HomeMy WebLinkAbout2930 Trousdale Drive - Application�
�� PROJECT APPLICATION ���"T" °� 2930 TROUSDALE DRIVE
�r CEQA ASSESSMENT BURLJNGAME project address --
� ° �project name - if any
Appl i cati on recei ved ( 2-14-89 )�b'"'""""`� •
Staff review/acceptance ( )
1. APPLICANT Paul Ratto 692-2149
name telephone no.
2930 Trousdale Drive, Burlingame, CA 94010
applicant s address: street, city, zip code
contact person, if different
teleohone no.
2. TYPE OF APPLICATION
Specia.l Perr^it () Variance* (X ) Condorrinium Permit () Other
*Attach letter which addresses each of the 4 findings required by Code Chapter 25.54.
3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
VARIANCE to side yard setback in order to make a 3' x 15'-6" (47 SF)
extension to the existing dining room. This extension will
encroach 1' into the required side yard. A 6' side yard is
proposed where a 7' setback would be required. This addition
meets all other code requirements.
(attach letter of explanation if additional space is needed)
Ref. code section(s): ( 25.66.050 ) (
n. PROPERTY IDEhITIFICATION
( 025-311-030 )( 3 )( 46 )( Mills Estate No. 19 )
APN lot no. block no. subdivision name
� R-1 ) ( 11,300± )
zoning�l��v ���J land area, square feet
Paul Ratto � 2930 Trousdale Drive
land owner's name address
Burlingame, CA 94010
Reouire�! Date received city zip code
(�e3� (no) ( — ) Proof of ownershi�
(3�es� (no) ( — ) Owner's consent,to a�plication
5. EXISTIPIG SITE CONDITIONS
2 894 SF two stor,� residence with an attached 480 SF arage
Reo,uired Date received
(yes) � ( 2-14-89 )
�Yes ) � i �� )
�YeS) ?�i i �� )
(other)(n�) ( 2-14-89 )
Site plan showing: propert,y lines; public sidewall;s and
curbs; all strGctures and improvements;
paved on-site parking; landscaping.
Floor plans of all buildings showing: gross floor area
by type of us� on each floor plan.
Building elevations, cross sections (if relevant).
Site cross section(s) (if relevant).
letter
*Land use classifications are: residential (show # dwelling units); office use; retail
sales; restaurant/cafe; manufacturing/repair shop; warehousing; other (to be described).
6. PROJECT PR�P�SAL NEW CONSTRUCTION ONLY
Proposed c^n si.ruction, "elov� grade ( — SF) Second floor ( — SF)
qross floor area First floor ( 4] SF) Third floor ( — �F)
Pro,ject Cn��
Pr000sal Requirrms�nt
Front setback 4% � 15' mi n.
Side setback — —
Side y�rd 6' 7'
°�ar yarcl ! 72'+ I 15' min.i
?roject Code
Proposal Requirement
Lot cover�+�e 19% 40%
n�,;i:����� hei�ht 13' 30' ma�.
Lardscaoed area — —
�
nn �ita ok<�.sn,tCe;,' � — ! — i
er
' ` 6. PROJECT PROPOSAL (continued)
EXISTING
after
8-5 5 PM
Full tir�e employees on site
Part time employees on site
Visitors/customers (weekday)
Visitors/customers (Sat.Sun.)
Residents on property
Trip ends to/from site*
Peak hour trip ends*
Trucks/service vehicles
IPl 2 YEARS IP! 5 YEARS
after after
8-5 5 PM 8-5 5 PM
"Show calculations on reverse side or attach seoarate sheet.
7. ADJACENT BUSINESSES/LAND USES
Residential uses on all adjacent lot�,; this use conforms
to the General Plan.
8. FEES Special Permit, all districts $100 () Other application type, fee $ ()
Variance/R-1,R-2 districts g 40 ( X) Project Assessment $ 25 (X j
Variance/other districts $ 75 () Neoative Declaration $ 25
Condominium Permit $ 50 () EIR/City & consultant fees $ ()
TOTAL FEES $ 65.�� RECEIPT N0. 49%H Received by �.Kranitsky
I herehy certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is
true and corre o the best of my knowledge and belief.
Signature Date -
Applican I
STAFF USE ONLY
NEGATIVE DECLARATION File No.
The City of Burlingame by o� � 19 �
completed a review of the proposed project and determined that:
( ) It will no't have a significant effect on the environment.
( ) No Environmental Impact Report is required.
Reasons for a Conclusion:
_ Cate orically exempt, reference CEQA
��,
S gn ure of Processing Official
Required Date received
(.�es ) ( � o ) ( - )
(.`�) (no) ( - )
Location plan of adjacent properties.
Other tenants/firms on property:
no. firris ( ) no. employees ( )
floor area occupied ( SF office space)
( SF other)
no. employee vehicles regularly on site ( )
no. comoany vehicles at this location ( )
15301 (e), existin4 facilities
� ���-2��
itle Daie Sign d
Unless ���ealed within 10 days hereof the �ate oosted, the deternination shall be final.
DECLARATIOV OF POSTI�IG Dai;e Posted:
I declare under penalty of perjiary ihat I ar� City Clerk of the City of 6urlingame and that
I�osted a true copy of the above Ne��ti��e Declar�tion ac the Citv Hall of said City near
the doors to ih� Council Charabers. J
-xecuted at 3urlingame, California on
Ap�ealeci: ( )Yes ( )P!o
19
IUDITH 11. '�:AI_FATiI, CITY CLERK, CIT`, �'' �UftLINGA,f�iE
STAFF REVIEW
1. CIRCULATION OF APPLICATION
Project proposal/plans have been circulated for review by:
date circulated reply received
City Engineer ( 2�21�gg ) (yes) (no)
Building Inspector ( " ) (yes) (no)
Fire Marshal ( �� ) (yes) (no)
Park Department ( — ) (yes) (no)
City Attorney ( — ) (yes) (no)
2. SUMMARY OF STAFF CONCERNS/POSSIBLE MITIGATION MEASUP.ES
memo attached
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
Concerns Mitiqation Measures
Does this project comply with Request comments from the Fire
all Fire and Building Code Marshal and Chief Building
requirements? Inspector.
3. CEQA REQUIREP4EPlTS
If a Negative Declaration has not been posted for this project:
Is the project subject to CEQA revieiN? Cateqorically exempt
IF AN EIR IS REQUIRED:
Initial Study comoleted
Decision to prepare EIR
Notices of preparation mailed
RFP to consultants
Contract awarded
Admin. draft EIR received
Draft EIR acce�ted by staff
Circulation to other agencies
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Study by P.C.
Review period ends
Public hearing by P.C.
Final EIR received by P.C.
Certification by Council
Decision on project
Notice of Determination
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
4. APPLICATIOPJ STATUS Date first received (2-14-89 )
Accepted as complete: no( ) letter to aoplicant advising info. required ( )
Yes( ) date P.C. study ( )
Is application ready for a�ublic hearing? (yes) (no) Recommended date (3 - 13 - 89 )
Date staff report mailed aoplicant ('3 �g %��) Date Commission hearing ( 3/j 3�' )
Application approved (� Denied ( ) � Appeal to Council (yes) (no)
Date Council hearing ( ) Aoolication aporoved ( ) Denied )
i�C.,. ��z'�
signed date