HomeMy WebLinkAbout464 Bloomfield Road - Approval Letter�` ,
�,�.P l�x.�� A'.� ��z'.��2�.��1'�P
SAN MATEO CCUNTY
CITY HALL-5(71 PRIMROSF -f^.OAO
BURUNGAME� C:ALIFORNIA 9401Q
April 16, 1987�
' �4.---„
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
(415) 342-8625
Mr. Hagop M.-Dakessian
464 Bloomfield Road
Burlingame,�•CA 9.4010 � ' . �.
, . , , . . : ..: :
_ .... , -: . ; � .
Dear Mr. Dake��:��an: � � �
. . . .. ,
We wish to ,z�otify ypu that a minor m�dification ha,�; �been granted to
your project:,�:.a 204 square foot.first�f'loor family room addition, at
464 Bloomf�.t��ld Road. This action is based on the plan submitted to the
Planning Department and date stamped March 11,.1987. The minor
modification;��-�ras to allow 40�.7$ lo� �o�verage (40$ maximum required by
code) and is.good anly'for �he projec� iiiiprovements as described in the
submitted plat�s: . . . .
A building permit is required for any construction in the City of
Burlingame. Flease contact the Builcting Department:at your earliest
convenience.:;:Thi,s. action of the ci�y is good for orie year; a building
permit must: b� �.is,sued prior to Apri1 1.3, ].988 fbr the construction of
this proposal. � �
Please do not Yaesi�tate to call the Planning Departmen�. if you have any
questions regarding this action.
Sincerely yours,
�/IG c��� �Q
�
Margaret Monroe
iity Planner
MM/s
cc: Chief Building Inspector
Assessor's Office, Redwood City
(Lot 16, Block 3, Burlingables Map No. 2; �1PN 029-165-170)
Page 5
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes April 13, 1987
Comment on the motion: appellant should comply with the codes, it would
jeopardize the city and the residents to allow this appeal; stairs are
not safe, concern about their use in an emergency; Fire Department has
noted its reasons for these code requirements, in an emergency
situation with packs on their backs negotiating the narrow stairs would
be a problem; if the use is going to be intensified this house should
be brought up to code to ensure safety.
Motion approved on a 5-0 roll call vote, Cers Garcia and Leahy absent.
Appellant was informed that determinations of the building code are not
appealable to Council. -
5. MINOR MODIFICATION - 464 BLOOMFIELD ROAD
Item was not called up for further review.
FROM THE FLOOR
There were no public comments.
STUDY ITEMS
6. SPECIAL PERMIT TO USE REAR HALF OF THE KINDERGARTEN BUILDING
AT ROOSEVELT SCHOOL FOR CHILDBIRTH PREPARATION CL�SSES AND AN
OFFICE, 1151 VANCOWER AVENUE, ZONED R-1
Requests: hours of office use; why use of this site rather than a
hospital; parking space need in daytime; list of all uses on the site.
Item set for public hearing on April 27, 1987.
7. SPECIAL PERMIT - ROOFTOP SATELLITE DISH ANTENNA -
1214 BURLINGAME AVENUE
Requests: why not more screening of the dish; photographs depicting
visibility from various angles; will the dish have writing on it, what
color; for what purpose will the dish be used. Item set for hearing
April 27, 1987 providing the requested photographs can be assembled in
a timely fashion.
8. SIGN EXCEPTION - 1100 BROADWAY
Requests: does this station have bathrooms; existing pole signs in the
immediate area; site plan showing location of signs. Item set for
hearing .April 27, 1987 providing all requested information is received
by staff.
9. SPECI�L PERMIT - NEW AND USED CAR S�LES - 1028 CAROLAN AVENUE
Requests: hours of operation; lighting plan; what make of new car;
number of trip ends to/from site; division of the property, possibility
of using the whole site for extra parking; past use of this site;
clarify exit easement. Item set for hearing April 27, 1987 if all
information is received by staff.
Page 6
Burlingame Planning Commission �inutes April 13, 1987
PLANNER REPORTS
- Regulating Signage for Auto Dealerships
Reference staff report, 4/13/87 with attachments. CP Monroe reviewed
her summary page of suggestions discussed at the last meeting compared
with present code and noted there are several aspects of signage
regulation relating to auto dealerships which are addressed in the
present code but were not covered in Commission's previous discussion.
C. H.Graham suggested a change in his proposal: maximum size of face of
pole signs to be 48 SF rather than 24 SF. C. Jacobs commented she
could not vote for either of the suggestions in the summary table and
will contact the CP with her recommendations to be added to this table.
Staff will bring back to Commission on a future agenda.
- Commission Rules of Procedure - Timing for Election of Officers
Due to a recent change in Council's commissioner appointment policy
election of officers in April does not seem feasible. An amendment to
the rules of procedure was suggested providing for election of officers
at the first meeting of the Commission after May 1 of each year. C.
H.Graham moved for adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 9-87
Amending Rules of Procedure of the Planning Commission. Second C.
S.Graham; motion approved on a 5-0 roll call vote, Cers Garcia and
Leahy absent.
- C. Schwalm reviewed Council actions at its April 6, 1987 regular
meeting.
- Commission discussed its current practice of observation of Council
meetings and agreed to continue this practice. Staff will prepare
a schedule for the remaining meetings in 1987.
- City Attorney introduced Ken Musso, new Fire Marshal who will be
attending all Planning Commission meetings.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
- Materials received at League of California Cities Planning
Commissioners Institute, Sacramento, March 11-13, 1987
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:23 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Charles F. Schwalm
Vice Chairman