The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About704 Burlingame Avenue - Staff ReportCommunity Development Department, Planning Division PLANS REMOVED FOR SCANNING December, 200�j Plans Dated: • 'D Item # 3 Study Calenda City of Burlingame Lot Coverage and Side Setback Variances For a Single Story Addition and a New Detached Garage Address: 704 Burlingame Avenue Meeting Date: 06/09/03 Request: Lot coverage and side setback variances for a single story addition and a new, detached garage at 704 Burlingame Avenue, zoned R-1. Applicant and Architect: Randy Grange Property Owner: Bruce Kaldor General Plan: Low density residential APN: 029-173-110 Lot Area: 6000 SF Zoning: R-1 Summary: The applicant is proposing to add 330 SF to the rear of the existing single-story dwelling, and to demolish an existing detached garage and to build a new, detached garage at the rear, right corner of the property. With the addition and the new garage, the lot coverage on the site will increase from 1,849 SF (37%) to ,2153 SF (43%), where 2,000 SF (40%) is the maximum allowed on the lot. The proposed project requires a lot coverage variance for exceeding 40% lot coverage on the site. All proposed decks are less than 30 inches above grade and are not included in lot coverage calculations. The existing left wall of the dwelling has a non-conforming 3 foot left side setback and the applicant is proposing to extend this wall by 24'-1" to add a master bedroom and bath to the rear of the existing dwelling, where a 4 foot side setback is the required by code. The proposed project requires a side setback variance for a left side setback of 3 feet where 4 feet is required. The existing detached garage is 303 SF, is 4 feet from the rear wall of the existing dwelling, and provides a single covered parking space that is non-conforming in length (18'-8" existing where 20 feet is required). The existing garage will be demolished and the applicant is proposing to build a new, detached garage in the rear 30% of the property. The new garage will provide the required single covered parking space for the 3- bedroom house and includes a 49 SF storage area. The applicant is requesting: Lot coverage variance for 43% (2,153 SF) lot coverage where 40% (2,000 SF) is the maximum allowed (C.S. 25.54 and 25.28.065); and Side setback variance at the left side for 3 feet where 4 feet is required (C.S. 25.54 and 25.28.072,c,1). Variances For Lot Covera e and Side Setback 704B ' Avemie PROPOSED EXISTING ALLOWED/REQ'D SETBACKS Front (Ist flr): no change 17'-0" 15'-0" Side (left): 3'-0" ** 3'-0" *** 4'-0" (right): no change 9'-4" 4'-0" Rear (1 st flr): 15'-0" 39'-6" 15'-0" Lot Coverage: 2,153 SF 1,849 SF 2,000 SF 43%* 37% 40% Parking: 1 covered 1 covered 1 covered (10' x 20') (10' x 18'-8" non-conforming in length) (10' x 20') 1 uncovered 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') (9' x 20') # of bedrooms: 3 2 --- * Lot coverage variance for 43% (2153 SF) lot coverage where 40 %(2000 SF) is the maximum allowed. ** Side setback vaxiance at the left side for 3 feet where 4 feet is required by code. *** Existing non-conforming condition (3 foot existing side setback). Staff Comments: Planning staff would note that the existing driveway at the right side is non-conforming, with 9'-4" of vehicle clearance where 9'-6" is required by code. This non-conforming situation will not be affected by the proposed addition or detached garage. The proposed planter box at the right side of the deck and the deck steps must meet the 9'-6" driveway width requirement. Design review is not required for this proj ect because the proposed additions are single-story and the proposed plate heights match the plate heights on the existing dwelling. Erika Lewit Planner c: Randy Grange, applicant 2 Item # Regular Action Calendar City of Burlingame Lot Coverage and Side Setback Variances For a Single Story Addition and a New Detached Garage Address: 704 Burlingame Avenue Meeting Date: 06/26/03 Request: Lot coverage and side setback variances for a single story addition and a new, detached garage at 704 Burlingame Avenue, zoned R-1. Applicant and Architect: Randy Grange APN: 029-173-110 Property Owner: Bruce Kaldor Lot Area: 5,000 SF General Plan: Low density residential Zoning: R-1 CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15301 Class 1(e)(1) - additions to existing structures provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition. Summary: The applicant is proposing to add 330 SF to the rear of the existing single-story dwelling, and to demolish an existing detached garage and to build a new, detached garage at the rear, right corner of the property. With the addition and the new gaxage, the lot coverage on the site will increase from 1,849 SF (37%) to 2,096 SF (41.9%), where 2,000 SF (40%) is the maximum allowed on the lot. The proposed project requires a lot coverage variance for exceeding 40% lot coverage on the site. All proposed decks are less than 30 inches above grade and are not included in lot coverage calculations. The existing left wall of the dwelling has a non-conforming 3 foot left side setback and the applicant is proposing to extend this wall by 24'-1" to add a master bedroom and bath to the rear of the existing dwelling, where a 4 foot side setback is the required by code. The proposed proj ect requires a side setback variance for a left side setback of 3 feet where 4 feet is required. The existing detached garage is 303 SF, and is separated from the rear wall of the existing dwelling by 4'- 0". The existing garage provides a single covered parking space that is 10'-0" wide and is non-conforming in length (18'-8" existing where 20 feet is required). The existing garage will be demolished. The applicant is proposing to build a new (10'-0" wide x 20'-0" length), detached garage in the rear 30% of the property. The new garage is 220 SF and will provide the required single covered parking space for the 3- bedroom house. The applicant is requesting: • Lot coverage variance for 41.9% (2,096 SF) lot coverage where 40% (2,000 SF) is the maximum allowed (C.S. 25.54 and 25.28.065); and • Side setback variance for a 24'-1" extension to an existing wall at the left side for 3 feet side setback where 4 feet is required (C.S. 25.54 and 25.28.072,c,1). Variances For Lot Coverage and Side Setback 704 Burlingame Avenue PROPOSED EXISTING ALLOWED/REQ'D SETBACKS Front (Ist flr): no change 17'-0" 15'-0" Side (left): 3'-0" * * 3'-0" * * * 4'-0" (right): no change 9'-4" 4'-0" Rear (1 st flr): 15'-0" 39'-6" 15'-0" Lot Coverage: 2,096 SF 1,849 SF 2,000 SF 41.9%* 37% 40% Parking: 1 covered 1 covered 1 covered (10' x 20') (10' x 18'-8" non-conforming in length) (10' x 20') 1 uncovered 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') (9' x 20') # of bedrooms: 3 2 --- * Lot coverage variance for 41.9% (2,096 SF) lot coverage where 40 %(2,000 SF) is the maximum allowed. ** Side setback variance at the left side for 3 feet where 4 feet is required by code. *** Existing non-conforming condition (3 foot existing side setback). Staff Comments: Planning staff would note that the existing driveway at the right side is non-conforming, with a vehicle clearance of 9'-4" where 9'-6" is required by code. This non-conforming situation will not be affected by the proposed addition or detached garage. The proposed planter box at the right side of the deck and the steps for the new deck must meet the 9'-6" driveway width requirement. Design review is not required for this project because the proposed additions are single-story and the proposed plate heights match the plate heights on the existing dwelling. Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission design review study meeting on June 9, 2003, the Commission made the following comments regarding the application and moved to place the item on the regular action calendar (June 9, 2003, Planning Commission Minutes): • Commission's comment ➢ Applicant's response 2 Variances For Lot Coverage and Side Setback Avenue 704 Burlingame • Concerned about expanding the foot print (lot coverage) of the existing house and someone later being able to add a larger second story; simple to reduce this project to comply with lot coverage, reduce the garage some and the house some; ➢ The applicant has submitted revised plans, date stamped June 16, 2003, in response the Commission's suggestions. The ground level storage area has been eliminated from the detached garage, reducing the garage size by 57 SF, from 277 SF to 220 SF. So the overall lot coverage variance has decreased from 2,153 SF (43%) to 2,096 (41.9%) where 2,000 SF is the maximum allowed on the site. There is little back yard left with this proposal, need a stronger rational for the exceptions; provide a better explanation of the hardships on the property to justify the variance, for example a second story addition would eliminate the lot coverage exception, why is it not proposed; ➢ The applicant has submitted an addendum to the variance form, date stamped June 16, 2003. The addendum explains in further detail why the owners have decided to do a single-story addition and provides additional hardship justification for the requested vanances. Neighbor adjacent to garage should be contacted about the extension of the house and the new garage; ➢ The owner has contacted neighboring property owners about the addition and there is a letter date stamped June 16, 2003 in support of the project. Required Findings for Variance: In order to grant a variance the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d): a) there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved that do not apply generally to property in the same district; b) the granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant, and to prevent unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship; c) the granting of the application will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare or convenience; and d) that the use of the property will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses of properties in the general vicinity. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action should be by resolution and include findings made for the two variances, and the reasons for any action should be clearly stated. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date Variances For Lot Coverage and Side Setback Avenue 704 Burlingame stamped June 16, 2003, sheets A-1 through A-4; the decks on site shall be no higher than 30 inches above adj acent grade and the side setback to the deck and planter along the left side of the driveway shall be no closer than 9'-6" from the right side property line; 2. that the conditions of the Recycling Specialist's May 1, 2003 and the City Engineer's May 5, 2003, memos shall be met; that the side setback variance and the lot coverage variance shall expire if the house is demolished or remodeled to an extent greater than 50% of the existing floor area; and 4. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. Erika Lewit Planner c: Randy Grange, applicant � City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes June 9, 2003 3. 704 BURLINGAME AVENUE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR LOT COVERAGE AND SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE FOR A FIRST FLOOR ADDITION AND A NEW DETACHED GARAGE (RANDY GRANGE, TRG ARCHITECTS, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; BRUCE KALDOR, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKA LEWIT Plr Hurin presented a summary of the staff report. C. Brownrigg arrived at 7:28 p.m. Commissioners asked: • Provide a better explanation of the hardships on the properiy to justify the variance, for example a second story addition would eliminate the lot coverage exception, why not proposing; • Concerned about expanding the foot print of the existing house and some one later adding a larger second story; • There is little back yard left with this proposal, need a stronger rational for the exceptions; • Neighbor adjacent to garage should be contacted about the extension of the house and the new garage; � Simple to reduce this project to comply with lot coverage, reduce the garage some and the house some. Chair Bojues place this item on a future action calendar when there is space after all the information has been collected, addressed and reviewed by staff. This item concluded at 7:30 p.m. 4. & 5.1230 BRO DWAY, ZONED -1, BROADWAY COMMERCIAL A— APPLICATION FOR CONDIT NAL USE PE IT FOR A FOOD ESTABLISHME (VITAE ARCHITECTURE, APPL ANT AND ARC ITECT; ZEDEN JONES, STARBUC COFFEE, APPLICANT; TSTN P NERSHIl' PROP RTY OWNER PROJECT PLANNER: ATHERINE BARBER Monroe briefly,�fresented the project. Commission asked,�ie following questions: • How muc eating is available at the Burlingame Av ue Starbuck's site, indoor and o door; • Have se a security officer at the Starbuck's on B rlingame, describe the program; • Whe re the peak sales hours, how do they co spond to available parking on Br dway; • Wi deliveries be made at the front or from t rear; • at standards does the city usually requ' e of limited food services regar 'ng trash, clean up and sidewalk cleaning; How can the business encourage custo r use of the public parking nearb , can an access into the store from the rear be created; • How will the "outdoor" seating ar be secured at night or when the usiness is closed; • How many similar businesses ha e outdoor seating in the Peninsul , what sort of problems have arisen from such seating; have there een problems created inside th store from outdoor seating; in this evaluation should consider a least one site within a block of i�h school. CA Anderson noted that thi s an application for a limited f d service which is a change in type of food service on this site but a p itted option if the criteria are et, in this case the applicant is also asking for an increase in the seatin limitation for a limited food se ice business so that requires review as well. The commission set is item for the consent calendar fter the information has been submitted, when there was space availabl on that calendar. This item con uded at 7:46 p.m. 3 City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org `; CITT A �•+� APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION �a.�r� . T e of a lication: Desi Review Conditional Use Pertnit Variance � YP PP � Special Permit Other Parcel Number: Project address: 70=�_�Q �1�1(�M'� Pi'�tS . APPLICANT � Name: lr� l7EcT� Address: 2�5 t'P,k�K . ST� 2�.� City/State/Zip:_ f��Lla�1�,4NIE , �' Phone (w): 50 . :S�Q -- �5'�62 (�: h.Sa - �5�q- a�15 ARCHITECT/DESIGNER PROPERTY OWNER � Name: ,%3�vG E �b � o �C � Ci ►�1l�- � Address: � o� �v �2 L in/G-r�9�Nl� fI'U� City/State/Zip: 13/>�-L /hl6,r�,rvi F . G�1 Phone (w): (�)� 65c� -5�� - ��T_ (fl� ,-� IVED Name: � Cr ,��.'G.H-I T�c..T'S Address: 2o.S �i4-�K. � • City/State/Zip: �(� �. L t n/ M��T�- Phone (w): -6 S° -' S � � � S �- � 2 (h): (fl: 6 Sa - 5 �-9 - � � � s APR 2 8 2003 CI.TY OF BURLINGAME Please indicate with an asteris�'�" N i N G° E P T. the contact person for this project. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ufh2l�QyvC� �0{2 LoT L'� U�1�. d- �/,�� _��I'�3AG1C �� / �S' 7a 121`' �»�/ n oN AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Applicant's signature: Date: ZSr o3 I know about the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. Property owner's signature: � ___ Date: Z �� Date submitted: PCAPP.FRM —_ _— _�.� v � �•._,�, �_.1 i r �JI-� tsui�L t N�� 550 3�1.2 8386 P. 02.�GJ3 6U17,..GAME �U� �rpY- 'L�N�Il�LbUl!!!�?1��p7CLS �� 1��WU�U�J�o(G ��L�,llt�rG°1l�o�H'tll� �;�y .� y wr.��' The Plann(ng Comml�sion is r�puired by law to make f�ndin�s �g defned by th� C�ty`� ordinance {�Qde Se�ctian 28.b4,02d a-d}. Your an�wera to th� folfpwing questions wilt �$�ist the Planning �omm�sslan in meking the decision�as to w�ether the findin�s can be made for your request. Plaa�e type or write ne�tly in ink. Refer to the back af this fqrm for assistsnae with these que�tions. a. Descr�ba the eYaeptlona/ or extraardinar� clrcr�m�rt`�neas or condi�tions ApFli'cable td y�ur P�'oP�RY which alo not app/y to other prap�rties !n this aree. S �E /-�-'�-}'AG f� MEnrj' f� � b. Explal� why !h� v�rri�nce �eq�es� Is necess8ry for th� preservetidn �nd anfpyment ot p sul�atant�al praperty ri'ght end wrhet unreaaonabll� p,raperty /o,�� of �nnacerssary hard�hlp � mi$ht resuh fro�n the denlaJ of the applicatlor►. SEE H-7'7',9-GI�M�E'NT �- � C. E.�rpleia why the proposed use at the p�aposed locatlon w�7/ not b� detrJmentg! a� 1nJurlarrs� to prape,rty ot' ir�p��verr�ents In ,the vicinity ar to pub/ic hea//thh, s�fety, genera! welfare, or canver�ience. � SE� f1-7'P9CyN�E�'T �9- d. H�w w!// th�r propvsed profi�ct b� comp�tlb/e wlth th� eesthetias, r��ss, bulk dnd c�haracter° of #fi� exist3ng and poteRtial rfses on �Gfjo/nJ�g prop�r#es In thB g�nera/ VI�Inhy'�' S'� y4TT�-Glfi�t �� 7` /� .., J'.r .: G � z/eZ v.►.trr» � «��K�„ , , . . . , . .. � . . . . _._ , A.<+:.�..:, . . R � � �-NVE�C� .. :.�r.r,�. ;ib'�e �'� . AFR�.��-�8 2003 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. RECEIVED APR 2 8 2003 Apri125, 2003 CITY OF BURLINGAME Attachment A PLANNING DEPT. VARIANCE APPLICATION FOR LOT COVERAGE IN EXCESS OF 40% & SETBACK a. Lot Cover: The existing house includes a front porch that is signi�cantly larger than what one would typically find on a house this size. It is approximately 10% of the home's area and 3% of the lot area. If the entry porch were more in scale with this house, and with other entry porches in the neighborhood, this project would only require a "Minor Modi�cation". This is the only home on the block with a detached garage. Due to the driveway, garage location, and front porch location (which accounts for excess lot coverage), design options for reconfiguring existing space to minimize additions are much more limited for this property than for others on the block (see item b below). Setback: The existing house is constructed 3' frorn the left side property line. That dimension conforms to building codes, and this proposal simply extends the existing building line and hip roof. There currently exists an odd roof configuration at the rear of the house, with a flat roof abutting a hip roof, while the walls below are in the same plane. If required to shift the addition over 12" to conform to the current setback requirements, one would be forced to create a messy and awkward roof design. b. Lot Cover: The existing house has just 2 bedrooms and one bath while most other houses in this neighborhood have at least 3 bedrooms and 2 bathrooms. Without the variance, one would be forced to infill the front porch in order to gain enough floor area to construct a simple bedroom and bath. But inflling the porch would have an adverse effect on the character and visual mass of the house, while not producing usable floor space for the development of a new bedroom. In order to accommodate a bedroom, all available space would need to be consolidated in one area. Space obtained by filling in the front porch could not be linked to a smaller addition on the back of the house due to the garage location. Even with the garage being pushed well back as proposed, one cannot gain enough space on that side of the house to accommodate a bedroom. Setback: Many houses in this neighborhood have side setbacks of 3' or even less. Since this house currently has such a setback, and since such a setback is common to the area, it would not be inconsistent with the neighborhood to extend the existing building line. Maintaining the existing setback and roofline would have no significant impacts, while enforcement of the current zoning rules would force a more awkward design solution. c. The proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimenta] or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience. There are no proposed changes that would impact public health, safety, or convenience. There are bene�ts to the general vicinity by developing the property in the proposed manner. The well-screened single story addition being proposed retains the character of the neighborhood, with far less impact on any neighbors, than even a single room on a new second floor. In fact, the properly will appear less developed when viewed from the street since the addition cannot be seen and the garage is pushed to the rear of the lot, opening up more space and air. The existing garage is nonconforming in that it is too far forward on the lot and less than 4 feet from the house. Both of these conditions are resolved by this proposal. Additionally, the new garage will be smaller than the existing garage. The proposed extension of an existing setback for the bedroom addition meets building codes covering public safety. d. The proposed project will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk, and character of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity. As stated above, the only noticeable change when viewed from the street is the revised garage location, which is a positive change. The property on the right will likely benefit from the project because moving the garage to the rear of the lot will open up more light and air to the middle of their backyard. Because of the one story nature of the project (as opposed to a new upper floor), fencing, and screening, the property on the left will be minimally impacted. Due to the project's solar orientation, there will be no impact to the daylight received by the yard to the left. r i Attnchment A AMEN�ED (6/13/03) Vnriance Application for Lot Coverage in Excess of 40% and for Side Setback - 704 Burlingame Ave. a. Lot Cover: RECEIVED J U N 1� 2003 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. The existing house includes a front porch that is significantly larger than what one would typically find on a house this size. It is approximately 10% of the home's area and 3% of the lot area. If the entry porch were more in scale with this house, and with other entry porches in the neighborhood, this project would only require a"Minor Modification". This is the only home on the block with a detached garage. �ue to the drivewny, garage location, and front porch location (which accounts for excess lot coverage), design options for reconfiguring existing space to minimize additions are much more limited for this property thnn for others on the block. Setback: The existing house is constructed 3' from the left side property line. That dimension conforms to building codes, and this proposal simply extends the existing building (ine and hip roof. There currently exists an odd roof configuration at the renr of the house, with a flat roof abutting a hip roof, while the walls below are in the same plane. If required to shift the addition over 12" to conform to the current setback requirements, one would be forced to create a messy and awkward roof design. b. Lot Cover: The owners bought this home for retirement purposes. Retirement is expected within three years. The wife is also legally responsible for two 90+ yenr old sisters (spinsters) currently still living independently in the Bay area. It is expected that the surviving sister will come to live with the owners after the death of the first sister. Expanding the existing house (2 bedrooms and one bnth) by an additional bedroom and bath on the same floor will best accommodnte this anticipated change in the family. Likewise, single story living will better accommodate the aging owners. This was one of the factors in selection of this home in the first place. Setback: Many houses in this neighborhood have side setbacks of 3' or even less. Since this house currently has such a setback, and since such a setback is common to the area, it would not be inconsistent with the neighborhood to extend the existing building line. Maintaining the existing setback and roofline would have no significant impacts, while enforcement of the current zoning rules would force a more awkward design solution. c. The proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety, genernl welfare, or convenience. There are no proposed changes that would impact public health, safety, or convenience. There are benefits to the general vicinity by developing the property in the proposed manner. The well-screened single story addition being proposed retains the character of the neighborhood, with far less impact on any neighbors, thnn even a single room on a new second floor. In fact, the property will appear less developed when viewed from the street since the addition cannot be seen and the garage is pushed to the rear of the lot, opening up more space and air. The existing garage is nonconforming in that it is too far forward on the lot and less than 4 feet from the house. Both of these conditions are resolved by this proposal. Additionally, the new garage wil) be smaller than the existing garage. The proposed extension of an existing setback for the bedroom addition meets building codes covering public safety. d. The proposed project will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk, and character of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the genernl vicinity. As stated above, the only noticeable change when viewed from the street is the revised garage location, which is a positive change. The property on the right will likely benefit from the project because moving the garage to the rear of the lot will open up more light and air to the middle of their backyard. 8ecause of the one story nature of the project (as opposed to a new upper floor), fencing, and screening, the property on the left will be minimnlly impacted. Due to the pro ject's solar orientation, there will be no impnct to the daylight received by the yard to the left. Note: Neighbors on all sides and across the street were personally contacted, with plans for review during late May. Each approved and two offered to write letters on our behalf. This design is seen as preferable to another two story. 'ra 06/02/2003 09:15 650-579-0115 TRG ARCHITECTS PAGE 02 Bruce and Cindy Ka�dor � —� �� ,��,� iO4 Burlingame Avenue, Burlingarr�e, CA 9�Oi� Burlingame Planning Commission Burlingame, CA 94010 Re: 7Q4 Burlingame Aventae remoclet Dear CQmmiss�oner, We are writing to request your approva� for a lot coverdge varianr,e in order to �xpand our two bedroam / one bath h�me by one additionai bedroom and bathroom. 7hat exp�nsion wi11 enhanc�3 our enjoyment af the hvme �rtd allaw us to house our growing brood af grandchildren a;nd in-laws when they c4me to viait. We have discussed our plans with neighbors bordering our prope�rty and found no resistance to date. Our plan design ratains the single s#ory configuratian w'rth the expansian built off the rear of the home. Also induded in the design is the r�loc�tion of our single car garage to the rear of the lot. The space currently provided by the garage is 1'equired fp� s#orage of m�diC�f files �nd resotarces for Bruce's part-time forensic medical practice. His semi-retirement work schedule alEows him to evaluate pa#ier�ts in Sacrarriento each week and then romplete his cas� analysis at hpnne. 7he cesulting foo#print of the house will be $n "L" sh�pe with ample rcxam for a re- landscaped yard and dedc. With the ex�ption of th� obvious s�t-badc of th� garage and the serendipitaus addition of more visibte yard and garden, the changes ta the home wifl be invisible from the street Ba#h tF�e exterior and interiar signature features af the 1930's vintage home will be retatined. This remadel wiil add 33Q sq, feet ia the cument 144fi sq. ft. This results in lot caverage that is 43% of the 6p00 sq ti lot. We believe a variance is the best solution #or our small �ddi#ion because af all the r�asons stated on our applicafiion. Our desi�'e is to remodel w'rth the I�ast amount of intrusipn to our neighbors and modificatior� of our property. Thank yau for aonsidering our request, Sinc�rely, �ruce and Cindy Kaldar EUGENE & LORRAINE BORDEGARAY 7OS BURLINGAME AVE. BURLINGAME, CA 94010 HoME 650-340-8151 Fax 650-340-8195 TO: FROM: Burlingame Planning Commission City of Burlingame Eugene & Lorraine Bordegaray Dear Burlingame Planning Commission- RECEIVED JUN 1 6 2003 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. We would like to comment on the submitted plans for 704 Burlingame Ave. for Bruce and Cindy Kaldor. The homeowners are applying for a variance for their addition. We support the variance, due to the minimal view of the new addition from the street. We live directly across from the Kaldor residence, and would not be able to see any of their addition from our home or street. Also the plans call for moving the garage to the back of the lot, which would benefit the view from the front of the house too. 'The plans are well thought-out and provide the least amount of impact of the overall neighborhood presence. Tha vance The Bordegaray ROUTING FORM DATE: Apri129, 2003 TO: _City Engineer _Chief Building Official Fire Marshal ✓ Recycling Specialist _City Arborist _City Attorney FROM: Planning Staff SUBJECT: Request for lot coverage and side setback variance for single story addition and a new garage at 704 Burlingame Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 029-173-110 . STAFF REVIEW: Monday May 5, 2003 �� l ��.� s�.�� ,�-� � Gr�� P�;r� �-vt� ��.�,� � v s :� -�.� � a� c�,Q,� �� j �� a� . � �� ro t�:f3 (��vy � atiw� ! �� -► ��J _ . �,��f��, �- ��v�•u t�c�� , Reviewed By: ate of Comments: '�� 3 ROUTING FORM DATE: Apri129, 2003 TO: � City Engineer _Chief Builcling Official Fire Marshal Recycling Specialist _Ciry Arborist _City Attorney FROM: SUBJECT: Planning Staff Request for lot coverage and side setback variance for single story addition and a new garage at 704 Burlingame Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 029-173-110 . STAFF REVIEW: Monday May 5, 2003 � —� �-` Reviewed By: ; e /� V. �I Y/� D�� Date of Comments: JC `��3 � RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND VARIANCES FOR SIDE SETBACK AND LOT COVERAGE RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for a variance for side setback and lot covera�e for a sin lg e-story addition and a new detached gara�e at 704 Burlin�ame Avenue, zoned R-1, Kaldor Trust, propertyo uwner, APN: 029-173-110; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on June 23, 2003, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15301 Class 1(e)(1) - additions to existing structures provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition. 2. Said variances are approved, subject to the conditions set forth in EaLhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such variances are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. C�:/_ 1: u s\�7 I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of June , 2003 , by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: SECRETARY EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for categorical exemption and variances 704 Burlingame Avenue effective July 7, 2003 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped June 16, 2003, sheets A-1 through A-4; the decks on site shall be no higher than 30 inches above adjacent grade and the side setback to the deck and planter along the left side of the driveway shall be no closer than 9'-6" from the right side property line; 2. that the conditions of the Recycling Specialist's May 1, 2003 and the City Engineer's May 5, 2003, memos shall be met; 3. that the side setback variance and the lot coverage variance shall expire if the house is demolished or remodeled to an extent greater than 50% of the existing floor area; and 4. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. �r4, c�rr o� CITY OF BURLINGAME BURLJN E PLANNING.DEPARTMENT • � • �� 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 �=,,.r�o „�•�'� TEL: (650) 558-7250 Site: 704 Burlingaine Avenue i Application for lot coverage and side setback �� variance for a first floor addition and a new detached PUBL�(� HEAR�N(j� garage at: 704 Burlingame Avenue. zoned R-1. N�T�CE �'•° (APN: 029-173-110 ). : -i $� The City of Burlingame Planning Commission ; l announces the following public, Hearing Date is on �, June 23, 2003 7:00 P.M, in the City Hall Council , Chambers located at , Burlingame, California. ,� ' Mailed: June 13, 2003 ° I ; F:::_ 2 � I A T„ �>�Y "� "(Please refer to other side) �- I ya r a> CITY `OF B URLINGANIE A copy of the.applic to the meeting �at� Burlingarne, Ca� � If you chal raising onl: described i at or prior 1 e t ay be reviewed prior ,�,_ _1 Primrose Road, � .r�. �. � �' �a ' �. � ` ff � '' Property o ers o .if tenants ab t thi � no� 558-7250. ' ank u. Margaret � �o�� City Planner � �� PU �I (Please refer to other side) ��.. be limited to �blic hearing, ;d to the city Forming their �e call (650) D�� ` � . �� -�� ._ � � ��, � ��,�.k��.�� ICE Q�...�.��.��,�- �. _ ��d!' ".R y� „� • ,r�v . � `L .�,�r � `.v : -^ y� �,-� � ` -�r..:.� .- � • �__,• ` y ' � S -0� ��-. i � 4 � � ,, �, 9. f � � t �� .qt � . as �. ,� � ' � .`r� ,�p� � � .-a .�� t , ��.�.�^.� .�y�, �. � �.-� f ''�� iaQ 7 '. `.,� � . ' �..r ` � �i �%.'i.g�f? � �i� " '. . . � •� 7s• �� r `e'� � "-��?�„',��'. � . `�`1� S `�? �/�- � s - � .C.n ,+, �', \ , �,� � ,;,�: ��r -d ' � p�'� �' � . > ir '.i �'-]. r� 7s , �t, ' �: � „� �F�� , � 1 � � ':�� ' i � �, � f . P�` i�i'� "�. : y.� ,� �.x-. - :q / � \;\ ":;;� � r - � '•i °';� �v�� ,,'"`•�,r`•� �-�_�.,-"� ; �,r, � � �V� ��. ��s#'.' �'1'� { ' ' .# � "{ �� .t..� � � 5 , � � • � �, � \�� ,� - �`.'�,`•r.• '=� � _.yyy'%,,, ,r#"�'�j .t', '�'Y'��, '' "� ��.`%� �Y''?''rG ': �. � "i' �r w �;e,. � � t� '� - "! _ `� � � � . � . ,�.� . . .�a,� " � � �.� � f, /� /,F . 1 ��/ �'�� ` �� s''�,��, �� . �r � \, i3:�'��p,� „" ��..�'7�, y �.'� �� ,,� -a -'`C+��r �' �r.'`.`�/?T;�. � +i cr' . �I! Y �1� � `C� � �:.. . � ..� `1 �!� � �2. 4 j/)V � � • .'T o'� •r" � ' ` `� ii�'r _ :ia, << ""� .�� Sti, c • ��% : r \ � � �< ,�:�� ,,.-'�r' y„� �\,�� SiT ;�� f�i�,p;� �� :.§ i. .ua�, as,r� ..� -V i *�.J'i' _ '� C.�j .L�. � ,•�y �,i� � � 'I �h.. �./ t. � �� d iP �`�% �....,�� , fM�S�� `�` . �� '�i�+i... `� ,,� !`.. � . !� . ✓ � < ,E A � ;�t `� �y ? �m�� , � /',� e �° � .,` �*`` , � � ,� ' i ,� �-t '"� ��ti � i ' � t - "_._ . «�. _ .;� _Yi.r�.��ir� !�'>,. - ,� •.'�-s� ..� `�, '.,�y `�;; 3 � �. .'"°3 �,;" -�; Vb'' � �s"! % n i' � .�., - `•'� � ,'9� / 7- '� T �O �{ .��. �1 1.• � $ � ' . � A a .,�.. r. . Y � r - - J� •i t • / , ! .. - ia�t �.;��. . �6: ,. � � / ' C � � . � i �• �Cr�, t' -�: ' ^''�\ � �' . � � �y` _ - ��, .""'"�a�'� „ ,�,. r + - J `�,,,�. • r ..� / r j � •* � �'�S•>'- �•* . � . ' x ,• ��,�"�y _ 'S. •�„`x; :2L+� �;l,�._ � �►' . `� � t� 't� 1 .�;� �r` : -�;�,f •l . �i�� - ' t, '�` �;?i � � r"+„t at ;'. A._ '�, `�.,' r -��' ,.' Y - • sl. .: �..% _ _ . . � � . � / � � a � �[" ✓ T��;�� 1 � iIZ�+' � •��15r\ .Y.. � � � t-,• . . . �: . �. ,n� .�... _��. .,.�� • 'r �1 '�, �.s� :`- � f\ ,�� , �. ;S ��i . �� , i.� �� ,�� ' /,l /' �yX'�s' �t; J ,} .>, � A 1.'Af� .�,' r � e .. � ' t � �7� +"�•A �' �1, } � , � , � /f ` �} . �_ � `' �'`,' ':i � '��"' �� . .4�� \� 1` J � . � �, �,:= . �'�, �. �./ ', i � . �' f ,a`` `� • �4.�� i ty�, �" � '` '� � S� � .V F +J,_ 1�' �//�� ":. � V' y, . th�:t. ^ .�`• �J fi� .�+ V+�t�, ��t �.. yn.` 2`, ,�' � '7 "� ' _ / �i. �..�'' -;.. y.P . " �'( � µ .'�,�'; �+ ' _ 'r' 1 �;�`' A i .: � �,t �_;�" _ �'.�,, . : �y v,. �2, � 5 ;�� `•�" �: � h�" `. .� _ � 1' �.�:� ' '�v . a,� �., ; . � �� y � .` ' ' 4 , �� ' � ' /� ` e . . - �, � �yr�-.,, `w�, ,� "S: - �... ` �,� ��r f ? f • 1 � s �y� { t. /, �S :+� r �r .. _ i `.t`j� ,,�''� � � �. �,. '. � t , _ y : �f �� , '3`.�� . �.'r., ,�s' �� .zi ��. ,' F � � � =j-'�" '. � �.' • a � f � . a.:J:'�� ',i' . � . � - �� _� � ' .�`t � + ,,� ' .. . �:� �J-r,• � .�,%,• ;�p t .fK' . :]!. .. . ?�1. , ir, \ - �� '�I I � `t' .._ ` � .,`�' l. � ' / S Tt�., 1 f .. . `. `�`, ..(F. �� i •:q � � • � � . � ��..' . "� 6. . �55'�•r_, ��. \ . �`�,� �,�„�� ''k,�� . , , .y; : ��;` +� 'Mp'. r'� � : ,,.� `�'�`�Y . y�.• ',�' . �-� -'� � �"��.�f` ..�' f`V,� ��.i,s'• "� ' •� �� " •; ��. {Y•�� ' 1 i . �e- �, ' �� :.:'��,i . : *. . ..Y . Xa � �� -'9� �:E��4T - �� y ,�,�X�. Y •'� ,� � +3 : � " . !. y �'�y �'�s� � 7a�- /v :�pA ��-� ., , -.�f. �. � �J'� ..:� ' � .` ' :.� �♦ .F�. -Y , t .� �,f . ♦ � �� ' 1..� / •� 'E''�.4+�� . �� v . •:j, v ! .+f v I s` . �, °•, . "% '�,� , � . l,+s-'.i; . � J -. _,'; u':� / . � ' \ � S} �,,4 g � � 'i � ' -yk ..,� � `` • q � t ��I� C �Y�, � y f` �D �!'�ya� � �. �� E�; �. r:''a n�:'' � '', .�� - .'f� :,r,� `�'* ;.. i' _,� i. v.� . Y� '��'. �t'. 1 ` ',� .��wr: �dl�J`�^. ' . , ..n�k , / � � �;�:�' �f,� �+. .:a, � ; �'� �' �,�``-- '� .f'� ` e��' ��'�� Sa��%f �; � ; ��y, �._ a .�.,,.; y ' ' �`* �� , `��` ��t �� Jy�,�'•:%: `�'/�� t �� .a. ,�;� � � �' ��3 ` ' �r .I� 6 . `�t �` �'� ,i � . �� .wi° � �. � �r } M„ t.� ,�. � � �,��t , t ��, � � ( . �i,: � . �i . � e ~ e � �,� �. � ��'. s.. /'" � '�' - . ��'. � <', r� �,• . `.r•,� f . "� � ^ ry�w, <� �/* � u / ��a �\` �� J. l • i� .1. A � �*A�.�. � �� w ." . ��.�J '.... � J .�''� I. Y, y � .� ?. y) �V /'0 ..� i .�' � Y ' �_ _ 1��*��.o I'l �� . �� ,ry� . � �J �. � .��, �9 `� tl � � .Y'i � _7�� f�� . �� A.¢ � y\� �� :1�" '` i '.`^^, � ,'r7-.��i� `JlRrr �t��c. � e Z,',% / .s�j► _ r" . : j; �. ,�� •(�.,;,� I \" '?ti f 7�i`..'".a�q.� ; T�� _ .;J�'��`. '"�t�� . _ D ` `�t.�,�% .. _ .' ,� V b�+,d'S�,;t-y;. ♦ •.T ( ? � •, �>( t,�,:�' � �:: �,4• y • i dh��ly+� � V �, " � :'�^ dt.•+ '9 ,'r` . �',a . ' • f:��, .�`� _,� yr;� �, .�y� ` �� _ �':� •� V'' �3�r :a, _ b��v .:q�. �� .� ! �" :_jti -{�. . �'�'s`' \• � w' l i`'�:�� •'•\` '��, 'a �-^� a, ' �� 'j ��j ♦�a �, ,� %S� �.� ' � 4� � �.�' �� . :�, .9 � � �.'l�� ; ,\i i ~�' ��-�'G' � '�''. �, > � � �� ?,� . �. �i ��f_. �~ G ''' ;y � G` �a � r�, ` L .,f'Q�' • ' ,3, q�.► " r, t � � / �. �,' i� . .-.� : e� J % ` .6` _�,�� e A� ��~� ` �=�?'�i4� 3' � � � ��r . �,. �� ' v �yy. � �' ..,<.\ � �_ � '.y �^ r ;!°�'. L - r,., . .'.� . '�,' c - �. � : . . 1 � .i - ` . .,, �� i "� 5 � ,� � .. '� ~� ...r-- v 1 �.. .� \i�� "g .,�� '� ,��s; X, �.._ •,�[4@t `^� `+ ? � � *' ,,� ,� �' 6- �, r' `. ``•�' \�.'l �+ i jn l.0 �`:. `� �� r�,_,�r l. .z �� ..�%.. _..p ` �.. `'. \ �� \ \ i � o� \ ��' � �� . � :,� � ,, � ,,� ,� . _; - y " 704 Burlingame Avenue �� O� „Y,, �� : "�� :,v �� ' ��`l" J�� o_ 1�:� ^`� a, "� �� ' \/ y �P � �ci ` � 1, �`n � . � �, � P :;;�, .�;. ` � �.�r, �V ' ��, �a. 1 �� ib h> ,�Ci�' � (�`�♦ �: , `� � �� V ' F��j, , �� G , � :, �<<� ., ,; , ,-, � � � �," ;- � � �� , ��' t h , �, �;,, .� ,'," ' ' . ,��^ ��'� �, �� `� , c` '�, ��i" v � ��, �P . .;�� ``� ��;'' �� ,�'� �, ;� � �� oo �� , �' `\\ �� S�� -(l \ ',\ 'jf / �C� \ / ' � ��n ' C�Y � ;.f /`(J _ ,\)� \�' _ ./ \�� _ '..� �� ' � , `n�� - ,�.� . .1��', \�L� � Parcel Owner 029 172 040 Hamblin Richard D,Susan W 029 172 050 Kelso Helen S Tr 029 172 060 Grymes Stanley,Edith M Trs 029 172 070 Fernandez James H,Nancy J 029 172 080 Bashaw Jeffrey S,Seidner Melanie L 029 172 090 Jones Matthew,Kathleen 029 172 100 Kircher Marcia R Tr 029 172 110 Ferguson Yukiko 029 172 120 Nash Frank,Amelia 029 172 130 Saul Charles E,Suzanne R 029 172 140 Bugg Molly Mclellan 029 172 150 Goldfarb Gregory,+ 029 172 160 Paine Thomas,Susan L 029 173 010 Escobar Daniel A,Laura L 029 173 020 Matteucci Paul A 029 173 030 Brown Wallace M,Carmen 029 173 040 Johnson Trust 029 173 050 Cole Marigold 029 173 060 Churich Kenneth J,Tina B 029 173 070 Sanders Jeffrey,J Trust 029 173 080 Schott Annaa B C 029 173 090 Sebanc Ronald P 029 173 100 Morrow Eunice K 029 173 110 Kaldor B T 1986 Trust 029 173 120 Weil David A,Jessica A 029 173 130 Weeks William L Tr 029 173 140 Dobson Neil H,Nancy A 029 173 150 Boubare Sophie Tr 029 173 160 Benedetti Marie Bianca Tr 029 173 170 Pinkus Claudio A 029 173 180 Kniveton Douglas 029 183 010 Connolly Sean T 029 183 020 Evars Roy W Tr 029 183 100 Karbo Felicia D 029 183 110 Ronan Brian C,Kerrie J 029 183 120 Eaton John M,Patricia Trs 029 183 130 Mc Swanson Clement S,P A 029 184 010 Knollin Charlotte E Tr 029 184 020 Dwyer Virginia M Tr 029 184 030 Bjj Of Ljj Trust 029 184 040 Paisley Mark D 029 184 090 Smythe Steven D 029 184 100 Voorsanger Conrad W 029 184 110 Sulon Eva Tr 029 184 120 Ang Edmund L,Meecho Lim-ang 029 251 030 Tierney Michael K,Janet P 029 252 010 Hahn Jerry W,Maryanne A 029 252 020 Allen Christina R 029 252 030 Calavano Ronald A,Jane R 029 252 040 Bice Richard E,Bohnye B Trs Mailaddres Mailcity Mai Mzipandzip 721 Vernon Way Burlingame CA 94010-2819 717 Vernon Way Burlingame CA 94010-2819 711 Vernon Way Burlingame CA 94010-2819 705 Vernon Way Burlingame CA 94010-2819 701 Vernon Way Burlingame CA 94010-2819 325 Bloomfield Rd Burlingame CA 94010-2870 704 Concord Way Burlingame CA 94010-2878 708 Concord Way Burlingame CA 94010-2878 712 Concord Way Burlingame CA 94010-2878 716 Concord Way Burlingame CA 94010-2878 720 Concord Way Burlingame CA 94010-2878 724 Concord Way Burlingame CA 94010-2878 728 Concord Way Burlingame CA 94010-2878 733 Concord Way Burlingame CA 94010-2837 729 Concord Way Burlingame CA 94010-2837 725 Concord Way Burlingame CA 94010-2837 721 Concord Way Burlingame CA 94010-2837 717 Concord Way Burlingame CA 94010-2837 715 Concord Way Burlingame CA 94010-2837 711 Concord Way Burlingame CA 94010-2837 707 Concord Way Burlingame CA 94010-2837 321 Bloomfield Rd Burlingame CA 94010-2870 301 Bloomfield Rd Burlingame CA 94010-2871 704 Burlingame Ave Burlingame CA 94010-2856 708 Burlingame Ave Burlingame CA 94010-2856 712 Burlingame Ave Burlingame CA 94010-2856 716 Burlingame Ave Burlingame CA 94010-2856 720 Burlingame Ave Burlingame CA 94010-2856 800 Burlingame Ave Burlingame CA 94010-2858 804 Burlingame Ave Burlingame CA 94010-2858 808 Burlingame Ave Burlingame CA 94010-2858 340 Bloomfield Rd Burlingame CA 94010-2867 621 Vernon Way Burlingame CA 94010-2817 604 Concord Way Burlingame CA 94010-2836 608 Concord Way Burlingame CA 94010-2836 612 Concord Way Burlingame CA 94010-2836 330 Bloomfield Rd Burlingame CA 94010-2868 320 Bloomfield Rd Burlingame CA 94010-2869 110 Park Rd #601 Burlingame CA 94010-4343 609 Concord Way Burlingame CA 94010-2835 607 Concord Way Burlingame CA 94010-2835 604 Burlingame Ave Burlingame CA 94010-2854 608 Burlingame Ave Burlingame CA 94010-2854 612 Burlingame Ave Burlingame CA 94010-2854 300 Bloomfield Rd Burlingame CA 94010-2869 801 Burlingame Ave Burlingame CA 94010-2857 719 Burlingame Ave Burlingame CA 94010-2855 236 Arundel Rd Burlingame CA 94010-3028 715 Burlingame Ave Burlingame CA 94010-2855 711 Burlingame Ave Burlingame CA 94010-2855 � 029 252 050 Bordegaray Eugene A Jr 029 252 060 Taylor Marjorie W Trust 029 252 070 Pivirotto John D,D M Trs 029 252 080 Lembi Donald P,Theresa A 029 252 090 Antosik Edwin M,M M Trs 029 252 240 Poleshaj Tatiana Tr 029 252 250 Boland Beatrice A Tr 029 252 260 Strem Mark 029 253 010 Hernandez Jorge P,Ramona 029 253 020 Muller Carol Ann 029 253 030 Wunderlich James 029 253 040 Tokheim William R 029 253 240 Widtfeldt Patricia M 029 253 250 Snider pon G,Lydia 029 253 260 Wayne June 705 Burlingame Ave Burlingame CA 94010-2855 701 Burlingame Ave Burlingame CA 94010-2855 233 Bloomfield Rd Burlingame CA 94010-3016 229 Bloomfield Rd Burlingame CA 94010-3016 225 Bloomfield Rd Burlingame CA 94010-3016 224 Arundel Rd Burlingame CA 94010-3028 228 Arundel Rd Burlingame CA 94010-3028 232 Arundel Rd Burlingame CA 94010-3028 625 Burlingame Ave Burlingame CA 94010-2853 621 Burlingame Ave Burlingame CA 94010-2853 617 Burlingame Ave Burlingame CA 94010-2853 609 Burlingame Ave Burlingame CA 94010-2853 224 Bloomfield Rd Burlingame CA 94010-3017 228 Bloomfield Rd Burlingame CA 94010-3017 232 Bloomfield Rd Burlingame CA 94010-3017 �� CITY o� CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPARTMENT BIJRIJNCtAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 �;,R�o�,��•�'� TEL: (650) 558-7250 Site: 704 Burlingame Avenue ., , � ,r Application for lot coverage and side setback variance for a first floor addition and a new detached pUBLIC HEARING = garage at: 704 Burlingame Avenue. zoned R-1. NQ.��CE (APN: 029-173-110 ). �-The City of Burlingame Planning Commission ;: �`announces the following public, Hearing Date is on ° June 23, 2003 7:00 P.M, in the City Hall Council �`' Chambers located at , Burlingame, California. Mailed: June 13, 200 Please refer to other side) 3 � � �� .�� CITY OF BURLINGAIVIE A copy of the a to the meeting Burlingame, Ca] If you chal raising onl� described i _at or prior t Property o� tenants abc 'S58-7250. ' t �ce� �� n,w � � t "� � �� .��i� � �; ,� �: ; A �.� ,. �� Margaret � o�� : City Planner .� � . . . .. `"°�. � �:� ' A � � � PU � � �� (Please refer to other side) ��.� i'�ans�°�o�is pra��,�inay be reviewed prior w 4 R � 5' ,1;�' . . u�gK D�pa�t�nent �,r� � 1� Primrose Road, ' t � �^ � � ,� ,� � � �� itc�t�qn�� court,"� u ma be limited to samen� e��`� k�a�sed� •: he blic hearing, .. �a. � . iitten co �po cie�t� ; ��e d to the cify , :., � �� ` - � � �� i { ponsi or i� orming their informatio . ple se call (650) �: � � � � � ��'�� t`�r �." � � a� �� ,��,�� ;�#.R � �.�a_�I .!C��I C E ��,Q:� � CITY OF BURLINGAME AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) Greg Argvres , being duly sworn, deposes and says: that she is a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years, that acting for the City of Burlingame on the 13`h day of June 2003, deposited in the United States Post Office a NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the persons listed on the addresses attached hereto and made a part hereof, t o wit: that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to NOTICE OF HEARING pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Burlingame that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses attached hereto. 704 Burlingame Avenue