Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout315 Burlingame Avenue - Staff ReportItem � 5 CITY OF BURLINGAME FRONT SETBACK AND HEIGHT VARIANCES SPECIAL PERMIT FOR AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE Address: 315 Burlingame Avenue Meeting Date: 8/25/97 Requests: Front setback and height variances for a new single family dwelling and a special permit for windows within 10'-0" of the property line in an accessory structure (CS 25.60.010, i) at 315 Burlingame Avenue, zoned R-1. Applicant: James Ingram, Jr. Property Owner: Same APN: 029-262-020 Lot Area: 4,713 SF General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 Adjacent Development: Single Family Residential CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15303 (a,e) - Construction and location of limited numbers of new structures. .. in urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences may be constructed or converted under this exemption. ..accessory structures including garages, carports, patios, swimming pools and fences. Summary: The applicant, James Ingram, 7r., is requesting front setback and height variances for a new single family dwelling and a special permit for an accessory structure at 315 Burlingame Avenue, zoned R-1. This project meets the definition of New Construction and Floor Area Ratio applies. In October, 1996, the house was destroyed by a fire and demolished shortly thereafter. A front setback variance is required for 15'-0" where 28'-0" is the minimum requirement (average of block). The applicant is also requesdng a variance for height, 31'-6" proposed where 30'-0" is the maximum allowed. The proposed building height would create a maximum ceiling height of 9' in the unfinished attic area. As proposed, there is no plan to use the attic for anything but storage. A drop down ladder provides access to the attic area. The proposed new dwelling contains three bedrooms, three bathrooms, a laundry room, living room, dining room, breakfast nook, kitchen and a two-car detached garage, bringing the total floor azea on the site to 2,407 SF (.51 FAR) (after deducting the chimney and covered porch, (CS 25.08.265, 1& 2). The maximum floor area allowed is 3,008 SF (.64 FAR). The new dwelling will cover 33.9% (1,600 SF) of the lot where 40% (1,885 SF) is the maximum allowed. The plans indicate that there will be eight new trees provided, there are no protected trees on the site now. All other zoning code requirements have been met. The applicant is also proposing to build a 448 SF detached garage (20'-0" x 20'-0" clear interior dimensions) at the rear of the lot with an attached 45 SF trellis as part of the new construction. A Front setback and height variances and special perm�t for an accessory structure 315 Burlingame Avenue The new detached garage will be set back approximately 81' from the front property line. The 9' x 20' uncovered parking space is provided in the 81' long driveway. A special permit is required for windows within 10'-0" of property line (CS 25.60.010, i). The windows are located 8'-3" from property line and are built into the doors facing into the yazd. There is also a 100 SF storage area over the parking area. A drop down ladder provides access to the storage area. This azea is less than 10% of the gross floor area of the main dwelling. All other requirements for an accessory structure have been met. '���� 1 *Front Setback (lst): (2nd): Side Setback (L): (R) = Rear Setback (lst): (2nd): Lot Coverage: Floor Area Ratio: *Building Height: Parking: 15'-0" 21'-0" 14'-0" 4' -0" 40' -9" 43'-9" 33.9% (1,600 SF) .51 (2,407 SF) 31'-6" 2 covered, 1 uncovered : � � � 1 � 1�1 28'-0" (avg. of block) 20' -0" 4' -0" 4'-0" 15'-0" 20'-0" 40% (1,885 SF) .64 (3,008 SF) 30'-0" 2 covered, 1 uncovered Declining Height: Complies using C.S. 25.28.075, 3(a-d) *Accessory Structures: 448 SF detached garage, windows within 10'-0" of property line Fences/Hedges: 6' solid wood fence with 1' lattice, complies * Front setback variance for 15'-0" where 28'-0" (average of block) is required and height variance for 31'-6' where 30'-0" is the maximum allowed. Special permit for windows within 10'-0" of property line in an accessory structure. Staff Comments: The City Engineer notes in his July 21, 1997 memo that a property line survey is required. The Chief Building Inspector notes that the storage area in the garage must meet 125 pounds per square foot. The Fire Marshal had no comment on this project. Planning staff would note that there are only four lots on this block, two of them are corner lots (one of the corner lots is used by a church). The dwellings on the interior lots were both built with 41'-6" front setbacks. Staff would also note that the garage back-up aisle is 22'-6". Staff has analyzed the maneuvers in and out of the garage and has determined that the vehicle from the second stall can enter and exit from the garage as code requires provided the garage door width is 18'-0". 2 Front setback and height variances and special permit for an accessory structure 315 Burlingame Avenue Study Meeting: At their meeting on August 11, 1997, the Planning Commission had two requests regarding this application (P.C. Minutes August 11, 1997). The prior front setback for the house on this site was 41'-6". The windows on the accessory structure are built into the double doors and are located 8'-3" from the rear property line. The windows are located on the side of the garage perpendicular to the rear property line facing into the rear yard. A second window on the same wa11 is located 17'-0" from the rear property line. Required �ndings for Variance: In order to grant a variance the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d): (a) there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved that do not apply generally to property in the same district; (b) the granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant, and to prevent unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship; (c) the granting of the application will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare or convenience; and (d) that the use of the property will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses of properties in the general vicinity. Required �ndings for a Special Permit: In order to grant a Special Permit the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.52.020 a-c): (a) the proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; (b) the proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Burlingame general plan and the purposes of this title; (c) the Planning Commission may impose such reasonable conditions or restrictions as it deems necessary to secure the purposes of this title and to assure operation of the use in a manner compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity. Front setback and heighl variances and special permit for an accessory structure 3I5 Burlingame Avenue Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action should be taken by resolution and should include findings made for the requested variances and special permit. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped 7uly 31, 1997, Sheets 1 through 6 with a maximum roof ridge height of 31'-6" as measured from the average top of curb at the front of the house (130.045'), a maximum attic height of 9'-0" as measured from the attic floor to the bottom of the roof beam and an 18' wide garage door shall be placed and maintained in the detached garage; 2. that the construction for the single family dwelling and detached garage shall conform exactly to the height, setbacks, envelope, rooflines, and window placement as shown on the plans date stamped 7uly 31, 1997, Sheets 1 through 6; any change to these features shall require amendment to this permit and a public hearing; 3. that the materials proposed for construction as detailed on the plans date stamped 7uly 31, 1997, Sheets 1 through 6, shall be used in the construction of the new single family dwelling and garage; 4. that the height of the roof (31'-6") and the height of the attic space (9'-0") shall be established by a survey and accepted by the City Engineer prior to calling for the framing inspection; 5. that the conditions of the City Engineer's and Chief Building Inspector's July 21, 1997 memos shall be met; and 6. that this project sha11 meet a11 the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 1995 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. Ruben Hurin Zoning Technician c: 7ames Ingram, 7r., applicant 4 MII�T[7TFS CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION August 1 , :00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Plannin ommission, City of Burli ame was called to order by Chairman Key on August 11, 1997 at 7• p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Absent: Staff Present: Commissioners Coffey, eal, Ellis, Galligan, Mink and Key Commissioner We ord City Planner Margaret Monroe; City Attorney, Engineer, ank Erbacher; Fire Marshal, Keith M all Anderson; City MINUTES - The f t sentence of the minutes of the July 8, 1997 Planning Commission wer amended to read: "A regulaz meetin of the Planning Commission, City urlingame was called to order by C rman Key on July �42s, 1997 at 7:02 p.m., the minutes were then approv as corrected. AGENDA -/ The order of the agenda was There were no public comments. APPLICATION FOR FRONT SETBACK AND HEIGHT VARIANCES FOR A NEW SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE AT 315 � BURLINGAME AVENUE, ZONED R-1, (JAMES E. INGRAM, 7R., APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER� Requests: What was the prior setback for the house on this site; where are the windows on the accessory structure relative to the rear property line. Item was set for public hearing on August 25, 1997. APPLICATION FOR AN ENDMENT TO A MASTER AGE PROGRAM AT 1375 BURLINGAME AVENU , ZONED C-1, SUBAREA A, (T ECA, APPLICANT AND KARIM Requests: Applic 'on should include applicant's re onse to findings for a si exception; there are paper signs on e tenant space at 1444 Burlinga Avenue (Plagmann's) r Tribeca, what is their relationship t this applicant; are the umbrella on the second floor w' Ben and 7erry's on their -1- _.ITY c•�F M�� ir�i_iNc,�i�nr /� �'f't_I(='/a I!i)fU 1(�) TIi `'._ ��NNI G C� 111i S,- (i)N� .e.. - ,� . . ; i� Specfal Permit ,�Va�i�n�e �Other � � . . _ . .. .. ..: .. ... .__u _ . __ . • • Prvjact Addrass_ � %� I 5 BU_l�l.l 1�G � M � /� V �- , -� Assessor's P�rcel Number(s) � Z�' 2�02' ��.O _ Neme: � ��C- Namec. � ��c= • Address; �� s g`� �' � � .Address: s �v� , �� � ' CitylStata/Zip: ,,,�,� e �� v Cf�ylStat�/Zip: � �!� � Ge- l� o�� ` 3% - 7i � Telephone:{work? �/S � �%v; � `� %/ � TelQphone:lworkj �/1 - � ---- - � <S'�� {hdrtr�el cJ'�,•e� Ihamel� - ��11 dNER . � � _. Name; . 1n � Ar55O��p�7'�S- nfoasa Jndl�sle ti•�tth �n estorlsk I"J yyhD t/►e cD�t�cLn�rson Addre$s: , 1?�f� �A��-- — l,,, _ f�r�hls_nral�c t , C�tyfstate/z�p: �UR.I.��lG�l0.�� . `i4p10 . . . 7elephana (deytime); ��i3-��T , . .. I �/ A ,�- _. . . . ... .: ,. ___.. __ ___ . . . �rr��r.�Al� AI�I�I�AIlfTI/111. <I �i I � .�J111 iC I.i � � � �r�. �I�/ . � .. . ..J•. . .. � � � C A. i� I► / . I hareby certifyr under penalty of besx of my knowfed'g -�er��isl� iifcant's Si natut I knaw abou� the applics�tian, se� ap�ly���ion info 2�tion given herein is true and`,correct to the 6 > / �' %� pate �e � uthorize th� ab applicant to submit this - . O;� - ��% • :Pr erty Owner's �Signature D�te - ...----�------------------------------ �.�_�.�_�..�OFF �E U� �NLY ---._..__._....._...............,...._._...__.----------- , � . , � . . . _ .__�.. _.. . _ . . ' pate Filad: � -..!�'��7�: Fee.: � �I t�;, 0o Re�eipt # �. -:�,,,. ... ,, ,,. I.ette�(s) to appllcant advisfng app(ication incomplQte: l7�te applic�tian accepted as complete: � P.C. study m�etin� (dato.) .� _.__. P.C. public hearing tdato? P.C. Action ~zr�2 Appea! to Gouncil7 Yes No � �,o�.�.�rM Councfl meeting date Councii Actic�n F, cYrv--'. ,�r �s BURLINGAME ..,, , ti\ • :o , , CITI' 00 F EUFLING/�,I'✓IE VAF�I�INCE !�F''�LIC�,TIC�)NS The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's ordinance (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d). Your answers to the following questions will assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. a. Describe the exceptiona/ or extraordinary circumstances or conditions app/icab/e to you� property which do not app/y to other properties in this area. �� kT1PGN�D sl��" b. Exp/ain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantia/ property right and what unreasonab/e property /oss or unnecessary hardship might resu/t from the denia/ of the app/ication. 5t�` �t7�`�c��� s7�lt�� c. Exp/ain why the proposed use at the proposed /ocation wi// not be detrimenta/ or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to pub/ic hea/th, safety, genera/ we/fare, or convenience. S� �7TA�C/I��j Sfi���T � How wi// the proposed project be compatib/e with the aesthetics, mass, bu/k and character of the existing and potentia/ uses on adjoining properties in the genera/ vicinityT 5�� �471A�� S�7" ,2�sz ��.f�„ a. Describe the exceptiona/ or extraordinary circumstances or conditions app/icab/e to your� p�operty which do not app/y to other properties in this area. Do any conditions exist �n the site which make other the alternatives to the variance impracticable or impossible and a�e also not common to other properties in the area7 For example, is there a creek cuttinp through the property, an exceptional tree specimen, steep terrain, odd lot shape or unusual placement of existing structures7 How is this property different from others in the neighborhood? b. Exp/ain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantia/ property right and what unreasonab/e property /oss or unnecessary hardship might resu/t from the denia/ of the app/ication. Would you be unable to build a project similar to others in the area or neighborhood without the exception7 (i.e., having as much on-site parking or bedrooms7) Would you be unable to develop the site for the uses allowed without the exception7 Do the requirements of the law place an unreasonable limitation or hardship on the development of the property7 c. Exp/ain why the proposed use at the proposed /ocation wi// not be detrimenta/ or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to pub/ic hea/th, safety, genera/ we/fare, or con venience. How will the proposed structure or use within the structure affect neighboring properties or structures on those propertiesl If neighboring properties will not be affected, state why. Think about traffic, noise, liphting, paving, landscaping sunlight/shade, views from neighboring properties, ease of maintenance. Why will the structure or use within the structure not affect the public's health, safety or peneral welfaret Public health includes such things as sanitation (garbage), air quality, discharges into sewer and stormwater systems, water supply safety, and things which have the potential to affect public health (i.e., under�round storage tanks, storage of chemicals, situations which encourage the spread of rodents, insects or communicable diseasesl. Public safetv. How will the structure or use within the structure affect police or fire protection7 Will alarm systems or sprinklers be installed7 Could the structure or use within the structure create a nuisance or need for police services (i.e., noise, unruly gatherings, loitering, traffic) or fire services (i.e., storage or use flammable o� hazardous materials, or potentially dangerous activities like welding, woodwork, engine �emoval). General welfare is a catch-all phrase meaning community good. Is the proposal consistent with the city's policy and goals for conservation and development7 Is there a social benefit7 Convenience. How would the proposed structure or use affect public convenience (such as access to or parking for this site or adjacent sites)7 Is the proposal accessible to particular segments of the public such as the elderly or handicapped7 d. How wi// the proposed project be compatib/e with the aesthetics, mass, bu/k and character of the existing and potentia/ uses on adjoining p�operties in the genera/ vicinityT How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetically with existing neighborhood7 If it does not affect aesthetics, state why. If chanpes to the structure are proposed, was the addition designed to match existin� architecture or pattern of development on adjacent properties in the neighborhood? If use will affect the way a neighborhood/area looks, compare your proposal to othe� uses in the area and explain why it "fits". How does the proposed structure compare to neighborin� structures in terms of mass or bulkl If there is no change to structure, say so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation etc. with other st�uctures in the neighborhood or area. How will the structure or use within the structure change the character of the neighborhoodl Think of character as the image or tone established by size, density of development and general pattern of land use. Will there be more traffic or less parking available resulting from this use7 If you don't feel the character of the neighborhood will change, state why. How will the proposed project be compatible with existing and potential uses in the fleneral vicinity? Compare your project with existing uses. State why you feel your project is consistent with other uses in the vicinity, and/or state why your project would be consistent with potential uses in the vicinity. ,sroz�.,.,,,,, CITY OF BIJRLINGAME VARIANCE APPLICATI(�N ANSWERS TO QUESTIOl�1S A,B,C & D. A. The subject property has an exceptional circumstance in that our property is one af only 4 properties vn this small block The most easterly �roperty has a church with a setback of 14'-0". The property adjoining has in the most forward location a garage which is located �l'-6'" from the property line_ The structures appear to be very old and in poor conditian. To the west there is only one property which fronts anto Stanley Road and is 15'-0" from the property line_ Therefore the average setback is 23'-6" due to the one property which has an exceptionally lc�ng front setback Additionally the property is only 46' wide and therefore with our desire to build a small Queen Anne style home with a detached garage in the rear makes it necessary to move the house closer to the front praperty line than the average of the block. B. It is our desire to piace the garage at the rear of the property and to create a Queen Anne style home with a front facade which offers a"small" appearance from the street. Due to the length of the lot there is not enough room to have the rear garage, the required baekup and the house without moving closer to the front. property line. This will place the covered porch at 15'-Q" from the front property line and the dwelling at 21'-0" from the front property line. 'The front parch is open at all sides and is no closer to the property line than the church and the other corner property. To com�ly with the average of the block would place an undue hardship onta development of the property and would cause an unreasonable praperty loss. C. This is a new home, built much smaller than the ma�mum, with a two car garage at the rear, instead of on the street, with larger than usual side setbacks and a style which will fit the character of the nei�hborhood. The new home will be an improvement to the neighborhood and will enhance the general welfare of the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety general welfare or convenience. D. Our home will be compatible with the neighborhaad for the follawing reasons. l. Our horne will be much smaller than what is allowed. 2. will ha�e a two car garage (as required by code) set in the rear corner of the property. 3. offers a front facade which will not create a bulky appearance. 4. is set back 6' on the ri�;ht side where orily 4' is required 5. is set back 14' on the left side where only 4' is required 6. is on a small block where 2 out of 3 praperties has a 15' front setback Al`�tSWERS TO QUESTIONS A,B,C & D HEIGHT VARIANCE A. The subject prQperty is smaller than usual in that in is only 46' x l03'. This is a project which has exceptional circumstances. In an attempt ta provide an aesthetically pleasing period home we have gone to �-eat extent. 1%Ve have done the follawing. 1_ Placed the garage at the rear to reduce the bulk as seen from the street. 2. Increased setbacks LF.FT SIDE-setback will be 14'-0" where 4'-d" is the minimum for the building and where 10'-0" is the minimum for a driveway. This has dramatically decreased the allowable building area. RIGHT S1DE-setback wil) be 6'-0° where 4'-0" is the minimum. 3. We have designed the house with a reduced height of the finished floar as it relates to the surrounding grade. This reduces the overall height and the variance request. A traditional proportion would have dictated a higher floor. 4. The raof pitch has been reduced from a more traditional slope of 12/12 (45degrees} to 9 1/2 in 12 (38 degrees}_ A further reduction in roof slope would jeopardize �he visual proportions necessary for the style of house. (Queen Anne). This has reduced the overall height and the variance request. 5. E�erior details ha�e been added to enhance the facade. 6. A laxge front covered porch is a part of the project. This helps to provide a buffer between the home and the street while providing an inviting element. S. Without the variance we will be required to dramatically aiter the traditional propartiana required of the Queen Anne style, therefore placing the design and the project in jeopardy. The height of the building with its steep roof is a direct reflection of the house width. Our praposed house is only 2C' wide instead of the possible 38'. C. In a climate af prafit where we seldom see a period design we ha�e a chance to build something that brings back some of the architecture of the past. The new house will be much smaller than the maximum, will have much greater setbacks than the minimums, will ha�e the garage set to the rear, and will offer a wide front porch. This project will be a gem in the neighborhood and certainly will not be detrimental. D. "I'he proposed house will be smaller than many house in the neighborhood, will place its twc� car garage in the rear, and will offer increased setbacks_ It will be of a style that will fit nicely with the neighborhood. �E������ J U L 1 8 1997 cirY oF �u��irvUH�v�� PLANNING DEPT. � � CITY 4r �� BURLJNGAME „�, t ' � - �:ITY Ci)F EUFLIf�!GH(��E ;��'E�;IHL F'Er�IUIIT �PF'LI��HTI(�)f���� The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's ordinance (Code Section 25.52.020). Your answers to the following questions will assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. 1. Exp/ain why the proposed use at the proposed /ocation wi// not be detrimenta/ or. injuiious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to pub/ic hea/th, safety, genera/ we/fare, or convenience. S �L ,�11-= ("f"f�� � E � S�+E �T 2. 3. How wi// the proposed use be /ocated and conducted in accordance with the Burlingame Genera/ P/an and Zoning OrdinanceT How wi// the proposed project be compatib/e with the aesthetics, mass, bu/k and character of the existing and potentia/ uses on adjoining properties in the genera/ vicinity7 , sias ep.frm 1. Exp/ain why the proposed use at the proposed /ocation wi// not be detrimenta/ or injurious to property o� improvements in the vicinity or to pub/ic hea/th, safety, genera/ we/fare, or convenience. How will the proposed structure or use within the structure affect neiphborinp properties or structures on those properties7 If neighboring properties will not be affected, state why. Think about traffic, noise, lighting, paving, landscapinp sunli�ht/shade, views from neighboring properties, ease of maintenance. Why will the structure or use within the structure not affect the public's health, safety or qeneral welfare7 Public health includes such things as sanitation (garba�el, air quality, dischar�es into sewer and stormwater systems, water supply safety, and things which have the potential to affect public health (i.e., underground storage tanks, storape of chemicals, situations which encourape the spread of rodents, insects or communicable diseases). Public safetv. How will the structure or use within the structure affect police or fire protection7 Will alarm systems or sprinklers be installed7 Could the structure or use within the structure create a ruisance nr need �for pdtice senric�es (i.e., noise, unruly �atherings, loitering, traffic) or fire services (i.e., storage or use flammable or hazardous materials, or potentially dangerous activities like welding, woodwo�k, engine removal). �enera/ welfare is a catch-all phrase meaning community good. Is the proposal consistent with the city's policy and goals for conservation and development7 Is there a social benefit7 Convenience. How would the proposed structure or use affect public convenience (such as access to or parking for this site or adjacent sites)7 Is the p�oposal accessible to particular segments of the public such as the elderly or handicapped7 2. How wi// the proposed use be /ocated and conducted in accordance with the Burrngame General P/an and Zoning OrdinanceT Ask the Planninfl Department for the �eneral plan designation and zoninp district for the proposed project site. Also ask for an explanation of each. Once yov have this information, you can compare your proposal with the stated designated use and zoning, then explain why this proposal would "fit" acco�dingly. 3. How wi// the proposed project be compatib/e with the aesthetics, mass, bu/k and character of the existing neighborhood and potentia/ uses on adjoining properties in the genera/ vicinityl How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetically with existing neighborhood? If it does not affect aesthetics, state why. If chanpes to the structure are proposed, was the addition designed to match existing architecture, pattern of development on adjacent properties in the neighborhood? If a use will affect the way a neighborhood or area looks, such as a long term airport parking lot, compare your proposal to other uses in the area and explain why it "fits". How does the proposed structure compare to neighboring structures in terms of mass or bulk7 If there is no change to structure, say so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation etc. with other structures in the neighborhood or area. How will the structure or use within the structu�e change the character of the neighborhood7 Think of character as the image or tone established by size, density of development and general pattern of land use. wll there be more traffic or less parking available resulting from this use? If you don't feel the character of the neighborhood will change, state why. How will the proposed project be compatible with existin� and potential uses in the peneral vicinityl Compare your project with existin� uses. State why you feel your project is consistent with other uses in the vicinity, and/or state why your project would be consistent with potential uses in the vicinity. ,sres .P,}rm CITY OF BURLINGANIE SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION It is our desire to place the double doors located at and centered on the side of the garage 8'-6" away from the property line. This is less than the required 10'-0" We are asking for this location because we want the garage to match the style of the house instead of a plain recta.ngular structure. This is why we have added the trellis, the double doors, the gable raof above with "fishscale" shingles and centered it all on the side. Our proposal will not be detrirnental to the adjoirting properties but instead will give the neighborhood a quality garage. 0 ROUTING FORM DATE: �T[.�.(� � �p , ( �'% TO: �CITY ENGINEER CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR FIRE MARSHAL PARKS DIRECTOR . CITY ATTORNEY FROM: CITY PLANNER/PLANNER SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR �Q.�YVt�I� "i7r( �CL'P_�F�f33Y' r�55i AT 0 SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION MEETING: STAFF REVIEW BY MEETING ON MONDAY: �� �(, (�cj� THANKS, Jane/Sheri/Maureen/Ruben ��, ��ate of Comments G� �.�-��-'�-�y �-�- ,� .� . 1 �.�,ti��, 0 ROUTING FORM DATE: �T(�,(�u � �P, [� / TO: CITY ENGINEER � CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR FIRE MARSHAL PARKS DIRECTOR , CITY ATTORNEY FROM: CITY PLANNER/PLANNER SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR rC��i AT �vl� ,"�r�r(c SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION MEETING: STAFF REVIEW BY MEETING ON MONDAY: i�i� �(, �Q�'-(r% THANKS, Jane/Sheri/Maureen/Ruben � � ate of Comments w� �� � ��i�� l ��/ � � %lj �� !��`�� ROUTING FORM DATE: �T[.t_(U � �p, I��I TO: CITY ENGINEER CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR � FIRE MARSHAL PARKS DIRECTOR . CITY ATTORNEY FROM: CITY PLANNER/PLANNER SUBJECT: REaUEST FOR r�5�i AT � SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION MEETING: STAFF REVIEW BY MEETING ON MONDAY: i� �(, [Q,��] THANKS, Jane/Sheri/Maureen/Ruben � � ���� 7 � Date of Comments �F" . � � '� � � �'�* - .. r 3�� � ��' � ,+``,4,"� a .y„�. . : . +{�����?�� a * 'J�� �� yp '�.,. z ��`.r. ':r � �a� *� � � � `��_ y� ��Y� � ` y.. �, A � `�'' �'"5.�`' ,� .� , 1ge �R, a,. �:. � '�� � Y '�' u�" . r . . � ' i � �Y V .y{. � ;C," ,�y� j"�' . , � - � , n. a t �� � � � � � � y�`9 Y � _. }@ � '�' d +�' r�fi � � '3 f � �.�J� � '�� c :� ,�t� � � �.� �:� ,IC r ;� '�� ' "'� i �' ,,' 3 QA ' .� � �, ' r�� . .� • ; . �' � it` 3 y "� 'r� ' � �P= Mh, , . �Ak' � }, ,; � :. 3L st,_�,j� h�;:.A = .� ? , +� 'j i- �2' p.z � � ;,= .� 7 a lu z a'4..�'� �� .��i.M��.� W' �. Y� �r '�} .A�T� ^t 1 .�: ��u2..i � v 3 3 � � � �{�.d V f � . .., / -y�. _ t .p �� � p_. �• ._ - :.. �$ . . . ,;� '� fi .� w' �5 tl' '" ,� _'T„ r �4 ��« �� " � . ,t '�S ':.. I "'f. 4� �� � xx 'i. � � :� g+�� ' ��� � "�� � '.- `'- Y. ^ h ti� Yt "k . �.�- X �,� x�[? - '+`�2, � f - . q* 'K�t' � . S, �:��� � � � ,� .� �W F t �. W" ' "` . . �..� �` �P a`:# • '�' r_E, 'fi � � ' � :$Fx . �Y 'h� � .'�/1 �'� � ' ;�� �+� , .. �. . - �,._,.�,t w .+rq�;"«:a`.'�. 'i�°„,�^� � ^ ��Yt , M''^`.�' ,�. , m�'�; x ,.�� �.��, '`a . . R" � -. +Y ,y pa ,.� �� � � Go�tco�Ro � -� �ti��Y �� .. � `, f� � � �` � � �� a �° �" . �� �, ' � � ����. ,� �� ' .._ � � �a`.. . ' � Y � � 'S� k;z� F FW '� �n . ;) � } . ., � ' i m .� � -Yyr �. 1 bu " � �� ��� g� __ 4 .. � [; ^ 8�'� �� ! , ;` �� �l6� � i - � �� �y' � •''�,: "a..,2��` �.;•. � , ;�'�,' h" � � .. .. . � i ��;i: Q � � � �., ,w p �.�# �� � `� # ;�+�' _ � � '�' '� � '�' . y,r i v � "f�° t � � � . s�, • I� . �� � �' _ ., .� '�. #�'� � � � -t�, � � } k � s : � �, �:.' � �. � K�.,:, < , : � . ..� � � �� � .,�.�✓ � ,�:i� �g �., ` � �+y � a`i"'����. � S� ,�a .:� *�� .:� P� �� a � `& � f1.: k J � .. �• � � � r �R ... ��� . �.) �" � w �•1 4 ��Y :Ct�, � � ' , �� �+ :. .. n ":�•`a; V�� ;,�„ L � f� �'' �;T`' ;� 3 _ �, ; '� . �t -'�,. �� �� kV ,��" �, �� a..�., ��'_ . �����3a���.� Sz+1- 3�b ���r��;. ` �'`�` . � � �+�;,�,� `� , . � �; , � � ,� ; " � � . ., � � , � A�� 5 � �'{ � • �.:- �.� ":3�.'�'. ^ �' .:�; 4 � � .' _ `" ' GS ,.y ,�,s g g, ` � 'j � ,t �3t� R,L.1►.i C�A t,��, � :��.�w �� ;� � >� . � fi ���, y � � �. 0 � :� `� T � �` � �'� � � +� �',c�'s,,.,f . Ky� �? °{ .. .Ka `�;;:yw �.,r�;, b�`�.,"��i+�,.�: `�' y n?Si:; ' r_, � X ,w, � \ ` �.,p � `. *�-�, i�, ;�,y�r � ,i �� .t �. �s � ����� ,;:" '� F' TM Y�� *�4 �� //''�� �; � � ���oS 30 3e1 � ,�� y,j'i?� � ; � � , �. . `y. O �� F � � - ` e r.� �� g, y �;. Y".�+' '.l'E r _�4 �„� b' �' � �� O D_ �� � :.4,?i Y � ��� t s'� . , . « X � � � +���1 �� f�`e+'� � � i� �T.�.� `^ 3'f . . '1 'id ■ � � F �. # µ* (�n�V//���� � a� � � ��4i �e,.� � st�•�. . � � �}-.:..Y � y��i. ' � �.�i�- � 9;� .�} . t � � � t � �� ��� � � X �� � I ` y� • o;:� -�5 � i ��(.� ������. �'� ��� �,�f�'. .. . . � ... h .;� x.. �_+ �' � 4� �.�i. �n..�b�T ,.i.y�'� w ; � � ' ��1 • �: E �, � �; t . ..�s� � . � �� � � F �� ��, � .. , .. � , < , +:a � , ��„ ' ,� � t� � � .. u: . ..o .. ..o - , �� � � � t � � ' • {, ....re , k ' .' » .�. x '..__ - .r�:. N",� � . . , . ' ,.� , ., ;F ; � . � e�� , s . ., .N dk p}�s'� , � � . . $ ;. �, - ,2-. � �, � �� . y " ' } ,.. �. � ' �.... '� ,� " .iy . . .�. . �. �� ^.$� . ; , . . ��,2 � �. : '� �i i' G °i :, .' 1 '� . .,, � �� . :, �. , .. � , p . �1t ,.j{f . �. � . � �� ='.<. � � � - � W r C S`,� 1 � ' y M 'v+.`F . _ n . .. � ; �� ��� � - .a' . -. '..,��' .-��; . . ..t' ., ^ �ErL�iC�k,�? : �`x ,, �• . �� : '.S � � .'s��, Lkw ` ��: r., F� ... . �r . . ,... . ��' ' �Aid'2 ' � ..., i.° �_...{ .. � , � • � �t�#`�� � � � � �C '�t �: ^ : .. �1:' r: ,N , t � +;Y �� . ��` 3 � �� � * M �' � ���� �' '�,� � Y r�` " � �* '� � i, '� . . :� ,�" , � ��:� �,.s, , � � �e� . w '� 2.. .. � ,_ - , � �� . � ` , , , ; � �.z , - _. � ; �,; . � � , � . , ,. .� . � �� ,�.. ��- ��►:. � �°�� .� � � � < . > �_ �, � � . _ �: ... . � . ,;: : ,.: �: � ,� � �� � ,. . �= � .�� , ,M S� i ` '� � : t �eo ; ` �€ �`° t � �,? . :;+� � w t�.� � �` s .x 'i' , ��'. � x � �y � � � :' � s,. . i +�."P� . t�-�:, i .� xt { �.M % � i'F� ak' � . � . ,e . .�.-= � a � � . rr,�. �k • , . " .i � . ,I 7 , t� ,. � ` :��-„' . . _. , r . .= g � � .- d � x � � � � :.�`.: ` y , . . � . �, � .. ; � . . � , 4 ., � ;. � �`r � - � ., ., t . '_`': t.� . ..r �. �. +� Y ,. �� . .. t � ,, � �jq�gy'' r t ���"3 �f W. T�p. .. b. °,A ;�� k�l`" � y� µ3�p "- L�� ; � y vA y s ��y,f- � .c� sttY` L y :..4� Fr � f. � ,-qP. � �kf '^."'r4fi. , g� � i �i .�� � ��A`�' , 's t��a� .�... �j �'.��� �d�i �` � - � k .� �'•Ia� , .. .. � +�`�.'. ��. �} . �-�wh� xt��..,,f . '�. .. � .. � , . � . j $.q`K .f �; �� . . K M,��� � y v�' .'L• } ��JR,.a,,..�. �' � 4 �' � . . . _ � ; '��.F; N . � "�. ✓ '.irG' � - Tt�.! ' .x9$i� �..:ff :�+MAfi'��. ' � �. ;,i'�j r:q�. . � ,-.l.ai... �;'�r. . �-_ . . �__..._. . T , . , , .. . .. „ CIT� OF BURLINGAME BURL�e . PLANNING DEPARTMENT �501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 TEL: (415) 696-7250 31S BLJRLIN4AME: AVENiIE APN:029-262-020 Application for fiont setbacic and height variances for a ncw einglc family dwclling and a epocial pam�it far an ac�oes.�cxy struchare (detached garage) at 315 Burlingame Avenue, zoned R-1. Tha City of Burlingame Planning Cammission announoes tha following public hearing on Ma�dav_�A �ust 25_ 1997 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Cotmcil Chambers located at 501 Primrosa Road, Burlingam�o, Celifornie. Mailod AngaaL 15.1997 (Please refer to other side) PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CITY OF B URLINGAME , A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the , Flanning Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or: in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public heazing. _�:: Property owners who receive this notice are responsible fqr �tiforming their tenants about' this notice. , For additional information, ���ise call (415) 696-7250. Thank you ;, � : � � . : 3 g. 3'��"���� Margazet Monzoe � �� � City Planner . � � ,� �` PU ICE - � :� ;,: (Please refer to other side) RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMP'rION, FRONT SETBACK AND HEIGHT VARIANCES AND SPECIAL PERMIT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for f� setback and height variances for a new single family dwelling and a�.pecial permit for an accessory structure at 315 Burlin�ame Avenue � zoned R-1� APN: 029-262-020; James E. Ing,Lam� 7r.��ro�ertr owner; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on August 25, 1997 , at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and Categorical Exemption, per Article 19. Section: 15303 (a,e) - Construction and location of limited numbers of new structures. .. in urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences may be constructed or converted under this exemption. ..accessory structures including garages, carports, patios, swimming pools and fences. 2. Said front setback and height variances and special permit are approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such front setback and height variances and special permit are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. CHAIRMAN I, 7� L. Deal , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of August , 1997 , by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: SECRETARY EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for categorical exemption, front setback and height variances and special permit. 315 Burlingame Avenue effective September 4, 1997 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped 7uly 31, 1997, Sheets 1 through 6 with a maximum roof ridge height of 31'-6" as measured from the average top of curb at the front of the house (130.045'), a maximum attic height of 9'-0" as measured from the attic floor to the bottom of the roof beam and an 18' wide garage door shall be placed and maintained in the detached garage; 2. that the construction for the single family dwelling and detached garage shall conform exactly to the height, setbacks, envelope, rooflines, and window placement as shown on the plans date stamped July 31, 1997, Sheets 1 through 6; any change to these features shall require amendment to this permit and a public hearing; 3. that the materials proposed for construction as detailed on the plans date stamped July 31, 1997, Sheets 1 through 6, shall be used in the construction of the new single family dwelling and garage; 4. that the height of the roof (31'-6") and the height of the attic space (9'-0") shall be established by a survey and accepted by the City Engineer prior to calling for the framing inspection; 5. that the conditions of the City Engineer's and Chief Building Inspector's July 21, 1997 memos shall be met; and 6. that this project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 1995 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. � ��;��I�(1��� G%_'� �,� (x ����:� �'� � ., _. _ � �� , �.e,`� � �,� �— `�-�—� � �`� � l �ti ` ' �,r� �,'�_� `� > ,,�;���,C�_��i'�„�1,�(� Cr��� ('�_�'. �. � Item � 5 CITY OF BURLINGAME FRONT SETBACK AND HEIGHT VARIANCES SPECIAL PERMIT FOR AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE l�)(,��tC(�;���` �xi-,� � �� � � ��� �.c��<c�. i�� �������� Address: 315 Burlingame Avenue Meeting Date: 8/25/97 Requests: Front setback and height variances for a new single family dwelling and a special permit for windows within 10'-0" of the property line in an accessory structure (CS 25.60.010, i) at 315 Burlingame Avenue, zoned R-1. Applicant: 7ames Ingram, 7r. Property Owner: Same Lot Area: 4,713 SF APN: 029-262-020 General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 Adjacent Development: Single Family Residential CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15303 (a,e) - Construction and location of limited numbers of new structures. .. in urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences may be constructed or converted under this exemption. ..accessory structures including garages, carports, patios, swimming pools and fences. Summary: The applicant, James Ingram, Jr., is requesting front setback and height variances for a new single family dwelling and a special pernut for an accessory structure at 315 Burlingame Avenue, zoned R-1. This project meets the definition of New Construction and Floor Area Ratio applies. In October, 1996, the house was destroyed by a fire and demolished shortly thereafter. �,�. front setback variance is required for 15'-0" where 28'-0" is the minimum requirement (average of block). The applicant is also requesting �ariance for height, 31'-6" proposed where 30'-0" is the maximum allowed. The proposed building height would create a maximum ceiling height of 9' in the unfinished attic area. As proposed, there is no plan to use the attic for anything but storage. A drop down ladder provides access to the attic area. The proposed new dwelling contains three bedrooms, three bathrooms, a laundry room, living room, dining room, breakfast nook, kitchen and a two-car detached garage, bringing the total floor area on the site to 2,407 SF (.51 FAR) (after deducting the chimney and covered porch, (CS 25.08.265, 1& 2). The maximum floor area allowed is 3,008 SF (.64 FAR). The new dwelling will cover 33.9% (1,600 SF) of the lot where 40% (1,885 SF) is the maximum allowed. The plans indicate that there will be eight new trees provided, there are no protected trees on the site now. All other zoning code requirements have been met. The applicant is also proposing to build a 448 SF detached garage (20'-0" x 20'-0" clear interior dimensions) at the rear of the lot with an attached 45 SF trellis as part of the new construction. Front setback and height variances and special permit for an accessory structure 3I5 Burltagame Aven�e The new detached garage will be set back approximately 81' from the front property line. The 9' x 20' uncovered pazldng space is provided in the 81' long driveway. A special permit is required for windows within 10'-0" of property line (CS 25.60.010, i). The windows are located 8'-3" from property line and are built into the doors facing into the yard. There is also a 100 SF storage area over the parking area. A drop down ladder provides access to the storage area. This area is less than 10% of the gross floor area of the main dwelling. All other requirements for an accessory structure have been met. 'C��� �1 *�ont Setback (lst): (2nd): Side Setback (L): (R): Rear Setback (ist): (2nd): Lot Coverage: Floor Area Ratio: *Building Height: Parking: 15' -0" 21' -0" 14'-0" 4' -0" 40'-9" 43'-9" 33.9% (1,600 SF) .51 (2,407 SF) 31'-6" 2 covered, 1 uncovered : .� � 1 /: � 1 28'-0" (avg. of block) 20' -0" 4'-0" 4' -0" 15'-0" 20' -0" 40% (1,885 SF) .64 (3,008 SF) 30' -0" 2 covered, 1 uncovered Declining Height: Complies using C.S. 25.28.075, 3(a-d) *Accessory Structures: 448 SF detached garage, windows within 10'-0" of property line Fences/Hedges: 6' solid wood fence with 1' lattice, complies * Front setback variance for 15'-0" where 28'-0" (average of block) is required and height variance for 31'-6' where 30'-0" is the maximum allowed. Special permit for windows within 10'-0" of property line in an accessory structure. Staff Comments: The City Engineer notes in his July 21, 1997 memo that a property line survey is required. The Chief Building Inspector notes that the storage area in the garage must meet 125 pounds per square foot. The Fire Marshal had no comment on this project. Planning staff would note that there are only four lots on this block, two of them are corner lots (one of the corner lots is used by a church). The dwellings on the interior lots were both built with 41'-6" front setbacks. Staff would also note that the garage back-up aisle is 22'-6". Staff has analyzed the maneuvers in and out of the garage and has determined that the vehicle from the second stall can enter and exit from the garage as code requires provided the garage door width is 18'-0". 2 Front setback and height variances and special permit for an accessory structure 3I5 Burlingame Avenue Study Meeting: At their meeting on August 11, 1997, the Planning Commission had two requests regarding this application (P.C. Minutes August 11, 1997). The prior front setback for the house on this site was 41'-6". The windows on the accessory structure aze built into the double doors and are located 8'-3" from the rear property line. The windows are located on the side of the garage perpendicular to the rear property line facing into the rear yard. A second window on the same wall is located 17'-0" from the rear property line. Required �ndings for Variance: In order to grant a variance the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d): . (a) there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved that do not apply generally to property in the same district; (b) the granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant, and to prevent unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship; (c) the granting of the application will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare or convenience; and (d) that the use of the property will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses of properties in the general vicinity. Required �ndings for a Special Permit: In order to grant a Special Permit the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.52.020 a-c): (a) the proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; (b) the proposed use will be located and conducterl in a manner in accord with the Burlingame general plan and the purposes of this title; (c) the Planning Commission may impose such reasonable conditions or restrictions as it deems necessary to secure the purposes of this title and to assure operation of the use in a manner compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity. Front setback and heighl variances and special permit for an accessory structure 315 Budingame Avenue Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action should be taken by resolution and should include findings made for the requested variances and special permit. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped 7uly 31, 1997, Sheets 1 through 6 with a maximum roof ridge height of 31'-6" as measured from the average top of curb at the front of the house (130.045'), a maximum attic height of 9'-0" as measured from the attic floor to the bottom of the roof beam and an 18' wide garage door shall be placed and maintained in the detached garage; 2. that the construction for the single family dwelling and detached garage shall conform exactly to the height, setbacks, envelope, rooflines, and window placement as shown on the plans date stamped July 31, 1997, Sheets 1 through 6; any change to these features shall require amendment to this permit and a public hearing; 3. that the materials proposed for construction as detailed on the plans date stamped July 31, 1997, Sheets 1 through 6, shall be used in the construction of the new single family dwelling and garage; 4. that the height of the roof (31'-6") and the height of the attic space (9'-0") shall be established by a survey and accepted by the City Engineer prior to calling for the framing inspection; 5. that the conditions of the City Engineex's and Chief Building Inspector's July 21, 1997 memos shall be met; and 6. that this project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 1995 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. Ruben Fiurin Zoning Technician c: James Ingram, 7r. , applicant 4 MINUTES CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION August 1 :00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Plannin ommission, City of Bur ' ame was called to order by Chairman Key on August 11, 1997 at 7• p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Absent: Staff Present: MINLTTFS - Commissioners Coffey Ellis, Galligan, Mink and Key AGENDA - Commissioner W City Planner Margaret Monroe; City Attorney, Anderson; City Engineer, k Erbacher; Fire Marshal, Keith M all The f t sentence of the minutes of the July 8, 1997 Planning Commission wer amended to read: "A regulaz meetin of the Planning Commission, City urlingame was called to order by C rman Key on July �42s, 1997 at 7:02 p.m., the minutes were then approv as corrected. The order of the agenda was There were no public comments. APPLICATION FOR FRONT SETBACK AND HEIGHT VARIANCES FOR A NEW SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE AT 315 BURLINGAME AVENUE, ZONED R-1, (7AMES E. INGRAM, 7R., APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNERI. Requests: What was the prior setback for the house on this site; where are the windows on the accessory structure relative to the rear property line. Item was set for public hearing on August 25, 1997. APPLICATION FOR AN NDMENT TO A MASTER AGE PROGRAM AT 1375 BURLINGAME AVE , ZONED C-1, SUBAREA A, ECA, APPLICANT AND KARIM Requests: Appli 'on should include applicant's re onse to findings for a si exception; there are paper signs on e tenant space at 1444 Burlinga Avenue (Plagmann's) r Tribeca, what is their relationship t this applicant; are the umbrella on the second floor w' Ben and Jerry's on their -1- �:ITY (�)F f;llf}I_IN(��l�ll/li- /1��>f'I_ 1('/a I(�)N 1(�} TI i:'_��NNI C� CC�N IU11S.- I(i)N �� . . ; X Speclal Permit ,�Vari�nce �dther_ , Neme: ProJeat A`ddress, ` � � 5 � �V RL I I�J� � [y � � V�- � - , .�,. . _ __. _ . Assessor's P�rcel Number(s) ' Z�OZ- D O r � _��G- Name: � `��c- _ . � � � Address; �� s g�ti '"� � CitylSt�te/Zip: ..,� TeiQphone:(worki e — 3 %u � �7/ 1-� � .Address: �-� Ci�ylst�te�z;�: � Telephone:(work} n given herein is true and;correct to the (hame). .. s,V,�_ (hame) d'�.� d�►L ' s�li . - . . . _ ._ _. Narne; �In � �SSF.Y�P�YES � � Pleesa indlr-si� wlth en astorlsk I•1 Wh�the cD�tBCLoorson Addre$s: , � AL� �� (, far thls ntal_c.t. c�tyfstate/z�p: �I • � �IO . . . 7elephone (daytime), ��i�.-�.� �-T , : ,. . ,.._,.. __�.. __ __. . •....w��r�.�•w nr_�iwr�m�riilwi. �11�I 1 .�sL 1C L� ��QA.�/�" � - � -"'. � ,^ � ' �1 � � i. I hareby cerkify under pena(ty of bes� af my knowled' -errd�i"s[� I knaw about the application. � A licant's Si natu� r ose ap I� on, re �{ -g - •� :Pr erty Owner's �Signature �6 � Dete , v2G. �4 �1-P /f✓-e . �,.;�.� C.�- ��o.d ''�% �`�%/� s�� orize the ab applicant to submit this - �� � ��� pate . . .. ,. . . � �� .�.......-�-----------------------�_.__..__�.��....�pFF �E� USE C1N�Y --�......._...................,.,.�.._...�._..----------- � ., . � � • � �� (.o-- � F��.: �Iq:�Do �.-.. Re�eipt # -. -.:�:.,... :._,.._�.__.. __.. - ' Date Fflad: � � � � l.etter(s1 to epplicant advlsing applicatfon incornplate: I��te epplie�tion acceptied as complete: � P.C. study m�gting� (dato.l ��. _ P.C, public hearing (dato) �----. P,C. Actfon ---- - srez Appea! to Councif7 Y,es Na . .. .oj.�.�r�, Councif ineeting date � CounciE Action � � LITY 4� �� BURLJNGAME .\ , �. � - CIT1' OF EUF;L1��1 H��.�IE VAFIl�,NCE /�,F'F'LIC,�ITIU�JS The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's ordinance ( Code Section 25.54.020 a-d1. Your answers to the following questions will assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this fo�m for assistance with these questions. a. Describe the exceptiona/ or extraordinary circumstances or conditions app/icab/e to your pioperty which do not app/y to other properties in this area. �G-� kT7'P�H�D SN�� b. Exp/ain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantia/ property �ight and what unreasonab/e property /oss or unnecessary hardship might resu/t from the denia/ of the app/ication. 5� �k77`h���� S7%� c. Exp/ain why the proposed use at the proposed /ocation wi// not be detrimenta/ o� injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to pub/ic hea/th, safety, genera/ we/fare, or convenience. 5,� „�{..7'j�C//��j S�� T .� How wi// the proposed project be compatib/e with the aesthetics, mass, bu/k and character of the existing and potentia/ uses on adjoining properties in the genera/ vicinityT 5�� ��ii�f� S��T , s�s2 ��.r�, CITY OF BURLINGAIV� VARIANCE APPLICATION ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS A,B,C & D. A. The subject property has an exceptional circumstance in that our property is one of only 4 properties on this small block. The most easterly property has a church with a setback of 14'-a". The property adjoining has in the most forward location a garage which is located 41'-6" from the property line. The structures appear to be very old and in poor condition. To the west there is only one property which fronts anto Stanley Road and is 15'-0" from the property line. Therefore the average setback is 23'-6" due to the one property which has an exceptionally long front setback Additionally the property is only 46' wide and therefore with our desire to build a small Queen Anne style home with a detached garage in the rear makes it necessary to move the hause closer to the front property line than the average of the block. B. It is our desire to place the garage at the rear of the property and to create a Queen Anne style home with a front facade which offers a"small" appearance from the street. Due to the length of the lot there is not enough room to have the rear garage, the required backup and the house without moving closer to the front property line. This will place the covered porch at 15'-0" from the front property line and the dwelling at 21'-0" from the front property line. The front porch is open at all sides and is no closer to the property line than the church and the other corner property. To comply with the average of the block would place an undue hardship onto develapment of the property and would cause an unreasonable property loss. C. This is a new home, built much smaller than the maximum, with a two car garage at the rear, instead of on the street, with larger than usual side setbacks and a style which will fit the character of the neighborhood. The new home will be an improvement to the neighborhood and will enhance the general welfare of the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety general welfare or convenience. D. Our home will be compatible with the neighborhood for the following reasons. 1. Our home will be much smaller than what is allowed. 2. will have a two car garage (as required by code) set in the rear corner of the property. 3. oi�ers a front facade which will not create a bulky appearance. 4. is set back 6' on the right side where only 4' is required 5_ is set back 14' on the left side where only 4' is required 6. is on a small block where 2 out of 3 properties has a 15' front setback ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS A,B,C & D HEIGHT VARIANCE A. The subject property is smaller than usual in that in is only 4b' x 103'_ This is a project which has exceptional circumstances. In an attempt to provide an aesthetically pleasing period home we have gone to great e�ent. We have done the following. 1. Placed the garage at the rear to reduce the bulk as seen from the street. 2. Increased setbacks LEFT SIDE-setback will be 14'-0" where 4'-0" is the minimum for the building and where 10'-0" is the minimum for a driveway_ This has dramatically decreased the allowable building area. RIGHT SIDE-setback will be 6'-0" where 4'-0" is the minimum. 3. We have designed the house with a reduced height of the finished floor as it relates to the surrounding grade. This reduces the overall height and the variance request. A traditional proportion would have dictated a higher floor. 4. The roof pitch has been reduced from a more traditional slope of 12 /12 (45degrees} to 9 1/2 in 12 (38 degrees). A further reduction in raof slope would jeopardize the visual proportions necessary for the style of house. (Queen Anne). This has reduced the overall height and the variance request. S. Exterior details have been added to enhance the facade. 6. A large front covered porch is a part of the project. This helps to provide a bu�er between the home and the street v�hile providing an inviting element. B. Without the variance we will be required to dramatically alter the traditional proportions required of the Queen Anne style, therefore placing the design and the project in jeopardy. The height of the building with its steep roof is a direct reflection of the house width. Our proposed house is only 26' wide instead of the possible 38'. C. In a climate of profit where we seldom see a period design we have a chance to build something that brings back some of the architecture of the past. The new house will be much smaller than the maximum, will have much greater setbacks than the minimums, will have the garage set to the rear, and will offer a wide front parch. This project will be a gem in the neighbarhood and certainly will not be detrimental. D. The proposed house wi11 be smaller than many house in the neighborhood, will place its two car garage in the rear, and will offer increased setbacks_ It will be of a style that will fit nicely with the neighborhood. RECEIVE� J U L 1 8 1997 CITY OF F3URLINGl�NIE PLANNING DEPT. .�it � ��I�,CITY 0��- . � . . . � . . ` . � ..2. :. . . : „ �, f . . i��E¢a F � � . � ' BURLlNGAME ! � . � . � `M� U II ,�� ��`� ��II,II�OU �1�1�119'll � � , � .�r +�,i; w o+',�.^ ` y�� ` �� � .`.. . . � i"' . , �� + ; ` . �<������.ru� , c�����,����a�����:.:�z�>����f�?C(�O�I�,:PC�f�1�110`I��;��f�f�'I�O�'�;ll�D�l��;��,�.����',���.��'�,,:��'�:�,�����::::���'����.:L ��'�1 � :�' . wi ,: b'• , i { %»� � � ,. � F:`' . . ,� . �u., , .I;�'k': , I � : � 4`$ � , . �a Qn � ;,yr Yt �s� ,'"�e :�N � ����. t ;ltr i� � � � y�, .��.���,,: The Planning Commission_is required:by�°law to:make°�findings as:;�defined�>by3th's�G�ity��rdin`�nce� ,��.:�r„,:,(Code Section:=25.52.020). :>-Your�answers to �the following =questions�.will�,assist�the�xPlanning�� �;w����:�Commission W�in �,making.�the �decision�as:::to ��rvhether:�the,;findings�can:,�be�amade��for�your:-request. 3� i� '�° ,Please� type `�or�`write neatly: in ink:� ; Refer.to>the back;of this ��form, for�=assistance°�,with��these'�� questions. , , .y , , s:�r<<, . , 1. . Exp/ain why the proposed use at the proposed /ocation wi// not be detrimenta/ or fnjuriousj�� � to property or improvements in the vicinity or to pub/ic:bea/th, safety, genera/ we/fare, or convenience. ` - S .�G ,�-�f"�� � �P . .. , : r. �, S�E�T � '_� . ,. , p 4L, . i , .., .. .u, i.;,.,,�. S. . .. �,�::�� :t . : � � � . , . .. . . � �,;r�° �. . .`�€ . .. .'' � . . , , be /ocated and conducted in accordance with the Burlingame : 2. Ho w wf// the proposed use Genera/ P/an and Zoning OrdmanceT � �'` � ` '� x w: .. . . ��_ � ., f .;t� � , . , . . : . , .,. . � . . , - -�.<�;�1'"J S' i �; s-. . : , � ,:��.' j�.._.. t,._.::p i3x . . �'�-'.cri {a��.:�' . . ... .5,:� . .�'.� � . .,..,.. ,.. .. � t8���'. ., ,e,i.J�1'- ,x:; 9. ,.;aGa 4'sNr�.. .� ew�'�.'2�.� ..p',�.. .... �., 1fiy� - � ��Li.'4g\� fr�w.♦6d <C.Y. �. .. _ �.'. . ; ..�.. � ..�. . t S. , " � . y. y'va S., �r, :. .. . :, : . �. .• .:.t`��:..a s�4'.��:� '`�¢�+��s, .:,r,�s . ,. �i.�3� ,a.ir ,....-G. '�. �i7:4'63�d,.%4;��'+� %n �w v.t�t,.�i.a n'�.�.;;"-14 . a� �`,.;ji a�e?;+:5 �irr�w .dx"5�t�ar+:.-. o:.i��. �Ax ,��;.5 awc>5.��...T. ;,�; _ ' . . .. � �' . ..`� " �� , .. �.�� �. �'�Y y5�•, .. i�. ., . . `a(:'.. �/7i� _ . � „. �rj. . . . � . . . .. . . ��. � :� , ' . j af'.�`F . . _ . �triliT���t.� .::� ,.r•, •.A.�➢ £ ti.`�l; .. .. .. �.': v : 1:.a'"�f.:4 ��:��.FSl4F . ..... ..� #:iit •��. ..�i�� .���"� .. .�i.�l� ,����,u.l:t� "' WQ;�.. a. _. . . .. t ,'. �.✓ J n f'� S �,.: ... kr �'a�tit., , W . * i ... �'.. :, .i . 1? t',�'a.H, p o �. f �' .:.� a t :...�� i.��.,,, � r.,., t '� �t .'iT s F I�f �Y., '^?v�,i���� S�'�.�i �i:',.��i 2�",'�;e. �lAe �r���7t'��I�'.�S',.�t���k. ���� 1�e6�:�` A.°����>,}Sn4 e.., `•:'fi �i ' t' f .t..t , i .t:. �.s sa '�& :3 � i'°��.'fr':x;;� �j . d'6 ;51 .o '.:' � °B� „R �i '4i � a' �k.e 5N'Si3. :i�� r. �'. `�' �-�''.'=�: #. i ,. . F ;.,9 "��d'�..i;� ':r:t x r,�N:��.��a�"Cd,$'°�ia±S:tt( #;%ia"s�".',�i"f���.�;,n+�X'�� �S'E��Y'1#�:� ;$'3t'%C�"€�z�°a'.fT:''.; s^.:Si� � ?� �1"�.%�t� ;'�e`�i.s'��'d?�i'w�a� 'F'CA �!�'�"W'�f�*',�T�3 ��.; . . . . . . . . � . . .. . � i.�Gi'n.��� 4f �'yy��1'x� �7�'.�.�'a'��YJ1� ��MF2? ,. �� rp.=.�� ��: �� �##�lAw wil/�therpr,oposedrproject,u6e.�co�patib/e ��� ���° ����of�the�exlsting�and,�potentia/�:uses�on adjainii ,1, ..' _, '� z �ki�X�te�iP;R �?? y1., .�'ri ;3�`rs ?ix �t '���ar.x y � ' - . �f � �.x�aE€arii,� �Fc:b ��dYi���` a�YY����l,a ��gr�r'� �34T� �l4�'1 ���� i�#'�C f�k�>�".��t.r a.k'�4;�i�t'335":�1#'s;' �t;,�:ti��te �-� �ti�i�¢w��63� �4��„4�'+�bi'� � � �,�:° s�; Ri�.r�i�a�� �D�a 9�'�D: ..e. !'41�::�V �rixn`�. Ahl�,ir��'��� �Ar�3Ns;�3sSR'»'� ��fc�°���� tll,"a�F 5�i7$�}��i�l;�ii:.��%��R ��.'4.�j{'i.�+�XJ,�� � 3'�„�i�. �YVQF A9F61FsA�'i�W+�� �'�'f�7�. �v'��F^'�i�� �Yf» y.y '�'. {r ,�'�'t"��.e t$�:ti?�' �,`'.�.zf;�i��ia�<cs*S 9���'+C''Y���;�§�d�F''� ���.��i�� "i""�1��1 i�tt��` �� �8� ��'�'�;� si#�."��'.�"a�#'�;•�i��l �t`��,+���:�����*i����3 �„`.it,,'��i'� �,i� ,, . Sw � , � , �°��k^i� 'ksS.'"'. ��� �,,:_ � �`,� " '' , , ?r. � x; �, �ac�...�,• nvrw"in* �t r!.�,,rrr �Y.i � a�yW�(S.r ;'�� ^w 3��7ir€��M?-�:A e�r .�� ait -ey.}� �n rA}�:r i l,,.� ..,,, , p� y 4,�F' a� py� �+, - .��. �P". R `���a i'� �.. � - �� u c S � ,-:.Ht •' `\ ��we d. ?v` cr �} ar ��,: �, . t.•�,. J iM1 �',�'�. t.a,��,r I:x\A ��d ',� S✓.i;4d S�.y ir' J'�w� �n zL,� G x��7 r � 3 ��:r�3 '9�����r ���x�°�� r�� r�f � �y t ��"� ����+� ��W��;,� ����'� ���'��qF '�b�� ,'i��: K�b��e 7�;��#?�`+�:�:�:.��]� �i,��:�� t�f�+;,,�yxa�.�3t'� ' �^� `` ��', . f � �' �' .$ �i. "�S'��:'�� � ... ,. 4' t �'�� y �F >'� A J F �. � � k a ,` ,�n���� '4�`�r � ��,'isvpn. ���PA� �7�[� Fd� 1'ri�"a4�"f � �� te�� 1�A9f � j '��il� � � 3? . � ,.�..�. :. �. . � '� 2�2 . i , . .� r . . �c , s:'��+'tAa � w.urf�' � ' . I. , . . ` , z n!, ,�c6 �.a:�, r�.�'.�� • .. , . . .+� r a.t!e'F;. �e.�'ir'v�'�.�. ,.. . . _ . .,. ,. . . . . .. . . . . .. .. . . . . . a-.,,�„�..,y �.. ap frm , ,pk.� � w ,� ° n ,'s ��� ,, � � t � •.,r �� a y �� � y � ti � r�f .� R� ,y� " v �'� : �. .. .; � -' � �. � � � .� } �� � ��� � � �.a.l� '� a� � 1 )��y Ar� y lt�. u tr� �" � ;� ,t-� �� p� �f �+t3 n I``� :h.� ° �,� � ' �^ 'P r �. Ti o I 1 ,f• k � � ,.a. N r, sy �' �"'i'� � i. ' ,1:( .. . � _ . _ ' � � i� � � . „ � ��� ��r z; � �t �� CITY OF BURLINGAME SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICA:I'ION It is our desire to place the double doors located at and centered on the side of the garage 8'-6" away from the property line. This is less than the required 10'-0". We are asking for this location because we want the garage to match the style of the house instead of a plain rectangular structure. This is why we have added the trellis, the double doors, the gable roof above with "fishscale" shingles and centered it a11 on the side. Our proposal will not be detrimental to the adjoining properties but instead will give the neighborhood a quality garage. ROUTING FORM DATE: �T[�.(1a I �p, (��] TO: �CITY ENGINEER CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR FIRE MARSHAL PARKS DIRECTOR . CITY ATTORNEY FROM: CITY PLANNER/PLANNER SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR � .. n . rC�SSi AT � SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION MEETING: STAFF REVIEW BY MEETING ON MONDAY: ^ 1%i� �(, (��r% THANKS, Jane/Sheri/Maureen/Ruben � q�ate of Comments � �-���;►�� � ,,� .�- � . � ROUTING FORM DATE: �T[.�.(la I �p, [��] TO: CITY ENGINEER � CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR FIRE MARSHAL PARKS DIRECTOR . CITY ATTORNEY FROM: CITY PLANNER/PLANNER SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR �� AT � r�5�i SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION MEETING: STAFF REVIEW BY MEETING ON MONDAY:_ i� (, Q�r% THANKS, Jane/Sheri/Maureen/Ruben � � ate of Comments �/� ,�I/f /'� � � �� !/ /0,�%��i�� l ��/ , �9� >� �� ��� ROUTING FORM DATE: �,T(.�,(�t�t I �p , ( �'% TO: CITY ENGINEER CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR � FIRE MARSHAL PARKS DIRECTOR , CITY ATTORNEY FROM: CITY PLANNER/PLANNER SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR ��� � ���� AT � r��i SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION MEETING: STAFF REVIEW BY MEETING ON MONDAY: �� �(, [��� THANKS, Jane/Sheri/Maureen/Ruben � O C��"���' / � Date of Comments . . . . ��. . ' v:�• " - , . .` . , �� . � y y,M .; \ �' �Y p , . . . .. � . ,� � " � � � 'F• ' � �`yrc 4 . �''4� . . '�i�D .� �. . \.fl . � ' . � . • ' � f 7 . y,^� � �' . . . . ` . ?'L _.,- _. , . . � � . ' ' � � - 1 ' . . . . '' " .. . , i �� ^ �'�.. � � �' •, ,��„ '� � �' � I.., `}' � � ;, �< < Q �a+ �i� Y � � I�{ � � .. i , l� . �i. "C � � ^''� i�3�=4i� `. , }r Y%y�ii .• ,' '� .� .. � t 4D � ,'• �• �' yw,` ` 'R cy a`, �'`. .:k . . , � � � . . �:s�. 1-,�e� . `��°,�"'� � . '0 �' � y �- � �,�ii t'��t. � . ' � �� �6'�• . f i�-S� c�,�. -� :t �' �� �� " �� � . a �� ,,�p� t.� hx . , � ,�t, � - 'ti, �' "�:� ;��kx � r` �.5t „ . t .. . � �; . . . . , ` � -. . +�.y_7��. �. ; t ;. �' .� '�s.r.� - +,, :. 1" � ry s ?,y w. � ' �� ^ �fi G� A'��k,Y w �s') �+' `?t•�n�'�'}�' �1� �� �'s�,�f,.Q . . ' �� �,sy�-�a`` y n . � � ��a� r� y����i.�t: ' ��� .., . �Y� . . . - ` . � �;�' �} • ��t�� . �- 21fY6' yi3,n .. � '�.�rr � trt(rJ :�� � � ' � A � •�� k,�/, . �, .� � R. �� ; ..�� . .. �5K . . ��� , �r' � ;�S •�� � � � �� . � � � ..� � . � .•a . _ � � i d �,' L � f•3 . � t i„� � �� .;�. � ` "�7C• ��i _ { �0s� ` . . r .�� � .�q�y� �„fr .tg- .' ; $�.,�� -L�•�,' . . � _ . �o.�• r .. � . . `D�' �,�" ;� � ' �� �_ � ;� � �-� . . � �� � f• ' �� � ' ' �. � � ". � � . -.�: - _= . I��fi �#µ� �; � z , . . '- . , w,,.. . . h J. JY �' v, ' :,�t �.wK� C°Y;.� / i + d q "� � -;�? ,�`.; Mj � ��' � ;a *t��, �'��`t"� ' �r.;� r✓.�. ,.:� ��j � � � • . ` � . - � ^ �� � ; � � y :s;:CF 4 � �'�.. . A r .. � `. .', . � . � , ' � . . .'� �i . 4` . ' �' t = Y '� if K ��Y . . . � � '` . . � . . . �. i:' Y'^"'V � �j�."s �M ,'�3'. � ' . � � � ~ � ! � , �.� � � � . ' '' . .' ��r . . ' � � . �� � -, �•, ' �i . .<�` �' 8� .. � ...i' '�,� .�`"� ra ' p. . . . . . i �'- � . . • klt�n`� ���( , �"3'tlt+t, , _ . � � . � ��� � . . � � � . .� . ., • e r� : . - . •�a, ) ' �' . ' �v 1 . �r Y . .- - � Y ���� *' �/k�y,l' ' .. . ..��r... F '�.,, .. ,t,.�.. . 1 �`f�'�'f' 4b. �CtYi. � � "� � �. . ' " • . . � . � 't,`f �. ... . ,..,_ . . ��`� �, . . }., , t `:; ..n » -� ',�,.; ..,�,x.,, �'` f �, m . s'�.", �'� F: ^ � . � + �� ' � � � �.0 , � f.4.. `a'. _ °��s� . i �" : . .�"S. � .S w .' O� . m"'r�4 . A�' � � . . . .+. ., .w' � ... ,.,* � • � . . � ,�+��� �.6p • " . y�{ . x `� � . `. `�. � _ i�. . . 4'� '�. �,: . iY+:�..,� � tf3• . . t.:�w�a� . . �,�:, L r .:?' . �,�' Y - F �,r�y.�"�i B �� ' . "i , 1 i: - �` � :�. �. "�. ' � , `!r• �i�. • �-.: r t��� Yx_. y .` �'�� ... �' � . .... E�' ... . ' k. 'P '« � '_ ��. .. . �.-.r��'i ,�yl,.�^ � ,, . G ' f,� �, ' . � s { t i �' y " . #.- � ��� ,. . � � a ,:i:.� p � •,�.� .� . X: . ,+ , ry �� �_. '' ! . ' . . . . 3 � . 4 . � . � �. �, + ���i:, � i'' � • � ,(: ` ' ' , , ' � . ` . � � 't: « � 1 ' � � � .i . 1 - � .. . '.. .. �. � . . . "`F.-. 4 { . . . . . _ _ .. � .. - - . . C. . , . S[ �iF ,y � � ��7 � 1 �, ' . �.'+,�S'' u.t. v �R � i •.p M ' . t � . �, ; �Zc � � � S y. .' {.�i_ ,t�'i� � �S�f,ry; Pf � F;};+; 0 CI'f'� OF BURLINGAME BURL�e . PLANNING DEPARTMENT �501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 TEL: (415) 696-7250 31S BLJRLINC3AMEAVE1ViJE APN:029-262-020 Applic;ation for fiont setback and height variances for a ncw ainglc family dwclling and a spocial P U B L I C H E A R I N G p�mit far an g°°esg°�' st�uchn'o (aetachea Sarage) N O T I C E at 315 Burlingame Avenue, zoned R-1. The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the fallowing public hearing on �_�ugt 25_ 1997 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chamhars locatsd at 501 Primrosa Roed, Burlingeme, Celifornie. Mailod Angasl 15.1997 (Please referto other side) CITY OF B URLINGAME . y' A copy of the appli to the meeting at Burlingame, Califo may be reviewed prior ':5;01 Primrose Road, If you challenge the:5ubject application(s) in court, yo_ raising only`those issues you or someone else raised aC described iri;the notic� qr �n written correspondence.;c at or prior to the pubuc,fiearing:; � �� Property owners who receive th�ts anotice are .responsible tenants about,,'.this nohce �. For additional informatior 696-7250. Thank yo� � "��� -� �� �:; � �� g � 4 < <' I �i � � F r' t i� , � � ; Margaret Monroe ; ' �` � � � � . � �`� ����,` . .� City Planner � ,� � � � �, _ , �4 � � PUBLMC, HEARING (Please refer to other side) ICE be limited to .blic hearing, ;d to the city ming their call (415) . . � -. �'a'~r RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, FRONT SETBACK AND �IEIGHT VARIANCES AND SPECIAL PERMIT RFSOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for fr4.t1� �etback �nd height v�ri�nces for a new single family dwelling �nd a�.p ria �.rmit fnr an a.cPss�ry SYI11�t11L� at� 15 BLrlingame Aven�e � zone�l R-1 � APN: 029-262-020; James E Ing�.,�,, nro��,v_ owner; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on A�i g�c 5� 1997 , at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and Categorical Exemption, per Article 19. Section: 15303 (a,e) - Construction and location of limited numbers of new structures. .. in urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences may be constructed or converted under this exemption. ..accessory structures including garages, carports, patios, swimming pools and fences. 2. Said front setback and height variances and special permit are approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such front setback and height variances and special permit are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. CHAIRMAN I, 7� L. Deal , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of August , 1997 , by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: SECRETARY EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for categorical exemption, front setback and height variances and special permit. 315 Burlingame Avenue effective September 4, 1997 1, that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped 7uly 31, 1997, Sheets 1 through 6 with a maximum roof ridge height of 31'-6" as measured from the average top of curb at the front of the house (130.045'), a maximum attic height of 9'-0" as measured from the attic floor to the bottom of the roof beam and an 18' wide garage door shall be placed and maintained in the detached garage; 2. that the construction for the single family dwelling and detached garage shall conform exactly to the height, setbacks, envelope, rooflines, and window placement as shown on the plans date stamped 7uly 31, 1997, Sheets 1 through 6; any change to these features shall require amendment to this permit and a public hearing; 3. that the materials proposed for construction as detailed on the plans date stamped 7uly 31, 1997, Sheets 1 through 6, shall be used in the construction of the new single family dwelling and garage; 4, that the height of the roof (31'-6") and the height of the attic space (9'-0") shall be established by a survey and accepted by the City Engineer prior to calling for the framing inspection; 5. that the conditions of the City Engineer's and Chief Building Inspector's July 21, 1997 memos shall be met; and 6. that this project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 1995 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.