HomeMy WebLinkAbout409 Burlingame Avenue - Resolution1 �
0
��
.�.
'�
�.� '
��
%.
. `
��4��106
RECORDEDATRE�UESi OF
Please return recorded copy to:
Planning Department
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
.,., _ .: - -. - ---�e--.-�-�-- _
.��us:x.-.�.,2e:�.,airs�:c:�::.�y..-a::��<.,� .
I hereby certify this to
be;a fuT.�, true and correct
�opy �f :;�l�e d�cumerlt �`� ;
pui^�or�s �Co ��, �t4i'e �r'i'gi nal
of whi�h is on fil�:in my
of�Fi�e. ,a. �'a'� ,.
..�;,�� �,�r\
Date ��1�"��+� ��1
�� , ,._ . ..:,.�1 11� _ :
rgaret Mo`�roe, City Planner
�P� I 1 2 zs P�1 '89
°eYl,4t:;t !� ; (.�i:,UN itEC�iRi2Lii
sr,H u.•rr�l cc��wtr
�.,.� �,, �,c �•: y
r:��tt.:,., ,
RESOLUTION NO. 15-89
RESOLUTION APPROVIN VARIAN E
RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of
Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, application has been made for a variance for �
Parking �
at 409 Burlingame Avenue ��ApN 029-261-030 � �
i �
and �.1
WHEREAS, this Commission held a public hearing on said�
application on March 27, , 1 89,, at which time it reviewed
and considered the staff report and all other written materials and
testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this
Planning Commission that said variance is approved, subject to the
conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
It is further directed that a certified copy of this
resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San
Mateo.
�
�i �h ` . <" `��,1.
RUTH E. J OBS
CHAIRMAN
I, MIKE ELLIS, Secretary of the Planning Commission of
the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission held on the 27th day of Plarch
,
19 9, by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ELLIS, GARCIA, H.GRAHAM, HARRISON, JACOBS
NOes: COMMISSIONeRs: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: GIOMI, S.GRAHAM
, - ,ti �-, � l�
.dIKE ELLiS
SECRETARY
v
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval, parking
variance, 409 Burlingame Avenue
(effective April 4, 1989)
Property owners:
Kelly M. & Rena J. Randall
409 Burlingame Avenue
Burlingame, CA 94010
1. that the project as built shall be consistent with the plans
submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped March
1, 1989 and there shall be no sewer or water connections to
this structure;
2, that the garage shall be placed on the side property line as
noted in the City Engineer�s memo of March 22, 1989; �
3. that the three conditions of the City Engineer�s memo of rp
March 22, 1989 regarding moving the garage to the side M
property line, installing an 18' wide garage door and 0
relocating the rear stairs on the house with any future 0'!
bedroom addition shall be met;
4. that the conditions of the Fire Marshal's March 13, 1989
memo and the Chief Building Inspector�s March 8, 1989 memo
shall be met;
5. that a building permit for the proposed 580 SF third
bedroom/bath second story addition shall be obtained within
a year of the parking variance approval and shall be
designed to meet all code requirements; and
6. that the garage shall have minimum interior dimensions of
21' x 24', set on property line.
� N
NGAME
l �
� _� , � _l.,:.��i'k.r+-... I
�.�Q �x�� Q�� ���,LZ�.���.e
SAN MATEO COUNTY
CITY HALL-501 PRIMROSE ROAD PLANNINGDEPARTMENT
BURLINGAME� CALIFORNIA 94010 (415) 342-6625
April 4, 1989
Kelly and Rena Randall
409 Burlingame Avenue
Burlingame, CA 94010
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Randall:
Since there was no appeal to or suspension by the City Council, the
March 27, 1989 Planning Commission approval of your variance
application became effective April 4, 1989. This application was
to allow a parking variance for the addition of a third bedroom at
409 Burlingame Avenue, zoned R-1. The March 27, 1989 minutes of
the Planning Commission state your application was approved with
the following conditions:
1. that the project as built shall be consistent with the plans
submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped March
1, 1989 and there shall be no sewer or water connections to
this structure;
2. that the garage shall be placed on the side property line as
noted in the City Engineer�s memo of March 22, 1989;
3. that the three conditions of the City Engineer's memo of
March 22, 1989 regarding moving the garage to the side
property line, installing an 18' wide garage door and
relocating the rear stairs on the house with any future
bedroom addition shall be met;
4. that the conditions of the Fire Marshal�s March 13, 1989
memo and the Chief Building Inspector's March 8, 1989 memo
shall be met;
5. that a building permit for the proposed 580 SF third
bedroom/bath second story addition shall be obtained within
a year of the parking variance approval and shall be
designed to meet all code requirements; and
6. that the garage shall have minimum interior dimensions of
21� x 24', set on property line.
Kelly and Rena Randall
Page 2
April 4, 1989
All site improvements and construction work will require separate
application to the Building Department.
Sincerely yours,
��u�'��--(l�t,� u�_
Margaret Monroe
City Planner
MM/s
Att.
cc: Jerry Deal (w/att.)
Chief Building Inspector (w/att.)
Assessor's Office, Redwood City
(Lot 3, Block 34, Lyon & Hoag, Town of Burlingame;
APN 029-261-030)
MEMO
TO: PLANNING
FROM: CITY ENGINEER
DATE: MARCH 22, 1989
SUBJECT: PARKING VARIANCE - REPLACE ONE-CAR GARAGE WHERE TWO CARS
ARE REQUIRED - 409 BURLINGAME AVENUE
The applicant proposes to construct a two-car garage on this site
with inadequate access to the second space because of the closeness
of the house. The applicant, at some point in the future, wishes to
expand the house. The applicant has a few options that can decrease
the inadequacies of this variance request.
The first option is to move the garage two feet (2') to the side
property line and install an 18' garage door (16' is standard) to
increase accessibility. This option, while not exactly meeting City
standards, would allow a larger compact car access to the second
space. Placing the garage at the side property line requires removal
of all eave overhangs and rain gutters. This necessitates either a
gabled roof paralleling the rear property line and a hip roof
extending towards the front (looks more like the gabled roof of the
house), or a flat roof, to insure that drainage does not go onto the
neighboring property. This is shown on Sketch A attached.
The second option is to both move the garage to the side property
line and expand the garage to meet parking requirements. This
requires a 670+ S.F. garage (462 S.F, proposed) unless an angled side
building is built (590+ S.F.) A special permit is required since the
garage would be over 500 S.F. This added square footage may also
affect the applicant's lot coverage for any house expansion.
Since the applicant is able to meet the parking concerns, I cannot
support this request. I would be supportive of the request if the
applicant would choose the development shown in Sketch A if condi-
tioned as follows:
1. Relocate garage to side property line.
2. Install 18' wide garage door.
3. Relocate rear exit and stairs clear of back-up area with any
bedroom addition or any modification to the rear of the house.
djm
, � �` ,
/ � /i l��v'r,-� �/� l�Cr �i ��,�-'��
Frank C. Erbacher
`,,��= J�
cc: Mr. Randall, 409 Burlingame Ave., Burlingame, CA 94010
J D& Associates, 1228 Paloma, Burlingame, CA 94010
„ , . •
DATE :_�ilor��'vA tj „ ��'�/
MEMO T0: CITY ENGINEER ���
CHIEF BUILDING PECTOR
FIRE MARSHAL
DIRECTOR OF PARKS
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
a 9' �� ��•� �
SUBJECT: � �� �,_
. \��
�''� � �� �2� 6�' ��'a�,r� �
� �9'� .� S ,�tv :
An application has been received for the above project for review by the
Planning Commission. The application will be scheduled for /�-�� �
__�.
at their � �� ,���, meeting. '.ti'e would appreciate having
% 3 �
your comments by
Thank you.
� � Pc��,��
.�-�3��
�, �� �� �-►�s���
v� « s L,�-s.r �n� 3�.� �, P�P.�� L, .,,�
�' ��i. O�- On�(�L (-}�wL. Con�Sy,fL4L7yv�.iL
��
���y�
�� � . � � I
' � /
�
MEMO T0: CITY ENGINEER
CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR
FIRE MARSHAL
DIRECTOR OF PARKS
FROM:
SUBJECT:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
� ���
i
. - �� �;�.�►
� / ..� .6�. ��`i� �
� ���' �'� s ,,er� ,
�
An application has been received for the above project for review by the
Planning Commission. The application wi11 be scheduled for /-'�-�� �
at their /���7�il� �� %7�;, meeting. �Ae would appreciate havin
�
your corranents by--1� � �.
Thank you.
� � �n'a'� �'� ,.-�� a�a �'%�- �� ��- �-
� ,
� 1-�rZ C��n.l��v�r � �� �< <2
^ �� ��
�� i � .� (.� vi'`� �� � l_ ;
J�
��
,-
RESOLUTION N0. 15-f�9
_ RESOLVED
Burlingame that:
RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCE
by the Planning Commission of the City of
WHEREAS, application has been made for a variance for
Parking
at 409 Burlingame Avenue �(p,pN 029-261-030
��
and
- WHEREAS, this Commission held a public hearing on said
, application on March 27, , 1989., at wh�ch time it reviewed
and considered the staff report and all other written materials and
' testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this
Planning Commission that said variance is approved, subject to the
conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
It is further directed that a certified copy of this
resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San
Mateo.
_ 'e� �:` ��,�%�
RUTH E . J OBS
CHAIRMAN
I, MIKE ELLIS, Secretary of the Planning Commission of
the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission held on the 27th day of rlarch �
1989 by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ELLIS, GARCIA, H.GRAHAM, HARRISON, JACOBS
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: GIOMI, S.GRAHAM
�'�`-� ���
� i�IIKE EL,LIS
SECRETARY
v +
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval, parking
variance, 409 Burlingame Avenue
(effective April 4, 1989)
Property owners:
Kelly M. & Rena J. Randall
409 Burlingame Avenue
Burlingame, CA 94010
1. that the project
submitted to the
1, 1989 and ther
this structure;
as built shall be consistent with the plans
Planning Department and date stamped March
e shall be no sewer or water connections to
2, that the garage shall be placed on the side property line as
noted in the City Engineer's memo of March 22, 1989;
3. that the three conditions of the City Engineer�s memo of
March 22, 1989 regarding moving the garage to the side
property line, installing an 18' wide garage door and
relocating the rear stairs on the house with any future
bedroom addition shall be met;
4. that the conditions of the Fire Marshal's March 13, 1989
memo and the Chief Building Inspector's March 8, 1989 memo
shall be met;
5. that a building permit for the proposed 580 SF third
bedroom/bath second story addition shall be obtained within
a year of the parking variance approval and shall be
designed to meet all code requirements; and
6. that the garage shall have minimum interior dimensions of
21' x 24�, set on property line.
.- , ,
MEMO T0:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
f::�•
/%���..,-- P.C. 3/27/89
"' I tem # 7
PLANNING COMMISSION
PLANNER
PARKING VARIANCE FOR THE ADDITION OF A THIRD
BEDROOM AT 409 BURLINGAME AVENUE, ZONED R-1
Jerry Deal, representing Kelly and Rena Randall is requesting a
parking variance in order to build a one car garage where two
covered parking spaces are required for the addition of a third
bedroom at 409 Burl i ngame Avenue, , zoned R-1 ( Code Section 25 . 70 . 030
a). The applicant plans to remove the existing detached one-car
garage (12� x 22�) and replace it with a new 20'x 21� (interior
dimensions) garage in the rear of the lot. This proposed garage
meets the minimum dimensions for a two car garage, however, a
parking variance is required because there will only be a 13'-6"
separation between the garage and the back of the existing house
and there is not enough room for a second vehicle to maneuver
into the garage. There is an 81� long driveway on this property,
so there is room to park a vehicle on the driveway behind the
front setback.
Currently the 1,196 SF house consists of 2 bedrooms and 1 bath.
The property owners would like to add a second story 580 SF
master bedroom/bath in the future, which would require that a
second parking space be provided on the property.
Staff Review
City staff have reviewed this request. The Fire Marshal (March
13, 1989 memo) notes that all walls closer than 3' to property
line will have to be of one-hour fire resistive construction.
The Chief Building Inspector (March 8, 1989 memo) also discusses
the required fire walls and also states that no roof eaves are
permitted on the east or south sides of the building.
The City Engineer (March 22, 1989 memo) comments that the
applicant has a few options for reducing the variance being
requested. One option would be to move the garage all the way to
the side property line and install an 18' wide garage door in
order to increase the accessibility of the structure. This
option would allow a larger size compact vehicle to use the
structure. In order to achieve this design, all eave overhangs
and rain gutters would have to be removed. The structure would
have to be constructed with either a gabled roof paralleling the
rear property line with a hip roof extending towards the front of
the structure or a flat roof in order to insure that drainage
will not run off onto the neighboring property. A second option
would be to move the garage to the side property line and enlarge
the structure to approximately 670 SF, unless the building is
angled, in which case it could be built within 590 SF. A special
permit would be required for this alternative since the garage
will exceed the 500 SF area allowed by code (lot coverage will
increase to approximately 40$). The City Engineer notes that
since the parking requirements can be better met by either of the
alternatives noted, he cannot support the proposed variance
request. He outlines three suggested conditions for the project
if the first alternative of moving the garage up against the side
property line is chosen.
-continued-
-2-
Applicants' Letter
In their letter date stamped March 20, 1989, the property
owners, Kelly and Rena Randall explain that they have a small two
bedroom home which sits on a 46'x 103' lot. The majority of the
homes in the area have three bedrooms with their garages attached
to the front of the house. Due to the existing detached garage
on this property, there is very little room in the back yard. A
two car garage which meets code requirements would take up a
large portion of the back yard. The proposed garage will
accommodate one standard size and one compact vehicle and there
is room on the driveway to park additional vehicles. The
requested parking variance will not create any negative effects
on neighboring properties since it is only the location of the
garage and not the size of the structure that is the issue. In
addition, granting the variance will result in less paving of the
property and more landscaping. The use of the property will be
compatable with the other uses in the area.
A partial site plan has been submitted by the applicants (date
stamped March 1, 1989) which illustrates that a code standard
garage could be constructed in the rear yard along the right side
property line. This alternative, however, would require paving
the entire back yard and using it as a driveway.
Findings for a Variance
In order to grant a variance the Planning Commission must find
that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section
25.54.020 a-d):
(a) there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to the property involved that do not
apply generally to property in the same district;
(b) the granting of the application is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right
of the applicant, and to prevent unreasonable property loss
or unnecessary hardship;
(c) the granting of the application will not be detrimental or
injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and
will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,
general welfare or convenience;
(d) that the use of the property will be compatible with the
aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and
potential uses of properties in the general vicinity.
PlanninQ Commission Action
The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing.
Affirmative action should be taken by resolution and findings
should be made. The reasons for any action should be clearly
stated. At the public hearing the following conditions should be
considered:
-continued-
�,
' -3-
1. that the project as built shall be consistent with the plans
submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped March
1, 1989 and there shall be no sewar or water connections to
this structure;
2. that the garage shall be placed on the side property line as
noted in the City Engineer�s memo of March 22, 1989 and
shall have minimum interior dimensions of 20' x 21�;
3. that the three conditions of the City Engineer�s memo of
March 22, 1989 regarding moving the garage to the side
property line, installing an 18� wide garage door and
relocating the rear stairs on the house with any future
bedroom addition shall be met;
4. that the conditions of the Fire Marshal's March 13, 1989
memo and the Chief Building Inspector's March 8, 1989 memo
shall be met; and
5. that a building permit for the proposed 580 SF third
bedroom/bath second story addition shall be obtained
within a year of the parking variance approval and shall be
designed to meet all code requirements.
��/C��
Adriana Garefalos
Planner
cc: Jerry Deal
Kelly & Rena Randall
!
PROJECT APPLICATION �,j.�CITY o� 409 BURLINGAME AVENUE
�r CEQA ASSESSMENT BURUNca�E project address
I __
i
Application received � 3_1_gg � ��•..�.�••`�• Project name - if any
Staff review/acceptance ( )
1. APPLICANT JD & Associ ates 343-6014
name telephone no.
1228 Paloma Avenue, Burlingame, CA 94010
applicant s address: street, city, zip code
Jerry Deal
contact person, if different telephone no.
2. TYPE OF APPLICATION
Speci�.l Perr^it () Variance* (X ) Condominium Permit () Other
*Attach letter which addresses each of the 4 findings required by Code Chapter 25.54.
3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION PARKING VARIANCE for the addition of a third
bedroom. The existing detached one car garage (12'± x 22') will be
ramnved and replaced with a new 20' x 21' (interior dimensions)
garaae. A Parking Variance is required because even though this new
qaraqe meets the minimum dimensions for a two car garage, due to its
loc�tion on the property a second vehicle cannot maneuver into the
qara4e, therefore it is providinq onl one covered parking space
where two spaces are required.
(attach letter of explanation if additional space is needed)
Ref. code section(s): (25.70.030-a) (
4. PROPERTY IDEPITIFICATION
( 029-261-030 ) ( 3 ) ( 34
APN lot no. block no.
( R-1 ) ( 4,730
zoning district land area, square feet
Kelly M. & Rena J. Randall
land owner's name
Renuired
(,�s) (no)
(,y��) (nol
� Lyon & Hoag, Town of Burlin�game
subdivision name
409 Burlingame Avenue
a dre s,
ur�ingame, CA 94010
Date received city zip code
( - ) Proof of ownershi�
( - ) Owner's consent to a�plication
5. EXISTIPJG SITE CONDITIONS
Existing 2 bedroom/1 bath single family dwelling with de�ached
12'± x 22' qarage.
Reo,uired Date received
(.ves) (��) ( 3- t-89 )
�Yes) ���) ( �� )
(.g�) {no) ( - )
(3�as) (no) ( - )
(other) ( 3-20-g9 )
Site plan shovaing: property lines; public sidewall:s and
curbs; all structures and improvements;
paved on-site parkino; landscaping.
Floor plans of all buildings showing: gross floor area
by tyoe of usc�`on each floor plan.
Building elevations, cross sections (if relevant).
Site cross section(s) (if relevant).
Letter
*Land use classifications are: residential (shoiv � dwelling units); office use; retail
sales; restaurant/cafe; manufacturing/repair shop; warehousing; other (to be described).
6. PROJECT PRnp�SAL NEW CONSTRUCTION
Existing house = 1,196 SF Proposed c�nsiruction, 3elova orade ( - S�) Second floor ( 58� SF)*
9ross floor area First floor ( 46 2 SF) Third floor ( - SF)
Pro.lect Co��
Pr000sal Requirc�r,c�n�
Front setback $1' 15' min._
Side setback - -
Side yard Z�' �'
R�ar yarcl ' E)" ( �� �
Project Code
Proposal 2equirement
�ct cover�;�e 35% 40% max.
r�,;�����i� hei9ht 14' 14' max..
Lardscaned area - -
' 1 ' 2
�ln. �i tf? nkasn�ll:f,`,� I I
*future master e room a a i ion
�'not shown on plans submitted.
, .
6. PROJECT PROPOSAL (continued)
EXISTING IP! 2 YEARS IPI 5 YEARS
after after after
8-5 5 PM 8-5 5 PM 8-5 5 PM
Full tine employees on site
Part time emoloyees on site
Visitors/customers (weekday)
Visitors/customers (Sat.Sun.)
Residents on property
Trin ends to/from site�
Peak hour trip ends*
Trucks/service vehicles
"Show calculations on reverse side or attach senarate sheet.
7. ADJACENT BUSINESSES/LAND USES
Residential uses on all adjacent lots;� this use conforms
to the General Plan.
Required Date received
�.'�) (no) i — )
�.�) (no) ( - )
Location plan of adjacent properties.
Other tenants/firms on property:
no. firr�s ( ) no. employees ( )
floor area occupied ( SF office space)
( SF other)
no. employee vehicles regularly on site ( )
no. comoany vehicles at this location ( )
8. FEES Special Permit, all districts $100 () Other application type, fee $ ()
Variance/R-1,R-2 districts 3 40 (X ) Project Assessment $ 25 (X )
Variance/other districts $ 75 () Neoative Declaration $ 25 ()
Condominium Permit � 50 () EIR/City & consultant fees 3 ()
TOTAL FEES $ 65 . QQ RECEI PT N0. 4%CZ Recei ved by K. M1 � � S
I hereby certi
true and corre
Signature
under penal ty of perjury
to the be$,j of �y knowl s�
op
the information given herein is
d belief.
Date 3 �
STAFF USE ONLY
NEGATIVE DECLARATION File No.
The City of Burlingame by on
completed a review of the proposed project and determined that:
( ) It will not have a significant effect on the environment.
( ) No Environmental Impact Report is required.
19 ,
Reasons for a Conclusion:
Categorically exempt, reference CEQA
_ _ Code Sec. 15301 (e), additions to existina
structures
�n'� ��5
� �.r�! �
Signatu of Processing Official le Dai:e Signed
Unless annealed within 10 days hereof the �ate oosted, the deterriination shall be final.
DECLARATIO^! OF POSTI^IG Date Posted:
I declare under penalty of perj�iry ihat I ar� City Clerk oF the City of Burlingaine and that
I �osted a true copy of the above Nen��ti��e Declar�tion ac the Citv Hall of said City near
the doors to i:h� Council Charaber�s. J
�xecuted at 3urlingame, California on
Apoeale�i: ( )Yes ( )f!o
19
;UDITH �1. '^�LF�ITTI, CITY CLERK, CIT`, �' �URLI"JGAftE
STAFF REVIEW
1. CIRCULATION OF APPLICATION
Project proposal/plans have been circulated for review by:
date circulated reply received
City Engineer ( 3-3-89 ) (yes) (no)
Building Inspector ( " ) (yes) (no)
Fire Marshal ( �� ) (yes) (no)
Park Department ( _ ) (yes) (no)
City Attorney ( _ ) (yes) (no)
2. SUMMARY OF STAFF CONCERNS/POSSIBLE MITIGATIOPI MEASURES
memo attached
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
Concerns Mitiaation Measures
Does this project comply with Request comments from the Fire
all Fire and Building Code Marshal and Chief Building
requirements? Inspector.
3. CEQA REQUIREP�EPlTS
If a Negative Declaration has not been posted for this project:
Is the project subject to CEQA review? Categorically exempt
IF AN EIR IS REQUIRED:
Initial Study comoleted
Decision to prepare EIR
Notices of preparation mailed
;2FP to consultants
Contract awarded
Admin. draft EIR received
Draft EIR acce�ted by staff
Circulation to other agencies
i
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Study by P.C.
Review period ends
Public hearing by P.C.
Final EIR received by P.C.
Certification by Council
Decision on project
Notice of Determination
c
�
�
�
i
�
�
4. APPLICATION STATUS Date first received ( 3— 1— 8 9 )
Accepted as complete: no( ) letter to aoplicant advising info. required ( )
Yes( ) date P.C. study ( )
Is application ready for a?ublic hearing? (yes) (no) Recommended date ( 3- 2 7- 8 9)
Date staff report mailed �aoplicant (_�/'2 z�� y) Date Comnission hearing (3I� 7� �)
Application approved (�) Denied ( ) Appeal to Council (yes) (n�
Date Council hearing ( ) Aoolication ap�roved ( ) Denied ( )
.I L. : +�'��l'1�, � �
� " . -� �.
.
Kelly & Rena Randall
409 Burlingame Avenue
Burlingame, Ca. 94010
To: � Planning Commission
City of Burlingame
M�nbers nf the Planning Commission
REC�tVED
MAR � 01989
C17Y���R'L��ME
We are applying for a parking variance regarding our property in
Burlingame and would like to address several items of concern.
1. Our small two bedroom home sits on a 46 foot wide by 103 foot long
lot and has a single car detached garage. A majority of the homes in
the area have three bedrooms with their garages attached to the front
of the house. Due to our detached garage there is little space in
the rear yard,
2. A two car garage conforming to all applicable codes would degrade our
quality of life by requireing excessive amounts of paving and a large
decrease in available exterior space for recreation and relaxation.
The proposed garage location would allow the parking of one standard
car and one small car while allowing offstreet parking in the driveway
out-of site of the neighbors.
3. Granting of the application would not be detrimental or injurious to
property in the area because it is only the location of the garage and
not the size that is under yuestion. The garage would still occupy the
same amount of rear yard. With the granting of the application there
would be considerable less paving and more landscaping. •
4. The use of the property will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass,
bulk and character of existing and potential uses of properties in the
general vicinity.
Thank you for your consideration
� '
��;: � ,� �,.��('
Kelly & Rena Randall
b
0
J D � LQ��OC��La�C �
BUILDING DESIGN �. ENGINEERING
RANDALL RESIDEL�IICE
409 Burliname Avenue, Ca.
�: �; �� �, �:: :
i;�l�lf� �. t.� 10�� �
���� �,,�
�� I ai� (o �SE�iBPG{
PLAN SHOWING NEW 'IWO CAR GARAGE
I;CX',�TED � AT REAR RIGHT PORTION OF �� 1
PROPIItTY LI (o.Op) Z d ti�L�C
�
� � L/�I� T �I� _ � ��
�
-o
_�
N
�ZE�� `�{�12D
This scheme degrades the quality of life for the occupants of the
home with excessive paving and a large decrease in available
exterior space for recreation and relaxation.
'1228 paloma • burlingame, ca. J40'10 [4'15] 343-60'14
DATE : �2' � �Q'
MEMO T0: CITY ENGINEER ���
CHIEF BUILDING PECTOR
FIRE MARSHAL
DIRECTOR OF PARKS
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
a q ���� ��
SUBJECT: ,I? � — �`"� �,`��
� / �/1-� .�vi /�i�-.- a_
�" '� . ��°�' ��i S �z�
An application has been received for the above project for review by the
Planning Commission. The application will be scheduled for /'z-�Q` �
at their j� �� %Q� meeting. We would appreciate having
your corrffnents by /�%(� � 3� /���%`,
Thank you.
Ta � Pl,a��,�, c�
� ' ��c %'r�-st-�c.
3-�3��
�
v� �� s�-� � 3�-� ,:R.�, P��.��, c., .��
� �I�i O� O/�%� �`'�t,. C.orJS7.(WG�yp-.%L
��
DATE : � � rQ'
MEMO T0: CITY ENGINEER
CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR
FIRE MARSHAL
DIRECTOR OF PARKS
FROM:
SUBJECT:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
�I i
� ��
.
��
, �7
� �� �`�
�G'' /t�" i^�.� �.
r�y " _ ���' �'�✓ s �.r�
An application has been received for the above project for review by the
Planning Commission. The application will be scheduled for ��� �
at their_j''�� �! %Qv meeting. We would appreciate having
your corrunents by /��,(� � 3� /���`.
Thank you.
I1 �n'd'� �� .�iv�� oc�¢ o"�%�, i� �� �
/
� ��i� �J��tQtJ(�i I t�� ��c li�F�
��
� i `�' S(.SV�T� L1� L L'a
_f"� �
;`
%�-
MEMO
TO: PLANNING
FROM: CITY ENGINEER
DATE: MARCH 22, 1989
SUBJECT: PARKING VARIANCE - REPLACE ONE-CAR GARAGE WHERE TWO CARS
ARE REQUIRED - 409 BURLINGAME AVENUE
The applicant proposes to construct a two-car garage on this site
with inadequate access to the second space because of the closeness
of the house. The applicant, at some point in the future, wishes to
expand the house. The applicant has a few options that can decrease
the inadequacies of this variance request.
The first option is to move the garage two feet (2') to the side
property line and install an 18' garage door (16' is standard) to
increase accessibility. This option, while not exactly meeting City
standards, would allow a larger compact car access to the second
space. Placing the garage at the side property line requires removal
of all eave overhangs and rain gutters. This necessitates either a
gabled roof paralleling the rear property line and a hip roof
extending towards the front (looks more like the gabled roof of the
house), or a flat roof, to insure that drainage does not go onto the
neighboring property. This is shown on Sketch A attached.
The second option is to both move the garage to the side property
line and expand the garage to meet parking requirements. This
requires a 670+ S.F. garage (462 S.F. proposed) unless an angled side
building is built (590+ S.F.) A special permit is required since the
garage would be over 500 S.F. This added square footage may also
affect the applicant's lot coverage for any house expansion.
Since the applicant is able to meet the parking concerns, I cannot
support this request. I would be supportive of the request if the
applicant would choose the development shown in Sketch A if condi-
tioned as follows:
1. Relocate garage to side property line.
2. Install 18' wide garage door.
3. Relocate rear exit and stairs clear of back-up area with any
bedroom addition or any modification to the rear of the house.
djm
,_ ��
Frank C. ErbacheG����
�
cc: Mr. Randall, 409 Burlingame Ave., Burlingame, CA 94010
J D& Associates, 1228 Paloma, Burlingame, CA 94010
, r ( �
' ' ' 22 r i �
� _ . � � � � 4�;�'n ' � � f
0 ��� � � . - ' I
N � I�a �� f�_ r.,_: � �
• • G 1 x �,1.' -
. i -- _-�.`_�� �
� � . , � '. �
�/ �'� �� ~ - � .
�, , � o -�
i � �. I
. , i -,.,� �
-,.;�, ti � : �: , ' i �
� , ,�.
. � � -_---� � , �r. �_ �� � � � j ;
� � � h � ' ., I . ' , ✓
;-G r / ? r �
f �'�0� ', .
� E c� .. _ __ � _ ' ' .
� E , F�� �J � - _ ,�- x - .
f �� ,.k- � _,o u � � � i.� � T, `
,r � >� �.aQ j . ' t F' Y _,. is�7b.�, i � , �.l i
! • � ��; �,. , .
A� .. ' , --{ � ' . _ . � .. . .
�%� � hl/ � �....]� - � � -��Il: � , .� . . . � . _ . . . . _ � . � , .. � .__.. . .
::, �
_.
,._ . �. . ., . .
"i L�i"it � _ , _. .. r �
� ---" ... �-..- '- _ ' - - __ _ _., , _ . .
+ ' � _ _ .� Q� Cafd /"�'r Cft/f .�ia�J�#►r, f
=^�. _ � , ._ _._
� � � C ���. �.+ _ . �- - �� ---, --- c%ar o�' 6a c� �.�rrc� ' , .
- � ��'� �� 6���� .���
; ,;
' -- �oa/i {rc.�vfto y �
or •rw►s, '
i G �� G�. : ,✓'� — 1. , �
; �- �'l,r rc.w- m��i E II os�r� •'' I
_ �
, � . F
I � � �,�,,. _. - I
.: . � --- _._ _ ..
- ' lo�-o" - , � � .
. _ ,
, _ . _ ._ f , . }�
-�i . , . i . . . . � R�' �, � . . . 0'..
a � . • `/ .�.�
�
� , . _ i
. � . �l} �
. - . E- ,
� 1 r'E ; ;7, _, ;�. f.� ; � _
i _ � ---- --- ------- � ;
I . _� ' '�, �
, ,• .
� �l _ N
I '
i
i
, � , ��
,. r-�
I -
�'
�°� %',a����it��i�/�/�
��� �j/��D �' CA�ir`'/e
VVI• ' ��� ��
i
i
�' 3/�'�'89
�_
- ---_ _ _. _
_ . __ _
- ... _ _ _
_ __._ .__ --- �.----�-- -- ----_ -� '�'
� ��
- r`
�_ _.. __ _ _._ -- �
�_ `+ _--- --__ - - -
� �
� " � 5'o s � �' � �
,, � ,
` F �, ,
� � j� � ,�_f` J ��...
�4 ,...._.__ ...._.._
i
� � �
� ,`� � � / �
_�► �_ i _ _, ,/ a � �
� � i q /
f � � �
N � � ', � I
� ; �7v SFw� �► ,
: / 4 . ____.� � ��( �S �r"��' • I
�� / �
,�T � , � � i � � '. �
----- •�.. ' {�, � . �
— ---.__. _-- ..._...____.._C _.....�,.� .,.._-1" _ .� �`�. � + , j .
, .
,,.. , .-
�
—s�-„ � �
_,_ 'i.
...r +�r....a
ir)V � �: � , � . /8�
!�� � :,,.- , I
� s • -9' :�,� 2v�f " . .' j ,,
-. � -
.,_ �.;_ � � _ i '
- ,y�,,.. ' --- -- �
.
_- _�_ �
� �� �. _ .
. ,. � �
. . ; �- -- ; . . . __.
-. _ — �
-;
------ — _- '' ' ��
. l. �
; ,_
,: . _
,� �
„';
t�
r
�;
� ���—
t'
_�.
� � ��l�t'U�t/,1��'� I
�
�� �
a;
�;_�
��
�`'•` * 1 . � ' .� .. � �F' �y
i * �� f i,k - t�; � 4 �:i:'��` .. � ���,,.��'{' . `9• � .. A.''+N
�. y . E;s .� . �'t� � "• �', �' `� I �iA � a � �` ,�'� ��'
,� •� , � p a �h , y�' �:' r r "t.� � y�'' � _ _� :� �.
� . � r �� � a r �-. �`' t� . y..
� ` !r }?. � � r� �t! �. , �i ` i} `r� 4 � f, �I . ..�� .� �,.i °'{�<t A . ti�.... � .
..�.s ky.. .
� � �, � fi`t`v��`�� �' ,;�4 f `�� � s , t � �; �p' �, - �«
. � ���� , • �Z +i���
S � �s�R � • �i:t. ., � 'ai. e:�� � r :r: c'� . .t• ' . t ' �n �`�., � � : r�, f
� .'�y7 Y �� r � ., ;�,�,' „���� '�r �R. _- ..�, �' e f� . . .! . . �� ' . #� '.-.�
� ��i' �� � . � � . � '+^Fs ' q� �� �"' I,1 /, �'a � t4
°��� j ;�5� •[y . ?�+� i�,�
� � ' . . �. - . , Si�:� . .. f
�'1 � ��'„rAy f :+.� �.F �� � t � �. r��
� �i��FvM. ��. 79►�;r . }. �.,.��,� � e � i: �, �
� ,�'H( + - �,� vii � J� �' � �� p" �,, ti�F ' ' � ' ..
�� �� 'tt°.. 2 k��'. � ts?.� �.' .r '` ��.. , . )' S
�'� �� \ �� ;�� . l����� � L� %'�., �� a .l�v''.� �y- . � . .
� l 19 L � ' � • 7', ; �
' � . \T .• J 1 �. . . R�4 � �' yt .
, a` lr .).
M.� � �-� d�.g.� r �i!9" . . �'f� ��A!'���� �i f��� � i
a.,::r.r rr�.. �t�� . r. ���.". �`" r«9 �.i• ._ ( '� .
c. . � h., .. \ �i�FhR nii'�`a��ii� ��!t`-'/. .: ' .4'j�'
. ,r t�' .. �._ � , � : �-, f, y �p g � ;�( y<, �, a , .,�, �. '`�t., ,,^�
'F �.� '. 'a. r . ' � � ^� 4 ��lV�i ( D'S 1 ~�f(/ J
�',. '����.1. � ,'.P rb ;'y.. � bS�Y .,y. �t Y����d�r ��'SR��. � �
�!" '�� �� � $ f *�� ��, ,�� Pr � � �
'. ' S • S
� .14� .�A . . -I f� '�_ F� < �� /�'-' � f A*
�I, I� "Y( '1� � .1Y.� � ( �}� ' �� fu�'w '��¢y� `� / ` �
�r; �'�^, � ,�i � Y - �p"9'� �.' �:. . „
���'�. � � � �� � .. i j, S�Jf`•y 'r ��i �5 y� Y,' Y ..{ �
� s � � �'i � �.. �
,� ., i , � , . . � ,.,.� x.1.
�;. '�' .
, . .
,� • �!,' . F ���ry' ,� �,1 .�... 9 .
. .. .
� r �',�;. � � . �� � �T;'� f `,z� S._ 5y �/ t. � ^�, :� �`��� . S ��� na�,�� ,
.�- {-. " +`� ' ✓.' . ,I��.
� � . � �.� r �.a• � ��� 'r�+°' ��' .�� ��� 1 f�;. ,i:�r �. �t . 'y��
v y ��
�;:, ' w � , " ���� `� . . ` '� �" ' ,. , � .�'. • .,!� _ , . , 23 i;� �. ,�!'�,� � .
�.'�x .ti a ti�" {� s Y '� . °�.�
. " d p, . � , r t � � ' : +�, � . � ,�'�, �
� �y�Sr� � � �.: Y�,� , ',r :w;, i. � .�.M1'a' i;�. . '� y�r� .,�:f
et�r.� �'� iL ��' ' , . •. � t. �r '� �,% r�• .
j �";� ',X, �• ly'�' ti '� tQ ` ' `' �
.�at, �`. - +�j� +_ v � �',- � , r'
�' �`f ��t . /'f�,4 ��.. t ��� , . == . R i . � a �
�'�t r. , :` .k �. � � �
� w.' 1 f frr`1�`� x°. ''� �n -��t._ C".r' .�
. �' , ., ' � , � �� ,''1�` 4 ' Y�
r;: " . �,� �, w �� ., w � ' J► � - �' : , � 4 ,� �
ti ♦� '�£'� ,�. ` Q, . t�i'�'�'{ '� _��i �i ,� � �j'�4, �. � {�,�
� s � �+'�y , � 3t,. �` ♦ �
�,�✓ »� jv �� , . ' � ' � � � .`'�' n ,g" ��, � � �'� 1r
/ i �e,�'� �gF '� �s{' , �, : ,'�. �p' '� _ �f'� �
a . : � -� � '�. � �� . �'.� �^t��; �t -t. �. :��..�: ���� �5;-:f:�� d��.��. �w.
� ;�� �yi 5 „5�` � .f '... ; �.�` . � �� �' IU '{. "��� � c+� y,K • ,''� '��' ,�L t. ' �� ,
K�.i �� . �_ .. +. . a ��J' .+,r \� y.,yR ;:•, a� r
. ��''�� t . e �A�,����� � .,�` i rA , ,' . ,' f.�..
� ,µ �. 'i , ♦ 7 j�,: �,,, .I °
� � �Tr`� � `•~� �,� � � w � �
,r �' � ,�:, ` w� � ;� �� ,3. � � � +
6 . . � r H ��� � � � �ti�: � P � ;T.r. .i� _� .1' �� .
y� E y<� s:< W.' �. k+, '.�. `��1•-.`�'�++ v \.' ��i
.�.1iy"r1`l p... . .. � . ,'��',� .�`. � >� �t � ��� ,. � : q/ ' . i�� 6�.
� � � Y�
la�,�_ �:b� . �_�ti�.:. �.���,,..� . ''a. � .� l�.f � .,� ` �A ' ..+l� �'� �j3c Y
� t`'" . � � � �..t �..�. �' ��� , . .��� '� �1i` , T '
�.
^�, �,Lf � v - � �y � . y�.�� •. �
n � i � � �,'� y.R�lt " � F . .� � � =��' � �,
vk � ;!+� - `!?� � '� j� �r �� , - r . . �.' ."`'
� <:r' j� �! . +�l�,R�cr a t . �; ' �� �':'�i'•' "�lli; ". � � ` �:�; . r : 3��; : . . �
R • �ir , . �s �'�''{ '' � .,a� •. S +. f �
',+ p.. ,p . -� '�. 'e�-,�. � .i��'.�`� " ��.� ..� �.. � � i '��;..
�,,�v;,_, �,, � �r �:;' [,� � �
�# , =��: �� � A� ; t - ,� ����,.9. �'` ,k���; ��°' . y'���'� �.
" �y ��!�" yY'�, . _ ;� � t ; ,�j'r'�p' .�:
� \ �. �La�R� �ItM !� ' '"'iJ �'.. ,-frY 1..�' c s'�
\_' : r,.. � '� :L
� ��� � '� �' . a. '�. , �. �`' ,+�� .'�i '��'� , ..
� ` � v �` � �� `,' •
�g ,.. �, . ..`�q .,d t�,
'7"L.� " .�# .� � �. s Y }� � '�..
' '�� � �I/��. ;� %M ` S 'y�"�i .✓� *��, �) .2}^ �� vF���t�
� `,, ',
� . � �� 1� . i s ''a . ,x�je :�J;
'�� �Y ;� � � � . � �-���. ��'. : ^� . �i�� -
���7(t ' � •� �� �.ti,� � ..�.{y1� .��n ` . !a r'�.� y ., � $� . ' � cr t__
.:�1 ;� � �g .o � �. } f ♦
IY-`' S �y�� ('�,["� ,�' f 1� J��_�.1_ . � .T��.L'.? �, . / ..
� ��6..� b � .; q. - f rF>� 'y, � .l" ..rT . . . �9� , � . �� �; � .
+F t'.i� � . . —� ■y,y��` ,3T.�' n.. t �
.� �
��, r.�. . � Yw�y �S f.�. �,,�i� . 1KT`�� �w^� `. � �4' .��'.'�'• !'_d J�.�°� ,� ���� �
�' d. • ,.+�^{ �� � �'�b�� .� +� �a1,�y � a
,R � y ,1 � D {' , , d �� '"� 1 , h � r�' ..
� + � p ��
-.D � �� � �'�� �, `�i'� � �r w�f �� �'� \
V.. � N •� � ♦ A ( `�
_�,�µ,. ��,+ �..J�\ . � .�_ 4.• � a`�� y �� ��9'�s �• .� � ���' •.y��� �� � y �
' '�1`!'7R ,,�• • � � � � � � ��� �.�c.A�r 1�`� ��,�� '�
_+�~ � �`� �,• � � :� ' i �^ �� �` � - y� ' ^i ..r� • � b
,�,� a.
.'^1 .r � t � �'�c �
'"��,;`� fg� „r .�� . � ..� `!'� i' a� x!1 ^ � �: 4' N; � �
,�pk�+ ` �'
�^'� " .�'j5� '� � ���, L.�`'" � � p . �it �� . � '�+�" . . `',T � � �` � r..
c .y,�
a 0. � � �a *�, �j �N1° ' � �
' �.,-� ��. ��.�Y����'r^�� �• �-. � • , s��,t, � r - . �t . �
�;�,� ' �. ' T �i i � . . �� �, � f� � � .
.v � • � �` � `J� i- � .�
f 'r "'+. '� '�� � `,. ..; , � }+ ,��.;n � u� _�'s. �'t �q�.' 'M�
v �, f,.� .�., �
�:;� . �.�"`, ��' �,�►,.^�.�� �. ��`� �+� �
. _ . 4, f �• _� �� ' " :�is,. E�_ .. ���� .
. .r
\A `
�o�nn �uNe
�ktr C�tf� af �uriirtg�tzrt�
SAN MATEO COUNTY
CITY HALL- 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME,CALIFORNIA 94010 TEL:(415) 342-8931
NOTICE OF HEARING
Parkin� Variance
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Monday, the 27th day ot rtar�h, 1989 , at
the hour of 7:30 P.M., in the City Hall Council (:ha.mbers , 501 Primrose Road,
Burlingame, California the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame will conduct
a,�ublic hearing on the application to ad� on� (1; bedrocm to an eXi��i:g residence
which reauires two cove•red off street parkinQ spaces while onl provirling one
covered, at 409 Bur�ingame Avenue. Zoned R-1.
�
At the time of the hearing all persons interested will be heard.
For further particulars reference is made to the Planning Department.
MARGARET MONROE
CITY PLANPJER
M�rch 17r 1989
V " M
RESOLUTION NO
RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCE
RESOLVED
Burlingame that:
by the Planning Commission of the City of
WHEREAS, application has been made for a variance for
Parking
at 409 Burlingame Avenue �ApN 029-261-030 �
. ,
and
WHEREAS, this Commission held a public hearing on said
application on_ March 27, , 1989,, at which time it reviewed
and considered the staff report and all other written materials and
testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this
Planning Commission that said variance is approved, subject to the
conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
It is further directed that a certified copy of this
resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San
Mateo.
RUTH E . JACOBS
CHAIRMAN
I, MIKE ELLIS, Secretary of the Planning Commission of
the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission held on the 27th day of riarch
,
1989, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
�dIKE ELLIS
SECRETARY