The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1044-1060 Broadway - PlansPage 7 Burlingame Planning Commission �inutes June 9, 1986 night and that was at 45 dBA; noise levels were taken in the backyards of residences on Davis Drive, 50' from the entrance to the hospital on the east side of Davis; two other locations were spot checked, the other ��de of the entrance and on Davis Drive. �. There were �no further audience comments and the public,,•tiearing was closed. ,� �.,�� ,..:... Further Commission.,.comment/discussion: don't.have enough information, applicants have agr�ed the.re would be new, rroise, that it could be reduced but cost effec�i.veness must be,,�e'onsidered; in view of the information given Commiss�ion this ev.etiing would like a revised proposal which would reduce noise to acceg.t°�ble levels. Staff commented Commission could deny without p�•e.judice but cautioned that dire,ction must be given regarding the ..n'oise ine,asurement they wish to attain and at what point. One Commissioner stated.,,he could not supoort even one dBA, the hospital chose�'its site and the'��ite is in a residential area; agree Commission does`not have enough info" tion, suggest continuing this item to the ne�t meeting to allow time t study the material received this ev.ening; Commission should give th applicant clear direction; cannot understand, with the money they talking about, why the exterior noise level cannot be reduced to zer C. Graham moved to deny this application without prejudice instruction to the applicant to return with a better plan reduce the noise level at property line to something less Second C. Taylor; motion approved on a 7-0 roll call vote. procedures were advised. _ Recess 10:10 P.M,; reconvene 10:20 P.M. with which would than 3 dBA. Appeal 1 6. SPECIAL PERMIT FOR AN AUTO SALES LOT AT 1044-1060 BROADWAY, �� ZONED M-1 _ Reference staff report, 6/9/86, with attachments. CP Monroe discussed details of the request, staE£ review, applicant's letters, study meeting questions. Four conditions were suggested for consideration at the pub.lic hearing. C. Taylor did not partici�ate in this item due to conflict of interest. Discussion: city action and intention on approval of the Bekins project with regard to signalization at Carolan and Broadway; CE's condition #1 in his May 9, 1986 memo concerning temporary asphalt concrete median; ingress/egress for both properties; city will require the two properties be merged. Chm. Giomi �pened the public hea.ring. Michael R. Harvey, applicant, addressed Commission: his impression when the Bekins project at 1070 Broadway was approved was that a signal at Broadway and Carolan had been approved; staff's impr.ession appears to be that the matter would be considered as a part of the Broadway/California intersection study and Public Works has further stated siqnalization at Broadway and Carolan may not be practical. Applicant requested clarification Page 8 Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes June 9, 1986 of the city's position with respect to this signalization in advance of closing escrow on the property at 1044-1060 Broadway. He stated he has volunteered to merge the three properties. Staff pointed out the issue this evening is a special pe.rmit for an auto sales lot; applicant agreed to proceed this evening with the special permit but stressed he must have the signal at Broadway and Carolan. He read a letter frbm Chicago Title Company reviewing his easement to use Whitethorn Way, there is still some clarification needed on this also. There were no audience comments and the public hearing was closed. Considerable Commission discussion followed regarding ingress/egress for these two properties, the need for some access to Whitethorn Way and the possibility of conditioning this permit for that. Applicant felt it would be a mistake to condition the permit on ingress to Whitethorn; he believed he could guarantee ingress but preferred to wait for an attorn.ey's opinion. C. Graham moved for approval of this special permit and for adoption of Commission Resolution Approving Special Permits with the following conditions: (1) that the conditions of the City Engineer's memo of May 9, 1986 shail be met; (2> that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped May 29, 1986 with 12' light standards each with 250 watt luminaires including appropriate shields to confine all light and glare on the properties of 1060-1044 Broadway and the adjacent wall of 1070 Broadway and that the automobile sales lot shall be operated according to the terms of the Controller's letters dated May 19, 1986 and May 29, 1986; (3) that the driveway from this property to Broadway be limited to right turns only and the street channelization be installed before the project is finaled by the Building Department and the project include ingress from Whitethorn Way; and (4) that properti�s at 1060-1044 Broadway be merged with the property at 1070 Broadway before the project construction is finaled by the Building Department. Second. C. Schwalm; motion approved on a 4-2-1 roll call vote, Cers Jacobs and Giomi dissenting, C. Taylor abstaining. Appeal procedures were advised. 7. FENCE EXCEP'I'ION TO ALLOW AN $' SECURITY FENCE AT' 840 MALCOLM ,ROAD, ZONED M-1 ~�,_ Referenc`"��s.taff report, 6/9/86, with attachments. CP Monroe reviewed details of the'`^� uest, staff review, Planning staff „�,�„�nemt,� applicant's letter, �,udy meeting question�....•.�a�'�"'conditions were suggested for considera'£��r��,at the.,N,p��b�"ic� hearing. Chm. Giomi opened the public` hearin`�:�.,..,�,Ken Berringer, John Sutti & Associates, applican�t�advised this reques�-i,.g,`mainly a security problem of one of the tenants wi th employees who work �1`a�.e„ at night , the rear area wa� chosen to secure because it had the spaces "r��eded, would be less noticeable and better for the appearance of the builcl�fng. There were no audience comments and the public hearing was closed. • . r , . � t V c i � �i � ��uY 9 - 19$6 MEMO T0: G �Ni� �i�� MaY g , 1986 Planning Department FROM: Dept. Public Works - Engineering Div. Re: Proposed Used Car Lot Adjacent to Former Bekins Building - Mike Harvey - 1044/1060 Broadway We have reviwed this request. There are no major problems with proposal in general. The following are questions or conditions that staff wi11 recommend once a formal request is submitted: 1. Thatapplicant constriact a temporary asphalt concrete median from the Rollins Road median to Carolan Avenue to prohibit left turns/turns to the site. 2. Driveway out of the proposed lot shall be restricted to right turn only and signed and marked by the applicant. 3. The applicant shall either install required rest room facilities on the used car site or merge this site with Bekins'site. 4. Access onto Whitethorn Way looks difficult if not impossible as shown. Adjacent Parcel 9 has building close to property line at the corner of Whitethorn Way. Access must be confirmed by map research and survey of lot. 5. All lots on the used car site to be merged into one �ite if not merged with old Bekins' site. Other comments will be forthcoming once detailed plans are presented. L � - � � Frank C. Erbacher City Engineer mg ' , '^ ... " �.. /A ,;: /` �"'�� . R � � �, f . e � . �`. ' !, � . `.. � I � �% � / \ . ' � � �., • '1 1 ' ` �. S, y�,��. .�.c�' . �"> ,': �,� . /r/ . � � t `' ; '�"'fi�j,�'� � ��'� _ "� , ^�y . a � �. �r � .'. � �`�`�e,�,r-,: '� `.`' � �`' �P �Y.. • A��. � /C�� y��.. . T !n � �' :'.�� , . �� . �' . �d �i�'- �' M�a'w.:' . .,, � � � �J/'� " r ��". �1` �.�t . • �� i\ � ` .,� .. 1;','� y �. . � � - ��, ' � ��- " :� ,,� �F� � , ��;.a . �-�A,� . �././ ' �' , `�n ''�' �� `�� / �i � /�, . , l.��+_, � . � � ^' ,�� ,�- , �,: , � F .�,:� , �a �;,�, a � , �, \ a � s �� F�, � �; ti� r . �� . T` , ,;. �� , � ��{�Nq� , a� �, � t4�� . , � � � � �d �. , . 2 . � ; ' � , � �'� 0. M ,� �.�. �3 �; •� P r�� . � ��,- � •� pa'� � � � ..`� �` I � �/ / * './ r, % � � �Y `"� i'�. ''\ '' � ^ ^ �!, w � � � � . �' �° . � , '(� i �. � ,. � tp �. ' ' � � , S � � t�� , '�' �� . � ��pYfi►�� G � ; • ` , . � � - k,A'� � �.. � �, ,. � . . , � ` , � � _..w;�.� fi • � � � ,. � � � \ , - � \`�, . - � ", , _ �, a, � � � ,,�: � ,, :: ��.. , . � ��' , �� f /' �'or .�. /� `%� � � � J�/ ' � � ,/ '�i�" P' cl. l) aL. ,, � �. � � � � � �.:.p !� ,�� 1 r�„d� ; w �, �. a � ,� 7. . �, .�>. ; ,� � s�� . , , o,r,c - ,� ��'�: �' .'`�, ,.� � �!=� � ��`��, /�,�' �� , �, � �1'�, �� .��«. ' •V'` � . . � � "1y„i �� - � � �� °'w, . �.� �r�. " i'� � �r'�'� Q �h� � . . � � , � •� �`� "�,� � ,;,�'�'^ F`'\ ``7e��c�^, �Q'`,�. �"�. � ��/�►�� `� � '�"`' �; \�j � '�;�, � � � ` _�,/1� �a r" � w � , �° ��" F � .., _ �� `,Fi = � � �,�ry,_ ;; � � , , - �� .• •��r ��`Ab . �°'' � �"� �� . ' � � �^y'� �T, �,,,��,/,rr' � / �Y,� f '�. ?. � � �f � ,� � u.` � ... �f�'�.fi. ^..... �'�' 'R. � �R �� .�(�� .:� � � .a . �, .� I �; t��`f ' '6 � � . �; � � .�� z , p�; %�` '�` . , �� :� � � ` � � � � � r �, . a�;•, ��' � '' � `� � � � � �?`` - .a%� "`� .�. � `-��•. � � �, —�O '� � � a . •�,; � � � � � `' `�� " T. � ��. 1' � -� S �� //�a � ... � A .'�; - / _. r, � r� } '�:. e � . �? �`` � _ �� p �� . l �', ';�i � �;:; . ,� a O � � � �, ' .. � . '�; 1`�„ l' � '�` � � � , �� i I � ' �' �n' ��." �� ., � ,� � �� '*� "�,. i,�" � a �' � � ��, r,�,� �,.. �/;;' f�!, � •�,� ��'� . � �' �� / i �� . ` '4,� ^ h . . �F�� • �,�� . �.�.E lnZ.�� .A".0 ��'�ZxC.��C11"C.e SAN MATEO COUNTY CITY HALL-501 PRIMROSE ROAD PLANNINGDEPARTMENT BURLINGAME�CALIFORNIA 94010 (415)342-8625 July 7, 1987 Mr. Michael R. Harvey Post Office Box 511 Burlingame, CA 94011 Dear Mr. Harvey Since there was no appeal to or suspension by the City Council, the June 22, 1987 Planning Commission approval of your request for extension of special permit for auto sales at 1044-1060 Broadway became effective July 7, 1987. The June 22, 1987 minutes of the Planning Commission state a one year extension to July 7, 1988 was approved with all previous conditions. Sincerely yours, �� `1J0�'�'V'C Margaret Monroe City Planner MM/s Attachment: July 9, 1986 action letter with City Engineer's May 9, 1986 memo attached cc: Chief Building Inspector (w/att.) a � � CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 22, 1987 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Planning Commission, City of Burlingame was called to order by Chairman Giomi on Monday, June 22, 1987 at 7:31 P.M. ROLL CALL Present: Absent: Staff Present: Commissioners Ellis, Garcia, H. Graham (arrived 7:50 P.M.), S. Graham, Jacobs, Leahy, Giomi None Margaret Monroe, City Planner; Jerome Coleman, City Attorney; Frank Erbacher, City Engineer; Ed Williams, Fire Marshal MINUTES - The minutes of the June 8, 1987 meeting were unanimously approved. AGENDA - Order of the agenda approved. ITEM FOR ACTION 1. REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF SPECIAL PERMIT FOR AUTO SALES AT 1044-1060 BROADW�Y, ZONED M-1 With the following statement C. S.Graham abstained from discussion and action: "The law firm I work for represents the City of Burlingame in litigation brought by Mr. Harvey against the city. To avoid any hint of impropriety or conflict of interest, I will abstain from discussion and action on this item." Reference staff report, 6/22/87, with attachments. CP Monroe reviewed previous action by Commission and Council on this special permit; there were no staff comments on the requested extension. C. Jacobs moved for a one year extension of this special permit to July 7, 1988 with all previous conditions. Second C. Ellis. In comment on the motion access to Whitethorn Way was discussed. Motion approved on a 5-0-2 roll call vote, C. S.Graham abstaining, C. H.Graham absent. Appeal procedures were advised. PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. SPECi'�-��.R.�MI�T TO ENLARGE AN EXISTING GARAGE �Ak��TNG TOTAL AREA TO EXCEED 5 p Q`��r�15 2 5 BERNAL AVENUE�D R-1 0 Reference staff report, 6/22/87 chments. CP Monroe reviewed details of the request, st review, applic ' letter, letter in opposition from Flore Cole, 1524 Vancouver Aven�.�,�June 17, 1987), Page 2 Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes June 22, 1987 study meeting questions•and applicant's subsequent letter. On-site parking provided would meet the standards for a larger house. s'Three conditions were suggested for consideration at the public hea�ing. The Chair determined from the Fire Marshal that one hour fire w�ll constructl•on is required just for the new portion of the st�ructure. Chm. Giomi ened the public hearing. Sandra Aguirre, �pplicant, was present. Re�ponding to Commission questions, she adv�,a�ed the brickwork facade is onl� an inch or so larger than the garage, she wished to extend back 274 -6" instead of 26' because she would like to have as much space as p ssible and cannot use the remaini rear yard, she has stayed 1'-3" fr property line to make it more cceptable to neighbors, one c` can be parked in the garage ow, there are no plans to add cabinets t the rear portion of the gar�age, she could possibly get two cars in th garage if present storag� were removed. In noting letter in oppositio from Florence Cole, s�ff commented this letter addressed other addi .ions and abuses of g ages in the neighborhood. There were no audienc comments and the �ublic hearing was closed. With the statement the '�ddition will m�'ke the garage more usable for number of cars for some �,uture familye; it does give the applicant storage, there is an ease ent and tY�erefore the structure is separated from adjacent property, it will not�be detrimental, applicant has shown concern in keeping with the°�rchi,�ecture of her property, C. Jacobs moved for approval of this sp`!�ci�l permit and for adoption of Commission Resolution Approviri� "Special Permits with the following conditions: (1) that the condi�ons of the Chief Building Inspector's May 13, 1987 memo and City Engin er's June l, 1987 memo shall be met; (2) that the garage extension sha be built in conformance with the plans submitted to the Pla�'ning De rtment and date stamped May 11, 1987; and (3) that the res'ulting 52 5 SF oversized garage shall not have any utilities extendfed to it exc.�t electricity and shall never be used for residential purposes. Second��. S.Graham. In comment on the mot:ion it was noted the�w would not meet code requirements but would� now. Motion was approved on a 6-0-1 roll c absent. Appeal pr-ocedures were advised. C. H. Graham arrived at 7:50 P.M. idth of the garage still be much closer than it is a'�,l vote, C. H.Graham 3. PARRING VARIANCE TO MAINTAIN AN EXISTING ONE CA�,GARAGE FOR A NEW FOU�'BEDROOM HOUSE AT 736 ACAC2� DRIVE, ZONEI�,R-1 Referenc��"staff report, 6/22/87, with attachments. CP nroe reviewed details'of the request, staff review, applicant's letter, code requi��ements for variance approval. Two conditions were ggested for co.t�'ideration at the public hearing. , Chm. Giomi opened the public hearing. Steve Warden, applicant, presented a letter in support signed by 20 neighbors on Acacia Drive. His comments: two years ago he replaced the old garage on this site, � / .z � � -�" % _� � 6/22/87 The law firm I work for represents the city of Burlingazne in litigation brought by Mr. Harvey against the city. To avoid any hint of impropriety or conflict of interest, I will abstain fran discussion and action on this item. Shelley S. Graham ., ,. ��, � � P.C. 6/22/87 Item #1 MEMO T0: PLANNING COMMISSION F'ROM; CITY PLANNER SUBJECT; REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF SPECIAL PERMIT FOR AUTO SALES AT 1044-1060 BROADWAY, ZONED M-1 Michael Harvey is requesting (May 29, 1987 letter) a one year extension of his permit to have auto sales at 1044-1060 Broadway (Code Sec. 25. 16.130). In July, 1986 Michael Harvey requested and received a special permit to have an auto sales lot at 1044-1060 Broadway, zoned M-1 (Code Sec. 25.42.030-g). The request was to demolish the existing buildings on this site and pave and landscape the area as required by code for an auto sales lot. The salesmen's offices and bathroom facilities would be located in the adjacent Bekins building. The two lots at 1044-1060 and 1070 Broadway would be merged before the work on the Bekins building was completed. The Planning Commission reviewed and approved the on-site lighting plan for the car sales lot (Code Sec. 25.74.010-f) along with the use permit. The lighting plan included six 12' high light standards each with a 250 watt fixture. Each fixture would be directed onto the lot and cutoff shields placed to prevent glare from affecting traffic on Broadway. City staff had no comments on this request for permit extension. The application was passed by the Planning Commission on a 4-2-1 vote (Commissioners Jacobs and Giomi dissenting, Commissioner Taylor abstaining) (Planning Commission Minutes, June 9, 1986). City Council called the item up for review. They upheld the Planning Commission on a 4-1 vote (Councilman Pagliaro voting no) (City Council Minutes, July 7, 1986). N��--I� fue. Margaret Monroe City Planner MM/s cc: Michael R. Harvey � � �irrli�game A�tomofi�e Ma�agement F t�'i.�._�.�'.�. . .. _ .,:.... a.e..r:r'.a:. » _ .��,�vi� , y w;,;.,., . x �0 9 _.._ � .a:.�, . � RECEIVEC� May 29, 1987 �v�� „ ��g j Ms. Meg Monroe City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 CITY OF BURLINGAME o� •n�nlr �Far Dear Meg: SUBJECT: 1044 and 1060 Broadway, Burlingame Please consider this our formal request to extend the permit on the above subject properties for an additional year. After the appropriate review process, please let me know, in writing, of the Planning Commission's decision. If you require any additional information, please contact me. Sincerely, � M. R. E Preside MRH/djr � __ F'U.I:�UX;�i; BURLINGAME, CA 94U11 415%579-4231 . � . , ITY �RLINGAM JVti[ �xrk' lni.�� ..[r,� c��C2:�r1�.Cj��ti�t�P � SAN MATEO COUIYTY July 9� 19g6 ��TY HqLL-501 PRIMRQSE ROAO BURLINGAME, CAL�FORNIA 94010 Mr. Michael R. Harvey Post Office Box 511 Burlingame, CA 94Q11 Dear Mr. Harvey: ,� � �..__.._. TEL:(al5} 342-6931 At their meeting of July 7, 1986 the City Council reviewed your special permit application to allow auto sales in the M-1 district at 1044-1060 Broadway. Following a public hearing Council approved your application with the following conditions: l. that the conditions of the City Engineer's memo of May 9, 1986 shall be met; � 2. that the project shall bz built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Deoartment and date stamped May 29, 1986 with 12' light standards each with 250 watt luminaires including appropriate shields to confine all light and glare on the properties of 1060- 1044 Broadway and the adjacent wall of 1070 Broadway and that the automobilz sales lot shall be operated according to t�e terms of the Controller's letters dated May 19, 1986 and May 29, 1986; 3. that the driveway from this property to Broadway be limited to right turns only and the street channelization be installed before the project is finaled by the Building Department and the project include ingress from Whitethorn Way; and , 4. that the properties at 1060-1044 Broadway be merged with the property at 1070 Broadway within 90 days.of finaling project construction by the Building Department. All site improvements and construction work will require separate application to the Building Department. Sincerely yours, �,��.�— b� � Margaret Monroe City. Planner MM/s att. cc: City Clerk E Chief Building Inspector (w/att.) Robert Frank (w/att.) cc: Anthony Crisafi/Robert Woodward (w/att.) Assessor's Office,. Redwood City (Parcels 11 & 15, Assessor's Map B16, City of Burlingame; APN 026-131-130/140) . � . . . .:.. . .. . �. � . ..� . . ' ' �.:.:<-:'+w.� ,:.K...� . .