bedrooms: 2 ; 2 ---
Parking: 0 covered ' 0 covered 1 covered
(11' x 16') (11' x 16') � (10' x 20')
1 uncovered 1 uncovered 1 uncovered
(9' x 18') ; (9' x 18')z j (9 x 20 )
� ................ . � .
;.... ............. .. ............. . ..................... ................... ................... ,.................. . .............. .......
,
�
Height: 15'-8" i 23'-10" ; 30'-0"
�.......... ,
DHEnvelope: complies � complies � CS 25.28.075
' (0.32 x S,UUU SN') + 1,lUU 5r =1, iuu �r �u.�4 ratc�
2 Both the covered and uncovered parking spaces may remain as non-conforming in length because
there is no increase in the number of potential bedrooms.
Staff Comments: See attached.
Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission design review study meeting on May 23,
2005, the Commission had some concern over the staircase, window box off the master bathroom and
the proposed window trim (May 23, 2005, Planning Commission Minutes). This project was placed on
the consent calendar for action at a time when the requested revisions have been made. The following
is a list of the Commission's direction and responses by the applicant. The applicant submitted revised
plans and a letter addressing the Commissions concerns date stamped June 1, 2005.
1. Staircase design will need to be revised; proposed staircase is not allowed by the building
code; need to have a minimum tread width of 6 inches; check building code and revise plans;
consider increasing the width of the stairway to make it easier to move furniture.
� Staircase winders were removed as suggested. There was no change made to the width of the
stairwell because the client wants maximum space at the patio off the existing dining room
(revised plans and elevations, date stamped June 1, 2005, pages 3 thru 5).
2. Concerned with the window box proposed in the second floor bathroom; would like to see
something different which is better integrated into the design of the house.
� Due to client request, the window box remains off the master bathroom. A redwood box skirt
with redwood corbels has been added to the window box and matches the redwood corbels on
the rear elevation; this has been added to correct the "stuck on" appeaxance of the window box
(revised plans and elevations, date stamped June 1, 2005, pages 3 thru 5).
3. Proposed windows and window trim should match existing (stucco mold), provide details.
2
Design Review
800 Burlingame Avenue
• Windows and window stucco mold trim will match the existing trim; this is noted on the plans
under the "Exterior Finish Schedule" on page 5 of the revised plans.
Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted
by the Council on Apri120, 1998 are outlined as follows:
1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood;
2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood;
3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure;
4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and
5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components.
Findings: Based on the findings stated in the attached minutes of the Planning Commission's May 23,
2005, design review study meeting, that the design of the addition is compatible with the mass and bulk
of the existing structures in the neighborhood and that the addition will blend well with the design of
the existing house, the project is found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five
residential design review guidelines.
Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative
action should be by resolution and include findings made for design review. The reasons for any action
should be clearly stated for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be
considered:
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date
stamped June 1, 2005, sheets 1 through 5.1 and survey date stamped April 19, 2005 and; and
that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall require and amendment to
this permit;
2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, which would include
adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or
changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review;
3. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed
professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as
window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed
professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the
certification under penalty of perjury; certifications shall be submitted to the Building
Department;
4. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the
architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built
according to the approved Planning and Building plans;
c3
Design Review
800 Burlingame Avenue
5. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single
termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these
venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building
permit is issued;
6. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall establish the height
of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department;
7. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's January 26, 2005 memo, the City Engineer's
January 28, 2005 memo, the Fire Marshal's and NPDES Coordinator's January 31, 2005
memos, and the Recycling Specialist's February 2, 2005 memo shall be met;
8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance
which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste
Reduction Plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure,
interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit;
9. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water
Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; and
10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California
Fire Code, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
Erica Strohmeier
Zoning Technician
c. Mark Robertson, Applicant/Designer
4
Project Comments
Date:
01 /25/2005
To: d City Engineer
❑ Chief Building Official
❑ City Arborist
❑ City Attorney
From:
Subject:
Planning Staff
❑ Recycling Specialist
❑ Fire Marshal
❑ NPDES Coordinator
Request for design review for a first and second story addition at 800
Burlingame Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 029-173-160
Staff Review: 01/31/2005
1. Storm drainage shall be designed to drain towards the street frontage.
2. Replace all displaced/damaged sidewalk, driveway, curb and gutter.
3. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works —
Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information.
Reviewed by: V V
Date: 1 /28/2005
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
Subject:
Staff Review:
01 /25/2005
❑ City Engineer
X Chief Building Official
❑ City Arborist
❑ City Attorney
❑ Recycling Specialist
a Fire Marshal
❑ NPDES Coordinator
Planning Staff
Request for design review for a first and second story addition at 800
Burlingame Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 029-173-160
01 /31 /2005
1) All construction must comply with the 2001 California Building Codes (CBC),
the Burlingame Municipal and Zoning Codes, and all other State and Federal
requirements.
2) Provide fully dimensioned plans.
3) Roof eaves must not project within two feet of the property line.
4) Exterior bearing walls less than three feet from the property line must be
constructed of one-hour fire-rated construction.
5) Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window
or door that complies with the egress requirements.
6) Provide guardrails at all landings.
7) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are more than finro risers.
8) Provide lighting at all exterior landings.
9) The fireplace chimney must terminate at least two feet above any roof surface
within ten feet.
__ . _ _ .__.�_.. .._
Reviewed lfy: -�'����� �_ �
�/ ��
Date: �e�� �o J�
Project Comments
Date:
01 /25/2005
To: � City Engineer
0 Chief Building Official
� City Arborist
0 City Attorney
From
Subject:
Planning Staff
X Recycling Specialist
� Fire Marshal
0 NPDES Coordinator
Request for design review for a first and second story addition at 800
Burlingame Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 029-173-160
Staff Review: 01 /31/2005
Applicant shall submit a Waste Reduction Plan and recycling deposit for this and all
covered projects prior to construction or permitting.
1� /
Reviewed by: � G C. Date: Z �' �-1 � S
�/!��
Project Comments
Date:
01 /25/2005
To: ❑ City Engineer
❑ Chief Building Official
❑ City Arborist
❑ City Attorney
From:
Subject:
Planning Staff
❑ Recycling Specialist
� Fire Marshal
❑ NPDES Coordinator
Request for design review for a first and second story addition at 800
Burlingame Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 029-173-160
Staff Review: 01 /31 /2005
Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence.
1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter.
2. Provide double backflow prevention.
Reviewed by: �e�/�`��,���
Date: ` � �.-�r�s �;
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
Subject:
Staff Review:
01 /25/2005
� City Engineer
� Chief Building Official
� City Arborist
� City Attorney
� Recycling Specialist
� Fire Marshal
✓ NPDES Coordinator
Planning Staff
Request for design review for a first and second story addition at 800
Burlingame Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 029-173-160
01 /31 /2005
Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City
NPDES permit requirement to prevent stormwater pollution including but not limited
to ensuring that all contractors implement construction Best Management Practices
(BMPs) and erosion and sediment control measures during ALL phases of the
construction project (including demolition).
Additional stormwater requirements may be issued as conditions of approval for this
project.
Brochures and literatures on stormwater pollution prevention and BMPs are available
for your review at the Planning and Building departments. Distribute to all project
proponents.
For additional assistance, contact Eva J. at 650/342-3727.
Reviewed by: � � , ��
Date: �1 �3��0,��
� Ciry of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes
May 23, 2005
10. 800 BURLINGAME AVENUE, ZONED R-1— APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST
AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (MARK ROBERTSON, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; MARIE
BENEDETTI, PROPERTY OWNERL55 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER
Plr Hurin briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Auran opened the public comment. Mark Robertson, designer, 918 E. Grant Place, San Mateo,
represented the project and was available to answer questions, noted that the addition was focused towards
the rear of the house. Commission complimented the designer on a great job, overall this is a good project.
Commissioners made the following comments:
• Staircase design will need to be revised, winding staircase proposed is not allowed by the building
code, need to have a minimum tread width of 6 inches, please check the building code and revise
plans;
• May also want to consider increasing the width of the stairway to make it easier to move furniture;
• Concerned with the window box proposed in the second floor bathroom, would like to see something
different which is better integrated into the design of the house; and
• Proposed windows and window trim should match existing (stucco mold), provide details.
There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
C. Cauchi made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar at a time when the suggested revisions
have been made and plan checked. This motion was seconded by C. Vistica.
Chair Auran called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans had been
revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 7-0. The Planning Commission's action is advisory
and not appealable. This item concluded at 9:35 p.m.
10
MARK ROBERTSON DESIGN o
5;'?8/2005
ATTN: CiTY OF BLIRLiNG,AME PL:4NNING CQn'IMTSSTON
RF.: RESPONSES TO CONA�NTS FROM MAY 23RD REVIEW MTG.
PRO.TECT: BENNEDETTT RESTDENCE, S00 BURLP,�TGAME AVE.
STAIRCASE REVISION:
S7'AIRCASE WINI�ERS REMQVEI� AS SL?GGrSTED. AS. FAR AS WID'PH OF
STATRS, OWNER IS OKAY WTTH STATRS AT MIN. WIDTH BECAUSE SHE
W.ANTS MAX. RQOM AT EXT. PATIO OFF THE EXISTING DINTNG ROOM.
��DQ�V-B��-AT 1ViS'�FR:-SATH:
Ci:iF.NT VERY MUCH WANTS THE WTNnOW BOX OFF HER TUB PLATFORM
BEf AUSE Sf3E IS BIG ON I-�OUSE PLANTS. SO 1�E HAVE ADDED A
REDWOOD BOX WITH RD. WD. CORBF,I_,S TO 1VI�ATCH THE REAR ELEVATION
KL?1�1P-OIJ f' STYLE TQ �'ORRECT THE "STUCK. QN" APPEAR�]�TCE.
WTNDOWS AND WiNDOW TRiM:
WINDOWS AND WINDOW STUCC� MOLD TR1M TO EXACTLY MATCH
EXTSTING AND NOTED ON PLANS WITH DETAIL (SEE PAGE # 5) AS
REQUESTED.
�ND OF COMMENTS / REVIS�ONS.
ST�ICERELY
,
/�
MARK RQBERT�ON
PROTECT DESIGNER.
RECEIV�C�
JUN - 1 2005
CITY OF BURLINGAM�:
PLANNING DEPT
918 E. GRANT PLACE, SAN MATEO, CALIF. 94402 U.S.A • TEL: (650) 571-1125 • FAX: (650) 571-1399
City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlin�ame.orQ
�`, CITY p
�
�.�E APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
�,.,,_.�. �
Type of application: Design Review�_ Conditional Use Permit Variance •
Special Permit Other Parcel Number:
Project address:
APPLICANT
Name:�,f2� ��
Address: �%� L - o �f�ll�'�T' '�L. •
City/State/Zip: �n➢ � _.�. . 9 �,�►(cP7_
� ��
Phone (w):�� �C�'i �7� - ,tJ2�
(n): yH w.�
(�� �7J -- �?-�'l�'
�ARCHITECT SIGNER
Name: f� �c:._ ��it7'�5f.��i
Address: %l � C • .��i'%164 '�i �L.- �
City/State/Zip: � , ���
Phone (w): (���i S�l --IIZ�
,
(h): �f4w� �
(fl: �7� -13�'�
F� P
PROPERTY OWNER
Name: )'�'1t9R(E l��NED�7TJ
Address: ��d �ti � � c ��
City/State/Zip: �'�NFo4�hE _ �%� . ��/�
Phone (w): ( �1S) — ��-� - �$� Z.
�h>: C�G'1- � 3�1�-
( fl; N
Please indicate with an asterisk *
the contact person for this project.
RECEIVED
JAN 2 5 2005
GTY OF BURUNCiAME
PLANNING DEPT.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
�
AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information
given herein is true and correct to the best of my know edge and belief.
Applicant's signature: /. Date: Z O
�
I know about the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this
application to the Planning Commission.
Property owner's signature: �— Date: I- 2-�- �� l
Date submitted:
PCAPP.FRM
�µj14/L��� ltl:'11 b���b�yJL� b u I rHVt �1%�1
>r -; �
,0' �HNL� SURVEI(ING ��� san Clemente Road• Half lNoon Bay, CA 94019
� r.� �I��ahJ �o �,4�'1�3, 86��o fEl: 650.560.97�21 F`RX: 650,56Q.9�23
Fax Trar�smi.ttat
��:
To:
Fqx:
Pt�:
FROtul:
CC:
RE:
April 18, 2005
Mack �tabe�tson Design
ATTN: MARK ROBERSTON
(S50) 571-i399
(650) 571-1't2S
Bryan Taylor
800 Burlingame elevatioris
RECEI���
Joe NO.: U5-04$
PAc�s: 1 ((ncluding cover pa�ye)
aPR 1 s 2005
11-E�AI� � 1fE$� � N.Q CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
CoMMENT3:
Marlc h�re are the resutts of our survey_ The elevations ace baseol upor� ttie City of
Burlin9aEne ele�rations. Benchmark used uuas t4�efr nalt and washer on toR of curl� at the
int€rseetion flf @urlingame and �4rundel with an elevation of 23.Od3 fe�t {BM # 33).
��ND SUq
�����y�,Tqyo��9
U � �
� �� �. & *
� . �55�
��
; ��� OF CP������
�-, _ , . ,,, ......._.
Zl.04'� TC ��
L3..� f�
�...__
1
E�► t� �3� ✓!'''l�'
s4.• �3.o'i'3 � �
�� �2.. b�t Tt. �
�g . f � ��.
�
.
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for
design review for a first and second story addition at 800 Burlin�ame Avenue zoned R-1, Marie
Benedetti property owner APN: 029-173-160;
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on
June 13, 2005, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written
materials and testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that:
1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and
comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no
substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the
environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15301 Class
1(e)(2) - additions to existing structures provided the addition will not result in an
increase of more than 10,000 SF in areas where all public services and facilities are
available and the area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive.
2. Said design review is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto. Findings for such design review are as set forth in the minutes and recording of
said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official
records of the County of San Mateo.
Chairman
I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame,
do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting
of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of June, 2005 by the following vote:
Secretary
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for categorical exemption and design review.
800 Burlingame Avenue
Effective June 23, 2005
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department
date stamped June 1, 2005, sheets 1 through 5.1 and survey date stamped April 19, 2005
and; and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall require and
amendment to this permit;
2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, which would include
adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features
or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review;
3. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other
licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details
such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is
no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall
provide the certification under penalty of perjury; certifications shall be submitted to the
Building Department;
4. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance
of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project
has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans;
5. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single
termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that
these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a
Building permit is issued;
6. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall establish the
height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building
Department;
7. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's January 26, 2005 memo, the City
Engineer's January 28, 2005 memo, the Fire Marshal's and NPDES Coordinator's
January 31, 2005 memos, and the Recycling Specialist's February 2, 2005 memo shall be
met;
that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling
Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to
submit a Waste Reduction Plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full
demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit;
9. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm
Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; and
10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and
California Fire Code, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
��� CITY o,� CITY OF BURUNGAME
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BURIJNGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
I +� . TEL:(650)558-7250 • FAX:(650)696-3790
� ;.,m '
,,,,�e www.burlingame.org
Site:800 BURLINGAME AVENUE
Application for design review for a first and
; second story addition at: 800 BURLINGAME
AVENUE , zoned R-1. (APN: 029-173-160).
The City of Burlingame Planning Commission
; announces the following public hearing
' on Monday, June 13, 2005 at 7:00 P.M.
in the City Hall Council Chambers located at
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California.
Mailed: June 3, 2005
' (Please refer to other side)
�
�
A copy of the aF
to the meeting
Burlingame, Ca�
��j'
���
If you challenge
raising only 1�2�
described in ' he
at or prior to�th
Property owt��i
their tenants��t
(650) 558-7���
�
Margaret MonY
City Planner
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE
I-- __ _ _
I
�� ._ -
,�.•`
CITY OF B URLINGAME
�� ���� �� � r M1 � ��� ���
�� m�� x <�� �8
ilic���i and��ans far th��� projecf��y, be reviewed prior
..�.i ,�.�,�,,,,r,�..:TlPr,artmPnt �f �SO��Primrose Road,
be limited to
�blic hearing,
�d to the city
��� -���
�
���
PU B�L��C
(Please refer to other side)
�_� � �� �
: :,��.
>' no�i�e���e respon ble or informing
ior a�lditio�al info � ati ��_ , please call
�' �:
}�`������ �� �
-�.��� ��.:a �.,� �� ��
.� ��s,��� � � ��
, ,� �..�..
�
�►�1����10� ,ICE
.� ° � �.-�� � � �, : , � ' � .:�,::
' �,�` � � �, � � �'; ,.� ���- �,
.. � � � F/;w �' • t,. ,� ,� � �.
� �
: y� � � "a" �,� Y_ �.�9"+r,••�` .r•r � $� t.' E
R � �� '� �- 1 • ,�� °`� rr'
z'; . , � j
,.�� �4> 4 �`' �.'�►.�` 'i �;;,.. a'�'\t•
. p e .
'�, ' `�
� :,;��' ``�" �,��&+y �"'�+� , . :
�'�' • • + ,�"��' � Y'� � � � ``' � ��
���,�'� �,�` 4.
�� +++,,���,444,,
iY� :#..4��. � �.:
� i . �
�.^ ��:Y yi 1' �f��
�� � ��' �� = _ .� � - s,�.� ;�,?r�� .•� � � �,
� � �* .i � 'r . � F�r'r�,� : � .i��t�` : � , �
� .'� � -i �., a a a, � ��,� � { � �'.c
. ,
T
� ��. •
� � vr • � � . /' '. �, Gw 9' �� .
. �,�� ��;���
.
q�.„:�� �x ' ' ' \ . �'�' ,. �''a`a.' '*T4 /.�`�' -'�'�.h". r,� � . ti �S
. '�t� P � � \�� �� '� , �� �, � ��. �' � ,��1�
, � �.. �" .�
�s>,, � � ' i�' ' � � ,, ,
..�'�r ., ��!^ * , �il:.... � ' �,'r',.. ' ���j°� �' \��� 1 .R �� +[ �����yF • • ' \�t .:..
{y. � C� �: ��4 ��
��� • g �� ` ; � � F �` �
q wy ¢, r� �" . y �� .�'� �' �^ + ..� A. �q.r�. '1 ♦ �
�w>� � � r!�b � „ � ,, ' � � - 5.
�., �-.� a
Ha„ ta . � �` . � � . .. , � � �.. e r , � ti,�.. ,
in . ��}" j'� „!�p�� ,.�' ' :� . i�.' ` �„ �'V� f� � .. r.�� ,�,�'
. %'tl �,'Y. \�� ,,,, '� :i; \ t�� r �Zi
.� � r;_ ��� � , � - � £ .
�
� �
r� ` � �" � �, ��,t
'�l ;A ,fl �, �L.�y . :' ¢�.< f. � `�'t � �.
a � �, ,'�, '�� ,� ' �'�: • '� � ,�r
� , � _ ` � � .,l�
�� ���, . , � �.TM � ; � , � r�
�'� . « ;�,,� ..'}� f � '��'. ��� t7 � i��� .b� � ;��;.. �..
� � � ` � �� � Li ^ ..
�f r .. ,� _� � � i '. �k�-s '. 'C� �
.. � '�, p! �'�ph k y::. � � "r� r. ' �''.
,��„� i`r�q. .;�4'' K�� at) �^ �*,� i. ' j��� ��t A° � a ,�.. `."'�,
� ., .
n n ; ' ��'�3� • < '� ��` � '� �� � �.� fiX.
.. '�
�� �� , � C � � . ` �� ; . r� � t"�,�-. X
� �'� ,� r�' � ,� �'�, `&�,�,, ti m � �, ���C� ��+ � � C ��;� ,� t � ' w
a ���..� t�,"'�x'' � % ° �,a������ 1�'4 � f. � ""€�tis r''i4 '�4:k 4: '�s�
h �� y� � k , � . � �� '.+� �✓� � �; ': ' ',� � 'i` �'�, + �h � b: � �• . � �
. t r''" � �lf4�g .r fs :� . . , o ` _,' �y ' �,�,'.: . ,1y �,y
� "b �'� �` �, . r . ' �' �i w� .'
F -'� 5 - �6 '� ^''; 1 �+t � q'�(�~� ' z. �tp1 .'�.�.�,� , � "� � cyR ;�,� v �'�.{� .i'� �:' � ad . , VR n.� .
..
�i �� ��3�` , . , � P �
,:
�. ��� � �;� � ��. ��t�^�� � . �'> � +� , d <�� � '�. A k �ia.��+e �� � � ` 'a `� � � � �
„� � "''�' j �ta''*�'�' �t, ,� 'V^r:v' ` t P 3,'�c,;.r � .o:�.l�'Cy��'`, � �b�" i e*4 � �•.
�'+s2'r+' � �� � Ej4 i��' ,/� . .�". "- �� '��9,,�� �'t '� c v' .�: • ;c54�'�£Ls �, ?" � f y '�� �
��. ;� � d �"'�+.> �n�.�' �'M� "' � dX' ��^,�� �� �, � <� �D�v., �a, . ��:�d �,,-,
._ .n A� ..� ' � D Y �. r n", �.r �- ��w��
1 e, j '� '� � �,. � f � � g 'ft �,.. `�, � , r .
� � �.
f � r t. s`� x-�� ,
�
. '�h� k* _ . `��� '��: � � t{ �y A�y�,�+ �` � "'
.
, + �,,.`
� �� �'�`i �� 2¢ ,�it ��.�t -.� i,� .. �.��f l ' i ',�"+" � ,
-
r . � �. � `� ,� ' y; a � �.. y .� ;
., � .
��� , �d, i""` ' � v� � � �' t ' , ��y� / ~� �y/+ , �
' 'i"� � Lrr. . , � .�"� ,�.i:r,. . ..,, � �y+ . ` �,. . � �� �'",pX �' : +�.
.
. r . . . � � � � �'.f� ��� x . 1 ;�, _ �r . � � �� ,
� � ��' a � •��� � t; a �, q,� ) '' �' �, � �,q,���'�" �" �. r '.
� Y � � � � s' F'., i �, i "�� ^ � \ ,� � � . �' , � ,�✓ * � Y 5.
pi !� ,i � �\,y �i'��� # 't' '� $n� .,, 4� 6',• K �. � .) j
m� r �.`` w. �.'� �,' ` , � , ,.
����? �t � j��e,r;y .�t; '' �'�t�� � k'� w�:�' � yl�
�' � �` ± A> . .� x ; rr`"� 6 �b xY� "1 � y� }.y� }r �'�'� l,� ,e. �' � : a ,� �>'
� '�' ��'"� �`""Ft„�� .� � ��� �_ .� � . .. : 'a . ', y��. �"+ ^' �$.,� � ,� +'-' . R''ij" - ' .% � t�>
9;�� � 3�" .; �� , � `il a � -5ti -5r. ,.� �a "'v ,r,
� r� �� � , 4 ��� "i` �` ' Z�R '� � � �y"�''�* l ,„+ ti. S� � '' � ' �. �
��. ; � t� �, t �i 1 'Y,,� a „F �# �f� �t'� a � , s �,r' � a v � ;�r:�y � , i� �i •
r � 3 ,.*� t � l� � � J ,�- kC � .' -�'q"' ''���i �� � , � �,� /
; � • {, .� � t `�: � .i� �� �y -. �'", �4 .,s ' �;' � �,,' ,� �
, ` �`b Y �� '"'°. � � '~� �;�. � "�
� * .c w . u �'�'�` *,i
, r
' � ;; :�„ � 1. � �� a � r: � � . }��',d 3�`�j � n �'t''i.
� ', �'
r. �� - e�15� �p�.r � �w�Z� 'n+ � �Y �t�.. r .:�� � � �
,'��i � � ,/' .s ;�" r . - • ,,yr ' � c.` �n°r a# .�.rp�,,-..
�,, . �
� ,. � *.t � , V .. K � rL '► �' ^' � * . . � ° ..�. � 'E'r � �'w � 'A �81 �,
�' . �. � � � ,� `�, r> ti
;i �',, £ ,� " "� *t . t ,y�'� 9�` r,, � f��""`� 4��'Oa�o r� � , i ,a�...•"� 1� � f ��,,1� ;�; "�. ",w
,� �,{�.
t � x r�, �jA,k° i �"�� �t � _:i w a�tr' '� � �%' ' . � �`�, •�hy �,� , fi�� � . �'� " � �'°'4� �'' � a
� ..
� f � , �, � ��r ���r .°.N .�,• �,,.'s. C � +;. n r6*- x�, -.�, �„'g p� .+ ;
�+ � � ;. � �' ki �z. �.. �7f 9 !� i . p�: � , ,'A s"9� :
:. ..y .. .. : 4. d '� { . ��} �}b 4 � .. 1 �v i' Y
- ; . � � .' J� , .
�
, �' ., t t 'C � L� a'
:
'�l � � _ , .. .'[ 6y � � 1
. . � �, a �s .�a� � �C„ � :r%'��" .�'� '�* ��r°,� � .�w 1a
'� ��• [ �' i r r�� ��..'�. . ,� �' � c����} 0 � 4 + x 'vp• � n
.a"�• :.z .�.: � �r' - .r.. �a .� n�� �� � ,S;�Y'�.
6T.t . � . y t �.' � M y��.� 's:' .,. •. (r � � , �a , �� pt, �,a; �1�, il' .
.
.,. / «
� � � "+y„��r';, r�� ♦ `�' • : , ��. ' c::
- : ',- � �; � • " , r * e �t
, r,� , ., .
.. A + r � �/ . . � s a�� � 7r . � I
:� � '�� /' � � �* `� 'y ,� „
1 ib �l '�' '+y. �� � � � � � � Y
..i � . 'h�r ! S.- � . ilf9\ � _}i' �{° "I - ys �� i �.
/ ' �� ' '� 'Y.i" 1' d 'Q�. �:.
.:. .
� •.
'� 'ir r� �� t,�k3,k � i ..�� , � y 0.4 �. � � ��� �
'-yr� z�+ . �� $n i. /y�1 ��. S.. � � �. � ��y". �� 1'
.tP "�+ r � . . � �' e '�.':� �! ��� � �,n' � �:: �;: i� '�" . � . 'r. .
.
:
`�"�" ����� � . � �^, � �� �,�� �. � i � "C/' � � � . � � ..
;��.�� , ° _ 'xi. .� r4 � ar� � � . �� � / � �f � ?:� '� ", �
+ �a ,�f .i. . k;. �p, .� V. 'a*�� ✓if r•� r .
.`
�. • ' 1� , � � �{ �
...
"� . �
� �
f - � `�� N:��, ���� a�• '
�� ,'��'' 1 !° ,, iF"''a . �i '�a� ,f"'�. � , �� � .. 1 ��J',�', �'t , � '�.
L � � ,r-� :" '+ ; r-� �. 9 � 41�: ' � . - � ,i'
ffi�.v�-n��i�`= •�'�c� �° '•�.:�''°y. '.f�,,�� v"»''♦ `r►�.• .v.. y�. l� Y `.'�
:�.. -�,* • A..;" ?k� , S7j ♦ � .x„ _ya 4�'-: �.�M� Y � .
J'. , s � ` a 9�" _ � � ` � � �'" W � �`' S .. � ` .� �' � ��. i'�,.
.., P� ,��:� �� a�: `�� 6 � � � �= j � � � �r�'��' � t;���� ��"fr �„* .
�� i � �` �, tr� ! '{ `✓ ` r'+ �P,y`�4� #�r ' � x� � . i ��,�1`�� 3:�
� j � M �,t i'.�' .:Y � � � � v .;�.
' � �... �. _ d jd � . ��P;Y I � yb
>? 1.• �, ; �'� �t
. !�-����� � ` � ., §* �� •` � �
�,�'� � �KY � / / � � I � � � � �,�i� C� 4� ,r�d �.�
� $� � .�� � � � � �� ��e�•
�^° °����' laral�q �' � .
'! l f����j �j. . "'�.,A. � � r^ D 1 �� ,�' � � S "'�.
� � `i� h.�,�1. \ �,�� ,'.���. i ��,. � ,�'f,. i V�`.
r ,
., .s.: ., - ,
. .�„ J� � � � ' �' ,
.' . ,c,_.-� . , . " . �yv;, .